The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 09 January 4 PUBLI AND Proposed Conduct Street Re bonds. Followin 1. M 2 2. M (2 B 3. M Ex Approva Reconstr in the res Approva member Overview The Cap commun The CIP w Staff has  N  La $ 2  F im 4, 2016 C HEARIN D STREET R O d Action t a public h econstructio g the public Move to app 020); Move to ap 2016-2020) onds; Move to app xpenditures l of these ruction Plan solution. l on the S rs present. w ital Improve nity’s infrast was discuss updated th North Creek G and of Ama 357k by ent 015; uture Dako mpact on th G FOR THE RECONSTRU OBLIGATIO earing for t on Plan and c hearing, St rove the Res prove the and Approv prove the R s from the P motions w n and provid treet Recon ement Plan ructure imp ed at multip he Plans to re Greenway T azement - T tering into a ota County e City of Lak E PROPOSE UCTION PL ON STREET the propose d the intent taff recomm solution Ado Resolution ving the Issu Resolution roceeds of B will result des the City nstruction P (CIP) for 20 provements f ple work ses eflect subse Trail– remov The cost of an agreeme Highways- keville’s bud ED 2016-202 LAN AND T T RECONST ed 2016-202 t to issue ge mends adopt opting the 5 Adopting t uance of Ge Declaring t Bonds to be in adoptio the flexibilit Plan require 016-2020 pr for the next ssions in 20 quent coun ed from CIP the equipm ent to purch adjusted to dget; 20 CAPITA THE INTEN TRUCTION 20 Capital Im eneral oblig tion of the fo 5-Year Capit the 5-Year eneral Oblig he City’s In Issued by th on of the 2 ty to issue b es an affirm rovides the t five years. 015, most re ncil direction P until develo ment was re hase the pro o match the AL IMPROV NT TO ISSU N BONDS mprovemen gation stree ollowing mo tal Improvem Street Reco gation Street ntent to Re he City. 2016-2020 bonds for th mative vote financial fra cently on O n provided a opment occ educed due oduct prior t e Dakota C Item No VEMENT PL UE GENERA nt Plan (CIP) et reconstru otions: ment Plan (2 onstruction t Reconstru imburse Ce CIP and S he projects l of ALL co amework fo October 26, 2 as follows: curs; e from $393 to Novembe County CIP o. LAN AL ) and ction 2016- Plan ction ertain Street listed ouncil or our 2015. 3k to er 13, – no  Equipment Fund – The 2016 budget included an additional Maintenance II position in the Street Department. An additional dump truck was anticipated with this new position in 2016 but was inadvertently left in 2017 of the Equipment Plan. The Equipment Plan has been updated to reflect the dump truck in 2016. As part of the consent agenda this evening, the Council considered approval of a 2016 budget amendment for the dump truck. The Planning Commission reviewed the CIP at their December 3, 2015 meeting. A motion was passed recommending adoption of the CIP by the City Council and finding that the capital improvements identified in the 2016-2020 CIP were consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the draft Planning Commission meeting minutes is attached to this report. The Internal Revenue Service has issued Treasury Reg. 1.150-2 which provides that proceeds of tax-exempt bonds used to reimburse prior expenditures will not be deemed spent unless certain requirements are met. In order to meet these requirements, the City should annually declare its intent to bond for certain projects. The resolution includes projects that may use bonds as a funding source. Primary Issues to Consider  Does the plan adequately address the City of Lakeville’s infrastructure requirements?  Does this resolution require the City to issue bonds for the projects? Approval of this resolution only approves the City’s intent to bond. It does not approve the sale of bonds or the projects. This declaration does not obligate the City to issue bonds for the projects. Supporting Information  Resolutions (3)  Capital Improvement Plan 2016-2020 (includes Street Reconstruction Plan 2016- 2020)  Draft Planning Commission 12/03/2015 Meeting Minutes Jerilyn Erickson Finance Director Financial Impact: $133M in 2016-2020. Budget – Yes Source: Various Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): ___2016-2020 CIP___________________________ Community Values: _Good Value for Public Services____________________________ CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. ___ RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (2016-2020) WHEREAS, The purpose of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is to protect the infrastructure and capital assets of the City of Lakeville by establishing a replacement plan for existing infrastructure and capital assets and by identifying those improvements necessary to accommodate the growth of the community; and WHEREAS, The CIP is a flexible planning document that attempts to balance the financial resources of the City with its needs; and WHEREAS, The CIP covers a five-year period of 2016 - 2020; sets forth the estimated schedule, timing, and details of specific capital improvements by year, together with the estimated costs, the need for the improvements, and sources of revenue to pay for the improvements; and WHEREAS, During the course of the preparation and review of the Capital Improvement Plan, the Council has considered, for each capital improvement: the condition of the City’s existing infrastructure, including the projected need for repair or replacement; the likely demand for the improvements; the estimated cost of the improvements; the available public resources; the relative benefits and costs of alternative uses of the funds; operating costs of the proposed improvements; and WHEREAS, On January 4, 2016, the Lakeville City Council conducted a Public Hearing on the 2016-2020 CIP and offered opportunity for public testimony on the capital spending priorities of the City Council. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville Minnesota as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. 2. The 2016-2020 Capital Improvement Plan is hereby adopted. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 4th day of January, 2016. CITY OF LAKEVILLE ___________________________ Matt Little, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Charlene Friedges, City Clerk VOTE Little Anderson Davis LaBeau Swecker Aye ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. ___ RESOLUTION ADOPTING A 5-YEAR STREET RECONSTRUCTION PLAN (2016-2020) AND APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION STREET RECONSTRUCTION BONDS WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.58, subd. 3b (the "Street Reconstruction Act"), the City has prepared a 2016-2020 street reconstruction plan dated January 4, 2016 (the "Street Reconstruction Plan") which sets forth various street reconstruction plan projects to be undertaken in the City within the next five years (the "Street Reconstruction Plan Projects"). The Street Reconstruction Plan recommends the issuance of general obligation street reconstruction bonds under the Street Reconstruction Act in the approximate principal amount of $39 million (the "Street Reconstruction Bonds") to finance a portion of the costs of the Street Reconstruction Plan Projects; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Street Reconstruction Act, the City is authorized to issue and sell obligations for street reconstruction under the circumstances and within the limitations set forth in the Street Reconstruction Act. The Street Reconstruction Act provides that a street reconstruction plan may be financed with bonds issued by the City, following a public hearing and the adoption of such plan, and other proceedings conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Street Reconstruction Act; and; and WHEREAS, on January 4, 2016 the City Council held a public hearing on the adoption of the Street Reconstruction Plan and the issuance of the Bonds after publication of the notice of public hearing for the Street Reconstruction Plan not less than 10 days nor more than 28 days prior to the date thereof in the City's official newspaper; and WHEREAS, all parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal to adopt the Street Reconstruction Plan and to undertake and finance a portion of the Street Reconstruction Plan Projects with Street Reconstruction Bonds and any written comments submitted prior to the hearing were considered. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville Minnesota as follows: 1. CITY POLICIES AND GOALS. The financing of the Street Reconstruction Plan Projects and the issuance of the Street Reconstruction Bonds will further the policies and goals of the City as set forth in the Street Reconstruction Plan. 2. ADOPTION OF STREET RECONSTRUCTION PLAN. Based on information received at the public hearing, such written comments (if any) and such other facts and circumstances as the City Council deems relevant, it is hereby found, determined and declared that: (a) the Street Reconstruction Plan Projects proposed in the Street Reconstruction Plan will allow the City to construct and finance various street reconstruction projects; (b) the Street Reconstruction Plan is hereby approved and adopted in the forms presently on file with the City. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF BONDS. The City hereby gives preliminary approval to the issuance of the Bonds, the proceeds of which will be used, together with additional funds of the City to finance costs of various Street Reconstruction Plan Projects and to pay costs of issuance of the Bonds. The City staff is hereby authorized, in consultation with the City's financial advisor and legal counsel, to take all necessary action to call for the sale of the Bonds and to present proposals to this Council for approval at a subsequent meeting. 4. VOTER REFERENDUM CONTINGENCY. Pursuant to the Street Reconstruction Act, if a petition requesting a vote on the question of issuing the Street Reconstruction Bonds, signed by voters equal to five percent of the votes cast in the last municipal general election, is filed within thirty days of the public hearing, the City may issue the Street Reconstruction Bonds only after obtaining the approval of a majority of the voters voting on the question of the issuance of the Street Reconstruction Bonds. The authorizations and approvals contained herein are subject to and contingent upon not receiving such a petition, or, in the event such a petition is filed, the approving vote of a majority of the voters voting on the question of the issuance of the Street Reconstruction Bonds. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 4th day of January, 2016. CITY OF LAKEVILLE ___________________________ Matt Little, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Charlene Friedges, City Clerk VOTE Little Anderson Davis LaBeau Swecker Aye ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. ___ RESOLUTION DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY WHEREAS, The Internal Revenue Service has issued Treasury Reg. 1.150-2 (the “ Reimbursement Regulations”) providing that proceeds of tax-exempt bonds used to reimburse prior expenditures will not be deemed spent unless certain requirements are met; and WHEREAS, The City expects to incur certain expenditures that may be financed temporarily from sources other than bonds, and later reimbursed from the proceeds of tax- exempt bonds; and WHEREAS, The City has determined to make this declaration of official intent (“Declaration”) to reimburse certain costs from proceeds of bonds in accordance with the Reimbursement regulations; and WHEREAS, The total estimated general obligation bonds for 2016 are $34,220,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, Minnesota as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. 2. The City proposes to undertake the following projects (the “Projects”): a. #15-02 2015 Street Reconstruction (Phase II) b. #15-02 2015 Watermain Replacement (Phase II) c. #16-04 Highview Avenue (CR70-South City Limit) d. #16-02 2016 Street Reconstruction e. #16-02 2016 Watermain Replacement f. #15-12 202nd Street/Hamburg Avenue Intersection g. #15-16 Lift Station #6 Replacement h. #13-09 Dodd Blvd: 194th Street to 185th Street i. #14-10 Kenwood Trail: Dodd Blvd to 185th Street j. #15-10 Well #21 Construction 3. The City reasonably expects to reimburse the expenditures made for certain costs of the Projects from the proceeds of bonds in an estimated maximum principal amount of the following: a. #15-02 2015 Street Reconstruction (Phase II) - $8,100,000 b. #15-02 2015 Watermain Replacement (Phase II) - $3,555,000 c. #16-04 Highview Avenue (CR70-South City Limit) - $420,000 d. #16-02 2016 Street Reconstruction - $9,350,000 e. #16-02 2016 Watermain Replacement - $3,200,000 f. #15-12 202nd Street/Hamburg Avenue Intersection - $200,000 g. #15-16 Lift Station #6 Replacement - $720,000 h. #13-09 Dodd Blvd: 194th Street to 185th Street - $2,500,000 i. #14-10 Kenwood Trail: Dodd Blvd to 185th Street - $5,300,000 j. #15-10 Well #21 Construction - $875,000 The City may declare other separate statements of reimbursement intent in connection with specific public improvements projects as they are initiated under Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 444, or for other capital projects, with the understanding that such additional declarations of reimbursement intent will supplement this resolution. All reimbursed expenditures will be capital expenditures, costs of issuance of the bonds, or other expenditures eligible for reimbursement under Section 1.150-2(d)(3) of the Reimbursement Regulations. 4. This Declaration has been made no later than 60 days after payment of any original expenditure to be subject to a reimbursement allocation with respect to the proceeds of bonds, except for the following expenditures: a) costs of issuance of bonds; b) costs in an amount not in excess of $100,000 or five percent of the proceeds of an issue; or c) “preliminary expenditures” up to an amount not in excess of 20 percent of the aggregate issue price of the issue or issues that are reasonably expected by the City to finance the project for which the preliminary expenditures were incurred. The term preliminary expenditures” includes architectural, engineering, surveying, bond issuance, and similar costs that are incurred prior to commencement of acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of a project, other than land acquisition, site preparation, and similar costs incident to commencement of construction. 5. This Declaration is an expression of the reasonable expectations of the City based on the facts and circumstances known to the City as the date hereof. The anticipated original expenditures for the Projects and the principal amount of the bonds described in paragraph 3 are consistent with the City’s budgetary and financial circumstances. No sources other than proceeds of bonds to be issued by the City are, or are reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated on a long term basis, or otherwise set aside pursuant to the City’s budget or financial policies to pay such Project expenditures. 6. This Declaration is intended to constitute a declaration of the official intent for the purposes of the Reimbursement Regulations. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 4th day of January, 2016. CITY OF LAKEVILLE ___________________________ Matt Little, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Charlene Friedges, City Clerk VOTE Little Anderson Davis LaBeau Swecker Aye ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ IIMP C PRO 2 CAP OVE 2016 PITA ME 6 – 20 AL NT 020 PLA AN 20 Introducti Transport P N Utilities Parks Facility P Equipmen Street Rec 016-202 ion tation rogrammed Non-program Plan (2015-20 nt Plan (2015 construction Table 20 Capit mmed 025) 5-2025) n Plan of Cont tal Impr tents rovemennt Plan Page 2 7 22 24 37 53 54 55 1 The infras make and a The P of no (MSA eleme relian The C may repre in th Comp Coun Cate Tran the C Majo prope Utilit system sanita new build Park recre park are fi Facil and o Liquo Capital Im structure nee ers and the c administratio Plan identifi on-tax reven A), connecti ents to finan nce on prope City should p require cha sents a sign he years ah prehensive nty Capital Im egories nsportation City with the or funding so erty taxes. ty infrastruc ms such as ary sewer an systems is ding permit. ks system inc ation faciliti dedication f inanced with lities include other munic or Fund cont mprovement eds and dev community on of improv es the alloca nues to finan ion charges ncing City im erty taxes to pursue the fi anges in bo nificant finan ead. The Plan and ta mprovement includes all e exception o ources includ cture includ wells, towe nd storm sew connection Maintenanc cludes region ies such as th fees collecte h property ta e the city ha cipal buildin tributions, sa Plan prov velopment ob with a strat vement proje ation of the C nce the imp , special as mprovement finance thes inancing stra oth costs a ncial, engine Capital Imp akes into c t Plan. roads, street of Interstate de Municipa des the con ers and the wer systems. charges whe ce projects ar nal, commun he Arts Cent d when prop xes and othe all, police st ngs. Primar ale of assets vides a lon bjectives of tegic (docum ects and equi City’s financ provements. sessments a ts. The use se improvem ategy as pres and revenue eering and d provement onsideration ts, street ligh e I-35 and ro al State Aid S struction an water treatm The primar en property re financed w nity and neig ter and Herit perty develo er revenue so tation, fire s ry revenue and propert ng range fr f our commu mented) app ipment acqu cial resource Municipal and other re of these rev ments. sented, but b es. The Cap development Plan is con n projects i hts, bridges outine maint Street funds nd major m ment facility ry source of develops o with user fee ghborhood p tage Center. ops and gran ources. stations, cen sources incl ty taxes. framework t unity. It pro proach to im uisitions. es and maxim l State Aid evenue sour venue source bear in mind pital Impro undertaking nsistent wit identified in and traffic s tenance of C s, special ass maintenance y. Utilities f financing fo or with the i es. parks as wel Major reso nts. Mainten ntral mainten lude, but no to meet th ovides polic mplementatio mizes the us Street Fund rces are vita es reduces th future event ovement Pla g for the Cit th the City n the Dakot signals withi County road sessments an of all wate also includ or developin issuance of ll as trails an ources includ nance project nance facilit ot limited to he cy on se ds al he ts an ty ’s ta in ds. nd er de ng a nd de ts ty o, 2 Equi sourc sale o Prog The o years show C Transp Utility Parks Facilit Equipm Tot ipment inclu ces include, of assets and gram Sum overwhelmin s. The total wn on subseq ategory portation y ties ment tal Tran $7 udes all majo but not limi d property tax mmary ng majority budgeted ca quent pages. 2016 17,896,30$ 7,053,050 3,415,259 955,350 3,427,082 32,747,042$ nsportation 6,328,857 58% Equ $13, 1 or equipmen ited to, Liqu xes. of capital in apital expend 2017 1 15,667$ 0 4,249 9 1,678 0 645 2 3,083 2 25,323$ Exp ipment ,818,464 10% 2016 ‐2 $13 nt acquisition uor Fund con nvestments a ditures by ca 20 ,369 13,9$ ,236 6,6 ,281 2,5 ,042 4 ,950 3,1 ,878 26,8$ penditures Faciliti $2,798,8 2% 2020 PRO 32,559,8 ns and replac ntributions, are in transp ategory are s 18 995,220 1$ 647,978 592,710 432,625 191,854 860,387 2$ $1es 817 OJECTS 815 cement. Prim Cable TV fr portation for shown below 2019 14,485,562 $ 3,891,013 1,929,187 491,200 2,155,434 22,952,396 $ Parks 1,049,538 8% mary revenu ranchise fee the next fiv w. Details ar 2020 14,284,405 6,722,862 1,434,101 274,600 1,960,144 24,676,112 Utility $28,564,139 22% ue s, ve re 3 Financing Summary The projects are financed from diverse revenues sources. A summary is shown below. Source 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Taxes 8,707,419$ 10,644,916$ 11,139,711$ 11,103,583$ 9,938,374$ Dakota County 1,598,250 385,000 365,000 - - Municipal State Aid 2,756,172 1,890,151 1,420,000 1,250,000 1,740,000 Special Assessments 3,513,230 4,642,341 4,488,035 4,640,415 4,390,931 Utility Operating Fees 5,908,625 3,946,361 3,820,464 3,462,513 4,634,987 Utility Trunk Fees 2,184,000 348,875 2,703,592 459,500 2,118,875 Liquor Fund 575,975 648,600 606,400 600,000 713,000 Other 7,503,371 2,817,634 2,317,185 1,436,385 1,139,945 Total 32,747,042$ 25,323,878$ 26,860,387$ 22,952,396$ 24,676,112$ Revenue Sources The predominant revenue source is taxes. Taxes 39% Dakota County 2% Municipal State Aid 7% Special Assessments 16% Utility Operating Fees 16% Utility Trunk Fees 6%Liquor Fund 2% Other 12% REVENUE SOURCES 2016 - 2020 4 Debt Issuance The City will issue debt over the next five years to finance street construction projects and utility infrastructure improvements. The debt will be repaid from various revenue sources. A majority of the debt is paid for from property tax levies and the remaining generated by other revenue sources such as water connection charges, state-aid for street construction, special assessments, tax increments, utility user fees, and liquor funds. A summary of outstanding long-term debt is shown below: 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Governmental Activities: General Obligation Bonds 54,865,000$ 50,705,000$ 37,325,000$ 34,970,000$ 32,475,000$ 29,865,000$ G.O. Improvement Bonds 34,130,000 31,790,000 29,075,000 26,350,000 23,635,000 21,145,000 Tax Increment Bonds 1,680,000 1,460,000 1,240,000 1,010,000 770,000 525,000 State-Aid Street Revenue Bonds 7,895,000 7,145,000 6,205,000 5,235,000 4,685,000 4,125,000 Arena Revenue Bonds 635,000 490,000 335,000 170,000 - - HRA Lease Revenue Bonds 7,855,000 7,585,000 7,270,000 6,930,000 6,575,000 6,205,000 Business-Type Activities: Liquor Revenue Bonds 2,895,000 2,715,000 2,525,000 2,325,000 2,115,000 1,895,000 Total Bonded Indebtedness 109,955,000$ 101,890,000$ 83,975,000$ 76,990,000$ 70,255,000$ 63,760,000$ *Does not include debt to be issued in conjunction with CIP Financial Impact of the Capital Improvement Plan The following chart shows the impact of the CIP. It includes the debt that would be issued for street improvement projects (special assessments and city portion), utility improvement projects, and equipment certificates issued for major equipment purchases per the Equipment Plan. $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 $200 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 (i n mi l l i o n s ) Projected Debt Balances (All Debt) 01‐04‐2016 Cumm. CIP Debt Projected Debt Existing Debt New CIP Debt 5 Impact of the Capital Improvement Plan on the Operating Budget The City’s Operating Budget is affected by the Capital Improvement Plan. Capital improvements typically result in ongoing expenses for routine operation, repair and maintenance upon completion or acquisition. Existing City facilities and equipment will eventually require rehabilitation, renovation or upgrades to accommodate new uses or address needed improvements. Older facilities usually involve higher maintenance and repair costs as well. Generally speaking, capital improvements make a positive contribution to the economic vitality, quality of life and fiscal well-being of our community in spite of potential recurring operating costs. Capital projects such as the redevelopment of under- performing or under-used areas of the City, and the infrastructure expansion needed to support new development, help promote the economic development and growth that generates additional operating revenues. These new revenue sources provide the funding needed to maintain, improve and expand the City’s infrastructure. 6 TRA P AN PRO P SPO OGR PRO ORT RAM OJEC TAT MM CTS TIO MED S ON D 7 Total CIP # Project / Financing 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016-2020 TP-1 Dodd Blvd (CR 9): 194th St - 185th St Municipal State Aid 1,978,000 - - - - 1,978,000 Escrow Fund 452,000 - - - - 452,000 Water Trunk Fund 520,000 - - - - 520,000 2,950,000 - - - - 2,950,000 TP-2 Kenwood Trl (CR50): Dodd Blvd (CR 9) to 185th St Municipal State Aid 568,172 1,455,151 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,023,323 Escrow Fund - 276,041 - - - 276,041 568,172 1,731,192 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,299,364 TP-3 Collector Road Reconstruction G.O. Improvement Bonds - Taxes 250,019 2,112,892 1,408,704 2,591,644 665,933 7,029,192 G.O. Improvement Bonds - Sp. Assess.166,680 1,354,594 1,008,789 1,647,742 443,955 4,621,760 Escrow Fund - - 104,480 - - 104,480 416,699 3,467,486 2,521,973 4,239,386 1,109,888 11,755,432 TP-4 Pavement Management - Maintenance Taxes 1,488,580 1,215,324 1,263,937 1,314,494 1,367,074 6,649,409 Escrow Fund 60,000 - - - - 60,000 Municipal State Aid 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 600,000 1,668,580 1,335,324 1,383,937 1,434,494 1,487,074 7,309,409 TP-5 Street Reconstruction Property Tax Levy 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds - Taxes 5,985,300 4,881,620 4,808,986 4,439,009 5,870,467 25,985,382 G.O. Improvement Bonds - Sp. Assess.3,346,550 3,287,747 3,239,324 2,992,673 3,946,976 16,813,270 9,381,850 8,219,367 8,098,310 7,481,682 9,867,443 43,048,652 TP-6 Pilot Knob Road and 160th Street Communications Fund - 14,000 41,000 - - 55,000 - 14,000 41,000 - - 55,000 TP-7 Ipava Avenue and 165th Street Municipal State Aid - - - 130,000 620,000 750,000 - - - 130,000 620,000 750,000 TP-8 172nd Street: Realignment at Kenwood Trail Dakota County 822,250 - - - - 822,250 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Fund 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Storm Sewer Trunk Fund 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Water Trunk Fund 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Tax Abatement Bonds/ Southfork IRR 607,500 - - - - 607,500 TIF Fund (79,750) - - - - (79,750) 1,800,000 - - - - 1,800,000 TP-9 202nd Street and Hamburg Avenue Dakota County 110,000 385,000 365,000 - - 860,000 Municipal State Aid 90,000 315,000 300,000 - - 705,000 Water Trunk Fund - - 85,000 - - 85,000 200,000 700,000 750,000 - - 1,650,000 TP-11 215th Street Principal Arterial Study General Fund 45,000 45,000 45,000 - - - - 45,000 TP-12 Right-of-Way Preservation and Management City of Lakeville (Unspecified)200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 TP-13 Future Dakota County Highways Dakota County 666,000 - - - - 666,000 666,000 - - - - 666,000 TOTAL 17,896,301$ 15,667,369$ 13,995,220$ 14,485,562$ 14,284,405$ 76,328,857$ TRANSPORTATION 8 Total CIP # Financing / Project 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016-2020 Communications Fund TP-6 Pilot Knob Road and 165th Street - 14,000 41,000 - - 55,000 Dakota County TP-8 172nd Street: Realignment at Kenwood Trail 822,250 - - - - 822,250 TP-9 202nd Street and Hamburg Avenue 110,000 385,000 365,000 - - 860,000 TP-13 Future Dakota County Highways 666,000 - - - - 666,000 Total Dakota County 1,598,250 385,000 365,000 - - 2,348,250 Escrow TP-1 Dodd Blvd (CR 9): 194th St - 185th St 452,000 - - - - 452,000 TP-2 Kenwood Trl (CR50): Dodd Blvd (CR 9) to 185th St - 276,041 - - - 276,041 TP-3 Collector Road Reconstruction - - 104,480 - - 104,480 TP-4 Pavement Management - Maintenance 60,000 - - - - 60,000 179th Street: Hayes Ave -0 Cedar/175th Street: Dodd to 179th - - - - - - Total Escrows 512,000 276,041 104,480 - - 892,521 General Fund TP-11 215th Street Arterial Study 45,000 - - - - 45,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds - Sp. Assess. TP-5 Street Reconstruction 3,346,550 3,287,747 3,239,324 2,992,673 3,946,976 16,813,270 TP-3 Collector Road Reconstruction 166,680 1,354,594 1,008,789 1,647,742 443,955 4,621,760 Total G.O. Improvement Bonds - Special Assessments 3,513,230 4,642,341 4,248,113 4,640,415 4,390,931 21,435,030 G.O. Improvement Bonds - Taxes TP-5 Street Reconstruction 5,985,300 4,881,620 4,808,986 4,439,009 5,870,467 25,985,382 TP-3 Collector Road Reconstruction 250,019 2,112,892 1,408,704 2,591,644 665,933 7,029,192 Total G.O. Improvement Bonds - Taxes 6,235,319 6,994,512 6,217,690 7,030,653 6,536,400 33,014,574 Municipal State Aid TP-1 Dodd Blvd (CR 9): 194th St - 185th St 1,978,000 - - - - 1,978,000 TP-2 Kenwood Trl (CR50): Dodd Blvd (CR 9) to 185th St 568,172 1,455,151 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,023,323 TP-4 Pavement Management - Maintenance 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 600,000 TP-7 Ipava Avenue and 165th Street - - - 130,000 620,000 750,000 TP-9 202nd Street and Hamburg Avenue 90,000 315,000 300,000 - - 705,000 Total Municipal State Aid 2,756,172 1,890,151 1,420,000 1,250,000 1,740,000 9,056,323 Property Taxes and Fund Balance Reserves TP-5 Street Reconstruction 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 TP-4 Pavement Management - Maintenance 1,488,580 1,215,324 1,263,937 1,314,494 1,367,074 6,649,409 Total Property Taxes and Fund Balance Reserves 1,538,580 1,265,324 1,313,937 1,364,494 1,417,074 6,899,409 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Fund TP-8 172nd Street: Realignment at Kenwood Trail 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Storm Sewer Trunk Fund TP-8 172nd Street: Realignment at Kenwood Trail 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Water Trunk Fund TP-1 Dodd Blvd (CR 9): 194th St - 185th St 520,000 - - - - 520,000 TP-8 172nd Street: Realignment at Kenwood Trail 150,000 - - - - 150,000 TP-9 202nd Street and Hamburg Avenue - - 85,000 - - 85,000 670,000 - 85,000 - - 755,000 Tax Abatement Bonds / Southfork IRR TP-8 172nd Street: Realignment at Kenwood Trail 607,500 - - - - 607,500 TIF Fund TP-8 172nd Street: Realignment at Kenwood Trail (79,750) - - - - (79,750) City of Lakeville (Unspecified) TP-12 Right-of-way Preservation and Management 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 TOTAL 17,896,301 15,667,369 13,995,220 14,485,562 14,284,405 76,328,857 TRANSPORTATION Financing Summary 9 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje Dako highw impro signa the pr ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: ect Descript ota County i way from 19 ovements an al at the inte roject costs i TRA r: r: rt: tion and Lo is proposing 94th Street to nd provide f ersection of D is shown. Revenues Escrow Fun Municipal S Water Trun Expenditur Constructio ANSPOR Dodd Boul City Projec Chris Petre 2016 (cons Dakota Cou cation g to expand 185th Street for increasin Dodd Boule nd State Aid Fund nk Fund Tot res on Tot RTATIO levard: ct 13-09 and ee, Public W struction) unty Dodd Boule t (CSAH 60) ng traffic le evard and 18 2016 452,000 1,978,000 520,000 tal 2,950,000$ 2,950,000 tal 2,950,000$ ON (TP-1 194th Street d Dakota Cou Works Directo evard (CSA ) to alleviate evels. The p 85th Street. Total (2016 0 45 0 1,97 0 52 0 2,95$ 0 2,95 0 2,95$ ) to 185th Stre unty Project or H 9) to a 4 e congestion project inclu Only the C 6-2020) 52,000 78,000 20,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 eet 9-36 -lane divide n, make safet udes a traffi ity’s share o ed ty fic of 10 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje Dako highw opera proje Kenw neigh proje of the Reven Escrow Munic Expen Design Land A Constr ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: ect Descript ota County i way from 18 ations, make ct may also wood Trail a hborhood. D ct costs, wit e project cos nues w Fund cipal State Aid Fu T nditures n Acquisition ruction T TRA r: r: rt: tion and Lo is proposing 85th Street (C e safety imp o include loc and Icenic T Dakota Coun th equal $1 m sts is shown. 2015 und 1,230,2 Total 1,230,2$ 415,0 815,2 Total 1,230,2$ ANSPOR Kenwood T City Projec Chris Petre 2017 (cons Dakota Cou cation g to expand CSAH 60) to provements cal road con Trail, and a nty will adv million paym 2016 - - 293 568,172 293 568,172$ 000 - 293 568,172 - - 293 568,172$ RTATIO Trail: Dodd ct 14-10 and ee, Public W struction) unty Kenwood T o Dodd Boul and provide nstruction, i temporary s vance fund $ ments made 2017 276,041 1,455,151 1,731,192 $ $ - - 1,731,192 1,731,192 $ $ ON (TP-2 d Boulevard t d Dakota Cou Works Directo Trail (CSAH evard (CSA e for increa involving an secondary a $3 million o in 2018-202 2018 - 1,000,000 1, 1,000,000$1,$ - - 1,000,000 1, 1,000,000$1,$ ) to 185th Stre unty Project or H 50) to a 4 AH 9) to impr asing traffic n access roa access to the of the City’s 20. Only the 2019 20 - ,000,000 1,00 ,000,000 1,00$ - - ,000,000 1,00 ,000,000 1,00$ eet 50-19 -lane divide rove roadwa levels. Th ad connectin e Jaguar Pat s share of th e City’s shar 020 Tota (2016-2 276 00,000 5,023 00,000 5,299$ 568 00,000 4,731 00,000 5,299$ ed ay he ng th he re al 2020) Tota (Proje 6,041 27 3,323 6,77 9,364 7,04$ - 41 8,172 1,90 1,192 4,73 9,364 7,04$ al ect) 76,041 71,239 47,280 5,000 01,088 1,192 47,280 11 Proje Proje Antic Proje Lakev City the m R I E * E C ect Name: ect Manage cipated Star ect Descript ville’s colle collector roa maximum ser Revenues Improvement Const. Debt Issuance - G. Property Taxes (fu Est. Special Assess Escrow Fund *Estimated Special A Expenditures Collector Rehabilitati Highview Avenue: Kenrick Ave: N. C Holyoke Ave: 215t Holyoke Ave/210th Ipava Ave: 185th - Hamburg Avenue: 172nd St: Kenyon A Klamath Tr: S. CR Kodiak/175th Stree Judicial/168th Stre Heritage Dr/Iberia Highview Avenue: TRA r: rt: tion and Lo ctor road rec adways, to m rvice life at t Fund O. Improvement Bon ture years) sments* Tota Assessments include on CR 70 - S. City Lim ity Limit - 173rd th - Heritage Dr h Intersection Kenwood Tr 202nd - Lkvl. Blvd Ave - Kodiak Ave R 5 - N. CR 5 et et Ave CR 46 - 175th To ANSPOR Collector R Chris Petre Annual cation construction maintain the the best over 2016 nds 250,019 166,680 - al 416,699$ $ assessments to City- mit 416,699 - - - - . - - - - - - - tal 416,699$ $ RTATIO Road Recons ee, Public W n program is e overall con rall cost. 2017 20 2,112,892 1,4 1,354,594 1,0 - 1 3,467,486$ 2,5$ -owned properties w - 2,234,045 1,152,441 81,000 - 1,4 - 1,1 - - - - - - 3,467,486$ 2,5$ ON (TP-3 struction Works Directo s designed to ndition of th 018 2019 408,704 2,591,64 008,789 1,647,74 04,480 521,973 4,239,3$ with front footage alo - - - - 405,366 16,607 - 701,73 - 1,534,10 - 796,52 - 744,04 - 462,9 - 521,973 4,239,3$ ) or o provide m he road surf 2020 44 665,933 42 443,955 - - 86 1,109,888$ ong the project. - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 - 03 - 25 - 44- 83 - - 1,109,888 86 1,109,888$ maintenance t face, and gai Total (2016-2020) 7,029,192 4,621,760 104,480 11,755,432$ 11,755,432$ to in 12 TRANSPORTATION (TP-4) Project Name: Pavement Management - Maintenance Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: Annual Project Description and Location Lakeville’s pavement management program is designed to provide basic maintenance to City streets, to maintain the overall condition of the road surface, and gain the maximum service life at the best overall cost. The program includes miscellaneous repairs, crack sealing, velocity patching, curb & sidewalk repair, bridge inspections & repairs, and transportation safety improvements. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2016-2020) Revenues Pavement Management Fund Property taxes/fund balance 1,488,580 1,215,324 1,263,937 1,314,494 1,367,074 6,649,409 Escrow Fund 60,000 - - - - 60,000 Municipal State Aid 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 600,000 Total 1,668,580$ 1,335,324$ 1,383,937$ 1,434,494$ 1,487,074$ 7,309,409$ Expenditures Maintenance Crack sealing 135,200 140,608 146,232 152,082 158,165 732,287 Velocity Patching 105,000 109,200 113,568 118,111 122,835 568,714 Patching & Minor Overlays 928,380 965,516 1,004,136 1,044,302 1,086,074 5,028,408 Sidewalk 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 Conc Curb, Draintile 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 County Road Utility Improv. 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 Bridge Insp & Repairs/Guardrail 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 75,000 Safety Improvements 410,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 530,000 Total 1,668,580$ 1,335,324$ 1,383,937$ 1,434,494$ 1,487,074$ 7,309,409$ 13 Proje Proje Antic Proje The C long- system advan The C the p City w Revenues Improvement C Property Taxe Debt Issuanc Property Tax Special Asses Expenditures Construction Legal, Enginee & Financing ect Name: ect Manage cipated Star ect Descript City embrac -term plan fo ms degradat ncement of t City Counci property own will finance Const. Fund es e - G.O. Imp Bon xes (future years) ssments T ering, Administra T TRA r: rt: tion and Lo ced a pavem or maintainin tion has acc the schedule il approved ners will be its 60% sha 2 0 ds s)5 3 Total 9$ 6 ation 2 Total 9$ ANSPOR Street Reco Chris Petre Annual cation ment manage ng City stree celerated in as shown be a Street Rec assessed fo are of the pro 016 20 50,000 5,985,300 4 3,346,550 3 9,381,850 8 $ 6,661,114 5 2,720,736 2 9,381,850 8 $ RTATIO onstruction ee, Public W ement study ets based on recent year elow. construction or 40% of th oject cost wit 017 20 50,000 ,881,620 4 ,287,747 3 ,219,367 8$ ,870,976 5 ,348,391 2 ,219,367 8$ ON (TP-5 Works Directo prepared in n pre-establis rs. Staff is n Policy in N he street rec th property t 018 20 50,000 4,808,986 4, 3,239,324 2, 8,098,310 7,$ ,784,507 4, 2,313,803 3, 8,098,310 7,$ ) or n 2009 which shed standar therefore re November 2 onstruction taxes. 0 19 2 50,000 ,439,009 5 ,992,673 3 ,481,682 9$ ,468,498 7 ,013,184 2 ,481,682 9$ h sets forth rds. The roa ecommendin 2006 whereb project. Th 020 T (201 50,000 5,870,467 2 3,946,976 1 9,867,443 4$ 7,048,173 2 2,819,270 1 9,867,443 4$ a ad ng by he Total 6-2020) 250,000 25,985,382 16,813,270 43,048,652 29,833,268 13,215,384 43,048,652 14 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje Dako along effici fiber arrow 170th Lavo Fund betwe share R E ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: ect Descript ota County i g Pilot Kno ient operatio for intercon ws; and c). in St. and Do n Rd., High ding provide een Dakota e of the proje Revenues Communication Expenditures Design Land Acquisiti Construction TRA r: r: rt: tion and Lo is proposing b Road (CS on of traffic s nnectivity; b nstall traffic odd Bouleva hview Ave., es 80% of t County and ect costs is sh 2 ns Fund 1 Total 1$ 1 on Total 1$ ANSPOR Pilot Knob Advanced T City Projec Chris Petre 2018 (cons Dakota Cou cation g to install SAH 31) an signals along b). modify tr monitoring ard. Intersec , Galaxie A the project c d the cities o hown. 2017 2018 14,000 41,0 14,000 41,0$ 14,000 - - 41,0 14,000 41,0$ RTATIO Road and 1 Traffic Man ct 17-03 and ee, Public W struction) unty advanced tr nd 160th Str g these corri raffic signals cameras. I ctions along Ave., Foliage costs. The of Apple Va 8 Total (20 00 00 $ - - 00 00 $ ON (TP-6 60th Street nagement Sy d Dakota Cou Works Directo raffic manag reet (CSAH idors. The p s to include Intersections g CSAH 46 e Ave. and remaining alley and La 016-2020)To 55,000 55,000 $ 14,000 - 41,000 55,000 $ 6) ystems unty Project or gement syste H 46) to pro project inclu flashing lef s along CSA include Ipa Flagstaff A cost will b akeville. On otal (Project) 55,000 55,000 14,000 - 41,000 55,000 31-87 ems (ATMS ovide for th udes a). insta ft-turn yellow AH 31 includ ava Ave., La Ave. Federa e split 55/4 nly the City S) he all w de ac al 45 ’s 15 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje The inters incre (i.e. t Reven Muni Expe Desig Land Cons ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: ect Descript City of La section oper ased traffic turn lanes), f nues icipal State Aid nditures gn d Acquisition struction TRA r: r: rt: tion and Lo keville is p ations, allev levels. The flashing yello 2 d Fund 13 Total 13$ 5 8 Total 13$ ANSPOR Ipava Aven City Projec Chris Petre 2020 (cons City of Lak cation proposing to viate congest e project inc ow arrows a 019 2020 30,000 620,0 30,000 620,0$ 50,000 80,000 - 620,0 30,000 620,0$ RTATIO nue and 165t ct XX-XX ee, Public W struction) keville o make inte tion, make s ludes a traff and pedestria 0 Total (20 000 000 $ - - 000 000 $ ON (TP-7 th Street: Works Directo ersection im safety impro fic signal, in an ramp imp 016-2020)To 750,000 750,000 $ 50,000 80,000 620,000 750,000 $ 7) Intersecti or mprovements ovements an ntersection r provements. otal (Project) 750,000 750,000 50,000 80,000 620,000 750,000 ion Improve s to improv nd provide fo reconstructio ment ve or on 16 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje The Railr to im provi inters Rev Dak San Sto Wa Tax TIF Exp Des Lan Con ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: ect Descript City of Lak oad right-of mprove inter ide for incre section of Ke venues kota County nitary Sewer Tru orm Sewer Trun ater Trunk Fund x Abatement Bo F Fund penditures sign nd Acquisition nstruction TRA r: r: rt: tion and Lo keville is pr f-way to the rsection geo easing traffi enwood Trai unk Fund nk Fund d onds/Southfork ANSPOR 172nd Stree City Projec Chris Petre 2016 (cons City of Lak cation oposing to Kenwood T ometrics an ic levels. T il and Kenyo 20 IRR 145 Total 145$ 145 Total 145$ RTATIO et: Realign ct 13-07 and ee, Public W struction) keville realign 172n Trail (CSAH nd operation This project on Avenue. 015 2016 - 822, - 150, - 150, - 150, - 607, 5,000 (79, 5,000 1,800,$ 5,000 - 400, - 1,400, 5,000 1,800,$ ON (TP-8 nment at Ken d Dakota Cou Works Directo nd Street fro H 5) and Ken ns, make sa may includ 6 Total (2 ,250 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,500 ,750) ,000 $ - ,000 ,000 ,000 $ ) nwood Trail unty Project or om the Can nyon Avenu afety impro de a traffic 2016-2020)T 822,250 150,000 150,000 150,000 607,500 (79,750) 1,800,000 $ - 400,000 1,400,000 1,800,000 $ 5-50 nadian Pacifi e intersectio ovements an signal at th Total (Project) 822,250 150,000 150,000 150,000 607,500 65,250 1,945,000 145,000 400,000 1,400,000 1,945,000 fic on nd he 17 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje The Hamb safety Revenues Dakota Co Municipal Water Tru Expenditu Design Land Acqu Constructi ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: ect Descript City of Lak burg Avenu y improveme ounty l State Aid Fund unk Fund T ures uisition ion T TRA r: r: rt: tion and Lo keville is p e intersectio ents and pro 2016 110,00 d 90,00 Total 200,00$ 200,00 Total 200,00$ ANSPOR 202nd Stree City Projec Chris Petre 2018 (cons City of Lak cation proposing to on to improv ovide for incr 2017 0 385,000 0 315,000 - 0 700,000$ 0 - 700,000 - 0 700,000$ RTATIO et and Hamb ct 15-12 and ee, Public W struction) keville o reconstruc ve intersecti reasing traff 2018 T 365,000 300,000 85,000 750,000$$ 750,000 750,000$$ ON (TP-9 burg Avenue d Dakota Cou Works Directo ct the 202nd ion geometri fic levels. Total (2016-202 860,0 705,0 85,0 1,650,0 200,0 700,0 750,0 1,650,0 ) : Intersecti unty Project or Street (CS ics and oper 20)Total (Pr 000 86 000 70 000 8 000 1,65$ 000 20 000 70 000 75 000 1,65$ ion Improve 50-03 SAH 50) an rations, mak roject) 60,000 05,000 85,000 50,000 00,000 00,000 50,000 50,000 ment nd ke 18 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje Dako study classi be in Coun ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: ect Descript ota County is y to evalua ification as p ncluded in th ncil, Scott Co Revenues General Fu Expenditu Roadway C TRA r: r: rt: tion and Lo s proposing ate potentia principal arte he study. Th o., and other und To ures Corridor Study To ANSPOR 215th Street City Projec Chris Petre 2016 Dakota Cou cation to conduct al east-west erials. The C he study wi r cities); only 2016 45,000 otal 45,000$ 45,000 otal 45,000$ RTATION t: P ct 16-06 and ee, Public W unty a county-wi t alignment CSAH 70 (2 ill involve m y the City’s s Total (2016-2 45 45$ 45 45$ N (TP-11 Principal Ar d Dakota Cou Works Directo ide principal s south of 210th Street/2 multiple par share of the 2020)Total (P 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 5,000 $ 1) rterial Study unty Project or l arterial sys f CSAH 42 215th Street) rtners (i.e. M study costs Project) 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 97-165 stem plannin 2 for futur ) corridor wi MnDOT, Me is shown. ng re ill et 19 TRANSPORTATION (TP-12) Project Name: Right-of-Way Preservation and Management Project Number: City Project XX-XX Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: TBD (construction) Project Description and Location The City may acquire land or right-of-way for existing or future transportation facilities at various locations within the City as opportunities arise. The land or right-of-way acquisition may include partnering with Dakota County for acquisition opportunities to support future roadway projects consistent with existing Official Maps and the City and County Transportation Plans. Dakota County annually budgets $550,000 for right-of- way acquisition at various locations throughout the County (55/45 cost share). 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2016-2020)Total (Project) Revenues City of Lakeville 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ Expenditures Design - - - - - - - Land Acquisition 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Construction - - - - - - - Total 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 20 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje The D Prefe future inclu inclu ident Plan. Coun Coun ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: ect Descript Dakota Cou erred System e east-west des the cons des the con ified as Alig T h e D a ko nty will parti nty transporta Revenues Dakota Cou Expenditure Design Land Acquis Construction Construction TRA r: r: rt: tion and Lo unty East-W m Plan (East roadway co struction of nstruction o gnment “B” ota County icipate in th ation faciliti nty To es sition n - 179th Street n - 185th Street To ANSPOR Future Dak City Projec Chris Petre 2016 (cons City of Lak cation West Corridor t-West Plan) onnections. 179th Street of 185th Str and Alignm 2030 Trans he engineerin ies to County 2016 666,000 otal 666,000$ - - t 250,000 t 416,000 otal 666,000$ RTATION kota County ct XX-XX an ee, Public W struction) keville r Preservatio ), identifies The Pheas (future CSA reet (future ment “C” Tr sportation P ng and const y standards. Total (2016 66 66$ 25 4 66$ N (TP-13 Highways nd Dakota C Works Directo on Study, P preservation sant Run of AH 9) and t CSAH 60) ransitional S Plan include truction cos -2020)Total 66,000 66,000 $ - - 50,000 16,000 66,000 $ 3) County Proje or Phase II – R n corridor al f Lakeville the Avonlea ). These r Segment in t s a policy ts for constr l (Project) 666,000 666,000 - - 250,000 416,000 666,000 ect 97-162/3 Refinement o lignments fo developmen developmen roadways ar the East-We in which th ructing futur of or nt nt re st he re 21 N TRA NON AN N‐P P SPO PRO PRO ORT OGR OJEC TAT RAM CTS TIO MM S ON MED 22 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje The C Aven that South ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Descript City of Lak nue as an art provides a hfork Village TRA r: r: rt Date: tion and Lo keville’s Tra terial roadwa connection e/Argonne V Revenues General O Expenditu Design Land Acq Construct ANSPOR Kenrick Av City Projec Chris Petre TBD (cons cation ansportation ay from 181 n between t Village busin s Obligation Impr ures quisition tion - Roadway RTATION venue: 181st ct XX-XX ee, Public W struction) Plan identif 1st Street to t the Timber ness districts rovement Fund Tot y Tot N (TP-10 Street – CP Works Directo fies the futu the Canadia rcrest comm s. Total 2,575,00 tal 2,575,00$ 594,40 1,980,60 tal 2,575,00$ 0) P Railroad Tr or ure extensio an Pacific Ra mercial cam 0 0 0 - 0 0 racks on of Kenric ailroad track mpus and th ck ks he 23 P U PRO P UTIL OGR PRO LITI RAM OJEC IES MM CTS MED S D 24 Total CIP # Project / Financing 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016-2020 U-4 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Extensions Sanitary Sewer Trunk Fund - Fees 139,000 148,875 257,100 259,500 81,375 885,850 U-1 Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund - User Fees 835,000 45,000 65,000 20,000 200,000 1,165,000 U-3 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund - User Fees 851,910 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,851,910 U-2 Sanitary Sewer Inflow/Infiltration Repairs Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund - User Fees 260,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 1,160,000 U-6 Watermain Replacement Water Operating Fund - User Fees 3,199,500 2,828,773 2,650,099 2,429,083 3,298,981 14,406,436 Special assessments - - 239,922 - - 239,922 U-6 Watermain Extensions - Hamburg Ave: 202nd - Hartford Water Trunk Fund - Fees - - 23,992 - - 23,992 U-10 Well Construction Water Trunk Fund - Fees 875,000 - 1,837,500 - 1,837,500 4,550,000 U-10 Well Collection Pipe Water Trunk Fund - Fees - - 300,000 - - 300,000 U-7 Water Main Trunk Extensions Water Trunk Fund - Fees 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 U-9 Well and Pump Rehabilitation Water Operating Fund - User Fees 145,000 180,000 225,000 120,000 240,000 910,000 U-5 Tower and Reservoir Maintenance Water Operating Fund - User Fees 125,000 - - - - 125,000 U-8 Water meter replacement Water Operating Fund - User Fees 422,640 371,588 374,365 387,430 390,006 1,946,029 Total 7,053,050$ 4,249,236$ 6,647,978$ 3,891,013$ 6,722,862$ 28,564,139 UTILITIES Project Summary 25 Total CIP # Financing / Project 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016-2020 Water Trunk Fund - Fees U-10 Well Construction 875,000$ - $ 1,837,500$ -$ 1,837,500$ 4,550,000$ U-10 Well Collection Pipe - - 300,000 - - 300,000 U-7 Water Main Trunk Extensions 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 U-6 Hamburg Ave: 202nd - Hartford - - 23,992 - - 23,992 Total 1,075,000$ 200,000$ 2,361,492$ 200,000$ 2,037,500$ 5,873,992$ Water Operating Fund - Fees U-8 Water Meter Replacement 422,640 371,588 374,365 387,430 390,006 1,946,029 U-6 Watermain Replacement 3,199,500 2,828,773 2,650,099 2,429,083 3,298,981 14,406,436 U-9 Well and Pump Rehabilitation 145,000 180,000 225,000 120,000 240,000 910,000 U-5 Tower and Reservoir Maintenance 125,000 - - - - 125,000 Total 3,892,140 3,380,361 3,249,464 2,936,513 3,928,987 17,387,465 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Fund - Fees U-4 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Extensions 139,000 148,875 257,100 259,500 81,375 885,850 Total 139,000$ 148,875$ 257,100 $ 259,500 $ 81,375 $ 885,850$ Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund - User Fees U-2 Sanitary Sewer Inflow/Infiltration Repairs 260,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 1,160,000 U-3 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 851,910 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,851,910 U-1 Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation 835,000 45,000 65,000 20,000 200,000 1,165,000 Total 1,946,910$ 520,000$ 540,000 $ 495,000 $ 675,000 $ 4,176,910$ Special assessments U-6 Watermain Replacement - - 239,922 - - 239,922 Total - $ - $ 239,922 $ - $ - $ 239,922$ Total 7,053,050$ 4,249,236$ 6,647,978$ 3,891,013 $ 6,722,862 $ 28,564,139$ UTILITIES Financing Summary 26 Proje Proje Antic Proje The C gravi perio servic sched under statio Revenues Sanitary S Fees Expenditu Lift Statio Lift Statio Lift Statio Lift Statio Lift Statio Lift Statio Lift Statio Lift Statio Oper No an ect name: ect Manage cipated star ect Descript City has 20 ity lines. T dically insp ce life for a duled for ins rgo a major on. Sewer Operatin ures n #6 n #7 n #23 n #8 n #16 n #24 n #9 n #10 rations and nticipated si r: rt date: tion and loc sanitary sew The pumps, pected and r lift station is spection and r rehabilitati g Fund $ Total $ operating c gnificant im UTIL Lift Station Chris Petre Annual cation wer lift statio motors, an ehabilitated s approximat d rehabilitati ion to repla 2016 835,000 720,000 100,000 15,000 835,000 costs impact mpact on oper LITY (U- n Rehabilitat ee, Public W ons which pu nd other equ to ensure u tely 15-20 y ion every 15 ace the exis 2017 45,000$ 45,000 45,000$ ts rations or op -1) tion Works Directo ump sewage uipment wit uninterrupted years but can 5 years. In sting lift sta 2018 65,000$ 45,000 20,000 65,000$ perating cost or e from low l thin each lif d service. T n vary. Each 2016, Lift S ation with a 2019 20,00$ 20,00 20,00$ ts. lying areas t ft station ar The expecte h lift station Station 6 wi a submersibl 2020 00 200,00$ 00 200,00 00 200,00$ to re ed is ill le Total 0 1,165,00$ 0 0 1,165,00$ 00 - 00 27 UTILITY (U-2) Project name: Sanitary sewer system inflow/infiltration repairs Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated start date: Annual Project Description and location A section of the sanitary sewer system is inspected each year for damage to the pipes that would result in inflow (direct entry of storm water) and infiltration (ground water seeping into the sanitary sewer) within the sanitary sewer system. This additional water penetrating the system increases stress to the capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities thereby resulting in higher sanitary sewer rates for Lakeville customers. Additionally, exceeding the City’s calculated peak flow can result in the imposition of surcharge by MCES. Should Lakeville exceed that peak flow, the minimum surcharge would be $216,000 per year for five years. The Utilities Division endeavors to reduce the inflow and infiltration by initiating repairs such as manhole structure sealing, cured in place pipe lining, and the replacement of manhole covers. A project was not completed in 2015 such that a larger project could be bid in 2016 to realize economies of scale benefits associated with combining two years’ worth of projects. As such, it is recommended the 2015 budget to be carried forward and included as part of the 2016 project. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenues Sanitary Sewer Oper. Fund Fees 260,000$ 225,000 $ 225,000$ 225,000 $ 225,000$ 1,160,000$ Expenditures Pipe Repairs and Lining 200,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Manhole Sealing 60,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 - Total 260,000$ 225,000 $ 225,000$ 225,000 $ 225,000$ 1,160,000$ Operations and operating costs impacts No anticipated significant impact on operations or operating costs. 28 Proje Proje Antic Proje The crack maint sanita proje Opera This w Revenues Sanitary Se Fees Ex penditur Sanitary Se ect name: ect Manage cipated star ect Descript sanitary sew king. Reha taining a clo ary sewer sy cts and will ations and o will result in ewer Operating res ewer Rehabilit a T r: rt date: tion and loc wer in areas abilitating th osed system ystem will be be programm operating co a reduction 201 g Fund 851$ ation 851 Total 851$ UTIL Sanitary Se Chris Petre Annual cation s around the hese portion m and reducin e evaluated i med based o osts impacts of expenses 16 201 1,910 250$ 1,910 250 1,910 250$ LITY (U- ewer Rehabi ee, Public W e City is su ns of the s ng the poten in conjunctio on that evalu s s for sanitary 7 201 0,000 250,$ 0,000 250, 0,000 250,$ -3) ilitation Works Directo ubject to bre ewer infras ntial for infl on with plan uation. y sewer repai 8 2019 ,000 250,$ ,000 250, ,000 250,$ or eaks, root in tructure is low and infi nned street r irs in future 9 2020 ,000 250,0$ ,000 250,0 ,000 250,0$ ntrusion, an important t iltration. Th reconstructio years. 0 Tot a 000 1,85$ 000 1,85 000 1,85$ nd to he on al 51,910 51,910 51,910 29 UTILITY (U-4) Project Name: Sanitary Sewer Trunk System Improvements Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: As development occurs Project Description and Location The Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan anticipates the extension of sanitary sewer trunk facilities to accommodate anticipated growth. Timing of future sanitary sewer trunk facilities depends on the growth rate and location of planned community development. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenues Sanitary Sewer Trunk Fund 139,000 148,875 257,100 259,500 81,375 885,850 Total 139,000$ 148,875$257,100 $259,500$ 81,375$ 885,850$ Expenditures Trunk Sanitary Sewer Oversizing 139,000 148,875 257,100 259,500 81,375 885,850 Total 139,000$ 148,875$257,100 $259,500$ 81,375$ 885,850$ Operations and Operating Costs Impacts No anticipated significant operating cost increases. 30 Proje Proje Antic Proje Inspe and e dust a and e corro reside throu Revenues Water Ope Expenditu Tower Cl Dak Fair Airla CMF Mich Oper No an ect name: ect Manage cipated star ect Descript ections of th extent of any and dirt that exterior coa osion and ru ential and ot ugh periodic s erating Fund - ures leaning/Inspect kota Heights To field Tower ake Tower F Tower haud Park Tow rations and nticipated im r: rt date: tion and loc e interior an y required ma collects ove tings on wa ust and mai ther users. T inspection a Fees $ tions ower wer Total $ operating c mpact on ope UTIL Tower and Chris Petre 2015 cation nd exterior o aintenance. er time that c ater towers intain the q The service and necessary 2016 125,000 $ 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 $ costs impact erations or op LITY (U- Reservoir M ee, Public W of water tow Periodic cle can reduce th and reservo quality of th life of the to y maintenan 2017 -$ -$ ts perating cos -5) Maintenance Works Directo wers are used eaning of the he life of the oirs protect t he treated w owers and re nce. 2018 -$ -$ sts. e or d to determin e tower exter e coating sys the metal st water passin eservoirs can 2019 $ $ ne the timin riors remove stem. Interio tructure from ng through t n be extende 2020 - $ - - $ ng es or m to ed Total - 125,000$ -- - 125,000$ 31 Proje Proje Antic Proje The w recen system repla soils. recon elsew Reven Specia Water Water Expen Water Water Oper This ect name: ect Manage cipated star ect Descript water mains nt years and m will be re cement is b This rep nstruction ar where within nues al Assessments r Trunk Funds r Operating Fun nditures r main extension r main replacem rations and will result in r: rt date: tion and loc in areas aro d are candid placed in co ased on the presents rep rea annually the project nd Total $ n ment Total $ Operating C n a reduction UTIL Water Main Chris Petre As required cation ound the Cit dates for rep onjunction w number of placing 10% y, and insta area. 2016 3,199,500 3,199,500 $ 3,199,500 3,199,500 $ Costs Impa n of expense LITY (U- n Replaceme ee, Public W d ty that have placement. with street rec breaks in a % of our w alling catho 2017 2,828,773 2,828,773$ 2,828,773 2,828,773$ acts s for water m -6) ent Works Directo e been subje Portions o construction particular a water system odic protect 2018 239,922 23,992 2,650,099 2,914,013 $ 263,914 2,650,099 2,914,013 $ main repairs or ct to numero of the City’s projects. A area and an m infrastruc tion and rep 2019 2,429,083 2,429,083 $ 2,429,083 2,429,083 $ in future ye ous breaks i s water mai All water mai evaluation o ture in eac placing bolt 2020 3,298,981 3,298,981$ 3,298,981 3,298,981$ ears. in in in of ch ts Total 239,9 23,9 14,406,4 14,670,3$ 263,9 14,406,4 14,670,3$ 22 92 36 50 14 36 50 32 UTILITY (U-7) Project Name: Watermain Trunk System Improvements Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: As development occurs Project Description and Location The Comprehensive Water Plan anticipates the extension of watermain trunk facilities to accommodate anticipated growth. Timing of future watermain trunk facilities depends on the growth rate and location of planned community development. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Revenues Water Trunk Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Total 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,000,000$ Expenditures Trunk Watermain Oversizing 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Total 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,000,000$ Operations and Operating Costs Impacts No anticipated significant operating cost increases. 33 Proje Proje Antic Proje The U end o years per y Being mana Natur Revenu Water Expend Water R In Oper No an ect name: ect Manage cipated star ect Descript Utilities Div of their servi s. The Utilit year based o g able to ch aging the wa ral Resource ues r Operating Fun ditures r meters Residential Meter Install Transmitter In ndustrial/Comm rations and nticipated si r: rt date: tion and loc vision replac ice life. The ties Division on the age o hange out w ater system a es. Replacem nd - Fees l nstall mercial Total operating c gnificant im UTIL Water mete Chris Petre Annual cation ces residenti e expected s n currently s f the meter water meters and monitor ment of mete 2016 422,640$ 232,739 149,901 40,000 422,640$ costs impact mpact on oper LITY (U- er replaceme ee, Public W ial and com ervice life fo schedules ap and to stay at the end ing water us ers is done b 2017 371,58$ 215,67 155,91 371,58$ ts rations or op -8) ent Works Directo mmercial wat for a water m pproximately on a 20 ye of their ser se for report by Utilities D 2018 88 374,3$ 75 214,9 3 159,4 88 374,3$ perating cost or ter meters t meter is appr y 800 meter ear replacem rvice life is ting to the D Division staff 201 365 387$ 945 220 420 167 365 387$ ts. that reach th roximately 2 replacement ment schedule important t Department o ff. 19 20 7,430 390$ 0,012 219 7,418 170 7,430 390$ he 20 ts e. to of 20 Tot 0,006 1,946$ 9,014 1,102 0,992 803 42 0,006 1,946$ tal 6,029 2,385 3,644 2,017 6,029 34 Proje Proje Antic Proje The C day, 7 Addit Period of the The C motor subme Revenue Water Expendi Well 4 r Well 6 r Well 8 r HSPS 60 Well 11 Well 19 Well 12 Well 13 Filter Ba Well 14 Well 15 Well 16 Well 2 r Well 9 r Well 10 Well 18 Operat No anti ect name: ect Manage cipated star ect Descriptio City’s wells p 7 days a we tionally, bein dic inspection e wells and wa City has 17 w rs. Vertical tu ersible pumps es Operating Fun itures roof replacemen rehabilitation rehabilitation 00HP Pump rehabilitation rehabilitation rehabilitation rehabilitation ackwash Pump rehabilitation rehabilitation rehabilitation rehabilitation rehabilitation rehabilitation rehabilitation tions and op icipated sign r: rt date: on and locati provide water eek. This pu g constantly n and mainten ater system at wells which a urbine pump s and motors d - Fees $ nt Total $ perating cos nificant impa UTIL Well and P Chris Petre Annual ion for the distri uts the motor exposed to w nance, with re t maximum p are a combina s and motors are scheduled 2016 145,000 $ 25,000 60,000 60,000 145,000 $ sts impacts: act of operat LITY (U- Pump Rehabi ee, Public W ibution system rs and pump water can cor eplacement a pumping capa ation of verti s are schedul d for rehabilit 2017 180,000$ 60,000 60,000 60,000 180,000$ : tions or oper -9) ilitation Works Directo m which oper p components rrode pipes a as needed, ens acity. ical turbine a led for rehab tation every 1 2018 225,000$ 60,000 60,000 45,000 60,000 225,000$ rating costs. or rates on dema s under trem and other wel sures the effic and submersib bilitation ever 10 years. 2019 120,000$ 60,000 60,000 120,000$ and 24 hours mendous stres ll component cient operatio ble pumps an ry 8 years an 2020 240,000$ 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 240,000$ a ss. ts. on nd nd Total 910,000$ 910,000$ 35 Proje Proje Antic Proje Well accom Chien adjace 2018 and w The M Protec Revenu Water T Expend Well Co Well Well Well Well Well Well Co Oper Main ect name: ect Manage cipated star ect Descriptio 21 is prog mmodate exis n, Jordan, an ent to the Hig and Wells 24 water needs. L Minnesota De ction Plan in ues Trunk Fund Total ditures onstruction 21 22 23 24 25 ollection Pipe Total rations and ntenance cost r: rt date: on and Locat rammed for sting and anti d/or the Tun ghview Avenu 4 and 25 are p Locations wil epartment of H order to recei 2016 875,000 l 875,000$ 875,000 875,000$ operating c ts are an add UTIL Well Const Chris Petre 2016 tion construction icipated grow nnel City/Wo ue/Dodd Bou planned for 20 ll be based on Health requir ive permits to 2017 - -$ $ -$ $ costs impact ditional $1,0 LITY (U-1 truction – W ee, Public W n in 2016 t wth. The we newoc aquife ulevard round 020. Constru n data provide res the City to o construct fut 2018 2,137,500 2,137,500$ 918,750 918,750 300,000 2,137,500$ ts 00 per year p 10) Well 21 Works Directo to provide a ell will draw fers. Well 2 dabout. Wells uction will dep ed in the Wate o amend its W ture wells. 2019 - -$ $ -$ $ per well. or adequate wa water from 1 is planned s 22 and 23 a pend on popu er Supply Pla Wellhead and 2020 1,837,500 1,837,500 $ 918,750 918,750 1,837,500 $ ater supply t the Prairie D to be locate are planned fo ulation deman an. d Source Wate Total 4,850,000 4,850,000 - 4,850,000 to Du ed or nd er 36 PPRO P PA OGR PRO ARK RAM OJEC KS MM CTS MED S D 37 Total CIP #Park / Project 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016-2020 P-1 Parks Major Maintenance General Fund General Maintenance 40,225 45,950 45,950 46,200 46,400 224,725 Buildings/Shelters/Grounds 12,100 92,850 19,250 25,000 - 149,200 Field Improvements/Maintenance 10,000 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 36,000 Open space improvement and maintenance 107,175 53,900 93,700 41,750 33,000 329,525 169,500 199,200 165,400 119,450 85,900 739,450 P-3 Summerlyn Park Park Dedication Fund 325,000 - - - - 325,000 325,000 - - - - 325,000 P-4 King Park Improvements Park Dedication Fund - Fees 412,538 - 857,825 597,550 - 1,867,913 Miracle League/LBA Lighting Donation 150,000 - 150,000 150,000 - 450,000 562,538 - 1,007,825 747,550 - 2,317,913 P-5 Avonlea Park King Creek Greenway - Sale 950,000 - - - - 950,000 Park Dedication Fund - Fees - 550,000 - - - 550,000 950,000 550,000 - - - 1,500,000 P-6 Quigley-Sime Parking Lot Paving Park Dedication Fund - Fees - - 180,000 - - 180,000 - - 180,000 - - 180,000 P-7 Park Development - Adminstrative Projects Park Dedication Fund - Fees 45,000 10,000 20,000 40,000 20,000 135,000 45,000 10,000 20,000 40,000 20,000 135,000 P-8 Park Development - Developer Credits Park Dedication Fund - Fees 433,201 433,201 433,201 433,201 433,201 2,166,005 433,201 433,201 433,201 433,201 433,201 2,166,005 P-9 Park Improvements (Various Parks) Park Improvement Fund 211,500 153,000 465,000 293,750 204,000 1,327,250 Fundraising 222,000 - - - - 222,000 Donations - LOA - Rotary 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Donations - Quail Meadows - ISD #192 50,000 - - - - 50,000 533,500 153,000 465,000 293,750 204,000 1,649,250 P-10 Ritter Farm Dog Park Park Dedication Fund - Fees 145,000 - - - - 145,000 145,000 - - - - 145,000 P-11 Legacy Park Park Dedication Fund - Fees - - - - 350,000 350,000 - - - - 350,000 350,000 P-12 Michaud Park Park Dedication Fund - Fees - - - - 96,000 96,000 - - - - 96,000 96,000 P-13 Trail Improvements Trail Improvement Fund 251,520 332,880 227,684 295,236 245,000 1,352,320 251,520 332,880 227,684 295,236 245,000 1,352,320 P-14 Trail - 175th: Isleton Ave to Jasmine Ave Park Dedication Fund - Fees - - 85,700 - - 85,700 Escrow Funds - - 7,900 - - 7,900 - - 93,600 - - 93,600 TOTAL 3,415,259$ 1,678,281$ 2,592,710$ 1,929,187$ 1,434,101$ 11,049,538$ PARKS AND RECREATION Project Summary 38 Total CIP #Funding Source / Project 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016-2020 Escrows P-14 Trail - 175th: Isleton Ave to Jasmine Ave - - 7,900 - - 7,900 Federal Grant P-2 North Creek Greenway Trail, Restroom, Amenities - - - - - - General Fund P-1 Park Major Maintenance 169,500 199,200 165,400 119,450 85,900 739,450 Other P-4 King Park Improvements - LBA Lighting Donation 150,000 - 150,000 150,000 - 450,000 P-5 Avonlea Park 950,000 - - - - 950,000 P-9 Park Improvements - Fundraising/Donations 322,000 - - - - 322,000 Total Other 1,422,000 - 150,000 150,000 - 1,722,000 Park Improvement Fund - Taxes P-9 Park Improvements (Various Parks)211,500 153,000 465,000 293,750 204,000 1,327,250 P-13 Trail Improvement Fund - Taxes Trail improvement 251,520 332,880 227,684 295,236 245,000 1,352,320 Park Dedication Fund - Fees P-3 Summerlyn Park 325,000 - - - - 325,000 P-4 King Park Improvements 412,538 - 857,825 597,550 - 1,867,913 P-5 Avonlea Park - 550,000 - - - 550,000 P-6 Quigley-Sime Parking Lot Paving - - 180,000 - - 180,000 P-7 Park Development-Administrative Projects 45,000 10,000 20,000 40,000 20,000 135,000 P-8 Park Development-Developer Credits 433,201 433,201 433,201 433,201 433,201 2,166,005 P-10 Ritter Farm Dog Park 145,000 - - - - 145,000 P-11 Legacy Park - - - - 350,000 350,000 P-12 Michaud Park - - - - 96,000 96,000 P-14 Trail - 175th: Isleton Ave to Jasmine Ave - - 85,700 - - 85,700 Total Park Dedication Fund 1,360,739 993,201 1,576,726 1,070,751 899,201 5,900,618 TOTAL 3,415,259$ 1,678,281$ 2,592,710$ 1,929,187$ 1,434,101$ 11,049,538$ PARKS AND RECREATION Financing Summary 39 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-1) Project name: Parks – Major Maintenance Project manager: John Hennen, Interim Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated start date: Various Totals 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016-2020 General Maintenance STS labor 16,225 16,750 16,750 17,000 17,000 83,725 Tree Trust labor 1,500 1,700 1,700 1,700 1,900 8,500 Tree Trust/Eagle Scout project materials 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 60,000 Tree plantings 5,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 45,000 Picnic table construction 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 15,000 Sign replacement 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 12,500 Total general maintenance 40,225 45,950 45,950 46,200 46,400 224,725 Buildings/Shelters/Grounds Meadows-reshingle warming house 1,600 - - - - 1,600 Antlers-reshingle shelters B&C - 5,000 - - - 5,000 Cherryview-reshingle warming house 1,700 - - - - 1,700 Casperson-reshingle building (contractual)- - 7,500 - - 7,500 Casperson-reshingle shelters B&C - - 2,700 - - 2,700 Bunker Hill-reshingle shelter 1,300 - - - - 1,300 Orchard Lake-reshingle shelter - - 1,400 - - 1,400 Meadows rink end-board replacement - - 1,200 - - 1,200 Rolling Oaks-reshingle warming house - 1,700 - - - 1,700 Dakota Heights-reshingle warming house - 1,700 - - - 1,700 Dakota Heights-rubber floor replacement - 2,500 - - - 2,500 Meadows-rubber floor replacement - 2,500 - - - 2,500 Prairie Lake-replace carpet w/rubber floor - 4,000 - - - 4,000 McGuire-rubber floor replacement - 2,500 - - - 2,500 Foxborough-ID sign replacement - 4,000 - - - 4,000 Antlers-replace plumbing fixtures - 6,000 - - - 6,000 Steve Michaud Park-building window replacement - 18,000 - - - 18,000 Steve Michaud Park-door replacement (1&3)1,000 4,000 - - - 5,000 Parkview-door replacement (1)- 1,000 - - - 1,000 Dakota Heights-trail and door installation - - 1,000 - - 1,000 Meadows-trail and door installation - - 650 - - 650 Auto bldg door opener/closers-Valley & Michaud 6,500 - - - - 6,500 Drinking fountain replacements (4):- - 4,800 - - 4,800 Aronson Field #3 fence improvements (3rd baseline) - 7,200 - - - 7,200 Aronson Fields #1 & 3-outfield fence improvements - 15,500 - - - 15,500 King Field #2-backstop fence repair - 4,750 - - - 4,750 Jaycee-fence replacement - - 15,000 - 15,000 Upper 205th Street trail fence - 12,500 - - - 12,500 Ritter-ELC roof replacement (contractual)- - - 10,000 - 10,000 Total buildings/shelters/grounds 12,100 92,850 19,250 25,000 - 149,200 Fields Field improvements/maintenance 10,000 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 36,000 Open Space Fogseal parking lots 21,750 30,500 32,000 26,250 25,500 136,000 Bench refurbishment 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 12,500 Resurface BB/tennis courts 19,200 20,900 20,700 13,000 5,000 78,800 Oak Shores-BB/tennis court reconstruction 63,725 - - - - 63,725 Dodd Pointe-overlay BB court - - 6,500 - - 6,500 Meadows-BB court reconstruction - - 17,000 - - 17,000 Quigley-Sime trail extension - - 15,000 - - 15,000 Total open space 107,175 53,900 93,700 41,750 33,000 329,525 Total Major Maintenance 169,500 199,200 165,400 119,450 85,900 739,450 40 Proje Proje Antic Proje The P Farm park only Chok baske amen Revenues Park Dedi Expenditu Park Cons Oper Summ inclu etc. Divis appro being ect name: ect manager cipated star ect descript Parks, Trails ms in the Sum in 2014 wit serve Summ kecherry Dev etball half-c nities. ication Fund ures struction rations and merlyn Park de items suc Staff recom sion’s maint oved in 2016 g completed PARK r: rt date: ion and loca s and Open mmerlyn De th constructi merlyn Deve velopment. court, bench operating c construction ch as paveme mmended ad tenance need 6, the additi on a timely KS AND R Summerlyn John Henn 2016 ation Space Plan evelopment. ion proposed elopment but The park w hes, walkin 2016 325,000$ 325,000$ costs impact n will add w ent managem dding a full ds. Consid ion of this p basis. RECREA n Park en, Interim P calls for a n Staff comm d for 2016. t also the D would includ ng trails, op 2017 -$ -$ ts work load to ment, turf ma l time staff dering at thi park will nec ATION (P Parks and Re neighborhood menced the p This neigh onnelly Farm de items suc pen green 2018 -$ -$ the mainten anagement, member in is time no a cessitate oth P-3) ecreation Di d park north preliminary hborhood pa ms Develop ch as shelter space and 2019 -$ -$ nance divisio playground n 2016 to m additional st her maintena irector h of Donnell design of th ark would no pment and th r, playground other sma 2020 ( -$ $ -$ $ on which wi maintenance meet the Par taff has bee ance tasks no ly he ot he d, all Total (2016-2020) 325,000 325,000 ill e, rk en ot 41 Proje Proje Antic Proje Impro field, projec additi constr donat Reven Park Mirac LBA Expen King Irr Dr Lig Oper Plann additi increa 100% the sta ect name: ect manager cipated star ect descriptio ovements to K parking lot ct will increa ional games to ruction of add te funds for th nues Dedication Fun cle League / Lighting Donat Total nditures Park: rigate four fields rainage system ghting (Design Total ations and op ned improvem ional staff tim asing mowing % Maintenanc aff time that h PARK r: rt date: on and locatio King Park in and trail ligh ase the playab o be played a ditional fields he lighting pro nd - Fees tion s & Const.) perating cost ments to King me required g frequency. e Free Plan f has been requ KS AND R King Park John Henn 2016 on nclude installa hting, installa bility, safety at the facility s. Lakeville B oject. 2016 412,538 150,000 562,538$ - - 562,538 562,538$ ts impacts g Park will a for turf man The purchase for 25 years. uired to remov RECREA Improvemen en, Interim P ation of irriga ation of drain and overall ultimately pr Baseball Asso 2017 - - -$ - - - -$ add workload nagement inc e and installat The installat ve standing w ATION (P nts Parks and Re ation systems n tile system quality of th reventing the ociation (LBA 2018 857,825 150,000 1,007,825$ 232,500 140,000 635,325 1,007,825$ d to the main cluding servic tion of the lig ation of the dr water from fie P-4) ecreation Di s on four fie m and trail ex he fields and need to acqui A) has and w 2019 597,550 150,000 747,550$ - 185,000 562,550 747,550$ ntenance divi cing irrigatio ghting system rain tile syste elds after rain irector lds along wit xtension. Th will allow fo ire land for th will continue t 2020 - - -$ - - - -$ sion regardin on system an m will include em will reduc events. th he or he to Total (2016-2020) 1,867,913 450,000 2,317,913$ 232,500 325,000 1,760,413 2,317,913$ ng nd a ce 42 Proje Proje Antic Proje The P corrid aside comp Reven King Park D Expen Avon Oper Until would $7,40 is dev it is d ect name: ect manager: cipated start ect descriptio Parks, Trails a dor for comm 66.5 acres at lex. nues Creek Greenwa Dedication Fund Total nditures nlea Park Total ations and op the park lan d include rou 0 for labor an veloped into i developed for PARK date: on and locatio and Open Sp munity playfie the corner of ay - Sale d - Fees l l perating cost d is develope ugh cutting th nd equipment ts final use. T agricultural u KS AND R Avonlea Par John Henne 2017 on ace Plan call elds. Staff h f future 185th 2016 950,000 - 950,000$ 950,000 950,000$ ts impacts ed, operation he site appro t. No additio There is the p use for approx RECREA rk n, Interim Pa s for the acqu has been work and Cedar A 2017 0 - 550,000 0 550,000$ 0 550,000 0 550,000$ al cost for th ximately fou onal operation potential to re ximately $250 ATION (P arks and Recre uisition of lan king with Ma Avenue for the 2018 - 0 - 0 -$ 0 0 -$ he 66.5 acres ur times/year nal cost is ant ent out the lan 0 - $400/year P-5) eation Directo nd along the attamy Devel e developmen 2019 - - -$ -$ s after the pu which is est ticipated unti nd after purch r. or Cedar Avenu lopment to s nt of an athlet 2020 - - -$ -$ urchase of lan timated to co l the park lan hased and unt ue et ic Total (2016-2020 950,0 550,0 1,500,0$ 1,500,0 1,500,0$ nd ost nd til ) 00 00 00 00 00 43 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-6) Project name: Quigley-Sime Parking Lot Paving Project manager: John Hennen, Interim Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated start date: 2018 Project description and location Funding is being scheduled for paving Quigley-Sime parking lot. Paving and striping of lot will maximize parking capacity, eliminate dust-control issues and reduce maintenance of the lot. Operations and operating costs impacts Operating cost impacts include pavement management maintenance (i.e. fog sealing and striping) increasing the budget two years after the lot has been constructed and every five years after initial fog seal application. This parking lot will not be plowed. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2016-2020) Revenues Park Dedication Fund - Fees -$ -$ 180,000 $ -$ -$ 180,000$ Expenditures Pave Quigley-Sime parking lot - - 150,000 - - 150,000 Parking lot Eng (Design, Insp, Adm-20%)- - 30,000 - - 30,000 Total -$ -$ 180,000 $ -$ -$ 180,000$ 44 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-7) Project name: Park Development – Administrative Projects Project manager: John Hennen, Interim Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated start date: On-going Project description and location The Park Dedication Fund budget provides appropriations for a number of activities including planning, design and feasibility reports for park projects such as Summerlyn Park, Antlers Park Master Plan, Legacy Park, Chokecherry Hill Greenway and Avonlea Development Concept Plan. It also includes appraisal and professional fees for the bi-annual review of park dedication fee analysis for commercial and industrial properties. Operations and operating costs impacts No anticipated significant impact on operations or operating cost as a result of completing planning and design work. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2016-2020) Revenues Park Dedication Fund - Fees 35,000$ 10,000 $ 20,000$ 50,000$ 20,000 $ 135,000$ Expenditures Park Fees analysis - C/I values 10,000 - 10,000 - 10,000 30,000 Summerlyn - Design & Construction 25,000 - - - - 25,000 Antlers Park Master Plan 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Legacy Planning & Design - - - 40,000 - 40,000 Planning & Design - 10,000 10,000 - 10,000 30,000 Total 45,000$ 10,000 $ 20,000$ 40,000$ 20,000 $ 135,000$ 45 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-8) Project name: Park Development – Developer Credits Project manager: John Hennen, Interim Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated start date: On-going Project description and location Developer credits: Represents credits associated with new development when the park dedication requirement is fulfilled through a land dedication. Operations and operating costs impacts No anticipated significant impact on operations or operating cost at this time. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2016-2020) Revenues Park Dedication Fund - Fees 433,201 $ 433,201 $ 433,201 $ 433,201$ 433,201 $ 2,166,005$ Expenditures Developer Credits 433,201$ 433,201 $ 433,201 $ 433,201$ 433,201 $ 2,166,005$ 46 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-9) Project name: Park Improvement Fund Project manager: John Hennen, Interim Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated start date: Various Project description and location The Park Improvement Fund provides funding for replacement and upgrades to items such as Aronson building improvements, Antlers building and playground replacements. The existing Land of Amazement (LOA) play structure (23 years old) at Steve Michaud Park was constructed in 1992. LOA is a destination site whereby residents and non-residents travel to the site to play on this unique play structure. This unit is an old type wood structure that is in need of replacement as many of the wooden poles, decking, handrails and balusters are deteriorating, splitting or cracking along with a significant number of play apparatus pieces that no longer can be repaired/replaced. LOA was preliminary designed in 2015 in order to facilitate fundraising efforts for construction in 2016. Operations and operating costs impacts No anticipated significant impact on operations or operating cost. *Includes architectural design, construction plans and misc. expenses. **City staff will work with Dakota County to obtain funding for the construction of this building as Antlers Park will be considered a trailhead along the Lake Marion/South Creek Trail Project, which will be a part of the Dakota County Regional Trail System. The building will also be incorporated into the Antlers Park Master Plan. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Revenues Park Improvement Fund 211,500 153,000 465,000 293,750 204,000 Fundraising 222,000 - - - - Donations - Rotary - LOA 50,000 Donations - ISD #192 - Quail Meadows 50,000 - - - - Total 533,500$ 153,000$ 465,000$ 293,750$ 204,000$ Expenditures *Aronson building upgrades - - 140,000 - - **Replacement of Antlers building - - 325,000 - - Playground Replacements Steve Michaud LOA 357,000 - - - - Oak Shores 76,500 - - - - Quail Meadows 100,000 - - - - Dodd Trail - 76,500 - - - Highview Heights - 76,500 - - - Hypointe Crossing - - - 65,500 - Cherryview - - - 78,750 - Independence - - - 73,000 - Greenridge - - - 76,500 - Dodd Pointe - - - - 77,000 Bunker Hill - - - - 77,000 Bracketts Crossing - - - - 50,000 Total 533,500$ 153,000$ 465,000$ 293,750$ 204,000$ 47 Proje Proje Antic Proje The R large tables Reve Park Expe Dog Oper The c will i drink site. ect name: ect Manage cipated star ect Descript Ritter Farm D and small d s. nues Dedication Fu Total enditures Park Construc Total rations and construction include item king fountain PARKS r: rt date: tion and loc Dog Park wo dog area, pe unds-Fees $ $ ction $ $ operating c of the dog p s such as ref n and gravel S AND R Ritter Farm John Henn 2016 cation ould be appr et drinking a 2016 145,000$ 145,000$ 145,000$ 145,000$ costs impact park will add fuse collectio parking lot m RECREA m Dog Park en, Interim P roximately 6 and wash of 2017 -$ -$ -$ -$ ts d work load on, periodic maintenance ATION (P Parks and Re 6-7 acres in s ff area, grav 2018 -$ -$ -$ -$ to the maint flail mowin e along with P-10) ecreation Di size. Ameni vel parking l 2019 -$ -$ -$ -$ tenance divis ng, winteriza the general irector ities include lot and picni 2020 -$ -$ -$ -$ sion which ation of up-keep of a ic 48 Proje Proje Antic Proje The P the L more neigh Reve Park Expe Park Oper Lega inclu maint the P been not b ect name: ect Manage cipated star ect Descript Parks, Trails Legacy, Cres non-traditi hborhood par nues Dedication Fu enditures Construction Total rations and cy Park cons de items suc tenance, etc ark Division approved in eing comple PARKS r: rt date: tion and loc s and Open S scent Ridge ional amen rks. unds-Fees operating c struction wil ch as turf ma . Staff recom n’s maintena n 2016, the a eted on a tim S AND R Legacy Par John Henn 2020 cation Space Plan c and Berres nities versus 2016 -$ -$ -$ costs impact ll add worklo anagement, p mmended ad ance needs. C ddition of th mely basis. RECREA rk en, Interim P calls for a ne Ridge Deve s what ha 2017 -$ -$ -$ ts oad to the m pavement ma dding a full t Considering his park will ATION (P Parks and Re eighborhood elopments. as been ins 2018 -$ -$ -$ maintenance d anagement, p time staff me g at this time necessitate P-11) ecreation Di d park in the The park w stalled in t 2019 - $ - $ - $ division whi possibly pla ember in 20 e no addition other mainte irector e area servin would includ the previou 2020 - 350,$ - 350,$ - 350,$ ich will ayground 16 to meet nal staff has enance tasks ng de us 0 ,000 ,000 ,000 s 49 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-12) Project name: Steve Michaud Soccer #8 & #9 Drain Tile Installation Project Manager: John Hennen, Interim Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated start date: 2020 Project Description and location Improvements to Steve Michaud Park include the installation of drain tile system in soccer fields 8 and 9. The project will increase the playability, safety and overall quality of the fields. At this time the fields are prone to becoming saturated and unplayable during periods of continued or heavy rains. These conditions have forced the closure of the fields during tournaments and regularly scheduled games. In addition the increase in soil moisture has had a negative impact on the turf conditions and an increase in turf stress. The installation of a sport field drain tile system will minimize or eliminate these negative conditions and allow for consistent field conditions and playability. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Revenues Park Dedication Funds-Fees -$ -$ -$ -$ 96,000$ Expenditures Drain Tile Installation 96,000$ Fields #8 and #9 Total -$ - $ - $ -$ 96,000$ Operations and operating costs impacts No impact on operations or operating costs. 50 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-13) Project name: Trail Improvement Fund Project manager: John Hennen, Interim Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated start date: Various Project description and location The City retained the services of WSB Engineering who evaluated the condition of all trail segments and provided recommendations for maintenance. Staff has developed a plan for either overlaying or reclaiming trail segments. Staff is proposing to have WSB inspect 1/3 of trail system each year to perform pavement ratings and analysis. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Revenues Trail Improvement Fund - Taxes 251,520$ 332,880$ 227,684$ 295,236 $ 245,000 $ Expenditures Trail crack and fog sealing 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Trail inspections (1/3 of system)5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 S side 165th - Hudson to Highview (reclamation)35,469 Dakota Heights Park Trails (reclamation)16,141 The Greenway Trail - W segment 24,087 N side 165th - Ipava to Holbrook Ave (reclamation)78,236 Casperson soccer field trail 1,800 W side Flagstaff Ave - Fontina Path to Dodd Blvd (reclam.)78,517 E side Flagstaff - Fontina Path to Dodd (overlay)51,914 N Creek Trail - E from Flagstaff to N Creek MHP (reclam.) 47,035 Dodd Trail Park Trails - Flagstaff to Dodd Blvd (reclamation)32,434 King park trail extension 16,000 Aronson Park Trails (reclamation)18,508 Cedar Highlands Park Trails (reclamation)30,295 Hypointe Park Trails (reclamation)9,869 Oak Shores Park Trails (reclamation)46,532 Parkview Park Trails (reclamation)16,281 Quail Meadows Park Trails (reclamation)14,085 N side of 175th - Ipava to Highview 78,509 *W side Cedar - 190th to 202nd (reclamation)50,148 *N side 160th - Ipava to Interlachen (reclamation)14,321 *S side 160th - Ipava to Cedar Ave (overlay)50,659 Misc. Trails - TBD 150,000$ Engineering costs for reclamation/overlay projects (20%)30,787 41,980 27,114 36,599 30,000 Total 251,520$ 332,880$ 227,684$ 295,236 $ 245,000 $ *Budget number is City's cost (45%) - Dakota County to pay 55% Operations and operating costs impacts No anticipated significant impact on operations or operating cost. 51 Proje Proje Antic Proje There Jasm segm Reve Park Escro Expe Trav Engi Oper The t budg ect name: ect Manage cipated star ect Descript e is an inad ine Avenue ment as a mea nues Dedication Fu ow Funds Total enditures vel Constructio neering (20% Total rations and trail segment et two years PARKS r: rt date: tion and loc dequate trail . Citizens ans of safe p unds-Fees on ) operating c t will be add after the tra S AND R 175th Street John Henn 2018 cation segment on have conta edestrian tra 2016 - - $ - - $ costs impact ded to the fog ail is constru RECREA t Trail – Isle en, Interim P n S side of acted staff r avel to Chris 2017 - $ - $ ts g sealing ma ucted and eve ATION (P eton Ave. to Parks and Re 175th Street regarding th stina Huddle 7 20 - 8 - - 9$ - 7 - 1 - 9$ aintenance sc ery 3-4 years P-14) Jasmine Av ecreation Di t from Isleto he request t eston Elemen 018 85,700 7,900 93,600 $ 78,000 15,600 93,600 $ chedule incr s after that p venue (S side irector on Avenue t to install th ntary School 2019 - - - $ - - - $ reasing the point. e) to is l. 2020 - - - - - - 52 C I T Y O F L A K E V I L L E Council Meeting 01.04.2016 2 0 1 5 - 2 0 2 5 F A C I L I T Y P L A N 20 1 4 C F + 2016 - 2025 20 1 5 2 0 1 5 E s t ' d 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 2 0 1 8 2 0 1 9 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 5 T o t a l s Us e o f F u n d s : Ar t C e n t e r 4 8 , 5 7 5 $ 7 3 , 5 6 5 $ 2 1 6 , 1 5 0 $ 1 0 1 , 2 9 2 $ 4 7 , 3 7 5 $ 1 0 , 8 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 45,000 $ 420,617 $ Ce n t r a l M a i n t e n a n c e F a c i l i t y 4 0 , 6 5 0 77 , 1 1 9 10 2 , 3 0 0 92 , 7 0 0 20 3 , 0 0 0 - - 36 , 0 0 0 80 , 0 0 0 7, 0 0 0 - - 521,000 Ci t y H a l l 2 9 3 , 5 0 0 36 8 , 3 9 6 33 9 , 4 5 0 27 5 , 6 5 0 77 , 0 0 0 14 5 , 0 0 0 75 , 0 0 0 17 5 , 0 0 0 - - - - 1,087,100 Fi r e S t a t i o n # 1 1 7 3 , 0 0 0 15 7 , 1 1 4 42 , 5 5 0 - - - 15 , 0 0 0 - - 14 , 8 0 0 - - 72,350 Fi r e S t a t i o n # 2 1 3 4 , 5 0 0 12 5 , 2 3 1 16 , 1 0 0 5, 3 0 0 - - 13 , 8 0 0 - - - - 5,900 41,100 Fi r e S t a t i o n # 3 1 0 , 7 0 0 5, 4 7 5 13 , 0 0 0 4, 8 0 0 6, 8 5 0 - 3, 8 0 0 - - - - - 28,450 Fi r e S t a t i o n # 4 2 , 4 0 0 4, 8 2 5 11 , 4 0 0 7, 2 0 0 26 , 0 0 0 11 5 , 0 0 0 - 4, 8 0 0 - - - - 164,400 He r it a g e C e n t e r 9 4 , 9 5 0 18 6 , 3 5 0 80 , 8 0 0 39 , 0 0 0 30 , 0 0 0 60 , 4 0 0 54 , 0 0 0 56 , 0 0 0 - - - - 320,200 Ga l a x i e L i q u o r S t o r e - - 11 , 4 7 5 2, 5 0 0 - - - 65 , 0 0 0 - - - - 78,975 Ke n r i c k L i q u o r S t o r e 89 , 0 0 0 89 , 0 0 0 64 , 5 0 0 46 , 1 0 0 6, 4 0 0 - 1 1 3 , 0 0 0 - - - - - 230,000 Po l i c e S t a t i o n 4 , 1 0 0 3, 8 1 9 19 , 0 5 0 55 , 5 0 0 36 , 0 0 0 16 0 , 0 0 0 - 60 , 0 0 0 - - - - 330,550 Wa t e r T r e a t m e n t F a c i l i t y 67 1 , 8 0 0 67 1 , 8 0 0 38 , 5 7 5 15 , 0 0 0 - - - 27 , 2 0 0 32 , 0 0 0 - 11,000 - 123,775 To t a l U s e o f F u n d s 1 , 5 6 3 , 1 7 5 $ 1, 7 6 2 , 6 9 4 $ 95 5 , 3 5 0 $ 64 5 , 0 4 2 $ 43 2 , 6 2 5 $ 49 1 , 2 0 0 $ 27 4 , 6 0 0 $ 42 4 , 0 0 0 $ 11 2 , 0 0 0 $ 21 , 8 0 0 $ 11,000 $ 50,900 $ 3,418,517 $ So u r c e o f F u n d s : In t e r e s t E a r n i n g s ( 2 % ) - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ -$ An n u a l L e v y ( B u i l d i n g F u n d ) 5 1 , 0 0 0 51 , 0 0 0 51 , 0 0 0 25 0 , 0 0 0 35 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 450,000 450,000 3,801,000 Co m m u n i c a t i o n s F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n 15 0 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - 150,000 Li q u o r F u n d 89 , 0 0 0 89 , 0 0 0 75 , 9 7 5 48 , 6 0 0 6, 4 0 0 - 1 1 3 , 0 0 0 65 , 0 0 0 - - - - 308,975 Wa t e r F u n d 67 1 , 8 0 0 67 1 , 8 0 0 38 , 5 7 5 15 , 0 0 0 - - - 27 , 2 0 0 32 , 0 0 0 - 11,000 - 123,775 D o n a t i o n s 2 7 , 0 0 0 27 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - Ot h e r 1 2 2 , 3 7 1 12 2 , 7 1 1 65 0 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - 650,000 To t a l S o u r c e o f F u n d s 9 6 1 , 1 7 1 $ 96 1 , 5 1 1 $ 96 5 , 5 5 0 $ 31 3 , 6 0 0 $ 35 6 , 4 0 0 $ 45 0 , 0 0 0 $ 56 3 , 0 0 0 $ 54 2 , 2 0 0 $ 48 2 , 0 0 0 $ 45 0 , 0 0 0 $ 461,000 $ 450,000 $ 5,033,750 $ Ch a n g e i n F u n d B a l a n c e (6 0 2 , 0 0 4 ) $ (8 0 1 , 1 8 3 ) $ 10 , 2 0 0 $ (3 3 1 , 4 4 2 ) $ (7 6 , 2 2 5 ) $ (4 1 , 2 0 0 ) $ 28 8 , 4 0 0 $ 11 8 , 2 0 0 $ 37 0 , 0 0 0 $ 42 8 , 2 0 0 $ 450,000 $ 399,100 $ 1,615,233 $ Be g i n n i n g F u n d B a l a n c e 1, 3 7 5 , 0 1 0 $ 1, 3 7 5 , 0 1 0 $ 57 3 , 8 2 7 $ 58 4 , 0 2 7 $ 25 2 , 5 8 5 $ 17 6 , 3 6 0 $ 13 5 , 1 6 0 $ 42 3 , 5 6 0 $ 54 1 , 7 6 0 $ 91 1 , 7 6 0 $ 1,339,960 $ 1,789,960 $ En d i n g F u n d B a l a n c e 77 3 , 0 0 6 $ 57 3 , 8 2 7 $ 58 4 , 0 2 7 $ 25 2 , 5 8 5 $ 17 6 , 3 6 0 $ 13 5 , 1 6 0 $ 42 3 , 5 6 0 $ 54 1 , 7 6 0 $ 91 1 , 7 6 0 $ 1, 3 3 9 , 9 6 0 $ 1,789,960 $ 2,189,060 $ 53 C I T Y O F L A K E V I L L E Council Meeting 01.04.2016 2 0 1 5 - 2 0 2 5 E Q U I P M E N T P L A N 20 1 4 C F + 2016 - 2025 20 1 5 2 0 1 5 E s t ' d 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 2 0 1 8 2 0 1 9 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 5 T o t a l s Us e o f F u n d s : El e c t i o n s 2 6 , 6 6 7 $ 30 , 3 2 2 $ 30 , 3 2 2 $ 30 , 3 2 2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,644 $ Fi r e 5 6 1 , 5 3 4 87 7 , 2 6 0 67 8 , 7 8 4 23 2 , 2 4 7 28 5 , 0 0 0 88 , 0 0 0 66 3 , 0 0 0 1, 0 7 5 , 0 0 0 20 , 0 0 0 70 , 0 0 0 591,000 - 3,703,031 In f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m s 8 7 , 9 2 6 83 , 9 6 3 55 7 , 6 7 9 42 6 , 0 3 9 37 5 , 7 8 7 34 4 , 0 7 0 83 , 9 5 3 13 5 , 0 7 9 56 0 , 5 2 3 46 4 , 2 0 3 285,816 240,681 3,473,830 In s p e c t i o n s - - - - - - - 22 , 4 6 0 22 , 4 6 0 22 , 4 6 0 22,460 - 89,840 Pa r k s 3 6 4 , 9 7 2 37 1 , 3 0 8 33 5 , 0 9 2 60 2 , 5 4 5 32 8 , 9 8 5 20 5 , 5 7 0 39 0 , 3 1 5 12 8 , 9 0 0 38 4 , 5 2 5 31 2 , 7 2 5 429,575 486,800 3,605,032 Po l i c e 3 0 4 , 4 4 1 41 5 , 4 2 3 22 0 , 9 7 1 70 2 , 7 3 6 1, 2 1 4 , 1 7 4 28 1 , 0 0 0 46 1 , 0 4 6 63 4 , 5 0 0 39 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 4 8 6 600,758 495,740 5,501,411 St r e e t s 8 6 5 , 3 1 2 90 1 , 3 2 1 1, 6 0 4 , 2 3 4 1, 0 9 0 , 0 6 1 98 7 , 9 0 8 1, 2 3 6 , 7 9 4 36 1 , 8 3 0 37 3 , 4 9 2 33 4 , 7 1 6 76 4 , 6 8 8 1,109,912 652,892 8,516,527 T ot a l U s e o f F u n d s 2 , 2 1 0 , 8 5 2 $ 2, 6 7 9 , 5 9 7 $ 3, 4 2 7 , 0 8 2 $ 3, 0 8 3 , 9 5 0 $ 3, 1 9 1 , 8 5 4 $ 2, 1 5 5 , 4 3 4 $ 1, 9 6 0 , 1 4 4 $ 2, 3 6 9 , 4 3 1 $ 1, 7 1 2 , 2 2 4 $ 2, 1 3 4 , 5 6 2 $ 3,039,521 $ 1,876,113 $ 24,950,315 $ So u r c e o f F u n d s : In t e r e s t E a r n i n g s ( 2 % ) - $ - $ 59 , 3 4 7 $ 17 , 6 1 5 $ 4, 4 0 9 $ 7, 4 8 0 $ 12 , 6 4 1 $ 10 , 8 1 1 $ 5, 7 5 8 $ 13 , 7 4 9 $ 14,453 $ 1,071 $ 147,334 $ An n u a l L e v y 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 30 0 , 0 0 0 25 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 75 0 , 0 0 0 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1, 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 1, 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 1, 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 1,500,000 1,600,000 9,950,000 Ge n e r a l F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n 7 2 7 , 0 0 0 87 7 , 0 0 0 50 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - 50,000 Li q u o r F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n 8 2 5 , 8 1 2 82 5 , 8 1 2 50 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 60 0 , 0 0 0 600,000 600,000 5,900,000 Co m m u n i c a t i o n s F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n 4 9 5 , 0 0 0 49 5 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - 100,000 Pa v e m e n t M g m t F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n 5 2 4 , 0 0 0 52 4 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 85 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - - 285,000 En v i r o n m e n t a l R e s F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n - - 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31,000 31,000 310,000 Au c t i o n / S a l e P r o c e e d s 2 2 5 , 8 0 4 20 1 , 8 7 0 25 0 , 1 7 5 22 5 , 0 0 0 22 5 , 0 0 0 22 5 , 0 0 0 22 5 , 0 0 0 22 5 , 0 0 0 22 5 , 0 0 0 22 5 , 0 0 0 225,000 225,000 2,275,175 Bo n d P r o c e e d s - - - 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1, 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 80 0 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - 3,600,000 To t a l S o u r c e o f F u n d s 3 , 0 9 7 , 6 1 6 $ 3, 2 2 3 , 6 8 2 $ 1, 3 4 0 , 5 2 2 $ 2, 4 2 3 , 6 1 5 $ 3, 3 4 5 , 4 0 9 $ 2, 4 1 3 , 4 8 0 $ 1, 8 6 8 , 6 4 1 $ 2, 1 1 6 , 8 1 1 $ 2, 1 1 1 , 7 5 8 $ 2, 1 6 9 , 7 4 9 $ 2,370,453 $ 2,457,071 $ 22,617,509 $ Ch a n g e i n F u n d B a l a n c e 88 6 , 7 6 4 $ 54 4 , 0 8 5 $ (2 , 0 8 6 , 5 6 0 ) $ (6 6 0 , 3 3 5 ) $ 15 3 , 5 5 5 $ 25 8 , 0 4 6 $ (9 1 , 5 0 3 ) $ (2 5 2 , 6 2 0 ) $ 39 9 , 5 3 4 $ 35 , 1 8 7 $ (669,068)$ 580,958 $ (2,332,806)$ Be g i n n i n g F u n d B a l a n c e 2, 4 2 3 , 2 4 7 $ 2, 4 2 3 , 2 4 7 $ 2, 9 6 7 , 3 3 2 $ 88 0 , 7 7 2 $ 22 0 , 4 3 7 $ 37 3 , 9 9 2 $ 63 2 , 0 3 8 $ 54 0 , 5 3 6 $ 28 7 , 9 1 5 $ 68 7 , 4 5 0 $ 722,637 $ 53,569 $ En d i n g F u n d B a l a n c e 3, 3 1 0 , 0 1 1 $ 2, 9 6 7 , 3 3 2 $ 88 0 , 7 7 2 $ 22 0 , 4 3 7 $ 37 3 , 9 9 2 $ 63 2 , 0 3 8 $ 54 0 , 5 3 6 $ 28 7 , 9 1 5 $ 68 7 , 4 5 0 $ 72 2 , 6 3 7 $ 53,569 $ 634,526 $ *V e h i c l e s a n d m a j o r e q u i p m e n t p u r c h a s e s Do e s n o t i n c l u d e v e h i c l e s f o r : En g i n e e r i n g , O p e r a t i o n s & M a i n t , E n v i r o n m e n t a l R e s o u r c e s , U t i l i t y F u n d s 54 C I T Y O F L A K E V I L L E Co u n c i l M e e t i n g 0 1 . 0 4 . 2 0 1 6 S T R E E T R E C O N S T R U C T I O N P L A N 20 1 6 20 1 7 20 1 8 20 1 9 20 2 0 Total Co l l e c t o r R o a d R e c o n s t r u c t i o n : Hi g h v i e w A v e n u e : C R 7 0 - S . C i t y L i m i t 41 6 , 6 9 9 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 416,699 $ Ke n r i c k A v e : N . C i t y L i m i t - 1 7 3 r d - 2, 2 3 4 , 0 4 5 - - - 2,234,045 Ho l y o k e A v e : 2 1 5 t h - H e r i t a g e D r - 1, 1 5 2 , 4 4 1 - - - 1,152,441 Ho l y o k e A v e / 2 1 0 t h I n t e r s e c t i o n - 81 , 0 0 0 - - - 81,000 Ip a v a A v e ; 1 8 5 t h - K e n w o o d T r - - 1 , 4 0 5 , 3 6 6 - - 1,405,366 17 2 n d S t . K e n y o n A v e - K o d i a k A v e - - - 70 1 , 7 3 1 - 701,731 Kl a m a t h T r L S . C R 5 - N . C R 5 - - - 1 , 5 3 4 , 1 0 3 - 1,534,103 Ko d i a k / 1 7 5 t h S t r e e t - - - 79 6 , 5 2 5 - 796,525 Ju d i c i a l / 1 6 8 t h S t r e e t - - - 74 4 , 0 4 4 - 744,044 He r i t a g e D r / I b e r i a A v e - - - 46 2 , 9 8 3 - 462,983 Hi g h v i e w A v e : C R 4 6 - 1 7 5 t h - - - - 1 , 1 0 9 , 8 8 8 1,109,888 St r e e t R e c o n s t r u c t i o n ( T a x P o r t i o n ) 5, 9 8 5 , 3 0 0 4, 8 8 1 , 6 2 0 4, 8 0 8 , 9 8 6 4, 4 3 9 , 0 0 9 5, 8 7 0 , 4 6 7 25,985,382 Ip a v a A v e / 1 6 t h S t r e e t I n t e r s e c t i o n - - - 13 0 , 0 0 0 62 0 , 0 0 0 750,000 20 2 n d S t r e e t / H a m b u r g A v e I n t e r s e c t i o n 20 0 , 0 0 0 70 0 , 0 0 0 75 0 , 0 0 0 - - 1,650,000 6, 6 0 1 , 9 9 9 $ 9, 0 4 9 , 1 0 6 $ 6, 9 6 4 , 3 5 2 $ 8, 8 0 8 , 3 9 5 $ 7, 6 0 0 , 3 5 5 $ 39,024,207 $ 55 CITY OF LAKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES December 3, 2015 Chair Swenson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The pledge of allegiance to the flag was given. Members Present: Chair Jason Swenson, Vice Chair Linda Maguire, Brooks Lillehei, Scott Einck, Paul Reuvers, Pat Kaluza, Karl Drotning, Ex-officio member Nic Stevens Members Absent: None Others Present: Daryl Morey, Planning Director, Kris Jenson, Associate Planner; Zach Johnson, City Engineer; and Penny Brevig, Recording Secretary 3. Approval of the Meeting Minutes The November 19, 2015 Planning Commission meeting minutes were approved as presented. 4. Announcements Mr. Morey stated that the December 17th Planning Commission will be cancelled due to lack of agenda items. The next regular meeting is scheduled for January 7, 2016. 5. Simply Self Storage Chair Swenson opened the public hearing to consider the application of O. B. Management Services, Inc. for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a self- storage facility in the O-P, Office Park District. Jared Farmer from Farmer Development, representing O. B. Management and Simply Self Storage, presented a brief overview of their project. Associate Planner Kris Jenson presented the planning report. Ms. Jenson stated O.B. Management Services, Inc. is requesting a CUP for a self-storage facility in the former Train America building at 9913 – 214th Street. The proposed storage business is Simply Self Storage, which is a national self-storage business with locations in 18 states. Ms. Jenson stated that the building has just over 100,000 square feet of floor area. Nearly 17,000 square feet of that is occupied by three tenant spaces, one on the first floor and two tenant spaces on the second floor. The area not currently occupied by the existing tenants will be remodeled to include storage units in a variety of sizes. Ms. Jenson explained that some parking spaces will be removed to accommodate the addition to the building and still meet the impervious surface maximum allowed Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, December 3, 2015 Page 2 by the CUP approved in 2006. She stated the parking on the site will exceed Zoning Ordinance parking requirements for the existing and proposed uses. Ms. Jenson explained the building modifications which are described in detail in the November 24, 2015 planning report. Because the building was originally designed for sports and athletic uses, there is only a second floor in a portion of the building. The structure will be modified to add a second floor to accommodate additional storage units. Ms. Jenson stated that Planning Department staff recommends approval of the CUP, subject to the three stipulations listed in the November 24, 2015 planning report. Chair Swenson opened the hearing to the public for comment. There were no comments from the audience. Motion was made by Reuvers, seconded by Drotning to close the public hearing at 6:06 p.m. Ayes: Lillehei, Einck, Maguire, Swenson, Reuvers, Kaluza, Drotning Nays: 0 Chair Swenson asked for comments from the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission felt this was a good re-use of an existing building. Motion was made by Maguire, seconded by Lillehei to recommend to City Council approval of the Simply Self Storage Conditional Use Permit to allow a self- storage facility in the O-P, Office Park District subject to the following stipulations, and adopt the Findings of Fact dated December 3, 2015: 1. The site plan and building shall be developed in accordance with the plans approved by the City Council. 2. A building permit is required prior to commencing construction. 3. Signs shown on the colored elevation plans are illustrative and any new signs proposed for the building or site will require a sign permit to be issued by the Planning Department. Ayes: Einck, Maguire, Swenson, Reuvers, Kaluza, Drotning, Lillehei Nays: 0 6. City of Lakeville Chair Swenson opened the public hearing to consider the request of the City of Lakeville for the adoption of the 2016-2020 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). City Engineer Zach Johnson presented the 2016-2020 CIP. Mr. Johnson reviewed the objectives of the CIP and indicated that the CIP includes future transportation, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, December 3, 2015 Page 3 utility, parks and recreation, facilities and equipment improvements for the years 2016-2020. The City Council has reviewed plans for the North Creek Greenway Trail and, due to the increased project costs and delays in acquiring the needed easements, this project will be postponed until time of development in the area. The final CIP document will reflect the deletion of this project. Mr. Johnson highlighted three of the more noticeable projects for 2016 which include the Dodd Boulevard reconstruction project scheduled for 2016, the County Road 50 reconstruction project between County Road 60 and Dodd Boulevard starting in 2017, and the 172nd Street realignment project planned for 2016. Mr. Johnson stated that staff has reviewed the 2016-2020 CIP and finds it to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and therefore recommends approval as presented. Chair Swenson opened the hearing to the public for comment. There were no comments from the audience. Motion was made by Kaluza, seconded by Maguire to close the public hearing at 6:14 p.m. Ayes: Maguire, Swenson, Reuvers, Kaluza, Drotning, Lillehei, Einck Nays: 0 Chair Swenson asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Discussion points included:  Commissioner Drotning asked for an explanation of the 172nd Street realignment project. Mr. Johnson explained that the intersection of 172nd Street and County Road 5 would be eliminated and realigned with Kenyon Avenue just south of HOM Furniture. Utilities will be extended to the northwest quadrant of the new intersection.  Commissioner Drotning commented on the pressure that the Met Council is putting on cities to provide affordable housing. Mr. Johnson commented that the 172nd Street realignment project is unique in that the City will be partnering with the County, property owners, and perspective developers.  Chair Swenson commented that having been on the Planning Commission for two years now, it is nice to see the transportation improvement projects scheduled for completion in the next five years. Motion was made by Drotning, seconded by Reuvers to recommend to City Council adoption of the 2016-2020 Capital Improvement Plan as presented, which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Ayes: Swenson, Reuvers, Kaluza, Drotning, Lillehei, Einck, Maguire Nays: 0 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, December 3, 2015 Page 4 There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Penny Brevig, Recording Secretary