HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 05City of Lakeville
Community & Economic Development
Memorandum
To: Planning Commission
From: David L. Olson, Community and Economic Development Director
Copy: Justin Miller, City Administrator
Mikaela Huot, Springsted Inc.
Andrea McDowell Poehler, Asst. City Attorney
Date: May 15, 2015
Subject: Mendell Inc. Tax Increment Financing Request
Mendell Inc. contacted the City recently and presented plans for a 18,700 square foot expansion of
their building located at 21463 Grenada Avenue. Mendell is a medical device manufacturing company
and is experiencing considerable growth and needs to add additional manufacturing and warehouse
space to their existing building. The company has submitted a request for Tax Increment Financing
(TIF) to assist with the $360,000 in eligible site improvement costs associated with the project.
Mendell has operated in Airlake since 2003 and currently has 94 employees. In addition to retaining
the existing 94 jobs in Lakeville, the proposed expansion will create an additional 12-25 jobs. The City
Council reviewed this proposed TIF project at the April 27" Work Session and the EDC reviewed this
request at the April 28th meeting and both recommended proceeding with the necessary steps to
create a new TIF District for the project.
One of the requirements of the TIF Statutes is that the City prepare a Tax Increment Financing Plan.
Attached is a copy of the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for this project prepared by
Springsted Inc. The City designated most of Airlake Industrial Park as a redevelopment project area in
1984 and has approved a number of TIF Districts for various projects over the years. The primary
purpose of designating this redevelopment project area was to provide the impetus for private
development, maintain and increase employment, and to increase the tax base for the City.
As indicated, the proposed Mendell expansion will involve an 18,700 square foot expansion of the
Company's existing building on Grenada Court. The proposed expansion will require the platting of
Outlot 6 currently owned by Mendell. A proposed preliminary and final plat will be coming before the
Planning Commission in the near future. Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.
ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt the attached resolution recommending to the City Council that the Tax Increment Financing
Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 20 is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
RESOLUTION OF THE LAKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDING THE
PROPOSAL FOR MODIFICATION OF AIRLAKE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1,
ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 20 LOCATED
WITHIN THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 AND PROPOSAL FOR APPROVAL
AND ADOPTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Lakeville
(the "Authority") has proposed modification of Airlake Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the
"Project") and establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 20 (the "Tax Increment
District") located within the Project, all located within the jurisdictional limits of the City of
Lakeville, Minnesota (the "City") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001 and 469.047,
inclusive, and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 and 469.179, inclusive and
WHEREAS, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Economic
Development) District No. 19 within Airlake Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the Financing Plan")
has been submitted to the Lakeville Planning Commission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.027, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Redevelopment Plan and
Financing Plan to determine consistency of the Plans to the Comprehensive Plan of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Lakeville Planning Commission that
the Redevelopment Plan and Financing Plan will be consistent with the Lakeville
Comprehensive Plan subject to platting of Outlot B, Grenada Business Park to be included in the
Tax Increment District and the Commission recommends forwarding these findings to the
Lakeville City Council.
Adopted this 21s' day of May, 2015.
Jason Swenson, Chair
ATTEST:
City of Lakeville, Minnesota
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville
Tax Increment Financing Plan
for
Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development)
District No. 20
Within
irlake Redevelopment Project No.1
(Mendell Inc. Expansion Project)
Draft Dated: May 15, 2015
Public Hearing Scheduled: June 15, 2015
Anticipated Approval Date: June 15, 2015
Prepared by:
SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
380 Jackson Street, Suite 300
St. Paul, MN 55101-2887
(651) 223-3000
WWW.SPRINGSTED.COM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1;7-,1;4 91
LAKEVILLE
AIRLAKE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
MODIFICATION NO.9
I. INTRODUCTION AND LEGAL BASIS
A. Statement of Intent of Modification..................................................................................... 1
B. Statement of Public Purpose............................................................................................ 1
C. Project Area Boundary ................................................................................................... 1
D. Statement of Authority.................................................................................................... 1
II. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
A. Redevelopment Plan Objectives ..................................
B. Land Use...............................................................
C. Development Standards ............................................
D. Environmental Controls .............................................
E. Redevelopment Activities ...........................................
1. City Activities -Original Plan
2. City Activities - Plan Modification
3. Private Activities - Original Plan
F, Project Cost Estimates.....................................................
G. Relocation.....................................................................
H. Development Contracts ....................................................
I. Operation of Public Improvements ......................................
J. Administriation of Project ..................................................
K. Modification Plan............................................................
................................................ 1
................................................ 2
................................................ 2
................................................ 2
................................................ 2
........................................... 3
........................................... 3
........................................... 3
........................................... 3
........................................... 4
........................................... 4
PARTI............................................................................................................................................................... EXHIBIT I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
PART II
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN NO. 20
Section
A.
Definitions...................................................................................................................5
B.
Statutory Authorization..................................................................................................
5
C.
Statement of Need and Public Purpose.............................................................................. 5
D.
Statement of Objectives..................................................................................................
5
E.
Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as an Economic Development District ..................
6
F.
Duration of the TIF District...............................................................................................
6
G.
Property to be Included in the TIF District............................................................................
6
H.
Property to be Acquired in the TIF District...........................................................................
7
I.
Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District ...............................................
7
J.
Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing...................................................................
7
K.
Estimated Public Costs...................................................................................................
9
L.
Estimated Sources of Revenue........................................................................................
9
M.
Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness........................................................................
9
N.
Original Net Tax Capacity.............................................................................................
10
0.
Original Tax Capacity Rate............................................................................................10
P.
Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment ............................
10
Q.
Use of Tax Increment...................................................................................................11
R.
Excess Tax Increment..................................................................................................
12
S.
Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule...................................................................
12
T.
Limitation on Administrative Expenses.............................................................................
13
U.
Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - Four Year Rule ......................................
13
V.
Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions..................................................................13
W.
Prior Planned Improvements..........................................................................................
14
X.
Development Agreements.............................................................................................
14
Y.
Assessment Agreements..............................................................................................14
Z.
Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan..............................................................15
AA.
Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan.............................................................
15
AB.
Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements...............................................................
16
Page(s)
Map of the Tax Increment Financing District within Redevelopment Project Area ............................. EXHIBIT I
AssumptionsReport........................................................................................................................... EXHIBIT II
Projected Tax Increment Report......................................................................................................... EXHIBIT III
Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report..................................................................... EXHIBIT IV
Market Value Analysis Report ............................................................................................................. EXHIBIT V
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
PART
MODIFICATION NO.9
TO AIRLAKE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
I. INTRODUCTION AND LEGAL BASIS
Section A Statement of Intent of Modification
The City proposes to implement the plan objective listed in Section II.A.3 of the Original Redevelopment Plan
approved by the Authority and Council in 1984. The activity objective primarily includes the expansion of the project
boundary to include the proposed Mendell Expansion TIF 20 as well as certain Airlake public Improvements.
Section B Statement of Public Purpose
No Change
The Authority and Council find that there is a need to provide impetus for private development, maintain and
increase employment, and to increase tax base for the taxing jurisdiction within the City's corporate limits. These
public purpose goals are not attainable in the foreseeable future without the intervention of the Authority and City in
the normal development process.
Section C Project Area Boundary
No Change
The expanded boundaries of the Project area are shown in Exhibit "I" "Project Area Boundary Map". All land included
in the Project Area is within the legal boundaries of the City
Section D Statement of Authority
No Change
The Authority is authorized to modify a project pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 469.001 to 469.047 (the
HRA Act) within boundaries of municipalities. The project as contemplated by this Plan consists of a Redevelopment
Project in the HRA Act, pursuant to Section 469.002, Subdivision 14 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.028,
Subdivision 3.
II. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Section A Redevelopment Plan Objectives
No Change
The Authority and City, through the implementation of this Plan, seek to achieve the following objectives:
1. To provide logical and organized land use for the Project Area consistent with the Comprehensive Land
Use Plan and the zoning ordinance of the City.
2. To promote the prompt development of property in the Project Area with a minimal adverse impact on the
environment
SPRINGSTED
im
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
3. To provided adequate streets, utilities, and other public improvements and facilities to enhance the Project
Area and the City for new and existing development.
4. To enhance the project Area and the City and surrounding area by retaining current, and providing
additional employment opportunities for the residents of the City and surrounding community.
5. To increase the City's tax base.
6. To afford existing business in the City the opportunity to expand or relocate within the Project Area.
7. To stimulate development and investment within the project Area by private interest by providing land of
suitable size and configuration to permit it's economic and appropriate development.
Section IS Land Use
No Change
1. Current use:
a. The project is partially vacant and undeveloped and used for both industrial and farming purposes.
The Area is principally Zoned 1-1 and 1-2, which provides for the establishment of warehousing,
light and heavy industrial and manufacturing development.
2. Future Land Use:
a. It is anticipated that the Project Area will develop consistent with existing zoning districts. The uses
of the Project Area proposed are consistent with the Plan, the Lakeville Comprehensive Plan, and,
to the knowledge of the City and Authority at this time, all other federal state and local laws and
regulation.
Section C Development Standards
The Authority and City will consider, among other things, the following factors when evaluating development
proposals in all phases:
Degree to which development objectives are provided for or enhanced.
Consistency with this Plan and the Lakeville Comprehensive Plan.
Ability of proposed tax increment projects to generate enough annual tax increment to retire the debt
created by the project.
Developer's ability to perform both from a standpoint of financial ability to perform and the necessary
experience and expertise to complete the proposed development.
Displaced Project Area property owners and tenants will be given priority over competing projects of similar
scale and magnitude.
Section D Environmental Controls
It is presently anticipated that the proposed development in the Project Area will not present major environment
problems. All municipal actions, public improvements, and private development will be carried out in a manner that
will comply with applicable environmental standards. Then environmental controls to be applied within the Area are
contained within the codes an ordinance of the City of Lakeville.
The Minnesota Code of Agency Rules (6 MCAR 3.021-3.056) defines Minnesota's environmental policy. The
threshold factor for the industrial/commercial projects on second class cities is 1,000,000 square feet (gross floor
area). Projects above this threshold would require an Environmental Impact Statement. There are no properties on
the National Historic Register of Historic Places within the Project Area.
Section E Redevelopment Activities
The Authority and the City proposes to implement this plan in phases. The activities of this Plan are described as
follows:
Page 2
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
1. City Activities — Original Plan
a. To acquire the land from the current owners and dedicate the land to an acceptable developer for
the purposes of constructing a 150,000 square foot office, warehouse and manufacturing facility.
2. City Activities — Plan Modification
a. A full discussion of the proposed City Activities can be found in Tax Increment District No. 4, 13,
14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 Plans prepared by the City's consultant(s) and is hereby adopted by
reference.
3. Private Activities — Original plan
a. Phase One (TIF# 4) included a major private development project — Please see TIF #4 Plan.
b. Phase Two (TIF #13) included a major private development project - Please see TIF #13 Plan.
c. Phase Three (TIF #14) included a major private development project — Please see TIF #14 Plan,
d. Phase Four (TIF #15) included a major private development project — Please see TIF #15 Plan.
e. Phase Five (TIF #16) included a major private development project. — Please see TIF #16 Plan.
f. Phase Six (TIF #17) — Please see TIF #17 Plan
g. Phase Seven (TIF #18) — Please see TIF # 18 Plan
h. Phase Eight (TIF #19) — Please see TIF # 19 Plan
i. Phase Nine (TIF #20) — Please see TIF #20 Plan
Section F Project Cost Estimates
A full description of project costs is provided in Tax Increment Financing District No.20 project budget.
Section G Relocation
No Change
Phase One of the Plan requires no relocation. In subsequent phases where development proposals require the
acquisition of either commercial, industrial or residentially occupied parcels of land, the displaced party or parties
shall be eligible for and receive those relocation benefits in conformance with the Minnesota Uniform Relocation Act.
Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.50-56.
The relocation plan will be part of any tax increment financing plan that provides for acquisition and subsequent
displacement.
Section H Development Contracts
No Change
The City and Authority will not authorize any public improvement or facilities projects nor acquire any property for
development which will be wholly or partially funded by the use of tax increment financing without first having
secured development contracts.
The Development Contracts shall require the developer to among other things, cause to be constructed an industrial
facility of at least a specified minimum cost, and having a specified minimum Assessor's Market Value; to complete
the work by a specified date pursuant to plans and specifications submitted to and building permits issued by or on
behalf of the City, and pursuant to an and in accordance with all other applicable governmental regulations; and to
demonstrate its financial capability for doing so.
Section I Operation of Public Improvements
No Change
All public improvements constructed under the provisions of this program shall be operated by the City of Lakeville in
the same manner as all publicly owned streets and utilities.
SPRINGSTED Page 3
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
Section J Administration of Project
No Change
The Lakeville Housing Authority shall be responsible for seeing that contents of this plan are promoted, implemented
and enforced. The Executive Director shall be delegated day by day responsibilities while the Board of Directors
shall make all policy regarding the Project Area. Administrative maintenance activities will be funded out of tax
increment revenue and other HRA funds.
Section K Modification of Plan
No Change
Modifications or revisions of this Plan which change the permitted uses; modify the Project Area Boundary; set forth,
revise, or modify and Developers Contract with respect to any part of the Project or terminate all or any part of the
Project require approval of such modifications by the Authority and the City, upon notice and other public hearing as
required for the adoption of this Plan and in accordance with Section 462.525, Subdivision 6 of the Act.
SPRINGSTED Page 4
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
I;LI:11111II
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN NO. 20
Section A Definitions
The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used
indicates a different meaning:
"Authority" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville.
"City" means the City of Lakeville, Minnesota; also referred to as a "Municipality".
"City Council" means the City Council of the City; also referred to as the "Governing Body".
"County„ means Dakota County, Minnesota
"Redevelopment Project Area" means Airlake Redevelopment Project No. 1 in the City, which is described in the
corresponding Redevelopment Plan.
"Redevelopment Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area.
"Project Area" means the geographic area of the Redevelopment Project Area.
"School District" means Independent School District No. 194, Minnesota.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, both inclusive.
"TIF District" means Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development) District No. 20.
"TIF Plan" means the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District (this document).
Section B Statutory Authorization
See Section I.D. of the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area.
Section C Statement of Need and Public Purpose
See Section LA and I.B of the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area.
Section D Statement of Objectives
See Section II.A of the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area.
SPRINGSTED Page 5
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
Section E Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as an
Economic Development District
Economic development districts are a type of tax increment financing district which consist of any project, or portions
of a project, which the City finds to be in the public interest because:
(1) it will discourage commerce, industry, or manufacturing from moving their operations to
another state or municipality;
(2) it will result in increased employment in the state; or
(3) it will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the state.
The TIF District qualifies as an economic development district in that the proposed development described in this
TIF Plan (see Section 1) meets the criteria listed above in (2) and (3). Without establishment of the TIF District, the
proposed development would not occur within the City. The proposed development will also result in increased
employment and enhancement of the tax base in both the City and the State.
Tax increments from an economic development district must be used to provide improvements, loans, subsidies,
grants, interest rate subsidies, or other assistance in which at least 85% of the square footage of the facilities to be
constructed are used for any of the following purposes:
(1) manufacturing or production of tangible personal property, including processing, resulting in the
change of the condition of the property;
(2) warehousing, storage and distribution of tangible personal property, excluding retail sales;
(3) research and development related to the activities listed in (1) or (2) above;
(4) telemarketing if that activity is the exclusive use of the property;
(5) tourism facilities (see M.S. Section 469.174, Subd. 22);
(6) qualified border retail facilities (see M.S. Section 469.176, Subd. 4c); or
(7) space necessary for and related to the activities listed in (1) through (6) above.
Section F Duration of the TIF District
Economic development districts may remain in existence 8 years from the date of receipt by the City of the first tax
increment. The City anticipates that the TIF District will remain in existence the maximum duration allowed by law
(projected to be through the year 2025, assuming first increment is received in 2017). The district will remain open
through the year 2026 if the first collection of increment is in taxes payable 2018. The City may decertify the TIF
District earlier if fulfillment of all District obligations occurs prior to the statutory maximum duration of 9 total years.
Section G Property to be Included in the TIF District
The TIF District is an approximate 3.07 -acre area of land located within the Project Area. A map showing the
location of the TIF District is shown in Exhibit I. The boundaries and area encompassed by the TIF District are
described below:
SPRINGSTED Page 6
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
Parcel ID Number Legal Description
22-31060-01-010 Lot 1, Block 1, Grenada Business Park.
22-31060-00-020 Outlot B, Grenada Business Park.
The area encompassed by the TIF District shall also include all street or utility right-of-ways located upon or adjacent
to the property described above.
Section H Property to be Acquired in the TIF District
The City may acquire and sell any or all of the property located within the TIF District; however, the City does not
anticipate acquiring any such property at this time.
Section I Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District
The proposed development is expected to consist of an 18,700 square foot expansion to the existing approximate
28,000 square foot facility. The development will result in increased employment (at least 12 jobs with wage ranges
between $51,000 and $59,300) within the City, as well as retain existing jobs, in compliance with statutory
requirements. It is anticipated tax increment will be used to finance a portion of the site development costs deemed
necessary for the project to proceed. In addition, the City anticipates using available tax increment for related
administrative expenses and any other eligible expenditures associated with the development of the site.
Construction of the facility is projected to start in 2015. The project is expected to be fully constructed by December
31, 2015, and be 100% assess and on the tax rolls as of January 2, 2016 for taxes payable in 2017.
At the time this document was prepared there were no signed construction contracts with regards to the above
described development.
Section J Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing
In establishing the TIF District, the City makes the following findings:
(1) The TIF District qualifies as an economic development district;
See Section E of this document for the reasons and facts supporting this finding.
(2) The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur
solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future, and the increased market
value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment would be
less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after
subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF
District permitted by the TIF Plan.
Factual basis:
Proposed development not expected to occur:
The project includes the development of an approximately 18,700 square foot expansion of an existing
industrial manufacturing and warehouse facility. The proposed developer of the site has submitted
SPRINGSTED
Page 7
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
information to the city demonstrating that the development of this site is not financially feasible without the
assistance provided in this TIF Plan.
The City has determined that the proposed development would not occur but for the financial assistance
provided in this TIF Plan because of the increased costs related to site development. Due to the high costs
of investment for the proposed expansion, including site improvements and infrastructure costs incurred by
the developer in conjunction with development of the project, the developer has stated that the project as
proposed would not occur without the financial assistance provided by the City, as it would not be
economically feasible without financial assistance. The City finds the use of tax increment necessary to
finance a portion of the site improvements costs to facilitate development of the expansion and developer
investment. The City anticipates providing financial assistance on a pay-as-you-go basis.
No higher market value expected:
The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax
increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed
development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration
of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan. Without improvements the City has no reason to expect that
significant development would occur without assistance similar to that provided in this plan. For the same
reasons that the desired development described above is not feasible without tax increment assistance, the
City believes that no alternative development is likely to occur without similar assistance.
To summarize the basis for the City's findings regarding alternative market value, in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 3(d), the City makes the following determinations:
a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the site will increase
without the use of tax increment financing is $0 (for the reasons described above), except some
unknown amount of appreciation.
b. If the proposed development to be assisted with tax increment occurs in the District, the
total increase in market value would be approximately $1,853,486, including the value of the
building (See Exhibit V).
C. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the
district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $127,185 (See Exhibit V).
d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the City
finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than
$1,726,301 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance.
(3) The TIF Plan would afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a
whole, for development of the Project Area by private enterprise.
Factual basis: The proposed development is the construction of an expansion to an existing business
facility in the Project Area that is proposed to retain existing jobs and create new jobs in the City, while
retaining and creating these jobs in the State, plus create new tax base for the City and the State. The
development clearly meets the City's economic development goals in terms of tax base expansion, job
retention and creation, and wage levels.
(4) The TIF Plan conforms to general plans for development of the City as a whole.
Factual basis: The City Planning Commission has determined that the development proposed in the TIF
Plan conforms to the City comprehensive plan.
SPRINGSTED — Page 8
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
Section K Estimated Public Costs
The estimated public costs of the TIF District are listed below. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax
increments of the TIF District.
Land/building acquisition 155,912
Utilities 0
Other qualifying Improvements 0
Loan Interest payments 0
Administrative expenses 8,208
Total $164,120
The City anticipates using tax increment to the extent available to assist with financing a portion of the site
improvement costs, related administrative expenses, and other TIF -eligible expenditures as necessary and related
to development of the project.
The City reserves the right to administratively adjust the amount of any of the items listed above or to incorporate
additional eligible items, so long as the total estimated public cost is not increased.
Section L Estimated Sources of Revenue
Tax increment revenue
164,120
Interest on invested funds
0
Loan proceeds
0
Special assessments
0
Rent/lease revenue
0
Grants
Total $164,120
The City anticipates providing financial assistance on a pay-as-you-go basis for site improvement costs, as well as
other TIF -eligible expenses related to the proposed development. As tax increments are collected from the TIF
District in future years, a portion of these taxes will be used by the City to reimburse the developer/owner for public
costs incurred (see Section K).
The City reserves the right to finance any or all public costs of the TIF District using pay-as-you-go assistance,
internal funding, general obligation or revenue debt (referred to together as "TIF Bonds"), or any other financing
mechanism authorized by law. The City also reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to
the Project Area to pay for such costs including, but not limited to, special assessments, utility revenues, federal or
state funds, and investment income.
Section M Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness
The maximum principal amount of bonds (as defined in the TIF Act) secured in whole or part with tax increment from
the TIF District is $164,120. The City currently plans to finance the improvement costs in the form of a pay -as -you go
revenue note, but reserves the right to issue bonds in any form, including without limitation any interfund loan with
interest not to exceed the maximum permitted under Section 469.178, subd. 7 of the TIF Act.
SPRINGSTED
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
Section N Original Net Tax Capacity
The County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. This value will be equal to the total
net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District as certified by the State Commissioner of Revenue. For districts
certified between January 1 and June 30, inclusive, this value is based on the previous assessment year. For
districts certified between July 1 and December 31, inclusive, this value is based on the current assessment year.
The Estimated Market Value of all property within the TIF District as of January 2, 2014, for taxes payable in 2015, is
$1,975,200 and the estimated tax capacity is $38,754, which is estimated to be the original net tax capacity of the
TIF District upon establishment and subsequent certification.
Each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount that the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased
as a result of:
(1) changes in the tax-exempt status of property;
(2) reductions or enlargements of the geographic area of the TIF District;
(3) changes due to stipulation agreements or abatements; or
(4) changes in property classification rates.
Section 0 Original Tax Capacity Rate
The County Auditor shall also certify the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. This rate shall be the sum of all
local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District. This rate shall be for the same taxes payable year as the
original net tax capacity.
In future years, the amount of tax increment generated by the TIF District will be calculated using the lesser of
(a) the sum of the current local tax rates at that time or (b) the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District.
It is anticipated the request for certification of the District will occur prior to June 30, 2015 and the local tax rates for
taxes levied in 2014 and payable in 2015 will apply. For purposes of estimating the tax increment generated by the
TIF District, the sum of the local tax rates for taxes levied in 2014 and payable in 2015, is 105.073% as shown
below.
2014/2015
Taxing Jurisdiction Local Tax Rate
City of Lakeville 38.948%
Dakota County 29.633%
ISD #194 31.459%
Other 5.033%
Total 105.073%
Section P Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and
Projected Tax Increment
The City anticipates that the project will begin construction in 2015 and be 100% completed by December 31, 2015,
creating a total tax capacity for TIF District No. 20 of $59,698 as of January 2, 2016. The captured tax capacity as of
SPRINGSTED Page 10
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
that date is estimated to be $12,698. The first year of tax increment is estimated to be $13,342 payable in 2017. A
complete schedule of estimated tax increment from the TIF District is shown in Exhibit III.
The estimates shown in this TIF plan assume that commercial class rates remain at 1.5% of the estimated market
value up to $150,000 and 2.0% of the estimated market value over $150,000, and assume 3% annual increases in
market values.
Each year the County Auditor shall determine the current net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District. To the
extent that this total exceeds the original net tax capacity, the difference shall be known as the captured net tax
capacity of the TIF District.
The County Auditor shall certify to the City the amount of captured net tax capacity each year. The City may choose
to retain any or all of this amount. It is the City's intention to retain 100% of the captured net tax capacity of the TIF
District. Such amount shall be known as the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District.
Exhibit II gives a listing of the various information and assumptions used in preparing a number of the exhibits
contained in this TIF Plan, including Exhibit III which shows the projected tax increment generated over the
anticipated life of the TIF District.
Section Q Use of Tax Increment
Each year the County Treasurer shall deduct 0.36% of the annual tax increment generated by the TIF District and
pay such amount to the State's General Fund. Such amounts will be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of
financial reporting and auditing of tax increment financing information throughout the state. Exhibit III shows the
projected deduction for this purpose over the anticipated life of the TIF District.
The City has determined that it will use 100% of the remaining tax increment generated by the TIF District for any of
the following purposes:
(1) pay for the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section K) and County administrative
costs associated with the TIF District (see Section T);
(2) pay principal and interest on tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated
public costs of the TIF District;
(3) accumulate a reserve securing the payment of tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to
finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District;
(4) pay all or a portion of the county road costs as may be required by the County Board under M.S.
Section 469.175, Subdivision 1a; or
(5) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and
School District.
Tax increments from property located in one county must be expended for the direct and primary benefit of a project
located within that county, unless both county boards involved waive this requirement. Tax increments shall not be
used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City.
Tax increment shall not be used to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a
building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or
any other local unit of government or the State or federal government, or for a commons area used as a public park,
or a facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes. This prohibition does not apply to the construction
or renovation of a parking structure or of a privately owned facility for conference purposes.
SPRINGSTED
Page 11
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
If there exists any type of agreement or arrangement providing for the developer, or other beneficiary of assistance,
to repay all or a portion of the assistance that was paid or financed with tax increments, such payments shall be
subject to all of the restrictions imposed on the use of tax increments. Assistance includes sale of property at less
than the cost of acquisition or fair market value, grants, ground or other leases at less then fair market rent, interest
rate subsidies, utility service connections, roads, or other similar assistance that would otherwise be paid for by the
developer or beneficiary.
Section R Excess Tax Increment
In any year in which the tax increments from the TIF District exceed the amount necessary to pay the estimated
public costs authorized by the TIF Plan, the City shall use the excess tax increments to:
(1) prepay any outstanding tax increment bonds;
(2) discharge the pledge of tax increments thereof;
(3) pay amounts into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of the tax increment bonds; or
(4) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and
School District. The County Auditor must report to the Commissioner of Education the amount of
any excess tax increment redistributed to the School District within 30 days of such redistribution.
Section S Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule
At least 80% of the tax increments from the TIF District must be expended on activities within the district or to pay for
bonds used to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section E for additional restrictions). No
more than 20% of the tax increments may be spent on costs outside of the TIF District but within the boundaries of
the Project Area, except to pay debt service on credit enhanced bonds. All administrative expenses are considered
to have been spent outside of the TIF District. Tax increments are considered to have been spent within the TIF
District if such amounts are:
(1) actually paid to a third party for activities performed within the TIF District within five years after
certification of the district;
(2) used to pay bonds that were issued and sold to a third party, the proceeds of which are reasonably
expected on the date of issuance to be spent within the later of the five-year period or a
reasonable temporary period or are deposited in a reasonably required reserve or replacement
fund.
(3) used to make payments or reimbursements to a third party under binding contracts for activities
performed within the TIF District, which were entered into within five years after certification of the
district; or
(4) used to reimburse a party for payment of eligible costs (including interest) incurred within five
years from certification of the district.
Beginning with the sixth year following certification of the TIF District, at least 80% of the tax increments must be
used to pay outstanding bonds or make contractual payments obligated within the first five years. When outstanding
bonds have been defeased and sufficient money has been set aside to pay for such contractual obligations, the TIF
District must be decertified.
SPRINGSTED Page 12
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
The City does not expect that allowable pooling expenditures will be made outside of the TIF District but within the
Project Area (along with allowable administrative expenses), but such expenditures are expressly authorized in this
TIF Plan.
Section T Limitation on Administrative Expenses
Administrative expenses are defined as all costs of the City other than:
(1) amounts paid for the purchase of land;
(2) amounts paid for materials and services, including architectural and engineering services directly
connected with the physical development of the real property in the project;
(3) relocation benefits paid to, or services provided for, persons residing or businesses located in the
project;
(4) amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued
pursuant to section 469.178; or
(5) amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to
finance costs described in clause (1) to (3).
Administrative expenses include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, planning or
economic development consultants, and actual costs incurred by the County in administering the TIF District. Tax
increments may be used to pay administrative expenses of the TIF District up to the lesser of (a) 10% of the total tax
increment expenditures authorized by the TIF Plan or (b) 10% of the total tax increments received by the TIF District.
Section U Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - Four Year Rule
If after four years from certification of the TIF District no demolition, rehabilitation, renovation, or qualified
improvement of an adjacent street has commenced on a parcel located within the TIF District, then that parcel shall
be excluded from the TIF District and the original net tax capacity shall be adjusted accordingly. Qualified
improvements of a street are limited to construction or opening of a new street, relocation of a street, or substantial
reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The City must submit to the County Auditor, by February 1 of the
fifth year, evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District.
If a parcel is excluded from the TIF District and the City or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of the
above activities, the City shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity has commenced and the parcel shall
once again be included in the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify the net tax capacity of the parcel, as most
recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue, and add such amount to the original net tax capacity of the TIF
District.
Section V Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions
Exhibit IV shows the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net
tax capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdictions. The City believes that
there will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed
development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public
assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the
development therein becomes part of the general tax base.
The fiscal and economic implications of the proposed tax increment financing district, as pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2, are listed below.
SPRINGSTED Page 13
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
1. The total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the district is estimated to be
$164,722.
2. To the extent the facility in the proposed TIF District generates any public cost impacts on city -provided
services such as police and fire protection, public infrastructure, and borrowing costs attributable to the
district, such costs will be levied upon the taxable net tax capacity of the City, excluding that portion
captured by the District. The City does not anticipate issuing bonds in conjunction with this project.
3. The amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to school district levies,
assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same,
is estimated to be $42,150.
4. The amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to county levies,
assuming the county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same is
estimated to be $56,150.
5. No additional information has been requested by the county or school district that would enable it to
determine additional costs that will accrue to it due to the development proposed for the district.
Section W Prior Planned Improvements
The City shall accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor (or notice of district enlargement), with a
listing of all properties within the TIF District for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months
immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of
the TIF District by the net tax capacity of each improvement for which a building permit was issued.
There have been no building permits issued in the last 18 months in conjunction with any of the properties within the
TIF District.
Section X Development Agreements
If within a project containing an economic development district, more than 10% of the acreage of the property to be
acquired by the City is purchased with tax increment bonds proceeds (to which tax increment from the property is
pledged), then prior to such acquisition, the City must enter into an agreement for the development of the property.
Such agreement must provide recourse for the City should the development not be completed.
The City anticipates entering into an agreement for development, but does not anticipate acquiring any property
located within the TIF District.
Section Y Assessment Agreements
The City may, upon entering into a development agreement, also enter into an assessment agreement with the
developer, which establishes a minimum market value of the land and improvements for each year during the life of
the TIF District.
The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County or City Assessor who shall review the plans and
specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land, and
so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears to be an accurate estimate,
shall certify the assessment agreement as reasonable. The assessment agreement shall be filed for record in the
office of the County Recorder of each county where the property is located. Any modification or premature
termination of this agreement must first be approved by the City, County and School District.
The City does not anticipate entering into an assessment agreement.
SPRINGSTED
Page 14
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
Section Z Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
Any reduction or enlargement in the geographic area of the Project Area or the TIF District; increase in the amount
of bonded indebtedness to be incurred; increase in the amount of capitalized interest; increase in that portion of the
captured net tax capacity to be retained by the City; increase in the total estimated public costs; or designation of
additional property to be acquired by the City shall be approved only after satisfying all the necessary requirements
for approval of the original TIF Plan. This paragraph does not apply if:
(1) the only modification is elimination of parcels from the TIF District; and
(2) the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of
those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the City agrees that the TIF District's
original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcels
eliminated.
The City must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the TIF
District. The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following the date
of certification.
Section AA Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
Upon adoption of the TIF Plan, the City shall submit a copy of such plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue.
The City shall also request that the County Auditor certify the original net tax capacity and net tax capacity rate of the
TIF District. To assist the County Auditor in this process, the City shall submit copies of the TIF Plan, the resolution
establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of any prior planned improvements. The City
shall also send the County Assessor any assessment agreement establishing the minimum market value of land and
improvements in the TIF District, and shall request that the County Assessor review and certify this assessment
agreement as reasonable.
The County shall distribute to the City the amount of tax increment as it becomes available. The amount of tax
increment in any year represents the applicable property taxes generated by the retained captured net tax capacity
of the TIF District. The amount of tax increment may change due to development anticipated by the TIF Plan, other
development, inflation of property values, or changes in property classification rates or formulas. In administering
and implementing the TIF Plan, the following actions should occur on an annual basis:
(1) prior to July 1, the City shall notify the County Assessor of any new development that has occurred
in the TIF District during the past year to insure that the new value will be recorded in a timely
manner.
(2) if the County Auditor receives the request for certification of a new TIF District, or for modification
of an existing TIF District, before July 1, the request shall be recognized in determining local tax
rates for the current and subsequent levy years. Requests received on or after July 1 shall be
used to determine local tax rates in subsequent years.
(3) each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount of the original net tax capacity of the TIF
District. The amount certified shall reflect any changes that occur as a result of the following:
(a) the value of property that changes from tax-exempt to taxable shall be added to the
original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The reverse shall also apply;
SPRINGSTED Page 15
Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Lakeville and City of
Lakeville, Minnesota
(b) the original net tax capacity may be modified by any approved enlargement or reduction
of the TIF District;
(c) if laws governing the classification of real property cause changes to the percentage of
estimated market value to be applied for property tax purposes, then the resulting
increase or decrease in net tax capacity shall be applied proportionately to the original
net tax capacity and the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District.
The County Auditor shall notify the City of all changes made to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District.
Section AB Filing TIF Plan, Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements
The City will file the TIF Plan, and any subsequent amendments thereto, with the Commissioner of Revenue and the
Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4A. The City will comply
with all reporting requirements for the TIF District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivisions 5 and 6.
SPRINGSTED Page 16
NJ
J
O
N
m
a/J
4,pDR � � TJU AVfA3lb`
— --
. V
�,T12Tj I_. LL
O
p-3(?NJA3
-
� <-1..�'3nWOtiJ d YI
AV
i
�.�3Av�a3AoravH:=.:�---
LET
(�
�
..
=�ara��ar,•i" wH:__, _ d
.tel !'
:anv'flanewvPa�
--�
U�`
jl
3I&
S AaH�-
.i
y
mo OIAI
Itt
/
—
-:31�Y1J;3;hli`JIM
-
3�3nr�ru�
� 3NflR-lpH
-3AV
�
C
w
Exhibit !l
Assumptions Report
City of Lakeville, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development) District No. 20
Proposed Business Expansion (Mendell Inc.)
Draft TIF Plan Exhibits: EMV of $1.047M with 3% MV Inflator
Type of Tax Increment Financing District Economic Development
Maximum Duration of TIF District 8 years from 1st increment
Projected Certification Request Date 06/30/15
Decertification Date 12/31/25 (9 Years of Increment)
2014/2015
Base Estimated Market Value $1,975,200
Original Net Tax Capacity $38,754
City of Lakeville
38.948%
Assess ment/Collection Year
29.633%
ISD #194
2015/2016
2016/2017
2017/2018
2018/2019
Base Estimated Market Value
$1,975,200
$1,975,200
$1,975,200
$1,975,200
Increase in Estimated Market Value
0
1,047,200
1,137,872
1,231,264
Total Estimated Market Value
1,975,200
3,022,400
3,113,072
3,206,464
Total Net Tax Capacity
$38,754
$59,698
$61,511
$63,379
City of Lakeville
38.948%
Dakota County
29.633%
ISD #194
31.459%
Other
5.033%
Local Tax Capacity Rate 105.073% 2014/2015
Fiscal Disparities Contribution From TIF District 39.3723%
Administrative Retainage Percent (maximum = 10%) 5.00%
Pooling Percent 0.00%
Bonds Note (Pay -As -You -Go)
Bonds Dated NA Note Dated 06/30/15
Bond Issue @ 0.00% (NIC) NA Note Rate 0.00%
Eligible Project Costs NA Note Amount $155,912
Present Value Date & Rate 06/30/15 4.00% Present Value Amount $120,389
Notes
Assumptions assume no change to future tax rates, class rates, and a 3% annual MV inflator is assumed
Final 2015 Tax Rates were used.
Total EMV upon completion based on $56/square foot value, as provided by Assessor
Base EMV of $1,975,200 as provided by Dakota County
SPRINGSTED Page 18
W
H Lo
0 0 r- V NM O O (D
V)
> O O
N U, M 6�
N h N h N CO O V I`
co
a r M 0r
vN-• r cM- L17
r`
N
a �
CD �N ?2- CA
� N
Z O
N
64
O O O LO N N M W O h O ti O
O N 00 'ITO ti M O t` O
Vj (6o CD r- r- CO Q) W O— N
N �
X�C O O V (D 00 O Ih LO r
N N
DH EO C) V U-) CD ao OONM V7
3 N --———— N N N (O
C O O 00 N (.0 LO O (f) O 0 N
O o LO LO (O O r r- 00 00 0
NQ LO
J N C') O (fJ
C:5
X CO O N n r- M LO LO Cr tY LO N
IV �
N N a) 00 P,rl, W 0) (O r
C NE O (D CO O N N N
C N ` _
a 2 U f!-}
C
0 0 o a o 0 o a o a o
M M M M M M M M M M M
N + N f� t` f� ti ti ti N ti ti ti
NN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E CU
U-29
0 Ln Ln L(i 0 0 LO 0 LO LO LO
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O 0)"'L 00 M
)M O Cn �C) c"
N
r-� O O M
CO r 0? O C'Ln 00 7%,
N
CNO
r!
67
C N U N
CD �N ?2- CA
� N
Z
N
L
_Lo
(fi
O O O LO N N M W O h O ti O
O N 00 'ITO ti M O t` O
Vj (6o CD r- r- CO Q) W O— N
N �
X�C O O V (D 00 O Ih LO r
N N
DH EO C) V U-) CD ao OONM V7
3 N --———— N N N (O
C O O 00 N (.0 LO O (f) O 0 N
O o LO LO (O O r r- 00 00 0
NQ LO
J N C') O (fJ
C:5
X CO O N n r- M LO LO Cr tY LO N
IV �
N N a) 00 P,rl, W 0) (O r
C NE O (D CO O N N N
C N ` _
a 2 U f!-}
C
0 0 o a o 0 o a o a o
M M M M M M M M M M M
N + N f� t` f� ti ti ti N ti ti ti
NN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E CU
U-29
0 Ln Ln L(i 0 0 LO 0 LO LO LO
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W
z
a
rn
N N X
O O w ti O (fl w 0 O N LO
N 0 7
;�'
t i U
h
CO r 0? O C'Ln 00 7%,
N
B w Q M
--- O— M r- w O N N
N N N R
ZU
Z U
L
U }'
0
O O CO OCO M M r` LC) r- LO
M
N O CD 1q,N O W r- LC)
p
N
00 00 O O C\C �T
N N N M
d
0
a
LO V m LO V LO V
d
�
m m 0
LC) r- Ln Ln LI) LC) Ln Li) LO L() P-
r`tir`r`ti�tir`���
—
H L)
) m V
Doeo00wwwwwwww
M Cl) M (M M M M M M M Cl)
OCL
zm
� C �
d L?
O N}
Z
00
O 1- CO LO O 00 N N 0) N
C C w
Nw
r- R( L!') M M N M iY Ln Oct
0 0 0
U •y
:aH
M
ZU
co 00 a) V)Lri1-rn mLf)
Cl) M LO CO CO CO CD (D r` r-
W a1 L W
C
y
C •v W ws
-p j
0 0 0 q, M W O�r CO
S N Q
f6
C6 m
O O O r- O Ln M m O I- w
N N V O V (C r n O (D
d XO
E �N
to Ln CV (M (D NM 00 ti 00
titiN�00000 N
W 6) O M LO
d LL W
H `
N S CO r 00
M M M
,> C' C
LL
r M M (h co vi M
�
0 LL
d LL
�� = zz 7 N N N N N N
J L
a 0i-
f[I O
0
r•���-�
0)c
MMM 22Q MQ MMMM
�•x e L
daw
UHap
W
z
a
rn
W
a
a� a
U N
O
O
N
O .O cu
It x
6
N
Z L
N
�+
V w
o
v
CN
C
CL
C-
C� co
0)
C
C
e
O
Q ^ M
0
G t
O
r
_ cu
T T c o o
N
L = n N
Y
F-
O
�T
U
CCal
C
O fH
cc
C C w
O O O
H
0
O C *
m w _
C
N
r; LU
_
O
N M
_
C V W
O
Cl)
R
d LL = LU
O
=
O
d M
t a
F- 3 o 'W =
47 LL
C p 0
a s
Z o' a
O
Q.
r
xO R
d
W
L.
U H o
a
a� a
U N
o
Lo
O
r -
O
O .O cu
It x
x
N
COO
N
0:
o
v
oF-ZU
'o
M
C-
C� co
N
It
O
a
U Z
N M
0
Ca
O
r
_ cu
T T c o o
N
L = n N
Y
F-
a)
s
�T
U
m
o
0
O
L
LL
F -
0
0
O C *
.t -
C
N
vr
00 N CO
,U a)
N f6 (DO
_
O
O
Cl)
r� UO
O
O
O
O
i J
CL U
F- 3 o 'W =
Z O
C p 0
a s
Z o' a
5
E U
w o m
Q N
U
aoi
n � E c)
CD
a x
> cmo x
U 0 N o COC
a)
C
aa) M F-
O
o
a)
C to
c o Z
0
0
0
0 0
C6 *
U a
M
r
U .�
M N
M
OMi
cM0
�
O O
L CA U
O O W
-0
CID
M
0)
N
r
Cl)
LO Lf)
O
J
Q
d
x
_ Fcu
-
0
Mo
0
a) X
LO
—
O
(b as
a)
O
C14
Z X N Cl O
F-ZU
�
co
I I
LO
LO
LO
Lc)
X..-
4) 0)cu
U
N_
NN
NA
N
CV
N
N
N
O N a) m
a U Z U
i
t
d X
Ul)
0
00
O
N
O .O cu
It x
"i
00
N
C5
N
0:
o
v
oF-ZU
'o
M
v
N
It
O
CDCD
a)
X ~
CCS N
N F -Z
Ln
OD
o a)
N X w
O
Y
y
ate+
CND
N
O
a)m
v
o
0
00
O
It
O
M
N M
0
Ca
O
r
Ln
OD
o a)
N X w
O
Y
y
ate+
CND
N
O
O N
00
M
C4ca
00
O
It
rn
�
0
Ca
Q
M
T T c o o
N T
>
o
o a)
N X w
U
Y
y
ate+
C6 UOX
N _ 2
O
O N
a) a p U
M
C4ca
y
:3
> `u a) a a)
.L
O
rn
a
6
_
Ca
Q
C>a
T T c o o
N
L = n N
Y
0
a)
s
�T
U
m
o
0
O
>
o
o a)
N X w
U
0 (D
y
ate+
C6 UOX
N _ 2
ZA
C
O N
a) a p U
M
C4ca
y
:3
> `u a) a a)
.L
O
V U C6 L cc
Ca
Az- = p
C>a
T T c o o
c
L = n N
N
42) CU
cn C N
U
to
` to N
N
LL
F -
0)
LL Cp,C U
U X O -0
.t -
a) +6 c O
O
00 N CO
N
•V
N .`-�
CCS
Q N
M p v_1
m o y m
CSS
U
CU -0 x p L
U ��a mF-
x
H v
X O U O
O
F- 3 o 'W =
Z O
C p 0
a s
Z o' a
5
E U
w o m
Q N
U
aoi
n � E c)
CD
a x
> cmo x
U 0 N o COC
a)
C
aa) M F-
O
o
a)
C to
c o Z
O
U a= N
p Q
C' E
O N 7
U
a y CO
U .�
Q ,co
n .< 3 a o
t
ow v�
°�•.
a) L O N
'—" w W
C ()
U)
r
N
d
d
x
U ,4
2-1 T
LL QTi
H
U
� c
N
l6 a)
U �
T 'CD
rn
m c
CL
C6 CO -
U 0
m,O
� U
C N
Ca
O
II �
Co
CL y
U
M C
_ O
O U
C �
a� a
x� ,E
x a)
F- H
0
N
N
rn
m
d
A
C/]
z
1--1
a
Exhibit V
Market Value Analysis Report
City of Lakeville, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development) District No. 20
Proposed Business Expansion (Mendell Inc.)
Draft TIF Plan Exhibits: EMV of $1.047M with 3% MV Inflator
Assumptions
Present Value Date
P.V. Rate - Gross T.I.
06/30/15
4.00%
Increase in EMV With TIF District
$1,853,486
Less: P.V of Gross Tax Increment
127,185
Subtotal
$1,726,301
Less: Increase in EMV Without TIF
0
Difference
$1,726,301
Annual
Present
Gross Tax
Value @
Year
Increment
4.00%
1
2017
13,342
12,214
2
2018
14,497
12,761
3
2019
15,687
13,277
4
2020
16,913
13,764
5
2021
18,175
14,222
6
2022
19,475
14,653
7
2023
20,814
15,059
8
2024
22,194
15,439
9
2025
23,615
15,796
$164,712
$127,185
SPRINGSTED Page 21
Hill I MW
§§§ JZO
■g 1 w 2 H d
■ 33 W Q w Q
C/) ya
---------------
nn
w
c
z � F �------------
4oIr
Bin i
fop ZS3�'
aF2 ----
Ee og / si3
d
d I
■ I I I �/s / I I
O
I ;
o �e
� blQyl J ^�
y 'JNIOlIf191N3�tlfOtl
1110 aI
I'
�I
:a
133N.LS 439LZ y
B
w Iy
`BF
g€=�b
��
4 g �� .R Y gYg d Y IS��F � I.e I.�
SSL¢ S iii