HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-074(Reserved for Dakota County Recording Information)
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 14-74
A RESOLUTION ISSUING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF NEED
WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville prepared an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
for the proposed Berres Ridge residential development project pursuant to Minnesota
Rules 4410; and
WHEREAS, the City authorized the distribution of the EAW for the required 30 -day
comment period; and
WHEREAS, the 30 -day comment period has ended on August 6,2014; and
WHEREAS, the preparation of the Berres Ridge EAW and comments received on the EAW have
generated information adequate to determine whether the proposed project has the potential
for significant environmental impacts; and
WHEREAS, the EAW has identified areas where the potential for significant environmental
effects exist, but appropriate measures have or will be incorporated into the project plan
and/or permits to reasonably mitigate these impacts; and
WHEREAS, the Berres Ridge development is expected to comply with all the City of Lakeville
and review agency standards; and
WHEREAS, based on the criteria established in Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, the project
does not have the potential for significant environmental effects; and
WHEREAS, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the project does not have the
potential for significant environmental impacts.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
ExhibitA
In the matter of the
Decision on the Need for FINDINGS OF FACT AND
an Environmental Impact CONCLUSIONS
Statement (EIS) for Berres
Heights in Lakeville, MN
The Berres Heights project is a residential development of 372 single family lots of
which 262 lots are RS- 3 zoning and 110 lots south of 2001h Street are proposed to be
RS -4 zoning on a total site area of 151.92 acres adjacent to CSAH 50 east of Highview
Avenue.
Pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, subp. 19, an Environmental Assessment
Worksheet (EAW) was been prepared for this proposed project. As to the need for an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the project and based on the record in this
matter, including the EAW and written comments received, the City of Lakeville makes
the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. Project
The proposed project involves grading and construction on 151 acres to
construct 372 single family homes. The project is anticipated to remove 8
acres of wooded area and convert 134 acres of agricultural area to
developed area. Approximately 45 acres of impervious surface area and 6
acres of storm water ponding will be developed.
B. Project Site
The project site is located south of 2001h Street, north of CSAH 50, and east
of Highview Avenue. The site currently contains approximately 10 acres of
woodland, 134 acres of cropland, 4.7 acres of lawn, and 3 acres of
impervious surface.
II. PROJECT HISTORY
A. The project was subject to the mandatory preparation of an EAW under
Minnesota Rules 4410.4300 subp. 19- Residential Development.
B. This EAW dated May 2014 was prepared for the proposed project and
distributed to the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) mailing list and other
interested parties for the July 7, 2014 EQB Monitor.
August 26, 2014 G: (Kris JensonlBerres RidgeIEAWTOF 082614.doc
Page I of 5
C. A public notice containing information about the availability of the EAW for
public review was published in the local paper on June 20, 2014.
D. The EAW was noticed in the July 7, 2014 EQB Monitor. The public comment
period ended August 6, 2014. Comments were received from Dakota
County, MDH, Met Council, DNR, and PCA. The comment letters and
responses to the comments are also incorporated by reference.
III. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING THE POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS.
Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, subp.1 states "an EIS shall be ordered for projects
that have the potential for significant environmental affects." In deciding
whether a project has the potential for significant environmental affects, the
City of Lakeville must consider the four factors set out in Minnesota Rules
4410.1700, subp. 7. with respect to each of these factors, the City finds as
follows:
A. TYPE, EXTENT, AND REVERSIBILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The first factor that the City must consider is "type, extent and reversibility
of environmental effects", Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, subp. 7.A. The City's
findings with respect to each of these issues are set forth below.
1. The type of environmental impacts and mitigation efforts
anticipated as part of this project include:
a. Water Consumption: Water will be supplied by the City's
water system. Additional watermain construction, in
conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, will need
to be completed with this development.
b. Wastewater Generation: Normal domestic sewage will be
generated by this project. The sewage loading will be 0.0882
MGD for ultimate development. Wastewater will be treated
at the Empire Sewage Treatment Plant. The Plant has the
capacity to accept this waste.
c. Storm Water: The project is anticipated to generate
additional storm water runoff due to development of this
site. Storm water will be required to be treated to meet City
and VRWJPO standards. Storm water ponds will not be
allowed within the buffers of the drainageways on the site.
August 26, 2014 G: (Kris Jenson Werres RidgeIEAWIFOF 082614.doc
Page 2 of 5
Constructing a storm water management system in
conformance with these rules will mitigate storm water
impacts. Development will also be required to meet NPDES
standards.
It is also noted that the project is within 1 mile of impaired
waters - Middle Creek and South Creek. Storm water
management will also need to take these water bodies into
account and meet NPDES requirements.
d. Wildlife: Information indicates that the Blandings turtle may
be located within 1 mile of the project area. The project will
incorporate surmountable curbs and native vegetation
plantings in open areas.
e. Traffic: The development will generate additional traffic in
the area. The mitigation measures outlined in the EAW will
mitigate the impacts of this additional traffic. Additional
coordination with the County will continue to address road
improvements on county roads.
2. The extent and reversibility of environmental impacts are consistent
with those of limited (light) industrial development.
B. CUMULATIVE POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF RELATED OR ANTICIPATED
FUTURE PROJECTS
The second factor that the City must consider is the "cumulative potential
effects of related or anticipated future projects", Minnesota Rules 4410.1700
subp.7.13. The City's findings with respect to this factor are set forth below.
Currently there is no known planned development immediately
adjacent to the site. However, the area is likely to develop based on
zoning and increased interest in the development market. If
additional development is proposed in the area, additional
environmental review may be needed for those other projects.
2. Traffic is anticipated to increase in the area. Improvements to CSAH
50/202nd Street as well as 200th Street will be needed
C. THE EXTENT TO WHICH ENVIRONMENTAL AFFECTS ARE SUBJECT TO
MITIGATION BY ONGOING PUBLIC REGULATORY AUTHORITY
August 26, 2014 G: (Kris Jenson lBerres Ridge EAWTOF_082614.doc
Page 3 of 5
1. The following permits or approvals will be required for the project:
Lakeville
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Lakeville
Rezoning
Lakeville
Preliminary Plat
Lakeville
Final Plat
Lakeville
Building Permit
Lakeville
Grading permit
MPCA
NPDES permit
MPCA
Sanitary sewer extension
Met Council
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Met Council
Sanitary sewer extension
MDH
Watermain extension
MDH
Well sealing permit
Dakota County
Access permit
Dakota County
Plat commission
VRWJPO
Plan approval
2. The City finds that the potential environmental impacts of the
project are subject to mitigation by ongoing regulatory authorities
such that an EIS need not be prepared.
D. THE EXTENT TO WHICH ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS CAN BE
ANTICIPATED AND CONTROLLED AS A RESULT OF OTHER
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY PUBLIC AGENCIES OR THE
PROJECT PROPOSER, INCLUDING OTHER EIS's.
The fourth factor that the City must consider is "the extent to which
environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other
environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project
August 26, 2014 G: (Kris Jenson Werres RidgeTAWTOF_082614.doc
Page 4 of 5
proposer, including other EIS's" Minnesota Rules 4700.1700, subp. 7.1). The
City's findings with respect to this factor are set forth below:
The proposed project is subject to the following plans prepared by the City:
• City of Lakeville Comprehensive Plan
• City of Lakeville Water Plan
• City of Lakeville Sanitary Sewer Plan
• City of Lakeville Water Resource Management Plan
• City of Lakeville Transportation Plan
• South Creek Management Plan
• Vermillion River Watershed JPO Plan
The City finds that the environmental effects of the project can be
anticipated and controlled as a result of the environmental review,
planning, and permitting processes.
CONCLUSIONS
The preparation of the Berres Heights EAW and comments received on the EAW have
generated information adequate to determine whether the proposed development
has the potential for significant environmental effects.
The EAW has identified areas where the potential for environmental effects exist, but
appropriate measures have or will be incorporated into the project plans and/or
permits to mitigate these effects. The project is anticipated to comply with all City of
Lakeville standards and review agency standards.
Based on the criteria established in Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, the project does not
have the potential for significant environmental effects.
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the project does not have the potential
for significant environmental impacts.
An Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
August 26, 2014 G-Wris Jenson lBerres Ridge EAWIFOF 082614.doc
Page 5 of S
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lakeville hereby
determines that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Findings of Fact (Exhibit A) are hereby adopted.
DATED this 2"d day of September, 2014.
Charlene Friedges,
Od
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
Matf Little, hKayor