HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-18-00-00 ITEM 2
• CITY OF LAKEVILLE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
APRIL 18, 2000
'Members Present: Brantly, Detjen, Emond, Erickson, Matasosky, Miller, Pogatchnik, Vogel,
and Ex-officio members Johnsen and Erickson.
Members Absent: Schubert and Tushie
Staff Present: David Licht, Northwest Associated Consultants; Rita Erpelding,
Economic Development Coordinator; and Ron Mullenbach, Associate
Planner.
1. Call to Order. Chair Vogel called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. in the
Administration Conference Room at Lakeville City Hall.
2. Approval of the March 21, 2000 Meeting Minutes
MOTION 00.13 Comms. Detjen/Erickson moved to approve the March 21, 2000
meeting minutes. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Update of Strategic Work Plan Activities
a. South Creek Trout Stream Subcommittee Update
Comm. Matasosky provided an update on the South Creek Subcommittee
activities. The subcommittee met on April 11 to discuss the structure, content,
and schedule for the development of a management plan which will summarize
the process and recommendations of the subcommittee.
Based on the results of Barr Engineering's recent study, the subcommittee is
recommending that the primary best management practice be the construction
of infiltration ponds. Staff has estimated that the proposed infiltration ponding
requirements will be less than the current ponding requirements. Other best
management practices to be incorporated include landscaping, education,
monitoring, and the development of an emergency response plan.
Comm. Erickson asked whether property owners will be losing significant
buildable areas of their lots. Comm. Matasosky stated that it is anticipated that
the use of infiltration basins will not reduce buildable area. However, infiltration
basins may have an economic impact because developers typically have
• utilized the granular material from pond excavation for site improvements.
Lakeville Economic Development Commission April 18, 2000
Meeting Minutes Page 2
Comm. Pogatchnik added that the subcommittee is beginning to learn about
various grant programs which may provide property. owners with financial
assistance to implement the best management practices.
Comm. Erickson asked whether property owners in Airlake Industrial Park
have responded favorably regarding the process. Comm. Matasosky stated that
the subcommittee has received favorable feedback. He added that an article in
the Airlake Industrial Park newsletter and direct mailings regarding the results
of the study would be appropriate.
Mr. Erickson asked whether the subcommittee should review the storm sewer
area charge based on the implementation of the recommended best
management practices. Comma Matasosky stated that the issue. had come up,
but was recommended to be discussed following the completion of the
management plan.
b. Corridor and Gateway Design Study Committee
Chair Vogel stated that the joint subcommittee has a meeting scheduled for
May 3rd to discuss commercial and industrial park dedication fees. The
subcommittee includes Chair Vogel and Comm. Tushie from the EDC and
Chair Larson and Comm. Messinger from the Parks and Recreation Advisory
Committee.
• Mr. Erickson reported that the City Council appreciates the EDC's
recommendation that funding for improvements on the Cedar Avenue corridor
be a priority.
c. Labor Force Subcommittee
The EDC reviewed a draft summary of the purpose, goals, and potential
questions for a labor force survey. Ms. Erpelding asked whether the survey
target should include all businesses in Lakeville orjust manufacturing/industrial
businesses. Comm. Erickson stated that retail and industrial businesses have
different labor force issues and therefore, the survey should only focus on
manufacturing/industrial businesses. EDC members agreed that the survey
should target manufacturing/industrial businesses.
Ms. Erpelding asked whether the focus of the survey should be limited to labor
force issues or if the survey should also include general questions such as
satisfaction with City services. EDC members agreed that the focus should be
on labor force questions.
Mr. Erickson stated that the EDC may find it beneficial to have the
• subcommittee meet with potential consultants to discuss the format of the
survey. Mr: Erickson suggested thafthe consultants can be asked to provide
Lakeville Economic Development Commission April 18, 2000
Meeting Minutes Page 3
recommendations regarding the most appropriate way to structure the survey
based on the EDC's goals and objectives.
Ms. Johnsen added that the Chamber of Commerce is in the process of
contracting with the NationJob Network to develop a website listing of available
employment opportunities. Ms. Johnsen suggested that the survey results may
be beneficial to include as part of the community profile.
d. Marketing Plan Update
Ms: Erpelding stated that staff recommends that the EDC begin the marketing
plan update process after the May EDC meeting. The EDC concurred with
staff's recommendation.
4. Review of Zoning Ordinance Update
David Licht of Northwest Associated Consultants presented the draft Zoning
Ordinance Update. Mr. Licht stated that the zoning ordinance consists of three main
sections: 1) administrative chapters; 2) performance standards; and 3) zoning districts.
An additional component consists of the draft zoning map.
The administrative sections include a revised conditional use permit chapter where
performance standards have been combined for ease of reference. The draft zoning
%i ordinance also includes new provisions for administrative permits. Administrative
permits will be used to handle requests that are technical in nature. Since site plans
are currently regularly reviewed by staff, a chapter clarifying the site plan review
process has been added.
The performance chapters include new or enhanced standards related to such issues
as erosion control and drainage, wetland setbacks, building materials, parking
requirements, and loading space requirements. Parking standards for the C-CBD
District have been revised based on the recently completed Downtown Lakeville
Parking Study.
New nomenclature has been applied to commercial and residential zoning districts.
While many of the districts remain the same, some new districts have been added. A
significant change for residential development involves planned unit development
zoning, which will no longer be allowed in areas guided for low density residential
development on the 2020 Land Use Plan. New RM-2 and RH-2 Districts include
density bonus provisions for multiple family development.
The R-B District was eliminated in favor of the O-R District. While both are transitional
districts, the new O-R District shifts the emphasis from residential to commercial uses
as the permitted uses. Minimum lot areas have been increased in the commercial and
industrial districts, though not significantly. Existing lots not meeting the new lot area
minimums will be "grandfathered-in" under the new zoning ordinance. Other than lot
Lakeville Ewnomic Development Commission April 18, 2000
Meeting Minutes page q
areas, few changes are proposed to the commercial and industrial districts. Mr. Licht
also stated that the draft zoning map has been developed consistent with the 2020
Land Use Plan, which was approved by the City Council in 1999.
Comm. Pogatchnik asked what types of comments City staff has received on the draft
zoning ordinance and map. Mr. Licht stated that the comments submitted consist of
requests for zoning changes on individual parcels, comments on the text, and some
zoning enforcement issues.
Mr. Erickson stated that several comments have included requests for zoning
designations that would be inconsistent with the 2020 Land Use Plan. The City
Council recently adopted a 60-day extension to the residential plat moratorium in order
that a thorough review and complete response could be provided
to all those who submitted written comments. The residential plat moratorium will now
end on July 17~'.
Comm. Erickson stated his agreement with the Planning Commission's approach to
the process. City staff will forward the draft responses to written comments related to
commercial and industrial development to the EDC for their review.
Comm. Matasosky asked whether day care facilities were allowed in the industrial
zoning districts. Mr. Licht stated that day care facilities are a conditional use in all of
the districts.
Comm. Emond asked whether the City had enough land proposed to be zoned for
retail and commercial development at the various freeway interchanges. Mr. Licht
stated that the combined commercial areas of Burnsville, Apple Valley and Lakeville
appear to be adequate to serve the future needs of the community. Some commercial
development will most likely involve redevelopment of underutilized properties in the
freeway interchange areas.
MOTION OD.14: Comms. Matasosky/Emond moved to commend the City staff and
Northwest Associated Consultants for their work on the Zoning
Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously.
5. Staff Activities Report
Ms. Erpelding stated that the City Council adopted the Downtown Lakeville Parking
Study at their April 17"' meeting. The Study includes a plan for striping tandem parallel
parking spaces along Holyoke Avenue, an analysis of the Post Office carrier facility
location, and new parking stall size and parking requirement calculations to be
incorporated into the zoning ordinance update. The Public Works Department has
already begun preparations to complete the recommended striping. City staff will be
distributing a summary of the Study to downtown property and business owners.
•
Lakeville Economic Development CommiBSion April 18, 2000
Meeting Minutes Page 5
Ms. Erpelding stated that ISD 194 has begun marketing their 25-acre site in Fairfield
Business Campus. In addition, CP Motor Freight has left their Airlake facility and is
now in the process of preparing for its sale or lease.
6. Other Business
Mr. Erickson stated that the City will be opening bids for the construction of a 104 stall
parking lot on the downtown All Saints campus. This will add to the available parking
in the downtown.
Ms. Johnsen briefed the EDC on upcoming activities of the Chamber of Commerce.
7. Adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by: Attested to:
i1.~.~.~.°et.-~<.~.P_
on Mullenbach, Recording Secretary R.T. Brantly, Secretary