HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 06.gDecember 21, 2011 Item No.
ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
JANUARY 3, 2012 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Proposed Action
Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve: an ordinance amending Title 10
(Subdivision Ordinance) and Title 11 (Zoning Ordinance) of the City Code and summary ordinance for
publication.
Adoption of this motion will result in an amended Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance.
Overview
With the adoption of the 2008 Comprehensive Land Use Plan by the City Council in December of 2008 the next
step in the process, as required by state statutes, was to update the City's development regulations, including
the Zoning Map, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinances. The Planning Commission at their April 22,
2010 meeting unanimously recommended approval of the amendments and the City Council adopted the
updates on May 17, 2010.
Over the past 17 months while using the new ordinances, City staff has identified sections of the Zoning and
Subdivision Ordinances that need to be revised to clarify the intent of the regulations to make the ordinances
more efficient, easier to use and interpret by the public. The City also received input from community
stakeholders including developers, brokers and property owners requesting clarification of specific sections of
the Zoning Ordinance or Subdivision Ordinance. In addition, the City held a Development Forum and conducted
a Development Survey that garnered additional feedback from home builders, developer's and property owners
as to possible modifications of the City's development regulations to streamline the review process and make
the regulations more user friendly.
The Planning Commission reviewed the list of possible amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision
Ordinance at their November 17, 2011 work sessions. Staff indicated the review and adoption of the list of
possible amendments would be broken into several phases allowing for the less technical changes to be
completed quickly and the other items, which will require more time for additional analysis or require City policy
changes, to be considered by Planning Commission and City Council in future phases.
At their December 15, 2011 meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing to review the Phase One
amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. There was no public input. The Planning
Commission unanimously recommended approval of the amendments to the Zoning and Subdivision
Ordinances as amended.
Primary Issues to Consider
None.
Supporting Information
• Ordinances Amending Title 10, Subdivision Ordinance and Title 11, Zoning Ordinance
• Summary Ordinance for Titles 10 and 11
• December 15, 2011 Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
• December 2, 2011 TPC Planning Commission Memo and Redlined Ordinance Changes
Ilyn`Kuennen, AICP, Associate Planner
Financial Impact: $ None Budgeted: Y/N Source:
Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances
Notes:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 (THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE) AND
TITLE 11 (THE ZONING ORDINANCE), OF THE LAKEVILLE CITY CODE
This ordinance amends the City's subdivision and zoning ordinances. Amendments have
been made to the following:
ATTEST:
Charlene Friedges, City Clerk
SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
DAKOTA, COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Title 10 (the Subdivision Ordinance)
Chapter 2 -2 (Preliminary Plats)
Chapter 2 -3 (Final Plats)
Chapter 3 -4 (Certification)
Title 11 (the Zoning Ordinance)
Chapter 17 -21 (Minimum Lot Area)
Chapter 21 -9 (Required Screening and Landscaping)
Chapter 23 -15 (General Sign Regulations)
Chapter 72 -7 (CUPs in the C -2 District)
Chapter 73 -7 (CUPs in the C -3 District)
Chapter 75 -13 (Design and Performance Standards in the O -P District)
Chapter 102 -9 (Shoreland Classifications)
A printed copy of the entire ordinance is available for inspection by any person during
the City Clerk's regular office hours.
Approved for publication by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, Minnesota, this
3rd day of January, 2012.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
BY:
Mark Bellows, Mayor
ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
DAKOTA, COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TITLE 10 (SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE) OF THE
LAKEVILLE CITY CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 10- 2 -2.D.6 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
6. If the preliminary plat is approved by the city council,
the subdivider must submit the final plat within one (1)
year after the approval or approval of the preliminary
plat shall be considered void, unless:
a. A request for time extension is submitted in
writing to the zoning administrator prior to the
expiration of the one (1) year period.
b. A request for an additional one (1) year extension
not to exceed two (2) years from the date of
preliminary plat approval may be approved by the
zoning administrator.
c. Requests for an extension beyond two (2) years from
the date of preliminary plat approval shall be
subject to approval by the city council.
Section 2. Section 10 -2 -3.B of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
B. Zoning Administrator Recommendation:
1. Five (5) copies of the final plat including all
information outlined in section 10 -3 -3 of this
title shall be submitted to the zoning
administrator.
2. The zoning administrator shall examine the final
plat and prepare a recommendation as to approval,
disapproval or any delay in decision of the final
plat, which recommendation shall be conveyed to the
subdivider prior to review by the city council.
3. The zoning administrator shall refer the final plat
to the planning commission for review if the
proposed final plat is substantially different from
the approved preliminary plat or the requirements
of the preliminary plat are not resolved.
Section 3. Section 10 -2 -3.0 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
C. Approval Of The City Council:
1. The final plat, together with the recommendations
of the planning commission (when applicable) and
the zoning administrator shall be submitted to the
city council for approval.
2. The city council may refer the final plat to the
planning commission for review if the proposed
final plat is substantially different from the
approved preliminary plat or the requirements of
the preliminary plat are not resolved.
3. If accepted, the final plat shall be approved by
resolution, providing for the acceptance of all
agreements for basic improvements, public
dedication and other requirements as indicated by
the city council.
4. If disapproved, the grounds for any refusal to
approve a plat shall be set forth in the
proceedings of the council and reported to the
person or persons applying for such approval within
ten (10) days of the city council's action.
Section 4. Section 10 -3 -4.0 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
C. Space for certificates of approval and review to be
filled in by the signatures of the mayor and city clerk.
2
Section 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication according to law.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, Minnesota, this
day of , 2012.
ATTEST:
The form of approval of the city council is as follows:
Charlene Friedges, City Clerk
This day of , 20 .
Signed:
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
BY:
3
Mark Bellows, Mayor
ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
DAKOTA, COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TITLE 11 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE
LAKEVILLE CITY CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 11- 17 -21.A of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
A. Lots Of Record And Preliminary Platted Lots Having Legal
Standing On January 1, 1994: Except as may be otherwise
required by this title, the area of a lot shall be
measured as the area of a horizontal plane within the
lot lines.
Section 2. Section 11- 17 -21.B of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
B. Lots Of Record Established After January 1, 1994: Except
as may be otherwise allowed by this title, the area of a
lot shall be measured as the area of a horizontal plane
within the lot lines excluding "major drainageways ", as
defined by the water resources management plan,
wetlands, water bodies, road rights of way, required
buffer strips, regional utility /pipeline easements, and
slopes steeper than three to one (3:1).
Section 3. Section 11- 21 -9.0 -1 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
1. Minimum Size: All plants must at least equal the following
minimum size in conformance with American Nursery Association
standards:
Shade trees
Ornamental trees (flowering crabs,
hawthorn serviceberry, etc.)
Coniferous evergreen trees ' ;8 feet
Low shrubs:
Deciduous
; Coniferous evergreen
Spreading coniferous evergreen
K. Reserved.
2
Balled And
Burlapped /Container
2 1 / 2 inch diameter
2 inch diameter
6 - 7 foot, clump
form
Tall shrubs and hedge material (evergreen 3 - 4 feet
or deciduous)
18 - 24 inch
; 18 - 24 inch
;18 - 24 inch spread
Section 4. Section 11- 23 -15.K of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Section 5. Section 11- 72- 7.H.11 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
11. Signs: All signs and informational or visual
communication devices shall be minimized and shall be in
compliance with chapter 23 of this title and the
following provisions:
a. A comprehensive sign plan must be submitted as part
of a conditional use permit application.
b. Freestanding sign. A freestanding sign allowed by
Chapter 23 of this Title shall be a monument sign
constructed as follows:
1. The sign shall be self- supported vertically by
a solid base extending horizontally for a
minimum of the entire width of the sign face.
Total height of the monument sign including
the base shall not exceed fifteen feet (15').
2. The sign base and supporting material shall be
equal to at least forty percent (40 of the
total allowable sign square footage, and shall
not be counted toward the sign area. The base
shall be attached to the ground for its entire
horizontal width of the sign. The base shall
be stone, brick, or decorative masonry and
shall not contain any sign copy.
c. In addition to the freestanding sign allowed by
Chapter 23 of this Title, convenience food uses may
display menu signs related to drive through
facilities, provided that:
1. Not more than two (2) menu signs per drive
through lane are allowed.
2. The menu sign(s) shall be single sided with an
area not to exceed fifty (50) square feet.
3. The height of the menu sign(s) shall not
exceed eight (8) feet including its base or
pole measured from grade to the top of the
structure.
4. The menu sign(s) shall not encroach into any
principal building setback and shall be
located directly adjacent to the drive through
aisle and oriented in such a manner so that
the sign provides information to the drive
through patrons only and does not provide
supplemental advertising to pass -by- traffic
and does not impair site visibility or
obstruct circulation.
Section 6. Section 11- 73- 7.H.11 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
11. Signs: All signs and informational or visual
communication devices shall be minimized and shall be in
compliance with chapter 23 of this title and the
following provisions:
3
a. A comprehensive sign plan must be submitted as part
of a conditional use permit application.
b. Freestanding sign. A freestanding sign allowed by
Chapter 23 of this Title shall be a monument sign
constructed as follows:
1. The sign shall be self - supported vertically by
a solid base extending horizontally for a
minimum of the entire width of the sign face.
Total height of the monument sign including
the base shall not exceed fifteen feet (15').
2. The sign base and supporting material shall be
equal to at least forty percent (40%) of the
total allowable sign square footage, and shall
not be counted toward the sign area. The base
shall be attached to the ground for its entire
horizontal width of the sign. The base shall
be stone, brick, or decorative masonry and
shall not contain any sign copy.
c. In addition to the freestanding sign allowed by
Chapter 23 of this Title, convenience food uses may
display menu signs related to drive through
facilities, provided that:
1. Not more than two (2) menu signs per drive
through lane are allowed.
2. The menu sign(s) shall be single sided with an
area not to exceed fifty (50) square feet.
3. The height of the menu sign(s) shall not
exceed eight (8) feet including its base or
pole measured from grade to the top of the
structure.
4. The menu sign(s) shall not encroach into any
principal building setback and shall be
located directly adjacent to the drive through
aisle and oriented in such a manner so that
the sign provides information to the drive
through patrons only and does not provide
supplemental advertising to pass -by- traffic
and does not impair site visibility or
obstruct circulation.
Section 7. Section 11- 75- 13.E.1 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
1. The parking area shall be set back a minimum of ten feet
(10') from any property line except as required by
Section 11- 21 -9.A.1 of this Title.
Section 8. Section 11- 102 -9.B.1 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
1. Lakes:
Name
Lake Marion
Orchard Lake
DNR ID#
�
Crystal Lake 19 -27 Recreational development (RD) ! 934.5
Lake Kingsley 19 -30 Natural environment (NE) 980.9
Lee Lake 19 -29 !Recreational development (RD) 948.5
Horseshoe Lake i 19 -32 ;Natural environment (NE)
Unnamed Lake
Section 9. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication according to law.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, Minnesota, this
day of , 2012.
ATTEST:
Charlene Friedges, City Clerk
r 19 -26 Refer to subsection C of this section 983.1
19 -31 Recreational development (RD) 1 977.6
70 -1101 'Natural environment (NE)
70 -1102
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
BY:
5
Classification
Mark Bellows, Mayor
OHWL
990.0
972.0
1 971.5
J. son commented that access to that medical clinic will be reviewed with
Dak• . County staff as part of the public improvement design process.
• How wi the public find out about the improvement projects? Mr. Feller
explained ' ' . t the full CIP will be presented at the December 19th City
Council meetin and it will be posted on the City's website.
• Explain the propo • d widening of Dodd Boulevard between 183rd Street and
Hayes Avenue. Mr. .hnson indicated that this improvement project will
result in four lanes of tr fic on Dodd Boulevard between 185th Street and
Hayes Avenue. He stated . at the widening of Dodd Boulevard between
Hayes Avenue and Cedar Ave e would be completed in conjunction with
future land development.
• On which side of Dodd Boulevard wi he proposed trail from County Road
50 to approximately 208th Street be loca d? Mr. Johnson explained that
preliminary plans identify that trail will be lo.. ted on the west side of Dodd
Boulevard and will connect to the existing trail t . t connects downtown and
Antlers Park.
11.57 Motion was made and seconded to recommend to City Counc '. adoption of the
2012 -2016 Capital Improvement Plan as presented, which is consisten with the 2008
Comprehensive Plan.
Ayes: Blee, Grenz, Drotning, Boerschel, Maguire, Lillehei, Davis.
Nays: 0
ITEM 8. CITY OF LAKEVILLE
Planning Commission Meeting
December 15, 2011
Page 4
Chair Davis opened the public hearing to consider the request of the City of
Lakeville to consider amendments to various chapters in the Subdivision Ordinance
and the Zoning Ordinance, as listed on the December 15, 2011 Planning
Commission agenda. The Recording Secretary attested that the legal notice had
been duly published in accordance with State Statutes and City Code.
Associate Planner Allyn Kuennen presented the planning report. Mr. Kuennen
indicated that the Planning Commission is looking at Part 1 of the proposed
modifications of the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance, which involve
wording clarifications as well as some responses to issues raised at the
Development Forum this past summer and do not include policy issues. He stated
that additional amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance,
which will require more study and include potential policy items, will be presented
in phases at future Planning Commission meetings.
11.58 Motion was made and seconded to close the public hearing at 6:26 p.m.
Ayes: Grenz, Drotning, Boerschel, Maguire, Lillehei, Davis, Blee.
Nays: 0
Chair Davis congratulated staff for pulling together and identifying those
Development Forum concerns that could be processed more quickly. The
development community will appreciate this effort. Chair Davis asked for
comments from the Planning Commission. Discussion points were:
• It was recommended that Section 10- 2 -3.B.3 of the Subdivision Ordinance be
amended to read, "The Zoning Administrator may shall refer the final plat to
the Planning Commission..."
11.59 Motion was made and seconded to recommend to City Council approval of the
proposed Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance amendments, as amended.
Ayes: Drotning, Boerschel, Maguire, Lillehei, Davis, Blee, Grenz.
Nays: 0
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:29 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Penny Brevig, Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Bart Davis, Chair
Planning Commission Meeting
December 15, 2011
Page 5
TPC
MEMORANDUM
3601 Thurston Avenue N, Suite 100
Anoka, MN 55303
Phone: 763.231 .5840
Facsimile: 763.427.0520
TPC @PlanningCo.com
TO: Daryl Morey
FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP
DATE: 2 December 2011
RE: Lakeville — Zoning Ordinance
TPC FILE: 135.01
BACKGROUND
Comprehensive updates of the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance were
adopted by the City Council on 17 May 2010 as required by State Statues to implement
the 2008 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. In the subsequent 17 months, City staff has
identified sections of the Zoning Ordinance that need to be revised to clarify the intent of
the regulations. The City has received input from other stakeholders including
developers, brokers and property owners requesting clarification of specific sections of
the Zoning Ordinance or Subdivision Ordinance. The City also held a Development
Forum and conducted a Development Survey that garnered additional feedback as to
possible modifications of the City's development regulations to streamline the review
process and make these regulations more user friendly.
The Planning Commission reviewed a list of possible amendments to the Zoning
Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance at their 17 November 2011 work session. This
memorandum forwards Part 1 of the proposed modifications of the Zoning Ordinance
and Subdivision Ordinance, which are more technical in nature and not a matter of
policy. Further discussion regarding additional amendments will occur at future
Planning Commission meetings or work sessions.
Exhibits:
A. Draft Ordinance amendment
ANALYSIS
• State Statues 462.358, Subd. 3.c provides that preliminary plats are valid for one
year from the date of approval. Section 10 -2 -2.D of the Subdivision Ordinance
is proposed to be amended to extend the requirement for submission of a
preliminary plat out to one year consistent with State Statutes. The proposed
amendment would thereafter allow an administrative extension of preliminary plat
approvals for up to one additional year. Subsequent extensions would require
City Council approval. This amendment reflects that more projects are requiring
additional time to move to a final plat stage given current market conditions and
allowing for initial extensions to be processed administratively will better facilitate
this process.
• Final plat applications are not required by State Statute to be reviewed by the
Planning Commission. By design, final plat applications are intended to be
technical reviews that the request is consistent with the entitlements granted with
the preliminary plat, that the detailed construction level plans conform with City
requirements and that any conditions of preliminary plat approval have been
satisfied. Section 10 -2.3.B is proposed to be amended to not require Planning
Commission review of final plat applications unless the Zoning Administrator or
City Council determines circumstances warrant.
• As the Planning Commission is not required to approve the final plat, the
signature of the Planning Commission chair and secretary is not required on the
documents. Section 10 -3 -4.0 is proposed to be amended to remove their
signature lines from final plats.
• Section 11- 17.21.A and B of the Zoning Ordinance is to be clarified to state that
the area of a lot established before January 1, 1994 is measured based on the
area of a horizontal plane within the lot lines. The current wording had been
moved from the definition section of the Zoning Ordinance and seemed to be
incomplete without the added language.
• Section 11- 21 -9.C.1 of the Zoning Ordinance is amended to remove the note
regarding bare root trees as such plantings are only appropriate as seedlings
within stormwater basins and would not apply to the intent of the regulations of
this Section.
• Section 11- 23 -15.K of the Zoning Ordinance is proposed to be amended to
eliminate the licensing requirement for off - premises signs. The licensing
requirement in not needed as the Zoning Ordinance adequately addresses
existing signs as permitted principal uses subject to performance standards and
prohibits new signs. As the remaining provisions of this section mirror Section
11- 23 -15.W of the Zoning Ordinance, this section is to be "reserved ".
2
• Sections 11- 72- 7.H.11 and 11- 73.7.H.11 of the Zoning Ordinance are proposed
to be amended to include language previously added in 2004 (but removed with
the 2010 update) regarding signage for convenience food uses, including exterior
menu boards.
• Section 11- 75- 13.E.1 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes a minimum parking
setback of 10 feet for uses in the O -P District. However, Section 11- 21 -9.A.1 of
the Zoning Ordinance establishes a minimum landscape buffer of 20 feet when
the parking areas abut a residential district. A cross reference to this
requirement is proposed to be added to Section 11- 75.12.E.1 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
■ The DNR has provided the City data on the Ordinary High Water Levels for
Horseshoe Lake and an unnamed lake, which is proposed to be included in the
table in Section 11- 102 -9.B.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
CONCLUSION
The Planning Commission will consider the proposed amendments at a public hearing
to be held on 15 December 2011. City staff and our office recommend approval of the
proposed amendments in the form attached hereto.
3
ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
DAKOTA, COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TITLE 10 (SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE) AND
TITLE 11 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE LAKEVILLE CITY CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 10- 2 -2.D.6 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
6. If the preliminary plat is approved by the city
council, the subdivider must submit the final plat
within one hundred (100) days (1) year after the
approval or approval of the preliminary plat shall be
considered void, unless:
a. A request for time extension is submitted in
writing and approvcd by thc City Council to the
zoning administrator prior to the expiration of
the one (1) year period.
b. A request for an additional one (1) year
extension not to exceed two (2) years from the
date of preliminary plat approval may be approved
by the zoning administrator.
c. Requests for an extension beyond two (2) years
from the date of preliminary plat approval shall
be subject to approval by the city council.
Section 2. Section 10 -2 -3.B of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
B. Approval of thc Planning Commiccion Zoning
Administrator Recommendation:
1. Tcn (10)Five (5) copies of the final plat
including all information outlined in section 10-
3 -3 of this title shall be submitted to the
zoning administrator --for distribution to the
planning commission, city council and appropriate
city staff.
2. The City staff zoning administrator shall examine
the final plat and prepare a recommendation as to
mis:ion. Naturc of approval,
disapproval or any delay in decision of the final
plat, which recommendation shall be conveyed to
the subdivider prior to review by the city
council. will be convcycd to thc subdivider
aftcr thc mccting of thc
icsion at which Such plat was
3. The zoning administrator shall refer the final
plat to the planning commission for review if the
proposed final plat is substantially different
from the approved preliminary plat or the
requirements of the preliminary plat are not
resolved.
Section 3. Section 10 -2 -3.0 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
C. Approval Of The City Council: Aftcr rcvicw of thc
final plat by thc planning commission, such
1. The final plat, together with the recommendations
of the planning commission (when applicable) and
the City staff zoning administrator shall be
submitted to the city council for approval.
2. The city council may refer the final plat to the
planning commission for review if the proposed
final plat is substantially different from the
approved preliminary plat or the requirements of
the preliminary plat are not resolved.
3. If accepted, the final plat shall be approved by
resolution, providing for the acceptance of all
agreements for basic improvements, public
dedication and other requirements as indicated by
the city council.
2
4. If disapproved, the grounds for any refusal to
approve a plat shall be set forth in the
proceedings of the council and reported to the
person or persons applying for such approval
within ten (10) days of the city council's
action.
Section 3. Section 10 -3 -4.0 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
C. Space for certificates of approval and review to be
filled in by the signatures of thc chair of thc city
the mayor and city clerk. The
followo:
This day of , 20_.
&igncd:
Chair
Attcct:
The form of approval of the city council is as
follows:
This day of , 20_.
Signed:
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Section 5. Section 11- 17 -21.A of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
A. Lots Of Record And Preliminary Platted Lots Having
Legal Standing On January 1, 1994: Except as may be
otherwise required by this title, the area of a lot
shall be measured as the area of a horizontal plane
within the lot lines.
3
Section 6. Section 11- 17 -21.B of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
B. Lots Of Record Established After January 1, 1994:
Except as may be otherwise allowed by this title, the
area of a lot shall be measured as the area of a
horizontal plane within the lot lines excluding "major
drainageways ", as defined by the water resources
management plan, wetlands, water bodies, road rights
of way, required buffer strips, regional
utility /pipeline easements, and slopes steeper than
three to one (3:1).
Section 7. Section 11- 21 -9.0 -1 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
1. Minimum Size: All plants must at least equal the following
minimum size in conformance with American Nursery
Association standards:
MINIMUM SIZE
Shade trees 1
2 / inch diameter
Ornamental trees (flowering crabs,
hawthorn serviceberry, etc.)
Coniferous evergreen trees
Tall shrubs and hedge material
(evergreen or deciduous)
Low shrubs:
1 Deciduous
[Coniferous evergreen
!Spreading coniferous evergreen
4
Balled And
Burlapped /Container
;2 inch diameter
;6 - 7 foot, clump
form
8 feet
:3 - 4 feet
; 18 - 24 inch
118 - 24 inch spread
Notc:
1. If cizc rcquircmcnts arc mct, barc root plant matcrial
may bc substitutcd. Typc and modc arc dcpcndcnt upon
c acon, availability, and sito
climatc, groundwatcr, manmadc
irrigation, grading, ctc.).
conditions (coils,
Section 8. Section 11- 23 -15.K of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
K. Off Prcmiccc Cignc:l. Off prcmiccs signs arc a
cignc must bc rcmovcd as a condition of construction
cc upon thc property or platting
or subdivision approval for thc land on which it is
locatcdReserved.
Section 9. Section 11- 72- 7.H.11 of the City Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
11. Signs: All signs and informational or visual
communication devices shall be minimized and shall be
in compliance with chapter 23 of this title and the
following provisions:
a. A comprehensive sign plan must be submitted as
part of a conditional use permit application.
b. Freestanding sign. A freestanding sign allowed
by Chapter 23 of this Title shall be a monument
sign constructed as follows:
1. The sign shall be self- supported vertically
by a solid base extending horizontally for a
minimum of the entire width of the sign
face. Total height of the monument sign
including the base shall not exceed fifteen
feet (15').
2. The sign base and supporting material shall
be equal to at least forty percent (40%) of
the total allowable sign square footage, and
shall not be counted toward the sign area.
5
The base shall be attached to the ground for
its entire horizontal width of the sign. The
base shall be stone, brick, or decorative
masonry and shall not contain any sign copy.
c. In addition to the freestanding sign allowed by
Chapter 23 of this Title, convenience food uses
may display menu signs related to drive through
facilities, provided that:
1. Not more than two (2) menu signs per drive
through lane are allowed.
2. The menu sign(s) shall be single sided with
an area not to exceed fifty (50) square
feet.
3. The height of the menu sign(s) shall not
exceed eight (8) feet including its base or
pole measured from grade to the top of the
structure.
4. The menu sign(s) shall not encroach into any
principal building setback and shall be
located directly adjacent to the drive
through aisle and oriented in such a manner
so that the sign provides information to the
drive through patrons only and does not
provide supplemental advertising to pass -by-
traffic and does not impair site visibility
or obstruct circulation.
Section 10. Section 11- 73- 7.H.11 of the City Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
11. Signs: All signs and informational or visual
communication devices shall be minimized and shall be
in compliance with chapter 23 of this title and the
following provisions:
a. A comprehensive sign plan must be submitted as
part of a conditional use permit application.
b. Freestanding sign. A freestanding sign allowed
by Chapter 23 of this Title shall be a monument
sign constructed as follows:
6
1. The sign shall be self - supported vertically
by a solid base extending horizontally for a
minimum of the entire width of the sign
face. Total height of the monument sign
including the base shall not exceed fifteen
feet (15').
2. The sign base and supporting material shall
be equal to at least forty percent (40 of
the total allowable sign square footage, and
shall not be counted toward the sign area.
The base shall be attached to the ground for
its entire horizontal width of the sign. The
base shall be stone, brick, or decorative
masonry and shall not contain any sign copy.
c. In addition to the freestanding sign allowed by
Chapter 23 of this Title, convenience food uses
may display menu signs related to drive through
facilities, provided that:
1. Not more than two (2) menu signs per drive
through lane are allowed.
2. The menu sign(s) shall be single sided with
an area not to exceed fifty (50) square
feet.
3. The height of the menu sign(s) shall not
exceed eight (8) feet including its base or
pole measured from grade to the top of the
structure.
4. The menu sign(s) shall not encroach into any
principal building setback and shall be
located directly adjacent to the drive
through aisle and oriented in such a manner
so that the sign provides information to the
drive through patrons only and does not
provide supplemental advertising to pass -by-
traffic and does not impair site visibility
or obstruct circulation.
Section 11. Section 11- 75- 13.E.1 of the City Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
7
Section 12. Section 11- 102 -9.B.1 of the City Code is hereby amended to read
as follows:
Name
Lake Marion
Orchard Lake
Crystal Lake
Lake Kingsley
Lee Lake
Horseshoe Lake
Unnamed Lake
Section 13. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication according to law.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, Minnesota, this
day of , 2012.
ATTEST:
1. The parking area shall be set back a minimum of ten
feet (10') from any property line except as required
by Section 11- 21 -9.A.1 of this Title.
1. Lakes:
DNR ID#
19 -31
19 -27
19 -30
19 -29
19 -32
Charlene Friedges, City Clerk
BY:
8
Classification OHWL
19 -26 .Refer to subsection C of this section i 983.1
Recreational development (RD)
F
'Recreational development (RD)
Natural environment (NE)
Recreational development (RD)
Natural environment (NE)
i
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
Mark Bellows, Mayor
977.6
934.5
980.9
948.5
990.0
70 -1101 'Natural environment (NE) 972.0
70 -1102 ' 971.5