HomeMy WebLinkAboutLA193782 - Approved engineer letterVSE Project Number: U3507.0107.211
August 12, 2021
TruNorth Solar LLC
ATTENTION: Donna Pickard
3735 Dunlap St. N.
Arden Hills, MN 55112
REFERENCE: Preszler, Christina Residence: 16938 Fairhill Avenue, Farmington, MN 55024
Solar Array Installation
To Whom It May Concern:
Per your request,we have reviewed the existing structure at the above referenced site.The purpose of our review was to
determine the adequacy of the existing structure to support the proposed installation of solar panels on the roof as shown on
the panel layout plan.
Based upon our review, we conclude that the existing structure is adequate to support the proposed solar panel installation.
Design Parameters
Code: 2020 Minnesota Building Code (2018 IBC)
Risk Category: II
Design wind speed, Vult: 109 mph (3-sec gust) per ASCE 7-16
Wind exposure category: C
Ground snow load, Pg: 50 psf
Connection to Roof
Mounting connection: (1) 5/16" lag screw w/ min. 2.5" threaded embedment into framing at max. 48" o.c. along rails
(2) rails per row of panels, evenly spaced; panel length perpendicular to the rails not to exceed 67 in. Rail cantilever shall
not exceed 50% of connection spacing.
Conclusions
Based upon our review,we conclude that the existing structure is adequate to support the proposed solar panel installation.
In the area of the solar array,other live loads will not be present or will be greatly reduced (2020 MBC,Section 1607.13.5).
The glass surface of the solar panels allows for a lower slope factor per ASCE 7,resulting in reduced design snow load on
the panels.The gravity loads,and thus the stresses of the structural elements,in the area of the solar array are either
decreased or increased by no more than 5%.Therefore,the requirements of Section 806.2 of the 2020 Minnesota
Conservation Code for Existing Buildings are met and the structure is permitted to remain unaltered.
The solar array will be flush-mounted (no more than 10"above the roof surface)and parallel to the roof surface.Thus,we
conclude that any additional wind loading on the structure related to the addition of the proposed solar array is negligible.
The attached calculations verify the capacity of the connections of the solar array to the existing roof against wind (uplift),
the governing load case.Because the increase in lateral forces is less than 10%,this addition meets the requirements of the
exception in Section 806.3 of the 2020 Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings.Thus the existing lateral force
resisting system is permitted to remain unaltered.
Limitations
651 W. Galena Park Blvd., Ste. 101 / Draper, UT 84020 / T (801) 990-1775 / F (801) 990-1776 / www.vectorse.com
VSE Project Number: U3507.0107.211
Preszler, Christina Residence
8/12/2021
Installation of the solar panels must be performed in accordance with manufacturer recommendations.All work performed
must be in accordance with accepted industry-wide methods and applicable safety standards.The contractor must notify
Vector Structural Engineering,LLC should any damage,deterioration or discrepancies between the as-built condition of the
structure and the condition described in this letter be found.Connections to existing roof framing must be staggered,except
at array ends,so as not to overload any existing structural member.The use of solar panel support span tables provided by
others is allowed only where the building type,site conditions,site-specific design parameters,and solar panel configuration
match the description of the span tables.The design of the solar panel racking (mounts,rails,etc.)and electrical engineering
is the responsibility of others.Waterproofing around the roof penetrations is the responsibility of others.Vector Structural
Engineering assumes no responsibility for improper installation of the solar array.
VECTOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, LLC
08/12/2021
_______________________________________________________
Brett Veazie, P.E.
Project Engineer
Enclosures
BDV/wic
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed
Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Brett Veazie, License No. 56392,
Expiration Date: 30-June-2022
08/12/2021
651 W. Galena Park Blvd., Ste. 101 / Draper, UT 84020 / T (801) 990-1775 / F (801) 990-1776 / www.vectorse.com
JOB NO.:U3507.0107.211
SUBJECT:WIND PRESSURE
PROJECT:Preszler, Christina Residence
Label:Note: Calculations per ASCE 7-16
SITE-SPECIFIC WIND PARAMETERS:
Basic Wind Speed [mph]:109 Notes:Exposure Category:C
Risk Category:II
Importance Factor, I:
ADDITIONAL INPUT & CALCULATIONS:
Height of Roof, h [ft]:25 (Approximate)
Comp/Cladding Location:Gable Roofs 27° < θ ≤ 45°
Enclosure Classification:
Zone 1, 2e, 2r GCp:1.75 Zone 1, 2e, 2r γa:0.78
Zone 2n, 3r GCp:1.96 Zone 2n, 3r γa:0.78
Zone 3e GCp:2.44 Zone 3e γa:0.78
γa:0.40
α:9.5 Table 26.11-1
zg [ft]:900 Table 26.11-1
Kh:0.95 Table 26.10-1
Ke:0.97 Table 26.9-1
Kzt:1 Equation 26.8-1
Kd:0.85 Table 26.6-1
Velocity Pressure, qh [psf]:23.6 Equation 26.10-1
γE:1.50 Section 29.4.4
γC:0.94 Section 29.4.4
γP:1.20 Section 29.4.4
p = q h (GC p )(γ E )(γ a )
p = q h (GC rn ), (GC rn ) = (γ p )(γ c )(γ E )(GC rn )nom
Zone 1, 2e, 2r, p [psf]:48.4 psf (1.0 W)
Zone 2n, 3r, p [psf]:54.3 psf (1.0 W)
Zone 3e, p [psf]:67.6 psf (1.0 W)
(a =3 ft)
Fig.
29.4-8
WIND PRESSURES:Equation 29.4-7
Solar Panel Array
Enclosed Buildings
Figure 30.3-2D
(negative coeff.)
Components and Cladding Wind Calculations
JOB NO.:U3507.0107.211
SUBJECT:CONNECTION
PROJECT:Preszler, Christina Residence
Calculate Uplift Forces on Connection
Pressure
(0.6 Dead -0.6 Wind)
(psf)
Max Trib. Width1
(ft)
Max Trib.
Area2
(ft2)
Max Uplift
Force
(lbs)
Zone 1, 2e, 2r 27.3 4.0 11.2 304
Zone 2n, 3r 30.8 4.0 11.2 344
Zone 3e 38.8 4.0 11.2 433
Calculate Connection Capacity
Lag Screw Size [in]:5/16
Cd:1.6 NDS Table 2.3.2
Embedment3 [in]:2.5
Grade:
Nominal Capacity [lbs/in]:205 NDS Table 12.2A
Number of Screws:1
Prying Coefficient:1.4
Total Capacity [lbs]:586
Determine Result
Maximum Demand [lbs]:433
Lag Screw Capacity [lbs]:586
Result:Capacity > Demand, Connection is adequate.
Notes
1. 'Max Trib. Width' is the width along the rails tributary to the connection.
3. Embedment is measured from the top of the framing member to the beginning of the tapered tip of the lag
screw. Embedment in sheathing or other material is not effective. The length of the tapered tip is not part of the
embedment length.
2. 'Max Trib Area' is the product of the 'Max. Trib Width' and 1/2 the panel width/height perpendicular to the
rails. (2) rails per row of panels. Length of panels perpendicular to the rails shall not exceed 67".
SPF (G = 0.42)
VECTOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
JOB NO.:U3507.0107.211
SUBJECT:GRAVITY LOADS
PROJECT:Preszler, Christina Residence
GRAVITY LOADS Roof Pitch: 10.8 :12
ROOF DEAD LOAD (D)
Increase due to
pitch
Material weight
[psf]
Composite Shingles 1.35 2.0
1/2" Plywood 1.35 1.0
Framing 1.00 3.0
Insulation 1.00 0.5
1/2" Gypsum Clg.1.35 2.0
M, E & Misc 1.00 1.5
Total Existing Roof DL
PV Array DL 1.35 3
DL:1.35
ROOF LIVE LOAD (Lr)
Existing Design Roof Live Load [psf]20 ASCE 7-16 Table 4.3-1
Roof Live Load With PV Array [psf]0
SNOW LOAD (S):w/ Solar Array
Roof Slope [x:12]:10.8
Roof Slope [°]:42
Ground Snow Load, pg [psf]:50 ASCE 7-16, Section 7.2
Terrain Category:C ASCE 7-16, Table 7.3-1
Exposure of Roof:Fully Exposed ASCE 7-16, Table 7.3-1
Exposure Factor, Ce:0.9 ASCE 7-16, Table 7.3-1
Thermal Factor, Ct:1.1 ASCE 7-16, Table 7.3-2
Risk Category:II ASCE 7-16, Table 1.5-1
Importance Factor, Is:1.0 ASCE 7-16, Table 1.5-2
Flat Roof Snow Load, pf [psf]:35 ASCE 7-16, Equation 7.3-1
Minimum Roof Snow Load, pm [psf]:0 ASCE 7-16, Section 7.3.4
Unobstructed Slippery Surface?Yes ASCE 7-16, Section 7.4
Slope Factor Figure:Figure 7-2b ASCE 7-16, Section 7.4
Roof Slope Factor, Cs:0.47 ASCE 7-16, Figure 7.4-1
Sloped Roof Snow Load, ps [psf]:16 ASCE 7-16, Equation 7.4-1
Design Snow Load, S [psf]:1630
10.8
42
50
C
Fully Exposed
0.9
1.1
II
1.0
35
0
No
Figure 7-2b
0.86
30
Design material
weight [psf]
2.7
1.3
3.0
0.5
2.7
1.5
11.7
4.0
#VALUE!
2020 MBC, Section 1607.13.5
Existing
JOB NO.:U3507.0107.211
SUBJECT:LOAD COMPARISON
PROJECT:Preszler, Christina Residence
Summary of Loads
Existing With PV Array
D [psf]12 16
Lr [psf]20 0
S [psf]30 16
Maximum Gravity Loads:
Existing With PV Array
(D + Lr) / Cd [psf]25 18 ASCE 7-16, Section 2.4.1
(D + S) / Cd [psf]36 28 ASCE 7-16, Section 2.4.1
Maximum Gravity Load [psf]:36 28
Ratio Proposed Loading to Current Loading:77%OK
The gravity loads, and thus the stresses of the structural elements, in the area of the
solar array are either decreased or increased by no more than 5%. Therefore, the
requirements of Section 806.2 of the 2020 Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing
Buildings are met and the structure is permitted to remain unaltered.
(Cd = Load Duration Factor = 0.9 for D, 1.15 for S, and 1.25 for Lr)
VECTOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
JOB NO.:U3507.0107.211
SUBJECT:SOLAR LAYOUT
PROJECT:Preszler, Christina Residence