HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 072
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
C-1
RST-2
RS-4
RS-3 PUD
P/OS
RS-4
160TH ST W
D
O
D
D LN
D O D D B L V D
E
X
C
E
L
S
I
O
R
D
R
F A N N I N G C T
EXC
EL W A Y
P I L O
T K N O B R DELMC
R
E
E
K
L
A
N
E
F A L L B R O O K D R
±
EXHIBIT A
City of LakevilleLocation and Zoning MapDodd CrossingPreliminary PlatComp Plan Amend.RezoningVariance
Dodd Crossing
Prelim ina ry Plat
±
Dodd Crossing
160th St (CSAH 46)
Dodd Boulevard (CSAH 9)
P i l o t
K n o b
R o a d
(C S A H
3 1 )
D
o
d
d
L
a
n
e
Elm
C
r
e
e
k
L
a
n
e
D
o
d
d
L
a
n
e
E x c e l s i o r D r
E
x
c
e
l
W
a
y
City of LakevilleAerial MapDodd CrossingPreliminary Plat,Comp Plan Amend.,Rezoning, andVarianceEXHIBIT B
±
Dodd
Crossing
160th St (CSAH 46)
Dodd Boulevard (CSAH 9)
P i l o t
K n o b
R o a d
(C S A H
3 1 )
D
o
d
d
L
a
n
e
Elm
C
r
e
e
k
L
a
n
e
D
o
d
d
L
a
n
e
E x c e l s i o r D r
E
x
c
e
l
W
a
y
City of Lakeville2030 ProposedLand Use
Re-guide fromC to L/MDR
EXHI BI T C
Legend
Rural D ensity Residential
Low D ensity R esidential
Low /M edium Density R esidential
Medium Density Residential
Medium/High D ensity Residential
High Density Residential
Manufactured Housing
Office/R esidential Transition
Comm ercial
Office Park
War ehouse/Light Industrial
Airport
Industrial
Public and Quasi-Public
Parks
Restricted Development
Special Plan Area
Water
Prop osed change from Com mercial
to Low/Medium Density Residential
L/MDR
LDR
C C
P/QP
M/HDR P/QP
LDR
HDR
P
P
O/RT
LDR
±
Dodd
Crossing
160th St (CSAH 46)
Dodd Boulevard (CSAH 9)
P i l o t
K n o b
R o a d
(C S A H
3 1 )
D
o
d
d
L
a
n
e
Elm
C
r
e
e
k
L
a
n
e
D
o
d
d
L
a
n
e
E x c e l s i o r D r
E
x
c
e
l
W
a
y
Rezone from C-1 Comm ercial to
RST-2 Single and Two-Family Residential DistrictRST-2
RS-4
C-1 PUD
RS-3
RM-2 P/OS
RS-3
P/OS
P/OS
RS-3
City of LakevilleZoning Districts
Rezone fromC-1 to RST-2
EXHI BI T D
Legend
Zoning
Agricultural Preserve
A-P, AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT
RA, RURAL/AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Residential Districts
RS-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RS-2, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
!!!!!!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!RS-3, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RS-4, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RS-CBD, RESIDENTIAL SIN GLE FAMILY CENTRAL BUSIN ESS DISTRICT
RSMH, SINGLE FAMILY MANUFACTURED HOME PARK DISTRICT
RST-1, SINGLE AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RST-2, SINGLE AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RM-1, MEDIU M DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RM-2, MEDIU M DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RH-1, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
RH-2, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Com mercial D istricts
O-R, OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL TRANSITION DISTRIC T
C-1, NEIGHBORHO OD COMM ERCIAL DISTRICT
C-2, HIGHWAY CO MMERCIAL DISTRICT
C-3, GENERAL COM MERCIAL DISTRICT
C-CBD, COMMERC IAL CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
OP, OFFICE PARK DISTRICT
Industrial D istricts
I-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
I-2, GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
I-CBD, INDUSTRIAL CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
Special D istricts
PU D, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
P/OS, PUBLIC AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
C
.
SB1
930.18
SB2
927.95
SB3
933.11
SB4
937.75
SB5
956.05
SB6
968.91
SB7
954.44
SB8
959.29
SB9
939.42
SB10
935.76
SB11
934.28 SB 12
937.49
SB13
963.79
SB14
969.10
SB15
943.52
C
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00
5
+
0
0
6+
0
0
7+
0
0
8+00
9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
15
+
0
0
16
+
0
0
17
+
0
0
18
+
0
0
19
+
0
0
20
+
0
0
2
1
+
0
0
22+00
23+0
0
24+0
0
25+0
0
26+0
0
27+0
0
28+0
0
29+0
0
30+0
0
31+0
0
31+3
4
SB1
930.18
SB2
927.95
SB3
933.11
SB4
937.75
SB5
956.05
SB6
968.91
SB7
954.44
SB8
959.29
SB9
939.42
SB10
935.76
SB11
934.28 SB 12
937.49
SB13
963.79
SB14
969.10
SB15
943.52
C
SB1
930.18
SB2
927.95
SB3
933.11
SB4
937.75
SB5
956.05
SB6
968.91
SB7
954.44
SB8
959.29
SB9
939.42
SB10
935.76
SB11
934.28 SB 12
937.49
SB13
963.79
SB14
969.10
SB15
943.52
C
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00
5
+
0
0
6
+
0
0
7+
0
0
8+00
9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
15
+
0
0
16
+
0
0
17
+
0
0
18
+
0
0
19
+
0
0
20
+
0
0
2
1
+
0
0
22+00
23+0
0
24+0
0
25+0
0
26+0
0
27+0
0
28+0
0
29+0
0
30+0
0
31+0
0
31+3
4
$.8&&1&&
2
+
.
1
6
-
0
1
$
4
1
#
&
6*564''69'56
&
1
&
&
.
#
0
'
210&
4116$#..
64''2.#06+0)&'6#+.
/+0
0Q5ECNG
64''
70&+5674$'&':+56+0)51+.
6121($#..61$'Á
.#;'4911&%*+2/7.%*
94#264''61(+456.#6'4#.
/+0
2.#06+0)51+.$#%-(+..
5#7%'4
(+0+5*'&)4#&'
#$18'(+0+5*'&)4#&'
$4#0%*+0)
(#..10.;
'37#..;52#%'&&')#4170&
ÁZ56#-'5+0)4170&
ÁZ56#-'5+0)4170&
56#-+0)"%1064#%6145126+10
64''5.#4)'46*#0
+0.+0'96470-
64''561
%'06'464''+0*1.'
0Q5ECNG
5*47$2.#06+0)&'6#+.
#$18'(+0+5*'&)4#&'
(+0+5*'&)4#&'
5#7%'4
2.#06+0)51+.$#%-(+..
.#;'4911&%*+2/7.%*
6121($#..61$'Á
70&+5674$'&':+56+0)51+.
/+0
4116$#..
/+0
OCVGTKCNUKHPGEGUUCT[ VGORQTCT[QPN[
2TWPGRNCPVUCUPGEGUUCT[ÁRGTUVCPFCTFPWTUGT[RTCEVKEG
7UGOKPKOWONQCORNCPVKPIUQKNQPVTGGU
DTGCMCRCTVRGCVRQVU
2.#06+0)016'5
#NNRNCPVUVQDGPQTVJGTPÁITQYPCPFJCTF[
EQOOGPEKPIWRQPRNCPVKPI
VJGVTWPMQTUVGOQHCNNVTGGUCPFUJTWDU6TGPEJGFIKPIUJCNNDGWUGFCTQWPFCNNOWNEJGFCTGCU
5JTGFFGFJCTFYQQFOWNEJ
ÁFGGR UJCNNDGUJCNNDGRNCEGFCTQWPFCNNPGYVTGGU
2NCPVUUJCNNDGKOOGFKCVGN[RNCPVGFWRQPCTTKXCNCVUKVG2TQRGTN[JGGNÁKP
1YPGTUJCNNDGTGURQPUKDNGHQTOCKPVGPCPEGCHVGTCEEGRVCPEGQHVJGYQTMD[VJG1YPGT
%QPVTCEVQTUJCNNXGTKH[NQECVKQPUYKVJCNNWVKNKNKGURTKQTVQKPUVCNNCVKQPQHRNCPVU
5VCMKPIQHVTGGUQRVKQPCN TGRQUKVKQPKHPQVRNWODCHVGTQPG[GCT
9TCRCNNUOQQVJÁDCTMGFVTGGUÁHCUVGPVQRCPFDQVVQO4GOQXGD[#RTKN
1RGPVQRQHDWTNCRQP$$OCVGTKCNU TGOQXGRQVQPRQVVGFRNCPVU URNKVCPF
%QPVTCEVQTUJCNNRTQXKFGQPG[GCTIWCTCPVGGQHCNNRNCPVOCVGTKCNU6JGIWCTCPVGG
DGIKPUQPVJGFCVGQHVJG.CPFUECRG#TEJKVGEVUYTKVVGPCEEGRVCPEGQHVJGKPKVKCN
2NCPVUVQDGKPUVCNNGFCURGTUVCPFCTF##0RNCPVKPIRTCEVKEGU
RNCPVKPI4GRNCEGOGPVRNCPVOCVGTKCNUUJCNNCNUQJCXGCQPG[GCTIWCTCPVGG
CPFUJTWDENWUVGTU&KCOGVGTQHOWNEJGFCTGCUUJTWDUUJCNNDGCOKPKOWOQHHTQO
$ $
5+<'4116
$ $2KPWUPKITC
2KEGCINCWECFGPUCVC$*5
#2
2.#06.+56
-'; 36;
#WUVTKCP2KPG
$NCEM*KNNU5RTWEG
$16#0+%#.0#/'%1//100#/'
$ $#EGTRNCVCPQKFGU 0/0QTYC[/CRNG
$ $#DKGUEQPEQNQT9( 9JKVG(KT
$ $$GVWNCPKITC 4$4KXGT$KTEJ
$ $/CNWU5PQYFTKHV 5%5PQYFTKHV%TCD
5;/
$ $2KPWUPKITC #2 #WUVTKCP2KPG
$ $2KEGCINCWECFGPUCVC$*5 $NCEM*KNNU5RTWEG
$ $#DKGUEQPEQNQT9( 9JKVG(KT
ICNEQPV,WPKRGTWUEJKPGPUKU/CPG[K /,/CPG[,WPKRGT
SB1
930.18
SB2
927.95
SB3
933.11
SB4
937.75
SB5
956.05
SB6
968.91
SB7
954.44
SB8
959.29
SB9
939.42
SB10
935.76
SB11
934.28 SB 12
937.49
SB13
963.79
SB14
969.10
SB15
943.52
C
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00
5
+
0
0
6+
0
0
7+
0
0
8+00
9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
15
+
0
0
16
+
0
0
17
+
0
0
18
+
0
0
19
+
0
0
20
+
0
0
2
1
+
0
0
22+00
23+0
0
24+0
0
25+0
0
26+0
0
27+0
0
28+0
0
29+0
0
30+0
0
31+0
0
31+3
4
SB6
968.91
SB7
954.44
SB8
959.29
SB9
939.42
SB10
935.76
SB13
963.79
SB14
969.10
SB15
943.52
C
17
+
0
0
18
+
0
0
19
+
0
0
20
+
0
0
2
1
+
0
0
22+00
23+0
0
24+0
0
25+0
0
26+0
0
27+0
0
28+0
0
29+0
0
SB1
930.18
SB2
927.95
SB3
933.11
SB4
937.75
SB5
956.05
SB9
939.42
SB10
935.76
SB11
934.28 SB 12
937.49
SB13
963.79
SB15
943.52
3+00
4+00
5
+
0
0
6
+
0
0
7+
0
0
8+00
9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
15
+
0
0
16
+
0
0
17
+
0
0
18
+
0
0
19
+
0
0
26+0
0
27+0
0
28+0
0
29+0
0
30+0
0
31+0
0
31+3
4
SB1
930.18
SB2
927.95
SB10
935.76
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00
5+
0
0
6
+
0
0
7+
0
0
8+00
9+00
29+0
0
30+0
0
31+0
0
31+3
4
SB1
930.18
SB2
927.95
SB3
933.11
SB4
937.75
SB5
956.05
SB6
968.91
SB7
954.44
SB8
959.29
SB9
939.42
SB10
935.76
SB11
934.28 SB 12
937.49
SB13
963.79
SB14
969.10
SB15
943.52
C
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00
5
+
0
0
6
+
0
0
7+
0
0
8+00
9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
15
+
0
0
16
+
0
0
17
+
0
0
18
+
0
0
19
+
0
0
20
+
0
0
2
1
+
0
0
22+00
23+0
0
24+0
0
25+0
0
26+0
0
27+0
0
28+0
0
29+0
0
30+0
0
31+0
0
31+3
4
Dakota County Surveyor’s Office
Western Service Center 14955 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124
952.891 -7087 Fax 952.891 -7127 www.co.dakota.mn.us
April 28, 2014
City of Lakeville
20195 Holyoke Avenue
Lakeville, MN 55044
Re: DODD CROSSING
The Dakota County Plat Commission met on April 21, 2014, to consider the preliminary plan of the above
referenced plat. The plat is adjacent to CSAH 31 / 46 / 9, and is therefore subject to the Dakota County
Contiguous Plat Ordinance.
This site includes a proposed residential development and is bounded by CSAH 9, CSAH 31, CSAH 46 and
Dodd Lane (a city street). Access to the site is via Dodd Lane with an emergency access location built along
CSAH 9. The CSAH 9 access would be opened at some point in the future. The Plat Commission noted that in
the future the CSAH 9 access to the proposed site would need to be a right turns only access if the
intersection at CSAH 9/CSAH 31 is a full access.
The Plat Commission discussed the potential land exchange between the County and developer for this
proposed site. The exchange would benefit the County that would include right-of-way needs for the future
interchange (reserve area), which was determined through the Pilot Knob Transportation Study. The
exchange would benefit the developer/owner since the ponding for the site could be moved to the County’s
parcel. In addition, if the right-of-way needs were met for the interchange, severance damages could be
avoided in the future, and the site would include additional buffer area between the residential development
and existing/future county roads. Also, a quit claim deed should be executed from the County to the City for
Parcels 9, 10, and 14, Dakota County Road Right of Way Map No. 177. Parcels 9 and 10 are in the existing
right of way for the Dodd Lane (a city street) and a portion of Parcel 14 would be a new city street to access
this proposed development. The County Engineer has agreed to the land exchange. The County will be
working with the County Assessors to determine if the land exchange meets MS 373.01 subd. 1. The County
Board would need to make formal approval for the land exchanged and authorization of the quit claim deeds.
The plan is to have this item go the County Board Physical Development Committee on June 10th and County
Board meeting on June 17th for approval.
Restricted access should be shown along all of CSAH 9, CSAH 46 and CSAH 31 except for the one approved
opening along CSAH 9 for Elm Creek Lane.
The Plat Commission has approved the preliminary plat provided that the described conditions are met. The
Ordinance requires submittal of a final plat for review by the Plat Commission before a recommendation is
made to the County Board of Commissioners.
Traffic volumes on CSAH 31 are 16,500 ADT; 22,500 ADT on CSAH 46; and 4,400 ADT on CSAH 9. The
anticipated ADT for CSAH 31 by the year 2030 are 36,900 ADT; 36,300 ADT for CSAH 46; and 13,000 ADT for
CSAH 9. These traffic volumes indicate that current Minnesota noise standards for residential units could be
exceeded for the proposed plat. Residential developments along County highways commonly result in noise
complaints. In order for noise levels from the highway to meet acceptable levels for adjacent residential
units, substantial building setbacks, buffer areas, and other noise mitigation elements should be incorporated
into this development.
No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from the County
Transportation Department and no permit will be issued until the plat has been filed with the County
Recorder’s Office. The Plat Commission does not review or approve the actual engineering design of
proposed accesses or other improvements to be made in the right of way. The Plat Commission highly
recommends early contact with the Transportation Department to discuss the permitting process which
reviews the design and may require construction of highway improvements, including, but not limited to,
turn lanes, drainage features, limitations on intersecting street widths, medians, etc. Please contact Gordon
McConnell regarding permitting questions at (952) 891-7115 or Todd Tollefson regarding Plat Commission or
Plat Ordinance questions at (952) 891-7070.
Sincerely,
Todd B. Tollefson
Secretary, Plat Commission
c:
±
Dodd Crossing
160th St (CSAH 46)
Dodd Boulevard (CSAH 9)
P i l o t
K n o b
R o a d
(C S A H
3 1 )
D
o
d
d
L
a
n
e
Elm
C
r
e
e
k
L
a
n
e
D
o
d
d
L
a
n
e
E x c e l s i o r D r
E
x
c
e
l
W
a
y
City of LakevilleAerial Map
Location of pipedTributary #1 ofNorth Creek
EXHIBIT O
1
Jenson, Kris
From:Skancke, Jennie (DNR) <Jennie.Skancke@state.mn.us>
Sent:Tuesday, May 13, 2014 9:46 AM
To:Jenson, Kris
Subject:RE: Public Hearing Notice - Dodd Crossing - Shoreland Variance
Kris,
I’m sorry I’m not going to be able to provide you with much of a review or comment on this as I’m having to prioritize
my work load. My initial review indicates that DNR is not opposed to the minor variances proposed here for lot
dimension standards, nor minor variances to the impervious surface.
Additionally, I had an initial discussion with the City of Apple Valley yesterday regarding the sections of “North Creek”
that are on the DNR public waters inventory and run through Apple Valley and Lakeville. It doesn’t look like we will be
meeting tomorrow to discuss, but the conversation will be continued at a later date and I will let you know if I think the
City of Lakeville would benefit from being involved.
Thank you,
Jennie
Jennie Skancke - South Metro Area Hydrologist
MnDNR | 1200 Warner Road | St. Paul, MN 55106 | T: 651-259-5790 | Jennie.Skancke@state.mn.us
From: Jenson, Kris [ mailto:kjenson@lakevillemn.gov ]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 12:19 PM
To: Skancke, Jennie (DNR)
Subject: Public Hearing Notice - Dodd Crossing - Shoreland Variance
Jennie,
We spoke a few weeks ago about a development proposal located in nort heast Lakeville at the intersections of CSAH 46,
CSAH 31, and CSAH 9. The proposed development’s name is Dodd Crossing. I have attached the public hearing notice,
the site location map, and a copy of the most recent set of plans.
The Shoreland Overlay District is for Tributary No. 1 to North Creek, which has been piped underground through this
location since 1996. This parcel is the last developable parcel along the segment of piped tributary.
We spoke about the applicant’s request for a variance from the SOD for lot width of sewered single-family home lots.
The SOD requires a minimum lot width of 75 feet whereas Lakeville’s RST-2 district allows interior lot widths at 70 feet.
There are 15 lots that fall all or partially within the SOD and an additional three lots in which the SOD crosses a very
small corner of the property. Of the 15 lots, 10 require a variance from the SOD to be developed as proposed. As I noted
previously, twin homes are also allowed within this zoning district and the SOD would only require a minimum of 115
feet of width.
The engineer estimated the amount of impervious surface area at 27%; however I realized his calculations are for the
entire development and not just the area within the SOD. I have asked him to provide the total area within the SOD. The
public hearing notice includes a variance for this item; if the calculations come through that shows the development
does not exceed the 25% maximum then we will notify the Planning Commission of the change. I will notify you of the
new impervious surface calculations as soon as I receive them. The RST-2 District also has a 25 foot setback to the
garage rather than a 30 foot setback to the garage that twin homes would have, so that helps to reduce the amount of
impervious
2
The Planning Commission meeting is on 22 May and my staff report will be distributed to the Planning Commission late
next week. I would like to receive your input about the lot width variance and the impervious surface variance (if
needed) to include with the staff report. If that time frame will not work for you, then I will provide a verbal update at
the Planning Commission meeting and share your thoughts on the variance at that time.
I would also like to discuss with you the process to remove this area from the Shoreland Overlay District and what the
City needs to do to pursue this possibility. Please advise me as to the process.
If you have questions regarding the plat or any of this information, please let me know. Thank you for your input about
this request.
Kris
Kris Jenson, Associate Planner
City of Lakeville | 20195 Holyoke Avenue | Lakeville, MN 55044
Office: 952-985-4424 | | www.lakevillemn.gov |
Lakeville, Minnesota—Positioned to Thrive
The information contained in this transmission including any attached documentation may be privileged and confidential. It is intended only for the use
of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the City of Lakeville
immediately by replying to this email.
DODD CROSSING PRELIMINARY PLAT
M AY 15, 2014
PAGE 2
DODD CROSSING PRELIMINARY PLAT
M AY 15, 2014
PAGE 3
DODD CROSSING PRELIMINARY PLAT
M AY 15, 2014
PAGE 4
DODD CROSSING PRELIMINARY PLAT
M AY 15, 2014
PAGE 5
DODD CROSSING PRELIMINARY PLAT
M AY 15, 2014
PAGE 6
DODD CROSSING PRELIMINARY PLAT
M AY 15, 2014
PAGE 7
DODD CROSSING PRELIMINARY PLAT
M AY 15, 2014
PAGE 8
DODD CROSSING PRELIMINARY PLAT
M AY 15, 2014
PAGE 9
DODD CROSSING PRELIMINARY PLAT
M AY 15, 2014
PAGE 10
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
DODD CROSSING VARIANCE
On May 22, 2014, the Lakeville Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to
consider the application of Manley Development, Inc. for a variance to the lot width and
impervious surface coverage for those lots within the Shoreland Overlay District within the Dodd
Crossing preliminary plat. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the
proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The applicant was present and the
Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is zoned RST-2, Single and Two-Family Residential District.
2. The property is located in Planning District No. 11 and is classified as Low/Medium
Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The lots within the Dodd Crossing preliminary plat are:
Lots 1-9, Block 1
Lots 1 and 30, Block 2
Lots 1, 2, 27, and 28, Block 3
4. Section 11-6-5 of the City of Lakeville Zoning Ordinance provides that a variance shall
not be approved unless failure to grant the variance will result in practical difficulties. The
criteria and our findings regarding them are:
a) That the variance would be consistent with the comprehensive plan.
The proposed lot width and impervious surface coverage will be consistent with the
City’s Comprehensive Plan which guides the Dodd Crossing neighborhood for
low/medium density residential uses.
b) That the variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and
intent of this Title.
The proposed lot width and impervious surface coverage is consistent with the other
lots within the development. Lots to the northwest within the Dodd Point 2nd and 3rd
Addition are developed with similar requirements as the proposed plat area.
2
c) That the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the
property not created by the landowner.
Having a portion of the property within the Shoreland Overlay District despite the
fact that the tributary creek has been piped below ground for over 15 years is a
situation of the property and was not created by the landowner or developer.
d) That the purpose of the variance is not exclusively economic
considerations.
The proposed lot widths and impervious surface coverage are to keep the proposed
lots consistent with those lots in the remainder of the Dodd Crossing plat and the
Dodd Pointe neighborhood to the northwest.
e) That the granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of
the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is located.
The proposed lots will be in keeping with the character of the remaining Dodd
Crossing neighborhood.
f) That the requested variance is the minimum action required to eliminate
the practical difficulty.
The proposed lot layout has been designed to minimize the amount of the variance
requested and still meet the intent of the ordinance and be consistent with other lots
within the plat.
g) Variances may not be approved for any use that is not allowed under this
section for property in the zone where the affected person’s land is
located.
Single-family homes are a permitted use in the RST-2, Single and Two-Family
Residential District.
5. The planning report dated May 15, 2014 and prepared by Associate Planner Kris Jenson
is incorporated herein.