Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-16-12CITY OF LAKEVILLE Planning Commission Meeting Minutes FEBRUARY 16, 2012 The February 16, 2012 Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Davis in the City Hall Council Chambers at 6:00 p.m. Flag pledge and roll call of members: Present: Chair Davis Vice Chair Lillehei Commissioner Blee Commissioner Boerschel Commissioner Drotning Commissioner Grenz Commissioner Maguire Absent Ex- officio Fitzhenry Staff Present Daryl Morey, Planning Director; Frank Dempsey, Associate Planner; Allyn Kuennen, Associate Planner; Zach Johnson, Interim City Engineer; Andrea Poehler, Assistant City Attorney; and Penny Brevig, Recording Secretary. ITEM 3. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: The February 2, 2012 Planning Commission meeting minutes were approved as presented. ITEM 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mr. Morey stated that the following items were distributed at tonight's meeting: 1. The February 15, 2012 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Committee meeting motions regarding Kenora Ridge and Crescent Ridge Third Addition. 2. Revised page 3 of the Kenora Ridge planning report with revisions under the Tree Preservation section. Mr. Morey stated that Agenda Item 5, Spirit of Brandgen Farm 6th Addition easement vacation request, has been withdrawn by the applicant because after further review it was determined that the easements in question are not in the favor of the City of Lakeville, therefore no public hearing or City Council action is necessary. ITEM 5. SPIRIT OF BRANDTJEN FARM 6TH ADDITION This agenda item has been withdrawn per the applicant's request. No further action is required. Planning Commission Meeting February 16, 2012 Page 2 ITEM 6. SPIRIT OF BRANDTJEN FARM 7m ADDITION Chair Davis opened the public hearing to consider the application of SBF Development Corp. for the vacation of public drainage and utility easements in conjunction with the re- platting of 13 lots in Spirit of Brandtjen Farm 7th Addition. The Recording Secretary attested that the legal notice had been duly published in accordance with State Statutes and City Code. Jacob Fick from SBF Development Corp. presented an overview of his request. Mr. Fick stated that 13 lots in SBF 7th Addition are being re- platted to accommodate a new builder, who is requiring larger house pads. Planning Director Daryl Morey presented the planning report. Mr. Morey stated that in conjunction with the SBF 9th Addition final plat, SBF Development Corporation has submitted an application to vacate the existing drainage and utility easements along the boundaries of the 13 lots being re- platted. He indicated that new drainage and utility easements will be established along the boundaries of the 12 lots being final platted in SBF 9th Addition, which is one lot less than was originally final platted with SBF 7th Addition. Mr. Morey reminded the Planning Commission that due to the Subdivision Ordinance amendment approved by the City Council on January 3, 2012, final plats no longer require review by the Planning Commission. The only action required at this time by the Planning Commission is a recommendation to the City Council on the easement vacation application. Mr. Morey stated that Planning and Engineering Department staff recommend approval of the drainage and utility easement vacation as presented in the February 9, 2012 planning report. Chair Davis opened the hearing to the public for comment. There zi7ere no comments from the audience. 12.07 Motion was made and seconded to close the public hearing at 6:06 p.m. Ayes: Boerschel, Maguire, Lillehei, Davis, Blee, Grenz, Drotning. Nays: 0 Chair Davis asked for comments from the Pl annin g Commission. There were no comments. Planning Commission Meeting February 16, 2012 Page 3 12.08 Motion was made and seconded to recommend to City Council approval of the vacation of public drainage and utility easements in conjunction with the re- platting of 13 lots in Spirit of Brandtjen Farm 7h Addition, located east of Draft Horse Boulevard and north of 170th Street. Ayes: Maguire, Lillehei, Davis, Blee, Grenz, Drotning, Boerschel. Nays: 0 ITEM 7. KENORA RIDGE Chair Davis opened the public hearing to consider the application of Kenyon Holdings, LLC for the preliminary and final plat of three single family lots to be known as Kenora Ridge. The Recording Secretary attested that the legal notice had been duly published in accordance with State Statutes and City Code. Chris Remus, with James R. Hill, Inc. and Keith Sperbeck from Kenyon Holdings, LLC were in attendance at tonight's meeting. Mr. Remus presented an overview of their request. He indicated that they are requesting to plat three single family lots that were platted in 2007 as Outlot B, Kent 46. Associate Planner Frank Dempsey presented the planning report. Mr. Dempsey stated that the Kent 46 development included a ghost plat showing three future single family lots within Outlot B. He indicated that the three single family lots in Kenora Ridge meet the requirements for lot size and lot width for the RS -3 District. He indicated that fill will be required to construct homes on these three lots due to the topography of the subject property. Regarding the tree preservation plan, Mr. Dempsey indicated that the plan identifies 48 significant trees and of those 48 trees, two are dead or damaged and five (three trees on lot 1 and two trees on lot 3) are identified to be saved resulting in a save ratio of 10.8 %. He stated that a minimum of two trees shall be planted on each lot without at least two save trees. Mr. Dempsey stated that Planning and Engineering Department staff recommend approval of the Kenora Ridge preliminary and final plat subject to the 4 stipulations listed in the February 10, 2012 planning report. Chair Davis opened the hearing to the public for comment. Planning Commission Meeting February 16, 2012 Page 4 Greg Kot, 11280 Kenora Way Mr. Kot had the following concerns: ➢ Why is the preliminary and final plats being considered at the same time? He objects to this. ➢ Tree preservation. He wants to make sure that all the proper paperwork for the tree preservation plan is complete. ➢ Because of the dramatic drops in elevations, a lot of fill will have to be brought in. He would like to know how this dirt will be contained. ➢ Wants to see what the homes are going to look like that will be built on these lots and who the builder will be. Wants to be sure the quality of the homes are similar to the existing homes in this neighborhood. ➢ Will any retaining walls be built? ➢ Will the homes be built as soon as the fill is brought in? He does not want to look at "for sale" signs for years. Scott Alman, 16240 Kenora Court Mr. Alman had the following concerns: ➢ Will any retaining walls be built? ➢ Wants to see the size and style of the homes being built. ➢ Will the builder sell the lots first and then take down the trees and build the homes or will he build them as spec homes and then try to sell them? Therese Marshik, 16338 Kent Trail Ms. Marshik stated that she built the first home in the Kenwood Oaks Development. She identified problems that occurred in the past with the construction of homes in the Kenwood Oaks development as well as with the development of Kent 46. She had the following additional concerns: ➢ Wants to be sure that the City watches the builders at all times to be sure that mistakes that occurred previously won't happen again, such as wrongful tree removal and fill placed in the wrong location. ➢ Because of the amount of fill that is proposed to be brought in, she suggested that retaining walls be built prior to the fill being brought in. She feels that the builder will be more careful where the fill goes if the retaining walls are already in. In addition, this will help protect the trees located behind the retaining walls. ➢ Would like the storm water drainage situation addressed so that fill does not end up in Lee Lake and so no more basements get flooded. Planning Commission Meeting February 16, 2012 Page 5 ➢ Wants the values of the proposed homes to be comparable to the values of the current homes in the Kenwood Oaks development. Commissioner Lillehei read the 4 stipulations that are listed in the February 10, 2012 planning report. 12.09 Motion was made and seconded to close the public hearing at 6:43 p.m. Ayes: Lillehei, Davis, Blee, Grenz, Boerschel, Maguire. Nays: 0 Abstain: Drotning Chair Davis asked staff to address the public comments. Mr. Dempsey stated that the tree preservation plan was prepared by a forester. There are a lot of trees that are less than six inches in diameter on this property that are not listed on the plan because they are not significant trees. Only the significant trees have been identified on the plan as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. He indicated that given the amount of fill that will be required to make these lots buildable, only the perimeter trees can be saved. Mr. Remus addressed the questions regarding how the fill will be contained on the three lots. He indicated that City staff will inspect the property prior to the developer importing any fill material. Mr. Remus was not sure if the fill would be brought in on a lot by lot basis or if they would bring it in all at once. As far as retaining walls, there is only one small retaining wall proposed and that would be adjacent to Mr. Ahlmari s property on the north side of proposed Lot 1. The retaining wall is not proposed to contain the fill, but rather to break the grade difference between the two properties. Mr. Morey stated that for approximately 15 years it has been City policy to process preliminary and final plats simultaneously, especially in the case of smaller plats with fewer lots. Mr. Johnson stated he had not heard that storm water problems have become worse in Kenwood Oaks since Kent 46 was developed. Ms. Marshik was asked to come forward again and explain her perception of the storm water problems. She indicated that there are homes that were not having storm water problems prior to the Kent 46 development that are now getting water seeping up from the ground. A control unit was put into the pond on Outlot A to help control the storm water, but that did not alleviate the problem. Chair Davis stated that the Pl annin g Commission is an advisory board to the City Council and their job is to determine if a plat is consistent with the Zoning and Planning Commission Meeting February 16, 2012 Page 6 Subdivision Ordinances. The issues concerning home values, property taxes, and who the builder is are beyond the Planning Commission's purview. Chair Davis did encourage the neighbors to keep in touch with the developer and builder and the City throughout the process. Regarding the types of homes that are proposed to be built with this development, Mr. Remus indicated that there are no specific plans at this time. Chair Davis asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Discussion points were: • The groundwater issue was discussed. Mr. Johnson indicated that this is the first he's heard of a problem, but he would be glad to meet with the residents to discuss the issue further. • The amount of fill being brought in was discussed. Mr. Remus was not sure of the exact amount of fill needed. • It was stated that the proposed homes must meet Zoning Ordinance requirements. Mr. Morey indicated that the Zoning Ordinance requires the site plan for new single family home building permits show the location of a three -car garage even if the builder does not intend to build one to ensure that there is enough room on the lot for a three -car garage meeting setback requirements. • Mr. Boerschel asked about the City requirements for tree preservation. Mr. Dempsey stated that the Subdivision Ordinance requires the developer to identify all significant trees within the property boundaries and identify the significant trees that will be saved. City staff reviews the tree preservation plan and determines if additional significant trees can be saved. • Discussion regarding the repercussions if significant trees located outside the plat boundaries are damaged with the development of the plat. Mr. Johnson stated that tree protection fencing would be installed and inspected by the City. If there were any trees outside the plat that were damaged by the developer, it would be settled by the private property owners. If, as in this case, the City owns the property outside the plat, the City would monitor the development and it would be up to the City to notify the developer/ builder of any tree damage on the City's property. Mr. Morey stated that if trees are damaged, two to one tree replacement would be required. • Mr. Johnson indicated that erosion control measures, including silt fencing, is reviewed on a case -by -case situation. • Mr. Dempsey stated that the boundaries of Outlot A are identified by conservation area posts. • Mr. Lillehei indicated that the residents did not have the best experience with the Kenwood Oaks developers. The residents are sensitive to erosion Pl annin g Commission Meeting February 16, 2012 Page 7 and don't want any more erosion problems caused by the Kenora Way development. It was made clear that the developer must contain all of the soil on his property. • The Planning Commission clarified that the City does not enforce private covenants. • Mr. Remus explained that a typical grading scenario would be for the developer to establish erosion control, clear the trees /brush, then bring in and stabilize the fill at a maximum slope of three to one. Construction of homes on the lots would follow. He stated there is no need for retaining walls because they can achieve three to one slopes at the rear of the three proposed single family lots. • Commissioner Blee asked if the Planning Commission could encourage the planting of additional trees. Mr. Morey stated the requirement of at least two trees per single family lot. Typically homeowners add landscaping that suits their needs and tastes following the completion of the house construction activities. Requiring the developer to install additional trees on the lots prior to house construction could be detrimental due to the trees being in the way of construction equipment. 12.10 Motion was made and seconded to recommend to City Council approval of the Kenora Ridge preliminary and final plat subject to the following 4 stipulations: 1. The recommendations listed in the Engineering Department memorandum dated February 9, 2012. 2. The recommendations of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Committee. 3. A minimum of two trees shall be planted on each lot that does not have at least two saved trees. Trees to be installed shall meet the size and species requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. All homes shall meet the following minimum setback requirements of the RS -3, Single Family Residential zoning District: Front Yard - 30 feet Side Yard -10 feet Rear Yard - 30 feet Ayes: Davis, Blee, Grenz, Boerschel, Maguire, Lillehei. Nays: 0 Abstain: Drotning ITEM H. CRESCENT RIDGE THIRD ADDITION Chair Davis opened the public hearing to consider the application of Shamrock Development for the preliminary plat of 111 single family lots to be known as Planning Commission Meeting February 16, 2012 Page 8 Crescent Ridge Third Addition. The Recording Secretary attested that the legal notice had been duly published in accordance with State Statutes and City Code. Jim Stanton from Shamrock Development presented an overview of his request. Mr. Stanton stated that he is aware the temporary cul -de -sac at the eastern terminus of 195th Street would require a temporary easement from the adjacent property owners or would need to be pulled back to the west and constructed completely within the Crescent Ridge Third Addition plat. He indicated he would meet with the adjacent property owners to discuss the possibility of a temporary easement and resolve the issue prior to submittal of the final plat. Associate Planner Allyn Kuennen presented the planning report. Mr. Kuennen stated that with the approval of a Comprehensive Plan and MUSA amendment in 2011 for the northerly 22 acres, the entire Crescent Ridge development is now within the current MUSA. Mr. Kuennen stated that the development is proposed to be completed in one phase. Outlot A will be deeded to the City with the final plat of Crescent Ridge Third Addition. Mr. Kuennen indicated that a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk must be installed on one side of all streets throughout the development and the developer is responsible for this cost. He also indicated that an 8 foot wide asphalt trail must be constructed on both sides of 194th Street, with the City and developer sharing this cost. He also stated that 190tII Street shall be upgraded to a paved rural section from Holyoke Avenue to the plat's eastern boundary. Mr. Kuennen stated that Planning and Engineering Department staff recommend approval of the Crescent Ridge Third Addition preliminary plat, subject to the 12 stipulations listed in the February 9, 2012 planning report. Commissioner Lillehei clarified that the cul -de -sac at the end of 195th Street would be temporary and that the developer will need to contact the neighbors to get a temporary easement from them, or put the entire cul -de -sac on the developer's property. He questioned the need for the temporary cul -de -sac. City staff indicated that this is a Subdivision Ordinance requirement to allow snow plows emergency vehicles, and school buses adequate area to turn around. Chair Davis opened the hearing to the public for comment. Susan Mortensen, 8487 195 Street W. Ms. Mortensen is the adjacent property owner who submitted the letter included in the Planning Commission packet. Her concern is to keep the cul -de -sac at the east end of 195th Street within public right -of -way or on the developer's property. Ms. Pl annin g Commission Meeting February 16, 2012 Page 9 Mortensen indicated that she has no problem with the plat but she does not want to have the cul -de -sac on her property. Bonnie and Lawrence Schweich, 8719190tH Street Their concerns are: ➢ Claims that he has never heard from the City or the developer regarding this plat until he recently returned from Florida and received his mail for the public hearing notice. ➢ Believes that 195th Court should not be a cul -de -sac and should just connect to Halo Avenue. Feels that it would cost less to snow plow and be easier for emergency vehicles to get through if it was a continuous road. ➢ Would like the roadway easement across his property verified as he does not think the City has a right to construct Harappa Avenue across his property to connect to 190th Street. ➢ He believes that north of Hilldale Avenue he has the equivalent of approximately three lots that could have been incorporated into this plat. He believes as a courtesy the developer or City should have called him to discuss this option to avoid landlocking the property. ➢ Feels that Holyoke Avenue is very dangerous and should have been "fixed" with this development. It's a bad situation with the gravel from 190th Street being tracked onto Holyoke Avenue, which is paved. The gravel from 190th Street causes potential safety issues for cars and motorcyclists on the Holyoke Avenue curve. Mark Zweber 12320 210t Street Mr. Zweber has no problem with this development. He owns the property south of the existing homes on 195th Street and would like an explanation of why this development was brought into the MUSA when the City won't bring his property into the MUSA. 12.11 Motion was made and seconded to close the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. Ayes: Blee, Grenz, Drotning, Boerschel, Maguire, Lillehei, Davis. Nays: 0 Chair Davis asked the staff to address the public comments. Chair Davis asked Mr. Kuennen to address the landlocked issue that both Ms. Mortensen and Mr. Schweich commented on. Mr. Kuennen stated that they are separate issues and indicated that the parcel referred to by Mr. Schweich is located north of the plat and the property referred to by Ms. Mortensen is located to the Planning Commission Meeting February 16, 2012 Page 10 east of the plat. Commissioner Lillehei asked for clarification as to why the landlocked issues are separate and when would they be addressed. Mr. Kuennen explained that property is landlocked when there is no street frontage for direct access to the public right -of -way. The parcel that Ms. Mortensen is referring to is accessed via a private driveway easement that extends through her property from the end of 195th Street. This property does not currently have direct access to a public street. However, this situation will be remedied and the property will have direct access to public right -of -way when 194th Street is extended to the east boundary of the Crescent Ridge Third Addition plat. Mr. Kuennen went on to explain that the triangular shaped property owned by Mr. Schweich that is located north of the Crescent Ridge plat, south of 190th Street and east of Holyoke Avenue is not landlocked because it abuts public right -of -way. Mr. Kuennen also explained that this triangular property owned by Mr. Schweich is encumbered by a public roadway easement, which allows the City the right to extend Harappa Avenue north to 190th Street, and is not developable into lots. Chair Davis asked about the dangerous intersections of 190th Street and Holyoke Avenue. Mr. Kuennen indicated that the City would not allow offset intersections like this to be built today. He stated that a preliminary traffic study of the Holyoke Avenue/ 190th Street intersection is being prepared. The preliminary results of the study indicates several options that could be considered and implemented in the future when funding is available or when the adjacent property to the north develops that would improve the safety of Holyoke Avenue and the 190th Street intersections. Mr. Morey confirmed that this is a very preliminary traffic study and has not been reviewed by the City Council. Mr. Morey indicated that the City is well aware of the dangers at these intersections and the City is looking at possible long range improvements to see what can be done to improve traffic safety. Funding and timing of the improvements, cooperation of property owners, and other factors need to be examined. Mr. Kuennen added that the eastern leg of 190th Street will be improved to a paved rural roadway with the Crescent Ridge Third Addition plat that should help keep the gravel off Holyoke Avenue at that intersection. Referring to Mr. Zweber's question regarding the MUSA line, Mr. Morey stated that the previous owner of the northerly portion of the Crescent Ridge Third Addition preliminary plat, Premier Bank, formally applied for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to bring the property into the MUSA and also to rezone the property to be similar to the zoning for the remainder of the Crescent Ridge development. That application was processed and approved by the City Council. Planning Commission Meeting February 16, 2012 Page 11 Mr. Stanton subsequently purchased the property and incorporated it into the Crescent Ridge development. Mr. Morey further stated the City is going to be studying the staged MUSA expansion areas in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. This study, which will be completed in 2012, will make recommendations to the City Council in terms of MUSA timing. Mr. Zweber's property is in Expansion Area A. Mr. Morey stated that the property owner also has the option to apply for a Comprehensive Plan amendment at any time. Mr. Zweber can contact the Planning Department to discuss MUSA timing in more detail. Chair Davis asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Discussion points were: • There was a discussion regarding the location of the temporary cul -de -sac at the east end of 195th Street and what exactly the Planning Commission would be approving tonight. Mr. Kuennen clarified that the developer has two options: either obtain the required easements from the adjacent property owners to place the temporary cul -de -sac on their property or to pull the cul -de -sac back to the west and place it all within the plat. Approving the current design of the preliminary plat allows either option to occur without the need for the plat to be reviewed by the Planning Commission again. • What is the process if Mr. Stanton wants to revise 195th Court to a through street? Staff indicated that Mr. Stanton can move forward with the current plat design and if he chooses to make changes to the 195th Court cul -de -sac in the future he can do so by re- platting just the 195th Court cul -de -sac area without affecting the rest of the plat. Mr. Morey commented that the public hearing notice stated 111 lots, so if that number were to increase, then a new public hearing would be required. • The preliminary Holyoke Avenue /190th Street intersection study was discussed. The preliminary results of the study indicate that future improvements to this intersection do not impact the Crescent Ridge Third Addition preliminary plat. It was clarified that the developer is contributing towards future improvements to Holyoke Avenue and 190th Street as is standard for all plats adjacent to roadways that are not fully improved. • There was a discussion regarding when temporary cul -de -sacs are required. Commissioner Grenz requested clarification of why a temporary cul -de -sac is required on 195th Street, and not on 193rd and 194th streets. The Zoning Ordinance allows a stub street that is 200 feet or less in length or has no more than two dwelling units to be constructed without a temporary cul -de -sac. The stub street at the end of 194th Street is only one lot deep and has access Planning Commission Meeting February 16, 2012 Page 12 from Halo Avenue not 194th Street, therefore a temporary cul -de -sac is not required. The stub street at the end of 193rd Street is less than 200 feet and therefore does not require a temporary cul -de -sac. A temporary cul -de -sac is required at the end of 195th Street due to multiple driveway accesses from the properties to the east and due to the pre - existing conditions with homes on the south side of 195th Street. • Commissioner Grenz felt strongly that Holyoke Avenue should be re- routed through the Crescent Ridge Third Addition plat to correct the geometry of the curves and to align 190th Street as a standard intersection as was proposed on a plat submitted by a previous developer in 2008. He felt that if this development proceeds as proposed, the City has lost options of improving Holyoke Avenue within this area. Commissioner Drotning indicated the 2008 version of the Crescent Ridge plat was pulled from consideration by that developer because the cost to relocate Holyoke Avenue through his plat was not financially feasible without some public funding. • Double frontage lots were discussed briefly, along with their marketability. Mr. Stanton commented that given the cost of certain things, he would rather not have double frontage lots, but the plat just didn't work without them. The double frontage lots in Crescent Ridge Third Addition meet ordinance requirements. This issue will be discussed with the third phase of the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance amendments. Lawrence Schweich asked to come forward to speak again. Chair Davis granted him the opportunity even though the public hearing had been closed. Mr. Schweich reiterated that his property north of this plat is landlocked and he did not think that there was a roadway easement at this location. He stated he would seek action in a court of law if he has to. Mr. Schweich stated he doesri t like that there will be more traffic coming out onto Holyoke Avenue and that a study is being done, but nothing is getting accomplished to fix Holyoke Avenue now. He stated he has a right to tell the Planning Commission about the unsafe conditions at the Holyoke Avenue/ 190th Street intersection. Chair Davis reminded Mr. Schweich that the public hearing is closed and called for a motion on the preliminary plat. Assistant City Attorney Poehler stated that his property is not considered landlocked and if there is a road easement across this property, it would be considered undevelopable and the City would have the right to extend Harappa Avenue through the property to 190th Street. 12.12 Motion was made and seconded to recommend to City Council approval of the Crescent Ridge Third Addition preliminary plat subject to the following 12 stipulations: Planning Commission Meeting February 16, 2012 Page 13 1. The recommendations outlined in the February 9, 2012 Engineering report. 2. The recommendations of the Park, Recreation & Natural Resources Committee. 3. Outlot A must be deeded to the City at the time of final plat. 4. Screening and berming adjacent to Holyoke Avenue, 190th Street and 194th Street must be installed consistent with the approved landscape plan. A $1,000 cash escrow must be submitted with the building permit application for each of these lots. This escrow will be in addition to the landscape /sod escrow required for each lot at the time of building permit. 5. The side and rear yards of the lots abutting Holyoke Avenue, 190th Street and 194th Street must be sodded to the edge of the right -of -way or trail. 6. A five foot wide concrete sidewalk must be installed on one side of all streets throughout the development as shown on the preliminary plat plans. The developer is responsible for the construction and cost of installing the sidewalks. 7. An 8 foot wide asphalt trail must be constructed on both sides of 194th Street. The City and developer will share the cost of the installation of the trails (3/8th paid by the City and 5/8th paid by the developer). 8. As part of the improvements associated with Crescent Ridge Third Addition, the developer shall upgrade 190th Street to a paved rural section from Holyoke Avenue to the plat's eastern boundary. The developer will receive a credit for all street improvements within 190th Street, consistent with City policy. The credit will be based on an estimate provided by the developer's engineer and include associated engineering, contract administration and construction staking costs, estimated to be 15% of the construction cost. A cash fee for the future upgrade of 190th Street will be collected with the final plat based on the current rate in effect at the time of final plat. 9. The eastern portion of 195th Street must be upgraded to a urban local street within a 60 foot wide right -of -way consistent with the approved Crescent Ridge Second Addition preliminary plat. The cost of the 195th Street road improvements will be funded by the developer. Existing adjacent property owners will not be assessed for the road improvements and access to the existing adjacent residents must be maintained by the developer during the reconstruction of 195th Street via a temporary road. 10. A temporary cul -de -sac is required to be constructed at the eastern terminus of 195th Street. If the developer cannot obtain the temporary easements necessary for the construction of the temporary cul -de -sac on the adjacent properties to the east prior to submittal of the final plat, the developer must construct the temporary cul -de -sac completely within the Crescent Ridge plat. A temporary cul -de -sac, with an 80 foot diameter Planning Commission Meeting February 16, 2012 Page 14 situated in the 195t" Street ROW and in a temporary easement on Lot 7, Block 8, Crescent Ridge Third Addition would be acceptable. 11. Barricades must be installed by the developer at the east end of 193rd Street and 194th Street until the streets are extended in the future. 12. The development must comply with the following setback requirements: Yard Front Side Side Side (abutting Rear Rear (abutting Interior Corner 190th St. and Holyoke Ave. and 194th St. 190th St. Setback 30' 10' 20' 50' 30' 60' Ayes: Drotning, Boerschel, Maguire, Lillehei, Davis, Blee. Nays: Grenz. Commissioner Grenz was satisfied with the cul -de -sac discussion, but thought that by putting this development in, we are limiting our options for safety improvements to Holyoke Avenue and 190th Street. The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for March 1, 2012. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, �l Penny BreVij, Recording Secretary ATTEST: Bart Da