Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 06.iT_ T January 15, 2014 Item No. AGREEMENT WITH BARR ENGINEERING CO. AND SUMMERGATE DEVELOPMENT, LLC January 21, 2014 City Council Meeting Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve Agreement with Barr Engineering Co. and Summer ate Development L Passage of this motion will establish City, Barr Engineering Co. and Summergate Development, LLC project responsibilities and costs associated with applying for a Letter of Map Revision. Overview Summergate Development, LLC is coordinating with the City to apply to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for floodplain modifications along South Creek between Dodd Boulevard (CSAH -g) and 2o2' Street (CSAH -5o). A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) is FEMA's administrative procedure for modifying an existing Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The FIRM is FEMA`s official map of the City showing the boundaries of the floodplain areas where flood insurance is required. The proposed LOMR will be used to revise the floodplain boundaries within the Donnelly Farm Addition subdivision. Attached is a proposal from Barr Engineering Co. that provides the scope of work, estimated costs and schedule for completing the LOMB application. Project funding will be provided by Summergate Development, LLC. Prirnary Issues to Consider What is the purpose of the LOMB? The LOMB will provide the most accurate floodplain information available and the revised FIRM will serve as a reference for future floodplain management decisions. Supporting Information • A copy of the Agreement is attached • Barr Engineering Co. Proposal, dated November 22, 2013 Zac o nso City n ineer �) Financial impact: None Budgeted: Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: Funding provided by Summergate Development, LLC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 2014, by, between and among the CITY OF LA.KEVILLE, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), BARR ENGINEERING CO., a Minnesota corporation ( "Engineer ") and SUMMERGATE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ( "Summergate "). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. Summergate proposes to develop certain land in the City of Lakeville which is in the floodpiain. Summergate intends to apply for a LOMR with FEMA and needs the professional services set forth in this Agreement to file the application. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Engineer to furnish the services set forth in the Contract Documents, Barr Proposal Alternate "A," a copy of which is attached hereto. The Engineer agrees to perfoml the services identified in said Proposal.. 3. CONTRACT" DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Professional Services Agreement; B. Barr Proposal for Professional Services — Donnelly Farm Development LOMR Application dated November 22, 2013; . C. Insurance certificate. In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts, with Contract Document "A" having the first priority and Contract Document "C" having the last priority. 4. COMPENSATION. Engineer shall be paid by the City for the services described in the Contract Documents as Alternate "A" the sum of Thirty -seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($37,500.00), inclusive of taxes and reimbursable costs. The stated fees shall not be adjusted if the estimated hours to perform a task, the number of estimated required meetings or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded. Engineer shall invoice the City as the work progresses and the City shall make progress payments to the Engineer. 5. REIMBURSEMENT. Summergate shall reimburse the City for all compensation the City pays to the Engineer for services rendered by the Engineer pursuant to this Agreement. Summergate shall escrow with the City Thirty -seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($37,500.00) upon execution of this Agreement. The City shall draw on the escrowed funds to pay the Engineer. If, as a result of the scope of work changing, and a change order occurring as Doc. #174034v.2 RNK: 1/13/2014 set forth in paragraph b below, the Escrowed funds are insufficient to pay the Engineer, the City will invoice Summergate for the balance owed and Summergate shall pay the invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt. b. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the Lakeville City Council and by Summergate. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval. 7. DOCUMENTS. The City and Summergate shall be the owner of all documents, reports, studies, analysis and the like prepared by the Engineer in conjunction with this contract. S. S'T'ANDARD OF CAFE. Engineer shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional Engineer under similar circumstances. City and Sunimergate shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Engineer's services. Engineer shall be responsible for the accuracy of the work and shall promptly make necessary revisions or corrections resulting from errors and omissions on the part of Engineer without additional compensation. 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Engineer shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 10. INDEMNIFICATION. The Engineer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and Surmnergate, its officers, agents, and employees, of and froin any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees, arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance of the work or services provided for herein and further agree to defend at their sole cost and expense any action or proceeding convuenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising hereunder. 11. COPYRIGHT. Engineer shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings or specifications supplied by them, and they shall hold harmless the City and Summergate from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 12. INSURANCE. Engineer shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Engineer from claims under the Worker's Compensation Acts, automobile liability, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence /aggregate Excess /Umbrella Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence /aggregate The City and Summergate shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability and umbrella policies. Doc. #I74034v.2 RNK: 11] 312014 The Engineer shall secure and maintain a professional liability insurance policy. Said policy shall insure payment of damages for legal liability arising out of the performance of professional services for the City, in the insured's capacity as Engineer, if such legal liability is caused by a negligent act, error or omission of the insured or any person or organization for which the insured is legally liable. Said policy shall provide minimum limits of $1,000,000 with a deductible maximum of $125,000 unless the City and Summergate agrees to a higher deductible. Before commencing work the Engineer shall provide the City and Summergate a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City and Summergate. The certificate shall provide that such insurance cannot be cancelled until thirty (30) days after the City and Summergate have received written notice of the insurer's intention to cancel this insurance. 13. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the Engineer as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Engineer is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Engineer shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Engineer shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Engineer' performance under this Agreement. City and Engineer agree that Engineer shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Engineer or any of Engineer' agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Engineer shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Engineer's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self - employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 14. SUBCONTRACTORS. Engineer shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City and Summergate. Engineer shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Engineer must pay Subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by Subcontractor within ten days of Engineer's receipt of payment from City. Engineer must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to Subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 15. ASSIGNMENT. No party shall assign this Agreement, or any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other parties. 16. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. Doe. 4174034v.2 RNK: 1/13/2014 IS. CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Dakota County 19. RECORDS. The Engineer shall maintain complete and accurate records of time and expense involved in the performance of services. 20. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Engineer must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Engineer pursuant to this Agreement. Engineer is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, ineluding but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if they were a government entity. In the event Engineer receives a request to release data., Engineer must immediately notify City. City will give Engineer instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Engineer agree to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Engineer' officer's', agents', city's, partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 21. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City with or without cause by written notice delivered in person by fax, email or snail to the Engineer at the following address: Barr Engineering Co. 4700 West 77"' Street, Suite 200 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 with a copy of said notice provided to Surnmergate at the following address: Surrnnergate Development, LLC 10621 165 Street West Lakeville, MN 55044 Upon termination under this provision if there is no fault of the Engineer, the Engineer shall be paid for services rendered until the effective date of termination. f A mv Matt Little, Mayor Charlene Friedges, City Clerk Doc. #174034v.2 RNK:1/1312014 I ., �. BY: Its vice �3 /,O&. i BY: �d 11-*, � 4 resourceful, noturallY. BARR engineennr, ar d envimrimentol c:on ultart November 22, 2013 Mr, Zach Johnson City of Lakeville, MN 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: Proposal for Professional Services - Donnelly Farm Development LOMR Application Dear Mr. Johnson: Barr Engineering Company (Barr) is pleased to submit this proposal for providing assistance in applying for floodplain modifications along South Creek between Dodd Boulevard (Highway 9) and 202' Street W (Highway 50). This letter presents our understanding of the projects and our proposed work scope, schedule, and cost for completing the work. Scope of ork Three alternative work scopes are included for developing a LOMR for the Donnelly Faun development along South Creek. The first alternative (Alternative A) assumes that the South Creek portion of the VRWJPO XP - SWMM model will be used for preparation of the LOMR submittal. The second. alternative (Alternative B) assumes that the LOMR application will be prepared using the current effective Lake Marion Branch of South Creek HEC -2 model. The third alternative (Alternative C) assumes that the developer's engineer will prepare the LOMB application, and Barr will review the application before submitting to FEMA. Below is a detailed description of each work task for the three alternatives. Table 1. and Table 2 includes a summary of the work tasks and associated costs. Alternative A — )LOMR Using the XP -SW1V M Model ($37,500) The Donnelly Farm development includes several stormwater ponds located adjacent to the creek. The storage volume provided by these ponds will likely have an impact on peak runoff rates reaching the creek. Therefore, it is important to properly model the interaction between the stormwater ponds and flow in the creek to accurately determine peak water surface elevations along South Creek. One of the benefits of using XP- SWMM is that flow between the stormwater ponds and creek can be accurately characterized in the model. Below is a detailed description of each work task. Table 1 includes a summary of the work tasks and associated costs. Task 1 — Update XP -SWMM Hydrologic Model to FEMA Specifications for Hydraulic Models ($11,6130) As part of the LOMR submittal FEMA requires evaluation of the 0 2, 1, 2, and 10- percent flood events and floodway analysis. The XP -SWMM model will be revised as needed for this evaluation. Since the 0.2- percent event has not been evaluated with the XP -SWMM model, model revisions may include extending cross sections or incorporating overflows to contain the entire 0.2- percent floodplain. Barr E;- icin-eenng '-o. 4700 Vies= 77th S treet, Suite 200, Mirineapofis, WNA 551435 95 www.?Da r.��, Mr. Zach Johnson November 22, 2013 Page 2 Additionally, the recently updated XP -SWMM model is an unsteady flow model. This means that flow through the model varies with time, and that the model uses the entire cross section for conveyance and storage through the floodplain. Typically, this ineans that a small encroachment to the floodplain will result in an increase in water surface elevations, or in other words, the floodway maybe mapped with similar dimensions as the revised floodplain. Work items in this task include preparation of the four models required for a LOMR submittal: the duplicate effective model, the corrected effective model, the existing conditions model, and revised conditions model. Additional work items also included within this task are: ® Add additional cross sections along South Creek as required by FEMA Run the 0.2- percent event and revise cross sections, overflow, and storage areas as needed Analyze the 1, 2, and 10- pereent flood events per FEMA requirements Complete I - percent flood event floodway analysis Task 2 - Inter Agency Hydrologic Review Committee (IAHRC) Submittal ($2,000) Before FEMA reviews the hydraulics in the XP -SWMM. model, the new hydrology developed using XP -SWMM must be reviewed and approved by the IAHRC. Hydrology for the South Creek will be developed for the 1, 2, 10, and 0.2- percent flood events using the Atlas 14 precipitation depths and a nested precipitation distribution. The hydrologic data from Task 1 will be summarized into and a submittal will be prepared and sent to the IAHRC for review. The cost estimate for this task assumes that the IAHRC - WHI" approve the hydrology without modifications to: the data "subinitted. ° ==' Task 3 — Prepare maps to FEMA Specifications for Application ($3,4€60) Based on model results obtained during Task 1 floodplain delineations and annotated FIRMs will be prepared for the LOMR submittal. The cost estimate for this task assumes that the revised floodplain will tie -in to the effective FIRM at Dodd Boulevard and 202 Street W because the effective FIRM does not indicate that 202' Street overtops. Additional inundation mapping and analysis will be completed on a time and expense basis if the modeling indicates that 202 " Street or Dodd Boulevard cannot be used as a. suitable tie -in locations based on FEMA specifications. Work items within this task include: ® Prepare floodplain snaps for 1 FIRM panels * Prepare topographic working map for 1 FIRM panels ® Annotated .FIRM for 1 panels Task 4 — Prepare FEMA LOMB Submittal ($5,500) Based on model results obtained during Task 1 the FEMA MT -2 fonns will be completed, and supporting information developed for the LOMR submittal. Work items within this task include: • Complete MT -2 application forms • Prepare project narrative • Package hydrologic and hydraulic model files for FEMA review • Preparation of floodway data tables and flood profiles FEMA requires that nearby property owners are notified of adverse changes to the floodplain on their property. We assume that property owner notifications will not be necessary because the 1001 -year floodplain should remain within the channel, and not extend onto residential parcels. Should property PAMp1s123 MNI1 912 3 1 92 621ProiRiskMgmt \Donnellyl:atin Donnelly_LOMR.doox Mr. 2ach .Johnsen November 22, 2013 p0ae 3 owner notifications be required, Barr could assist with this task on a time and expense basis as directed by the City. Taste 5 — Meeting with City and Obtain City Concurrence ($1.100) The LOMR application form requires a signature of a local official to acknowledge they are aware of the application and that the LOMR request is consistent with their local floodplain ordinance. In this case the local official will be a City staff member. It is assumed that City concurrence will not need to go before the City Planning Commission or City council. This work task includes one meeting with City staff to go over the requirements and LOMR application. Task 6 — Subunit application to FEMA ($6,100) We will prepare copies of the FEMA application and supporting materials and submit the application to FEMA. Copies of the materials will also be provided to the City. The cost estimate for this task includes to $5,300 LOMR application fee to FEMA. Task 7 — FEMA follow -up ($4,000) FEMA. will have questions regarding the information submitted for review. We have included 40 hours of time to coordinate with FEMA and respond to FEMA's questions. Additional correspondence and coordination with FEMA during the review process will be completed on a time and expense basis. Task 8 — Project Meetings and Correspondence ($3,800) It is anticipated that we will need to attend coordination/planning meetings with the City of Lakeville during the project. We have assumed three meetings total. This work also includes providing regular updates on the project status and coordination with the City and others. Alternative B — LOMR Using the Effective HEC -2 Model ($40,900) Alternative B includes updating the effective HEC -2 model to a HEC -RAS model for the LOMR application. As part of this update, the City's HEC -1 hydrologic model would also need to be updated to characterize the impact of the stornawater ponds adjacent to the creek. The cost estimate for Alternative B assumes that the IAHRC will accept hydrology based on a HEC -1 model, and the existing model will not need to be converted to HEC -HMS. The following work scope has been developed assuming that the effective HEC -2 model will be converted to a HEC -RAS model and used for preparation of the LOMR submittal. A description of Task I is given below. The scope of services for Tasks 2 -8 are similar to the tasks listed in Alternative A. Rather than reiterate the task descriptions for Alternative B, Table I includes a summary of the work tasks and associated costs. Task 1 -- Determine Post - Development hydrology for the Donnelly Farm Development and Convert HEC -2 Hydraulic Model to a KEC -RAS that meets FEMA Specifications ($15,000) As part of the LOMR submittal FEMA requires evaluation of the 0.2, 1, 2, and 10- percent flood events and floodway analysis. The first step in evaluating the required design events is to determine the peak flow rates along the creek. The City's HEC -1 model will be updated to account for the stormwater ponds adjacent to the creels, and used to determine the appropriate flow rates to use in the HEC -RAS model. After determining the peak flow rates, the HEC -2 model will be converted to HEC - RAS and updated to reflect the grading that has occurred adjacent to the creek. Work items in this task include updating the hydrologic model, preparation of the four models required for a LOMB P:1Mpls'+?3 MN1 19',2 3 1 9 2 5211?rojRiskMgintlDonnellyFannlDonnelly _LOMR.docx Mr. Zach Johnson November 22, 2013 Paae 4 submittal: the duplicate effective model, the corrected effective model, the existing conditions model, and revised conditions model, a Update the hydrologic model Develop models required for FEMA submittal Complete 1- percent flood event floodway analysis Tasks 2 -8 ($25,900) The scope of services for tasks 2 -8 are similar to Alternative A. A summary of the work tasks and associated costs is also included in Table 1. Alternative C - Independent Review of LOMB Prepared by Developer's Engineer ($10,400) We understand that the developer may select to hire an engineer to complete a LOMR application for the Donnelly farm development. Therefore, the scope of services included in Alternative C includes a third party review of submittal materials prepared by the developer's engineer to verify that the LOMB submittal materials were prepared in conformance with FEMA specifications. Since the model approved by FEMA will ultimately be used to revise the FIRM within the City. The model should be developed following a methodology that is consistent with the C.ity!s WRMP and VRWTPO „guidelines so that after the LOMR has been approved by FEMA, the City will,.have a single ... .. .... . model to reference for future floodplain management decisions. Therefore we are also proposing to review the submittal from the developer's engineer for consistency with the VRWJPO standards. For each task, following our review we will provide a brief technical memorandum to the City summarizing our comments. We assume that there will be a single review for each task listed below, and any additional review caii be completed on a time and expense basis. Table 2 includes a summary of the work tasks and associated costs. Task I - Review Inter Agency Hydrologic Review Commitfree Submittal ($3,900) We will review the IAFIRC submittal prepared by the developer's engineer, including the hydrologic model used to calculate flows along the creek. Our review will be for consistency between the hydrologic and hydraulic models, and initial inundation maps of the floodplain. Task 3 - Review LOMR Submittal ($6;500) As part of the LOMB submittal FEMA requires hydraulic models to meet specific specifications. We will review the hydraulic model prepared by the developer's engineer for consistency with FEMA speeifications. We will also review the completed LOMR application form including all supporting documentation for completeness and confonriance with FEMA specifications. Schedule We anticipate that the LOMR application submittal can be prepared within 6 months following authorization to proceed and receipt of grading and storm sewer plans for the development. After the LOMR application has been submitted it will depend on how long FEMA takes reviewing the submittal package, before the FIRM is revised. We appreciate the opportunity to offer our services for this project and we look forward to working with you. If this proposal is acceptable we will work with you to determine the appropriate agreement for 1 1 AMI pis123 MN\19\231926211' roiitiskN4gintlDonnel ]yFannlDonnelly_LOMRAocx Mr. Tack -'chnson November 22, 2013 Page 5 performing this work. Please contact me at 952- 832 -2755 or Brandon Barnes at 952 - 832 -2737 if you need additional information or have questions. Sincerely, Scott Sobiech, PE CFM Brandon Barnes, PE Nice President Project Manager P :1Mpls123 MN1 1 912 3 1 92 6 21P rojRiskMpntl llonnellyFanii1D ennelly_LOMR.dorx Table 1, Donnelly Farm Development Work Tasks and Costs LOMB Submittal for Donnelly Farm Development City of LakeWle November, 2013 Work Task Alternative A Alternative B xP -SWMM HEC -RAS Task 1 - update Hydrologic and Hydraulic Model to FEMA Specifications $12,600 $15,000 1. Add stormwater ponds and outlet structures adjacent to creek. 2. Run 506 -year event & revise cross sections, overflows, and pond storage curves as needec 3. Complete floodway analysis, assuming the majority of floadway will equal foodplain. Task 2 - Inter Agency Hydrologic Review Committee Submittal $2,000 $2,000 1. Summarize hydrologic information far fANRC review 2. Prepare letter to IAHRC and submit.' model results Task 3 - Prepare maps to FEMA Specifications for Application (Topo Work Map and Annotated FIRM} $3,400 $3,400 1. Prepare foodplain maps for 1 ponei 2. Topographic working map far 1 ponei 3. Annotated FIRM for 3 panel A. Floodplain delineation of the 100- yearfloodplain and delineation of the 100- yearfloodway and 500 year fioodplain Task 4 - Prepare FEMA's MT -2 LOMB Farms (which include tasks listed below) $5,500 $5,500 ....... ....... 1:•Compfetezipplication forms .::.. ..., . .... .... .. 2. Narrative on project and submittal. Knowing the project and purpose of the request better ensures the needs of the requester are met. 3. Hydrologic Computations along with digitoi files of computer models used. 4. Hydraulic Computations oiong with digital files of computer models used. 5. Certified topographic map with floodplain and floodwoy delineations 6. Annotated DNS -FEMA FIRM and /orFBFM to reflect changes due to project (FIRMS and /ar FBFMs can be ordered on -line at http;/ /store. mscfemo. gov /). 7. Items required to satisfy any DNS -FEMA NFIPregulatory requirements. 8, Prepare floodwoy data tables 9. Prepare flood profiles for the 10 -, 50 -, 100- and 500- yearfood event! 10. Prepare property owner not f utions for the City to send to affected residence, Task 5 - Meeting with City and Obtain City Concurrence $1,100 $1,100 I. One meeting to review the submittal information and obtain concurrence before submitting materia ?s to FEMA and IAHRCforreview, Task 6 - Submit application to FEMA $6,100 $6,100 1. Submit hard copies of the application to FEMA and IAHRC i 2. Submit electronic copies of the application submittal to the City 2. Payment of $5,300 FEMA application fee Task 7 - FEMA Follow -up (coordinate with FEMA to address review questions and comments see assumptions below) $4 54 400 1. Assumes one round of model and map revisions, if necessary, to address FEMA review comments. Additional rounds of revisions, if necessary, fallowing FEMA's initial comments will be completed on a time and expense basin Task 8 - Communication with City and Project management $3,800 $3,800 1. Regular progress updates provided to city 2. Project team meetings and coordination $37,500 $40,900 Total = V4/ork scope ASsumptionS., We are not anticipating that any residential property or structures will be within the floadway, The estimated cost does not include evaluation of alternatives to remove residential parcels from the floodway. Additionai analyses or evaluation to alternatives to remove residential parcels from the f loodway can be completed on a time and expense basis- City staff will provide necessary survey data or as -biAts reclutred for FEMA submittals. Assumes a LOMB application will be submitted to FEMA. The above cost do not include preparing a CLOMR submittal Friar to the LOMB submittal. ' Table 2. Donnelly Farm Development Work Tasks and Costs LOMR Submittal Review for Donnelly Farm Development City of Lakeville November, 2013 Work Task Alternative C LOMR Review Task 1- Review Inter Agency Hydrologic Review Committee Submittal $3,900 1. Review hydrologic model prepared by developer 2. Review IAHRC submittal materials 3. Provide a brief (1 -2) page technical memorandum summarizing comments Task 2 - Review LOMR Submittal $6,5[10 1. Review duplicate effective hydraulic model 2. Review existing conditions model 3. Review project - conditions model 4. Review floodway analysis 5, Review LOMR application forms 6.- ,Revre.!v.tapographic,work..map and annotated FIRM for co....m.pliance „with FEMAstan.dards 7. Review property owner notification letters S. Review other items required to satisfy DHS -FEMA NFIP regulatory requirements (i.e. annotated flood 3 profiles, data tables, etc...) 9. Provide a brief (1 -2) page technical memorandum summarizing comments Total a $10,400 Work Scope Assumptions. Developer's ang ineer will preeare an electronic submittal of all files for review. - Assume that a single round of review will occur for each task. Additional review itterations can be completed upon request on a time and ex pens basis.