HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-06-14 WSCITY OF LAKEVILLE
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES
Wednesday, August 6, 2014
Mayor Little called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Marion Conference Room at
City Hall.
1. Roll Call:
Members Present: Council Members Swecker, LaBeau, Anderson, and Davis, and
Mayor Little
Staff Present: Allyn Kuennen, Interim City Administrator; Brenda Visnovec, Liquor
Manager; Brett Altergott, Parks and Recreation Director; Judi Hawkins, Deputy City Clerk
2. Citizen Comments
There were no citizen comments.
3. Chemical Prevention Specialist Agreement with ISD194
Council reviewed and discussed the Chemical Prevention Specialist Agreement with
School District 194 at their June 23, 2014 Work Session and directed staff to obtain more
details regarding the accuracy and basis of the increased costs within the agreement.
The City's increased cost is mainly due to a benefit package which is being extended to
the employee. The Liquor Manager and the Police Chief strongly support the substance
abuse program and believe it should continue to be funded. Staff is suggesting that the
program be funded at a specific amount rather than a percentage of the cost, which
would protect the City from unforeseen increases in the employee's health care benefit
package provided by the School District. Staff recommends a fixed annual amount of
$25,000.
The school district is requesting $24,000 for 2014; however, the cost to the City for 2013
was $18,660, which is the amount budgeted for 2014. Due to the large disparity it was
suggested that annual funding be increased incrementally over the life of the proposed
agreement which is 2014-2019. Council Members LaBeau and Anderson stated that
they believe it is important to continue support of the program with liquor proceeds
and believe that the level of funding can be adjusted upward each year until the
$25,000 recommended fixed amount is reached.
Following discussions, Council concurred with funding of $20,000 in 2014,$21,500 in
2015; $23,000 in 2016, and $25,000 each year from 2017 through 2019. Council directed
staff to place the revised contract on the next regular Council agenda.
4. Update of 2014 Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan
The draft of the 2014 Comprehensive Parks, Trails & Open Space Plan was reviewed by
the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Committee at their July 30 meeting.
Council is being asked to provide input and direction for completion of the final plan.
City Council Work Session
August 6, 2014
Page -2-
Brett Altergott introduced Dan Licht, The Planning Company (TPC), who presented an
overview of the document.
In 2000 the Comprehensive Parks Plan and the Comprehensive Trails Plan were merged
into one document. The plan was update in 2006. Another revision was initiated in
2012 but was deferred in order to incorporate community input gained through the
Envision Lakeville process.
Lakeville continues to have one of the fastest growth rates in the Metro area. Although
the recession slowed growth by several years, there is a large amount of undeveloped
land remaining and there is pressure to expand the MUSA expansion areas and Urban
Reserve Area, such as for the Mattamy project. The 2006 Park Plan anticipated infilling
existing neighborhoods and gaps in the service areas.
As the City began to develop in the 1970s a three to five acre neighborhood park was
built in conjunction with each subdivision. In the 1980s and 90s park service areas were
defined by physical barriers as well as distances. In the 2000s focus shifted to greenway
corridor development as part of the 2006 Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan Update.
These corridors provide recreational opportunities for play as well as a means of active
non -motorized transportation. A greenway corridor through the Mattamy Homes
development will be classified as an east/west lineal park. This change in park planning
policy adds amenities to the park system without adding typical neighborhood parks
and creates opportunities to fill needs in the park system as a whole.
Anderson agrees with the concept of greenways and believes it will present
opportunities to work with the county on several levels, including funding; however, he
believes there is an inconsistent theme of continuing to build neighborhood parks.
Licht stated that redevelopment of existing parks will continue to provide a range of
amenities and is an important part of the park system. The updated plan redefines what
a neighborhood park is or consists of and recommends moving towards more unique
amenities in existing or new parks to create destination parks spread across the system.
As parks are moved up on the CIP list for redevelopment, each park's facilities will be
reviewed to determine how it can complement other parks while providing balance in
the system. Altergott added that the corridors will provide destinations for specific
amenities. In some cases, a park amenity could be removed or replaced with a different
amenity to reflect changes in demographics or as local or regional trends change.
LaBeau stated that she continues to see parks being underutilized. She believes that a
park bond referendum would give the community a voice in future park and trail
development and would help people visualize the actual cost. Altergott stated that the
play systems that people have in their own backyards also have an impact on how much
the parks are used. LaBeau stated that in communities with fewer parks, the parks are
more heavily used.
City Council Work Session
August 6, 2014 Page -3-
Anderson would like to find a way to collect data on how heavily the parks are actually
used. This information could help validate whether or not additional parks are needed
in a particular area of the City. He believes Council has a responsibility to be efficient
with resources and being aware of the level of use would help to determine system-
wide needs and wishes. Altergott stated that the Parks Dept. also needs to continually
promote and market the existing system. Parks and Rec. Committee Chair Scott Kelly
recently completed a research project regarding park use which will be reviewed by the
committee. In order to take advantage of park development opportunities staff needs
to be aware of ongoing growth and discuss with developers what their product will be
and to what age group they will market their products. Licht stated that the proposed
plan has been revised from earlier versions and does not repeat the pattern of parks in
close proximity to one another, but highlights the need for community parks.
Council Member Swecker suggested that based on the city's demographics and type of
housing, especially in senior -focused neighborhoods, amenities such as exercise
stations might be well received. Altergott added that neighborhood meetings could be
held to better engage the community and give them an opportunity to provide input.
Davis stated that in his experience trails and connectivity are amenities that endure
through the years. Mayor Little stated that there are other low -maintenance features
that add to the interest of parks and green spaces and create unstructured play areas.
He stated that the parks must also keep up with technology and use creativity to offer
interactive challenges.
Requests have come from the community for dog parks, a skate park, splash -park, etc.
Many people drive or bike to the parks and specific features and amenities become
destinations. Council members suggested amenities and types of parks they believe
would engage people in the park system including a dog park, fitness/exercise stations
or training route, water features, and challenges that can be done in conjunction with
Wads, such as geocaching. Swecker stated that the Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources Committee should also be creative with new ideas to encourage people to
use the parks. Corporate and civic groups could partner to educate people and offer
competitions to get people of all ages into the parks. It was suggested that an online
survey of the parents of school-age children might be a cost effective way to determine
what they would like to see offered. LaBeau suggested reaching out to Chamber and
CVB members for their opinions. Staff will also look into having used bikes available at
local hotels so guests can explore the trails.
Anderson asked what are the next steps and how does the plan move forward. Licht
stated that this is the policy document and the framework and not an actual plan or
timeline. A public hearing will be held prior to Council adoption. The Parks Dept. will
then need to initiate programs that promote use of the parks. Anderson clarified that
the plan is descriptive not prescriptive and wants to ensure that people do not take this
as an actual plan with a timeline for completion. Council agreed that the plan should
not be perceived as a continuation of the same guidelines and standards. Licht stated
City Council Work Session
August 6, 2014 Page -4-
that the plan informs developers of how the park system will grow in relation to growth
in the City. The plan will be revised using input from the Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources Committee and the City Council. It was also suggested that a school district
representative act as a liaison to the PRNR to help with coordination of facilities.
Anderson if an Executive Summary could be included at the beginning to highlight
goals and objectives of the document. There has not been a parks bond referendum in
20 years and he believes the time is right to consider that as a funding source for
acquisitions and other capital items. An increase in maintenance funding will also need
to be considered. Altergott stated that decisions such as playground replacements will
need to be made in the next 12 months and in the next few years. Before decisions can
be made, demographic data will need to be obtained and a plan for financing
implementation will need to be adopted. As an example, ISD 194 provided information
for an upcoming decision related to ice rinks and staff learned that there are over 900
school -aged children in the Rolling Oaks Park neighborhood. LaBeau asked if staff could
get this information for all the parks. Staff will work with all three school districts to
obtain this quantifiable data for all 36 neighborhood parks in order to give Council a
better basis for their decisions.
Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Committee Chair Scott Kelly was present to
answer questions on behalf of the committee. He stated that the committee advocates
for parks, but is not necessarily attached to neighborhood parks. The committee is
interested in working with the Council and is open to any input and suggestions; they
would welcome a brainstorming session with the Council. As part of his recent Master's
degree he worked on a project for obtaining quantified data. Swecker suggested a joint
work session to seek feedback from the PRNR.
Kelly believes the Committee needs direction and suggested Council provide
parameters for creativity in scope, cost, interest, etc., in order to make their work most
acceptable and valuable. Davis believes setting parameters could be detrimental by
putting restrictions on imagination and inspiration. Swecker stated that developers
need to be challenged to come up with new ideas also in order to move away from
doing what has always been done. Council expressed appreciation to the Parks and
Recreation Committee for all their work on the Update.
5. Other
Kuennen stated that improvements to 190th Street have begun and the road is
closed as of today. Residents have been provided with alternate accesses during the
construction project which should be completed within the next eight to 10 weeks.
The west end of 190th Street will remain closed until Dodd Boulevard is upgraded in
2016.
• LaBeau stated that at the Night to Unite picnics several people commented on
seeking volunteer opportunities within the community. Churches want to serve
local people in need. The Civil Air Patrol is a good example of a group that has great
City Council Work Session
August 6, 2014
Page -5-
potential but is underutilized. It might be beneficial for the community to have a
coordinator for churches and other volunteer groups.
Kuennen updated the Council on the complaints that have been received from
Farmington residents regarding the grading permit to stockpile dirt/clay within the
proposed Pheasant Run development. Staff has contacted the developer regarding
the work they have done that was beyond what was allowed under the grading
permit and are working with the developer to address the issues.
6. Adjourn
Mayor Little adjourned the meeting at 7:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
J d Hawkins, Deputy Clerk
Matt Lit1W, Mayor 71