HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 06.c
Date: December 2, 2019 Item No.
ADOPTION OF THE LAKEVILLE WATER SUPPLY PLAN
Proposed Action
Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to adopt the Lakeville Water Supply
Plan.
Overview
Public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people, large private water suppliers in designated
Groundwater Management Areas, and all water suppliers in the Twin Cities metropolitan area are
required to prepare and submit a water supply plan for approval to the Department of Natural
Resources. Water supply plans are updated every 10 years.
The goal of the water supply plan is to help water suppliers prepare for droughts and water
emergencies and fulfill contingency plan provisions contained in the wellhead protection and
surface water protection plans. A key benefit to completion of the plan is to allow water suppliers
to submit requests for new wells or expand capacity in existing wells.
Implementation of the plan contributes to maintaining aquifer levels, reducing potential well
interference and water use conflicts, and reducing the need to drill new wells or expand system
capability prematurely. The plan was submitted to DNR in December 2016, returned with
comments in June 2019, and approved in November 2019.
Primary Issues to Consider
• Why do we complete a water supply plan? First, it is required by state statute. Beyond that, it
is a planning tool used by both the City and DNR to evaluate usage and demand trends and
plan for future needs based on population growth. It facilitates a review by the City of
emergency procedures in case of a water shortage and it focuses the City on methods to
encourage more efficient use of this finite resource. The water supply plan is the basis for the
Comprehensive Water Plan included in the City’s comprehensive plan.
Supporting Information
• A copy of the water supply plan and a certificate of adoption of the water supply plan are
attached.
Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: Source:
Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.):
Envision Lakeville Community Values: Access to a multitude of natural amenities
Report Completed by: Neil Normandin, Public Works and Facilities Coordinator
9/6/17
CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION
WATER SUPPLY PLAN
City or Water System Name: City of Lakeville, Minnesota
Name of Person Authorized to Sign
Certificate on Behalf of the System:
Douglas P. Anderson
Title: Mayor
Address: 20195 Holyoke Avenue, Lakeville MN 55044
Telephone: 952-985-4403
E-mail: danderson@lakevillemn.gov
I certify that the Water Supply Plan approved by the Department of Natural Resources has been
adopted by the city council or utility board that has authority over water supply services.
Signed: Date:
Douglas P. Anderson, Mayor
Attest:
Charlene Friedges, City Clerk
Submit Certificate of Adoption through MPARS
Or mail this certificate to: DNR Waters
Water Permit Program Supervisor
500 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, MN 55155-4032
Lakeville Water Supply Plan December 19, 2016
For more information on this Water Supply Plan Template, please contact the DNR Division of Ecological
and Water Resources at (651) 259-5034 or (651) 259-5100.
Copyright 2015 State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources
Template information is available in an alternative format upon request.
Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex,
marital status, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, disability or activity on behalf of a local
human rights commission. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette
Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior,
Washington, DC 20240.
i
Table of contents
INTRODUCTION TO WATER SUPPLY PLANS (WSP) ............................................................. 1
Who needs to complete a Water Supply Plan .......................................................................................... 1
Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA) ............................................................................................. 1
Benefits of completing a WSP ................................................................................................................... 1
WSP Approval Process .............................................................................................................................. 2
PART 1. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION ................................ 4
A. Analysis of Water Demand................................................................................................................ 4
B. Treatment and Storage Capacity ...................................................................................................... 6
Treatment and storage capacity versus demand ................................................................. 7
C. Water Sources ................................................................................................................................... 7
Limits on Emergency Interconnections ................................................................................ 8
D. Future Demand Projections – Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark .............................................. 8
Water Use Trends ............................................................................................................... 8
Projection Method ............................................................................................................... 9
E. Resource Sustainability ................................................................................................................... 10
Monitoring – Key DNR Benchmark ....................................................................................10
Water Level Data ...............................................................................................................13
Potential Water Supply Issues & Natural Resource Impacts – Key DNR & Metropolitan
Council Benchmark ............................................................................................................15
Wellhead Protection (WHP) and Surface Water Protection (SWP) Plans ...........................18
F. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) ...................................................................................................... 18
Adequacy of Water Supply System ....................................................................................18
Proposed Future Water Sources ........................................................................................19
Water Source Alternatives - Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark ....................................19
Part 2. Emergency Preparedness Procedures ..........................................................................21
A. Federal Emergency Response Plan ................................................................................................. 21
B. Operational Contingency Plan ........................................................................................................ 21
ii
C. Emergency Response Procedures ................................................................................................... 21
Emergency Telephone List ................................................................................................22
Current Water Sources and Service Area ..........................................................................22
Procedure for Augmenting Water Supplies ........................................................................22
Allocation and Demand Reduction Procedures ..................................................................23
Notification Procedures ......................................................................................................25
Enforcement ......................................................................................................................26
PART 3. WATER CONSERVATION PLAN ...............................................................................27
Progress since 2006 ................................................................................................................................ 27
A. Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions ................................................................. 28
B. Conservation Objectives and Strategies – Key benchmark for DNR ............................................... 29
Objective 1: Reduce Unaccounted (Non-Revenue) Water loss to Less than 10% ..............29
Objective 2: Achieve Less than 75 Residential Gallons per Capita Demand (GPCD) .........31
Objective 3: Achieve at least a 1.5% per year water reduction for Institutional, Industrial,
Commercial, and Agricultural GPCD over the next 10 years or a 15% reduction in ten
years. .................................................................................................................................32
Objective 4: Achieve a Decreasing Trend in Total Per Capita Demand ..............................33
Objective 5: Reduce Peak Day Demand so that the Ratio of Average Maximum day to the
Average Day is less than 2.6..............................................................................................34
Objective 6: Implement a Conservation Water Rate Structure and/or a Uniform Rate
Structure with a Water Conservation Program ...................................................................34
Objective 7: Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use and Support Wellhead Protection
Planning .............................................................................................................................36
Objective 8: Tracking Success: How will you track or measure success through the next ten
years? ................................................................................................................................37
A. Regulation ....................................................................................................................................... 37
B. Retrofitting Programs ..................................................................................................................... 38
Retrofitting Programs .........................................................................................................38
C. Education and Information Programs ............................................................................................. 39
Proposed Education Programs ..........................................................................................39
iii
Part 4. ITEMS FOR METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNITIES .................................................43
A. Water Demand Projections through 2040 ...................................................................................... 43
B. Potential Water Supply Issues ........................................................................................................ 43
C. Proposed Alternative Approaches to Meet Extended Water Demand Projections ....................... 43
D. Value-Added Water Supply Planning Efforts (Optional) ................................................................. 44
Source Water Protection Strategies ...................................................................................44
Technical assistance ..........................................................................................................44
GLOSSARY ..............................................................................................................................45
Acronyms and Initialisms ........................................................................................................................ 47
APPENDICES ...........................................................................................................................49
Appendix 1: Well Records and Maintenance Summaries ...................................................................... 50
Appendix 2: Water Level Monitoring Plan ............................................................................................. 51
Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan .................................................................................................. 53
Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List ................................................................................................. 56
Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services............................................................. 59
Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Ordinance .................................................................. 60
Appendix 8: Annual Per Capita Demand 2005 - 2015 ............................................................................. 63
Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure ......................................................................................................... 65
Appendix 10: Adopted or Proposed Regulations to Reduce Demand or Improve Water Efficiency ...... 67
Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist ................................................................................................ 68
1
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES – DIVISION OF ECOLOGICAL AND WATER RESOURCES AND METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
INTRODUCTION TO WATER SUPPLY PLANS (WSP)
Who needs to complete a Water Supply Plan
Public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people, large private water suppliers in designated
Groundwater Management Areas, and all water suppliers in the Twin Cities metropolitan area are
required to prepare and submit a water supply plan.
The goal of the WSP is to help water suppliers: 1) implement long term water sustainability and
conservation measures; and 2) develop critical emergency preparedness measures. Your community
needs to know what measures will be implemented in case of a water crisis. A lot of emergencies can be
avoided or mitigated if long term sustainability measures are implemented.
Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA)
The DNR has designated three areas of the state as Groundwater Management Areas (GWMAs) to focus
groundwater management efforts in specific geographies where there is an added risk of overuse or
water quality degradation. A plan directing the DNRs actions within each GWMA has been prepared.
Although there are no specific additional requirements with respect to the water supply planning for
communities within designated GWMAs, communities should be aware of the issues and actions
planned if they are within the boundary of one of the GWMAs. The three GWMAs are the North and
East Metro GWMA (Twin Cities Metro), the Bonanza Valley GWMA and the Straight River GWMA (near
Park Rapids). Additional information and maps are included in the DNR webpage at
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/gwmp/areas.html
Benefits of completing a WSP
Completing a WSP using this template, fulfills a water supplier’s statutory obligations under M.S.
M.S.103G.291 to complete a water supply plan. For water suppliers in the metropolitan area, the WSP
will help local governmental units to fulfill their requirements under M.S. 473.859 to complete a local
comprehensive plan. Additional benefits of completing WSP template:
• The standardized format allows for quicker and easier review and approval.
• Help water suppliers prepare for droughts and water emergencies.
• Create eligibility for funding requests to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) for the
Drinking Water Revolving Fund.
• Allow water suppliers to submit requests for new wells or expanded capacity of existing wells.
• Simplify the development of county comprehensive water plans and watershed plans.
• Fulfill the contingency plan provisions required in the MDH wellhead protection and surface
water protection plans.
• Fulfill the demand reduction requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.291 subd 3
and 4.
2
• Upon implementation, contribute to maintaining aquifer levels, reducing potential well
interference and water use conflicts, and reducing the need to drill new wells or expand
system capacity.
• Enable DNR to compile and analyze water use and conservation data to help guide decisions.
• Conserve Minnesota’s water resources
If your community needs assistance completing the Water Supply Plan, assistance is available from your
area hydrologist or groundwater specialist, the MN Rural Waters Association circuit rider program, or in
the metropolitan area from Metropolitan Council staff. Many private consultants are also available.
WSP Approval Process
10 Basic Steps for completing a 10-Year Water Supply Plan
1. Download the DNR/Metropolitan Council Water Supply Plan Template
www.mndnr.gov/watersupplyplans
2. Save the document with a file name with this naming convention:
WSP_cityname_permitnumber_date.doc.
3. The template is a form that should be completed electronically.
4. Compile the required water use data (Part 1) and emergency procedures information (Part 2)
5. The Water Conservation section (Part 3) may need discussion with the water department,
council, or planning commission, if your community does not already have an active water
conservation program.
6. Communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area should complete all the
information discussed in Part 4. The Metropolitan Council has additional guidance information
on their webpage http://www.metrocouncil.org/Handbook/Plan-Elements/Water-
Resources/Water-Supply.aspx. All out-state water suppliers do not need to complete the
content addressed in Part 4.
7. Use the Plan instructions and Checklist document to insure all data is complete and attachments
are included. This will allow for a quicker approval process. www.mndnr.gov/watersupplyplans
8. Plans should be submitted electronically – no paper documents are required.
https://webapps11.dnr.state.mn.us/mpars/public/authentication/login
9. DNR hydrologist will review plans (in cooperation with Metropolitan Council in Metro area) and
approve the plan or make recommendations.
10. Once approved, communities should complete a Certification of Adoption form, and send a copy
to the DNR.
3
Complete Table 1 with information about the public water supply system covered by this WSP.
Table 1. General information regarding this WSP
Requested Information Description
DNR Water Appropriation Permit Number(s) 1980-6107
Ownership ☒ Public or ☐ Private
Metropolitan Council Area ☒ Yes or ☐ No (and county name)
Street Address 20195 Holyoke Avenue
City, State, Zip Lakeville, Minnesota 55044
Contact Person Name Paul Oehme
Title Public Works Director
Phone Number 952-985-2701
MDH Supplier Classification Municipal
4
PART 1. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION
The first step in any water supply analysis is to assess the current status of demand and availability.
Information summarized in Part 1 can be used to develop Emergency Preparedness Procedures (Part 2)
and the Water Conservation Plan (Part 3). This data is also needed to track progress for water efficiency
measures.
A. Analysis of Water Demand
Complete Table 2 showing the past 10 years of water demand data.
• Some of this information may be in your Wellhead Protection Plan.
• If you do not have this information, do your best, call your engineer for assistance or if
necessary leave blank.
If your customer categories are different than the ones listed in Table 2, please describe the differences
below:
5
Table 2. Historic water demand (see definitions in the glossary after Part 4 of this template)
Year Pop
Served
Total
Connections
Residential
Water
Delivered
(MG)
C/I/I
Water
Delivered
(MG)
Water
Used for
Non-
Essential
(MG)
Wholesale
Deliveries
(MG)
Water
Supplier
Services
(MG)
Total Water
Delivered
(MG)
Total Water
Pumped
(MG)
Percent
Unmetered/
Unaccounted
Average
Daily
Demand
(MGD)
Max Daily
Demand
(MGD)
Date of
Max
Demand
Residential
Per Capita
Demand
(GPCD)
Total Per
Capita
Demand
(GPCD)
2005 51,472 15,633 1,620 255 - - - 1,875 2,059 9%5.46 17.82 7/16/2005 86.23 109.60
2006 53,693 16,625 1,875 301 - - 4 2,180 2,354 7%6.38 18.57 7/13/2006 95.67 120.11
2007 52,835 16,870 2,096 279 4 - 4 2,383 2,554 7%6.92 19.91 8/3/2007 108.69 132.44
2008 54,731 17,029 2,034 282 15 - 3 2,334 2,441 4%6.65 17.40 7/2/2008 101.82 122.19
2009 54,731 17,175 1,952 276 13 - 6 2,247 2,387 6%6.53 16.49 6/5/2009 97.71 119.49
2010 55,772 17,339 1,688 254 10 - 20 1,972 2,093 6%5.71 12.35 8/29/2010 82.92 102.82
2011 55,954 17,458 1,822 274 12 - 23 2,131 2,242 5%6.12 15.18 9/11/2011 89.21 109.78
2012 56,534 17,665 2,116 312 12 - 28 2,468 2,558 4%6.99 18.87 7/17/2012 102.54 123.96
2013 57,048 18,043 1,877 284 15 - 18 2,194 2,299 5%6.28 17.06 8/27/2013 90.14 110.41
2014 57,715 17,405 1,740 273 12 - 28 2,053 2,189 6%5.98 16.53 8/15/2014 82.60 103.91
2015 58,592 18,802 1,637 261 19 - 35 1,952 2,168 10%5.92 15.11 8/15/2015 76.55 101.37
Avg. 2010 -
2015 17,785 1,813 276 13 - 25 2,128 2,258 6%6.17 15.85 87.33 108.71
MG – Million Gallons MGD – Million Gallons per Day GPCD – Gallons per Capita per Day
See Glossary for definitions
6
Complete Table 3 by listing the top 10 water users by volume, from largest to smallest. For each user,
include information about the category of use (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, or
wholesale), the amount of water used in gallons per year, the percent of total water delivered, and the
status of water conservation measures.
Table 3. Large volume users
Customer Use Category
(Residential,
Industrial,
Commercial,
Institutional,
Wholesale)
Amount
Used
(Gallons per
Year)
Percent of
Total
Annual
Water
Delivered
Implementing
Water
Conservation
Measures?
(Yes/No/
Unknown)
1. COUNTRYVIEW MOBILE HOME
COMMUNITY
RESIDENTIAL 23,436,000 1.0 YES
2. LIFETIME FITNESS COMMERCIAL 11,665,000 0.6 YES
3. CONAGRA FOODS INDUSTRIAL 8,925,000 0.4 UNKNOWN
4. ARDMOOR VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL 8,206,000 0.4 YES
5. NORTH CREEK MOBILE HOME COURT RESIDENTIAL 8,190,000 0.4 YES
6. NATIONAL POLYMERS INDUSTRIAL 5,470,000 0.3 UNKNOWN
7. LAKEVILLE HOTEL GROUP LLC COMMERCIAL 5,390,000 0.3 YES
8. MILLS FLEET FARM CAR WASH COMMERCIAL 5,309,000 0.3 UNKNOWN
9. CLOVERLEAF COLD STORAGE CO INDUSTRIAL 5,195,000 0.3 UNKNOWN
10. MENASHA PACKAGING LAKEVILLE PLANT INDUSTRIAL 4,354,000 0.2 UNKNOWN
B. Treatment and Storage Capacity
Complete Table 4 with a description of where water is treated, the year treatment facilities were
constructed, water treatment capacity, the treatment methods (i.e. chemical addition, reverse osmosis,
coagulation, sedimentation, etc.) and treatment types used (i.e. fluoridation, softening, chlorination,
Fe/MN removal, coagulation, etc.). Also describe the annual amount and method of disposal of
treatment residuals. Add rows to the table as needed.
Table 4. Water treatment capacity and treatment processes
Treatment
Site ID
(Plant
Name or
Well ID)
Year
Constructed
Treatment
Capacity
(MGPD)
Treatment
Method
Treatment
Type
Annual
Amount of
Residuals
Disposal
Process
for
Residuals
Do You
Reclaim
Filter
Backwash
Water?
Lakeville
Water
Treatment
Facility
1998 26.5 Coagulation Fe/MN
Removal
Trace Sanitary
Sewer
Yes
Total NA NA NA NA
7
Complete Table 5 with information about storage structures. Describe the type (i.e. elevated, ground,
etc.), the storage capacity of each type of structure, the year each structure was constructed, and the
primary material for each structure. Add rows to the table as needed.
Table 5. Storage capacity, as of the end of the last calendar year
Structure Name Type of Storage
Structure
Year Constructed Primary
Material
Storage Capacity
(Gallons)
1. WTF Clearwell Ground 1998/2001/2015 Concrete 4,100,000
2. Airlake Hydropillar 1968 Steel 500,000
3. Fairfield Hydropillar 1984 Steel 750,000
4. Dakota Heights Standpipe 1974 Steel 2,000,000
5. Michaud Park Spheroid 1995 Steel 1,000,000
6. Valley Park/CMF Composite 2006 Concrete/Steel 1,500,000
7. Holyoke Composite 2016 Concrete/Steel 2,000,000
Total 11,850,000
Treatment and storage capacity versus demand
It is recommended that total storage equal or exceed the average daily demand.
Discuss the difference between current storage and treatment capacity versus the water supplier’s
projected average water demand over the next 10 years (see Table 7 for projected water demand):
Based on expected population growth, Lakeville has sufficient storage and treatment capacity to meet expected
average daily demand.
C. Water Sources
Complete Table 6 by listing all types of water sources that supply water to the system, including
groundwater, surface water, interconnections with other water suppliers, or others. Provide the name
of each source (aquifer name, river or lake name, name of interconnecting water supplier) and the
Minnesota unique well number or intake ID, as appropriate. Report the year the source was installed or
established and the current capacity. Provide information about the depth of all wells. Describe the
status of the source (active, inactive, emergency only, retail/wholesale interconnection) and if the
source facilities have a dedicated emergency power source. Add rows to the table as needed for each
installation.
Include copies of well records and maintenance summary for each well that has occurred since your last
approved plan in Appendix 1.
8
Table 6. Water sources and status
Resource Type
(Groundwater,
Surface water,
Interconnection)
Resource Name MN Unique
Well # or
Intake ID
Year
Installed
Capacity
(Gallons
per
Minute)
Well
Depth
(Feet)
Status of Normal
and Emergency
Operations (active,
inactive,
emergency only,
retail/wholesale
interconnection))
Does this Source
have a Dedicated
Emergency Power
Source? (Yes or
No)
Groundwater PDC-J 207708 1964 1100 574 Active No
Groundwater PDC-J 207727 1968 1300 460 Emergency Only No
Groundwater PDC-J 212650 1969 1250 505 Active No
Groundwater PDC-J 161409 1981 1250 581 Active No
Groundwater PDC-J 161439 1984 1400 479 Inactive No
Groundwater PDC-J 433296 1990 1200 605 Active No
Groundwater PDC-J 554192 1995 1200 524 Active No
Groundwater PDC-J 554193 1995 600/1600 616 Active Yes
Groundwater PDC-J 554215 1996 1200 637 Active No
Groundwater PDC-J 562991 1997 1500 585 Active No
Groundwater PDC-J 596650 1999 1500 611 Active No
Groundwater PDC-J 603073 2001 1500 600 Active Yes
Groundwater PDC-J 651737 2001 1500 517 Active No
Groundwater PDC-J 655907 2003 1000 570 Active No
Groundwater PDC-J 694913 2004 1400 607 Active No
Groundwater TC-W 745558 2007 500 864 Active Yes
Groundwater PDC-J 686288 2009 1250 545 Active Yes
Groundwater PDC-J 813743 2016 1500 Active No
Limits on Emergency Interconnections
Discuss any limitations on the use of the water sources (e.g. not to be operated simultaneously,
limitations due to blending, aquifer recovery issues etc.) and the use of interconnections, including
capacity limits or timing constraints (i.e. only 200 gallons per minute are available from the City of Prior
Lake, and it is estimated to take 6 hours to establish the emergency connection). If there are no
limitations, list none.
Well 18 (745558) is limited to 500 GPM due to flow within aquifer.
Use of interconnections with Burnsville, Apple Valley, and Farmington are limited by water pressure. Apple Valley
and Farmington can only feed a portion of the low-pressure system in Lakeville. Burnsville can only feed the high
pressure system but requires that Lakeville lower its tower levels 8 to 11 feet.
D. Future Demand Projections – Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark
Water Use Trends
Use the data in Table 2 to describe trends in 1) population served; 2) total per capita water demand; 3)
average daily demand; 4) maximum daily demand. Then explain the causes for upward or downward
trends. For example, over the ten years has the average daily demand trended up or down? Why is this
occurring?
Lakeville continues to be a growing community. Population has expanded by more the 8,300 people in the last 10
years and, based on housing starts, will continue to grow at that pace for the foreseeable future. Currently,
Lakeville population is at about 70 percent of the total population projected by the Metropolitan Council.
9
In spite of this continuing growth, all other indicators are either trending down or remaining flat based on data for
the last ten years. Key among those indicators are total water delivered, total water pumped, and average daily
demand which have all remained flat and residential and total per capita use with both show a downward trend.
Weather factors have played a role in Lakeville’s water consumption. Drier, hotter years have seen increases in
pumping totals and per capita consumption tied primarily to residential irrigation systems. The City’s odd/even
and time of day watering restriction have minimized the impact of those increases on the water system and have
led, after several years of customer education to a general decline in those consumption rates. However, the
return of a hot and dry year could well reverse, in the short term, existing downward trends.
Use the water use trend information discussed above to complete Table 7 with projected annual
demand for the next ten years. Communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area must
also include projections for 2030 and 2040 as part of their local comprehensive planning.
Projected demand should be consistent with trends evident in the historical data in Table 2, as discussed
above. Projected demand should also reflect state demographer population projections and/or other
planning projections.
Table 7. Projected annual water demand
Year Projected Total
Population
Projected
Population
Served
Projected Total
Per Capita Water
Demand (GPCD)
Projected Daily
Average
Demand (MGD)
Projected
Maximum Daily
Demand (MGD)
2016 59,786 58,586 109 6,385,874 15,964,685
2017 61,938 60,738 109 6,620,442 16,551,105
2018 63,748 62,548 109 6,817,732 17,044,330
2019 64,385 63,185 109 6,887,217 20,661,652
2020 65,222 64,022 109 6,978,452 20,935,355
2021 66,070 64,870 109 7,070,872 21,212,615
2022 66,929 65,729 109 7,164,494 21,493,481
2023 67,799 66,799 109 7,281,132 21,843,397
2024 68,681 67,681 109 7,377,204 22,131,612
2025 69,450 68,450 109 7,461,050 22,383,149
2030 74,600 73,800 109 8,044,169 24,132,506
2040 83,500 82,900 109 9,036,122 27,108,367
GPCD – Gallons per Capita per Day MGD – Million Gallons per Day
Projection Method
Describe the method used to project water demand, including assumptions for population and business
growth and how water conservation and efficiency programs affect projected water demand:
The demand projections are based on an assumed average total per capita demand of 109 gallons per capita per
day which is an average of the prior 10 years. A 10 average was used as better depicting impacts of weather and
10
population growth. Shorter term averages are more susceptible to extremes in weather. The maximum day
demand is projected using a peaking factor of 2.5 which is the average of the previous 5 years. The projected
demand rates represent an average to high water use year for the projected population and likely a summer with
lower rainfall and higher temperatures.
E. Resource Sustainability
Monitoring – Key DNR Benchmark
Complete Table 8 by inserting information about source water quality and quantity monitoring efforts.
List should include all production wells, observation wells, and source water intakes or reservoirs. Add
rows to the table as needed. Find information on groundwater level monitoring program at:
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/groundwater_section/obwell/index.html
Table 8. Information about source water quality and quantity monitoring
MN Unique Well # or
Surface Water ID
Type of monitoring
point
Monitoring program Frequency of
monitoring
Monitoring Method
Well 2
207708
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 3
207727
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 4
212650
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 6
161409
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 7
161439
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
11
MN Unique Well # or
Surface Water ID
Type of monitoring
point
Monitoring program Frequency of
monitoring
Monitoring Method
Well 8
433296
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 9
554192
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 10
554193
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 11
554215
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 12
562991
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 13
596650
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 14
603073
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 15
651737
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
12
MN Unique Well # or
Surface Water ID
Type of monitoring
point
Monitoring program Frequency of
monitoring
Monitoring Method
reservoir ☐ annually
Well 16
655907
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 17
694913
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 18
745558
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 19
686288
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well 20
813743
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☒ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Monitoring Well 1
686711
☐ production well
☒ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☐ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☐ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Monitoring Well 2
686713
☐ production well
☒ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☐ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☐ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Monitoring Well 3
686712
☐ production well
☒ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☐ monthly
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☐ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
13
MN Unique Well # or
Surface Water ID
Type of monitoring
point
Monitoring program Frequency of
monitoring
Monitoring Method
☐ source water
reservoir
☐ other ☐ quarterly
☐ annually
Monitoring Well 4
518801
☐ production well
☒ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☒ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☒ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☐ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☐ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Water Level Data
A water level monitoring plan that includes monitoring locations and a schedule for water level readings
must be submitted as Appendix 2. If one does not already exist, it needs to be prepared and submitted
with the WSP. Ideally, all production and observation wells are monitored at least monthly.
Complete Table 9 to summarize water level data for each well being monitored. Provide the name of the
aquifer and a brief description of how much water levels vary over the season (the difference between
the highest and lowest water levels measured during the year) and the long-term trends for each well. If
water levels are not measured and recorded on a routine basis, then provide the static water level when
each well was constructed and the most recent water level measured during the same season the well
was constructed. Also include all water level data taken during any well and pump maintenance. Add
rows to the table as needed.
Provide water level data graphs for each well in Appendix 3 for the life of the well, or for as many years
as water levels have been measured. See DNR website for Date Time Water Level
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/groundwater_section/obwell/waterleveldata.html
Table 9. Water level data
Unique Well
Number or Well ID
Aquifer Name Seasonal Variation
(Feet)
Long-term Trend in
water level data
Water level
measured during
well/pumping
maintenance
Well 2
207708
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 36.2
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 3
207727
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 2.6
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 4
212650
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 23.6
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 6
161409
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 51.4
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 7
161439
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 14.6 ☐ Falling
☒ Stable
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
14
Unique Well
Number or Well ID
Aquifer Name Seasonal Variation
(Feet)
Long-term Trend in
water level data
Water level
measured during
well/pumping
maintenance
☐ Rising MM/DD/YY:____
Well 8
433296
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 29.1
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 9
554192
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 28.0
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 10
554193
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 26.7
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 11
554215
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 43.0
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 12
562991
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 27.3
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 13
596650
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 33.5
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 14
603073
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 32.6
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 15
651737
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 21.3
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 16
655907
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 27.3
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 17
694913
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 32.5
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 18
745558
Tunnel City/
Wonewoc 34.0
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 19
686288
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 6.2
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well 20
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 15.5
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Monitoring Well 1
686711
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 26.2
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Monitoring Well 2
686713
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 44.9 ☐ Falling
☒ Stable
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
15
Unique Well
Number or Well ID
Aquifer Name Seasonal Variation
(Feet)
Long-term Trend in
water level data
Water level
measured during
well/pumping
maintenance
☐ Rising MM/DD/YY:____
Monitoring Well 3
686712
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 22.7
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Monitoring Well 4
518801
Prairie du Chien/
Jordan 10.6
☐ Falling
☒ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Potential Water Supply Issues & Natural Resource Impacts – Key DNR & Metropolitan Council
Benchmark
Complete Table 10 by listing the types of natural resources that are or could be impacted by permitted
water withdrawals. If known, provide the name of specific resources that may be impacted. Identify
what the greatest risks to the resource are and how the risks are being assessed. Identify any resource
protection thresholds – formal or informal – that have been established to identify when actions should
be taken to mitigate impacts. Provide information about the potential mitigation actions that may be
taken, if a resource protection threshold is crossed. Add additional rows to the table as needed. See
glossary at the end of the template for definitions.
Some of this baseline data should have been in your earlier water supply plans or county comprehensive
water plans. When filling out this table, think of what are the water supply risks, identify the resources,
determine the threshold and then determine what your community will do to mitigate the impacts.
Your DNR area hydrologist is available to assist with this table.
For communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area, the Master Water Supply Plan
Appendix 1 (Water Supply Profiles, provides information about potential water supply issues and natural
resource impacts for your community.
Table 10. Natural resource impacts
Resource Type Resource
Name
Risk Risk Assessed
Through
Describe
Resource
Protection
Threshold*
Mitigation
Measure or
Management
Plan
Describe
How
Changes to
Thresholds
are
Monitored
☐ River or
stream
☐ Flow/water
level decline
☐ Degrading
water quality
trends and/or
MCLs exceeded
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened, or
☐ GIS analysis
☐ Modeling
☐ Mapping
☐ Monitoring
☐ Aquifer
testing
☐ Other: ___
☐ Revise
permit
☐ Change
groundwater
pumping
☐ Increase
conservation
☐ Other
16
Resource Type Resource
Name
Risk Risk Assessed
Through
Describe
Resource
Protection
Threshold*
Mitigation
Measure or
Management
Plan
Describe
How
Changes to
Thresholds
are
Monitored
special concern
species habitat
or other natural
resource
impacts
☐ Other: _____
☐ Calcareous
fen
☐ Flow/water
level decline
☐ Degrading
water quality
trends and/or
MCLs exceeded
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened, or
special concern
species habitat
or other natural
resource
impacts
☐ Other: _____
☐ GIS analysis
☐ Modeling
☐ Mapping
☐ Monitoring
☐ Aquifer
testing
☐ Other: ___
☐ Revise
permit
☐ Change
groundwater
pumping
☐ Increase
conservation
☐ Other
☒ Lake Lake
Marion/
Orchard
Lake
☒ Flow/water
level decline
☐ Degrading
water quality
trends and/or
MCLs exceeded
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened, or
special concern
species habitat
or other natural
resource
impacts
☐ Other: _____
☐ GIS analysis
☐ Modeling
☐ Mapping
☒ Monitoring
☐ Aquifer
testing
☐ Other: ___
Reduction in
lake water
level.
Significant
reduction in
outflow.
☐ Revise
permit
☒ Change
groundwater
pumping
☒ Increase
conservation
☐ Other
Visual
☐ Wetland ☐ Flow/water
level decline
☐ Degrading
water quality
trends and/or
MCLs exceeded
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened, or
special concern
☐ GIS analysis
☐ Modeling
☐ Mapping
☐ Monitoring
☐ Aquifer
testing
☐ Other: ___
☐ Revise
permit
☐ Change
groundwater
pumping
☐ Increase
conservation
☐ Other
17
Resource Type Resource
Name
Risk Risk Assessed
Through
Describe
Resource
Protection
Threshold*
Mitigation
Measure or
Management
Plan
Describe
How
Changes to
Thresholds
are
Monitored
species habitat
or other natural
resource
impacts
☐ Other: _____
☒ Trout
stream
South
Creek
☒ Flow/water
level decline
☐ Degrading
water quality
trends and/or
MCLs exceeded
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened, or
special concern
species habitat
or other natural
resource
impacts
☐ Other: _____
☐ GIS analysis
☐ Modeling
☐ Mapping
☒ Monitoring
☐ Aquifer
testing
☐ Other: ___
Noticeable
reduction in
flow.
☐ Revise
permit
☒ Change
groundwater
pumping
☐ Increase
conservation
☐ Other
Visual
☒ Aquifer Prairie
du
Chien/
Jordan
☒ Flow/water
level decline
☐ Degrading
water quality
trends and/or
MCLs exceeded
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened, or
special concern
species habitat
or other natural
resource
impacts
☐ Other: _____
☐ GIS analysis
☐ Modeling
☐ Mapping
☒ Monitoring
☐ Aquifer
testing
☐ Other: ___
Significant
declines in
pumping levels
during peak
use.
Slow recharge
rates.
☐ Revise
permit
☒ Change
groundwater
pumping
☒ Increase
conservation
☐ Other
SCADA
Steel tape
☐
Endangered,
threatened, or
special
concern
species
habitat, other
natural
resource
impacts
☐ Flow/water
level decline
☐ Degrading
water quality
trends and/or
MCLs exceeded
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened, or
special concern
species habitat
☐ GIS analysis
☐ Modeling
☐ Mapping
☐ Monitoring
☐ Aquifer
testing
☐ Other: ___
☐ Revise
permit
☐ Change
groundwater
pumping
☐ Increase
conservation
☐ Other
18
Resource Type Resource
Name
Risk Risk Assessed
Through
Describe
Resource
Protection
Threshold*
Mitigation
Measure or
Management
Plan
Describe
How
Changes to
Thresholds
are
Monitored
or other natural
resource
impacts
☐ Other: _____
* Examples of thresholds: a lower limit on acceptable flow in a river or stream; water quality outside of an accepted range; a
lower limit on acceptable aquifer level decline at one or more monitoring wells; withdrawals that exceed some percent of the
total amount available from a source; or a lower limit on acceptable changes to a protected habitat.
Wellhead Protection (WHP) and Surface Water Protection (SWP) Plans
Complete Table 11 to provide status information about WHP and SWP plans.
The emergency procedures in this plan are intended to comply with the contingency plan provisions
required in the Minnesota Department of Health’s (MDH) Wellhead Protection (WHP) Plan and Surface
Water Protection (SWP) Plan.
Table 11. Status of Wellhead Protection and Surface Water Protection Plans
Plan Type Status Date Adopted Date for Update
WHP ☐ In Process
☒ Completed
☐ Not Applicable
August 4, 2014 August, 2024
SWP ☐ In Process
☐ Completed
☐ Not Applicable
F. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Please note that any wells that received approval under a ten-year permit, but that were not built, are
now expired and must submit a water appropriations permit.
Adequacy of Water Supply System
Complete Table 12 with information about the adequacy of wells and/or intakes, storage facilities,
treatment facilities, and distribution systems to sustain current and projected demands. List planned
capital improvements for any system components, in chronological order. Communities in the seven-
county Twin Cities metropolitan area should also include information about plans through 2040.
The assessment can be the general status by category; it is not necessary to identify every single well,
storage facility, treatment facility, lift station, and mile of pipe.
Please attach your latest Capital Improvement Plan as Appendix 4.
Table 12. Adequacy of Water Supply System
19
System Component Planned action Anticipated
Construction
Year
Notes
Wells/Intakes ☐ No action planned - adequate
☐ Repair/replacement
☒ Expansion/addition
2017
2024
2028
Well 21 and 22
Well 23
Well 24 and 25
Water Storage Facilities
☒ No action planned - adequate
☐ Repair/replacement
☐ Expansion/addition
Water Treatment Facilities ☐ No action planned - adequate
☐ Repair/replacement
☒ Expansion/addition
2027 Treatment
Facility
Expansion
Distribution Systems
(pipes, valves, etc.)
☐ No action planned - adequate
☐ Repair/replacement
☒ Expansion/addition
As required
by growth.
Pressure Zones ☒ No action planned - adequate
☐ Repair/replacement
☐ Expansion/addition
Other: ☐ No action planned - adequate
☐ Repair/replacement
☐ Expansion/addition
Proposed Future Water Sources
Complete Table 13 to identify new water source installation planned over the next ten years. Add rows
to the table as needed.
Table 13. Proposed future installations/sources
Source Installation
Location
(approximate)
Resource
Name
Proposed
Pumping
Capacity (gpm)
Planned
Installation Year
Planned
Partnerships
Groundwater Lakeville PDC-J/TC-W 1200/TBD 2017, 2024, 2028
Surface Water
Interconnection
to another
supplier
Water Source Alternatives - Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark
Do you anticipate the need for alternative water sources in the next 10 years? Yes ☐ No ☒
For metro communities, will you need alternative water sources by the year 2040? Yes ☐ No ☒
If you answered yes for either question, then complete table 14. If no, insert NA.
20
Complete Table 14 by checking the box next to alternative approaches that your community is
considering, including approximate locations (if known), the estimated amount of future demand that
could be met through the approach, the estimated timeframe to implement the approach, potential
partnerships, and the major benefits and challenges of the approach. Add rows to the table as needed.
For communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area, these alternatives should include
approaches the community is considering to meet projected 2040 water demand.
Table 14. Alternative water sources
Alternative Source
Considered
Source and/or
Installation
Location
(approximate)
Estimated
Amount of
Future
Demand (%)
Timeframe
to
Implement
(YYYY)
Potential
Partners
Benefits Challenges
☐ Groundwater NA
☐ Surface Water NA
☐ Reclaimed stormwater NA
☐ Reclaimed wastewater NA
☐ Interconnection to
another supplier
NA
21
Part 2. Emergency Preparedness Procedures
The emergency preparedness procedures outlined in this plan are intended to comply with the
contingency plan provisions required by MDH in the WHP and SWP. Water emergencies can occur as a
result of vandalism, sabotage, accidental contamination, mechanical problems, power failings, drought,
flooding, and other natural disasters. The purpose of emergency planning is to develop emergency
response procedures and to identify actions needed to improve emergency preparedness. In the case of
a municipality, these procedures should be in support of, and part of, an all-hazard emergency
operations plan. Municipalities that already have written procedures dealing with water emergencies
should review the following information and update existing procedures to address these water supply
protection measures.
A. Federal Emergency Response Plan
Section 1433(b) of the Safe Drinking Water Act, (Public Law 107-188, Title IV- Drinking Water Security
and Safety) requires community water suppliers serving over 3,300 people to prepare an Emergency
Response Plan.
Do you have a federal emergency response plan? Yes ☒ No ☐
If yes, what was the date it was certified? September 7, 2011
Complete Table 15 by inserting the noted information regarding your completed Federal Emergency
Response Plan.
Table 15. Emergency Preparedness Plan contact information
Emergency Response Plan Role Contact Person Contact Phone Number Contact Email
Emergency Response Lead Shane Quade 952-985-2741 squade@lakevillemn.gov
Alternate Emergency Response Lead Steve Grossman 952-985-2742 sgrossman@lakevillemn.gov
B. Operational Contingency Plan
All utilities should have a written operational contingency plan that describes measures to be taken for
water supply mainline breaks and other common system failures as well as routine maintenance.
Do you have a written operational contingency plan? Yes ☐ No ☒
At a minimum, a water supplier should prepare and maintain an emergency contact list of contractors
and suppliers.
C. Emergency Response Procedures
Water suppliers must meet the requirements of MN Rules 4720.5280 . Accordingly, the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) requires public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people
to submit Emergency and Conservation Plans. Water emergency and conservation plans that have been
approved by the DNR, under provisions of Minnesota Statute 186 and Minnesota Rules, part 6115.0770,
will be considered equivalent to an approved WHP contingency plan.
22
Emergency Telephone List
Prepare and attach a list of emergency contacts, including the MN Duty Officer (1-800-422-0798), as
Appendix 5. A template is available at www.mndnr.gov/watersupplyplans
The list should include key utility and community personnel, contacts in adjacent water suppliers, and
appropriate local, state and federal emergency contacts. Please be sure to verify and update the
contacts on the emergency telephone list and date it. Thereafter, update on a regular basis (once a year
is recommended). In the case of a municipality, this information should be contained in a notification
and warning standard operating procedure maintained by the Emergency Manager for that community.
Responsibilities and services for each contact should be defined.
Current Water Sources and Service Area
Quick access to concise and detailed information on water sources, water treatment, and the
distribution system may be needed in an emergency. System operation and maintenance records should
be maintained in secured central and back-up locations so that the records are accessible for emergency
purposes. A detailed map of the system showing the treatment plants, water sources, storage facilities,
supply lines, interconnections, and other information that would be useful in an emergency should also
be readily available. It is critical that public water supplier representatives and emergency response
personnel communicate about the response procedures and be able to easily obtain this kind of
information both in electronic and hard copy formats (in case of a power outage).
Do records and maps exist? Yes ☒ No ☐
Can staff access records and maps from a central secured location in the event of an emergency?
Yes ☒ No ☐
Does the appropriate staff know where the materials are located?
Yes ☒ No ☐
Procedure for Augmenting Water Supplies
Complete Tables 16 – 17 by listing all available sources of water that can be used to augment or replace
existing sources in an emergency. Add rows to the tables as needed.
In the case of a municipality, this information should be contained in a notification and warning
standard operating procedure maintained by the warning point for that community. Municipalities are
encouraged to execute cooperative agreements for potential emergency water services and copies
should be included in Appendix 6. Outstate Communities may consider using nearby high capacity wells
(industry, golf course) as emergency water sources.
WSP should include information on any physical or chemical problems that may limit interconnections
to other sources of water. Approvals from the MDH are required for interconnections or the reuse of
water.
23
Table 16. Interconnections with other water supply systems to supply water in an emergency
Other Water Supply
System Owner
Capacity (GPM
& MGD)
Note Any Limitations
On Use
List of services, equipment, supplies
available to respond
CITY OF BURNSVILLE 3 MGD System elevation limits
capacity
CITY OF FARMNGTON 1 MGD System elevation limits
capacity and supply area
CITY OF APPLE VALLEY 1 MGD System elevation limits
capacity and supply area
GPM – Gallons per minute MGD – million gallons per day
Table 17. Utilizing surface water as an alternative source
Surface Water
Source Name
Capacity
(GPM)
Capacity
(MGD)
Treatment Needs Note Any Limitations
On Use
If not covered above, describe additional emergency measures for providing water (obtaining bottled
water, or steps to obtain National Guard services, etc.)
Allocation and Demand Reduction Procedures
Complete Table 18 by adding information about how decisions will be made to allocate water and
reduce demand during an emergency. Provide information for each customer category, including its
priority ranking, average day demand, and demand reduction potential for each customer category.
Modify the customer categories as needed, and add additional lines if necessary.
Water use categories should be prioritized in a way that is consistent with Minnesota Statutes 103G.261
(#1 is highest priority) as follows:
1. Water use for human needs such as cooking, cleaning, drinking, washing and waste disposal; use
for on-farm livestock watering; and use for power production that meets contingency
requirements.
2. Water use involving consumption of less than 10,000 gallons per day (usually from private wells
or surface water intakes)
3. Water use for agricultural irrigation and processing of agricultural products involving
consumption of more than 10,000 gallons per day (usually from private high-capacity wells or
surface water intakes)
24
4. Water use for power production above the use provided for in the contingency plan.
5. All other water use involving consumption of more than 10,000 gallons per day.
6. Nonessential uses – car washes, golf courses, etc.
Water used for human needs at hospitals, nursing homes and similar types of facilities should be
designated as a high priority to be maintained in an emergency. Lower priority uses will need to address
water used for human needs at other types of facilities such as hotels, office buildings, and
manufacturing plants. The volume of water and other types of water uses at these facilities must be
carefully considered. After reviewing the data, common sense should dictate local allocation priorities to
protect domestic requirements over certain types of economic needs. Water use for lawn sprinkling,
vehicle washing, golf courses, and recreation are legislatively considered non-essential.
Table 18. Water use priorities
Customer Category Allocation Priority
Average Daily Demand
(GPD)
Short-Term Emergency
Demand Reduction
Potential (GPD)
Residential 1 4,484,501 1,000,000
Institutional 2 148,444 0
Commercial 3 380,490 0
Industrial 4 186,136 0
Irrigation 5 561,567 561,567
Wholesale NA 0 0
Non-Essential 6 200,000 200,000
TOTAL NA 5,961,138 1,761,567
GPD – Gallons per Day
Tip: Calculating Emergency Demand Reduction Potential
The emergency demand reduction potential for all uses will typically equal the difference between
maximum use (summer demand) and base use (winter demand). In extreme emergency situations,
lower priority water uses must be restricted or eliminated to protect priority domestic water
requirements. Emergency demand reduction potential should be based on average day demands for
customer categories within each priority class. Use the tables in Part 3 on water conservation to help
you determine strategies.
Complete Table 19 by selecting the triggers and actions during water supply disruption conditions.
25
Table 19. Emergency demand reduction conditions, triggers and actions (Select all that may apply and describe)
Emergency Triggers Short-term Actions Long-term Actions
☒ Contamination
☒ Loss of production
☒ Infrastructure failure
☒ Executive order by
Governor
☐ Other: _____________
☒ Supply augmentation through
interconnections with Burnsville,
Apple Valley, and Farmington.
☒ Adopt (if not already) and
enforce a critical water
deficiency ordinance to penalize
lawn watering, vehicle washing,
golf course and park irrigation &
other nonessential uses.
☐ Water allocation through____
☐ Meet with large water users to
discuss their contingency plan.
☒ Supply augmentation through
interconnections with Burnsville,
Apple Valley, and Farmington.
☒ Adopt (if not already) and
enforce a critical water
deficiency ordinance to penalize
lawn watering, vehicle washing,
golf course and park irrigation &
other nonessential uses.
☐ Water allocation through____
☒ Meet with large water users to
discuss their contingency plan.
Notification Procedures
Complete Table 20 by selecting trigger for informing customers regarding conservation requests, water
use restrictions, and suspensions; notification frequencies; and partners that may assist in the
notification process. Add rows to the table as needed.
Table 20. Plan to inform customers regarding conservation requests, water use restrictions, and suspensions
Notification
Trigger(s)
Methods (select all that apply) Update
Frequency
Partners
☒ Short-term
demand reduction
declared (< 1
year)
☒ Website
☒ Email list serve
☒ Social media (e.g. Twitter,
Facebook)
☐ Direct customer mailing,
☒ Press release (TV, radio,
newspaper),
☐ Meeting with large water users
(> 10% of total city use)
☐ Other: ________
☒ Daily
☐ Weekly
☐ Monthly
☐ Annually
☒ Long-term
Ongoing demand
reduction
declared
☒ Website
☒ Email list serve
☒ Social media (e.g. Twitter,
Facebook)
☒ Direct customer mailing,
☒ Press release (TV, radio,
newspaper),
☒ Meeting with large water users
(> 10% of total city use)
☐ Other: ________
☐ Daily
☒ Weekly
☐ Monthly
☐ Annually
☒ Governor’s critical
water deficiency
declared
☒ Website
☒ Email list serve
☒ Social media (e.g. Twitter,
Facebook)
☐ Daily
☒ Weekly
☐ Monthly
☐ Annually
26
Notification
Trigger(s)
Methods (select all that apply) Update
Frequency
Partners
☒ Direct customer mailing,
☒ Press release (TV, radio,
newspaper),
☒ Meeting with large water users
(> 10% of total city use)
☐ Other: ________
Enforcement
Prior to a water emergency, municipal water suppliers must adopt regulations that restrict water use
and outline the enforcement response plan. The enforcement response plan must outline how
conditions will be monitored to know when enforcement actions are triggered, what enforcement tools
will be used, who will be responsible for enforcement, and what timelines for corrective actions will be
expected.
Affected operations, communications, and enforcement staff must then be trained to rapidly implement
those provisions during emergency conditions.
Important Note:
Disregard of critical water deficiency orders, even though total appropriation remains less than
permitted, is adequate grounds for immediate modification of a public water supply authority’s water
use permit (2013 MN Statutes 103G.291)
Does the city have a critical water deficiency restriction/official control in place that includes
provisions to restrict water use and enforce the restrictions? (This restriction may be an ordinance,
rule, regulation, policy under a council directive, or other official control) Yes ☒ No ☐
If yes, attach the official control document to this WSP as Appendix 7.
If no, the municipality must adopt such an official control within 6 months of submitting this WSP and
submit it to the DNR as an amendment to this WSP.
Irrespective of whether a critical water deficiency control is in place, does the public water supply
utility, city manager, mayor, or emergency manager have standing authority to implement water
restrictions? Yes ☒ No ☐
If yes, cite the regulatory authority reference: Lakeville City Ordinance 7-5-12-1.
If no, who has authority to implement water use restrictions in an emergency?
27
Priority 1:
Significant water
reduction; low
cost
Priority 2: Slight
water reduction,
low costs (low
hanging fruit)
Priority 2:
Significant water
reduction;
significant costs
Priority 3: Slight
water reduction,
significant costs
(do only if
necessary)
PART 3. WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
Minnesotans have historically benefited from the state’s abundant
water supplies, reducing the need for conservation. There are
however, limits to the available supplies of water and increasing
threats to the quality of our drinking water. Causes of water supply
limitation may include: population increases, economic trends,
uneven statewide availability of groundwater, climatic changes, and
degraded water quality. Examples of threats to drinking water
quality include: the presence of contaminant plumes from past land
use activities, exceedances of water quality standards from natural
and human sources, contaminants of emerging concern, and
increasing pollutant trends from nonpoint sources.
There are many incentives for conserving water; conservation:
• reduces the potential for pumping-induced transfer of contaminants into the deeper aquifers,
which can add treatment costs
• reduces the need for capital projects to expand system capacity
• reduces the likelihood of water use conflicts, like well interference, aquatic habitat loss, and
declining lake levels
• conserves energy, because less energy is needed to extract, treat and distribute water (and less
energy production also conserves water since water is use to produce energy)
• maintains water supplies that can then be available during times of drought
It is therefore imperative that water suppliers implement water conservation plans. The first step in
water conservation is identifying opportunities for behavioral or engineering changes that could be
made to reduce water use by conducting a thorough analysis of:
• Water use by customer
• Extraction, treatment, distribution and irrigation system efficiencies
• Industrial processing system efficiencies
• Regulatory and barriers to conservation
• Cultural barriers to conservation
• Water reuse opportunities
Once accurate data is compiled, water suppliers can set achievable goals for reducing water use. A
successful water conservation plan follows a logical sequence of events. The plan should address both
conservation on the supply side (leak detection and repairs, metering), as well as on the demand side
(reductions in usage). Implementation should be conducted in phases, starting with the most obvious
and lowest-cost options. In some cases one of the early steps will be reviewing regulatory constraints to
water conservation, such as lawn irrigation requirements. Outside funding and grants may be available
for implementation of projects. Engage water system operators and maintenance staff and customers
in brainstorming opportunities to reduce water use. Ask the question: “How can I help save water?”
Progress since 2006
Is this your community’s first Water Supply Plan? Yes ☐ No ☒
28
If yes, describe conservation practices that you are already implementing, such as: pricing, system
improvements, education, regulation, appliance retrofitting, enforcement, etc.
If no, complete Table 21 to summarize conservation actions taken since the adoption of the 2006 water
supply plan.
Table 21. Implementation of previous ten-year Conservation Plan
2006 Plan Commitments Action Taken?
Change water rates structure to provide conservation pricing ☒ Yes
☐ No
Water supply system improvements (e.g. leak repairs, valve replacements, etc.) ☒ Yes
☐ No
Educational efforts ☒ Yes
☐ No
New water conservation ordinances ☐ Yes
☒ No
Rebate or retrofitting Program (e.g. for toilet, faucets, appliances, showerheads, dish
washers, washing machines, irrigation systems, rain barrels, water softeners, etc.
☐ Yes
☒ No
Enforcement
☒ Yes
☐ No
Describe other ☐ Yes
☐ No
What are the results you have seen from the actions in Table 21 and how were results measured?
As the City continues to grow, 10 year trends have shown little to no increase in per capita water use.
Educational efforts with local schools and to the community at large have been extremely important in
informing customers of the importance of conservation in preserving the City’s water resources.
A. Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions
Complete table 22 by checking each trigger below, as appropriate, and the actions to be taken at various
levels or stages of severity. Add in additional rows to the table as needed.
29
Table 22. Short and long-term demand reduction conditions, triggers and actions
Objective Triggers Actions
Protect surface water flows ☐ Low stream flow conditions
☐ Reports of declining wetland
and lake levels
☐ Other: ______________
☐ Increase promotion of conservation
measures
☐ Other: ____________
Short-term demand reduction
(less than 1 year
☒ Extremely high seasonal
water demand (more than
double winter demand)
☐ Loss of treatment capacity
☒ Lack of water in storage
☐ State drought plan
☒ Well interference
☐ Other:
_____________
☒ Adopt (if not already) and enforce the
critical water deficiency ordinance to
restrict or prohibit lawn watering, vehicle
washing, golf course and park irrigation &
other nonessential uses.
☐ Supply augmentation through ____
☐ Water allocation through____
☐ Meet with large water users to discuss
user’s contingency plan.
☐ Reduction in pumping and enforcement
of water use restrictions.
Long-term demand reduction
(>1 year)
☒ Per capita demand
increasing
☒ Total demand increase
(higher population or more
industry) Water level in
well(s) decreasing below
normal levels.
☐ Other: _____________
☐ Develop a critical water deficiency
ordinance that is or can be quickly
adopted to penalize lawn watering,
vehicle washing, golf course and park
irrigation & other nonessential uses.
☐ Enact a water waste ordinance that
targets overwatering (causing water to
flow off the landscape into streets,
parking lots, or similar), watering
impervious surfaces (streets, driveways
or other hardscape areas), and negligence
of known leaks, breaks, or malfunctions.
☐ Meet with large water users to discuss
user’s contingency plan.
☐ Enhanced monitoring and reporting:
audits, meters, billing, etc.
☒ Reduction in pumping and enforcement
of water use restrictions.
☒ Notification of residents and education
on how to reduce water consumption.
☒ Increase restrictions on water use for
other than domestic use
Governor’s “Critical Water
Deficiency Order” declared
☒ Metro area, County, or
statewide increase in water use
at an unsustainable level.
☒ Restrict customers to domestic use only.
☒ Meet with large water users to discuss
and implement water conservation for their
operations plan.
B. Conservation Objectives and Strategies – Key benchmark for DNR
This section establishes water conservation objectives and strategies for eight major areas of water use.
Objective 1: Reduce Unaccounted (Non-Revenue) Water loss to Less than 10%
30
The Minnesota Rural Waters Association, the Metropolitan Council and the Department of Natural
Resources recommend that all water uses be metered. Metering can help identify high use locations
and times, along with leaks within buildings that have multiple meters.
It is difficult to quantify specific unmetered water use such as that associated with firefighting and
system flushing or system leaks. Typically, water suppliers subtract metered water use from total water
pumped to calculate unaccounted or non-revenue water loss.
Is your five-year average (2010-2015) unaccounted Water Use in Table 2 higher than 10%?
Yes ☐ No ☒
What is your leak detection monitoring schedule? (e.g. monitor 1/3rd of the city lines per year)
The City conducts leak detection coincident with street reconstruction projects, averaging 37,500 feet
per year, or as needed to make water main repairs.
Water Audits - are intended to identify, quantify and verify water and revenue losses. The volume of
unaccounted-for water should be evaluated each billing cycle. The American Water Works Association
(AWWA) recommends that ten percent or less of pumped water is unaccounted-for water. Water audit
procedures are available from the AWWA and MN Rural Water Association www.mrwa.com . Drinking
Water Revolving Loan Funds are available for purchase of new meters when new plants are built.
What is the date of your most recent water audit? January 2015
Frequency of water audits: ☒ yearly ☐ other (specify frequency) ________
Leak detection and survey: ☐ every year ☐ every other year ☒ periodic as needed
Year last leak detection survey completed: _________
If Table 2 shows annual water losses over 10% or an increasing trend over time, describe what actions
will be taken to reach the <10% loss objective and within what timeframe
Unaccounted for water approaching 10 percent is indicative of an unusual or extraordinary water event
in the City associated with development contractors or specific water quality needs of specific industrial
customers. The City has strived to maintain unaccounted for water at less than the 10 percent threshold
for the last 16 years.
Metering -AWWA recommends that every water supplier install meters to account for all water taken
into its system, along with all water distributed from its system at each customer’s point of service. An
effective metering program relies upon periodic performance testing, repair, maintenance or
replacement of all meters. AWWA also recommends that water suppliers conduct regular water audits
to ensure accountability. Some cities install separate meters for interior and exterior water use, but
some research suggests that this may not result in water conservation.
31
Complete Table 23 by adding the requested information regarding the number, types, testing and
maintenance of customer meters.
Table 23. Information about customer meters
Customer
Category
Number of
Customers
Number of
Metered
Connections
Number of
Automated
Meter
Readers
Meter testing
intervals
(years)
Average
age/meter
replacement
schedule (years
Residential 20,628 18,288 0 NA 15 / 20
Irrigation meters ___ / ___
Institutional 47 47 0 5 7.5 / 15
Commercial 349 349 0 5 7.5 / 15
Industrial 118 118 0 5 7.5 / 15
Public facilities ___ / ___
Other ___ / ___
TOTALS 21,142 18,802 NA NA
For unmetered systems, describe any plans to install meters or replace current meters with advanced
technology meters. Provide an estimate of the cost to implement the plan and the projected water
savings from implementing the plan.
Table 24. Water source meters
Number of
Meters
Meter testing
schedule
(years)
Number of Automated
Meter Readers
Average age/meter
replacement schedule (years
Water source
(wells/intakes)
18 7 to 10 0 7 / 10 (depending on
accuracy)
Treatment plant 2 As needed. 0 15 / 20
Objective 2: Achieve Less than 75 Residential Gallons per Capita Demand (GPCD)
The 2002 average residential per capita demand in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area was 75 gallons per
capita per day.
Is your average 2010-2015 residential per capita water demand in Table 2 more than 75? Yes ☒ No ☐
What was your 2010 – 2015 five-year average residential per capita water demand? 86.86
g/person/day
Describe the water use trend over that timeframe:
The water use trend has varied with the weather. Over the past 10 years residential per capita demand
has trended downward.
32
Complete Table 25 by checking which strategies you will use to continue reducing residential per capita
demand and project a likely timeframe for completing each checked strategy (Select all that apply and
add rows for additional strategies):
Table 25. Strategies and timeframe to reduce residential per capita demand
Strategy to reduce residential per capita demand Timeframe for completing work
☐ Revise city ordinances/codes to encourage or require water
efficient landscaping.
☐ Revise city ordinance/codes to permit water reuse options,
especially for non-potable purposes like irrigation,
groundwater recharge, and industrial use. Check with
plumbing authority to see if internal buildings reuse is
permitted
☐ Revise ordinances to limit irrigation. Describe the restricted
irrigation plan:
☐ Revise outdoor irrigation installations codes to require high
efficiency systems (e.g. those with soil moisture sensors or
programmable watering areas) in new installations or system
replacements.
☒ Make water system infrastructure improvements Ongoing
☐ Offer free or reduced cost water use audits for residential
customers.
☒ Implement a notification system to inform customers when
water availability conditions change.
Existing through online and broadcast media.
☒ Provide rebates or incentives for installing water efficient
appliances and/or fixtures indoors (e.g., low flow toilets, high
efficiency dish washers and washing machines, showerhead
and faucet aerators, water softeners, etc.)
2018
☒ Provide rebates or incentives to reduce outdoor water use
(e.g., turf replacement/reduction, rain gardens, rain barrels,
smart irrigation, outdoor water use meters, etc.)
2020
☐ Identify supplemental Water Resources
☒ Conduct audience-appropriate water conservation education
and outreach.
Annually
☐ Describe other plans
Objective 3: Achieve at least a 1.5% per year water reduction for Institutional, Industrial,
Commercial, and Agricultural GPCD over the next 10 years or a 15% reduction in ten years.
Complete Table 26 by checking which strategies you will used to continue reducing non-residential
customer use demand and project a likely timeframe for completing each checked strategy (add rows
for additional strategies).
Where possible, substitute recycled water used in one process for reuse in another. (For example, spent
rinse water can often be reused in a cooling tower.) Keep in mind the true cost of water is the amount
on the water bill PLUS the expenses to heat, cool, treat, pump, and dispose of/discharge the water.
Don’t just calculate the initial investment. Many conservation retrofits that appear to be prohibitively
expensive are actually very cost-effective when amortized over the life of the equipment. Often
reducing water use also saves electrical and other utility costs. Note: as of 2015, water reuse, and is not
33
allowed by the state plumbing code, M.R. 4715 (a variance is needed). However several state agencies
are addressing this issue.
Table 26. Strategies and timeframe to reduce institutional, commercial, industrial, and agricultural and non-revenue use
demand
Strategy to reduce total business, industry, agricultural demand Timeframe for completing work
☐ Conduct a facility water use audit for both indoor and outdoor
use, including system components
☒ Install enhanced meters capable of automated readings to
detect spikes in consumption
Ongoing. Meters replaced at least every 15
years to 20 years to ensure water use data is
accurately captured.
☐ Compare facility water use to related industry benchmarks, if
available (e.g., meat processing, dairy, fruit and vegetable,
beverage, textiles, paper/pulp, metals, technology, petroleum
refining etc.)
☐ Install water conservation fixtures and appliances or change
processes to conserve water
☒ Repair leaking system components (e.g., pipes, valves) Ongoing. Repairs made as leaks discovered.
Hydrant and valve bolts are replaced during
annual street reconstruction projects.
☒ Investigate the reuse of reclaimed water (e.g., stormwater,
wastewater effluent, process wastewater, etc.)
The City has already started program to reuse
stormwater for irrigation of two of its athletic
complexes.
☐ Reduce outdoor water use (e.g., turf replacement/reduction,
rain gardens, rain barrels, smart irrigation, outdoor water use
meters, etc.)
☐ Train employees how to conserve water
☐ Implement a notification system to inform non-residential
customers when water availability conditions change.
☐ Rainwater catchment systems intended to supply uses such as
water closets, urinals, trap primers for floor drains and floor
sinks, industrial processes, water features, vehicle washing
facilities, cooling tower makeup, and similar uses shall be
approved by the commissioner. Proposed plumbing code
4714.1702.1 http://www.dli.mn.gov/PDF/docket/4714rule.pdf
☐ Describe other plans:
Objective 4: Achieve a Decreasing Trend in Total Per Capita Demand
Include as Appendix 8 one graph showing total per capita water demand for each customer category
(i.e., residential, institutional, commercial, industrial) from 2005-2015 and add the calculated/estimated
linear trend for the next 10 years.
Describe the trend for each customer category; explain the reason(s) for the trends, and where trends
are increasing.
The trend for residential per capita demand has decreased over the last ten years. With regard to future
trends, the City has no way to calculate the impacts of continuing growth and weather factors on
residential per capita demand.
34
No trends are available in other customer categories because there is no way to track the population in
those customer categories.
Objective 5: Reduce Peak Day Demand so that the Ratio of Average Maximum day to the
Average Day is less than 2.6
Is the ratio of average 2005-2015 maximum day demand to average 2005-2015 average day demand
reported in Table 2 more than 2.6? Yes ☒ No ☐
Calculate the average (2005 – 2015) of the ratio of maximum day demand to average day demand:
2.68
The position of the DNR has been that a peak day/average day ratio that is above 2.6 for in summer
indicates that the water being used for irrigation by the residents in a community is too large and that
efforts should be made to reduce the peak day use by the community.
It should be noted that by reducing the peak day use, communities can also reduce the amount of
infrastructure that is required to meet the peak day use. This infrastructure includes new wells, new
water towers which can be costly items.
Objective 6: Implement a Conservation Water Rate Structure and/or a Uniform Rate
Structure with a Water Conservation Program
Water Conservation Program
Municipal water suppliers serving over 1,000 people are required to adopt demand reduction measures
that include a conservation rate structure, or a uniform rate structure with a conservation program that
achieves demand reduction. These measures must achieve demand reduction in ways that reduce
water demand, water losses, peak water demands, and nonessential water uses. These measures must
be approved before a community may request well construction approval from the Department of
Health or before requesting an increase in water appropriations permit volume (Minnesota Statutes,
section 103G.291, subd. 3 and 4). Rates should be adjusted on a regular basis to ensure that revenue of
the system is adequate under reduced demand scenarios. If a municipal water supplier intends to use a
Uniform Rate Structure, a community-wide Water Conservation Program that will achieve demand
reduction must be provided.
Current Water Rates
Include a copy of the actual rate structure in Appendix 9 or list current water rates including
base/service fees and volume charges below.
Volume included in base rate or service charge: __0__ gallons or ____ cubic feet ___ other
Frequency of billing: ☐ Monthly ☐ Bimonthly ☒ Quarterly ☐ Other: _________________
Water Rate Evaluation Frequency: ☒ every year ☐ every ___ years ☐ no schedule
Date of last rate change: February 1, 2016
35
Table 27. Rate structures for each customer category (Select all that apply and add additional rows as needed)
Customer
Category
Conservation Billing Strategies
in Use *
Conservation Neutral
Billing Strategies in Use **
Non-Conserving Billing
Strategies in Use ***
Residential ☐ Monthly billing
☒ Increasing block rates
(volume tiered rates)
☐ Seasonal rates
☐ Time of use rates
☐ Water bills reported in
gallons
☐ Individualized goal rates
☐ Excess use rates
☐ Drought surcharge
☐ Use water bill to provide
comparisons
☐ Service charge not based on
water volume
☐ Other (describe)
☐ Uniform
☒ Odd/even day watering
☐ Service charge based on water
volume
☐ Declining block
☐ Flat
☐ Other (describe)
Commercial/
Industrial/
Institutional
☐ Monthly billing
☒ Increasing block rates
(volume tiered rates)
☐ Seasonal rates
☐ Time of use rates
☐ Water bills reported in
gallons
☐ Individualized goal rates
☐ Excess use rates
☐ Drought surcharge
☐ Use water bill to provide
comparisons
☐ Service charge not based on
water volume
☐ Other (describe)
☐ Uniform ☐ Service charge based on water
volume
☐ Declining block
☐ Flat
☐ Other (describe)
☐ Other
* Rate Structures components that may promote water conservation:
• Monthly billing: is encouraged to help people see their water usage so they can consider changing
behavior.
• Increasing block rates (also known as a tiered residential rate structure): Typically, these have at least
three tiers: should have at least three tiers.
o The first tier is for the winter average water use.
o The second tier is the year-round average use, which is lower than typical summer use. This rate
should be set to cover the full cost of service.
o The third tier should be above the average annual use and should be priced high enough to
encourage conservation, as should any higher tiers. For this to be effective, the difference in
block rates should be significant.
• Seasonal rate: higher rates in summer to reduce peak demands
• Time of Use rates: lower rates for off peak water use
36
• Bill water use in gallons: this allows customers to compare their use to average rates
• Individualized goal rates: typically used for industry, business or other large water users to promote
water conservation if they keep within agreed upon goals. Excess Use rates: if water use goes above an
agreed upon amount this higher rate is charged
• Drought surcharge: an extra fee is charged for guaranteed water use during drought
• Use water bill to provide comparisons: simple graphics comparing individual use over time or compare
individual use to others.
• Service charge or base fee that does not include a water volume – a base charge or fee to cover universal
city expenses that are not customer dependent and/or to provide minimal water at a lower rate (e.g., an
amount less than the average residential per capita demand for the water supplier for the last 5 years)
• Emergency rates -A community may have a separate conservation rate that only goes into effect when
the community or governor declares a drought emergency. These higher rates can help to protect the city
budgets during times of significantly less water usage.
**Conservation Neutral**
• Uniform rate: rate per unit used is the same regardless of the volume used
• Odd/even day watering –This approach reduces peak demand on a daily basis for system operation, but
it does not reduce overall water use.
*** Non-Conserving ***
• Service charge or base fee with water volume: an amount of water larger than the average residential
per capita demand for the water supplier for the last 5 years
• Declining block rate: the rate per unit used decreases as water use increases.
• Flat rate: one fee regardless of how much water is used (usually unmetered).
Provide justification for any conservation neutral or non-conserving rate structures. If intending to adopt
a conservation rate structure, include the timeframe to do so:
Objective 7: Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use and Support Wellhead Protection
Planning
Development and redevelopment projects can provide additional water conservation opportunities,
such as the actions listed below. If a Uniform Rate Structure is in place, the water supplier must provide
a Water Conservation Program that includes at least two of the actions listed below. Check those actions
that you intent to implement within the next 10 years.
Table 28. Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use & Support Wellhead Protection
☒ Participate in the GreenStep Cities Program, including implementation of at least one of the 20
“Best Practices” for water
☐ Prepare a master plan for smart growth (compact urban growth that avoids sprawl)
☐ Prepare a comprehensive open space plan (areas for parks, green spaces, natural areas)
☐ Adopt a water use restriction ordinance (lawn irrigation, car washing, pools, etc.)
☐ Adopt an outdoor lawn irrigation ordinance
☐ Adopt a private well ordinance (private wells in a city must comply with water restrictions)
☐ Implement a stormwater management program
☐ Adopt non-zoning wetlands ordinance (can further protect wetlands beyond state/federal laws-
for vernal pools, buffer areas, restrictions on filling or alterations)
37
☐ Adopt a water offset program (primarily for new development or expansion)
☐ Implement a water conservation outreach program
☐ Hire a water conservation coordinator (part-time)
☒ Implement a rebate program for water efficient appliances, fixtures, or outdoor water
management
☐ Other
Objective 8: Tracking Success: How will you track or measure success through the next ten
years?
Numbers of residents that take advantage of the rebate programs.
Monitoring quarterly trends in aggregate and per capita water use.
Tip: The process to monitor demand reduction and/or a rate structure includes:
a) The DNR Hydrologist will call or visit the community the first 1-3 years after the water supply plan is
completed.
b) They will discuss what activities the community is doing to conserve water and if they feel their
actions are successful. The Water Supply Plan, Part 3 tables and responses will guide the discussion.
For example, they will discuss efforts to reduce unaccounted for water loss if that is a problem, or go
through Tables 33, 34 and 35 to discuss new initiatives.
c) The city representative and the hydrologist will discuss total per capita water use, residential per
capita water use, and business/industry use. They will note trends.
d) They will also discuss options for improvement and/or collect case studies of success stories to share
with other communities. One option may be to change the rate structure, but there are many other
paths to successful water conservation.
e) If appropriate, they will cooperatively develop a simple work plan for the next few years, targeting a
couple areas where the city might focus efforts.
A. Regulation
Complete Table 29 by selecting which regulations are used to reduce demand and improve water
efficiencies. Add additional rows as needed.
Copies of adopted regulations or proposed restrictions or should be included in Appendix 10 (a list with
hyperlinks is acceptable).
Table 29. Regulations for short-term reductions in demand and long-term improvements in water efficiencies
Regulations Utilized When is it applied (in effect)?
☒ Rainfall sensors required on landscape irrigation systems ☒ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during declared Emergencies
☒ Water efficient plumbing fixtures required ☒ New development
☒ Replacement
☐ Rebate Programs
☒ Critical/Emergency Water Deficiency ordinance ☒ Only during declared Emergencies
☒ Watering restriction requirements (time of day, allowable days, etc.) ☒ Odd/even
☐ 2 days/week
☐ Only during declared Emergencies
38
Regulations Utilized When is it applied (in effect)?
☐ Water waste prohibited (for example, having a fine for irrigators
spraying on the street)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during declared Emergencies
☐ Limitations on turf areas (requiring lots to have 10% - 25% of the
space in natural areas)
☐ New development
☐ Shoreland/zoning
☐ Other
☒ Soil preparation requirement s (after construction, requiring topsoil
to be applied to promote good root growth)
☒ New Development
☒ Construction Projects
☐ Other
☒ Tree ratios (requiring a certain number of trees per square foot of
lawn)
☒ New development
☐ Shoreland/zoning
☐ Other
☒ Permit to fill swimming pool and/or requiring pools to be covered (to
prevent evaporation)
☒ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during declared Emergencies
☐ Ordinances that permit stormwater irrigation, reuse of water, or
other alternative water use (Note: be sure to check current plumbing
codes for updates)
☐ Describe
B. Retrofitting Programs
Education and incentive programs aimed at replacing inefficient plumbing fixtures and appliances can
help reduce per capita water use, as well as energy costs. It is recommended that municipal water
suppliers develop a long-term plan to retrofit public buildings with water efficient plumbing fixtures and
appliances. Some water suppliers have developed partnerships with organizations having similar
conservation goals, such as electric or gas suppliers, to develop cooperative rebate and retrofit
programs.
A study by the AWWA Research Foundation (Residential End Uses of Water, 1999) found that the
average indoor water use for a non-conserving home is 69.3 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The
average indoor water use in a conserving home is 45.2 gpcd and most of the decrease in water use is
related to water efficient plumbing fixtures and appliances that can reduce water, sewer and energy
costs. In Minnesota, certain electric and gas providers are required (Minnesota Statute 216B.241) to
fund programs that will conserve energy resources and some utilities have distributed water efficient
showerheads to customers to help reduce energy demands required to supply hot water.
Retrofitting Programs
Complete Table 30 by checking which water uses are targeted, the outreach methods used, the
measures used to identify success, and any participating partners.
Table 30. Retrofitting programs (Select all that apply)
Water Use Targets Outreach Methods Partners
☒ Low flush toilets,
☐ Toilet leak tablets,
☒ Low flow showerheads,
☐ Faucet aerators;
☒ Education about
☐ Free distribution of
☐ Rebate for
☐ Other
☐ Gas company
☐ Electric company
☐ Watershed organization
39
Water Use Targets Outreach Methods Partners
☐ Water conserving washing machines,
☐ Dish washers,
☐ Water softeners;
☐ Education about
☐ Free distribution of
☐ Rebate for
☐ Other
☐ Gas company
☐ Electric company
☐ Watershed organization
☒ Rain gardens,
☒ Rain barrels,
☐ Native/drought tolerant landscaping, etc.
☒ Education about
☐ Free distribution of
☐ Rebate for
☐ Other
☐ Gas company
☐ Electric company
☒ Watershed organization
Briefly discuss measures of success from the above table (e.g. number of items distributed, dollar value
of rebates, gallons of water conserved, etc.):
Maintaining water use increases commensurate with population growth and continuing to experience a
decline in per capita residential water use.
C. Education and Information Programs
Customer education should take place in three different circumstances. First, customers should be
provided information on how to conserve water and improve water use efficiencies. Second,
information should be provided at appropriate times to address peak demands. Third, emergency
notices and educational materials about how to reduce water use should be available for quick
distribution during an emergency.
Proposed Education Programs
Complete Table 31 by selecting which methods are used to provide water conservation and information,
including the frequency of program components. Select all that apply and add additional lines as
needed.
40
Table 31. Current and Proposed Education Programs
Education Methods General summary of
topics
#/Year Frequency
Billing inserts or tips printed on the actual bill Water conservation
around the house; money
saving tips
1 ☒ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Consumer Confidence Reports Water system description;
results of monitoring and
testing; compliance with
national regulations
1 ☒ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Press releases to traditional local news outlets
(e.g., newspapers, radio and TV): Included
City’s weekly news page
Water conservation tips;
watering restrictions
10 ☐ Ongoing
☒ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Social media distribution (e.g., emails,
Facebook, Twitter)
Water conservation tips;
watering restrictions
5 ☐ Ongoing
☒ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Paid advertisements (e.g., billboards, print
media, TV, radio, web sites, etc.)
Paid ads as necessary to
explain the water
emergency.
☐ Ongoing
☒ Seasonal
☒ Only during
declared emergencies
Presentations to community groups An open house for
Imagine a Day Without
Water addresses water
conservation and
stormwater impacts.
1 ☐ Ongoing
☒ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Staff training ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Facility tours Description of the water
treatment process and
importance of
conservation
3 to 5
tours
per year
☒ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Displays and exhibits Watershed Cleanup Day,
Earth Day, Imagine a Day
Without Water
3 ☒ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Marketing rebate programs (e.g., indoor
fixtures & appliances and outdoor practices)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Community news letters Water conservation tips;
watering restrictions
52 ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
41
Direct mailings (water audit/retrofit kits,
showerheads, brochures)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Information kiosk at utility and public
buildings
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Public service announcements Water conservation 500 ☒ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Cable TV Programs Water conservation tips;
water system description
2 ☐ Ongoing
☒ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Demonstration projects (landscaping or
plumbing)
Landscaping for Clean
Water
3 ☐ Ongoing
☒ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
K-12 education programs (Project Wet,
Drinking Water Institute, presentations)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Community events (children’s water festivals,
environmental fairs)
Watershed Cleanup Day
and Earth Day
2 ☐ Ongoing
☒ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Community education classes ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Water week promotions ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Website (include address:
http://www.ci.lakeville.mn.us/274/Water-
Conservation )
Water conservation tips;
saving money through
conservation
☒ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Targeted efforts (large volume users, users
with large increases)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Notices of ordinances ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Emergency conservation notices ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
42
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Other: Water conservation ordinance signs 150 ☐ Ongoing
☒ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Briefly discuss what future education and information activities your community is considering in the
future:
Lakeville will continue to support its current educational efforts and look to expand presentations to
local school and groups such as the Chamber of Commerce and Rotary.
43
Part 4. ITEMS FOR METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNITIES
Minnesota Statute 473.859 requires WSPs to be completed for all local units of government in the
seven-county Metropolitan Area as part of the local comprehensive planning process.
Much of the information in Parts 1-3 addresses water demand for the next 10 years. However,
additional information is needed to address water demand through 2040, which will make the WSP
consistent with the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act, upon which the local comprehensive plans are
based.
This Part 4 provides guidance to complete the WSP in a way that addresses plans for water supply
through 2040.
A. Water Demand Projections through 2040
Complete Table 7 in Part 1D by filling in information about long-term water demand projections through
2040. Total Community Population projections should be consistent with the community’s system
statement, which can be found on the Metropolitan Council’s website and which was sent to the
community in September 2015.
Projected Average Day, Maximum Day, and Annual Water Demands may either be calculated using the
method outlined in Appendix 2 of the 2015 Master Water Supply Plan or by a method developed by the
individual water supplier.
B. Potential Water Supply Issues
Complete Table 10 in Part 1E by providing information about the potential water supply issues in your
community, including those that might occur due to 2040 projected water use.
The Master Water Supply Plan provides information about potential issues for your community in
Appendix 1 (Water Supply Profiles). This resource may be useful in completing Table 10.
You may document results of local work done to evaluate impact of planned uses by attaching a
feasibility assessment or providing a citation and link to where the plan is available electronically.
C. Proposed Alternative Approaches to Meet Extended Water Demand
Projections
Complete Table 12 in Part 1F with information about potential water supply infrastructure impacts (such
as replacements, expansions or additions to wells/intakes, water storage and treatment capacity,
distribution systems, and emergency interconnections) of extended plans for development and
redevelopment, in 10-year increments through 2040. It may be useful to refer to information in the
community’s local Land Use Plan, if available.
Complete Table 14 in Part 1F by checking each approach your community is considering to meet future
demand. For each approach your community is considering, provide information about the amount of
44
future water demand to be met using that approach, the timeframe to implement the approach,
potential partners, and current understanding of the key benefits and challenges of the approach.
As challenges are being discussed, consider the need for: evaluation of geologic conditions (mapping,
aquifer tests, modeling), identification of areas where domestic wells could be impacted, measurement
and analysis of water levels & pumping rates, triggers & associated actions to protect water levels, etc.
D. Value-Added Water Supply Planning Efforts (Optional)
The following information is not required to be completed as part of the local water supply plan, but
completing this can help strengthen source water protection throughout the region and help
Metropolitan Council and partners in the region to better support local efforts.
Source Water Protection Strategies
Does a Drinking Water Supply Management Area for a neighboring public water supplier overlap your
community? Yes ☒ No ☐
If you answered no, skip this section. If you answered yes, please complete Table 32 with information
about new water demand or land use planning-related local controls that are being considered to
provide additional protection in this area.
Table 32. Local controls and schedule to protect Drinking Water Supply Management Areas
Local Control Schedule to
Implement
Potential Partners
☐ None at this time
☒ Comprehensive planning that guides development in
vulnerable drinking water supply management areas
2019 Apple Valley and
Rosemount
☐ Zoning overlay
☐ Other:
Technical assistance
From your community’s perspective, what are the most important topics for the Metropolitan Council to
address, guided by the region’s Metropolitan Area Water Supply Advisory Committee and Technical
Advisory Committee, as part of its ongoing water supply planning role?
☐ Coordination of state, regional and local water supply planning roles
☒ Regional water use goals
☒ Water use reporting standards
☐ Regional and sub-regional partnership opportunities
☐ Identifying and prioritizing data gaps and input for regional and sub-regional analyses
☐ Others: ___________________________________________________________________
45
GLOSSARY
Agricultural/Irrigation Water Use - Water used for crop and non-crop irrigation, livestock watering,
chemigation, golf course irrigation, landscape and athletic field irrigation.
Average Daily Demand - The total water pumped during the year divided by 365 days.
Calcareous Fen - Calcareous fens are rare and distinctive wetlands dependent on a constant supply of
cold groundwater. Because they are dependent on groundwater and are one of the rarest natural
communities in the United States, they are a protected resource in MN. Approximately 200 have been
located in Minnesota. They may not be filled, drained or otherwise degraded.
Commercial/Institutional Water Use - Water used by motels, hotels, restaurants, office buildings,
commercial facilities and institutions (both civilian and military). Consider maintaining separate
institutional water use records for emergency planning and allocation purposes. Water used by multi-
family dwellings, apartment buildings, senior housing complexes, and mobile home parks should be
reported as Residential Water Use.
Commercial/Institutional/Industrial (C/I/I) Water Sold - The sum of water delivered for
commercial/institutional or industrial purposes.
Conservation Rate Structure - A rate structure that encourages conservation and may include increasing
block rates, seasonal rates, time of use rates, individualized goal rates, or excess use rates. If a
conservation rate is applied to multifamily dwellings, the rate structure must consider each residential
unit as an individual user. A community may have a separate conservation rate that only goes into
effect when the community or governor declares a drought emergency. These higher rates can help to
protect the city budgets during times of significantly less water usage.
Date of Maximum Daily Demand - The date of the maximum (highest) water demand. Typically this is a
day in July or August.
Declining Rate Structure - Under a declining block rate structure, a consumer pays less per additional
unit of water as usage increases. This rate structure does not promote water conservation.
Distribution System - Water distribution systems consist of an interconnected series of pipes, valves,
storage facilities (water tanks, water towers, reservoirs), water purification facilities, pumping stations,
flushing hydrants, and components that convey drinking water and meeting fire protection needs for
cities, homes, schools, hospitals, businesses, industries and other facilities.
Flat Rate Structure - Flat fee rates do not vary by customer characteristics or water usage. This rate
structure does not promote water conservation.
Industrial Water Use - Water used for thermonuclear power (electric utility generation) and other
industrial use such as steel, chemical and allied products, paper and allied products, mining, and
petroleum refining.
46
Low Flow Fixtures/Appliances - Plumbing fixtures and appliances that significantly reduce the amount
of water released per use are labeled “low flow”. These fixtures and appliances use just enough water to
be effective, saving excess, clean drinking water that usually goes down the drain.
Maximum Daily Demand - The maximum (highest) amount of water used in one day.
Metered Residential Connections - The number of residential connections to the water system that
have meters. For multifamily dwellings, report each residential unit as an individual user.
Percent Unmetered/Unaccounted For - Unaccounted for water use is the volume of water withdrawn
from all sources minus the volume of water delivered. This value represents water “lost” by
miscalculated water use due to inaccurate meters, water lost through leaks, or water that is used but
unmetered or otherwise undocumented. Water used for public services such as hydrant flushing, ice
skating rinks, and public swimming pools should be reported under the category “Water Supplier
Services”.
Population Served - The number of people who are served by the community’s public water supply
system. This includes the number of people in the community who are connected to the public water
supply system, as well as people in neighboring communities who use water supplied by the
community’s public water supply system. It should not include residents in the community who have
private wells or get their water from neighboring water supply.
Residential Connections - The total number of residential connections to the water system. For
multifamily dwellings, report each residential unit as an individual user.
Residential Per Capita Demand - The total residential water delivered during the year divided by the
population served divided by 365 days.
Residential Water Use - Water used for normal household purposes such as drinking, food preparation,
bathing, washing clothes and dishes, flushing toilets, and watering lawns and gardens. Should include all
water delivered to single family private residences, multi-family dwellings, apartment buildings, senior
housing complexes, mobile home parks, etc.
Smart Meter - Smart meters can be used by municipalities or by individual homeowners. Smart
metering generally indicates the presence of one or more of the following:
• Smart irrigation water meters are controllers that look at factors such as weather, soil, slope,
etc. and adjust watering time up or down based on data. Smart controllers in a typical summer
will reduce water use by 30%-50%. Just changing the spray nozzle to new efficient models can
reduce water use by 40%.
• Smart Meters on customer premises that measure consumption during specific time periods and
communicate it to the utility, often on a daily basis.
• A communication channel that permits the utility, at a minimum, to obtain meter reads on
demand, to ascertain whether water has recently been flowing through the meter and onto the
47
premises, and to issue commands to the meter to perform specific tasks such as disconnecting
or restricting water flow.
Total Connections - The number of connections to the public water supply system.
Total Per Capita Demand - The total amount of water withdrawn from all water supply sources during
the year divided by the population served divided by 365 days.
Total Water Pumped - The cumulative amount of water withdrawn from all water supply sources during
the year.
Total Water Delivered - The sum of residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, water supplier
services, wholesale and other water delivered.
Ultimate (Full Build-Out) - Time period representing the community’s estimated total amount and
location of potential development, or when the community is fully built out at the final planned density.
Unaccounted (Non-revenue) Loss - See definitions for “percent unmetered/unaccounted for loss”.
Uniform Rate Structure - A uniform rate structure charges the same price-per-unit for water usage
beyond the fixed customer charge, which covers some fixed costs. The rate sends a price signal to the
customer because the water bill will vary by usage. Uniform rates by class charge the same price-per-
unit for all customers within a customer class (e.g. residential or non-residential). This price structure is
generally considered less effective in encouraging water conservation.
Water Supplier Services - Water used for public services such as hydrant flushing, ice skating rinks,
public swimming pools, city park irrigation, back-flushing at water treatment facilities, and/or other
uses.
Water Used for Nonessential Purposes - Water used for lawn irrigation, golf course and park irrigation,
car washes, ornamental fountains, and other non-essential uses.
Wholesale Deliveries - The amount of water delivered in bulk to other public water suppliers.
Acronyms and Initialisms
AWWA – American Water Works Association
C/I/I – Commercial/Institutional/Industrial
CIP – Capital Improvement Plan
GIS – Geographic Information System
GPCD – Gallons per capita per day
48
GWMA – Groundwater Management Area – North and East Metro, Straight River, Bonanza,
MDH – Minnesota Department of Health
MGD – Million gallons per day
MG – Million gallons
MGL – Maximum Contaminant Level
MnTAP – Minnesota Technical Assistance Program (University of Minnesota)
MPARS – MN/DNR Permitting and Reporting System (new electronic permitting system)
MRWA – Minnesota Rural Waters Association
SWP – Source Water Protection
WHP – Wellhead Protection
49
APPENDICES
Appendix 1: Well records and maintenance summaries
Appendix 2: Water level monitoring plan
Appendix 3: Water level graphs for each water supply well
Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan
Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List
Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services
Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Ordinance
Appendix 8: Graph showing annual per capita water demand for each customer
category during the last ten-years
Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure
Appendix 10: Adopted or proposed regulations to reduce demand or improve water
efficiency
Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist – summary of all the actions that a
community is doing, or proposes to do, including estimated implementation dates
50
Appendix 1: Well Records and Maintenance Summaries
Well logs for production and monitoring wells provided separately. See separate upload titled Appendix
1 - Well Logs
• Information regarding Lakeville’s monitoring wells is provided daily to DNR. Data sent
previously regarding the amended 2008 water appropriation permit no longer exists other than
in the well logs provided.
Maintenance summaries provided separately. See separate upload titled Appendix 1 – Well
Maintenance Summaries
51
Appendix 2: Water Level Monitoring Plan
52
Water Level Monitoring Plan
Purpose.
Provide guidance and outline procedures for monitoring the water levels in each of
Lakeville’s wells.
General.
All water supply wells are checked on a weekly basis to ensure proper operation,
exercise the security system, and verify control readings.
Procedures.
All water supply wells will be manually measured at least once per month.
Measurements can be taken when the well is operating.
Staff measuring the well will use a water level meter with a laser etched tape accurate
to 1/10th of a foot.
Water depth readings will be taken directly from the tape and entered into the log at
each well.
Water level data for the wells will be maintained by the Utilities Division for the life of
the well.
53
Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan
54
Project Name: Watermain Trunk System Improvements
Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director
Anticipated Start: As development occurs
Project Description and Location
The Comprehensive Water Plan anticipates the extension of watermain trunk facilities to accommodate
anticipated growth. Timing of future watermain trunk facilities depends on the growth rate and location
of planned community development.
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Revenues
Water Trunk Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Total 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,000,000$
Expenditures
Trunk Watermain Oversizing 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000
Total 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,000,000$
55
Project name: Well Construction – Well 21
Project Manager: Chris Petree, Public Works Director
Anticipated start date: 2017
Project Description and Location
Well 21 is programmed for construction in 2017 to provide adequate water supply to accommodate
existing and anticipated growth. The well will draw water from the Prairie Du Chien, Jordan, and/or the
Tunnel City/Wonewoc aquifers. Well 21 is planned to be located adjacent to the Highview Avenue/Dodd
Boulevard roundabout. Wells 22 and 23 are planned for 2019 and Wells 24 and 25 are planned for 2021.
Construction will depend on population demand and water needs. Locations will be based on data
provided in the Water Supply Plan.
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Revenues
Water Trunk Fund 875,000 - 2,137,500 - 1,837,500 4,850,000
Total 875,000$ -$ 2,137,500$ -$ 1,837,500$ 4,850,000$
Expenditures
Well Construction
Well 21 875,000
Well 22 918,750
Well 23 918,750
Well 24 918,750
Well 25 918,750
Well Collection Pipe 300,000 -
Total 875,000$ -$ 2,137,500$ -$ 1,837,500$ 4,850,000$
56
Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List
57
Emergency Response Team Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
Emergency Response Lead Shane Quade 952-985-2741 952-367-7334
Alternate Emergency
Response Lead
Steve Grossman 952-985-2742 952-292-2525
Water Operator John Favourite 952-985-2743 952-367-7380
Alternate Water Operator Steve Grossman 952-985-2742 952-292-2525
Public Communications Tierney Helmers 952-985-4407
State and Local Emergency
Response Contacts
Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
State Incident Duty Officer Minnesota Duty Officer 800/422-0798 Out State 651-649-5451 Metro
County Emergency Director B.J. Battig 651-438-4532
National Guard Minnesota Duty Officer 800/422-0798 Out State 651-649-5451 Metro
Mayor/Board Chair Douglas P. Anderson 952-985-4403
Fire Chief Mike Meyers 952-985-4701 952-240-6065
Sheriff Tim Leslie 651-438-4710
Police Chief Jeff Long 952-985-4801 952-292-4801
Ambulance Allina 911
Hospital Fairview Burnsville 952-460-4000
Doctor or Medical Facility
State and Local Agencies Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
MDH District Engineer Basam Banat 651-201-3973 507-251-7707
MDH Drinking Water Protection 651-201-4700
State Testing Laboratory Minnesota Duty Officer 800/422-0798 Out State 651-649-5451 Metro
MPCA Minnesota Duty Officer 800/422-0798 Out State 651-649-5451 Metro
DNR Area Hydrologist Jeremy Rivord 651-539-2115
County Water Planner Environmental Resources 952-891-7000
Utilities Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
Electric Company Dakota Electric 651-463-6201 1-800-430-9722
Gas Company MN Energy Resources 1-800-889-4970
Telephone Company
Gopher State One Call Utility Locations 800-252-1166 651-454-0002
Highway Department Rob Hendel 651-775-0345
Mutual Aid Agreements Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
Neighboring Water System Burnsville 952-895-4552 952-292-5577
Emergency Water Connection Burnsville 952-895-4552 952-292-5577
Materials Minnesota Pipe and Equipment 651-463-6090
58
Technical/Contracted
Services/Supplies
Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
MRWA Technical Services MN Rural Water Association 800-367-6792
Well Driller/Repair EH Renner 763-427-0533
Pump Repair Quality Flow Systems 952-758-9445
Electrician Helm Electric 612-599-9804
Plumber Air Lake Plumbing 952-985-0574
Backhoe Jerry Sauber 651-755-5322
Chemical Feed Hawkins Chemical 952-992-9527
Meter Repair Ferguson 612-850-4050
Generator Cummins 952-445-4292
Valves Minnesota Pipe and Equipment 651-463-6090
Pipe & Fittings Minnesota Pipe and Equipment 651-463-6090
Water Storage KLM Engineering 888-959-5111
Laboratory Twin City Water Clinic 952-935-3556
Engineering firm SEH 651-490-2000
Communications Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
News Paper
Radio Station
School Superintendent
Property & Casualty Insurance
Critical Water Users Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
Hospital
Critical Use:
Nursing Home
Critical Use:
Public Shelter
Critical Use:
59
Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services
Lakeville has no agreements for emergency services.
60
Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Ordinance
61
7-5-12: WATER USE:
7-5-12-1: WATER EMERGENCY:
To protect the health and safety of the consumers, as well as the general welfare, the mayor or
his/her designee may impose emergency regulations pertaining to city water use.
A. During an emergency, restrictions for the use of city water may include, but are not limited to, the
total prohibition of watering, sprinkling, or irrigation of lawn, grass, turf, or plantings.
B. Restrictions imposed during an emergency shall continue in effect until the end of the emergency
and/or removed by the mayor or his/her designee.
C. Notification of restrictions to city water use may be given by publication or by posting in the city
hall and at such public places as the council may direct. (Ord. 831, sec. 1, 12-17-2007)
7-5-12-2: ANNUAL WATER USE RESTRICTIONS:
To conserve water resources and allow the city's water system flexibility in meeting peak demands,
certain limitations must be placed on the city's water supply.
A. An odd/even sprinkling restriction based on street addresses is in effect from May 1 to September
30 each year. Residents with odd numbered addresses may water on odd numbered calendar
days; residents with even numbered addresses may water on even numbered calendar days.
B. Homeowners' associations and apartment complexes that provide a common irrigation system
may water only every other day. Homeowners' associations and apartments north of 185th
Street may water on odd numbered days and those south of 185th Street may water on even
numbered days.
C. City water cannot be used for the purposes of irrigating or watering lawns, sod, or seeded areas
between eleven o'clock (11:00) A.M. and five o'clock (5:00) P.M. daily. (Ord. 831, sec. 1, 12-17-
2007)
7-5-12-3: EXCEPTIONS:
The water use restrictions in section 7-5-12-2 of this chapter do not apply in the following situations:
A. Limited hand watering of gardens and plants using a hose.
B. Watering of areas with new sod or seed within thirty (30) days of installation.
C. Watering from a source other than the city's water supply if the water user has registered the
alternative source with Dakota County and the alternative source is properly permitted by the
state of Minnesota. Under this exemption, the city may inspect the property to ensure
compliance. (Ord. 831, sec. 1, 12-17-2007)
7-5-12-4: PENALTIES:
62
A. Failure to comply with restrictions or prohibitions imposed under this section 7-5-12 shall result in
a surcharge for water service for each violation in an amount determined by resolution of the city
council, which will be added to the water bill for the property on which such violation occurs.
B. Violators will be notified prior to the imposition of a surcharge. An initial notice of violation will be
given to the violator. Subsequent violations in the same calendar year will result in the imposition
of a surcharge. Notices of surcharge for violations occurring after receipt of the initial notice shall
be mailed to the property owner. The city shall presume receipt of the notice of surcharge three
(3) days after mailing. (Ord. 831, sec. 1, 12-17-2007)
63
Appendix 8: Annual Per Capita Demand 2005 - 2015
64
-
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Residential Per Capita
Residential Per Capita Linear (Residential Per Capita)
65
Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure
66
UTILITY BILLING FEES - (Effective for all accounts billed after 2/1/2016)
Water Rates
Residential
- Charges shall be based on actual metered gallons consumed each quarter.
- A basic water charge of $4.38 per quarter will be charged for each dwelling unit.
a) Tier one consumption – Shall be $1.03 per thousand gallons for the first 30 thousand gallons.
b) Tier two consumption – Shall be $1.63 per thousand gallons in excess of 30 thousand gallons but
less than or equal to 49 thousand gallons.
c) Tier three consumption – Shall be $2.79 per thousand gallons consumption exceeding 49
thousand gallons.
Commercial, Industrial and Institutional
- Charges shall be based on actual metered gallons consumed each quarter.
- A basic water charge of $4.38 per quarter will be charged for each account
a) Tier one consumption – Shall be $1.03 per thousand gallons for the first 30 thousand gallons.
b) Tier two consumption – Shall be $1.63 per thousand gallons in excess of 30 thousand gallons.
c) Irrigation sprinkler meters shall be billed at $2.79 per thousand gallons.
Manufactured Home Parks and Multi-family dwellings
- Charges shall be based on actual metered gallons consumed each quarter.
- A basic water charge of $4.38 per quarter will be charged for each dwelling unit.
a) Tier one consumption – Shall be $1.03 per thousand gallons for the first 30 thousand gallons.
b) Tier two consumption – Shall be $1.63 per thousand gallons in excess of 30 thousand gallons but
less than or equal to 49 thousand gallons.
c) Tier three consumption – Shall be $2.79 per thousand gallons consumption exceeding 49
thousand gallons.
Irrigation sprinkler accounts shall be billed at $2.79 per thousand gallons.
Bulk water accounts
- Shall be billed at $3.13 per thousand gallons.
- Account set up fee of $10.00/account.
For those accounts whereby an accurate reading cannot be determined due to faulty meter, water
consumption shall be established to be 18,000 gallons per quarter per dwelling unit.
67
Appendix 10: Adopted or Proposed Regulations to Reduce Demand or
Improve Water Efficiency
Lakeville has no adopted regulations, other than those provided previously, or proposed regulations, at
this time, specifically to reduce demand or improve water efficiency. The City is working with the
Metropolitan Council to look at ways the City can improve its water efficiency.
68
Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist
Lakeville is evaluating the establishment of a rebate program based on the current Metropolitan Council
Water Efficiency Grant Program. Program would be established based on the continued availability of
grant funds and planned for the 2018 fiscal year budget.