Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLA224045 - APPROVED-TOM KING Permit PlansConcept Approval ONLYSubject to Field Inspection Inspector Date 2015 MN Bldg Code 05/23/2024jnuetzman STRUCTURAL CERTIFICATION REPORT Roof-mounted Solar Panels May 20, 2024 To: All Energy Solar Re: Tom King - 83060 1264 Energy Lane 4774 165th St W St. Paul, MN 55108 Lakeville, MN 55044 AHJ: Lakeville (City), MN All Energy Solar proposes to install new roof-mounted solar panels at this residence and asked Right Angle Engineering to review the existing structure for suitability. This letter summarizes the methods that were used to survey, evaluate, and certify the existing roof framing and the attachment of the new solar panels to it. STRUCTURAL DESIGN Building Code:Minnesota Residential Code 2020 Design Standards:ASCE 7-16 Snow:Ground: pg= 60.0 psf | Flat Roof: pf= 41.58 psf | Sloped Roof: ps= 24.95 psf Wind:Ultimate Wind Speed = 109.0 mph | Exposure = C Seismic:Risk Category = 2 | Seismic Design Category = A | Site Class = D STRUCTURE Field Technicians from All Energy Solar visited the site and observed the existing structure : Array Name Panel Quantity Roof Framing Material Pitch Array 1 7 Pre-Manufactured Truss | 24" o.c.Asphalt Shingles 45° Array 2 23 Pre-Manufactured Truss | 24" o.c.Asphalt Shingles 34° Array 3 2 Pre-Manufactured Truss | 24" o.c.Asphalt Shingles 34° Array 4 4 Pre-Manufactured Truss | 24" o.c.Asphalt Shingles 34° ANCHORAGE The solar panel anchorage shall be installed according to the manufacturer's most current installation manual. The attachment configuration should match the certified building plans. The solar panels should be mounted parallel (max 5 inches) to the roof surface. Array Name Connection Type Fastener Max Anchorage Spacing Array 1 Anchor Foot 5/16” lag screw (2.5" embedment) into roof substructure 48" Array 2 Anchor Foot 5/16” lag screw (2.5" embedment) into roof substructure 24" Array 3 Anchor Foot 5/16” lag screw (2.5" embedment) into roof substructure 24" Array 4 Anchor Foot 5/16” lag screw (2.5" embedment) into roof substructure 24" Installation Instructions Solar panels and the equipment shall be installed per the manufacturer's installation specifications. Improper installation will void this certification. If deviations from the approved structural plans occur, Right Angle Engineering must be notified. Prior to installation, the installer should: 581 E Technology Ave, C1500 | Orem, UT 84097 | 925-787-3067 | www.rightangleeng.com | Page 1 of 7 •Confirm that the existing structure matches the information provided in the site survey, the approved installation plans and this certification. •Identify discrepancies between this certification and the approved installation plans. If found, then this certification shall govern. •Identify structural elements that are dangerous (cracked, broken, excessive sag, signs of overstress, rot,decay, fire, water). If found, installation shall cease until those elements are adequately abated and made to comply with the referenced building code. •Verify that both the existing structure and the solar addition has been permitted through the AHJ. STRUCTURAL CERTIFICATION I certify the addition of solar panels on the roof of this structure does not cause the structure to become unsafe or make it generally less compliant with the life-safety requirements of the referenced building code. Based on the evaluation methods described below, for the loads that exist at this site, the existing framing will safely support the new solar panels if they are installed and attached correctly. Electrical design is not included in this certification. Array Name Certification Method Retrofits Array 1 Prescriptive method Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings code 806.2 None required Array 2 Prescriptive method Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings code 806.2 None required Array 3 Prescriptive method Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings code 806.2 None required Array 4 Prescriptive method Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings code 806.2 None required Regards, Robert D. Smythe, P.E. Right Angle Engineering 581 E Technology Ave, C1500 | Orem, UT 84097 | 925-787-3067 | www.rightangleeng.com | Page 2 of 7 Job Details Roof Snow Load - ASCE 7-16 Ground Snow Load (pg) Section 7.2 60.0 psf Exposure Factor (Ce) Table 7.3-1 0.9 Thermal Factor (Ct) Table 7.3-2 1.1 Importance Factor (Is) Table 1.5-2 1 Flat Roof Snow Load (pƒ) Equation 7.3-1 41.58 psf Non-Slippery Surface Slope Factor (Cs) Figure 7.4-1 1 Slippery Surface Slope Factor (Cs) Figure 7.4-1 0.6 Roof Snow Load Equation 7.4-1 41.58 psf Reduced Snow Load (Slippery Surface) Equation 7.4-1 24.95 psf Design Criteria Wind Speed (Vult) Local Design Criteria 109.0mph Exposure Category C Risk Category 2 Mean Roof Height 20 ft Roof Type Gable Roof Building Type Enclosed Roof Live Load Existing Roof Live Load ASCE 7-16 Table 4.3-1 20 psf 1Roof Dead Load Asphalt Shingles 2.0 psf No Drywall 0.0 psf 5/8" Plywood Sheathing 2.0 psf Solar Panel Array 2.74 psf Roof Framing 4 psf Dead Load Without Panels 9.2 psf Insulation 1.2 psf 1Roof Dead Load is taken from the worst case scenario dead load from all arrays of the job in order to provide a more conservative evaluation. 581 E Technology Ave, C1500 | Orem, UT 84097 | 925-787-3067 | www.rightangleeng.com | Page 3 of 7 Array 1 Array Details Roof Framing Pre-Manufactured Truss Spacing 24.0" Beam Span 17.0' Roof Pitch 45° Panel Quantity 7 Panel Array Area 151.45 ft² Panel Orientation Portrait Lag Screw Embedment 2.5" Roof Attachment Type Anchor Foot 5/16” lag screw Shear Capacity NDS 190.0 lbs Pullout Capacity NDS 665.0 lbs Velocity Pressure Equation 26.10-1 (Kz=0.9, Kht=1, Kd=0.85, Ke=0.97) 22.54 psf GCP Zones 1/2e/ 2r 2n/3r 3e GCpFigure 30.3-(2A-5B)-1.8 -2.0 -3.2 Design Pressure Up [psf] Equation 29.4-7 ga=0.49 gE=1.0,-20.0 -22.2 -35.6 Factored Design Pressure Up [psf] ASD LC (.6D + .6W) -10.9 -12.2 -20.2 Exposed Design Pressure Up [psf] ga=0.49 gE=1.5, -30.0 -33.4 -53.4 Design Pressure Down [psf]8.9 8.9 8.9 Tributary Area [ft2]13.4 13.4 13.4 Maximum Connection Spacing [in]51 51 51 Maximum Rail Span [in]48 48 48 Maximum Rail Cantilever [in]16 16 16 Design Connection Spacing [in]48 48 48 Deign Connection Spacing (exposed) [in]48 48 48 Prescriptive Method: Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings Code 806.2 Total load on member without solar 1878.86 lbs Total load on member with solar 1357.44 lbs Percentage of total design load on member with solar 0.72% The 2020 Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings section 806.2 indicates that alterations to an existing building that results in less than a 5.0% increase in the total stress may be performed without a structural evaluation of the existing building. As demonstrated in the above calculations, the additional weight of the solar panels will be less than 5.0% increase in the gravity loading and therefore stress on the existing roof framing. Load case before and load case after solar panels have been added have both been considered according to Minnesota State Building Code 1607.13.5.1. 581 E Technology Ave, C1500 | Orem, UT 84097 | 925-787-3067 | www.rightangleeng.com | Page 4 of 7 Array 2 Array Details Roof Framing Pre-Manufactured Truss Spacing 24.0" Beam Span 25.0' Roof Pitch 34° Panel Quantity 23 Panel Array Area 497.61 ft² Panel Orientation Portrait Lag Screw Embedment 2.5" Roof Attachment Type Anchor Foot 5/16” lag screw Shear Capacity NDS 190.0 lbs Pullout Capacity NDS 665.0 lbs Velocity Pressure Equation 26.10-1 (Kz=0.9, Kht=1, Kd=0.85, Ke=0.97) 22.54 psf GCP Zones 1/2e/ 2r 2n/3r 3e GCpFigure 30.3-(2A-5B)-1.8 -2.0 -3.2 Design Pressure Up [psf] Equation 29.4-7 ga=0.49 gE=1.0,-20.0 -22.2 -35.6 Factored Design Pressure Up [psf] ASD LC (.6D + .6W) -10.7 -12.0 -20.0 Exposed Design Pressure Up [psf] ga=0.49 gE=1.5, -30.0 -33.4 -53.4 Design Pressure Down [psf]8.9 8.9 8.9 Tributary Area [ft2]12.3 12.3 12.3 Maximum Connection Spacing [in]47 47 47 Maximum Rail Span [in]48 48 48 Maximum Rail Cantilever [in]8 8 8 Design Connection Spacing [in]24 24 24 Deign Connection Spacing (exposed) [in]24 24 24 Prescriptive Method: Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings Code 806.2 Total load on member without solar 2691.34 lbs Total load on member with solar 1822.31 lbs Percentage of total design load on member with solar 0.68% The 2020 Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings section 806.2 indicates that alterations to an existing building that results in less than a 5.0% increase in the total stress may be performed without a structural evaluation of the existing building. As demonstrated in the above calculations, the additional weight of the solar panels will be less than 5.0% increase in the gravity loading and therefore stress on the existing roof framing. Load case before and load case after solar panels have been added have both been considered according to Minnesota State Building Code 1607.13.5.1. 581 E Technology Ave, C1500 | Orem, UT 84097 | 925-787-3067 | www.rightangleeng.com | Page 5 of 7 Array 3 Array Details Roof Framing Pre-Manufactured Truss Spacing 24.0" Beam Span 13.0' Roof Pitch 34° Panel Quantity 2 Panel Array Area 43.27 ft² Panel Orientation Portrait Lag Screw Embedment 2.5" Roof Attachment Type Anchor Foot 5/16” lag screw Shear Capacity NDS 190.0 lbs Pullout Capacity NDS 665.0 lbs Velocity Pressure Equation 26.10-1 (Kz=0.9, Kht=1, Kd=0.85, Ke=0.97) 22.54 psf GCP Zones 1/2e/ 2r 2n/3r 3e GCpFigure 30.3-(2A-5B)-1.8 -2.0 -3.2 Design Pressure Up [psf] Equation 29.4-7 ga=0.49 gE=1.0,-20.0 -22.2 -35.6 Factored Design Pressure Up [psf] ASD LC (.6D + .6W) -10.7 -12.0 -20.0 Exposed Design Pressure Up [psf] ga=0.49 gE=1.5, -30.0 -33.4 -53.4 Design Pressure Down [psf]8.9 8.9 8.9 Tributary Area [ft2]12.3 12.3 12.3 Maximum Connection Spacing [in]47 47 47 Maximum Rail Span [in]48 48 48 Maximum Rail Cantilever [in]8 8 8 Design Connection Spacing [in]24 24 24 Deign Connection Spacing (exposed) [in]24 24 24 Prescriptive Method: Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings Code 806.2 Total load on member without solar 1472.62 lbs Total load on member with solar 1298.81 lbs Percentage of total design load on member with solar 0.88% The 2020 Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings section 806.2 indicates that alterations to an existing building that results in less than a 5.0% increase in the total stress may be performed without a structural evaluation of the existing building. As demonstrated in the above calculations, the additional weight of the solar panels will be less than 5.0% increase in the gravity loading and therefore stress on the existing roof framing. Load case before and load case after solar panels have been added have both been considered according to Minnesota State Building Code 1607.13.5.1. 581 E Technology Ave, C1500 | Orem, UT 84097 | 925-787-3067 | www.rightangleeng.com | Page 6 of 7 Array 4 Array Details Roof Framing Pre-Manufactured Truss Spacing 24.0" Beam Span 17.0' Roof Pitch 34° Panel Quantity 4 Panel Array Area 86.54 ft² Panel Orientation Portrait Lag Screw Embedment 2.5" Roof Attachment Type Anchor Foot 5/16” lag screw Shear Capacity NDS 190.0 lbs Pullout Capacity NDS 665.0 lbs Velocity Pressure Equation 26.10-1 (Kz=0.9, Kht=1, Kd=0.85, Ke=0.97) 22.54 psf GCP Zones 1/2e/ 2r 2n/3r 3e GCpFigure 30.3-(2A-5B)-1.8 -2.0 -3.2 Design Pressure Up [psf] Equation 29.4-7 ga=0.49 gE=1.0,-20.0 -22.2 -35.6 Factored Design Pressure Up [psf] ASD LC (.6D + .6W) -10.7 -12.0 -20.0 Exposed Design Pressure Up [psf] ga=0.49 gE=1.5, -30.0 -33.4 -53.4 Design Pressure Down [psf]8.9 8.9 8.9 Tributary Area [ft2]12.3 12.3 12.3 Maximum Connection Spacing [in]47 47 47 Maximum Rail Span [in]48 48 48 Maximum Rail Cantilever [in]8 8 8 Design Connection Spacing [in]24 24 24 Deign Connection Spacing (exposed) [in]24 24 24 Prescriptive Method: Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings Code 806.2 Total load on member without solar 1878.86 lbs Total load on member with solar 1357.44 lbs Percentage of total design load on member with solar 0.72% The 2020 Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings section 806.2 indicates that alterations to an existing building that results in less than a 5.0% increase in the total stress may be performed without a structural evaluation of the existing building. As demonstrated in the above calculations, the additional weight of the solar panels will be less than 5.0% increase in the gravity loading and therefore stress on the existing roof framing. Load case before and load case after solar panels have been added have both been considered according to Minnesota State Building Code 1607.13.5.1. 581 E Technology Ave, C1500 | Orem, UT 84097 | 925-787-3067 | www.rightangleeng.com | Page 7 of 7