Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 09 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 763.231.5840 TPC@PlanningCo.com 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Daryl Morey FROM: D. Daniel Licht, AICP DATE: 11 July 2018 RE: Lakeville – Zoning Ordinance; Dynamic display sign height TPC FILE: 135.01 BACKGROUND Lakeville adopted amendments to the City Code and Zoning Ordinance in 2012 making allowance for dynamic display signs with electronic changeable copy or graphic display within the C-2 and C-3 Districts. The provisions allowing for dynamic display signs established construction standards that include a height limitation of the sign structure of 15 feet. The developer of a pending multiple tenant retail building has raised issue with the height limitation as it limits the ability to have a freestanding sign that incorporates a dynamic display together with fixed displays identifying individual tenants. Exhibits:  Draft ordinance  Examples of multiple tenant sign with dynamic display element ANALYSIS The intent of the location and construction standards adopted within the Zoning Ordinance for dynamic display signs within the C-2 and C-3 Districts are to place the dynamic display sign within a freestanding sign close to the street to maximize visibility from passing vehicle traffic, minimize driver distraction, and avoid compatibility impacts to adjacent properties. The 15 foot height limit for the freestanding sign is integral to this approach. However, the 15 foot height limit applies to the total height of the freestanding sign structure including static signs. Within the C-2 and C-3 Districts, freestanding sign structures without a 2 dynamic display element are allowed to be constructed to a height of 20 feet. And for those properties within the Freeway Corridor District adjacent to I-35, the total height of the freestanding sign structure is allowed to be up to 30 feet (with additional flexibility for signs located on grades below the elevation of I-35). The effect of the height limit required when a freestanding sign structure includes a dynamic display limits the ability to utilize the sign to identify the tenants of a multiple tenant building using static signs. City staff has drafted an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to modify the height limits required when the freestanding sign includes a dynamic display to respond to this issue. The proposed amendment would allow for the freestanding sign structure to be constructed to the height allowed within the zoning district. A dynamic display incorporated within the allowed area of the freestanding sign would be limited to a height of not more than 15 feet. The proposed amendment allows a property the same freestanding sign area and height regardless if the sign includes a dynamic display. Furthermore, this amendment maintains consistency with the original intent of the dynamic display construction regulations while allowing greater flexibility in the use of the allowed area for a freestanding sign. CONCLUSION A public hearing has been noticed for the Planning Commission meeting on 19 July 2018 to consider the proposed amendment modifying the construction standards for dynamic display signs. City staff recommends approval of the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment as presented. c. Justin Miller, City Administrator Allyn Kuennen, Assistant City Administrator Andrea McDowell-Poehler, City Attorney 1 ORDINANCE NO.________ CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKEVILLE CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 11-23-15.T.2.c(2)(c) of the Lakeville Zoning Ordinance (Signs – Changeable Copy) is hereby amended to read as follows: (c) The total height of the sign structure including the base electronic changeable copy or graphic display within the sign structure shall not exceed fifteen feet (15'). Section 2. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this ___ day of ______, 2018. CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: _______________________ Douglas P. Anderson, Mayor ATTEST BY: ________________________ Charlene Friedges, City Clerk