Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 06.cMinutes Lakeville City Council Work Session October 24, 2011 In attendance: Mayor Mark Bellows Council Member Kerrin Swecker Council Member Matt Little Council Member Colleen LaBeat Absent: Council Member Laurie Rieb Staff: Steve Mielke, City Administrator' Dennis Feller, Finance Director" Tom Nesseth, Senior Accountant Dave Olson, Community and Econom Steve Michaud, Parks and Recreation Chris Petree, Director of Operations a Judi Hawkins, Deputy City The meeting was called to order at ITEM #1 — 2012 -13 Budget ment Director Finance Director Dennis Feller reviewed the reliminary 2012 tax levy; subsequent adjustments; maj and othef` 2siderations. Mr. Feller stated that the adopted prell inary levy accounting for the reduction of the Market Value Homestead Credit levy, is $23,376,00( an increase of $127,000, or .06 %. Se brat,adjustments have occurred since the preliminary budget was adopted in September, that will result in e`reduction of $206,000 from the 2012 adopted preliminary'taz levy and a reduction of $187,000 in the 2013 estimated tax levy. Revenue adjustments included an increase in the City's police and fire aid as a result of the 2010 census, several staff positions which were not immediately filled; and a reduction in the contingency fund due to health insurance premiums. The fund balance in 2012 remains at 42% and will be at 40% of expenditures in 2013. Overall this results in a $78,745 or .03% decrease. Council Member LaBeau questioned several line items in the Human Resources budget, including wages and benefits, electrical inspector costs, and health insurance. Mr. Feller explained that the electrical inspector proposed costs for 2012 would be for unemployment. There is an estimated $30,000 cost for proceeding with the visioning process for the City. Council members discussed combining this cost with the cost of a community survey. City Council Work Session Minutes October 24, 2011 Page -2- Council Member Little asked if the residents who were in attendance to discuss the ice rinks could be accommodated and moved forward in the budget discussions. The consensus of the Council was to accommodate the suggestion. Staff stated that five of the City's 11 rink sites were closed in 2009, saving approximately $35,000 annually. The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Board recommended which rinks to close based upon an analysis of the sites performed by the Parks and Recreation Department. Residents from the Highview Heights Park neighborhood have been asking for that rink to be reopened this year., There is an operating cost of approximately $7,000 per rink per season, mostof which is for preparations before skating begins. Because of this, most of the'expenditure for this winter season would come from the 2011 budget. The "unbudgeted expenses could be allocated from the contingency fund. Mayor Bellows asked what constitutes the service areas for neighborhood parks . Parks Director Steve Michaud stated that Lakeville's park plan follows national standards of one -half to three - quarters of a mile distance betweenneighborhood parks. Bellows believes the demographics of ftie school boundaries need to be considered; this neighborhood is in the Apple Valley High Schodarea and students want to identify with their own neighborhood 'rink. , He wan #s to ensure that all the residents in the city are served equally,,, Mr. Michaud stated that the hydrology at the Highview heights rink site makes ice - building difficult, which was one of the deciding factors in closing this particular rink. However, he believes with s6me additional maintenance it would be possible to prepare the rink for flooding y this winter:° Council Member LaBeau stated that their construction company uses,91ass rockto assist with drainage. She asked about using volunteers to staff the warming houses,: , Mr. Michaud stated that they attempted to use volunteer attendants a few years ago, tut for several reasons, including liability and training issues, the program was not successful. He would not recommend reopening all.of the,rinks, in particular Bunker Hill, since Parkview rink is nearby. Council Memt* suggested reopening Highview Heights and one or two other rinks thisyc ar then' decide at the end of the skating season if they should stay open next year. Council Member LaBeau would support this. Council Member Little believes that it would be unfair to reopen one rink and not the others and would like to reopen all the closed rinks. He disagrees with the previous Council's decision to close the rinks and believes this neighborhood has demonstrated their desire to get the Highview Heights rink reopened. He suggested a phased approach, reopening one or two rinks this year and adding more next year. Mark Ketterer, 10560 — 166 Street, asked if there could be a rotation on closing rinks so different rinks could be open every year. His family lives near Rolling Oaks Park City Council Work Session Minutes October 24, 2011 Page -3- and they would like that rink reopened. Emily Ketterer stated that with the paved rink and permanent warming house, it should be less costly to open than some of the others with rental warming houses. Patti McDonald, 20094 Kenwood Trail, asked if the rinks are being used by the LHA and how much their organization contributes to the rinks. She added that the LHA has now taken over the Lions' pull -tab operations and suggested they contribute some of their profits. Mr. Michaud will contact the LHA to see if they are willing to use some of their proceeds for Park rinks. Tony Moore, 16257 Havelock Way, asked what percen6ge of the parks budget the rinks would constitute. Mr. Michaud stated the percentage is small bit the park budget encompasses many areas. Mr. Moore asked if there Is another area to cut in order to reallocate those funds. Mr. Mielke suggested that Council refer the rink issue to the harks, Recreation and Natural Resources Board for a review of the rink locations and e recommendation on prioritization of rinks. The 2012 budget assumes the current number of rinks will remain open, however, a rotating schedule could'be an option. If,H ghview Heights rink is reopened, other neighborhoods will likely ask to reopen, additional rinks. Some funding should be allocated in the 2012 budget for this potential. The Parks board should conduct a thorough evaluation of the rinks for the 2012 -13 season and make a recommendation to Council Council directed staff to prep re Highview Heights rink to be reopened for the 2011 -12 skating season with the usef General Fund contingency funds. In addition, Council asked the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Committee to review the ice rink budget and ptovide redomrriendations at , the November work session on 1) whether to allow a second closed rintt t6 be reopened this year, and 2) which rinks should be opened for the 2012 -13 skatihcd season. The Council will determine which rinks are to be budgeted to be open in the'2012 -13 season. Discussions regarding majorinitiatives resumed. Funding for the community visioning process and the community'survey is proposed to be from the communications budget. The Chainber,Government Affairs Committee is in support of the visioning process. LaBeau asked if the franchise fees that go into the communications budget could be put in thegeneral fund for other uses. She stated the Minnesota School of Business is attempting to survey all of the Chamber businesses in the area and prefers the results of that survey be used. Council Member Swecker stated that she believes the survey is valuable in determining what people support and her decisions are largely based on the results. Swecker would like to consider conducting either the visioning process or the community survey, but not both. Bellows stated he would choose the visioning City Council Work Session Minutes October 24, 2011 Page -4- process over the community survey, since the MN School of Business will contribute their results. Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Todd Bornhauser was present and stated that the MN School of Business will survey approximately 60 businesses. Though it is beneficial, the survey is not statistically valid and Council might not want to make decisions based on those results. Mr. Mielke believes the visioning process is more beneficial than the survey at this time. LaBeau proposed a $25,000 cap for both. Council,Mern e"rLittle asked for clarification on what the visioning would involve. Mr. Mietke explained the visioning survey would ask residents to describe their long term "vision" f, iTi e"oity as it continues to grow and develop. The process would look at future land use amenities, transportation, infrastructure, housing stock, etc., and would assist the City,irf, managing growth and setting priorities. Swecker believes if,residents are given the opportunity to express their concerns, Council is better 'able to "rioritize. Development of a strategic action plan would follow Council directed staff to develop a scope of work to complete the { community visioning process including a citizen survey in 2012 with a budget, of $30,000. Membership in the Greater MSP initiative was discussed.' The EDC is not recommending joining at this time. L*f feels it �rould, benefit the City of Lakeville and should still be considered. Mr. Mielke stated thafthe MSP markets the entire region while the EDC is working on a marketing plan exclusive to Lakeville. Little feels the EDC's marketing survey woUfd compliment the Greater MSP. Other Council members did not support joirting Greater MSP at,this time. Little asked to have this membership reconsidered at a later date:; Council requested the $25,000 for Greater MSP membership be removed from the budget and asked that the EDC's marketing efforts be funded by the communications budget. MrO=Feller continued to review the budget. LaBeau asked about the significance of the Human Resources market study. Mr. Mielke explained that the study looks at each of the positions and whether,wages and comparability are competitive in the marketplace. Lawns that'govern public employees are different than the private sector. The City needs to follow state mandates and comply with pay equity. Resident Patti McDonald asked if if is for the City's protection. Mielke stated that the City needs to ensure that its compensation system is accurate, competitive, and not biased. The Personnel Committee will review the scope of services for the wage study and make a recommendation to City Council. The communications fund includes $20,000 for planning and consulting fees to improve meeting room space at City Hall. Staff believes relocating certain departments and reconfiguring space would result in a more conducive meeting area. City Council Work Session Minutes October 24, 2011 Page -5- Council members believe that planning can be done in -house and asked that the $20,000 expense be removed from the budget. Steve Michaud presented a request for replacement of the Parks showmobile, which is used as a stage for Pan- O -Prog events, other special events, concerts, etc. The current unit is old and is experiencing maintenance problems. Michaud has been unsuccessful in finding another agency to jointly purchase a new model. He has also tried to find a second -hand showmobile but has not located a unit in good condition. There might be a revenue opportunity in renting the unit out. Council members believed the return on investment (ROI) would be low. Mayor Bellows suggested the Parks Dept. could get by with the current unit for another year Little would like additional information on actual costs including overtime and estimated ROI to be factored in and brought forward to the November work'session. 'Other Council members concurred. Council discussed whether to move forward with Phase 11 of the Liquor Study. This phase would make recommendations on whether to purchase property for another store, and if so, the location for that store. Council directed staff to conduct the analysis in- house. ' ITEM #2 — Feasibility Report — 1 As part of the scheduled intersection improvements at CSAH 50 and 185 Street, the existing off - street trail on 185 will be relocated. There is a gap in off - street trail improvements between Jasper Path} and Ipava Avenue. Parks Director Steve Michaud is asking that the extension of this 8400t trail-to Ipava Avenue be added to the 2014 budget. Currently the section of trail from Casper Way to Ipava Avenue is a paved shoulder. ,Staff believes anew trail extension will enhance pedestrian safety. WSB & Associates have prepared a ,feasibility report which details the proposed project. Construction costs of the project will be approximately $275,000, of which the City would p4y'45% and Dakota County would pay 55 %. There are no long -range plans for 185 Street improvements so the trail extension would be done independently of a roadway project,. LaBeau asked about the cost of maintenance for the trail system. Michaud stated that there are ongoing as well as long -term expenses so it is difficult to calculate an annual expense. There have been discussions with Dakota County about them contributingp'the maintenance expenses. Council directed staff to include this trail extension in the 2014 budget. ITEM #3 — Policy Manual Changes Staff presented proposed changes to the first section of the Lakeville Policy Manual. City Attorney Roger Knutson had reviewed City policies and recommended several City Council Work Session Minutes October 24, 2011 Page -6- changes. LaBeau asked how employees are provided with information from the manual. Staff explained that it is the responsibility of the department directors to ensure that employees are well informed and familiar with both the policy manual and pertinent state statutes. Section 3.06 has been added which addresses employees' role in providing information and explanations to the public. Council Member Little believes some of the verbiage is confusing and wants employees to know that they can express their own position when they are not speaking on behalf of the City. Mr. Mielke will ask the City Attorney to review the paragraph and clarify the language. Following discussion of other recommended revisions, Council.directed "staff to make the suggested changes and prepare the document for.Council consideration at a future meeting. ITEM #4 — Flagstaff Avenue Traffic Calming P Residents along Flagstaff Avenue had approached the City in ,fune with= concerns of speed and safety in their neighborhood. Directocof,Qperations and Maintenance Chris Petree provided background on traffic caiming:-elorts to dat .`A neighborhood , meeting held on August 16 was attended by35 -40 residents. Residents appreciated efforts by the City, which included narrowing the dove lanes and installing driver feedback (DFB) signs. Due to lack of an accessible power source, the DFB signs will need to be solar powered; this will increase thecctst of the project from $31,000 to $40,100. Staff is recommending a phased implemeni;a:ion: Phase 1 will be re- striping of the roadway to narrow the drive lanes from 12 feet to 10 feet; Phase 2 will include installation of two solar powe're'd DFB signs. Estimated cost of those two phases is $22,100. Staff wilt evaluate these two phases for at least a year and then recommend whether Phase 34111 be implemented.: Phase 3 will consist of two additional solar - powered DFB signs. Prior to beginning this projecf, Council will be asked to consider approval of a DFB sigh polio ,which was previously provided in draft format. Funding for Phases 1 and will be from ttie 2012 Pavement Management CIP, with no cost to the property owners. Worlrin Phases," and 2 is anticipated to be done early in the summer of 2012. Mr. Petree suggests that Phase 3, if needed, be completed with the 2014 reconstruction of Flagstaff Avenue. Council directed staff to add the Driver Feedback Sign Policy to a future Council agenda for consideration and prepare to proceed with Phases 1 and 2. Mr. Petree will notify the residents. LaBeau stated there are other areas which may also request DFB signs. Mr. Petree stated that the policy will set criteria and provide guidance for staff and Council to make those determinations. City Council Work Session Minutes October 24, 2011 Page -7- ITEM #5 — Board /Commission Reappointment Procedures and Advisory Appreciation Event Council members expressed a desire to delay their discussion of the process for reappointing board and commission members until the entire Council is present. This item will be added to the November work session agenda. It has been suggested that the annual Advisory Appreciation Event be postponed until February or March so that recognition of outgoing advisory committee members would coincide with term expirations, which are now March 31, check with Council for available dates. LaBeau asked about the status of the Innovative Awards program. St review of the ideas submitted by staff will resume following the budget Council Member LaBeau would like the Council to coridOct a"h evaluation of the City Administrator as called for in his employment contract. Counctt Member Swecker suggested the evaluation be conducted every other year in January to give new Council members an opportunity to work with the administrator fora year. LaBeau stated that would require a change in the employment contract; ITEM #6 — Other Interagency Commi Council Member Swecker Advisory Committee meet ITEM #7. -, Adiourn adjourned at 8: Judi Hawkins Deputy Clerk she will be attending the Met Council Land Use uvere no other reports. Mark Bellows Mayor