HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 06Memorandum
City of Lakeville
Community & Economic Development
To: Mayor and City Council Members
Steven Mielke, City Administrator
From: David L. Olson, Community and Economic Development Director
Copy: Adam Kienberger, Economic Development Specialist
Date: February 22, 2013
Subject: Review of Draft Tax increment Financing and Tax Abatement Policies
One of the goals in the City Council approved 2011 -2013 Strategic Plan for Economic
Development is the creation of a toolbox of incentives. The most commonly used incentive
tool utilized by cities in Minnesota is Tax Increment Financing (TIF). The EDC reviewed and
recommended a proposed TIF Policy to the City Council at the November EDC Meeting. Tax
Abatement is probably the second most common economic development incentive used by
cities. The EDC reviewed and recommended a proposed Tax Abatement Policy to the City
Council at their January EDC Meeting. It is recommended that these attached recommended
policies be considered together by the City Council.
Also attached is a PowerPoint presentation prepared by Springsted, the City's fiscal
consultant that provides a good overview on the basics of both these economic development
financing tools.
Both of these recommended policies attempt to include the objectives that were included in
the revised overall Business Subsidy Policy recommended by the EDC and adopted by the
City Council in August of 2011 and is also attached.
The primary objectives of both the TIF and Tax Abatement polices are to:
1. To retain local jobs and /or increase the number and diversity of jobs that offer stable
employment and /or attractive wages and benefits.
2. To encourage additional unsubsidized private development in the area, either directly
or indirectly through "spin off" development.
3. To facilitate the development process and to achieve development on sites that would
not otherwise be developed but /for the use of TIF or Tax Abatement.
4. To remove blight and /or encourage the redevelopment of commercial and industrial
areas of the City.
5. To create opportunities for affordable housing.
6. Projects that improve the quality of life in the City by providing a desirable good or
service and address an unmet demand in the community.
Tax Abatement, while similar to TIF, has several significant differences. One of the most
significant differences is that the County and School District are able to decide if they wish to
participate in tax abatement projects, which is not the case with TIF projects. As a result,
many Tax Abatement projects are done with only City participation. With City only
participation, the amount of financial incentive that can be offered for projects is considerably
less.
This is, however, offset somewhat by the increased flexibility of Tax Abatement. While TIF can
only be used for manufacturing and warehousing projects (unless it is a redevelopment or
housing type project), Tax Abatement can be used for other types of projects, such as
commercial office or retail projects, as well as industrial projects. While Lakeville has
approved a number of TIF projects over the years, Tax Abatement has not previously been
used in Lakeville.
In practice, Tax Abatement is a rebate rather than an exemption from paying taxes. In fact,
the City is required to increase its levy by the amount of the Tax Abatement amount. This will
however, be offset by a decrease in the tax levy by the other taxing entities (County and
School District) that are not participating in the Tax Abatement project.
Action Requested: Staff is requesting comments and feedback from the Council on both
proposed policies. Formal adoption of these policies would take place at a future regular City
Council meeting.
�3.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
November 27, 2012
it Matasosky called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. in the Marion Conference
Roo - City Hall.
Members Pres- • Comms. Matasosky, Longie, Brantly, Emoncl(5:35 p.m.), Starfield,
Smith, Schubert, Vlas- Ex- officio member Chamber of Commerce Executive Director
Todd Bornhauser, Ex- office ember Mayor Mark Bellows" E officio member City
Administrator Steve Mielke.
Members Absent: Comm. Tushie.
Others Present: David Olson, Community & Icono Developments ctor; Adam
Kienberger, Economic Development SpeciaC ..
2. Approval of September 25, 2012 meeting nhrtu
Motion
Comms. Smit
September 25,
unanimously.
The EDC discus
customer C ed
m. Smith cone
and flexibilit
Id moved approve the minutes the
ng as presented. Motion carne
Review of Proposed Tax Increment Fi (TIF) Policy
Mr. Olson reviewed the EDC "demo ouining the proposed TIF policy. He provided
an overview of he recommended objectives and policies for the use of TIF.
prof'
Feral i gunge t tieaks to the policy to make it "more
EDC also discussed the level of equity stake that should
considered for TIF assistance.
e policy serves as a guide for analyzing TIF eligible
accounted for in the policy.
Motion Smith /Longie moved to recommend the draft TIF policy to
y Council. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Olson noted that a draft Tax Abatement policy will be presented at the next
EDC meeting.
Cit Visioning Process
for the upcoming City visioning process. He
used to guide the City
Mr. Mielke discusse
noted that the process is community focuse
Council on making decisions about what the City should look like as i
grow and age.
Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes, January 22, 2013 Page 3
rnhauser noted that the Comprehensive Parks Plan should be reviewed and
reevaluate • - - 't truly "afford" it.
Mr. Mielke responded that there is a revs
that review to come after the Visioning Plan currently un
Review of Proposed Tax Abatement Policy
Mr. Olson reviewed the EDC memo outlining the proposed tax abatement policy.
He provided an overview of the recommended objectives and policies for the use of
tax abatement and noted its similarities to the recommended TIF policy.
Comm. Emond inquired if there have been projects that Piave recently requested
assistance.
Mr. Olson responded that there have been several recent requests for assistance.
The EDC discussed the differences between:. ax abatement and F how there
needs to be a public benefit demonstratett prior to granting a tax abatement. They
also went on to clarify how this will be ' as an incentive or assistance versus
calling it a subsidy.
Mr. Mielke added
decision based of
the City C
'I.
2012 Plan but the Council wants
Mr. Olson noted that it is prudent to conduct: e diligence of each individual
application for assistance but t[ is a tool that .n be used as an incentive to
attract business growth.
`but -for" to t;for public assistance will be a City Council
e indiv tal project's merit.
Comm. Tushi concluded that the more tools the City has in its toolbox for
businesses, the better p ®"ft
Tushie /Brantly moved to recommend the draft Tax
temer policy be forwarded to the City Council for approval.
otion carried unanimously.
iscusson of Recent `City Council Actions
Co agie requested clarification on how the EDC motions are forwarded on to
Mr. Mielke respo t - e Council receives copies of all minutes from boards
and commissions on a regula : - is, as well as discusses recommendations at
work sessions.
Comm. Longie inquired about a recent approval o - IBG fund allocation by the
City Council and why it was not brought to the EDC prior to • oval.
Mr. Mielke responded that not all CDBG activities are within the purview o • - EDC
and that the Council decision this year was on appropriating funds for pu
improvements and housing initiatives.
Lakeville
City Council
February 26, 2013
Business Assistance Programs
• Tax Increment Financing
• Tax Abatement
Tax Increment and Tax Abatement Generally
• Frequently used tools for development
• Different set of rules apply to each
• Tax Increment usually gives control over more revenues
• Tax Abatement is often less restrictive
Springsted
1
Commonalities
• Locally controlled resources
• Capture taxes and redistribute them to support
development efforts
• Debt issued is not subject to general debt limit
• General obligation backing is permitted
Use requires certain process steps be followed,
including public hearing(s)
Business subsidy provisions apply
Springsted
Differences
• Locally controlled resources
— Tax Increment: 100% by initiating entity
— Tax Abatement: City, school, county can each approve /deny
• Capture taxes and redistribute them to support
development efforts
— Tax Increment: 100% from new development value
— Tax Abatement: From old and/or new development value
Public Sector Advisors
Springste;
Differences com.
• General obligation backing
— Tax Increment: TIF must provide for at least 20% of the
debt service to be paid
— Tax Abatement: GO may be used, but for any type of
issue, TA must at least equal principal amount of bonds to
be issued
Springste,.
Differences cony.
• Administration
— Tax increment - Counties provide settlements semi - annually
to Cities with their property tax payments
— Tax abatement - Cities collect revenues through annual levy
• Reporting
— Tax increment — Must submit annual TIF Reports to OSA
— Tax abatement - No financial reporting requirements (yet)
Public Sector Advisors
Springsted
3
What is TIF?
• A method of capturing tax base growth resulting from
new development
• Captures new local taxes (increment) to pay for public
improvements related to development
• Fixed term for capture, then new development added
to tax base
Springsted
Tax Increment Financing
• Defined by State Statute 469.174 — 469.1799
• Gap financing tool
• Depending on year created, different compliance
requirements apply
• Used mainly by Cities and Counties
• Provides incentive and funding for development
Public Sector Advisors
Springsted
4
Tax Increment Financing
• Cities Use TIF to:
— Stimulate development where it would otherwise not occur
( "but for" test)
— Encourage development of uses and areas that would
otherwise not occur
— Enhance tax base
— Facilitate infrastructure improvements
— Coordinate new developments with existing plans
tai Auvise�s
Springsted
Process for Approving TIF District
• Subsidy Review
• Approximate 60 day approval process, which includes
notifications to County and School Board, publication of
hearing notice, Planning Commission review, and
holding of public hearing
• But -For test:
— City to make a finding that "...the proposed development
or redevelopment would not reasonably be expected to
occur solely through private investment within the
reasonably foreseeable future..."
Public Sector Advisors
Springsted
5
Analysis of Subsidy Request
• Process of testing subsidy request and measuring
against industry standards
• Two questions are asked and answered:
— Is the assistance necessary?
— How much assistance is needed?
• Objective:
— Provide minimum subsidy required to get a project
completed
— Mitigate city risk
Springsted
Types of TIF Districts
(Determines Timeframe and Uses of TIF)
• Redevelopment
• Renewal and Renovation
• Housing
• Soils Condition
• Economic Development
• Other
— Hazardous Substance Subdistrict
Public Sector Advisors
Springsted
6
Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
Eligible Costs
• Public Improvements
• Land Acquisition
• Soil Correction -Site Grading
• Site Preparation /Demolition
• Relocation
• Cost of Qualifying Housing
• Financing Fees /Capitalized Interest
• Administrative Costs
Springsted
Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
Public Improvement Costs Allowed
• Streets and Roads
• Utilities
• Bridges and Interchanges
• Parking
• Sidewalks and walkways
• Soft costs related to any of the above
Springsted
7
Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
Public Improvement Costs Not Allowed
• Public Buildings such as a City Center, Public Safety,
Public Works buildings
• Culture and Recreation such as parks, community
centers, golf courses, etc.
• Administration beyond 10% of TIF collections
Spring
Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
Common Methods for Financing Costs
• Pay -as- you -go Notes
— Project financed upfront by developer
— Developer is reimbursed over time
• G.O. Tax Increment Bonds
— Can be issued without a referendum if tax increment
contributes at least 20% of debt service costs
Public Sector Advisors
° Springsted
8
Tax Increment — Project Example
• Manufacturing business proposing to locate in the
City's Industrial Park
• Business asks for an incentive to reduce
development costs
• City reviews request and determines a gap exists
• City establishes TIF District and enters into a
Development Agreement with developer
• City pledges portion of annual increment to developer
for reimbursement of TIF - eligible costs
Springsted
Tax Abatement Basics
• Defined in Minnesota Statutes 469.1812 to 469.1815
(as amended)
• NOT an actual abatement of taxes
• Permits levy of taxes for application toward
development purposes
• Adopted by resolution at a noticed meeting (does not
require property owner consent)
• Abatement resolution indicates terms: amount, length,
public benefit, etc.
Public Sector Advisors - Springsted
9
Tax Abatement Eligible Costs
• Improvements to private property
• Finance or provide public infrastructure
• Acquire or construct public facilities
• Phase in property tax increase /equalization of
property tax revenue
• If bonds are issued, eligible costs only include -
- public improvements that benefit the property,
— acquisition and conveyance of land or other property,
— reimbursements to the property owner for the cost of
improvements made to their property, or
— costs of issuance
Springst
Tax Abatement Constraints
• No back -to -back abatements
Eight years must pass before a new abatement may
begin on the same parcel.
• Cannot be applied within TIF districts, but can be
used after TIF decertification
• Maximum duration of 15 years if three participants
(City, County & ISD), 20 years if two or fewer
ublic Sector Advisors
Springstec
10
Tax Abatement Constraints coil
• If Tax Abatement Bonds issued - principal may not
exceed the estimated sum of total abatements
• Maximum aggregate annual abatement for any taxing
entity is the greater of:
— 10% of the net tax capacity or $200,000
• Maximum parcel abatement is subdivision's tax rate
times net tax capacity of parcel
Springsted
Tax Abatement — Things to Consider
• Taxing entities often adopt Tax Abatement Policies that may
further constrain abatement terms
• Bonding issues with public versus private improvements
• Political subdivision must add to its levy each year the
estimated amount of the abatements
• Abatements may be reviewed and modified every other year
by the governing body, unless abatement bonds have been
issued or resolution indicates no modification permitted
'obhc Sector Aoviror
Springsted
11
Tax Abatement — Project Examples
• Infrastructure Improvements
— New Interchange
— Highway Improvements
— New Frontage Road
— Public and private improvements for Development
• Construction of Community Center /Senior Center
• Construction of Recreational Facility
Springsted
12
1.00 PURPOSE
2.00 POLICY
Policy 1.25
BUSINESS SUBSIDY POLICY
Adopted 8/1 /11
1.01 This Policy is adopted for purposes of the Business Subsidies Act (the "Act "), Minnesota Statues,
Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995. Terms used in this Policy are intended to have the same
meanings as if used in the Act, and this Policy shall apply only with respect to "subsidies" as
defined by the Act if and to the extend required thereby.
2.01 The City of Lakeville and the Lakeville Economic Development Commission maintain several
policy documents which speak to the general goals and objectives for the provision of public
assistance for private development or redevelopment activities. These documents include, but are
not limited to the current Strategic Plan for Economic Development and the Comprehensive Land
Use Plan.
2.02 The City of Lakeville has determined that in order for any project to be considered for financial
assistance, a finding is needed that determines that, "but for" the City's assistance, this project
will not occur or will not occur within a reasonable amount of time. The City will also need to
demonstrate a return on its investment based on one or more of the public benefit categories listed
in this Policy.
2.03 Because projects vary greatly in structure and public benefit derived, each project will be
considered on its own merits. Consideration will be given to projects providing public benefits in
one or more of the following categories:
a. The creation of new jobs /increase in total payroll. In the case of new job creation, new jobs
must pay an average wage equal to the minimum wage level for business assistance programs
administered by the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development for
cities located in the seven county metropolitan area in place at the time of an application by
any business seeking a subsidy. Preference will be given to higher paying jobs that also
provide benefits such as health care coverage.
b. Projects that provide value in the forms of needed transportation and other utility
infrastructure improvements including regional infrastructure in the community that would
be completed in conjunction with the project.
c. Redevelopment projects that result in the stabilization of business districts or neighborhoods
by elimination of blighting conditions.
d. Projects that enhance or increase the economic diversity of the community by attracting
businesses or industries not currently located in the City. New job wage requirements will
apply to any new jobs created.
e. Projects that result in the development of affordable senior or workforce housing.
f. Quality of Life based on business /projects. Those business /entities that provide a desirable
good or service and address an unmet demand in the community will be considered. New job
wage requirements will apply to any new jobs created.
g.
Retention of existing jobs. To be considered under this category, it must be demonstrated —
to the satisfaction of the City - that the loss of jobs is specific and can be demonstrated.
2.04 If a particular project does not involve the creation of jobs, but is nonetheless found to meet
another public purpose of the City it may be considered without any specific job wage goals, as
permitted by Minnesota Statutes. This public purpose has to be something other than an increase
to the City's tax base. Other measurable, specific and tangible goals must be established.
Examples of tangible goals may include redevelopment or clean-up of a contaminated site or
increased tourism.
2.05 Each project shall not only be evaluated against the Business Subsidy Policy but also against other
applicable City of Lakeville or Economic Development Commission policies, including the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan, current Strategic Plan for Economic Development. The level of
assistance to be provided for any project is at the discretion of City of Lakeville.
2.06 Because it is not possible to anticipate every type of project which may in its context and time
present desirable community building or preservation goals and objectives, the governing body
must retain the right in its discretion to approve projects and subsidies which may vary from the
principles and criteria of this Policy. The burden will be on the applicant to demonstrate, to the
satisfaction of the City of Lakeville, that the public benefit justifies the requested subsidy.
2.07 In all cases of business subsidy, where the subsidy is equal to or greater than the threshold
prescribed in Minnesota Statutes, a subsidy agreement will be entered into between the City and
the recipient. This agreement will delineate the subsidy structure and amount, as well as the
expected public benefit. The agreement will include provisions for repayment and other
resolution options if the expected public benefit is not achieved. Upon completion of the project,
the actual costs of the elements of the project eligible for the business subsidy will be verified.
All business subsidies will be subject to the criteria outlined in Minnesota Statutes, Section
116J.933 through Section 116J.955 except those subsidies as exempted by same.
DRAFT
CITY OF LAKEVILLE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING POLICY
A. POLICY PURPOSE
For the purposes of this document, the term "City "shall include the Lakeville City
Council.
The purpose of this policy is to establish the City of Lakeville's position
relating to the use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) for private
development above and beyond the requirements and limitations set forth
by State Law. This policy shall be used as a guide in the processing and
review of applications requesting tax increment assistance. The
fundamental purpose of tax increment financing in the City of Lakeville is
to encourage desirable development or redevelopment that would not
otherwise occur but forthe assistance provided through TIF.
The City of Lakeville (City) is granted the power to utilize TIF by the
Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act, as amended. The fundamental
purpose of tax increment financing in Lakeville is to encourage desirable
development or redevelopment that would not otherwise occur but for the
assistance provided through the tax abatement.
The City reserves the right to approve or reject projects on a case by case
basis, taking into consideration established policies, project criteria, and
demand on city services in relation to the potential benefits from the
project. Meeting policy criteria does not guarantee the award of business
assistance to the project. Approval or denial of one project is not intended
to set precedent for approval or denial of another project.
The City Council can deviate from this policy for projects that supersede
the objectives identified herein.
B. OBJECTIVES OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) uses the increased property taxes
generated by new real estate development within a tax increment district
to pay for certain eligible costs associated with the development. As a
matter of adopted policy, the City will consider using TIF to assist private
development projects that will achieve one or more of the following
objectives:
1. To retain local jobs and /or increase the number and diversity of jobs
that offer stable employment and /or attractive wages and benefits.
Preference will be given to higher paying jobs that also provide
benefits such as health care coverage.
1
2. Projects that provide value in the forms of needed transportation and
other utility infrastructure improvement that would be completed in
conjunction with the project.
3. To encourage additional unsubsidized private development in the
area, either directly or indirectly through "spin off" development.
4. To facilitate the development process and to achieve development on
sites which would not otherwise be developed but /for the use of TIF.
5. To remove blight and /or encourage redevelopment of commercial and
industrial areas in the city that result in high quality redevelopment
and private reinvestment.
6. To offset increased costs of redevelopment (i.e. contaminated site
clean up) over and above the costs normally incurred in development.
7. To create opportunities for affordable housing.
8. Projects that improve the quality of life in the City by providing a
desirable good or service and address an unmet demand in the
community.
9. To contribute to the implementation of other public policies, as
adopted by the city from time to time, such as the promotion of
quality urban or architectural design, energy conservation, and
decreasing capital and /or operating costs of local government.
C. POLICIES FOR THE USE OF TIF
1. When possible, TIF shall be used to finance public improvements
associated with the project. The priority for the use of TIF funds is:
a. Public improvements, legal, administrative, and engineering costs.
b. Site preparation, site improvement, land purchase, demolition, and
environmental remediation.
c. Capitalized interest, bonding costs.
2. The following types of TIF districts may be established:
a. Economic Development Districts (maximum term 9 years)
b. Redevelopment Districts (maximum term 26 years)
c. Housing Districts (maximum term 26 years)
d. Renewal and Renovation Districts (maximum term 16 years)
2
e. Other types of TIF districts, along with specific criteria, may be
considered on a case by case basis.
3. TIF assistance shall not be provided for reimbursement of land and /or
property price that is in excess of fair market value. An appraisal by a
third party, agreed upon by the City and Developer, will determine the
fair market value of the land.
4. The City shall retain a fee to reimburse administrative costs up to but
not to exceed ten percent (10 %) of any tax increment received.
5. Only for a project which significantly supersedes the objectives
identified herein, will the term of the TIF assistance exceed 15 years.
6. Any developer receiving TIF assistance shall provide a minimum of
twenty percent (20 %) cash equity investment in the project. The
assistance shall not be used to supplant cash equity. The City may
consider exceptions for "pay -as- you -go" TIF projects.
7. Developer shall be able to demonstrate a market demand for a
proposed project. TIF shall not be used to support purely speculative
projects.
8. TIF shall not be utilized in cases where it would create an unfair and
significant competitive financial advantage over other projects in the
City.
9. TIF shall not be provided for projects that would place extraordinary
demands on city services or for projects that would generate
significant environmental impacts.
10. The developer must provide adequate financial guarantees to ensure
completion of the project, including, but not limited to: assessment
agreements, letters of credit, personal guaranties, etc.
11. The developer shall adequately demonstrate, to the City's sole
satisfaction, an ability to complete the proposed project based on past
development experience, general reputation, and credit history,
among other factors, including the size and scope of the proposed
project.
12. For the purposes of underwriting the proposal, the developer shall
provide any requested market, financial, environmental, or other data
requested by the City or its consultants.
3
D. PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS
All TIF projects considered by the City of Lakeville must meet a / /of the
following requirements:
1. To be eligible for TIF, a project shall result in:
a. For Economic Development TIF Districts, new construction of a
minimum of 5,000 square feet;
b. For Economic Development TIF Districts, the minimum creation of
one new or retained full time job per $25,000 of TIF provided;
c. For Redevelopment TIF Districts, a minimum value increase of
$200,000 or not less than 2 times the current year assessed value,
whichever is greater; and,
2. The project shall meet at least one of the objectives set forth in
Section B.
3. The developer shall demonstrate that the project is not financially
feasible but - forthe use of TIF.
4. The project must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan,
Land Use Plan, and Zoning Ordinances.
5. The project shall serve at least two of the following public purposes:
a. Creation of jobs with livable wages and benefits, per City's
Business Subsidy Policy.
b. Increase of tax base.
c. Enhancement or diversification of the city's economic base.
d. Industrial development that will spur additional private
investment in the area.
e. The project contributes to the fulfillment of the City's
development or redevelopment objectives.
f. Removal of blight or the rehabilitation of a high profile or
priority downtown site.
E. SUBSIDY AGREEMENT & REPORTING REQUIRMENTS
All developers /businesses receiving tax increment financing assistance
from the City of Lakeville shall be subject to the provisions and
requirements set forth by state statute 1161993 and summarized below.
All developers /businesses receiving TIF assistance shall enter into a
subsidyagreementwith the City of Lakeville that identifies: the reason for
the subsidy, the public purpose served by the subsidy, and the goals for
the subsidy, as well as other criteria set forth by statute 1163.993.
4
The developer /business shall file a report annually for two years after the
date the benefit is received or until all goals set forth in the application
and performance agreement have been meet, whichever is later. Reports
shall be completed using the format drafted by the State of Minnesota and
shall be filed with the City of Lakeville no later than March 1 of each year
for the previous calendar year. Businesses fulfilling job creation
requirements must file a report to that effect with the city within 30 days
of meeting the requirements.
The developer /business owner shall maintain and operate its facility at the
site where TIF assistance is used for a period of five years after the
benefit is received.
The developer /business will be required to attain or exceed the jobs and
wages goals set forth in the Subsidy Agreement.
Developers / Businesses failing to comply with the above provisions will be
subject to fines, repayment requirements, and be deemed ineligible by the
State of Minnesota to receive any loans or grants from public entities for a
period of five years.
F. APPLICATION PROCESS
1. Applicant submits the completed application along with a nonrefundable
initial application fee of $500.
a. City staff reviews the application and completes the Application
Review Worksheet.
b. Results of the Worksheet are submitted to the appropriate
governing authorities for preliminary approval of the proposal.
2. If preliminary approval is granted, the applicant submits the final
application fee of $5,500 and the Tax Increment Financing Plan, along
with all necessary notices, resolutions and certificates are prepared by
City staff and /or consultants.
a. Notices are published and sent to the county and school board
b. Public hearing(s) on the proposed project are held.
c. The City Council grants final approval or denial of the proposal.
5
DRAFT
CITY OF LAKEVILLE TAX ABATEMENT POLICY
A. POLICY PURPOSE
For the purposes of this document the term "City "shall include the Lakeville City Council.
The purpose of this policy is to establish the City of Lakeville's position
relating to the use of Tax Abatement for private development above and
beyond the requirements and limitations set forth by State Law. This policy
shall be used as a guide in the processing and review of applications
requesting tax abatement assistance. It is the intent of the city to minimize
the risk and amount of business assistance to a project and to leverage its
public dollars to maximize private sector funding.
The City of Lakeville (City) is granted the power to utilize Tax Abatement by
Minnesota Statutes chapters 469.1812 through 468.1815, as amended. The
fundamental purpose of Tax Abatement in Lakeville is to encourage desirable
development or redevelopment that would not otherwise occur but for the
assistance provided through the tax abatement.
The City reserves the right to approve or reject projects on a case by case
basis, taking into consideration established policies, project criteria, and
demand on city services in relation to the potential benefits from the project.
Meeting policy criteria does not guarantee the award of business assistance
to the project. Approval or denial of one project is not intended to set
precedent for approval or denial of another project.
The City Council can deviate from this policy for projects that supersede the
objectives identified herein.
B. OBJECTIVES OF TAX ABATEMENT
As a matter of adopted policy, the City will consider using the use of Tax
Abatement to assist private development projects that will achieve one or
more of the following objectives:
1. To retain local jobs and /or increase the number and diversity of
jobs that offer stable employment and /or attractive wages and
benefits.
1
2. Projects that provide value in the forms of needed transportation
and other utility infrastructure improvement that would be
completed in conjunction with the project.
3. To encourage additional unsubsidized private development in the
area, either directly or indirectly through "spin off" development.
4. To facilitate the development process and to achieve development
on sites which would not otherwise be developed but -for the use of
Tax Abatement.
5. To remove blight and /or encourage redevelopment of commercial
and industrial areas in the city that result in high quality
redevelopment and private reinvestment.
6. To offset increased costs of redevelopment (i.e. contaminated site
cleanup) over and above the costs normally incurred in
development.
7. To create opportunities for affordable housing.
8. Projects that improve the quality of life in the City by providing a
desirable good or service and address an unmet demand in the
community.
9. To contribute to the implementation of other public policies, as
adopted by the city from time to time, such as the promotion of
quality urban or architectural design, energy conservation, and
decreasing capital and /or operating costs of local government.
C. POLICY FOR THE USE OF TAX ABATEMENT
1. When possible, Tax Abatement shall be used to finance public
improvements associated with the project. The priority for the use
of Tax Abatement funds is:
a. Public improvements, legal, administrative, and engineering
costs.
b. Site preparation, site improvement, land purchase, demolition,
and environmental remediation.
c. Capitalized interest, bonding costs.
2. Tax Abatement assistance shall be provided to the developer upon
receipt of the increment by the City, otherwise referred to as the
pay -as- you -go method. Requests for up front financing will be
considered on a case by case basis.
3. Any developer receiving assistance shall provide a reasonable
amount of cash equity investment in the project as determined by
the City. The assistance shall not be used to supplant cash equity.
4. The length or term of any Tax Abatement assistance will be based
on need for each project as determined by the City.
5. Assistance shall not be provided for reimbursement of land and /or
property price that is in excess of fair market value. An appraisal
by a third party, agreed upon by the City and Developer, will
determine the fair market value of the land.
6. The Developer shall be able to demonstrate a market demand for a
proposed project. Assistance shall not be granted to support purely
speculative projects.
7. Business assistance shall not be utilized in cases where it would
create an unfair and significant competitive financial advantage
over other projects in the area.
8. Business assistance shall not be provided for projects that would
place extraordinary demands on city services or for projects that
would generate significant environmental impacts.
9. The developer must provide adequate financial guarantees to
ensure completion of the project, including, but not limited to:
assessment agreements, letters of credit, personal guaranties, etc.
unless an exception is granted by the City.
10. The developer shall adequately demonstrate, to the City's sole
satisfaction, an ability to complete the proposed project based on
past development experience, general reputation, and credit
history, among other factors, including the size and scope of the
proposed project.
11. For the purposes of underwriting the proposal, the developer shall
provide any requested market, financial, environmental, or other
data requested by the City or its consultants.
D. PROJECT QUALIFICATIONS
All Tax Abatement projects considered by the City of Lakeville must meet all
of the following requirements:
1. The project shall meet at least one of the objectives set forth in
Section B, Objectives of Tax Abatement, and satisfy all the
provisions set forth in Section C, Policy for the Use of Tax
Abatement, of this document.
2. The developer shall demonstrate that the project is not financially
feasible but - forthe use of Tax Abatement.
3. The project must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan,
Land Use Plan, and Zoning Ordinances.
4. The project shall serve at least two of the following public
purposes:
a. Creation of jobs with livable wages and benefits, per City's
Business Subsidy Policy.
b. Increase of tax base.
c. Enhancement or diversification of the city's economic base.
d. Industrial development that will spur additional private
investment in the area.
e. The project contributes to the fulfillment of the City's
development or redevelopment objectives.
f. Removal of blight or the rehabilitation of a high profile or
priority downtown site.
E. SUBSIDY AGREEMENT & REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
All developers /businesses receiving tax abatement assistance from the City of
Lakeville shall be subject to the provisions and requirements set forth by
state statute 116j.993 and summarized below.
4
All developers /businesses receiving tax abatement assistance shall enter into
a subsidy agreement with the City of Lakeville that identifies: the reason for
the subsidy, the public purpose served by the subsidy, and the goals for the
subsidy, as well as other criteria set forth by statute 116j.993.
The developer /business shall file a report annually for two years after the
date the benefit is received or until all goals set forth in the application and
performance agreement have been met, whichever is later. Underperforming
projects shall result in reduced assistance on a pro rata basis. Reports shall
be completed using the format drafted by the State of Minnesota and shall be
filed with the City of Lakeville no later than March 1 of each year for the
previous calendar year. Businesses fulfilling job creation requirements must
file a report to that effect with the city within 30 days of meeting the
requirements.
The developer /business will be required to attain or exceed the jobs and
wages goals set forth in the Subsidy Agreement.
In addition to attaining or exceeding the jobs and wages goals set forth in the
Subsidy Agreement, the applicant shall meet the qualifications set forth in
Section D, Project Qualifications, of this document.
Developers /businesses failing to comply with the above provisions will be
subject to fines, repayment requirements, and be deemed ineligible by the
State of Minnesota to receive any loans or grants from public entities for a
period of five years.
F. APPLICATION PROCESS
1. Applicant submits the completed application along with a
nonrefundable initial application fee of $500.
a. City staff reviews the application and completes the
Application Review Worksheet.
b. Results of the Worksheet are submitted to the appropriate
governing authorities for preliminary approval of the
proposal.
2. If preliminary approval is granted, the applicant submits the final
application fee of $3,000. The process for creating a Tax
Abatement project area, including all necessary notices, resolutions
and certificates prepared by City staff and /or consultants is begun.
a. Public hearing notices are published.
b. Public hearing(s) on the proposed project are held.
c. The City Council grants final approval or denial of the
proposal.