HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 06.iDate: 15 July 2014 Item No.
RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE WSB & ASSOCIATES TO PREPARE A FEASIBILITY
REPORT FOR THE 2015 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
Proposed Action
Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a resolution
authorizing WSB & Associates to prepare an engineering feasibility report for the 2015 Street
Reconstruction Project, City Improvement Project 15-02.
Overview
The City's Pavement Management Program rates pavement condition as a guide to long-term
infrastructure management and includes the street reconstruction plan as part of its Capital
Improvement Plan. The streets planned for reconstruction in 2015 show significant surface
distresses and failures in the asphalt; there is a significant water main break history along
165' Street, 166th Street, 168th Street, 169th Street, and throughout the Foxborough
development. The estimated project cost is $11,360,000.
Staff conducted a neighborhood meeting for the project on Thursday, June 26, 2014.
Approximately 100 property owners attended this first meeting.
Proposed project financing is through bonds issued under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
for local improvements. A portion of the total project cost will be assessed to the property
owners abutting the identified streets. The engineering feasibility report is required under
Chapter 429 prior to adopting a resolution ordering the improvement.
Primary Issues to Consider
• Could some property owners oppose the proposed assessments for the street
reconstruction project, and question the need for the proposed improvements? Yes, and
City Staff has worked to address all questions and concerns from residents regarding the
timing of and the need for the project.
Supporting Information
• Attached are minutes from the June 26, 2014 Neighborhood Meeting, a summary of the
comment cards received and a Project Location Map.
risto J. Petree
Public Works Director
Financial Impact: $11,360,000 Budgeted: Yes Source: 429 Bonds & Water Op.
Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Capital Improvement Plan
Notes: A portion of the cost is planned to be assessed to the property owners.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
RESOLUTION NO:
RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE WSB & ASSOCIATES TO PREPARE A
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE 2015 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the pavement within portions of of Carroll 1St Addition, Cedar Glen,
Cedar Glen 2nd Addition, Cedar Glen 3rd Addition, Cedar Glen 41 Addition, Chapel Hills,
Chapel Hills 2nd Addition, Chapel Hills 3rd Addition, Foxborough, Foxborough 2nd
Addition, Foxborough 3rd Addition, Goodview Estates, Highview Heights, Highview
Heights 2nd Addition, Highview Heights 3rd Addition, Highview Heights 41 Addition,
Highview Heights 5th Addition, Highview Heights 6th Addition, Highview Heights 7"
Addition and Highview Heights 8th Addition has reached the end of its lifespan and is
programmed to be reconstructed in the City's 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville wishes to finance a portion of the project
through special assessments; and
WHEREAS, a feasibility report is required under MN Stat. Chapter 429 for this
local improvement;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Lakeville, that WSB & Associates is hereby authorized to prepare an engineering
feasibility report for the 2015 Street Reconstruction Project, City Improvement Project
15-02.
ADOPTED this 211 day of July 2014, by the City Council of the City of Lakeville.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
Matt Little, Mayor
ATTEST:
Charlene Friedges, City Clerk
WSB rI� SB
.c ,,,,,1.,hu, engineering- planning environmental • construction
Memorandum
To: Chris Petree, Public Works Director
Troy Grossman, Streets Superintendent
Zach Johnson, City Engineer
From: Monica Heil, Project Manager
Krista Anderson, Project Engineer
Date: June 30, 2014
Re: City Project No. I5-02
WSB Project No. 2109-49
701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Tel: 763-541-4800
Fax: 763-541-1700
A Neighborhood Meeting was held on Thursday, June 26, 2014 to discuss the proposed 2015
Street Reconstruction Project, City Project #15-02. Approximately 100 residents attended the
meeting held in the Lakeville City Hall Council Chambers to discuss the proposed
improvements. The following Staff and WSB & Associates, Inc. representatives were in
attendance:
• Chris Petree, City of Lakeville, Public Works Director
• Troy Grossman, City of Lakeville, Streets Superintendent
• Matt Barnard, City of Lakeville, Engineering Technician
• Monica Heil, WSB & Associates, Inc.
• Krista Anderson, WSB & Associates, Inc.
The following is a summary from the Question and Answer portion of the presentation:
Question #1 (Q1): Are homes on streets that are only receiving street and storm sewer
reconstruction, and not watermain improvements, assessed differently?
Answer #1 (Al): Watermain improvements are funding using Water Operating Funds, not by
special assessments. Properties are assessed on a per single family unit basis
for the street and storm sewer improvements, only.
Q2: If I share my mailbox post with two other neighbors (three mailboxes on one post), how
will the mailbox be replaced? Does each home receive a mailbox?
A2: If the post is salvageable, the same post with three boxes will be reinstalled.
If a mailbox isn't salvageable, or the post is deteriorated beyond the point of salvaging,
the City will replace with a standard mailbox and/or mailbox post to each property
St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul
Equal Opportunity Employer
wsbeng.com
K:\02109-490\Admin\Meeting,Neighborhood Meeting\6 26 14 Neighborhood Meeting Minutes.doex
City of Lakeville 2015 Street Reconstruction Project Meeting Minutes
June 26, 2014
Page 2
affected. If the property owner decides to purchase a different mailbox while construction
is underway adjacent to their property, the City will work with the property owner to
install this new mailbox in conjunction with the project,
Temporary mailboxes will be established for the project area to ensure delivery during
construction. The temporary mailbox locations will be established by the post office.
Q3: What if I have an irrigation system? How will that be impacted by the proposed
construction?
A3: The contractor is responsible for protecting; or replacing to their original condition if
damaged, most items such as small retaining walls, landscape features, or irrigation
systems found in the homeowner's yard. For underground items such as invisible dog
fences and irrigation lines, all homeowners are asked to make an effort to mark them so
that the contractor can work around them and protect them as much as possible from
damage.
Q4: What if I have better quality irrigation system features such as upgraded sprinkler heads,
how will the City or contractor replace those? Will I get the same quality of materials?
A4: Yes, damaged materials or fixtures will be replaced in-kind provided they are still
available.
Q5: With construction occurring, how much of my driveway can I expect to be taken out?
A5: Typically, only the first 3 -to -5 feet of a driveway are disturbed with the curb and gutter
improvements. However, if more extensive improvements are needed to correct
grading/drainage issues, or to install additional storm sewer improvements, the maximum
distance that would be to the City's right-of-way limits.
Q6: What about trees? How will I know if one of my trees will be taken out?
A6: All trees within the City's right-of-way will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to
determine if their proximity to the street will necessitate the removal of the tree in
conjunction with the street improvements. The factors that necessitate the removal of any
given tree within a street reconstruction project area are varied: The location of the curb
removal in relation to the tree; if the tree is currently causing damage to the street or curb
(i.e. heaving); if the tree species has potential to cause damage to the roadway in the
future (i.e. silver maples); or if there is a conflict with a utility. Additional information
regarding tree removal will be made available to residents at a second neighborhood
meeting for the project, to be held in the spring of 2015, prior to commencing
construction.
Q7: What about street lights? They are really close to the street, will they be removed?
A7: Street lights within the project area are owned and operated by Dakota Electric. DEA will
evaluate street lights and all other private utilities and determine if there is a need for
relocation or replacement ahead of the street reconstruction activities.
K:102109490VWininMw&g\Neigliborhood Meetingl6 2614 Neighborhood Meeting Minwes.docs
City of Lakeville 2015 Street Reconstruction Project Meeting Minutes
June 26, 2014
Page 3
Q8: How are special assessments calculated?
A8: This project is proposed to be funded by the City's Street Capital Improvement Funds
and Special Assessments to benefiting properties. The City's assessment policy is to
assess 40% of the street and storm sewer improvements to the benefiting property
owners. Assessments are calculated on a per unit basis, and are estimated at this time to
be: $5,150 - $5,650 per single family residential unit and $2,575 - $2,825 per townhome
unit.
The assessment period for street reconstruction projects is 20 -years. Property owners will
be given the option to pay their assessment prior to December 31, 2015, either partially or
in -full, to avoid interest charges.
Special assessment deferments are available in some situations. Please refer to the City's
website for additional information regarding special assessment deferrals.
Q9: Why are Hearthside Way and Hearthside Court included in the proposed street
reconstruction when this is a newer (1994 — 1997) development?
A9: Streets within the 2015 Street Reconstruction Project Area are identified within the City's
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for reconstruction. The roadways included within this
project were selected as part of the City's Pavement Management Program. This program
is used by the City to manage and extend the pavement life of our streets and select
improvement projects in a cost-effective and efficient manner.
Hearthside Way and Hearthside Court are being re-evaluated by City Staff, and will
likely be removed from the scope of the 2015 Street Reconstruction Project.
Q10: Is Gunflint Trail also being removed as it way part of the same development? It doesn't
have any pavement patches or anything that would show it needs to be replaced.
A10: This area is also under re-evaluation by City Staff. The City will send follow-up letters
to residents along Hearthside Way and Gunflint Trail if those streets are removed from
the scope of the 2015 Street Reconstruction Project.
Q11: If streets are designed to last 40 -years, why are we replacing streets that are not yet 40 -
years old?
Al l: Design standards have evolved over the years, and current design and maintenance
practices allow for 40 -year pavement life cycles. The design standards from 30+ years
ago did not facilitate 40 -year lifecycle roadways. Additionally, soils in the area have
been known to prematurely deteriorate the condition of the roadways.
Q12: I thought the City was chip sealing/crack sealing this area, specifically Griffon Trail, to
prevent this from occurring? Was poor material or construction methods used that caused
this to be happening?
Al2: The work along Griffon Trail was a surface patch, and only intended as a temporary
repair to mitigate some of the severe pavement distresses that were occurring until such
time as the roadway could be completely reconstructed.
K:\02109-490�Adirdn4Meeting\Neighborhood Meeting\6 26 14 Neighborhood Meeting Minutes.doex
City of Lakeville 2015 Street Reconstruction Project Meeting Minutes
June 26, 2014
Page 4
Q13: When can I expect work outside my home?
A13: The project schedule will be better -defined once a contractor is selected for the project, in
late spring, 2015. Another neighborhood meeting will be held prior to starting
construction to address more specific questions regarding schedules, construction access
and general construction concerns. Residents will be mailed the construction
representative contact information, as well as a project phasing map, prior to starting
construction. Residents can also sign up for the City's e-mail listsery to receive updates
about the project.
Q14: My asphalt driveway needs to be replaced, what do you recommend?
A14: Wait until next year to replace your driveway if at all possible to avoid having a seam
between existing asphalt and new asphalt that will be installed with the street
reconstruction.
Driveways are replaced in-kind. With concrete driveways, the City's practice has been to
remove and replace the driveway to the first joint and to replace the driveway to match its
current width.
Q15: Can I contract with the City to have my driveway replaced at the time of construction?
A15: No, the City cannot add the replacement of individual property owner's driveways into
the City's contract for the Street Reconstruction Project. Homeowners are welcome to
discuss this with the contractor for a separate contract, but in past experience, it is rare for
a contractor to provide quotes to private property owners for driveway replacement work
beyond the limits of the street reconstruction project.
Q16: Will there be interruptions to water service if I am located on a street with watermain
reconstruction?
A16: There will be brief disruptions when the contractor connects and disconnects residents to
the temporary water supply system that will provide water while the permanent water
main system is replaced.
Q17: I'm concerned with the proposed traffic calming measures along the section of Griffon
Trail; why doesn't the City try to slow traffic prior to installing the traffic calming
measures?
A17: Enforcement alone has not been able to deter all speeding vehicles along Griffon Trail.
As such, the City will look alter the physical characteristics of Griffon Trail to further
reduce speeds. The City plans to investigate traffic calming options such as bumpouts
and driver feedback signs with the feasibility report for the project, but would also like
feedback from residents along Griffon Trail about some of the proposed solutions.
It has been shown that driver feedback signs account for approximately 4-5 mile -per -
hour average speed reductions when used for traffic calming.
K:102109-490Wdmin�Meeting�Neighborhood Mee ing\6 26 14 Neighborbood Meering Minules.docx
City of Lakeville 2015 Street Reconstruction Project Meeting Minutes
June 26, 2014
Page 5
Q18: I'm concerned with vehicular speeds along Godson Drive; could you install speed
bumps?
A18: The City has a policy against speed bumps on public streets. Please contact the Traffic
Safety Unit of the Police Department regarding your speed concerns and fill out a
comment card to look at possible traffic calming measures.
Q19: I'm concerned about getting the value out of my investment on the assessment due to the
traffic loads and weights along Griffon Trail. A lot of the time, traffic is so heavy that I
cannot get out of my driveway. How do you plan on limiting truck weights and volumes
of heavy traffic along this road to make sure it lasts the 40 years it is designed for?
A19: Griffon Trail is designated as a minor collector in the City's Comprehensive
Transportation Plan, and is intended to keep heavy vehicles off local streets. Public
streets are designed for public use.
The City will look into additional traffic calming and safety improvements as part of the
feasibility and final design of this project.
Q20: Can the City impose speed restrictions on Grove Trail?
A20: Speed limits for local residential roadways in Minnesota are set by State Statute, which
limits speed to 30 mph on streets in urban districts.
Q21: I live on Godson Drive and have major drainage problems; is draintile planned for this
street?
A21: Yes, draintile is planned for your street.
Q22: What are the most common issues or complaints on street reconstruction projects?
A22: The most common issued are individual property concerns. For example, tree removals,
turf establishment, and driveway installations.
Q23: I'm wondering how much of my tax dollars are being put towards this project?
A23: 40% of the project costs are funded by special assessments to the benefitting property
owner. The remaining 60% is funded by taxes for street improvement projects.
Q24: How long is it going to take to complete the portion of the project adjacent to my home?
A24: It is anticipated to take approximately 3 — 4+ weeks in areas where no watermain is being
replaced and 6 — 8+ weeks where watermain will be replaced.
Residents will have access to their driveways for the majority of the construction project.
However, when the concrete curb and gutter is being replaced in front of your driveway,
the City requires a 5 -day minimum curing time with no disturbance to the concrete during
this time. There also may be short periods during the day where a resident may not have
access to his/her driveway due to roadway construction. Property owners will be
provided as much advance notification as possible when access to driveways will be
restricted.
K:\02109-490\dmizi vMeeting�Neighborhood MeelingN6 26 14 Neighborhood Meeting Minut-d—
City of Lakeville 2015 Street Reconstruction Project Meeting Minutes
June 26, 2014
Page 6
Q25: If one of my trees is removed, will it be replaced?
A25: It is City policy that if a tree is within City right-of-way, and not impacted due to
watermain replacement, it will not be replaced. If a tree is removed due to watermain
replacement, it will be replaced. There are 4 different varieties of replacement trees to
choose from.
Q26: I have a curb stop for my water service that is located in my driveway pavement and it
sticks up. I've tried lowering it and it won't budge. Can the City move my service to my
yard or lower the curb stop so my snow blower doesn't hit it in the winter?
A26: If you are not in the watermain replacement areas, the curb stop will not be relocated.
However, there are castings (covers) available that can be placed over the top of the curb
stop to better integrate the curb stop with your driveway surface.
Q27: How is the City determining what portions of the watermain to replace?
A27: All watermain within the project will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to determine if
it will necessitate the removal and replacement. The factors that necessitate the removal
and replacement within the project area are varied: Break history; leak detection; soil
borings showing corrosive soils; and watermain material. Some watermain areas may be
removed or added to the areas currently proposed upon additional testing.
Q28: I live on 168th Court West and my sump pump runs all year long; are drainage problems
being addressed on my street?
A28: Yes, draintile is being proposed along both sides of your street. Each home will be
provided with one connection at their desired location.
Q29: I have a brick paver driveway and am wondering how the City proposes to salvage and
restore the driveway that is damaged due to construction.
A29: The contractor will attempt to salvage and reinstall all pavers.
The stone paver driveway will be restored by a competent landscaping contractor to the
owner's satisfaction.
Q30: Is there the potential to add sidewalk in or to Foxborough Park?
A30: There are no current plans to add sidewalk as part of this project, however, the City
welcomes your input from residents regarding additional sidewalk requests. If neighbors
can agree on the placement of a new sidewalk, the City will review the request to
determine if it is feasible to add the additional sidewalk to the scope of the project.
Q31: How would the costs associated with the aforementioned sidewalk be distributed?
A31: Costs associated with the addition of any potential sidewalk additions would go toward
the overall project costs, not just to those property owner directly affected by sidewalk.
K:\0'109-490\ dmin\Meeting\Neighborhood Meeting\6 26 14 Neighborhood Meeting Minutes.doex
City of Lakeville 2015 Street Reconstruction Project Meeting Minutes
June 26, 2014
Page 7
Q32: As I understand it, we cannot park in our driveways for 5 -days following concrete curb
and gutter installation; what about on -street parking restrictions?
A32: Parking restrictions go into effect November 1St, and it is the City's plan for all street
reconstruction activities to be complete by November. However, if the construction
season did carry into November, the City would waive any parking restrictions for those
that would be affected.
Q33: The intersection of Cedar Avenue and Griffon Trail in the winter and spring is always
iced over (both sides of the intersection) and this is very dangerous.
A33: The City wants to be aware of any drainage problems like this (that lead to seasonal
icing), so please either fill out a comment card with your concerns or mark them on the
map provided at the rear of the room so drainage issues may potentially be addressed.
Q34: I live on Grove Trail and believe the beginning of the street's deterioration is directly
linked to all the construction vehicles passing through. If these vehicles are going to
continue to travel down my road, how can you ensure me that I will get my money's
worth for this street reconstruction? How can we change the road's classification from
collector to local?
A34: The City recognizes these are all valid concerns; however, Grove Trail is designated as a
minor collector in the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, which is intended to
keep heavy vehicles off local streets. Public streets are designed for public use.
The City cannot change the traffic volumes along public roads, but will look into
additional traffic calming and safety improvements as part of the feasibility and final
design of this project.
As far as limiting construction traffic from this roadway, the City can only suggest traffic
routes to the contractor(s) and increase the police presence along this road.
To help ensure the lifespan of the road, collector streets have a different pavement section
and design than public roads to accommodate the increased weight and traffic loads. A
thicker pavement section and/or thicker aggregate base are potential remedies. A flexible
pavement design analysis will be conducted as part of the feasibility and final design of
this project.
Q35: I have a general question of the special assessments; what is the definition of a
"townhome?"
A35: For this project, it is considered a duplex.
K:\02109490WdminNeetingWeighborhood Meeting\6 ^6 14 Neighborhood Meeting Minutes.deex
0 O
0
R'
n; �c
��d
'O
.mt
d`•
coo
N
o
°'
w
m
y z 7
£•5�x
w E
ci.
L 'g
�m�o
.co
w
3
m
��
£.-m0
g9.,oacmc
'y-'a'S
•5
�
�0
._�
�°
c
v�]F
.a
arnc
fr�
m
C7
a
o,�
�w
rd��'a2
M.
rno2`
cy._
me
v o
.y
.,m_
N
H�o
o
E
�N
��
T9
nim
p°
wW
Et
m
m
c
w
$
r m`
LD
omm
.. ..
as
0
�wm
3
?i'y
a� N
TaEy£am
c°
w U
EC8_6nab
a7
a
n >
o
v
m
g
£
�$x0
w z
t�
o m
t m3
c 3 N
aim
Yu
t
c
n
y
w
m
aT$
p r
v
f�
•k m a
we°
O 0 C O
O@m w�
m y
W e Q
£ m
O
•s
W
N w
@m
r
•Q
W
d LL
N '90 x
w°'m0
, E
_
° m 16 t
a
°°
sm
n•
L_
«w
nan
W T m
.�ycmmm}s�V�'
=._m
Qc$
v
m
"
>.
x>=QiY
'o
Yi
m
mm
mai'
�E
3£�
wmrd
Fm
Ly�o
�QOd
�£ W 3E3arn
w B�m 3o
ay.a
£oc
�c10
m
$
c'6E
i'a
75
3
zZaij
a@
nr
wo. ENm
£mac
3�
mvm
va@
oopc
ct
coj
eN�m
Q
f,}
y
d
E
E v y W C C
W E •s
y
ya'
£
C
yW�
H
O C
u
p
F2�om
N
.0
L
y
W
00 m t E O N m _.
Tss
> u°i v
o.Jc
H 3 �
O 5i
m w �
a °
v
o
mvg�i=
c W
m
C m� 7
£UO
'a
=C
3�
3
• a
00�
twm
T?•52w2
3w3£b
Q
N
W uai=woo
o' -m o
t
-m3oir'.cnsNa8
,°oy
wn m
z�w
cE
00
cmc
>-
on9
c
Lyy''yo9$°oo
v°v
0
ai
Ws_'5000'ocyyo
C7 ..za
m0
�wm`o
r>
_
�c
.0 F._ m
_
m
'Sa
t~_
Euya
m6
vu�
y J
wamva
C zz m r W
C$ N d$
''d
m
2 r°
N N O
m U'
e0
O N
X D '6
°
b
N .�
L
' `o
t m3omiJ
3 y
m v
Z
r E i K
y
a O
N n'S
O t >, a
m 0
m E
£d
N �°
`°'cc=
N
u C
O y
f
Tj `• £
oQ u
ai
r
C
V TW Hca
s Y3w3 n�
W Yu
c
`m'
y@
uo
:°ot
>
m
LL
rndw
c
na..
r'E
ctO=
cc
e
o.Q
SU �'
m
r
>�
o a
ao
an
rno ofqq�
Q a
Scmm,emn0
o
d`
v$
m
w m
to
y o
mtga
d
E
m. m
E>.� °$ Ev£a
w'" m
8
o
cW'-
m rn
�£ c
o
m
5 ui
m3 a
nrm
o
0.
W
~�
-c
(7 E Q
gOpx
°=pwQ0
°v
C'
a Z`3
EOx�'S
f o
on
H w
dcmm`•"
rn3
w �c�
w o m w
n-
iJ
� � � N$
£90 .c
w -a
mm3
� 2 E
$m,�
m
ami
c10n
y cW
v
_°c
W m
-0
C3'`3
W ¢ 121:
�iOz
mK
am°fm
NN
3'�c
m'o
03 2S
N
v W
`o m�>c$w
Y Tr.
3£m
;
u€mow
Y
o a`mipE
mH
E'�"Q
SNF
xw
>
m e
3aa
$
'-a
m
mWNm
av'-w
�E
-
v=
vomer
(F;1
N
mvx ��aaa
-mvuom
mt
w
£g
nom£
mL'a
9{3i
cv
H>
marc
•5s
v`ym
uwi~2c
ym��Oxc.=��t
o UW
°�O
c w
nW
mN
m�
=m
w-
m
m9B>w
w�
w.0
oo
c
m'212
W
E>>�
?imcw o a0ow5
0
anm
w-
N8
d:4
aav
a=->$
we Wa
c330
tb
mmxF-
T»rN
and
�3
m
�nm£
3m
❑mr
3._IL
o3
-Uiw
�
ro
d
m
s
0
t7
f0 O
O
N
O
o
1°
V
N
O]
m
m
m
r
o
M
m
M
A
A
'u5
m
m
aNn
v
a
(O
N
1 m
m
CV V
CV N
m m
W
N
rn
V
N
rn
R
N
m
m
CV
m
mq
N
m
N
rn
m
N
w
m
N
m
q
m
N
m
N
m
N
m
N
m
N
ao
VW
Q Q
~
>£
N
O
>
D
CQ
v t
N N
N
r
£
r
C
C
F
Q
E
O
O
N
O
.s
o
o
v
9
C7 (7
r
(7
aro
d
n
m
n
(7
(7
o
z
d
a
C$7
=1
m
v
v
r
r
8
r
V
r
t0
m
n
{O
w
YUU
m
O
W
O
mam
Z $
v c
n
E
m
'2
;W;
m
to
Y
K
@
v
m
N
d
o
E
m
.�
F
Y
p
m
m
o6
W
Y
F ao
T
w
at
E
w
:°o
E_T
gW
Eda�io
Wim'
aUccFN
as
$d
n$ EQQ
�
09
EcLyyry o
N T
W
� @ m
L W
WS
O
W
D
O N
W�
W E
Q"pa Eo���
o
L
W
yY T=
d
3 W
E
W
n;
v w
E«
•�
a F%
$ C W A
3
U1 O N
T U
c
ao'
c o a o
Et,°�
_ c
.*.
U A
E o" c
W
c
12m W
a W _
C7
L
L� y d
W �
TtD 3
CV
'fig
~yy�
W
5�E5
E Wd
roo
Py
c�3
Wac`—"
tT�«
v«3SW
L=�WCL
3m8�'¢=r
n
n
o
v
0
M
N
0
N
t7
5
N
M
Y
N
M
�
N
t+1
5
N
F
3
3
Q
m
U
a
v
ro
c
o
c
�
W
O
.Yq
L
N
10
o
aWi
E
aQ1i
E
a
a
at
r
m
r
o
N
N
_JD
a
_
ol
le
Ike.
I..
-
�.
V t YC,�.
-
a. _ , Cray
•r
�
I
�'4. jam.
I •4+
... -
�. � . _.
e'! _�
,
,lF .!.
•1vy
... I � 1 n.
_
�F..
�p�77,yyjj����rr_ -.• � , _
Lid
" , -1
I- ,w,� ;
1�`
••�LQQyy `V ■ I- •
�h
xf6
-
i]�C, 1' vii #. �
\ �
� •Y I
_- —
-
J.,
42-
I
—
` )
Ito'i�
x A
I;
-Irm,