Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10-21-2024 Agenda Packet
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING October 21, 2024 - 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers Members of the public can participate in person at Lakeville City Hall, 20195 Holyoke Avenue. Members of the public may join the meeting via Teams Meeting, Meeting ID: 270 967 142 637 or by calling Toll Number 1-323-433-2142; Conference ID: 244 190 036#. The mayor will allow for public comments and questions at the appropriate time. The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees, and boards. Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy, practices, input from constituents, and a council member’s personal judgment. 1. Call to order, moment of silence and flag pledge 2. Roll Call 3. Citizen Comments 4. Additional agenda information 5. Presentations/Introductions 6. Consent Agenda a. Check Register Summary b. Minutes of the 10/07/2024 City Council Meeting c. Contract for Well 23 Utility and Site Improvements d. Approve Easement Acquisition Agreements for 185th Street Expansion e. Contract for Oak Shores Park Lift Station #26 Improvements, Professional Services Construction Services Agreement, and Materials Testing Agreement f. Contract for Oak Wilt Management Trenching g. Contract for LED Lighting Equipment for Parks Facilities h. Resolution for 2025 Health and Dental Insurance Rates i. MOU to LELS Union Contracts j. Deferment of Special Assessments for Senior Citizens, Disabled and Military k. Resolution Approving Feasibility Report and Calling a Public Hearing for the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project 7. Action Items a. Lakeville 35 Logistics Park North Addition preliminary plat and CUP Page 1 of 452 City Council Meeting Agenda October 21, 2024 Page 2 b. Crown Lakeville Apartments Preliminary Plat and CUP 8. Unfinished Business 9. New Business 10. Announcements a. Next Work Session October 28, 2024 b. Next City Council Meeting November 4, 2024 11. Adjourn Page 2 of 452 Date: 10/21/2024 Check Register Summary Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve the Check Register Summary. Overview A summary of the claims paid during the period 09/03/2024 – 10/18/2024 is as follows: Checks – City ACH/EFT - City Total City 324024-324167 18149-18294 $726,152.56 $3,186,571.74 $3,912,724.30 Checks – Arena Checks – Dakota 911 ACH/EFT – Arena/Dakota 911 Total Arena/Dakota 911 100000-100001 200000-200005 1-6 $15,335.82 $15,699.95 $22,925.78 $53,961.55 Grand Total $3,966,685.85 The City Council will receive a list of expenditures paid (claims detail) and it is available to the public upon request. Supporting Information 1. 10.8.24CKSUM 2. Check Register 10.08.24 for Oct 21,2024 Council Mtg Financial Impact: $3,912,724.30 Budgeted: Yes Source: Various Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Cheri Donovan, Assistant Finance Director Page 3 of 452 Amount CHECK DISBURSEMENT REPORT FOR CITY OF LAKEVILLE 1000 GENERAL FUND 417,408.63 2000 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 2,553.75 2280 DOWNTOWN SPECIAL SERVICES DIST 175.00 4000 BUILDING FUND 70,836.74 4100 EQUIPMENT FUND 66,443.08 4125 TECHNOLOGY FUND 23,110.02 4161 ARENAS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 57,126.32 4200 PARK DEDICATION FUND 7,242.57 4700 2022 C PARK BONDS 8,031.20 4720 2024 A PARK BONDS 448,793.82 5200 STATE AID CONSTRUCTION FUND 187,659.50 5300 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT FUND 54,590.37 5400 STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE FND 79,710.30 5500 WATER TRUNK FUND 135,918.15 5600 SANITARY SEWER TRUNK FUND 138,618.00 6586 22-03 210TH ST LKVL BLVD RECON 1,403.32 6589 22-24 AIRLAKE 70 IMPROVEMENT 572,987.46 6596 24-03 COLLECTOR RD REHAB 590,798.81 7450 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES FUND 43,405.76 7575 STREET LIGHTING FUND 80,899.62 7600 WATER FUND 169,318.69 7700 SEWER FUND 17,181.22 7800 LIQUOR FUND 658,877.87 7900 MUNICIPAL RESERVES FUND 3,625.00 8000 ESCROW FUND 8,402.42 8910 ESCROW - DCA/SECTION 125 7,160.56 8924 LKVL ARENAS CAPITAL PROJECTS F 14,995.00 8950 DAKOTA 911 - OPERATING FUND 28,743.27 8954 DAKOTA 911 - CAPITAL PROJECTS 11,957.87 8970 LAKEVILLE ARENAS - OPERATIONS 55,946.77 9800 PAYROLL CLEARING FUND 2,764.76 Report Total:3,966,685.85 Page:1/110/17/2024 07:58 AM Page 4 of 452 MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING October 7, 2024 - 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers 1.Call to order, moment of silence and flag pledge Mayor Hellier called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2.Roll Call Members Present: Mayor Hellier, Council Members Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter Staff Present: Justin Miller, City Administrator; Andrea McDowell Poehler, City Attorney; Julie Stahl, Finance Director; Joe Masiarchin, Parks & Recreation Director; Allyn Kuennen, Assistant City Administrator; Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk; Brad Paulson, Police Chief; Mike Meyer, Fire Chief; Zach Johnson, City Engineer; Paul Oehme, Public Works Director; Tina Goodroad, Community Development Director 3.Citizen Comments None 4.Additional agenda information None 5.Presentations/Introductions a.Public Works Quarterly Report Public Works Director Paul Oehme presented the Quarterly Report. 6.Consent Agenda Motion was made by Bermel, seconded by Lee, to approve the following: Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes - Hellier, Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter a.Check Register Summary b.Minutes of the 09/16/2024 City Council Meeting c.Minutes of the 09/23/2024 Special Meeting d.Minutes of the 09/23/2024 Work Session e.Joint Powers Agreement with Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization and Dakota County, and Supplemental Agreement for Professional Services with Kimley-Horn for Launch Park Wetland Restoration f.Proposal from St. Croix Recreation, Inc. for Kenmore Park Playground Equipment Page 5 of 452 City Council Meeting Minutes October 7, 2024 Page 2 g.Youth Advisory Commission Appointments h.Accepting Donation from Lakeville Public Safety Foundation i.Resolution Calling Public Hearing - Special Service Dist No.1 j.Agreement with Xcel Energy for Street Light Replacement on Ideal Way k.Joint Powers Agreement Regarding Internet Crimes Against Children l.Professional Services Agreement with Action Target m.Supplemental Agreement for Professional Services with WSB for FiRST Center n.Resolution of Support for Draft 2025-2029 Dakota County Capital Improvement Program o.Approve Change Order for Citywide Trail Gap Improvements (City Project 23-06) p.Resolution Setting Dates of Regular City Council Meetings and Work Sessions for 2025 q.Ritter Meadows Second Addition Final Plat r.U.S. Department of Homeland Security Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant Acceptance s.Contract for Fall 2024 Tree Planting under the 2023 Shade Tree Program Bonding Grant t.Master Agreement with Lakeville Baseball Association for Facility Use and Sponsorships 7.Action Items a.Public Hearing for the Proposed 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Plan and Street Reconstruction Plan and the Intent to Issue General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds and General Obligation Capital Improvement Bonds Finance Director Julie Stahl and City Engineer Zach Johnson presented the proposed 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Project. Stahl explained that there are three resolutions to approve tonight after the public hearing. Approval of these motions will result in adoption of the 2025-2029 CIP and Street Reconstruction Plan and provide the City the flexibility to issue bonds for the projects listed in the resolution. There have been no changes to the CIP since the August work session. The Internal Revenue Service has issued Treasury Reg. 1.150-2, which provides that proceeds of tax-exempt bonds used to reimburse prior expenditures will not be deemed spent unless certain requirements are met. To meet these requirements, the City should annually declare its intent to bond for certain projects. The resolution includes projects that may use bonds as a funding source. An estimate for bonding for water facility and infrastructure improvements and equipment acquisition is included in the resolution. Approval of the declaration of intent to bond resolution does not approve the sale of bonds or the projects. This declaration does not obligate the City to issue bonds for the projects either. City Engineer Zach Johnson presented the specific projects that the CIP will support. Page 6 of 452 City Council Meeting Minutes October 7, 2024 Page 3 Mayor Hellier opened the public hearing at 6:32 p.m. There were no comments from the public. Motion was made by Volk, seconded by Bermel, to close the public hearing at 6:33 p.m. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes - Hellier, Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter Motion was made by Bermel, seconded by Volk, to approve Resolution 24-104 Adopting the 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan (2025-2029) and Approving the Issuance of General Obligation Capital Improvement Bonds. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes - Hellier, Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter The motion was made by Wolter, seconded by Lee, to approve Resolution 24-106 Adopting the 5-Year Street Reconstruction Plan (2025-2029) and Approving the Issuance of General Obligation Street Reconstruction Bonds. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes - Hellier, Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter Motion was made by Lee, seconded by Bermel, to approve Resolution 24-108 Declaring the Official Intent of the City of Lakeville to Reimburse Certain Expenditures from the Proceeds of Bonds to be Issued by the City. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes - Hellier, Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter b.Cedar Hills North Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments Steve Troskey of Lennar is requesting a comprehensive plan amendment from to guide property from Medium/High-Density Residential and Low/Medium Density Residential to Medium/High-Density Residential and Low-Density Residential and a zoning map amendment from RM-3, Medium Density Residential District to RST-2, Single and Two Family Residential District and from RST-2, Single and Two Family Residential District to RM-3, Medium Density Residential District. The requests are part of the proposed Cedar Hills North preliminary plat, which proposes the development of single- family homes and attached townhomes on about 75 acres of land located north of 200th Street (CR 64), between Cedar Avenue (CSAH 23) and the city boundary with Farmington. The Community Development Director provided information from the staff report and added that the Planning Commission held a hearing on September 9, 2024, and there was no public comment. The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval. Motion was made by Bermel, seconded by Wolter, to approve Resolution 24-102 amending the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Map, and an ordinance amending the Zoning Map and adoption of findings of fact for Cedar Hills North. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes - Hellier, Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter 8.Unfinished Business None 9.New Business None Page 7 of 452 City Council Meeting Minutes October 7, 2024 Page 4 10.Announcements a.Next City Council Meeting October 21, 2024 b.Next Work Session Monday, October 28, 2024 11.Adjourn Motion was made by Wolter, seconded by Volk, to adjourn. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes - Hellier, Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter Respectfully Submitted, __________________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk ____________________________ Luke M. Heller, Mayor Page 8 of 452 Date: 10/21/2024 Contract for Well 23 Utility and Site Improvements Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to award construction contract to Pember Companies, Inc for Well 23 Site Work Contract B, City Project 24-07 Overview This contract is for the second phase of the construction of Well 23. The well has been drilled and test pumping performed. The work in this phase of the contract includes installation of the pitless adapter, drop pipe, and well motor/pump, connecting the new well to the existing raw water collection lines; installation of a pre-cast concrete electrical building; electrical equipment; bituminous paving and site restoration. Well 23 is located on the south side of 190th St east of Dodd Blvd. The City opened bids for the project on September 12, 2024. Two bids were received: one from Pember Companies, Inc in the amount of $771,811 and one from Municipal Builders, Inc in the amount of $907,800. City Staff along with Barr Engineering have reviewed the bids and recommended award. Supporting Information 1. Contract 2. Letter of Recommendation Financial Impact: $771,811 Budgeted: Yes Source: Water Fund 7606-6295 Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Steve Ferraro, Public Works Coordinator Page 9 of 452 Page 10 of 452 Page 11 of 452 Page 12 of 452 Page 13 of 452 Page 14 of 452 Page 15 of 452 Page 16 of 452 Page 17 of 452 Page 18 of 452 Page 19 of 452 barr.com 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 | 952.832.2600 October 1, 2024 Paul Oehme City of Lakeville 18400 Ipava Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: City Project No. 24-07B, Lakeville Well 23 Dear Paul: Bids were received on September 12, 2024, for the above-referenced project located on 190th St. W in Lakeville MN. The project was advertised for bidding on August 19, 2024, and two contractors provided a bid. The bids received are tabulated below: Bidder Total Bid 1. MBI $907,800 2. Pember $771,811 We have reviewed the bid and their attachments and recommend that the project be awarded to the low bidder, Pember. Barr is familiar with Pember, and they have successfully completed projects we have designed. A copy of Pember’s bid is attached. Please let me know if you have questions about this project. Sincerely, Julia Macejkovic, P.E. Enclosure Page 20 of 452 By checkmarking the box at the bottom of this page and continuing, I agree to the terms stated in the Ad for Bid and the following terms for bidVAULT: DISCLAIMER AND WAIVER OF LIABILITY TERMS OF USE: BY USING THIS ON-LINE BIDDING SERVICE, YOU AGREE AS FOLLOWS: YOU EXPRESSLY ASSUME ALL RISK ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF THIS SERVICE. YOU ARE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY INFORMATION OR CONTENT YOU TRANSMIT THROUGH THE UNITED CLOUD COMPUTING SOLUTIONS, INC. ("UCCS") SERVICE. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE ACCURACY OF ALL INFORMATION YOU SUBMIT USING THIS SERVICE, INCLUDING THAT OF ALL DOCUMENTS YOU MAY UPLOAD IN SUPPORT OF YOUR BID. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE TO ELECTRONICALLY VERIFY YOUR BID BOND. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAFEGUARDING YOUR USER IDENTIFICATION, PASSWORD, PIN AND BID KEY TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO YOUR BID INFORMATION. UCCS MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THAT THE SERVICE IS MERCHANTABLE OR FIT FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE UCCS ON-LINE BIDDING SERVICE IS PROVIDED AS-IS, WITH ALL FAULTS. NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTY IS MADE THAT SERVICE WILL BE ERROR-FREE OR UNINTERRUPTED. UCCS MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS THAT THE UCCS SITE IS SECURE, OR IS FREE FROM BUGS, VIRUSES, ERROR OR OTHER PROGRAM LIMITATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ACCURATE OR UPDATED THIRD PARTY CONTENT. UCCS MAKES NO REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTY THAT ITS SECURITY PROCEDURES WILL PREVENT THE LOSS OF, ALTERATION OF OR IMPROPER ACCESS TO YOUR DATA. UCCS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY TRANSMISSION ERRORS IN, CORRUPTION OF, OR THE SECURITY OF YOUR INFORMATION CARRIED OVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS' OR OTHER PROVIDERS' FACILITIES. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL UCCS BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INFORMATION AND DATA CONTENT THAT YOU OR OTHERS TRANSMIT THROUGH THIS ON-LINE SERVICE. IN NO EVENT ARE UCCS OR ITS AFFILIATES, CONTRACTORS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS LIABLE TO YOU OR ANY THIRD PARTY USING YOUR ACCOUNT FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES INCURRED IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE SERVICE, OR OUT OF ANY BREACH OF A REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY, REGARDLESS OF THE TYPE OF CLAIM OR THE NATURE OF THE CAUSE Accept Terms 9/12/24, 10:34 AM bidVAULT https://bidvault.mn.uccs.com/emp_bid.php?bidid=10742 1/9Page 21 of 452 OF ACTION, EVEN IF UCCS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE OR LOSS. YOU AGREE TO HOLD UCCS, ITS AFFILIATES, CONTRACTORS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, EMPLOYEES OF AGENTS HARMLESS FOR ANY LOSS OR CLAIM (INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS) INCURRED OR SUFFERED BY UCCS RELATED TO YOUR USE OF THE UCCS BIDDING PROCESS. TO THE EXTENT THAT A COUNTY OR CITY'S DISCLAIMER AND WAIVER OF LIABILITY TERMS CONFLICT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF UCCS'S DISCLAIMER AND WAIVER OF LIABILITY, THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF UCCS'S DISCLAIMER AND WAIVER OF LIABILITY, APPLICABLE TO ALL USERS AS SET FORTH ABOVE, SHALL CONTROL. THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT ARE GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANY PROCEEDING TO ENFORCE OR CONSTRUE THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE BROUGHT IN MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT AND SHALL BE VENUED IN THE COUNTY OF MORRISON. [ X ] I agree to the terms stated in the Ad for Bid and the above terms for bidVAULT. The following plans and proposal documents must be read and accepted. File Type File List Confirm Acceptance Released Plans Well 23 Site_24-07B_Drawings.pdf [ X ] I have read and accepted these plans. Specifications Well 23 Site_24-07B_Project Manual.pdf [ X ] I have read and accepted these plans. NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT The following Non-Collusion Affidavit shall be executed by the bidder: State Project No.24-07B Federal Project No. State of Minnesota ) ) ss County of ) I, Brent Pember, President , do state under penalty of (name of person signing this affidavit) perjury under 28 U.S.C. 1746 of the laws of the United States: Plans and Proposal Non-Collusion Affidavit 9/12/24, 10:34 AM bidVAULT https://bidvault.mn.uccs.com/emp_bid.php?bidid=10742 2/9Page 22 of 452 (1)that I am the authorized representative of Pember Companies, Inc (name of person, partnership or corporation submitting this proposal) and that I have the authority to make this affidavit for and on behalf of said bidder; (2)that, in connection with this proposal, the said bidder has not either directly or indirectly entered into any agreement, participated in any collusion or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive bidding; (3)that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the contents of this proposal have not been communicated by the bidder or by any of his/her employees or agents to any person who is not an employee or agent of the bidder or of the surety on any bond furnished with the proposal and will not be communicated to any person who is not an employee or agent of the bidder or of said surety prior to the official opening of the proposal, and (4)that I have fully informed myself regarding the accuracy of the statements made in this affidavit. Signed: Jane R. Hanke OjyC1huz04uwiZapKDZu6t H16BjQGQkG0U5z/c5oBHA= (bidder or authorized representative) ATTACHMENT A PRIME CONTRACTOR RESPONSE RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER: 24-07B This form includes changes by statutory references from the Laws of Minnesota 2015, chapter 64, sections 1-9. This form must be submitted with the response to this solicitation. A response received without this form, will be rejected. Minn. Stat.§16C.285, Subd. 7. IMPLEMENTATION …any prime contractor or subcontractor or motor carrier that does not meet the minimum criteria in subdivision 3 or fails to verify that it meets those criteria is not a responsible contractor and is not eligible to be awarded a construction contract for the project or to perform work on the project… Minn. Stat.§16C.285, Subd. 3. RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTOR, MINIMUM CRITERIA. "Responsible contractor" means a contractor that conforms to the responsibility requirements in the solicitation document for its portion of the work on the project and verifies that it meets the following minimum criteria: (1)The Contractor: (i) is in compliance with workers' compensation and unemployment insurance requirements; (ii) is in compliance with Department of Revenue and Department of Employment and Economic Development registration requirements if it has employees; Responsible Contractor, Attachment A 9/12/24, 10:34 AM bidVAULT https://bidvault.mn.uccs.com/emp_bid.php?bidid=10742 3/9Page 23 of 452 (iii) has a valid federal tax identification number or a valid Social Security number if an individual; and (iv) has filed a certificate of authority to transact business in Minnesota with the Secretary of State if a foreign corporation or cooperative. (2)The contractor or related entity is in compliance with and, during the three-year period before submitting the verification, has not violated section 177.24, 177.25, 177.41 to 177.44, 181.03, 181.101, 181.13, 181.14, or 181.722, and has not violated United States Code, title 29, sections 201 to 219, or United States Code, title 40, sections 3141 to 3148. For purposes of this clause, a violation occurs when a contractor or related entity: (i) repeatedly fails to pay statutorily required wages or penalties on one or more separate projects for a total underpayment of $25,000 or more within the three-year period, provided that a failure to pay is "repeated" only if it involves two or more separate and distinct occurrences of underpayment during the three-year period; (ii) has been issued an order to comply by the commissioner of Labor and Industry that has become final; (iii) has been issued at least two determination letters within the three-year period by the Department of Transportation finding an underpayment by the contractor or related entity to its own employees; (iv) has been found by the commissioner of Labor and Industry to have repeatedly or willfully violated any of the sections referenced in this clause pursuant to section 177.27; (v) has been issued a ruling or findings of underpayment by the administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the United States Department of Labor that have become final or have been upheld by an administrative law judge or the Administrative Review Board; or (vi) has been found liable for underpayment of wages or penalties or misrepresenting a construction worker as an independent contractor in an action brought in a court having jurisdiction. Provided that, if the contractor or related entity contests a determination of underpayment by the Department of Transportation in a contested case proceeding, a violation does not occur until the contested case proceeding has concluded with a determination that the contractor or related entity underpaid wages or penalties;* (3) The contractor or related entity is in compliance with and, during the three-year period before submitting the verification, has not violated section 181.723 or chapter 326B. For purposes of this clause, a violation occurs when a contractor or related entity has been issued a final administrative or licensing order;* (4)The contractor or related entity has not, more than twice during the three-year period before submitting the verification, had a certificate of compliance under section 363A.36 revoked or suspended based on the provisions of section 363A.36, with the revocation or suspension becoming final because it was upheld by the Office of Administrative Hearings or was not appealed to the office;* (5)The contractor or related entity has not received a final determination assessing a monetary sanction from the Department of Administration or Transportation for failure to meet targeted group business, disadvantaged business enterprise, or veteran-owned business goals, due to a lack of good faith effort, more than once during the three-year period before submitting the verification;* 9/12/24, 10:34 AM bidVAULT https://bidvault.mn.uccs.com/emp_bid.php?bidid=10742 4/9Page 24 of 452 * Any violations, suspensions, revocations, or sanctions, as defined in clauses (2) to (5), occurring prior to July 1, 2014, shall not be considered in determining whether a contractor or related entity meets the minimum criteria. (6)The contractor or related entity is not currently suspended or debarred by the federal government or the state of Minnesota or any of its departments, commissions, agencies, or political subdivisions that have authority to debar a contractor; and (7)All subcontractors and motor carriers that the contractor intends to use to perform project work have verified to the contractor through a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer that they meet the minimum criteria listed in clauses (1) to (6). Minn. Stat.§16C.285, Subd. 5. SUBCONTRACTOR VERIFICATION. A prime contractor or subcontractor shall include in its verification of compliance under subdivision 4 a list of all of its first- tier subcontractors that it intends to retain for work on the project. Prior to execution of a construction contract, and as a condition precedent to the execution of a construction contract, the apparent successful prime contractor shall submit to the contracting authority a supplemental verification under oath confirming compliance with subdivision 3, clause (7). Each contractor or subcontractor shall obtain from all subcontractors with which it will have a direct contractual relationship a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer verifying that they meet all of the minimum criteria in subdivision 3 prior to execution of a construction contract with each subcontractor. If a prime contractor or any subcontractor retains additional subcontractors on the project after submitting its verification of compliance, the prime contractor or subcontractor shall obtain verifications of compliance from each additional subcontractor with which it has a direct contractual relationship and shall submit a supplemental verification confirming compliance with subdivision 3, clause (7), within 14 days of retaining the additional subcontractors. A prime contractor shall submit to the contracting authority upon request copies of the signed verifications of compliance from all subcontractors of any tier pursuant to subdivision 3, clause (7). A prime contractor and subcontractors shall not be responsible for the false statements of any subcontractor with which they do not have a direct contractual relationship. A prime contractor and subcontractors shall be responsible for false statements by their first-tier subcontractors with which they have a direct contractual relationship only if they accept the verification of compliance with actual knowledge that it contains a false statement. Subd. 5a. Motor carrier verification. A prime contractor or subcontractor shall obtain annually from all motor carriers with which it will have a direct contractual relationship a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer verifying that they meet all of the minimum criteria in subdivision 3 prior to execution of a construction contract with each motor carrier. A prime contractor or subcontractor shall require each such motor carrier to provide it with immediate written notification in the event that the motor carrier no longer meets one or more of the minimum criteria in subdivision 3 after submitting its annual verification. A motor carrier shall be ineligible to perform work on a project covered by this section if it does not meet all the minimum criteria in subdivision 3. Upon request, a prime contractor or subcontractor shall submit to the contracting authority the signed verifications of compliance from all motor carriers providing for-hire transportation of materials, equipment, or supplies for a project. Minn. Stat.§16C.285, Subd. 4. VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE. 9/12/24, 10:34 AM bidVAULT https://bidvault.mn.uccs.com/emp_bid.php?bidid=10742 5/9Page 25 of 452 A contractor responding to a solicitation document of a contracting authority shall submit to the contracting authority a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer verifying compliance with each of the minimum criteria in subdivision 3, with the exception of clause (7), at the time that it responds to the solicitation document. A contracting authority may accept a signed statement under oath as sufficient to demonstrate that a contractor is a responsible contractor and shall not be held liable for awarding a contract in reasonable reliance on that statement. A prime contractor, subcontractor, or motor carrier that fails to verify compliance with any one of the required minimum criteria or makes a false statement under oath in a verification of compliance shall be ineligible to be awarded a construction contract on the project for which the verification was submitted. A false statement under oath verifying compliance with any of the minimum criteria may result in termination of a construction contract that has already been awarded to a prime contractor or subcontractor or motor carrier that submits a false statement. A contracting authority shall not be liable for declining to award a contract or terminating a contract based on a reasonable determination that the contractor failed to verify compliance with the minimum criteria or falsely stated that it meets the minimum criteria. A verification of compliance need not be notarized. An electronic verification of compliance made and submitted as part of an electronic bid shall be an acceptable verification of compliance under this section provided that it contains an electronic signature as defined in section 325L.02, paragraph (h). CERTIFICATION By signing this document I certify that I am an owner or officer of the company, and I swear under oath that: 1) My company meets each of the Minimum Criteria to be a responsible contractor as defined herein and is in compliance with Minn. Stat.§16C.285, and 2) if my company is awarded a contract, I will submit Attachment A-1 prior to contract execution, and 3) if my company is awarded a contract, I will also submit Attachment A-2 as required. Authorized Signature of Owner or Officer: Jane R. Hanke QNVA5nWlrEb60mj1GtOXhv +a9MgnV2Xmc2uh9WyQ6f4= Printed Name: Brent Pember Title: President Date: 09/12/2024 Company Name: Pember Companies, Inc NOTE: Minn. Stat.§16C.285, Subd. 2, (c) If only one prime contractor responds to a solicitation document, a contracting authority may award a construction contract to the responding prime contractor even if the minimum criteria in subdivision 3 are not met. ATTACHMENT A-1 FIRST-TIER SUBCONTRACTORS LIST 9/12/24, 10:34 AM bidVAULT https://bidvault.mn.uccs.com/emp_bid.php?bidid=10742 6/9Page 26 of 452 SUBMIT PRIOR TO EXECUTION OF A CONTRUCTION CONTRACT PROJECT NUMBER: 24-07B Minn. Stat.§16C.285, Subd. 5. A prime contractor or subcontractor shall include in its verification of compliance under subdivision 4 a list of all of its first-tier subcontractors that it intends to retain for work on the project. Prior to execution of a construction contract, and as a condition precedent to the execution of a construction contract, the apparent successful prime contractor shall submit to the contracting authority a supplemental verification under oath confirming compliance with subdivision 3, clause (7). Each contractor or subcontractor shall obtain from all subcontractors with which it will have a direct contractual relationship a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer verifying that they meet all of the minimum criteria in subdivision 3 prior to execution of a construction contract with each subcontractor. FIRST TIER SUBCONTRACTOR NAMES *Expand text box by dragging lower right corner (Legal name of company as registered with the Secretary of State & name of city where home office is located) McNamara Contracting Inc-Rosemount, MN Champion Coatings, Inc-Jordan, MN Traut Companies-St Joseph, MN Hoffman & McNamara Nursery & Landscape-Hastings, MN Dynamic Electric, LLC-Faribault, MN SUPPLEMENTAL CERTIFICATION FOR ATTACHMENT A-1 By signing this document I certify that I am an owner or officer of the company, and I swear under oath that: All first-tier subcontractors listed on attachment A-1 have verified through a signed statement under oath by an owner or officer that they meet the minimum criteria to be a responsible contractor as defined in Minn. Stat.§16C.285. Authorized Signature of Owner or Officer: Jane R. Hanke QNVA5nWlrEb60mj1GtOXhv +a9MgnV2Xmc2uh9WyQ6f4= Printed Name: Brent Pember Title: President Date: 09/12/2024 Company Name: Pember Companies, Inc Base Bid Items 9/12/24, 10:34 AM bidVAULT https://bidvault.mn.uccs.com/emp_bid.php?bidid=10742 7/9Page 27 of 452 Line Item Number Description Units Quantity Unit Price Item Total 1 1 Mobillization/Demobilization LS 1 $41,740.00 $41,740.00 2 2 Furnish and Install Pitless Adapter EACH 1 $68,000.00 $68,000.00 3 3 Furnish and Install 10-inch Diameter Drop Pipe and Two 1-inch Probe Pipes L F 309 $281.00 $86,829.00 4 4 Furnish and Install Water Level Indicator EACH 1 $4,240.00 $4,240.00 5 5 Furnish and Install Submersible Pump and Motor (150 HP) EACH 1 $102,000.00 $102,000.00 6 6 Furnish and Install Concrete Slab (around Well 23) and Well Enclosure LS 1 $30,500.00 $30,500.00 7 7 Furnish and Install Electrical Building LS 1 $75,150.00 $75,150.00 8 8 Furnish and Install Electrical LS 1 $149,800.00 $149,800.00 9 9 Site Preparation LS 1 $1,160.00 $1,160.00 10 10 Erosion Control LS 1 $5,700.00 $5,700.00 11 11 Furnish and Install 12-Inch DIP Watermain LF 80 $206.00 $16,480.00 12 12 Furnish and Install 12-Inch Watermain Fittings and Appurtenances LS 1 $4,712.00 $4,712.00 13 13 Furnish and Install Precast 84-Inch Diameter Meter Manhole and Appurtenances EACH 1 $40,225.00 $40,225.00 14 14 Furnish and Install Precast 72-Inch Diameter Check Valve Manhole and Appurtenances EACH 1 $54,500.00 $54,500.00 15 15 Furnish and Install Hydrant Assembly EACH 1 $9,875.00 $9,875.00 16 16 Bituminous Driveway and Trail Pavement SY 275 $90.00 $24,750.00 17 17 Turf Establishment AC 0.5 $14,000.00 $7,000.00 18 18 Traffic Control LS 1 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 19 19 Site Restoration LS 1 $27,400.00 $27,400.00 20 20 Utility Company Allowance LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Base Bid Total:$771,811.00 Bid Bond Attach or verify Bid Bond [ ] Attach bond document [ X ] Enter information to verify with Surety 2000 [ ] Enter information to verify with SurePath 9/12/24, 10:34 AM bidVAULT https://bidvault.mn.uccs.com/emp_bid.php?bidid=10742 8/9Page 28 of 452 Bidder:Pember Companies, Inc Approved:Jane R. Hanke 09/12/2024 10:25 AM Approve Bid 9/12/24, 10:34 AM bidVAULT https://bidvault.mn.uccs.com/emp_bid.php?bidid=10742 9/9Page 29 of 452 Date: 10/21/2024 Approve Easement Acquisition Agreements for 185th Street Expansion Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve easement acquisition agreements for the 185th Street Expansion between Kenwood Trail and Ipava Avenue, City Project 25-04. Overview The City of Lakeville and Dakota County are partnering to complete improvements to County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 60 (185th Street) from CSAH 50 (Kenwood Trail) to Ipava Avenue. City Project 25-04 is programmed in the City and County adopted five-year Capital Improvement Plans (2024-2028) to improve intersection operations, make safety improvements, and provide for increasing traffic levels. The project includes widening to a four-lane divided urban roadway with pedestrian/bicyclist facilities along both sides, intersection modifications and public utility infrastructure improvements. Construction of the project requires acquisition of additional permanent right-of-way, trail and drainage and utility easements, and temporary construction easements to accommodate the street, trail and drainage improvements. The City's consultant engineer contracted a consultant and an independent appraiser to appraise the value of the easements. The appraisals were reviewed and approved by City staff and the City Attorney. The City and property owners of Parcels 8 and 14 reached agreement on terms and conditions of the required easements through direct negotiation. Compensation and the conveyance of easements are subject to City Council approval, verification of marketable title and lender consent (if applicable). The City and County will share easement acquisition costs as established in the project's Joint Powers Agreement. The City is the lead agency. Therefore, the total cost is reflected in this memo. The City's estimated net cost for these easement acquisitions is $155,180. Supporting Information 1. Parcel Sketches Financial Impact: $344,850 Budgeted: Yes Source: Multiple Sources Envision Lakeville Community Values: Safety Throughout the Community Report Completed by: Zach Johnson, City Engineer Page 30 of 452 Page 31 of 452 Page 32 of 452 Page 33 of 452 Date: 10/21/2024 Contract for Oak Shores Park Lift Station #26 Improvements, Professional Services Construction Services Agreement, and Materials Testing Agreement Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to 1) award construction contract to Bituminous Roadways, Inc for Oak Shores Park Lift Station #26, City Project 24-09, 2) approve proposal for professional services from Bolten-Menk and 3) approve materials testing proposal from AET. Overview The Maple Island lift station, located in Burnsville, has supported the cities of Lakeville and Burnsville for sewer conveyance to gravity systems since 1972. The lift station has reached its capacity and in 2022 the City of Burnsville requested a review of the lift station operations. 80% of the sewer flowing to the Maple Island lift station is from Lakeville. Since most of the flow to the lift station is from Lakeville, the lift station is at capacity and there is no room for expansion, it has been determined that Lakeville should build a new lift station. Earlier this year the City of Lakeville authorized Bolton-Menk to prepare a Feasibility Report to examine options to manage the existing Lakeville sewer flow currently serviced by the Maple Island Lift Station. The most feasible design option for the new lift station was chosen in which Bolton-Menk designed and the City advertised this fall. The new sewer pipe and forcemain will need to be constructed through Oak Shores Park, in Jamacia Ave and Oak Shores Drive to convey sewer to the nearest gravity system. The new lift station, which will be located just north of the current parking lot in Oak Shores Park, would be able to handle all current and future sewer flows from the Lakeville sewer shed. On Thursday October 10, 2024 at 10:30 a.m., the City received six bids ranging from Bituminous Roadways’ low bid of $1,022,250.42 to a high bid of $1,728,315.25. The engineers estimate for construction was $1,580,438.50. Due to specialized nature of the work and current City staffing shortages, Bolten-Menk provided a proposal as requested for professional services & construction observation. AET provided a proposal for all materials testing as part of the project. All project costs fall within the CIP budgeted amount. City Staff has reviewed all bids & proposals and finds all acceptable and subsequently recommends award. Supporting Information 1. Bituminous Roadways Agreement 2. Bolton-Menk Professional Services Proposal 3. AET Proposal Oak Shores Lift Station #26 AAS Page 34 of 452 Financial Impact: $1,169,600.42 Budgeted: Yes Source: Sanitary Sewer Trunk Fund 5600-6280 Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Steve Ferraro, Public Works Coordinator Page 35 of 452 Page 36 of 452 Page 37 of 452 Page 38 of 452 Page 39 of 452 Page 40 of 452 Page 41 of 452 Page 42 of 452 N:\Proposals\Lakeville\Crystal Lake LS\Construction Scope and Fee\Lakeville Lift Station #26 (Crystal Lake) construction scope and fee ltr.docx October 15, 2024 Mr. Paul Oehme, P.E. Public Works Director City of Lakeville 18400 Ipava Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: Oak Shores Park Lift Station #26 & Force Main Installation Lakeville, Minnesota Dear Mr. Oehme, Thank you for providing us this opportunity to assist you with the construction phase of the Oak Shores Lift Station (Lift Station #26) project. Bolton & Menk, Inc. has the expertise, experience and staff resources to oversee the construction of this project to a successful completion. Having completed the design, we also are already intimately familiar with the details of the project and the city’s needs and concerns related to it. Based on our understanding, the construction phase of this project will involve the following components: • Construction Administration: o Assisting with contract assembly, award, and execution o Preconstruction meeting organization, attendance, and follow-up o Review and approve shop drawings and other project materials documentation o Apply for Dakota County ROW Obstruction Permit (city to pay for permit fee) o Prepare for, attend, and follow up on three (3) project meetings during construction • Construction Observation: o Full-time construction observation while major construction is taking place ▪ Assumes 50 hours/week for Civil/Municipal resident project representative (RPR) and 5 hours/week for Civil/Municipal project manager (PM) o Maintenance of daily construction logs and documentation of pay item quantities o Assisting city with preparation of pay estimates o Coordination of materials testing by AET, documentation of materials and testing (actual testing paid for by city) o Startup of new lift station & system o Site visits to develop punch list and determine its completion (three assumed) • Survey & Staking o Includes field staking, when called for, for the following project features: ▪ New lift station structures and concrete pad Page 43 of 452 Name: Mr. Paul Oehme, P.E., Public Works Director Date: October 15, 2024 N:\Proposals\Lakeville\Crystal Lake LS\Construction Scope and Fee\Lakeville Lift Station #26 (Crystal Lake) construction scope and fee ltr.docx ▪ New forcemain (both open cut and trenchless) ▪ New sanitary gravity sewer ▪ New manhole structures (8) ▪ Curb & gutter, including park parking lot ▪ Trail replacement • Project Closeout o Obtain from Contractor, review, and approve project closeout documents o Obtain information from field representatives and Contractor o Prepare as-built record drawings For the scope of the construction portion of this project, we have made the following assumptions: • Full construction observation coverage by Bolton & Menk is assumed within the estimated cost. It is understood that the City of Lakeville may provide some level of construction observation in addition to what is included in this proposal by Bolton & Menk. Good communication between observation parties will be maintained with relation to how much coverage is required. • It is assumed that only one “Phase” of the project (as defined in the project specifications) will be under construction at any given time. • The City of Lakeville will primarily be preparing pay estimates for the project, based on information from the Contractor and from the on-site RPR(s). Bolton & Menk will be prepared to provide some assistance and answer related questions. • The survey construction staking required for the project shall involve only the portions of the project described above. • Three meetings which involve a larger project team are assumed during construction. It is assumed that regular discussions will be taking place between Bolton & Menk and City of Lakeville Staff in the field, including for any critical topics or decisions. • Materials testing by AET will be coordinated by Bolton & Menk in the field and will be paid for by the city. A proposal for materials testing during construction has already been received from AET and passed along to the city. • Once the MPCA Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit and Dakota County Right-of-Way Obstruction Permit are obtained, no additional permitting will be needed. In accordance with the Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services, dated September 20, 2021, we propose to complete the construction phase services for an estimated fee of $137,000. This amount accounts for both construction services and the additional scope and challenges that were dealt with during final design. Because the Engineer has no direct control over the scheduling or operations of the Contractor, the services described in this proposal are based on similar project experience and the assumptions already noted. This construction portion of the project will be billed hourly at standard rates, and discussion with the city would take place prior to exceeding the amount stated above. Page 44 of 452 Name: Mr. Paul Oehme, P.E., Public Works Director Date: October 15, 2024 N:\Proposals\Lakeville\Crystal Lake LS\Construction Scope and Fee\Lakeville Lift Station #26 (Crystal Lake) construction scope and fee ltr.docx Thank you for the opportunity to present this scope and fee letter. We look forward to working with you and your staff. If you need any additional information or have any questions on the above, please do not hesitate to give me a call at 612-751-9227. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Jacob Humburg, P.E. Water/Wastewater Engineer Leader | Principal Luke Hellier Mayor, City of Lakeville Ann Orlofsky City Clerk, City of Lakeville Page 45 of 452 550 Cleveland Avenue North | Saint Paul, MN 55114 Phone (651) 659-9001 | (800) 972-6364 | Fax (651) 659-1379 | teamAET.com | AA/EEO This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from American Engineering Testing, Inc. October 4, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT OF SERVICES The services of American Engineering Testing, Inc., (AET) have been requested for the referenced project by Craig Eldred with Bolton & Menk, Inc. on October 2, 2024. Understood information from requesting party includes the following: Project Name: Oak Shores Lift Station #26 Project Address: 10435 162nd Street West Lakeville, MN 55044 Project Number: AET Project No. P-0037772 Client: City of Lakeville, Public Works Client Address: 7570 179th Street West Lakeville, MN 55044 Client Contact: Paul Oehme – Public Works Director SERVICE EXTENT/COMMUNICATION: AET’s services will be provided on an on-call basis when requested by Client or authorized representative. UNDERSTOOD SCOPE OF SERVICES: AET understands our Scope of Services is limited the following: • Observations of completed excavation bottoms to evaluate the suitability of soils for structural support. • Soil testing to evaluate compaction of fill and suitability of fill soils for use. • Site testing of concrete; including slump tests, air content tests, temperature tests, casting test cylinders, and compressive strength testing of cylinders. • Prepare reports presenting the results of the services provided. The following services are optional. If requested, a change order may be necessary: • Aggregate qualities per ASTM C131 Los Angeles Rattler Abrasion. • Percent crushing per ASTM D5821. Page 46 of 452 City of Lakeville – Oak Shores Lift Station #26; Lakeville, MN AET Proposal No. P-0037772 October 4, 2024 Page 2 of 3 This proposal is valid for a period of 30 days from the date issued. FEES: Our services will be provided on a unit cost basis according to the unit rates provided in the attached Fee Schedule. Our monthly invoices will be determined by multiplying the number of personnel hours or tests by their respective unit rates. This estimated total cost is based on our past experience with similar projects and our estimated total cost is $10,350.00. TERMS/CONDITIONS: All AET Services are provided subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth in the enclosed Service Agreement—Terms and Conditions, which, upon acceptance of this proposal, are binding upon you as the Client requesting Services, and your successors, assignees, joint ventures and third-party beneficiaries. Please be advised that additional insured status is granted upon acceptance of the proposal. ACCEPTANCE: AET requests written acceptance of this proposal in the Authorized Client Representative section below, but the following actions shall constitute your acceptance of this proposal together with the Terms and Conditions and Amendments: 1) issuing an authorizing purchase order for any of the Services described above, 2) authorizing AET’s presence on site or 3) written or electronic notification for AET to proceed with any of the Services described in this proposal. Please indicate your acceptance of this proposal by signing below and returning a copy to us. When you accept this proposal, you represent that you are authorized to accept on behalf of the Client. AET Representative: Ryan S. Schaefer Geologist II/Project Manager Phone: (651) 603-6639 Email: rschaefer@teamAET.com Page 47 of 452 City of Lakeville – Oak Shores Lift Station #26; Lakeville, MN AET Proposal No. P-0037772 October 4, 2024 Page 3 of 3 ACCEPTANCE AND AUTHORIZATION: AET Proposal No. P-0037772 SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME: COMPANY: ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL: DATE: INVOICING INFORMATION (Provide Company AP Department Information, if present.) AP CONTACT NAME: BILLING/MAILING ADDRESS: AP PHONE NUMBER AND INVOICE EMAIL: P.O. NO./ PROJECT NO.: Attachments: Fee Schedule Construction Service Agreement – Terms and Conditions Certificate of Insurance W9 Page 48 of 452 PROJECT TESTING SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE OAK SHORES LIFT STATION #26 10435 162ND STREET WEST LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 AET PROPOSAL No. P-0037772 UNIT BUDGET RATE AMOUNT Excavation Observations - Engineer I for observations of excavations, consultation and reporting (assumes 1 trip to the jobsite).3 Hours $170.00 $510.00 Soil Density Testing - Technician II for soil compaction testing and reporting (assumes 7 trips to the jobsite).21 Hours $115.00 $2,415.00 Personal or company vehicle mileage.500 Miles $1.30 $650.00 Nuclear Density Test 21 Tests $42.00 $882.00 ASTM D698 Standard Proctor 2 Tests $184.00 $368.00 ASTM C136 Sieve Analysis of Aggregate (Coarse and Fine)2 Tests $135.00 $270.00 ASTM C131 Los Angeles Rattler (LAR) Abrasion 0 Tests $131.00 $0.00 ASTM D5821 Percent Fractured Particles in Coarse Aggregate 0 Tests $221.00 $0.00 Section Subtotal:$5,095.00 Concrete Testing - Technician I for testing of concrete only - NO OBSERVATIONS OF REINFORCING STEEL (assumes 6 trips to the jobsite).18 Hours $100.00 $1,800.00 Personal or company vehicle mileage.300 Miles $1.30 $390.00 Sample Pickup - service from jobsite.6 Each $100.00 $600.00 ASTM C39 Concrete Compressive Strength - Curing, handling and testing of 4" x 8" concrete test cylinders (includes handling of non-tested cylinders).30 Tests $42.00 $1,260.00 Section Subtotal:$4,050.00 Project Management - Engineer II/Project Manager for coordination of AET personnel and activities, attending meetings (if requested), consultation and report preparation.5 Hours $190.00 $950.00 Project Administrator for report preparation, review, invoicing.3 Hours $85.00 $255.00 Section Subtotal:$1,205.00 $10,350.00 Project Management & Coordination ESTIMATED BUDGET PROJECT BUDGET Concrete Testing SERVICE DESCRIPTION Excavation Observations & Compaction Testing UNITS ESTIMATED Page 1 of 1 Page 49 of 452 CONSTRUCTION SERVICE AGREEMENT - TERMS AND CONDITIONS Page 1 of 4 ACS 403C (01/24) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. SECTION 1 - RESPONSIBILITIES 1.1 – This Service Agreement – Terms and Conditions (“terms and conditions”) is applicable to all services ("Services") provided by American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET). As used herein “Services” refer to the scope of Services described in the proposal submitted by AET to Client. The proposal, these terms and conditions and any appendices attached hereto shall comprise the agreement ("Agreement") between AET and Client for Services described in the proposal and are binding upon the Client, its successors, assignees, joint ventures and third-party beneficiaries. AET requests written acceptance of the Agreement, but the following actions shall also constitute Client’s acceptance of the Agreement: 1) issuing an authorizing purchase order, task order, service order, or any other documentation for any of the Services, 2) authorizing AET’s presence on site, or 3) written or electronic notification for AET to proceed with any of the Services. Issuance of a purchase order, task order or service order by Client which contains separate terms and conditions will not take precedence or modify the terms and conditions contained in this Service Agreement AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS SERVICE AGREEMENT AND ANY CORRESPONDING PROPOSAL ISSUED BY AET SHALL GOVERN UNLESS AUTHORIZED IN WRITING IN ADVANCE BY AET. 1.2 - Prior to AET performing Services, Client will provide AET with all information that may affect the cost, progress, safety and performance of the Services. This includes, but is not limited to, information on proposed and existing construction, all pertinent sections of contracts between Client and their client and/or Owner which contain flow-down provisions to AET, if they are included, site safety plans or other documents which may control or affect AET's Services. If new information becomes available or changes are made during AET's Services, Client will provide such information to AET in a timely manner. Failure of Client to timely notify AET of changes to the project including, but not limited to, location, elevation, loading, or configuration of the structure or improvement will constitute a release of any liability of AET. Client will provide a representative for timely answers to project-related questions by AET. 1.3 - AET observes and tests earthwork and other construction operations and materials, and may provide opinions, conclusions and recommendations regarding the same. However, AET’s Services do not relieve the contractors of their contractual responsibility to perform their work in accordance with approved plans, specifications and building code requirements. 1.4 - AET personnel do not have authority to accept, reject, direct or otherwise approve the work of the contractor. AET cannot stop work or waive or alter the requirements of the project documents. Any authority given to AET by Client must be in writing prior to the start of Services. 1.5 - AET does not perform construction management, general contracting or surveying services and our involvement with the project does not constitute any assumption of those responsibilities. 1.6 - Services performed by AET often include sampling at specific locations. Client acknowledges the limitations inherent in sampling. Variations in conditions occur between and beyond sampled/tested locations. The passage of time, natural occurrences and direct or indirect human activities at the site or distant from it may alter the actual conditions. Client assumes all risks associated with such variations. 1.7 - AET is not responsible for interpretations or modifications of AET's recommendations by other persons. 1.8 - Should change in conditions be alleged, Client agrees to notify AET before evidence of alleged change is no longer accessible for evaluation. 1.9 - Test borings and/or cone penetration test soundings to a proper depth below foundation grade and the base of suitable bearing soils are recommended to explore the deeper unseen soil and ground water conditions. Judgments made by AET personnel regarding the suitability of materials and ground water conditions below the bottom of an excavation are limited if sufficiently deep test borings/soundings are not provided by the Client prior to our observations and judgments. AET’s opinions, conclusions and recommendations are qualified to that extent. 1.10 – Pricing in the proposal assumes use of these terms and conditions. AET reserves the right to amend pricing if Client requests modifications to the Agreement or use of Client’s alternate contract format. Any contract amendments made after Client has authorized the Services shall be applicable only to Services performed after the effective date of such amendment. The proposal and these terms and conditions, including terms of payment, shall apply to all Services performed prior to the effective date of such amendment. 1.11 – The AET proposal accompanying these terms and conditions is valid for thirty (30) days after the proposal issuance date to the Client. Any attempt to authorize Services after the expiration date is subject to AET’s right to revise the proposal as necessary. SECTION 2 – ON CALL SERVICES 2.1 - If AET’s Services are performed on an on-call basis at the direction of the Client or its authorized representatives, Client acknowledges the inherent limitations associated with performing engineering judgments and testing Services on an on-call basis, including without limitation, the inability to completely evaluate, document or judge work and conditions not directly observed or tested by AET. AET’s opinions, conclusions, and recommendations are qualified to the extent of those limitations. 2.2 - Density tests of fill soils represent conditions only at the locations and elevations tested and do not necessarily represent conditions laterally, above or below. AET can only provide judgments regarding the engineered fill system to adequately support the design construction loadings by monitoring the filling process on a continuous basis for consistency of soil type, moisture content, lift thickness, and compaction effort. 2.3 – AET requires a minimum of 24 hours’ notice of the need for Services. AET will not be liable for claims, damages, or delays related to failure of Client to provide adequate advance notice to AET. SECTION 3 - SITE ACCESS, UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND CONSTRUCTION STAKING 3.1 - Client will furnish AET safe and legal site access. 3.2 – With the exception of public utilities which AET will contact state “call before you dig” notification centers (e.g. Gopher State One call in Minnesota), Client will mark or cause to be marked the location of all other underground utilities and structures (Facilities) that service or are located on the site. AET shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy of all location information supplied by any source. 3.3 – Client shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend AET from all claims, damages, losses, fines, penalties and expenses (including attorney’s fees) arising out of or related to the following: a) Facilities that are not shown or vary from the locations shown on any plans or drawings, b) Facilities that are not located by or vary from the locations marked by Client, governmental or quasi-governmental locator programs, or private utility locating services, or c) any other Facilities that are not disclosed or vary from locations provided by the Client. The obligation to defend AET shall be independent of the obligation to indemnify and hold harmless AET and shall be with independent counsel acceptable to AET. 3.4 - The location and elevation of a proposed structure or facility shall be staked (with offsets) and controlled by surveying or GPS equipment by others. AET’s measurements are made in relation to that information. The reliability of any opinions, conclusions, and recommendations based on those measurements is strictly dependent on the accuracy of the staking or GPS information provided by others. Page 50 of 452 CONSTRUCTION SERVICE AGREEMENT - TERMS AND CONDITIONS Page 2 of 4 ACS 403C (01/24) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. 3.5 - During construction, observations and testing Services are based on the positioning of the formwork by the contractor or its subcontractor. AET will not be responsible for any errors or damages resulting from improper location or positioning of the formwork. SECTION 4 - SAFETY 4.1 - Client shall inform AET of any known or suspected hazardous materials or unsafe conditions at the site. Client or its authorized representative(s) is responsible for the safety of the jobsite. If, during the course of AET's Services, such materials or conditions are discovered, AET reserves the right to take measures to protect AET personnel and equipment or to immediately terminate Services. Client shall be responsible for payment of such additional protection costs. 4.2 - AET shall only be responsible for safety of AET employees at the site; the safety of all others shall be Client's or other persons' responsibility. SECTION 5 - SAMPLES 5.1 - Client shall inform AET of any known or suspected hazardous materials prior to submittal to AET. All samples obtained by or submitted to AET remain the property of the Client during and after the Services. Any known or suspected hazardous material samples will be returned to the Client at AET's discretion. 5.2 - Non-hazardous samples will be held for thirty (30) days and then discarded unless, within thirty (30) days of the report date, the Client requests in writing that AET store or ship the samples. Storage and shipping costs shall be borne solely by Client. SECTION 6 - PROJECT RECORDS The original project records prepared by AET will remain the property of AET. AET shall retain these original records for a minimum of three years following submission of the report, during which period the project records can be made available to Client at AET's office at reasonable times. SECTION 7 - STANDARD OF CARE AET performs its Services consistent with the level of care and skill normally performed by other firms in the profession at the time of this service and in this geographic area, under similar budgetary constraints. SECTION 8 - INSURANCE AET maintains insurance with coverage and minimum limits shown below. AET will furnish certificates of insurance to Client upon request. 8.1 – Workers’ Compensation Statutory Limits Employer’s Liability $100,000 each accident $500,000 disease policy limit $100,000 disease each employee Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate Automobile Liability $1,000,000 each accident Professional/Pollution Liability Insurance $1,000,000 per claim $1,000,000 aggregate 8.2 - Commercial General Liability insurance will include coverage for Products/Completed Operations extending one (1) year after completion of AET’s Services as outlined in our proposal, Property Damage, Personal Injury, and Contractual Liability coverage applicable to AET's indemnity obligations under this Agreement. 8.3 - Automobile Liability insurance shall include coverage for all owned, hired and non-owned automobiles. 8.4 - Professional/Pollution Liability Insurance is written on a claims-made basis and coverage will be maintained for one (1) year after completion of AET’s Services as outlined in our proposal. Renewal policies during this period shall maintain the same retroactive date. 8.5 - To the extent permitted by applicable state law, and upon Client’s signing of the proposal, which includes these Terms and Conditions, and return of the same to AET, or Client provided forms of acceptance as defined in Section 1.1; Client and Owner shall be named an “additional insured” on AET’s Commercial General Liability Policy (Form CG D4 14, which includes blanket coverage for the Additional Insured on a Primary and Non-Contributory basis). Client and Owner shall also be named an "additional insured" on a Primary and Non-contributory basis on AET's Automobile Liability Policy (Form CA T4 74). Any other endorsement, coverage or policy requirement may result in additional charges. 8.6 - AET will maintain insurance coverage required by this Agreement at its sole expense, provided such insurance is reasonably available, with insurance carriers licensed to do business in the state in which the project is located and having a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A minus (A-). Such insurance shall provide for thirty (30) days prior written notice to Client for notice of cancellation or material limitations for the policy or ten (10) days' notice for non-payment of premium. 8.7 - AET reserves the right to charge Client for AET’s costs for additional coverage requirements unknown on the date of the proposal, e.g., coverage limits or policy modification including waiver of subrogation, additional insured endorsements and other project specific requirements. Page 51 of 452 CONSTRUCTION SERVICE AGREEMENT - TERMS AND CONDITIONS Page 3 of 4 ACS 403C (01/24) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. SECTION 9 - DELAYS If delays to AET's Services are caused by Client or Owner, other parties, strikes, natural causes, pandemic, weather, or other items beyond AET's control, a reasonable time extension for performance of the Services shall be granted, and AET shall receive an equitable fee adjustment. SECTION 10 - PAYMENT, INTEREST AND BREACH 10.1 - Invoices are due net thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of an undisputed invoice. Invoices will be paid without reductions for bond or retention. Client will inform AET of invoice questions or disagreements within fifteen (15) days of invoice date; unless so informed, invoices are deemed correct. 10.2 – Invoices remaining unpaid for sixty (60) days shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement, permitting AET, in its sole discretion and without limiting any other legal or equitable remedies for such breach, to terminate performance of this Agreement and be relieved of any associated duties to the Client or other persons. Further, AET may withhold from Client data and reports in AET’s possession. If Client fails to cure such breach, all reports associated with the unpaid invoices shall immediately upon demand be returned to AET and Client may neither use nor rely upon such reports or the Services. 10.3 – AET reserves the right to pursue any unpaid invoice utilizing available remedies at law. AET explicitly reserves its Mechanic Lien or Bond Claim rights for nonpayment of an undisputed invoice. Client is responsible for paying AET expenses and attorney fees related to collection of past due invoices. 10.4 – AET reserves the right to charge a 2.5% fee on any payment made using a credit card or debit card. SECTION 11 - CHANGE ORDERS AET's proposal associated with this project may provide an estimated cost for the work. If the proposal amount is a time and material estimate, or if changes occur affecting the project scope, estimated quantities, project schedule or other unforeseen conditions, AET will communicate with Client and request a change order. However, nothing in this agreement shall be construed in any way as a waiver of payment by Client to AET for Services authorized under this agreement. Approval of a change order may be in writing, by electronic communication, or any directive for additional Services. SECTION 12 - MEDIATION 12.1 - Except for enforcement of AET’s rights to payment for Services rendered or to assert and/or enforce its lien rights, including without limitation assertion and enforcement of mechanic’s lien rights and foreclosure of the same, Client and AET agree that any claim, dispute or other matter in question arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to arbitration or the institution of legal or equitable proceedings by either party; provided however that if either party fails to respond to a request for mediation within sixty (60) days, the party requesting mediation may without further notice, proceed to arbitration or the institution of legal or equitable proceedings. 12.2 - Mediation shall be in accordance with the Construction Industry Mediation Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Request for mediation shall be in writing and the parties shall share the mediator’s fee and any filing fees equally and each party shall pay their own legal fees. The mediator shall be acceptable to both parties and shall have experience in commercial construction matters. SECTION 13 - LITIGATION REIMBURSEMENT Except for matters relating to non-payment of fees, which is governed by Section 10 hereof, payment of attorney’s fees and costs associated with lawsuits or arbitration of disputes between AET and Client, which are dismissed or are judged substantially in either party's favor, shall be paid by the non-prevailing party. Applicable costs include, but are not limited to, attorney and expert witness fees, court costs, and other direct costs. SECTION 14 - MUTUAL INDEMNIFICATION 14.1 - Subject to the limitations contained in Sections 14 and 17, AET agrees to indemnify Client from and against damages and costs to the extent caused by AET's negligent performance of the Services. 14.2 - Client agrees to indemnify AET from and against damages and costs to the extent caused by the intentional acts or negligence of the Client, Owner, Client's contractors and subcontractors or other third parties. 14.3 - If Client has an indemnity agreement with other persons or entities relating to the project for which AET’s Services are performed, the Client shall include AET as an Additional Insured. 14.4 - AET's indemnification to the Client, including any indemnity required or implied by law, is limited solely to losses or damages caused by its failure to meet the standard of care and only to the extent of its negligence. SECTION 15 - NON-SOLICITATION Each party to this Agreement (a “Party”) agrees that it will not encourage, induce, or actively solicit any employee of the other party to leave their employment for any reason, provided that neither Party is precluded from (a) hiring any such employee who has been terminated by a Party or its subsidiaries prior to commencement of employment discussions between a Party and such employee, or (b) soliciting any such employee by means of a general advertisement or through an employment agency that does not specifically pursue the employee, or (c) hiring employees or former employees of the other Party who contact the Party on its own accord. This Non-Solicitation provision shall be effective and enforceable for six (6) months following termination of this Agreement. SECTION 16- MUTUAL WAIVER OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES Except as specifically set forth herein and to the extent permitted by applicable law, Client and AET waive against each other, and each other’s officers, directors, members, subcontractor, agents, assigns, successors, partners, and employees any and all claims for or entitlement to special, incidental, indirect, punitive, or consequential damages arising out of, resulting from, or in any way related to the Services provided by AET under this Agreement. This mutual waiver of consequential damages includes, but is not limited to, the following: loss of profits; loss of revenue; rental costs/expenses incurred; loss of income; loss of use of property, equipment, materials or services; loss of opportunity; loss of rent; loss of good will; loss of financing; loss of credit; diminution of value; loss of business and reputation; loss of management or employee productivity or the services of such persons; increased financing costs; cost of substitute facilities; cost of substitute goods/property/equipment; cost of substitute services; and/or cost of capital. This mutual waiver is applicable, without limitation, Page 52 of 452 CONSTRUCTION SERVICE AGREEMENT - TERMS AND CONDITIONS Page 4 of 4 ACS 403C (01/24) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. to all consequential damages due to either party’s termination of this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement and related documents and shall survive any such termination. SECTION 17 - LIMITATION OF LIABILITY To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the total aggregate liability of AET and its officers, directors, partners, employees, subcontractors, agents, and sub-consultants, to Client and/or Client’s employees, officers, directors, members, agents, assigns, successors, or partners, or anyone claiming through Client, for any and all injuries, damages, claims, losses, or expenses (including attorney’s fees and costs) arising out of, resulting from or in any way related to Services provided by AET from any cause or causes, including, but not limited to, its negligence, professional errors and omissions, strict liability, breach of contract, or breach of warranty shall not exceed the total compensation in excess of costs received by AET for Services or $50,000, whichever is less. The limitation of liability set forth herein does not apply to claims arising solely out of or related to the willful or intentional acts of AET. SECTION 18 - POSTING OF NOTICES ON EMPLOYEE RIGHTS Effective June 21, 2010, prime contracts with a value of $100,000 or more and signed by federal contractors on projects with any agency of the United States government must comply with 29 CFR Part 471, which requires physical posting of a notice to employees of their rights under Federal labor laws. The required notice may be found at 29 Code of Federal Regulations Part 471, Appendix A to Subpart A. The regulation also has a "flow-down" requirement for subcontractors under the prime agreement for subcontracts with a value of $10,000 or more. AET requires strict compliance of its subcontractors working on federal contracts subject to this regulation. The regulation has specific requirements for location of posting and language(s) for the poster. SECTION 19 - TERMINATION After 7 days' written notice, either party may elect to terminate work for justifiable reasons. In this event, the Client shall pay AET for all Services performed, including demobilization and reporting costs to complete the Services. SECTION 20 - SEVERABILITY Any provisions of this Agreement later held to violate a law or regulation shall be deemed void, and all remaining provisions shall continue in force. However, Client and AET will in good faith attempt to replace an invalid or unenforceable provision with one that is valid and enforceable, and which comes as close as possible to expressing the intent of the original provision. SECTION 21 - GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the Laws of the State of Minnesota without regard to its conflicts of law provisions. SECTION 22 - ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement, including these terms and conditions and attached proposal and appendices, is the entire agreement between AET and Client. Regardless of method of acceptance of this Agreement by the Client, this Agreement supersedes any written or oral agreements, including purchase/work orders or other Client agreements submitted to AET after the start of our Services. Any modifications to this Agreement must be mutually acceptable to both parties and accepted in writing. No considerations will be given to revisions to AET's terms and conditions or alternate contract format submitted by the Client as a condition for payment of AET's accrued Services. Page 53 of 452 Page 54 of 452 Page 55 of 452 Date: 10/21/2024 Contract for Oak Wilt Management Trenching Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a contract with Rainbow Tree Company for oak wilt management trenching services. Overview While surveying for oak wilt, Forestry staff identified two infected oak trees on city owned property at 19030 Kenwood Trail adjacent to the Preserve neighborhood. Testing by the University of Minnesota Plant Pathology lab confirmed the presence of oak wilt in the samples provided. A follow-up site survey was conducted and oak trees within 200 feet of the infected trees were inventoried. A number of dead oak trees were observed, but no other trees presented visual signs of oak wilt during the survey. To isolate the infested trees and limit the underground spread of oak wilt, it is recommended mechanical trenching be used to disrupt root grafts. Following the site survey, Forestry requested an estimate from the Rainbow Tree Company to conduct trenching services in the park. The estimate provided includes trenching 366 feet at a cost of $4,392.00, or $12.00/ft, which is consistent with past trench work provided to the city in 2019. Staff recommends approval of the contract. Work is proposed to occur this fall to limit the potential spread of oak wilt. Supporting Information 1. Contract 2. Proposal Financial Impact: $4,392.00 Budgeted: Yes Source: Forestry Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service; Access to a Multitude of Natural Amenities and Recreational Opportunities Report Completed by: Zachary Jorgensen - City Forester Page 56 of 452 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT made this 21st day of October 2024, by and between the CITY OF LAKEVILLE, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, and Rainbow Tree Company, DBA Rainbow Treecare , a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter referred to as the “Contractor”. THE CITY AND THE CONTRACTOR, FOR THE CONSIDERATION HEREINAFTER STATED, AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The scope of services consists of mechanical trenching to disrupt root grafts in a city owned oak woodland at The Preserve to manage oak wilt. Trenching will be completed using a Vermeer 925 Tracked Skid Loader with a trench depth of 36”-40”. Soil excavated during trenching will be used to backfill the trench. The Contractor agrees to perform the services as detailed in the Contract Documents. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents", all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This document entitled “Contract for Services”. B. Contractor’s Proposal dated October 9th, 2024. If there is a conflict among the provisions of the Contract, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document "A" having the first priority and Contract Document "B" having the last priority. 3. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. A. The Contractor agrees that the work contemplated by the Contract shall be fully and satisfactorily completed in accordance with the terms of the Contract Documents. B. Contractor shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a contractor under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Contractor’s services. C. The Contractor shall complete the work on City owned land no later than November 30th. 4. PAYMENT. A. The City agrees to pay and the Contractor agrees to receive and accept payment in accordance with the price quoted, which is inclusive of sales tax, as set forth in the Contractor’s Proposal. Payment to the Contractor shall be made based on work completed and submission and approval of an invoice. Page 57 of 452 B. Payments to Subcontractor. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.425, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of 1½ percent per month or any part of a month to the subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. A. The Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City and its officials, agents, representatives, and employees from any loss, claim, liability and expense (including reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation) with respect to: (a) Worker’s Compensation benefits payable on account of injury or death to any Contractor employee or to any employee of Contractor’s subcontractors, where the injury or death arises out of or is in any way related to the work performed or to be performed under the Contract; (b) claims for personal injury, death, or property damage or loss asserted by a Contractor or subcontractor or any of their officers, agents, representatives, or employees where the injury, death, damage, or loss arises out of or is in any way related to the work performed or to be performed under the Contract; and (c) claims for personal injury, death, or property damage or loss as asserted by third-parties at the work site, where the claim is based in the whole or in any part on, or is in any way related to, any act or omission by Contractor, or Contractor’s subcontractors, agents, employees or delegates. B. Contractor shall agree that the indemnities stated above shall be construed and applied in favor of indemnification. To the extent permitted by law, the stated indemnities shall apply regardless of any strict liability or negligence attributable to the City and regardless of the extent to which the underlying harm is attributable to the negligence or otherwise wrongful act or omission (including breach of contract) of Contractor, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or delegates. Contractor also agrees that if applicable law limits or precludes any aspect of the stated indemnities, then the indemnities will be considered limited only to the extent necessary to comply with that applicable law. The stated indemnities continue until all applicable statutes of limitations have run. C. If a claim arises within the scope of the stated indemnity, the City may require Contractor to furnish a written acceptance of tender of defense and indemnity from Contractor’s insurance company. Contractor will take the action required by City within fifteen (15) days of receiving notice from City. 6. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES. A. The duties and obligations imposed by the Contract Documents and the rights and remedies available thereunder shall be in addition to and not a limitation of any duties, obligations, rights, and remedies otherwise imposed or available by law. Page 58 of 452 B. No action or failure to act by the City or the Contractor shall constitute a waiver of any right or duty afforded by any of them under the Contract, nor shall any such action or failure to act constitute an approval of or acquiescence in any breach thereunder, except as may be specifically agreed in writing. 7. GOVERNING LAW. The Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8. INSURANCE. Prior to the start of the project, Contractor shall furnish to the City a certificate of insurance showing proof of the required insurance required under this Paragraph. Contractor shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, such insurance as shall protect Contractor and the City for work covered by the Contract including workers’ compensation claims and property damage, bodily and personal injury which may arise from operations under this Contract, whether such operations are by Contractor or anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them. The minimum amounts of insurance shall be as follows: Commercial General Liability (or in combination with an umbrella policy) $2,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000 Annual Aggregate The following coverages shall be included: Premises and Operations Bodily Injury and Property Damage Personal and Advertising Injury Blanket Contractual Liability Products and Completed Operations Liability Automobile Liability $2,000,000 Combined Single Limit – Bodily Injury & Property Damage Including Owned, Hired & Non-Owned Automobiles Workers Compensation Except as provided below, Contractor must provide Workers’ Compensation insurance for all its employees and, in case any work is subcontracted, Contractor will require the subcontractor to provide Workers’ Compensation insurance in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of Minnesota, including Coverage B, Employer’s Liability. Insurance minimum limits are as follows: $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease per employee $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease aggregate $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Accident Page 59 of 452 If Minnesota Statute 176.041 exempts Contractor from Workers’ Compensation insurance or if the Contractor has no employees in the City, Contractor must provide a written statement, signed by an authorized representative, indicating the qualifying exemption that excludes Contractor from the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation requirements. If during the course of the contract the Contractor becomes eligible for Workers’ Compensation, the Contractor must comply with the Workers’ Compensation insurance requirements herein and provide the City with a certificate of insurance. Professional/Technical (Errors and Omissions) Liability Insurance This policy will provide coverage for all claims the contractor may become legally obligated to pay resulting from any actual or alleged negligent act, error, or omission related to Contractor’s professional services required under the contract. Contractor is required to carry the following minimum limits: $1,000,000 – per claim or event $2,000,000 – annual aggregate Any deductible will be the sole responsibility of the Contractor and may not exceed $50,000 without the written approval of the City. If the Contractor desires authority from the City to have a deductible in a higher amount, the Contractor shall so request in writing, specifying the amount of the desired deductible and providing financial documentation by submitting the most current audited financial statements so that the City can ascertain the ability of the Contractor to cover the deductible from its own resources. The retroactive or prior acts date of such coverage shall not be after the effective date of this Contract and Contractor shall maintain such insurance for a period of at least three (3) years, following completion of the work. If such insurance is discontinued, extended reporting period coverage must be obtained by Contractor to fulfill this requirement. The Contractor’s insurance must be “Primary and Non-Contributory”. All insurance policies (or riders) required by this Contract shall be (i) taken out by and maintained with responsible insurance companies organized under the laws of one of the states of the United States and qualified to do business in the State of Minnesota, (ii) shall name the City, its employees and agents as additional insureds (CGL and umbrella only) by endorsement which shall be filed with the City. A copy of the endorsement must be submitted with the certificate of insurance . Contractor’s policies and Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30) days’ advanced written notice to the City, or ten (10) days’ notice for non-payment of premium. An Umbrella or Excess Liability insurance policy may be used to supplement Contractor’s policy limits on a follow-form basis to satisfy the full policy limits required by this Contract. Page 60 of 452 9. TERM. The term of this Contract shall be from the effective date of the executed contract to the completion of all work contemplated by this contract or November 30 th, 2024, unless sooner terminated as hereinafter provided. 10. SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT, AND INCIDENTALS. The City and Contractor agree that the Contractor shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, protective measures, and incidentals necessary for Contractor’s performance of this Contract. 11. SUPERVISION OF CONTRACTOR. The City’s designated supervisor will be Zachary Jorgensen, City Forester. The City Forester, acting on the City’s behalf, shall be responsible for providing communication and direction as to the provision of services by the Contractor under this Contract. The Contractor will contact the City of Lakeville to supply the dates and the times they will perform work. The City Forester’s mailing address is: 20195 Holyoke Avenue, Lakeville, MN 55044; telephone numbers are: (W) 952-985-2724; (C) 952-836-4511; email address is zjorgensen@lakevillemn.gov. 12. TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE BY CITY. The City reserves the right to terminate Contractor at will immediately without cause at any time within the term of this Contract. In the event of such termination, the City shall provide Contractor written notice of termination and upon receipt of same, Contractor shall immediately cease and desist Contractor’s provision of services under this Contract and City shall have no further obligation under this Contract to pay any further compensation to Contractor except for compensation due and owing for services prior to Contractor’s receipts of the written notice of termination. 13. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. City and Contractor agree that Contractor, while engaged in carrying out and complying with the terms and conditions of this Contract and the provision of services thereunder, shall be considered at all times an independent contractor and not an officer, employee, or agent of the City. City and Contractor further agree that Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of the Contractor’s agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. City and Contractor further agree that Contractor shall be exclusively responsible under this Contract for Contractor’s own FICA payment, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes or other taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulations. 14. WRITTEN NOTICE OR OTHER CORRESPONDENCE. Any written notice or other correspondence to be provided by or between the City and the Contractor in accordance with this Contract shall be hand delivered or mailed by registered or certified mail to the following address: CITY: City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville MN 55044 Page 61 of 452 CONTRACTOR: 15. WAIVER OF DEFAULT. Any waiver by City of a default under the provisions of this Contract by Contractor shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of a subsequent default by the Contractor. No waiver shall be valid unless in writing and signed by the Mayor and the City Administrator on behalf of the City. 16. NO ASSIGNMENT OR SUBCONTRACTING. The City and Contractor agree that the services to be rendered by the Contractor under this Contract are unique and personal. Accordingly, the Contractor may not assign or subcontract out any of the Contractor’s rights or any of the Contractor’s duties or obligations under this Contract. 17. INVALIDITY OF PROVISIONS. If any term or provision of this Contract or any application hereof to any person or circumstances, shall to any extent be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Contract or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be effected hereby and each term and provision of this Contract shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. 18. DATA PRACTICES/RECORDS. A. All data created, collected, received, maintained, or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. B. All books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Contractor and its subcontractors, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination by the City. 19. WARRANTY. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship, materials, and equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service, and upon proper notification by the City shall immediately replace, without cost to the City, any such faulty part or parts and damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the proposal specifications. 20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This instrument herein contains the entire and only agreement between the parties and no oral statement or representation, or prior written matter not contained in this instrument shall have any force and effect. This Contract shall not be modified in any way except by writing executed by both parties. Rainbow Tree Company 11571 K-Tel Dr Minnetonka, MN 55343 Page 62 of 452 21. DISCRIMINATION. Contractor agrees to comply with Minnesota Statute 181.59 that states: Subsection A. That, in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work under any contract, or any subcontract, no contractor, material supplier or Contractor, shall, by reason of race, creed, or color, discriminate against the person or persons who are citizens of the United States or resident aliens who are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates; Subsection B. That no contractor, material supplier, or Contractor, shall, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any person or persons identified in clause (1) of this section, or on being hired, prevent, or conspire to prevent the person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed, or color; Subsection C. That a violation of this section is a misdemeanor; and Subsection D. That this contract may be canceled or terminated by the state, county, city, town, school board, or any other person authorized to grant the contracts for employment, and all money due, or to become due under the contract, may be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or conditions of this contract. 22. WORK HOURS. Working hours shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Changes to those hours should be coordinated with the City. 23. BACKGROUND CHECKS. The City must receive from the Contractor and each Contractor’s employee written authorization permitting the City of Lakeville Police Department to perform a criminal history background check and further authorize the Police Department to release the information obtained to the Lakeville City Council, City Administrator and other appropriate employees. The City reserves the right to deny access to City facilities to those Contractors or Contractor’s employees that it deems inappropriate. Page 63 of 452 CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: Luke M. Hellier, Mayor AND Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk RAINBOW TREE COMPANY BY: (Print Name) Its: Ryan Spencer Municipal Consulting Arborist Page 64 of 452 Honorific Proposal Date Estimate # 10/09/2024 571712 www .rainbowtreecare.com 11571 K Tel Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 952-922-3810 Job Name Lakeville OW Trench 2024 Item Description TotalQty City of Lakeville Zach Jorgensen 20195 Holyoke Ave Lakeville, MN 55044 952-985-2724 Bill To Ryan Spencer 952-217-9776 rspencer@rainbowtreecare.com Consulting Arborist Trenching Line Root Graft Disruption - Trencher (Standard)$4,392.00366 Mechanical Trenching to Sever Root Grafts Between Healthy & Diseased Trees. Work Requires the Use of a Vermeer 925 Skid Loader on Tracks Weighing Approximately 3 ,500 Lbs. Expect Root Severing to a Depth of 36 -40 ". Soil Brought Upward by the Trencher will be Placed Back Into the Furrow. Any Restoration Beyond Filling the Furrow is the Customer's Responsibility . Trench Line Near 18862 Ixonia Ave.: 366 Lineal Feet at $12 per foot. Estimates Good for 90 Days. Total:$4,392.00 Subtotal:$4,392.00 Tax:$0.00 Customer Signature Date There is a 3% Processing Fee added to payments made via Credit Card. Payments made via e-Check (preferred method), Check and Debit Card are FREE. Page 65 of 452 Honorific Terms and Conditions The following terms and conditions are a part of the confirmation of work to be performed by Rainbow Tree Co., and with the information on the front constitutes the entire agreement. HAZARDS AND RISKS: Proposals made by Rainbow Tree Co. are intended to reduce or minimize hazardous conditions inherently associated with trees. However, Rainbow Tree Co. can not guarantee that the proposed efforts will prevent tree failure or breakage during a storm or other natural events. At times hazardous conditions can be undetectable, therefore Rainbow Tree Co. also holds no guarantee that all hazardous conditions will be detected. PAYMENT TERMS: Services are invoiced as they are completed. Services completed on different days, by different crews will be invoiced separately. Payment for each Invoice is due upon receipt. Invoices are emailed to the primary email address on the account, or an alternative email address, if provided by the customer. There is a 3 % Processing Fee added to payments made via Credit Card. Payments made via e-Check (preferred method), Check and Debit Card are FREE. Rainbow will impose 1 .5 % interest per month on all outstanding balances over 30 days old. INSURANCE: Rainbow Tree Co. is insured against liability resulting from personal injury or property damage related to work performed on your property and all Rainbow Tree Co. employees are covered by Workers Compensation. Proof of insurance is available upon request. OWNERSHIP: The customer warrants that all trees, plant material, and property upon which the work is to be performed are either owned by the customer or permission has been granted by the owner. Rainbow Tree Co. is not responsible for any claims resulting from the customer's failure to obtain such permission. The customer assumes all responsibility for providing accurate property markers and will provide Rainbow Tree Co. with copies of any easements or restrictions. WORKMANSHIP AND PERFORMANCE: Rainbow Tree Co. is responsible for the removal of all wood and debris related to the proposed work, unless otherwise specified in this proposal. All work will be performed in a professional manner. Techniques and tools will meet or exceed industry standards. Rainbow Tree Co. shall attempt to meet all promised performance dates, but shall not be liable for damages due to delays for inclement weather or other causes beyond its control. Delays in work will not relieve the customer from the responsibility of this contract. STUMPS: Unless noted otherwise all stumps will be cut as close to the ground level as safely possible without damaging company equipment or endangering employees. Removal· of stumps is not included in a tree removal contract unless specifically stated. CONCEALED CONTINGENCIES: The customer agrees to pay Rainbow Tree Co. on a time and materials basis for any additional work required to complete the job if concrete, brick , pipe, or other foreign materials (including stinging insect nests) are encountered in the tree (s ). The customer agrees to pay Rainbow Tree Co. for any additional work due to pipe or electrical lines encountered during trenching or excavations and not described on the face of this agreement and for any other condition not apparent at the time the estimate was completed. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND IRRIGATION LINES: Rainbow Tree Co. is not responsible for the damage of concealed irrigation lines, utility lines or invisible fencing. The customer signifies no knowledge of concealed utilities not listed on the front of this page. The customer is responsible for the marking of irrigation lines and invisible fencing. Public utilities will be marked by local agencies under Rainbow Tree Company's instruction . SPRAY APPLICATIONS: Rainbow Tree Co. is responsible for the proper treatment of sprayed landscape plants. Since treatments are time sensitive it is the customer's responsibility to provide access to the plants. Failure to provide access may result in Rainbow Tree Co. withdrawing from the responsibility of proper treatment. Rainbow Tree Co. is responsible to use spray formulations commonly used by the industry for the treatment of the problems of landscape plants but can not be responsible for unforeseen or abnormal reactions to a spray . Revised Mav 2015. Page 66 of 452 Date: 10/21/2024 Contract for LED Lighting Equipment for Parks Facilities Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve the purchase contract with Voss Lighting through the State of Minnesota’s cooperative purchasing agreement. Overview The Parks department is actively working to upgrade lighting in its buildings and outdoor areas to energy-efficient LED's. This upgrade aims to improve both energy savings and sustainability. By utilizing the state of Minnesota’s cooperative purchasing agreement, the city is able to secure highly competitive pricing for the necessary LED fixtures and equipment, ensuring cost- effective procurement for the project. In addition to securing the best pricing, city staff plans to pursue available rebate programs through Xcel Energy and Dakota Electric Association once the new LED lighting is installed. These rebates will further help reduce the overall project cost and provide additional financial benefits to the city. This comprehensive lighting upgrade will not only result in long-term energy savings but will also contribute to the city's environmental goals by reducing energy consumption and improving lighting quality across park facilities. Staff will solicit quotes from electrical contractors in the future for the installation. Supporting Information 1. Contract for Purchase of LED Lighting Equipment Financial Impact: $24,181.72 Budgeted: Yes Source: Parks Operating Major Maintenance Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Tom Breeggemann, Facilities Supervisor Page 67 of 452 200196v1 1 CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CITY OF LAKEVILLE LIGHTING EQUIPMENT THIS CONTRACT made and entered into this 21st day of October, 2024, by and between CITY OF LAKEVILLE, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and VOSS ELECTRIC COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation ("Contractor"). WHEREAS, the City is authorized to purchase equipment without regard to the statutory competitive bidding requirements if the purchase is through a national municipal association’s purchasing alliance or cooperative created by a joint powers agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 471.345, subd. 15; and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, has instituted a cooperative purchasing venture that meets the requirements of Minnesota Statutes § 471.345, subd. 15. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. Contract Documents. The following documents, attached hereto, shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents", all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set out verbatim and in full herein: • This document entitled "Contract for Purchase of “City of Lakeville Lighting Equipment.” • State of MN contract L-290 (5) Exhibit A. • Contractor Quotes Dated 10/04/2024 Exhibit B. In the event of conflict among the provisions of these documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control with the document listed first having the highest priority. The Contract Documents are fully a part of this Contract as if attached to this Contract or repeated herein. Section 2. Acceptance of Proposal. Contractor shall perform the work as provided in the Contract Documents. Contractor shall be engaged as an independent contractor and not as a City employee. Section 3. Contract Time/Delivery. The Equipment shall be delivered to the City on or before December 31st 2024. The time for delivery shall be extended for the period of any reasonable delay due exclusively to unforeseeable causes beyond the control, and without the fault of the Contractor, including but not limited to, acts of God, fires, and floods. Section 4. Price/Terms of Payment. A. Price. As a contract price for the Equipment, the City shall pay the sum of twenty-four thousand, one hundred eighty-one dollars and seventy-two cents ($24,181.72) as listed in the quote (Exhibit B), and in agreement with schedule set forth under State of Minnesota contract L-290(5) (Exhibit A). Page 68 of 452 200196v1 2 B. Terms of Payment. Payment shall be made in full within fifteen (15) days after this contract has been signed by the City and after the Contractor has furnished the equipment. Section 5. Risk of Loss. The Contractor shall bear the entire risk of loss caused by damage or destruction of equipment or property furnished pursuant to the Contract Documents to the time the equipment is delivered to the City. Section 6. Warranties. The Contractor is responsible for any and all defects in workmanship and materials and upon notification by the City shall immediately replace or repair the defective workmanship and materials without cost to the City. The Contractor warrants that only new unused materials will be used. The Contractor further warrants to the City that all materials and services furnished under the Contract will be in conformance with Contract Documents and that the goods are of merchantable quality and are fit for the use for which they are sold. These warranties are in addition to the manufacturer’s warranty, and any warranty provided by law. Section 7. Inspection at Delivery. At the point of delivery, the City will have fifteen (15) days to inspect the equipment for compliance with the Contract Documents. Section 8. Assignment. Neither party may assign, sublet or transfer any interest or obligation in this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. Section 9. Prompt Payment to Subcontractors. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 471.25, Subdivision 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of one and one-half percent (1½ %) per month or any part of a month to subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the Contractor shall be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney’s fees, incurred in bringing the action. Section 10. Worker’s Compensation. The Contractor shall obtain and maintain for the duration of this Contract, statutory Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Section 11. Comprehensive General Liability. Contractor shall obtain the following minimum insurance coverage and maintain it at all times throughout the life of the Contract, with the City included as an additional name insured. The Contractor shall furnish the City a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City evidencing the required coverage: A. Comprehensive Public Liability - Personal Injury - $5,000,000.00 Property damage - $1,000,000.00 B. Comprehensive Automobile Liability - Personal Injury - $2,000,000.00 Page 69 of 452 200196v1 3 Property damage - $1,000,000.00 C. Blanket contractual (hold harmless) protection and fire, theft and vandalism insurance for the full value of all materials and equipment furnished by the Contractor. Section 12. Product Liability Insurance. Contractor must submit a Certificate of Insurance listing the manufacturer's product liability insurance coverage. Liability insurance shall be a minimum amount of $5,000,000.00 with coverage attained with a minimum of $1,000,000.00 underlying insurance and $4,000,000.00 umbrella coverage. Submitted Certificate shall name the apparatus manufacturer, insurance company, policy number, and effective dates of the insurance policy. Section 13. Data Practices/Records. A. All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. B. All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the Contractor and its subcontractors, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination by the City. Section 14. U.L. Certification. Contractor shall furnish City with a Certificates of Testing for the Manufacturer's Preliminary Test and the ULI Certification Tests. Section 15. Miscellaneous. A. The Contractor shall hold harmless and indemnify the City from any and all claims, suits, and proceedings, including reasonable attorney fees and expenses, for infringement of any software licenses, copyrights or patent, or patents, covering the property purchased hereunder. B. Each and all of the covenants and agreements herein contained shall extend to and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto; provided however, that the Contractor shall not assign this Contract with any person, firm, or corporation for the performance of the Contractor's obligations hereunder, or any part thereof, without the written approval of the City. C. This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. D. If either party waives any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Contract by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. E. This Contract, and the Contract Documents, embody the entire understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter contained herein, and merges all prior discussions and agreements between them. No agent or representative of the Contractor has authority to make any representations, statements, warranties or agreements not herein expressed. Page 70 of 452 200196v1 4 THIS CONTRACT ENTERED INTO AS OF THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. CITY OF LAKEVILLE VOSS ELECTRIC COMPANY BY: ________________________________ BY: ________________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor Name:________________________ Title:_________________________ BY:_________________________________ Ann Orlofsky. City Clerk fasterLoche Page 71 of 452 Contract Release 17 Page 1 of 5 Admin Minnesota Office of State Procurement Room 112 Administration Bldg., 50 Sherburne Ave., St. Paul, MN 55155; Phone: 651.296.2600, Fax: 651.297.3996 Persons with a hearing or speech disability can contact us through the Minnesota Relay Service by dialing 711 or 1.800.627.3529. CONTRACT RELEASE: L-290(5) DATE: AUGUST 1, 2024 PRODUCT/SERVICE: LAMPS AND BULBS: VARIOUS TYPES AND APPLICATIONS CONTRACT PERIOD: AUGUST 12, 2024 THROUGH JULY 31, 2026 EXTENSION OPTIONS: 36 MONTHS ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST (AMS): CASSANDRA JENSEN PHONE: 651.201.2450 E-MAIL: cassandra.m.jensen@state.mn.us WEB SITE: www.mn.gov/admin/osp CONTRACT VENDOR CONTRACT NO. TERMS DELIVERY J H LARSON ELEC CO 253841 NET 30 1 TO 3 CAL DAYS 10200 51ST AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 VENDOR NO: 0000192964 MANUFACTURER: LEDVANCE (Sylviania) Angie Bjerke OFFICE: 763.525.6360 EMAIL: angela.bjerke@jhlarson.com CONTRACT VENDOR CONTRACT NO. TERMS DELIVERY PREMIER LIGHTING INC. 253828 3% in 10/NET 30 5 CAL DAYS 2885 COUNTY RD, SUITE 135 ST. PAUL, MN 55117 VENDOR NO: 0000217018 MANUFACTURERS: Acuity (Lithonia), Linmore, Keystone, Eiko, Current Lighting (GE) Erin Sturm OFFICE: 651.490.0886 EMAIL: sales@premierltg.com CONTRACT VENDOR CONTRACT NO. TERMS DELIVERY SOLUS LED LLC 253837 NET 30 10-14 CAL DAYS 310 4TH AVE. S. SUITE 5010 PMB 93042 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 VENDOR NO: 0000810126 MANUFACTURERS: Maxlite, Westgate, Satco, Envision Niral Patel Exhibit A Page 72 of 452 Contract Release: L-290(5) Contract Release 17 Page 2 of 5 OFFICE: 612.605.5806 EMAIL: niral@solusled-usa.com CONTRACT VENDOR CONTRACT NO. TERMS DELIVERY VOSS LIGHTING 253838 NET 30 IN STOCK: 1251 RED FOX ROAD 1 -3 CAL DAYS ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112 MADE TO ORDER: VENDOR NO: 0000224918 MANUFACTURER: Philips/Signify, Barron Lighting 14-21 CAL DAYS Group (Exitronix, Specialty LED, Trace Lite, Growlite) Josh Koch OFFICE: 612.968.3274 EMAIL: joshua.koch@vosslighting.com CONTRACT VENDOR CONTRACT NO. TERMS DELIVERY TALOS ELEMENTAL CORP 253832 3% in 10/1% in 20/ NET 30 14 CAL DAYS DBA: LIGHTING PLASTICS OF MN 3326 GORHAM AVENUE ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 VENDOR NO: 0000196913 MANUFACTURER: Best Lighting John Sexton OFFICE: 952.920.1400 EMAIL: john@lightingplastics.com CONTRACT USERS. This Contract is available to the following entities as indicated by the checked boxes below ☒ State agencies ☒ Cooperative Purchasing Venture (CPV) members ☐ Limited to the following entities only _____________________________________________ STATE AGENCY CONTRACT USE. State agencies should make every effort to use the Contract Vendor(s) listed. However, this Contract does not prohibit State agencies from using their delegated local purchasing authority to procure similar products from other vendors. This is a non-mandatory use contract. Agencies should thoroughly review the products listed on Contract. ALP buyers should also refer to Purchasing Policy 23 when considering products outside of this contract if it is determined that the products under this contract do not meet business needs. Before purchasing outside established state contracts, consider the following contract: T-757(5) Tools: Industrial Supplies & Equipment STATE AGENCY ORDERING INSTRUCTIONS. Orders are to be placed directly with the Contract Vendor. State agencies should use a Contract release order (CRO) or a blanket purchase order (BPC). The person ordering should include his or her name and phone number. The following vendor is an authorized distributer of many OEM’s and is an eligible Service-Disabled Veteran owned business: ATEK Distribution LLC Jeff Anderson, Owner 3401 Nevada Avenue N. Ste 1A 952.254.1205 Minneapolis, MN 55427 jeff.anderson@atekdistribution.com Vendor ID Number: 0001030492 OEM List Page 73 of 452 Contract Release: L-290(5) Contract Release 17 Page 3 of 5 CONTRACT FEEDBACK. If these commodities or service can be better structured to help you with your business needs, let us know. We solicit your comments and suggestions to improve all of our contracts so that they may better serve your business needs. If you have a need for which no contract currently exists, or you would like to be able to use an existing state contract that is not available to your entity, whether a state agency or CPV, please contact us. If you have specific comments or suggestions about an individual contract you can submit those via the Contract Feedback Form. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS SCOPE. The purpose of this contract is to provide Lamps and Bulbs: Various Types and Applications, on an as needed basis. Lamps and bulbs consist of, but are not limited to tubular, compact fluorescent (CFLs) and light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs. Contract Vendors must meet the environmental specifications. Does not include ballasts or LED drivers and does not include outdoor LED luminaires. DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. See delivery offered above for each Contract Vendor. No delivery can be made on a State Holiday (as defined in Minn. Stat. § 645.44, subd. 5), on Saturday or Sunday, or after 3:00 p.m. Central Time on weekdays, without prior written approval by the receiving entity. Contractor must confirm delivery locations and requirements with the ordering entity. Prior to delivery, the Contractor is responsible for confirming in writing with the ordering entity that the delivery location will accommodate unloading the equipment. Contractor must notify the receiving entity at least 72 hours before delivery to allow for inspection and compliance. ITEMS OFFERED AS NEW. All products, materials, supplies, replacement parts, and equipment offered and furnished must be new, of current manufacturer production, and must have been formally announced by the manufacturer as being commercially available, unless otherwise stated in this Contract. FREIGHT (FOB). All prices must be FOB Destination, prepaid, and allowed (with freight included in the price), to the ordering entity’s receiving dock or warehouse, or as otherwise instructed on the purchase order by the ordering entity. In those situations, in which the “deliver-to” address has no receiving dock or agents, the Contractor must be able to deliver to the person specified on the purchase order. Any item damaged in transit and those found to be defective will be replaced at no charge to the Customer. RIGHT TO ADD. The State reserves the right to add additional like products to the Contract. Additional items may only be added upon the mutual agreement of the Office of State Procurement and the Contract Vendor through a duly executed amendment to the Contract. USAGE REPORTS. Contractor must send an annual Usage Report, or as otherwise requested. An annual usage report is due within thirty days of the Contract execution anniversary date. A requested Usage Report is due within thirty days from when the request was made. Contractor must provide the State with a final Usage Report within 30 calendar days of the expiration or termination of the Contract. Failure to provide a Usage Report may result in the State cancelling the Contract. This term survives the expiration or termination of the Contract. PRICING OFFERED IN RESPONSE. Prices listed in your response to this solicitation must take into consideration all inherent costs of providing the requested goods and/or services. The responder agrees to pay any and all fees, including, but not limited to duties, custom fees, permits, brokerage fees, licenses and registrations. The State will not pay any additional charges beyond the price(s) listed in the response, unless otherwise provided for by law or expressly allowed by the terms of the solicitation. CONTRACT PRICES. Prices offered are a percent (%) discount from the Manufacturer’s (OEM) List Price. The discount offered must remain firm or increase for the life of the Contract. Dealer’s list prices are not accepted. If extension options are available, and after the initial term of the Contract, the manufacturer’s price list may be updated upon mutual agreement by the State and the Contract Vendor to extend the Contract. The discount originally contracted must remain the same or may be increased at the time of Contract extension. Page 74 of 452 Contract Release: L-290(5) Contract Release 17 Page 4 of 5 PRICE SCHEDULE. The Price Schedules list all items available under the contract. Price lists are available only to verify OEM list price. SPECIFICATION DELIVERY COMPLIANCE. It is agreed that any products delivered that fail to meet the specifications will be replaced at no additional expense to the Customer and that all products quoted will comply with the State and federal regulations in effect at the date of manufacture. SWIFT LINE PRODUCT OR SERVICE UNSPSC CODE UNITS OF MEASURE 1. Lamps & Bulbs: T8 Lamps (Tubular Fluorescent) 39100000 EA = Each; CA = Case; 2. Lamps & Bulbs: T5 Lamps (Tubular Fluorescent) 39100000 BX = Box; DO = Dollar; 3. Lamps & Bulbs: CFL’s (Compact Fluorescent) 39100000 LO = Lot 4. Lamps & Bulbs: LED’s (Light Emitting Diode) 39100000 VERIFYING THE CONTRACT PRICES. The following information explains the method(s) for calculating and/or confirming the contract prices. The Contract(s) was executed with FIXED PRICING. The pricing offered must match or be lower than that detailed herein and on the Price Schedule labeled State Contract Price. The Contract(s) pricing structure is a PERCENTAGE DISCOUNT OFF OF LIST PRICE. To calculate the Contract Price, follow the three steps detailed below. 1. Locate the appropriate price list below. 2. Verify that the OEM List Price on the Price List matches the OEM List Price on the Price Schedule. 3. If so, the State Contract Price should be your final price. Only accept contract vendor quotes that provide itemized contract pricing (lump sum price quotes must be rejected and reworked by the Contract Vendor to show itemized State contract pricing). Prior to accepting an order and/or issuing payment on an invoice, inspect the goods and/or deliverables to ensure they match both the terms and pricing of the contract. Contact the AMS/Buyer detailed herein to report any pricing discrepancies or for assistance in confirming/calculating contract pricing. LINKS J H LARSON ELEC CO LINKS: A. Price Schedule B. LEDVANCE (Sylvania) C. Executed Contract PREMIER LIGHTING INC. LINKS: A. Price Schedule B. Acuity Linmore Lithonia Price List C. Keystone Price List D. Eiko Price List E. GE LED – Current Lighting Price List F. GE Legacy – Current Lighting Price List G. Executed Contract SOLUS LED LLC LINKS: A. Price Schedule B. Executed Contract Page 75 of 452 Contract Release: L-290(5) Contract Release 17 Page 5 of 5 VOSS LIGHTING LINKS: A. Price Schedule B. Philips LED Fixtures Price List C. Executed Contract TALOS ELEMENTAL CORP DBA: LIGHTING PLASTICS OF MN LINKS: A. Price Schedule B. Best Lighting Price List C. Executed Contract *Price lists are only to verify OEM list price. Only items on the Price Schedule can be purchased on this contract. REVISIONS. Page 76 of 452 Quote Accepted By : _________________________ Date Accepted : ____________________________ Exhibit B Page 77 of 452 Date: 10/21/2024 Resolution for 2025 Health and Dental Insurance Rates Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve resolution for 2025 health and dental insurance rates. Overview Each year our health and dental rates are set by the insurance carrier for the respective benefit. Our insurance carrier for health will continue to be MHC/Medica and our carrier for dental will remain HealthPartners. Lakeville's health insurance premiums increased slightly at an overall cost of 1.37%. Due to the low renewal increase and prior benefit comparison, the employer contribution has been increased on the lowest premium HDHP plans (3300 HDHP 80/20% Park Nicollet and Vantage networks). That employer amount is then applied to all other plans and networks. The difference then is the employee's responsibility. This results in a decrease to the employee's monthly premium to help keep Lakeville's benefits competitive. Dental premiums will remain the same as they currently are for 2025. All benefit liabilities are reflective in the City's 2025 proposed budget. Supporting Information 1. health resolution draft 2025 Financial Impact: Budgeted: Yes Source: General Fund Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Alissa Frey, Human Resources Director Page 78 of 452 DRAFT Page 79 of 452 Page 80 of 452 Page 81 of 452 Date: 10/21/2024 MOU to LELS Union Contracts Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve the MOU's for each LELS union group. Overview The attached MOU's provide clarifying language to the Police, Sergeant and Lieutenants LELS contracts. The language changes are specific to the insurance articles of each contract. The changes clarify that each year, insurance rates are approved by council resolution and will be made available to all benefit, eligible employees and specific to each plan year. The MOUs further resolve that the employer contribution to employee HSA and HRA/VEBA accounts will be deposited monthly, instead of bi-annually. Supporting Information 1. Lieutenants LELS MOU 2. Sergeants LELS MOU 3. Police LELS MOU Financial Impact: Budgeted: Yes Source: General Fund Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Alissa Frey, Human Resources Director Page 82 of 452 Memorandum of Understanding Between City of Lakeville and L.E.L.S. Local #384 WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville and L.E.L.S. Local #384 have agreed to amend Articles 15.1 and 15.2 of the contract language as it relates to insurance. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following amendments: 1. (Article 15.1) Effective January 1, 2024, the Employer shall make payment according to the schedule set forth in Appendix C. The annual benefit costs and employer payment schedule will be approved by council resolution and will be made available to all employees via the city’s intranet site: Insite. 2. (Article 15.1) The VEBA and HSA funding will be deposited in two installments; the first six months will be deposited in January and the second six months will be deposited in July. Deposits for new employees will be prorated. Follow the approved resolution schedule of monthly employer HSA and HRA/VEBA contributions. For those employees who may be facing a medical emergency or medical hardship, the City Administrator may approve an advance deposit of employer funds. Employees in this situation should make a written request to the HR department, to be approved by the City Administrator. 3. (Article 15.2) The City of Lakeville provides single health insurance to the employee for the lowest cost, high deductible plan. The Employer contributes 70% for the dependent coverage for the lowest cost, high deducible plan. Once these values are set, they are applied to the other high optional plans. The City of Lakeville will provide an employer contribution to health insurance based on the lowest cost, high-deductible health plan. The City of Lakeville will provide an employer contribution to health insurance based on the lowest cost, high-deductible plan. The employer will contribute 100% toward employee-only (single) coverage and not less than 70% for two-party or family coverage options. Once these employer values are set, they are applied to the other plan options. Annual health, dental and HSA/VEBA contributions will be set and approved by council resolution and made available to all benefit eligible employees. Page 83 of 452 FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES (LOCAL #384) Kevin McGrath Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ Business Agent Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __Jason Polinski___________ Steward Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ Steward FOR CITY OF LAKEVILLE Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ Mayor Luke Hellier Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ City Administrator Justin Miller Page 84 of 452 Memorandum of Understanding Between City of Lakeville and L.E.L.S. Local #177 WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville and L.E.L.S. Local #177 have agreed to amend Articles 19.1 and 19.2 of the contract language as it relates to insurance. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following amendments: 1. (Article 19.1) Effective January 1, 2025, the Employer shall make payment according to the schedule set forth in Appendix C. The annual benefit costs and employer payment schedule will be approved by council resolution and will be made available to all employees via the city’s intranet site: Insite. 2. (Article 19.1) The VEBA and HSA funding will be deposited in two installments; the first six months will be deposited in January and the second six months will be deposited in July. Deposits for new employees will be prorated. Follow the approved resolution schedule of monthly employer HSA and HRA/VEBA contributions. For those employees who may be facing a medical emergency or medical hardship, the City Administrator may approve an advance deposit of employer funds. Employees in this situation should make a written request to the HR department, to be approved by the City Administrator. 3. (Article 19.2) The City of Lakeville provides single health insurance to the employee for the lowest cost, high deductible plan. The Employer contributes 70% for the dependent coverage for the lowest cost, high deducible plan. Once these values are set, they are applied to the other high optional plans. The City of Lakeville will provide an employer contribution to health insurance based on the lowest cost, high-deductible health plan. The City of Lakeville will provide an employer contribution to health insurance based on the lowest cost, high-deductible plan. The employer will contribute 100% toward employee-only (single) coverage and not less than 70% for two-party or family coverage options. Once these employer values are set, they are applied to the other plan options. Annual health, dental and HSA/VEBA contributions will be set and approved by council resolution and made available to all benefit eligible employees. Page 85 of 452 FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES (LOCAL #177) Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ Business Agent Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ Steward Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ Steward FOR CITY OF LAKEVILLE Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ Mayor Luke Hellier Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ City Administrator Justin Miller Page 86 of 452 Memorandum of Understanding Between City of Lakeville and L.E.L.S. Local #128 WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville and L.E.L.S. Local #128 have agreed to amend Articles 17.1 and 17.2 of the contract language as it relates to insurance. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following amendments: 1. (Article 17.1) Effective January 1, 2024, the Employer shall make payment according to the schedule set forth in Appendix C. The annual benefit costs and employer payment schedule will be approved by council resolution and will be made available to all employees via the city’s intranet site: Insite. 2. (Article 17.1) The VEBA and HSA funding will be deposited in two installments; the first six months will be deposited in January and the second six months will be deposited in July. Deposits for new employees will be prorated. Follow the approved resolution schedule of monthly employer HSA and HRA/VEBA contributions. For those employees who may be facing a medical emergency or medical hardship, the City Administrator may approve an advance deposit of employer funds. Employees in this situation should make a written request to the HR department, to be approved by the City Administrator. 3. (Article 17.2) The City of Lakeville provides single health insurance to the employee for the lowest cost, high deductible plan. The Employer contributes 70% for the dependent coverage for the lowest cost, high deducible plan. Once these values are set, they are applied to the other high optional plans. The City of Lakeville will provide an employer contribution to health insurance based on the lowest cost, high-deductible health plan. The City of Lakeville will provide an employer contribution to health insurance based on the lowest cost, high-deductible plan. The employer will contribute 100% toward employee-only (single) coverage and not less than 70% for two-party or family coverage options. Once these employer values are set, they are applied to the other plan options. Annual health, dental and HSA/VEBA contributions will be set and approved by council resolution and made available to all benefit eligible employees. FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT (LOCAL #128) Page 87 of 452 Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ Business Agent Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ Steward Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ Steward FOR CITY OF LAKEVILLE Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ Mayor Luke Hellier Dated: ______________________, 2024 By: __________________________ City Administrator Justin Miller Page 88 of 452 Date: 10/21/2024 Deferment of Special Assessments for Senior Citizens, Disabled and Military Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve the deferment of special assessments for those qualifying residents who are senior citizens, disabled or ordered into active military service for taxable year 2025. Overview The City Council can defer the payment of any special assessment on homestead property owned by the applicant who meets the household income requirements and meets one of the following criteria: 1) is at least 65 years of age or is unemployed due to a total and permanent disability or 2) is a member of the Minnesota National Guard or other military reserves who is ordered into active military service for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments (see Policy #5.14 Section 6). Deferments are classifications that must be reapplied for annually. Residents that don’t meet the hardship criteria established in the policy may still apply to the Council for a waiver. The income requirements for hardship were amended by Council on February 20, 2018 to reflect the poverty guidelines as established by the US Department of Health and Human Services and became effective with the 2018 street reconstruction project. Council also approved the existing deferrals (including deferrals for the 2017 street reconstruction project) be grandfathered into the program using the previous income criteria that states the average annual payment for assessments levied against the property must exceed one percent (1%) of the applicant’s adjusted gross income. If an existing deferral fails to meet the grandfathered criteria and the assessment is then activated, future re-applications for deferral would be based on the new hardship requirements. Deferment applications and income information have been submitted to the City by residents who were assessed as the result of street reconstruction projects. Renewal deferment applications were sent in May with an additional reminder sent in September to those who did not yet submit their applications. There are three senior deferments recommended for approval. At this time all applicants meet the requirements and there are no senior deferments recommended for termination. Supporting Information 1. 2024-10-21 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERMENTS Page 89 of 452 Financial Impact: $0.00 Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Zach Johnson, City Engineer/Cheri Donovan, Assistant Finance Director Page 90 of 452 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERMENTS Address City Project 20245 Hunter Ct. 1,851.46$ 2011 Street Reconstruction 6614 Flounder Ct 3,218.47$ 2014 Street Reconstruction 18482 Jaeger Path 5,487.00$ 2024 Street Reconstruction 10,556.93$ Original Assessment Amount Deferred Page 91 of 452 Date: 10/21/2024 Resolution Approving Feasibility Report and Calling a Public Hearing for the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a resolution approving the engineering feasibility report and calling a public hearing for the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project 25-02. Overview The City Council authorized WSB to prepare a feasibility report for the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project on August 5, 2024. The feasibility report has been completed. Based on information in the Feasibility Report, the estimated cost for the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project is $4,268,257. Recommended funding sources are Water Fund, Sewer Fund, Stormwater Infrastructure Fund, City issuance of debt which is repaid with property tax levies and special assessments to benefitting property owners (consistent with the City’s Special Assessment Policy for Roadway Rehabilitation). A neighborhood meeting was held on September 12, 2024 for the proposed improvements. 19 residents attended the meeting and there was no significant opposition to the project. Multiple questions and comments were shared with the City and WSB staff. The primary topics were related to: assessments; traffic concerns, which included traffic-calming efforts & speeding along the corridor; individual construction impacts; existing localized drainage concerns and overall project scope. Due to the potential options associated with traffic-calming efforts and watermain rehabilitation, staff feels it important to host a second neighborhood meeting to present possible options to the residents and gather further input/feedback from them regarding the project. The second neighborhood meeting is scheduled to be held in early November 2024 after WSB and City Staff thoroughly evaluate the pros and cons of the alternative project scope. The project is feasible, and staff recommends approving the report and setting a public hearing on November 18th. Supporting Information 1. CP2502_CC_resolution_ordering_public_hearing 2. 25-02 Project Location Maps 3. 25-02 Feasibility Report - Reclamation 4. Engineering Report- Mill and Overlay 5. 25-02 Project Financing Page 92 of 452 Financial Impact: $4,268,257 Budgeted: Yes Source: Multiple Sources Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Steve Ferraro, Public Works Coordinator Page 93 of 452 CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. 24-__ RESOLUTION APPROVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE 2025 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT WHEREAS, on October 21, 2024, the City Council received the feasibility report for the proposed improvements of portions of Cherry View 2nd Addition, Cherrywood Heights, Creek View 2nd Addition, and Foxborough Addition, City Project 25-02; and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lakeville: 1. The Feasibility Report for Project 25-02 is hereby approved. 2. The council will consider the improvement of such improvements in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting and nonabutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated cost of the improvement of $4,268,257. 3. A public hearing on such improvement is hereby called for November 18, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers of the City Hall and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 21st day of October 2024. ______________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor _________________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk Page 94 of 452 GLACIERWAY170TH ST W DODD BLVDCEDAR AVE171ST ST W HAVEN AVE172ND ST W GLENC OE CT 1 7 3 R D S T W GLENCOE AVE170TH CT WG L A S G O W A V E173RDCIRHEIDELBERGWAYHAYES AVEHIBISCUS AVE174TH CT W GOLDENRODAVEGEORGETOW NWAYHICKORY CT GROVE AVEGLENWOOD AVEGREENTREE AVEHARBOR CT169TH S T W GREENTREE PATHHEYWOOD CTHAMILTONCT HANNIBAL CTGOLDENVIEW AVEG O O D L A N DPATHHERSHEYCTHEMLOCKCTU P P ER 167TH ST W 169TH C T W HARRINGTON WA Y HALIFAX PATHHARDINGLNGRENADIERAVEGREENVIEW CIR175THSTW GOODHUE AVEG R EENLANDPATHHAMILTON DR HAZEL CT 174TH ST W UPPER 171ST ST W GARCIA WAY Document Path: J:\gis\city\LKVL\Maps\LKVLProposal\25-02 Layout Date Saved: 9/10/2024¯1 inch = 400 feet 0 400 Feet 2025 Street Reconstruction Project Lakeville, MN Project Location Map Proposed Reconstruction Page 95 of 452 F O R T U N E T R L FORMOSA AVE G L A CIE R WAY D O D D B L V D FULDATRL179T H S T WCEDAR AVEFREEPORT WAYGROVE AVEGLENCOEAVE173RD S T W GREELEY PL1 7 5 T H S T W HAMBURG AVEGREENTREE AVEGREENWICH WAY G A G E A V EGANDER LN173RDCIRGERDINE PATHGAGE CTGRANBY LNFREEPORTCTGOLDENRODAVEGRESFORD LN174TH ST W GREENTREE PATH FRENCH AVEG L A S GOWAVEGOLDENVIEW AVEG O O D L A N DPATH GALLECTGLASGOW WAY177TH STW F O R MOSA CTGREENVIEW CIR178THSTWGOODHUE AVEGIANTSWAY GRAPHIT E L N GALERY DRGILLETTE WAYGETTYSBURG WAY Document Path: J:\gis\city\LKVL\Maps\LKVLProposal\25-02 Layout Date Saved: 10/16/2024¯1 inch = 400 feet 0 550 Feet 2025 Street Reconstruction Project Lakeville, MN Project Location Map Proposed Mill & Overlay Page 96 of 452 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM FEASIBILITY REPORT 2025 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT October 21, 2024 Prepared for: City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 CITY PROJECT NO. 25-02 WSB PROJECT NO. 026423 -000 Page 97 of 452 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM October 21, 2024 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: C.P. 25-02 WSB Project No. 026423-000 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: Transmitted herewith for your review is a feasibility report which addresses improvements associated with the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project. This feasibility report describes the necessary improvements and associated costs for this street improvement project. I am available at your convenience to discuss this report. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 612.523.7374 if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, WSB Jeff Oliver, PE Senior Project Manager Attachments Page 98 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Table of Content s Letter of Introduction Table of Cont ents Certification Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 Authorization ................................................................................................. 3 Scope ........................................................................................................... 3 Data Available ............................................................................................... 3 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................... 4 Surface ......................................................................................................... 4 Public Utilities ............................................................................................... 7 Public Sanitary Sewer .................................................................................... 7 Public Water Main ....................................................................................... 7 Public Storm Sewer ..................................................................................... 8 Proposed Improvements .................................................................................... 8 Surface ......................................................................................................... 8 Traffic Considerations .................................................................................... 9 Public Utilities .............................................................................................. 11 Public Sanitary Sewer ................................................................................. 11 Public Water Main ...................................................................................... 11 Storm Sewer .............................................................................................. 12 Public Street Sign Replacement ...................................................................... 13 Mailbox Replacement .................................................................................... 13 Permits/Approvals ......................................................................................... 13 Construction Access/Staging .......................................................................... 13 Public Involvement ........................................................................................ 13 Financing ........................................................................................................ 15 Opinion of Probable Cost ............................................................................... 15 Funding ....................................................................................................... 15 Project Schedule ............................................................................................. 17 Feasibility and Recommendation ....................................................................... 18 Page 99 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Appendix A Figures Appendix B Opinion of Probable Cost Appendix C Draft Geotechnical Report, Braun Intertec Appendix D Public Engagement Appendix E Assessment Map Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 100 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Certification Sheet I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Rachel Scheu , PE _______________________________________________ Date: October 21 , 20 2 4 Lic. No. 63257 Quality Control Review Completed By: Monica Heil , PE _______________________________________________ Date: October 21 , 20 2 4 Lic. No. 47497 Page 101 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 1 Executive Summary The City of Lakeville’s 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 2 5 -02, was initiated based on the City’s Pavement Management Program and is separated into two parts based on the proposed improvements. This Feasibility Report discusses the Street Reconstruction portion of the 2025 Project . The project will include reclaiming and paving , following rehabilitation or replacement of the watermain within the project area. T he 202 5 Street Rehabilitation Project will include milling and overlaying , and will be discussed in a separate Engineering Report . The s treets proposed for reconstruction, and discussed in this report include roadways within the Cherry View 2 nd Addition, Cherrywood Heights , Creek View 2 nd Addition, and Foxborough Addition totaling approximately 1.3 miles and shown in blue on the attached Figure 1, Project Location Map of Appendix A : • Hayes Avenue (175 th Street W est to Hamilton Drive) • 170 th Street (Hamilton Drive to Cedar Avenue) • Harbor Court (170 th Street W est to end of the cul -de-sac ) The 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project includes roadway reclamation based on pavement ratings, current roadway conditions, and utility needs in the area, as well as the overall Capital Improvement Plan budget. Surface improvements recommended for all streets within the project include reclamation of the existing bituminous pavement, s ubgrade correction as necessary, replacement of structurally deficient or improperly draining concrete curb and gutter , sidewalks , and trails , ADA compliant pedestrian ramp installation, and new pavement installation. Replacing portions of the City’s deteriorating utility infrastructure in conjunction with the proposed street improvements provides an opportunity to minimize the replacement costs and traffic disruptions associated with the work. Proposed utility improvem ents include the following: • Installation of corrosion protection for the existing watermain throughout a majority of the project area. • Rehabilitation or replacement of structurally deficient watermain throughout the majority of the project area. • Repair or replacement of structurally deficient storm sewer manholes and installation of stormwater quality best management practices (BMPs). • Installation of additional storm sewer drainage structures and storm sewer, including drain tile in areas with poorly draining soils (drain tile services to individual properties will be evaluated in final design). • Replacement of all structurally deficient storm sewer and sanitary sewer manhole castings, concrete adjusting rings, and installing inflow and infiltration (I&I protection ) per current City Standards. The total estimated project cost for the City of Lakeville’s 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project is $4,268,25 7 which includes a 8 % contingency and 2 5 % Page 102 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 2 indirect costs for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing costs. The project is proposed to be funded through various City funds and through special assessments to benefitting property owners in accordance with the City’s current assessment poli cy. Page 103 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 3 Introduction Authorization On August 5 , 202 4 , the Lakeville City Council authorized the preparation of a Feasibility R eport for the 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project. This project is included in the City’s 202 4 -202 8 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and is designated as City Project No. 2 5 -02. Scope This report investigates the feasibility of proposed street and utility improvements identified by the City Pavement Management Program (PMP) and CIP for 2025. Streets proposed within the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project were initially considered because of existing pavement conditions. The average Overall Condition Index (OCI) value for streets within the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project area is 54.2 using an OCI scale of 0 to 100 (with zero representing a completely failed street section and 100 repre senting a new street section free of deficiencies). Streets with OCI values less than 40 are considered to be in failing condition. Streets with OCI values of 40 – 60 are considered to be in weakened condition and will deteriorate more quickly based on a t ypical pavement performance curve. Improvements outlined within this feasibility report include street rehabilitation in the form of reclamation, including partial replacement of concrete curb and gutter and concrete sidewalk , installing ADA compliant pedestrian ramps, installation of corrosion protection on select watermain facilities and watermain replacement or repairs, sanitary sewer repairs, and storm sewer improvements. Data Available Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following: • City of Lakeville Utility Record Plans • City of Lakeville Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, and Storm Sewer inspection documentation • City of Lakeville Water and Natural Resources Management Plan, Barr Engineering, dated January 2019 • Dakota County Topography Maps • Topographic Survey • Field Observations of the Area and Discussions with City Staff • Resident Input from Neighborhood Meetings • Draft Geotechnical Evaluation Report, Braun Intertec, dated October 10, 2024 Page 104 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 4 Existing Conditions Surface Hayes Avenue ,170 th Street West , and Harbor Court are aging and experiencing differing severities of distress, including alligator, transverse, and longitudinal cracking. All streets within the project area are urbanized, with existing concrete curb and gutter . A ll of the curb and gutter is surmountable . The curb and gutter is in overall fair condition, with isolated instances of cracking, heaving, and settlements resulting in localized drainage issues. Both Hayes Avenue and 170 th Street West within the 202 5 Street R econstruction Project Area are designated as a minor collector and Municipal State Aid Street (MSAS ) route 139 . The project area contains landscaping, trees, irrigation systems, and numerous other private improvements beyond the edge of the roadway and within City right -of-way. A neighborhood meeting for property owners within the proposed projects was held on September 12, 2024. The need for the project and special assessments were discussed with residents. In addition, residents had the opportunity to ask questions and express concerns about the proposed project. A number of the residents present expressed concerns about traffic in the project area. These comments included concerns about vehicles speeding and non -compliance at stop signs. The photos below illustrate some of the varying levels of pavement distress: Photo 1. Hayes Avenue south towards 175th Street West. Page 105 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 5 Photo 2. 170th Street West looking east towards Glenwood Avenue. Photo 3. 170th Street West looking east towards Glencoe Avenue. Concrete sidewalks exist throughout the project area, including connection points with Cedar Avenue and 175 th Street W est . The concrete walks are generally in good condition; however, man y of the existing pedestrian ramps do not meet the current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) design standards, and there are isolated instances where concrete sidewalk panels have heaved, settled, or are otherwise structurally deficient. Soil borings and corings for streets within the 2025 project area were collected in September of 202 4. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) was employed in both directions on each street to collect interpretations on pavement layer thickness between boring and coring locations. The draft geotechnical report is included in Page 106 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 6 Appendix D , and the draft boring and coring logs were used to determine the feasibility of a full depth reclamation. The final geotechnical report will be available with final design. The quantities included in the Opinion of Probable Cost, Appendix B , are based on the draft geotechnical report. Table 1 Below provides a summary of existing street conditions within the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project. 1 Information transcribed from coring data in Geotechnical Evaluation Report, Braun Intertec Corporation, dated October 10, 2024 . Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) interpolations are contained wtihin the report. Traffic Concerns A t the September 12, 2024 Neighborhood meeting for the proposed project, a number of residents expressed concerns regarding traffic speed and stop sign compliance on 170 th Street and Hayes Avenue. Based on these concerns a crash history search and vehicle speed survey were performed. The crash history search was for the entire 170 th and Hayes corridor, with an emphasis on the all way stop intersections. During the ten year look back of crash history, there were 3 6 crashes in the corridor. Of these crashes two were at an all way stop intersection at Hayes and 172 nd. Of these two incidents one was a result of non -compliance of the stop con t rol. The vehicle speed study occurred during October of 2024, and included surveys on Hayes Avenue between 173 rd and 174 th; and on 170 th Street west of Cedar Avenue. The Hayes Avenue results showed that 1545 vehicles were counted during the two day survey. Of these vehicles 71% were traveling 30 mph or less, and 98% were traveling less than 35 mph. The 85 th percentile, which is the speed that speed limits are typically based upon, was 32.9 mph, indicating that the posted 30 mph speed limit is appropriate. Table 1 - 2025 Street Reconstruction Project Summary of Existing Street Conditions Street Name Right - of-Way (feet) Street Width (feet) Curb Type Sub -base (aggregate)1 (inches) Avg. Bituminous Section 1 (inches) OCI Approx. Year of Most Recent Construction Hayes Avenue 80 44 Standard Surmountable 5.5 5.6 57.0 1987 170th Street W est 8 0 44 Standard Surmountable 7.7 6.5 57.8 1980 Harbor Court 60 28 Standard Surmountable 4.3 3.5 47.8 1987 Page 107 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 7 The 170 th Street survey showed similar results, with 54% of the 1765 vehicles counted traveling 30 mph or less, and 96% traveling 35 mph or less. The 85 th percentile speed was 34.4 mph, which also indicates that the 30 mph posted speed limit is appropriate for 170 th Street. Public Utilities Public Sanitary Sewer All of the existing sanitary sewer located within the 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project Area consists of 8 -inch polyvinylchloride pipe (PVC). Public Water Main All of the existing watermain located in the 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project Area is ductile iron pipe (DIP). The diameter of watermain pipes varies throughout the project area. Below is a list of watermain pipe size by street: 8 -inch Watermain • Hayes Avenue (175 th Street W est to 173 rd Street W est ) 12-inch Watermain • 170 th Street W est (Cedar Avenue to Hamilton Drive) • Hayes Avenue (173 rd Street W est to Hamilton Drive) • Harbor Cour t through Foxborough Conservation Area to Havelock Court City maintenance records indicate multiple watermain break and bolt, fittings, and valve failure history throughout the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project area that have required typical maintenance efforts. The watermain breaks have occurred primarily on 170 th Street between Cedar Avenue and Harbor Court and on Harbor Court. This portion of the project also has a history of failed bolt s , fittings and valves due to corrosion. The portion of 170 th Street between Harbor Court and Hamilton Court, and from Hamilton Court to 170 th Street also has a significant history or corrosion related failures. The 12 -inch watermain in 170th Street extends across Cedar Avenue and to the east . This main is DIP under Cedar Avenue and transitions to PVC pipe just west of Garcia Way. The remaining DIP under Cedar Avenue will be considered for rehabilitation as part of this project in order to bring the section to current City standards. The 12 -inch DIP watermain in Harbor Court extends through Foxborough Park and connects to an existing 12 -inch watermain in Havelock Court that was previously rehabilitated. The portion of the trunk watermain through Foxborough Park will also be evaluated for rehabilitation as part of this project. Page 108 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 8 The watermain in Hayes Avenue does not have any history of breaks to the watermain pipes. However, it has a signficant history of repairs and maintenance due to corrosion of bolts at fitting, valves and hydrants. Public Storm Sewer City record drawing information indicates that public storm sewer facilities exist within the 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project Area. All areas within the project area are urban section with curb and gutter and storm sewer . All runoff is discharged into the Vermillion River and is subject to review by the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization (VRWJPO). Most of the storm sewer facilities within the 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project are constructed of reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and appear to provide the necessary collection and conveyance capacity for the 10 -year 24 - hour design storm event. However, some segments do not allow for proper conveyance, but the headwater remains below the structure rim elevations in the 10 -year 24 hour event. These locations are shown in the stormwater capacity analyis figures in Appendix A . They have been reviewed by City staff and input from adjacent property owners has been solicited . All storm sewer structures have been inspected by City Public Works staff and repair recommendations have been incorporated into the Opinion of Probable Cost . Proposed Improvements Surface Surface improvements recommended with the 202 5 Street Re construction Project Area are intended to extend the life of the existing roadway systems, improve isolated drainage issues, and improve the ride quality of roadways. Surface improvements include the full depth reclamation of all roadways. Reclamation is the process by which the existing roadway surface is pulverized and mixed with existing aggregate base below and reused as aggregate roadway base for the new street section. Street grades will closely match the existing grades so as to minim ize construction impacts to adjacent properties. Minor adjustments to select roadway vertical profiles are proposed to improve drainage conditions. A significant portion of the existi ng curb and gutter within the project is in structurally adequate condition, so only partial curb and gutter replacement is proposed as a part of the project. The minor collector streets within the project area will be reclaimed and reconstructed in accordance with the recommendations provided in the geotechnical report . Appendix A illustrates the proposed minor collector roadwa y and residential roadway sections, which in general, consist of a new pavement layer of varying thickness over the existing bituminous road section or consist of 2.0 inches of bituminous wearing course for the collector roadways or 1.5 inches of bituminous wearing course for the local roa dway , 2.5 inches of bituminous base course, and a Page 109 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 9 minimum of 6 to 8 inches of reclaimed aggregate base over 12 inches of acceptable compacted subgrade. Certain areas have been identified in the geotechnical report as candidates for full depth reclamation due to the cracking, stripping, and additional distresses evident in the bituminous cores and upon visual inspection of the pavement surface. These include Hayes Avenue and 170 th Street W est . The crown for each street within the project area will be reviewed, and any with less than two percent grade towards the gutterline will be corrected. As part of the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project, all City owned and maintained pedestrian curb ramps with the project area that do not meet current ADA accessibility design standards will be reconstructed. Additionally, spot replacement of structurally d eficient concrete sidewalk is propose d. This includes concrete sidewalk panels that have settled where drainage pools and any trip hazards. Traffic Considerations Based upon resident input regarding traffic in the project area at the first neighborhood meeting, and the speed survey and crash history study discussed above, traffic calming measures will be evaluated as part of the final design of the project. This evaluation will include the effectiveness of the measures at reducing vehicles speeds and increasing compliance with stop signs, as well as costs and impacts on em ergency response and maintan ence operations including snow and ice control. The traffic calming evaluation will include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Modifications to pavement markings including lane width reductions. Painting wider (6 to 8 inches) edge striping that narrow s the lanes from the existing 12-13 f oot width s , which can result in lower speeds. The addition of stop bars at each stop sign also provides visual clues to drivers that encourage compliance with the stop signs. This is a low cost option that does require repainting every three to five years. The effectiveness of painting for speed reduction is likely not as great as measures that make physical changes to the roadway environment. Page 110 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 10 • Localized narrowning of the streets at intersections, also know as “bump outs”. The installation of curb bump outs creating localized narrowing of the roadway at various locations along the street may have a more significant impact on vehicle speeds tha n painting. Localized widening of the roadway to provide parking bays can also have a similar effect. Drawbacks to these methods include increased construction and pavement rehabiliation costs, and there may be impracts on snow and ice control operations. • Additional signing. Changes to the existing traffic control signing can also have impacts on driver behavior. Stop signs with flashing lights around the sign perimter can draw drivers attention to the stop sign and encourage compliance. Other signing changes could include mor e and larger speed limit signs, including the installation of an orange placard at the top of the sign to draw attention to the signs. The installation of additional signs will result in some increases in installation and maintenance in the range of $300 t o $500 per sign installed. Drawbacks to additional signing include complaints of “sign pollution”, as well as loss of compliance for the signs after installation as the signs become “part of the landscape” and drivers no longer observe the signs and compliance tends to decrease. • Installation of traffic calming circles . Traffic calming circles are typically small circles installed in the center of an intersection that do not require changes to the curb lines in the intersection, and are driven in a similar manner to round -abouts. Benefits of traffic circles may include sl ower vehicle speeds in the immediate vicinity of the intersection, but that reduction will likely d iminish rapidly as vehicle distance from the traffic circle increase after exiting, and speeds may increase as drivers attempt to make up for their perceptio n of lost time. Pot e ntial drawbacks to traffic Page 111 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 11 circles include increased construction costs, impacts on maintenance efforts, and speed reductions being limited to the immediate vicinity of the traffic circle. • Installation of mini round -abouts . Round -abouts, including the mini round -abouts are highly effective in reducing the number and severity of crashes at intersections, and have localized impacts of reduced vehicle speeds. There are typically significant increases in constructions costs with round - abouts that include right of way acquisitions, additional street lighting, and possible impacts to landscaping on private property. Public Utilities Public Sanitary Sewer The City’s Public Works Department has televised the sanitary sewer system. The sanitary sewer video inspection revealed that the existing sewer pipe is in relatively good condition and will not require full replacement. Sanitary sewer manholes within the project are identified as needing new adjustment rings and/or castings will be repaired as a part of this project. Some existing structures have been identified as not having enough adjustment rings and will require recon figuration. Additionally, all sanitary sewer manholes within the street reconstruction area will receive external chimney seals as a part of the project to reduce the potential for inflow and infiltration issues and reduce the frequency of maintenance requ ests. Public Water Main As discussed earlier in this report, rehabilitation of the existing 12 inch watermain in 170 th Street and Hayes Avenue is being considered . Rehabilitation with removal and replacement and in -place lining were evaluated . Based upon the analysis of the rehabilitatation options, the following recommendations are as follows: Page 112 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 12 • 170 th Street (Cedar to Hamilton Court), Harbor Court and Foxborough Nature area to Haveland Court , and under Cedar Avenue to a point west of Garcia Way should be rehabilitated using i n -place lining. The portion of the lining under Cedar Avenue and through Foxborough Park discussed previously is considered necessary in order to provide a water system in the area that meets current standards and greatly reduce the risk of future mainenance or watermain breaks in the park wetland and Cedar Avenue. Maintenance and repairs in these areas will be difficult at best and will be considerably more costly to repair than other breaks. However, due to overall watermain rehabilitation costs, it is recommended that the watermain lining through Foxborough Park be included in the project as a bid alternate. If the results of bidding result in this portion of the watermain not being rehabilit ated with this project, it can be reprioritized in the Capital Improvement Program for improvement in future years. Factors considered as part of the analysis included construction costs for the watermain work, impacts to the neighborhood including traffic, removal and replacement of sidewalks and curbs, as well as impacts to landscaping, lawns and driveways. • Hayes Avenue (Hamilton Court to 175 th Street) will be rehabilitated with bolt replacement at fittings, valves and hydrants. During the rebolting the condition of the fittings, valves and hydrants will be evaluated, and a field detrmination will be made regardng additional replacement. Storm Sewer Reconstruction of the streets provides a timely opportunity to improve drainage conditions and increase the longevity of the streets within the project area by repairing existing known issues and installing additional storm sewer facilities. City staff completed an inspection of the storm sewer system in the fall of 202 4 and provided recommendations for repairs and replacement including castings, adjustment rings, and structure replacement, as well as replacement of failing or deteriorating reinforced concr ete pipe (RCP). Structures identified as needing rehabilitation will undergo necessary interior concrete/grout invert and doghouse replacement. Those structures identified as having existing sumps, but are not the last accessible structure in the street, will have their sumps filled with grout. Sections of storm sewer that have been identified in Section 3.2.3 as not meeting capacity are proposed to be upsized to increase capacity to keep the headwater below the upstream structure rim elevation. Additional catch basins are also proposed at the locations identified in the capacity figures in order to increase the inlet capacity and reduce localized flooding. C osts for this work are included in the O pinion of Probable C ost . Any new storm sewer that is upsized or structure replaced due to upsizing of pipes or if the structure Page 113 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 13 needs to be upsized itself, shall be funded by the stormwater infrastructure fund and shall not be assessed. It is the City’s practice to have storm sewer castings meeting current City Standards installed on all catch basins within the project area, and therefore, structure top slabs or entire structures will be replaced to accommodate the transition. Existing inlets and outlets of storm sewer runs within the project area that were identified as needing improvements such as repair, replacement, tree removal, and/or delta excavation will be improved with the project. Public Street Sign Replacement E xisting street signs within the project will not need to be replaced unless it is due to utility work, in which case they will be salvaged and reinstalled. Mailbox Replacement It is the City’s intent to salvage and reinstall all existing mailboxes and mailbox supports that may be impacted with construction. In the event the condition of the existing mailbox support warrants replacement prior to reinstallation, the City is propos ing to salvage the existing mailbox and install a new mailbox support that will meet both City Standards and United States Postal Service (USPS) requirements. Permits/Approvals An NPDES permit for construction activity will be required if more than one acre will be disturbed by construction activities within the project, which will be determined in final design of the project. A Dakota County Work in Right -of-Way user registration will be required for the contractor for any county roads (i.e. CSAH 23 , etc.) that may be used as a haul route for the project. Work in Right -of-Way permits will be also required for construction within Dakota County Right -of-Way. A DNR Work in Protected Waters Permit will be required for the contractor for any work in the Foxborough Conservation Easement. Construction Access/Staging The contractor will be responsible for providing access to all properties throughout the project. Adequately signed detours will be identified to direct traffic around the construction zones and notify users of the increased truck and construction activity . Construction will be phased such that construction truck traffic will not need to access newly reconstructed streets to complete the project. Detailed construction phasing plans will be developed with final design of the project. Public Involvement A neighborhood meeting conducted in presentation and open house format was held on September 12, 2024 for anticipated Assessed Parcels. City and WSB staff Page 114 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 14 attended and provided property owners with information regarding the proposed improvements, funding, schedule, and impacts associated with the project. The meeting was held to update the property owners on the status of the project, and to solicit comments from them regarding any issues or concerns they have relating to the public infrastructure. Invitations to the neighborhood meeting were sent to all property owners within the pro ject area . Of those, 18 property owners attended the neighborhood meeting . Comments cards were made available attendees at the meeting, and an online comment submittal form is provided on the project website for property owners to submit comments electronically. Comments received are provided in Appendix D . Page 115 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 15 Financing Opinion of Probable Cost A detailed opinion of probable cost for the project area can be found in th e Appendix B of this report. The opinion of cost incorporates estimated 2025 construction costs and includes a 8 % contingency factor. Indirect costs are projected at 2 5 % of the construction cost and include engineering, legal, financing, and administrative costs. Option 1 of the Watermain Lining opinion of cost includes a 5% contingency factor and indirect costs are projected at 20% of the construction costs. Table 2 below provides a summary of the opinion of probable cost for the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project: Funding Financing for the watermain and sanitary sewer improvements within the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project will come from City CIP Funds, Water Operating Fund, and Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund , and Storm water Infrastructure Fund . Financing for the street and storm sewer improvements within the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project will come from Special Assessments and City CIP Funds . Special Assessments benefitting properties are proposed to f und 40% of the roadway street and storm sewer improvements identified to be reconstructed with the project, with the remaining 60% funded using city funds. Assessments for this project were calculated in accordance with the City’s Assessment Policy dated Septemeber 20, 2021 . In general, those properties zoned residential were assessed on a per parcel (unit) basis. Along collectors, the Single -Family Unit Rate and Duplex Rate shall be prorated to re flect the City’s typical 32 foot street section. Table 2 – 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project Opinion of Probable Cost Summary Schedule Amount Street Improvements $1,816,267 Storm Sewer Improvements $377,33 2 Option 1: Watermain Improvements - Lining $2,032,268 Option 1: Watermain Improvements - Lining without Bid Alt $1,609,651 Option 2: Watermain Improvements - Open Cut $1,734,928 Sanitary Sewer Improvements $42,390 TOTAL WITH OPTION 1: $4,268,25 7 TOTAL WITH OPTION 2: $3,970,917 Page 116 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 16 Table 3 below provides the funding level anticipated through the levy of Special Assessments to benefitting property owners for the street and storm improvements is $593,123 . Table 3 – 2025 Street Reconstruction Project Special Assessments Funding Level Amount Single Family Unit Assessment Rate Hayes/170th $6,178 per unit Duplex Unit Assessment Rate Hayes/170th $3,089 per unit Table 4 below provides a funding summary for the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project. The 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 2 5 -02, was separated into two parts based on the proposed improvements. The 202 5 Street Reconstruction portion total cost is $4,268,257 while the 202 5 Street Rehabilitation Project total cost is $2,086,089 . Combined the 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 2 5 -02 overall cost will be $6,354,346 . Table 4 – 2025 Street Reconstruction Project Funding Summary Funding Source Amount Street and Storm Sewer Assessments (Effective rate 40%) $593,123 City CIP Funds – Street/Storm $1,378,026 Storwater Infrastructure Fund $222,450 City Water Operating Fund $2,032,268 City Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund $42,390 TOTAL $4,268,257 Page 117 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 17 Project Schedule The proposed schedule for the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project is as follows: *Schedule assumes any necessary private utility work is completed prior to the start of construction. Task Description Completion Date Present Feasibility Report and Set Public Hearing October 21, 2024 Neighborhood Meeting Early November Public Hearing November 18, 2024 City Council Approves Plans and Specifications January 20, 2025 Open Bids February 19, 2025 Neighborhood Meeting Late March Award Contract and Assessment Hearing April 7 , 202 5 Begin Construction April/May 202 5 Substantial Completion October 202 5 Final Completion November 202 5 Page 118 of 452 Feasibility Report 2025 Street Reconstruction Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 18 Feasibility and Recommendation The 2025 Street Reconstruction Project includes full depth reclamation, watermain improvements, sanitary sewer improvements, storm sewer improvements, pedestrian ramp installation, partial repair and repalcement of structurally deficient concrete sidewalk and concrete curb and gutter. The total estimated cost for the 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project including roadway, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain improvements is $4,268,25 7 . Proposed funding for the project is provided through City Funds and Special Assessments. Construction costs are based on anticipated construction costs for 202 5 . This project is feasible, necessary and cost -effective from an engineering standpoint. The project feasibility is subject to financial review by the City. Based on information contained in this report, it is recommended to proceed with the improvements as outlined in this report. Page 119 of 452 Appendix A Figure 1 – Project Locations Map Figure 2 – Typical Section Figure 3 – Stormwater Capacity Analysis Page 120 of 452 GLACIERWAY170TH ST W DODD BLVDCEDAR AVE171ST ST W HAVEN AVE172ND ST W GLENC OE CT 1 7 3 R D S T W GLENCOE AVE170TH CT WG L A S G O W A V E173RDCIRHEIDELBERGWAYHAYES AVEHIBISCUS AVE174TH CT W GOLDENRODAVEGEORGETOW NWAYHICKORY CT GROVE AVEGLENWOOD AVEGREENTREE AVEHARBOR CT169TH S T W GREENTREE PATHHEYWOOD CTHAMILTONCT HANNIBAL CTGOLDENVIEW AVEG O O D L A N DPATHHERSHEYCTHEMLOCKCTU P P ER 167TH ST W 169TH C T W HARRINGTON WA Y HALIFAX PATHHARDINGLNGRENADIERAVEGREENVIEW CIR175THSTW GOODHUE AVEG R EENLANDPATHHAMILTON DR HAZEL CT 174TH ST W UPPER 171ST ST W GARCIA WAY Document Path: J:\gis\city\LKVL\Maps\LKVLProposal\25-02 Layout Date Saved: 9/10/2024¯1 inch = 400 feet 0 400 Feet 2025 Street Reconstruction Project Lakeville, MN Project Location Map Proposed Reconstruction Page 121 of 452 30' 14'14' DRIVE LANE ℄ INSET A 3.0%3.0% URBAN RESIDENTIAL - FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION HARBOR COURT (N.T.S.) 30' EXISTING/NEW PAVEMENT SURFACE 1:4 MA X 1:4 MAX 1:4 MAX 1:4 MA X R/WR/W EX. D412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (PARTIAL REPLACEMENT) EX. D412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (PARTIAL REPLACEMENT) 40' 22'22' DRIVE LANE ℄ INSET B URBAN MINOR COLLECTOR - FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION HAYES AVENUE 170TH STREET W (N.T.S.) 40' EXISTING/NEW PAVEMENT SURFACE 1:4 MA X 1:4 MAX R/WR/W EX. D412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (PARTIAL REPLACEMENT) 1:4 MAX 1:4 MA X 2.0%2.0% EX. D412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (PARTIAL REPLACEMENT) DRIVE LANE DRIVE LANE FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION (APPROX. 10") 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) (SPWEA340C) 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT (INCIDENTAL) 2.5" TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) (SPNWB330C) MINIMUM 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE OR SUITABLE RECLAIM MATERIAL APPROVED EXISTING SUBGRADE INSET A RESIDENTIAL STREET SECTION 5" CONCRETE (MNDOT 3F52) 4" SELECT GRANULAR (INCIDENTAL) DETAIL CONCRETE WALK (CITY STD. PLATE NO. LV-ST-15) APPROVED SUBGRADE (INCIDENTAL) CONCRETE WALK SHALL BE 6" THICK WITHIN PEDESTRIAN RAMP LIMITS DETAIL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY & APRON SECTION (CITY STD. PLATE NO. LV-ST-3 & LV-ST-4) APPROVED SUBGRADE (INCIDENTAL) 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (SPWEA240B) 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (SPWEA240B) DETAIL BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SECTION 6" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 MODIFIED (100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE; INCIDENTAL) APPROVED SUBGRADE (INCIDENTAL) 7" CONCRETE (MNDOT 3F52) 6" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 MODIFIED (100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE; INCIDENTAL) RECON FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION (APPROX. 14") 2.0" TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) (SPWEA340C) 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT (INCIDENTAL) 2.5" TYPE SP 12.5 NON-WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C) (SPNWB330C) MINIMUM 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE OR SUITABLE RECLAIM MATERIAL APPROVED EXISTING SUBGRADE INSET B COLLECTOR STREET SECTION C:\ACC\ACCDocs\WSB\026423-000\Project Files\05_Discipline\Site\03_Sheets\026423-000-C-TYPS-DETL.dwg 10/11/2024 1:06:10 PM1 AS SHOWN XXX XXXXXX SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: SHEET OF WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONCLIENT PROJECT NO.2025 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTCITY OF LAKEVILLE026423-000 25-02 ## TYPICAL SECTIONS 1 Page 122 of 452 """"""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""" """"" "HAYESAVEHARDING LN Structure 61AP001 Water coming in at 6.44 cfs Ponds on CB up to 0.322-feet in the 3-yr event Would spread 12.6-feet across the roadway Spread is allowable Structure 61AP002 Water coming in at 2.82 cfs Ponds on CB up to 0.295-feet in the 3-yr event Would spread 11.5-feet across the roadway Spread is allowable Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\FDR Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/2/2024¯1 inch = 50 feet 0 50 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) City of Lakeville, MN Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Sag Point Catch Basin "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Good in Rational Calculation Full-Depth Reclamation Page 123 of 452 """""""""""""""""""""""""" ! " " " "" "HAYES AVEHARRINGTON WAY Pipe 61AC038-61AC037 12-inch pipe fails at 10-yr event in Rational Calculation Headwater is 2.1 feet below structure rim in 10-year event Head pushes water through pipe, capacity doesn't appear to be an issue Structure 61AC038 Water coming in at 5.86 cfs Ponds on CB up to 0.302-feet in the 3-yr event Would spread 11.8-feet across the roadway Spread is allowable Structure 61AC037 Water coming in at 5.26 cfs Ponds on CB up to 0.45-feet in the 3-yr event Would spread 17.7-feet across the roadway **Recommend adding adjacent CB Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\FDR Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/2/2024¯1 inch = 50 feet 0 50 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) City of Lakeville, MN Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Sag Point Catch Basin "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Good in Rational Calculation Full-Depth Reclamation Page 124 of 452 """""""""""""" "" 170TH ST W Pipe 69AC024-69AC023 12-inch pipe fails at 10-yr event in Rational Calculation Headwater is 1.7 feet below structure rim in 10-year event Head pushes water through pipe, capacity doesn't appear to be an issue Structure 69AC023 Water coming in at 3.24 cfs Ponds on CB up to 0.325-feet in the 3-yr event Would spread 12.7-feet across the roadway Spread is allowable Structure 69AC024 Water coming in at 9.84 cfs Ponds on CB up to 0.43-feet in the 3-yr event Would spread 16.9-feet across the roadway **Recommend adding adjacent CB Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\FDR Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/2/2024¯1 inch = 50 feet 0 50 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) City of Lakeville, MN Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Sag Point Catch Basin "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Good in Rational Calculation Full-Depth Reclamation Page 125 of 452 """"""""HARBOR CTStructure 69AC026 Water coming in at 3.6 cfs Ponds on CB up to 0.347-feet in the 3-yr event Would spread 13.6-feet across the roadway Spread is allowable Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\FDR Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/2/2024¯1 inch = 50 feet 0 50 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) City of Lakeville, MN Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Sag Point Catch Basin "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Good in Rational Calculation Full-Depth Reclamation Page 126 of 452 """"""""" """"" """""""" " " " " " " "GRENADIER AVE170TH ST W Pipe 69BC004-69BC007 15-inch pipe fails at 10-yr event in Rational Calculation Headwater is 1.14 feet below structure rim in 10-year event Head pushes water through pipe, capacity doesn't appear to be an issue Structure 69BC004 Water coming in at 8.74 cfs Ponds on CB up to 0.397-feet in the 3-yr event Would spread 15.6-feet across the roadway **Recommend adding adjacent CB Structure 69BC007 Water coming in at 8.39 cfs Ponds on CB up to 0.385-feet in the 3-yr event Would spread 15.1-feet across the roadway Spread is allowable Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\FDR Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/2/2024¯1 inch = 50 feet 0 50 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) City of Lakeville, MN Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Sag Point Catch Basin "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Good in Rational Calculation Full-Depth Reclamation Page 127 of 452 "" "" """"""""""""""""""""" "" "" ""GLENWOOD AVE170TH ST W Structure 69BC021 Water coming in at 5.23 cfs Ponds on CB up to 0.282-feet in the 3-yr event Would spread 11-feet across the roadway Spread is allowable Structure 69BC020 Water coming in at 2.31 cfs Ponds on CB up to 0.163-feet in the 3-yr event Would spread 6.2-feet across the roadway Spread is allowable Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\FDR Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/2/2024¯1 inch = 50 feet 0 50 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) City of Lakeville, MN Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Sag Point Catch Basin "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Good in Rational Calculation Full-Depth Reclamation Page 128 of 452 Appendix B Opinion of Probable Cost Page 129 of 452 WSB Project:2025 Street Reconstruction Project Design By:RJS Project Location:City of Lakeville Checked By:JAO City Project No.:25-02 WSB Project No:026423-000 Date:10/17/2024 Item No. MnDOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 64,065.86$ 64,065.86$ 2 2101.502 CLEARING EACH 3 500.00$ 1,500.00$ 3 2101.502 GRUBBING EACH 3 400.00$ 1,200.00$ 4 2104.502 SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 11 125.00$ 1,375.00$ 5 2104.502 SALVAGE SIGN EACH 5 50.00$ 250.00$ 6 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER L F 4180 8.00$ 33,440.00$ 7 2104.503 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F 720 4.00$ 2,880.00$ 8 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F 877 7.00$ 6,139.00$ 9 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 400 12.00$ 4,800.00$ 10 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 9 12.00$ 108.00$ 11 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 156 15.00$ 2,340.00$ 12 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK S F 7430 2.50$ 18,575.00$ 13 2104.601 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES LS 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 14 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 537 40.00$ 21,480.00$ 15 2106.507 STABILIZING AGGREGATE (CV)C Y 537 37.00$ 19,869.00$ 16 2106.509 STABILIZING AGGREGATE TON 42 37.00$ 1,554.00$ 17 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 67 30.00$ 2,010.00$ 18 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 50 160.00$ 8,000.00$ 19 2130.523 WATER MGAL 162 70.00$ 11,340.00$ 20 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION S Y 32204 3.00$ 96,612.00$ 21 2360.504 TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR CRS MIX(2,B)3.0" THICK S Y 246 35.00$ 8,610.00$ 22 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3;C)TON 3780 85.00$ 321,300.00$ 23 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3;C)TON 4777 83.00$ 396,491.00$ 24 2504.602 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REPAIR EACH 20 190.00$ 3,800.00$ 25 2521.518 5" CONCRETE WALK S F 6150 10.00$ 61,500.00$ 26 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 1280 15.00$ 19,200.00$ 27 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 250 25.00$ 6,250.00$ 28 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN D412 L F 4180 25.00$ 104,500.00$ 29 2531.504 7" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 367 80.00$ 29,360.00$ 30 2531.604 7" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SPECIAL S Y 23 170.00$ 3,910.00$ 31 2531.601 ADA COMPLIANCE SUPERVISOR LS 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 32 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 242 65.00$ 15,730.00$ 33 2540.602 MAIL BOX EACH 11 50.00$ 550.00$ 34 2540.602 MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 11 50.00$ 550.00$ 35 2540.602 TEMPORARY MAIL BOX EACH 102 40.00$ 4,080.00$ 36 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 37 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 38 2575.504 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25 S Y 586 5.00$ 2,930.00$ 39 2575.523 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 MGAL 6 50.00$ 300.00$ 40 2575.523 WATER MGAL 14 70.00$ 980.00$ 41 2575.604 PERMANENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT S Y 586 20.00$ 11,720.00$ 42 2575.604 TEMPORARY STABILIZATION S Y 586 20.00$ 11,720.00$ 43 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 11419 0.75$ 8,564.25$ 44 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 26 3.00$ 78.00$ 45 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE PAINT L F 5722 1.00$ 5,722.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 1,345,383.11$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (8%)107,630.65$ SUBTOTAL 1,453,013.76$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%)363,253.44$ TOTAL 1,816,267.20$ 46 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 13,309.75$ 13,309.75$ 47 2101.502 CLEARING EACH 1 500.00$ 500.00$ 48 2101.502 GRUBBING EACH 1 400.00$ 400.00$ 49 2104.502 REMOVE CASTING EACH 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 50 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 15 575.00$ 8,625.00$ 51 2104.503 REMOVE PERFORATED PIPE L F 1683 10.00$ 16,830.00$ 52 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)L F 225 20.00$ 4,500.00$ 53 2106.601 DEWATERING LS 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 54 2502.503 6" PERF TP PIPE DRAIN L F 1983 35.00$ 69,405.00$ 55 2502.602 6" TP PIPE DRAIN CLEAN OUT EACH 25 200.00$ 5,000.00$ 56 2503.503 12" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V L F 41 60.00$ 2,460.00$ 57 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V L F 94 65.00$ 6,110.00$ OPINION OF PROBABLE COST B. Storm Sewer Improvements A. Street Improvements Page 130 of 452 58 2503.503 21" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS III L F 20 77.00$ 1,540.00$ 59 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS III L F 50 82.00$ 4,100.00$ 60 2503.503 30" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS III L F 40 200.00$ 8,000.00$ 60 2503.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 2 2,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 61 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 2 2,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 62 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 28 950.00$ 26,600.00$ 63 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 52 900.00$ 46,800.00$ 64 2506.602 6" TOP SLAB FOR 48-4020 STRUCTURE EACH 4 2,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 65 2506.602 6" TOP SLAB FOR 60-4020 STRUCTURE EACH 1 2,200.00$ 2,200.00$ 66 2506.602 CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 3 275.00$ 825.00$ 67 2506.602 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3')EACH 8 2,500.00$ 20,000.00$ 68 2506.602 FILL STRUCTURE SUMP EACH 5 400.00$ 2,000.00$ 69 2506.602 GROUT CATCH BASIN OR MANHOLE EACH 9 400.00$ 3,600.00$ 70 2506.602 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SPECIAL (TRASH GUARD)EACH 2 350.00$ 700.00$ 71 2511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III C Y 7 200.00$ 1,400.00$ 72 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 34 150.00$ 5,100.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 279,504.75$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (8%)22,360.38$ SUBTOTAL 301,865.13$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%)75,466.28$ TOTAL 377,331.41$ 73 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 1,495.25$ 1,495.25$ 74 2104.502 REMOVE CASTING EACH 1 230.00$ 230.00$ 75 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 24 750.00$ 18,000.00$ 76 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 1 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 77 2506.503 RECONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE L F 4 1,500.00$ 6,000.00$ 78 2506.602 CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 25 175.00$ 4,375.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 31,400.25$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (8%)2,512.02$ SUBTOTAL 33,912.27$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%)8,478.07$ TOTAL 42,390.34$ Option 1- Watermain Improvements- Lining 79 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 80 2104.502 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 14 450.00$ 6,300.00$ 81 2104.502 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 7 700.00$ 4,900.00$ 82 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN L F 524 9.00$ 4,716.00$ 83 2105.610 EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION HOUR 20 500.00$ 10,000.00$ 84 2106.601 DEWATERING LS 1 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 85 2451.507 GRANULAR BEDDING C Y 20 250.00$ 5,000.00$ 86 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 10 1,600.00$ 16,000.00$ 87 2504.602 HYDRANT EACH 7 6,000.00$ 42,000.00$ 88 2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX EACH 14 185.00$ 2,590.00$ 89 2504.602 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 5 2,800.00$ 14,000.00$ 90 2504.602 12" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 9 5,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 91 2504.602 BOLT & VALVE BOX REPLACEMENT- VALVE EACH 8 3,500.00$ 28,000.00$ 92 2504.602 VALVE BOX SECTION EACH 4 750.00$ 3,000.00$ 93 2504.603 LINING PIT EACH 15 5,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 94 2504.603 6" PVC WATERMAIN L F 309 75.00$ 23,175.00$ 95 2504.603 12" PVC WATERMAIN L F 215 72.00$ 15,480.00$ 96 2504.603 LINING WATER MAIN 12"L F 5085 250.00$ 1,271,250.00$ 97 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 900 15.00$ 13,500.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 1,612,911.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (5%)80,645.55$ SUBTOTAL 1,693,556.55$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (20%)338,711.31$ TOTAL 2,032,267.86$ TOTAL W/OUT BID ALTERNATE 1,609,651.26$ Option 1- Watermain Improvements- Lining Bid Alternate 1 2504.603 12" PVC WATERMAIN L F 30 72.00$ 2,160.00$ 2 2504.603 LINING WATER MAIN 12"L F 1333 250.00$ 333,250.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 335,410.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (5%)16,770.50$ SUBTOTAL 352,180.50$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (20%)70,436.10$ TOTAL 422,616.60$ 98 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 45,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 99 2104.502 REMOVE CURB STOP & BOX EACH 60 200.00$ 12,000.00$ 100 2104.502 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 14 450.00$ 6,300.00$ 101 2104.502 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 7 700.00$ 4,900.00$ 102 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN L F 120 9.00$ 1,080.00$ C. Sanitary Sewer Improvements Option 2. Watermain Improvements- Open Cut Page 131 of 452 103 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER L F 512 8.00$ 4,096.00$ 104 2104.503 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F 27 4.00$ 108.00$ 105 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F 15 7.00$ 105.00$ 106 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 47 12.00$ 564.00$ 107 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 26 15.00$ 390.00$ 108 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK S F 1150 2.50$ 2,875.00$ 103 2104.602 REMOVE WATER SERVICE EACH 60 60.00$ 3,600.00$ 104 2105.610 EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION HOUR 20 500.00$ 10,000.00$ 105 2106.601 DEWATERING LS 1 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 106 2106.601 TEMPORARY WATER SYSTEM LS 1 35,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 107 2360.504 TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR CRS MIX(2,B)3.0" THICK S Y 157 35.00$ 5,495.00$ 107 2451.507 GRANULAR BEDDING C Y 20 250.00$ 5,000.00$ 108 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 10 1,600.00$ 16,000.00$ 109 2504.602 HYDRANT EACH 7 6,000.00$ 42,000.00$ 110 2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX EACH 14 185.00$ 2,590.00$ 111 2504.602 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 5 2,800.00$ 14,000.00$ 112 2504.602 12" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 9 5,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 113 2504.602 BOLT & VALVE BOX REPLACEMENT- VALVE EACH 8 3,500.00$ 28,000.00$ 114 2504.602 CURB STOP & BOX EACH 60 800.00$ 48,000.00$ 115 2504.602 VALVE BOX SECTION EACH 4 750.00$ 3,000.00$ 116 2504.603 LINING PIT EACH 5 5,500.00$ 27,500.00$ 117 2504.603 1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE L F 1200 65.00$ 78,000.00$ 118 2504.603 6" PVC WATERMAIN L F 314 60.00$ 18,840.00$ 119 2504.603 12" PVC WATERMAIN L F 3707 72.00$ 266,904.00$ 120 2504.603 LINING WATER MAIN 12"L F 1424 350.00$ 498,400.00$ 118 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB 1747 15.00$ 26,205.00$ 119 2521.518 5" CONCRETE WALK S F 1150 10.00$ 11,500.00$ 120 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN D412 L F 512 25.00$ 12,800.00$ 121 2531.504 7" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 86 80.00$ 6,880.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 1,285,132.00$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (8%)102,810.56$ SUBTOTAL 1,387,942.56$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%)346,985.64$ TOTAL 1,734,928.20$ GRAND TOTAL W/ OPTION 1 4,268,256.81$ GRAND TOTAL W/ OPTION 1 (W/OUT BID ALTERNATE)3,845,640.21$ GRAND TOTAL W/ OPTION 2 3,970,917.15$ DISCLAIMER: In review of this Opinion of Probable Cost, the Client understands that the Consultant has no control over the availability of labor, equipment or materials, market conditions, or the Contractor’s method of pricing. This Opinion of Probable Cost is made on the basis of the Consultant’s professional judgment and experience. The Consultant makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding the ultimate bids or negotiated cost of the Work. Page 132 of 452 Appendix C Draft Geotechnical Report, Braun Intertec Page 133 of 452 Geotechnical Evaluation Report City of Lakeville 25-02 – Street Reconstruction Lakeville, Minnesota Prepared for City of Lakeville Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Richard S. Jett, PE Project Engineer License Number: 58781 October 10, 2024 Project B2407625 Braun Intertec Corporation DRAFTPage 134 of 452 AA/EOE Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com October 10, 2024 Project B2407625 Mr. Steve Ferraro City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: Geotechnical Evaluation Report City of Lakeville 25-02 – Miscellaneous Overlays Lakeville, Minnesota Dear Mr. Ferraro: We are pleased to present this Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the above-referenced project. The following report provides the results of our evaluation and should be read in its entirety. Thank you for making Braun Intertec your geotechnical consultant for this project. If you have questions about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please contact Richard Jett at 815.545.7059 (rjett@braunintertec.com) or Matt Ruble at 952.995.2000 (mruble@braunintertec.com). Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Richard S. Jett, PE Project Engineer Matthew P. Ruble, PE Vice President, Principal Engineer DRAFTPage 135 of 452 Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 A.1. Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1 A.2. Site Conditions and History ................................................................................................. 3 A.3. Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents .......................................................... 3 A.5. Scope of Services ................................................................................................................. 3 B. Results .............................................................................................................................................. 5 B.1. Geologic Overview .............................................................................................................. 5 B.2. Soil Boring Results ............................................................................................................... 5 B.3. Pavement Coring and Power Auger Results ........................................................................ 6 B.4. Groundwater ....................................................................................................................... 8 B.5. Laboratory Test Results ....................................................................................................... 9 B.6. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Results ............................................................................ 9 C. Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 11 C.1. Design and Construction Discussion ................................................................................. 11 C.1.a. Overview .............................................................................................................. 11 C.1.b. Full Depth Reclamation ........................................................................................ 11 C.1.c. Mill & Overlay ....................................................................................................... 11 C.2. Site Grading and Excavations ............................................................................................ 12 C.2.a. Overview .............................................................................................................. 12 C.2.b. Pavement Subgrade Preparation ......................................................................... 13 C.2.c. Pavement Subgrade Test Roll ............................................................................... 13 C.2.d. Excavation Oversizing ........................................................................................... 14 C.2.e. Excavated Slopes .................................................................................................. 14 C.2.f. Excavation Dewatering ......................................................................................... 15 C.2.g. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction .......................................................... 15 C.3. Pavements ......................................................................................................................... 16 C.3.a. Rehabilitation via Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) ................................................. 16 C.3.b. Rehabilitation via Mill and Overlay ...................................................................... 16 C.3.c. Design Sections .................................................................................................... 17 C.3.d. Subgrade Drainage ............................................................................................... 18 C.3.e. Performance and Maintenance ........................................................................... 18 C.4. Utilities .............................................................................................................................. 19 C.4.a. Subgrade Stabilization .......................................................................................... 19 C.4.b. Utility Backfill ........................................................................................................ 19 C.4.c. Dewatering ........................................................................................................... 19 C.4.d. Corrosion Potential .............................................................................................. 19 D. Procedures ...................................................................................................................................... 20 D.1. Penetration Test Borings ................................................................................................... 20 D.2. Ground Penetrating Radar ................................................................................................ 20 D.2.a. GPR Data Collection ............................................................................................. 20 D.2.b. GPR Analysis ......................................................................................................... 20 D.3. Power Auger Borings ......................................................................................................... 20 D.4. Exploration Logs ................................................................................................................ 21 D.4.a. Log of Boring Sheets ............................................................................................. 21 DRAFTPage 136 of 452 Table of Contents (continued) Description Page D.4.b. Geologic Origins ................................................................................................... 21 D.5. Material Classification and Testing ................................................................................... 21 D.5.a. Visual and Manual Classification .......................................................................... 21 D.5.b. Laboratory Testing ............................................................................................... 21 D.5.c. Groundwater Measurements ............................................................................... 22 E. Qualifications .................................................................................................................................. 22 E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions .................................................................................. 22 E.1.a. Material Strata ..................................................................................................... 22 E.1.b. Groundwater Levels ............................................................................................. 22 E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility .......................................................................... 22 E.2.a. Plan Review .......................................................................................................... 22 E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing ............................................................... 23 E.3. Use of Report ..................................................................................................................... 23 E.4. Standard of Care ................................................................................................................ 23 Appendix Soil Boring and Pavement Core Location Sketch Log of Boring ST-1 through ST-5 Pavement Core Photographs GPR Results Corrosivity Test Results Descriptive Terminology of Soil DRAFTPage 137 of 452 A. Introduction A.1. Project Description This Geotechnical Evaluation Report addresses the proposed design and rehabilitation of various local roadways throughout the City of Lakeville, Minnesota. As part of City of Lakeville Project 25-02, this project will include rehabilitation of the following bituminous roadways using Mill and Overlay techniques: Glacier Way from 175th Street West to 179th Street West Gerdine Path from Dodd Boulevard to 179th Street West Gettysburg Way / Gillette Way from 175th Street to 175th Street Glasgow Avenue from Dodd Boulevard to Glacier Way Glasgow Way from Glacier Way to Glasgow Avenue 178th Street from Glacier Way to Glasgow Way 177th Street from Glacier Way to Glasgow Way 175th Street West from Glasgow Avenue to Glacier Way Galle Court from Gerdine Path to Cul-De-Sac In addition, the following roadways will be rehabilitated using full depth reclamation techniques: Hayes Avenue / 170th Street West from 175th Street West and Cedar Avenue Harbor Court from 170th Street West to Cul-De-Sac We also understand that the existing watermain beneath a portion of 170th Street from Cedar Avenue to Hayes Avenue will be replaced as part of this project. Table 1 outlines descriptions of the existing roadways. Table 1. Existing Roadway Descriptions Roadway Roadway Designation Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) Hayes Avenue / 170th Street West Urban Minor Collector 3,336 (2023) Harbor Court Residential Less than 600 Glacier Way Urban Major Collector 4,651 (2021) Gerdine Path Urban Minor Collector 1941 (2023) Galle Court Residential Less Than 600 DRAFTPage 138 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 2 Roadway Roadway Designation Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) Gettysburg Way / Gillette Way Residential Less Than 600 Glasgow Way Residential Less than 600 177th Street Residential Less Than 600 178th Street Residential Less Than 600 Glasgow Avenue Residential Less Than 600 175th Street West Residential Less Than 600 Figure 1 below show an illustration of the existing roadway alignments. Figure 1. Existing Roadway Layout – City of Lakeville 25-02 Figure taken from Google Earth. Hayes Avenue / 170th street is marked in green, Harbor Courtis marked in teal, Glacier Way is marked in blue, Gerdine Path is marked in orange, Glasgow Avenue is marked in red, Glasgow way is marked in dark green, 178th Street is marked in purple, 177th Street is marked in yellow, 175th Street West is marked in light blue, Galle Court is marked in light green, and Gettysburg Way / Gillette Way are marked in dark red. DRAFTPage 139 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 3 A.2. Site Conditions and History A majority of the roadways are generally classified as low volume residential roadways with a few exceptions. Hayes Avenue / 170th Street and Gerdine Path are generally classified as a Minor Urban Collector with Glacier Way classified as a Major Urban Collector. All roadways included within this project are bituminous. We understand that these roadways are currently maintained under the existing City of Lakeville street maintenance program. A.3. Purpose The purpose of the geotechnical services was to characterize existing pavement conditions throughout the proposed corridors and provide geotechnical recommendations for use in the design and rehabilitation of the outlined roadways. A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents We reviewed the City of Lakeville 25-02 Project Map, provided by the City of Lakeville (undated). In addition, we have used several publicly available sources of information including topography maps obtained from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnTOPO website) and Google Earth aerial photographs. We have described our understanding of the proposed construction and site to the extent others reported it to us. Depending on the extent of available information, we may have made assumptions based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the project details, the project team should notify us. New or changed information could require additional evaluation, analyses, and/or recommendations. A.5. Scope of Services We performed our scope of services for the project in accordance with our Proposal for a Geotechnical Evaluation (QTB200001) dated July 30, 2024. The following list describes the geotechnical tasks completed in accordance with our authorized scope of services. DRAFTPage 140 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 4 Reviewing the background information and reference documents previously cited. Staking and clearing the exploration location of underground utilities. The City of Lakeville selected, and we staked the exploration locations. The Soil Boring and Pavement Core sketch included in the Appendix shows the approximate locations of the pavement cores and soil borings. Performing Gound Penetrating Radar (GPR) scans in both travel directions along the length of each roadway included in this project. Performing five Standard Penetration Test (SPT) soil borings, denoted as ST-1 through ST-5, to depths ranging from approximately 5 to 15 feet below existing grade along Hayes Avenue / 170th Street. Performing 24 pavement cores and shallow power auger borings, denoted as C-1 through C-24, near the client-designated locations throughout the remaining project areas. Our original scope of 22 pavement cores was increased to 24 pavement cores at the clients request shortly after the start of the project. Performing eight (8) companion pavement cores, designated as C-1a, C-3a, C-11a, C-13a, C-14a, C-16a, C-19a, and C-21a, near the curbline of the roadways. Performing laboratory testing on select samples to aid in soil classification and engineering analysis. Preparing this report containing a soil boring and pavement core location sketch, pavement core photographs, a summary of the soils and pavements encountered, results of laboratory tests, recommendations for rehabilitation of the existing pavements, and recommendations for use in the design and construction of water main replacement. Our scope of services did not include environmental services or testing and our geotechnical personnel performing this evaluation are not trained to provide environmental services or testing. We can provide environmental services or testing at your request. DRAFTPage 141 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 5 B. Results B.1. Geologic Overview We based the geologic origins used in this report on the soil types, in-situ and laboratory testing, and available common knowledge of the geological history of the site. Because of the complex depositional history, geologic origins can be difficult to ascertain. We did not perform a detailed investigation of the geologic history for the site. B.2. Soil Boring Results Table 2 provides a summary of the soil boring results in the general order we encountered the strata. Please refer to the Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix for additional details. The Descriptive Terminology sheet in the Appendix includes definitions of abbreviations used in Table 2. Table 2. Subsurface Profile Summary – ST-1 through ST-5 Strata Soil Type - ASTM Classification N values Commentary and Details Pavement section N/A N/A Observed at all five soil boring locations with total pavement thicknesses ranging from approximately 12 1/2 to 16 inches. Bituminous thicknesses ranged from approximately 6 1/2 to 9 inches. Apparent aggregate base thicknesses ranged from approximately 4 to 9 inches. Fill SM, SC, CL 6 to 25 Observed at the boring locations below the pavements and extended to depths ranging from approximately 10 to 11 feet below existing grade. Borings ST-4 and ST-5 terminated within the fill zone. Moisture conditions were generally moist. Generally consisted of brown to dark brown clay and silt laden soils. Apparent hydrocarbon odor (detected by human perception only) was observed in Boring ST-4. Variable amounts of gravel; may contain cobbles and boulders. DRAFTPage 142 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 6 Strata Soil Type - ASTM Classification N values Commentary and Details Glacial deposits CL, SM 7 to 35 Observed in Borings ST-1 through ST-3 below the pavements and fill soils and extended to the termination depths of these borings. Generally light brown to brown in color. Relative consistencies of the clay soils were generally stiff to hard. Relative densities of the silty sand soils were generally loose to medium dense. Variable amounts of gravel; may contain cobbles and boulders. Moisture conditions were generally moist to wet. We did not perform gradation analysis on the apparent aggregate base material encountered as part of the pavement section, in accordance with our scope of work. Therefore, we cannot conclusively determine if the encountered material satisfies a particular specification. For simplicity in this report, we define existing fill to mean existing, uncontrolled, or undocumented fill. B.3. Pavement Coring and Power Auger Results Table 3 outlines the results of our pavement coring and power auger borings performed as part of this project. Table 3: Pavement Coring and Power Auger Summary Location Associated Roadway Bituminous Thickness (inches) Apparent Aggregate Base Thickness (inches) Subgrade Soils Pavement Core Conditions ST-1 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 7 9 SM N/A ST-2 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 6 1/2 6 SP N/A ST-3 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 8 8 CL N/A ST-4 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 6 1/2 7 CL N/A ST-5 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 9 4 CL N/A DRAFTPage 143 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 7 Location Associated Roadway Bituminous Thickness (inches) Apparent Aggregate Base Thickness (inches) Subgrade Soils Pavement Core Conditions C-1 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 3 1/2 9 1/2 SM Moderate stripping and raveling C-1a Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 4 --- --- Moderate stripping and raveling C-2 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 6 1/4 6 1/4 SC Moderate stripping and raveling, debonded C-3 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 7 6 3/4 CL Moderate stripping, debonded C-3a Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 5 3/4 --- --- Moderate stripping, debonded C-4 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 6 3/4 16 SC Severe stripping and raveling, debonded C-5 Glacier Way 4 1/4” bituminous over 4 1/2” rehydrated concrete 3 1/4 SC Good condition, 4 1/2” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-6 Glacier Way 3 3/4” bituminous over 9 1/2” rehydrated concrete 0 SP-SM Good condition, 9 1/2” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-7 Glacier Way 3 1/2 8 SM Good condition C-8 Glacier Way 3 1/2 8 SM Moderate stripping and severe raveling C-9 Glacier Way 3 1/4 8 SM Severe stripping and raveling, debonded C-10 Glacier Way 4 10 1/2 SM Good condition C-11 Glasgow Avenue 3 1/4 13 1/4 SP-SM Mild stripping C-11a Glasgow Avenue 3 3/4 --- --- Mild stripping C-12 175th Street 4 6 SP-SM Mild stripping C-13 Gillette Way / Gettysburg Way 4 1/2 5 1/2 SM Severe stripping and raveling, debonded C-13a Gillette Way / Gettysburg Way 4 --- --- Severe stripping and raveling, debonded C-14 Gillette Way / Gettysburg Way 3 14 SM Good condition C-14a Gillette Way / Gettysburg Way 3 1/2 --- --- Mild stripping C-16 Glasgow Way 4 6 3/4 SM Moderate raveling, mild stripping C-16a Glasgow Way 4 --- --- Debonded, mild stripping, moderate raveling C-19 Glasgow Way 4 1/4 8 1/4 SP-SM Mild stripping DRAFTPage 144 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 8 Location Associated Roadway Bituminous Thickness (inches) Apparent Aggregate Base Thickness (inches) Subgrade Soils Pavement Core Conditions C-19a Glasgow Way 4 1/4 --- --- Moderate stripping and raveling, debonded, 2” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-17 177th Street 3 1/2” bituminous over 6 1/2” rehydrated concrete 11 1/2 SM Good condition, 6 1/2” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-18 178th Street 3 3/4” bituminous over 3 3/4” rehydrated concrete 16 1/2 SP-SM Mild stripping, 3 3/4” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-15 Gerdine Path 3 3/4 5 1/4 SM Moderate raveling C-20 Gerdine Path 4 8 1/4 SP-SM Moderate stripping, debonded C-21 Gerdine Path 4” bituminous over 2” rehydrated concrete 10 3/4 SP Mild stripping, 2” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-21a Gerdine Path 4 --- --- Debonded, severe raveling C-22 Gerdine Path 4 1/4” bituminous over 4” rehydrated concrete 3 3/4 SM Severe stripping, moderate raveling, 4” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-23 Harbor Court 3 1/2 4 1/4 SC Moderate stripping C-24 Galle Court 3 1/2 3 SP Good condition, 2” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer B.4. Groundwater Groundwater was observed at two of the completed five SPT soil borings (Borings ST-1 and ST-2) at depths of approximately 13 feet below existing grade (approximate elevations of 965 and 959 1/2 feet respectively). Groundwater was not observed in the remaining soil borings or power auger borings performed as part of this project and the static groundwater level is likely below the depths explored at these locations. If the project team identifies a need for more accurate determination of groundwater depth, we can install piezometers and complete a groundwater monitoring program. Project planning should anticipate seasonal and annual fluctuations of groundwater. DRAFTPage 145 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 9 Given the presence of silt and clay laden soils encountered throughout complete soil borings, the project team should anticipate that perched groundwater may be a concern in this area. The project team should anticipate that perched groundwater may be encountered during construction and should have a plan in place to manage any encountered perched groundwater. B.5. Laboratory Test Results Table 4 outlines the results of the laboratory testing program completed on the recovered soil samples within the SPT soil borings and subgrade samples from the pavement core locations. Table 4. Laboratory Test Summary Laboratory Test Range of Results Moisture content (MC) tests, percent (per ASTM D2216) Sandy Soils: 3 to 15 percent moisture Clay Soils: 7 to 26 percent moisture Percent of particles passing the #200 Sieve, percent (per ASTM D1140) 6 to 62 percent particles In addition to the above laboratory testing program, we also completed corrosivity testing with composite subgrade samples obtained from both Borings ST-1 and ST-3 at a depth of approximately 5 to 10 feet below existing grade. The results of these laboratory testing suites, performed by Project X Corrosion Engineers, indicated that the subgrade soils in both borings are considered mildly to highly corrosive according to the National Academy of Corrosion Engineers (NACE). Full results of the laboratory tests are included in the appendix. B.6. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Results GPR was used to approximate pavement layer thicknesses along each of the roadways for this project. The data was collected at a nominal 1-foot interval in both directions of travel. Where “ground truth” (soil boring) data was obtained, the interpreted layers from the GPR scan were compared directly to the measured thicknesses to validate the accuracy of the GPR analysis. Based on our analysis using the RADAN software program, Table 5 provides the interpreted average pavement layer thicknesses and statistical data for the roadways in this project. The graphs in the Appendix show the interpreted layer depth per foot along the roadway. We recommend referring to these graphs to see how thicknesses vary. DRAFTPage 146 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 10 Table 5. Statistics of GPR-Estimated Bituminous Pavement Thicknesses Segment Direction Bituminous Thickness (inches) Avg Std Dev Min1 Max 10th Pctl 175th Street West EB 4.6 0.6 3.0 7.0 3.8 WB 4.2 0.6 2.9 6.6 3.5 177th Street West EB 3.3 0.4 2 4.3 2.9 WB 3.9 0.6 3.0 5.5 3.2 178th Street EB 3.5 0.4 2.7 4.8 3.1 WB 3.6 0.4 2.7 4.7 3.2 Galle Court NB 3.9 0.4 1.4 4.9 3.5 SB 3.6 0.4 2.9 5.0 3.2 Gerdine Path NB 3.8 0.5 2.5 5.9 3.3 SB 4.0 0.6 1.8 6.9 3.4 Gillette Way EB 3.8 0.6 2.5 7.5 3.8 WB 3.7 0.8 2.3 8.2 2.9 Glacier Way EB 4.2 1.0 1.7 11.2 3.4 WB 4.3 1.2 1.7 13.4 3.5 Glasgow Way NB 3.8 0.4 2.8 6.0 3.4 SB 3.8 0.5 2.1 7.5 3.2 Glasgow Avenue NB 4.1 0.4 2.8 5.6 3.6 SB 4.4 0.5 2.9 6.5 3.9 Harbor Court NB 4.2 0.6 3.0 5.7 3.5 SB 4.3 0.6 2.8 6.3 3.6 Hayes Avenue NB 5.6 0.8 3.2 9.2 4.7 SB 5.7 1.0 1.8 11.8 4.6 1. Minimum values can be extreme outliers resulting from noise and other erroneous readings. We recommend using 10th percentile values and consulting the graphics attached to this report. Substantial ambient interference of the GPR signal made it difficult to interpret layer transitions below those of the bituminous layer. As such, a second layer (likely aggregate base) was generally not visible consistently throughout the project alignment. A lack of a visible layer in the GPR scan does not imply an absence of one within the pavement section. Our borings and pavement cores suggested a probable aggregate base layer within the pavement section. DRAFTPage 147 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 11 C. Recommendations C.1. Design and Construction Discussion C.1.a. Overview We understand that a portion of the project roadways (Hayes Avenue/ 170th Street West and Harbor Court) will be rehabilitated using full depth reclamation (FDR) techniques and the remaining project roadways (Glacier Way, Gerdine Path, Glasgow Avenue, Glasgow Way, 178th Street, 177th Street, 175th Street, Galle Court, and Gillette Way) will be rehabilitated using Mill and Overlay techniques. Traffic information used for our analysis is included in Section A.1. C.1.b. Full Depth Reclamation Based on the results of the pavement cores, shallow hand auger borings, SPT soil borings, and ground penetrating radar scans performed along the Hayes Avenue / 170th Street West and Harbor Court, these roadways are generally considered suitable for rehabilitation using FDR techniques. In general, the soil borings and power auger borings performed along Hayes Avenue / 170th Street encountered bituminous pavements ranging from approximately 4 to 8 inches (10th percentile thicknesses of GPR scans observed was 4.6 and 4.7 inches) with apparent aggregate base thicknesses ranging from approximately 4 to 16 inches and total pavement section thicknesses generally ranging from approximately 12 to 16 inches. Power auger borings and GPR scans performed along Harbor Court indicated a bituminous pavement thickness of 3 1/2 inches (10th percentile thicknesses of GPR scans observed was 3.5 and 3.6 inches) with apparent aggregate base thickness of approximately 4 1/4 inches with a total pavement section thickness of approximately 7 3/4 inches. Based on these results, Hayes Avenue / 170th Street appears suitable for rehabilitation via FDR techniques. Harbor Court, however, does not appear suitable due to its relatively thin existing pavement section. We recommend that Harbor court be rehabilitated using shallow mill and overlay techniques. C.1.c. Mill & Overlay Based on the results of our pavement cores, shallow power auger borings, and ground penetrating radar (GPR) scans, the roadways included within the City of Lakeville CP 25-01, as outlined in Section A.1. are generally considered suitable for rehabilitation using mill and overlay techniques. DRAFTPage 148 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 12 The encountered bituminous thicknesses, through both pavement cores and GPR scans, generally averaged between 3 and 4 inches with isolated zones of thicker or thinner bituminous pavement. The project team should anticipate that a mill depth of approximately 2 inches with a 2-inch overlay can be performed across these project areas. It should be noted that mill depths will likely need to be adjusted during milling in areas where debonding was encountered. We do not generally recommend a mill depth deeper than 2 inches unless a full depth mill is being performed or in localized areas where debonding occurred deeper than 2 inches below the existing pavement surface. Cores C-13A, C-16A, and C-19A found at Gilette Way and Glasgow Way had debonding with competent base thicknesses less than 2 inches in thickness and represent more difficult situations for mill and overlay. In general, a majority of the project areas exhibited pavements which were in good to fair condition with mild to moderate stripping, raveling and debonding within the top 1 1/2 inches of existing pavement. A detailed evaluation of pavement surface conditions, which will influence the suitability and service life of the overlay, was outside of the scope of our evaluation. This will be the primary factor influencing the performance of the selected rehabilitation option. The risk and additional cost of repairs with additional milling and/or excavation to reach a suitable surface for overlay placement must also be considered. In general, this will include areas with surface distresses such as fatigue/alligator distress and edge cracks. We recommend further reviewing the condition data from the city’s pavement management system for signs that these types of distresses are prevalent within the project area. C.2. Site Grading and Excavations C.2.a. Overview We understand that the roadways included in this project will be rehabilitated using either FDR or mill and overlay techniques with limited subgrade corrections as needed in areas which exhibit poor subgrade soils. However, we also understand that a portion of Hayes Avenue / 170th Street between ST-1 and ST-3 will also include a full replacement of the existing water utilities and subsequent reconstruction of the roadway above. DRAFTPage 149 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 13 C.2.b. Pavement Subgrade Preparation In areas where new water utilities are being installed and the existing pavement subgrade is disturbed, we recommend the following steps for pavement subgrade preparation. We recommend roadway construction be completed in accordance with MnDOT Specification 2106. 1. Reclaim and stockpile the top 10 inches of pavement section as outlined in Section C.3.a. 2. Remove the exposed unsuitable soils, including organic soils, soft clay soils, from below the proposed pavement grade following installation of the water main utility. Soils used as engineered backfill should be moisture conditioned, placed, and compacted as outlined in Section C.2.g. 3. Have a geotechnical representative observe the excavated subgrade to evaluate if additional subgrade improvements are necessary. Hand auger borings and dynamic cone penetrometer testing should be completed on the exposed subgrade prior to the placement of new engineered fill. 4. Slope subgrade soils to allow the removal of accumulating water. 5. Test roll the exposed subgrade as described in Section C.2.c. Areas that yield or rut in excess of project requirements should be corrected. 6. Test roll the final subgrade, following placement of reclaimed aggregate base material, as described in Section C.2.c. C.2.c. Pavement Subgrade Test Roll After preparing the subgrade as described above and prior to the placement of the aggregate base, we recommend test rolling the subgrade soils with a fully loaded tandem-axle truck. We also recommend having a geotechnical representative observe the test roll. Areas that fail the test roll likely indicate soft or weak soils that will require additional correction work to support pavements. The contractor should correct areas that fail to meet the test roll acceptance criteria. Possible options for subgrade correction include moisture conditioning and recompaction, subcutting and replacement with soil or crushed aggregate, and/or geotextiles. We recommend performing a second test roll after the aggregate base material is in place, and prior to placing bituminous pavement. We recommend performing test rolls in accordance with MnDOT Specification 2111. DRAFTPage 150 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 14 C.2.d. Excavation Oversizing When removing unsuitable materials below pavements for utility installation, we recommend the excavation extend outward and downward at a slope of 1H:1V or flatter. See Figure 2 for an illustration of excavation oversizing. Figure 2. Generalized Illustration of Oversizing C.2.e. Excavated Slopes Based on the borings, we anticipate on-site soils in excavations for utility installations will consist of silt and clay-laden fill soils. These soils are typically considered Type C Soil under OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) guidelines. OSHA guidelines indicate unsupported excavations in Type C soils should have a gradient no steeper than 1 1/2H:1V. Slopes constructed in this manner may still exhibit surface sloughing. OSHA requires an engineer to evaluate slopes or excavations over 20 feet in depth. An OSHA-approved qualified person should review the soil classification in the field. Excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations and Trenches.” This document states excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. The project specifications should reference these OSHA requirements. 1. Engineered pavement core fill as defined in Section C.2.g 2. Excavation oversizing minimum of 1H:1V slope or flatter 3. Backslope to OSHA requirements 4. Outside edge of existing pavement 5. Outside edge of new pavement 6. Unsuitable soils to be removed DRAFTPage 151 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 15 C.2.f. Excavation Dewatering We do not anticipate that static groundwater will be encountered during project excavations. If perched water or accumulated runoff water is encountered, we recommend it is removed from the excavations to facilitate proper backfilling and concrete placement. If needed, project planning should include temporary sumps and pumps for excavations in low-permeability soils, such as clays. C.2.g. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction Table 6 contains our recommendations for engineered fill materials and compaction specifications. Table 6. Recommended Fill and Compaction Specifications* Material Material Specification Compaction Specification New road core fill (<3 feet below Grading Grade of Road Core) Select Grading Material MnDOT 2106.1.B.1 MnDOT 2106.3.G.1 New road core fill (>3 feet below Grading Grade of Road Core) Select Grading Material MnDOT 2106.1.B.1 MnDOT 2106.3.G.1 Below landscaped surfaces, where subsidence is not a concern Non-Structural Grading Material MnDOT 2106.1.B.8 MnDOT 2106.3.G.2 *More select soils comprised of coarse sands with < 5% passing #200 sieve such as MnDOT 3149.2G Fine Filter Aggregate may be needed to accommodate work occurring in periods of wet or freezing weather. In areas of where new engineered fill is placed as pavement subgrade, new engineered fill soils should be consistent with the classification, moisture content, and performance characteristics of the soils with those in the upper 5 feet of the existing road core. We recommend placing engineered fill in accordance with MnDOT Specification 2106. We recommend compacting engineered fill in accordance with the MnDOT specifications listed in Table 6. The project documents should specify relative compaction of engineered fill, based on the structure located above the engineered fill, and vertical proximity to that structure. The project documents should not allow the contractor to use frozen material as engineered fill or to place engineered fill on frozen material. Frost should not penetrate under pavements during construction. We recommend performing density tests in engineered fill to evaluate if the contractors are effectively compacting the soil and meeting project requirements. DRAFTPage 152 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 16 C.3. Pavements C.3.a. Rehabilitation via Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Based on the results of our completed soil borings and GPR scans, we anticipate the existing Hayes Avenue / 170th Street generally consists of approximately 4 to 8 inches of bituminous pavement over an aggregate base layer with a thickness of approximately 4 to 16 inches (total pavement thicknesses ranging from approximately 12 to 16 inches). In our opinion, the GPR data representing the 10th percentile of values will provide a general representation of the existing pavement section. For reference, the 10th percentile of the recorded GPR data provides a bituminous thickness of approximately 4 1/2 inches. In our opinion, a reclamation with a depth of 10 inches can generally be used along Hayes Avenue / 170th Street. Based on the pavement measurements from the completed soil borings and power auger borings, these reclamation depths will generally avoid subgrade soils through much of Hayes Avenue / 170th Street. In areas where subgrade may be penetrated due to an isolated area of thin aggregate base, the reclamation depth may need to be adjusted. Variation of existing pavement depth should be anticipated across the alignment, which will require adjustment of the reclaim depth. We recommend implementing through quality control practices, including frequent sieve analyses, to achieve a desirable gradation of the reclaimed material. The gradation requirements of MnDOT Specification 2215 (Reclamation) or Specification 3138 (Aggregate for Surface and Base Courses) can be used for the aggregate base; the latter specification’s controls on gradation and asphalt content are stricter and will generally be more difficult to meet. We suggest that the contractor assume some contingency for importing clean, crushed rock that can be blended with the reclaimed material to improve the uniformity of the resulting gradation prior to reuse as an aggregate base. Minor soil corrections may be needed in areas where subgrade instabilities are exhibited during the test roll prior to the placement of bituminous. As previously outlined, the thinner total pavement sections found at Harbor Court make that roadway less desirable for FDR. C.3.b. Rehabilitation via Mill and Overlay A detailed visual assessment of the pavement surface condition was not included in the scope of this evaluation. However, based on the completed pavement cores and power auger borings performed along the roadways as outlined in Section A.1, it appears the cores were generally in fair to moderate condition DRAFTPage 153 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 17 with some stripping raveling and debonding. We recommend an experienced engineer walk the milled surface to delineate areas for these repairs based on conditions exposed by the milling process. As typical for an overlay, reflective cracking will occur quickly, and crack sealing and other maintenance will be necessary. We recommend a mill thickness of 2 inches, with the replacement mix meeting SPWEA340C. We do not recommend that the mill thickness select for the project exceed 2 inches, as there are specific areas where the existing pavement has more significant stripping or a generally thinner bituminous section where the entire bituminous section may be milled (namely along portions of Glacier Way and Gillette Way). The mill and overlay should proceed in general accordance with MnDOT Specifications 2232 and 2360. The surface condition prior to milling can also indicate where repairs may be necessary. This includes distresses such as severe longitudinal and transverse cracking, alligator/fatigue cracking of any severity, potholes, and other similar failures. MnDOT defines these distresses in their surface rating procedure as follows: High-severity transverse cracking: Any crack running transverse to the centerline of the roadway with significant adjacent random cracking (12 inches or more apart), have large areas of spalling, missing material, and/or potholes. High-severity longitudinal cracking: Any crack running parallel to the centerline of the roadway with significant adjacent random cracking (12 inches or more apart), large areas of spalling, missing material, and/or potholes. Alligator cracking: A series of interconnected cracks forming many-sided, sharp-angled pieces, 6 inches or less in size typically located in the wheel paths or where traffic loads are concentrated. C.3.c. Design Sections Our scope of services for this project did not include laboratory tests on subgrade soils along Hayes Avenue / 170th Street to determine an R-value for pavement design. Based on our experience with similar soils anticipated at the pavement subgrade elevation, we recommend pavement design assume an R-value of 15. Note the contractor may need to perform limited removal of unsuitable or less suitable soils to achieve these values. Table 7 provides minimum recommended pavement sections, based on the soils support and traffic loads, for the bituminous pavement section with reclaimed aggregate base. It should be noted that we used historical AADT counts and the State Aid 10-Ton ESAL Traffic Forecast DRAFTPage 154 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 18 Calculator to provide an ESAL forecast of 582,000 for Hayes Avenue / 170th Street. This assumes a growth of 4.4 percent with a truck traffic volume of 4 percent. Table 7. Recommended Bituminous Pavement Section – Reclaimed Pavement Material Thickness (inches) Designation Specification Bituminous 4 SPWEA340C 2360 FDR* 6 Class 5 or 6, modified aggregate base 3138 or 2215 Existing aggregate base 2+ --- --- *Thickness of FDR material will vary based on reclamation depth C.3.d. Subgrade Drainage Based on the possible presence of perched groundwater conditions, subgrade drainage will be vital for a high performing pavement. In areas where the pavement is being removed, we recommend installing perforated drainpipes throughout pavement areas at low points, around catch basins, and behind curb. In areas where saturated subgrade soils are encountered during excavations or anticipated based on the results of the test roll, we recommend that additional drain tile may be installed to manage perched groundwater in these areas. C.3.e. Performance and Maintenance We based the pavement design in Section C.3.c. on a 20-year performance life for pavements. This is the amount of time before we anticipate the pavement will require major rehabilitation. This performance life assumes routine maintenance, such as seal coating and crack sealing. The actual pavement life will vary depending on variations in weather, traffic conditions and maintenance. It is common to place the non-wear course of bituminous and then delay placement of wear course. For this situation, we recommend evaluating if the reduced pavement section will have sufficient structure to support construction traffic. Many conditions affect the overall performance of the pavements. Some of these conditions include the environment, loading conditions and the level of ongoing maintenance. With regard to bituminous pavements in particular, it is common to have thermal cracking develop within the first few years of placement and continue throughout the life of the pavement. We recommend developing a regular maintenance plan for filling cracks in exterior slabs and pavements to lessen the potential impacts for cold weather distress due to frost heave or warm weather distress due to wetting and softening of the subgrade. DRAFTPage 155 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 19 C.4. Utilities C.4.a. Subgrade Stabilization For watermain construction, we anticipate the soils at typical invert elevations will be suitable for utility support. However, if construction encounters unfavorable conditions such as soft clay, organic soils, or perched water at invert grades, the unsuitable soils may require some additional subcutting and replacement with rushed rock to prepare a proper subgrade for pipe support. Project design and construction should not place utilities within the 1H:1V oversizing of foundations. C.4.b. Utility Backfill We recommend utility trench backfill adhere to the recommendations of Section C.2.g. depending on what overlies the trench. The contractor should anticipate that moisture conditioning of the clays as well as separation of any zones of unsuitable or organic soils will be needed prior to replacement of backfill in utility trenches. We note that moisture conditioning and compaction of clays can be difficult in confined areas such as utility trenches. C.4.c. Dewatering If perched groundwater conditions are encountered during excavations for utility installation, we recommend the contractor remove any water that collects in work areas before performing further work. We recommend project planning anticipate temporary excavation dewatering during construction. Project planning should include temporary sumps and pumps for excavations in low-permeability soils, such as clays. Should static groundwater be encountered, we recommend keeping the groundwater level a minimum of 2 feet below the bottom of excavation to help facilitate a more stable working platform. C.4.d. Corrosion Potential As part of our geotechnical analysis, we performed corrosion testing on two select soil samples recovered during drilling operations along Hayes Avenue / 170th Street. The results of the corrosivity testing are presented in the Appendix. Based on the Corrosion Severity Ratings outlined by the National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE), the above results indicate that the on-site clay soils generally range from Mildy Corrosive to Highly Corrosive in their current state. We recommend that metallic conduits and similar metallic structures will need to be protected from corrosion. It should be noted that these test results as outlined in the Appendix are representative of the soil at the specific sample location and may not be representative of other soils at different locations across the site. The corrosivity of the on-site soils at different depths and locations throughout the project site will vary. DRAFTPage 156 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 20 D. Procedures D.1. Penetration Test Borings We drilled the penetration test borings with a truck-mounted core and auger drill equipped with hollow- stem auger. We performed the borings in general accordance with ASTM D6151 taking penetration test samples at 2 1/2- or 5-foot intervals in general accordance to ASTM D1586. The boring logs show the actual sample intervals and corresponding depths. We also collected bulk samples of auger cuttings at selected locations for laboratory testing. We sealed penetration test boreholes in general accordance with MDH procedures. D.2. Ground Penetrating Radar D.2.a. GPR Data Collection GPR data was collected in August of 2024. GPR collection occurred at posted speed limits and data was recorded continuously along each street (scan interval of 1-foot), in both directions of travel except for cul-de-sac sections. A calibration file, required for data post-processing, was collected at the onset of testing. D.2.b. GPR Analysis Data collected by the GPR unit was returned to our office and analyzed to estimate the pavement thickness using RADAN 7.0, a software package included with the GSSI RoadScan system. The software includes tools to delineate pavement layer transitions with thickness estimates based on measured signal time and amplitude. Where “ground-truth” data (ores) were performed, the interpreted layers from the GPR scan were compared directly to the measured thicknesses from the borings to validate the accuracy of the GPR analysis, with adjustments if necessary to improve accuracy or data clarity. D.3. Power Auger Borings We obtained core samples of the pavement using a portable coring machine advancing a 4-inch diameter core barrel. Immediately after completing the coring, we repaired the bituminous pavement with a coldmix bituminous patch. We measured the cores to obtain approximate bituminous thickness and noted their material conditions based on visual observation. The Appendix includes images of the cores. DRAFTPage 157 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 21 We performed the power auger borings using a truck mounted auger. We inferred the soil classifications and strata depths from the cuttings brought to the surface by dead pulling the auger after screwing it to selected depths in the ground. At desired depths, we placed auger cuttings in bags and jars. D.4. Exploration Logs D.4.a. Log of Boring Sheets The Appendix includes Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings. The logs identify and describe the penetrated geologic materials, and present the results of penetration resistance and other in-situ tests performed. The logs also present the results of laboratory tests performed on penetration test samples and groundwater measurements. We inferred strata boundaries from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings. Because we did not perform continuous sampling, the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The boundary depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may occur as gradual rather than abrupt transitions. D.4.b. Geologic Origins We assigned geologic origins to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report, based on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface exploration, (3) penetration resistance and other in-situ testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results, and (5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the site and surrounding area in the past. D.5. Material Classification and Testing D.5.a. Visual and Manual Classification We visually and manually classified the geologic materials encountered based on ASTM D2488. When we performed laboratory classification tests, we used the results to classify the geologic materials in accordance with ASTM D2487. The Appendix includes a chart explaining the classification system we used. D.5.b. Laboratory Testing The exploration logs in the Appendix note the results of the laboratory tests performed on geologic material samples. We performed the tests in general accordance with ASTM or AASHTO procedures. DRAFTPage 158 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 22 D.5.c. Groundwater Measurements The drillers checked for groundwater after auger withdrawal. We then filled the boreholes as noted on the boring logs. E. Qualifications E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions E.1.a. Material Strata We developed our evaluation, analyses, and recommendations from a limited amount of site and subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from exploration locations continuously with depth. Therefore, we must infer strata boundaries and thicknesses to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and project planning should expect the strata to vary in depth, elevation, and thickness, away from the exploration locations. Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until performing additional exploration work, or starting construction. If future activity for this project reveals any such variations, you should notify us so that we may reevaluate our recommendations. Such variations could increase construction costs, and we recommend including a contingency to accommodate them. E.1.b. Groundwater Levels We made groundwater measurements under the conditions reported herein and shown on the exploration logs, and interpreted in the text of this report. Note that the observation periods were relatively short, and project planning can expect groundwater levels to fluctuate in response to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications and other seasonal and annual factors. E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility E.2.a. Plan Review We based this report on a limited amount of information, and we made a number of assumptions to help us develop our recommendations. We should be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the DRAFTPage 159 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 23 designs and specifications. This review will allow us to evaluate whether we anticipated the design correctly, if any design changes affect the validity of our recommendations, and if the design and specifications correctly interpret and implement our recommendations. E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing We recommend retaining us to perform the required observations and testing during construction as part of the ongoing geotechnical evaluation. This will allow us to correlate the subsurface conditions exposed during construction with those encountered by the borings and provide professional continuity from the design phase to the construction phase. If we do not perform observations and testing during construction, it becomes the responsibility of others to validate the assumption made during the preparation of this report and to accept the construction-related geotechnical engineer-of-record responsibilities. E.3. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of the addressed parties. Without written approval, we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties or projects. E.4. Standard of Care In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. DRAFTPage 160 of 452 Appendix DRAFTPage 161 of 452 ST-2 C-3 C-3A C-2 C-1 C-1A ST-5 ST-4 ST-3 C-4 ST-1 C-7 C-5 C-6 C-23 F:\2024\B2407625\CAD\B2407625.dwg,1,9/11/2024 10:46:49 AMbraunintertec.com 952.995.2000 Minneapolis, MN 55438 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Project No: B2407625 Drawn By: Date Drawn: Checked By: Last Modified: 9/11/24 Drawing No: Project Information Drawing Information Sheet: of Fig: B2407625 BJB 8/20/24 RSJ Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville - 25-02 Street Reconstruction Lakeville, Minnesota Soil Boring and Pavement Core Location Sketch 1 2 NDENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING 0 SCALE:1" = 400' 400'200' DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PAVEMENT CORE DRAFTPage 162 of 452 C-7 C-5 C-6 C-8 C-9 C-10 C-12 C-11 C-11A C-19 C-19A C-18 C-17 C-16 C-16A C-14AC-14 C-13A C-13 C-15 C-20 C-21A C-21 C-22 C-24 F:\2024\B2407625\CAD\B2407625.dwg,2,9/11/2024 10:46:50 AMbraunintertec.com 952.995.2000 Minneapolis, MN 55438 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Project No: B2407625 Drawn By: Date Drawn: Checked By: Last Modified: 9/11/24 Drawing No: Project Information Drawing Information Sheet: of Fig: B2407625 BJB 8/20/24 RSJ Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville - 25-02 Street Reconstruction Lakeville, Minnesota Soil Boring and Pavement Core Location Sketch 2 2 NDENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING 0 SCALE:1" = 400' 400'200' DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PAVEMENT CORE DRAFTPage 163 of 452 Elev./ Depth ft 976.4 1.3 975.7 2.0 973.7 4.0 969.7 8.0 966.7 11.0 963.7 14.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) ASPHALT, 7 inches of bituminous over 9 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium- grained, trace Gravel, dark brown, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, brown, moist FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, contains seams of Silty Sand, brown, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, slightly organic, black to dark gray, moist SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), contains seams of Silty Sand, gray, moist to wet, stiff to hard (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery AU 16" 4-10-8-7 (18) 14" 4-5-6-8 (11) 18" 9-9-13-11 (22) 18" 10-10-9-9 (19) 18" 5-4-5-6 (9) 22" 11-14-18-11 (32) 10" qₚ tsf MC % 7 17 15 26 Tests or Remarks P200=26% OC=3% Water observed at 13.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2407625 Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville -25-02 Street Reconstruction Minnesota BORING:ST-1 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:184388.8 EASTING:525164.7 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:09/04/24 END DATE:09/04/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:977.7 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear B2407625 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:09/11/2024 ST-1 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 164 of 452 Elev./ Depth ft 971.3 1.0 969.3 3.0 966.3 6.0 964.3 8.0 962.3 10.0 960.3 12.0 958.3 14.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) ASPHALT, 6 1/2 inches of bituminous over 6 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, light brown, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, brown, moist FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, blue to brown, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND with GRAVEL (SC), brown, moist SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, contains seams of Silt, reddish brown to light brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL TILL) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, CLAY layers, brown, wet, loose (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 7-10-12-7 (22) 16" 8-11-7-6 (18) 14" 4-11-14-12 (25) 16" 8-8-6-7 (14) 18" 3-5-6-10 (11) 6" 4-8-12-10 (20) 10" 2-3-4-4 (7) 22" qₚ tsf MC % 9 11 Tests or Remarks Water observed at 13.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2407625 Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville -25-02 Street Reconstruction Minnesota BORING:ST-2 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:184474.1 EASTING:523820.8 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:09/04/24 END DATE:09/04/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:972.3 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear B2407625 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:09/11/2024 ST-2 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 165 of 452 Elev./ Depth ft 987.7 1.3 979.1 10.0 975.1 14.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) ASPHALT, 8 inches of bituminous over 8 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, brown, moist SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, dark gray, moist, very stiff to hard (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery AU 6" 2-2-4-5 (6) 16" 3-4-6-5 (10) 18" 7-9-9-10 (18) 24" 3-5-7-11 (12) 24" 3-7-10-14 (17) 24" 14-17-18-14 (35) 24" qₚ tsf MC % 16 14 Tests or Remarks P200=62% Water not observed while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2407625 Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville -25-02 Street Reconstruction Minnesota BORING:ST-3 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:184406.1 EASTING:522694.3 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:09/04/24 END DATE:09/04/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:989.1 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear B2407625 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:09/11/2024 ST-3 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 166 of 452 Elev./ Depth ft 1007.0 1.2 1006.2 2.0 1004.2 4.0 1002.2 6.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) ASPHALT, 6 1/2 inches of bituminous over 7 1/2 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, dark brown to brown, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, hydrocarbon like odor, light brown, moist FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium- grained, trace Gravel, light brown, moist END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery AU 12" 2-3-4-7 (7) 23" 3-6-9-10 (15) 24" qₚ tsf MC % 15 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2407625 Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville -25-02 Street Reconstruction Minnesota BORING:ST-4 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:183287.4 EASTING:521990.1 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:09/04/24 END DATE:09/04/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:1008.2 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear B2407625 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:09/11/2024 ST-4 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 167 of 452 Elev./ Depth ft 1029.1 1.1 1024.2 6.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) ASPHALT, 9 inches of bituminous over 4 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, dark brown, moist END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery AU 6" 2-4-7-9 (11) 22" 6-6-6-10 (12) 24" qₚ tsf MC % 12 Tests or Remarks P200=62% Water not observed while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2407625 Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville -25-02 Street Reconstruction Minnesota BORING:ST-5 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:182219.4 EASTING:522003.4 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:09/04/24 END DATE:09/04/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:1030.2 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear B2407625 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:09/11/2024 ST-5 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 168 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-1 DRAFTPage 169 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-1A DRAFTPage 170 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-2 DRAFTPage 171 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-3 DRAFTPage 172 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-3A DRAFTPage 173 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-4 DRAFTPage 174 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-5 DRAFTPage 175 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-6 DRAFTPage 176 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-7 DRAFTPage 177 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-8 DRAFTPage 178 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-9 DRAFTPage 179 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-10 DRAFTPage 180 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-11 DRAFTPage 181 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-11A DRAFTPage 182 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-12 DRAFTPage 183 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-13 DRAFTPage 184 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-13A DRAFTPage 185 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-14 DRAFTPage 186 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-14A DRAFTPage 187 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-15 DRAFTPage 188 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-16 DRAFTPage 189 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-16A DRAFTPage 190 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-17 DRAFTPage 191 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-18 DRAFTPage 192 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-19 DRAFTPage 193 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-19A DRAFTPage 194 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-20 DRAFTPage 195 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-21 DRAFTPage 196 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-21A DRAFTPage 197 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-22 DRAFTPage 198 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-23 DRAFTPage 199 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-24 DRAFTPage 200 of 452 Project X REPORT S240909C Corrosion Engineering Page 1 Corrosion Control – Soil, Water, Metallurgy Testing Lab 29990 Technology Dr, Suite 13, Murrieta, CA 92563 Tel: 213-928-7213 Fax: 951-226-1720 www.projectxcorrosion.com Results Only Soil Testing for City Of Lakeville 25-02 September 10, 2024 Prepared for: Richard Jett Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 rjett@braunintertec.com Project X Job#: S240909C Client Job or PO#: B2407625 Prepared by: D. Bobrova Respectfully Submitted, Eduardo Hernandez, M.Sc., P.E. Sr. Corrosion Consultant NACE Corrosion Technologist #16592 Professional Engineer California No. M37102 ehernandez@projectxcorrosion.com DRAFTPage 201 of 452 Project X REPORT S240909C Corrosion Engineering Page 2 Corrosion Control – Soil, Water, Metallurgy Testing Lab 29990 Technology Dr., Suite 13, Murrieta, CA 92563 Tel: 213-928-7213 Fax: 951-226-1720 www.projectxcorrosion.com Soil Analysis Lab Results Client: Braun Intertec Corporation Job Name: City Of Lakeville 25-02 Client Job Number: B2407625 Project X Job Number: S240909C September 10, 2024 Method ASTM G51 ASTM G200 SM 4500-D ASTM D4327 ASTM D6919 ASTM D6919 ASTM D6919 ASTM D6919 ASTM D6919 ASTM D6919 ASTM D4327 ASTM D4327 Bore# / Description Depth pH Redox Sulfide S2- Nitrate NO3 - Ammonium NH4 + Lithium Li+ Sodium Na+ Potassium K+ Magnesium Mg2+ Calcium Ca2+ Fluoride F2 2- Phosphate PO4 3- (ft)(mg/kg) (wt%) (mg/kg) (wt%)(Ω-cm) (Ω-cm)(mV) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) ST-1 5-10 43.5 0.0043 30.3 0.0030 14,740 2,613 7.3 119 0.7 1.4 5.5 ND 50.4 2.6 18.6 56.8 7.7 1.7 ST-3 5-10 24.6 0.0025 153.5 0.0153 1,943 871 6.9 123 ND 0.8 7.1 ND 46.3 4.9 19.6 66.6 5.3 2.8 ASTM G187 ASTM D4327 ASTM D4327 Resistivity As Rec'd | Minimum Sulfates SO4 2- Chlorides Cl- Cations and Anions, except Sulfide and Bicarbonate, tested with Ion Chromatography mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram (parts per million) of dry soil weight ND = 0 = Not Detected | NT = Not Tested | Unk = Unknown Chemical Analysis performed on 1:3 Soil-To-Water extract PPM = mg/kg (soil) = mg/L (Liquid) Note: Sometimes a bad sulfate hit is a contaminated spot. Typical fertilizers are Potassium chloride, ammonium sulfate or ammonium sulfate nitrate (ASN). So this is another reason why testing full corrosion series is good because we then have the data to see if those other ingredients are present meaning the soil sample is just fertilizer- contaminated soil. This can happen often when the soil samples collected are simply surface scoops. This is why it's best to dig in a foot, throw away the top and test the deeper stuff. Dairy farms are also notorious for these items. If one sample pops up much more corrosive than all others, we would recommend collecting more samples surrounding the problem sample location to determine if the peak is isolated to it. This allows us to conclude it was a contaminated sample and able to declare it an outlier. Try out our new online forms: SOIL CORROSIVITY & THERMAL RESISTIVITY LAB REQUEST FORM & IN-SITU WENNER 4 PIN QUOTE REQUEST FORM DRAFTPage 202 of 452 Proj ect X^A ^Corrosion linginoering Lai)Rcqiii'sl Shct'J Chain of Custody Phone:(213) ‘)28-7213 I'a);(951)22(>-l 720 ●w\vw.|)tojectxco rrosi(>ii.coni Ship Samples To:29990 Technology Dr, Suite 13,Murrieta,CA 92563 C 2 PiJ I.MI’OIM ANT;I’Icuse complete Project and Sample Identification Data as yon would like it to appear in report &include (his form witii samples. I’rojeci X Job Niimbor ?>Z/jo-^QZS~gCAuA/-H*J H A-l6r+<rC_Compuu)Nuniv:Cimmcl Numr:AscVx T-d-yt I'bojie No;U.A ] \do \v-)(MMp>sU A^C S,/v\\AA^c<pc]\b,AAV ~M <S-to/~g<uAMuiliii)!Address:^CiiiOuet Kiiiail:\r< I 'RNcK -X-gAAAccounlingC'oiilacC III)oii'c Kiiuil: C'lii'ti*I’l oji'i l No:Proji'cl Name:Cvt>'Cy-f vvllg.ZS-07- 3 Day Guarantee nLTfk-up 24 Hour RUSK 10Q%mafk-iin 3-5 Day Standard METHOD ANALYSIS REQUESTED (Please circle)I’.o.#: ii(Business Days)l urn Around Time:t aii36 .S!"●●e.Q.££E UsForCorrosionControlRecommcMidations(35l)g soil sani[)le): .NKKD (1)Groundwater depth and (2)Soil Sanijile Locations Map C Iitnn7??●-i I 7T-C ;'n< '3 KzDefault Method 57 I'i i 557,2||=I-25577'5 2 ■?2222■?2<I I52rsFORTHERM.AL RESISTIVITY PROVIDK (L500tr soil sample): (1)Optimal Moisture %I (2)Dry DensityjPCF} (3)Desired Compaction Dale &Received Bv: Full Corrosion Series Reports His,5 IGeoQuad u —c <=.■2 =X>.3>■5I55sga:25 -p=c Ot3 a;e- — =c 3i =oa.5 3 £=O <i.rIUE3~0 23:’C3O§X 3-3 7 s z3O g23 -=3O X.3 £DATK COl.I.KnKI)'I ISAMPLEID-BORE #-Description o oc aiu.3DEPTH(ft)3 f o^ 2u:Cd X,00OCl. 'y).y c-h-Xc. ^13/Xssr-tI )o^$T-3 3 4 5 (. 7 ') ID I I 12 U 14 15 DRAFTPage 203 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-01 175th Street West Glasgow Avenue Glacier Way Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: 175th Street West - Glasgow Avenue to Glacier Way From To B2407618 Location Project No. Roadway C-12 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 175th Street West (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 175th Street West (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 175th Street West (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 175th Street West (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 175th Street West (EB)DRAFTPage 204 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-01 177th Street Glacier Way Glasgow Way Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: 177th Street - Glacier Way to Glasgow Way From To B2407618 Location Project No. Roadway C-17 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 177th Street (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 177th Street (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 177th Street (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 177th Street (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)177th Street (EB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 205 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-01 178th Street Glacier Way Glasgow Way Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: 178th Street - Glacier Way to Glasgow Way From To B2407618 Location Project No. Roadway C-18 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 178th Street (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 178th Street (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 178th Street (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 178th Street (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 178th Street (EB)DRAFTPage 206 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-01 Galle Court Gerdine Path Cul-De-Sac Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Galle Court - Gerdine Path to Cul-De-Sac From To B2407618 Location Project No. Roadway C-24 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Galle Court (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Galle Court (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Galle Court (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Galle Court (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)Galle Court (NB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 207 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-01 Gerdine Path 179th Street West Dodd Boulevard Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Gerdine Path - 179th Street West to Dodd Boulevard From To B2407618 Location Project No. Roadway C-22 C-21 C-20 C-150 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gerdine Path (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gerdine Path (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gerdine Path (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gerdine Path (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)Gerdine Path (NB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 208 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 Gillette Way NB 175th Street SB 175th Street Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Gillette Way - NB 175th Street to SB 175th Street From To B2407625 Location Project No. Roadway C-13 C-140 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gillette Way (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gillette Way (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gillette Way (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gillette Way (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)Gillette Way (EB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 209 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 Glacier Way 175th Street West 179th Street West Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Glacier Way - 175th Street West to 179th Street West From To B2407625 Location Project No. Roadway C-6 C-5 C-7 C-8 C-90 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glacier Way (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glacier Way (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger C-100 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glacier Way (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glacier Way (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)Glacier Way (EB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 210 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 Glasgow Way Glasgow Avenue Glacier Way Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Glasgow Way - Glasgow Avenue to Glacier Way From To B2407625 Location Project No. Roadway C-16 C-190 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Way (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Way (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Way (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Way (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)Glasgow Way (NB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 211 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 Glasgow Avenue Dodd Boulevard Glacier Way Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Glasgow Avenue - Dodd Boulevard to Glacier Way From To B2407625 Location Project No. Roadway C-11 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Avenue (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Avenue (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Avenue (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Avenue (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)Glasgow Avenue (NB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 212 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 Harbor Court 170th Street South Cul-De-Sac Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Harbor Court - 170th Street South to Cul-De-Sac From To B2407625 Location Project No. Roadway C-23 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Harbor Court (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Harbor Court (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Harbor Court (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Harbor Court (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Harbor Court (NB)DRAFTPage 213 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 Hayes Avenue 175th Street West Cedar Avenue Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Hayes Avenue - 175th Street West to Cedar Avenue From To B2407625 Location Project No. Roadway C-1 C-2 C-3ST-5 ST-4 ST-3 ST-20 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Hayes Avenue (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring) 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Hayes Avenue (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring) C-4 ST-10 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Hayes Avenue (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring) 7 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Hayes Avenue (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring) 0 Depth (in.)Hayes Avenue (NB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 214 of 452 Descriptive Terminology of Soil Based on Standards ASTM D2487/2488 (Unified Soil Classification System) Group Symbol Group NameB Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D GW Well‐graded gravelE Cu < 4 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D GP Poorly graded gravelE Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravelE F G Fines Classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelE F G Cu ≥ 6 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D SW Well‐graded sandI Cu < 6 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D SP Poorly graded sandI Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sandF G I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sandF G I CL Lean clayK L M PI < 4 or plots below "A" lineJ ML SiltK L M Organic OL CH Fat clayK L M MH Elastic siltK L M Organic OH PT Peat Highly Organic Soils Silts and Clays (Liquid limit less than 50) Silts and Clays (Liquid limit 50 or more) Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor Inorganic Inorganic PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" lineJ PI plots on or above "A" line PI plots below "A" line Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory TestsA Soil Classification Coarse‐grained Soils (more than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve)Fine‐grained Soils (50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve) Sands (50% or more coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve) Clean Gravels (Less than 5% finesC) Gravels with Fines (More than 12% finesC) Clean Sands (Less than 5% finesH) Sands with Fines (More than 12% finesH) Gravels (More than 50% of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve) Liquid Limit − oven dried Liquid Limit − not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M N Organic silt K L M O Liquid Limit − oven dried Liquid Limit − not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M P Organic silt K L M Q ParticleSize Identification Boulders.............. over 12" Cobbles................ 3" to 12" Gravel Coarse............. 3/4" to 3" (19.00 mm to 75.00 mm) Fine................. No. 4 to 3/4" (4.75 mm to 19.00 mm) Sand Coarse.............. No. 10 to No. 4 (2.00 mm to 4.75 mm) Medium........... No. 40 to No. 10 (0.425 mm to 2.00 mm) Fine.................. No. 200 to No. 40 (0.075 mm to 0.425 mm) Silt........................ No. 200 (0.075 mm) to .005 mm Clay...................... < .005 mm Relative ProportionsL, M trace............................. 0 to 5% little.............................. 6 to 14% with.............................. ≥ 15% Inclusion Thicknesses lens............................... 0 to 1/8" seam............................. 1/8" to 1" layer.............................. over 1" Apparent Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils Very loose ..................... 0 to 4 BPF Loose ............................ 5 to 10 BPF Medium dense.............. 11 to 30 BPF Dense............................ 31 to 50 BPF Very dense.................... over 50 BPF A. Based on the material passing the 3‐inch (75‐mm) sieve. B. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders, or both" to group name. C. Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW‐GM well‐graded gravel with silt GW‐GC well‐graded gravel with clay GP‐GM poorly graded gravel with silt GP‐GC poorly graded gravel with clay D. Cu = D60 / D10 Cc = 𝐷30 2 / ሺ𝐷10 𝑥 𝐷60) E. If soil contains ≥ 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name. F. If fines classify as CL‐ML, use dual symbol GC‐GM or SC‐SM. G. If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name. H. Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW‐SM well‐graded sand with silt SW‐SC well‐graded sand with clay SP‐SM poorly graded sand with silt SP‐SC poorly graded sand with clay I. If soil contains ≥ 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name. J. If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soil is CL‐ML, silty clay. K. If soil contains 15 to < 30% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel", whichever is predominant. L. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name. M. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name. N. PI ≥ 4 and plots on or above “A” line. O. PI < 4 or plots below “A” line. P. PI plots on or above “A” line. Q. PI plots below “A” line. Laboratory Tests DD Dry density,pcf qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf WD Wet density, pcf qU Unconfined compression test, tsf P200 % Passing #200 sieve LL Liquid limit MC Moisture content, %PL Plastic limit OC Organic content, %PI Plasticity index Consistency of Blows Approximate Unconfined Cohesive Soils Per Foot Compressive Strength Very soft................... 0 to 1 BPF................... < 0.25 tsf Soft........................... 2 to 4 BPF................... 0.25 to 0.5 tsf Medium.................... 5to 8 BPF .................. 0.5 to 1 tsf Stiff........................... 9 to 15 BPF................. 1 to 2 tsf Very Stiff................... 16 to 30 BPF............... 2 to 4 tsf Hard.......................... over 30 BPF................ > 4 tsf Drilling Notes: Blows/N‐value: Blows indicatethe driving resistance recorded for each 6‐inch interval. The reported N‐value is the blows per foot recorded by summing the second and third interval in accordance with the Standard Penetration Test, ASTM D1586. PartialPenetration:If the sampler could not be driven through a full 6‐inch interval, the number of blows for that partial penetration is shown as #/x" (i.e. 50/2"). The N‐value is reported as "REF" indicating refusal. Recovery: Indicates the inches of sample recovered from the sampled interval. For a standard penetration test, full recovery is 18", and is 24" for a thinwall/shelby tube sample. WOH: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammer and rods alone; driving not required. WOR: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods alone; hammer weight and driving not required. Water Level: Indicates the water level measured by the drillers either while drilling ( ), at the end of drilling ( ), or at some time after drilling ( ). Moisture Content: Dry:Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch. Moist: Damp but no visible water. Wet: Visible free water, usually soil is below water table. 5/2021 DRAFTPage 215 of 452 Appendix D Public Engagement Page 216 of 452 Page 217 of 452 Page 218 of 452 Page 219 of 452 Page 220 of 452 Page 221 of 452 Page 222 of 452 Page 223 of 452 Page 224 of 452 Appendix E Assessment Map Preliminary Assessment Roll Page 225 of 452 36 35 37 3834 3933 4032 25 24 9023 91 92 22 21 20 19 93 9418 17 95 16 9615 14 13 12 11 9710 9 8 987 99 6 5 100 4 3 1012 1 102 57 56 58 55 54 59 53 52 606162636465 6667 51 68 50 69 49 70 48 71 47 72 46 73 74757677 45 7879 44 80 43 81 42 82 41 8384858687 3130 88 29 89 28 27 26 CEDAR AVEGLACIER WAY170TH ST W DODD BLVD171ST ST W HAVEN AVEGLENC OE CT HEIDELBERG WAY 1 7 3 R D S T W G L A S G O W A V E 172ND ST W 170TH CT WGLENCOE AVE173RDCIRHAYES AVEHIBISCUS AVE174TH CT W GOLDENRODAVEGEORGETOW NWAYHICKORY CT GROVE AVEGLENWOOD AVEGREENTREE AVEHARBOR CTGREENTREE PATHHEYWOOD CTHAMILTONCT HANNIBAL CTGOLDENVIEW AVE1 6 9 T H S T W G O O D L A N DPATHHERSHEYCTHEMLOCKCT U P PER 167TH ST W 169TH C T W HARRINGTON WA Y HALIFAX PATHHARDINGLNGRENADIERAVEGREENVIEW CIRGOODHUE AVEG R E ENLANDPATHHAMILTON DR 175THSTW HAZEL CT 174TH ST W UPPER 171ST ST W GA RCIA WAY Document Path: J:\gis\city\LKVL\Maps\LKVLProposal\Assessment Rollout Date Saved: 9/10/2024¯1 inch = 400 feet 0 400 Feet 2025 Street Reconstruction Project Lakeville, MN Property List Proposed Reconstruction Assessed Parcels Page 226 of 452 2025 Street Reconstruction Project Category A Single Family Unit Assessment Rate Hayes/170th Neighborhood 6,178.36$ per unit 90 Date:10/1/2024 25-02 Category B Duplex Unit Assessment Rate Hayes/170th Neighborhood 6,178.36$ per unit 12 Revised:10/11/2024 MAP ID PID FEE OWNER FEE OWNER ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE PROPERTY NUMBER PROPERTY STREET USE DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT CATEGORY SF RES. EQUIV. UNITS UNIT ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT 1 221710101040 MELISSA R MOEN 17493 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17493 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 2 221710101030 BRADLEY H ROE 17483 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17483 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 3 221710101020 RAKESH KANAKAMEDALA 17473 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17473 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 4 221710101010 ANN E SATHER 17463 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9514 17463 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 5 221715306050 RYAN MICHAEL KHUON 17453 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17453 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 6 221715306040 TODD R & LISA KAY R ALDRICH 17439 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9514 17439 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 7 221715306030 DAVID E & BARBARA L SUNDBERG 17425 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9514 17425 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 8 221715306020 CHRISTOPHER & MELANEE TARGIA 17409 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17409 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 9 221715306010 JOE TOVES 17401 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17401 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 10 221715305110 ADAM & REBECCA DEHAAN 17363 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-6115 17363 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 11 221715305100 JACOB P & LATISHA MOENING 17349 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17349 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 12 221715305090 KURT R & AMY L WYTTENBACK 17333 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17333 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 13 221715305080 CHRISTIE NGUYEN 17319 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17319 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 14 221715305070 SEAN R & EMILY S KLINGENSMITH 17305 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17305 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 15 221715305060 DARREN HESTER 17291 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-6216 17291 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 16 221715305050 DAVID PATRICK MONAHAN 17275 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17275 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 17 221715305040 THOMAS R GRIFFITH 17259 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-6217 17259 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 18 221715305030 RYAN ELLIOT JOHNSON 17245 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17245 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 19 221715305020 PAUL B & GRETCHEN I BAYER 17231 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-6217 17231 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 20 221715305010 DALE TSTE R ERICKSON 17215 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-6217 17215 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 21 221715203010 JOHN D & CAROL A DUERR 17201 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-6217 17201 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 22 221715206020 TIMOTHY A & LYNN A GORSKI 17191 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17191 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 23 221715206090 TIMOTHY P & GEORGINE MALONE 17083 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9500 17083 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 24 221715206100 DAVID MICHAEL FITZHUGH 1008 1ST ST W HASTINGS MN 55033 17047 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 25 221715206110 SHAWN DAY 17011 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9500 17011 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 26 221850101150 BRENDEN C & ALLISON JOHNSON 8145 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9347 8145 170TH ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 27 221850101140 HERBERT L & LINDA K GILES 8131 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9347 8131 170TH ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 28 221850101130 DUSTIN M & LYNAE M ANDERSON 8119 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 8119 170TH ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 29 221850101120 TREVOR D & ROSHELLE M ROTH 8103 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 8103 170TH ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 30 221850101110 DARIUS PISCIKAS 8089 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9346 8089 170TH ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 31 221850101100 TODD MICHAEL MOONEY 8073 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9346 8073 170TH ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 32 221850101090 MEIGHAN L SORENSON 16951 HARBOR CT LAKEVILLE MN 55044 16951 HARBOR CT RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 33 221850101080 GREGORY D SCHOLLER 16931 HARBOR CT LAKEVILLE MN 55044 16931 HARBOR CT RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 34 221850101070 JAMES H & JENAYE M GREER 16915 HARBOR CT LAKEVILLE MN 55044 16915 HARBOR CT RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 35 221850101060 ELIZABETH JOHNSON 16903 HARBOR CT LAKEVILLE MN 55044 16903 HARBOR CT RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 36 221850101050 JACOB SOKOLOVE 16901 HARBOR CT LAKEVILLE MN 55044 16901 HARBOR CT RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 37 221850101040 PATTY M ANDERSON-MARTINOTT 16904 HARBOR CT LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9369 16904 HARBOR CT RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 38 221850101030 TIMOTHY A & MARY C ULSCHMID 16914 HARBOR CT LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9369 16914 HARBOR CT RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 39 221850101020 DONALD P JR GRASSL 16930 HARBOR CT LAKEVILLE MN 55044 16930 HARBOR CT RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 40 221850101010 JESSICA SCHMIDT 16950 HARBOR CT LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9369 16950 HARBOR CT RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 41 222760004250 PHILLIP MICHAEL ENGELHART 7989 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7989 170TH ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 42 222760004240 DONALD L & SHARON M REEVES 7967 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9005 7967 170TH ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 43 222760004230 BRETT W CAMPBELL 113 GILLETT RD SPENCERPORT NY 14559 7945 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 44 222760004220 ASHLEY MICHELLE LUND 7923 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7923 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 45 222760004210 ROBERT & BRENDA CHAMBERLAND PO BOX 174 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068 7901 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 46 222760005210 MARK R BUSCHBACHER 7823 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7823 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL B 0.5 6,178.36$ 3,089.18$ 47 222760005220 MARK BUSCHBACHER 7823 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7801 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL B 0.5 6,178.36$ 3,089.18$ 48 222760005230 TRACY M KNUTSON 7789 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9003 7789 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 49 222760005240 STEVEN M & JUILE K FLINTROP 7767 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9003 7767 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 50 222760005250 ERIN TO 7745 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7745 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 51 222760005260 PAUL L OLSON 7723 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7723 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 52 222760007270 DEAN W SANDO 7623 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9002 7623 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL B 0.5 6,178.36$ 3,089.18$ 53 222760007280 NANCY LEA DONNER 7601 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7601 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL B 0.5 6,178.36$ 3,089.18$ 54 222760007290 JOHN C STEAD 7581 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9162 7581 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL B 0.5 6,178.36$ 3,089.18$ 55 222760007300 MICHAEL ODONNELL 7563 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9162 7563 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL B 0.5 6,178.36$ 3,089.18$ 56 222760007310 ELIZABETH J OFFERDAHL 7545 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7545 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 57 222760007010 MICHAEL J STRAND 7525 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7525 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ Preliminary Assessment Roll City Name Project: City Project No.: Cherry View 2nd Addition, Cherrywood Heights 2nd and 3rd Addition, Creek View 2nd Addition, and Foxborough. Page 227 of 452 2025 Street Reconstruction Project Category A Single Family Unit Assessment Rate Hayes/170th Neighborhood 6,178.36$ per unit 90 Date:10/1/2024 25-02 Category B Duplex Unit Assessment Rate Hayes/170th Neighborhood 6,178.36$ per unit 12 Revised:10/11/2024 MAP ID PID FEE OWNER FEE OWNER ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE PROPERTY NUMBER PROPERTY STREET USE DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT CATEGORY SF RES. EQUIV. UNITS UNIT ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Preliminary Assessment Roll City Name Project: City Project No.: Cherry View 2nd Addition, Cherrywood Heights 2nd and 3rd Addition, Creek View 2nd Addition, and Foxborough. 58 222760009010 MICHAEL A & CYNTHIA SCHULTZ 7550 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9161 7550 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 59 222760009020 ZACKARY SIEBEN 7584 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7584 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 60 222760009030 DAVID & LINDA NORDEAN 7626 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9001 7626 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 61 222760009040 MAJID GORGI 7640 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7640 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 62 222760010010 PAMELA A KOHLBECK 7666 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-7434 7666 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 63 222760010020 NANCY L KANKEL 7676 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7676 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 64 222760010030 JACOB WILLIAM DUEHN 7686 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7686 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 65 222760010040 ARTHUR C & LUCIA A JOHNSON 7694 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-7434 7694 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 66 222760010050 NIBARDO OLMEDO RAMOS 7700 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7700 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 67 222760010060 YU LI 18198 ICON CT LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7720 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 68 222760010070 LEVI DANIEL KROPP 7742 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7742 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 69 222760010080 VICTORIA A TSTE MATSON 4276 PLUM CREEK RD ELKO NEW MARKET MN 55020 7764 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL B 0.5 6,178.36$ 3,089.18$ 70 222760010090 MEI FANG ZHENG 7786 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7786 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL B 0.5 6,178.36$ 3,089.18$ 71 222760010100 BRIGHTPRCH PROPERTIES LLC 4617 COLORADO ST SE PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 7792 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL B 0.5 6,178.36$ 3,089.18$ 72 222760010110 JERI SUE BARKER 7804 170TH ST LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9156 7804 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL B 0.5 6,178.36$ 3,089.18$ 73 222760010120 GERALD & JOYCELYN GRENZ 16190 GARNER AVE ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-1059 7826 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL B 0.5 6,178.36$ 3,089.18$ 74 222760010130 BENJAMIN JAY FLIETH 7848 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7848 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL B 0.5 6,178.36$ 3,089.18$ 75 222760010140 BRIAN L BARGSTEN 7856 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9156 7856 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 76 222760011010 KEVIN J TANGHE 7886 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9164 7886 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 77 222760011020 THOMAS J HEARN 7890 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7890 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 78 222760011030 KELLIE J MURPHY LEKIE 7904 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9164 7904 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 79 222760011040 RICHARD L DILORENZO 7920 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7920 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 80 222760011050 AMANDA BLEED 7944 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7944 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 81 222760011060 THOMAS J SPENCER 7966 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7966 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 82 222760011070 ADAM J & COLLEEN M STARK 7988 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 7988 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 83 221850102010 DAVID J BRANDT 8008 170TH ST LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9367 8008 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 84 221850102020 JANE M MEREDITH 8026 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9367 8026 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 85 221850102030 CHARLES H & REBECCA MCGARVEY 8040 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9367 8040 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 86 221850102040 SF PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC 15214 FISH POINT RD SE PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 8058 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 87 221850102050 AMY JULIUS 8072 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 8072 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 88 221850102060 IRMA & RALF KASSNER 8090 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9367 8090 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 89 221850102070 DAVID SOLIS 8110 170TH ST W LAKEVILLE MN 55044 8110 170TH ST W 170th ST W RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 90 221715205120 RUSSELL F & JULIE H TERRELL 17048 HAYES LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9589 17048 HAYES AVE HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 91 221715205110 NATHAN BODE 17084 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17084 HAYES AVE HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 92 221715205100 ADAM E DAHER 17120 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17120 HAYES AVE HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 93 221715301090 KIRK LEN JOHNSON 17232 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17232 HAYES AVE HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 94 221715301080 PHILLIP J WESTRUDE 17244 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-6217 17244 HAYES AVE HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 95 221715301070 RUSSELL & LINDA MOERKE 17260 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-6217 17260 HAYES AVE HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 96 221715302110 DAVID J GRAY 17290 HARRINGTON WAY LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9545 17290 HARRINGTON WAY HARRINGTON WAY RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 97 221715303020 JAMES W & TERESA L SCHAEFER 17360 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-6115 17360 HAYES AVE HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 98 221715303150 JOSEPH JR & DEBORAH DAMIANO 17413 HARDING LN LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9540 17413 HARDING LN HARDING LN RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 99 221710102100 MOHABIR & LILOWTIE NOWRANG 17436 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17436 HAYES AVE HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 100 221710102110 GLEN D & KRISTA SHAW 17458 HAYES AVE S LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9537 17458 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 101 221710102120 ELICASITH & ANGELA J YOU 17480 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044-9537 17480 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ 102 221710102130 ROBERT J JOSLIN JR 17498 HAYES AVE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 17498 HAYES AVE RESIDENTIAL A 1.0 6,178.36$ 6,178.36$ Page 228 of 452 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM ENGINEERING REPORT 2025 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT October 21, 2024 Prepared for: City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 CITY PROJECT NO. 25-02 WSB PROJECT NO. 026423 -000 Page 229 of 452 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM October 21, 2024 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: C.P. 25-02 WSB Project No. 026423-000 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: Transmitted herewith for your review is an Engineering Report which addresses improvements associated with the 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project. This Engineering Report describes the necessary improvements and associated costs for this street improvement project. I am available at your convenience to discuss this report. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 612.523.7374 if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, WSB Jeff Oliver, PE Senior Project Manager Attachments Page 230 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Table of Content s Letter of Introduction Table of Cont ents Certification Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 Authorization ................................................................................................. 3 Scope ........................................................................................................... 3 Data Available ............................................................................................... 3 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................... 4 Surface ......................................................................................................... 4 Public Utilities ............................................................................................... 7 Public Sanitary Sewer .................................................................................. 7 Public Water Main ....................................................................................... 7 Public Storm Sewer ..................................................................................... 7 Proposed Improvements .................................................................................... 8 Surface ......................................................................................................... 8 Public Utilities ............................................................................................... 8 Public Sanitary Sewer .................................................................................. 8 Public Water Main ....................................................................................... 9 Storm Sewer ............................................................................................... 9 Public Street Sign Replacement ....................................................................... 9 Mailbox Replacement .................................................................................... 10 Permits/Approvals ......................................................................................... 10 Construction Access/Staging .......................................................................... 10 Financing ........................................................................................................ 11 Opinion of Probable Cost ............................................................................... 11 Funding ....................................................................................................... 11 Project Schedule ............................................................................................. 13 Feasibility and Recommendation ....................................................................... 13 Page 231 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Appendix A Figures Appendix B Opinion of Probable Cost Appendix C Draft Geotechnical Report, Braun Intertec Page 232 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Certification Sheet I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Rachel Scheu , PE _______________________________________________ Date: October 21 , 20 2 4 Lic. No. 63257 Quality Control Review Completed By: Monica Heil , PE _______________________________________________ Date: October 21 , 20 2 4 Lic. No. 47497 Page 233 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 1 Executive Summary The 202 5 Street Re habilitation Project, City Project No. 2 5 -02, was initiated based on the City’s Pavement Management Program and is separated into two parts based on the proposed improvements. The 202 5 Street Reconstruction portion will require reclaiming and paving while the 202 5 Street Rehabilitation Project will require milling and overlaying. The streets proposed for improvements have deteriorated to a point where reclaiming and paving rehabilitation work is needed. Streets proposed for improvements in 202 5 include roadways within the following subdivisions totaling approximately 2.2 miles: Shady Oak Shores 7 th Addition, Cherry Highlands 3 rd Addition,Crossroads 1 st Addition , Crossroads 2 nd Addition, Crossroads 3 rd Addition, Crossroads 5 th Addition, Crossroads 6 th Addition, Crossroads 7 th Addition, and Crossroads 8 th Addition . • Glacier Way (175 th Street W est to 179 th Street W est ) • 175 th Street W est (Glasgow Avenue to Glacier Way) • Gla sgow Avenue (Dodd Boulevard to Glacier Way) • 177 th Street W est (Glacier Way to Glasgow Way) • Glasgow Way (Glacier Way to Glacier Way) • 178 th Street W est (Glacier Way to Glasgow Way) The project location map for Milled Streets is included in Figure 1 of Appendix A of this report . The 202 5 Street Rehabilitation Project includes roadway mill and overlay based on pavement ratings, current roadway conditions, and utility needs in the area, as well as the overall Capital Improvement Plan budget. Surface improvements recommended for all streets within the project include milling or reclamation of the existing bituminous pavement, including full depth milling where necessary based on the geotechnical report, s ubgrade correction as necessary, replacement of structurally deficient or improperly draining concrete curb and gutter , sidewalks , and trails , ADA complia nt pedestrian ramp installation, and new pavement installation. Replacing portions of the City’s deteriorating utility infrastructure in conjunction with the proposed street improvements provides an opportunity to minimize the replacement costs and traffic disruptions associated with the work. Proposed utility improvem ents include the following: • Installation of corrosion protection for the existing watermain throughout a majority of the project area. • Repair or replacement of structurally deficient storm sewer manholes and installation of stormwater quality best management practices (BMPs). • Installation of additional storm sewer drainage structures and storm sewer, including drain tile in areas with poorly draining soils (drain tile services to individual properties will be evaluated in final design). Page 234 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 2 • Replacement of all structurally deficient storm sewer and sanitary sewer manhole castings, concrete adjusting rings, and installing inflow and infiltration (I&I protection ) per current City Standards. The total estimated project cost for the City of Lakeville’s 202 5 Street R ehabilitation Project is $2,086,089 which includes a 8 % contingency and 2 5 % indirect costs for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing costs. The project is proposed to be funded through various City funds and through special assessments to benefitting property owners in accordance with the City’s current assessment pol icy. Page 235 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 3 Introduction Authorization On August 5 , 202 4 , the Lakeville City Council authorized the preparation of an engineering report for the 202 5 Street Rehabilitation Project. This project is included in the City’s 202 4 -202 8 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and is designated as City Project No. 25 -02. Scope This report investigates the feasibility of proposed street and utility improvements identified by the City Pavement Management Program (PMP) and CIP for 2025. Streets proposed within the 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project were initially considered because of existing pavement conditions. The average Overall Condition Index (OCI) value for streets within the 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project area is 57.1 using an OCI scale of 0 to 100 (with zero representing a completely failed street section and 100 repre senting a new street section free of deficiencies). Streets with OCI values less than 40 are considered to be in failing condition. Streets with OCI values of 40 – 60 are considered to be in weakened condition and will deteriorate more quickly based on a t ypical pavement performance curve. Improvements outlined within this report include street rehabilitation in the form of reclamation, including partial replacement of concrete curb and gutter and concrete sidewalk, replacement of bituminous trail, installing ADA compliant pedestrian ramps, installation of corrosion protection on select watermain facilities and watermain replacement or repairs, sanitary sewer repairs, and storm sewer improvements. Data Available Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following: • City of Lakeville Record Plans • City of Lakeville Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, and Storm Sewer inspection documentation • City of Lakeville Water and Natural Resources Management Plan, Barr Engineering, dated January 2019 • Dakota County Topography Maps • Topographic Survey • Field Observations of the Area and Discussions with City Staff • Draft Geotechnical Evaluation Report, Braun Intertec, dated October 10, 2024 Page 236 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 4 Existing Conditions Surface Streets within the proposed improvement area are aging and experiencing differing severities of distress, including alligator, transverse, and longitudinal cracking. All streets within the project area are urbanized, with existing concrete curb and gutter . A ll of the curb and gutter is either full height curb or surmountable . The curb and gutter is in overall fair condition, with isolated instances of cracking, heaving, and settlements resulting in localized drainage issues. Majority of the streets within the 202 5 Street R ehabilitation Project Area are designated as local residential, while Glacier Way is designated as a m inor collector. The project area contains landscaping, trees, irrigation systems, and numerous other private improvements beyond the edge of the roadway and within City right -of-way. The photos below illustrate some of the varying levels of pavement distress: Photo 1. Glacier Way west towards 175th Street West. Page 237 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 5 Photo 2. Glasgow Way looking west towards Glacier Way. Photo 3. 175th Street West looking southwest towards Glasgow Avenue. Concrete sidewalks and bituminous trails exist throughout the project area, including connection points with Dodd Boulevard, Cedar Avenue, and 175 th Street W est . The concrete sidewalks and bituminous trails are generally in good condition; however, many of the existing pedestrian ramps do not meet the current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) design standards, and there are isolated instances where concrete sidewalk panels have heaved, settled, or are otherwise structurally deficient. Page 238 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 6 Soil borings and corings for streets within the 2025 project area were collected in September of 202 4. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) was employed in both directions on each street to collect interpretations on pavement layer thickness between boring and coring locations. The draft geotechnical report is included in Appendix C , and the draft boring and coring logs were used to determine the feasibility of a mill and overlay or full depth reclamation. The final geotechnical report will be available with fina l design. The quantities included in the Opinion of Probable Cost, Appendix B , are based on the draft geotechnical report. Table 1 Below provides a summary of existing street conditions within the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project. 1. Information transcribed from coring data in Geotechnical Evaluation Report, Braun Intertec Corporation, dated October 10 , 2024 . Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) interpolations are contained wtihin the report. * Indicates rehydrated concrete under bituminous sections as noted in the Geotechnical Report. Table 1 - 2025 Street Re habilitation Project Summary of Existing Street Conditions Street Name Right - of-Way (feet) Street Width (feet) Curb Type Sub -base (aggregate)1 (inches) Avg. Bituminous Section 1 (inches) OCI Approx. Year of Most Recent Construction Glacier Way 80 4 0 B618 Curb & Gutter 7.6 * 4.3 54.6 2003 175th Street W est 8 0 4 0 B618 Curb & Gutter 6.0 4.4 55.0 2003 Glasgow Avenue 80 40 B618 Curb & Gutter 13.2 4.3 55.0 2003 177th Street W est 115 28 Standard Surmountable 11.5 * 3.6 65.0 2003 Glasgow Way 115 2 8 Standard Surmountable 7.5 3.8 60.0 2004 178th Street W est 115 28 Standard Surmountable 16.5 * 3.5 60.0 2004 Page 239 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 7 Public Utilities Public Sanitary Sewer All of the existing sanitary sewer located within the 202 5 Street Re habilitation Project Area consists of 8 -inch polyvinylchloride pipe (PVC). Public Water Main All of the existing watermain located in the 202 5 Street Rehabilitation Project Area is ductile iron pipe (DIP). The diameter of watermain pipes varies throughout the project area. Below is a list of watermain pipe size by street: 8 -inch Watermain • Glasgow Way • 177 th Street W est • 178 th Street W est 12-inch Watermain • Glasgow Avenue • 175 th Street W est • Glacier Wa y (179 th Street W est to 175 th Street W est ) 20-inch Watermain • Glacier Way (175 th Street W est to 175 th Street W est ) City maintenance records indicate a sporadic and limited watermain break history throughout the 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project area that have required typical maintenance efforts. Public Storm Sewer City record drawing information indicates that public storm sewer facilities exist within the 202 5 Street Re habilitation Project Area. All areas within the project area are urban section with curb and gutter and storm sewer . All runoff is discharged into the Vermillion River Watershed and is subject to review by the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization (VRWJPO). Most of the storm sewer facilities within the 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project are constructed of reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and appear to provide the necessary collection and conveyance capacity for the 10 -year 24 - hour design storm event. However, some segments do not allow for proper conveyance, but the headwater remains below the structure rim elevations in the 10 -year 24 hour event. These locations are shown in the stormwater capacity analyis figures in Appendix A . Page 240 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 8 All storm sewer structures have been inspected by City Public Works staff and repair recommendations have been incorporated into the Opinion of Probable Cost . Proposed Improvements Surface Due to cost increases in recent years and the available funding for this project, several of the street originally included in this project have been removed from consideration. These streets will be moved back into the CIP for consideration in future year s. Surface improvements recommended with the 202 5 Street Re habilitation Project Area are intended to extend the life of the existing roadway systems, improve isolated drainage issues, and improve the ride quality of roadways. Surface improvements include the variable depth pavement milling. Milling is the process by which the existing wear course of the road is ground off and hauled off site and . A new pavement layer is installed over the exposed underlying pavement layer. Street grades are typically not changed with a mill and overlay, however, the roadway crown will be restored where necessary. A significant portion of the existing curb and gutter within the project is in structurally adequate condition, so only partial curb and gutter replacement is proposed as a part of the project. The local residential and minor collector streets within the project area will be milled and overlaid in accordance with the recommendations provided in the geotechnical report. Appendix A illustrates the proposed residential and minor collector roadway sections, which in general, consist of a new pavement layer of varying thickness over the existing bituminous road section . Certain areas have been identified by the Geotechnical Report as potentially needing a full depth mill and overlay or edge mill and overlay to remove the poor -quality pavement near the edges. These areas are limited to Glacier Way, Glasgow Avenue, Glasgow Way, 175 th Street W est , 177 th Street W est , and 178 th Street W est . As part of the Street Rehabilitation Project, all City owned and maintained pedestrian curb ramps with the project area that do not meet current ADA accessibility design standards will be reconstructed. Additionally, spot replacement of structurally deficient concret e sidewalk and bituminous pathways is proposed. Public Utilities Public Sanitary Sewer The City’s Public Works Department has televised the sanitary sewer system. The sanitary sewer video inspection revealed that the existing sewer pipe is in relatively good condition and will not require full replacement. Sanitary sewer manholes within the project are identified as needing new adjustment rings and/or castings will be repaired as a part of this project. Some existing structures have been identified as not having enough adjustment rings and will require recon figuration. Additionally, all sanitary Page 241 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 9 sewer manholes within the street reconstruction area will receive external chimney seals as a part of the project to reduce the potential for inflow and infiltration issues and reduce the frequency of maintenance requests. Public Water Main It is proposed that in conjunction with the street improvements, the service life of the existing watermain systems be extended by replacing all bolts at select existing hydrants and watermain valves with stainless steel bolts, which are more resistant to the corrosive nature of the underlying soils. The City’s maintenance records show dispersed and limited watermain breaks and maintenance issues and therefor no watermain replacement is proposed with the 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project. Storm Sewer Rehabilitaion of the streets provides a timely opportunity to improve drainage conditions and increase the longevity of the streets within the project area by repairing existing and installing additional storm sewer facilities. City staff completed an inspection of the storm sewer system in the fall of 202 4 and provided recommendations for repairs and replacement including castings, adjustment rings, and structure replacement, as well as replacement of failing or deteriorating reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). Structures identified as needing rehabilitation will undergo necessary interior concrete/grout invert and doghouse replacement. Those structures identified as having existing sumps, but are not the last accessible structure in the street, will have their sumps filled with grout. Sections of storm sewer that have been identified in Appendix A as not meeting capacity are proposed to be upsized to increase capacity to keep the headwater below the upstream structure rim elevation. Additional catch basins are also proposed at the locations identified in the capacity figures in order to increase the i nlet capacity and reduce localized flooding. C osts for this work are included in the O pinion of Probable C ost . Any new storm sewer that is upsized or structure replaced due to upsizing of pipes or if the structure needs to be upsized itself, shall be funded by the stormwater infrastructure fund and shall not be assessed. Existing inlets and outlets of storm sewer runs within the project area that were identified as needing improvements such as repair, replacement, tree removal, and/or delta excavation will be improved with the project. Public Street Sign Replacement E xisting street signs within the project will not need to be replaced unless it is due to utility work, in which case they will be salvaged and reinstalled. Page 242 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 10 Mailbox Replacement It is the City’s intent to salvage and reinstall all existing mailboxes and mailbox supports that may be impacted with construction. In the event the condition of the existing mailbox support warrants replacement prior to reinstallation, the City is propos ing to salvage the existing mailbox and install a new mailbox support that will meet both City Standards and United States Postal Service (USPS) requirements. Permits/Approvals An NPDES permit for construction activity will be required if more than one acre will be disturbed by construction activities within the project, which will be determined in final design of the project. A Dakota County Work in Right -of-Way user registration will be required for the contractor for any county roads (i.e. CR 9 , CSAH 23 etc.) that may be used as a haul route for the project. Work in Right -of-Way permits will be also required for construction within Dakota County Right -of-Way. Construction Access/Staging The contractor will be responsible for providing access to all properties throughout the project. Adequately signed detours will be identified to direct traffic around the construction zones and notify users of the increased truck and construction activity . Construction will be phased such that construction truck traffic will not need to access newly reconstructed streets to complete the project. Detailed construction phasing plans will be developed with final design of the project. Page 243 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 11 Financing Opinion of Probable Cost A detailed opinion of probable cost for the project area can be found in the Appendix B of this report. The opinion of cost incorporates estimated 2025 construction costs and includes a 8 % contingency factor. Indirect costs are projected at 2 5 % of the construction cost and include engineering, legal, financing, and administrative costs. Table 2 below provides a summary of the opinion of probable cost for the 2025 Street Re habilitation Project: Funding Financing for the street, storm sewer, watermain, and sanitary sewer improvements within the 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project will come from City CIP Funds, Stormwater Infrastructure Fund, Water Operating Fund, and Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund. Table 3 below provides a funding summary for the 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project. The 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 2 5 -02, was separated into two parts based on the proposed improvements. The 202 5 Street Reconstruction Table 2 – 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project Opinion of Probable Cost Summary Schedule Amount Street Improvements $1,745,662 Storm Sewer Improvements $247,970 Watermain Improvements $45,686 Sanitary Sewer Improvements $4 6,771 TOTAL $2,086,089 Table 3 – 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project Funding Summary Funding Source Amount City CIP Funds – Street/Storm $1,955,988 City Water Operating Fund $46,770 City Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund $45,686 City Storm w ater Infrastructure Fund $37,64 5 TOTAL $2,086,089 Page 244 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 12 portion total cost is $4,268,25 7 while the 202 5 Street Rehabilitation Project total cost is $2,086,089 . Combined the 202 5 Street Reconstruction Project, City Project No. 2 5 -02 overall cost will be $6,354,346 . Page 245 of 452 Engineering Report 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project C.P. 25-02 City of Lakeville, MN WSB Project No. 026423-000 Page 13 Project Schedule The proposed schedule for the 2025 Street Reconstruction Project is as follows: *Schedule assumes any necessary private utility work is completed prior to the start of construction. Feasibility and Recommendation The 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project includes roadway milling and overlaying, watermain improvements, sanitary sewer improvements, storm sewer improvements, pedestrian ramp installation, sidewalk improvements , and partial repair and repalcement of structurally deficient concrete sidewalk and concrete curb and gutter. The total estimated cost for the 2025 Street Rehabilitation Project including roadway, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain improvements is $2,379,14 2 . Proposed funding for the project is provided through City Funds. Construction costs are based on anticipated construction costs for 2025. This project is feasible, necessary, cost -effective from an engineering standpoint. The project feasibility is subject to financial review by the City. Based on information contained in this report, it is recommended to proceed with the improvements as outlined in this report. Task Description Completion Date Present Feasibility Report and Set Public Hearing October 21, 2024 Neighborhood Meeting Early November City Council Approves Plans and Specifications January 20, 2025 Open Bids February 19, 2025 Neighborhood Meeting Late March Award Contract April 7 , 202 5 Begin Construction April/May 202 5 Substantial Completion October 202 5 Final Completion November 202 5 Page 246 of 452 Appendix A Figure 1 – Project Locations Map Figure 2 – Typical Section Figure 3 – Stormwater Capacity Analysis Page 247 of 452 F O R T U N E T R L FORMOSA AVE G L A CIE R WAY D O D D B L V D FULDATRL179T H S T WCEDAR AVEFREEPORT WAYGROVE AVEGLENCOEAVE173RD S T W GREELEY PL1 7 5 T H S T W HAMBURG AVEGREENTREE AVEGREENWICH WAY G A G E A V EGANDER LN173RDCIRGERDINE PATHGAGE CTGRANBY LNFREEPORTCTGOLDENRODAVEGRESFORD LN174TH ST W GREENTREE PATH FRENCH AVEG L A S GOWAVEGOLDENVIEW AVEG O O D L A N DPATH GALLECTGLASGOW WAY177TH STW F O R MOSA CTGREENVIEW CIR178THSTWGOODHUE AVEGIANTSWAY GRAPHIT E L N GALERY DRGILLETTE WAYGETTYSBURG WAY Document Path: J:\gis\city\LKVL\Maps\LKVLProposal\25-02 Layout Date Saved: 10/16/2024¯1 inch = 400 feet 0 550 Feet 2025 Street Reconstruction Project Lakeville, MN Project Location Map Proposed Mill & Overlay Page 248 of 452 REHAB 40' 20'20' DRIVE LANE DRIVE LANE ℄ INSET B URBAN MINOR COLLECTOR - VARIABLE DEPTH MILL GLACIER WAY (N.T.S.) 40' EXISTING/NEW PAVEMENT SURFACE 1:4 MA X 1:4 MAX 1:4 MAX 1:4 MA X R/WR/W DETAIL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY & APRON SECTION (CITY STD. PLATE NO. LV-ST-3 & LV-ST-4) APPROVED SUBGRADE (INCIDENTAL) 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (SPWEA240B) 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT (INCIDENTAL) 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (SPWEA240B) DETAIL BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SECTION 6" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 MODIFIED (100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE; INCIDENTAL) APPROVED SUBGRADE (INCIDENTAL) 7" CONCRETE (MNDOT 3F52) 6" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 MODIFIED (100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE; INCIDENTAL) 3" TYPE SP 9.5 SPWEA240B WEAR COURSE 6" CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE (100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE; INCIDENTAL) DETAIL BITUMINOUS TRAIL (CITY STD. PLATE NO. LV-ST-10) APPROVED SUBGRADE (INCIDENTAL) MATCH EX. (3.0% MIN.) MATCH EX. (3.0% MIN.) EX. B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (PARTIAL REPLACEMENT) EX. B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (PARTIAL REPLACEMENT) 72' - 115' 14' - 20.5'14' - 20.5' DRIVE LANE DRIVE LANE ℄ INSET B URBAN RESIDENTIAL - VARIABLE DEPTH MILL GLASGOW AVENUE, GLASGOW WAY, 175TH STREET W, 177TH STREET W, 178TH STREET W (N.T.S.) 72' - 115' 3 4" MILL +/- 3 4" AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETION 1:4 MA X 1:4 MAX R/WR/W EX. D412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (PARTIAL REPLACEMENT) EX. D412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (PARTIAL REPLACEMENT) 1:4 MAX 1:4 MA X 3.0% MIN.3.0% MIN. 2.0" MILL +/- 3 4" AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETION 2.0" MILL +/- 3 4" AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETION VARIABLE MILL / 2.0" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,B) (SPWEA340B) 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT ON MILLED SURFACE (INCIDENTAL) EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE EXISTING SUBGRADE INSET B VARIABLE DEPTH MILL AND OVERLAY SECTION THE ENGINEER MAY ALSO REQUEST VARIABLE DEPTH MILLING FOR AREAS NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS. 2" MILL / 2.0" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,B) (SPWEA340B) 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT ON MILLED SURFACE (INCIDENTAL) EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE EXISTING SUBGRADE INSET A MILL AND OVERLAY SECTION C:\ACC\ACCDocs\WSB\026423-000\Project Files\05_Discipline\Site\03_Sheets\026423-000-C-TYPS-DETL.dwg 10/16/2024 4:12:59 PM1 AS SHOWN XXX XXXXXX SCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: SHEET OF WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONCLIENT PROJECT NO.2025 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTCITY OF LAKEVILLE026423-000 25-02 ## TYPICAL SECTIONS 12025 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECTPage 249 of 452 """"""""""""""""" " " " """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""" " """""""""""""""""""""" """""""""! " " " " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " 175TH ST W GLACIERW AYPipe 53BC017-53BC012 12'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.08 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 53BC012-53BC011 24'' pipe fails at 10-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.28 feet below structure rim in 10-year event.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/16/2024¯1 inch = 50 feet 0 50 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 1 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 250 of 452 """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" " " " "" " "" " " " GLACIER WAYGOLDENVIEWAVESag Point 53BC019 Water coming in at 9.54 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.524-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 20.6-ft across the roadway. Sag Point 53BC018 Water coming in at 10.24 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.524-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 20.6-ft across the roadway. Pipe 53BC019-53BC018 18'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.28 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 53BC023-53BC019 12'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 2.58 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 53BC018-53BC016 24'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.28 feet below structure rim in 10-year event.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 60 feet 0 60 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 2 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 251 of 452 "" " """""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""" " " " "GLACIERWAYPipe 53BC026-53BC025 18'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 2.18 feet below structure rim in 10-year event.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 50 feet 0 50 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 3 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 252 of 452 " " " " " """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" " """"""" " " " " """"""""""""" " " "" ! !"" " " " "" " " " " " G L A C I E R W AY CEDAR AVESag Point 61BP018 Water coming in at 3.02 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.309-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 12-ft across the roadway.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 50 feet 0 50 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 4 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 253 of 452 "" " " " " """""""""""""""""""""""" " """""""" " " " " " " " " " " """""""""""""""""""""""" " " """"""""""""""""" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " GLACIERWAY Sag Point 62AC043 Water coming in at 1.19 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.167-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 6.3-ft across the roadway. Sag Point 62AP028 Water coming in at 1.54 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.124-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 4.6-ft across the roadway.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 50 feet 0 50 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 5 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 254 of 452 " """"""""""""""""""""""""""""" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " """"""""""" " " " " " " " " " " " ""! ! ! " "" "" " " " " " "DODD BLVDG L A C I E R W A Y Sag Point 62AC072 Water coming in at 7.95 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.524-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 20.6-ft across the roadway. Sag Point 62AC071 Water coming in at 1.84 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.222-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 8.5-ft across the roadway.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 50 feet 0 50 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 6 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 255 of 452 " " " " " " " " " " """"""""""""" " " " " " " " " " " """"""""""""""""! " " " "GL A C I E R W A Y175TH ST W Sag Point 62AP029 Water coming in at 0.84 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.132-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 4.9-ft across the roadway. Pipe 62AC068-62AC069 12'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 3.15 feet below structure rim in 10-year event.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 40 feet 0 40 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 7 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 256 of 452 """"""""""" """""" " """""""""""""""""""""""" """""""" " """""""""""" ! " " " " " " "" " " " G L A S G OW A V E 175TH ST W Sag Point 54AC043 Water coming in at 1.56 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.199-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 7.6-ft across the roadway. Sag Point 54AC044 Water coming in at 6.07 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.494-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 19.4-ft across the roadway.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 50 feet 0 50 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 8 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 257 of 452 """"""""""""" " " " " " " """"""""""" " " """""" """" """"""""""""""""" " " """""" " " """"""! " " " " " " " " " " " " G L A S G O WA V E175TH ST W Sag Point 54AC049 Water coming in at 7.01 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.524-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 20.6-ft across the roadway. Sag Point 54AC050 Water coming in at 0.93 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.139-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 5.2-ft across the roadway. Pipe 54AC049-54AC050 15'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.26 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC047-54AC046 15'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 2.05 feet above structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC050-54AM004 15'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.26 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC046-54AC048 30'' pipe fails at 10-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 5.08 feet below structure rim in 10-year event.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 60 feet 0 60 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 9 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 258 of 452 """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" " """"""""""" " " " " " """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" " " " " " """"""" " " " " " " " " " " " " G LACIERW AYG L A S G O WWA Y G L A S G O W A V E Sag Point 54AC034 Water coming in at 2.1 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.242-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 9.3-ft across the roadway. Sag Point 54AC031 Water coming in at 2.87 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.299-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 11.6-ft across the roadway. Pipe 54AC040-54AC034 12'' pipe fails at 10-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 2.47 feet below structure rim in 10-year event.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 40 feet 0 40 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 10 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 259 of 452 " " " " """" " " " " """"""""""" " " " """" " " " " """"""""""" " " " " """"""""" " " " " " 177TH ST W GLASGOW WAYSag Point 54AC080 Water coming in at 5.41 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.458-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 17.2-ft across the roadway. Sag Point 54AC081 Water coming in at 6.18 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.501-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 18.9-ft across the roadway. Pipe 54AC080-54AC081 15'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 0.39 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC078-54AC079 12'' pipe fails at 10-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.62 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC081-54AC082 21'' pipe fails at 10-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.4 feet below structure rim in 10-year event.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 40 feet 0 40 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 11 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 260 of 452 """"""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""" " """"""""" " " " " " " "GLASGOW WAY177THSTW Pipe 54AC089-54AC090 12'' pipe fails at 10-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.23 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC090-54AC083 12'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 0.51 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC088-54AC089 12'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 3.1 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC092-54AC091 15'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 2.39 feet below structure rim in 10-year event.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 40 feet 0 40 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 12 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 261 of 452 """"""""""" """""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""" " " " " "GLASGOW WAY178TH S T W Pipe 54AC110-54AC109 15'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.02 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC111-54AC110 12'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.68 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC109-54AC085 15'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 0.51 feet below structure rim in 10-year event.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 40 feet 0 40 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 13 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 262 of 452 """""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""" " " " " " " """""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""" " " " " " " """"""""" " """"""""""" " " "GLASGOWWAYSag Point 54AC113 Water coming in at 4.84 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.268-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 9.6-ft across the roadway. Sag Point 54AC116 Water coming in at 6.7 cfs. Ponds on CB up to 0.528-ft in the 3-yr event. Would spread 20-ft across the roadway. Pipe 54AC113-54AC116 21'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.48 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC114-54AC112 15'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.83 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC116-54AC086 21'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 0.5 feet below structure rim in 10-year event.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 30 feet 0 30 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 14 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 263 of 452 " " " " " " " " " " """"""" " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " """"""" " " " " " " " " " "" " " " " """" " " " " " " " " " """" " " " " " GLASG O W W A Y Pipe 54AC127-54AM024 12'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 2.38 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC114-54AC112 15'' pipe fails at 5-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 1.83 feet below structure rim in 10-year event. Pipe 54AC115-54AC114 15'' pipe fails at 10-yr event in Rational Calculation. Headwater is 0.93 feet below structure rim in 10-year event.Document Path: M:\026422-000\GIS\Maps\026422-000 Lakeville 25-01\MO Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements Date Saved: 10/11/2024¯1 inch = 40 feet 0 40 Feet2025 Street Reconstruction Project (25-02) - Page 15 City of Lakeville, MN Storm Sewer Improvements Proposed for Additional Capacity "Allowable HW Pressure Flow "Consider Replacement "Good in Rational Calculation Mill & Overlay Area Sag Point Catch Basin Recommend adding adjacent CB Spread is allowable Page 264 of 452 Appendix B Opinion of Probable Cost Page 265 of 452 WSB Project:2025 Street Rehabilitation Project Design By:RJS Project Location:City of Lakeville Checked By:JAO City Project No.:25-02 WSB Project No:026423-000 Date:10/17/2024 Item No. MnDOT Specification No.Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 61,575.39$ 61,575.39$ 2 2101.502 CLEARING EACH 2 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 3 2101.502 GRUBBING EACH 2 400.00$ 800.00$ 4 2104.502 SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 5 125.00$ 625.00$ 5 2104.502 SALVAGE SIGN EACH 10 50.00$ 500.00$ 6 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER L F 4043 8.00$ 32,344.00$ 7 2104.503 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F 750 4.00$ 3,000.00$ 8 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F 170 7.00$ 1,190.00$ 9 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 417 12.00$ 5,004.00$ 10 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 205 12.00$ 2,460.00$ 11 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 0 15.00$ -$ 12 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK S F 10509 2.50$ 26,272.50$ 13 2104.601 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES LS 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 14 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE C Y 798 40.00$ 31,920.00$ 15 2106.507 STABILIZING AGGREGATE (CV)C Y 798 37.00$ 29,526.00$ 16 2106.509 STABILIZING AGGREGATE TON 192 37.00$ 7,104.00$ 17 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 119 30.00$ 3,570.00$ 18 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 50 160.00$ 8,000.00$ 19 2130.523 WATER MGAL 50 70.00$ 3,500.00$ 20 2231.609 BITUMINOUS PATCH SPECIAL TON 417 105.00$ 43,785.00$ 21 2232.504 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.0")S Y 47849 1.75$ 83,735.75$ 22 2360.504 TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR CRS MIX(2,B)3.0" THICK S Y 1594 31.00$ 49,414.00$ 23 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3;B)TON 5948 80.00$ 475,840.00$ 24 2504.602 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REPAIR EACH 15 190.00$ 2,850.00$ 25 2521.518 5" CONCRETE WALK S F 7109 10.00$ 71,090.00$ 26 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK S F 3400 15.00$ 51,000.00$ 27 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 L F 2428 25.00$ 60,700.00$ 28 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN D412 L F 2503 25.00$ 62,575.00$ 29 2531.601 ADA COMPLIANCE SUPERVISOR LS 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 30 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES S F 560 65.00$ 36,400.00$ 31 2540.602 MAIL BOX EACH 5 50.00$ 250.00$ 32 2540.602 MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 5 50.00$ 250.00$ 33 2540.602 TEMPORARY MAIL BOX EACH 137 40.00$ 5,480.00$ 34 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 35 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LS 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 36 2575.504 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25 S Y 1950 5.00$ 9,750.00$ 37 2575.523 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 MGAL 20 50.00$ 1,000.00$ 38 2575.523 WATER MGAL 44 70.00$ 3,080.00$ 39 2575.604 PERMANENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT S Y 1950 20.00$ 39,000.00$ 40 2575.604 TEMPORARY STABILIZATION S Y 1950 20.00$ 39,000.00$ 41 2582.503 4" BROKEN LINE PAINT S Y 383 0.75$ 287.25$ 42 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE PAINT L F 5547 1.25$ 6,933.75$ 43 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 5398 0.75$ 4,048.50$ 44 2582.503 6" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 504 1.25$ 630.00$ 45 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE PAINT L F 311 3.00$ 933.00$ 46 2582.518 PAVT MSSG PAINT S F 610 6.00$ 3,660.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 1,293,083.14$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (8%)103,446.65$ SUBTOTAL 1,396,529.79$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%)349,132.45$ TOTAL 1,745,662.24$ 47 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 8,746.75$ 8,746.75$ 48 2101.502 CLEARING EACH 1 500.00$ 500.00$ 49 2101.502 GRUBBING EACH 1 400.00$ 400.00$ 50 2104.502 REMOVE CASTING EACH 9 250.00$ 2,250.00$ 51 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 8 600.00$ 4,800.00$ 52 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM)L F 111 20.00$ 2,220.00$ 53 2106.601 DEWATERING LS 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 54 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V L F 111 65.00$ 7,215.00$ 55 2503.503 18" RC PIPE SEWER CLASS V L F 30 70.00$ 2,100.00$ 56 2503.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 3 2,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 57 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 45 650.00$ 29,250.00$ 58 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 12 950.00$ 11,400.00$ 59 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 L F 32 900.00$ 28,800.00$ 60 2506.602 6" TOP SLAB FOR 48-4020 STRUCTURE EACH 5 2,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 61 2506.602 6" TOP SLAB FOR 60-4020 STRUCTURE EACH 2 2,200.00$ 4,400.00$ 62 2506.602 CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 4 275.00$ 1,100.00$ 63 2506.602 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3')EACH 3 2,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 64 2506.602 FILL STRUCTURE SUMP EACH 11 400.00$ 4,400.00$ 65 2506.602 GROUT CATCH BASIN OR MANHOLE EACH 98 300.00$ 29,400.00$ 66 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 88 150.00$ 13,200.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 183,681.75$ OPINION OF PROBABLE COST B. Storm Sewer Improvements A. Street Improvements Page 266 of 452 CONTINGENCY TOTAL (8%)14,694.54$ SUBTOTAL 198,376.29$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%)49,594.07$ TOTAL 247,970.36$ 67 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 1,611.50$ 1,611.50$ 68 2104.502 REMOVE CASTING EACH 1 230.00$ 230.00$ 69 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 33 750.00$ 24,750.00$ 70 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 1 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 71 2506.602 CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 34 175.00$ 5,950.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 33,841.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (8%)2,707.32$ SUBTOTAL 36,548.82$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%)9,137.21$ TOTAL 45,686.03$ 72 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 1,649.75$ 1,649.75$ 73 2105.610 EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION HOUR 10 500.00$ 5,000.00$ 74 2106.601 DEWATERING LS 1 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 75 2451.507 GRANULAR BEDDING C Y 10 250.00$ 2,500.00$ 76 2504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX EACH 27 185.00$ 4,995.00$ 77 2504.602 BOLT & VALVE BOX REPLACEMENT - VALVE EACH 2 3,500.00$ 7,000.00$ 78 2504.602 VALVE BOX SECTION EACH 14 750.00$ 10,500.00$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 34,644.75$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (8%)2,771.58$ SUBTOTAL 37,416.33$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (25%)9,354.08$ TOTAL 46,770.41$ GRAND TOTAL 2,086,089.04$ DISCLAIMER: In review of this Opinion of Probable Cost, the Client understands that the Consultant has no control over the availability of labor, equipment or materials, market conditions, or the Contractor’s method of pricing. This Opinion of Probable Cost is made on the basis of the Consultant’s professional judgment and experience. The Consultant makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding the ultimate bids or negotiated cost of the Work. C. Sanitary Sewer Improvements D. Watermain Improvements Page 267 of 452 Appendix C Draft Geotechnical Report, Braun Intertec Page 268 of 452 Geotechnical Evaluation Report City of Lakeville 25-02 – Street Reconstruction Lakeville, Minnesota Prepared for City of Lakeville Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Richard S. Jett, PE Project Engineer License Number: 58781 October 10, 2024 Project B2407625 Braun Intertec Corporation DRAFTPage 269 of 452 AA/EOE Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com October 10, 2024 Project B2407625 Mr. Steve Ferraro City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: Geotechnical Evaluation Report City of Lakeville 25-02 – Miscellaneous Overlays Lakeville, Minnesota Dear Mr. Ferraro: We are pleased to present this Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the above-referenced project. The following report provides the results of our evaluation and should be read in its entirety. Thank you for making Braun Intertec your geotechnical consultant for this project. If you have questions about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please contact Richard Jett at 815.545.7059 (rjett@braunintertec.com) or Matt Ruble at 952.995.2000 (mruble@braunintertec.com). Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Richard S. Jett, PE Project Engineer Matthew P. Ruble, PE Vice President, Principal Engineer DRAFTPage 270 of 452 Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 A.1. Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1 A.2. Site Conditions and History ................................................................................................. 3 A.3. Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents .......................................................... 3 A.5. Scope of Services ................................................................................................................. 3 B. Results .............................................................................................................................................. 5 B.1. Geologic Overview .............................................................................................................. 5 B.2. Soil Boring Results ............................................................................................................... 5 B.3. Pavement Coring and Power Auger Results ........................................................................ 6 B.4. Groundwater ....................................................................................................................... 8 B.5. Laboratory Test Results ....................................................................................................... 9 B.6. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Results ............................................................................ 9 C. Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 11 C.1. Design and Construction Discussion ................................................................................. 11 C.1.a. Overview .............................................................................................................. 11 C.1.b. Full Depth Reclamation ........................................................................................ 11 C.1.c. Mill & Overlay ....................................................................................................... 11 C.2. Site Grading and Excavations ............................................................................................ 12 C.2.a. Overview .............................................................................................................. 12 C.2.b. Pavement Subgrade Preparation ......................................................................... 13 C.2.c. Pavement Subgrade Test Roll ............................................................................... 13 C.2.d. Excavation Oversizing ........................................................................................... 14 C.2.e. Excavated Slopes .................................................................................................. 14 C.2.f. Excavation Dewatering ......................................................................................... 15 C.2.g. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction .......................................................... 15 C.3. Pavements ......................................................................................................................... 16 C.3.a. Rehabilitation via Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) ................................................. 16 C.3.b. Rehabilitation via Mill and Overlay ...................................................................... 16 C.3.c. Design Sections .................................................................................................... 17 C.3.d. Subgrade Drainage ............................................................................................... 18 C.3.e. Performance and Maintenance ........................................................................... 18 C.4. Utilities .............................................................................................................................. 19 C.4.a. Subgrade Stabilization .......................................................................................... 19 C.4.b. Utility Backfill ........................................................................................................ 19 C.4.c. Dewatering ........................................................................................................... 19 C.4.d. Corrosion Potential .............................................................................................. 19 D. Procedures ...................................................................................................................................... 20 D.1. Penetration Test Borings ................................................................................................... 20 D.2. Ground Penetrating Radar ................................................................................................ 20 D.2.a. GPR Data Collection ............................................................................................. 20 D.2.b. GPR Analysis ......................................................................................................... 20 D.3. Power Auger Borings ......................................................................................................... 20 D.4. Exploration Logs ................................................................................................................ 21 D.4.a. Log of Boring Sheets ............................................................................................. 21 DRAFTPage 271 of 452 Table of Contents (continued) Description Page D.4.b. Geologic Origins ................................................................................................... 21 D.5. Material Classification and Testing ................................................................................... 21 D.5.a. Visual and Manual Classification .......................................................................... 21 D.5.b. Laboratory Testing ............................................................................................... 21 D.5.c. Groundwater Measurements ............................................................................... 22 E. Qualifications .................................................................................................................................. 22 E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions .................................................................................. 22 E.1.a. Material Strata ..................................................................................................... 22 E.1.b. Groundwater Levels ............................................................................................. 22 E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility .......................................................................... 22 E.2.a. Plan Review .......................................................................................................... 22 E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing ............................................................... 23 E.3. Use of Report ..................................................................................................................... 23 E.4. Standard of Care ................................................................................................................ 23 Appendix Soil Boring and Pavement Core Location Sketch Log of Boring ST-1 through ST-5 Pavement Core Photographs GPR Results Corrosivity Test Results Descriptive Terminology of Soil DRAFTPage 272 of 452 A. Introduction A.1. Project Description This Geotechnical Evaluation Report addresses the proposed design and rehabilitation of various local roadways throughout the City of Lakeville, Minnesota. As part of City of Lakeville Project 25-02, this project will include rehabilitation of the following bituminous roadways using Mill and Overlay techniques: Glacier Way from 175th Street West to 179th Street West Gerdine Path from Dodd Boulevard to 179th Street West Gettysburg Way / Gillette Way from 175th Street to 175th Street Glasgow Avenue from Dodd Boulevard to Glacier Way Glasgow Way from Glacier Way to Glasgow Avenue 178th Street from Glacier Way to Glasgow Way 177th Street from Glacier Way to Glasgow Way 175th Street West from Glasgow Avenue to Glacier Way Galle Court from Gerdine Path to Cul-De-Sac In addition, the following roadways will be rehabilitated using full depth reclamation techniques: Hayes Avenue / 170th Street West from 175th Street West and Cedar Avenue Harbor Court from 170th Street West to Cul-De-Sac We also understand that the existing watermain beneath a portion of 170th Street from Cedar Avenue to Hayes Avenue will be replaced as part of this project. Table 1 outlines descriptions of the existing roadways. Table 1. Existing Roadway Descriptions Roadway Roadway Designation Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) Hayes Avenue / 170th Street West Urban Minor Collector 3,336 (2023) Harbor Court Residential Less than 600 Glacier Way Urban Major Collector 4,651 (2021) Gerdine Path Urban Minor Collector 1941 (2023) Galle Court Residential Less Than 600 DRAFTPage 273 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 2 Roadway Roadway Designation Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) Gettysburg Way / Gillette Way Residential Less Than 600 Glasgow Way Residential Less than 600 177th Street Residential Less Than 600 178th Street Residential Less Than 600 Glasgow Avenue Residential Less Than 600 175th Street West Residential Less Than 600 Figure 1 below show an illustration of the existing roadway alignments. Figure 1. Existing Roadway Layout – City of Lakeville 25-02 Figure taken from Google Earth. Hayes Avenue / 170th street is marked in green, Harbor Courtis marked in teal, Glacier Way is marked in blue, Gerdine Path is marked in orange, Glasgow Avenue is marked in red, Glasgow way is marked in dark green, 178th Street is marked in purple, 177th Street is marked in yellow, 175th Street West is marked in light blue, Galle Court is marked in light green, and Gettysburg Way / Gillette Way are marked in dark red. DRAFTPage 274 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 3 A.2. Site Conditions and History A majority of the roadways are generally classified as low volume residential roadways with a few exceptions. Hayes Avenue / 170th Street and Gerdine Path are generally classified as a Minor Urban Collector with Glacier Way classified as a Major Urban Collector. All roadways included within this project are bituminous. We understand that these roadways are currently maintained under the existing City of Lakeville street maintenance program. A.3. Purpose The purpose of the geotechnical services was to characterize existing pavement conditions throughout the proposed corridors and provide geotechnical recommendations for use in the design and rehabilitation of the outlined roadways. A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents We reviewed the City of Lakeville 25-02 Project Map, provided by the City of Lakeville (undated). In addition, we have used several publicly available sources of information including topography maps obtained from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnTOPO website) and Google Earth aerial photographs. We have described our understanding of the proposed construction and site to the extent others reported it to us. Depending on the extent of available information, we may have made assumptions based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the project details, the project team should notify us. New or changed information could require additional evaluation, analyses, and/or recommendations. A.5. Scope of Services We performed our scope of services for the project in accordance with our Proposal for a Geotechnical Evaluation (QTB200001) dated July 30, 2024. The following list describes the geotechnical tasks completed in accordance with our authorized scope of services. DRAFTPage 275 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 4 Reviewing the background information and reference documents previously cited. Staking and clearing the exploration location of underground utilities. The City of Lakeville selected, and we staked the exploration locations. The Soil Boring and Pavement Core sketch included in the Appendix shows the approximate locations of the pavement cores and soil borings. Performing Gound Penetrating Radar (GPR) scans in both travel directions along the length of each roadway included in this project. Performing five Standard Penetration Test (SPT) soil borings, denoted as ST-1 through ST-5, to depths ranging from approximately 5 to 15 feet below existing grade along Hayes Avenue / 170th Street. Performing 24 pavement cores and shallow power auger borings, denoted as C-1 through C-24, near the client-designated locations throughout the remaining project areas. Our original scope of 22 pavement cores was increased to 24 pavement cores at the clients request shortly after the start of the project. Performing eight (8) companion pavement cores, designated as C-1a, C-3a, C-11a, C-13a, C-14a, C-16a, C-19a, and C-21a, near the curbline of the roadways. Performing laboratory testing on select samples to aid in soil classification and engineering analysis. Preparing this report containing a soil boring and pavement core location sketch, pavement core photographs, a summary of the soils and pavements encountered, results of laboratory tests, recommendations for rehabilitation of the existing pavements, and recommendations for use in the design and construction of water main replacement. Our scope of services did not include environmental services or testing and our geotechnical personnel performing this evaluation are not trained to provide environmental services or testing. We can provide environmental services or testing at your request. DRAFTPage 276 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 5 B. Results B.1. Geologic Overview We based the geologic origins used in this report on the soil types, in-situ and laboratory testing, and available common knowledge of the geological history of the site. Because of the complex depositional history, geologic origins can be difficult to ascertain. We did not perform a detailed investigation of the geologic history for the site. B.2. Soil Boring Results Table 2 provides a summary of the soil boring results in the general order we encountered the strata. Please refer to the Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix for additional details. The Descriptive Terminology sheet in the Appendix includes definitions of abbreviations used in Table 2. Table 2. Subsurface Profile Summary – ST-1 through ST-5 Strata Soil Type - ASTM Classification N values Commentary and Details Pavement section N/A N/A Observed at all five soil boring locations with total pavement thicknesses ranging from approximately 12 1/2 to 16 inches. Bituminous thicknesses ranged from approximately 6 1/2 to 9 inches. Apparent aggregate base thicknesses ranged from approximately 4 to 9 inches. Fill SM, SC, CL 6 to 25 Observed at the boring locations below the pavements and extended to depths ranging from approximately 10 to 11 feet below existing grade. Borings ST-4 and ST-5 terminated within the fill zone. Moisture conditions were generally moist. Generally consisted of brown to dark brown clay and silt laden soils. Apparent hydrocarbon odor (detected by human perception only) was observed in Boring ST-4. Variable amounts of gravel; may contain cobbles and boulders. DRAFTPage 277 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 6 Strata Soil Type - ASTM Classification N values Commentary and Details Glacial deposits CL, SM 7 to 35 Observed in Borings ST-1 through ST-3 below the pavements and fill soils and extended to the termination depths of these borings. Generally light brown to brown in color. Relative consistencies of the clay soils were generally stiff to hard. Relative densities of the silty sand soils were generally loose to medium dense. Variable amounts of gravel; may contain cobbles and boulders. Moisture conditions were generally moist to wet. We did not perform gradation analysis on the apparent aggregate base material encountered as part of the pavement section, in accordance with our scope of work. Therefore, we cannot conclusively determine if the encountered material satisfies a particular specification. For simplicity in this report, we define existing fill to mean existing, uncontrolled, or undocumented fill. B.3. Pavement Coring and Power Auger Results Table 3 outlines the results of our pavement coring and power auger borings performed as part of this project. Table 3: Pavement Coring and Power Auger Summary Location Associated Roadway Bituminous Thickness (inches) Apparent Aggregate Base Thickness (inches) Subgrade Soils Pavement Core Conditions ST-1 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 7 9 SM N/A ST-2 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 6 1/2 6 SP N/A ST-3 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 8 8 CL N/A ST-4 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 6 1/2 7 CL N/A ST-5 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 9 4 CL N/A DRAFTPage 278 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 7 Location Associated Roadway Bituminous Thickness (inches) Apparent Aggregate Base Thickness (inches) Subgrade Soils Pavement Core Conditions C-1 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 3 1/2 9 1/2 SM Moderate stripping and raveling C-1a Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 4 --- --- Moderate stripping and raveling C-2 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 6 1/4 6 1/4 SC Moderate stripping and raveling, debonded C-3 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 7 6 3/4 CL Moderate stripping, debonded C-3a Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 5 3/4 --- --- Moderate stripping, debonded C-4 Hayes Avenue / 170th Street 6 3/4 16 SC Severe stripping and raveling, debonded C-5 Glacier Way 4 1/4” bituminous over 4 1/2” rehydrated concrete 3 1/4 SC Good condition, 4 1/2” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-6 Glacier Way 3 3/4” bituminous over 9 1/2” rehydrated concrete 0 SP-SM Good condition, 9 1/2” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-7 Glacier Way 3 1/2 8 SM Good condition C-8 Glacier Way 3 1/2 8 SM Moderate stripping and severe raveling C-9 Glacier Way 3 1/4 8 SM Severe stripping and raveling, debonded C-10 Glacier Way 4 10 1/2 SM Good condition C-11 Glasgow Avenue 3 1/4 13 1/4 SP-SM Mild stripping C-11a Glasgow Avenue 3 3/4 --- --- Mild stripping C-12 175th Street 4 6 SP-SM Mild stripping C-13 Gillette Way / Gettysburg Way 4 1/2 5 1/2 SM Severe stripping and raveling, debonded C-13a Gillette Way / Gettysburg Way 4 --- --- Severe stripping and raveling, debonded C-14 Gillette Way / Gettysburg Way 3 14 SM Good condition C-14a Gillette Way / Gettysburg Way 3 1/2 --- --- Mild stripping C-16 Glasgow Way 4 6 3/4 SM Moderate raveling, mild stripping C-16a Glasgow Way 4 --- --- Debonded, mild stripping, moderate raveling C-19 Glasgow Way 4 1/4 8 1/4 SP-SM Mild stripping DRAFTPage 279 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 8 Location Associated Roadway Bituminous Thickness (inches) Apparent Aggregate Base Thickness (inches) Subgrade Soils Pavement Core Conditions C-19a Glasgow Way 4 1/4 --- --- Moderate stripping and raveling, debonded, 2” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-17 177th Street 3 1/2” bituminous over 6 1/2” rehydrated concrete 11 1/2 SM Good condition, 6 1/2” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-18 178th Street 3 3/4” bituminous over 3 3/4” rehydrated concrete 16 1/2 SP-SM Mild stripping, 3 3/4” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-15 Gerdine Path 3 3/4 5 1/4 SM Moderate raveling C-20 Gerdine Path 4 8 1/4 SP-SM Moderate stripping, debonded C-21 Gerdine Path 4” bituminous over 2” rehydrated concrete 10 3/4 SP Mild stripping, 2” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-21a Gerdine Path 4 --- --- Debonded, severe raveling C-22 Gerdine Path 4 1/4” bituminous over 4” rehydrated concrete 3 3/4 SM Severe stripping, moderate raveling, 4” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer C-23 Harbor Court 3 1/2 4 1/4 SC Moderate stripping C-24 Galle Court 3 1/2 3 SP Good condition, 2” of rehydrated concrete observed below the bituminous layer B.4. Groundwater Groundwater was observed at two of the completed five SPT soil borings (Borings ST-1 and ST-2) at depths of approximately 13 feet below existing grade (approximate elevations of 965 and 959 1/2 feet respectively). Groundwater was not observed in the remaining soil borings or power auger borings performed as part of this project and the static groundwater level is likely below the depths explored at these locations. If the project team identifies a need for more accurate determination of groundwater depth, we can install piezometers and complete a groundwater monitoring program. Project planning should anticipate seasonal and annual fluctuations of groundwater. DRAFTPage 280 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 9 Given the presence of silt and clay laden soils encountered throughout complete soil borings, the project team should anticipate that perched groundwater may be a concern in this area. The project team should anticipate that perched groundwater may be encountered during construction and should have a plan in place to manage any encountered perched groundwater. B.5. Laboratory Test Results Table 4 outlines the results of the laboratory testing program completed on the recovered soil samples within the SPT soil borings and subgrade samples from the pavement core locations. Table 4. Laboratory Test Summary Laboratory Test Range of Results Moisture content (MC) tests, percent (per ASTM D2216) Sandy Soils: 3 to 15 percent moisture Clay Soils: 7 to 26 percent moisture Percent of particles passing the #200 Sieve, percent (per ASTM D1140) 6 to 62 percent particles In addition to the above laboratory testing program, we also completed corrosivity testing with composite subgrade samples obtained from both Borings ST-1 and ST-3 at a depth of approximately 5 to 10 feet below existing grade. The results of these laboratory testing suites, performed by Project X Corrosion Engineers, indicated that the subgrade soils in both borings are considered mildly to highly corrosive according to the National Academy of Corrosion Engineers (NACE). Full results of the laboratory tests are included in the appendix. B.6. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Results GPR was used to approximate pavement layer thicknesses along each of the roadways for this project. The data was collected at a nominal 1-foot interval in both directions of travel. Where “ground truth” (soil boring) data was obtained, the interpreted layers from the GPR scan were compared directly to the measured thicknesses to validate the accuracy of the GPR analysis. Based on our analysis using the RADAN software program, Table 5 provides the interpreted average pavement layer thicknesses and statistical data for the roadways in this project. The graphs in the Appendix show the interpreted layer depth per foot along the roadway. We recommend referring to these graphs to see how thicknesses vary. DRAFTPage 281 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 10 Table 5. Statistics of GPR-Estimated Bituminous Pavement Thicknesses Segment Direction Bituminous Thickness (inches) Avg Std Dev Min1 Max 10th Pctl 175th Street West EB 4.6 0.6 3.0 7.0 3.8 WB 4.2 0.6 2.9 6.6 3.5 177th Street West EB 3.3 0.4 2 4.3 2.9 WB 3.9 0.6 3.0 5.5 3.2 178th Street EB 3.5 0.4 2.7 4.8 3.1 WB 3.6 0.4 2.7 4.7 3.2 Galle Court NB 3.9 0.4 1.4 4.9 3.5 SB 3.6 0.4 2.9 5.0 3.2 Gerdine Path NB 3.8 0.5 2.5 5.9 3.3 SB 4.0 0.6 1.8 6.9 3.4 Gillette Way EB 3.8 0.6 2.5 7.5 3.8 WB 3.7 0.8 2.3 8.2 2.9 Glacier Way EB 4.2 1.0 1.7 11.2 3.4 WB 4.3 1.2 1.7 13.4 3.5 Glasgow Way NB 3.8 0.4 2.8 6.0 3.4 SB 3.8 0.5 2.1 7.5 3.2 Glasgow Avenue NB 4.1 0.4 2.8 5.6 3.6 SB 4.4 0.5 2.9 6.5 3.9 Harbor Court NB 4.2 0.6 3.0 5.7 3.5 SB 4.3 0.6 2.8 6.3 3.6 Hayes Avenue NB 5.6 0.8 3.2 9.2 4.7 SB 5.7 1.0 1.8 11.8 4.6 1. Minimum values can be extreme outliers resulting from noise and other erroneous readings. We recommend using 10th percentile values and consulting the graphics attached to this report. Substantial ambient interference of the GPR signal made it difficult to interpret layer transitions below those of the bituminous layer. As such, a second layer (likely aggregate base) was generally not visible consistently throughout the project alignment. A lack of a visible layer in the GPR scan does not imply an absence of one within the pavement section. Our borings and pavement cores suggested a probable aggregate base layer within the pavement section. DRAFTPage 282 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 11 C. Recommendations C.1. Design and Construction Discussion C.1.a. Overview We understand that a portion of the project roadways (Hayes Avenue/ 170th Street West and Harbor Court) will be rehabilitated using full depth reclamation (FDR) techniques and the remaining project roadways (Glacier Way, Gerdine Path, Glasgow Avenue, Glasgow Way, 178th Street, 177th Street, 175th Street, Galle Court, and Gillette Way) will be rehabilitated using Mill and Overlay techniques. Traffic information used for our analysis is included in Section A.1. C.1.b. Full Depth Reclamation Based on the results of the pavement cores, shallow hand auger borings, SPT soil borings, and ground penetrating radar scans performed along the Hayes Avenue / 170th Street West and Harbor Court, these roadways are generally considered suitable for rehabilitation using FDR techniques. In general, the soil borings and power auger borings performed along Hayes Avenue / 170th Street encountered bituminous pavements ranging from approximately 4 to 8 inches (10th percentile thicknesses of GPR scans observed was 4.6 and 4.7 inches) with apparent aggregate base thicknesses ranging from approximately 4 to 16 inches and total pavement section thicknesses generally ranging from approximately 12 to 16 inches. Power auger borings and GPR scans performed along Harbor Court indicated a bituminous pavement thickness of 3 1/2 inches (10th percentile thicknesses of GPR scans observed was 3.5 and 3.6 inches) with apparent aggregate base thickness of approximately 4 1/4 inches with a total pavement section thickness of approximately 7 3/4 inches. Based on these results, Hayes Avenue / 170th Street appears suitable for rehabilitation via FDR techniques. Harbor Court, however, does not appear suitable due to its relatively thin existing pavement section. We recommend that Harbor court be rehabilitated using shallow mill and overlay techniques. C.1.c. Mill & Overlay Based on the results of our pavement cores, shallow power auger borings, and ground penetrating radar (GPR) scans, the roadways included within the City of Lakeville CP 25-01, as outlined in Section A.1. are generally considered suitable for rehabilitation using mill and overlay techniques. DRAFTPage 283 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 12 The encountered bituminous thicknesses, through both pavement cores and GPR scans, generally averaged between 3 and 4 inches with isolated zones of thicker or thinner bituminous pavement. The project team should anticipate that a mill depth of approximately 2 inches with a 2-inch overlay can be performed across these project areas. It should be noted that mill depths will likely need to be adjusted during milling in areas where debonding was encountered. We do not generally recommend a mill depth deeper than 2 inches unless a full depth mill is being performed or in localized areas where debonding occurred deeper than 2 inches below the existing pavement surface. Cores C-13A, C-16A, and C-19A found at Gilette Way and Glasgow Way had debonding with competent base thicknesses less than 2 inches in thickness and represent more difficult situations for mill and overlay. In general, a majority of the project areas exhibited pavements which were in good to fair condition with mild to moderate stripping, raveling and debonding within the top 1 1/2 inches of existing pavement. A detailed evaluation of pavement surface conditions, which will influence the suitability and service life of the overlay, was outside of the scope of our evaluation. This will be the primary factor influencing the performance of the selected rehabilitation option. The risk and additional cost of repairs with additional milling and/or excavation to reach a suitable surface for overlay placement must also be considered. In general, this will include areas with surface distresses such as fatigue/alligator distress and edge cracks. We recommend further reviewing the condition data from the city’s pavement management system for signs that these types of distresses are prevalent within the project area. C.2. Site Grading and Excavations C.2.a. Overview We understand that the roadways included in this project will be rehabilitated using either FDR or mill and overlay techniques with limited subgrade corrections as needed in areas which exhibit poor subgrade soils. However, we also understand that a portion of Hayes Avenue / 170th Street between ST-1 and ST-3 will also include a full replacement of the existing water utilities and subsequent reconstruction of the roadway above. DRAFTPage 284 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 13 C.2.b. Pavement Subgrade Preparation In areas where new water utilities are being installed and the existing pavement subgrade is disturbed, we recommend the following steps for pavement subgrade preparation. We recommend roadway construction be completed in accordance with MnDOT Specification 2106. 1. Reclaim and stockpile the top 10 inches of pavement section as outlined in Section C.3.a. 2. Remove the exposed unsuitable soils, including organic soils, soft clay soils, from below the proposed pavement grade following installation of the water main utility. Soils used as engineered backfill should be moisture conditioned, placed, and compacted as outlined in Section C.2.g. 3. Have a geotechnical representative observe the excavated subgrade to evaluate if additional subgrade improvements are necessary. Hand auger borings and dynamic cone penetrometer testing should be completed on the exposed subgrade prior to the placement of new engineered fill. 4. Slope subgrade soils to allow the removal of accumulating water. 5. Test roll the exposed subgrade as described in Section C.2.c. Areas that yield or rut in excess of project requirements should be corrected. 6. Test roll the final subgrade, following placement of reclaimed aggregate base material, as described in Section C.2.c. C.2.c. Pavement Subgrade Test Roll After preparing the subgrade as described above and prior to the placement of the aggregate base, we recommend test rolling the subgrade soils with a fully loaded tandem-axle truck. We also recommend having a geotechnical representative observe the test roll. Areas that fail the test roll likely indicate soft or weak soils that will require additional correction work to support pavements. The contractor should correct areas that fail to meet the test roll acceptance criteria. Possible options for subgrade correction include moisture conditioning and recompaction, subcutting and replacement with soil or crushed aggregate, and/or geotextiles. We recommend performing a second test roll after the aggregate base material is in place, and prior to placing bituminous pavement. We recommend performing test rolls in accordance with MnDOT Specification 2111. DRAFTPage 285 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 14 C.2.d. Excavation Oversizing When removing unsuitable materials below pavements for utility installation, we recommend the excavation extend outward and downward at a slope of 1H:1V or flatter. See Figure 2 for an illustration of excavation oversizing. Figure 2. Generalized Illustration of Oversizing C.2.e. Excavated Slopes Based on the borings, we anticipate on-site soils in excavations for utility installations will consist of silt and clay-laden fill soils. These soils are typically considered Type C Soil under OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) guidelines. OSHA guidelines indicate unsupported excavations in Type C soils should have a gradient no steeper than 1 1/2H:1V. Slopes constructed in this manner may still exhibit surface sloughing. OSHA requires an engineer to evaluate slopes or excavations over 20 feet in depth. An OSHA-approved qualified person should review the soil classification in the field. Excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations and Trenches.” This document states excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. The project specifications should reference these OSHA requirements. 1. Engineered pavement core fill as defined in Section C.2.g 2. Excavation oversizing minimum of 1H:1V slope or flatter 3. Backslope to OSHA requirements 4. Outside edge of existing pavement 5. Outside edge of new pavement 6. Unsuitable soils to be removed DRAFTPage 286 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 15 C.2.f. Excavation Dewatering We do not anticipate that static groundwater will be encountered during project excavations. If perched water or accumulated runoff water is encountered, we recommend it is removed from the excavations to facilitate proper backfilling and concrete placement. If needed, project planning should include temporary sumps and pumps for excavations in low-permeability soils, such as clays. C.2.g. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction Table 6 contains our recommendations for engineered fill materials and compaction specifications. Table 6. Recommended Fill and Compaction Specifications* Material Material Specification Compaction Specification New road core fill (<3 feet below Grading Grade of Road Core) Select Grading Material MnDOT 2106.1.B.1 MnDOT 2106.3.G.1 New road core fill (>3 feet below Grading Grade of Road Core) Select Grading Material MnDOT 2106.1.B.1 MnDOT 2106.3.G.1 Below landscaped surfaces, where subsidence is not a concern Non-Structural Grading Material MnDOT 2106.1.B.8 MnDOT 2106.3.G.2 *More select soils comprised of coarse sands with < 5% passing #200 sieve such as MnDOT 3149.2G Fine Filter Aggregate may be needed to accommodate work occurring in periods of wet or freezing weather. In areas of where new engineered fill is placed as pavement subgrade, new engineered fill soils should be consistent with the classification, moisture content, and performance characteristics of the soils with those in the upper 5 feet of the existing road core. We recommend placing engineered fill in accordance with MnDOT Specification 2106. We recommend compacting engineered fill in accordance with the MnDOT specifications listed in Table 6. The project documents should specify relative compaction of engineered fill, based on the structure located above the engineered fill, and vertical proximity to that structure. The project documents should not allow the contractor to use frozen material as engineered fill or to place engineered fill on frozen material. Frost should not penetrate under pavements during construction. We recommend performing density tests in engineered fill to evaluate if the contractors are effectively compacting the soil and meeting project requirements. DRAFTPage 287 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 16 C.3. Pavements C.3.a. Rehabilitation via Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Based on the results of our completed soil borings and GPR scans, we anticipate the existing Hayes Avenue / 170th Street generally consists of approximately 4 to 8 inches of bituminous pavement over an aggregate base layer with a thickness of approximately 4 to 16 inches (total pavement thicknesses ranging from approximately 12 to 16 inches). In our opinion, the GPR data representing the 10th percentile of values will provide a general representation of the existing pavement section. For reference, the 10th percentile of the recorded GPR data provides a bituminous thickness of approximately 4 1/2 inches. In our opinion, a reclamation with a depth of 10 inches can generally be used along Hayes Avenue / 170th Street. Based on the pavement measurements from the completed soil borings and power auger borings, these reclamation depths will generally avoid subgrade soils through much of Hayes Avenue / 170th Street. In areas where subgrade may be penetrated due to an isolated area of thin aggregate base, the reclamation depth may need to be adjusted. Variation of existing pavement depth should be anticipated across the alignment, which will require adjustment of the reclaim depth. We recommend implementing through quality control practices, including frequent sieve analyses, to achieve a desirable gradation of the reclaimed material. The gradation requirements of MnDOT Specification 2215 (Reclamation) or Specification 3138 (Aggregate for Surface and Base Courses) can be used for the aggregate base; the latter specification’s controls on gradation and asphalt content are stricter and will generally be more difficult to meet. We suggest that the contractor assume some contingency for importing clean, crushed rock that can be blended with the reclaimed material to improve the uniformity of the resulting gradation prior to reuse as an aggregate base. Minor soil corrections may be needed in areas where subgrade instabilities are exhibited during the test roll prior to the placement of bituminous. As previously outlined, the thinner total pavement sections found at Harbor Court make that roadway less desirable for FDR. C.3.b. Rehabilitation via Mill and Overlay A detailed visual assessment of the pavement surface condition was not included in the scope of this evaluation. However, based on the completed pavement cores and power auger borings performed along the roadways as outlined in Section A.1, it appears the cores were generally in fair to moderate condition DRAFTPage 288 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 17 with some stripping raveling and debonding. We recommend an experienced engineer walk the milled surface to delineate areas for these repairs based on conditions exposed by the milling process. As typical for an overlay, reflective cracking will occur quickly, and crack sealing and other maintenance will be necessary. We recommend a mill thickness of 2 inches, with the replacement mix meeting SPWEA340C. We do not recommend that the mill thickness select for the project exceed 2 inches, as there are specific areas where the existing pavement has more significant stripping or a generally thinner bituminous section where the entire bituminous section may be milled (namely along portions of Glacier Way and Gillette Way). The mill and overlay should proceed in general accordance with MnDOT Specifications 2232 and 2360. The surface condition prior to milling can also indicate where repairs may be necessary. This includes distresses such as severe longitudinal and transverse cracking, alligator/fatigue cracking of any severity, potholes, and other similar failures. MnDOT defines these distresses in their surface rating procedure as follows: High-severity transverse cracking: Any crack running transverse to the centerline of the roadway with significant adjacent random cracking (12 inches or more apart), have large areas of spalling, missing material, and/or potholes. High-severity longitudinal cracking: Any crack running parallel to the centerline of the roadway with significant adjacent random cracking (12 inches or more apart), large areas of spalling, missing material, and/or potholes. Alligator cracking: A series of interconnected cracks forming many-sided, sharp-angled pieces, 6 inches or less in size typically located in the wheel paths or where traffic loads are concentrated. C.3.c. Design Sections Our scope of services for this project did not include laboratory tests on subgrade soils along Hayes Avenue / 170th Street to determine an R-value for pavement design. Based on our experience with similar soils anticipated at the pavement subgrade elevation, we recommend pavement design assume an R-value of 15. Note the contractor may need to perform limited removal of unsuitable or less suitable soils to achieve these values. Table 7 provides minimum recommended pavement sections, based on the soils support and traffic loads, for the bituminous pavement section with reclaimed aggregate base. It should be noted that we used historical AADT counts and the State Aid 10-Ton ESAL Traffic Forecast DRAFTPage 289 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 18 Calculator to provide an ESAL forecast of 582,000 for Hayes Avenue / 170th Street. This assumes a growth of 4.4 percent with a truck traffic volume of 4 percent. Table 7. Recommended Bituminous Pavement Section – Reclaimed Pavement Material Thickness (inches) Designation Specification Bituminous 4 SPWEA340C 2360 FDR* 6 Class 5 or 6, modified aggregate base 3138 or 2215 Existing aggregate base 2+ --- --- *Thickness of FDR material will vary based on reclamation depth C.3.d. Subgrade Drainage Based on the possible presence of perched groundwater conditions, subgrade drainage will be vital for a high performing pavement. In areas where the pavement is being removed, we recommend installing perforated drainpipes throughout pavement areas at low points, around catch basins, and behind curb. In areas where saturated subgrade soils are encountered during excavations or anticipated based on the results of the test roll, we recommend that additional drain tile may be installed to manage perched groundwater in these areas. C.3.e. Performance and Maintenance We based the pavement design in Section C.3.c. on a 20-year performance life for pavements. This is the amount of time before we anticipate the pavement will require major rehabilitation. This performance life assumes routine maintenance, such as seal coating and crack sealing. The actual pavement life will vary depending on variations in weather, traffic conditions and maintenance. It is common to place the non-wear course of bituminous and then delay placement of wear course. For this situation, we recommend evaluating if the reduced pavement section will have sufficient structure to support construction traffic. Many conditions affect the overall performance of the pavements. Some of these conditions include the environment, loading conditions and the level of ongoing maintenance. With regard to bituminous pavements in particular, it is common to have thermal cracking develop within the first few years of placement and continue throughout the life of the pavement. We recommend developing a regular maintenance plan for filling cracks in exterior slabs and pavements to lessen the potential impacts for cold weather distress due to frost heave or warm weather distress due to wetting and softening of the subgrade. DRAFTPage 290 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 19 C.4. Utilities C.4.a. Subgrade Stabilization For watermain construction, we anticipate the soils at typical invert elevations will be suitable for utility support. However, if construction encounters unfavorable conditions such as soft clay, organic soils, or perched water at invert grades, the unsuitable soils may require some additional subcutting and replacement with rushed rock to prepare a proper subgrade for pipe support. Project design and construction should not place utilities within the 1H:1V oversizing of foundations. C.4.b. Utility Backfill We recommend utility trench backfill adhere to the recommendations of Section C.2.g. depending on what overlies the trench. The contractor should anticipate that moisture conditioning of the clays as well as separation of any zones of unsuitable or organic soils will be needed prior to replacement of backfill in utility trenches. We note that moisture conditioning and compaction of clays can be difficult in confined areas such as utility trenches. C.4.c. Dewatering If perched groundwater conditions are encountered during excavations for utility installation, we recommend the contractor remove any water that collects in work areas before performing further work. We recommend project planning anticipate temporary excavation dewatering during construction. Project planning should include temporary sumps and pumps for excavations in low-permeability soils, such as clays. Should static groundwater be encountered, we recommend keeping the groundwater level a minimum of 2 feet below the bottom of excavation to help facilitate a more stable working platform. C.4.d. Corrosion Potential As part of our geotechnical analysis, we performed corrosion testing on two select soil samples recovered during drilling operations along Hayes Avenue / 170th Street. The results of the corrosivity testing are presented in the Appendix. Based on the Corrosion Severity Ratings outlined by the National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE), the above results indicate that the on-site clay soils generally range from Mildy Corrosive to Highly Corrosive in their current state. We recommend that metallic conduits and similar metallic structures will need to be protected from corrosion. It should be noted that these test results as outlined in the Appendix are representative of the soil at the specific sample location and may not be representative of other soils at different locations across the site. The corrosivity of the on-site soils at different depths and locations throughout the project site will vary. DRAFTPage 291 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 20 D. Procedures D.1. Penetration Test Borings We drilled the penetration test borings with a truck-mounted core and auger drill equipped with hollow- stem auger. We performed the borings in general accordance with ASTM D6151 taking penetration test samples at 2 1/2- or 5-foot intervals in general accordance to ASTM D1586. The boring logs show the actual sample intervals and corresponding depths. We also collected bulk samples of auger cuttings at selected locations for laboratory testing. We sealed penetration test boreholes in general accordance with MDH procedures. D.2. Ground Penetrating Radar D.2.a. GPR Data Collection GPR data was collected in August of 2024. GPR collection occurred at posted speed limits and data was recorded continuously along each street (scan interval of 1-foot), in both directions of travel except for cul-de-sac sections. A calibration file, required for data post-processing, was collected at the onset of testing. D.2.b. GPR Analysis Data collected by the GPR unit was returned to our office and analyzed to estimate the pavement thickness using RADAN 7.0, a software package included with the GSSI RoadScan system. The software includes tools to delineate pavement layer transitions with thickness estimates based on measured signal time and amplitude. Where “ground-truth” data (ores) were performed, the interpreted layers from the GPR scan were compared directly to the measured thicknesses from the borings to validate the accuracy of the GPR analysis, with adjustments if necessary to improve accuracy or data clarity. D.3. Power Auger Borings We obtained core samples of the pavement using a portable coring machine advancing a 4-inch diameter core barrel. Immediately after completing the coring, we repaired the bituminous pavement with a coldmix bituminous patch. We measured the cores to obtain approximate bituminous thickness and noted their material conditions based on visual observation. The Appendix includes images of the cores. DRAFTPage 292 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 21 We performed the power auger borings using a truck mounted auger. We inferred the soil classifications and strata depths from the cuttings brought to the surface by dead pulling the auger after screwing it to selected depths in the ground. At desired depths, we placed auger cuttings in bags and jars. D.4. Exploration Logs D.4.a. Log of Boring Sheets The Appendix includes Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings. The logs identify and describe the penetrated geologic materials, and present the results of penetration resistance and other in-situ tests performed. The logs also present the results of laboratory tests performed on penetration test samples and groundwater measurements. We inferred strata boundaries from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings. Because we did not perform continuous sampling, the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The boundary depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may occur as gradual rather than abrupt transitions. D.4.b. Geologic Origins We assigned geologic origins to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report, based on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface exploration, (3) penetration resistance and other in-situ testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results, and (5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the site and surrounding area in the past. D.5. Material Classification and Testing D.5.a. Visual and Manual Classification We visually and manually classified the geologic materials encountered based on ASTM D2488. When we performed laboratory classification tests, we used the results to classify the geologic materials in accordance with ASTM D2487. The Appendix includes a chart explaining the classification system we used. D.5.b. Laboratory Testing The exploration logs in the Appendix note the results of the laboratory tests performed on geologic material samples. We performed the tests in general accordance with ASTM or AASHTO procedures. DRAFTPage 293 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 22 D.5.c. Groundwater Measurements The drillers checked for groundwater after auger withdrawal. We then filled the boreholes as noted on the boring logs. E. Qualifications E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions E.1.a. Material Strata We developed our evaluation, analyses, and recommendations from a limited amount of site and subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from exploration locations continuously with depth. Therefore, we must infer strata boundaries and thicknesses to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and project planning should expect the strata to vary in depth, elevation, and thickness, away from the exploration locations. Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until performing additional exploration work, or starting construction. If future activity for this project reveals any such variations, you should notify us so that we may reevaluate our recommendations. Such variations could increase construction costs, and we recommend including a contingency to accommodate them. E.1.b. Groundwater Levels We made groundwater measurements under the conditions reported herein and shown on the exploration logs, and interpreted in the text of this report. Note that the observation periods were relatively short, and project planning can expect groundwater levels to fluctuate in response to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications and other seasonal and annual factors. E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility E.2.a. Plan Review We based this report on a limited amount of information, and we made a number of assumptions to help us develop our recommendations. We should be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the DRAFTPage 294 of 452 City of Lakeville Project B2407625 October 10, 2024 Page 23 designs and specifications. This review will allow us to evaluate whether we anticipated the design correctly, if any design changes affect the validity of our recommendations, and if the design and specifications correctly interpret and implement our recommendations. E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing We recommend retaining us to perform the required observations and testing during construction as part of the ongoing geotechnical evaluation. This will allow us to correlate the subsurface conditions exposed during construction with those encountered by the borings and provide professional continuity from the design phase to the construction phase. If we do not perform observations and testing during construction, it becomes the responsibility of others to validate the assumption made during the preparation of this report and to accept the construction-related geotechnical engineer-of-record responsibilities. E.3. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of the addressed parties. Without written approval, we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties or projects. E.4. Standard of Care In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. DRAFTPage 295 of 452 Appendix DRAFTPage 296 of 452 ST-2 C-3 C-3A C-2 C-1 C-1A ST-5 ST-4 ST-3 C-4 ST-1 C-7 C-5 C-6 C-23 F:\2024\B2407625\CAD\B2407625.dwg,1,9/11/2024 10:46:49 AMbraunintertec.com 952.995.2000 Minneapolis, MN 55438 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Project No: B2407625 Drawn By: Date Drawn: Checked By: Last Modified: 9/11/24 Drawing No: Project Information Drawing Information Sheet: of Fig: B2407625 BJB 8/20/24 RSJ Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville - 25-02 Street Reconstruction Lakeville, Minnesota Soil Boring and Pavement Core Location Sketch 1 2 NDENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING 0 SCALE:1" = 400' 400'200' DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PAVEMENT CORE DRAFTPage 297 of 452 C-7 C-5 C-6 C-8 C-9 C-10 C-12 C-11 C-11A C-19 C-19A C-18 C-17 C-16 C-16A C-14AC-14 C-13A C-13 C-15 C-20 C-21A C-21 C-22 C-24 F:\2024\B2407625\CAD\B2407625.dwg,2,9/11/2024 10:46:50 AMbraunintertec.com 952.995.2000 Minneapolis, MN 55438 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Project No: B2407625 Drawn By: Date Drawn: Checked By: Last Modified: 9/11/24 Drawing No: Project Information Drawing Information Sheet: of Fig: B2407625 BJB 8/20/24 RSJ Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville - 25-02 Street Reconstruction Lakeville, Minnesota Soil Boring and Pavement Core Location Sketch 2 2 NDENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING 0 SCALE:1" = 400' 400'200' DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PAVEMENT CORE DRAFTPage 298 of 452 Elev./ Depth ft 976.4 1.3 975.7 2.0 973.7 4.0 969.7 8.0 966.7 11.0 963.7 14.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) ASPHALT, 7 inches of bituminous over 9 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium- grained, trace Gravel, dark brown, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, brown, moist FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, contains seams of Silty Sand, brown, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, slightly organic, black to dark gray, moist SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), contains seams of Silty Sand, gray, moist to wet, stiff to hard (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery AU 16" 4-10-8-7 (18) 14" 4-5-6-8 (11) 18" 9-9-13-11 (22) 18" 10-10-9-9 (19) 18" 5-4-5-6 (9) 22" 11-14-18-11 (32) 10" qₚ tsf MC % 7 17 15 26 Tests or Remarks P200=26% OC=3% Water observed at 13.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2407625 Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville -25-02 Street Reconstruction Minnesota BORING:ST-1 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:184388.8 EASTING:525164.7 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:09/04/24 END DATE:09/04/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:977.7 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear B2407625 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:09/11/2024 ST-1 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 299 of 452 Elev./ Depth ft 971.3 1.0 969.3 3.0 966.3 6.0 964.3 8.0 962.3 10.0 960.3 12.0 958.3 14.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) ASPHALT, 6 1/2 inches of bituminous over 6 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, light brown, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, brown, moist FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, blue to brown, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND with GRAVEL (SC), brown, moist SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, contains seams of Silt, reddish brown to light brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL TILL) SILTY SAND (SM), fine to coarse-grained, trace Gravel, CLAY layers, brown, wet, loose (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery 7-10-12-7 (22) 16" 8-11-7-6 (18) 14" 4-11-14-12 (25) 16" 8-8-6-7 (14) 18" 3-5-6-10 (11) 6" 4-8-12-10 (20) 10" 2-3-4-4 (7) 22" qₚ tsf MC % 9 11 Tests or Remarks Water observed at 13.0 feet while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2407625 Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville -25-02 Street Reconstruction Minnesota BORING:ST-2 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:184474.1 EASTING:523820.8 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:09/04/24 END DATE:09/04/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:972.3 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear B2407625 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:09/11/2024 ST-2 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 300 of 452 Elev./ Depth ft 987.7 1.3 979.1 10.0 975.1 14.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) ASPHALT, 8 inches of bituminous over 8 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, brown, moist SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, dark gray, moist, very stiff to hard (GLACIAL TILL) END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery AU 6" 2-2-4-5 (6) 16" 3-4-6-5 (10) 18" 7-9-9-10 (18) 24" 3-5-7-11 (12) 24" 3-7-10-14 (17) 24" 14-17-18-14 (35) 24" qₚ tsf MC % 16 14 Tests or Remarks P200=62% Water not observed while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2407625 Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville -25-02 Street Reconstruction Minnesota BORING:ST-3 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:184406.1 EASTING:522694.3 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:09/04/24 END DATE:09/04/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:989.1 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear B2407625 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:09/11/2024 ST-3 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 301 of 452 Elev./ Depth ft 1007.0 1.2 1006.2 2.0 1004.2 4.0 1002.2 6.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) ASPHALT, 6 1/2 inches of bituminous over 7 1/2 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, dark brown to brown, moist FILL: CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace Gravel, hydrocarbon like odor, light brown, moist FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium- grained, trace Gravel, light brown, moist END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery AU 12" 2-3-4-7 (7) 23" 3-6-9-10 (15) 24" qₚ tsf MC % 15 Tests or Remarks Water not observed while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2407625 Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville -25-02 Street Reconstruction Minnesota BORING:ST-4 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:183287.4 EASTING:521990.1 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:09/04/24 END DATE:09/04/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:1008.2 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear B2407625 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:09/11/2024 ST-4 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 302 of 452 Elev./ Depth ft 1029.1 1.1 1024.2 6.0 WaterLevelDescription of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) ASPHALT, 9 inches of bituminous over 4 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace Gravel, dark brown, moist END OF BORING Boring then backfilled with auger cuttings 5 10 15 20 25 30 SampleBlows (N-Value) Recovery AU 6" 2-4-7-9 (11) 22" 6-6-6-10 (12) 24" qₚ tsf MC % 12 Tests or Remarks P200=62% Water not observed while drilling. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2407625 Geotechnical Evaluation City of Lakeville -25-02 Street Reconstruction Minnesota BORING:ST-5 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Dakota (US Feet) NORTHING:182219.4 EASTING:522003.4 DRILLER:C. McClain LOGGED BY:R. Jett START DATE:09/04/24 END DATE:09/04/24 SURFACE ELEVATION:1030.2 ft RIG:7514 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Bituminous WEATHER:Clear B2407625 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:09/11/2024 ST-5 page 1 of 1DRAFT Page 303 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-1 DRAFTPage 304 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-1A DRAFTPage 305 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-2 DRAFTPage 306 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-3 DRAFTPage 307 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-3A DRAFTPage 308 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-4 DRAFTPage 309 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-5 DRAFTPage 310 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-6 DRAFTPage 311 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-7 DRAFTPage 312 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-8 DRAFTPage 313 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-9 DRAFTPage 314 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-10 DRAFTPage 315 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-11 DRAFTPage 316 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-11A DRAFTPage 317 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-12 DRAFTPage 318 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-13 DRAFTPage 319 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-13A DRAFTPage 320 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-14 DRAFTPage 321 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-14A DRAFTPage 322 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-15 DRAFTPage 323 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-16 DRAFTPage 324 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-16A DRAFTPage 325 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-17 DRAFTPage 326 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-18 DRAFTPage 327 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-19 DRAFTPage 328 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-19A DRAFTPage 329 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-20 DRAFTPage 330 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-21 DRAFTPage 331 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-21A DRAFTPage 332 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-22 DRAFTPage 333 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-23 DRAFTPage 334 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 B2407625 Core Photo Log 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 952.995.2000 Braunintertec.com C-24 DRAFTPage 335 of 452 Project X REPORT S240909C Corrosion Engineering Page 1 Corrosion Control – Soil, Water, Metallurgy Testing Lab 29990 Technology Dr, Suite 13, Murrieta, CA 92563 Tel: 213-928-7213 Fax: 951-226-1720 www.projectxcorrosion.com Results Only Soil Testing for City Of Lakeville 25-02 September 10, 2024 Prepared for: Richard Jett Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 rjett@braunintertec.com Project X Job#: S240909C Client Job or PO#: B2407625 Prepared by: D. Bobrova Respectfully Submitted, Eduardo Hernandez, M.Sc., P.E. Sr. Corrosion Consultant NACE Corrosion Technologist #16592 Professional Engineer California No. M37102 ehernandez@projectxcorrosion.com DRAFTPage 336 of 452 Project X REPORT S240909C Corrosion Engineering Page 2 Corrosion Control – Soil, Water, Metallurgy Testing Lab 29990 Technology Dr., Suite 13, Murrieta, CA 92563 Tel: 213-928-7213 Fax: 951-226-1720 www.projectxcorrosion.com Soil Analysis Lab Results Client: Braun Intertec Corporation Job Name: City Of Lakeville 25-02 Client Job Number: B2407625 Project X Job Number: S240909C September 10, 2024 Method ASTM G51 ASTM G200 SM 4500-D ASTM D4327 ASTM D6919 ASTM D6919 ASTM D6919 ASTM D6919 ASTM D6919 ASTM D6919 ASTM D4327 ASTM D4327 Bore# / Description Depth pH Redox Sulfide S2- Nitrate NO3 - Ammonium NH4 + Lithium Li+ Sodium Na+ Potassium K+ Magnesium Mg2+ Calcium Ca2+ Fluoride F2 2- Phosphate PO4 3- (ft)(mg/kg) (wt%) (mg/kg) (wt%)(Ω-cm) (Ω-cm)(mV) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) ST-1 5-10 43.5 0.0043 30.3 0.0030 14,740 2,613 7.3 119 0.7 1.4 5.5 ND 50.4 2.6 18.6 56.8 7.7 1.7 ST-3 5-10 24.6 0.0025 153.5 0.0153 1,943 871 6.9 123 ND 0.8 7.1 ND 46.3 4.9 19.6 66.6 5.3 2.8 ASTM G187 ASTM D4327 ASTM D4327 Resistivity As Rec'd | Minimum Sulfates SO4 2- Chlorides Cl- Cations and Anions, except Sulfide and Bicarbonate, tested with Ion Chromatography mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram (parts per million) of dry soil weight ND = 0 = Not Detected | NT = Not Tested | Unk = Unknown Chemical Analysis performed on 1:3 Soil-To-Water extract PPM = mg/kg (soil) = mg/L (Liquid) Note: Sometimes a bad sulfate hit is a contaminated spot. Typical fertilizers are Potassium chloride, ammonium sulfate or ammonium sulfate nitrate (ASN). So this is another reason why testing full corrosion series is good because we then have the data to see if those other ingredients are present meaning the soil sample is just fertilizer- contaminated soil. This can happen often when the soil samples collected are simply surface scoops. This is why it's best to dig in a foot, throw away the top and test the deeper stuff. Dairy farms are also notorious for these items. If one sample pops up much more corrosive than all others, we would recommend collecting more samples surrounding the problem sample location to determine if the peak is isolated to it. This allows us to conclude it was a contaminated sample and able to declare it an outlier. Try out our new online forms: SOIL CORROSIVITY & THERMAL RESISTIVITY LAB REQUEST FORM & IN-SITU WENNER 4 PIN QUOTE REQUEST FORM DRAFTPage 337 of 452 Proj ect X^A ^Corrosion linginoering Lai)Rcqiii'sl Shct'J Chain of Custody Phone:(213) ‘)28-7213 I'a);(951)22(>-l 720 ●w\vw.|)tojectxco rrosi(>ii.coni Ship Samples To:29990 Technology Dr, Suite 13,Murrieta,CA 92563 C 2 PiJ I.MI’OIM ANT;I’Icuse complete Project and Sample Identification Data as yon would like it to appear in report &include (his form witii samples. I’rojeci X Job Niimbor ?>Z/jo-^QZS~gCAuA/-H*J H A-l6r+<rC_Compuu)Nuniv:Cimmcl Numr:AscVx T-d-yt I'bojie No;U.A ] \do \v-)(MMp>sU A^C S,/v\\AA^c<pc]\b,AAV ~M <S-to/~g<uAMuiliii)!Address:^CiiiOuet Kiiiail:\r< I 'RNcK -X-gAAAccounlingC'oiilacC III)oii'c Kiiuil: C'lii'ti*I’l oji'i l No:Proji'cl Name:Cvt>'Cy-f vvllg.ZS-07- 3 Day Guarantee nLTfk-up 24 Hour RUSK 10Q%mafk-iin 3-5 Day Standard METHOD ANALYSIS REQUESTED (Please circle)I’.o.#: ii(Business Days)l urn Around Time:t aii36 .S!"●●e.Q.££E UsForCorrosionControlRecommcMidations(35l)g soil sani[)le): .NKKD (1)Groundwater depth and (2)Soil Sanijile Locations Map C Iitnn7??●-i I 7T-C ;'n< '3 KzDefault Method 57 I'i i 557,2||=I-25577'5 2 ■?2222■?2<I I52rsFORTHERM.AL RESISTIVITY PROVIDK (L500tr soil sample): (1)Optimal Moisture %I (2)Dry DensityjPCF} (3)Desired Compaction Dale &Received Bv: Full Corrosion Series Reports His,5 IGeoQuad u —c <=.■2 =X>.3>■5I55sga:25 -p=c Ot3 a;e- — =c 3i =oa.5 3 £=O <i.rIUE3~0 23:’C3O§X 3-3 7 s z3O g23 -=3O X.3 £DATK COl.I.KnKI)'I ISAMPLEID-BORE #-Description o oc aiu.3DEPTH(ft)3 f o^ 2u:Cd X,00OCl. 'y).y c-h-Xc. ^13/Xssr-tI )o^$T-3 3 4 5 (. 7 ') ID I I 12 U 14 15 DRAFTPage 338 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-01 175th Street West Glasgow Avenue Glacier Way Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: 175th Street West - Glasgow Avenue to Glacier Way From To B2407618 Location Project No. Roadway C-12 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 175th Street West (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 175th Street West (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 175th Street West (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 175th Street West (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 175th Street West (EB)DRAFTPage 339 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-01 177th Street Glacier Way Glasgow Way Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: 177th Street - Glacier Way to Glasgow Way From To B2407618 Location Project No. Roadway C-17 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 177th Street (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 177th Street (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 177th Street (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 177th Street (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)177th Street (EB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 340 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-01 178th Street Glacier Way Glasgow Way Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: 178th Street - Glacier Way to Glasgow Way From To B2407618 Location Project No. Roadway C-18 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 178th Street (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 178th Street (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 178th Street (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) 178th Street (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 178th Street (EB)DRAFTPage 341 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-01 Galle Court Gerdine Path Cul-De-Sac Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Galle Court - Gerdine Path to Cul-De-Sac From To B2407618 Location Project No. Roadway C-24 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Galle Court (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Galle Court (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Galle Court (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Galle Court (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)Galle Court (NB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 342 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-01 Gerdine Path 179th Street West Dodd Boulevard Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Gerdine Path - 179th Street West to Dodd Boulevard From To B2407618 Location Project No. Roadway C-22 C-21 C-20 C-150 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gerdine Path (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gerdine Path (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gerdine Path (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gerdine Path (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)Gerdine Path (NB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 343 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 Gillette Way NB 175th Street SB 175th Street Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Gillette Way - NB 175th Street to SB 175th Street From To B2407625 Location Project No. Roadway C-13 C-140 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gillette Way (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gillette Way (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gillette Way (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Gillette Way (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)Gillette Way (EB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 344 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 Glacier Way 175th Street West 179th Street West Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Glacier Way - 175th Street West to 179th Street West From To B2407625 Location Project No. Roadway C-6 C-5 C-7 C-8 C-90 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glacier Way (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glacier Way (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger C-100 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glacier Way (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glacier Way (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)Glacier Way (EB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 345 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 Glasgow Way Glasgow Avenue Glacier Way Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Glasgow Way - Glasgow Avenue to Glacier Way From To B2407625 Location Project No. Roadway C-16 C-190 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Way (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Way (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Way (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Way (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)Glasgow Way (NB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 346 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 Glasgow Avenue Dodd Boulevard Glacier Way Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Glasgow Avenue - Dodd Boulevard to Glacier Way From To B2407625 Location Project No. Roadway C-11 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Avenue (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Avenue (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Avenue (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Glasgow Avenue (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 Depth (in.)Glasgow Avenue (NB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 347 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 Harbor Court 170th Street South Cul-De-Sac Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Harbor Court - 170th Street South to Cul-De-Sac From To B2407625 Location Project No. Roadway C-23 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Harbor Court (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Harbor Court (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Harbor Court (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Harbor Court (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Harbor Court (NB)DRAFTPage 348 of 452 City of Lakeville 25-02 Hayes Avenue 175th Street West Cedar Avenue Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Hayes Avenue - 175th Street West to Cedar Avenue From To B2407625 Location Project No. Roadway C-1 C-2 C-3ST-5 ST-4 ST-3 ST-20 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Hayes Avenue (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring) 0 10 20 30 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Hayes Avenue (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring) C-4 ST-10 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Hayes Avenue (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring) 7 0 10 20 30 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500 7,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Hayes Avenue (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring) 0 Depth (in.)Hayes Avenue (NB)DRAFTDRAFTPage 349 of 452 Descriptive Terminology of Soil Based on Standards ASTM D2487/2488 (Unified Soil Classification System) Group Symbol Group NameB Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D GW Well‐graded gravelE Cu < 4 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D GP Poorly graded gravelE Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravelE F G Fines Classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelE F G Cu ≥ 6 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D SW Well‐graded sandI Cu < 6 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D SP Poorly graded sandI Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sandF G I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sandF G I CL Lean clayK L M PI < 4 or plots below "A" lineJ ML SiltK L M Organic OL CH Fat clayK L M MH Elastic siltK L M Organic OH PT Peat Highly Organic Soils Silts and Clays (Liquid limit less than 50) Silts and Clays (Liquid limit 50 or more) Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor Inorganic Inorganic PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" lineJ PI plots on or above "A" line PI plots below "A" line Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory TestsA Soil Classification Coarse‐grained Soils (more than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve)Fine‐grained Soils (50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve) Sands (50% or more coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve) Clean Gravels (Less than 5% finesC) Gravels with Fines (More than 12% finesC) Clean Sands (Less than 5% finesH) Sands with Fines (More than 12% finesH) Gravels (More than 50% of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve) Liquid Limit − oven dried Liquid Limit − not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M N Organic silt K L M O Liquid Limit − oven dried Liquid Limit − not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M P Organic silt K L M Q ParticleSize Identification Boulders.............. over 12" Cobbles................ 3" to 12" Gravel Coarse............. 3/4" to 3" (19.00 mm to 75.00 mm) Fine................. No. 4 to 3/4" (4.75 mm to 19.00 mm) Sand Coarse.............. No. 10 to No. 4 (2.00 mm to 4.75 mm) Medium........... No. 40 to No. 10 (0.425 mm to 2.00 mm) Fine.................. No. 200 to No. 40 (0.075 mm to 0.425 mm) Silt........................ No. 200 (0.075 mm) to .005 mm Clay...................... < .005 mm Relative ProportionsL, M trace............................. 0 to 5% little.............................. 6 to 14% with.............................. ≥ 15% Inclusion Thicknesses lens............................... 0 to 1/8" seam............................. 1/8" to 1" layer.............................. over 1" Apparent Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils Very loose ..................... 0 to 4 BPF Loose ............................ 5 to 10 BPF Medium dense.............. 11 to 30 BPF Dense............................ 31 to 50 BPF Very dense.................... over 50 BPF A. Based on the material passing the 3‐inch (75‐mm) sieve. B. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders, or both" to group name. C. Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW‐GM well‐graded gravel with silt GW‐GC well‐graded gravel with clay GP‐GM poorly graded gravel with silt GP‐GC poorly graded gravel with clay D. Cu = D60 / D10 Cc = 𝐷30 2 / ሺ𝐷10 𝑥 𝐷60) E. If soil contains ≥ 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name. F. If fines classify as CL‐ML, use dual symbol GC‐GM or SC‐SM. G. If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name. H. Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW‐SM well‐graded sand with silt SW‐SC well‐graded sand with clay SP‐SM poorly graded sand with silt SP‐SC poorly graded sand with clay I. If soil contains ≥ 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name. J. If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soil is CL‐ML, silty clay. K. If soil contains 15 to < 30% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel", whichever is predominant. L. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name. M. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name. N. PI ≥ 4 and plots on or above “A” line. O. PI < 4 or plots below “A” line. P. PI plots on or above “A” line. Q. PI plots below “A” line. Laboratory Tests DD Dry density,pcf qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf WD Wet density, pcf qU Unconfined compression test, tsf P200 % Passing #200 sieve LL Liquid limit MC Moisture content, %PL Plastic limit OC Organic content, %PI Plasticity index Consistency of Blows Approximate Unconfined Cohesive Soils Per Foot Compressive Strength Very soft................... 0 to 1 BPF................... < 0.25 tsf Soft........................... 2 to 4 BPF................... 0.25 to 0.5 tsf Medium.................... 5to 8 BPF .................. 0.5 to 1 tsf Stiff........................... 9 to 15 BPF................. 1 to 2 tsf Very Stiff................... 16 to 30 BPF............... 2 to 4 tsf Hard.......................... over 30 BPF................ > 4 tsf Drilling Notes: Blows/N‐value: Blows indicatethe driving resistance recorded for each 6‐inch interval. The reported N‐value is the blows per foot recorded by summing the second and third interval in accordance with the Standard Penetration Test, ASTM D1586. PartialPenetration:If the sampler could not be driven through a full 6‐inch interval, the number of blows for that partial penetration is shown as #/x" (i.e. 50/2"). The N‐value is reported as "REF" indicating refusal. Recovery: Indicates the inches of sample recovered from the sampled interval. For a standard penetration test, full recovery is 18", and is 24" for a thinwall/shelby tube sample. WOH: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammer and rods alone; driving not required. WOR: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods alone; hammer weight and driving not required. Water Level: Indicates the water level measured by the drillers either while drilling ( ), at the end of drilling ( ), or at some time after drilling ( ). Moisture Content: Dry:Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch. Moist: Damp but no visible water. Wet: Visible free water, usually soil is below water table. 5/2021 DRAFTPage 350 of 452 Project Financing Funding for the project was programmed in the 2025-2029 CIP. The following is a breakdown of the anticipated costs. ▪ The City’s cost-share for roadway and storm sewer improvements, including storm sewer repair/replacement, will be financed from the issuance of G.O. Improvement Bonds. The City’s share of debt will be financed with taxes, which are repaid with property tax levies. ▪Public watermain improvements, including full replacement or lining and the installation of corrosion protection best management practices, will be financed from the Water Operating Fund. ▪Public sanitary sewer improvements, including infrastructure repair/replacement and inflow and infiltration best management practices, will be financed from the Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund. ▪Public stormwater management improvements, including upsizing of current stormwater pipes and new stormwater infrastructure installation, will be financed from the Stormwater Infrastructure Fund. Anticipated Funding Sources Amount G.O. Improvement Bonds – Taxes (Reclamation)1,378,026 G.O. Improvement Bonds – Sp. Assessments (Reclamation)593,123 G.O. Improvement Bonds – Taxes (Mill & Overlay)1,955,988 Water Operating Fund (Combined)2,079,038 Sanitary Sewer Operating Fund (Combined)88,076 Stormwater Infrastructure Fund (Combined)260,095 $6,354,346 The adopted Lakeville 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (2025-2029) programs an estimated total project cost of $5,400,000. The Opinion of Probable Cost Summary provided in the feasibility study & engineering report shows a slightly higher amount including contingency and indirect costs. This will be monitored closely throughout design and bidding. If required, further scope and project reductions will be made to address budget gaps and keep in line with the adopted 2025 budgeted CIP amounts for the project. Page 351 of 452 Date: 10/21/2024 Lakeville 35 Logistics Park North Addition preliminary plat and CUP Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion:Move to approve: 1) a resolution approving the preliminary plat of Lakeville 35 Logistics Park North Addition, and 2) approval of a conditional use permit to permit a warehouse building in the O-P, Office Park District, and adopt the findings of fact. Overview Representatives of LPDC, LLC have submitted applications for a preliminary plat to be known as Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North Addition for the proposed development of 16 acres of a 39-acre property for the development of a 189,678 square foot industrial office/warehouse building to be located north of Juniper Way (CSAH 70)/215th Street and south of 210th Street. A conditional use permit is proposed to allow the warehouse building as required in the OP, Office Park District. The preliminary plat includes one lot and one outlot. The preliminary plat has been amended to clarify right-of-way dedication for Juniper Way (CSAH 70). The landscape plan has been revised addressing stipulation number 5 of the planning report. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and conditional use permit at its October 3, 2024 meeting. There was no public comment at the public hearing. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval. Supporting Information 1. Preliminary Plat Resolution 2. Conditional Use Permit and findings of fact 3. Revised Preliminary Plat, Grading, and Landscape Plans 4. October 3, 2024 Draft Planning Commission Minutes 5. September 27, 2024 Planning Report 6. Exhibits A-B - Location and Zoning Maps 7. Exhibits C-D - Preliminary Plat and Existing Condititons 8. Exhibits E-F - Site and Grading Plans 9. Exhibits G-H - Erosion Control and Utility Plans 10. Exhibit I - Landscape Plan 11. Exhibit J - Architectural and Lighting Plans 12. Exhibit K - Dakota County Plat Commission Letter 8-30-24 13. September 26, 2024 Engineering Report Page 352 of 452 Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Diversified Economic Development Report Completed by: Frank Dempsey, AICP, Associate Planner Page 353 of 452 1 CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 24-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS PARK NORTH ADDITION WHEREAS, LPDC, LLC requests approval of the preliminary plat of one industrial lot to be known as LAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS PARK NORTH ADDITION; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at its October 3, 2024 meeting, preceded by notice as required by the Subdivision Ordinance, and unanimously recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat meets Subdivision Ordinance requirements; and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat is acceptable to the City. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Lakeville City Council: The NORTH RYAN SECOND ADDITION preliminary plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The recommendations listed in the Engineering Division memorandum dated September 26, 2024. 2. The site and building shall be developed and constructed consistent with the preliminary plat and final plat and site development plans approved by the City Council. 3. Prior to City Council consideration of the final plat, a stormwater maintenance agreement shall be signed by the property developer for the on- site private stormwater facilities. 4. The landscape plan shall be revised to include a row of deciduous overstory trees along the Juniper Way (CSAH 70) right-of-way with a caliper size in compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements. 5. A landscaping financial security shall be submitted with the final plat. 6. All signs shall comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements for the OP District. A sign permit shall be issued by the Community Development Department prior to the installation of any signs. 7. Site lighting shall not glare onto public streets and shall not exceed one-foot candle at the property line. A photometric lighting plan shall be submitted for review prior to issuance of a building permit. Page 354 of 452 2 8. Snow storage shall not take place in required parking spaces. If there is not adequate space to store snow on site, snow must be removed from the site. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 21st day of October 2024 CITY OF LAKEVILLE Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk Page 355 of 452 (Reserved for Dakota County Recording Information) CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 24- ___ 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Lakeville hereby grants a conditional use permit to LPDC, LLC to allow a warehouse building in the O-P, Office Park District. 2. Property. The permit is for the following described property in the City of Lakeville, Dakota County, Minnesota, described in Exhibit A. 3. Conditions. This conditional use permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a) The recommendations listed in the Engineering Division memorandum dated September 25, 2024. b) The site and building shall be developed and constructed consistent with the preliminary plat and final plat and site development plans approved by the City Council. c) Prior to City Council consideration of the final plat, a stormwater maintenance agreement shall be signed by the property developer for the on-site private stormwater facilities. d) A landscaping financial security shall be submitted with the final plat. e) All signs shall comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements for the OP District. A sign permit shall be issued by the Community Development Department prior to the installation of any signs. f) Site lighting shall not glare onto public streets and shall not exceed one-foot candle at the property line. A photometric lighting plan shall be submitted for review prior to issuance of a building permit. g) Snow storage shall not take place in required parking spaces. If there is not adequate space to store snow on site, snow must be removed from the site. Page 356 of 452 4. Revocation. The City may revoke the permit for cause upon determination that the conditional use is not in conformance with the conditions of this permit or is in continued violation of the Zoning Ordinance, City Code, or other applicable regulations. 5. Expiration. This conditional use permit shall expire unless the applicant commences construction of the authorized use within one year of the date of this conditional use permit, unless an extension is approved by the Zoning Administrator. DATED: October 21, 2024 CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: ________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor BY: ________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 21st day of October 2024, by Luke M. Hellier, Mayor and by Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk of the City of Lakeville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. _______________________ Notary Public SEAL DRAFTED BY: City of Lakeville, 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Page 357 of 452 EXHIBIT A That part of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 36, Township 114 North Range 21 West; all according to the United States Government Survey thereof, County of Dakota, State of Minnesota lying northeasterly of the centerline of County State Aid Highway 70. Said centerline is described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 36; thence on an assumed of bearing South 00 degrees 10 minutes 08 seconds West along the West line of the said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 108.20 feet to point of beginning of said centerline; thence South 51 degrees 18 minutes 52 seconds East 1481.34 feet; thence southeasterly a distance of 1935.59 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a radius of 1273.24 feet and a central angle of 8 degrees 42 minutes 41 seconds, to the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and said centerline there terminating. Page 358 of 452 1 CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA LAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH ADDITION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION On October 3, 2024, the Lakeville Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider a conditional use permit to allow a warehouse building in the O-P, Office Park District. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed conditional use permit preceded by published and mailed notice. The applicant was present, and the Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak. The City Council hereby adopts the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is located in Planning District No. 6 of the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, which guides the property for office park uses. 2. The property is currently zoned O-P, Office Park District. 3. The legal description of the property is: That part of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 36, Township 114 North Range 21 West; all according to the United States Government Survey thereof, County of Dakota, State of Minnesota lying northeasterly of the centerline of County State Aid Highway 70. Said centerline is described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 36; thence on an assumed of bearing South 00 degrees 10 minutes 08 seconds West along the West line of the said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 108.20 feet to point of beginning of said centerline; thence South 51 degrees 18 minutes 52 seconds East 1481.34 feet; thence southeasterly a distance of 1935.59 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a radius of 1273.24 feet and a central angle of 8 degrees 42 minutes 41 seconds, to the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and said centerline there terminating. 4. Section 11-4-3E of the City of Lakeville Zoning Ordinance provides that a conditional use permit may not be issued unless certain criteria are satisfied. The criteria and our findings regarding them are: Page 359 of 452 2 a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed warehouse building is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the District 6 recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The proposed warehouse building will be accessed exclusively from Juniper Way (CSAH 70). There are no nearby land uses that will be adversely impacted by the proposed warehouse building. Provided compliance with the conditional use permit, the proposed warehouse use will be compatible with existing and planned nearby land uses in the vicinity. c. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Finding: The exterior design of the industrial warehouse building conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance and the City Code. d. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. Finding: The subject property lies within in the current MUSA. The property can be served with public sanitary sewer and water services. The use of the property as an industrial warehouse will have no impact on the City’s service capacity. e. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: Anticipated traffic generated by the proposes warehouse building will be within the capabilities of all public streets serving the property. 5. The planning report dated September 27, 2024 prepared by Associate Planner Frank Dempsey is incorporated herein. DECISION The City Council approves the conditional use permit in the form attached hereto. DATED: October 21, 2024 Page 360 of 452 3 CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: _________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor BY: _________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk SEAL PREPARED BY: City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Page 361 of 452 IRON PIPE LS 16456 IRON PIPE LS 47476 IRON PIPES LS 47476 IRON PIPELS 47476 IRON PIPE LS 16456 IRON PIPE LS 47476 IRON PIPE LS 47476 IRON PIPE LS 47476 TE M P O R A R Y E A S E M E N T P E R DO C . N O . 4 6 2 1 5 315 15CENTERLINE OFDRAINAGE DITCH BENCHMARK #1 TNH ELEV:1030.86 BENCHMARK #2 TNH ELEV:1043.75 ED G E O F B I T U M I N O U S ED G E O F B I T U M I N O U S PER PLAN PER PLAN WATERMAIN (12" PVC) TE M P O R A R Y E A S E M E N T P E R DO C . N O . 4 6 2 1 5 3 TEMPORARY EASE MENT PERDOC. NO. 462153DELINEATION PER 6/30/2021 WSB WETLAND DELINEATION BLOCK 1 LOT 1 NORTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116, R21 WEST LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116, R21 EAST LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116, R21 SW CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116,R21 SE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116,R21 NE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116,R21 SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116, R21 SO U T H W E S T E R L Y R I G H T - O F - W A Y LIN E O F C . S . A . H N O . 7 0 JU N I P E R W A Y (C. S . A . H . N O . 7 0 ) HI G H W A Y E A S E M E N T P E R D O C . N O . 6 2 1 5 3 NW CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116,R21 OUTLOT A EX C E P T I O N TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1692406 TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 613697 BUILDING SETBACK PARKING SETBACK BUILDING SETBACK PARKING SETBACK BUILDING SETBACK PARKING SETBACK (D E D I C A T E D R I G H T O F W A Y ) NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, survey, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO.REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | JARED AVERBECK | 9/27/2024 9:36:08 AML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\SURVEY\SHEETS\52927-PPLAT.DWG:C2.02 PRELIMINARY PLAT© 2021 Sambatek DATE ISSUED LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNFINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 52927 EJH CC JJA 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 09/10/2024 CDC EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 50 100 LEGEND The Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 36, Township 114 North Range 21 West; all according to the United States Government Survey thereof, County of Dakota, State of Minnesota. Excepting therefrom that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4) of Section Thirty-six (36), Township One Hundred Fourteen (114), Range Twenty-one (21), Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4) of said Section Thirty-six (36); thence bearing South (assumed bearing) along the West line of the said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4), a distance of 216.83 feet, more or less, to the Southwesterly right of way line of County State Aid Highway No. 70 and the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence South 51 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds East, along the said Southwesterly right of way line, 232.73 feet; thence South 38 degrees 31 minutes 00 seconds West, at right angles to said right of way line, 292.41 feet, more or less, to the West line of the said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4); thence North on said West line 373.72 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. 1.THE VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NAVD88. THE ORIGINATING BENCH MARKS IS BR 19850 SE,REFERENCED FROM THE MNDOT GEODETIC DATABASE SITE BENCHMARK #1 TNH ELEV.=1030.86 SITE BENCHMARK #2 TNH ELEV.=1043.75 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BENCHMARKS OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL WIRE LIGHT SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC GUY ANCHOR UTILITY POLE GUARD POST UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE BUILDING LINE CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS SURFACE GRAVEL SURFACE WET LAND SIGN TRAFFIC MARKERS POND / WATER LINE FEMA FLOOD ZONE LINE SOIL BORING TREE LINE FOUND MONUMENT FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE RESTRICTED ACCESS FOUND RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENT SET MONUMENT MARKED LS 53642 SECTION LINE UNDERLYING / ADJACENT LOT TIE LINE BOUNDARY LINE DEED DISTANCE(100.00) CONIFEROUS TREE TRANSFORMER BUILDING CANOPY REGULAR PARKINGSTALL COUNTGAS METER COMMUNICATIONS MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL CABLE TV BOX GATE VALVE / HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE CLEAN OUT STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN FLARED END SECTION SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RETAINING WALL BLOCK RETAINING WALL STONE RETAINING WALL RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WIRE FENCE DECIDUOUS TREE ## DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY AREA LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OUTLOT A DEDICATED RIGHT OF WAY SETBACKS (PARKING) FRONT YARD REAR YARD SIDE YARD SETBACKS (BUILDING) FRONT YARDREAR YARD SIDE YARD ZONING EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING 20 FT 10 FT 10 FT 50 FT 30 FT 30 FT OP OFFICE PARK OP OFFICE PARK 695,814 SF 15.97 AC 721,620 SF 16.57 AC 284,707 SF 6.54 AC 1.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 2.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 3.THE NAME OF THE PLAT IS TO BE DETERMINED. DEVELOPMENT NOTES 24.1S (LMS TECH) | JARED AVERBECK | 9/27/2024 9:36:08 AML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\SURVEY\SHEETS\52927-PPLAT.DWG:C2.02 PRELIMINARY PLATPRELIMINARY PLAT C2.02 THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 36 T. 116 R. 21 IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 10 10 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: (NOT TO SCALE) Jared Averbeck 53642 LAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH ADDITION Page 362 of 452 PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G 1 8 9 , 6 7 8 S F LO T 1 , B L O C K 1 15. 9 7 4 A C , 6 9 5 , 8 1 4 S F NOPA R K I N G NOPA R K I N G NOPA R K I N G FIL T R A T I O N B A S I N 10 0 - Y E A R H W L : 1 0 2 7 . 3 6 10- Y E A R H W L : 1 0 2 6 . 3 2 OU T L E T : 1 0 2 5 . 4 0 BO T T O M : 1 0 2 4 . 5 0 NU R P P O N D 10 0 - Y E A R H W L : 1 0 2 7 . 4 6 10- Y E A R H W L : 1 0 2 6 . 3 4 OU T L E T 1 0 2 5 . 4 0 N W L : 1 0 2 4 . 5 0 BO T T O M : 1 0 1 5 . 0 0 EXISTING WETLAND NWL: 1017.93 NOPA R K I N G 18" CMPIE:1027.78 18" CMP IE:1027.88 18" CMPIE:1036.67 18" CMPIE:1036.96 JU N I P E R W A Y (C. S . A . H . N O . 7 0 ) EX C E P T I O N 25912592259325942595 259625972598 2599 2600 26012602 260326042605 26062607 260826092610261126122613 2614 261526162617 2618 26192620 2621 26222623 26242625 26262627 2628 2629 2630 26312632 2633 2634 263526362637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 26452647264826492650 265126522653 26542655265626572658 2659 266026612662 2663 26642665 2666 2667266826692670 2671 26722673 2674 2675 2676 267726782679 2680268126822683 26842685 2686 2687 2688 2689 26902691 2692 2693 26942695 2696 26972698 2699 27002701 2702270327042705 2706 270727082709 2710 2711 271227132714 2715 27162717 2718 27192720 272127222723 2724272527262727 272827292730 27312732 2733273427352736 27372738273927402741 2742 2743 2744 2745 2746 274727482749 2750 2751 2752 275327542755 2756 275727582759276027612762 276327642766 2767 2768 1025103010351040 1026102710281029 1031 1032 1033 10341036103710381039104110411035104010361037103810391041 103 5 10 3 3 1034 1036 1037 10301035102910311032103310341036103710381025103010351040 102610271028102910311032103310341036103710381039EO F SP I L L W A Y1036103610371038103910391038103710361035103410331032 1032 10 3 2 1031 1031 10 2 0 10 3 0 10 2 5 1020 1025 1030 1030 1035 1025102510 3 0 10 2 5 1032 10 3 2 1032 10 3 5 103 5 10 3 5 1035 10 3 5 10351030102510 3 0 10 3 5 10 3 0 10 3 5 1035 1035 1035 1 0 3 6 103 6 1035 10 3 6 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 10/14/2024 6:14:50 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C4.01-GRAD.DWG:C4.01 GRADING PLAN© 2021 Sambatek LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNFINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 22 52927 07/26/2024 10/04/2024 TPK CC JDB ERIK W. MILLER, PE 41326 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 09/10/2024 CDC EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SOIL BORING999.9 ST # DRAINTILE 902.50 902.50 SPOT ELEVATIONS RIPRAP EOF 902.50 OVERFLOW ELEV. CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE 902 CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER BUILDING LINE 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 10/14/2024 6:14:50 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C4.01-GRAD.DWG:C4.01 GRADING PLANGRADING PLAN C4.01 4 NOT TO SCALE 01 6' AVERAGE 100YR DEPTH OF FLOW = 1.38' PROPOSED BY PASS DITCH (SECTION A-A) 6'6' A A 3:1 3:1 NOT TO SCALE 01 7.5' AVERAGE 100YR DEPTH OF FLOW = 1.44' EXISTING BY PASS DITCH 15'15' 5:1 5:1 Page 363 of 452 PROPOSED BUILDING 189,678 SF NOPARKING NOPARKING 18" CMP IE:1036.6718" CMP IE:1036.9610401038 10391041104110 4 0 10 3 6 10 3 7 10 3 8 10 3 9 10411035104010321033103410361037103810391034.62 1036.25 1034.35 1034.89 1030.92 1037.00 1030.42 1036.25 1036.10 1036.121036.42 1036.40 1036.57 1037.33 1036.91 1036.56 1038.28 1039.16 1039.53 1037.89 1037.89 1037.44 1037.44 1037.00 1037.00 1036.33 1035.85 1035.83 1035.761035.61 1036.25 1037.00 1035.61 1035.76 1035.98 1036.13 1036.10 1036.25 1036.25 1036.05 1036.251035.71 1035.48 1035.42 1035.26 1035.26 1033.96 1033.64 1032.73 1032.40 1032.40 1032.40 1032.40 1031.60 TW 1039.77 BW 1036.75 BW 1038.81TW 1039.81 1037.98 1039.76 1039.79 1039.82 1039.76 MATCH EXISTING 1039.20± MATCH EXISTING1041.00± 1041.65 1041.52 1040.53 1037.00 1036.55 1036.55 1036.05 1036.251036.751036.75 1036.91 1036.911037.00 1035.96 1035.76 1035.61 1036.25 1037.00 1037.00 1035.52 1035.67 1035.791035.81 1036.31 1036.31 1035.811035.80 1035.67 1035.52 MATCH EXISTING1038.00±MATCH EXISTING 1038.00± 1036.25 1036.75 1036.91 1036.91 1036.251036.75 1036.551036.55 1036.051036.05 1037.00 1037.00 1036.25 1037.00 TW 1040.32 1033.24 1032.041031.98 BW 1034.77 (WALL START) 1032.401032.40 1031.50 1033.00 1037.001037.001033.001033.001037.001037.00 1037.00 1036.05 1039.16 1039.61 1038.34 1037.89 1037.45 1036.78 1036.33 1035.71 1034.41 1033.96 1037.27 1036.91 1036.56 1036.92 1039.531039.98 1039.92 1039.98 1039.40 1039.79 BW 1037.82TW 1040.29 BW 1035.45TW 1039.61 BW 1033.03TW 1036.63 1 0 4 1 104010391038 1037 1036 1035 1 0 3 4 10331036 1035 1034 1035103610371036 103610361035103610371038103910391040104110411040 103910391040 1041 1039 1038 1037 1038 1037 1036 1035 1036 1036 1035 103710381039 1035 1035 1036 1036 1037 10361037103710361037 1036 1031 10321032 1036 1035 1034 1033 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 10/14/2024 6:14:50 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C4.01-GRAD.DWG:C4.02 GRADING PLAN© 2021 Sambatek LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNFINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 22 52927 07/26/2024 10/04/2024 TPK CC JDB ERIK W. MILLER, PE 41326 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 09/10/2024 CDC EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SOIL BORING999.9 ST # DRAINTILE 902.50 902.50 SPOT ELEVATIONS RIPRAP EOF 902.50 OVERFLOW ELEV. CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE 902 CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER BUILDING LINE 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 10/14/2024 6:14:50 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C4.01-GRAD.DWG:C4.02 GRADING PLANGRADING PLAN C4.02 5 Page 364 of 452 PROPOSED BUILDING 189,678 SF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 15.974 AC, 695,814 SF NOPARKING NOPARKING EXISTINGWETLAND NWL: 1017.9318" CMP IE:1027.7818" CMP IE:1027.881025103010351 0 2 6 102710281029103110321033103410361 0 3 7 10301 0 2 6 10271028102910311034.35 1036.25 1034.62 1036.25 1037.00 1037.00 1030.84 1032.40 1036.25 1032.40 1032.40 1032.40 1032.40 1033.65 1036.94 1037.00 1036.94 1036.941036.941037.00 1032.401032.401032.40 1032.55 1035.67 1035.77 1035.811035.77 1035.67 1035.52 1035.52 1036.25 1036.05 1036.551036.55 1036.05 1036.251036.751036.751036.25 1036.91 1037.00 1037.00 1036.91 1035.52 1035.67 1035.77 1035.81 1035.77 1035.67 1035.52 1036.25 1037.00 1037.00 1037.001036.91 1036.25 1036.751036.75 1036.91 1036.09 1036.02 1035.94 1035.91 1036.011035.99 1035.77 1035.771035.75 1035.61 1035.59 1035.03 1037.00 1037.00 1033.47 1033.07 TW 1022.72BW 1022.58 TW 1031.87BW 1024.61 1033.30 1032.77 TW 1032.77BW 1024.97 1032.58 1032.16 TW 1032.16BW 1025.02 1032.40 1032.40 1033.18 1037.00 1037.00 1032.401032.40 1032.401032.401032.401032.40 1033.00 1037.001033.001033.001037.001037.00 1033.001037.001033.00 1035.81 1036.05 1037.00 1036 1036 1036 1035 1035 1035 1036 1036 1036 1035 1035 1036 1035 1034 1033 1032 1031 1030 1035 1034 1033 1032 1031 1030 1029 1028 103610351037 1036 1035 1034 1036 1035 1034 1033 1035103410331032103110301029102810271026102510241032 1032103 2 1031 1032 1036 1035 1034 1033 1036 1035 1034 1033 1036 1035 1034 1033 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 10/14/2024 6:14:50 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C4.01-GRAD.DWG:C4.03 GRADING PLAN© 2021 Sambatek LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNFINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 22 52927 07/26/2024 10/04/2024 TPK CC JDB ERIK W. MILLER, PE 41326 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 09/10/2024 CDC EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SOIL BORING999.9 ST # DRAINTILE 902.50 902.50 SPOT ELEVATIONS RIPRAP EOF 902.50 OVERFLOW ELEV. CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE 902 CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER BUILDING LINE 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 10/14/2024 6:14:50 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C4.01-GRAD.DWG:C4.03 GRADING PLANGRADING PLAN C4.03 6 Page 365 of 452 FILTRATION BASIN 100-YEAR HWL: 1027.36 10-YEAR HWL: 1026.32 OUTLET: 1025.40 BOTTOM: 1024.50 NURP POND 100-YEAR HWL:1027.46 10-YEAR HWL:1026.34 OUTLET 1025.40 NWL:1024.50 BOTTOM:1015.00 103 5 103 6 10 3 7 10 3 8 1035 1033 103410361037103010351029103110321033103410361037103810 2 5 1 0 2 6 102710281030.92 1030.42 1033.30 1030.45 1030.84 1032.40 1032.201032.20 1032.20 EOF SPILLWAY 1027.50 1027.49 1031.65 1032.40 1032.40 1032.40 1032.40 1032.40 1032.40 1032.40 1032.401032.401032.40 1032.20 1031.60 TW 1032.16BW 1025.02 1032.40 1032.40 1032.401032.40 1032.401032.401032.401032.40 1032.041031.98 1032.401032.40 1032.10 1031.50 1032.20 1031.65 1032.20 TW 1032.20BW 1026.50 TW 1025.97BW 1025.22 TW 1032.20BW 1025.25 1032.20 1032 1032103 2 1031 1031 1032103210321032 1032 1031 1031 1032 1032 1032 1033 1032 1031 1030 1029 1028 1027 1026 1025 1024 1023 1022 1021 1020 1019 1018 1017 1016 101510251026102710281029103010311031103010301031103210331034103510361037 1032 1033 1034 1035 10351034 1033 103310341032 1031 1030 1029 1028 1027 1026 10251025102610271027102610251 0 2 5 1 0 2 6 1 0 2 7 1 0 2 8 1 0 2 8 1 0 2 7 1 0 2 7 1 0 2 8 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 10/14/2024 6:14:50 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C4.01-GRAD.DWG:C4.04 GRADING PLAN© 2021 Sambatek LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNFINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 22 52927 07/26/2024 10/04/2024 TPK CC JDB ERIK W. MILLER, PE 41326 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 09/10/2024 CDC EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SOIL BORING999.9 ST # DRAINTILE 902.50 902.50 SPOT ELEVATIONS RIPRAP EOF 902.50 OVERFLOW ELEV. CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE 902 CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER BUILDING LINE 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 10/14/2024 6:14:50 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C4.01-GRAD.DWG:C4.04 GRADING PLANGRADING PLAN C4.04 7 NOT TO SCALE 01 6' AVERAGE 100YR DEPTHOF FLOW = 1.38' PROPOSED BY PASS DITCH (SECTION A-A) 6'6' 3:1 3:1 NOT TO SCALE 01 7.5' AVERAGE 100YR DEPTHOF FLOW = 1.44' EXISTING BY PASS DITCH 15'15' 5:1 5:1 A A Page 366 of 452 NOPARKING NOPARKING 18" CMP IE:1036.6718" CMP IE:1036.96N89°50'19"E 1317.83S 0 0 ° 1 0 ' 0 8 "W 2 1 6 . 8 4 N 0 0 ° 1 0 ' 0 8 " E 2 1 6 . 8 4N89°50'19"E 1317.83ROCK MULCH ROCK MULCH ROCK MULCH 6LBS 3BT 5LBS 3BT 10LBS 9BT 6SN BT6 LBS5 BT9 LBS5 SN3 SN6 BH8 SW4 1AB AB1 1SG 1SG 3NS BS3 HL1 11BH224BJ 6BT 3SN 4SN 3LBS SO2 MATCH LINEMATCH LINESN3 BT6 PE1SO1SO1PE1AB12NSNO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | SOPHIE GALLANDAT | 10/14/2024 2:19:27 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS\52927-L1.01-LSCP.DWG:L1.01 LANDSCAPE PLAN WEST© 2021 Sambatek LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNSITE PLAN APPLICATION 52927 07/26/2024 SG SG JRW 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 09/10/2024 CDC EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 09/26/2024 CDC EWM EWM REVISED SITE PLAN PER DAKOTA COUNTY COMMENTS SCALE IN FEET 0 6030 NORTH LANDSCAPE PLAN WEST L1.01 # 11-21-9 : REQUIRED SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING A. LANDSCAPING: REQUIRED LANDSCAPING FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS AND COMMERCIAL,INDUSTRIAL OR INSTITUTIONAL USES SHALL INCLUDE PLANTINGS AT THE PROPERTY PERIMETER, OFF STREET PARKING PERIMETER LANDSCAPING AND INTERIOR LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS AS WELL AS REQUIRED RESIDENTIAL BUFFER YARD OR TRANSITIONAL BUFFER ZONE PLANTINGS. D. OFF STREET PARKING AREAS: ALL OFF STREET PARKING AREAS WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE PARKING SPACES : 2. FOR ALL COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL USES, AND FOR THOSE INDUSTRIAL USES ABUTTING A MAJOR COLLECTOR OR ARTERIAL STREET, A CONTINUOUS OPAQUE BARRIER WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THIRTY SIX INCHES (36") SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE PERIMETER ABUTTING PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTIES THAT CONSISTS OF PLANTINGS, HEDGES, DECORATIVE OR ORNAMENTAL FENCES, WALLS OR EARTH BERMS OR ANY COMBINATION THEREOF. 3. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE SET BACK TWO FEET (2') FROM PARKING STALLS TO ALLOW PARKING OF VEHICLES WITHOUT EXTENDING OVER THE LANDSCAPED AREA. 11-75-13: DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS B. LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS: LOT COVERAGE: 30 PERCENT OF THE LOT, PARCEL OR TRACT OF LAND SHALL REMAIN AS A GRASS PLOT INCLUDING SHRUBBERY, PLANTINGS, OR FENCING AND SHALL BE LANDSCAPED. LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED CITY LANDSCAPE CODE PLANT SCHEDULE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TREE TO BE REMOVED D S LS RIPRAP LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED LAKEVILLE LANDSCAPE CODE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TREE TO BE REMOVED D S LS RIPRAP SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY TREES AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 3 SG Acer freemanii `Sienna Glen` / Sienna Glen Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 2 HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 1 SO Quercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 4 PE Ulmus americana `Princeton` / American Elm B & B 2.5"Cal 2 CONIFERS NS Picea abies / Norway Spruce B & B 8` 5 BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 8` 3 SHRUBS BT Berberis thunbergii 'NCBT1' / Sunjoy Mini Maroon® Barberry 5 gal.18" 42 BH Diervilla lonicera / Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle 5 gal 18" 19 BJ Juniperus sabina `Broadmoor` / Broadmoor Juniper 5 gal 24"79 SW Physocarpus opulifolius `Summer Wine` / Summer Wine Ninebark 5 gal 24" 4 SN Spiraea x 'NCSX2' / Double Play Doozie® Spirea 5 gal 18" 25 GRASSES LBS Schizachyrium scoparium `Blue Heaven` / Blue Heaven Little Bluestem 1 gal 34 PLANT SCHEDULE WEST GROUND COVER SCHEDULE CALCULATIONS DECIDUOUS TREES CONIFEROUS TREESORNAMENTAL TREESSHRUBS SITE AREA : 15.97 AC PROPOSED 25 11 0446 5.68 AC (36%) REQUIRED - - - - 4.79 AC (30%) SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME GROUND COVERS RT MNDOT Residential Turfgrass Seed Mix / Formerly 25-151 SSR MNDOT Southern Shortgrass Seed Mix / Formerly Seed Mix 36-311/36-211 WD MNDOT Wet Ditch Seed Mix / Formerly 33-261 TUR HIG Turf Sod Highland Sod / Sod PLANT SCHEDULE Page 367 of 452 PROPOSED BUILDING 189,678 SF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 15.974 AC, 695,814 SF NOPARKING NOPARKING FILTRATION BASIN 100-YEAR HWL: 1026.37 10-YEAR HWL: 1025.37 OUTLET: 1024.70 BOTTOM: 1023.17 NURP POND 100-YEAR HWL:1026.90 10-YEAR HWL:1026.12 OUTLET 1024.70 NWL:1024.50 BOTTOM:1015.00 EXISTINGWETLAND NWL: 1017.93RE:1023.56IE:1013.09 N, SRE:1021.70IE:1011.50 N, SRE:1023.58IE:1009.86 NIE:1009.74 S, W 18" CMP IE:1027.7818" CMP IE:1027.88S 0 0 ° 0 6 ' 2 1 "W 1 3 1 5 . 9 2 0+501 0 3 5 . 1 1 0 3 5 . 1 1 1+001 0 3 5 . 6 1 0 3 5 . 6 1 ROCK MULCH ROCK MULCH ROCK MULCH ROCK MULCH 1GB 1AB 1HL AB1 AB1 21BH 21BH 4SN 3LBS 5LBS 7BT 6SN 5LBS 7BT 3SN 3LBS 4SN 6BT 3SN LBS5 BT9 SN6 5LBS SN7 BT3 LBS5 SN6 BT6 LBS6 5BT 3SN 5LBS 3SN 5LBS3BT 5LBS 3SN 7LBS 3NS 2BO MATCH LINEMATCH LINEBT6 BL1BL1HB1PE11SOHB1NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | SOPHIE GALLANDAT | 10/14/2024 2:19:27 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS\52927-L1.01-LSCP.DWG:L1.02 LANDSCAPE PLAN EAST© 2021 Sambatek LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNSITE PLAN APPLICATION 52927 07/26/2024 SG SG JRW 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 09/10/2024 CDC EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 09/26/2024 CDC EWM EWM REVISED SITE PLAN PER DAKOTA COUNTY COMMENTS SCALE IN FEET 0 6030 NORTH LANDSCAPE PLAN EAST L1.02 # LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TREE TO BE REMOVED D S LS RIPRAP SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY TREES AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 3 HB Celtis occidentalis / Common Hackberry B & B 2.5"Cal 2 GB Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold` TM / Maidenhair Tree B & B 2.5"Cal 1 HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 1 SO Quercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 1 BO Quercus macrocarpa / Burr Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 2 BL Tilia americana `Boulevard` / Boulevard Linden B & B 2.5"Cal 2 PE Ulmus americana `Princeton` / American Elm B & B 2.5"Cal 1 CONIFERS NS Picea abies / Norway Spruce B & B 8` 3 SHRUBS BT Berberis thunbergii 'NCBT1' / Sunjoy Mini Maroon® Barberry 5 gal.18" 46 BH Diervilla lonicera / Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle 5 gal 18" 42 BJ Juniperus sabina `Broadmoor` / Broadmoor Juniper 5 gal 24"145 SN Spiraea x 'NCSX2' / Double Play Doozie® Spirea 5 gal 18" 44 GRASSES LBS Schizachyrium scoparium `Blue Heaven` / Blue Heaven Little Bluestem 1 gal 56 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT GROUND COVERS RT MNDOT Residential Turfgrass Seed Mix / Formerly 25-151 Seed SSR MNDOT Southern Shortgrass Seed Mix / Formerly Seed Mix 36-311/36-211 Seed WD MNDOT Wet Ditch Seed Mix / Formerly 33-261 Seed TUR HIG Turf Sod Highland Sod / Sod Sod PLANT SCHEDULE EAST Page 368 of 452 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, October 3, 2024 Page 3 • Vice Chair Zimmer asked the Developer for further information on vacancy rates. Mr. Griffith responded that in the South Metro area, the vacancy rate is 2% - 3%, which is very low. • Vice Chair Zimmer inquired about the nearest playground to the development site. Ms. Jenson responded that the closest neighborhood park will be the one constructed as part of the Ritter Meadows development, north of 205th Street but that the proposed site will be connected to the trail along 210th Street, which provides pedestrian access to the commercial area along Keokuk Avenue. • Commissioner Kaluza asked if Dakota County has indicated any plans to change the access at 210th Street (CSAH 70) and Keswick Loop, which is the access point for this project. Assistant City Engineer Jon Nelson confirmed that the access will remain open. Motion was made by Kaluza, seconded by Zuzek to recommend to City Council approval of the preliminary plat and conditional use permit for Crown Lakeville Apartments, subject to the seven stipulations listed below and approval of the Findings of Fact dated October 3, 2024: 1. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the September 24, 2024 engineering report. 2. Park dedication must be paid at the time of final plat approval. 3. Outlot A shall be deeded to the City with the final plat. 4. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated, and the developer shall submit a financial security to guarantee installation of the approved landscaping at the time of final plat approval. 5. All signs shall comply with the Zoning Ordinance requirements. A sign permit shall be issued by the Planning Department prior to the installation of any signs. 6. Snow storage shall not take place in required parking spaces. 7. Details about the fence surrounding the amenity area must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator prior to installation, to confirm compliance with Section 11-21.5 of the Zoning Ordinance. Ayes: Zuzek, Kaluza, Majorowicz, Zimmer, Einck, Swenson Nays: 0 5b. Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North Addition Chair Majorowicz opened the public hearing to consider the application of LPDC LLC to consider the following: 1. Preliminary plat of one industrial lot to be known as Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North Addition; and 2. Conditional use permit to allow a warehouse use in the OP, Office Park District. Ed Farr, of Edward Farr Architects introduced the project on behalf of the applicant. Page 369 of 452 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, October 3, 2024 Page 4 Associate Planner Dempsey presented the planning report. Mr. Dempsey stated that the applicant has applied for a preliminary plat and conditional use permit for an industrial warehouse building in the OP, Office Park district to be known as Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North Addition. Mr. Dempsey reviewed the site layout including the access point from Juniper Way (CSAH 70), landscaping, and building materials. A photometric lighting plan is required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and conditional use permit subject to the 10 stipulations listed in the September 27, 2024 planning report as amended, and approval of the Findings of Fact dated October 3, 2024. Chair Majorowicz opened the hearing to the public for comment. There were no comments from the audience. Motion was made by Zimmer, seconded by Swenson to close the public hearing at 6:42 p.m. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes – unanimous Chair Majorowicz asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Discussion points included: • Commissioner Kaluza asked if the doors and entrances on the building will be numbered. The applicant confirmed that the units in the building will be addressed with suite numbers and that the docks will be identified individually. Motion was made by Zimmer, seconded by Einck to recommend to City Council approval of the Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North Addition preliminary plat and conditional use permit, subject the 10 stipulations listed below, and approval of the Findings of Fact dated October 3, 2024: 1. The recommendations listed in the Engineering Division memorandum dated September 25, 2024. 2. The preliminary plat plans shall be revised prior to City Council consideration of the preliminary plat removing the east driveway access to Juniper Way (CSAH 70) in accordance with Dakota County Plat Commission recommendations. 3. Any public drainage and utility easements identified in the to be submittal title commitment shall be vacated prior to final plat approval. 4. The site and building shall be developed and constructed consistent with the preliminary plat and site development plans approved by the City Council. 5. Prior to City Council consideration of the final plat, a stormwater maintenance agreement shall be signed by the property developer for the on-site private stormwater facilities. Page 370 of 452 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, October 3, 2024 Page 5 6. The landscape plan shall be revised to include a row of deciduous overstory trees along the Juniper Way (CSAH 70) right-of-way, not less than 40 feet apart with a caliper size in compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements. 7. A landscaping financial security shall be submitted with the final plat. 8. All signs shall comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements for the OP District. A sign permit shall be issued by the Community Development Department prior to the installation of any signs. 9. Site lighting shall not glare onto public streets and shall not exceed one-foot candle at the property line. A photometric lighting plan shall be submitted for review prior to issuance of a building permit. 10. Snow storage shall not take place in required parking spaces. If there is not adequate space to store snow on site, snow must be removed from the site. Ayes: Zuzek, Kaluza, Majorowicz, Zimmer, Einck, Swenson Nays: 0 There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kris Jenson, Planning Manager Page 371 of 452 1 City of Lakeville Community Development Department Memorandum To: Planning Commission From: Frank Dempsey, AICP, Associate Planner Date: September 27, 2024 (revised October 1, 2004) Subject: Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North Addition A. Preliminary Plat B. Conditional Use Permit BACKGROUND Representatives of LPDC, LLC have submitted applications for a preliminary plat and conditional use permit for the proposed development of 16 acres of a 39-acre property for the development of a 189,678 square foot industrial office/warehouse building to be located north of Juniper Way (CSAH 70)/215th Street and south of 210th Street. The preliminary plat is named Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North Addition. The proposed warehouse building also requires a conditional use permit within the OP, Office Park District. The preliminary plat includes one lot and one outlot. EXHIBITS: A. Aerial Photo Location Map B. Zoning Map C. Preliminary Pat D. Property Survey E. Site Plan F. Grading and Drainage Plan G. Erosion Control Plan H. Utility Plan I. Landscape Plan J. Building Floor and Exterior Elevation Plans (2 Pages) K. Dakota County Plat Commission letter dated August 30, 2024 Page 372 of 452 3 control, and utility plans have been submitted with the preliminary plat and are discussed in more detail in the September 25, 2024 engineering report. Tree Preservation. The tree preservation plan submitted with the preliminary plat identified 152 significant trees. The tree preservation plan proposes removal of 136 trees and the preservation of 16 (10.5 %) of significant trees. Wetlands. A small wetland has been identified in the northeast corner of the property within the preliminary plat. A wetland delineation was completed for the property in preparation of the preliminary plat. Scrap metal and other possible waste debris was identified within the same area of the property. All waste materials shall be removed from the property as a condition of preliminary plat approval. A cash security shall be submitted as a condition of final plat approval. Park Dedication, Trails and Sidewalks. The City’s Comprehensive Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan does not identify any future park land needs in the area of the plat. Park dedication will be satisfied with a cash fee in effect at the time of final plat approval. A public trail was constructed along the north side of Juniper Way (CSAH 70) with the recently approved road improvements project to the County Road. SITE PLAN ANALYSIS The site development and construction plans propose a single phase building construction totaling 189,000 square feet to include both office and warehouse. The building is being constructed on speculation, so there is specific data to determine parking requirements at this time. The site plan estimates a 10% office/90% warehouse occupancy, consistent with similar industrial office/warehouse buildings. Setbacks. The building setback requirements of the OP District are being met with the proposed site plans for Lot 1, Block 1 as follows: Required Building Setbacks Proposed Building Setbacks Front Yard (south)-- 50 feet Front (south) – 95 feet Side Yard (east) - 30 feet Side Yard (west) - 30 feet Side (east) – 40 feet Side (west) – 160+ feet Rear Yard (north)—30 feet Rear (north) – 75 feet Proposed and Required Parking Stalls: Building Sq. Ft. …………………………..189,678 square feet Office Sq. Ft est. 10% (18,967 sf) – 10% = 85 stalls Warehouse Sq. Ft. est. 90% …...........................138 stalls Page 373 of 452 4 Required (assuming 10% office occupancy)....223 stalls Provided……………………………………....223 stalls Access. The property will be accessed via a single driveway near the northwest corner of the property directly from Juniper Way (CSAH 70). The initial draft preliminary plat plans included a left and right turn access from 215th Street on the east side of the property, but Dakota County indicated that access at that location was not optimal due to traffic speed and limited visibility for vehicles leaving the subject property and for CSAH 70 westbound vehicle traffic. The site plan showing the east access across from 215th Street will be amended prior to City Council consideration of the preliminary plat and conditional use permit. Circulation. All drive aisles and parking stalls comply with the required aisle width and parking stall dimensions for two way 90-degree vehicle parking. The site has been designed to allow semi- truck and trailer and emergency vehicle circulation throughout the site. Employee and visitor vehicles will park on the on the northwest and southwest sides of the building with semi-traffic, loading docks, and semi-trailer parking northeast of the loading dock area. Outdoor Storage. Outside storage will be limited to semi-trailers as part of the function of the building occupancy that includes receiving, transferring, shipping of goods and materials. The trailer parking will be located at the rear of the building not in view of public right-of-way. Landscaping/Screening. The OP District requires a minimum of 30% landscaped area on the property. The landscape plan as designed proposes 40% greenspace over the 16-acre property. The landscape plan proposes 45 shade and evergreen trees and a variety of shrubs and perennials. Zoning Ordinance 11-21-9.B requires industrial and commercial properties to include perimeter plantings, including along the Juniper Way right-of-way of the proposed preliminary plat. The landscape plan proposed plantings are noted in the table below: Landscape Materials 8 Overstory trees (2.5 inch min. diameter) Additional trees to included per Zoning Ordinance requirements 16 Conifer trees (8 foot min. height) 21 Ornamental trees (2 inch min. diameter) 203 Variety of shrubs and perennial plantings The proposed landscaping provides screening from the public street on three sides of the building. An area at the northeast corner of the property will include saved trees around the wetland area. The OP District zoned property to the north is undeveloped. All areas not planted with trees, shrubs or perennials will be seeded with a natural grass mixture as shown on the landscape plan. All landscaping shall be kept in living condition with dead or diseased materials replaced as needed to comply with the approved landscape plan. Page 374 of 452 5 The landscape plan shall be revised to include a row of deciduous overstory trees along the Juniper Way (CSAH 70) right-of-way, not less than 40 feet apart and a caliper size in compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements. A landscape security shall be submitted with the final plat to guarantee installation of the approved landscaping. The security amount will be determined by the developer’s landscaping contractor prior to City Council consideration of the final plat. Signage. Building signage is proposed for each tenant with a separate building entrance fronting Juniper Way. The Zoning Ordinance for the OP District allows one freestanding sign to a maximum area of 100 square feet and 10 feet in height. Lot 1 is allowed one wall sign not to exceed 100 square feet. A sign permit shall be issued by the Community Development Department prior to the installation of any signs. Site Lighting. Exterior lighting fixtures and specifications have not been submitted. Parking lot and site lighting shall be downcast LED fixtures. Poles not taller than 35 feet are allowed. Wall mounted lights shall be downcast fixtures only. The light fixtures shall meet Zoning Ordinance requirements and shall be reviewed by staff prior to issuance of an electrical permit. The Zoning Ordinance requires not more than one foot-candle of light measurement at any property line. A photometric plan must be submitted prior to issuance of an electrical permit for exterior light installation. Recycling and Trash Containers. The site plan proposes an outdoor recycling and trash container constructed of pre-cast concrete panels and a gate in compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements. Snow Storage. Snow storage may not take place in required parking spaces. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 11-75-7.H of the Zoning Ordinance requires conditional use permit approval for warehouse buildings in the OP, Office Park District. Building Height/Exterior Materials. The proposed building will be one-story and 39 feet in height in compliance with OP District requirements. The building will be constructed of smooth texture pre-cast concrete panels painted white and gray with blue accents. The loading docks will be located on the north side of the building. The exterior building materials and design comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements for the OP District. The proposed building is compatible with the area in which it is proposed and consistent in design to other warehouse/office buildings in the OR District, as allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. Approval of a conditional use permit requires adoption of findings of fact by the Planning Commission and City Council. Draft findings of fact are attached to this report. Page 375 of 452 6 RECOMMENDATION Planning Department staff has determined that the Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North Addition site development plans comply with Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements. The industrial office/warehouse building use of the property in addition to the site and building exterior design comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements for the OP District. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and conditional use permit subject to the following stipulations: 1. The recommendations listed in the Engineering Division memorandum dated September 25, 2024. 2. The preliminary plat plans shall be revised prior to City Council consideration of the preliminary plat removing the east driveway access to Juniper Way (CSAH 70) in accordance with Dakota County Plat Commission recommendations. 3. Any public drainage and utility easements identified in the to be submittal title commitment shall be vacated prior to final plat approval. 4. The site and building shall be developed and constructed consistent with the preliminary plat and site development plans approved by the City Council. 5. Prior to City Council consideration of the final plat, a stormwater maintenance agreement shall be signed by the property developer for the on-site private stormwater facilities. 6. The landscape plan shall be revised to include a row of deciduous overstory trees along the Juniper Way (CSAH 70) right-of-way, not less than 40 feet apart with a caliper size in compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements. 7. A landscaping financial security shall be submitted with the final plat. 8. All signs shall comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements for the OP District. A sign permit shall be issued by the Community Development Department prior to the installation of any signs. 9. Site lighting shall not glare onto public streets and shall not exceed one-foot candle at the property line. A photometric lighting plan shall be submitted for review prior to issuance of a building permit. 10. Snow storage shall not take place in required parking spaces. If there is not adequate space to store snow on site, snow must be removed from the site. Page 376 of 452 Exhibit A Page 377 of 452 Lakeville South High School Exhibit B Page 378 of 452 IRON PIPE LS 16456 IRON PIPE LS 47476 IRON PIPES LS 47476 IRON PIPELS 47476 IRON PIPE LS 16456 IRON PIPE LS 47476 IRON PIPE LS 47476 IRON PIPE LS 47476 TE M P O R A R Y E A S E M E N T P E R DO C . N O . 4 6 2 1 5 315 15CENTERLINE OFDRAINAGE DITCH BENCHMARK #1 TNH ELEV:1030.86 BENCHMARK #2 TNH ELEV:1043.75 ED G E O F B I T U M I N O U S ED G E O F B I T U M I N O U S PER PLAN PER PLAN WATERMAIN (12" PVC) TE M P O R A R Y E A S E M E N T P E R DO C . N O . 4 6 2 1 5 3 TEMPORARY EASE MENT PERDOC. NO. 462153BLOCK 1 LOT 1 NORTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116, R21 WEST LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116, R21 EAST LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116, R21 SW CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116,R21 SE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116,R21 NE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116,R21 SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116, R21 SO U T H W E S T E R L Y R I G H T - O F - W A Y LIN E O F C . S . A . H N O . 7 0 JU N I P E R W A Y (C. S . A . H . N O . 7 0 ) HI G H W A Y E A S E M E N T P E R D O C . N O . 6 2 1 5 3 NW CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116,R21 OUTLOT A 215TH STREET W. EX C E P T I O N TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1692406 TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 613697 BUILDING SETBACK PARKING SETBACK BUILDING SETBACK PARKING SETBACK BUILDING SETBACK PARKING SETBACK NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, survey, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO.REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 9/27/2024 9:36:08 AML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\SURVEY\SHEETS\52927-PPLAT.DWG:C2.02 PRELIMINARY PLAT© 2021 Sambatek DATE ISSUED LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNSITE PLAN APPLICATION 52927 EJH CC JJA 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 09/10/2024 CDC EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 50 100 LEGEND The Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 36, Township 114 North Range 21 West; all according to the United States Government Survey thereof, County of Dakota, State of Minnesota. Excepting therefrom that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4) of Section Thirty-six (36), Township One Hundred Fourteen (114), Range Twenty-one (21), Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4) of said Section Thirty-six (36); thence bearing South (assumed bearing) along the West line of the said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4), a distance of 216.83 feet, more or less, to the Southwesterly right of way line of County State Aid Highway No. 70 and the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence South 51 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds East, along the said Southwesterly right of way line, 232.73 feet; thence South 38 degrees 31 minutes 00 seconds West, at right angles to said right of way line, 292.41 feet, more or less, to the West line of the said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4); thence North on said West line 373.72 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. 1.THE VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NAVD88. THE ORIGINATING BENCH MARKS IS BR 19850 SE,REFERENCED FROM THE MNDOT GEODETIC DATABASE SITE BENCHMARK #1 TNH ELEV.=1030.86 SITE BENCHMARK #2 TNH ELEV.=1043.75 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BENCHMARKS OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL WIRE LIGHT SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC GUY ANCHOR UTILITY POLE GUARD POST UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE BUILDING LINE CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS SURFACE GRAVEL SURFACE WET LAND SIGN TRAFFIC MARKERS POND / WATER LINE FEMA FLOOD ZONE LINE SOIL BORING TREE LINE FOUND MONUMENT FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE RESTRICTED ACCESS FOUND RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENT SET MONUMENT MARKED LS 53642 SECTION LINE UNDERLYING / ADJACENT LOT TIE LINE BOUNDARY LINE DEED DISTANCE(100.00) CONIFEROUS TREE TRANSFORMER BUILDING CANOPY REGULAR PARKINGSTALL COUNTGAS METER COMMUNICATIONS MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL CABLE TV BOX GATE VALVE / HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE CLEAN OUT STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN FLARED END SECTION SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RETAINING WALL BLOCK RETAINING WALL STONE RETAINING WALL RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WIRE FENCE DECIDUOUS TREE ## DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY AREA LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OUTLOT A RIGHT OF WAY SETBACKS (PARKING) FRONT YARD REAR YARD SIDE YARD SETBACKS (BUILDING) FRONT YARDREAR YARD SIDE YARD ZONING EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING 20 FT 10 FT 10 FT 50 FT 30 FT 30 FT OP OFFICE PARK OP OFFICE PARK 695,814 SF 15.97 AC 654,895 SF 15.03 AC 351,432 SF 8.07 AC 1.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 2.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 3.THE NAME OF THE PLAT IS TO BE DETERMINED. DEVELOPMENT NOTES 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 9/27/2024 9:36:08 AML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\SURVEY\SHEETS\52927-PPLAT.DWG:C2.02 PRELIMINARY PLATPRELIMINARY PLAT C2.02 THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC. 36 T. 116 R. 21 IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 00 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 10 10 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: (NOT TO SCALE) Jared Averbeck 53642 LAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH ADDITION Exhibit C Page 379 of 452 RE:1023.56IE:1013.09 N, S RE:1021.70 IE:1011.50 N, S RE:1023.58IE:1009.86 NIE:1009.74 S, W1025103010351023 10241026102710281029103110321033103410361037103110321033103410351037 1038 1039 1040 1041 10271036IRON PIPE LS 16456 IRON PIPE LS 47476 IRON PIPESLS 47476 IRON PIPE LS 47476 IRON PIPE LS 16456 IRON PIPELS 47476 18" CMPIE:1027.78 18" CMPIE:1027.88 18" CMP IE:1036.67 18" CMPIE:1036.96 S5 1 ° 1 8 ' 5 2 " E 1 1 8 0 . 9 6 S5 1 ° 1 8 ' 5 2 " E 1 5 4 8 . 3 0 N00°10'08"E 727.00N38°41'08"E 292.40N5 1 ° 1 8 ' 5 2 " W 2 3 2 . 7 3 N89°50'19"E 1317.83 S00°06'21"W 1315.921317.30 0.53 1047.69S00°10'08"W 216.84NORTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116, R21 WEST LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116, R21 JU N I P E R W A Y (C. S . A . H . N O . 7 0 )8585858585NW CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116,R21 NE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SEC. 36, T116,R21 S5 1 ° 1 8 ' 5 2 " E 1 5 4 8 . 3 0 Δ=6°19'42" L=131.24R=1188.24 EX C E P T I O N N00°10'08"E 373.71TE M P O R A R Y E A S E M E N T P E R DO C . N O . 4 6 2 1 5 315 15CENTERLINE OF DRAINAGE DITCH BENCHMARK #1TNH ELEV:1030.86 BENCHMARK #2TNH ELEV:1043.75 ED G E O F B I T U M I N O U S ED G E O F B I T U M I N O U S1042.21041.41040.61040.41038.31034.91032.21032.41031.31031.71032.11028.91028.71025.21025.21025.21024.51025.91026.91028.51026.81029.81029.41031.61032.41034.11033.51034.31035.91034.31024.01027.91033.81032.01039.31034.81043.21042.41041.51041.01039.11038.31037.21036.61035.71035.11034.11033.41032.41031.91031.21030.31029.21028.51027.71027.31026.51025.91024.91023.81023.31023.11022.41024.81026.51029.41033.51036.91038.01038.51039.21039.51040.71040.41040.91040.61040.81040.81040.31038.11033.91036.91035.51023.71025.21027.81034.01029.51031.11026.61023.31025.41026.31027.51031.91031.81033.91029.11027.41025.61023.91029.91034.41035.81041.81041.61040.41036.61035.21043.01041.41040.61039.41037.81036.41034.81033.01030.51029.01027.71026.31024.91024.21023.41032.3103810391040 1041 1037103810391040 10351034103310321031 1030102910281027102610251024102310221024102 2 102 3 10 2 4 10 2 5 10 2 6 10 2 7 10 2 8 10 2 9 10 3 0 1 0 3 1 10 2 9 10 3 0 10 3 1 10 3 2 10 3 3 10 3 4 10 3 5 10 3 6 10 3 7 10 3 8 10 3 9 1040 10 3 8 10 3 9 10 4 0 10 4 1 10 4 2 10 4 3 1043 1 0 4 2 1 0 4 1 1041 1042 1041 10401039 1038 1037 1036 1035 1034 1033 1032 1031 1030 1029 1028 1027 1026 10251024 102310171018101910 2 0 10 2 1 102 2 102 3 102 410171018101910201021102210231024102510261027102810291030103110241025102610271028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 102 5 1026 1027 1028 10291030 1039.11039.51038.81034.71040.61041.51040.11040.41029.01033.81031.91035.51025.01026.41026.51033.825912592259325942595 259625972598 2599 2600 26012602 260326042605 26062607 260826092610261126122613 2614 261526162617 2618 26192620 2621 26222623 26242625 26262627 2628 2629 2630 26312632 2633 2634 263526362637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 26452647264826492650 265126522653 26542655265626572658 2659 266026612662 2663 26642665 2666 2667266826692670 2671 26722673 2674 2675 2676 267726782679 2680268126822683 26842685 2686 2687 2688 2689 26902691 2692 2693 26942695 2696 26972698 2699 27002701 2702270327042705 2706 270727082709 2710 2711 271227132714 2715 27162717 2718 27192720 272127222723 2724272527262727 272827292730 27312732 2733273427352736 27372738273927402741 2742 2743 2744 2745 2746 274727482749 2750 2751 2752 275327542755 2756 275727582759276027612762 276327642766 2767 2768 12911292 1293129412951296 1297 1298 129913001301 1302 1303 130413051306 1307 13081309 1310 1311 131213131314 1315 13161317 1318 13191320 13211322 13231324 1325132613271328 1329 1330 1331133213331334 1335133613371338 133913401341 13421343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348134913501351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 13581359 1360 1361 13621363 1364 1365136613671368 1369 13701371 1372 13731374 1375 1376 13771378 13791380 13811382 13831384 1385 13861387 1388 13891390 139113921393139413951396 13971398 139914001401 14021403 1404 1405 14061407 1408 1409 14101411 14121413 1414141514161417 1418 1419 142014211422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427142814291430 143114321433 14341435 1436 14371438 14391440 14411442 (C. S . A . H . N O . 7 0 ) RE:1033.7IE:1017.3 NE SW IE:1017.1 NW SE 15" P.V.CPER EFN SURVEY PER PLAN SANITARY SERVICE (8" PVC) WATERMAIN (12" PVC) TE M P O R A R Y E A S E M E N T P E R DO C . N O . 4 6 2 1 5 3 IRON PIPESLS 47476 N00°10'08"E 216.840.53 1317.30 N89°50'19"E 1317.83 JU N I P E R W A Y (C. S . A . H . N O . 7 0 ) SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 1. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ADDRESS IS UNASSIGNED, ITS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS22-03600-07-011. 2. THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 39.076 ACRES OR 1,702,139 SQUARE FEET. 3. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED OP OFFICE PARK. 4. THERE WERE NO BUILDINGS OBSERVED. The Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 36, Township 114 North Range 21 West; all according to the United States Government Survey thereof, County of Dakota, State of Minnesota. Excepting therefrom that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4) of Section Thirty-six (36), Township One Hundred Fourteen (114), Range Twenty-one (21), Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4) of said Section Thirty-six (36); thence bearing South (assumed bearing) along the West line of the said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4), a distance of 216.83 feet, more or less, to the Southwesterly right of way line of County State Aid Highway No. 70 and the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence South 51 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds East, along the said Southwesterly right of way line, 232.73 feet; thence South 38 degrees 31 minutes 00 seconds West, at right angles to said right of way line, 292.41 feet, more or less, to the West line of the said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4); thence North on said West line 373.72 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. (Abstract Property) 1. THE INTENTION OF THIS PROJECT IS TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY NORTH OF C.S.A.H. NO. 70. THE PROPERTY AREA SOUTH OF THE NORTHERLY EDGE OF THE HIGHWAY WAS NOT SURVEY AT THIS TIME. 2. THE BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE DAKOTA COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD83 (1986 ADJUST). WITH AN ASSUMED BEARING OF N 89°54'33" E FOR THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 114, RANGE 21. THE ORIGINATING MONUMENTS UTILIZED TOESTABLISH THE HORIZONTAL POSITION OF THIS SURVEY WAS THE NORTHEAST CORNER AND THENORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION. 3. UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS A COMPILATION OF PROVIDED MAP INFORMATION ANDTHOSE VISIBLE UTILITIES AND MARKED UTILITIES WHICH WERE LOCATED DURING THE SURVEY FIELDWORK. UTILITY SUPPLIERS OFTEN DO NOT RESPOND TO LOCATE REQUESTS IN THE FIELD BUT MAY PROVIDE MAPS, PLANS, AND DRAWINGS IN LIEU OF PHYSICAL LOCATION. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEES THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES INTHE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THATTHE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION AS INDICATED, ALTHOUGH THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PURSUANT TO MS 216.D CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT (651-454-0002) PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 4. FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 5/15/2024. 1. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NAVD88. THE ORIGINATING BENCH MARKS IS BR 19850 SE, REFERENCED FROM THE MNDOT GEODETIC DATABASE SITE BENCHMARK #1TNH ELEV.=1030.86 SITE BENCHMARK #2 TNH ELEV.=1043.75 LEGEND DESCRIPTION PROPERTY SUMMARY BENCHMARKS SURVEY NOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL WIRE LIGHT SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC GUY ANCHOR UTILITY POLE GUARD POST UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE BUILDING LINE CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS SURFACE GRAVEL SURFACE WET LAND SIGN TRAFFIC MARKERS POND / WATER LINE FEMA FLOOD ZONE LINE SOIL BORING TREE LINE FOUND MONUMENT FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE RESTRICTED ACCESS FOUND RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENT SECTION LINE UNDERLYING / ADJACENT LOT TIE LINE BOUNDARY LINE DEED DISTANCE(100.00) CONIFEROUS TREE TRANSFORMER BUILDING CANOPY REGULAR PARKING STALL COUNTGAS METER COMMUNICATIONS MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL CABLE TV BOX GATE VALVE / HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE CLEAN OUT STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN FLARED END SECTION SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RETAINING WALL BLOCK RETAINING WALL STONE RETAINING WALL RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WIRE FENCE DECIDUOUS TREE ## NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, survey, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO.REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 8/21/2024 5:29:46 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\SURVEY\SHEETS\52927-EXCON.DWG:C2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS© 2021 Sambatek DATE ISSUED LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNSITE PLAN APPLICATION 52927 CDJ JA 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 09/10/2024 CDC EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 8/21/2024 5:29:46 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\SURVEY\SHEETS\52927-EXCON.DWG:C2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONS C2.01 SEE DETAIL A DETAIL A JARED AVERBECK 5/22/2024 53642 5/22/2024 Exhibit D Page 380 of 452 C.S.A.H. NO. 70JU N I P E R W A Y (C. S . A . H . N O . 7 0 ) EX C E P T I O N 25912592259325942595 259625972598 2599 2600 2601 2602 260326042605 26062607 260826092610261126122613 2614 261526162617 2618 26192620 2621 26222623 26242625 26262627 2628 2629 2630 26312632 2633 2634 263526362637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 26452647264826492650 265126522653 26542655265626572658 2659 266026612662 2663 26642665 2666 2667266826692670 2671 26722673 2674 2675 2676 267726782679 2680268126822683 26842685 2686 2687 2688 2689 26902691 2692 2693 26942695 2696 26972698 2699 27002701 2702270327042705 2706 270727082709 2710 2711 271227132714 2715 27162717 2718 27192720 272127222723 2724272527262727 272827292730 27312732 2733273427352736 27372738273927402741 2742 2743 2744 2745 2746 2747 27482749 2750 2751 2752 275327542755 2756 275727582759276027612762 276327642766 2767 2768 1373 138313841385 13861387 1388 13891390 139113921393 139413951396 1397 PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G 1 8 9 , 6 7 8 S F LO T 1 , B L O C K 1 15. 9 7 4 A C , 6 9 5 , 8 1 4 S F NOPA R K I N G NOPA R K I N G NOPA R K I N G FIL T R A T I O N B A S I N 10 0 - Y E A R H W L : 1 0 2 6 . 3 7 10- Y E A R H W L : 1 0 2 5 . 3 7 OU T L E T : 1 0 2 4 . 7 0 BO T T O M : 1 0 2 3 . 1 7 NU R P P O N D 10 0 - Y E A R H W L : 1 0 2 6 . 9 0 10- Y E A R H W L : 1 0 2 6 . 1 2 OU T L E T 1 0 2 4 . 7 0 N W L : 1 0 2 4 . 5 0 BO T T O M : 1 0 1 5 . 0 0 EXISTING WETLANDNWL: 1017.93 NOPA R K I N G 16 20 30. 0 '9.0'9.0'30.0'24.0'24. 0 ' 9.0 ' 9.0 '24.0'20.0'20. 0 ' 20. 0 ' 12. 0 ' 9.0 ' 24. 0 ' 42 27 20 20 9.0 ' 9.0 ' 9.0 ' 9.0 ' F B B B B B B J J J 20.0'24.0'20.0'9.0 '20.0'20.0'24.0'I I 24.0'20.0'20.0'20.0'9.0 ' 95 27 J F I I F F K 60.0'48.6'F F BUILDING SETBACK PARKING SETBACK BUILDING SETBACK PARKING SETBACK BUILDING SETBACK PARKING SETBACK REMOVE GRAVEL APPROACH SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICHCONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. A.BUILDING, STOOPS, STAIRS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) B.B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER C.B-618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER D.CONCRETE APRON E.FLAT CURB SECTION F.CONCRETE SIDEWALK G.SEGMENTAL BLOCK RETAINING WALL H.ADA ACCESS LOCATION I.ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING J.ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN K.TRANSFORMER KEY NOTES NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 9/26/2024 2:37:42 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS\52927-C3.01-SITE.DWG:C3.01 SITE PLAN© 2021 Sambatek LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNSITE PLAN APPLICATION 52927 07/26/2024 TPK CC JDB 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 09/10/2024 CDC EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL 09/26/2024 CDC EWM EWM REVISED SITE PLAN PER DAKOTA COUNTY COMMENTS PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE SAW CUT LINE BOLLARD PARKING STALL COUNT## 1 KEY NOTE HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS) EASEMENT LINE CONCRETE CURB BUILDING LINE SIGN 24.1S (LMS TECH) | CHANDLER CIRRICIONE | 9/26/2024 2:37:42 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS\52927-C3.01-SITE.DWG:C3.01 SITE PLANSITE PLAN C3.01 # N.T.S. 32' 15' 53' 11.2'± BUILDING WALLWB-67 32' 15' 48' CONCRETE LANDING PAD 11.2'± WB-62 BUILDING WALL CONCRETE LANDING PAD WB-62 - Interstate Semi-Trailer WB-67 - Interstate Semi-Trailer 11.2'36.8' 11.2'41.8' 15' 32' ±4.8' ±5.2 DOLLY PAD 53' AND 48' DRY TRAILERS 1.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 2.ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT “GUTTER OUT” WHERE WATER DRAINS AWAY FROM CURB. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS “GUTTER IN” CURB. COORDINATE WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR. 4.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 5.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 20' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. ALL TRUCK PARKING STALL TO BE 12' IN WIDTH AND 55' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 7.SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PYLON/MONUMENT SIGN DETAILS 8. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DETAIL AND FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF LIGHT POLE. 9.REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, LOT NUMBERS, LOT AREAS, AND LOT DIMENSIONS. 10.ALL GRADIENT ON SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 5% (1:20), EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS (1:12), AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2.00% (1:50). MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS AISLE SHALL BE IN 2.00% (1:50). CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTES PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD VERSUS THE DESIGN GRADIENT. COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PAVING CONTRACTOR. 11."NO PARKING" SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ALONG ALL DRIVEWAYS AS REQUIRED BY CITY. 12.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 13.BUILDING ADDITION HAS BEEN LOCATED BASED ON ORIGINAL GRIDLINE DESIGN AND/OR EXISTING BUILDING EXTERIOR CORNER SURVEY LOCATIONS. EXTERIOR CORNERS DO NOT REPRESENT EXISTING BUILDING GRIDLINES. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE EXISTING GRIDLINES IN THE FIELD FOLLOWING DEMOLITION AND COORDINATE REQUIRED MODIFICATIONS, IF ANY, TO EXPANSION PLACEMENT WITH CIVIL AND ARHCITECT ACCORDINGLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD PLANS AS REQUIRED BY PERMITTING AGENCIES DEVELOPMENT NOTES DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY AREA LOT 1, BLOCK 1 RIGHT OF WAY BUILDING SUMMARY LOT 1, BLOCK 1 PARKING STALLS ADA STALLS TRAILER STALLS TOTAL STALLS SETBACKS (PARKING) FRONT YARD REAR YARD SIDE YARD SETBACKS (BUILDING) FRONT YARDREAR YARD SIDE YARD ZONING EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING 20 FT 10 FT 10 FT 50 FT 30 FT 30 FT OP OFFICE PARK OP OFFICE PARK 695,814 SF 15.974 AC 189,678 SF 4.35 AC 225 8 42 275 142,603 SF 3.274 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS PROPOSED PERVIOUS 442,620 SF 10.16 AC 253,147 SF 5.81 AC REQUIRED PARKING ASSUME GROSS BLDG. SQ. FOOTAGE - 10% = ASSUME 10% OFFICE AT 1/200 ASSUME 90% WAREHOUSE AT 1/1000 TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED 170,710 SF = 85 STALLS = 154 STALLS = 239 STALLS = 225 STALLS Exhibit E Page 381 of 452 PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G 1 8 9 , 6 7 8 S F LO T 1 , B L O C K 1 15. 9 7 4 A C , 6 9 5 , 8 1 4 S F NO PA R K I N G NOPA R K I N G NOPA R K I N G NOPA R K I N G FIL T R A T I O N B A S I N H W L : 1 0 2 6 . 3 2 OU T L E T : 1 0 2 4 . 7 0 BO T T O M : 1 0 2 3 . 1 7 NU R P P O N D H W L : 1 0 2 7 . 1 8 OU T L E T 1 0 2 4 . 7 0 N W L : 1 0 2 4 . 5 0 BO T T O M : 1 0 1 5 . 0 0 NOPA R K I N G NO PA R K I N G NOPA R K I N G EXISTING WETLANDNWL: 1017.93 18" CMPIE:1027.78 18" CMPIE:1027.88 18" CMPIE:1036.67 18" CMPIE:1036.96 JU N I P E R W A Y (C. S . A . H . N O . 7 0 ) EX C E P T I O N 25912592259325942595 259625972598 2599 2600 2601 2602 260326042605 26062607 260826092610261126122613 2614 261526162617 2618 26192620 2621 26222623 26242625 26262627 2628 2629 2630 26312632 2633 2634 263526362637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 26452647264826492650 265126522653 26542655265626572658 2659 266026612662 2663 26642665 2666 2667266826692670 2671 26722673 2674 2675 2676 267726782679 2680268126822683 26842685 2686 2687 2688 2689 26902691 2692 2693 26942695 2696 26972698 2699 27002701 2702270327042705 2706 270727082709 2710 2711 271227132714 2715 27162717 2718 27192720 272127222723 2724272527262727 272827292730 27312732 2733273427352736 27372738273927402741 2742 2743 2744 2745 2746 2747 27482749 2750 2751 2752 275327542755 2756 275727582759276027612762 276327642766 2767 2768 1373 138313841385 13861387 1388 13891390 139113921393 139413951396 1397 1025103010351040 1026102710281029 1031 1032 1033 10341036103710381039104110411035104010361037103810391041 103 5 10 3 3 1034 1036 1037 10301035102910311032103310341036103710381025103010351040 10261027102810291031103210331034103610371038103910301035102810291031103210331034103610301035 10281029103110321033103410 3 5 10 3 3 10 3 4 10 3 6 10 3 5 10 3 3 10 3 4 10 3 6 10 3 5 10 3 3 10 3 4 10 3 6 10 3 5 10 3 3 10 3 4 10 3 6 1 0 3 5 1 0 3 4 10 3 61035 10321033103410361036104010371038103910411036103710381036 1035 103 6 1035 103 6 1035 103 6 1035 103 6 10 2 9 10 3 0 103 1 10 3 2 10 3 3 103 4 10 3 5 1025103010241026102710281029103110321030102510271030 1041104010421026 1027 102 8 1034.36 1036.25 1034.61 1036.25 1034.61 1036.25 1034.35 1035.16 1031.30 1033.00 1033.00 1030.65 1032.20 1030.65 1033.00 1030.40 1033.00 1032.56 1032.33 1032.20 1032.20 1 0 3 1103110311 0 3 2 103210321036.25 1036.25 1035 1035 1031 1031 1032 1032 1033 1033 1034 10341034 10251024NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | THOMAS KEELEY | 7/25/2024 1:35:37 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C4.01-GRAD.DWG:C4.01 GRADING PLAN© 2021 Sambatek LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNSITE PLAN APPLICATION 52927 07/26/2024 TPK CC JDB 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SOIL BORING999.9 ST # DRAINTILE 902.50 902.50 SPOT ELEVATIONS RIPRAP EOF 902.50 OVERFLOW ELEV. CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE 902 CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER BUILDING LINE 24.1S (LMS TECH) | THOMAS KEELEY | 7/25/2024 1:35:37 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C4.01-GRAD.DWG:C4.01 GRADING PLANGRADING PLAN C4.01 ### #MATCH LINE - SEE LEFTMATCH LINE - SEE RIGHTSCALE: 1"=50'TURN LANE EXTENSION Exhibit F Page 382 of 452 FIL T R A T I O N B A S I N H W L : 1 0 2 6 . 3 2 OU T L E T : 1 0 2 4 . 7 0 BO T T O M : 1 0 2 3 . 1 7 NU R P P O N D H W L : 1 0 2 7 . 1 8 OU T L E T 1 0 2 4 . 7 0 N W L : 1 0 2 4 . 5 0 BO T T O M : 1 0 1 5 . 0 0 EXISTING WETLANDNWL: 1017.93 18" CMPIE:1027.78 18" CMPIE:1027.88 18" CMPIE:1036.67 18" CMPIE:1036.96 JU N I P E R W A Y (C. S . A . H . N O . 7 0 ) EX C E P T I O N 25912592259325942595 259625972598 2599 2600 2601 2602 260326042605 26062607 260826092610261126122613 2614 261526162617 2618 26192620 2621 26222623 26242625 26262627 2628 2629 2630 26312632 2633 2634 263526362637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 26452647264826492650 265126522653 26542655265626572658 2659 266026612662 2663 26642665 2666 2667266826692670 2671 26722673 2674 2675 2676 267726782679 2680268126822683 26842685 2686 2687 2688 2689 26902691 2692 2693 26942695 2696 26972698 2699 27002701 2702270327042705 2706 270727082709 2710 2711 271227132714 2715 27162717 2718 27192720 272127222723 2724272527262727 272827292730 27312732 2733273427352736 27372738273927402741 2742 2743 2744 2745 2746 2747 27482749 2750 2751 2752 275327542755 2756 275727582759276027612762 276327642766 2767 2768 1373 138313841385 13861387 1388 13891390 139113921393 139413951396 1397 1025103010351040 1026102710281029 1031 1032 1033 10341036103710381039104110411035104010361037103810391041 103 5 10 3 3 1034 1036 1037 10301035102910311032103310341036103710381025103010351040 1026102710281029103110321033103410361037103810390+ 1 0 1+ 0 0 2+ 0 0 3+ 0 0 4+ 0 0 5+006+007+00 8+00 9+00 10 + 0 0 11 + 0 0 12+0012+510+ 0 0 1+ 0 0 2+ 0 0 3+0 0 4+005+006+007+008+009+ 0 0 10 + 0 0 11 + 0 0 12 + 0 0 12 + 9 8 10301035102810291031103210331034103610301035 10281029103110321033103410 3 5 10 3 3 10 3 4 10 3 6 10 3 5 10 3 3 10 3 4 10 3 6 10 3 5 10 3 3 10 3 4 10 3 6 10 3 5 10 3 3 10 3 4 10 3 6 1 0 3 5 1 0 3 4 10 3 61035 10321033103410361036104010371038103910411036103710381036 1035 103 6 1035 103 6 1035 103 6 1035 103 6 10 2 9 10 3 0 103 1 10 3 2 10 3 3 103 4 10 3 5 1025103010241026102710281029103110321030102510271030 1041104010421026 1027 102 8 1 0 3 1103110311 0 3 2 103210321035 1035 1031 1031 1032 1032 1033 1033 1034 10341034 IP1IP2 IP1IP2 IP1IP2 IP1IP2 IP1IP2 IP1IP2 IP1IP2 IP1IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1IP2 IP1IP2 IP1IP2 IP1IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 IP1 IP2 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | THOMAS KEELEY | 7/25/2024 1:35:29 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C5.01-EROS.DWG:C5.01 EROSION CONTROL PLAN© 2021 Sambatek LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNSITE PLAN APPLICATION 52927 07/26/2024 TPK CC JDB 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY SILT FENCE LINEAR FEET X SILT DIKE LINEAR FEET X BIO-ROLL LINEAR FEET X CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE UNIT X INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-1)UNIT X INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-2)UNIT X INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-3)UNIT X THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. * REFER TO SHEET C5.03 & C5.04 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCENOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND NOTE TO CONTRACTOR EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES BIO-ROLL SILT FENCE SILT DIKE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH CHECK DAM LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICEIP# TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINSB TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES (SEED, MULCH, MATS OR BLANKETS AS OUTLINED IN THE SWPP)TSM TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREATS TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DRAINTILE 902 CONTOUR OVERFLOW ELEV.EOF902.5 SOIL BORING999.9 ST # RIPRAP CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER 24.1S (LMS TECH) | THOMAS KEELEY | 7/25/2024 1:35:29 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C5.01-EROS.DWG:C5.01 EROSION CONTROL PLANEROSION CONTROL PLAN C5.01 ### # Exhibit G Page 383 of 452 FIL T R A T I O N B A S I N H W L : 1 0 2 6 . 3 2 OU T L E T : 1 0 2 4 . 7 0 BO T T O M : 1 0 2 3 . 1 7 NU R P P O N D H W L : 1 0 2 7 . 1 8 OU T L E T 1 0 2 4 . 7 0 N W L : 1 0 2 4 . 5 0 BO T T O M : 1 0 1 5 . 0 0 EXISTING WETLANDNWL: 1017.93 RE:1023.56IE:1013.09 N, S RE:1021.70IE:1011.50 N, S RE:1023.58IE:1009.86 NIE:1009.74 S, W 18" CMPIE:1027.78 18" CMPIE:1027.88 18" CMPIE:1036.67 18" CMPIE:1036.96 JU N I P E R W A Y (C. S . A . H . N O . 7 0 ) EX C E P T I O N TEMPORARY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 46215315 1525912592259325942595 259625972598 2599 2600 2601 2602 260326042605 26062607 260826092610261126122613 2614 261526162617 2618 26192620 2621 26222623 26242625 26262627 2628 2629 2630 26312632 2633 2634 263526362637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 26452647264826492650 265126522653 26542655265626572658 2659 266026612662 2663 26642665 2666 2667266826692670 2671 26722673 2674 2675 2676 267726782679 2680268126822683 26842685 2686 2687 2688 2689 26902691 2692 2693 26942695 2696 26972698 2699 27002701 2702270327042705 2706 270727082709 2710 2711 271227132714 2715 27162717 2718 27192720 272127222723 2724272527262727 272827292730 27312732 2733273427352736 27372738273927402741 2742 2743 2744 2745 2746 2747 27482749 2750 2751 2752 275327542755 2756 275727582759276027612762 276327642766 2767 2768 1373 138313841385 13861387 1388 13891390 139113921393 139413951396 1397 8" BUILDING SANITARY SERVICESTUB IE=1021.70 SW CONNECT TO EXISTING SAN. STUB IE=1019.12 (FIELD VERIFY) 129 LF - 8" PVC SCH 40 @ 2.00% TEE GATE VALVE (2) 90° BEND GATE VALVE (2) HYDRANT TEE GATE VALVE (2) TEE GATE VALVE (2) TEE GATE VALVE (2) TEE GATE VALVE 45° BENDS BUILDING WATER SERVICE HYDRANT HYDRANT HYDRANT HYDRANT WATERMAINW A T E R M A I NWATERMAIN CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN STUB W A T E R M A I N 0+ 1 0 1+ 0 0 2+ 0 0 3+ 0 0 4+ 0 0 5+006+007+00 8+00 9+00 10 + 0 0 11 + 0 0 12+0012+510+ 0 0 1+ 0 0 2+ 0 0 3+0 0 4+005+006+007+008+009+ 0 0 10 + 0 0 11 + 0 0 12 + 0 0 12 + 9 8 CBMH 105 RE=1037.78 IE=1030.64 SE IE=1030.64 NE CBMH 104 RE=1035.43 IE=1030.20 SW IE=1030.20 N CBMH 103 RE=1036.62 IE=1030.15 S IE=1028.18 E CBMH 106A RE=1034.36 IE=1031.05 NW IE=1031.05 SE CBMH 107A RE=1034.61 IE=1031.61 SE CBMH 107 RE=1034.61 IE=1031.61 NW CBMH 106 RE=1034.35 IE=1031.05 SE IE=1031.05 NW ROOF DRAIN IE=1030.33 NE ROOF DRAIN IE=1028.16 NE ROOF DRAIN IE=1028.38 NE ROOF DRAIN IE=1027.92 NE CBMH 102 RE=1031.30 IE=1027.72 W IE=1027.72 SW IE=1027.72 SE CBMH 102A RE=1030.65 IE=1025.54 SE IE=1025.54 SW IE=1025.54 NW CBMH 103A RE=1030.40 IE=1025.76 SW IE=1027.41 SE IE=1025.76 NW CBMH 101 RE=1030.65 IE=1026.55 NW IE=1025.30 SE IE=1025.30 SW IE=1025.30 NE FES 100 IE=1024.88 SW 225 LF - 15'' HDPE @ 0.25% 193 LF - 18'' HDPE @ 0.21% 24 LF - 18'' HDPE @ 0.21% 268 LF - 24'' HDPE @ 0.17% 225 LF - 24'' HDPE @ 0.52% 79 LF - 36'' HDPE @ 0.53% 225 LF - 36'' HDPE @ 0.10% 200 LF - 36'' HDPE @ 0.12% 131 LF - 14'' PVC SCH 40 @ 2.00% 131 LF - 14'' PVC SCH 40 @ 2.00% 131 LF - 14'' PVC SCH 40 @ 2.00% 131 LF - 14'' PVC SCH 40 @ 2.00% 30 LF - 24'' HDPE @ 0.17% 225 LF - 15'' HDPE @ 0.25% 150 LF - 18'' HDPE @ 0.21% CBMH 105A RE=1035.31 IE=1030.73 NW IE=1028.42 NE 265 LF - 18'' HDPE @ 0.21% 175 LF - 18'' HDPE @ 0.21% CBMH 104A RE=1031.37 IE=1027.86 SW IE=1027.86 N CBMH 103B RE=1031.10 IE=1027.50 S IE=1027.50 NW 40 LF - 18'' HDPE @ 0.22% 267 LF - 36'' HDPE @ 1.29% STMH 204 RE=1028.01 IE=1019.05 NW IE=1019.05 NW IE=1019.05 S 202 LF - 36'' HDPE @ 0.38% STMH 205 RE=1031.40 IE=1018.28 N IE=1018.28 SE 73 LF - 36'' HDPE @ 0.38% FES 206 IE=1018.00 NW FES 200 IE=1022.50 SE 25 LF - 24'' HDPE @ -8.09% STMH 201 RE=1027.50 IE=1024.50 NW IE=1023.17 SE15 LF - 24'' HDPE @ 0.00%FES 202 IE=1023.17 NW105 LF - 18'' HDPE @ 0.25% CBMH 104B RE=1035.16 IE=1030.33 SW IE=1030.33 NE 92 LF - 24'' HDPE @ 0.14% CBMH 105B RE=1037.09 IE=1030.59 SW IE=1030.59 NE FES 300 IE=1037.65 SE 104 LF - 18'' CMP @ 0.93% FES 301 IE=1036.68 NW FES 302 IE=1022.88 SE 152 LF - 24'' CMP @ 0.92% FES 303 IE=1021.49 NW TEE GATE VALVE HYDRANT HYDRANT TEE GATE VALVE (2) 45° BENDS CBMH 307 RE=1026.38 IE=1022.32 SE 84 LF - 12'' HDPE @ 1.77% CBMH 306 RE=1023.64 IE=1020.83 NW IE=1020.83 N 174 LF - 12'' HDPE @ 0.50% 38 LF - 12'' HDPE @ 2.00%CBMH 305 RE=1026.61 IE=1019.96 S IE=1022.59 W IE=1019.96 E CBMH 305A RE=1027.73 IE=1023.35 E 42 LF - 12'' HDPE @ 1.00% FES 304 IE=1019.53 W FES 203B IE=1022.50 S 34 LF - 36'' HDPE @ 0.00% OCS 203A SEE DETAILSHEET C9.02 RE=1027.90 IE=1022.50 N IE=1022.50 SE FES 200C IE=1022.50 SE 25 LF - 24'' HDPE @ -8.06% STMH 201C RE=1027.50 IE=1024.50 NW IE=1023.17 SE 16 LF - 24'' HDPE @ 0.00% FES 202C IE=1023.17 NW (48") (DRAINTILE) 6" PVC SCH 40 0.5% MIN (TYP) NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | THOMAS KEELEY | 8/20/2024 1:07:13 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C6.01-UTIL.DWG:C6.01 UTILITY PLAN© 2021 Sambatek LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNSITE PLAN APPLICATION 52927 07/26/2024 TPK CC JDB 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINEUNDERGROUND TELEPHONEUNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DRAINTILE SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN (SAN.) STORM SEWER CONCRETE CURB WATERMAIN EASEMENT LINE 24.1S (LMS TECH) | THOMAS KEELEY | 8/20/2024 1:07:13 PML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-C6.01-UTIL.DWG:C6.01 UTILITY PLANUTILITY PLAN C6.01 ### # 1.THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS" AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS. a.ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIRMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY AND MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REQUIREMENTS. b.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN, TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO OR TAP WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE THE LIABILITY OF CONTRACTOR. c.A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES, AND HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10-FEET, BETWEEN OUTSIDE PIPE AND/OR STRUCTURE WALLS, IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN AND SEWER MAIN (BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS. 2.ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. a.ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. b.ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR-35, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. i.ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BUILDING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS APPROVED FOR USE WITHIN A BUILDING (SEE TABLE 701.2 OF 2020 MN PLUMBING CODE). ii.ALL SANITARY SEWER WITHIN 10 FEET OF, CROSSING ABOVE, OR WITHIN 12-INCHES BELOW, A POTABLE WATER LINE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS APPROVED FOR USE WITHIN A BUILDING (SEE TABLE 701.2 OF 2020 MN PLUMBING CODE). c.ALL WATERMAIN TO BE DUCTILE IRON - CLASS 52, or PVC C-900, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. i.ALL WATERMAIN TO HAVE 7.5-FEET OF COVER OVER TOP OF WATERMAIN. ii.PROVIDE THRUST BLOCKING AND MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINTS ON ALL WATERMAIN JOINTS PER CITY STANDARDS. iii.WHERE A SEWER LINE CROSSES A WATER SERVICE, THE WATER SERVICE SHALL NOT CONTAIN ANY JOINTS OR CONNECTIONS WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE CROSSING. d.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE SMOOTH INTERIOR DUAL WALL HDPE PIPE WITH WATERTIGHT GASKETS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. i.ALL STORM SEWER CROSSING ABOVE, OR WITHIN 12-INCHES BELOW, A POTABLE WATER LINE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS APPROVED FOR USE WITHIN A BUILDING (SEE TABLE 701.2 OF 2020 MN PLUMBING CODE). ii.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE FOR ROOF DRAIN SERVICES TO THE BUILDING, OR WITHIN 10' OF A BUILDING, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MATERIALS APPROVED FOR USE WITHIN A BUILDING (SEE TABLE 701.2 OF 2020 MN PLUMBING CODE). e.RIP RAP SHALL BE Mn/DOT CLASS 3. 3.COORDINATE ALL BUILDING SERVICE CONNECTION LOCATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4.ALL BUILDING SERVICE CONNECTIONS (STORM, SANITARY, WATER) WITH FIVE FEET OR LESS COVER ARE TO BE INSULATED FROM BUILDING TO POINT WHERE 5-FEET OF COVER IS ACHIEVED. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. 6.SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 7.ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED BENEATH THE SOD. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. 9.ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE UTILITY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY:COMPANY: ADDRESS: PHONE: DATED: CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THIS SOILS REPORT. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF SHOP DRAWINGS FOR MANHOLE AND CATCH BASIN STRUCTURES TO ______________. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW 5 WORKING DAYS FOR SHOP DRAWING REVIEW. 11.CONTRACTOR AND MATERIAL SUPPLIER SHALL DETERMINE THE MINIMUM DIAMETER REQUIRED FOR EACH STORM SEWER STRUCTURE. 12.THE UTILITY DESIGN DOES NOT INCLUDE WATERMAIN ELEVATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL WATERMAIN AT DEPTHS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE AGENCIES AND SHALL DETERMINE LOCATIONS OF CONFLICTS WITH OTHER UTILITIES AND INCLUDE THE REQUIRED EFFORTS TO AVOID CONFLICTS (BENDS, MATERIAL CHANGES, ETC.) IN THEIR BIDS. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD PLANS AS REQUIRED BY PERMITTING AGENCIES. Exhibit H Page 384 of 452 NOPARKING NOPARKING NOPARKING NOPARKING 18" CMP IE:1036.6718" CMP IE:1036.96N89°50'19"E 1317.83S 0 0 ° 1 0 ' 0 8 "W 2 1 6 . 8 4 N 0 0 ° 1 0 ' 0 8 " E 2 1 6 . 8 4N89°50'19"E 1317.83ROCK MULCH ROCK MULCH ROCK MULCH 6LBS 3BT 5LBS 3BT 10LBS 9BT 6SN BT6 LBS5 BT9 LBS5 SN3 SN6 BH8 SW4 NS3 1AB AB1 1SG 1SG 3NS BS3 HL1 AB1 11BH224BJ 6BT 3SN 4SN 3LBS SO2 MATCH LINEMATCH LINESN3 BT6 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | THOMAS KEELEY | 8/19/2024 9:40:07 AML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-L1.01-LSCP.DWG:L1.01 LANDSCAPE PLAN WEST© 2021 Sambatek LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNSITE PLAN APPLICATION 52927 07/26/2024 SG SG JRW 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 6030 NORTH LANDSCAPE PLAN WEST L1.01 ##### 11-21-9 : REQUIRED SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING A. LANDSCAPING: REQUIRED LANDSCAPING FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS AND COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL OR INSTITUTIONAL USES SHALL INCLUDE PLANTINGS AT THE PROPERTY PERIMETER, OFF STREET PARKING PERIMETER LANDSCAPING AND INTERIOR LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS AS WELL AS REQUIRED RESIDENTIAL BUFFER YARD OR TRANSITIONAL BUFFER ZONE PLANTINGS. D. OFF STREET PARKING AREAS: ALL OFF STREET PARKING AREAS WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE PARKING SPACES : 2. FOR ALL COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL USES, AND FOR THOSE INDUSTRIAL USES ABUTTING A MAJOR COLLECTOR OR ARTERIAL STREET, A CONTINUOUS OPAQUE BARRIER WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THIRTY SIX INCHES (36") SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE PERIMETER ABUTTING PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTIES THAT CONSISTS OF PLANTINGS, HEDGES, DECORATIVE OR ORNAMENTAL FENCES, WALLS OR EARTH BERMS OR ANY COMBINATION THEREOF. 3. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE SET BACK TWO FEET (2') FROM PARKING STALLS TO ALLOW PARKING OF VEHICLES WITHOUT EXTENDING OVER THE LANDSCAPED AREA. 11-75-13: DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS B. LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS: LOT COVERAGE: 30 PERCENT OF THE LOT, PARCEL OR TRACT OF LAND SHALL REMAIN AS A GRASS PLOT INCLUDING SHRUBBERY, PLANTINGS, OR FENCING AND SHALL BE LANDSCAPED. LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED CITY LANDSCAPE CODE PLANT SCHEDULE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TREE TO BE REMOVED D S LS RIPRAP LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED LAKEVILLE LANDSCAPE CODE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TREE TO BE REMOVED D S LS RIPRAP SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY TREES AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 3 SG Acer freemanii `Sienna Glen` / Sienna Glen Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 2 HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 1 SO Quercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 2 CONIFERS NS Picea abies / Norway Spruce B & B 8`6 BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 8`3 SHRUBS BT Berberis thunbergii 'NCBT1' / Sunjoy Mini Maroon® Barberry 5 gal.18"42 BH Diervilla lonicera / Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle 5 gal 18"19 BJ Juniperus sabina `Broadmoor` / Broadmoor Juniper 5 gal 24"79 SW Physocarpus opulifolius `Summer Wine` / Summer Wine Ninebark 5 gal 24"4 SN Spiraea x 'NCSX2' / Double Play Doozie® Spirea 5 gal 18"25 GRASSES LBS Schizachyrium scoparium `Blue Heaven` / Blue Heaven Little Bluestem 1 gal 34 PLANT SCHEDULE WEST GROUND COVER SCHEDULE CALCULATIONS DECIDUOUS TREES CONIFEROUS TREES ORNAMENTAL TREES SHRUBS SITE AREA : 15.97 AC PROPOSED 15 12 0 266 6.38 AC (40%) REQUIRED---- 4.79 AC (30%) SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME GROUND COVERS RT MNDOT Residential Turfgrass Seed Mix / Formerly 25-151 SSR MNDOT Southern Shortgrass Seed Mix / Formerly Seed Mix 36-311/36-211 WD MNDOT Wet Ditch Seed Mix / Formerly 33-261 TUR HIG Turf Sod Highland Sod / Sod PLANT SCHEDULE Exhibit I Page 385 of 452 PROPOSED BUILDING 189,678 SF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 15.974 AC, 695,814 SF NOPARKING NOPARKING FILTRATION BASIN HWL: 1026.32 OUTLET: 1024.70 BOTTOM: 1023.17NURP POND HWL:1027.18 OUTLET 1024.70 NWL:1024.50 BOTTOM:1015.00 NOPARKING NOPARKING EXISTINGWETLAND NWL: 1017.93RE:1023.56IE:1013.09 N, SRE:1021.70IE:1011.50 N, SRE:1023.58IE:1009.86 NIE:1009.74 S, W 18" CMP IE:1027.7818" CMP IE:1027.88S 0 0 ° 0 6 ' 2 1 "W 1 3 1 5 . 9 2 0+501 0 3 5 . 1 1 0 3 5 . 1 1 1+001 0 3 5 . 6 1 0 3 5 . 6 1 ROCK MULCH ROCK MULCH ROCK MULCH ROCK MULCH 1GB 1AB 1HL AB1 AB1 21BH 21BH 4SN 3LBS 5LBS 7BT 6SN 5LBS 7BT 3SN 3LBS 4SN 6BT 3SN LBS5 BT9 SN6 5LBS SN7 BT3 LBS5 SN6 BT6 LBS6 5BT 3SN 5LBS 3SN 5LBS3BT 5LBS 3SN 7LBS 3NS 2BO MATCH LINEMATCH LINEBT6 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental 24.1S (LMS TECH) | THOMAS KEELEY | 8/19/2024 9:40:07 AML:\PROJECTS\52927\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52927-L1.01-LSCP.DWG:L1.02 LANDSCAPE PLAN EAST© 2021 Sambatek LIKEWISE PARTNERSLAKEVILLE 35 LOGISTICS CENTER NORTH LAKEVILLE, MNSITE PLAN APPLICATION 52927 07/26/2024 SG SG JRW 07/26/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT SUBMITTAL 08/20/2024 TPK EWM EWM CITY ENTITLEMENT RE-SUBMITTAL SCALE IN FEET 0 6030 NORTH LANDSCAPE PLAN EAST L1.02 ##### LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TREE TO BE REMOVED D S LS RIPRAP SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY TREES AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 3 GB Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold` TM / Maidenhair Tree B & B 2.5"Cal 1 HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 1 BO Quercus macrocarpa / Burr Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 2 CONIFERS NS Picea abies / Norway Spruce B & B 8`3 SHRUBS BT Berberis thunbergii 'NCBT1' / Sunjoy Mini Maroon® Barberry 5 gal.18"46 BH Diervilla lonicera / Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle 5 gal 18"42 BJ Juniperus sabina `Broadmoor` / Broadmoor Juniper 5 gal 24"145 SN Spiraea x 'NCSX2' / Double Play Doozie® Spirea 5 gal 18"44 GRASSES LBS Schizachyrium scoparium `Blue Heaven` / Blue Heaven Little Bluestem 1 gal 56 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT GROUND COVERS RT MNDOT Residential Turfgrass Seed Mix / Formerly 25-151 Seed SSR MNDOT Southern Shortgrass Seed Mix / Formerly Seed Mix 36-311/36-211 Seed WD MNDOT Wet Ditch Seed Mix / Formerly 33-261 Seed TUR HIG Turf Sod Highland Sod / Sod Sod PLANT SCHEDULE EAST Page 386 of 452 OWNER: LIKEWISE PARTNERS 1600 UTICA AVENUE SOUTH ST LOUIS PARK, MN ARCHITECT: EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS 7710 GOLDEN TRIANGLE DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 PHONE: 952-943-9660 CONTACT: ED FARR CIVIL ENGINEER: SAMBATEK 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 PHONE: 763-476-6010 CONTACT: ERIK MILLER SURVEYOR: SAMBATEK 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 PHONE: 763-476-6010 CONTACT: JARED AVERBECK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SAMBATEK 12800 WHITEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 300 MINNETONKA, MN 55343 PHONE: 763-476-6010 CONTACT: JOHN WORKMAN SHEET INDEX: A0 COVER SHEET A1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A2 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN A3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS & TRASH ENCLOSURE A5 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS ARCHITCTURAL LIGHTING -- SITE LIGHTING Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Project Manager Date Reg. No. I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2024 Location PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Likewise Partners 1600 Utica Avenue South 9th Floor St. Louis Park, Minnesota 7/25/2024 4:30:38 PMA024.034 COVER SHEET / CODE INFORMATION 07/26/2024 16362 NSL Speculative Warehouse County Road 70 Lakeville, Minnesota County Road 70 Industrial Lakeville, Minnesota Likewise Warehouse VACINITY MAP SITE N BUILDING RENDERING SITE PLAN REVIEW 07/26/2024 Exhibit J Page 387 of 452 FILT R A TIO N B A SIN H W L: 1 0 2 8.0 2 xxx O U TLET: 1 0 2 4.5 0 B O TT O M : 1 0 2 3.1 7 N U R P P O N D H W L:1 0 2 9.2 4 xxx N W L:1 0 2 4.5 0 B O TT O M :1 0 1 5.0 0 C .S.A. H . N O . 7 0 TRASH ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURERAMP UPRAMP UPRAMP UPRAMP UPRAMP UPT R AIL E R P A R KI N G 4 6 S T A L L SDOCKDOCKDOCKDOCKDOCKDOCK DOCKDOCKDOCKDOCKDOCKDOCKDOCKDOCKDOCKDOCKDOCKDOCKDOCKDOCKTENANT SIGNAGE. SEE ELEVATIONS TENANT SIGNAGE. SEE ELEVATIONS TENANT SIGNAGE. SEE ELEVATIONS TENANT SIGNAGE. SEE ELEVATIONS MONUMENT SIGN, SEE 2/A1 ELECTRIC WATER RESTROOM TRANSFORMER 93 27 20 20 27 16 20 46 22 3 S T A L L S 9 0 0' - 0"210' - 0"CONCRETE APRON A4 4 LIGHT POLE (TYP.) LIGHT POLE LIGHT POLE FDC GAS METERS CONNECTION CABINETS 10601 JUNIPER WAY TENANT 1 8' - 0"1' - 0"4' - 0".10' - 0"METAL TRIM. MATCH BLUE OF BUILDING PAINTED WHITE PRECAST. MATCH WHITE OF BUILDING PAINTED MEDIUM GRAY PRECAST. MATCH MEDIUM GRAY OF BUILDING BUILDING ADDRESS NUMERALS & LETTERS POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION 2" REVEALS PAINTED DARY GRAY PRECAST. MATCH DARK GRAY OF BUILIDNG 6"7' - 0"6"7' - 6"2' - 6"TENANT 2 TENANT 3 TENANT 4 TENANT 5 TENANT 6 MONUMENT SIGN 100 SF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SITE DATA: SITE AREA: 695,814 SF 15.97 ACRES ZONING: OP - OFFICE PARK BUILDING:189,678 SF ZONING PARKING CALCULATIONS: 15% OFFICE = 2,845 SF @ 1/200 = 15 STALLS 85% WHSE = 186,833 SF @ 1/1000 = 187 STALLS TOTAL: 202 STALLS REQUIRED 223 STALLS PROVIDED Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Project Manager Date Reg. No. I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2024 Location PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Likewise Partners 1600 Utica Avenue South 9th Floor St. Louis Park, Minnesota 7/25/2024 4:30:40 PMA124.034 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 07/26/2024 16362 NSL Speculative Warehouse County Road 70 Lakeville, Minnesota N 0'30'60'120'SCALE:1" = 50'-0"A1 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SCALE:3/8" = 1'-0"A1 2 MONUMENT SIGN SITE PLAN REVIEW 07/26/2024 Page 388 of 452 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< < < < < < <<< <<<<<<<< <<<<<<<< <<<<<<<< <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< <<<<<<<< <<<<<<<< <<<<<<<< << << <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII12345678910111213141516171819 A B C D E 900' - 0"210' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"50' - 0"60' - 0"A3 3 A3 2 ELECTRIC WATER RESTROOM OHCW OHCWOHCW OHCWSAN SAN STORMSTORMSTORMSTORMSAN SAN STORM STORM STORM STORM SANHATCHED AREA INDICATES UNDER-SLAB VAPOR RETARDER ROOF DRAIN (TYP) T 5.9 14.1 EXPANSION JOINTEXPANSION JOINTFDC GAS METERS CONNECTION CABINETS Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Project Manager Date Reg. No. I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2024 Location PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Likewise Partners 1600 Utica Avenue South 9th Floor St. Louis Park, Minnesota 7/25/2024 4:30:42 PMA224.034 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 07/26/2024 16362 NSL Speculative Warehouse County Road 70 Lakeville, Minnesota 0'16'32'64' N SCALE:1/32" = 1'-0"A2 1 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN - PLAN NORTH SITE PLAN REVIEW 07/26/2024 Page 389 of 452 FLOOR 1 100' -0" T/ PRECAST 139' -0" 12345678910111213141516171819 99991010 111111111112131415 16 1717 18 FDC GAS METERS CONNECTION CABINETS 19 FLOOR 1 100' -0" T/ PRECAST 139' -0" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 A4 2 A4 1 A4 3 6 1 23 45 77 8 8 999999 9 9 99 7 1820 6 FLOOR 1 100' -0" T/ PRECAST 139' -0" ACDE 9910 18 7 16 138 6 B FLOOR 1 100' -0" T/ PRECAST 139' -0" A C D E99101816 13 7 8 6 B Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Project Manager Date Reg. No. I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2024 Location PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION8/22/2024 3:33:57 PMA324.034 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 07/26/2024 16362 NSL Speculative Warehouse 21300 Juniper Way Lakeville, Minnesota 0'8'16'32' 0'8'16'32' 0'16'32'64'SCALE:1/32" = 1'-0"A3 2 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/32" = 1'-0"A3 1 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0"A3 3 EAST ELEVATION SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0"A3 4 WEST ELEVATION 0'16'32'64' MATERIALS 1 SMOOTH PAINTED PRECAST WALL PANEL - PAINT 1 - WHITE 2 SMOOTH PAINTED PRECAST WALL PANEL - PAINT 2 - LIGHT GRAY 3 SMOOTH PAINTED PRECAST WALL PANEL - PAINT 3 - MEDIUM GRAY 4 SMOOTH PAINTED PRECAST WALL PANEL - PAINT 4 - DARK GRAY 5 SMOOTH PAINTED PRECAST WALL PANEL - PAINT 5 - BLUE 6 MCM WALL PANEL SYSTEM - BLUE 7 MCM WALL PANEL SYSTEM - GRAY 8 ALUMINUM AND GLASS STOREFRONT SYSTEM 9 AREA LIGHT 10 EXIT LIGHT (TYP.) 11 OVERHEAD DRIVE-IN DOOR 12 OVERHEAD DOCK DOOR WITH LEVELER AND DOCK SEAL 13 HOLLOW METAL DOOR WITH TRANSOM 14 METAL DOCK STAIR 15 BOLLARD 16 CLERESTORY WINDOW 17 CONCRETE STAIR WITH METAL RAILING 18 PREFINISHED METAL COPING 19 KNOCK-OUT PANEL 20 TENANT SIGNAGE 21 ADDRESS NUMERALS SITE PLAN REVIEW 07/26/2024 REVISED DOCK HEIGHT 08/22/2024 Page 390 of 452 FLOOR 1 100' -0" T/ PRECAST 139' -0" 18 19 1 2 3 8 7 20 21 2 2 1 1 1 1 18 FLOOR 1 100' -0" T/ PRECAST 139' -0" 6 7 8 1 3 8 7 20 2 1 18 1 1 1 2 4 444 3 2 5 5.9 FLOOR 1 100' -0" T/ PRECAST 139' -0" 1 2 3 4 8 9 2 2 A A4 6 A4 5 8' - 6"16' - 0" SLOPE SLAB TO DRAIN AWAY CONTROL JT TRTD 2 x 10 WOOD BUMPERS (3 SIDES) 6" GATE POST CONC FILLED SOLID PRECAST PANEL. PAINT BOTH SIDES LIGHT GRAY A4 6 REV 14.1 A PRECAST PANEL. PAINT LIGHT GRAY BOTH SIDES DOCK WALL T/ SLAB 96' -0"4' - 8"7' - 0"PAINTED MTL DECK SWING GATES. 6" GATE POST PREFINISHED MTL COPING CANE BOLT T/ PRECAST 103' -8" 14.1 Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Project Manager Date Reg. No. I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2024 Location PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Likewise Partners 1600 Utica Avenue South 9th Floor St. Louis Park, Minnesota 7/25/2024 4:30:48 PMA424.034 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS & TRASH ENCLOSURE 07/26/2024 16362 NSL Speculative Warehouse County Road 70 Lakeville, Minnesota SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A4 2 SOUTHEAST CORNER - FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A4 1 ENLARGED INTERMEDIATE - 8' FLANKING WINDOWS SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0"A4 3 ENLARGED FIRE ACCESS MATERIALS 1 SMOOTH PAINTED PRECAST WALL PANEL - PAINT 1 - WHITE 2 SMOOTH PAINTED PRECAST WALL PANEL - PAINT 2 - LIGHT GRAY 3 SMOOTH PAINTED PRECAST WALL PANEL - PAINT 3 - MEDIUM GRAY 4 SMOOTH PAINTED PRECAST WALL PANEL - PAINT 4 - DARK GRAY 5 SMOOTH PAINTED PRECAST WALL PANEL - PAINT 5 - BLUE 6 MCM WALL PANEL SYSTEM - BLUE 7 MCM WALL PANEL SYSTEM - GRAY 8 ALUMINUM AND GLASS STOREFRONT SYSTEM 9 AREA LIGHT 10 EXIT LIGHT (TYP.) 11 OVERHEAD DRIVE-IN DOOR 12 OVERHEAD DOCK DOOR WITH LEVELER AND DOCK SEAL 13 HOLLOW METAL DOOR WITH TRANSOM 14 METAL DOCK STAIR 15 BOLLARD 16 CLERESTORY WINDOW 17 CONCRETE STAIR 18 PREFINISHED METAL COPING 19 KNOCK-OUT PANEL 20 TENANT SIGNAGE 21 ADDRESS NUMERALS SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A4 4 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A4 6 TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION - SIDE SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A4 5 TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION - FRONT SITE PLAN REVIEW 07/26/2024 Page 391 of 452 Sheet Title Project Number Sheet Number Issued For Date Project Client Project Manager Date Reg. No. I hereby certified that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2024 Location PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Likewise Partners 1600 Utica Avenue South 9th Floor St. Louis Park, Minnesota 7/25/2024 4:30:50 PMA524.034 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS 07/26/2024 16362 NSL Speculative Warehouse County Road 70 Lakeville, Minnesota SCALE:NO SCALEA5 1 VIEW - FRONT OF BUILDING PERSPECTIVE SCALE:NO SCALEA5 2 VIEW - CORNER ENTRY SOUTHEAST SCALE:NO SCALEA5 3 VIEW - CORNER ELEVATION SOUTH SCALE: NO SCALE A5 4 VIEW - SECONDARY ENTRY SOUTH SCALE: NO SCALE A5 5 VIEW - SECONDARY ENTRY NORTH SITE PLAN REVIEW 07/26/2024 Page 392 of 452 Page 1 of 2Date:7/25/2024DISCLAIMER: Based on the information provided, all dimensions and luminaire locationsshown represent recommended positions. Actual performance of any manufacturer's luminairesmay vary due to changes in electrical voltage, tolerance in LEDs and othervariable field conditions. Calculations do not include obstructions such as buildings,curbs, landscaping or any other architectural elements unless noted.Fixture nomenclature to be finalized by engineer and/or architect.This drawings is for photometric evaluation purposes only andshould not be used as a construction document or as a final documentfor ordering product.Designed By: K. TomczakType P1, P2 & P3:Type W1 & W2:Likewise Juniper SiteChecked By: Alyssa HammellScale: 1" = 70'Luminaire ScheduleSymbolQtyCalculation SummaryLabelUnitsAvgTypeMountingHeightLum. WattsMaxMinAvg/MinMax/MinParking Lot and DriveLuminaire LumensLLFDescription7P1Fc35316350750.900NV-2-T4-96L-1-40K1.747.00.71P235168127070.900NV-2-T4-80L-7-40K8-HSS2.4910.00Property LineFc0.234P3351.00.0N.A.N.A.106129320.900NV-1-T2-32L-1-40K-UNV17W135205229510.900NV-W2-T4-64L-1-40K720W21019.021927440.900OWS-FC-116-LED-3ML-DIM10-120V-347V-3CCT-BZMH: 35W1W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W1MH: 35W2MH: 10W2MH: 10W2MH: 10W1MH: 35MH: 10W2W2MH: 10W2MH: 10W2MH: 10MH: 10W2W2MH: 10W2MH: 10MH: 10W2W2MH: 10MH: 10W2MH: 10W2MH: 10W2W2MH: 10W2MH: 10W2MH: 10W2MH: 10MH: 10W2P1MH: 35P1MH: 35MH: 35P1P1MH: 35MH: 35P1P1MH: 35P2MH: 35P3MH: 35P3MH: 35MH: 35P3MH: 35P3MH: 35P10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.00.10.00.00.30.00.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.80.60.60.40.30.40.60.40.60.41.00.60.20.00.30.10.60.50.20.20.30.50.50.40.50.40.50.70.90.90.60.20.20.10.40.30.20.40.40.40.30.30.40.20.20.30.40.40.40.40.30.30.20.00.40.00.00.00.10.40.20.30.30.30.20.20.20.20.10.00.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.30.30.30.30.40.50.00.30.00.20.20.10.10.10.10.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.50.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.50.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.20.10.20.10.10.10.10.20.10.10.60.60.40.20.00.40.10.30.40.40.40.40.40.40.20.40.40.30.30.30.30.20.20.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.40.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.30.30.30.30.30.40.30.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.40.00.00.00.30.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.01.00.8 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.8 1.9 1.81.0 0.90.91.51.12.50.91.31.41.31.5 1.4 1.5 2.20.81.42.10.9 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.92.90.81.4 1.3 1.7 2.5 3.30.91.02.40.9 1.1 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.11.11.32.1 3.1 4.01.1 0.91.11.01.01.11.9 2.6 2.91.1 1.11.71.10.90.7 1.3 1.2 0.71.13.33.32.81.2 0.91.2 1.8 1.90.83.10.91.02.2 0.73.0 2.4 0.80.81.21.21.1 2.2 1.6 0.72.21.50.91.21.30.9 1.0 1.3 1.73.51.41.12.41.1 1.1 1.6 2.53.7 1.51.61.50.81.3 1.01.2 0.90.70.91.60.91.10.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.51.42.72.11.71.31.00.91.01.11.21.41.41.31.72.12.93.23.02.51.71.51.51.41.10.91.62.53.03.00.92.41.93.73.42.71.91.41.11.01.01.01.11.21.11.12.61.61.82.8 2.00.8 0.91.21.41.51.9 2.3 2.23.3 2.13.11.00.90.91.01.01.01.41.72.22.42.12.21.81.42.51.01.53.73.42.72.22.01.71.41.00.91.01.11.11.21.11.91.61.20.90.90.90.91.11.41.71.92.22.93.30.91.60.91.8 2.0 2.2 2.73.02.92.70.9 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.31.13.01.33.42.92.01.41.51.51.20.92.42.41.91.62.91.62.11.11.11.00.90.80.91.01.31.61.82.12.63.01.51.71.51.92.23.23.62.01.61.51.21.00.91.81.63.00.92.21.5 1.4 1.5 1.31.41.01.60.9 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.42.81.11.02.60.90.94.04.43.32.21.51.21.21.11.11.11.22.85.21.0 1.1 1.2 1.51.12.91.12.0 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.11.51.91.12.11.51.11.11.11.04.03.52.51.81.41.51.31.01.21.9 2.1 2.21.7 2.11.21.71.11.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.02.91.92.13.03.54.14.12.41.51.21.31.31.00.91.32.03.11.22.72.31.61.21.01.01.00.91.11.82.01.71.42.61.51.52.01.61.91.81.71.51.11.00.90.70.81.12.01.90.90.90.9 1.1 1.51.21.61.22.82.7 2.9 2.3 1.81.31.61.41.23.82.52.72.01.41.11.01.11.01.22.52.60.92.30.8 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.62.02.61.71.4 0.90.9 1.0 1.21.21.91.81.90.80.91.61.91.71.61.31.01.00.91.22.61.31.31.4 1.3 1.3 1.9 2.92.53.92.20.9 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.61.13.32.40.83.93.32.52.12.01.71.51.21.11.31.82.12.81.23.02.11.61.51.51.31.00.81.93.02.72.21.92.51.41.21.61.81.81.41.21.11.00.84.43.62.72.20.91.81.61.6 1.6 1.9 2.02.02.01.71.6 1.3 1.1 0.9 1.01.02.11.71.81.01.00.81.42.02.02.01.91.71.51.71.71.30.91.9 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.11.60.82.91.1 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.91.80.82.41.91.41.41.82.63.24.72.71.71.21.21.31.11.01.62.4 2.6 2.04.2 2.40.81.51.71.5 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.41.71.74.21.51.51.51.72.12.01.92.01.91.61.51.72.51.92.02.21.71.61.71.51.63.13.81.91.81.51.51.71.92.21.02.52.11.81.82.22.42.22.02.02.11.91.71.71.51.21.8 1.42.5 2.32.01.72.11.4 2.0 3.92.5 2.31.81.71.41.41.11.31.61.71.61.72.02.53.12.61.91.91.03.81.21.2 1.3 1.4 1.41.52.71.34.22.0 3.4 3.21.51.11.81.71.81.21.21.51.71.81.71.81.81.71.82.01.91.03.81.3 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.11.92.71.84.1 3.01.4 1.3 1.51.22.61.41.01.11.11.21.41.31.21.21.51.61.31.32.71.61.21.14.53.72.62.01.81.81.61.41.41.51.71.81.41.11.91.31.00.90.80.80.90.80.90.90.80.70.91.10.91.91.4 1.5 1.8 2.20.93.50.91.8 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.41.22.72.01.71.22.33.73.72.92.63.02.82.62.42.12.01.42.61.7 1.9 1.71.6 1.52.01.72.13.57.0 3.2 2.4 2.01.61.42.10.91.71.51.61.21.31.23.74.43.53.33.73.51.32.31.5 1.7 2.0 2.6 2.53.03.22.41.8 1.6 1.7 2.0 1.91.63.31.83.12.11.51.41.41.31.21.01.00.90.80.94.01.41.22.02.32.72.32.82.31.61.41.02.64.03.82.61.10.91.02.92.01.51.22.62.31.81.51.51.51.21.14.12.01.21.5 2.0 3.1 3.01.02.80.91.5 1.5 1.4 1.1 0.93.93.40.91.81.11.11.21.21.41.82.51.82.11.81.71.21.11.52.21.2 1.1 1.0 0.91.11.41.01.8 2.0 2.2 2.0 1.51.11.12.03.81.21.11.11.11.01.01.01.01.01.51.82.01.12.71.0 1.0 1.2 1.5 2.11.83.01.91.91.0 1.2 1.5 1.91.32.61.11.11.41.82.02.22.64.02.31.51.31.61.53.81.70.91.52.32.82.72.31.81.41.21.01.11.11.01.01.92.51.01.21.61.81.92.02.73.82.42.21.61.41.51.02.21.11.0 1.1 1.2 1.21.51.62.23.2 4.0 3.31.4 2.20.91.21.61.12.01.82.63.22.72.01.61.31.11.01.81.61.51.02.4 1.9 1.4 1.2 1.21.41.11.70.9 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.31.31.21.61.11.31.71.91.92.91.81.91.61.31.21.31.11.71.31.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.10.71.11.21.4 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.01.11.0Page 393 of 452 Dakota County Surveyor’s Office Western Service Center 14955 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124 952.891 -7087 Fax 952.891 -7127 www.co.dakota.mn.us August 30, 2024 City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Ave. Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: LIKEWISE PARTNERS The Dakota County Plat Commission met on August 28, 2024, to consider the preliminary plat of the above referenced plat. The plat is adjacent to CSAH 70 (Juniper Way) and is therefore subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. The proposed site includes a 190,000 square foot speculative building, lying northerly of CSAH 70. The right-of-way needs are 75 feet of half right of way, which have been met. CSAH 70 is a future principal roadway that requires ½-mile full access spacing and ¼-mile for restricted access locations. A full access would be allowed on the northern portion of the site, which would require reconstruction for turn lanes, medians, and lane widening. As discussed, a full access on the southern portion of the site would meet the access spacing guidelines; however, there are future challenges for adequate sight lines and safety of the intersection. A restricted access movement was discussed for the southern portion of the site. Further discussions will continue to occur with the city, county transportation, and the developer regarding access design and estimated construction costs. Restricted access should be shown along all of CSAH 70 except for two access openings. A quit claim deed to Dakota County for restricted access is required with the recording of the plat mylars. The Plat Commission has approved the preliminary plat provided that the described conditions are met. The Ordinance requires submittal of a final plat for review by the Plat Commission before a recommendation is made to the County Board of Commissioners. Traffic volumes on CSAH 70 are 15,842 ADT and are anticipated to be 16,800ADT by the year 2040. No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from the County Transportation Department and no permit will be issued until the plat has been filed with the County Recorder’s Office. The Plat Commission does not review or approve the actual engineering design of proposed accesses or other improvements to be made in the right of way. Nothing herein is intended to restrict or limit Dakota County’s rights with regards to Dakota County rights of way or property. The Plat Commission highly recommends early contact with the Transportation Department to discuss the permitting process which reviews the design and may require construction of highway improvements, including, but not limited to, turn lanes, drainage features, limitations on intersecting street widths, medians, etc. Exhibit K Page 394 of 452 Please contact TJ Bentley regarding permitting questions at (952) 891-7115 or Todd Tollefson regarding Plat Commission or Plat Ordinance questions at (952) 891-7070. Sincerely, Todd B. Tollefson Secretary, Plat Commission c: Steven Buss and Mark Nordland, Likewise Partners/ Erik Miller, Sambatek Page 395 of 452 Page 396 of 452 City of Lakeville Public Works – Engineering Division Memorandum To: Frank Dempsey, Associate Planner From: Michael Kutz, Civil Engineer McKenzie Cafferty, Environmental Resources Manager Joe Masiarchin, Parks and Recreation Director Copy: Zach Johnson, City Engineer Julie Stahl, Finance Director Dave Mathews, Building Official Tina Goodroad, Community Development Director Date: September 26, 2024 Subject: Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North • Preliminary Plat • Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan • Preliminary Utility Plan • Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan • Preliminary Site Plan BBAACCKKGGRROOUUNNDD Likewise Partners submitted a preliminary plat named Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North. The proposed development is located east of Interstate 35, north of and adjacent to 215th Street and bisected by County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 70 (Juniper Way). The parent parcel consists of one metes and bounds parcel in Section 36, Township 114, Range 21 (PID No. 22- 03600-07-011) zoned OP, Office Park District. The preliminary plat consists of one lot within one block, and one outlot on 39.07 acres. The property will be administratively subdivided between two parcels, north and south of the Juniper Way. The Developer is dedicating 6.63 acres for Juniper Way (CSAH 70) right-of-way. Page 397 of 452 LLAAKKEEVVIILLLLEE 3355 LLOOGGIISSTTIICCSS CCEENNTTEERR NNOORRTTHH –– PPRREELLIIMMIINNAARRYY PPLLAATT SSEEPPTTEEMMBBEERR 2266,, 22002244 PPAAGGEE 22 OOFF 77 The outlot created with the preliminary plat shall have the following use: Outlot A: Future development; retained by Developer (15.03 acres) The development will be completed by: Developer: Likewise Partners Engineer/Surveyor: Sambatek SSIITTEE CCOONNDDIITTIIOONNSS The Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North site contains undeveloped agricultural land and wooded areas. All existing remnants from the site, including field entrances and culverts, shall be removed with the final plat. The Developer must provide a security with the final plat to ensure the work is completed in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. There are no existing assessments levied against the parent parcel. EEAASSEEMMEENNTTSS Prior to final plat consideration, the Developer shall submit a current title commitment and/or certificate of title. If the parent parcel contains existing public easements, they must be vacated prior to final plat consideration. SSIITTEE PPLLAANN A site plan was submitted for Lot 1 and features a 190,000 square-foot industrial spec building. Parking is provided for 225 automobiles and 42 truck trailers, including 8 designated handicapped-accessible stalls. Parking stalls and drive aisles are consistent with requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance. SSTTRREEEETT AANNDD SSUUBBDDIIVVIISSIIOONN LLAAYYOOUUTT Juniper Way Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North is bisected by Juniper Way, a Dakota County highway classified as a principal arterial. Juniper Way is an existing four-lane divided rural highway. The 2022 Dakota County Plat Needs Map (rev. 10-27-22) identifies a half right-of-way need of 75 feet. The Developer is dedicating 6.63 acres for right-of-way for Juniper Way over the area currently encumbered by a highway easement. The Dakota County Plat Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat on August 28, 2024. The Developer is responsible for any requirements stipulated by Dakota County. Page 398 of 452 LLAAKKEEVVIILLLLEE 3355 LLOOGGIISSTTIICCSS CCEENNTTEERR NNOORRTTHH –– PPRREELLIIMMIINNAARRYY PPLLAATT SSEEPPTTEEMMBBEERR 2266,, 22002244 PPAAGGEE 33 OOFF 77 215th Street Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North is located north of and adjacent to 215th Street, a City roadway classified as a minor collector. The Developer is dedicating the north ½ right-of-way of 40 feet with the final plat. Dedication of the south ½ right-of-way will be collected when the adjoining property to the south is subdivided. 215th Street is a two-lane undivided rural gravel roadway. 215th Street will be constructed in the future consistent with City urban collector roadway design standards. There are no programmed improvements in Lakeville’s current adopted 5-year Capital Improvement Plan (2024-2028). CCOONNSSTTRRUUCCTTIIOONN AACCCCEESSSS Construction traffic access and egress for grading, utility and street construction shall be determined with the final construction plans. PPAARRKKSS,, TTRRAAIILLSS AANNDD SSIIDD EEWWAALLKKSS Development of Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North includes construction of a public trail. A ten-foot-wide trail, with pedestrian curb ramps, will be constructed along the south side of Juniper Way at the time Outlot A is final platted into lots and blocks. The Park Dedication requirement has not been collected on the parent parcel. The City’s Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan identifies a proposed community play field within the Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North plat. In consideration of the topography, access, zoning and proximity to the Lakeville South High School play fields, the Park Dedication requirement will be satisfied through a cash contribution to be paid with the final plat at the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. UUTTIILLIITTIIEESS SSAANN IITTAARRYY SSEE WWEERR Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North is located within subdistricts SC-10500 and SC-10510 of the South Creek sanitary sewer district. Wastewater will be conveyed through City sanitary sewer to the MCES interceptor sewer monitored by meter M649. Wastewater treatment is provided by the Empire Wastewater Treatment Plant. Development of Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North includes construction of public sanitary sewer. Sanitary sewer will extend within 215th Street from an existing manhole located at the intersection of Juniper Way and 215th Street, at the time Outlot A is final platted into lots and blocks. Page 399 of 452 LLAAKKEEVVIILLLLEE 3355 LLOOGGIISSTTIICCSS CCEENNTTEERR NNOORRTTHH –– PPRREELLIIMMIINNAARRYY PPLLAATT SSEEPPTTEEMMBBEERR 2266,, 22002244 PPAAGGEE 44 OOFF 77 Development of Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North includes construction of private sanitary sewer. Sanitary sewer will extend within Lot 1 from an existing manhole located at the intersection of Juniper Way and 215th Street. Sanitary sewer was constructed by the City in 2021 (City Project 20-05) in partnership with Dakota County. The Lateral Sanitary Sewer Charge has not been collected on the parent parcel and shall be paid with the final plat. The fee will be based on the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. The Developer shall reimburse the City for its share of the sanitary sewer improvements associated with Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North with the final plat. The Developer shall also reimburse the City for its share of the sanitary sewer improvements associated with future additions of the Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North preliminary plat at the time Outlot A is final platted into lots and blocks. The Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge has not been collected on the parent parcel and shall be collected with the building permit based on NCES SAC unit determination. WWAATTEERRMMAAIINN Development of Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North includes construction of public watermain. Watermain will extend within 215th Street from an existing stub located at the intersection of Juniper Way and 215th Street, at the time Outlot A is final platted into lots and blocks. Development of Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North includes construction of private watermain. Watermain will extend within Lot 1 from an existing stub located at the intersection of Juniper Way and 215th Street. Watermain was constructed by the City in 2021 (City Project 20-05) in partnership with Dakota County. The Lateral Watermain Charge has not been collected on the parent parcel and shall be paid with the final plat. The fee will be based on the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. The Developer shall reimburse the City for its share of the watermain improvements associated with Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North with the final plat. The Developer shall also reimburse the City for its share of the watermain improvements associated with future additions of the Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North preliminary plat at the time Outlot A is final platted into lots and blocks. SSTTOORRMM SSEEWWEERR Development of Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North includes construction of private storm sewer systems. Storm sewer will be constructed within Lot 1 to collect and convey stormwater runoff generated from within the site to a private stormwater management facility. The storm sewer systems will be privately-owned and maintained by property owner. Page 400 of 452 LLAAKKEEVVIILLLLEE 3355 LLOOGGIISSTTIICCSS CCEENNTTEERR NNOORRTTHH –– PPRREELLIIMMIINNAARRYY PPLLAATT SSEEPPTTEEMMBBEERR 2266,, 22002244 PPAAGGEE 55 OOFF 77 The Storm Sewer Charge has not been collected on the parent parcel and shall be paid with the final plat at the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. Draintile construction is required in areas of non-granular soils within Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North for the street subgrade and lots. Any additional draintile construction, including perimeter draintile required for building footings, deemed necessary during construction by the City shall be the Developer’s responsibility to install and finance. Final locations and sizes of all storm sewer facilities will be reviewed by City staff with the building permit application and final construction plans. OOVVEERRHHEEAADD LLIINN EESS Existing aboveground equipment (utility lines and poles) is located along the south plat boundary, adjacent to the parent parcel. Requirements for removal of the equipment, in relation to the City’s Public Ways and Property Ordinance, will be reviewed with the final plat. DDRRAAIINNAAGGEE AANNDD GGRRAADDIINNGG Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North is located within subdistricts SC-004, SC-005, and SC-008 of the South Creek stormwater district. Development of Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North includes construction of a privately- owned and maintained stormwater management system. A stormwater management basin will be located in Lot 1 and provide treatment and rate control of stormwater runoff generated from the site. The Developer shall enter into a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement with the City for the private stormwater management systems. Prior to final plat consideration, a final stormwater management design consistent with the City’s stormwater management ordinance must be submitted and approved by City staff. The MS4 Administration Fee has not been collected on the parent parcel and must be paid with the final plat or with a grading permit issued following preliminary plat approval. The Developer must certify to the City that all lots with footings placed on fill have been monitored and constructed to meet or exceed FHA/HUD 79G specifications. Prior to issuance of building permits, the soils observation and testing report, and an as-built certified grading plan must be submitted and approved by City staff. Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North contains more than one acre of site disturbance, therefore a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Stormwater Permit for construction activity from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is required. A copy of the Notice of Stormwater Permit Coverage must be submitted to the City upon receipt from the MPCA. Page 401 of 452 LLAAKKEEVVIILLLLEE 3355 LLOOGGIISSTTIICCSS CCEENNTTEERR NNOORRTTHH –– PPRREELLIIMMIINNAARRYY PPLLAATT SSEEPPTTEEMMBBEERR 2266,, 22002244 PPAAGGEE 66 OOFF 77 RREETTAAIINN IINN GG WWAALLLLSS Development of Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North includes construction of private retaining walls. The retaining walls will be privately-owned and maintained by the property owner. The Developer must provide a security with the final plat to ensure the work is completed and certified in accordance with all applicable codes and regulations, including building permits and designs by a registered engineer for walls with a combined height over four feet, from the Building Inspections Division. EERROOSSIIOONN CCOONNTTRROOLL The Developer is responsible for obtaining a MPCA Construction Permit for the site as well as developing a SWPPP for the site prior to construction. The permit requires that all erosion and sediment BMPS be clearly outlined in a site’s SWPPP. No grading or tree removals can take place until the City has reviewed and approved the SWPPP for the site. Changes made throughout construction must be documented in the SWPPP. Redundant silt fence is required along all waterways. Additional erosion control measures may be required during construction as deemed necessary by City staff. Any additional measures required shall be installed and maintained by the Developer. A maintenance schedule for the establishment of vegetation in the stormwater management basin must be submitted to the City for review prior to the start of grading. WWEETTLLAANNDDSS A wetland delineation report was completed and approved August 27, 2024. One wetland (144 sq/ft) was identified in the northeast corner of the site. The wetland is in the same location as the dump site that was located on the property and may be a result of that. The Developer is in the process of completing a wetland exemption for the impacts to this wetland. The Developer will be responsible for the cleanup of the dump site. TTRREEEE PPRREESSEERRVVAATTIIOONN The plan identifies 152 total trees on site and proposes to save 0 trees. Prior to removals, tree protection or silt fence line must be installed. Minor changes may result in additional removals or preservation based on location or condition of the tree. Significant trees, as identified in the Lakeville Subdivision Ordinance, shall be protected and preserved through termination of all grading and construction activities. A tree preservation plan for Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North shall be submitted prior to issuance of a grading permit. Page 402 of 452 LLAAKKEEVVIILLLLEE 3355 LLOOGGIISSTTIICCSS CCEENNTTEERR NNOORRTTHH –– PPRREELLIIMMIINNAARRYY PPLLAATT SSEEPPTTEEMMBBEERR 2266,, 22002244 PPAAGGEE 77 OOFF 77 FFEEMMAA FFLLOOOODDPPLLAAIINN AANN AALLYYSSIISS Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North is shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (Map No. 27037C0191E; Eff. Date 12/2/2011) as Zone X by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Based on this designation by FEMA, the lots within Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North are not located within a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), as determined by FEMA. RREECCOOMMMMEENNDDAATTIIOONN Engineering recommends approval of the preliminary plat, site plan, grading and erosion control plan, and utility plan for Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North, subject to the requirements and stipulations within this report. Page 403 of 452 Date: 10/21/2024 Crown Lakeville Apartments Preliminary Plat and CUP Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve: 1) the preliminary plat of Crown Lakeville Apartments, 2) a conditional use permit to allow a) more than one principal building on one lot, b) Construction of multiple family residential buildings that are greater than 48 feet in height; and c) an exception to the exterior materials requirements and 3) adopt findings of fact. Overview Crown LMN, LLC has submitted applications and plans for a preliminary plat and conditional use permit for Crown Lakeville Apartments, which proposes one lot with two multi-family buildings with 182 dwelling units on 8.28 acres north of 210th Street (CSAH 70) and west of Keokuk Avenue. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the preliminary plat and conditional use permit at its October 3, 2024 meeting. There was public comment asking about the site elevations, tree removal, and placement of a fence along the north property line. The questions raised at the public hearing were addressed by the applicant’s engineer. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the preliminary plat and conditional use permit and subject to nine stipulations. The applicant has submitted a revised landscape plan to reflect the correct minimum planting sizes, so stipulation #9 of the Planning report has been satisfied. Supporting Information 1. Preliminary Plat Resolution 2. Conditional Use Permit and findings of fact 3. Revised Landscape Plan 4. October 2, 2024 draft Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Committee meeting minutes 5. October 3, 2024 draft Planning Commission meeting minutes 6. September 24, 2024 Planning Report, revised October 15, 2024 7. Exhibits A-B - Location and Zoning Maps 8. Exhibits C-D - Survey and Preliminary Plat 9. Exhibits E-G - Site, Grading, and Utility Plans 10. Exhibits H-J - Tree Preservation and Landscape Plans 11. Exhibits K-L - East Building Elevation And Floor Plans 12. Exhibits M-N - West Building Elevation and Floor Plans 13. Exhibit O - Plat Commission Letter dated June 23, 2023 Page 404 of 452 14. September 24, 2024 Engineering report, revised October 15, 2024 Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: A Home for All Ages and Stages of Life Report Completed by: Kris Jenson, Planning Manager Page 405 of 452 CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 24-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CROWN LAKEVILLE APARTMENTS WHEREAS, Crown LMN, LLC has requested preliminary plat approval of one lot to be known as Crown Lakeville Apartments, legally described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at its October 3, 2024 meeting, preceded by notice as required by the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat meets Subdivision Ordinance requirements and is acceptable to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Lakeville City Council: The Crown Lakeville Apartments preliminary plat is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the September 24, 2024, revised October 15, 2024 engineering report. 2. Park dedication must be paid at the time of final plat approval. 3. Outlot A shall be deeded to the City with the final plat. 4. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated and the developer shall submit a financial security to guarantee installation of the approved landscaping at the time of final plat approval. 5. All signs shall comply with the Zoning Ordinance requirements. A sign permit shall be issued by the Community Development Department prior to the installation of any signs. 6. Snow storage shall not take place in required parking spaces. 7. Details about the fence surrounding the amenity area must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator prior to installation, to confirm compliance with Section 11- 21.5 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. A site lighting plan shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. Site lighting shall not exceed one foot candle at the property line adjacent to public right-of-way. All exterior light fixtures shall be down-cast design so as not to glare onto public right-of-way and adjacent properties. Page 406 of 452 ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 21st day of October 2024. CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: _______________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: BY: ________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk Page 407 of 452 1 (Reserved for Dakota County Recording Information) CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 24-___ 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Lakeville approves a conditional use permit Crown LMN, LLC to allow construction of more than one principal building on one lot of record, construction of multiple family residential buildings that are greater than 48 feet in height, and an exception to the exterior material requirements, all within the RH-2, Multiple Family Residential District. 2. Property. The permit is for the following described property located at 11813 210th Street West in the City of Lakeville, Dakota County, Minnesota and will be platted as: Lot 1, Block 1, Crown Lakeville Apartments 3. Conditions. This conditional use permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the September 24, 2024, revised October 15, 2024 engineering report. b. Park dedication must be paid at the time of final plat approval. c. Outlot A shall be deeded to the City with the final plat. d. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated and the developer shall submit a financial security to guarantee installation of the approved landscaping at the time of final plat approval. e. All signs shall comply with the Zoning Ordinance requirements. A sign permit shall be issued by the Community Development Department prior to the installation of any signs. f. Snow storage shall not take place in required parking spaces. Page 408 of 452 2 g. Details about the fence surrounding the amenity area must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator prior to installation, to confirm compliance with Section 11-21.5 of the Zoning Ordinance. h. A site lighting plan shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. Site lighting shall not exceed one foot candle at the property line adjacent to public right-of-way. All exterior light fixtures shall be down-cast design so as not to glare onto public right-of-way and adjacent properties. 4. Revocation. The City may revoke the conditional use permit for cause upon determination that the conditional use permit is not in conformance with the conditions of the permit or is in continued violation of the city code or other applicable regulations. 5. Expiration. This conditional use permit shall expire unless the applicant commences construction of the authorized use within one year of the date of this conditional use permit unless an extension is approved by the Zoning Administrator. Dated: October 21, 2024 BY: ________________________ Luke Hellier, Mayor BY:________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk SEAL STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 21st day of October 2024 by Luke Hellier, Mayor and by Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk of the City of Lakeville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. __________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Page 409 of 452 1 CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CROWN LMN, LLC CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION On October 3, 2024 the Lakeville Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Crown LMN, LLC for a conditional use permit to allow construction of more than one principal building on one lot of record, construction of multiple family residential buildings that are greater than 48 feet in height, and an exception to the exterior material requirements, all within the RH-2, Multiple Family Residential District. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed conditional use permits preceded by published and mailed notice. The applicant was present and the Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak. The City Council hereby adopts the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is located in Planning District No. 6 of the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, which guides the property for high density land use. 2. The property is zoned RH-2, Multiple Family Residential District. 3. The legal description of the property at the time of final plat will be: Lot 1, Block 1, Crown Lakeville Apartments 4. Section 11-4-3E of the City of Lakeville Zoning Ordinance provides that a conditional use permit may not be issued unless certain criteria are satisfied. The criteria and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The multiple family building use of the property is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan and District 6 recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan. Page 410 of 452 2 b. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The multiple family buildings on a single parcel are compatible with existing land uses in the area given compliance with the stipulations listed in the September 24, 2024 planning report. c. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Finding: Provided compliance with stipulations of the conditional use permit, the multiple family buildings on a single parcel will conform to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. Finding: The subject property is within the existing MUSA and is served with city sanitary sewer and water. The multi-family apartment buildings will not have a negative impact on the City’s service capacity. e. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The multi-family apartment building use on a single parcel will not overburden the streets serving the property and the additional building height will not increase the traffic generated by the proposed use. 5. The planning report dated September 24, 2024, revised October 15, 2024, prepared by Kris Jenson, Planning Manager is incorporated herein. DECISION The City Council hereby approves the conditional use permit in the form attached thereto. DATED: October 21, 2024 CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY:______________________ Luke Hellier, Mayor BY:_______________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk Page 411 of 452 PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE: 1112.00LFE/GFE: 1100.67PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE: 1114.50LFE/GFE: 1103.17DOGPLAY AREA PATIO PLAY GROUND POOL SPLASH PAD NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKING2525 25 110110ROCK MULCH ROCK MULCH NO PARKINGNO PARKINGSCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24.1S (LMS TECH) | JOHNNIE WORKMAN, PLA (MN, WI, TX) | 10/16/2024 8:39:17 AML:\PROJECTS\52908\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52908-L1-LSCP.DWG:L1.01 LANDSCAPE PLANCROWN LMN, LLC CROWN LAKEVILLE APARTMENTS LAKEVILLE, MN52908 04/26/2024 JRW JRW MCA JOHN WORKMAN 59119 1.04/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2.07/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 3.08/27/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 4.09/18/2024 TPK MCA MCA CITY COMMENT REVISIONS PRELI MI N A R Y LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1.01 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. Landscaping: Required landscaping for new residential subdivisions and commercial, industrial or institutional uses shall include plantings at the property perimeter, off street parking perimeter landscaping and interior landscape plantings as well as required residential buffer yard or transitional buffer zone plantings. Off Street Parking Areas: All off street parking areas with five (5) or more parking spaces or any parking area within twenty feet (20') of a residential zoning district shall be screened from view as follows: 1. Installation of shade, ornamental and/or evergreen trees at the perimeter of the parking area in accordance with the spacing requirements of subsections A and C of this section. All rooftop and ground mounted mechanical equipment of residential buildings having five (5) units or more and of nonresidential buildings shall comply with the following standards: A. All rooftop and ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened so as to mitigate noise in compliance with section 11-16-25 of this title. B. All rooftop and ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be designed (including exterior color) and located so as to be aesthetically harmonious and compatible with the building. Screening of and landscaping around the equipment may be required where the design, color, and location of the equipment are found to not effectively buffer noise or provide aesthetic harmony and compatibility. Screening shall be constructed of durable materials which are aesthetically compatible with the structure and which may be an integral part of the structure. Applicable requirements for access to the equipment shall be observed in the design and construction of the screening. C. Rooftop mechanical equipment less than three feet (3') in height may be exempt from screening requirements by the zoning administrator. (Ord. 674, sec. 1, 7-17-2000) CALCULATIONS ONE TREE PER 40 FT OF ROW REQUIRED: 16 PROPOSED: 16 SCREENING SHRUBS LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED LAKEVILLE LANDSCAPE CODE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TREE TO BE REMOVED D S LS RIPRAP PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL HEIGHT QTY TREES AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 6 GB Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold` TM / Maidenhair Tree B & B 2.5"Cal 7 HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 13 BO Quercus macrocarpa / Burr Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 7 SAT Salix alba `Tristis` / Golden Weeping Willow B & B 2.5"Cal 2 CONIFERS BF Abies balsamea / Balsam Fir B & B 8`9 JSB Juniperus scopulorum `Blue Arrow` / Blue Arrow Juniper B & B 8`53 BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 8`3 ORN. TREES SS Malus x `Spring Snow` / Spring Snow Crab Apple B & B 2"Cal 5 IL Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk` / Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac B & B 2"Cal 6 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY SHRUBS YD Cornus alba `Bud`s Yellow` / Bud`s Yellow Dogwood 5 gal 24" MIN 8 CD Cornus sericea `Alleman`s Compact` / Dwarf Red Twig Dogwood 5 gal 24" MIN 44 BJ Juniperus sabina `Broadmoor` / Broadmoor Juniper 5 gal 18" MIN SPREAD 9 CJ Juniperus sabina `Monna` / Calgary Carpet Juniper 5 gal 18" MIN SPREAD 8 GL Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low` / Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 5 gal 18" MIN SPREAD 39 FS Sorbaria sorbifolia `Sem` / Sem Ash Leaf Spirea 5 gal 24" MIN 22 GS Spiraea japonica `Goldflame` / Spirea 5 gal 24" MIN 39 SJW Spiraea japonica `Walbuma` / Magic Carpet Japanese Spirea 5 gal 24" MIN 16 MK Syringa patula `Miss Kim` / Miss Kim Lilac 5 gal 24" MIN 38 LB Syringa x `Bloomerang` / Lilac 5 gal 24" MIN 15 GRASSES KFG Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster` / Feather Reed Grass 1 gal 6 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT GROUND COVERS 35-221 MNDOT Seed Mix 35-221 / Dry Praire General Seed 25-131 MNDOT Seed Mix 25-131 / Low Maintenance Fescue mix Seed 33-261 MNDOT Seed Mix 33-261 / Ponds and Wet Areas Seed TUR HIG Turf Sod Highland Sod / Sod Sod PLANT SCHEDULE Page 412 of 452 Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources committee Meeting Minutes, October 2, 2024 Page 2 5. Lakeville Baseball Association Master Agreement A Master Agreement between the City of Lakeville and the Lakeville Baseball Association (LBA) was presented. This agreement will manage the City’s relationship with LBA for all major parks that the association currently uses. The opportunity to enter into such an agreement was presented with the construction of Grand Prairie Park. The agreement outlines privately sought sponsorship and funding opportunities for LBA while utilizing City parks. A motion was made by Haneman, seconded by Young to approve the Lakeville Baseball Master Agreement, with one minor language correction to be made by City staff. Ayes: unanimous 6. Crown Lakeville Apartments Preliminary Plat This plat consists of one outlot and two multi-family apartment buildings on approximately 10 acres of land located north of 210th Street and west of Keokuk Avenue. A single-family home and heavily wooded area currently exist on the property. Though the 2015 Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan does identify a neighborhood park within this development, the Park Dedication will be satisfied with a cash contribution. A wetland was identified on the site in Outlot A, this will be deeded to the City at the time of final plat. The tree preservation plan identified 519 significant trees on the site, 495 trees will be removed with most of the preserved trees being located within the wetland. A motion was made by Haneman, seconded by Joubert to approve the Crown Lakeville Apartments Preliminary Plat as presented in the September 24, 2024 Planning Report. Ayes: unanimous 7. Review of Recent Lakeville Area Active Adults Committee Meeting Minutes The Active Adults Committee requested that this committee review their meeting minutes, staff will include these in our packet as they are available. No action is needed, this is just to keep the PRRNC updated on what is happening over at the Heritage Center. 8. Staff Report Staff shared new informational park pages that have been added to the City’s website. This is a work in progress and will continue to be updated as material becomes available. Committee members were asked to review the pages and provide any feedback that they might have. Motion was made by Haneman, seconded by Nadeem to adjourn the October 2, 2024 meeting. Ayes: unanimous 9. Adjourn Meeting 6:42 p.m. Page 413 of 452 CITY OF LAKEVILLE. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES October 3, 2024 Chair Majorowicz called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The Pledge of Allegiance to the flag was given. Members Present: Chair Jenna Majorowicz, Scott Einck, Pat Kaluza, Jason Swenson, Vice Chair Christine Zimmer, Patty Zuzek, Ex-Officio Jeff Hanson. Members Absent: Amanda Tinsley Staff Present: Kris Jenson, Planning Manager; Tina Goodroad, Community Development Director, Frank Dempsey, Associate Planner, Jon Nelson, Assistant City Engineer 3. Approval of the Meeting Minutes The September 19, 2024 Planning Commission meeting minutes were approved as presented. 4. Announcements Planning Manager Kris Jenson stated that the following was distributed to the Planning Commission at tonight’s meeting: 1. October 2, 2024 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Committee meeting motion regarding the Crown Lakeville Apartments preliminary plat. 2. Revised preliminary plat and site plan for Agenda item 5a. Crown Lakeville Apartments. 5a. Crown Lakeville Apartments Chair Majorowicz opened the public hearing to consider the application of Crown LMN, LLC for the following: 1. Preliminary plat of one lot to be known as Crown Lakeville Apartments and 2. Conditional use permit to allow the following in the RH-2, Multiple Family Residential District a) Construction of more than one principal building on one lot of record; and b) Construction of multiple family residential buildings that are greater than 48 feet in height; and c) An exception to the exterior materials requirements. Tom LaSalle, representing Crown, briefly described the project and introduced William Griffith of Larkin Hoffman, representing Crown LMN, LLC and Emily Castanias, PE, of Sambatek. Mr. Griffith then presented an overview of the project and the actions requested. Ms. Jenson presented the planning report and stated that the applicant has applied for a preliminary plat and conditional use permit for more than one building on a parcel, to exceed the building height in RH-2, Multiple Family District, and for an exception to the exterior materials requirement. The RH-2 District allows multiple family buildings as a permitted use. Ms. Jenson noted that the preliminary plat had been modified such that the wetland on site that was to be within Outlot A would now be shown as a conservation easement to the City. Page 414 of 452 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, October 3, 2024 Page 2 Due to this modification, stipulation number eight of the planning report is no longer required as the site now meets the required Floor Area Ratio (FAR). Ms. Jenson reviewed the conditional use permits, noting that the increased building height was due to significant topography of the site and that both buildings were at or below the maximum height if measured from the ground floors. She also noted that the west building has two underground garage levels, in order to provide at least one enclosed space for every unit within the building. As for the exception to the exterior materials standards, both buildings meet or exceed the ordinance requirement from the ground floor up, but that the significant topography exposes more of the underground garage walls than would typically be seen. Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and conditional use permits for Crown Lakeville Apartments, subject to the seven stipulations listed in the September 24, 2024 planning report, as amended and approval of the Findings of Fact dated October 3, 2024. Chair Majorowicz opened the hearing to the public for comment. Colleen Powell – 11774 205th Street. Ms. Powell stated that she spoke with the Developer before the meeting and requested that a black chain link fence be installed along the north property line of the Crown project to delineate the property line between the two parcels. Chris Powell – 11770 205th Street. Mr. Powell asked about trees shown on the plans for removal that are on the property line and asked how much elevations changes there are on site and whether retaining walls would be constructed. Motion was made by Zimmer, seconded by Einck to close the public hearing at 6:22 p.m. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes – unanimous Chair Majorowicz asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Discussion points included: • Ms. Castanias, representing the applicant, responded to the questions about the elevations on the site, identified the locations of retaining walls, and confirmed that trees would be removed up to the property line, but would not include any trees that are partially located on adjacent parcels. • Vice Chair Zimmer asked for clarification on the heights of the retaining walls. • Mr. Griffith confirmed that the Developer has agreed to install a black vinyl chain link fence along the north property line and will work with that property owner to coordinate it’s installation. • Commission Kaluza asked if the units will be rented at market rate, which the Developer confirmed. Page 415 of 452 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, October 3, 2024 Page 3 • Vice Chair Zimmer asked the Developer for further information on vacancy rates. Mr. Griffith responded that in the South Metro area, the vacancy rate is 2% - 3%, which is very low. • Vice Chair Zimmer inquired about the nearest playground to the development site. Ms. Jenson responded that the closest neighborhood park will be the one constructed as part of the Ritter Meadows development, north of 205th Street but that the proposed site will be connected to the trail along 210th Street, which provides pedestrian access to the commercial area along Keokuk Avenue. • Commissioner Kaluza asked if Dakota County has indicated any plans to change the access at 210th Street (CSAH 70) and Keswick Loop, which is the access point for this project. Assistant City Engineer Jon Nelson confirmed that the access will remain open. Motion was made by Kaluza, seconded by Zuzek to recommend to City Council approval of the preliminary plat and conditional use permit for Crown Lakeville Apartments, subject to the seven stipulations listed below and approval of the Findings of Fact dated October 3, 2024: 1. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the September 24, 2024 engineering report. 2. Park dedication must be paid at the time of final plat approval. 3. Outlot A shall be deeded to the City with the final plat. 4. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated, and the developer shall submit a financial security to guarantee installation of the approved landscaping at the time of final plat approval. 5. All signs shall comply with the Zoning Ordinance requirements. A sign permit shall be issued by the Planning Department prior to the installation of any signs. 6. Snow storage shall not take place in required parking spaces. 7. Details about the fence surrounding the amenity area must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator prior to installation, to confirm compliance with Section 11-21.5 of the Zoning Ordinance. Ayes: Zuzek, Kaluza, Majorowicz, Zimmer, Einck, Swenson Nays: 0 5b. Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North Addition Chair Majorowicz opened the public hearing to consider the application of LPDC LLC to consider the following: 1. Preliminary plat of one industrial lot to be known as Lakeville 35 Logistics Center North Addition; and 2. Conditional use permit to allow a warehouse use in the OP, Office Park District. Ed Farr, of Edward Farr Architects introduced the project on behalf of the applicant. Page 416 of 452 1 City of Lakeville Community Development Dept Memorandum To: Planning Commission From: Kris Jenson, Planning Manager Date: September 24, 2024, revised October 15, 2024 Subject: Packet Material for the October 3, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Item: 1. Preliminary plat of one lot to be known as Crown Lakeville Apartments; 2. Conditional use permit to allow the following in the RH-2, Multiple Family Residential District: a. Construction of more than one principal building on one lot of record; and b. Construction of multiple family residential buildings that are greater than 48 feet in height; and c. An exception to the exterior material requirements. Action Deadline: November 15, 2024 BACKGROUND Crown LMN, LLC has submitted applications and plans for a preliminary plat and conditional use permits for Crown Lakeville Apartments, which proposes one lot for two multi-family apartment buildings on about 10 acres of land located north of 210th Street (CSAH 70) and west of Keokuk Avenue. The property currently includes a single-family home and is heavily wooded. The preliminary plat plans have been submitted to the Engineering Division and Parks and Recreation Department for review. EXHIBITS A. Location Map B. Zoning Map C. Existing Conditions D. Preliminary Plat E. Site Plan F. Grading Plan G. Utility Plan H. Tree Preservation Plan Page 417 of 452 2 I. Tree Inventory J. Landscape Plan K. East Building Elevation Plans (2 pages) L. East Building Floor Plans (5 pages) M. West Building Elevation Plans (2 pages) N. West Building Floor Plans (3 pages) O. Plat Commission Letter dated June 23, 2023 PLANNING ANALYSIS PRELIMINARY PLAT Comprehensive Plan. The property is located in Planning District No. 6 of the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan and is within the current Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). City municipal services, including sanitary sewer service, are available to serve the property. The subject property is guided HDR, High Density Residential in the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The proposed Crown Lakeville Apartments preliminary plat meets the recommended goals and objectives outlined in Planning District No. 6 of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Zoning and Surrounding Uses. The subject property is zoned RH-2, Multiple Family Residential District. The proposed preliminary plat is surrounded by the following land uses: Direction Existing Use Land Use Plan Zoning North Large lot single family home Low/Medium Density Residential RST-2, Single and Two- Family Residential District South 210th Street (CSAH 70), large lot single family home, vacant parcel 210th Street right of way and Commercial RAO, Rural Ag Overlay District, C-3, General Comm. District East Authentix multi-family development, wetlands, vacant parcel High Density Residential, Commercial Undesignated (Right-of- Way West Large lot single family home Rural Density Residential RA, Rural Agricultural District Lots and Blocks. The proposed lot exceeds the minimum lot area and lot width requirements of the RH-2 District. Minimum Proposed Lot Area 20,000 Square Feet 319,199 square feet Lot Width Requirements 100 feet 655 feet Development Density. Section 11-62-13.B.1 of the Zoning Ordinance requires multiple family uses to provide a minimum of 1,675 square feet of net lot area per dwelling unit. The area Lot 1, Block 1 is 8.28 acres or 360,676 square feet. Based on 182 dwelling units, the lot area per unit for the proposed multiple family use is 1,981 square feet per dwelling unit, which complies with the Zoning Ordinance. Page 418 of 452 3 Premature Subdivision Criteria. The preliminary plat is not premature under the terms of the Subdivision Ordinance. All utilities and public streets are in place to serve the subject property. Capital Improvement Program (CIP). All proposed improvements necessary for the development of Crown Lakeville Apartments will be privately funded by the developer. Streets. Crown Lakeville Apartments abuts 210th Street (CSAH 70), a principal arterial roadway as identified in the City’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan and will have a driveway access from 210th Street as well as a future private drive connection along the north side of 210th Street to Keokuk Avenue. The Dakota County Plat Commission met at its June 21, 2023 meeting to review the Crown Lakeville Apartments preliminary plat under the terms of the Contiguous Plat Ordinance (plats adjacent to County Roads) and recommended approval of the preliminary plat (Exhibit O). The required right of way for 210th Street will be dedicated with the final plat. Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control and Utilities. City sanitary sewer and water is currently available to the site, which is within the current MUSA. All public utilities will be constructed by the developer to serve the proposed preliminary plat following final plat approval. Grading and utility plans have been submitted with the Crown Lakeville Apartments preliminary plat plans. Grading, drainage, erosion control, utility, and tree preservation review comments are addressed in the engineering report prepared by Alanna Sobotka, Civil Engineer and Mac Cafferty, Environmental Resources Manager, dated September 24, 2024. A copy of the engineering report is attached for reference. Park Dedication. The 2015 Parks Trails, and Open Space plan identifies a neighborhood park service area primarily south of this site, in an area not yet available to be served by municipal utilities. Park dedication will be satisfied with a cash fee in effect at the time of final plat approval. Wetlands. A wetland delineation was completed for the site on September 4, 2024. The majority of the wetland area on site will be located within a conservation easement dedicated to the City with the final plat. See the September 24, 2024 Engineering report for additional information. Tree Preservation. The tree preservation plan (Exhibit H) identifies 519 significant trees on the entire 9.94 acre site. Due to the high-density residential development proposed, 495 trees (95.4%) will be removed with the residential development, with 24 trees remaining, most of which are within the wetland on site. See the September 24, 2024 Engineering report for additional information. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CONSTRUCTION OF MORE THAN ONE PRINCIPAL RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ON ONE LOT OF RECORD. Section 11-62-7 of the Zoning Ordinance allows multi-family buildings on a single parcel subject to approval of a conditional use permit, provided that the applicable provisions of Section 11- 62-17 are met. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that there is a mechanism in place by which common areas will be maintained. The Developer intends to maintain ownership of the site and buildings and will be responsible for all site maintenance costs. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CONSTRUCTION OF MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS THAT ARE GREATER THAN 48 FEET IN HEIGHT. Page 419 of 452 4 Multiple family buildings within the RH-2 District are limited to a height of four stories or 48 feet, whichever is less. The Zoning Ordinance defines building height as “the distance measured from the mean ground level to the mean height of the roof. Exhibits K and M show the exterior elevations of each building, including the height. Due to the topography of the site and that each building includes underground parking, the mean ground level is below that of the first floor of each apartment building. Both buildings have a building height of 48 feet when measured from the first-floor level. However, given the varying ground levels around each building, in part to provide access to the underground parking areas, both buildings exceed the 48 feet height maximum. Exhibit K shows that the east building’s average grade is 93 feet (for the purposes of measuring building height, the first-floor grade is marked at 100 feet, and all other measurements based off that elevation) and that the parapet height is 148 feet. Based on the Zoning Ordinance definition, the building height is 55 feet. The plan shows that the roof deck is 43 feet, 7 inches, which is 4 feet, 5 inches below the parapet. Parapet walls less than three feet above the limiting height of the building are exempt from building height limits, which does not apply to this building. Exhibit M shows that the west building’s average grade is 92 feet 4 inches, that the parapet height is 147 feet, which is a building height of 54 feet, 8 inches. The roof height is 142 feet 7 ½ inches, 4 feet and 4 ½ inches below the parapet height. Section 11-17-7.E of the Zoning Ordinance states that building heights in excess of the standards established within the individual zoning districts may be allowed through a CUP provided that the intensity of use, traffic impacts, public utilities, setbacks, airport zoning regulations, and the general performance standards of Section 11-4-7 for all CUPs are considered. Intensity of the use, traffic impacts, public utilities, and performance standards are addressed below. The Crown Lakeville Apartments site is over three miles from Airlake Airport and therefore is not in conflict with airport zoning regulations. Section 11-17-7.E also requires that for each additional 10 feet above the maximum building height allowed within the RH-2 District, the front and side yard setbacks are increased by five feet. The table below reflects the required 30 foot setback of the RH-2 District plus the additional five feet required for the front and side yard setbacks due to the additional building height. The locations of the proposed multiple family buildings within the lot meets or exceeds the minimum setbacks required by the Zoning Ordinance. Front (South)Rear (North)Side (West)Side (East) Required 35 feet.30 feet.35 feet.35 feet Proposed 100+ feet.30 feet.70+ feet.75+ feet The CUP performance standards to allow additional building height are listed below: A. The use and the site in question shall be served by a street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the type and volume of traffic which would be generated and adequate right of way shall be provided. The site’s primary access is to 210th Street (CSAH 70), which is designated as a minor arterial street in the City’s Transportation Plan. The street is designed and has sufficient capacity to serve the Crown Lakeville Apartments. See the September 24, 2024 Engineering report for more information. Page 420 of 452 5 B. The site design for access and parking shall minimize internal as well as external traffic conflicts and shall be in compliance with chapter 19 of this title. The site has one access point from 210th Street (CSAH 70) which provides access to the parking area as well as two of the three underground parking garages. The third garage access point is at the northeast side of the west building. C. If applicable, a pedestrian circulation system shall be clearly defined and appropriate provisions made to protect such areas from encroachment by parked or moving vehicles. A sidewalk will extend from the existing trail along the north side of 210th Street (CSAH 70) into the site, providing connections to the sidewalks that run along the front of each building to the various entrances. Due to the outdoor amenity space at the northwest corner of the east building, a separate sidewalk is provided along the north side of the east building. There is also a sidewalk and crosswalk connection between the two buildings near their main access doors. D. Adequate off-street parking and off-street loading shall be provided in compliance with chapters 19 and 20 of this title. The east building has 94 units and the west building 88 units for a total of 182 units and an average of 1.7 bedrooms per unit. Section 11-19-13 requires multiple family dwellings to provide 2.0 parking stalls per dwelling unit if there are less than 2.0 bedrooms per dwelling unit. Based on 182 dwelling units, 364 parking spaces are required. Underground parking provides 227 spaces with another 160 surface stalls for a total of 377 parking spaces, which exceeds the parking requirements for the site. Of the 377 parking spaces, nine ADA accessible spaces are located within the underground garages with another eight spaces provided in the surface parking lot. The breakdown of surface and garage parking shown on the submitted plans is summarized below: East Building Garage Spaces 103 West Building Garage Spaces 114 Surface Parking Spaces 160 Total 377 The proposed off-street parking areas and drive aisles are setback more than 15 feet from the property line adjacent to 215th Street (CSAH 70) and at least five feet from the side and rear property lines. Section 11-19-7.I.1 of the Zoning Ordinance requires off-street parking stalls to have minimum dimensions of 9 feet by 20 feet and drive aisles at least 24 feet in width. The proposed surface parking spaces are 9 feet by 20 (9 feet by 18 feet next to the sidewalk) and the driveway aisles are 26 feet in width, which meets ordinance requirements. Section 11-19-7.I.3 requires that parking spaces within multi-family structures be a minimum of 9 feet wide by 18 feet deep with access aisles at least 24 feet in width. Plans submitted indicate that the proposed parking stalls and aisles within the underground structures meet these minimum requirements. The east building garage stalls are a minimum 9 feet by 18 feet The parking area is surrounded by perimeter concrete curb as required by Section 11-19-7.I.15 of the Zoning Ordinance. E. Loading areas and drive-up facilities shall be positioned so as to minimize internal site access problems and maneuvering conflicts, to avoid visual or noise impacts on any "adjacent" residential use or district, and provided in compliance with chapter 20 of this title. This standard does not apply to the Crown Lakeville Apartments development. F. Whenever a nonresidential use "is adjacent to" a residential use or district, a buffer area with screening and landscaping shall be provided in compliance with chapter 21 of this title. This standard does not apply to the Crown Lakeville Apartments development. Page 421 of 452 6 G. General site screening and landscaping shall be provided in compliance with chapter 21 of this title. The landscape plan (Exhibit J) includes a row of overstory trees between 210th Street and the access drive to the site, within the parking lot islands, and scattered around the remainder of the site. Prior to City Council consideration of the preliminary plat, the plant schedule must be updated to reflect that all conifers must be a minimum of eight feet in height at the time of planting and identify minimum shrub heights in accordance with Zoning Ordinance requirements, not container size as shown. H. All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right of way or neighboring residential uses or districts, and shall be in compliance with section 11-16-17 of this title. In conjunction with the final plat submittal, a photometric plan must be submitted and demonstrate compliance with Section 11-16-17 of the Zoning Ordinance. All exterior lighting shall be downcast and not glare onto other residential properties. The lighting plan must show the location, height, type, and illumination pattern of all exterior lighting, demonstrating that the intensity of exterior lighting is limited to one foot-candle measured at the right of way or property line. I. Potential exterior noise generated by the use shall be identified and mitigation measures as may be necessary shall be imposed to ensure compliance with section 11-16-25 of this title. It is not anticipated that the multiple family development will generate noise above and beyond what can be expected by any residential development. J. The site drainage system shall be subject to the review and approval of the city engineer. See the September 24, 2024 Engineering report for more information. K. The architectural appearance and functional design of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing or potential buildings and area so as to cause a blighting influence. All sides of the principal and accessory structures are to have essentially the same or coordinated, harmonious exterior finish materials and treatment. See the section below for information regarding the CUP requested for the proposed exterior materials. L. Provisions shall be made for daily litter control, an interior location for recycling, and trash handling and storage or an outdoor, enclosed receptacle area shall be provided in compliance with section 11-18-11 of this title. Each underground garage includes a refuse room, as does each floor of both apartment buildings. There are no exterior waste enclosures proposed for the site. M. All signs and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with chapter 23 of this title. At this time, no signs are proposed with the project. Should the Developer decide to add signs in the future, they will be subject to Section 11-23 of the Zoning Ordinance and a permit must be issued prior to the installation of any signs, permanent or temporary, on the site. N. The use and site shall be in compliance with any federal, state or county law or regulation that is applicable and any related permits shall be obtained and documented to the city. This standard does not apply to the Crown Lakeville Apartments development. O. Any applicable business licenses mandated by this code are approved and obtained. This standard does not apply to the Crown Lakeville Apartments development. P. The hours of operation may be restricted when there is judged to be an incompatibility with a residential use or district. This standard does not apply to the Crown Lakeville Apartments development. Page 422 of 452 7 Q. The use complies with all applicable performance standards of the zoning district in which it is located and where applicable. Provided the site is developed in compliance with the stipulations of this report, the use will be in compliance with all applicable performance standards. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: AN EXCEPTION TO THE EXTERIOR MATERIALS PROVISIONS. Section 11-17-9.G states that exceptions to the provisions may be granted as a CUP subject to the applicant demonstrating that the proposed building materials maintains the quality in design and materials intended by the Zoning Ordinance, that the proposed building design and materials are compatible and in harmony with other structures within the district, and that the justification for deviation from the requirements shall not be based on economic considerations. Section 11-62-19.B of the Zoning Ordinance requires multiple family buildings to include a variation in building materials to be distributed throughout the building elevations and coordinated into the architectural design. Each building is required to have a minimum of 50% of the combined area of all elevations of the structure have an exterior finish of brick, stucco, and/or natural or artificial stone. Windows and doors are excluded from the building elevation calculations. The submitted building elevation plans (Exhibits K and M) identify the type of all exterior finish materials and include a schedule indicating the percent of the total area of the exterior of the principal buildings using required materials. Both buildings have 52% brick exterior for the building when the exposed portions of the underground garage are excluded. Due to the topography of the site and the west building having a dual-level underground garage, more of the garage exterior is exposed than would typically be seen. Including the integrally colored rock face block proposed for the garage levels, the total area of brick on the west building is 46% while the east building is 47%. Staff’s review of the request for an exception to the exterior materials provisions finds that the design and materials of the proposed buildings are compatible and consistent with other multiple family structures in the RH-2 District or subject to RH-2 standards. Staff also notes that providing the additional underground garage level, which led to this CUP request, provides each unit in the west building an underground parking space, thereby reducing the number of required surface parking spaces, which in turn provided space for amenity area including a playground, pool, and splash pad available to the residents. It is staff’s opinion that the CUP for an exception to the exterior materials requirement is justified. SITE PLAN Floor Area Ratio. Section 11-62-13.B.2 of the Zoning Ordinance limits the floor area ratio for the proposed multiple family buildings to 0.7 as the subject site abuts property zoned RST-2 District to the north. The gross floor area of the proposed buildings is currently 231,357 square feet and the current area of Lot 1 is 360,676 square feet, for a FAR of 0.64, which meets the Zoning Ordinance requirement. Dwelling Units. The proposed buildings have a mix of one- and two-bedroom dwelling units, summarized in the table below: Page 423 of 452 8 Min Floor Area Required Proposed Floor Area # of Units % of Total Units 1 Bedroom 700sf.783 sf.54 30% 2 Bedroom 800sf.1,011-1,067 sf.128 70% The proposed dwelling units comply with the minimum floor area requirements specified in Section 11-17-13.B of the Zoning Ordinance. Amenity Area. The site plan indicates an amenity area attached to the east building, which includes a patio, pool, playground, and splash pad and is enclosed with a decorative black metal fence. Section 11-21-5.A of the Zoning Ordinance requires details regarding fencing for the patio and pool area to be submitted for review and approval by the Zoning Administrator, including compliance with Section 11-21-5.G of the Zoning Ordinance related to pools. Findings of Fact in consideration of the conditional use permits are attached. RECOMMENDATION Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and conditional use permits for Crown Lakeville Apartments, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the September 24, 2024, revised October 15, 2024 engineering report. 2. Park dedication must be paid at the time of final plat approval. 3. Outlot A shall be deeded to the City with the final plat. 4. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated and the developer shall submit a financial security to guarantee installation of the approved landscaping at the time of final plat approval. 5. All signs shall comply with the Zoning Ordinance requirements. A sign permit shall be issued by the Community Development Department prior to the installation of any signs. 6. Snow storage shall not take place in required parking spaces. 7. Details about the fence surrounding the amenity area must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator prior to installation, to confirm compliance with Section 11-21.5 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. A site lighting plan shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. Site lighting shall not exceed one foot candle at the property line adjacent to public right-of-way. All exterior light fixtures shall be down-cast design so as not to glare onto public right-of-way and adjacent properties. 9. Prior to City Council consideration, the plant schedule on the landscape plan must be amended to show a minimum planting size of eight feet for all conifers and to identify minimum shrub heights in accordance with Zoning Ordinance requirements, not container size as shown. Page 424 of 452 Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Preliminary Plat area 210TH ST (CSAH 70)KEOKUK AVE207TH STKEYSTONE AVEKESWICK LOOP&City of Lakeville Location Map Crown Lakeville Apartments Preliminary Plat 205TH ST EXHIBIT A Page 425 of 452 Preliminary Plat area 210TH ST (CSAH 70)KEOKUK AVE207TH STKEYSTONE AVERH-2 RST-2 PUD RA M-1 KESWICK LOOP&City of Lakeville Zoning Map Crown Lakeville Apartments Preliminary Plat 205TH ST EXHIBIT B C-3 C-3 C-3 RAO RAO RM-2 RM-2 C-3 C-3 C-3 Page 426 of 452 661.26FOUND IP OPEN 5.3FT N AND 3.6FT E OF COMPUTED LOCATION NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 661.26 FEET OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, SECTION 26 WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, SECTION 26 SOUTH LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, SECTION 26 EAST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THESOUTHEAST 1/4, SECTION 26110110BM #1: IP CAPPED 17255 ELEV: 1100.87 BM #2: ROW MONUMENT ELEV: 1137.64 1080 1080 108510851090109010951 1 0 0 11051 1 0 5 1105111011151120112511301135114011451 1 5 0 1079107910 7 9 1081 1081 108210821083 10831084 108410861086108710871088108810891089109110911092 10 9 2 10931093 1094109410961 0 9 7 1 0 9 8 1 0 9 9 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 11031 1 0 3 1103 11041 1 0 4 11 0 411061 1 0 6 110611071108110911111112111311141116111711181119112111221123112411261127112811291131113211331134113611371138113911411142114311441 1 4 6114 7 1 1 4 8 1 1 4 9 11511152 10901095110011051110111511 2 0 1 1 2 511301135 1140 11 4 0 114011451091109210931094109610971098109911011102110311041106110711081109111111121113111411161 1 1 7 1 1 1 8 1 1 1 9 1 1 2 1 112 2112311241 1 2 61127112811291131113211331134 11361136 11361137 1137 11371138 1138 11381139 1139 1139 1141 11 4 1 11411142 1142 1142114311441130 1130 1135 1140 11 2 7 1127 1128 1128 1129 1129 1131 1131 1132 1132 1133 1133 1134 1134 1136 1137 11381139 11411 1 2 51125 1130113511261126112711281129113111321133113411361137109511001105111011151092 1092 109210 9 31093 10931094109610971098109911011102110311041106110711081109111111121113111411161117111811191135 11 4 0 114011451145 11 4 5 1 1 4 5 11 5 0 11 5 0 1134 1136 113 7 113 8 113 9 1 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 1141 1141 1 1 4 2 11421142 11 4 2 1 1 4 3 1 1 4 3 1143 1 1 4 3 1144 11441 1 4 4 1 1 4 4 1146 114611 4 6 1 1 4 6 11 4 7 1 1 4 7 11 4 8 11 4 8 11 4 9 11 4 9 1 1 5 1 11511152115210851090109511001105111011151120112511 3 01130 108610871088108910911092109310941096109710981099110111021103110411061107110811091111111211131114111611171118111911211122112311241126112611271127112 8 11281 1 2 91129 114811421140 1144 1142 11401130112211261 1 2 8 111011001101109810961094109211121088 1086108810901088108610841084 10891090 1092 1094 1096 1098 1100 1102 1104 11051106 11241122111811161114111211101108110611361143114411401130114011401138EXMH 500 RE=1005.38 IE=1083.02 39 LF - 8" PVC(SDR 26) @ 0.40%EXMH 501 RE=1005.88 IE=1082.86 W IE=1082.76 E 330 LF - 8" PVC(SDR 26) @ 0.40% EXMH 503 RE=1096.34 IE=1081.54 S IE=1081.44 W,E EXMH 502 26 LF 8" PVC (SDR 35) @ 0.40% WITH 8" PLUG IE=1081.64 EXCBMH RE=1091.49 IE=1087.14 EXCB RE=1091.71 IE=1087.56 FES IE=1087.86 EX FES IE=1083.46 EXCBMH RE=1094.95 IE=1088.85 W IE=1088.70 E IE=1089.25 S EXCBMH RE=1094.88 IE=1090.63 EXCB RE=1095.51 IE=1091.06 EX FES IE=1090.19 EX SKIMMER MH RE=1101.95 IE=1090.10 N IE=1090.50 BLD EXCB RE=1107.05 IE=1104.35 EXCBMH RE=1106.68 IE=1103.68 N IE=1103.68 E EXCBMH RE=1105.62 IE=1097.02 N IE=1101.97 W IE=1097.02 SE EXCB RE=1103.34 IE=1098.79 EXCBMH RE=1105.69 IE=1099.89 W IE=1096.59 E IE=1096.44 S EXMH 501 RE=1105.93 IE=1082.88 OUTLOT A BW=1120.3BW=1125.1 TW=1126.0± BW=1119.73 TW=1125.0±TW=1121.0± BW=1122.5 TW=1125.0± BLOCK 1 SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, survey, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24.1S (LMS TECH) | ALEA STUTZ | 9/18/2024 1:21:46 PML:\PROJECTS\52908\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52908-C2.01-EXCND.DWG:C2.01 EXISTING CONDITIONSCROWN LMN, LLC CROWN LAKEVILLE APARTMENTS LAKEVILLE, MN52908 04/26/20241.04/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2.07/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 3.08/27/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 4.09/18/2024 TPK MCA MCA CITY COMMENT REVISIONS PRELI MI N A R Y 1.SUBJECT PROPERTIES ADDRESSES ARE 11813 210TH ST W AND 11655 210TH ST W, ITS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS ARE 22119000010 AND 220260081010. 2.THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 12.839 ACRES OR 559,274 SQUARE FEET. 3.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED C-3, GENERAL COMMERICAL DISTRICT (22119000010 ) AND RH-2, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (220260081010), PER ZONING MAP FOUND ON THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE WEBSITE DATED JULY 2021. 4.THE BUILDING(S) AND EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS OF THE OUTSIDE WALL AT GROUND LEVEL ARE SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. IT MAY NOT BE THE FOUNDATION WALL. THAT PART OF OUTLOT A, AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID OUTLOT A; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 33SECONDS EAST ASSUMED BEARING ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT A A DISTANCE OF 324.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE LINE TO BE DESCRIBED; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST,455.62 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID OUTLOT A AND THERE TERMINATING. TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTH 661.26 FEET OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 114,RANGE 21, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 1.THE BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE DAKOTA COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD83 (1986 ADJUST). WITH AN ASSUMED BEARING OF SOUTH 89 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 51 SECONDS FOR THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 114, RANGE 21. THE ORIGINATING MONUMENTS UTILIZED TO ESTABLISH THE HORIZONTAL POSITION OF THIS SURVEY WAS THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION. 2.FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 12/14/2022. 3.THE LOCATION OF THE WETLAND HAS BEEN SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AS DELINEATED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ON 05/2015, AND REAPPROVED IN 2019. FOUND MONUMENT SET MONUMENT MARKED LS 47481 ELECTRIC METER LIGHT SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FLARED END SECTION ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER AIR CONDITIONER GUY ANCHOR HANDICAP STALL UTILITY POLE POST SIGN TELEPHONE PEDESTAL GAS METER OVERHEAD WIRE CHAIN LINK FENCE IRON FENCE WIRE FENCE WOOD FENCE EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE RESTRICTED ACCESS BUILDING LINE BUILDING CANOPY CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE LANDSCAPE SURFACE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE 1.THE VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NAVD88. THE ORIGINATING BENCH MARK IS 1980 T, REFERENCED FROM THE MNDOT GEODETIC DATABASE BENCHMARK #1 FOUND IP CAPPED 17255 ELEV.=1100.87 BENCHMARK #2 FOUND DAKOTA COUNTY ROW MON. ELEV.=1137.64 LEGEND DESCRIPTION PROPERTY SUMMARY BENCHMARKS SURVEY NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS C2.01 EXHIBIT C Page 427 of 452 DAKOTA COUNTY RD R.O.W. MAP 300 & 300A C.S.A.H. NO. 70 (210TH STREET) FND IP 17255 FND IP LOT 1 BLOCK 1 OUTLOT A NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, survey, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO.REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24.1S (LMS TECH) | ALEA STUTZ | 9/18/2024 12:05:19 PML:\PROJECTS\52908\CAD\SURVEY\SHEETS\52908-PPLAT.DWG:C3.00 PRELIMINARY PLATDATE ISSUED CROWN LMN, LLC CROWN LAKEVILLE APARTMENTS LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA52908 04\26\2024 DJT MRS Mark R. Salo 07/01/2024 43933 SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH PRELIMINARY PLAT C3.00 1 THE SOUTH 661.26 FEET OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 114,RANGE 21, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA. OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL WIRE LIGHT SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC GUY ANCHOR UTILITY POLE GUARD POST UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE BUILDING LINE CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE WET LAND SIGN TRAFFIC MARKERS POND / WATER LINE FEMA FLOOD ZONE LINE SOIL BORING TREE LINE FOUND MONUMENT FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE RESTRICTED ACCESS FOUND RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENT SET MONUMENT MARKED LS 43933 SECTION LINE UNDERLYING / ADJACENT LOT TIE LINE BOUNDARY LINE DEED DISTANCE(100.00) CONIFEROUS TREE TRANSFORMER BUILDING CANOPY REGULAR PARKING STALL COUNTGAS METER COMMUNICATIONS MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL CABLE TV BOX GATE VALVE / HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE CLEAN OUT STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN FLARED END SECTION SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RETAINING WALL BLOCK RETAINING WALL STONE RETAINING WALL RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WIRE FENCE DECIDUOUS TREE ## TOTAL SITE AREA: LESS OUTLOTS: LESS RIGHT-OF-WAY: 432,853 S.F. (GROSS) 41,611 S.F. 72,043 S.F. 319,199 S.F. (NET) LOT 1, BL.OCK 1: OUTLOT A: 319,199 S.F. 41,611 S.F. PROPOSED DENSITY:14 UNITS PER ACRE (GROSS) 23 UNITS PER ACRE (NET) ZONE: RH-2 FRONT YARD: REAR YARD: SIDE YARD: 30' 30' 15' 1.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 2.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 3.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND UP TO 1 FOOT ABOVE THE HIGH WATER LEVEL OF ALL PONDS. LEGEND DESCRIPTION PROPERTY SUMMARY LOT SUMMARY SITE DENSITY SITE SETBACKS DEVELOPMENT NOTES VICINITY MAP SITE 205TH ST W N.T.S. 35 70 210TH ST WKEOKUK AVE1 07/01/2024 JJA MS REMOVED EAST PARCEL BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 10 10 10 10 EXHIBIT D Page 428 of 452 PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE: 1112.00LFE/GFE: 1100.67PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE: 1114.50LFE/GFE: 1103.17DOGPLAYAREA PATIO PLAYGROUND POOL SPLASHPAD NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGBM #1: IP CAPPED 17255 ELEV: 1100.87 BM #2: ROW MONUMENT ELEV: 1137.64 NO PARKINGNO PARKING28 24 10 15 12 14 38 14 5 24.0'26.0'26.0'24.0'24.0' 26.0'26.0'26.0'24.0'15.0'15.0'15.0' 26.0'20.0'20.0'26.0'26.0'18.0'26.0'20.0'20.0'26.0'26.0 ' B 9.0'9.0' 9.0'9.0' 9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'9.0'B BB B B B B B B B BB F F F F HH H H H H H I I I I J J J F J G G G G G PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT G LIMITS OF UNDERGROUND GARAGE WETLAND BUFFER LINES, 17.5' MIN. 25' AVG NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24.1S (LMS TECH) | ALEA STUTZ | 9/25/2024 10:48:47 AML:\PROJECTS\52908\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52908-C3.01-SITE.DWG:C3.01 SITE PLANCROWN LMN, LLC CROWN LAKEVILLE APARTMENTS LAKEVILLE, MN52908 04/26/2024 TPK EJC MCA MARK ANDERSON 23450 1.04/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2.07/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 3.08/27/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 4.09/18/2024 TPK MCA MCA CITY COMMENT REVISIONS PRELIMINARY SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH SITE PLAN C3.01 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARDGUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FORANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICHCONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE SAW CUT LINE BOLLARD PARKING STALL COUNT## 1 KEY NOTE HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS) (LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED) EASEMENT LINE CONCRETE CURB BUILDING LINE SIGN A.BUILDING, STOOPS, STAIRS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) (NOT USED) B.B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER C.B-618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (NOT USED) D.CONCRETE APRON (NOT USED) E.FLAT CURB SECTION (NOT USED) F.CONCRETE SIDEWALK G.SEGMENTAL BLOCK RETAINING WALL H.ADA ACCESS LOCATION I.ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING J.ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN K.TRANSFORMER (NOT USED) KEY NOTES SITE DEVELOPMENT NOTES 1.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 2.ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT “GUTTER OUT” WHERE WATER DRAINS AWAY FROM CURB. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS “GUTTER IN” CURB. COORDINATE WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR. 4.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 6.SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PYLON SIGN DETAILS 7.SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DETAIL AND FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF LIGHT POLE. 8.REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, LOT NUMBERS, LOT AREAS, AND LOT DIMENSIONS. 9.ALL GRADIENTS ON SIDEWALKS ALONG THE ADA ROUTE HAVE BEEN DESIGNED WITH A MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 4.5%, AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5%. THIS IS LESS THAN THE ADA CODE MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 5% (1:20), EXCEPT AT CURB RAMPS (1:12), AND A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2.00% (1:50). THE MAXIMUM DESIGN SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS AISLE IS 1.5%, LESS THAN THE ADA CODE MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION ON AN ADA PARKING STALL OR ACCESS AISLE OF 2.00% (1:50). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND VERIFY THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD ALONG THE ADA ROUTES PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE GRADIENT IN THE FIELD VERSUS THE DESIGN GRADIENT AND COORDINATE WITH GRADING CONTRACTOR. 10."NO PARKING" SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ALONG ALL DRIVEWAYS AS REQUIRED BY CITY. 11.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY. DEVELOPMENT NOTES AREA GROSS SITE AREA LESS DELINEATED WETLAND LESS WETLAND BUFFER LESS COUNTY ROW NET SITE AREA FLOOR TO AREA RATIO (FAR) = FLOOR AREA 231,357 SF/SITE AREA 9.70 AC MAX ALLOWABLE FAR LOT SUMMARY EAST BUILDING WEST BUILDING TOTAL PARKING SUMMARY INDOOR PARKING INDOOR ADA PARKING OUTDOOR PARKING OUTDOOR ADA PARKING TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED PARKING OUTDOOR ADA PARKING REQIRED OUTDOOR ADA PARKING PROVIDED BUILDING SETBACKS PERIPHERY OF BASE LOT BUILDING TO BACK OF CURB OF PRIVATE DRIVES BUILDING TO PARKING AREAS MINIMUM LOT SIZE ZONING EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING BUILDING REQUIREMENTS MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY 9.94 AC 0.63 AC 0.48 AC 1.64 AC 9.31 AC 0.55 0.70 94 UNITS 88 UNITS 182 UNITS 210 9 152 8 379 (182 UNITS X 2 SPACES/UNIT) = 364 SPACES 7 SPACES 8 SPACES 30 FT 30 FT 15 FT 20,000 SF RH-2 RH-2 45 FT DECORATIVE FENCE PATIO PAVERS EXHIBIT E Page 429 of 452 NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING108010771078107910811075 1085 1085 1084 1087108810891089108010771078107910811075 1088 1087 1088 1085 1084 108 6 108110821083108010791081108510861 0 8 7 10871 0 8 51086 1078661.262525 25 110110108010801085108510901 0 9 0 10951 1 0 0 110511 0 5 1 1 0 5 1110111511201125113011351140114511 5 0 1079107910 7 9 1081 1081 108210821083 1083108410841086108610871087108810881089108910911091109210 9 2 10931093 1094109410961 0 9 7 1 0 9 8 1 0 9 9 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 110311 0 3 1103 110411 0 4 1 1 0 4 1 1 0 6 11 0 6 11061107110811091111111211131114111611171118111911211122112311241126112711281129113111321133113411361 1 3 711381139114111421 1 4 311441 1 4 6 1 1 4 7 11 4 8 11 4 9 1151 1090109511001105111011151 1 2 0 1 1 2 511301135 1140114 0 114011451091109210931094109610971098109911011102110311041106110711081109111111121113111411161 1 1 7 1 1 1 8 1 1 1 9 1 1 2 1 112211 2 311241 1 2 6 1 1 2 7112811291131113211331134 11361136 113611371137 113711381138 113811391139 11391141114 1 11411142 1142 11421143114411301130 1135 1140 11 2 7 1127 11281128 11291129 11311131 11321132 11331133 11341134 1136 1137 11381139 114111 2 51125 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 5 112611261 1 2 7 1 1 2 8 1 1 2 9 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 3 4 1 1 3 6 1 1 3 7 1095110011051110111510921092 1092109 31093 109310941096109710981099110111021103110411061107110811091111111211131114111611171118111911481142 1 1 4 0 1144 1142 114011301122112611 2 8 11101100110110981096109410921 1 1 2 10881086108810901088108610841084 10891090 1092 1094 1096 1098 1100 1102 1104 1105110611241122111811161114111211101108110611361143114411401130114011401138OUTLOT APROPOSED BUILDINGFFE: 1112.00LFE/GFE: 1100.67PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE: 1114.50LFE/GFE: 1103.17DOGPLAY AREA PATIO PLAY GROUND POOL SPLASH PAD EOF EOF EOFEOFEOFEOF EOF 1101.76 1102.48 1104.43 1102.211105.48 1105.96 1105.81 1106.20 1105.60 1100.571100.57 1100.67 1100.67 B/W: 1104.97 T/W: 1104.95 1112.00 1110.04 1106.40 1106.88 1108.31 1108.49 1109.67 1110.15 1110.25 1111.661113.00 1110.46 1110.711110.35 1110.78 1111.10 1113.62 1113.62 1110.47 1111.10 1110.831113.28 1113.62 1113.28 1110.73 1112.00 1112.00 1108.40 1099.651090.511101.00 1100.33 T/W: 1106.00 B/W: 1105.72 T/W: 1100.17 B/W: 1099.87 1111.51 1111.60 1111.10 1112.57 1112.78 1112.92 1112.67 1114.50 1114.50 1112.62 1112.77 1116.001122.501121.42 1114.00 1113.07 1114.13 1103.17 1103.07 1103.17 1103.07 1107.38 1107.86 1114.12 1113.62 1113.62 1109.86 1111.03 1111.20 1110.83 1110.95 1110.81 1110.29 1109.84 1109.84 1110.29 1110.81 1111.01 1110.78 1110.80 1110.26 1109.94 1110.26 1110.90 1111.201111.201111.20 1110.931110.72 1111.00 1111.10 1111.08 1113.77 1113.77 1115.501122.00 1117.81 B/W: 1124.67 T/W: 1125.00 B/W: 1124.00 T/W: 1134.53 T/W: 1135.50 B/W: 1119.07 T/W: 1120.40 B/W: 1119.90 B/W: 1128.00 T/W: 1128.30 T/W: 1138.00 B/W: 1128.98 B/W: 1132.00 T/W: 1132.00 B/W: 1106.16 T/W: 1106.28 T/W: 1114.00 B/W: 1103.97 B/W: 1103.80 T/W: 1114.31 T/W: 1114.10 B/W: 1106.89 T/W: 1114.43 B/W: 1107.39 T/W: 1114.48 B/W: 1107.82 T/W: 1112.91 B/W: 1108.11 T/W: 1114.55 B/W: 1108.66 T/W: 1114.56 B/W: 1111.00 B/W: 1110.89 T/W: 1111.19 B/W: 1108.39 T/W: 1108.69 T/W: 1111.56 B/W: 1100.00 B/W: 1095.14 T/W: 1111.52 B/W: 1093.33 T/W: 1111.00B/W: 1093.50 T/W: 1111.53T/W: 1111.74 B/W: 1098.00 T/W: 1111.54 B/W: 1103.00 T/W: 1111.67 B/W: 1107.28 T/W: 1108.65 B/W: 1108.30 1105.27 1091.56 1087.07 1083.90 1086.00 1100.36 1105.81 1109.52 T/W: 1104.00 B/W: 1090.02 T/W: 1103.00 B/W: 1090.00 T/W: 1102.46 B/W: 1087.79 1110.75 1114.50 1114.46 1114.00 1112.00 11 0 5 110 3 1103 110 4 1106 1 1 0 7 1 1 0 8 1 1 0 9 1105 1101 1102 1103 110411101108110911111112111311111105 1104 1106 11071108110911121113111411111111111211131111111511131114 10951100109310941096109710981099109210951100109210931094109610971098109910851090109510861087108810891091109210931094109610971098109911001105111010951100 109011051110 111511201125 11301135112011251130111611171118111911211122112311241126112711281129111511141110 1115 112 0 1125 112011 2 5 1130 1115114011451 1 3 5 1 1 3 01125 1120113511401140113011351090 1095 110 5 11 0 4 11 0 611071108110911141135 1095 1 0 9 0 1 1 0 0 EOFEOF1110.60 EOF 1114.10 -3.3 6 % -2.67% -2.46% -1.63 %-1.64%-1.83 %-1.65% - 5 . 8 2%-3.50%-3.10%-30.78% -28.45% -31.5 4 %-23.53%-29.6 1 % -33.00% -30.99% -29.76% -28.67%-31.97%-30.22%-10.00%B/W: 1101.47 T/W: 1108.93 3:1 SLOPES 3:1 SLOPES 3:1 SLOPES 3:1 SLOPES 3:1 SLOPES 3:1 SLOPES 3:1 SLOPES CROSS SECTION XS12 YR HWL:1087.110 YR HWL:1087.22 100 YR HWL:1087.25 SEE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR MORE DETAILS CROSS SECTION XS22 YR HWL:1079.18 10 YR HWL:1079.30 100 YR HWL:1079.48 SEE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR MORE DETAILS CROSS SECTION XS3 2 YR HWL:1076.14 10 YR HWL:1076.34 100 YR HWL:1076.61 SEE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR MORE DETAILS PROPOSED UTILITYEASEMENT PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT WETLAND IMPACT AREA = 1,652 SQ. FT. SCALE IN FEET 0 8040 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24.1S (LMS TECH) | ALEA STUTZ | 9/18/2024 8:42:48 AML:\PROJECTS\52908\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52908-C4.01-GRADE.DWG:C4.01 GRADING PLANCROWN LMN, LLC CROWN LAKEVILLE APARTMENTS LAKEVILLE, MN52908 04/26/2024 TPK EJC MCA MARK ANDERSON 23450 1.04/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2.07/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 3.08/27/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 4.09/18/2024 TPK MCA MCA CITY COMMENT REVISIONS PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C4.01 PROPERTY LINE CONCRETE CURB BUILDING LINE RETAINING WALL TREE LINE HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND SOIL BORING999.9 ST # STORM SEWER DRAINTILE WETLAND LIMITSWL 800 SPOT ELEVATIONS RIPRAP EOF 902.5 OVERFLOWELEV. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING PATIO PAVERS EXHIBIT F Page 430 of 452 PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE: 1112.00LFE/GFE: 1100.67PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE: 1114.50LFE/GFE: 1103.17DOGPLAY AREA PATIO PLAY GROUND POOL SPLASHPAD SUBSURFACE FILTRATION SYSTEM 13P60" ROUND PERFORATED PIPE100-YEAR HWL: 1,107.8810-YEAR HWL: 1,105.78BOTTOM OF CHAMBER: 1,102.50SUBSURFACE FILTRATION SYSTEM 14P 60" ROUND PERFORATED PIPE 100-YEAR HWL: 1,100.9810-YEAR HWL: 1,098.88BOTTOM OF CHAMBER: 1,095.50 2525D&U 40A:DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PERDAKOTA COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 300A25 RIGHT-OF-WAY PER DAKOTA COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAYMAP NO. 300 AND NO. 300A FILED ASDOC NOS. 2483217 AND 2544948EXMH 500 RE=1005.38 IE=1083.02 EXMH 501 330 LF - 8" PVC(SDR 26) @ 0.40% EXCBMH RE=1094.95IE=1088.85 WIE=1088.70 E IE=1089.25 S EXCBMH RE=1094.88IE=1090.63 EX FESIE=1090.19 EX SKIMMER MHRE=1101.95 EXCB RE=1107.05 IE=1104.35 EXCBMHRE=1106.68IE=1103.68 N IE=1103.68 E EXCBMH RE=1105.62 IE=1097.02 NIE=1101.97 WIE=1097.02 SE EXCBRE=1103.34IE=1098.79 EXCBMHRE=1105.69IE=1099.89 WIE=1096.59 EIE=1096.44 S EXMH 501RE=1105.93 IE=1082.88 12" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN8" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN8" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN8" WATERSERVICE 8" WATER SERVICE 8" PVC C900 WATERMAIN STUBTOP OF WATER ELEV: 1080.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"WATER MAIN CONNECT TO EXIST. 12" WATERMAIN STUB 12" PVC C-900WATERMAIN STUB TOP OF WATERELEV: 1129.30 EXTEND STORM SEWER 42 LF - RCP @ 1.00% (FIELD VERIFY PIPE SIZE AND SLOPE) 8" GV 12"x8" TEE HYD.6" GV 8"x6" TEE 8" PVC C-900 WATERMAIN SMH 6 RE=1113.14IE=1075.60 SIE=1075.60 E IE=1075.50 N SMH8RE=1127.39IE=1077.12 W IE=1077.02 NE SMH7 RE=1110.38IE=1076.31 SWIE=1076.21 N SMH 4 RE=1113.13IE=1074.34 SIE=1074.24 NE SMH3 RE=1110.48 IE=1073.69 SWIE=1073.69 NIE=1073.59 E SMH 2 RE=1111.42IE=1072.06 W IE=1071.96 SE SMH 1RE=1087.50 IE=1071.48 NW IE=1071.38 E 81 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.50% 143 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.50% 37 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 2.29% 109 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.50% 305 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.50% 97 L F - 8 " PV C S D R 2 6 @ 0 . 5 0 % 44 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.50% 20 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.50% 52 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 2.18% 101 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 2.20% 8" SAN PLUG IE=1077.83 W 8" SAN PLUGIE=1075.80 E 12" PVC C-900WATERMAIN 8X6" TEE 8x8" TEE 8x8" CROSS 8" TO 6"RED. HYD. 6" GV CBMH 301RE=1105.69 IE=1097.52 NIE=1097.52 W IE=1097.32 S W/ 4' SUMP CBMH 411RE=1101.85 IE=1098.80 W W/ 2' SUMP 13 LF - 36" HDPE @ 1.00% 65 LF - 36"HDPE @ 1.26% 63 LF - 12" PVC SCH 40 @ 0.50% CBMH 107 RE=1109.94IE=1104.85 SIE=1104.85 W 108 LF - 15" HDPE @ 0.30% 9 LF - 18"HDPE @ 0.33% 126 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.30% CBMH 105RE=1109.84 IE=1104.50 E IE=1103.70 SIE=1104.50 W 109 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.30% CBMH 103RE=1112.67IE=1103.79 NE IE=1105.27 W IE=1103.79 S 81 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.40% 45 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.51% CBMH 104 RE=1109.86 IE=1104.12 EIE=1104.12 SW STMH 310RE=1110.48 IE=1104.56 WIE=1102.82 EIE=1099.85 N IE=1099.79 S 64 LF - 24" HDPE @ 2.00% SMH 5 RE=1112.92IE=1074.66 S IE=1074.66 W IE=1074.56 N 15 LF - 12" PVC SCH 40 @ 1.03% ROOF DRAIN IE=1105.00 N ROOF DRAIN IE=1104.00 N 15 LF - 12" PVC SCH 40 @ 2.00% ROOF DRAIN IE=1104.00 W ROOF DRAINIE=1104.00 W 58 LF - 12"PVC SCH 40 @ 2.05% 97 LF - 12" PVC SCH 40 @ 2.00% ROOF DRAINIE=1106.50 E ROOF DRAINIE=1106.50 E 63 LF - 12" PVC SCH 40 @ 2.01% 60 LF - 12" PVC SCH 40 @ 2.06% ROOF DRAINIE=1106.50 E 17 LF - 12" PVC SCH 40 @ 2.00% CBMH 202RE=1110.61 IE=1103.69 E IE=1103.69 S 63 LF - 15" HDPE @ 0.50% CBMH 106 RE=1109.84IE=1104.53 EIE=1104.53 W 142 LF - 17" PVC SCH 40 @ 1.00% STMH 303 RE=1105.93 IE=1099.84 NWIE=1099.84 NIE=1099.84 E TRENCH DRAIN IE=1100.07 S 46 LF - 12" PVC SCH 40 @ 0.50% STMH 304 (R-4341)RE=1113.06 IE=1100.43 SE 53 LF - 18" HDPE @ 1.10% 31 LF - 12"PVC SCH 40 @ 1.00% 23 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.57% CBMH 201RE=1110.47 IE=1103.37 N IE=1103.37 W W/ SAFL W/ 4' SUMP TRENCH DRAIN IE=1097.83 S 8" SAN PLUGIE=1077.52 E 44 LF - 8" PVC SDR 26 @ 0.50% 8" SAN PLUG IE=1073.91 S HYD. 6" GV8"x6" TEE 12"GV STMH 102 RE=1112.85IE=1103.47 NIE=1105.24 W IE=1103.47 S W/ SAFL W/ 4' SUMP ROOF DRAIN IE=1106.50 E HYD. 6" GV STMH 302 RE=1107.46 IE=1098.51 NIE=1098.41 WIE=1098.41 E RISER MHRE=1104.99 CONNECT TO SYSTEMIE=1095.50 N RISER MH RE=1110.71 CONNECT TO SYSTEMIE=1102.50 S RISER MHRE=1111.31CONNECT TO SYSTEM IE=1103.24 E RISER MHRE=1112.16CONNECT TO SYSTEM IE=1105.09 W STMH 101RE=1113.50 IE=1106.15 W IE=1106.15 E W/ 2' SUMP 252 LF - 8"PVC SDR 26 @ 0.24% 53 LF - 12"HDPE @ 2.00% OCS 402RE=1104.77IE=1095.50 S IE=1092.35 N FES400 IE=1088.40 RISER MHRE=1103.92 CONNECT TO SYSTEM IE=1097.85 E 10 LF - 24"HDPE @ 0.00% 12"GV 32 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.52% FES401 IE=1092.18 8 LF - 24"HDPE @ 0.00% 8 LF - 24"HDPE @ 2.00%OCS 311RE=1110.60IE=1102.50 N IE=1100.00 S RISER MHRE=1112.23CONNECT TO SYSTEM IE=1103.24 N LOWER ANDINSULATE WM LOWER AND INSULATE WM LOWER AND INSULATE WM LOWER AND INSULATE WM LOWER AND INSULATE WM LOWER AND INSULATE WM 92 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.04% RISER MHRE=1106.07 CONNECT TO SYSTEM IE=1097.19 N CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" PVC. SDR 26 CBMH 301ARE=1105.92 IE=1097.59 WIE=1097.59 E 6 LF - 36" HDPE @ 1.26%NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24.1S (LMS TECH) | ALEA STUTZ | 9/13/2024 2:42:49 PML:\PROJECTS\52908\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52908-C6.01-UTIL.DWG:C6.01 UTILITY PLANCROWN LMN, LLC CROWN LAKEVILLE APARTMENTS LAKEVILLE, MN52908 04/26/2024 TPK EJC MCA MARK ANDERSON 23450 1.04/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2.07/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 3.08/27/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 4.09/18/2024 TPK MCA MCA CITY COMMENT REVISIONS PRELIMINARY SCALE IN FEET 0 8040 NORTH THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND UNDERGROUND GAS LINEUNDERGROUND TELEPHONEUNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DRAINTILE SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN (SAN.) STORM SEWER CONCRETE CURB WATERMAIN EASEMENT LINE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS" AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS. a. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIRMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY AND MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REQUIREMENTS. b. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN, TURN OFF, INTERFERE WITH, OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO OR TAP WATERMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE THE LIABILITY OF CONTRACTOR. c. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES, AND HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10-FEET, BETWEEN OUTSIDE PIPE AND/OR STRUCTURE WALLS, IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATERMAIN AND SEWER MAIN (BUILDING, STORM AND SANITARY) CROSSINGS. 2. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN. a. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. b. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDR-35, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. i. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES TO BUILDING SHALL BE PVC SCH 40 CONFORMING TO ASTM D2665. c. ALL WATERMAIN TO BE PVC C-900, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. i. ALL WATERMAIN TO HAVE 7.5-FEET OF COVER OVER TOP OF WATERMAIN. ii. PROVIDE THRUST BLOCKING AND MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINTS ON ALL WATERMAIN JOINTS PER CITY STANDARDS. d. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE SMOOTH INTERIOR DUAL WALL HDPE PIPE WITH WATERTIGHT GASKETS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. i. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE FOR ROOF DRAIN SERVICES TO BUILDING SHALL BE PVC SCH 40 CONFORMING TO ASTM D2665. e. RIP RAP SHALL BE Mn/DOT CLASS 3. 3. COORDINATE ALL BUILDING SERVICE CONNECTION LOCATIONS AND INVERT ELEVATIONS WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALL BUILDING SERVICE CONNECTIONS (STORM, SANITARY, WATER) WITH FIVE FEET OR LESS COVER ARE TO BE INSULATED FROM BUILDING TO POINT WHERE 5-FEET OF COVER IS ACHIEVED. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. 6. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 7. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES THAT ARE DISTURBED BY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED IN KIND. SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED BENEATH THE 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. 9. ALL SOILS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE UTILITY BACKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL UTILITY PLAN C6.01 10. THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THE SITE EXCAVATION CONDITIONS FOR THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEMS TO DETERMINE IF GROUNDWATER IS PRESENT AT THE SYSTEM BOTTOM ELEVATION. THE UNDERGROUND STORAGE SYSTEMS 13P AND 14P SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH AN IMPERMEABLE LINER DUE TO THE EXISTING SEASONALLY HIGH GROUNDWATER BEING WITHIN 3FEET OF THE SYSTEM. 11. THE BORINGS IN THE CURRENT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DO NOT EXTEND TO THE DEPTH OF THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM 13P, ADDITIONAL BORINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO VERIFY THE UNDERLYING SOILS. IF CHALLENGING SOIL CONDITIONS EXIST, DEWATERING OR SHORING MAY BE REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEMEXHIBIT G Page 431 of 452 PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE: 1112.00LFE/GFE: 1100.67PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE: 1114.50LFE/GFE: 1103.17DOGPLAYAREA PATIO PLAYGROUND POOL SPLASHPAD NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKING661.26308 309 310 311 312313 314 315 316 317 318 319 186951117.083.ABPC 1101109"ASH 8"POP7"POP9"POP6"POP7"POP8"POP9"POP19"CT.WD20"WIL 17"WIL17"WIL13"WIL17"WIL11"WIL7"WIL 20"POP 14"POP 6"ASH18"CT.WD 20"OAK 9"OAK 7"OAK 7"OAK 6"OAK8"OAK 8"OAK7"OAK 7"OAK8"OAK8"OAK 8"OAK 8"OAK 9"ELM 8"POP 6"POP8"POP8"POP7"POP 6"ELM6"ELM 6"OAK 9"CHRY 12 7"S.BRY 12"ASH 12"OAK8"OAK 6"OAK 12"OAK 11"OAK 6"OAK 11"POP 9"POP 10"POP 9"POP 8"POP 10"POP10"POP 9"POP10"POP10"POP 6"ELM9"POP 7"POP6"POP8"POP6"POP 6"POP8"POP 7"POP9"POP10"POP8"POP 8"POP8"POP8"POP 6"POP 6"POP6"POP 8"POP9"POP 10"BOX10"POP9"POP11"POP8"BOX11"POP9"POP10"POP 10"POP 9"POP 7"POP7"POP7"POP 6"POP10"OAK 11"POP8"BOX 9"POP 11"POP 10"POP11"POP9"POP10"POP10"POP 8"POP7"POP 7"POP6"POP 7"POP8"POP7"POP 9"POP10"POP11"POP12"POP 7"POP12"POP 13"POP 8"CHRY 9"POP14"OAK 12"POP7"POP7"POP12"POP9"POP 11"POP 7"POP12"POP12"POP9"POP7"POP 6"CHRY 7"CHRY10"OAK6"OAK6"OAK 11"OAK6"OAK 7"POP 6"ELM7"POP 8"ELM 7"POP 8"OAK9"POP9"POP8"POP9"POP8"POP9"POP8"POP 7"POP 6"POP 10"POP 8"POP 6"POP7"POP7"POP 8"POP 6"POP6"POP6"POP6"POP7"POP6"POP8"POP 6"OAK 9"OAK 8"POP9"POP7"POP 6"POP9"POP10"POP10"POP9"POP 8"POP8"POP6"POP8"POP9"POP 7"POP8"POP 9"POP 9"POP 8"POP 8 4"ELM11"OAK7"OAK7"OAK 6"OAK7"OAK 6"OAK13"OAK 9"OAK36"OAK 13"BOX7"POP9"POP11"POP 12"POP 10"POP 9"POP7"POP11"CHRY7"BOX8"BOX15"BOX 11"BOX8"CHRY 8"CHRY 7"CHRY 8"BOX 7"BOX9"ASH 8"BOX11"BOX 9"BOX9"BOX 8"BOX9"BOX7 8"BOX 48"CT.WD 19 14"OAK 24"OAK 21"OAK 11"OAK12"OAK 18"OAK 8"POP 20"OAK 14"OAK 8"OAK 11"OAK 7"POP9 10"POP 8"POP7"POP 8"POP7"POP 8"CHRY8"CHRY 24"WIL 19"OAK18 10"OAK7"ELM14"OAK8"ELM15"OAK 8"ELM17"OAK 18"OAK 8"ELM 9"ELM 7"CHRY 12"CHRY 6 7"BOX 7"BOX8"BOX 8"BOX 8 8"BOX 8 8"BOX 11"BOX8"BOX 7"BOX 18"OAK 8"CHRY 24"OAK 15"BOX 19 18"OAK 10"ELM 18"OAK 8"ELM 7"CHRY 7 7"CHRY7"CHRY 8"CHRY 22"OAK 7"ELM 9"BOX 24"OAK 8"BOX 14"OAK 19"OAK 12 28"OAK34"OAK 14"OAK9"OAK 8"OAK9"BOX 8 8"BOX 33"OAK 22"OAK8"ELM 17"OAK 16 20"OAK 12"ELM8"HACK12"OAK 6"OAK 9"ASH 8"POP7"POP9"POP6"POP7"POP8"POP9"POP19"CT.WD20"WIL 17"WIL17"WIL13"WIL17"WIL11"WIL7"WIL 20"POP 14"POP 6"ASH18"CT.WD 20"OAK 9"OAK 7"OAK 7"OAK 6"OAK8"OAK 8"OAK7"OAK 7"OAK8"OAK8"OAK 8"OAK 8"OAK 9"ELM 8"POP 6"POP8"POP8"POP7"POP 6"ELM6"ELM 6"OAK 9"CHRY 12 7"S.BRY 12"ASH 12"OAK8"OAK 6"OAK 12"OAK 11"OAK 6"OAK 11"POP 9"POP 10"POP 9"POP 8"POP 10"POP10"POP 9"POP 6"ELM9"POP 7"POP6"POP8"POP6"POP 6"POP8"POP 7"POP9"POP10"POP8"POP 8"POP8"POP8"POP 6"POP 6"POP6"POP 9"POP 7"POP7"POP7"POP 6"POP 7"POP6"POP 6"ELM7"POP 8"ELM 7"POP 6"POP 6"POP6"POP6"POP6"POP7"POP6"POP8"POP 6"OAK 9"OAK 7"POP9 10"POP 8"POP7"POP 8"POP7"POP 3001 3002 300330043005 3006 3007 3008 3009 3010 3011 3012 3013 3014 3015 3016 3017 3018 3019 3020 3021 3022 3023 3024 3025 3026 3027 3028 3029 3030 3031 3032 3033 3034 3035 3036 3037 3038 3039 3040 3041 3042 3043 3044 3045 3046 3047 3048 3049 3050 3051 3052 3053 3054 3055 30563057 3058 3059 3060 3061 3062 3063 3064 30653066 3067 3068 30693070 3071 3072 3073 3074 3075 3076 3077 3078 3079 30803081 3082 3083 3084 3085 3086 3087 3088 3089 3090 3091 3092 3093 3094309530963097 3098 3099 3100 3101 3102 3103 3104 3105 3106 3107 3108 31093110 3111 3112 3113 31143115 3116 3117 3118 3119 3120 3121 3122 3123 3124 3125 3126 3127 3128 3129 3130 3131 3132 3133 3134 3135 3136 31373138 31393140 3141 3142 3143 3144 3145 31463147 3148 3149 3150 31513152 3153 3154 3155 3156 3157 3158 3159 315931603161 3162 3163 3164 3165 3166 3167 3168 3169 3170 3171 31723173 3174 3175 3176 3177 3178 3179 31803181 3182 3183 3184 3185 3186 3187 3188 3189 3190 3191 3192 3193 3194 3195 3196 3197 3198 3199 3200 3201 3202 3203 3204 3205 3206 3207 32083209 32103211 3212 3213 3214 32153216321732183219 3220 3221 3222 3223 32243225 3226 3227322832293230 3231 32323233 32343235 3236 3237 3238 32393240 3241 3242 3243 3244 3245 3246 3247 3248 3249 3250 3251 3252 3253 3254 3255 3256 3257 3258 3259 3260 3261 32623263 3264 3265 32663267 32683269 3270 3271 3272 3273 3274 3275 3276 32773278 3279 32803281 3282 3283 3284 3285 3286 3287 3288 3289 32903291 3292 3293 32943295 3296 3297 3298 3299 3300 3301 33023303 3304 3305 33063307 3308 3309 33103311 3312 3313 3314 3315 33163317 3318 3319 3320 3321 3322 3323 3324 3325 3326 3327 3328 3329 3330 3331 3332 33333334 3335 3336 3337 3338 3339 3340 3341 3342 3343 3344 3345 3346 3347 3348 3349 3350 3351 3352 3353 3354 3355 33563357 33583359 3360 3361 3362 3363 3364 3365 3366 33673368 3369 3370 3371 3372 3373 3374 33753376 3377 3378 3379 33803381 3382 3383 3384 3385 3386 3387 3388 3389 3390 3391 3392 3393 3394 3395 3396 3397 3398 3399 3400 34013402 3403 34043405 3406 3407 340834093410 3411 3412 3413 3414 3415 3416 3417 3418 3419 3420 3421 3422 3423 3424 3425 3426 3427 3428 34293430 3431 3432 3433 3434 3435 3436 3437 3438 3439 3440 3441 3442 3443 3444 3445 3446 3447 3448 3449 3450 345134523453 3454 3455 3456 3457 3458 3459 3460 3461 3462 3463 3464 3465 3466 3467 3468 3469 3470 3471 34723473 3474 3475 3476 3477 3478 347934803481 3482 3483 3484 3485 3486 3487 3488 3489 3490 3491 3492 3493 3494 3495 3496 3497 3498 34993500 3501 3502 3503 3504 3505 3506 3507 3508 3509 3510 3511 3512 3513 3514 35153516 3517 3518 BW=1120.3BW=1125.1 TW=1126.0± BW=1119.73 TW=1125.0±TW=1121.0± BW=1122.5 TW=1125.0± -3.3 6 % -2.67% -2.46% -1.63 %-1.64%-1.83 %-1.65% - 5 . 8 2%-3.50%-3.10%-30.78% -28.45% -31.5 4 %-23.53%-29.6 1 % -34.17% -30.99% -29.76% -28.67%-31.97%-30.22% TREE OFF SITE TREE OFF SITE SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24.1S (LMS TECH) | ALEA STUTZ | 6/28/2024 3:06:16 PML:\PROJECTS\52908\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52908-L0-TREE.DWG:L0.01 TREE PRESERVATION PLANCROWN LMN, LLC CROWN LAKEVILLE APARTMENTS LAKEVILLE, MN52908 04/26/2024 JRW JRW MCA JOHN WORKMAN 59119 1.04/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2.07/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 3.08/27/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 4.09/18/2024 TPK MCA MCA CITY COMMENT REVISIONS PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN L-0.01 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARDGUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FORANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICHCONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 28.0' 1. Responsibility Of Subdividers And Builders: Subdividers and builders shall be required to replace the significant trees which were indicated on the tree preservation plan to be saved but ultimately were destroyed or damaged. The subdivider and builder shall be required to replace each of the significant trees destroyed or damaged with two (2) replacement trees. Replacement trees must consist of nursery stock and be no less than the following sizes: a. Deciduous trees: No less than two and one-half inches (21/2") in diameter. b. Coniferous trees: No less than eight feet (8') high as measured from the top of the ball to the bottom of the leader branch. SUMMARY: TOTAL TREES ON SITE: 519 TREES (6,349 INCHES) TOTAL TREES REMOVED: 495 TREES (6,127 INCHES) TOTAL TREES PRESERVED: 24 TREES (222 INCHES) LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED LAKEVILLE LANDSCAPE CODE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TREE TO BE REMOVED D S LS RIPRAP TREE REMOVAL EXHIBIT H Page 432 of 452 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24.1S (LMS TECH) | ALEA STUTZ | 6/28/2024 3:06:16 PML:\PROJECTS\52908\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52908-L0-TREE.DWG:L0.02 TREE LISTCROWN LMN, LLC CROWN LAKEVILLE APARTMENTS LAKEVILLE, MN52908 04/26/2024 JRW JRW MCA JOHN WORKMAN 59119 1.04/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2.07/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 3.08/27/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 4.09/18/2024 TPK MCA MCA CITY COMMENT REVISIONS PRELIMINARY TREE LIST L-0.02 Tag DBH Species Common Species Latin STATUS 3001 10 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3002 20 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3003 7 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3004 8 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3005 7 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3006 6 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3007 19 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3008 15 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3009 7 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3010 9 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3011 8 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3012 8 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3013 19 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3014 22 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3015 7 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3016 8 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3017 6 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3018 13 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3019 10 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3020 16 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3021 12 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3022 12 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3023 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3024 8 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3025 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3026 16 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3027 11 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3028 17 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3029 13 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3030 22 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3031 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3032 28 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3033 16 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3034 11 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3035 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3036 12 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3037 14 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3038 10 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3039 20 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3040 8 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3041 7 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3042 9 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3043 7 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3044 9 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3045 12 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3046 17 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3047 7 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3048 14 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3049 6 Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove 3050 7 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3051 9 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3052 15 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3053 13 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Remove 3054 19 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3055 8 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3056 12 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3057 11 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3058 9 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3059 13 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3060 9 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3061 19 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3062 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3063 19 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3064 16 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3065 12 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3066 21 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Preserve 3067 7 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3068 18 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3069 6 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3070 28 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3071 17 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3072 10 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3073 14 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3074 6 Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove 3075 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3076 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3077 17 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3078 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3079 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3080 7 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3081 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3082 11 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3083 21 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3084 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3085 21 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3086 18 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Remove 3087 10 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3088 6 Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)Remove 3089 6 Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)Remove 3090 14 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3091 6 Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)Remove 3092 16 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Remove 3093 6 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3094 12 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Remove 3095 12 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Remove 3096 10 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Remove 3097 13 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Remove 3098 7 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3099 14 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3100 16 Basswood (Tilia americana)Remove 3101 13 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3102 13 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3103 15 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3104 9 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3105 13 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3106 16 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3107 17 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3108 17 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3109 16 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3110 18 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3111 23 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3112 15 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3113 13 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3114 14 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3115 14 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3116 11 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3117 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3118 8 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3119 12 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3120 19 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3121 9 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3122 19 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3123 13 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3124 27 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3125 7 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3126 16 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3127 17 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3128 8 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3129 15 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3130 11 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3131 20 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3132 6 Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)Remove 3133 8 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3134 16 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3135 14 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3136 7 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3137 9 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3138 10 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3139 19 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3140 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3141 8 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3142 23 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3143 21 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3144 6 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3145 16 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3146 8 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3147 19 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3148 10 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3149 10 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3150 7 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3151 13 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3152 8 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3153 11 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3154 27 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3155 15 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3156 6 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3157 10 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3158 8 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3159 16 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3159 16 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3160 17 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3161 15 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3162 10 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3163 17 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3164 16 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3165 15 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3166 12 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3167 13 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3168 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3169 19 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3170 6 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3171 9 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3172 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3173 17 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3174 6 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3175 13 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3176 9 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3177 6 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3178 17 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3179 8 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3180 16 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3181 11 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3182 14 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3183 12 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3184 13 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3185 8 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3186 14 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3187 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3188 20 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3189 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3190 23 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3191 17 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3192 17 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3193 14 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3194 18 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3195 14 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3196 16 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3197 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3198 13 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3199 7 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3200 14 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3201 10 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3202 18 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3203 6 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3204 6 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3205 7 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3206 10 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3207 16 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3208 8 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3209 12 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3210 10 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3211 6 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3212 9 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3213 6 Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)Remove 3214 14 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3215 6 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3216 8 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3217 23 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3218 23 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3219 6 Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)Remove 3220 7 Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)Remove 3221 19 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3222 6 Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)Remove 3223 6 Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)Remove 3224 20 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3225 6 Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove 3226 19 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3227 6 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3228 13 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3229 10 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3230 13 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3231 12 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3232 15 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3233 9 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3234 15 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3235 18 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3236 6 Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)Remove 3237 17 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3238 12 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3239 10 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3240 7 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3241 12 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3242 14 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3243 13 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3244 16 Cottonwood (Populus Deltoides)Remove 3245 6 Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)Remove 3246 14 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3247 11 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3248 6 Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)Remove 3249 9 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3250 12 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3251 6 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3252 7 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3253 22 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3254 20 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3255 14 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3256 17 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3257 11 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3258 12 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3259 9 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3260 7 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3261 13 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3262 10 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3263 8 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3264 9 Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove 3265 6 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3266 13 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3267 12 Basswood (Tilia americana)Remove 3268 6 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3269 6 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3270 7 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3271 13 Basswood (Tilia americana)Remove 3272 11 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3273 19 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3274 16 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3275 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3276 13 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3277 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3278 22 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3279 7 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3280 6 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3281 14 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3282 20 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3283 11 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3284 17 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3285 10 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3286 17 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3287 6 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3288 15 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3289 20 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3290 12 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3291 18 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3292 16 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3293 12 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3294 12 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3295 12 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3296 10 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3297 9 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3298 11 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3299 8 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3300 9 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3301 13 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3302 12 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3303 12 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3304 11 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3305 17 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3306 17 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3307 6 Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana)Remove 3308 11 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3309 11 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3310 12 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3311 9 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3312 10 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3313 15 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3314 9 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3315 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3316 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3317 6 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3318 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3319 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3320 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3321 9 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3322 9 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3323 6 Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove 3324 6 Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove 3325 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3326 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3327 10 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3328 10 Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove 3329 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3330 6 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3331 6 Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove 3332 9 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3333 31 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3334 7 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3335 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3336 22 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3337 10 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3338 10 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3339 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3340 13 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3341 7 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3342 7 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3343 6 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3344 22 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3345 12 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3346 26 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3347 9 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3348 17 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3349 23 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3350 12 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3351 22 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3352 6 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3353 31 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3354 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3355 16 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3356 19 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3357 23 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3358 15 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3359 23 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3360 27 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3361 6 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3362 6 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3363 9 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3364 26 Black Willow (Salix nigra)Preserve 3365 12 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve 3366 6 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3367 7 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3368 6 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3369 7 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3370 8 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3371 8 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3372 7 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3373 6 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3374 6 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3375 6 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3376 7 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3377 8 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3378 12 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3379 11 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Preserve 3380 7 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Preserve 3381 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve 3382 9 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3383 16 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3384 12 Paper Birch (Betula papyrifera)Remove 3385 22 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3386 20 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3387 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3388 7 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3389 12 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3390 8 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3391 15 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3392 11 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3393 17 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3394 8 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3395 7 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3396 6 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3397 11 Red Maple (Acer rubrum)Remove 3398 7 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3399 10 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3400 11 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3401 6 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3402 15 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3403 6 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3404 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3405 6 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3406 9 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3407 16 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3408 22 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3409 11 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3410 10 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3411 7 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3412 14 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3413 21 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3414 19 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3415 8 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3416 21 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3417 23 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3418 7 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3419 17 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3420 11 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3421 16 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3422 16 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3423 11 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3424 24 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3425 8 Red Pine (Pinus resinosa)Remove 3426 6 Black Walnut (Juglans nigra)Remove 3427 23 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3428 14 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3429 21 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3430 13 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3431 7 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3432 15 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3433 13 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3434 15 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3435 7 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3436 11 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3437 13 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3438 18 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3439 11 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3440 18 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3441 21 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3442 10 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3443 23 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3444 19 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3445 11 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3446 23 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3447 26 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3448 18 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3449 11 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3450 18 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3451 18 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3452 19 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3453 9 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3454 11 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3455 12 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3456 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3457 8 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3458 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3459 12 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3460 10 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3461 9 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3462 18 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3463 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3464 6 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3465 28 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3466 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3467 17 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3468 11 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3469 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Preserve 3470 27 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3471 16 White Oak (Quercus alba)Preserve 3472 24 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3473 6 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3474 10 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3475 6 Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis)Remove 3476 22 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3477 8 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3478 8 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3479 10 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3480 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3481 10 Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove 3482 8 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3483 8 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3484 7 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3485 10 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3486 22 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3487 24 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3488 13 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3489 7 Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove 3490 19 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3491 12 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3492 25 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3493 6 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3494 11 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Remove 3495 13 Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)Remove 3496 6 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3497 19 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3498 8 Box Elder (Acer negundo)Remove 3499 10 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3500 11 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3501 6 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3502 6 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3503 21 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3504 17 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3505 7 American Elm (Ulmus americana)Remove 3506 17 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3507 19 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3508 10 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3509 13 White Oak (Quercus alba)Remove 3510 8 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3511 28 Red Oak (Quercus rubra)Remove 3512 6 Black Cherry (Prunus serotina)Remove 3513 22 Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)Remove 3514 12 Blue Spruce (Picea pungens)Remove 3515 10 Blue Spruce (Picea pungens)Remove 3516 7 Blue Spruce (Picea pungens)Remove 3517 6 Blue Spruce (Picea pungens)Remove 3518 22 White Oak (Quercus alba)RemoveEXHIBIT I Page 433 of 452 PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE: 1112.00LFE/GFE: 1100.67PROPOSED BUILDINGFFE: 1114.50LFE/GFE: 1103.17DOGPLAYAREA PATIO PLAYGROUND POOL SPLASHPAD NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKING2525 25 110110-3.3 6 % -2.67% -2.46% -1.63 %-1.64%-1.83 %-1.65% - 5 . 8 2%-3.50%-3.10%-30.78% -28.45% -31.5 4 %-23.53%-29.6 1 % -34.17% -30.99% -29.76% -28.67%-31.97%-30.22%ROCK MULCH ROCK MULCH NO PARKINGNO PARKINGSCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24.1S (LMS TECH) | ALEA STUTZ | 8/21/2024 4:12:07 PML:\PROJECTS\52908\CAD\CIVIL\SHEETS\52908-L1-LSCP.DWG:L1.01 LANDSCAPE PLANCROWN LMN, LLC CROWN LAKEVILLE APARTMENTS LAKEVILLE, MN52908 04/26/2024 JRW JRW MCA JOHN WORKMAN 59119 1.04/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2.07/26/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 3.08/27/2024 TPK MCA MCA REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL PER CITY COMMENTS 4.09/18/2024 TPK MCA MCA CITY COMMENT REVISIONS PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1.01 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARDGUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FORANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICHCONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. Landscaping: Required landscaping for new residential subdivisions and commercial, industrial or institutional uses shall include plantings at the property perimeter, off street parking perimeter landscaping and interior landscape plantings as well as required residential buffer yard or transitional buffer zone plantings. Off Street Parking Areas: All off street parking areas with five (5) or more parking spaces or any parking area within twenty feet (20') of a residential zoning district shall be screened from view as follows: 1. Installation of shade, ornamental and/or evergreen trees at the perimeter of the parking area in accordance with the spacing requirements of subsections A and C of this section. All rooftop and ground mounted mechanical equipment of residential buildings having five (5) units or more and of nonresidential buildings shall comply with the following standards: A. All rooftop and ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened so as to mitigate noise in compliance with section 11-16-25 of this title. B. All rooftop and ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be designed (including exterior color) and located so as to be aesthetically harmonious and compatible with the building. Screening of and landscaping around the equipment may be required where the design, color, and location of the equipment are found to not effectively buffer noise or provide aesthetic harmony and compatibility. Screening shall be constructed of durable materials which are aesthetically compatible with the structure and which may be an integral part of the structure. Applicable requirements for access to the equipment shall be observed in the design and construction of the screening. C. Rooftop mechanical equipment less than three feet (3') in height may be exempt from screening requirements by the zoning administrator. (Ord. 674, sec. 1, 7-17-2000) CALCULATIONSONE TREE PER 40 FT OF ROW REQUIRED: 16 PROPOSED: 16SCREENING SHRUBS LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED LAKEVILLE LANDSCAPE CODE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TREE TO BE REMOVED D S LS RIPRAP PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL HEIGHT QTY TREES AB Acer freemanii `Autumn Blaze` / Autumn Blaze Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 6 GB Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold` TM / Maidenhair Tree B & B 2.5"Cal 7 HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 13 BO Quercus macrocarpa / Burr Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 7 SAT Salix alba `Tristis` / Golden Weeping Willow B & B 2.5"Cal 2 CONIFERS BF Abies balsamea / Balsam Fir B & B 8`9 JSB Juniperus scopulorum `Blue Arrow` / Blue Arrow Juniper B & B 6`53 BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 8`3 ORN. TREES SS Malus x `Spring Snow` / Spring Snow Crab Apple B & B 2"Cal 5 IL Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk` / Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac B & B 2"Cal 6 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY SHRUBS YD Cornus alba `Bud`s Yellow` / Bud`s Yellow Dogwood 5 gal 8 CD Cornus sericea `Alleman`s Compact` / Dwarf Red Twig Dogwood 5 gal 44 BJ Juniperus sabina `Broadmoor` / Broadmoor Juniper 5 gal 9 CJ Juniperus sabina `Monna` / Calgary Carpet Juniper 5 gal 8 GL Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low` / Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 5 gal 39 FS Sorbaria sorbifolia `Sem` / Sem Ash Leaf Spirea 5 gal 22 GS Spiraea japonica `Goldflame` / Spirea 5 gal 39 SJW Spiraea japonica `Walbuma` / Magic Carpet Japanese Spirea 5 gal 16 MK Syringa patula `Miss Kim` / Miss Kim Lilac 5 gal 38 LB Syringa x `Bloomerang` / Lilac 5 gal 15 GRASSES KFG Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster` / Feather Reed Grass 1 gal 6 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT GROUND COVERS 35-221 MNDOT Seed Mix 35-221 / Dry Praire General Seed 25-131 MNDOT Seed Mix 25-131 / Low Maintenance Fescue mix Seed 33-261 MNDOT Seed Mix 33-261 / Ponds and Wet Areas Seed TUR HIG Turf Sod Highland Sod / Sod Sod PLANT SCHEDULE EXHIBIT J Page 434 of 452 Michael D. Knisely 26926 Signed Printed Name Date Reg No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. No.Description Date SD501 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 21.12.06 CAD/BIM PUBLISH DATE: EAST BUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DRAWING TITLE COPYRIGHT 2024 DISTYLE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, P.C. MDK DRAWING INFORMATION DLK, MDK 4/25/2024 210th Street West Lakeville Minnesota EAST BUILDING Crown Lakeville Apartments 620 Mendelssohn Ave. N, Suite 118 Minneapolis, Minneapolis, [763] 591.0996 Not for Constr uction Preliminary Plat Submittal 4/26/2024 13 12 11 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 11012 GARAGE LEVEL 88'-8" 1ST FLOOR & ENTRY 100'-0" 2ND FLOOR 111'-7 7/8" 3RD FLOOR 122'-3 3/4" 4TH FLOOR 132'-11 5/8" ROOF DECK 143'-7 1/2" AVERAGE GRADE @ EAST BLDG93'-0" T/O HIGH PARAPET148'-0"±55'-0" @ T/O HIGH PARAPETTHIN BRICK VENEER PREFIN MTL COPING AND TRIM VERTICAL MTL SIDING PANEL SIDING PREFIN MTL BALCONY AND RAILING ROCK FACE BLOCK N LM K J H G F E C B AD GARAGE LEVEL 88'-8" 1ST FLOOR & ENTRY 100'-0" 2ND FLOOR 111'-7 7/8" 3RD FLOOR 122'-3 3/4" 4TH FLOOR 132'-11 5/8" ROOF DECK 143'-7 1/2" AVERAGE GRADE @ EAST BLDG93'-0" T/O HIGH PARAPET148'-0"±55'-0" @ T/O HIGH PARAPETTHIN BRICK VENEER PREFIN MTL COPING AND TRIMVERTICAL MTL SIDING PREFIN MTL BALCONY AND RAILING PANEL SIDING 1 2 5 7 8 11 12 13310 GARAGE LEVEL 88'-8" 1ST FLOOR & ENTRY 100'-0" 2ND FLOOR 111'-7 7/8" 3RD FLOOR 122'-3 3/4" 4TH FLOOR 132'-11 5/8" ROOF DECK 143'-7 1/2" AVERAGE GRADE @ EAST BLDG93'-0" T/O HIGH PARAPET148'-0"±55'-0" @T/O HIGH PARAPETTHIN BRICK VENEER PREFIN MTL COPPING AND TRIMPANEL SIDING PREFIN MTL BALCONY AND RAILING ROCK FACE BLOCK VERTICAL MTL SIDING A B C G J L NDFM GARAGE LEVEL 88'-8" 1ST FLOOR & ENTRY 100'-0" 2ND FLOOR 111'-7 7/8" 3RD FLOOR 122'-3 3/4" 4TH FLOOR 132'-11 5/8" ROOF DECK 143'-7 1/2" AVERAGE GRADE @ EAST BLDG93'-0" T/O HIGH PARAPET148'-0"±55'-0" @ T/O HIGH PARAPETTHIN BRICK VENEER PREFIN MTL COPING AND TRIMPANEL SIDING PREFIN MTL BALCONY AND RAILING ROCK FACE BLOCK VERTICAL MTL SIDING East Building West North East South Total Notes Brick Veneer 5,383 4,522 5,250 5,250 20,405 Other Exterior Materials 7,694 7,675 10,309 10,376 36,054 1 Elevation Face Area including Exposed Garage Walls 10,110 8,993 12,742 12,650 44,495 1, 2 % Brick 53%50%44%44%47% Elevation Face Area less Exposed Garage Walls 10,079 8,993 10,006 10,006 39,084 1, 2 % Brick 53%50%52%52%52% Notes: 1. Face area calculations do not include windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas per 11-62-19.B.2 2. Variance requested to exclude integrally-colored rock face block exposed garage walls from face area calculation SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 5 EAST BLDG - WEST ELEVATION SD501 0 8'16'32' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 6 EAST BLDG - NORTH ELEVATION SD501 0 8'16'32' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 7 EAST BLDG - EAST ELEVATION SD501 0 8'16'32' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 8 EAST BLDG - SOUTH ELEVATION SD501 0 8'16'32' 4/26/2024 EXHIBIT K Page 435 of 452 Michael D. Knisely 26926 Signed Printed Name Date Reg No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. No.Description Date SD502 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 21.12.06 CAD/BIM PUBLISH DATE: 3D VISUALIZATION DRAWING TITLE COPYRIGHT 2024 DISTYLE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, P.C. DRAWING INFORMATION 4/25/2024 210th Street West Lakeville Minnesota EAST BUILDING Crown Lakeville Apartments 620 Mendelssohn Ave. N, Suite 118 Minneapolis, Minneapolis, [763] 591.0996 Not for Constr uction Preliminary Plat Submittal 4/26/2024 2 RENDERED WEST ELEVATION SD502 3 PERSEPCTIVE RENDER SD502 12 MATERIAL KEY SD502 4/26/2024 Page 436 of 452 Michael D. Knisely 26926 Signed Printed Name Date Reg No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. No.Description Date SD100 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 21.12.06 CAD/BIM PUBLISH DATE: EAST BLDG - GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN DRAWING TITLE COPYRIGHT 2024 DISTYLE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, P.C. MDK DRAWING INFORMATION MDK, DLK 4/25/2024 210th Street West Lakeville Minnesota EAST BUILDING Crown Lakeville Apartments 620 Mendelssohn Ave. N, Suite 118 Minneapolis, Minneapolis, [763] 591.0996 Not for Constr uction Preliminary Plat Submittal 4/26/2024 1 2 3 12112312312312312312311211231231231231231231231 12121231231231 2 3123123123123123123 1 2 1231231 112 1231 1 12 11212AIR HANDLER AIR HANDLERAIR HANDLERelec gearMOTORCYCLESCARWASH A.7 D E 13 13 12.3 12.3 10.7 10.7 14 14 15 15 16 16 10 10 A C.3 11 4 77 6 88 9 1.71.7 5.6 2.82.8 6.46.4 8.7 8.38.3 M.2 M.2 J.6 J.6 L.2 L.2 G.6 G.6 F.6 F.6 E.6 E.6 12 N N Water Svcextr ventwellelec meeters 271'-0"271'-0"67'-0"338'-0"70'-0"203'-0"203'-0"135'-0"70'-0"GARAGEG150 GARAGEG150 GARAGEG150 LOBBYG160 LOBBYG130 SPRINKLER UTILITYG136 PET WASHG142 STAIRG140 ELECTRICAL UTILITYG172 POOL EQPMG170 STAIRG180 REFUSE ROOMG195 UTILITY ROOMG196 99+4 ACCESSIBLE +1 CARWASH = 104 PARKING SPACES AND 3 MOTORCYCLE SPACES 5SD501 6 SD501 7SD501 GENERAL NOTES N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 8 EAST BLDG GARAGE LEVEL PLAN SD100 0 8'16'32' 4/26/2024 EXHIBIT L Page 437 of 452 Michael D. Knisely 26926 Signed Printed Name Date Reg No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. No.Description Date SD101 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 21.12.06 CAD/BIM PUBLISH DATE: EAST BLDG - 1ST FLOOR PLAN DRAWING TITLE COPYRIGHT 2024 DISTYLE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, P.C. MDK DRAWING INFORMATION MDK, DLK 4/25/2024 210th Street West Lakeville Minnesota EAST BUILDING Crown Lakeville Apartments 620 Mendelssohn Ave. N, Suite 118 Minneapolis, Minneapolis, [763] 591.0996 Not for Constr uction Preliminary Plat Submittal 4/26/2024123456789101112131415 12345678910111213141234534567891012 A A B B C C E 13 13 12 12 11 11 D D 10 10 11 22 33 4 77 6 5 88 9 N N L L M MK G G H JF F FEC FEC FEC5 SD501 6 SD501 7 SD501 8SD501 70'-0"203'-0"203'-0"70'-0"273'-0"275'-2 3/8" 2BE102 2BE101 1BD103 1BD104 2BD106 2BD108 2BD110 2BD112 2BD109 1BD107 2BD105 STAIR140 POSTAL SERVICES132POSTAL SERVICES133 ENTRY131 GRAND LOBBY132 VESTIBULE130 STORAGE190 REFUSE195 UTILITY196 2BD114 2BD116 2BD118 2BD120 1BD122 2BE124 2BE127 1BD125 STAIR180 2BD1231AD121 2BD119 LOBBY161 VESTIBULE160 UTILITY166 FITNESS CLASSROOM151 FITNESS150 TOILET151 CORRIDOR185 COWORKING SPACE170 OFFICE A171 OFFICE B172 CORRIDOR145E-PNLGENERAL NOTES N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 8 EAST BLDG 1ST FLOOR PLAN SD101 0 8'16'32' 4/26/2024 Page 438 of 452 Michael D. Knisely 26926 Signed Printed Name Date Reg No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. No.Description Date SD102 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 21.12.06 CAD/BIM PUBLISH DATE: EAST BLDG - 2ND FLOOR PLAN DRAWING TITLE COPYRIGHT 2024 DISTYLE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, P.C. MDK DRAWING INFORMATION MDK, DLK 4/25/2024 210th Street West Lakeville Minnesota EAST BUILDING Crown Lakeville Apartments 620 Mendelssohn Ave. N, Suite 118 Minneapolis, Minneapolis, [763] 591.0996 Not for Constr uction Preliminary Plat Submittal 4/26/2024 A A B B C C E 13 13 12 12 11 11 D D 10 10 11 22 33 4 77 6 5 88 9 N N L L M MK G G H JF F FECFEC FEC5 SD501 6 SD501 7 SD501 8SD501 275'-0"203'-0"70'-0"70'-0"203'-0"273'-0"2BE202 1BD204 2BD206 2BD208 2AD210 2BD212 2BD216 2BD218 2BD220 2BD222 1BD224 2BE226 2BE225 1BD223 STAIR280 2BD2211BD219 2BD217 2BD209 1BD207 2BD205 1BD203 2BE201 STAIR240 UTILITY231 ELEVATOR CORRIDOR230 CLUBROOM232 STORAGE290 REFUSE295 UTILITY296 TOILET291 TOILET292 CORRIDOR285 1BD213 1BD215 ELEVATOR CORRIDOR260 STORAGE266 E-PNLDECK GENERAL NOTES N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 8 EAST BLDG 2ND FLOOR PLAN SD102 0 8'16'32' 4/26/2024 Page 439 of 452 Michael D. Knisely 26926 Signed Printed Name Date Reg No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. No.Description Date SD103 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 21.12.06 CAD/BIM PUBLISH DATE: EAST BLDG - 3RD FLOOR PLAN DRAWING TITLE COPYRIGHT 2024 DISTYLE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, P.C. MDK DRAWING INFORMATION MDK, DLK 4/25/2024 210th Street West Lakeville Minnesota EAST BUILDING Crown Lakeville Apartments 620 Mendelssohn Ave. N, Suite 118 Minneapolis, Minneapolis, [763] 591.0996 Not for Constr uction Preliminary Plat Submittal 4/26/2024 A A B B C C E 13 13 12 12 11 11 D D 10 10 11 22 33 4 77 6 5 88 9 N N L L M MK G G H JF F FECFEC FEC5 SD501 6 SD501 7 SD501 8SD501 mechchase 271'-0"203'-0"70'-0"70'-0"203'-0"273'-0"2BE302 1BD304 2BD306 2BD308 2BD310 2BD312 2BD309 1BD307 2BD305 1BD303 2BE301 UTILITY331 ELEVATOR CORRIDOR330 STORAGE390 UTILITY296 REFUSE395 1BD213 1BD215 ELEVATOR CORRIDOR360 STORAGE366 2AD317 1BD319 2BD318 CORRIDOR385 2BD316 2BD320 2BD322 1BD324 2BE326 2BE325 1BD3232BD321 STAIR380 CORRIDOR345E-PNLGENERAL NOTES N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 8 EAST BLDG 3RD FLOOR PLAN SD103 0 8'16'32' 4/26/2024 Page 440 of 452 Michael D. Knisely 26926 Signed Printed Name Date Reg No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. No.Description Date SD104 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 21.12.06 CAD/BIM PUBLISH DATE: EAST BLDG - 4TH FLOOR PLAN DRAWING TITLE COPYRIGHT 2024 DISTYLE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, P.C. MDK DRAWING INFORMATION MDK, DLK 4/25/2024 210th Street West Lakeville Minnesota EAST BUILDING Crown Lakeville Apartments 620 Mendelssohn Ave. N, Suite 118 Minneapolis, Minneapolis, [763] 591.0996 Not for Constr uction Preliminary Plat Submittal 4/26/2024 A A B B C C E 13 13 12 12 11 11 D D 10 10 11 22 33 4 77 6 5 88 9 N N L L M MK G G H JF F FECFEC FEC5 SD501 6 SD501 7 SD501 8SD501 WH Ventchase 70'-0"203'-0"203'-0"70'-0"271'-0"273'-0"2BD416 2BD418 2BD420 2BD422 1BD424 2BE426 2BE425 1BD4232BD4211BD419 2BD417 1BD2151BD213 2BD412 2BD410 2BD408 2BD406 1AD404 2BE402 2BE401 1BD403 2BD405 STAIR140 1BD407 2BD409 UTILITY431 CORRIDOR445CORRIDOR485 UTILITY496 REFUSE495 STORAGE490 ELEVATOR CORRIDOR430 STAIR480 E-PNLGENERAL NOTES N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 8 EAST BLDG 4TH FLOOR plan SD104 0 8'16'32' 4/26/2024 Page 441 of 452 Michael D. Knisely 26926 Signed Printed Name Date Reg No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. No.Description Date SD501 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 21.12.06 CAD/BIM PUBLISH DATE: WEST BUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DRAWING TITLE COPYRIGHT 2024 DISTYLE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, P.C. MDK DRAWING INFORMATION DLK, MDK 4/25/2024 210th Street West Lakeville Minnesota WEST BUILDING Crown Lakeville Apartments 620 Mendelssohn Ave. N, Suite 118 Minneapolis, Minneapolis, [763] 591.0996 Not for Constr uction Preliminary Plat Submittal 4/26/2024 A B C D LOWER GARAGE 77'-4" LOWER GARAGE 77'-4" GARAGE & ENTRY LEVEL 88'-8" GARAGE & ENTRY LEVEL 88'-8" 1ST FLOOR 100'-0" 1ST FLOOR 100'-0" 2ND FLOOR 110'-7 7/8" 2ND FLOOR 110'-7 7/8" 3RD FLOOR 121'-3 3/4" 3RD FLOOR 121'-3 3/4" 4TH FLOOR 131'-11 5/8" 4TH FLOOR 131'-11 5/8" ROOF DECK 142'-7 1/2" ROOF DECK 142'-7 1/2" AVERAGE GRADE@ WEST BLDG92'-4"54'-8" @ T/O PARAPETTHIN BRICKVENEER PREFIN MTL COPING AND TRIM PANEL SIDING PREFIN MTL BALCONY AND RAILING ROCK FACE BLOCK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8.4 9 9.6 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 GARAGE & ENTRY LEVEL 88'-8" GARAGE & ENTRY LEVEL 88'-8" 1ST FLOOR 100'-0" 1ST FLOOR 100'-0" 2ND FLOOR 110'-7 7/8" 2ND FLOOR 110'-7 7/8" 3RD FLOOR 121'-3 3/4" 3RD FLOOR 121'-3 3/4" 4TH FLOOR 131'-11 5/8" 4TH FLOOR 131'-11 5/8" ROOF DECK 142'-7 1/2" ROOF DECK 142'-7 1/2" AVERAGE GRADE@ WEST BLDG92'-4"54'-8" @ T/O HIGH PARAPETTHIN BRICK VENEER PREFIN MTL COPING AND TRIMVERTICAL MTL SIDING PANEL SIDING PREFIN MTL BALCONY AND RAILING ROCK FACE BLOCK 17 7 6 4 3 2 1161514131211109859.6 8.4 GARAGE & ENTRY LEVEL 88'-8" GARAGE & ENTRY LEVEL 88'-8" 1ST FLOOR 100'-0" 1ST FLOOR 100'-0" 2ND FLOOR 110'-7 7/8" 2ND FLOOR 110'-7 7/8" 3RD FLOOR 121'-3 3/4" 3RD FLOOR 121'-3 3/4" 4TH FLOOR 131'-11 5/8" 4TH FLOOR 131'-11 5/8" ROOF DECK 142'-7 1/2" ROOF DECK 142'-7 1/2" AVERAGE GRADE@ WEST BLDG92'-4"54'-8" @ T/O HIGH PARAPETTHIN BRICKVENEER PREFIN MTL COPING AND TRIMPANEL SIDING PREFIN MTL BALCONY AND RAILING ROCK FACE BLOCK VERTICAL MTL SIDING D C B A GARAGE & ENTRY LEVEL 88'-8" GARAGE & ENTRY LEVEL 88'-8" 1ST FLOOR 100'-0" 1ST FLOOR 100'-0" 2ND FLOOR 110'-7 7/8" 2ND FLOOR 110'-7 7/8" 3RD FLOOR 121'-3 3/4" 3RD FLOOR 121'-3 3/4" 4TH FLOOR 131'-11 5/8" 4TH FLOOR 131'-11 5/8" ROOF DECK 142'-7 1/2" ROOF DECK 142'-7 1/2" AVERAGE GRADE@ WEST BLDG92'-4"54'-8" @ T/O PARAPETTHIN BRICK VENEER PREFIN MTL COPING AND TRIM PANEL SIDING PREFIN MTL BALCONY AND RAILING ROCK FACE BLOCK West Building West North East South Total Notes Brick Veneer 6,847 1,741 7,169 1,741 17,498 Other Exterior Materials 7,171 993 6,939 993 16,096 1 Elevation Face Area including Exposed Garage Walls 16,403 2,929 17,946 3,863 41,141 1, 2 % Brick 45%62%43%48%46% Elevation Face Area less Exposed Garage Walls 14,018 2,734 14,108 2,734 33,594 1, 2 % Brick 49%64%51%64%52% Notes: 1. Face area calculations do not include windows, entrance doors, garage doors, or roof areas per 11-62-19.B.2 2. Variance requested to exclude integrally-colored rock face block exposed garage walls from face area calculation SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 15 SOUTH ELEVATION SD501 0 8'16'32' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 EAST ELEVATION SD501 0 8'16'32' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 5 WEST ELEVATION SD501 0 8'16'32' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 14 NORTH ELEVATION SD501 0 8'16'32' T/O HIGH PARAPET147'-0"± T/O HIGH PARAPET147'-0"± T/O HIGH PARAPET147'-0"± T/O HIGH PARAPET147'-0"± GARAGE & ENTRY LEVEL GARAGE & ENTRY LEVEL GARAGE & ENTRY LEVEL GARAGE & ENTRY LEVEL 4/26/2024 EXHIBIT M Page 442 of 452 Michael D. Knisely 26926 Signed Printed Name Date Reg No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. No.Description Date SD502 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 21.12.06 CAD/BIM PUBLISH DATE: WEST BUILDING 3D VISUALIZATION DRAWING TITLE COPYRIGHT 2024 DISTYLE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, P.C. DRAWING INFORMATION 4/25/2024 210th Street West Lakeville Minnesota WEST BUILDING Crown Lakeville Apartments 620 Mendelssohn Ave. N, Suite 118 Minneapolis, Minneapolis, [763] 591.0996 Not for Constr uction 1 RENDERED EAST ELEVATION SD502 9 PERSPECTIVE RENDER SD502 15 MATERIAL KEY SD502 4/26/2024 Page 443 of 452 Michael D. Knisely 26926 Signed Printed Name Date Reg No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. No.Description Date SD101 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 21.12.06 CAD/BIM PUBLISH DATE: WEST BLDG - GARAGES & ENTRY DRAWING TITLE COPYRIGHT 2024 DISTYLE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, P.C. DRAWING INFORMATION 4/25/2024 210th Street West Lakeville Minnesota WEST BUILDING Crown Lakeville Apartments 620 Mendelssohn Ave. N, Suite 118 Minneapolis, Minneapolis, [763] 591.0996 Not for Constr uction Preliminary Plat Submittal 4/26/2024 121 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1231 2 12121 2 1 2 12311 2123 1 elec gearAIR HANDLERAIR HANDLERAA A.7A.7 DD C.3C.3 1 1 1.8 1.8 4.6 4.6 2.9 2.9 3 3 7 7 16.2 16.2 17 176 11 11 9 9 10 10 15 15 6.4 6.4 7.4 7.4 8.2 8.2 9.8 9.8 10.6 10.6 12 12.5 12.5 15.2 15.2 11.6 11.68.4 9.6 9.1 9.1 5 SD501 15 SD501 1 SD501 14 SD50120'-0"9'-0"elec meetersAREA WAY Water Svc 406'-0"70'-0"GARAGEG150 GRAND LOBBYG131 NORTH UTILITY ROOMG165 SOUTH UTILITY ROOMG135 POSTAL SERVICESG132 POSTAL SERVICES (PACKAGES)G133 VESTIBULEG130 STAIRG140 STAIRG180 PET WASHG142 47 + 5 ACCESSIBLE = 52 PARKING SPACES AND 2 MOTORCYCLE SPACES 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1211 2 123123123121231231121231231AIR HANDLERAIR HANDLERCARWASHMOTORCYCLESMOTORCYCLES AA A.7A.7 DD C.3C.3 1 1 1.8 1.8 4.6 4.6 2.9 2.9 3 3 7 7 16.2 16.2 17 176 11 11 9 9 10 10 15 15 6.4 6.4 7.4 7.4 8.2 8.2 9.8 9.8 10.6 10.6 12 12.5 12.5 15.2 15.2 11.6 11.68.4 9.6 9.1 9.1 AREA WAYAREA WAY406'-0"70'-0"GARAGEG250 REFUSEG235 LOBBYG231 STAIRG240 STAIRG280 62 + 1 CARWASH = 63 PARKING SPACES AND 6 MORORCYCLE SPACES 5 SD501 15 SD501 1 SD501 14 SD501 NNGENERAL NOTES SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 9 WEST BLDG - GARAGE & ENTRY LEVEL SD101 0 8'16'32' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 5 WEST BLDG - LOWER GARAGE SD101 0 8'16'32' 4/26/2024 EXHIBIT N Page 444 of 452 Michael D. Knisely 26926 Signed Printed Name Date Reg No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. No.Description Date SD102 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 21.12.06 CAD/BIM PUBLISH DATE: WEST BLDG - 1ST & 2ND FLOOR PLANS DRAWING TITLE COPYRIGHT 2024 DISTYLE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, P.C. DRAWING INFORMATION 4/25/2024 210th Street West Lakeville Minnesota WEST BUILDING Crown Lakeville Apartments 620 Mendelssohn Ave. N, Suite 118 Minneapolis, Minneapolis, [763] 591.0996 Not for Constr uction Preliminary Plat Submittal 4/26/2024 AA BB CC DD 1 1 2 2 4 3 3 7 7 17 17614 11 11 16 16 5 8 8 9 9 10 10 13 15 15128.4 9.6 FECFECFEC 5 SD501 15SD501 1 SD501 14 SD501 406'-0"70'-0"2BE202 1BD204 2BD206 2BD208 2BD210 2BD212 2BD214 2AD216 2BD218 2BD220 1BD222 2BE224 2BE2231BD221 STAIR280 CORRIDOR185 2BD2191BD217 2BD215 UTILITY ROOM265FITNESS CLASSROOM231 FITNESS CENTER230 STORAGE232 CORRIDOR237CORRIDOR267REFUSE235 TOILET236 2BD209 1BD207 2BD205 STAIR2401BD203 2BE201 CORRIDOR185 E-PNLAA A.7A.7 BB CC DD C.3C.3 1 1 2 2 4 3 3 7 7 17 17614 11 11 16 16 5 8 8 9 9 10 10 13 15 1512 FECFEC 8.4 9.6 FEC 5 SD501 15 SD501 1SD501 14SD5012'-0"406'-0"70'-0"2BE102 1BD104 2BD106 2BD108 2BD110 2BD112 2BD114 2BD116 2BD118 2BD120 1BD122 1BE124 1BE123 1BD121 STAIR180 CORRIDOR185 2BD1191BD117 2BD115 CORRIDOR145 COFFEE BAR/LOUNGE130 UTILITY ROOM165 REFUSE135 TOILET136 CORRIDOR137CORRIDOR1672BD1091AD107 2BD1051BD103 2BE101 STAIR140 E-PNLE-FPNNGENERAL NOTES SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 9 WEST BLDG - 2ND FLOOR SD102 0 8'16'32' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 5 WEST BLDG - 1ST FLOOR SD102 0 8'16'32' 4/26/2024 Page 445 of 452 Michael D. Knisely 26926 Signed Printed Name Date Reg No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. No.Description Date SD103 PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: 21.12.06 CAD/BIM PUBLISH DATE: WEST BLDG - 3RD & 4TH FLOOR PLANS DRAWING TITLE COPYRIGHT 2024 DISTYLE DESIGN ARCHITECTS, P.C. DRAWING INFORMATION 4/25/2024 210th Street West Lakeville Minnesota WEST BUILDING Crown Lakeville Apartments 620 Mendelssohn Ave. N, Suite 118 Minneapolis, Minneapolis, [763] 591.0996 Not for Constr uction Preliminary Plat Submittal 4/26/2024 RE F AA BB CC DD 1 1 2 2 4 3 3 7 7 17 17614 11 11 16 16 5 8 8 9 9 10 10 13 15 15128.4 9.6 FECFECFEC 5 SD501 15 SD501 1SD501 14SD501 406'-0"70'-0"2BE402 1BD404 2BD406 2BD408 2BD410 2BD412 2BD414 2BD416 2BD418 2BD420 1AD422 2BE424 2BE423 1BD421 2BD419 STAIR4801BD417 2BD4152BD4091BD407 2BD4051BD403 2BE401 CORRIDOR185 CORRIDOR185 UTILITY ROOM465 CORRIDOR467CORRIDOR437CLUBROOM430 E-PNLDECK AA BB CC DD 1 1 2 2 4 3 3 7 7 17 17614 11 11 16 16 5 8 8 9 9 10 10 13 15 15128.4 9.6 FECFECFEC 5 SD501 15SD501 1 SD501 14 SD501 406'-0"70'-0"2BE302 1BD304 2BD306 2BD308 2BD310 2BD312 2BD314 2BD316 2BD318 2BD320 1BD322 2BE324 2BE323 1BD321 STAIR3802BD3191BD317 2BD315 CORRIDOR185 UTILITY ROOM365 CORRIDOR367COWORKING SPACE330CORRIDOR337REFUSE335 TOILET336 2AD3091BD307 2BD305 STAIR3401BD303 2BE301 CORRIDOR185 TENANT STORAGE331 E-PNLNNGENERAL NOTES SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 9 WEST BLDG - 4TH FLOOR SD103 0 8'16'32' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 5 WEST BLDG - 3RD FLOOR SD103 0 8'16'32' 4/26/2024 Page 446 of 452 Dakota County Surveyor’s Office Western Service Center 14955 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124 952.891 -7087 Fax 952.891 -7127 www.co.dakota.mn.us June 23, 2023 City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Ave. Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: LAKEVILLE CROWN APARTMENTS The Dakota County Plat Commission met on June 21, 2023, to consider the preliminary plat of the above referenced plat. The plat is adjacent to CSAH 70 (210th St. W.) and is therefore subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. The proposed site includes two apartment buildings with access at CSAH 70/Keswick Loop. The plat meets the future right-of-way needs along CSAH 70. As discussed, the County will look into the possibility of releasing the existing highway easement for 207th Street as the future connection is no longer needed. Restricted access should be shown along all of CSAH 70 except for one access opening. A quit claim deed to Dakota County for restricted access is required with the recording of the plat mylars. The Plat Commission has approved the preliminary plat provided that the described conditions are met. The Ordinance requires submittal of a final plat for review by the Plat Commission before a recommendation is made to the County Board of Commissioners. Traffic volumes on CSAH 70 are 6,700 ADT and are anticipated to be 8,200 ADT by the year 2040. No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from the County Transportation Department and no permit will be issued until the plat has been filed with the County Recorder’s Office. The Plat Commission does not review or approve the actual engineering design of proposed accesses or other improvements to be made in the right of way. Nothing herein is intended to restrict or limit Dakota County’s rights with regards to Dakota County rights of way or property. The Plat Commission highly recommends early contact with the Transportation Department to discuss the permitting process which reviews the design and may require construction of highway improvements, including, but not limited to, turn lanes, drainage features, limitations on intersecting street widths, medians, etc. Please contact Gordon McConnell regarding permitting questions at (952) 891-7115 or Todd Tollefson regarding Plat Commission or Plat Ordinance questions at (952) 891-7070. Sincerely, Todd B. Tollefson Secretary, Plat Commission c: Steve Tronsky, Sambatek EXHIBIT O Page 447 of 452 City of Lakeville Public Works – Engineering Division Memorandum To:Kris Jenson, Planning Manager From:Alanna Sobottka, Civil Engineer McKenzie L. Cafferty, Environmental Resources Manager Joe Masiarchin, Parks and Recreation Director Copy:Zach Johnson, City Engineer Julie Stahl, Finance Director Dave Mathews, Building Official Tina Goodroad, Community Development Director Date:September 24, 2024, revised October 15, 2024 Subject:Crown Lakeville Apartments •Preliminary Plat Review •Site Plan Review •Grading and Erosion Control Plan Review •Utility Plan Review BACKGROUNDBACKGROUND Crown LMN, LLC has submitted a preliminary plat of one lot named Crown Lakeville Apartments and plans for the construction of a 182-unit multiple family complex within two multi-unit buildings. The proposed development is located north of and adjacent to 210th Street (CSAH 70) and west of Keokuk Ave. The parent parcel consists of one metes and bounds parcel in section 26, township 114, range 21 (PID No. 220260081010) zoned RH-2, Multiple Family Residential District. The preliminary plat consists of one lot within one block on 9.94 acres. The proposed development will be completed by: Developer: Crown LMN, LLC Engineer/Surveyor: Sambatek SITESITE CONDITIONSCONDITIONS Page 448 of 452 CCROWNROWN LLAKEVILLEAKEVILLE AAPARTMENTSPARTMENTS –– PPRELIMINARYRELIMINARY PPLATLAT SSEPTEMBEREPTEMBER 24,24, 2024,2024, REVISEDREVISED OOCTOBERCTOBER 15,15, 20242024 PPAGEAGE 22 OFOF 55 The Crown Lakeville Apartments site contains undeveloped land with one pre-existing homestead and an accessory building that will be demolished prior to site development. A wetland complex is located on the east side of the property. The land generally slopes from the west to the east. An overhead utility line is located adjacent to the south property line of the parent parcel. EASEMENTSEASEMENTS Several easements for highway, stormwater, and utility purposes exist across the parent parcel and will remain with the development improvements. A conservation easement will be established over the wetland and required buffer area and dedicated with the final plat. STREETSTREET ANDAND SUBDIVISIONSUBDIVISION LAYOUTLAYOUT 210th Street (CSAH 70) Crown Lakeville Apartments is located north of and adjacent to 210th Street, a Principal Arterial roadway as identified in the City’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The Dakota County Plat Commission reviewed the proposed development at its June 21, 2023 meeting and recommended approval. Dakota County controls the right-of-way requirements and access locations along 210th Street. The current Dakota County Plat Review Needs Map identifies 210th Street as a 4-lane divided roadway with a half right-of-way requirement of 75-feet adjacent to the plat. The Developer is dedicating the necessary right-of-way for 210th Street with the Crown Lakeville Apartments plat. CONSTRUCTIONCONSTRUCTION ACCESSACCESS Construction traffic access and egress for grading, utility and street construction shall be determined with the final construction plans. PARKS,PARKS, TRAILSTRAILS ANDAND SIDEWALKSSIDEWALKS The Park Dedication Fee has not been collected on the parent parcel and shall be satisfied through a cash contribution that shall be paid with the final plat. UTILITIESUTILITIES SSANITARYANITARY SSEWEREWER Crown Lakeville Apartments is located within sub-district SC-13440 of the South Creek sanitary sewer district as identified in the City’s Comprehensive Sewer Plan. The wastewater from the proposed site will be conveyed by City-owned sanitary sewer facilities to the Elko/New Market interceptor and then to the Empire Wastewater Treatment Plant. The existing City-owned downstream facilities are adequate to convey the wastewater generated by the proposed development. Page 449 of 452 CCROWNROWN LLAKEVILLEAKEVILLE AAPARTMENTSPARTMENTS –– PPRELIMINARYRELIMINARY PPLATLAT SSEPTEMBEREPTEMBER 24,24, 2024,2024, REVISEDREVISED OOCTOBERCTOBER 15,15, 20242024 PPAGEAGE 33 OFOF 55 Private sanitary sewer service hookups were extended from the public sanitary sewer to the south side of the subject parcel for development of the property with the development of Crown Lakeville Apartments. The Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge has not been collected on the parent parcel and shall be paid with the final plat. The fee will be based on the current rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. WWATERMAINATERMAIN A service stub was provided with the development of Crown Lakeville Apartments from the 12-inch watermain along 210th Street within the City’s Normal Pressure Zone. Final locations and sizes of all sanitary sewer and watermain facilities will be reviewed by City staff with the final plat, building permit application and final construction plans. OOVERHEADVERHEAD LLINESINES An overhead electric transmission line and poles are located along the north side of 210th Street on the parent parcel. The Developer will be required to remove the poles and place the utilities underground when the preliminary plat is developed, consistent with the City’s Public Ways and Property Ordinance or provide a security for their share of the costs to bury the overhead utility adjacent to the plat. DRAINAGEDRAINAGE ANDAND GRADINGGRADING Crown Lakeville Apartments is located within subdistrict ML-085 of the Lake Marion District of the City’s Comprehensive Water and Natural Resources Management Plan. Development of Crown Lakeville Apartments includes the construction of a privately owned and maintained underground stormwater management system within Lot 1, Block 1. The Developer shall enter into a private stormwater maintenance agreement with the final plat for the private system. Prior to final plat approval, the final grading plan must be reviewed to be consistent with City Ordinance requirements. The final grading plan shall identify all fill lots in which the building footings will be placed on fill material. The grading specifications shall also indicate that all embankments meet FHA/HUD 79G specifications. The Developer shall certify to the City that all lots with footings placed on fill material are appropriately constructed. Building Certificates of Occupancy will not be issued until a soils report and an as-built certified grading plan have been submitted and approved by City staff. Crown Lakeville Apartments contains more than one acre of site disturbance. A National Pollution Discharge Elimination System General Stormwater Permit for construction activity is required from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for areas exceeding one acre being disturbed by grading. A copy of the Notice of Stormwater Permit Coverage must be submitted to the City upon receipt from the MPCA. STORMSTORM SEWERSEWER Page 450 of 452 CCROWNROWN LLAKEVILLEAKEVILLE AAPARTMENTSPARTMENTS –– PPRELIMINARYRELIMINARY PPLATLAT SSEPTEMBEREPTEMBER 24,24, 2024,2024, REVISEDREVISED OOCTOBERCTOBER 15,15, 20242024 PPAGEAGE 44 OFOF 55 Development of Crown Lakeville Apartments includes the construction of private storm sewer systems to be located within Lot 1, Block 1 and will collect and convey stormwater runoff generated from within the development to the underground stormwater management system on-site. The Storm Sewer Area Charge has not been collected on the parent parcel and must be paid with the final plat. Final locations and sizes of all storm sewer facilities will be reviewed by City staff with the building permit application and final construction plans. FEMA FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS Crown Lakeville Apartments is shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as Zone X by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Based on this designation by FEMA, the plat is not located within a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). WETLANDSWETLANDS A wetland delineation report was reviewed in the field and was approved September 4, 2024. One wetland was identified on the site. The project is proposing to impact 1,652 square feet of wetland. The project is eligible for the de minimis exemption based on the information provided and the wetland de minimis application for the areas outlined in the report have been determined to be acceptable for use in implementing the Wetland Conservation Act. The wetland and required buffer will be placed in a conservation easement to be dedicated with the final plat. Natural area signs will be placed along the easement that contains the wetland and wetland buffer. Final locations of signs will be determined with final plat. TREETREE PRESERVATIONPRESERVATION The plan identifies 519 total trees on site and proposes to save 24 trees (4.6%). Measures to protect significant trees as identified in the Tree Preservation ordinance (10-4-11), including but not limited to tree protection fencing and erosion control measures, are to be installed prior to the start of tree removals or other site work and maintained throughout construction. Minor changes may result in additional removals or saves based on location or condition of the tree. All “save” trees that are damaged or removed will require replacement at a ratio of 2:1 as per the Lakeville Subdivision Ordinance. EROSIONEROSION CONTROLCONTROL The Developer is responsible for obtaining a MPCA Construction Permit for the site as well as maintaining the SWPPP for the site during construction. The permit requires that any changes made throughout construction must be documented in the SWPPP. Page 451 of 452 CCROWNROWN LLAKEVILLEAKEVILLE AAPARTMENTSPARTMENTS –– PPRELIMINARYRELIMINARY PPLATLAT SSEPTEMBEREPTEMBER 24,24, 2024,2024, REVISEDREVISED OOCTOBERCTOBER 15,15, 20242024 PPAGEAGE 55 OFOF 55 The developer is responsible for establishment of all slopes adjacent to the wetland and buffer. The area will be established with native vegetation. Additional erosion control measures may be required during construction as deemed necessary by City staff. Any additional measures required shall be installed and maintained by the developer. The MS4 Administration Fee has not been collected on the parent parcel and must be paid with the final plat or at the time a grading permit is issued, if done prior to final plat. RECOMMENDATIONRECOMMENDATION Engineering recommends approval of the preliminary plat, site plan, grading and erosion control plan, and utility plan for Crown Lakeville Apartments, subject to the requirements and stipulations within this report. Page 452 of 452