HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 07
Date: Item No.
ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 11 OF THE CITY CODE (THE ZONING ORDINANCE)
CONCERNING MULTI-FAMILY PARKING
Proposed Action
Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve an ordinance amending Title 11 of
the City Code concerning parking requirements for multi-family uses.
Overview
Planning Department staff recommends approval of an ordinance amending Section 11-19-7 of the
Zoning Ordinance concerning off-street parking requirements for multi-family uses. The City Council
discussed multi-family zoning options at their March 28 and April 11, 2016 work sessions. The Planning
Commission discussed revisions to the multi-family parking requirements at their July 21, 2016 work
session and directed staff to prepare an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance addressing deferred parking
for multi-family uses and parking dimensions for structured parking.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Zoning Ordinance amendment at their
September 8, 2016 meeting. There was no public comment. The Planning Commission unanimously
recommended approval of the amendment, which was prepared by the City’s planning consultant.
Primary Issues to Consider
• Will the proposed reduction in parking dimensions for structured parking have any negative impacts?
The proposed amendment will reduce the parking stall depth by two feet (from 20 feet to 18 feet). The
reduction in parking stall depth is appropriate given that there are no environmental conditions (i.e.
snow storage) that would potential impact parking stall depth. In addition, the underground parking
garages in a number of senior apartment buildings were constructed with reduced parking dimensions
as part of a PUD.
Supporting Information
• Ordinance amending Title 11 of the City Code
• September 8, 2016 draft Planning Commission meeting minutes
• July 21, 2016 Planning Commission work session minutes
• August 5, 2016 planning memorandum
Financial Impact: $ Budgeted: Y☐ N☐ Source:
Related Documents: (CIP, ERP, etc.):
Envision Lakeville Community Values: A Home for All Ages and Stages of Life
Report Completed by: Daryl Morey, Planning Director
September 19, 2016
1
ORDINANCE NO. _________
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKEVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE
REGARDING OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIPLE
FAMILY USES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 11-19-7.1.3 of the Zoning Ordinance (Off-Street
Parking – General Provisions) is hereby amended to read as follows:
3. Within Structures:
a. The off street parking requirements may be furnished by
providing stalls within the principal building or detached
accessory structure.
b. Parking stalls shall comply with the dimensions specified
by Section 11-19-7.I.1 of this title, except that stalls for
multiple family uses and public uses shall be not less than
nine feet (9’) wide and eighteen feet (18’) in length
accessed by access aisles a minimum of twenty four (24’)
feet wide.
c. Unless alternative provisions in compliance with this
chapter and title are made, no building permit shall be
issued to convert said parking structure into a dwelling unit
or living area or other activity.
Section 2. Section 11-19-7.J of the Zoning Ordinance (Off-Street
Parking – General Provisions) is hereby amended to read as follows:
J. Parking Deferment: The city may allow a reduction in the number of
required parking stalls for commercial, industrial, institutional, and
multiple family uses by administrative permit provided that:
1. The proposed use will have a peak parking demand less than the
required parking under section 11-19-13 of this chapter. Factors to
2
be considered when reviewing the proposed parking demand shall
include, but not be limited to:
a. Size of building, or number of dwelling units and number
of bedrooms per dwelling unit.
b. Type and use.
c. Number of employees or residents.
d. Projected volume and turnover of customer traffic.
e. Projected frequency and volume of delivery or service
vehicles.
f. Number of company owned vehicles.
g. Storage of vehicles on site.
2. In no case shall the amount of parking provided be less than one-
half (1/2) of the amount of parking required by ordinance.
3. The site has sufficient property under the same ownership to
accommodate the expansion of the parking facilities to meet the
minimum requirements of this chapter if the parking demand
exceeds on site supply.
4. On site parking shall only occur in areas designed and constructed
for parking in accordance with this chapter.
5. The applicant and city enter into a development agreement, to be
recorded against the subject property, which includes a clause
requiring the owner to install the additional parking stalls, upon a
finding of the zoning administrator that such additional parking
stalls are necessary to accommodate the use.
6. A change of use will necessitate compliance with the applicable
zoning ordinance standard for parking.
7. Parking deferments, as provided for herein, shall not be granted for
parcels and uses within the RS-CBD, C-CBD, and I-CBD districts.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its
passage and publication.
3
ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 19th day of September 2016
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
BY:_________________________________
Matt Little, Mayor
ATTEST:__________________________________
Charlene Friedges, City Clerk
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, September 8, 2016 Page 5
2. The Kenwood Hills HOA shall maintain the sidewalk on the east side of Jurel
Way within the final plat and adjacent to Outlot A, Southfork 3rd Addition.
3. The developer shall pay the City the estimated 3/8ths cost of the trail west of
Jurel Court with the initial final plat and credited to the developer within the
development agreement.
4. The developer shall submit revised Kenwood Hills HOA documents addressing
the change in the legal description of the development as Kenwood Hills 2nd
Addition, subject to review by the City Attorney and approval of the City Council.
5. Installation of subdivision signs as allowed by Section 11-23-15.X of the Zoning
Ordinance shall require issuance of a sign permit.
6. The revised grading plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer.
7. The revised utility plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer.
Ayes: Lillehei, Swenson, Bakewicz, Kaluza, Drotning, Kelvie, Einck
Nays: 0
8. City of Lakeville
Chair Swenson opened the public hearing to consider an amendment to Title 11 (the
Zoning Ordinance), Section 19-7 of the City Code concerning off-street parking
provisions for multiple family uses.
Planning Consultant Daniel Licht presented the planning report. Mr. Licht stated that
after hearing from several developers interested in possible multiple family
developments, the City Council requested that City staff provide preliminary
information regarding actions that could be taken within the City’s land use controls
to facilitate greater opportunity for multiple family development.
The Planning Commission concurred with staff’s recommendations at their July 21,
2016 work session to address opportunities for multiple family development primarily
through a PUD District process on a case-by-case basis. The Planning Commission
directed staff to initiate an amendment of the Zoning Ordinance for off-street parking
requirements for multiple family uses. Mr. Licht reviewed the proposed amendment,
which includes adding multiple family uses to the allowed parking deferment, and the
parking dimensions for off-street parking within structures.
Mr. Licht stated that Planning Department staff recommends approval of the Zoning
Ordinance amendment, as presented.
There were no comments from the audience.
Motion was made by Kelvie, seconded by Bakewicz to close the public hearing
at 6:41 p.m.
Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes – unanimous
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, September 8, 2016 Page 6
Chair Swenson asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Discussion
points included:
• Chair Swenson explained that the proposed amendment was discussed at a
recent Planning Commission work session, which is why there are no
comments from the Planning Commission at tonight’s meeting.
Motion was made by Kelvie, seconded by Drotning to recommend to City
Council approval of an amendment to Title 11 (the Zoning Ordinance), Section 19-7
of the City Code concerning off-street parking provisions for multiple family uses, as
presented.
Ayes: Swenson, Bakewicz, Kaluza, Drotning, Kelvie, Einck, Lillehei
Nays: 0
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:42 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Penny Brevig, Recording Secretary
MEMORANDUM
TO: Daryl Morey
FROM: D. Daniel Licht, AICP
DATE: 5 August 2016
RE: Lakeville – Zoning Ordinance; Multiple Family Development
TPC FILE: 135.01
BACKGROUND
The City Council, at a work session on 28 March 2016, requested that City staff provide
preliminary information as to possible actions that could be taken within the City’s land use
controls to facilitate greater opportunity for multiple family development. This effort is being
initiated in response to contacts made by several developers interested in possible multiple
family developments and in consideration of the Economic Development Commission’s 2014-
2016 Strategic Plan for Economic Development that identified high density housing as a
strategic priority. The Planning Commission discussed these issues at a work session on 21
July 2016. The Planning Commission concurred with the recommendations of City staff to
address opportunities for multiple family development primarily through a PUD District process
on a case-by-case basis. The Planning Commission directed staff to initiate an amendment of
the Zoning Ordinance for off-street parking requirements for multiple family uses.
Exhibits:
A. Draft Zoning Ordinance amendment
ANALYSIS
Number of Stalls Required. The Zoning Ordinance requires 2.5 off-street parking stalls per
multiple family dwelling unit to accommodate both the residents as well as guest parking. A
survey of communities with similar development characteristics to Lakeville was completed
regarding off-street parking requirements for multiple family uses:
2
City Parking Requirement Note
Apple Valley 1.5 stalls/du. 1 stall/du. must be enclosed
Burnsville 1.5 stalls/efficiency-1br. du.
2.25 stalls/2br.+ du.
1 stall must be enclosed
Add 0.5 stalls/du guest parking
Bloomington 1.8 stalls/1br. du
2.2 stalls/2br. du
2.6 stalls/3br.+ du
1 stall/du. must be enclosed
1 stall/100sf. of party room area
Eagan 2.0 stalls/du. 1 stall/du. must be underground
Eden Prairie 2.0 stalls/du. 1 stall/du. must be enclosed
Edina 2.0 stalls/du Minimum of 1.25 stalls must be
enclosed.
Maple Grove 2.0 stalls/du. 1 stall/du. must be underground
Plymouth 2.0 stalls/du. 1 stall/du. must be enclosed
Woodbury 2.5 stalls/du. 2.0 stalls/du if one underground
Lakeville 2.5 stalls/du.
The Institute of Transportation Engineer’s 4th Edition Parking Generation Study includes analysis
of off-street parking demand for multiple family uses based on the type of building and either in
an urban or suburban location. Most applicable to the potential development scenarios in
Lakeville are the Low/Mid-Rise Apartment having four or fewer floors being distinguished from
a High Rise Apartment, and being located in a suburban versus central city area.
ITE Parking Generation 4th Edition
Low/Mid-Rise Apartment
Peak Period Range 85th Percentile Average Peak
Demand
Suburban Midnight-
5:00AM
0.59 – 1.94
vehicles/du
1.94 vehicles/du 1.23 vehicles/du
Urban 10:00PM-
5:00AM
0.66 – 2.50
vehicles/du
1.61 vehicles/du 1.20 vehicles/du
The off-street parking requirements for multiple family uses in Lakeville and the surveyed
communities other than Bloomington and Burnsville do not account for variations in the
number of bedrooms within each dwelling unit, which may be expected to have a
corresponding effect on parking demand. Institute of Transportation Engineers included
reference to a subset of data regarding bedroom data acknowledging the need for further
studies, but indicating the following:
1.5 bedrooms/dwelling unit peak parking demand equals 92 percent of the average
peak parking demand for all of the study sites reporting bedrooms per unit data.
1.5 – 2.0 bedrooms / dwelling unit equals 98 percent of the average peak parking
demand for all of the study sites reporting bedrooms per unit data.
3
2.0 bedrooms / dwelling unit or more equals 113 percent of the average peak parking
demand for all of the study sites reporting bedrooms per unit data.
Based on the ITE study data and survey of surrounding communities, specifying off-street
parking of 2.0 stalls/dwelling unit for a multiple family land use within I-35 or Cedar Avenue
corridors having 2.0 bedrooms/dwelling unit or less with one stall/dwelling unit required to be
enclosed under the principal building (exempting housing meeting regional affordability
standards) is appropriate. It is the City’s intent at this time to implement a reduction in the
required number of parking stalls for multiple family uses based on the preceding analysis on a
case-by-case basis using a PUD District approach for development to allow the City opportunity
to further evaluate the functionality of the 2.0 parking stalls/dwelling unit requirement.
Parking Deferment. For multiple family developments exceeding the 2.0 bedroom threshold or
development occurring outside of a PUD District, flexibility as to the implementation of
required parking stalls can be accommodated through a parking deferment. Section 11-19-7.J
of the Zoning Ordinance allows a deferment in the number of required parking stalls for
commercial, industrial, or institutional uses subject to the criteria and requirements outlined
below. The Planning Commission agreed at their 21 July work session to expand the use of
parking deferments to include multiple family uses subject to these same criteria and
performance standards.
1. The proposed use will have a peak parking demand less than the required
parking under section 11-19-13 of this chapter. Factors to be considered
when reviewing the proposed parking demand shall include, but not be
limited to:
a. Size of building.
b. Type and use.
c. Number of employees.
d. Projected volume and turnover of customer traffic.
e. Projected frequency and volume of delivery or service vehicles.
f. Number of company owned vehicles.
g. Storage of vehicles on site.
2. In no case shall the amount of parking provided be less than one-half (1/2)
of the amount of parking required by ordinance.
4
3. The site has sufficient property under the same ownership to
accommodate the expansion of the parking facilities to meet the
minimum requirements of this chapter if the parking demand exceeds on
site supply.
4. On site parking shall only occur in areas designed and constructed for
parking in accordance with this chapter.
5. The applicant and city enter into a development agreement, to be
recorded against the subject property, which includes a clause requiring
the owner to install the additional parking stalls, upon a finding of the
zoning administrator that such additional parking stalls are necessary to
accommodate the use.
6. A change of use will necessitate compliance with the applicable zoning
ordinance standard for parking.
7. Parking deferments, as provided for herein, shall not be granted for
parcels and uses within the RS-CBD, C-CBD, and I-CBD districts.
Parking Dimensions. Section 11-19-7.I.1 of the Zoning Ordinance requires off-street parking
stalls to be nine feet wide and 20 feet deep, although a two foot overhang is allowed for
parking rows adjacent to a curb, accessed by 24 foot wide drive aisles. Section 11-19-7.I.3 of
the Zoning Ordinance allows enclosed parking stalls so designed to meet the requirements for
the number of off-street parking required by the Zoning Ordinance. In reviewing the
development application for Lakeville Pointe, the City considered interior parking stalls
designed to be nine feet wide and 18 feet deep accessed by a 24 foot wide drive aisle. The
developer provided a detail showing adequate access to the parking stalls by a typical
passenger car. These dimensions of the interior parking stalls are appropriate given that the
interior parking area are limited to tenant use, there are no environmental conditions such as
snow or pooled water to maneuver around, and there would be at least one exterior stall per
dwelling unit to accommodate larger vehicles tenants may own. City staff proposes including
language specifying nine foot by 18 foot stall dimensions accessed by a 24 foot drive aisle.
CONCLUSION
Our office and City staff have drafted a proposed amendment of the Zoning Ordinance based
on the direction of the City Council and Planning Commission regarding off-street parking
requirements for multiple family uses. A public hearing has been noticed for the Planning
Commission meeting on 8 September 2016 to consider said amendment. Our office
recommends approval of the draft Zoning Ordinance amendment as presented.
1
ORDINANCE NO. _________
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKEVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE
REGARDING OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIPLE
FAMILY USES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 11-19-7.1.3 of the Zoning Ordinance (Off-Street
Parking – General Provisions) is hereby amended to read as follows:
3. Within Structures:
a. The off street parking requirements may be furnished by
providing a space so designedstalls within the principal
building or detached accessory structure.
b. Parking stalls shall comply with the dimensions specified
by Section 11-19-7.I.1 of this title, except that stalls for
multiple family uses and public uses shall be not less than
nine feet (9’) wide and eighteen feet (18’) in length
accessed by access aisles a minimum of twenty four (24’)
feet wide.
bc. Unless alternative provisions in compliance with this
chapter and title are made, no building permit shall be
issued to convert said parking structure into a dwelling unit
or living area or other activity.
Section 2. Section 11-19-7.J of the Zoning Ordinance (Off-Street
Parking – General Provisions) is hereby amended to read as follows:
J. Parking Deferment: The city may allow a reduction in the number of
required parking stalls for commercial, industrial, and institutional, and
multiple family uses by administrative permit provided that:
1. The proposed use will have a peak parking demand less than the
required parking under section 11-19-13 of this chapter. F actors to
2
be considered when reviewing the proposed parking demand shall
include, but not be limited to:
a. Size of building, or number of dwelling units and number
of bedrooms per dwelling unit.
b. Type and use.
c. Number of employees or residents.
d. Projected volume and turnover of customer traffic.
e. Projected frequency and volume of delivery or service
vehicles.
f. Number of company owned vehicles.
g. Storage of vehicles on site.
2. In no case shall the amount of parking provided be less than one-
half (1/2) of the amount of parking required by ordinance.
3. The site has sufficient property under the same ownership to
accommodate the expansion of the parking facilities to meet the
minimum requirements of this chapter if the parking demand
exceeds on site supply.
4. On site parking shall only occur in areas designed and constructed
for parking in accordance with this chapter.
5. The applicant and city enter into a development agreement, to be
recorded against the subject property, which includes a clause
requiring the owner to install the additional parking stalls, upon a
finding of the zoning administrator that such additional parking
stalls are necessary to accommodate the use.
6. A change of use will necessitate compliance with the applicable
zoning ordinance standard for parking.
7. Parking deferments, as provided for herein, shall not be granted for
parcels and uses within the RS-CBD, C-CBD, and I-CBD districts.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its
passage and publication.
3
ADOPTED this ____ day of ________, 2016, by the City Council of the
City of Lakeville, Minnesota.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
BY:_________________________________
Matt Little, Mayor
ATTEST:__________________________________
Charlene Friedges, City Clerk