Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 07 November 21, 2016 Item No. PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PROPOSED 2017-2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND STREET RECONSTRUCTION PLAN AND THE INTENT TO ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION STREET RECONSTRUCTION BONDS AND GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS Proposed Action Conduct a public hearing for the proposed 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Street Reconstruction Plan and the intent to issue general obligation street reconstruction bonds and general obligation capital improvement bonds. Following the public hearing, Staff recommends adoption of the following motions: 1. Move to approve the Resolution Adopting the 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan (2017- 2021) and Approving the Issuance of General Obligation Capital Improvement Bonds; 2. Move to approve the Resolution Adopting the 5-Year Street Reconstruction Plan (2017-2021) and Approving the Issuance of General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds; 3. Move to approve the Resolution Declaring the City’s Intent to Reimburse Certain Expenditures from the Proceeds of Bonds to be Issued by the City; 4. Move to approve the Resolution Amending the 2016 General Fund Budget. Approval of these motions will result in adoption of the 2017-2021 CIP and Street Reconstruction Plan, provides the City the flexibility to issue bonds for the projects listed in the resolution and provides funding for the Equipment Fund and Environmental Resources Fund. Approval on the Street Reconstruction Plan requires an affirmative vote of ALL council members present. Overview The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 2017-2021 provides the financial framework for our community’s infrastructure improvements for the next five years. The CIP was discussed at the July 25, 2016 worksession. Below are the more significant changes to the CIP document since the July 25th presentation: • Added non-programmed project – Dodd Blvd. Reconstruction: Cedar Ave to Pilot Knob Rd. • Kenrick Avenue collector road reconstruction pushed back from 2017 to 2018 – increased costs and additional water main replacement due to failing infrastructure in the area. • Added Natural Resources component to the CIP to reflect ongoing water quality improvement projects. • Advanced projects by one year to align with Dakota County CIP – the County will advance the City’s share and the payment to Dakota County will be in-line with original estimates for the following projects: o 162nd St. and Kenyon Ave. Intersection Improvements o Dodd Blvd. and Flagstaff Ave. Intersection Improvements The Planning Commission reviewed the CIP at their November 3, 2016 meeting. A motion was passed recommending adoption of the CIP by the City Council and finding that the capital improvements identified in the 2017-2021 CIP were consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the draft Planning Commission meeting minutes is attached to this report. Subsequent to the Planning Commission, the Equipment Plan has been slightly modified to reflect the following: • Police – Purchase of a trailer in 2017 utilizing proceeds from the sale of 1993 and 1995 vehicles. Purchase is also contingent upon receiving a donation from the Lakeville Public Safety Foundation for the balance of the cost of the trailer not covered by the sale proceeds. Original plan showed the purchase in 2018. • Fire – Purchase of replacement radios in 2017 to maximize trade-in proceeds and avoid planned cost increases. Original plan showed the purchase of radios over three years (2017-2019). Staff will be seeking authorization to purchase these radios at the December 5, 2016 council meeting. The Internal Revenue Service has issued Treasury Reg. 1.150-2 which provides that proceeds of tax-exempt bonds used to reimburse prior expenditures will not be deemed spent unless certain requirements are met. In order to meet these requirements, the City should annually declare its intent to bond for certain projects. The resolution includes projects that may use bonds as a funding source. Primary Issues to Consider • Does the plan adequately address the City of Lakeville’s infrastructure requirements? • Does this resolution require the City to issue bonds for the projects? Approval of this resolution only approves the City’s intent to bond. It does not approve the sale of bonds or the projects. This declaration does not obligate the City to issue bonds for the projects. Supporting Information • Resolutions (4) • Capital Improvement Plan 2017-2021 (includes Street Reconstruction Plan 2017- 2021) • Draft Planning Commission 11/03/2016 Meeting Minutes Financial Impact: $ Budgeted: Y☐ N☐ Source: Related Documents: (CIP, ERP, etc.): Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Services Report Completed by: Jerilyn Erickson, Finance Director 134million Various 2017-2021 CIP CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. ___ RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (2017-2021) AND APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS WHEREAS, The purpose of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is to protect the infrastructure and capital assets of the City of Lakeville by establishing a replacement plan for existing infrastructure and capital assets and by identifying those improvements necessary to accommodate the growth of the community; and WHEREAS, The CIP is a flexible planning document that attempts to balance the financial resources of the City with its needs; and WHEREAS, The CIP covers a five-year period of 2017 - 2021; sets forth the estimated schedule, timing, and details of specific capital improvements by year, together with the estimated costs, the need for the improvements, and sources of revenue to pay for the improvements; and WHEREAS, During the course of the preparation and review of the Capital Improvement Plan, the Council has considered, for each capital improvement: the condition of the City’s existing infrastructure, including the projected need for repair or replacement; the likely demand for the improvements; the estimated cost of the improvements; the available public resources; the relative benefits and costs of alternative uses of the funds; operating costs of the proposed improvements; and WHEREAS, On November 21, 2016, the Lakeville City Council conducted a Public Hearing on the 2017-2021 CIP and offered opportunity for public testimony on the capital spending priorities of the City Council. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville Minnesota as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. 2. The 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Plan is hereby adopted. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF BONDS. The City hereby gives preliminary approval to the issuance of the Bonds in the approximate principal amount of $72 million, the proceeds of which will be used, together with additional funds of the City to finance costs of various Capital Improvement Plan Projects and to pay costs of issuance of the Bonds. The City staff is hereby authorized, in consultation with the City's financial advisor and legal counsel, to take all necessary action to call for the sale of the Bonds and to present proposals to this Council for approval at a subsequent meeting. 4. VOTER REFERENDUM CONTINGENCY. Pursuant to State Statute 475.521, if a petition requesting a vote on the question of issuing the Capital Improvement Bonds, signed by voters equal to five percent of the votes cast in the last municipal general election, is filed within thirty days of the public hearing, the City may issue the Capital Improvement Bonds only after obtaining the approval of a majority of the voters voting on the question of the issuance of the Capital Improvement Bonds. The authorizations and approvals contained herein are subject to and contingent upon not receiving such a petition, or, in the event such a petition is filed, the approving vote of a majority of the voters voting on the question of the issuance of the Capital Improvement Bonds. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 21st day of November, 2016 CITY OF LAKEVILLE ___________________________ Matt Little, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Charlene Friedges, City Clerk VOTE Little Anderson Davis LaBeau Swecker Aye ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. ___ RESOLUTION ADOPTING A 5-YEAR STREET RECONSTRUCTION PLAN (2017-2021) AND APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION STREET RECONSTRUCTION BONDS WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.58, subd. 3b (the "Street Reconstruction Act"), the City has prepared a 2017-2021 street reconstruction plan dated November 21, 2016 (the "Street Reconstruction Plan") which sets forth various street reconstruction plan projects to be undertaken in the City within the next five years (the "Street Reconstruction Plan Projects"). The Street Reconstruction Plan recommends the issuance of general obligation street reconstruction bonds under the Street Reconstruction Act in the approximate principal amount of $35.4 million (the "Street Reconstruction Bonds") to finance a portion of the costs of the Street Reconstruction Plan Projects; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Street Reconstruction Act, the City is authorized to issue and sell obligations for street reconstruction under the circumstances and within the limitations set forth in the Street Reconstruction Act. The Street Reconstruction Act provides that a street reconstruction plan may be financed with bonds issued by the City, following a public hearing and the adoption of such plan, and other proceedings conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Street Reconstruction Act; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 2016 the City Council held a public hearing on the adoption of the Street Reconstruction Plan and the issuance of the Bonds after publication of the notice of public hearing for the Street Reconstruction Plan not less than 10 days nor more than 28 days prior to the date thereof in the City's official newspaper; and WHEREAS, all parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal to adopt the Street Reconstruction Plan and to undertake and finance a portion of the Street Reconstruction Plan Projects with Street Reconstruction Bonds and any written comments submitted prior to the hearing were considered. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville Minnesota as follows: 1. CITY POLICIES AND GOALS. The financing of the Street Reconstruction Plan Projects and the issuance of the Street Reconstruction Bonds will further the policies and goals of the City as set forth in the Street Reconstruction Plan. 2. ADOPTION OF STREET RECONSTRUCTION PLAN. Based on information received at the public hearing, such written comments (if any) and such other facts and circumstances as the City Council deems relevant, it is hereby found, determined and declared that: (a) the Street Reconstruction Plan Projects proposed in the Street Reconstruction Plan will allow the City to construct and finance various street reconstruction projects; (b) the Street Reconstruction Plan is hereby approved and adopted in the forms presently on file with the City. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF BONDS. The City hereby gives preliminary approval to the issuance of the Bonds, the proceeds of which will be used, together with additional funds of the City to finance costs of various Street Reconstruction Plan Projects and to pay costs of issuance of the Bonds. The City staff is hereby authorized, in consultation with the City's financial advisor and legal counsel, to take all necessary action to call for the sale of the Bonds and to present proposals to this Council for approval at a subsequent meeting. 4. VOTER REFERENDUM CONTINGENCY. Pursuant to the Street Reconstruction Act, if a petition requesting a vote on the question of issuing the Street Reconstruction Bonds, signed by voters equal to five percent of the votes cast in the last municipal general election, is filed within thirty days of the public hearing, the City may issue the Street Reconstruction Bonds only after obtaining the approval of a majority of the voters voting on the question of the issuance of the Street Reconstruction Bonds. The authorizations and approvals contained herein are subject to and contingent upon not receiving such a petition, or, in the event such a petition is filed, the approving vote of a majority of the voters voting on the question of the issuance of the Street Reconstruction Bonds. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 21st day of November, 2016 CITY OF LAKEVILLE ___________________________ Matt Little, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Charlene Friedges, City Clerk VOTE Little Anderson Davis LaBeau Swecker Aye ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. ___ RESOLUTION DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE TO REIMBURSE CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY WHEREAS, The Internal Revenue Service has issued Treasury Reg. 1.150-2 (the “Reimbursement Regulations”) providing that proceeds of tax-exempt bonds used to reimburse prior expenditures will not be deemed spent unless certain requirements are met; and WHEREAS, The City expects to incur certain expenditures that may be financed temporarily from sources other than bonds, and later reimbursed from the proceeds of tax-exempt bonds; and WHEREAS, The City has determined to make this declaration of official intent (“Declaration”) to reimburse certain costs from proceeds of bonds in accordance with the Reimbursement regulations; and WHEREAS, The total estimated general obligation bonds and/or equipment certificates for 2017 are $11,434,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, Minnesota as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. 2. The City proposes to undertake the following projects (the “Projects”): a. #17-02 2017 Street Reconstruction b. #17-04 Holyoke Avenue: 215th – Heritage Drive c. Holyoke Avenue / 210th Intersection d. #17-02 2017 Watermain Replacement e. Equipment Purchases 3. The City reasonably expects to reimburse the expenditures made for certain costs of the Projects from the proceeds of bonds in an estimated maximum principal amount of the following: a. #17-02 2017 Street Reconstruction - $8,170,000 b. #17-04 Holyoke Avenue: 215th – Heritage Drive - $1,393,000 c. Holyoke Avenue / 210th Intersection - $81,000 d. #17-02 2017 Watermain Replacement - $1,095,000 e. Equipment Purchases - $695,000 The City may declare other separate statements of reimbursement intent in connection with specific public improvements projects as they are initiated under Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 444, or for other capital projects, with the understanding that such additional declarations of reimbursement intent will supplement this resolution. All reimbursed expenditures will be capital expenditures, costs of issuance of the bonds, or other expenditures eligible for reimbursement under Section 1.150-2(d)(3) of the Reimbursement Regulations. 4. This Declaration has been made no later than 60 days after payment of any original expenditure to be subject to a reimbursement allocation with respect to the proceeds of bonds, except for the following expenditures: a) costs of issuance of bonds; b) costs in an amount not in excess of $100,000 or five percent of the proceeds of an issue; or c) “preliminary expenditures” up to an amount not in excess of 20 percent of the aggregate issue price of the issue or issues that are reasonably expected by the City to finance the project for which the preliminary expenditures were incurred. The term preliminary expenditures” includes architectural, engineering, surveying, bond issuance, and similar costs that are incurred prior to commencement of acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of a project, other than land acquisition, site preparation, and similar costs incident to commencement of construction. 5. This Declaration is an expression of the reasonable expectations of the City based on the facts and circumstances known to the City as the date hereof. The anticipated original expenditures for the Projects and the principal amount of the bonds described in paragraph 3 are consistent with the City’s budgetary and financial circumstances. No sources other than proceeds of bonds to be issued by the City are, or are reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated on a long term basis, or otherwise set aside pursuant to the City’s budget or financial policies to pay such Project expenditures. 6. This Declaration is intended to constitute a declaration of the official intent for the purposes of the Reimbursement Regulations. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 21st day of November, 2016 CITY OF LAKEVILLE ___________________________ Matt Little, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Charlene Friedges, City Clerk VOTE Little Anderson Davis LaBeau Swecker Aye ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Nay ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Abstain ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Absent ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. ________ RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 2016 GENERAL FUND BUDGET WHEREAS, The 2016 General Fund budget was adopted on December 7, 2015; and WHEREAS, The General Fund has unencumbered funds available from 2015; and WHEREAS, The City Council discussed utilizing $500,000 of the 2015 General Fund unencumbered funds for funding capital purchases in the 2016-2026 Equipment Plan in 2016; and WHEREAS, The City Council had committed $45,000 of General Fund reserve funds on 12/16/2013 to provide for future costs related to the Emerald Ash Borer invasion; and WHEREAS, Costs associated with mitigating the Emerald Ash Borer will be accounted for in the Environmental Resources Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, Minnesota as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. 2. The 2016 General Fund budget is amended in the amount of $545,000 for the purpose of transferring funds to the following Funds: a. Equipment Fund - $500,000; b. Environmental Resources Fund - $45,000. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 21st day of November, 2016 CITY OF LAKEVILLE ___________________________ Matt Little, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Charlene Friedges, City Clerk IIMP C PRO 2 CAP OVE 2017       PITA ME 7 – 20 AL NT 021 Propose PLA ed Novem AN mber 21, 22016 20 Introducti Transport P N Utilities Natural R Parks Facility P Equipmen Street Rec 017-202 ion tation rogrammed Non-program Resources Plan (2017-20 nt Plan (2017 construction Table 21 Capit mmed 026) 7-2026) n Plan of Cont tal Impr tents rovemennt Plan Page 2 7 23 28 41 51 68 69 70 1 The infras make and a The P of no (MSA eleme relian The C may repre in th Comp Coun Cate Tran the C Majo prope Utilit system sanita new build Natu Main Park recre park are fi Capital Im structure nee ers and the c administratio Plan identifi on-tax reven A), connecti ents to finan nce on prope City should p require cha sents a sign he years ah prehensive nty Capital Im egories nsportation City with the or funding so erty taxes. ty infrastruc ms such as ary sewer an systems is ding permit. ural Resour ntenance proj ks system inc ation faciliti dedication f inanced with mprovement eds and dev community on of improv es the alloca nues to finan ion charges ncing City im erty taxes to pursue the fi anges in bo nificant finan ead. The Plan and ta mprovement includes all e exception o ources includ cture includ wells, towe nd storm sew connection Maintenanc ces system ject are finan cludes region ies such as th fees collecte h property ta Plan prov velopment ob with a strat vement proje ation of the C nce the imp , special as mprovement finance thes inancing stra oth costs a ncial, engine Capital Imp akes into c t Plan. roads, street of Interstate de Municipa des the con ers and the wer systems. charges whe ce projects ar includes lak nced with us nal, commun he Arts Cent d when prop xes and othe vides a lon bjectives of tegic (docum ects and equi City’s financ provements. sessments a ts. The use se improvem ategy as pres and revenue eering and d provement onsideration ts, street ligh e I-35 and ro al State Aid S struction an water treatm The primar en property re financed w kes, wetland ser fees. nity and neig ter and Herit perty develo er revenue so ng range fr f our commu mented) app ipment acqu cial resource Municipal and other re of these rev ments. sented, but b es. The Cap development Plan is con n projects i hts, bridges outine maint Street funds nd major m ment facility ry source of develops o with user fee ds, streams, ghborhood p tage Center. ops and gran ources. framework t unity. It pro proach to im uisitions. es and maxim l State Aid evenue sour venue source bear in mind pital Impro undertaking nsistent wit identified in and traffic s tenance of C s, special ass maintenance y. Utilities f financing fo or with the i es. prairies and parks as wel Major reso nts. Mainten to meet th ovides polic mplementatio mizes the us Street Fund rces are vita es reduces th future event ovement Pla g for the Cit th the City n the Dakot signals withi County road sessments an of all wate also includ or developin issuance of d woodland ll as trails an ources includ nance project he cy on se ds al he ts an ty ’s ta in ds. nd er de ng a ds. nd de ts 2 Facil and o Liquo Equi sourc sale o Prog The o years show Cate Transpor Utility Natural R Parks Facilities Equipme Total lities include other munic or Fund cont ipment inclu ces include, of assets and gram Sum overwhelmin s. The total wn on subseq egory rtation $ Resources s ent $ T e the city ha cipal buildin tributions, sa udes all majo but not limi d property tax mmary ng majority budgeted ca quent pages. 2017 13,490,37$ 3,441,24 1,037,20 3,018,30 895,69 2,121,79 24,004,61$ Transportation $79,952,473  60% Equi $12,6 9 all, police st ngs. Primar ale of assets or equipmen ited to, Liqu xes. of capital in apital expend 2018 701 7 , 26$ 444 , 45 0048 092 , 67 9278 97 3,84 2 29,50$ Ex n pment 615,664  9% 2017 ‐ $1 tation, fire s ry revenue and propert nt acquisition uor Fund con nvestments a ditures by ca 8 63,910 1$ 50,375 82,200 73,017 86,825 45,216 01,543 3$ xpenditures Facilities $9,444,817 7% ‐2021 PR 134,492, stations, cen sources incl ty taxes. ns and replac ntributions, are in transp ategory are s 2019 16,037,006 $ 4,494,560 592,200 2,571,665 7,149,600 3,017,498 33,862,529 $ s Parks $10,783, 8%7  ROJECTS ,460 ntral mainten lude, but no cement. Prim Cable TV fr portation for shown below 2020 13,281,07$ 2,463,88 482,20 1,270,45 397,50 1,952,26 19,847,37$ Util $18,62 14 Natural Resource $3,076,00 2% s ,070  S nance facilit ot limited to mary revenu ranchise fee the next fiv w. Details ar 202 741 9 , 88$ 813 , 77 0048 521 , 24 0021 68 1,67 75 27,27$ lity 20,436  4% l  es 00  ty o, ue s, ve re 1 80,113 70,376 82,200 49,627 15,200 78,885 76,401 3 Financing Summary The projects are financed from diverse revenues sources. A summary is shown below. Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Taxes 8,303,821$ 11,353,384$ 9,826,791$ 8,662,141$ 8,187,044$ Dakota County 346,875 (14,375) 1,037,500 (517,500) - Municipal State Aid 939,900 2,249,833 2,416,849 3,230,558 3,835,172 Special Assessments 3,844,793 4,975,890 4,150,101 3,477,077 2,913,774 Utility Operating Fees 2,779,069 4,137,561 2,345,760 2,590,706 2,168,276 Utility Trunk Fees 2,437,375 586,092 3,097,000 694,625 3,181,250 Liquor Fund 200,000 257,300 409,500 500,000 565,000 Other 5,152,779 5,955,858 10,579,028 1,209,768 6,425,885 Total 24,004,612$ 29,501,543$ 33,862,529$ 19,847,375$ 27,276,401$ Revenue Sources The predominant revenue source is taxes. Taxes 35% Dakota County 1% Municipal State Aid 9% Special Assessments 14% Utility Operating Fees 10% Utility Trunk Fees 7%Liquor Fund 2% Other 22% REVENUE SOURCES 2017 - 2021 4 Debt Issuance The City will issue debt over the next five years to finance street construction projects and utility infrastructure improvements. The debt will be repaid from various revenue sources. A majority of the debt is paid for from property tax levies and the remaining generated by other revenue sources such as water connection charges, state-aid for street construction, special assessments, tax increments, utility user fees, and liquor funds. A summary of current outstanding long-term debt is shown below: 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Governmental Activities: General Obligation Bonds 50,705,000$ 37,325,000$ 34,970,000$ 32,475,000$ 29,865,000$ 27,090,000$ G.O. Improvement Bonds 47,470,000 44,755,000 41,495,000 38,140,000 34,825,000 31,590,000 Tax Increment Bonds 1,460,000 1,240,000 1,010,000 770,000 525,000 265,000 State-Aid Street Revenue Bonds 7,145,000 6,205,000 5,235,000 4,685,000 4,125,000 3,860,000 Water Connection Revenue Bonds 8,280,000 7,940,000 7,595,000 7,230,000 6,850,000 6,450,000 Arena Revenue Bonds 490,000 335,000 170,000 - - - HRA Lease Revenue Bonds 14,700,000 6,795,000 6,440,000 6,080,000 5,710,000 5,325,000 Business-Type Activities: Liquor Revenue Bonds 2,715,000 2,525,000 2,325,000 2,115,000 1,895,000 1,660,000 Utility Revenue Bonds 6,570,000 6,570,000 6,190,000 5,795,000 5,370,000 4,930,000 Total Bonded Indebtedness 139,535,000$ 113,690,000$ 105,430,000$ 97,290,000$ 89,165,000$ 81,170,000$ Financial Impact of the Capital Improvement Plan The following chart shows the impact of the CIP. It includes the debt that would be issued for street improvement projects (special assessments and city portion), utility improvement projects, and equipment certificates issued for major equipment purchases per the Equipment Plan. $0 $50 $100 $150 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 (i n  mi l l i o n s ) Projected Debt Balances (All Debt) 11‐21‐2016 Cumm. CIP Debt Projected Debt Existing Debt New CIP Debt 5 Impact of the Capital Improvement Plan on the Operating Budget The City’s Operating Budget is affected by the Capital Improvement Plan. Capital improvements typically result in ongoing expenses for routine operation, repair and maintenance upon completion or acquisition. Existing City facilities and equipment will eventually require rehabilitation, renovation or upgrades to accommodate new uses or address needed improvements. Older facilities usually involve higher maintenance and repair costs as well. Generally speaking, capital improvements make a positive contribution to the economic vitality, quality of life and fiscal well-being of our community in spite of potential recurring operating costs. Capital projects such as the redevelopment of under- performing or under-used areas of the City, and the infrastructure expansion needed to support new development, help promote the economic development and growth that generates additional operating revenues. These new revenue sources provide the funding needed to maintain, improve and expand the City’s infrastructure. 6 TRA P AN PRO  P SPO OGR PRO       ORT   RAM   OJEC     TAT MM CTS TIO MED S  ON D  7 Total CIP # Project / Financing 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017-2021 TP-1 Pavement Management - Maintenance Taxes 1,215,324 1,263,937 1,314,494 1,367,074 1,421,756 6,582,585 Municipal State Aid 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 600,000 1,335,324 1,383,937 1,434,494 1,487,074 1,541,756 7,182,585 TP-2 Street Reconstruction Property Tax Levy 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds - Taxes 4,881,620 4,635,450 3,703,538 3,879,260 3,397,309 20,497,177 G.O. Improvement Bonds - Sp. Assess.3,287,747 3,123,634 2,502,359 2,619,506 2,298,206 13,831,452 8,219,367 7,809,084 6,255,897 6,548,766 5,745,515 34,578,629 TP-3 Collector Road Reconstruction G.O. Improvement Bonds - Taxes 916,568 3,764,305 2,591,644 1,286,355 923,352 9,482,224 G.O. Improvement Bonds - Sp. Assess.557,046 1,612,334 1,647,742 857,571 615,568 5,290,261 Escrow Fund - 135,500 - - - 135,500 1,473,614 5,512,139 4,239,386 2,143,926 1,538,920 14,907,985 TP-4 Kenwood Trl (CR50): Dodd Blvd (CR 9) to 185th St Escrow Fund 276,790 - - - - 276,790 Storm Sewer Trunk Fund 778,500 - - - - 778,500 Municipal State Aid 675,900 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 3,675,900 1,731,190 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 4,731,190 TP-5 Pilot Knob Road and 160th Street Communications Fund 40,000 175,000 - - - 215,000 40,000 175,000 - - - 215,000 TP-6 162nd Street and Buck Hill Road/Kenyon Avenue Dakota County 196,875 (196,875) - Escrow Fund - 68,292 - - - 68,292 Municipal State Aid - 128,583 - - - 128,583 196,875 - - - - 196,875 TP-7 202nd Street: Reconstruction Holyoke Ave to Cedar Ave Escrow Fund - - 287,880 - - 287,880 Municipal State Aid 144,000 717,750 313,320 - - 1,175,070 Storm Sewer Fund - - 45,000 - - 45,000 Water Fund - - 240,000 - - 240,000 144,000 717,750 886,200 - - 1,747,950 TP-8 Dodd Blvd: 202nd Street and Heritage Drive Storm Sewer Fund - - - 83,250 - 83,250 Municipal State Aid Fund - 216,000 562,500 200,250 - 978,750 - 216,000 562,500 283,500 - 1,062,000 TP-9 Dodd Blvd and Flagstaff Avenue Dakota County 150,000 182,500 1,037,500 (517,500) - 852,500 Municipal State Aid - 67,500 112,500 292,500 - 472,500 Storm Sewer Fund - - - 225,000 - 225,000 150,000 250,000 1,150,000 - - 1,550,000 TP-10 Ipava Avenue and 165th Street Municipal State Aid Fund - - - 130,000 620,000 750,000 - - - 130,000 620,000 750,000 TP-11 CSAH 70 Reconstruction Sanitary Sewer Fund - - - - 131,250 131,250 Storm Sewer Fund - - - - 607,500 607,500 Water Fund - - - - 300,000 300,000 Municipal State Aid Fund - - 308,529 1,487,808 3,095,172 4,891,509 - - 308,529 1,487,808 4,133,922 5,930,259 TP-12 Right-of-Way Preservation and Management City of Lakeville (Unspecified)200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 TNP-A Dodd Blvd Recon: Cedar Ave to Pilot Knob Rd City of Lakeville (Unspecified)- - - - 6,100,000 6,100,000 - - - - 6,100,000 6,100,000 TOTAL 13,490,370$ 17,263,910$ 16,037,006$ 13,281,074$ 19,880,113$ 79,952,473$ Project Summary TRANSPORTATION 8 Total CIP #Financing / Project 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017-2021 Communications Fund TP-5 Pilot Knob Road and 165th Street 40,000 175,000 - - - 215,000 Dakota County TP-6 162nd Street and Buck Hill Road/Kenyon Avenue 196,875 (196,875) - - - - TP-9 Dodd Blvd and Flagstaff Avenue 150,000 182,500 1,037,500 (517,500) - 852,500 Total Dakota County 346,875 (14,375) 1,037,500 (517,500) - 852,500 Escrow TP-3 Collector Road Reconstruction - 135,500 - - - 135,500 TP-4 Kenwood Trl (CR50): Dodd Blvd (CR 9) to 185th St 276,790 - - - - 276,790 TP-6 162nd Street and Buck Hill Road/Kenyon Avenue - 68,292 - - - 68,292 TP-7 202nd Street: Reconstruction Holyoke Ave to Cedar Ave - - 287,880 - - 287,880 Total Escrows 276,790 203,792 287,880 - - 768,462 G.O. Improvement Bonds - Sp. Assess. TP-2 Street Reconstruction 3,287,747 3,123,634 2,502,359 2,619,506 2,298,206 13,831,452 TP-3 Collector Road Reconstruction 557,046 1,612,334 1,647,742 857,571 615,568 5,290,261 Total G.O. Improvement Bonds - Special Assessments 3,844,793 4,735,968 4,150,101 3,477,077 2,913,774 19,121,713 G.O. Improvement Bonds - Taxes TP-2 Street Reconstruction 4,881,620 4,635,450 3,703,538 3,879,260 3,397,309 20,497,177 TP-3 Collector Road Reconstruction 916,568 3,764,305 2,591,644 1,286,355 923,352 9,482,224 Total G.O. Improvement Bonds - Taxes 5,798,188 8,399,755 6,295,182 5,165,615 4,320,661 29,979,401 Municipal State Aid TP-1 Pavement Management - Maintenance 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 600,000 TP-4 Kenwood Trl (CR50): Dodd Blvd (CR 9) to 185th St 675,900 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 3,675,900 TP-6 162nd Street and Buck Hill Road/Kenyon Avenue - 128,583 - - - 128,583 TP-7 202nd Street: Reconstruction Holyoke Ave to Cedar Ave 144,000 717,750 313,320 - - 1,175,070 TP-8 Dodd Blvd: 202nd Street and Heritage Drive - 216,000 562,500 200,250 - 978,750 TP-9 Dodd Blvd and Flagstaff Avenue - 67,500 112,500 292,500 - 472,500 TP-10 Ipava Avenue and 165th Street - - - 130,000 620,000 750,000 TP-11 CSAH 70 Reconstruction - - 308,529 1,487,808 3,095,172 4,891,509 Total Municipal State Aid 939,900 2,249,833 2,416,849 3,230,558 3,835,172 12,672,312 Property Taxes and Fund Balance Reserves TP-2 Street Reconstruction 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 TP-1 Pavement Management - Maintenance 1,215,324 1,263,937 1,314,494 1,367,074 1,421,756 6,582,585 Total Property Taxes and Fund Balance Reserves 1,265,324 1,313,937 1,364,494 1,417,074 1,471,756 6,832,585 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Fund TP-11 CSAH 70 Reconstruction - - - - 131,250 131,250 Storm Sewer Trunk Fund TP-4 Kenwood Trl (CR50): Dodd Blvd (CR 9) to 185th St 778,500 - - - - 778,500 TP-7 202nd Street: Reconstruction Holyoke Ave to Cedar Ave - - 45,000 - - 45,000 TP-8 Dodd Blvd: 202nd Street and Heritage Drive - - - 83,250 - 83,250 TP-9 Dodd Blvd and Flagstaff Avenue - - - 225,000 - 225,000 TP-11 CSAH 70 Reconstruction - - - - 607,500 607,500 778,500 - 45,000 308,250 607,500 1,739,250 Water Trunk Fund TP-7 202nd Street: Reconstruction Holyoke Ave to Cedar Ave - - 240,000 - - 240,000 TP-11 CSAH 70 Reconstruction - - - - 300,000 300,000 - - 240,000 - 300,000 540,000 City of Lakeville (Unspecified) TP-12 Right-of-way Preservation and Management 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 TNP-A Dodd Blvd Recon: Cedar Ave to Pilot Knob Rd - - - - 6,100,000 6,100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 6,300,000 7,100,000 TOTAL 13,490,370 17,263,910 16,037,006 13,281,074 19,880,113 79,952,473 TRANSPORTATION Financing Summary 9 TRANSPORTATION (TP-1) Project Name: Pavement Management - Maintenance Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: Annual Project Description and Location Lakeville’s pavement management program is designed to provide basic maintenance to City streets, to maintain the overall condition of the road surface, and gain the maximum service life at the best overall cost. The program includes miscellaneous repairs, crack sealing, velocity patching, curb & sidewalk repair, bridge inspections & repairs, and transportation safety improvements. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total (2017-2021) Revenues Pavement Management Fund Property taxes/fund balance 1,215,324 1,263,937 1,314,494 1,367,074 1,421,756 6,582,585 Municipal State Aid 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 600,000 Total 1,335,324$ 1,383,937$ 1,434,494$ 1,487,074$ 1,541,756$ 7,182,585$ Expenditures Maintenance Crack sealing 140,608 146,232 152,082 158,165 164,491 761,578 Velocity patching 109,200 113,568 118,111 122,835 127,748 591,462 Patching & Minor Overlays 965,516 1,004,136 1,044,302 1,086,074 1,129,517 5,229,545 Sidewalk 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 Conc Curb, Draintile 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 County Road Utility Improv. 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 Bridge Insp & Repairs/Guardrail 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 75,000 Safety Improvements 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 Total 1,335,324$ 1,383,937$ 1,434,494$ 1,487,074$ 1,541,756$ 7,182,585$ 10 Proje Proje Antic Proje The C term degra the sc The C prope financ Revenues Improvemen Property T Debt Issua Property T Special As Expenditure Construction Legal, Engin Financing ect Name: ect Manager cipated Star ect Descripti City embrace plan for mai adation has ac chedule as sh City Council erty owners w ce its 60% sh nt Const. Fund Taxes nce - G.O. Imp B Taxes (future yea ssessments es n neering, Adminis TRA r: t: ion and Loca ed a pavemen ntaining City ccelerated in hown below. l approved a will be asses hare of the pr Bonds ars) Total $ stration & Total $ ANSPOR Street Reco Chris Petree Annual ation nt manageme y streets base n recent years Street Reco sed for 40% roject cost wi 2017 50,000 4,881,620 3,287,747 8,219,367$ $ 5,870,976 2,348,391 8,219,367$ $ RTATIO onstruction e, Public Wo ent study pre ed on pre-est s. Staff is the onstruction P of the street ith property t 2018 50,000 4,635,450 3,123,634 7,809,084$ $ 5,784,507 2,024,577 7,809,084$ $ ON (TP-2 orks Director epared in 200 tablished stan erefore recom Policy in Nov t reconstructi taxes. 2019 50,000 3,703,538 2,502,359 6,255,897$ $ 4,468,498 1,787,399 6,255,897$ $ ) r 09 which sets ndards. The mmending ad vember 2006 ion project. 2020 50,000 3,879,260 2,619,506 6,548,766$ $ 4,850,938 1,697,828 6,548,766$ $ s forth a long e road system dvancement o 6 whereby th The City wi 2021 50,000 3,397,309 2,298,206 5,745,515$ $ 4,255,937 1,489,578 5,745,515$ $ g- ms of he ill Total (2017-2021) 250,000 20,497,177 13,831,452 34,578,629$ 25,230,856 9,347,773 34,578,629$ 11 TRANSPORTATION (TP-3) Project Name: Collector Road Reconstruction Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: Annual Project Description and Location Lakeville’s collector road reconstruction program is designed to provide maintenance to City collector roadways, to maintain the overall condition of the road surface, and gain the maximum service life at the best overall cost. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total (2017-2021) Revenues Improvement Const. Fund Debt Issuance - G.O. Improvement Bonds Property Taxes (future years)916,568 3,764,305 2,591,644 1,286,355 923,352 9,482,224 Est. Special Assessments*557,046 1,612,334 1,647,742 857,571 615,568 5,290,261 Escrow Fund - 135,500 - - 135,500 Total 1,473,614$ 5,512,139$ 4,239,386$ 2,143,926$ 1,538,920$ 14,907,985$ *Estimated Special Assessments include assessments to City-owned properties with front footage along the project. Expenditures Collector Rehabilitation Kenrick Ave: N. City Limit - 173rd - 2,962,610 - - - Holyoke Ave: 215th - Heritage Dr 1,392,614 - - - - Holyoke Ave/210th Intersection 81,000 - - - - Ipava Ave: 185th - Kenwood Tr - 1,432,922 - - - Hamburg Avenue: 202nd - Lkvl. Blvd. - 1,116,607 - - - 172nd St: Kenyon Ave - Kodiak Ave - - 701,731 - - Klamath Tr: S. CR 5 - N. CR 5 - - 1,534,103 - - Kodiak/175th Street - - 796,525 - - Judicial/168th Street - - 744,044 - - Heritage Dr/Iberia Ave - - 462,983 - - Highview Avenue: CR 46 - 175th - - - 905,274 - Kenyon Avenue (CR 60 to Queen Anne)- - - 1,238,652 - 170th Street (Flagstaff to PKR & at Eagleview)- - - - 1,538,920 Total 1,473,614$ 5,512,139$ 4,239,386$ 2,143,926$ 1,538,920$ 14,907,985$ 12 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Tota Proje The C divid opera proje and neigh proje the pr Revenues Escrow Fu Storm Sew Municipal Expenditu Design R/W Acqu Constructi ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: l Project Co ect Descript City and Co ded highway ations, make ct involves Icenic Tr., hborhood. T ct costs, wit roject cost is und wer Fund l State Aid Fund To ures uisition ion To TRA r: r: rt: ost: tion and Lo ounty are par from Dodd e safety imp local road c and potent The County th equal $1 s shown belo 2017 276,79 778,50 675,90 otal 1,731,19$ 1,731,19 otal 1,731,19$ ANSPOR Kenwood T City Projec Chris Petre 2017 (cons Dakota Cou $15,660,62 cation rtnering to r Blvd. (CSA provements construction, tially a tem y will advan million pay ow. 2018 0 - 0 - 0 1,000,000 0 1,000,000$ - - - - 0 1,000,000 0 1,000,000$ RTATIO Trail Recons ct 14-10 and ee, Public W struction) unty 20 reconstruct K AH 9) to 185t and provide , including a mporary sec nce fund $3 yments made 2019 -- -- 0 1,000,000 0 1,000,000$ -- -- 0 1,000,000 0 1,000,000$ ON (TP-4 struction: Do d Dakota Cou Works Directo Kenwood Trth St. (CSAH e for increa an access ro condary acc 3 million of e in 2018-20 2020 - - 1,000,000 1,000,000$ - - 1,000,000 1,000,000$ ) odd Bouleva unty Project or r. (CSAH 50 H 60) to impr asing traffic oad connecti cess to the f the City’s 020. The C 2021 Tota (2017-20 - 276 - 778 - 3,675 -$ 4,731$ - - - 4,731 -$ 4,731$ ard to 185th S 50-19 0) to a 4-lan rove roadwa levels. Th ing CSAH 5 Jaguar Pat share of th ity’s share o al 021) Total (Projec ,790 276,7 ,500 778,5 ,900 5,991,9 ,190 7,047,2$ - 415,0 - 1,901,0 ,190 4,731,1 ,190 7,047,2$ Street ne ay he 50 th he of t) 790 500 988 278 000 088 190 278 13 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Tota Proje The C the 1 signa signa instal Galax and D cost i City’ R C Ex D C ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: l Project Co ect Descript City and Cou 60th St. (CS al operations al modificat llation. CSA xie Ave., Fo Dodd Blvd. is split 55/45 s share of th Revenues Communications xpenditures Design Construction TRA r: r: rt: ost: tion and Lo unty are part SAH 46) an . The projec tion (flashin AH 46 inters oliage Ave. a Federal Fun 5 between th he project co 20 s Fund 40 Total 40$ 40 Total 40$ ANSPOR 160th Street Advanced T City Projec Chris Petre 2018 (cons Dakota Cou $1,661,200 cation tnering to in nd Pilot Kno ct includes a ng yellow sections incl and Flagstaf nding provid he County an st is shown b 017 2018 0,000 175,00 0,000 175,00$ 0,000 - 175,00 0,000 175,00$ RTATIO t and Pilot K Traffic Man ct 17-03 and ee, Public W struction) unty 0 stall advanc ob Rd. (CSA a). fiber insta arrows); a ude Ipava A ff Ave. CSA des 80% of t nd the cities below. 2019 202 00- 00-$ $ - - 00- 00-$ $ ON (TP-5 Knob Road nagement Sy d Dakota Cou Works Directo ed traffic ma AH 31) cor allation (inte and c). tra Ave., Lac La AH 31 inters the construct of Apple V 20 2021 (20 - - - -$ $ - - - - - -$ $ ) ystems unty Project or anagement s rridors to im erconnectivit ffic monito avon Rd., Hi sections incl tion cost. T Valley and La Total 017-2021) T (Pr 215,000 21 215,000 $21 40,000 4 175,000 17 215,000 $21 31-87 systems alon mprove traffi ty); b). traffi oring camer ghview Ave lude 170th S The remainin akeville. Th Total roject) 15,000 15,000 40,000 75,000 15,000 ng fic fic ra e., St. ng he 14 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Tota Proje The C 46) a allevi The p advan City’ ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: l Project Co ect Descript City and Co and Kenyon iate congest project inclu nce fund the s share of th Revenues Dakota Co Escrow Fu Municipal Expenditu Design Constructi TRA r: r: rt: ost: tion and Lo ounty are pa n Ave./Buck ion, make sa udes a traffic e City’s shar he project co ounty (advance) und State Aid Fund Tot res on Tot ANSPOR 162nd Stree Intersection City Projec Chris Petre 2017 (cons Dakota Cou $437,500 cation artnering to c k Hill Rd. i afety improv signal and p re of the proj st is shown b 2017 196,875 - - tal 196,875$ 39,375 157,500 tal 196,875$ RTATIO et and Buck H n Improvem ct 16-17 and ee, Public W struction) unty construct im intersection vements and pedestrian ra ject costs, w below. 2018 2019 (196,875) 68,292 - 128,583 - -$ -$ - - - - -$ -$ ON (TP-6 Hill Road/K ment d Dakota Cou Works Directo mprovements to improve d provide fo amp improv with full paym 9 2020 2021 -- - -- - --$ -$ -- - -- - --$ -$ 6) Kenyon Aven unty Project or s at the 162n e intersectio or increased ements. The ment made i Total (2017-2021)( - 68,292 128,583 196,875$ $ 39,375 157,500 196,875$ $ nue 46-45 nd St. (CSAH n operation traffic level e County wi in 2018. Th Total (Project) - 68,292 128,583 196,875$ 39,375 157,500 196,875$ H ns, s. ill he 15 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Tota Proje The divid make a tra inters Feder City’ Reven Escro Muni Storm Wate Expen Desig R/W Const ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: l Project Co ect Descript City and C ded highway e safety impr ffic signal a sections, a p ral FAST A s share of th nues ow Fund icipal State Aid m Sewer Fund r Fund nditures gn Acquisition truction TRA r: r: rt: ost: tion and Lo ounty are p from Holyo rovements an at the CSA edestrian un Act funding he project co 20 Fund 144 Total 144$ 144 Total 144$ ANSPOR 202nd Stree City Projec Chris Petre 2019 (cons Dakota Cou $5,900,000 cation partnering to oke Ave. to nd provide f AH 50 and C nderpass and as part of th st is shown b 17 2018 - 4,000 717 - - 4,000 717$ 4,000 - 717 - 4,000 717$ RTATIO et Reconstruc ct 15-12 and ee, Public W struction) unty 0 o reconstruc Cedar Ave. for increasin CSAH 23 i d trails along he 2016 Re below (assum 8 2019 - 287,8 7,750 313,32 - 45,00 - 240,00 7,750 886,20$ - 7,750 - 886,20 7,750 886,20$ ON (TP-7 ction: Holyo d Dakota Cou Works Directo ct 202nd St. . (CSAH 23 ng traffic lev intersection, g both sides. egional Solic mes Federal 2020 202 80 - 20 - 00 - 00 - 00 -$ $ - - - - 00 - 00 -$ $ 7) oke Avenue unty Project or (CSAH 50) ) to alleviat vels. The pro dedicated . The Count citation (FY l Funding). 21 Total (2017-2021 - 287,88 - 1,175,07 - 45,00 - 240,00 - 1,747,950$ - 144,00 - 717,75 - 886,20 -$ 1,747,95 to Cedar Av 50-23 ) to a 2-lan te congestion oject include turn lanes a ty applied fo Y 2019). Th 1) Total (Project) 0 287,880 0 1,175,070 0 45,000 0 240,000 0 1,747,950$ 0 144,000 0 717,750 0 886,200 0 $ 1,747,950 venue ne n, es at or he 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Tota Proje The C inters allevi The p and a Act f proje Revenues Storm Sew Municipal Expenditu Design R/W Acqu Constructi ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: l Project Co ect Descript City and Cou sections at 2 iate congest project inclu a ¾ intersect funding as pa ct cost is sho wer Fund l State Aid Fund T ures uisition ion T TRA r: r: rt: ost: tion and Lo unty are par 02nd St. (CS ion, make sa udes a multi- tion at CSAH art of the 20 own below ( 2017 - d - Total -$ $ - - - Total -$ $ ANSPOR Dodd Boul Dodd Boul City Projec Chris Petre 2020 (cons Dakota Cou $4,855,000 cation rtnering to m SAH 50) and afety improv -lane rounda H 9 and Her 016 Regional (assumes Fed 2018 2 - 216,000 56 216,000 56$ 216,000 - 56 - 216,000 56$ RTATIO levard and 2 levard and H ct 18-04 and ee, Public W struction) unty 0 make improv d Heritage D vements and about at the ritage Dr. T l Solicitation deral Fundin 019 2020 - 83,2 62,500 200,2 62,500 283,5$ - 62,500 - 283,5 62,500 283,5$ ON (TP-8 02nd Street I Heritage Driv d Dakota Cou Works Directo vements to th Dr. to improv d provide fo CSAH 9 an The County a n (FY 2020) ng). 0 2021 (2 250 - 250 - 500 -$ $ - - - - 500 - 500 -$ $ ) Intersection I ve Intersecti unty Project or he Dodd Blv ve intersectio or increased nd CSAH 50 applied for F ). The City’ Total 2017-2021) 83,250 978,750 1,062,000 $ 216,000 562,500 283,500 1,062,000 $ Improvemen ion Improve 9-55 vd. (CSAH 9 on operation traffic level 0 intersection Federal FAS s share of th Total (Project) 83,250 978,750 1,062,000$ 216,000 562,500 283,500 1,062,000 nt ment 9) ns, s. n, T he 17 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Tota Proje The C 9) a conge proje Coun made Revenues Dakota Co Municipal Storm Sew Expenditu Design R/W Acqu Constructi ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: l Project Co ect Descript City and Cou and Flagstaf estion, mak ct includes nty will adva e in 2018, 20 ounty l State Aid Fund wer Fund T ures uisition ion T TRA r: r: rt: ost: tion and Lo unty are part ff Ave. in e safety im a roundabo ance fund th 019 and 2020 2017 150,000 d Total 150,000$ 150,000 Total 150,000$ ANSPOR Dodd Blvd City Projec Chris Petre 2019 (cons City of Lak $1,550,000 cation tnering to co ntersection t mprovements out at the C he City’s sha 0. 2018 0 182,500 - 67,500 - - 0 250,000$ 0 - - 250,000 - - 0 250,000$ RTATIO d. and Flagsta ct 18-05 and ee, Public W struction) keville 0 onstruct imp to improve and provid CSAH 9 an are of the pr 2019 1,037,500 112,500 - 1,150,000$ - - 1,150,000 1,150,000$ ON (TP-9 aff Avenue I d Dakota Cou Works Directo provements a e intersectio de for increa nd Flagstaff roject costs e 2020 202 (517,500) 292,500 225,000 -$ $ - - - -$ $ ) Intersection unty Project or at the Dodd B on operatio ased traffic Ave. inters each year, w 21 Total (2017-2021 - 852,50 - 472,50 - 225,00 - 1,550,00$ - 150,00 - 250,00 - 1,150,00 - 1,550,00$ Improveme 9-54 Blvd. (CSAH ons, alleviat levels. Th section. Th with payment 1) Total (Project) 008 5 2 , 5 00 004 7 2 , 5 00 002 2 5 , 0 00 00 1,550,000$ 001 5 0 , 0 00 002 5 0 , 0 00 00 1,150,000 00 1,550,000$ nt H te he he ts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Tota Proje The inters impro signa Reven Muni Expen Desig R/W Const ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: l Project Co ect Descript City is pro section to ovements an al, dedicated nues icipal State Aid nditures gn Acquisition truction TRA r: r: rt: ost: tion and Lo oposing to c improve in nd provide turn lanes a 2017 Fund - Total -$ - - - Total -$ ANSPOR Ipava Aven City Projec Chris Petre 2021 (cons City of Lak $750,000 cation construct im ntersection o for increase and pedestria 7 2018 2019 -- - --$ - $ -- - -- - -- - --$ - $ RTATION nue and 165t ct 20-03 ee, Public W struction) keville mprovement operations, ed traffic lev an ramp impr 2020 130,000 130,000$$ 50,000 80,000 - 130,000$$ N (TP-10 th Street Inte Works Directo s at the Ip alleviate c vels. The p rovements. 2021 (20 620,000 620,000$$ - - 620,000 620,000$$ 0) ersection Imp or pava Ave. a congestion, project inclu Total 017-2021) T (Pr 750,000 7 750,000 7$ 50,000 80,000 620,000 6 750,000 7$ provement and 165th S make safet udes a traffi Total roject) 50,000 50,000 50,000 80,000 20,000 50,000 St. ty fic 19 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Tota Proje The C study classi in the The C Study CSAH (CSA a Prin costs the C ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: l Project Co ect Descript City and Co y (Study) to ifications as e Study. The City and Cou y in annual H 70 is curr AH 5) to Dod ncipal Arter will be a m County’s Tran TRA r: r: rt: ost: tion and Lo unty are par evaluate po principal ar e Study is an unty will rev CIP discus rently identi dd Blvd. (CS rial, the City maximum of nsportation P R E S S W M Ex D R C ANSPOR CR 70 (210 Kenrick Av City Projec Chris Petre TBD Dakota Cou $12,220,00 cation rtnering on a otential east rterials. The nticipated to view recomm ssions durin ified as a fut SAH 9). If th y’s share of 25% of the Plan). The C evenues Escrow Fund Sanitary Sewer F Storm Sewer Fun Water Fund Municipal State xpenditures Design R/W Acquisition Construction RTATION 0th/215th Stre venue to Do ct 19-03 and ee, Public W unty 00 a County-wi t-west alignm e CSAH 70 be complete mended CSA g 2017 for ture 4-lane he Study rec f the enginee total project City’s share Fund nd Aid Fund Total $ n Total $ N (TP-11 eet) Reconst dd Boulevar d Dakota Cou Works Directo ide principal ments south (210th/215th ed and adopt AH 70 impro inclusion in divided high commendati ering, right- t cost (per C of the proje Total (Project) - 131,250 607,500 300,000 4,891,509 5,930,259$ 308,529 1,487,808 4,133,922 5,930,259$ 1) truction rd unty Project or l arterial sys h of CSAH h St.) corrido ted in 2017. ovements ide nto future C hway from K on is to clas -of-way and County polic ect cost is sho 70-xx stem plannin 42 for futur or is include entified in th County CIP Kenrick Ave sify CR 70 a d constructio cy included i own below. ng re ed he s. e. as on in 20 TRANSPORTATION (TP-12) Project Name: Right-of-Way Preservation and Management Project Number: City Project XX-XX Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Project Description and Location The City may acquire land or right-of-way for existing or future transportation facilities at various locations within the City as opportunities arise. The land or right-of-way acquisition may include partnering with the County for acquisition opportunities to support future roadway projects consistent with existing Official Maps and the City and County Transportation Plans. The County annually budgets $550,000 for right-of-way acquisition at various locations throughout the County (55/45 cost share). 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total (2017-2021) Total (Project) Revenues City of Lakeville 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,000,000$ $1,000,000 Expenditures R/W Acquisition 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,000,000$ $1,000,000 21 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje Proje The C highw 31) to levels to CS with t neces below ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: ect Cost: ect Descript City and Cou way from its o alleviate c s. The Coun SAH 9, as a the County t ssary for a j w. TRA r: r: rt: tion and Lo unty are partn current term congestion, m nty’s 2030 Tr potential ju to evaluate th urisdictional Rev Cit Exp De R/W Co ANSPOR Dodd Boul Cedar Aven City Projec Chris Petre 2021 Dakota Cou $13,555,55 cation nering to rec minus east of make safety ransportation urisdictional t he timing and l turnback. venues ty of Lakeville Tot penditures esign W Acquisition onstruction Tot RTATION levard Recon nue to Pilot ct XX-XX an ee, Public W unty 55 onstruct Dod Cedar Ave. improvemen n Plan identi transfer, and d highway im The City’s Total (Project) 6,100,000 tal $6,100,000 487,800 1,586,250 4,025,950 tal $6,100,000 N (TNP-A nstruction Knob Road nd Dakota C Works Directo dd Blvd. (CS (CSAH 23) nts and prov ifies Dodd B d the City ag mprovements share of th A) County Proje or SAH 9) to a 2 to Pilot Kno vide for incr Blvd., from H grees to coor s and/or finan he project c ect 9-XX 2-lane divide ob Rd. (CSAH reasing traffi Highview Av rdinate effor ncial paymen cost is show ed H fic e. rts nt wn 22 N TRA NON AN N‐P  P SPO PRO PRO   ORT   OGR   OJEC       TAT RAM CTS TIO MM S  ON MED  23 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje Proje The C inters impro at the ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: ect Cost: ect Descript City is propo section to ovements an e Holyoke A TRA r: r: rt: tion and Lo osing to con improve in nd provide fo Avenue and 1 Reve Escr City Storm Wate Expe Desi R/W Cons ANSPOR Holyoke A City Projec Chris Petre TBD City of Lak $1,375,000 cation struct impro ntersection o or increased 90th Street in enues ow Fund Lakeville m Sewer Fund er Fund Total enditures gn W Acquisition struction Total   RTATION Avenue and 1 ct XX-XX ee, Public W keville 0 ovements at t operations, traffic level ntersection. Total (Projec 1,275,00 100,00 l 1,375,00$ 150,00 75,00 1,150,00 l $ 1,375,00 N (TNP-B 190th Street I Works Directo the Holyoke alleviate c ls. The proje ct) - 00 00 - 00 00 00 00 00 B) Intersection I or e Avenue an congestion, ect includes Improvemen nd 190th Stree make safet a roundabou nt et ty ut 24 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje Proje The C CSAH conge includ with t 179th Pilot Align Study for fu Coun will p facilit ect Name: ect Number: ect Manager cipated Star ect Lead: ect Cost: ect Descripti City and Co H 9) and Fl estion, make des a rounda the Develope Street as a 2 Knob Road nment “B” T y, Phase 2 – R uture east-w nty. The Dak participate in ties to Count TRA : r: t: ion and Loca ounty are par lagstaff Aven safety impro about at the er-installed c 2-lane divided (CSAH 31) Transitional Refinement of west roadway kota County 2 n engineering ty standards. R E ANSPOR 179th Street City Projec Chris Petree TBD City of Lak $1,550,000 ation rtnering to c nue intersec ovements an 179th Street construction o d highway fr with subdiv Segment (D of Preferred S y connection 2030 Transpo g and constru Revenues Dakota Count City of Lakev Storm Sewer F Expenditures Design R/W Acquisit Construction RTATION t and Flagstaf t XX-XX an e, Public Wo keville construct imp tion to impr nd provide fo t and Flagsta of 179th Stre rom its curren vision of the Dakota Coun System Plan) s to promot ortation Plan uction costs f T (P ty ville Fund Total 1$ tion 1 Total $ 1 N (TNP-C ff Avenue In d Dakota Co orks Director provements a rove intersec or increased t aff Avenue i eet. The Dev nt terminus e property. 1 nty East-We ) and a prese te efficient m n includes a p for construct Total Project) 852,500 597,500 100,000 1,550,000 150,000 250,000 1,150,000 1,550,000 C) ntersection Im ounty Project r at the 179th ction operati traffic levels intersection veloper will e east of Flagst 79th Street is est Corridor ervation corri movement th policy in whi ting County mprovement XX-XX Street (futur ions, alleviat s. The projec and coincide extend/expan taff Avenue t s identified a Preservatio idor alignmen hroughout th ch the Count transportatio re te ct es nd to as on nt he ty on   25 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje Proje The Aven The camp ect Name: ect Number ect Manage cipated Star ect Lead: ect Cost: ect Descript City’s Tran nue as an art proposed ro pus and the S TRA r: r: rt Date: tion and Lo nsportation P terial roadwa oadway pro Southfork Vi Revenues Escrow Fund City Lakevill Sanitary Sew Storm Sewer Water Fund Expenditures Design R/W Acquisit Construction ANSPOR Kenrick Av City Projec Chris Petre TBD City of Lak $2,575,000 cation Plan identif ay from 181 ovides a con illage/Argon d e wer Fund Fund Tota s tion Tota RTATION venue Expan ct XX-XX ee, Public W keville 0 fies the futust Street to t nnection be nne Village b Total (Project) - 2,575,000 - - - al 2,575,000$ 595,000 - 1,980,000 al $ 2,575,000 N (TNP-D nsion: 181st S Works Directo ure extensio the Canadian etween the business dist - - - - 0 - D) Street – CP or on/expansion n Pacific Ra Timbercrest tricts. Railroad Tra n of Kenric ailroad track t commercia acks ck ks. al 26 TRANSPORTATION (TNP-E) Project Name: Future Dakota County Highways Project Number: City Project XX-XX and Dakota County Project XX-XX Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Project Description and Location The Dakota County 2030 Transportation Plan includes a policy in which the County will participate in the engineering and construction costs for constructing future County transportation facilities to County standards. Total (Project) Revenues Dakota County - Total $ - Expenditures Design - R/W Acquisition - Construction - Total $ - 27 PR UT RO PR TIL GR RO LIT RAM JEC TIES MM CTS S MED S D 28 Total CIP # Project / Financing 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017-2021 U-4 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Extensions Sanitary Sewer Trunk Fund - Fees 148,875 257,100 259,500 81,375 - 746,850 U-1 Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund - User Fees 45,000 65,000 20,000 200,000 - 330,000 U-3 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund - User Fees 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000 U-2 Sanitary Sewer Inflow/Infiltration Repairs Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund - User Fees 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000 U-6 Watermain Replacement Water Operating Fund - User Fees 1,094,952 2,631,369 960,810 941,916 538,362 6,167,409 Special assessments - 239,922 - - - 239,922 U-6 Watermain Extensions - Hamburg Ave: 202nd - Hartford Water Trunk Fund - Fees - 23,992 - - - 23,992 U-10 Well Construction Water Trunk Fund - Fees 875,000 - 1,837,500 - 1,837,500 4,550,000 U-10 Well Collection Pipe Water Trunk Fund - Fees - - 300,000 - - 300,000 U-7 Water Main Trunk Extensions Water Trunk Fund - Fees 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 U-9 Well and Pump Rehabilitation Water Operating Fund - User Fees 180,000 165,000 60,000 180,000 180,000 765,000 U-5 Tower and Reservoir Maintenance Water Operating Fund - User Fees - 15,000 - - 150,000 165,000 U-8 Water meter replacement Water Operating Fund - User Fees 397,417 352,992 356,750 360,590 364,514 1,832,263 Total 3,441,244$ 4,450,375$ 4,494,560$ 2,463,881$ 3,770,376$ 18,620,436 UTILITIES Project Summary 29 Total CIP # Financing / Project 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017-2021 Water Trunk Fund - Fees U-10 Well Construction 875,000$ - $ 1,837,500$ -$ 1,837,500$ 4,550,000$ U-10 Well Collection Pipe - - 300,000 - - 300,000 U-7 Water Main Trunk Extensions 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 U-6 Hamburg Ave: 202nd - Hartford - 23,992 - - - 23,992 Total 1,075,000$ 223,992$ 2,337,500$ 200,000$ 2,037,500$ 5,873,992$ Water Operating Fund - Fees U-8 Water Meter Replacement 397,417 352,992 356,750 360,590 364,514 1,832,263 U-6 Watermain Replacement 1,094,952 2,631,369 960,810 941,916 538,362 6,167,409 U-9 Well and Pump Rehabilitation 180,000 165,000 60,000 180,000 180,000 765,000 U-5 Tower and Reservoir Maintenance - 15,000 - - 150,000 165,000 Total 1,672,369 3,164,361 1,377,560 1,482,506 1,232,876 8,929,672 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Fund - Fees U-4 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Extensions 148,875 257,100 259,500 81,375 - 746,850 Total 148,875$ 257,100$ 259,500 $ 81,375 $ - $ 746,850$ Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund - User Fees U-2 Sanitary Sewer Inflow/Infiltration Repairs 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000 U-3 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000 U-1 Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation 45,000 65,000 20,000 200,000 - 330,000 Total 545,000$ 565,000$ 520,000 $ 700,000 $ 500,000 $ 2,830,000$ Special assessments U-6 Watermain Replacement - 239,922 - - - 239,922 Total - $ 239,922$ - $ - $ - $ 239,922$ Total 3,441,244$ 4,450,375$ 4,494,560$ 2,463,881 $ 3,770,376 $ 18,620,436$ UTILITIES Financing Summary 30 Proje Proje Antic Proje The C gravi perio servic sched Revenues Sanitary S Fees Expenditu Lift Station Lift Station Lift Station Lift Station Lift Station Oper No an ect name: ect Manager cipated start ect Descript City has 20 ty lines. T odically insp ce life for a l duled for ins ewer Operatin ures n #8 n #23 n #24 n #9 n #10 rations and o nticipated si r: t date: ion and loca sanitary sew The pumps, ected and re lift station is pection and ng Fund $        Total  $   operating co gnificant im UTIL Lift Station Chris Petre Annual ation wer lift statio motors, and ehabilitated s approxima rehabilitatio 2017 45,000    $   45,000             45,000    $   osts impacts mpact on ope LITY (U- n Rehabilitat ee, Public W ons which p d other equ to ensure u ately 15-20 ye on every 15 y 2018 65,000    $  45,000    20,000       65,000   $  s rations or op -1) ion Works Directo ump sewage uipment wit uninterrupte years but can years. 2019 20,000     $  20,000        20,000    $  perating cos or e from low l thin each lif ed service. T n vary. Each 2020 200,000  $ 200,000   200,000 $ sts. lying areas t ft station ar The expecte h lift station 2021 ‐$                $ ‐$               $ to re ed is Total 330,000$    330,000$   31 UTILITY (U-2) Project name: Sanitary sewer system inflow/infiltration repairs Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated start date: Annual Project Description and location A section of the sanitary sewer system is inspected each year for damage to the pipes that would result in inflow (direct entry of storm water) and infiltration (ground water seeping into the sewer) within the sanitary sewer system. This additional water increases stress on the wastewater treatment facilities thereby resulting in higher sanitary sewer rates for Lakeville customers. Additionally, exceeding the City’s calculated peak flow can result in the imposition of surcharge by MCES, the minimum surcharge would be $216,000 per year for five years. The Utilities Division endeavors to reduce the inflow and infiltration by initiating repairs such as manhole structure sealing, cured in place pipe lining, and the replacement of manhole covers. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total Revenues  Sanitary Sewer Oper. Fund   Fees 250,000$   250,000$   250,000$   250,000$   250,000$   1,250,000$      Expenditures Pipe Repairs and Lining 175,000      175,000    175,000    175,000    175,000       Manhole Sealing 75,000        75,000      75,000      75,000      75,000         Total  250,000$   250,000$  250,000$  250,000$  250,000$   1,250,000$     Operations and operating costs impacts No anticipated significant impact on operations or operating costs. 32 Proje Proje Antic Proje The crack main sanita proje Revenues  Sanitary Se  Fees  Expenditur Sanitary Se Oper This w ect name: ect Manager cipated start ect Descript sanitary sew king. Rehab ntaining a clo ary sewer sy ects and will ewer Oper. Fun res wer Rehabilitat rations and o will result in r: t date: ion and loca wer in areas bilitating th osed system ystem will be be programm 2 nd  2$    tion 2       Total  2$    operating co n a reduction UTIL Sanitary Se Chris Petre Annual ation s around the hese portion and reducin e evaluated in med based o 2017 2 250,000 2$    250,000 2     250,000 2$   ost impacts n of expenses LITY (U- ewer Rehabil ee, Public W e City i s su ns of the se ng the poten n conjunctio on that evalu 2018 2 50,000 2$    50,000 2     50,000 2$   s for sanitary -3) litation Works Directo ubject to bre ewer infrast ntial for infl on with plan uation. 2019 2 50,000 2$    50,000 2     50,000 2$   y sewer repa or eaks, root in tructure is low and infil nned street re 2020 2 50,000 25$    50,000 25       50,000 25$    airs in future ntrusion, an important t ltration. Th econstructio 021 T 50,000 1$      50,000 50,000 1$     e years. nd to he on Total 1,250,000 1,250,000 33 UTILITY (U-4) Project Name: Sanitary Sewer Trunk System Improvements Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: As development occurs Project Description and Location The Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan anticipates the extension of sanitary sewer trunk facilities to accommodate anticipated growth. Timing of future sanitary sewer trunk facilities depends on the growth rate and location of planned community development. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total Revenues Sanitary Sewer Trunk Fund 148,875      257,100    259,500    81,375       ‐                    746,850        Total 148,875$   257,100$  259,500$  81,375$      ‐$                746,850$      Expenditures Trunk Sanitary Sewer Oversizing 148,875      257,100    259,500    81,375       ‐                     Total 148,875$   257,100$  259,500$  81,375$      ‐$                746,850$      Operations and Operating Costs Impacts No anticipated significant operating cost increases. 34 Proje Proje Antic Proje Inspe and remo system corro other perio Revenues Water Op Expenditu Cleaning/I Holyoke T Dakota He Fairfield T Airlake To CMF Towe Michaud P Operatio No antici ect name: ect Manager cipated start ect Descript ections of th extent of a oves dust an m. Interior osion and ma r u s e r s . Th odic inspectio erating Fund ‐  ures Inspection Tower eights Tower ower wer er Park Tower ons and oper ipated impac Tower r: t date: ion and loca he interior an any required nd dirt that and exterio aintain the q he service li on and neces Fees $    Total  $    rating cost i ct on operat UTIL r and Reservo Chris Petre 2017 ation nd exterior o d maintenan collects ove or coatings o quality of the ife of the to ssary mainte 2017 ‐            $         ‐             $    impacts ions or oper LITY (U- oir Maintena ee, Public W of water tow nce. Period er time that on water tow e treated wat owers and r enance. 2018 15,000  $   15,000   15,000   $   rating costs. -5) ance Works Directo wers are used dic cleaning t can reduc wers protect ter passing th reservoirs ca 2019 ‐             $  ‐              $  or d to determin g of the tow ce the life o the metal st hrough to re an be exten 2020 ‐               $                          ‐               $  ne the timin wer exterior f the coatin tructure from esidential an nded throug 2021 150,000  $ 25,000      25,000      25,000      25,000      25,000      25,000      150,000  $ ng rs ng m nd gh Total 165,000$   165,000$    35 Proje Proje Antic Proje Porti recon a par water prote (colle Revenues Special As Water Tru Water Op Expenditu Water ma Water ma Oper This w ect name: ect Manager cipated start ect Descript ons of the nstruction pr rticular area r system inf ection, and ector road) w s ssessments unk Funds perating Fund  To ures ain extension ain replacement Tota rations and O will result in r: t date: ion and loca City’s water rojects. All w and an eval frastructure replacing b water main r 2017 1,094,95     otal 1,094,95     t 1,094,95     al  1,094,95     Operating C n a reduction UTIL Water Mai Chris Petre As required ation r main syste water main luation of so in each rec bolts elsewh replacement 2018 239,9       23,9         52 2,631,3   52 2,895,2   263,9       52 2,631,3   52 2,895,2   Costs Impac n of expenses LITY (U- n Replaceme ee, Public W d em will be replacement oils. This re construction ere within is included i 2019 922 992 369 960,8       283 960,8       914 369 960,8       283 960,8       cts s for water m -6) ent Works Directo replaced in t is based on epresents rep n area annu the project in 2018 for a 9 202 810 941       810 941       810 941       810 941       main repairs or conjunctio n the numbe placing up t ually, installi area. Ken approx. $1.6 0 202 1,916 538         1,916 538         1,916 538         1,916 538         in future ye n with stree er of breaks i to 10% of ou ing corrosio nrick Avenu million. 21 To 2                    8,362 6,1      8,362 6,4      2         8,362 6,1      8,362 6,4      ars. et in ur on ue otal 239,922 23,992 167,409 431,323 263,914 167,409 431,323 36 UTILITY (U-7) Project Name: Watermain Trunk System Improvements Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: As development occurs Project Description and Location The Comprehensive Water Plan anticipates the extension of watermain trunk facilities to accommodate anticipated growth. Timing of future watermain trunk facilities depends on the growth rate and location of planned community development. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total Revenues Water Trunk Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Total 200,000$ 200,000 $ 200,000$ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000$ Expenditures Trunk Watermain Oversizing 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Total 200,000$ 200,000 $ 200,000$ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,000,000$ Operations and Operating Costs Impacts No anticipated significant operating cost increases. 37 Proje Proje Antic Proje The U end o meter repla life is the D Divis Revenues Water Op Expenditur Water m           Resid                Me               Tra           Indus Oper No an ect name: ect Manager cipated start ect Descript Utilities Div of their serv r replaceme cement sche s important t Department sion staff. perating Fund  res eters ential eter Install ansmitter Insta strial/Commerc rations and o nticipated si Water r: t date: ion and loca vision replac vice life. The ents per yea edule. Being to managing of Natural ‐ Fees $       ll      cial      Total  $  operating co gnificant im UTIL meter repla Chris Petre Annual ation ces residenti e Utilities D r based on g able to cha g the water s Resources. 2017 397,417  $  261,030      88,283        48,104    397,417  $  osts impacts mpact on ope LITY (U- cement ee, Public W ial and com Division curr the age of t ange out wa system and m R e p l a c em 2018 352,992 $  262,060    90,932      352,992 $  s rations or op -8) Works Directo mmercial wat rently sched the meter a ater meters a monitoring w ment of met 2019 356,750 $  263,090     93,660       356,750 $  perating cos or ter meters th ules approxi and to stay at the end of water use for ters is done 2020 360,590 $  264,120      96,470        360,590 $  sts. hat reach th imately 1,00 on a 20 yea f their servic r reporting t e by Utilitie 2021 364,514  $  265,150   99,364     364,514  $  he 00 ar ce to es Total 1,832,263  1,832,263  38 Proje Proje Antic Proje The C hours stress comp efficie Rehab Revenues Water O Expenditu Well 8 reh HSPS 600 Well 11 re Well 12 re Well 13 re Filter Back Well 14 re Well 2 reh Well 9 reh Well 10 re Well 4 reh Well 15 re Well 16 re   Operat No ant ect name: ect Manager: cipated start ect Descripti City’s wells p s a day, 7 day s. Additiona ponents. Per ent operatio bilitation is s s Operating Fund ures habilitation HP Pump ehabilitation ehabilitation ehabilitation kwash Pump ehabilitation habilitation habilitation ehabilitation habilitation ehabilitation ehabilitation tions and op icipated sign : t date: Annua ion and locat provide wate ys a week. T ally, being co iodic inspect on of the w scheduled eve  ‐ Fees $                          Total  $     perating cos nificant impa UTIL Well and Pu Chris Petre al tion er for the di This puts the onstantly exp tion and mai wells and w ery 8 to 10 ye 2017 180,000   $   60,000     60,000     60,000                 180,000   $   ts impacts: act of operat LITY (U- ump Rehabil e, Public Wo istribution sy motors and posed to wa intenance, wi water system ears for each 2018 165,000   $ 60,000      60,000      45,000        165,000   $ tions or oper -9) litation orks Director ystem which pump comp ater can corr ith replacem m at maxim well dependi 2019 60,000$        60,000        60,000$        rating costs. r h operates on ponents unde rode pipes a ment as neede mum pump ing on its typ 2020 180,000$      60,000         60,000         60,000         180,000$      n demand, 2 er tremendou nd other we ed, ensures th ping capacity pe. 2021 180,000$     60,000         60,000         60,000         180,000$     24 us ell he y. Total 765,000$    765,000$    39 Proje Proje Antic Proje Well accom Chien adjace 2019 a and w Minn Prote Revenues Water Tru Expenditu Well Cons Well 21 Well 22 Well 23 Well 24 Well 25 Well Colle Opera Main ect name: ect Manager cipated start ect Descriptio 21 is progr mmodate exis n, Jordan, an ent to the Hig and Wells 24 water needs. nesota Depart ction Plan in s unk Fund To ures struction  1 2 3 4 5 ection Pipe To ations and o ntenance cos Well C r: t date: on and Locati rammed for sting and ant d/or the Tun ghview Avenu and 25 are pl Locations w tment of Hea order to rece 2017 875,00         otal 875,00$      875,00         otal 875,00$      perating cos ts are estima UTIL Construction Chris Petre 2016 ion construction ticipated grow nnel City/Wo ue/Dodd Bou lanned for 20 will be based alth requires ive permits to 2018 00 ‐               00 ‐$             00 00 ‐$             sts impacts ated at $1,00 LITY (U-1 n – Well 21 ee, Public W n in 2017 t wth. The we onewoc aquif ulevard round 021. Construc d o n d a t a p ro the City to a o construct fu 2019 ‐2,137,50     ‐2,137,50$    918,75        918,75        300,00        ‐2,137,50$    0 per year pe 10) Works Directo to provide a ell will draw fers. Well 2 dabout. Well ction will dep ovided in th amend its W uture wells. 2020 00                 00$              50 50 00 00$              er well. or adequate wa water from t 1 is planned ls 22 and 23 a pend on popu e Water Sup Wellhead and 2021 ‐  1,837,      ‐  1,837,$     918,         918,         ‐  1,837,$     ater supply t the Prairie D d to be locate are planned fo ulation deman pply Plan. Th Source Wate Tot 500 4,85       500 4,85$      750 750               500 4,85$     to Du ed or nd he er tal 50,000 50,000 ‐          50,000 40 P N RE PRO  P NAT ESO OGR PRO     TUR   OUR   RAM   OJEC   RAL RCE MM CTS L  S  MED S  D  41 Total CIP # Project / Financing 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017-2021 NR-1 Lake Management Environmental Resources - User Fees 102,200 102,200 102,200 102,200 102,200 511,000 102,200 102,200 102,200 102,200 102,200 511,000 NR-2 Maintenance - Natural Resources and Storm Water Infrastructure Environmental Resources - User Fees 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 625,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 625,000 NR-3 Storm Water Basin Rehabilitation Environmental Resources - User Fees 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 NR-4 Storm Water Management Improvements - Street Reconstruction Storm Sewer Trunk Fund - Fees 215,000 105,000 215,000 105,000 105,000 745,000 215,000 105,000 215,000 105,000 105,000 745,000 NR-5 South Creek Restoration at Golden Pond Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Org 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Storm Sewer Trunk Fund - Fees 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Environmental Resources - User Fees 100,000 - - - - 100,000 200,000 - - - - 200,000 NR-6 Downtown Storm Water Treatment System Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Org 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Storm Sewer Trunk Fund - Fees 70,000 - - - - 70,000 120,000 - - - - 120,000 NR-7 Comprehensive Plan Update Storm Sewer Trunk Fund - Fees 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Environmental Rescoures - User Fees 25,000 - - - - 25,000 125,000 - - - - 125,000 Total 1,037,200$ 482,200$ 592,200$ 482,200$ 482,200$ 3,076,000$ NATURAL RESOURCES Project Summary 42 Total CIP # Financing / Project 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017-2021 Environmental Resources - Fees NR-1 Lake Management 102,200$ 102,200$ 102,200 $ 102,200 $ 102,200 $ 511,000$ NR-2 Maintenance - Natural Resources and Storm Water In 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 625,000 NR-3 Storm Water Basin Rehabilitation 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 NR-5 South Creek Restoration at Golden Pond 100,000 - - - - 100,000 NR-7 Comprehensive Plan Update 25,000 - - - - 25,000 502,200$ 377,200$ 377,200 $ 377,200 $ 377,200 $ 2,011,000$ Storm Sewer Trunk Fund - Fees NR-4 Storm Water Management Improvements - Street Rec 215,000 105,000 215,000 105,000 105,000 745,000 NR-5 South Creek Restoration at Golden Pond 50,000 - - - - 50,000 NR-6 Downtown Storm Water Treatment System 70,000 - - - - 70,000 NR-7 Comprehensive Plan Update 100,000 - - - - 100,000 435,000 105,000 215,000 105,000 105,000 965,000 Vermillion Watershed Joint Powers Organization NR-5 South Creek Restoration at Golden Pond 50,000 - - - - 50,000 NR-6 Downtown Storm Water Treatment System 50,000 - - - - 50,000 100,000$ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000$ Total 1,037,200$ 482,200$ 592,200 $ 482,200 $ 482,200 $ 3,076,000$ NATURAL RESOURCES Financing Summary 43 NATURAL RESOURCES (NR-1) Project Name: Lake Management Project Number: City Project 17-XX Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: Annual Project Description and Location The City’s lake management program is designed to manage, promote and protect the City’s water resources including lakes, wetlands and streams. Each year, the City conducts water monitoring and implements strategies that are intended to preserve and enhance the water quality of the City’s lakes. Examples of water monitoring and treatments include aquatic plant surveys, fish surveys, watershed storm water basin sampling and invasive aquatic plant control. Water quality improvement projects are initiated when appropriate to meet Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and Watershed Restoration and Protection strategies, consistent with the Federal Clean Water Act. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total (2017-2021) Revenues Utility Fund - Environmental Resources 102,200 102,200 102,200 102,200 102,200 511,000 Total 102,200$ 102,200$ 102,200 $ 102,200 $ 102,200$ 511,000$ Expenditures Water Quality Assessments 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 325,000 Water Quality Treatments 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Monitoring - Met Council 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 11,000 Total 117,200$ 117,200$ 117,200 $ 117,200 $ 117,200$ 586,000$ 44 NATURAL RESOURCES (NR-2) Project Name: Maintenance - Natural Resources and Storm Water Infrastructure Project Number: City Project 17-XX Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: Annual Project Description and Location The City’s environmental resources maintenance program is designed to manage, preserve and protect the City’s forestry and water resources by maintaining existing prairies/uplands and woodlands, and existing storm water management infrastructure. Each year, the City implements best management practices that are designed to preserve, protect and extend the life of public forestry and storm water management assets. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total (2017-2021) Revenues Utility Fund - Environmental Resources 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 625,000 Total 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000$ 625,000$ Expenditures Storm Water Infrastructure 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000 Forestry 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Total 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 125,000$ 625,000$ 45 NATURAL RESOURCES (NR-3) Project Name: Storm Water Basin Rehabilitation Project Number: City Project 17-XX Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: Annual Project Description and Location The City’s storm water basin rehabilitation program is designed to manage, preserve and extend the life of public storm water basin systems. The City has approximately 450 storm water basins and conducts on-site inspects on about 20% each year for erosion, sediment accumulation and outfall functioning. Rehabilitation projects include emergency overflow and easement maintenance, erosion restoration, outfall repair and sediment removal. The program is a requirement of the City’s Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total (2017-2021) Revenues Utility Fund - Environmental Resources 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 Total 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000$ 750,000$ Expenditures Engineering 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Construction 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 650,000 Total 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000$ 750,000$ 46 NATURAL RESOURCES (NR-4) Project Name: Storm Water Management Improvements – Street Reconstruction Project Number: City Project 17-XX Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: Annual Project Description and Location In coordination with the City’s street reconstruction and collector roadway reconstruction programs, storm water management system improvements will be constructed where water quality, volume reduction or rate control enhancements can be achieved. Storm water management system improvements include: hydrodynamic separations, rain gardens, infiltration/filtration trenches, water conservation BMP’s and tree trenches. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total (2017-2021) Revenues Storm Sewer Fund 215,000 105,000 215,000 105,000 105,000 745,000 Total 215,000$ 105,000 $ 215,000$ 105,000 $ 105,000$ 745,000$ Expenditures Engineering 30,000 15,000 30,000 15,000 15,000 105,000 Construction 185,000 90,000 185,000 90,000 90,000 640,000 Total 215,000$ 105,000 $ 215,000$ 105,000 $ 105,000$ 745,000$ 47 NATURAL RESOURCES (NR-5) Project Name: South Creek Restoration at Golden Pond Project Number: City Project 16-07 Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: 2017 (Construction) Project Lead: City of Lakeville Total Project Cost: $295,300 Project Description and Location The City and Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization (VRWJPO) are partnering to improve the water quality of South Creek and meet waste load allocation reductions, as required by the City’s South Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL). A storm water basin located southwest of the Holyoke Avenue/210th Street intersection is experiencing bank failures and mixing water with South Creek. The water mixing is contributing to temperature and water quality impairments in South Creek and the Vermillion River. A feasibility study (2016) will evaluate options to reduce erosion and sedimentation downstream, lower stream temperatures and improve water quality in South Creek. The VRWJPO is funding $65,000 in 2016 for a feasibility study and preliminary design and $50,000 in 2017 for construction. The VRWJPO applied for State Clean Water Fund funding for up to 75% of the construction costs as part of the 2016 Solicitation (FY 2017). 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total (2017-2021) Total (Project) Revenues VRWJPO 50,000 - - - - 50,000 115,000 Storm Sewer Fund 50,000 - - - - 50,000 50,000 Utility Fund - Environmental Resources 100,000 - - - - 100,000 130,300 Total 200,000$ -$ - $ -$ -$ 200,000$ 295,300$ Expenditures Design - - - - - - 95,300 R/W Acquisition - - - - - - - Construction 200,000 - - - - 200,000 200,000 Total 200,000$ -$ - $ -$ -$ 200,000$ 295,300$ 48 NATURAL RESOURCES (NR-6) Project Name: Downtown Storm Water Treatment System Project Number: City Project 17-XX Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: 2017 (Construction) Project Lead: City of Lakeville Total Project Cost: $120,000 Project Description and Location The City is proposing to install a storm water treatment system at the downstream end of a City storm sewer line to remove sediment from storm water generated from a large, highly urbanized watershed. The project includes installation of a hydrodynamic separator east of the Holyoke Avenue and 210th Street intersection. The VRWJPO is funding $50,000 in 2017 for construction. The VRWJPO applied for State Clean Water Fund funding for up to 75% of the construction costs as part of the 2016 Solicitation (FY 2017). 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total (2017-2021) Total (Project) Revenues VRWJPO 50,000 - - - - 50,000 50,000 Storm Sewer Fund 70,000 - - - - 70,000 70,000 Total 120,000$ -$ - $ -$ -$ 120,000$ 120,000$ Expenditures Design 10,000 - - - - 10,000 10,000 R/W Acquisition - - - - - - - Construction 110,000 - - - - 110,000 110,000 Total 120,000$ -$ - $ -$ -$ 120,000$ 120,000$ 49 NATURAL RESOURCES (NR-7) Project Name: Comprehensive Plan Update Project Number: City Project 17-XX Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director Anticipated Start: 2017 Project Description and Location The City is proposing to update its comprehensive plans as part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total (2017-2021) Total (Project) Revenues Storm Sewer Fund 100,000 - - - - 100,000 100,000 Utility Fund - Environmental Resources 25,000 - - - - 25,000 25,000 Total 125,000$ -$ - $ -$ -$ 125,000$ 125,000$ Expenditures EAB Management Plan 25,000 - - - - 25,000 25,000 Natural Resources Management Plan 100,000 - - - - 100,000 100,000 Total 125,000$ -$ - $ -$ -$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 50 PRRO PR PA GR RO ARK RAM JEC KS MM CTS MED S D 51 Total CIP #Park / Project 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017-2021 P-1 Parks Major Maintenance General Fund General Maintenance 41,750 41,750 40,250 40,250 40,250 204,250 Buildings/Shelters/Grounds 81,900 11,700 37,850 - - 131,450 Field Improvements/Maintenance 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 32,500 Open space improvement and maintenance 24,875 96,102 48,993 33,443 29,018 232,431 155,025 156,052 133,593 80,193 75,768 600,631 P-2 Park Development - Adminstrative Projects Park Dedication Fund - Fees 58,000 56,000 42,000 10,000 20,000 186,000 58,000 56,000 42,000 10,000 20,000 186,000 P-3 Park Development - Developer Credits Park Dedication Fund 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 2,175,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 2,175,000 P-4 Future Park Land Acquisition Park Dedication Fund - Fees 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 P-5 Trail Improvements (Various Trails) Trail Improvement Fund 350,284 343,640 318,522 329,259 363,859 1,705,564 350,284 343,640 318,522 329,259 363,859 1,705,564 P-6 Park Improvements (Various Parks) Park Improvement Fund 235,000 190,000 215,000 220,000 255,000 1,115,000 235,000 190,000 215,000 220,000 255,000 1,115,000 P-7 Avonlea Park Dedication Fund - Fees 1,500,000 - - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 - - - - 1,500,000 P-8 West Lake Marion Park Park Dedication Fund - Fees 75,000 75,000 Donation - Bike Organization 10,000 - - - - 10,000 85,000 - - - - 85,000 P-9 Trail - 175th: Isleton Ave to Jasmine Ave Park Dedication Fund - Fees 92,100 - - - - 92,100 Escrow Funds 7,900 - - - - 7,900 100,000 - - - - 100,000 P-10 Legacy Park Park Dedication Fund - Fees - 385,000 - - - 385,000 - 385,000 - - - 385,000 P-11 King Park Improvements Park Dedication Fund - Fees - 857,325 617,550 - - 1,474,875 Miracle League/LBA Lighting Donation - 150,000 150,000 - - 300,000 - 1,007,325 767,550 - - 1,774,875 P-12 Cedar Crossing Park Park Dedication Fund - Fees - - 385,000 - - 385,000 - - 385,000 - - 385,000 P-13 Michaud Park Park Dedication Fund - Fees - - - 96,000 - 96,000 - - - 96,000 - 96,000 P-14 Skate Park Park Dedication Fund - Fees - - 175,000 - - 175,000 - - 175,000 - - 175,000 TOTAL 3,018,309$ 2,673,017$ 2,571,665$ 1,270,452$ 1,249,627$ 10,783,070$ PARKS AND RECREATION Project Summary 52 Total CIP #Funding Source / Project 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017-2021 Escrows P-9 Trail - 175th: Isleton Ave to Jasmine Ave 7,900 - - - - 7,900 General Fund P-1 Park Major Maintenance 155,025 156,052 133,593 80,193 75,768 600,631 Other P-11 King Park Improvements - LBA Lighting Donation - 150,000 150,000 - - 300,000 P-8 West Lake Marion Park 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Total Other 10,000 150,000 150,000 - - 310,000 Park Improvement Fund - Taxes P-6 Park Improvements (Various Parks)235,000 190,000 215,000 220,000 255,000 1,115,000 P-5 Trail Improvement Fund - Taxes Trail improvement 350,284 343,640 318,522 329,259 363,859 1,705,564 Park Dedication Fund - Fees P-2 Park Development - Adminstrative Projects 58,000 56,000 42,000 10,000 20,000 186,000 P-3 Park Development - Developer Credits 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 435,000 2,175,000 P-4 Future Park Land Acquisition 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 P-7 Avonlea 1,500,000 - - - - 1,500,000 P-8 West Lake Marion Park 75,000 - - - - 75,000 P-9 Trail - 175th: Isleton Ave to Jasmine Ave 92,100 - - - - 92,100 P-10 Legacy Park - 385,000 - - - 385,000 P-11 King Park Improvements - 857,325 617,550 - - 1,474,875 P-12 Cedar Crossing Park - - 385,000 - - 385,000 P-13 Michaud Park - - - 96,000 - 96,000 P-14 Skate Park - - 175,000 - - 175,000 Total Park Dedication Fund 2,260,100 1,833,325 1,754,550 641,000 555,000 7,043,975 TOTAL 3,018,309$ 2,673,017$ 2,571,665$ 1,270,452$ 1,249,627$ 10,783,070$ PARKS AND RECREATION Financing Summary 53 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-1) Project Name: Parks – Major Maintenance Project Number: N/A Project Manager: John Hennen, Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated Start: Various Project Lead: City of Lakeville Totals 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017-2021 General Maintenance STS labor 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 85,000 Tree Trust labor 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 6,250 Tree Trust/Eagle Scout project materials 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 Tree plantings 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 Picnic table construction 3,500 3,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 13,000 - Total general maintenance 41,750 41,750 40,250 40,250 40,250 204,250 Buildings/Shelters/Grounds Antlers-reshingle shelters B&C - 2,500 - - 2,500 Casperson-reshingle building (contractual)- 8,000 - - - 8,000 Casperson-reshingle shelters B&C - 2,500 - - - 2,500 Orchard Lake-reshingle shelter - 1,200 - - 1,200 Meadows rink end-board replacement - 1,200 - - - 1,200 Rolling Oaks-reshingle warming house 1,200 - - - - 1,200 Dakota Heights-reshingle warming house 1,200 - - - - 1,200 Dakota Heights-rubber floor replacement - 2,500 - - 2,500 Meadows-rubber floor replacement - 2,500 - - 2,500 Prairie Lake-replace carpet w/rubber floor 4,000 - - - - 4,000 McGuire-rubber floor replacement - 2,500 - - 2,500 Foxborough-ID sign replacement 4,000 - - - - 4,000 Steve Michaud Park-building window replacement 18,000 - - - - 18,000 Steve Michaud Park-door replacement (3)4,000 - - - - 4,000 Parkview-door replacement (1)1,000 - - - - 1,000 Dakota Heights-trail and door installation - 1,000 - - 1,000 Meadows-trail and door installation - 650 - - 650 Auto bldg door opener/closers(King, Quigley, Antlers)8,500 - - - - 8,500 Drinking fountain replacements (4):4,800 - - - 4,800 Antlers, Steve Michaud, Aronson & Parkview - - - - - - Aronson Field #3 fence improvements (3rd baseline)7,200 - - - - 7,200 Aronson Fields #1 & 3-outfield fence improvements 15,500 - - - - 15,500 Jaycee-fence replacement - 15,000 - - 15,000 Upper 205th Street trail fence 12,500 - - - - 12,500 Ritter-ELC roof replacement (contractual)- - 10,000 - - 10,000 Total buildings/shelters/grounds 81,900 11,700 37,850 - - 131,450 Fields - Field improvements/maintenance 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 32,500 Open Space - Fogseal parking lots 16,575 24,502 31,493 25,543 26,518 124,631 Bench refurbishment 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 12,500 Resurface BB/tennis courts 5,800 25,600 15,000 5,400 - 51,800 Dodd Pointe-overlay BB court - 8,500 - - - 8,500 Jaycee - BB court reconstruction - 20,000 - - - 20,000 Quigley-Sime trail extension - 15,000 - - - 15,000 Total open space 24,875 96,102 48,993 33,443 29,018 232,431 Total Major Maintenance 155,025 156,052 133,593 80,193 75,768 600,631 54 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-2) Project Name: Parks – Administrative Projects Project Number: N/A Project Manager: John Hennen, Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated Start: Various Project Lead: City of Lakeville Project description and location The Park Dedication Fund budget provides appropriations for a number of activities including planning, design and feasibility reports for park projects such as Antlers Park Master Plan, East Community Park Master Plan, Legacy Park, Cedar Crossing Park and Avonlea Development Concept Plan. It also includes appraisal and professional fees for the bi-annual review of park dedication fee analysis for commercial and industrial properties. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total (2017-2021) Revenues Park Dedication Fund - Fees 58,000$ 56,000$ 42,000$ 10,000$ 20,000$ 186,000$ - Expenditures - Park Fees analysis - C/I values 10,000 - 10,000 - 10,000 30,000 East Comm. Park Master Plan - 14,000 - - - 14,000 Antlers Park Master Plan 18,000 - - - - 18,000 Avonlea Master Plan 20,000 - - - - 20,000 Legacy Planning/ Design/ Const. Adm 10,000 30,000 - - - 40,000 Cedar Crossing Planning/ Design/ Cost Adm. - 12,000 32,000 - - 44,000 Future Planning & Design Projects - - - 10,000 10,000 20,000 Total 58,000$ 56,000$ 42,000$ 10,000$ 20,000$ 186,000$ Operations and operating costs impacts No anticipated significant impact on operations or operating cost as a result of completing planning and design work. 55 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-3) Project Name: Park Development – Developer Credits Project Number: N/A Project Manager: John Hennen, Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated Start: Various Project Lead: City of Lakeville Project description and location Developer credits: Represents credits associated with new development when the park dedication requirement is fulfilled through a land dedication. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total (2017-2021) Revenues Park Dedication Fund -360,000$ 360,000$ 360,000$ 360,000$ 360,000$ 1,800,000$ Expenditures Developer Credits 360,000$ 360,000$ 360,000$ 360,000$ 360,000$ 1,800,000$ Operations and operating costs impacts No anticipated significant impact on operations or operating cost at this time. 56 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-4) Project Name: Future Park Land Acquisition Project Number: N/A Project Manager: John Hennen, Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated Start: Various Project Lead: City of Lakeville Project Description and location Park dedication funds would be used to purchase future park land. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 TOTAL 2017-2021 Revenues Park Dedication Funds-Fees 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ Expenditures Land Acquisition 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ Operations and operating costs impacts N/A. 57 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-5) Project Name: Trail Improvement Fund Project Number: TBD Project Manager: John Hennen, Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated Start: Various Project Lead: City of Lakeville Project description and location The City retained the services of WSB Engineering who evaluated the condition of all trail segments and provided recommendations for maintenance. Staff has developed a plan for either overlaying or reclaiming trail segments along with crack filling and fog sealing of trails. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 TOTAL (2017-2021) Revenues Trail Improvement Fund - Taxes 350,284$ 343,640$ 318,522$ 329,259$ 363,859$ 1,705,564$ Expenditures Trail crack and fog sealing 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 350,000$ Dakota Heights Park Trails (reclamation)31,610 31,610$ N side 165th - Ipava to Interlachen (reclaim)57,825 57,825$ Casperson soccer field trail (New)3,000 3,000$ W side Flagstaff Ave - Fontina Path to Dodd Blvd (reclam.)120,377 120,377$ E side Flagstaff - Fontina Path to Dodd (reclaim)125,136 125,136$ N Creek Trail - E from Flagstaff to N Creek MHP (reclam.) 75,507 75,507$ Dodd Trail Park Trails - Flagstaff to Dodd Blvd (reclamation 56,327 56,327$ King park trail extension (New)13,715 13,715$ Aronson Park Trails (reclamation)31,629 31,629$ Cedar Highlands Park Trails (reclamation)50,767 50,767$ Hypointe Park Trails (reclamation)15,726 15,726$ Oak Shores Park Trails (reclamation)59,702 59,702$ Parkview Park Trails (reclamation)21,172 21,172$ Quail Meadows Park Trails (reclamation)17,540 17,540$ N side of 175th - Ipava to Highview 118,271 118,271$ *W side Cedar - 190th to 202nd (reclamation)79,945 79,945$ *N side 160th - Ipava to Interlachen (reclamation)21,495 21,495$ *S side 160th - Ipava to Cedar Ave (overlay)74,033$ 74,033$ Misc. Trails - TBD 175,000$ 175,000$ Engineering costs for reclamation/overlay projects (18%)42,755 41,742 37,916 39,548 44,826 206,787$ Total 350,284$ 343,640$ 318,522$ 329,259$ 363,859$ 1,705,564$ *Budget number is City's cost (45%) - Dakota County to pay 55% Operations and operating costs impacts No anticipated significant impact on operations or operating cost. 58 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-6) Project Name: Park Improvement Fund Project Number: TBD Project Manager: John Hennen, Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated Start: Various Project Lead: City of Lakeville Project description and location The Park Improvement Fund provides funding for replacement and upgrades to items such as Aronson building, Dodd Trail pickleball courts, playgrounds and other park amenities. Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 (2017-2021) Revenues Park Improvement Fund 235,000 190,000 215,000 220,000 255,000 1,115,000 Ex penditures - *Aronson building design/ upgrades 10,000 190,000 - - 200,000 Dodd Trail Pickleball Courts 60,000 60,000 Brackett's Crossing Amenity 55,000 55,000 Orchard Lake Beach Shelter 50,000 50,000 - Playground Replacements - Dodd Trail 82,500 - - - 82,500 Highview Heights 82,500 - - - 82,500 Hypointe Crossing - - 75,000 - 75,000 Cherryview - - 85,000 - 85,000 Independence - - 85,000 - 85,000 Greenridge - - 85,000 - 85,000 Dodd Pointe - - - 85,000 85,000 Bunker Hill - - - 85,000 85,000 Kenmore - - - 85,000 85,000 Total 235,000$ 190,000$ 215,000$ 220,000$ 255,000$ 1,115,000$ *Includes architectural design, construction plans and misc. expenses Operations and operating costs impacts No anticipated significant impact on operations or operating cost. 59 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje The P corrid aside comp purch Revenues Park Ded Expenditu Avonlea P Opera Until would $7,400 is dev it is d ect Name: ect Number: ect Manager: cipated Start: ect Lead: ect descriptio Parks, Trails a dor for comm 59.4 acres at plex. The City hase the remai s ication Fund Total ures Park ations and op the park lan d include rou 0 for labor an veloped into it eveloped for PARK Avonle : n and locatio and Open Sp munity play fi the corner of y owns approx inder of the a 2017 1,500 1,500$ 1,500 perating cost nd is develope ugh cutting th nd equipment ts final use. T agricultural u KS AND R ea Communit TBD John Henne Various City of Lake on ace Plan calls fields. Staff h f future 185th ximately half allocated land 7 2018 0,000 0,000 $ 0,000 ts impacts ed, operation he site appro t. No additio There is the p use for approx RECREA y Play Field en, Parks and eville s for the acqu has been work and Cedar Av f of the land c in order to se 8 2019 -- --$ nal cost for th oximately fou onal operation otential to ren ximately $250 ATION (P Recreation D uisition of lan king with Ma venue for the currently, and ecure a fixed 9 2020 -- --$ he 59.4 acres ur times/year nal cost is ant nt out the lan 0 - $400/year. P-7) Director nd along the attamy Devel e developmen d has until Ju price per acre 2021 -$ after the pu which is esti ticipated unti nd after purch Cedar Avenu lopment to s nt of an athlet une 29, 2020 t e. TOTAL (2017-2021) 1,500,00 1,500,00 -- 1,500,00 urchase of lan imated to co l the park lan hased and unt ue et tic to 0 0 0 nd ost nd til 60 R D T E O Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje The W indivi contr would comp Revenues Park Dedicatio Donation - Bik Total Expenditures Off Road Bike Oper The c but th volun ect Name: ect Number: ect Manager: cipated Start ect Lead: ect Descripti West Lake M iduals the op ractor design d also assist plete the majo on Funds-Fees ke Org. s e Course rations and o construction he majority o nteers. PARK : t: ion and locat Marion Park o pportunity to n and constru with the fu ority of the tr 2017 75,000$ 10,000$ 85,000$ 85,000$ operating co n of the bike of the maint KS AND R West Lake M TBD John Henne Various City of Lake tion off-road bike o ride throug uct the trail. nding of the rail maintena 2018 0 $ 0 0 $ 0 $ osts impacts course will a tenance is pr RECREA Marion Park en, Parks and eville course woul ghout the en An off roa e project, an ance. 2019 -$ -$ -$ s add some wo roposed to be ATION (P k Off-Road Bi d Recreation ld be 2.5 – 3. ntire year. St ad biking org nd have indic 2020 - $ - $ - $ ork load to th e done by a b P-8) ike Course Director .5 miles in le taff is propos ganization a cated there w 0 202 - $ - $ - $ he maintena biking organ ength allowin sing to have and volunteer willingness t 1 TOTA 2017-20 - 75,0$ 10,0$ - 85,0$ - 85,0$ ance division nization and ng a rs to AL 021 000 000 000 000 n d 61 R P E E T E O Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje There Jasmi segm Revenues Park Dedicatio Escrow Funds Tot Expenditures Trail Construct Engineering (2 Tot Operations a The t budg ect Name: ect Number ect Manager cipated Star ect Lead: ect Descript e is an inad ine Avenue ment as a mea on Funds-Fees al tion 0%) al and operatin trail segment get two years PARK 175th S : r: rt: ion and loca dequate trail . Citizens ans of safe pe 2017 92,100 7,900 100,000$ 83,350 16,650 100,000$ ng costs imp t will be add after the tra KS AND R Street Trail – TBD John Henn 2017 City of Lak ation l segment on have conta edestrian tra 2018 0 - 0 - 0 -$ 0 - 0 - 0 -$ pacts ded to the fog ail is constru RECREA Isleton Ave nen, Parks an keville n S side of cted staff r avel to Christ 2019 - - -$ - - -$ g sealing mai cted and eve ATION (P e. to Jasmine nd Recreatio 175th Street egarding th tina Huddle 2020 - - $ - - $ intenance sc ery 3-4 years P-9) e Ave (So. Sid n Director from Isleto he request t eston Elemen 2021 - $ - $ chedule incre s after that p de) on Avenue t o install th ntary School 1 TOT (2017 - 9 - - 10$ - 8 - 1 - 10$ easing the oint. to is l. TAL -2021) 92,100 7,900 00,000 83,350 16,650 00,000 62 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje The P Legac more the pr Revenues Park Dedic Expenditur Park Const Operation Legacy Par items such ect Name: ect Number: ect Manager: cipated Start ect Lead: ect Descripti Parks, Trails cy, Crescent non-traditio revious neigh ation Funds-F res ruction ns and opera rk constructi as turf man PARKS Legacy : t: ion and locat and Open Sp Ridge and B onal amenitie hborhood pa 20 Fees $ $ ating costs im ion will add agement, pa S AND R y Park TBD John Henne 2018 City of Lake tion pace Plan ca Berres Ridge es such as nat rks. 17 20 - 385$ - 385$ mpacts workload to avement man RECREAT en, Parks and eville lls for a neig Developmen tural play fea 18 20 5,000 $ 5,000 $ o the mainten nagement, pl TION (P- d Recreation ghborhood pa nts. The pa atures versus 019 202 - $ - $ nance divisio layground m -10) Director ark in the ar ark is propos what has be 20 202 - $ - $ on which wi maintenance rea serving th sed to includ en installed i 1 TOT (2017-2 - 38$ - 38$ ill include , etc. he de in TAL 2021) 85,000 85,000 63 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Projec Impro lot and and ov Baseba Revenues Park Dedic Miracle Le LBA Light Expenditur King Park: Irrigate Drainag Lighting Opera Planne staff t freque for 25 remov ect Name: ect Number ect Manager cipated Star ect Lead: ct description ovements to Ki d trail lighting verall quality o all Association cation Fund - Fe eague / ting Donation Total res : four fields ge system g (Design & Co Total ations and op ed improveme time required ency. The purc years. The in ve standing wat PARKS King P : r: rt: and location ng Park includ g, and installati of the fields an n (LBA) has and ees $ onst.) $ perating cost ents to King Pa for turf mana chase and insta nstallation of t ter from fields S AND R Park Improv TBD John Henn Various City of Lak de installation o ion of drain ti nd will allow f d will continue 2017 - 1$ - 1$ ts impacts ark will add w agement inclu allation of the l he drain tile sy after rain even RECREAT ements nen, Parks an keville of irrigation sy ile system. Th for additional e to donate fun 2018 857,325 150,000 1,007,325 $ 212,000 160,000 635,325 1,007,325 $ workload to the ding servicing lighting system ystem will red nts. TION (P- nd Recreatio ystems on four he project will games to be p nds for the light 2019 617,550 150,000 767,550 $ - 205,000 562,550 767,550 $ e maintenance g irrigation sy m will include a duce the staff t -11) n Director fields along wi increase the p played at the fa ting project. 2020 -$ $ -$ $ e division regar ystem and incr a 100% Mainte ime that has b ith field, parkin layability, safe facility. Lakevil 2021 T (20 - 1,4 - 3 -$ 1$ - - - -$ 1$ rding addition reasing mowin enance Free Pla been required t ng ty lle TOTAL 017-2021) 474,875 0 00,000 1,774,875 212,000 365,000 1,197,875 1,774,875 nal ng an to 64 Proje Proje Proje Antic Proje Proje The P Ceda Coun Revenues Park Dedicat Expenditure Park Constru Oper work pavem ect Name: ect Number ect Manager cipated Star ect Lead: ect Descript Parks, Trails ar Crossing, C ntry Lane To tion Funds-Fe es uction rations and o kload to the m ment manag PAR Cedar : r: rt: ion and loca , and Open S Cedar Landi ownhomes. T 20 es $ operating co maintenance gement, play RKS & RE Crossing Pa TBD John Henn Various City of Lak ation Space Plan c ing, and Lind The park wil 17 20 - $ osts impacts e division wh ground main ECREATI ark nen, Parks an keville calls for a nei den Ridge ne ll be approxi 018 20 - 38$ 38$ s: Cedar Cro hich will incl ntenance, et ION (P-1 nd Recreatio ighborhood eighborhood imately 6-7 a 019 20 85,000 85,000 ossing Park c lude items su tc. 2) n Director park in the ds along with acres in size 020 2 $ $ construction uch as turf m area serving h the . 021 T (20 - $ - $ n will add management g TOTAL 17-2021) 385,000 385,000 t, 65 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-13) Project Name: Steve Michaud Soccer #8 and #9 Drain Tile Installation Project Number: TBD Project Manager: John Hennen, Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated Start: 2020 Project Lead: City of Lakeville Project Description and location Improvements to Steve Michaud Park include the installation of drain tile system in soccer fields 8 and 9. The project will increase the playability, safety and overall quality of the fields. At this time the fields are prone to becoming saturated and unplayable during periods of continued or heavy rains. These conditions have forced the closure of the fields during tournaments and regularly scheduled games. In addition the increase in soil moisture has had a negative impact on the turf conditions and an increase in turf stress. The installation of a sport field drain tile system will minimize or eliminate these negative conditions and allow for consistent field conditions and playability. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 TOTAL (2017-2021) Revenues Park Dedication Funds-Fees -$ - $ -$ 96,000$ -$ 96,000$ Expenditures Drain Tile Installation -$ Fields #8 and #9 96,000$ -$ 96,000$ Operations and operating costs impacts No impact on operations or operating costs. 66 PARKS AND RECREATION (P-14) Project Name: Skate Park Project Number: TBD Project Manager: John Hennen, Parks and Recreation Director Anticipated Start: Various Project Lead: City of Lakeville Project Description and location Residents have contacted staff over the years regarding the construction of a skate park amenity. The skate park would provide an opportunity for individuals to participate in skate boarding and in-line skating activities at a designated facility. The site for the skate park will be determined at a later date after additional research on the facility has been completed. 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 TOTAL 2017-2021 Revenues Park Dedication Funds-Fees 175,000$ 175,000$ Expenditures Skate Park 175,000$ 175,000$ Operations and operating costs impacts The skate park would add some work load to the maintenance division which will require the upkeep and maintenance of the structure once it is constructed. 67 C I T Y O F L A K E V I L L E Council Meeting 2016.11.21 2 0 1 7 - 2 0 2 6 F A C I L I T Y P L A N 20 1 5 C F + 2017 - 2026 20 1 6 2 0 1 6 E s t ' d 2 0 1 7 2 0 1 8 2 0 1 9 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 5 2 0 2 6 T o t a l s Us e o f F u n d s : Ar t C e n t e r 2 1 6 , 1 5 0 $ 4 9 , 3 5 6 $ 2 9 1 , 7 9 2 $ 1 2 5 , 6 7 5 $ 3 5 , 8 0 0 $ - $ - $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 3 , 7 5 0 $ - $ 2 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 717,017 $ Ce n t r a l M a i n t e n a n c e F a c il i t y 10 2 , 3 0 0 8 4 , 2 6 3 1 0 0 , 7 0 0 2 4 7 , 5 0 0 6 , 5 7 3 , 8 0 0 - 3 6 , 0 0 0 - 9 7 , 0 0 0 - 7 5 , 0 0 0 - 7,130,000 Ci t y H a l l 3 3 9 , 4 5 0 3 2 9 , 6 5 4 1 9 0 , 0 0 0 2 4 2 , 0 0 0 2 4 2 , 0 0 0 1 9 5 , 0 0 0 - 2 , 5 0 0 - - 1, 5 0 0 135,000 1,008,000 Fi r e S t a t i o n # 1 4 2 , 5 5 0 21 , 8 3 7 - - - 31 , 0 0 0 27 , 0 0 0 - 23 , 5 0 0 - - 6,000 87,500 Fi r e S t a t i o n # 2 1 6 , 1 0 0 15 , 1 4 7 10 , 9 0 0 10 , 0 0 0 - 10 , 0 0 0 - - - - 25 , 9 0 0 12,000 68,800 Fi r e S t a t i o n # 3 1 3 , 0 0 0 12 , 4 5 0 - 6, 8 5 0 - - - 11 , 0 0 0 5, 0 0 0 - 20 , 0 0 0 - 42,850 Fi r e S t a t i o n # 4 1 1 , 4 0 0 11 , 3 1 6 18 , 3 0 0 23 , 5 0 0 11 5 , 0 0 0 52 , 5 0 0 - - - - - 5,500 214,800 He r i ta g e C e n t e r 8 0 , 8 0 0 51 , 7 8 8 14 , 0 0 0 65 , 0 0 0 48 , 5 0 0 96 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - 223,500 Ga l a x i e L i q u o r S t o r e 11 , 4 7 5 12 , 0 7 5 15 , 0 0 0 - 5, 0 0 0 - 65 , 0 0 0 - 60 , 0 0 0 - - - 145,000 Ke n r i c k L i q u o r S t o r e 64 , 5 0 0 64 , 5 0 0 18 5 , 0 0 0 7, 3 0 0 4, 5 0 0 - - - - - - - 196,800 Po l i c e S t a t i o n 1 9 , 0 5 0 19 , 2 3 7 41 , 5 0 0 59 , 0 0 0 85 , 0 0 0 13 , 0 0 0 60 , 0 0 0 - - - - 75,000 333,500 Pu b l i c W o r k s S t o r a g e F a c il i t y - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ra d i o C o m m u n i c a t i o n s B u i l d i n g - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wa t e r T r e a t m e n t B a r n - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wa t e r T re a t m e n t F a c i l i t y 38 , 5 7 5 38 , 5 7 5 28 , 5 0 0 - 40 , 0 0 0 - 27 , 2 0 0 32 , 0 0 0 - 11 , 0 0 0 - - 138,700 To t a l U s e o f F u n d s 9 5 5 , 3 5 0 $ 71 0 , 1 9 8 $ 89 5 , 6 9 2 $ 78 6 , 8 2 5 $ 7, 1 4 9 , 6 0 0 $ 39 7 , 5 0 0 $ 21 5 , 2 0 0 $ 55 , 5 0 0 $ 19 9 , 2 5 0 $ 11 , 0 0 0 $ 34 2 , 4 0 0 $ 253,500 $ 10,306,467 $ So u r c e o f F u n d s : In t e r e s t E a r n i n g s ( 2 % ) - $ - $ 15 , 0 9 2 $ 9, 0 5 0 $ 1, 6 4 0 $ 67 1 $ 1, 7 3 5 $ 8, 3 0 9 $ 17 , 0 0 5 $ 23 , 5 6 0 $ 33 , 0 3 2 $ 35,844 $ 145,938 $ An n u a l L e v y ( B u i l d i n g F u n d ) 5 1 , 0 0 0 51 , 0 0 0 15 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 65 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 45 0 , 0 0 0 450,000 4,350,000 Ge n e r a l F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n - - - - - - - - - - - - - Li q u o r F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n - - - - - - - - - - - - - Un e n c u m b e r e d 2 0 1 6 G F - - 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - 200,000 Co m m un i c a t i o n s F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 15 0 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - Li q u o r F u n d 75 , 9 7 5 76 , 5 7 5 20 0 , 0 0 0 7, 3 0 0 9, 5 0 0 - 65 , 0 0 0 - 60 , 0 0 0 - - - 341,800 Wa t e r F u n d 38 , 5 7 5 38 , 5 7 5 28 , 5 0 0 - 40 , 0 0 0 - 27 , 2 0 0 32 , 0 0 0 - 11 , 0 0 0 - - 138,700 D o n a t i o n s / F u n d r a i s i n g - - - - - - - - - - - - - En e r g y R e b a t e s - 1, 5 7 5 - - - - - - - - - - - Bo n d P r o c e e d s - - - - 6 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - - 6,400,000 Ot h e r 6 5 0 , 0 0 0 65 0 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - To t a l S ou r c e o f F u n d s 9 6 5 , 5 5 0 $ 96 7 , 7 2 5 $ 59 3 , 5 9 2 $ 41 6 , 3 5 0 $ 7, 1 0 1 , 1 4 0 $ 45 0 , 6 7 1 $ 54 3 , 9 3 5 $ 49 0 , 3 0 9 $ 52 7 , 0 0 5 $ 48 4 , 5 6 0 $ 48 3 , 0 3 2 $ 485,844 $ 11,576,438 $ Ch a n g e i n F u n d B a l a n c e 10 , 2 0 0 $ 25 7 , 5 2 7 $ (3 0 2 , 1 0 0 ) $ (3 7 0 , 4 7 5 ) $ (4 8 , 4 6 0 ) $ 53 , 1 7 1 $ 32 8 , 7 3 5 $ 43 4 , 8 0 9 $ 32 7 , 7 5 5 $ 47 3 , 5 6 0 $ 14 0 , 6 3 2 $ 232,344 $ 1,269,971 $ Be g i n n i n g F u n d B a l a n c e 57 3 , 8 2 7 $ 49 7 , 0 6 2 $ 75 4 , 5 8 9 $ 45 2 , 4 8 9 $ 82 , 0 1 4 $ 33 , 5 5 4 $ 86 , 7 2 5 $ 41 5 , 4 6 0 $ 85 0 , 2 6 9 $ 1, 1 7 8 , 0 2 4 $ 1, 6 5 1 , 5 8 4 $ 1,792,216 $ En d i n g F u n d B a l a n c e 58 4 , 0 2 7 $ 75 4 , 5 8 9 $ 45 2 , 4 8 9 $ 82 , 0 1 4 $ 33 , 5 5 4 $ 86 , 7 2 5 $ 41 5 , 4 6 0 $ 85 0 , 2 6 9 $ 1, 1 7 8 , 0 2 4 $ 1, 6 5 1 , 5 8 4 $ 1, 7 9 2 , 2 1 6 $ 2,024,560 $ G: \ C I P \ 2 0 1 6  (2 0 1 7 ‐20 2 1 ) \ F a c il i t i e s  Pl a n  20 1 7 ‐20 2 6  ‐   Pr e l i m i n a r y  20 1 6 . 1 1 . 2 1  : Pl a n  Su m m a r y 11/18/2016 68 C I T Y O F L A K E V I L L E Council Meeting 2016.11.21 2 0 1 7 - 2 0 2 6 E Q U I P M E N T P L A N 20 1 6 2 0 1 5 C F + 2017 - 2026 (a s a m e n d e d ) 20 1 6 E s t ' d 2 0 1 7 2 0 1 8 2 0 1 9 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 4 2 0 2 5 2 0 2 6 T o t a l s Us e o f F u n d s : El e c t i o n s 3 0 , 3 2 2 $ 29 , 6 8 5 $ 29 , 6 8 5 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 29,685 $ In f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m s 2 4 0 , 0 8 2 25 3 , 0 9 6 46 0 , 0 0 0 34 6 , 5 0 4 32 5 , 1 3 0 21 1 , 5 5 1 10 9 , 6 5 7 48 9 , 5 5 2 36 0 , 3 8 2 40 9 , 2 1 7 260,960 447,249 3,420,202 Fa c i l i t i e s - - - - - - - 30 , 1 7 9 - - - - 30,179 In s p e c t i o n s - - - - - 22 , 4 6 0 22 , 4 6 0 22 , 4 6 0 22 , 4 6 0 - - - 89,840 Po l i c e 5 2 8 , 0 2 6 47 3 , 9 0 6 24 1 , 9 3 3 1, 3 0 6 , 2 1 6 58 4 , 2 6 0 55 2 , 0 1 4 48 1 , 8 8 7 77 1 , 3 1 0 49 5 , 0 1 5 48 5 , 9 8 1 708,090 514,933 6,141,639 Fi r e 1 , 1 5 1 , 9 2 6 1, 1 5 1 , 3 9 9 31 0 , 8 4 3 32 2 , 0 0 0 57 5 , 0 0 0 57 5 , 0 0 0 49 4 , 0 0 0 20 , 0 0 0 16 , 0 0 0 64 0 , 0 0 0 - 590,000 3,542,843 En g i n e e r i n g - - - - - - - - - 36 , 4 8 1 30,059 - 66,540 Pu b l i c W o r k s - - - - - - - - 37 , 5 2 8 30 , 0 5 9 32,804 32,804 133,195 St r e e t s 1 , 9 5 5 , 4 3 8 1, 9 2 6 , 9 7 9 81 6 , 8 3 1 1, 2 3 2 , 1 4 7 1, 2 1 7 , 5 3 5 35 2 , 5 9 3 36 6 , 8 3 1 33 4 , 7 1 5 1, 2 8 1 , 6 3 1 1, 4 2 2 , 0 1 0 791,044 574,856 8,390,193 Pa r k s 3 3 6 , 1 2 0 32 8 , 6 2 5 26 2 , 5 0 5 63 8 , 3 4 9 31 5 , 5 7 3 23 8 , 6 5 0 20 4 , 0 5 0 25 4 , 1 0 0 17 6 , 8 5 0 40 8 , 6 2 0 789,700 340,175 3,628,572 To t a l U s e o f F u n d s 4 , 2 4 1 , 9 1 4 $ 4, 1 6 3 , 6 9 0 $ 2, 1 2 1 , 7 9 7 $ 3, 8 4 5 , 2 1 6 $ 3, 0 1 7 , 4 9 8 $ 1, 9 5 2 , 2 6 8 $ 1, 6 7 8 , 8 8 5 $ 1, 9 2 2 , 3 1 6 $ 2, 3 8 9 , 8 6 6 $ 3, 4 3 2 , 3 6 8 $ 2,612,657 $ 2,500,017 $ 25,472,888 $ So u r c e o f F u n d s : In t e r e s t E a r n i n g s ( 2 % ) 5 9 , 3 4 7 $ 59 , 3 4 7 $ 33 , 5 7 8 $ 24 , 7 8 9 $ 6, 8 0 0 $ 5, 8 0 6 $ 18 , 4 4 6 $ 25 , 8 0 7 $ 27 , 9 9 6 $ 21 , 8 7 9 $ (1,211)$ (6,368)$ 157,522 $ An n u a l L e v y 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 25 0 , 0 0 0 35 0 , 0 0 0 55 0 , 0 0 0 85 0 , 0 0 0 1, 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1, 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 1, 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 1, 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 1, 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 1,600,000 1,600,000 11,250,000 Ge n e r a l F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n 5 0 , 0 0 0 55 0 , 0 0 0 25 0 , 0 0 0 - - 22 , 4 6 0 22 , 4 6 0 - - - - - 294,920 Li q u o r F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 - 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 40 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 00 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 50 0 , 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 4,150,000 Co m m u n i c a t i o n s F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - Pa v e m e n t M g m t F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 10 0 , 0 0 0 85 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - 185,000 En v i r o n m e n t a l R e s F u n d C o n t r i b u t i o n 3 1 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31 , 0 0 0 31,000 - 279,000 Au c t i o n / S a l e P r o c e e d s 2 5 0 , 1 7 5 32 2 , 1 5 2 20 7 , 7 2 8 22 5 , 0 0 0 22 5 , 0 0 0 22 5 , 0 0 0 22 5 , 0 0 0 22 5 , 0 0 0 22 5 , 0 0 0 22 5 , 0 0 0 225,000 225,000 2,232,728 D o n a t i o n s - - 15 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - 15,000 Bo n d P r o c e e d s - - 6 9 5 , 0 0 0 1, 7 8 0 , 0 0 0 1, 4 5 5 , 0 0 0 80 0 , 0 0 0 - - - - - - 4,730,000 To t a l S o u r c e o f F u n d s 1 , 3 4 0 , 5 2 2 $ 1, 9 1 2 , 4 9 9 $ 1, 6 8 2 , 3 0 6 $ 2, 9 4 5 , 7 8 9 $ 2, 9 6 7 , 8 0 0 $ 2, 5 8 4 , 2 6 6 $ 2, 0 4 6 , 9 0 6 $ 2, 0 3 1 , 80 7 $ 2, 0 8 3 , 9 9 6 $ 2, 2 7 7 , 8 7 9 $ 2,354,789 $ 2,318,632 $ 23,294,170 $ Ch a n g e i n F u n d B a l a n c e (2 , 9 0 1 , 3 9 2 ) $ (2 , 2 5 1 , 1 9 1 ) $ (4 3 9 , 4 9 1 ) $ (8 9 9 , 4 2 7 ) $ (4 9 , 6 9 8 ) $ 63 1 , 9 9 8 $ 36 8 , 0 2 1 $ 10 9 , 4 9 1 $ (3 0 5 , 8 7 0 ) $ (1 , 1 5 4 , 4 8 9 ) $ (257,868)$ (181,385)$ (2,178,718)$ Be g i n n i n g F u n d B a l a n c e 2, 9 6 7 , 3 3 2 $ 3, 9 3 0 , 1 1 3 $ 1, 6 7 8 , 9 2 2 $ 1, 2 3 9 , 4 3 1 $ 34 0 , 0 0 4 $ 29 0 , 3 0 6 $ 92 2 , 3 0 4 $ 1, 2 9 0 , 3 2 5 $ 1, 3 9 9 , 8 1 6 $ 1, 0 9 3 , 9 4 6 $ (60,543)$ (318,411)$ En d i n g F u n d B a l a n c e 65 , 9 4 0 $ 1, 6 7 8 , 9 2 2 $ 1, 2 3 9 , 4 3 1 $ 34 0 , 0 0 4 $ 29 0 , 3 0 6 $ 92 2 , 3 0 4 $ 1, 2 9 0 , 3 2 5 $ 1, 3 9 9 , 8 1 6 $ 1, 0 9 3 , 9 4 6 $ (6 0 , 5 4 3 ) $ (318,411)$ (499,796)$ *V e h i c l e s a n d m a j o r e q u i p m e n t p u r c h a s e s Do e s n o t i n c l u d e v e h i c l e s f o r : En v i r o n m e n t a l R e s o u r c e s , U t i l i t y F u n d s G: \ C I P \ 2 0 1 6  (2 0 1 7 ‐20 2 1 ) \ E q u i p m e n t  Pl a n  20 1 7 ‐20 2 6  ‐   Pr e l i m i n a r y  20 1 6 . 1 1 . 2 1  : Pl a n  Su m m a r y 11/18/2016 69 C I T Y O F L A K E V I L L E Co u n c i l M e e t i n g 2 0 1 6 . 1 1 . 2 1 S T R E E T R E C O N S T R U C T I O N P L A N 20 1 7 20 1 8 20 1 9 20 2 0 20 2 1 Total Co l l e c t o r R o a d R e c o n s t r u c t i o n : Ke n r i c k A v e : N . C i t y L i m i t - 1 7 3 r d - $ 2, 9 6 2 , 6 1 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,962,610 $ Ho l y o k e A v e : 2 1 5 t h - H e r i t a g e D r 1, 3 9 2 , 6 1 4 - - - - 1,392,614 Ho l y o k e A v e / 2 1 0 t h I n t e r s e c t i o n 81 , 0 0 0 - - - - 81,000 Ip a v a A v e ; 1 8 5 t h - K e n w o o d T r - 1, 4 3 2 , 9 2 2 - - - 1,432,922 Ha m b u r g A v e n u e : 2 0 2 n d - L a k e v i l l e B l v d - 1, 1 1 6 , 6 0 7 - - - 1,116,607 17 2 n d S t . K e n y o n A v e - K o d i a k A v e - - 70 1 , 7 3 1 - - 701,731 Kl a m a t h T r L S . C R 5 - N . C R 5 - - 1 , 5 3 4 , 1 0 3 - - 1,534,103 Ko d i a k / 1 7 5 t h S t r e e t - - 79 6 , 5 2 5 - - 796,525 Ju d i c i a l / 1 6 8 t h S t r e e t - - 74 4 , 0 4 4 - - 744,044 He r i t a g e D r / I b e r i a A v e - - 46 2 , 9 8 3 - - 462,983 Hi g h v i e w A v e : C R 4 6 - 1 7 5 t h - - - 90 5 , 2 7 4 - 905,274 Ke n y o n A v e n u e ( C R 6 0 t o Q u e e n A n n e ) - - - 1 , 2 3 8 , 6 5 2 - 1,238,652 17 0 t h S t r e e t ( F l a g s t a f f t o P K R & a t E a g l e v i e w ) - - - - 1 , 5 3 8 , 9 2 0 1,538,920 St r e e t R e c o n s t r u c t i o n ( T a x P o r t i o n ) 4, 8 8 1 , 6 2 0 4, 6 3 5 , 4 5 0 3, 7 0 3 , 5 3 8 3, 8 7 9 , 2 6 0 3, 3 9 7 , 3 0 9 20,497,177 6, 3 5 5 , 2 3 4 $ 10 , 1 4 7 , 5 8 9 $ 7, 94 2 , 92 4 $ 6, 0 2 3 , 1 8 6 $ 4, 9 3 6 , 2 2 9 $ 35,405,162 $ 70 CITY OF LAKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES November 3, 2016 Chair Swenson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The pledge of allegiance to the flag was given. Members Present: Chair Jason Swenson, Vice Chair Brooks Lillehei, Karl Drotning, Scott Einck, Elizabeth Bakewicz, Jason Kelvie, Paul Reuvers, Ex-officio member Nic Stevens Members Absent: Pat Kaluza Others Present: Daryl Morey, Planning Director, Frank Dempsey, Associate Planner; Zach Johnson, City Engineer; and Penny Brevig, Recording Secretary 3. Approval of the Meeting Minutes The October 6, 2016 Planning Commission meeting minutes were approved as presented. 4. Announcements Mr. Morey stated that if there are no items tabled at tonight’s meeting, the November 17th Planning Commission meeting will be cancelled. Mr. Morey asked the Planning Commission to respond to an e-mail that the Planning Commission Secretary will be sending out regarding their availability if the December 1st Planning Commission meeting were to be rescheduled to December 8th. 5. City of Lakeville City Engineer Zach Johnson presented the draft 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Mr. Johnson reviewed the objectives of the CIP and indicated that the CIP includes future transportation, utilities, parks and recreation, facilities and equipment improvements for the years 2017-2021. Mr. Johnson commented that the items included in the CIP are mainly due to increased growth and maintaining our existing infrastructure. Mr. Johnson stated that the draft CIP was presented to the City Council at their July 25th work session. The 2017-2021 CIP will be considered for approval at the November 21st City Council meeting. He highlighted the more significant projects included in the CIP. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, November 3, 2016 Page 2 Mr. Johnson stated that staff has reviewed the 2017-2021 CIP and finds it to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and therefore recommends approval as presented. Chair Swenson thanked Mr. Johnson for his presentation and asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Discussion points included: • Commissioner Kelvie asked if there will be any utility work done in conjunction with the downtown reconstruction project. Mr. Johnson indicated that the majority of the downtown utilities were reconstructed in 1994. No new utilities are scheduled to be installed with this CIP. There will be some road rehabilitation and complete replacement of the sidewalks. • Chair Swenson commented that he feels the CIP is an exciting document. Several of the projects in the CIP are addressing issues that the public has raised at public hearings for new development projects. • Mr. Johnson stated that the City continuously examines new technologies and safety ideas concerning public street construction. The City is continually updating our construction standards so that public improvements are a good investment for our residents. • Commissioner Drotning explained that most public streets are built and paid for by developers with new development projects. Motion was made by Drotning, seconded by Kelvie to recommend to City Council adoption of the 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Plan as presented, finding that it is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Ayes: Kelvie, Einck, Lillehei, Swenson, Reuvers, Bakewicz, Drotning Nays: 0 6. Northern Natural Gas Company Chair Swenson opened the public hearing to consider the application of Northern Natural Gas Company for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a utility building at an existing natural gas substation, located at the northeast corner of 215th Street and Kenrick Avenue. Tony Stucchi from Northern Natural Gas (NNG) presented a short overview of the request. He indicated that the proposed building would house a regulator system. Associate Planner Frank Dempsey presented the planning report. Mr. Dempsey stated that NNG is proposing to construct a utility shed relating to the natural gas transmission use of the property. There is no record of any previous CUPs being approved for the development of this substation site. A CUP was approved in 2015 to allow installation of additional transmission line equipment from this location to the west City limits. Mr. Dempsey reviewed the non-conformities that must be identified and eliminated when a CUP is requested, including the area of 215th Street right-of-way adjacent to Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, November 3, 2016 Page 3 the NNG property that will need to be restored to grass consistent with the adjacent Kenrick Avenue ditch section, and the paving of the unpaved driveway access that leads into the substation property. Planning Department staff recommends approval of the NNG CUP, subject to the 3 stipulations listed in the October 27, 2016 planning report and approval of the Findings of Fact dated November 3, 2016. Chair Swenson opened the hearing to the public for comment. There were no comments from the audience. Motion was made by Kelvie, seconded by Reuvers to close the public hearing at 6:22 p.m. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes – unanimous Chair Swenson commented that NNG provides a public service to our community and he does not see any issues with the proposed CUP request. He appreciates their willingness to restore the grass boulevard along 215th Street. Motion was made by Lillehei, seconded by Kelvie to recommend to City Council approval of the Northern Natural Gas Company Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a utility building at an existing natural gas substation, located at the northeast corner of 215th Street and Kenrick Avenue, subject to the following stipulations and approval of the Findings of Fact dated November 3, 2016: 1. A building permit from the City of Lakeville is required prior to construction of the accessory utility building. 2. The area of 215th Street right-of-way identified on Exhibit D shall be restored to a grass surface consistent with the grass surface in the Kenrick Avenue east ditch section. The area of turf planting shall begin at a point measured 33 feet north of the centerline of 215th Street up to the Northern Natural Gas south property line between the grass ditch section on Kenrick Avenue and the east property line. A cash security in the amount of $3,000 shall be submitted with the building permit application to guarantee completion by June 30, 2017 3. The gravel driveway for the Northern Natural Gas substation shall be paved from the edge of 215th Street to the south property line when 215th Street is paved. Ayes: Einck, Lillehei, Swenson, Reuvers, Bakewicz, Drotning, Kelvie Nays: 0 There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:24 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Penny Brevig, Recording Secretary