Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02-17-2026
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 17, 2026 - 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers Members of the public can participate in person at Lakeville City Hall, 20195 Holyoke Avenue. The mayor will allow for public comments and questions at the appropriate time. The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees, and boards. Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy, practices, input from constituents, and a council member’s personal judgment. 1. Call to order, moment of silence and flag pledge 2. Roll Call 3. Citizen Comments 4. Additional agenda information 5. Presentations/Introductions a. Police Department Quarterly Report 6. Consent Agenda a. Check Register Summary b. Minutes of the 02/02/2026 City Council Meeting c. Portable Restroom Service Agreement with Rent-N-Save Portable Services d. Resolution Approving Charitable Gambling for Lakeville Lakeville South High School Clay Target Team e. Quote for Annual Purchase of Hydrant Parts f. Quote for Purchase of Pressure Reducing Valve and Meter Coupling g. Quote for Purchase of Watermain Parts h. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Report for 215th Street and Utility Improvements i. Encroachment Agreement with Warsan Property L.L.C. for Private Improvements in Public Easements j. Amendment to Supplemental Agreement for Professional Services with WSB for Lake Marion Greenway Improvements k. CNH Architects Contract Amendment l. Professional Services Agreements for Mechanical Systems Design and Construction Page 1 of 251 City Council Meeting Agenda February 17, 2026 Page 2 Services m. Keokuk Property Real Estate Brokerage Services n. Conditional Use Permit - CA Commercial Development o. Resolution Approving an Application to the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources for a 2027 Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund Grant 7. Action Items a. Short-Term Rental Ordinance b. 2026 Fee Schedule Amendment c. Public Hearing for Vacation of Right-of -Way from the Deer Park Plat and Dedication of Easements 8. Unfinished Business 9. New Business New Business items are intended for informal City Council discussion and will not begin before 6:30 p.m. The Council may provide direction to staff but will not take formal action on these matters. a. Cedar Avenue Corridor Land Use and Market Analysis b. 2026-2036 Parks System Master Plan and State of the Parks 10. Announcements a. Next City Council Meeting, March 2, 2026 11. Adjourn Page 2 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Check Register Summary Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve the Check Register Summary. Overview Checks 328669 - 328773 $1,376,845.36 ACH/EFT 24286 - 24474 $22,900,002.52 Total $24,276,847.88 The City Council receives a list of expenditures paid (claims detail), which is available to the public upon request. The City serves as the fiscal agent for Lakeville Arenas and Dakota 911 and processes their accounts payable and payments – these amounts are not included in the total above. Supporting Information 1. 02.10.26 CKSUM-Checks 2. 02.10.26 CKSUM-ACH-EFT 3. Check Register 02.10.26 for February 17, 2026 Council Mtg - Checks 4. Check Register 02.10.26 for February 17, 2026 Council Mtg - ACH-EFT Financial Impact: $24,276,847.88 Budgeted: Yes Source: Various Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Cheri Donovan, Assistant Finance Director Page 3 of 251 Page 4 of 251 Page 5 of 251 MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 2, 2026 - 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers 1. Call to order, moment of silence and flag pledge Acting Mayor Bermel called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Acting Mayor Bermel, Council Members Lee, Volk, Wolter Absent: Mayor Hellier Staff Present: Justin Miller, City Administrator; Andrea McDowell Poehler, City Attorney; Julie Stahl, Finance Director; Joe Masiarchin, Parks & Recreation Director; Allyn Kuennen, Assistant City Administrator; Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk; Zach Johnson, City Engineer; Brad Paulson, Police Chief; Paul Oehme, Public Works Director; Tina Goodroad, Community Development Director; Kati Bachmeyer, Economic Development Manager 3. Citizen Comments The following individuals addressed the City Council regarding the Traditions Development plans for the southwest study area Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR): • Beth Louden, 12330 210th Street West, Lakeville, also distributed handouts for the City Council to follow along. • Mark Zweber, 12320 210th Street West, Lakeville • Bob Erickson, 19081 Inndale Drive, Lakeville • Larry Jones, 12450 210th Street West, Lakeville • Phil Curtis, electrical contractor in Lakeville • Katie Gross, 22100 Penn Avenue, New Market, Scott County resident • Sheryl Soule, 22035 Penn Avenue, New Market, Scott County resident 4. Additional agenda information None. 5. Presentations/Introductions Page 6 of 251 City Council Meeting Minutes February 2, 2026 Page 2 a. Minnesota School Bus Driver Proclamation Acting Mayor John Bermel proclaimed Wednesday, February 18th as Minnesota School Bus Driver Day. b. Annual Economic Development Update Community Development Director Tina Goodroad presented the Annual Economic Development Update. 6. Consent Agenda Motion was made by Wolter, seconded by Volk, to approve the following: Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes - Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter Absent: Mayor Hellier a. Check Register Summary b. Minutes of the 01/20/2026 City Council Meeting c. Minutes of the 01/17/2026 City Council Retreat d. Contract for Tree Maintenance and Removal Services e. Amendment to the Contract for Public Ash Tree Injection Services f. Contract with Axon Enterprise Inc. for FiRST Center Training Equipment g. State of Minnesota Grant Agreement – FiRST Center h. FiRST Center Capital Membership Agreements i. Resolution Accepting Grant from the AKC Reunite K9 Grant Program j. Contract for Replacement of Galaxie Liquor Store Flooring k. Agreement for Purchase Residential Water Meters l. Agreement with Castle Rock Contracting & Tree Service, LLC for Lake Marion Trail Tree Removals m. Resolution Approving Charitable Gambling for Lakeville Lions Club n. Resolution Approving Appointments to City Council Committees and Inter-Agencies o. Policies 360 Software Service Agreement p. Conditional Use Permit for 19730 Judicial Road q. Conditional Use Permit for 21300 Juniper Way - Lakeville Soccer Club r. Proposal from Lano Equipment, Inc. for Kubota RTVX2C s. Calling Public Hearing on Unpaid Special Charges 7. Action Items a. Ordinance Amendment on Licensing Background Checks for Sexually Oriented Businesses and Massage Businesses City Clerk Ann Orlofsky presented proposed amendments related to licensing background checks for Sexually Oriented Businesses and Massage Businesses, noting that the updates are intended to ensure compliance with Minnesota Statutes. Page 7 of 251 City Council Meeting Minutes February 2, 2026 Page 3 Motion was made by Volk, seconded by Lee, to adopt an ordinance amending Title 1, Chapter 1, and Title 3, Chapters 10, 16, and 21 of the Lakeville City Code, and a summary ordinance for publication. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes - Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter Absent: Mayor Hellier b. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Ordinance Amendment - Lennar Steve Troskey, Lennar, submitted applications for approximately 20 acres located east of Holyoke Avenue, west of Highview Avenue, and north of Heritage Drive to amend the 2040 Comprehensive Plan from Low Density Residential to Low-Medium Density Residential and to rezone the property from RS-3 to RST-2. Community Development Director Tina Goodroad presented the staff report and explained that the concept plan includes 46 single-family homes on approximately 12 acres that could be developed. She noted that future development would require a preliminary plat and a Planning Commission public hearing. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 15, 2026, during which residents raised concerns regarding traffic, school impacts, and environmental issues. Based on comprehensive planning policies, infrastructure studies, wetland data, roadway capacity, and a sanitary sewer analysis, staff determined the site can accommodate the proposed density. Holyoke Avenue is included in the City’s Capital Improvement Program for future reconstruction, and additional review will occur during final engineering and platting. The following individuals addressed the City Council regarding concerns about traffic, school impacts, and environmental issues: • Jerome Jirik, 19845 Highview Avenue • Ann Wood, 17025 Jonquil Avenue • Brian Louden, 210th Street West • Jim Wood, 17025 Jonquil Avenue City Council members asked questions regarding water and sewer service, wetland delineation, density and housing type, and Metropolitan Council density requirements. City Engineer Zach Johnson stated that the properties would not be landlocked from a utilities or transportation standpoint. Motion was made by Lee, seconded by Volk, to adopt a resolution approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and an ordinance approving a Zoning Map amendment, and adopt the findings of fact. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes - Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter Absent: Mayor Hellier 8. Unfinished Business Page 8 of 251 City Council Meeting Minutes February 2, 2026 Page 4 None 9. New Business a. Draft Orderly Annexation Agreement with Eureka Township City Administrator Justin Miller reported that, in response to past annexation requests from Eureka Township property owners adjacent to Lakeville, the City and Township began discussions last year on a draft orderly annexation agreement to establish standards for future annexations. Miller presented the draft agreement, which would create a framework for coordinating future annexations along the City’s southern boundary, potentially encompassing up to 600 acres near 225th Street, to support long- term growth, infrastructure planning, and economic development opportunities similar to Airlake Industrial Park. Miller explained that the agreement would allow properties to remain in the Township unless owners seek annexation, while helping facilitate development in areas that currently lack water and sewer service. Staff noted that the draft has been shared with Township officials and that there is general alignment on several provisions. City Council directed staff to continue discussions with Eureka Township regarding the draft orderly annexation agreement. 10. Announcements a. Next City Council Meeting, Tuesday, February 17, 2026 11. Adjourn Motion was made by Volk, seconded by Wolter, to adjourn at 7:32 p.m. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes - Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter Absent: Mayor Hellier Respectfully Submitted, __________________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk ____________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor Page 9 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Portable Restroom Service Agreement with Rent-N-Save Portable Services Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve Agreement with Rent-N- Save Portable Services to provide and service portable restrooms. Overview In January, City staff requested proposals from two contractors for portable restroom services. Rent-N-Save Portable Services provided the lowest proposal. Portable restrooms are available at various locations throughout the City. Staff recommends approving a 2-year contract with Rent-N-Save Portable Services for the term of April 1, 2026 – March 31, 2028, at a cost of $23,570.88 per year. Supporting Information 1. Contract for Services 2026-2028 2. Exhibit A, Portable Restroom Schedule 2026 3. Proposal Results Financial Impact: $23,570.88/year Budgeted: Yes Source: General Fund Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Paul Miskimen, Parks Supervisor Page 10 of 251 1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF LAKEVILLE AND RENT-N-SAVE PORTABLE SERVICES DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGREEMENT made this 17th day of February 2026, between the CITY OF LAKEVILLE, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and RENT-N-SAVE PORTABLE SERVICES a Minnesota corporation ("Contractor") for providing and servicing portable restrooms within the City of Lakeville. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL UNDERTAKINGS HEREIN CONTAINED, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents", all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. The City of Lakeville Portable Restroom Facilities Request for Quotes, dated January 20, 2026. B. This Agreement. C. Quote dated January 20, 2026. In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “C” having the last priority. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The Contractor shall provide and service portable restrooms in accordance with the Contract Documents in accordance with the number of restrooms at the locations provided in Exhibit A, as directed by the City’s Park and Recreation Director, or his designee. 3. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party may assign or transfer any interest or obligation in this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. 4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Contractor shall complete its obligations from April 1, 2026 through March 31, 2028. The City in its sole discretion may extend the Contract for the period of April 1, 2028 thru March 31, 2030. The City must notify the Contractor of its decision to extend the Contract by November 1, 2027. 5. PAYMENT. The City will pay the Contractor in accordance with the Quote, which is inclusive of reimbursable expenses. Payment shall be made periodically after a work has been performed and within thirty-five (35) days of receiving an invoice for work performed. Page 11 of 251 2 6. UNAUTHORIZED WORK. Additional work performed without authorization of an amendment of this Contract will not entitle Contractor to an increase in the Compensation or an extension of the Contract. 7. DOCUMENTS. The City shall be the owner of all documents, reports, studies, analysis and the like prepared by the Contractor solely and exclusively for the City in conjunction with this contract. 8. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Contractor shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of goods and services to be provided. 9. STANDARD OF CARE. Contractor shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a Contractor under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Contractor’s services. 10. WORKER’S COMPENSATION. The Contractor shall obtain and maintain for the duration of this Contract, statutory Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 11. INSURANCE. Prior to the start of the project, Contractor shall furnish to the City a certificate of insurance showing proof of the required insurance required under this Paragraph. Contractor shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, such insurance as shall protect Contractor and the City for work covered by the Contract including workers’ compensation claims and property damage, bodily and personal injury which may arise from operations under this Contract, whether such operations are by Contractor or anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them. The minimum amounts of insurance shall be as follows: Commercial General Liability (or in combination with an umbrella policy) $2,000,000 Each Occurrence $2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000 Annual Aggregate The following coverages shall be included: Premises and Operations Bodily Injury and Property Damage Personal and Advertising Injury Blanket Contractual Liability Products and Completed Operations Liability Automobile Liability $2,000,000 Combined Single Limit – Bodily Injury & Property Damage Page 12 of 251 3 Including Owned, Hired & Non-Owned Automobiles Workers Compensation Workers’ Compensation insurance in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability with minimum limits are as follows: $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease per employee $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Disease aggregate $500,000 – Bodily Injury by Accident The Contractor’s insurance must be “Primary and Non-Contributory”. All insurance policies (or riders) required by this Contract shall be (i) taken out by and maintained with responsible insurance companies organized under the laws of one of the states of the United States and qualified to do business in the State of Minnesota, (ii) shall name the City, its employees and agents as additional insureds (CGL and umbrella only) by endorsement which shall be filed with the City. A copy of the endorsement must be submitted with the certificate of insurance. Contractor’s policies and Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30) days’ advanced written notice to the City, or ten (10) days’ notice for non-payment of premium. An Umbrella or Excess Liability insurance policy may be used to supplement Contractor’s policy limits on a follow-form basis to satisfy the full policy limits required by this Contract. 12. DATA PRACTICES/RECORDS. A. All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. B. All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the Contractor and its subcontractors, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination by the City. 13. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the Contractor as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Contractor shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Contractor shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Contractor's performance under this Agreement. City and Contractor agree that Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Contractor shall be exclusively Page 13 of 251 4 responsible under this Agreement for Contractor's own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self- employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 14. INDEMNITY. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, and its employees, officials, and agents (“Representatives”) from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees (“Claims”), arising out of Contractor’s negligence or its performance or failure to perform its obligations under this Contract, provided such Claims are not caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its Representatives. Contractor’s indemnification obligation shall apply to subcontractor(s), or anyone directly or indirectly employed or hired by Contractor, or anyone for whose acts Contractor may be liable. Contractor agrees this indemnity obligation shall survive the completion or termination of this Contract. 15. WAIVER. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Contract by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. 16. GOVERNING LAW. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretation of this Contract. 17. SEVERABILITY. If any provision, term or condition of this Contract is found to be or become unenforceable or invalid, it shall not affect the remaining provisions, terms and conditions of this Contract, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Contract impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties' entire contract. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Contract represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete and all-inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto. 19. CONTROLLING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 20. COPYRIGHT. Contractor shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting there from. 21. TERMINATION. This Agreement or any portion of the service provided under this Agreement may be terminated by City on two (2) days’ written notice delivered to Contractor at Page 14 of 251 Leah Budde Page 15 of 251 PORTABLE RESTROOM SITES SUMMER/FALL No. of Units No. of Months DBL Service Dates Supplied Aronson Park, 8520 202nd Street -Double service June-Aug.2 6.25 3 April 13th - October 19th Aronson Park (Field #5), 8520 202nd Street 1 6.25 April 13th - October 19th Bunker Hill Park, 7267 167th Street 1 6.25 April 13th - October 19th Casperson Soccer/Off Road Bike Course 2 3.25 April 13th - July 20th Cedar Crossing, 20785 Glade Ave 1 6.25 April 13th - October 19th Chadwick Park, 21225 Italy Avenue 1 6.25 April 13th - October 19th Dodd Trail Park, 17035 Flagstaff Avenue - ADA - Dbl May-Sept 1 7.5 5 April 13th - November 23rd Fieldstone Park, 16525 Fairgreen Avenue 1 6.5 April 13th - October 26th Foxborough Park, 7743 Upper 167th Street 2 6.25 April 13th - October 19th Jaycee Park, 20510 Hull Avenue 1 6.25 April 13th - October 19th Kensington Park, 20600 Kensington Blvd 1 5 April 13th - September 14th King Park, 18350 Dodd Blvd 3 6.25 April 13th - October 19th Knob Hill Park, 6000 178th street (new in 2024)1 6.25 April 13th - October 19th Northcreek Park, 5182 175th Street W 1 6.25 April 13th - October 19th Pinnacle Reserve Park, 18268 Hamel Drive 1 6.25 April 13th - October 19th Oak Shores Park, East parking lot 10435 162nd Street 1 5 April 13th - September 14th Oak Shores Park, BB, west parking lot 10435 162nd Street 1 5 April 13th - September 14th Parkview Park, 6833 Gerdine Path (building closed '21)1 6.25 April 13th - October 19th Quail Meadows Park, 5580 170th Street 1 5 May 4th - October 5th Spyglass Park, 7175 205th Street 1 5 April 13th - September 14th Summerlyn , 19352 Hillcrest Ave 1 5 April 13th - September 14th Village Creek Park 20651 Hartford Way 1 5 April 13th - September 14th ALL YEAR LOCATIONS Casperson Boat Launch, 19520 Juno Trail - Double Service June-Sept 1 12 4 ALL YEAR Cherryview Park, 7952 175th Street 1 12 ALL YEAR Dakota Heights Park, 9550 175th Street 1 12 ALL YEAR East Community Park, 16700 Pilot Knob Road 1 12 ALL YEAR Greenridge Park, 17685 Flagstaff Avenue 1 12 ALL YEAR Highview Heights Park, 16181 Harvard Lane 1 12 ALL YEAR Juno Trailway parking area - Double Service April - Oct.1 12 7 ALL YEAR Meadows Park, 20707 Jacquard Avenue 1 12 ALL YEAR Orchard Lk Boat Launch, 11875 175th Street 1 12 ALL YEAR Ritter Farm Park, 19300 Ritter Trail (lower lot)1 12 ALL YEAR Ritter Farm Dog Park, 19440 Ritter Trail (NW corner of lot)1 12 ALL YEAR Rolling Oaks Park, 10595 167th Street 1 12 ALL YEAR Steve Michuad Playground, - ADA Dbl May-Sept 1 12 5 ALL YEAR Valley Lake Park 7165 Upper 162nd St, (On path,off parking lot)1 12 ALL YEAR Quail Meadows Park, 5580 170th Street 1 12 ALL YEAR FUTURE PLACEMENTS IN LAKEVILLE Casperson Soccer/Off Road Bike Course (remove 1 unit above)1 4.25 July 20th - November 30th Century MS, 185th & Ipava - Near Tennis courts 1 3 June 1st - August 31st Hypointe Crossing Park, 16396 Hutchinson Drive 1 2.5 June 8th - August 17th McGuire Jr. High, 8660 210th Street 1 2.25 Dec. 16th - Feb 22nd RESTROOMS WILL BE CLEANED ON THURSDAYS -- 2x/wk UNITS ON M & TH RESTROOMS WILL BE CLEANED ON THURSDAYS -- 2x/wk UNITS ON M & TH DISTRIBUTION OF PORTABLE RESTROOMS IN LAKEVILLE - 2026 EXHIBIT A Page 16 of 251 ITEM Rent N Save Rent N Save Notes OnSite OnSite Notes Unit cost per month 54.50 65.00 Twice a week service (2nd service cost)20.00 65.00 ADA unit cost 135.00 155.00 Twice a week service (2nd service cost)20.00 155.00 Hand sanitizer 0.00 5.00 Damage waiver 5.00 5.00 Tip over charge - extra service call 0.00 $50 if it can't wait for them to be in the area.39.00 Tip over charge - extra service call-within 24 hours of call 50.00 39.00 Tip over charge - extra service call-weekend or emergency 50.00 39.00 Extra Cleaning - 1-2 units 50.00 29.00 Extra Cleaning - 3 or more units 20.00 29.00 Stake or chain unit 0.00 10.00 Special event standard 54.50 63.00 Special event ADA 135.00 150.00 Cost for total loss replacement 850.00 No total loss cost provided Grand Total 2026-28 Scheduled Service $23,570.88 $28,461.25 Portable Restroom RFP Results 1/30/2026 Page 17 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Resolution Approving Charitable Gambling for Lakeville Lakeville South High School Clay Target Team Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a resolution granting approval to Lakeville South Clay Target Team to conduct lawful gambling at Crystal Lake Golf Club LLC. Overview Lakeville South Clay Target Team has applied to the State of Minnesota Gambling Control Board to conduct gambling activities at Crystal Lake Golf Club, 16725 Innsbrook Drive. The application requires a resolution of approval by the City Council. Supporting Information None Financial Impact: $ Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: A Sense of Community and Belonging Report Completed by: Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk Page 18 of 251 CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO._________ RESOLUTION APPROVING CHARITABLE GAMBLING FOR LAKEVILLE LAKEVILLE SOUTH HIGH SCHOOL CLAY TARGET TEAM WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville received an application from the Lakeville South Clay Target Team to conduct gambling activities at Crystal Lake Golf Club, 16725 Innsbrook Drive; and WHEREAS, Lakeville South Clay Target Team is a qualified organization. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lakeville grants approval to Lakeville South Clay Target Team conduct gambling activities at Crystal Lake Golf Club, 16725 Innsbrook Drive. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 17th day of February, 2026. CITY OF LAKEVILLE: _________________________ Luke M Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk Page 19 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Quote for Annual Purchase of Hydrant Parts Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve quote of hydrant parts from Core and Main. Overview Annually, the City issues a request for quotes to replenish its inventory of hydrant parts needed to maintain the City’s fire hydrants. The Utility Division is responsible for maintaining more than 4,500 hydrants throughout the City. Replacement parts are used to repair hydrants that are broken or leaking and inventory levels are replenished based on actual usage. Utilities staff solicited quotes from Ferguson Waterworks and Core & Main, the two primary hydrant parts suppliers in the metro area. Core & Main submitted the lowest responsive quote with a total cost of $31,374.67. Supporting Information 1. Core and Main Quote 2. Ferguson Quote Financial Impact: $31,374.67 Budgeted: Yes Source: Water Fund Envision Lakeville Community Values: Safety Throughout the Community Report Completed by: Kyle Hanson, Utilities Supervisior Page 20 of 251 Seq#Qty Description Units Price Ext Price 10 1 HYDRANT GREASE 5 LB V3174 EA 207.69 207.69 20 200 5FT HYDRAFINDER FLAG/HYD MARKR EA 19.50 3,900.00 30**1 K528 BREAKABLE KIT FLG WB-67 EA 364.00 364.00 40**1 6" WB67 HYD EXT F/5-1/4VO EA 785.00 785.00 50**1 12" WB67 HYD EXT F/5-1/4VO EA 925.00 925.00 60**1 #3 WB-67 5" O-RING EA 10.07 10.07 70 20 #7 WB-67 5" DRAIN PLUNGER EA 24.98 499.60 80 #8 N/A REPLACED BY #179/180 90**1 #11 WAT HOSE CAP GASKET EA 10.07 10.07 100**1 #11B WAT PUMPER CAP GASKET EA 14.38 14.38 110 15 #17A WAT LOWER OP NUT LH EA 54.99 824.85 120 15 17B WAT UP OP NUT W/#90 WASHER EA 99.99 1,499.85 130 12 #30 HYD BRONZE CROSSARM W67 EA 106.98 1,283.76 140 12 #31 WAT VALVE SEAT W/O-RING EA 307.89 3,694.68 150 16 #34 WAT UPPER VALVE WASHER BRZ EA 106.99 1,711.84 160 30 #35 MAIN VLV RBR URETHANE EA 99.89 2,996.70 170**1 #36 WAT LOWER VALVE WASHER STD EA 57.00 57.00 180**1 #56 WAT HYD SUPPORT EA 107.25 107.25 190**1 #57 WAT OP NUT O-RING EA 4.35 4.35 200**1 #59 WAT STEM O-RING (EACH)EA 4.35 4.35 210 40 #64 WAT SS LOCK RING EA 12.89 515.60 220 30 #67 WAT BREAK CPLG HALF EA 19.35 580.50 230 10 ACIPCO K712 UPPER ROD ASSEMBLY WITH STUDS AND NUTS #71 EA 243.89 2,438.90 240**1 #77 WAT O-RING PACKING EA 15.10 15.10 250**1 #82 UPPER SUPPORT O-RING W67 EA 4.32 4.32 260**1 #83 LOWER SUPPORT O-RING WB67 EA 4.32 4.32 270 25 #84 WAT HYD GASKET (2 REQ'D)EA 4.29 107.25 280**1 #85 WAT HYD SUPPORT TUBE EA 56.79 56.79 290**1 #86 WAT HYD STOP NUT EA 10.07 10.07 300 40 #87 WB-67 5" CPLG NUT EA 6.44 257.60 310**1 #88 WB-67 5" CPLG STUD EA 13.66 13.66 320 25 AFC #89 OP NUT BUSHING WB-67 52836 EA 44.49 1,112.25 330 10 #90 WAT HYD THRUST RING EA 10.04 100.40 340 40 #92 WAT HYD GASKET LIPPED 7/8"" X 8 1/2"" X 1/16"" TH EA 15.09 603.60 350 15 #179 CLEVIS W/PIN W67 INCL#180 EA 7.89 118.35 360 #179 INCLUDES #180 370**1 #72 PACER LOWER ROD 7'6" BURY EA 298.89 298.89 380 2 #72 PACER LOWER ROD 8'0" BURY EA 298.89 597.78 390 2 #72 PACER LOWER ROD 8'6" BURY EA 298.89 597.78 400 1 #72 PACER LOWER ROD 9'0" BURY EA 298.89 298.89 410 1 #72 PACER LOWER ROD 9'6" BURY EA 298.89 298.89 420 1 #72 PACER LOWER ROD 10'0" BURY EA 298.89 298.89 430**1 #72 PACER LOWER ROD 10'6" BURY EA 298.89 298.89 440**1 #72 PACER LOWER ROD 11'0" BURY EA 298.89 298.89 ** For reference only - not included in total 01/21/2026 - 3:25 PM Actual taxes may vary Page 1 of 2 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MN Job Location: Lakeville , MN Bid Date: 02/27/2026 03:00 pm Core & Main Bid #: 4685139 Core & Main 5145 211th Street West Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: 6514636090 Fax: 6514634554 Bid Proposal for Lakeville 2026 Hyd Parts Page 21 of 251 Seq#Qty Description Units Price Ext Price 450**1 #72 PACER LOWER ROD 11'6" BURY EA 298.89 298.89 460 20 #113 WAT HYD BREAKABLE FLG EA 81.94 1,638.80 470 8 #40 16" UPPER STANDPIPE W67 EA 635.66 5,085.28 480 1 1 GAL. #51 HYDRANT OIL EA 104.94 104.94 Sub Total 31,374.67 Tax 0.00 Total 31,374.67 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN, PRICES QUOTED ARE VALID IF ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER AND PRODUCTS ARE RELEASED BYCUSTOMER FOR MANUFACTURE WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS QUOTATION. CORE & MAIN LPRESERVES THE RIGHT TO INCREASE PRICES TO ADDRESS FACTORS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS,TARIFFS, TRANSPORTATION, FUEL AND RAW MATERIAL COSTS. DELIVERY WILL COMMENCE BASED UPON MANUFACTURER LEADTIMES. ANY MATERIAL DELIVERIES DELAYED BEYOND MANUFACTURER LEAD TIMES MAY BE SUBJECT TO PRICE INCREASES AND/ORAPPLICABLE STORAGE FEES. THIS BID PROPOSAL IS CONTINGENT UPON BUYER’S ACCEPTANCE OF SELLER’S TERMS ANDCONDITIONS OF SALE, AS MODIFIED FROM TIME TO TIME, WHICH CAN BE FOUND AT: https://coreandmain.com/terms-of-sale/ THIS BID MAY INCLUDE GLOBALLY SOURCED (IMPORTED) MATERIALS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGING TARIFFS. PRICES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL TARIFFS IMPOSED BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. IF IMPOSED, PRICES WILL INCREASE BY THE SAME PERCENTAGE AND WILL BE EFFECTIVE ON THE DATE THAT THE NEW TARIFFS ARE IMPLEMENTED. THESE ITEMS SHOULD BE PURCHASED WITH HASTE TO AVOID ANY ADDITIONAL RISING TARIFF COSTS. ** For reference only - not included in total 01/21/2026 - 3:25 PM Actual taxes may vary Page 2 of 2 Bid Proposal for Lakeville 2026 Hyd Parts Bid #: 4685139 Page 22 of 251 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2805 1420 3RD AVE WEST SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1036 Phone: 651-286-2334 Deliver To: From:Michael P Fries michael.fries@ferguson.com Comments: HOW ARE WE DOING? WE WANT YOUR FEEDBACK! Scan the QR code or use the link below to complete a survey about your bids: https://survey.medallia.com/?bidsorder&fc=2518&on=24674 10:10:28 JAN 30 2026 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518 Price Quotation Phone: 651-286-2334 Bid No:B181895 Bid Date:01/21/26 Quoted By:TMF Cust Phone:952-985-4400 Terms:NET 10TH PROX Customer:CITY OF LAKEVILLE ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 20195 HOLYOKE AVE LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 Ship To:CITY OF LAKEVILLE ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 20195 HOLYOKE AVE LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 Cust PO#:2026 PRICING Job Name:HYDRANT PARTS Page 1 of 2 Item Description Quantity Net Price UM Total AFCV1936 5 LB HYD GRSE 1 212.140 EA 212.14 SP-EZFG21 E-Z GUIDE HYD MRKR FIBERGLASS 200 19.520 EA 3904.00 AFCK56206 PACER 6 K562 TOP HYD EXT KIT 1 779.070 EA 779.07 AFCK56212 PACER 12 K562 TOP HYD EXT KIT 1 917.200 EA 917.20 AFCPACER3 PACER #3 LWR VLV SEAT ORING W59 1 10.280 EA 10.28 AFC51469 PACER #7 DRN PLGR 20 24.900 EA 498.00 AFCPACER179 PACER #179 CLEVIS PIN W/ #180 RNG 15 8.070 EA 121.05 AFCPACER11 PACER PUMPER CAP GSKT 1 14.230 EA 14.23 AFCPACER11H PACER #11 HOSE CAP GSKT 1 10.280 EA 10.28 AFCPACER17A PACER #17A LWR OP NUT 15 54.940 EA 824.10 AFCPACER17B PACER #17B UPPER OP NUT 15 102.770 EA 1541.55 AFCPACER30 PACER #30 CROSSARM BRZ 12 109.370 EA 1312.44 AFCPACER31 PACER #31 VLV SEAT 12 311.590 EA 3739.08 AFCPACER34BRZ PACER #34 UPPER VLV WSHR BRZ 16 109.373 EA 1749.97 AFCPACER35 PACER #35 MAIN VLV URTHN 30 102.770 EA 3083.10 AFCPACER36 PACER #36 LWR VLV WSHR EPOX 1 57.990 EA 57.99 AFCPACER56 PACER #56 SUPP WHL W/ #59 ORING 1 108.620 EA 108.62 AFCPACER57 PACER #57 OP NUT ORING 1 4.400 EA 4.40 AFCPACER59 PACER #59 SUPP ORING 1 4.400 EA 4.40 AFCPACER64 PACER #64 FLG LCK RNG 40 13.200 EA 528.00 AFCPACER67 PACER #67 BREAK COUP SLV 30 19.800 EA 594.00 AFCPACER7116 #71 16 UPPER ROD ASSY OL 10 249.310 EA 2493.10 AFCPACER77 PACER #77 UPPER VLV SEAT ORING 1 15.400 EA 15.40 AFCPACER82 PACER #82 UPPER ORING TUBE SEAL 1 4.400 EA 4.40 AFCPACER83 PACER #83 LOWER ORING TUBE SEAL 1 4.400 EA 4.40 AFCPACER84 PACER #84 SUPP GSKT 25 4.400 EA 110.00 AFCPACER85 PACER #85 SUPP TUBE 1 57.930 EA 57.93 AFCPACER86 PACER #86 STOP NUT 1 10.270 EA 10.27 AFCPACER87 PACER #87 COUP NUT BRZ 40 6.590 EA 263.60 AFCPACER88 PACER #88 COUP STUD 1 14.670 EA 14.67 AFCPACER89 PACER #89 NOZ SEC BUSH 25 45.460 EA 1136.50 AFCPACER90 PACER #90 THRUST RNG 10 10.270 EA 102.70 AFCPACER92 PACER #92 LIPPED UPPER S/PIPE GSKT 40 15.400 EA 616.00 SP-AFCPACER7276 LOWER ROD W/STUD&NUT 1-3/4 7'6"BURY 1 331.580 EA 331.58 SP-AFCPACER728 LOWER ROD W/STUD&NUT 1-3/4 8' BURY 2 331.580 EA 663.16 SP-AFCPACER7286 LOWER ROD W/STUD&NUT 1-3/4 8'6"BURY 1 331.580 EA 331.58 Page 23 of 251 Page 2 of 2 10:10:28 JAN 30 2026 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518 Price Quotation Reference No:B181895 HOW ARE WE DOING? WE WANT YOUR FEEDBACK! Scan the QR code or use the link below to complete a survey about your bids: https://survey.medallia.com/?bidsorder&fc=2518&on=24674 Item Description Quantity Net Price UM Total SP-AFCPACER729 LOWER ROD W/STUD&NUT 1-3/4 9' BURY 1 331.580 EA 331.58 SP-AFCPACER7296 LOWER ROD W/STUD&NUT 1-3/4 9'6"BURY 1 331.580 EA 331.58 SP-AFCPACER7210 LOWER ROD W/STUD&NUT 1-3/4 10' BURY 1 331.580 EA 331.58 SP-AFCPACER72106 LOWER ROD W/STUD & NUT 10'6" BURY 1 331.580 EA 331.58 SP-AFCPACER7211 LOWER ROD W/STUD&NUT 1-3/4 11' BURY 1 331.580 EA 331.58 SP-AFCPACER72116 LOWER ROD W/STUD&NUT 11'6" BURY 1 331.580 EA 331.58 AFCPACER113 PACER #113 B/FL 20 83.680 EA 1673.60 AFCPACER4016 16 PACER UPPER S/ PIPE TRFC 8 652.560 EA 5220.48 AFCV3175 1 GAL HYD OIL 1 107.170 EA 107.17 Net Total:$35159.92 Tax:$0.00 Freight:$0.00 Total:$35159.92 Quoted prices are based upon receipt of the total quantity for immediate shipment (48 hours). SHIPMENTS BEYOND 48 HOURS SHALL BE AT THE PRICE IN EFFECT AT TIME OF SHIPMENT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. QUOTES FOR PRODUCTS SHIPPED FOR RESALE Due to the uncertain impact of potential tariffs, Ferguson's quotation/proposal has not included any provision or contingency for future tariffs or increase of existing tariffs. Ferguson reserves the right to adjust prices to reflect the impact of any new or increased tariffs that affect our costs at the time of shipment. Ferguson will provide notice of any such adjustments along with documentation supporting the changes. CONTRACTOR CUSTOMERS: IF YOU HAVE DBE/MBE/WBE//VBE/SDVBE/SBE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS DIVERSITY GOALS/ REQUIREMENTS ON A FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, PRIVATE SECTOR PROJECT, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR BRANCH SALES REPRESENATIVE IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO RECEIVING A QUOTE/ORDER. ARE NOT FIRM UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. https://www.ferguson.com/content/website-info/terms-of-sale LEAD LAW WARNING: It is illegal to install products that are not "lead free" in accordance with US Federal or other applicable law in potable water systems anticipated for human consumption. Products with *NP in the description are NOT lead free and can only be installed in non-potable applications. Buyer is solely responsible for product selection. Seller not responsible for delays, lack of product or increase of pricing due to causes beyond our control, and/or based upon Local, State and Federal laws governing type of products that can be sold or put into commerce. This Quote is offered contingent upon the Buyer's acceptance of Seller's terms and conditions, which are incorporated by reference and found either following this document, or on the web at Govt Buyers: All items are open market unless noted otherwise. Page 24 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Quote for Purchase of Pressure Reducing Valve and Meter Coupling Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a quote for the purchase of pressure-reducing valves and meter couplings from Core and Main. Overview Annually, the Utilities Division issues a request for quotes to replenish its inventory of pressure reducing valves and meter couplings used for new development and repairs to existing infrastructure. Utilities staff solicited quotes from Ferguson Waterworks and Core & Main, the two primary suppliers in the metro area. Core & Main submitted the lowest responsive quote, with a total cost of $72,450.00. Supporting Information 1. Core & Main PRV & Meter Coupling Quote 2. Furguson PRV & Coupling Quote Financial Impact: $72,450.00 Budgeted: Yes Source: Water Fund Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Kyle Hanson, Utilities Supervisor Page 25 of 251 Seq#Qty Description Units Price Ext Price 10 300 1 WATT 25AUB PRES REG FIPXFIP EA 173.98 52,194.00 20 1LF25AUB-Z3 30 1200 74620 3/4X1 METER COUPLING NO LEAD EA 16.88 20,256.00 Sub Total 72,450.00 Tax 0.00 Total 72,450.00 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN, PRICES QUOTED ARE VALID IF ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER AND PRODUCTS ARE RELEASED BYCUSTOMER FOR MANUFACTURE WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS QUOTATION. CORE & MAIN LPRESERVES THE RIGHT TO INCREASE PRICES TO ADDRESS FACTORS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS,TARIFFS, TRANSPORTATION, FUEL AND RAW MATERIAL COSTS. DELIVERY WILL COMMENCE BASED UPON MANUFACTURER LEADTIMES. ANY MATERIAL DELIVERIES DELAYED BEYOND MANUFACTURER LEAD TIMES MAY BE SUBJECT TO PRICE INCREASES AND/ORAPPLICABLE STORAGE FEES. THIS BID PROPOSAL IS CONTINGENT UPON BUYER’S ACCEPTANCE OF SELLER’S TERMS ANDCONDITIONS OF SALE, AS MODIFIED FROM TIME TO TIME, WHICH CAN BE FOUND AT: https://coreandmain.com/terms-of-sale/ THIS BID MAY INCLUDE GLOBALLY SOURCED (IMPORTED) MATERIALS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGING TARIFFS. PRICES ARESUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL TARIFFS IMPOSED BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. IF IMPOSED, PRICES WILLINCREASE BY THE SAME PERCENTAGE AND WILL BE EFFECTIVE ON THE DATE THAT THE NEW TARIFFS ARE IMPLEMENTED. THESEITEMS SHOULD BE PURCHASED WITH HASTE TO AVOID ANY ADDITIONAL RISING TARIFF COSTS. 01/23/2026 - 3:07 PM Actual taxes may vary Page 1 of 1 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MN Job Location: Lakeville, MN Bid Date: 02/27/2026 03:00 pm Core & Main Bid #: 4689957 Core & Main 5145 211th Street West Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: 6514636090 Fax: 6514634554 Bid Proposal for Lakeville 2026 PRV & Meter Coupling Page 26 of 251 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2805 1420 3RD AVE WEST SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1036 Phone: 651-286-2334 Deliver To: From:Michael P Fries michael.fries@ferguson.com Comments: HOW ARE WE DOING? WE WANT YOUR FEEDBACK! Scan the QR code or use the link below to complete a survey about your bids: https://survey.medallia.com/?bidsorder&fc=2518&on=24674 10:02:58 JAN 30 2026 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518 Price Quotation Phone: 651-286-2334 Bid No:B182109 Bid Date:01/29/26 Quoted By:TMF Cust Phone:952-985-4400 Terms:NET 10TH PROX Customer:CITY OF LAKEVILLE ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 20195 HOLYOKE AVE LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 Ship To:CITY OF LAKEVILLE ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 20195 HOLYOKE AVE LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 Cust PO#:2026 PRICING Job Name:PRV & METER COUP QT Page 1 of 1 Item Description Quantity Net Price UM Total WLF25AUBZ3G LF 1 WTR PRV 300 174.920 EA 52476.00 FC382425NL LF 3/4X1X2-1/2 MIP STRT MTR COUP 1200 19.190 EA 23028.00 Net Total:$75504.00 Tax:$0.00 Freight:$0.00 Total:$75504.00 Quoted prices are based upon receipt of the total quantity for immediate shipment (48 hours). SHIPMENTS BEYOND 48 HOURS SHALL BE AT THE PRICE IN EFFECT AT TIME OF SHIPMENT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. QUOTES FOR PRODUCTS SHIPPED FOR RESALE Due to the uncertain impact of potential tariffs, Ferguson's quotation/proposal has not included any provision or contingency for future tariffs or increase of existing tariffs. Ferguson reserves the right to adjust prices to reflect the impact of any new or increased tariffs that affect our costs at the time of shipment. Ferguson will provide notice of any such adjustments along with documentation supporting the changes. CONTRACTOR CUSTOMERS: IF YOU HAVE DBE/MBE/WBE//VBE/SDVBE/SBE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS DIVERSITY GOALS/ REQUIREMENTS ON A FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, PRIVATE SECTOR PROJECT, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR BRANCH SALES REPRESENATIVE IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO RECEIVING A QUOTE/ORDER. ARE NOT FIRM UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. https://www.ferguson.com/content/website-info/terms-of-sale LEAD LAW WARNING: It is illegal to install products that are not "lead free" in accordance with US Federal or other applicable law in potable water systems anticipated for human consumption. Products with *NP in the description are NOT lead free and can only be installed in non-potable applications. Buyer is solely responsible for product selection. Seller not responsible for delays, lack of product or increase of pricing due to causes beyond our control, and/or based upon Local, State and Federal laws governing type of products that can be sold or put into commerce. This Quote is offered contingent upon the Buyer's acceptance of Seller's terms and conditions, which are incorporated by reference and found either following this document, or on the web at Govt Buyers: All items are open market unless noted otherwise. Page 27 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Quote for Purchase of Watermain Parts Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve the purchase of Watermain parts from Core and Main. Overview Annually, the Utilities Division issues a request for quotes to replenish its inventory of watermain parts used to repair broken and leaking watermains. Utilities staff solicited quotes from Ferguson Waterworks and Core & Main, the two primary watermain parts suppliers in the metro area. Core & Main submitted the lowest responsive quote, with a total cost of $29,818.11. Supporting Information 1. Core & Main Watermain Parts Quote 2. Ferguson Waterworks Watermain Parts Quote Financial Impact: $29,818.11 Budgeted: Yes Source: Water fund Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Kyle Hanson, Utilities Supervisor Page 28 of 251 Bid Proposal for Lakeville 2026 Watermain Parts 01/23/2026 - 3:02 PM Actual taxes may vary Page 1 of 1 4.99 50 6 73.25 25 17.94 408.75 8 EA 32.99 3,958.80 5614BP AY 1-1/4 CB LID PLUG PENT PLUG ONLY 70 5 EA 6 80 6 81.75 EA 1-1/4 WESTERN CB REPAIR LID EA 679.92 74MAL8WO 8 REC CVR MK: WATER 4174-346 124.75 40 120 60 EA 84.99 5614A 8'0" AIS MP CURB BOX TAPT 1-1/2 4517-061 EA 230.94 90 107.64 6850-60 16T TOP SECT THRD USA DOMESTIC FOR 6850/6860 VB A-1 15" F&C MK: WATER USA 30 38.49 INCLUDE 60" ROD 5-1/4 VB LID M/WATER DOM USA EA 439.50 100 109.99 110 #59 SCREW VLV BOX 18" EXT USA THRD DOMESTIC ALSO24B/#6860 EA 82.99 1,099.90 120 5 10 829.90 EA EJIW 8550 24A VLV BOX EXT ADJ 2-1/2-21" SCREW TYPE 6850-60 26T TOP SECT THRD USA EA 96.49 482.45 85508024 USA 130 10 Units Price Ext Price 100 EA 14.9910 1,499.00 Qty 20 Seq#Description 5614L LID 1 1/4 UPPER 1 1/4 PE NT NUT 8 190 160 565.52 EA140 150 1 226-090515-001 8X15 REP CLP SS B&N 8.99-9.39 OD 6 238-090515-009 8X15X1CC TAPT REP CLP 8.99-9.39 OD 232.001 2 245.00 3/4X3-1/2 304SS T-HEAD B&N USA 36.00 180 EA69S 5-1/4 X 9 SCREW VB RISER 148197 USA 232.00 EA 18.00 250 203031 BLUE WATER BASED 17OZ MARKING PAINT #6 BASE FOR #6860 VLV BOX USA DOMESTIC ROUND BASE EA EA 4.02 1,005.00 325 94.59 170 70.69 245.00 EA 567.54 RUSTOLEUM WB GRN MARKER PAINT 17 OZ #203032 200 159.99 EA Sub Total 100 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN, PRICES QUOTED ARE VALID IF ACCEPTED BY CUSTOMER AND PRODUCTS ARE RELEASED BYCUSTOMER FOR MANUFACTURE WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS QUOTATION. CORE & MAIN LPRESERVES THE RIGHT TO INCREASE PRICES TO ADDRESS FACTORS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS,TARIFFS, TRANSPORTATION, FUEL AND RAW MATERIAL COSTS. DELIVERY WILL COMMENCE BASED UPON MANUFACTURER LEADTIMES. ANY MATERIAL DELIVERIES DELAYED BEYOND MANUFACTURER LEAD TIMES MAY BE SUBJECT TO PRICE INCREASES AND/ORAPPLICABLE STORAGE FEES. THIS BID PROPOSAL IS CONTINGENT UPON BUYER’S ACCEPTANCE OF SELLER’S TERMS ANDCONDITIONS OF SALE, AS MODIFIED FROM TIME TO TIME, WHICH CAN BE FOUND AT: https://coreandmain.com/terms-of-sale/ 1,306.50 Tax 4.02 32# MAX MAG ANODE 15,999.00 29,818.11 THIS BID MAY INCLUDE GLOBALLY SOURCED (IMPORTED) MATERIALS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGING TARIFFS. PRICES ARESUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL TARIFFS IMPOSED BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. IF IMPOSED, PRICES WILLINCREASE BY THE SAME PERCENTAGE AND WILL BE EFFECTIVE ON THE DATE THAT THE NEW TARIFFS ARE IMPLEMENTED. THESEITEMS SHOULD BE PURCHASED WITH HASTE TO AVOID ANY ADDITIONAL RISING TARIFF COSTS. 0.00 Total 29,818.11 EA Page 29 of 251 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2805 1420 3RD AVE WEST SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-1036 Phone: 651-286-2334 Deliver To: From:Michael P Fries michael.fries@ferguson.com Comments: HOW ARE WE DOING? WE WANT YOUR FEEDBACK! Scan the QR code or use the link below to complete a survey about your bids: https://survey.medallia.com/?bidsorder&fc=2518&on=24674 10:20:11 JAN 30 2026 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518 Price Quotation Phone: 651-286-2334 Bid No:B182064 Bid Date:01/28/26 Quoted By:TMF Cust Phone:952-985-4400 Terms:NET 10TH PROX Customer:CITY OF LAKEVILLE ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 20195 HOLYOKE AVE LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 Ship To:CITY OF LAKEVILLE ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 20195 HOLYOKE AVE LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 Cust PO#:2026 PRICING Job Name:WATERMAIN PART QUOTE Page 1 of 2 Item Description Quantity Net Price UM Total FPLLID 1-1/4 PL-LID CB LID & PLUG 100 11.610 EA 1161.00 FRL 1-1/4 CB REP LID 120 37.540 EA 4504.80 M5614BPH 1-1/4 BRS PENTAGON PLUG 25 5.270 EA 131.75 M5614AX 1-1/4 X 8 X 1-1/2 MINN CURB BX DOM 5 78.240 EA 391.20 WITH STAT ROD INCLUDED M74M1AWO 74M1AWO FRAME 15 & REC CVR 8 WATER 8 105.280 EA 842.24 M74MAL8WO REC CVR 8-WATER 6 40.770 EA 244.62 DVBLIDW TYLER VLV BX LID WTR DOM 6 18.950 EA 113.70 DVBSTS16 16 HD SC VLV BX TOP SECT DOM 6 73.420 EA 440.52 DVBSTS26 26 SC VLV BX TOP SECT DOM 10 110.140 EA 1101.40 DVBEXT59 18 VLV BX EXT SCRW 59 DOM 10 83.210 EA 832.10 T685069AR 69 VLV BX RSR 2-12 SCRW TYPE DOM 8 70.980 EA 567.84 T6860B6 6 BX BSE 6860 DOM 6 94.630 EA 567.78 S22600090515001 8X15 FC REP CLMP 8.99-9.39 1 230.000 EA 230.00 S23900090515009 8X15X1 2B CC REP CLMP 8.99-9.79 1 217.390 EA 217.39 MDSS4TBFN DOM 3/4X3-1/2 304SS T-BLT HH NUT *X 100 18.880 EA 1888.00 R203031 17OZ INV WTR MARK PAINT CBLU 250 3.840 EA 960.00 R203032 FLGR INV MARK PAINT WTR 325 3.840 EA 1248.00 E32LBPKG10B 32# HP MAG ANO PKG W/10 #12 TW 100 167.370 EA 16737.00 Net Total:$32179.34 Tax:$0.00 Freight:$0.00 Total:$32179.34 Page 30 of 251 Page 2 of 2 10:20:11 JAN 30 2026 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518 Price Quotation Reference No:B182064 HOW ARE WE DOING? WE WANT YOUR FEEDBACK! Scan the QR code or use the link below to complete a survey about your bids: https://survey.medallia.com/?bidsorder&fc=2518&on=24674 Quoted prices are based upon receipt of the total quantity for immediate shipment (48 hours). SHIPMENTS BEYOND 48 HOURS SHALL BE AT THE PRICE IN EFFECT AT TIME OF SHIPMENT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. QUOTES FOR PRODUCTS SHIPPED FOR RESALE Due to the uncertain impact of potential tariffs, Ferguson's quotation/proposal has not included any provision or contingency for future tariffs or increase of existing tariffs. Ferguson reserves the right to adjust prices to reflect the impact of any new or increased tariffs that affect our costs at the time of shipment. Ferguson will provide notice of any such adjustments along with documentation supporting the changes. CONTRACTOR CUSTOMERS: IF YOU HAVE DBE/MBE/WBE//VBE/SDVBE/SBE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS DIVERSITY GOALS/ REQUIREMENTS ON A FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, PRIVATE SECTOR PROJECT, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR BRANCH SALES REPRESENATIVE IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO RECEIVING A QUOTE/ORDER. ARE NOT FIRM UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. https://www.ferguson.com/content/website-info/terms-of-sale LEAD LAW WARNING: It is illegal to install products that are not "lead free" in accordance with US Federal or other applicable law in potable water systems anticipated for human consumption. Products with *NP in the description are NOT lead free and can only be installed in non-potable applications. Buyer is solely responsible for product selection. Seller not responsible for delays, lack of product or increase of pricing due to causes beyond our control, and/or based upon Local, State and Federal laws governing type of products that can be sold or put into commerce. This Quote is offered contingent upon the Buyer's acceptance of Seller's terms and conditions, which are incorporated by reference and found either following this document, or on the web at Govt Buyers: All items are open market unless noted otherwise. Page 31 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Report for 215th Street and Utility Improvements Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a resolution ordering preparation of a feasibility report for 215th Street and Utility Improvements, City Project 26-09. Overview The City's adopted 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan programs improvements to 215th Street from Kenrick Avenue (County State Aid Highway 5) to Juniper Way (County State Aid Highway 70). City Project 26-09 is intended to improve safety and provide capacity for increasing traffic volumes associated with anticipated private development along the corridor. Proposed improvements include a) public utility extensions (sanitary sewer, water, and stormwater management), and b) reconstruction of 215th Street to a two-lane undivided roadway. Potential funding sources include special assessments and sanitary sewer, stormwater infrastructure and water trunk funds. Because the City intends to finance the local improvement with bonds and special assessments to benefiting properties (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429), state law requires that an engineering feasibility report be prepared. The report will advise whether the improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible and include an estimated project cost and an estimate of the total amount to be assessed. The report will be used for future City Council consideration before ordering the improvements. Supporting Information 1. 2026.02.17 Resolution Ordering Report Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: Yes Source: Multiple Sources Envision Lakeville Community Values: Design that Connects the Community Report Completed by: Alanna Sobottka, Civil Engineer Page 32 of 251 CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. 26-__ RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR 215TH STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, 215th Street is located between Kenrick Avenue (County State Aid Highway 5) and Juniper Way (County State Aid Highway 70) and is programmed in the City’s adopted 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Plan to be improved, and to include the extension of public utilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville wishes to finance a portion of the project costs through special assessments to benefited properties; and WHEREAS, an engineering feasibility report is required under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, for this proposed local improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, that the City Engineer is hereby authorized to prepare an engineering feasibility report for the 215th Street and Utility Improvements, City Project 26-09, advising the City Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should be best made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for the affected parcel(s). ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 17th day of February 2026. CITY OF LAKEVILLE ______________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Page 33 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Encroachment Agreement with Warsan Property L.L.C. for Private Improvements in Public Easements Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve Encroachment Agreement with Warsan Property L.L.C. for private improvements in public easements. Overview Warsan Property L.L.C. (5928 Upper 179th Street) requests approval for an existing privately- owned and maintained deck in public easements. The property owner will own and maintain the deck and is responsible for removing the private improvements if the City determines the public easement must be utilized. Supporting Information 1. Encroachment Agreement Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: No Source: N/A Envision Lakeville Community Values: Design that Connects the Community Report Completed by: Jonathan Nelson, Assistant City Engineer Page 34 of 251 1 238314v1 (reserved for recording information) ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this ____ day of _____________, 2026, by and between the CITY OF LAKEVILLE, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and WARSAN PROPERTY L.L.C., a Minnesota limited liability company (“Owner”). 1. BACKGROUND. Owner is the fee owner of certain real property located in the City of Lakeville, County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, legally described as follows: Parcel ID No. 22-42277-03-050 Lot 5, Block 3, Knob Hill of Lakeville Third Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. (Abstract Property) having a street address of 5928 Upper 179th Street W, Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 (“Subject Property”). The City owns easements for drainage and utility purposes over portions of the Subject Property. Owner constructed a deck overhang (“Improvements”) on the Subject Property which encroach on the City’s drainage and utility easement areas as depicted on the attached Exhibit “A”. 2. ENCROACHMENT AUTHORIZATION. The City hereby approves the encroachment of the Improvements in its easement areas on the Subject Property to the extent depicted in Exhibit A. Further conditions of encroachment approval are as follows: Page 35 of 251 2 238314v1 • The Improvements located on the Subject Property shall not impact or increase water drainage on the abutting property or cause any adverse drainage patterns or erosion to the abutting property. • Owner agrees that the construction of the Improvements is consistent with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. • The Owner of the Subject Property will own and maintain the Improvements. 3. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY. In consideration of being allowed to encroach in the City's easement areas, Owner, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any damage caused to the Subject Property, including the Improvements in the City’s easement areas, caused in whole or in part by the encroachment into the City's easement areas. 4. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. The City may, at its sole discretion, terminate this agreement at any time if the City needs to occupy the easements for drainage and utility purposes by giving the then owner of the Subject Property thirty (30) day advance written notice. The owner of the Subject Property may be required to remove the Improvements if it is deemed necessary by the City in order to exercise the purpose of the existing drainage and utility easement. If the owner fails to do so, the City may remove the Improvements and charge the cost of removal back to the owner for reimbursement. No notice under this paragraph shall be required in the event of an emergency condition determined solely by the City and the Agreement may then be terminated immediately. 5. RECORDING. This Agreement shall run with the land and shall be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank. Signature pages to follow.] Page 36 of 251 3 238314v1 CITY OF LAKEVILLE By: _____________________________________ (SEAL) Luke M. Hellier, Mayor And ____________________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _________ day of __________________, 2026, by Luke M. Hellier and Taylor Snider, respectively the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk of the City of Lakeville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________ Notary Public Page 37 of 251 Page 38 of 251 5 238314v1 EXHIBIT “A” Page 39 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Amendment to Supplemental Agreement for Professional Services with WSB for Lake Marion Greenway Improvements Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve WSB amendment to supplemental agreement for professional services for Lake Marion Greenway Improvements, City Project 26-15. Overview The City and Dakota County are partnering to construct segments of the Lake Marion Greenway (City Project 26-15), a multiphased trail project that will connect existing City and County trail systems and improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety. When complete, the greenway will span approximately 20 miles through Burnsville, Credit River, Farmington, Lakeville and Savage. The City Council previously approved a supplemental agreement with WSB for preliminary and final engineering on January 21, 2025, with amendments on April 7, 2025 (Ritter Farm Park trailhead design) and October 20, 2025 (state grant applications, environmental documents, bridge design, and traffic analysis). WSB has submitted an amendment to cover additional work requested during design and to provide construction services. The amendment reflects design adjustments including a) modified trail alignment at Ritter Farm Park, including retaining wall analysis and additional survey, b) expanded sidewalk design in downtown, and c) archaeological investigations required for state grant compliance. The amendment also incorporates construction services, including field staking, materials testing and inspection. This amendment is subject to the Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services between the City and WSB (dated September 20, 2021) and adds value by ensuring the project remains on schedule for 2026 construction. The City and County will share responsibilities and costs consistent with the County's adopted cost-share policies and as established in a future Joint Powers Agreement. The City is the lead agency; therefore, the total cost of this amendment is reflected in this memo. Supporting Information 1. 2026.01.30 WSB Amendment No.3 to Lake Marion Greenway Improvements Page 40 of 251 Financial Impact: $539,526 Budgeted: Yes Source: Multiple Sources Envision Lakeville Community Values: Design that Connects the Community Report Completed by: Jonathan Nelson, Assistant City Engineer Page 41 of 251 pw:\\wsbeng-pw.bentley.com:wsbeng-pw-01\Documents\Projects\Minnesota\027938- 000\01_Project_Management\Contract\ January 30, 2026 Mr. Jonathan Nelson, PE Assistant City Engineer City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 RE:Lake Marion Greenway Improvements Phase 1 (Preliminary and Final Engineering), CP 26-15 Amendment No. 3: Various Scope Items Dear Mr. Nelson On behalf of WSB we are pleased to submit this Amendment for Professional Services Agreement, dated January 21, 2025, to provide engineering services to the City. Specifically, our services will include the following tasks and associated fee: Date (Notice to Proceed) Scope Budget September & October 2025 Additional Field Walks and Survey: Original assumption was one field walk; three were completed to ensure thorough evaluation of site conditions and alignment feasibility. $13,587 10/30/2025 Alignment Shifts / Re-Design at Ritter Farm Park: Adjustments made to accommodate unforeseen site conditions, including re-design of trail alignment for optimal functionality and minimal environmental impact. $7,112 10/30/2025 Wall Analysis & Design at Ritter Farm: Structural analysis & design required for proposed retaining wall(s) to ensure compliance with bike & ped standards along with minimizing tree impacts. •5 hand augers to 10 feet •5 tests to 10 feet •Soil classification, logs, lab tests, site trip •Tech memo with retaining wall foundation recommendations $17,390 11/18/2025 LCCMR Grant Administration: Assistance with work plan revisions, status summaries, reimbursement requests, and final submittal. $35,398 11/22/2025 Additional Survey & Design Along Existing Ski Trail: Expanded survey scope to include ski trail corridor and $19,484 Page 42 of 251 Mr. Jonathan Nelson, PE January 30, 2026 Page 2 pw:\\wsbeng-pw.bentley.com:wsbeng-pw-01\Documents\Projects\Minnesota\027938- 000\01_Project_Management\Contract\ design modifications to integrate trail improvements with existing conditions. Complete tree inventory, use symbology/colors to distinguish the different tree species. 11/24/2025 Expanded Sidewalk Construction: Additional sidewalk segment between Howland and Holyoke along 209th Street to enhance pedestrian connectivity and safety. $2,886 12/09/2025 Phase I Archaeological Survey: Additional investigation (literature review and field work) required to facilitate project review by State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for compliance with DNR grant environmental review requirements. To be completed by sub-consultant (Merjent, Inc.). $12,000 01/30/2026 Construction Services: Contract administration, Construction Inspection, Labor compliance, survey, and material testing. $431,969 TOTAL $539,526 Attached to this memo are the services for each task outlining the details of each out-of-scope activity and associated budget. PROPOSED FEE Our budget was developed based on our understanding of the scope and coordinating closely with staff members in the City of Lakeville working on the project. We estimate an hourly not to exceed fee of $539,526. The proposed scope and fee presented herein represents our complete understanding of the project based on site visits and discussions with City staff. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact DJ Sosa at (612) 214-9244 | dsosa@wsbeng.com. Once again, we appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with you and your staff. Sincerely, WSB DJ Sosa, PE Principal/Sr. Project Manager Monica Heil, PE Page 43 of 251 Mr. Jonathan Nelson, PE January 30, 2026 Page 3 pw:\\wsbeng-pw.bentley.com:wsbeng-pw-01\Documents\Projects\Minnesota\027938- 000\01_Project_Management\Contract\ Vice President of Municipal Services Attachments Cc: Travis Wieber, WSB ACCEPTED BY: City of Lakeville By: Luke Hellier, Mayor Date: Attest: Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk Page 44 of 251 PM QA/QC Roadway Roadway Forester Forester Structural Geotechnical Geotechnical Survey Survey Sr. Sr. Soil Project Total Task Description Engineer Support Lead Support Engineer Engineer Support Chief Crew (1 Person) Planner Scientist Controls Hours Cost 1.0 Additional Field Walks & Survey ########### Field Investigation (2 additional visits) 16 8 16 40 8,320.00$ ########### Supplemental Survey 1 2 2 4 16 25 5,267.00$ 2.0 Alignment Shifts/Re-Design at Ritter ########### Update alignment and profile within Ritter Farm 2 2 4 24 32 5,190.00$ ########### Parking lot re-configure (i.e., Equestrian & upper lot) 2 2 2 4 10 1,922.00$ 3.0 Wall Analysis & Design at Ritter Farm ########### 5 hand augers, 5 DCP tests, & Reports 4 10 24 38 7,456.00$ ########### Retaining Wall Design 2 2 8 16 16 4 48 9,934.00$ 4.0 LCCMR Grant Administration ########### Project Management and Coordination 2 16 2 20 4,160.00$ ########### Work Plan Revisions 2 8 4 14 3,034.00$ ########### Work Plan Status Summaries 8 36 8 52 11,124.00$ ########### Reimbursement Requests 4 32 4 40 8,320.00$ ########### Final Submittal 8 24 8 40 8,760.00$ 5.0 Additional Survey & Design Along Existing Ski Trail ########### Supplemental Survey 1 8 16 25 5,479.00$ ########### Add design, update plan set, & permit requirements 2 2 8 24 36 5,966.00$ ########### Tree Survey 1 2 16 32 51 8,039.00$ 6.0 Expanded Sidewalk Construction ########### Add design & update plan set 2 2 4 8 16 2,886.00$ Total Hours 53 14 40 92 16 32 16 14 24 12 32 116 26 0 487 2025 Hourly Costs $279.00 $200.00 $194.00 $144.00 $206.00 $127.00 $270.00 $200.00 $195.00 $250.00 $200.00 $197.00 $225.00 $143.00 SUBTOTAL $14,787.00 $2,800.00 $7,760.00 $13,248.00 $3,296.00 $4,064.00 $4,320.00 $2,800.00 $4,680.00 $3,000.00 $6,400.00 $22,852.00 $5,850.00 $0.00 $95,857.00 Subconsultant - Merjent (Archaeological Study) $12,000.00 TOTAL $107,857.00 City of Lakeville Amendment No. 3 - Various Scope Items Lake Marion Greenway Trail Detailed Cost Breakdown of Tasks Page 45 of 251 70 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | SU I T E 3 0 0 | MI N N E A P O L I S , M N | 55 4 1 6 | 76 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | WS B E N G . C O M January 30th, 2026 Jonathan Nelson, PE Assistant City Engineer City of Lakeville RE: Lake Marion Trail Construction Dear Mr. Nelson: WSB is excited about the opportunity to present this scope of work and deliverables for construction services for the Lake Marion Trail Project. The scope of work WSB will provide is the staff and services as necessary to meet the expected outcomes of this contract, which include the following tasks: Project Management Contract Administration Construction Inspection Labor compliance Survey Material Testing Deliverables and responsibilities provided for each of the above tasks are described in the Project Approach/Scope of Services below. The intent of the scope is to outline the major tasks required for this project and highlight areas of importance that are needed to complete the requested services. The scope does not list all responsibilities to be performed. PROJECT APPROACH/SCOPE OF SERVICES A.Project Management WSB will provide project management throughout the duration of this project. This will include the following deliverables: Prepare materials for and facilitate the preconstruction meeting and weekly on-site meetings for the duration of the project. Prepare materials and coordinate private utility relocations prior to and during construction. Communicate with the County and Contractor to address project related issues. Provide understanding of County standard construction practices as they relate to the project. Provide the necessary resources and direction to WSB personnel to ensure project compliance and quality results. Review and verify prepared pay vouchers and documented quantities. Provide the tools and equipment needed to WSB personnel to perform and meet the expected outcomes of the project including cell phones, computers, iPad’s, PPE, testing equipment, and additional supplies needed to perform the work. Provide services required under this contract as necessary to accommodate the contractor’s schedule. Page 46 of 251 Mr. Jonathan Nelson January 30th, 2026 Page 2 B. Contract Administration WSB will provide contract administration for this project. Our project team will work with the contractor and the city to ensure construction work and activities will be constructed in accordance with the plans and standards and are correctly and adequately documented throughout the project. Scope of work for this task includes: Coordinate, facilitate, and document construction meetings for close coordination of day- to-day progress of work and ensure the project is completed as intended. Communicate regularly with involved stakeholders to keep them informed regarding the impact of construction to the area, including neighbors, businesses, and local agencies. Review, document and file contractor permits, submittals, test reports, and certificates of compliance. Verify and review all labor submittals meet requirements. Accurately verify contract pay items daily. Prepare all pay vouchers in accordance to project revenues and expenses. Prepare contract change documents and cost estimates with negotiations with the contractor on any contract changes. Respond to all contractor requests for information (RFI). Complete all necessary field finalizing of the project documentation in accordance with project specifications. C. Construction Inspection WSB will provide Construction Inspection services through construction of the project and final project closeout. This task will include: Record construction activities daily, making a complete and accurate record of all events. Ensure construction practices and materials used on site are compliant with project specifications. Accurately measure and record contract pay items daily. Perform daily reviews of construction signing, detour signing, and construction traffic control maintenance. Perform monthly labor compliance interviews. Communicate regularly with the Project Manager, Contractor, County, and involved stakeholders. Perform reviews of temporary and permanent erosion control measures on the project for compliance with applicable permits and specifications. Provide services required under this contract as necessary to accommodate the contractor’s schedule and needs. Exercise the “Authority and Duties of the Inspector” as necessary. D. Survey WSB will provide Survey services through project construction. This will include: Verifying datum points are accurate and correct. Provide all required construction staking including setting benchmark elevation locations. Provide and maintain records for as-builts. Coordinate with contractor on private utility relocations. E. Construction Materials Testing WSB will provide materials testing as required by the special provisions and Schedule of Materials control through the project. This will include: Grading and base items including material gradations and densities. Page 47 of 251 Mr. Jonathan Nelson January 30th, 2026 Page 3 Asphalt gradations, extractions, and densities. Concrete air, slump, and strength tests. Provide services required under this contract as necessary to accommodate the contractor’s schedule and needs. Depending on project sequence and workload, as determined by the contractor, we will adjust our staffing needs accordingly. PROPOSED FEE The estimated cost proposal we are providing is based on the contract documents and anticipated schedule for the work based on the time determination schedule that was developed as part of design. A better understanding of the level of effort needed will be realized once the contractor presets their approach to the work. WSB will provide the services as outlined in Project Approach/Scope of Services. Our budget was developed based on our understanding of the scope and experience with many similar projects. Our 2026 estimate used the current time determination as was developed with the project design to date. The proposed scope and fee presented herein represents our complete understanding of the project based on current plans and schedule being developed. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (763)-286-6141. Once again, we appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with you and your staff. Sincerely, WSB Craig Alberg, PE, DBIA Vice President, Contract Admin Attachments ACCEPTED BY: City of Lakeville By: City of Lakeville Date: Page 48 of 251 Project Design Manager Project Manager Construction Project Lead Inspector Environmental Compliance EEO/ Labor Senior Survey Technician Two Person Clerical Survey Crew Total WORK TASK Hours Cost Description PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Management (2 hour per week CM)56 20 76 $17,300.00 Submittal Review/Shop Drawing Review/RFI's (1 hour/Week)20 28 48 $13,020.00 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION Pre-Construction Conference 2 4 3 9 $2,130.00 Private Utility Meetings 2 13 15 $4,005.00 Weekly Meeting (Assume 1 meeting a week, 2 hours per meeting)56 56 $14,840.00 Labor Compliance (4 hours per week for 28 weeks)112 112 $14,560.00 Documentation Review (1/2 hour a week)14 14 $3,710.00 Contract Administration (1 hour a week)28 8 36 $8,404.00 Monthly Pay Estimates (10 estimates) 10 15 25 $4,495.00 Final Documentation 10 10 20 $4,350.00 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES Pre-Project Inspection / Removal Measurements 20 20 $3,400.00 Construction Inspection (28 Weeks)28 1400 1428 $245,420.00 Punchlist 15 15 $2,550.00 Record Plan Measurements 20 20 $3,400.00 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING SERVICES Construction Survey 140 140 $37,100.00 Office Support 6 6 $1,230.00 Record Plans 15 10 25 $5,725.00 ENVIRONMANTAL Weekly NPDES Inspections (3 hours per week, for 28 weeks)84 84 $10,920.00 On Site Documentation (1.5 hours per week, for 28 weeks)42 42 $5,460.00 Post Rain Event Inspections (Assume 1 rain event every other week) 42 42 $5,460.00 Permit Coordination 8 8 $1,040.00 Assume 28 weeks inspection, 5 days per week, 10 hours per day. (Lead Inspector) Total Hours 24 247 1468 176 112 21 150 43 2241 $408,519.00 Hourly Costs 280.00 265.00 170.00 130.00 130.00 205.00 265.00 123.00 WSB SALARY COSTS $6,720.00 $65,455.00 $249,560.00 $22,880.00 $14,560.00 $4,305.00 $39,750.00 $5,289.00 $408,519.00 Materials Testing $23,450.00 $431,969.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST 2026 $431,969.00 WSB ESTIMATE OF COST - Lake Marion Trail Project Grading, Bituminous Surfacing, Drainage, ADA Improvements TOTAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PROJECT COST Page 49 of 251 CMT Unit Hourly or Unit Cost Total Unit Cost CMT03 2.00 hours 135.00$ 270.00$ 1 trips at 2.00 hours each CMT02 16.00 hours 110.00$ 1,760.00$ 8 trips at 2.00 hours each 3510 18 tests 40.00$ 720.00$ 4 tests 4 tests 4 tests 2 tests 2 tests 2 tests 3500 4 tests 55.00$ 220.00$ CMT01 3.00 hours 95.00$ 285.00$ 2 trips at 1.50 hours each 2130 11 trips 60.00$ 660.00$ 3025 5 tests 165.00$ 825.00$ 2 tests 1 tests 1 tests 1 tests 3260 5 tests 250.00$ 1,250.00$ 1 tests 2 tests 1 tests 1 tests 4030 1 tests 190.00$ 190.00$ Subtotal 6,180.00$ CMT01 12.00 hours 95.00$ 1,140.00$ 8 trips at 1.50 hours each 2130 8 trips 60.00$ 480.00$ 4090 6 tests 650.00$ 3,900.00$ 4050 2 tests 115.00$ 230.00$ 4030 2 tests 190.00$ 380.00$ 4040 2 tests 155.00$ 310.00$ Subtotal 6,440.00$ CMT03 6.00 hours 135.00$ 810.00$ Footings 3 trips at 2.00 hours each 2130 3 trips 60.00$ 180.00$ Subtotal 990.00$ Trip Charge Concrete Reinforcement Observations Concrete Reinforcement Asphalt Pavements Extraction - Bituminous Content Asphalt Content Extracted Gradation Sample Pick Up Standard Proctor on footing backfill Trip Charge MnDOT Gyratory Mix Properties Rice Specific Gravity Laboratory Testing Field Testing Construction Materials Testing Estimate of Costs City of Lakeville Lake Marion Trail Greenway Phase I R-027938-000 January 29, 2026 Service Description Estimated Units Aggregate and Soils Excavation Observations (Restroom Building Footings) Compaction Testing of Fill and Backfill Nuclear Density Testing Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) on embankment (select granular & common) on footing backfill on subgrade on storm sewer trench backfill on sanitary trench backfill Laboratory Testing Sieve Analysis through no. 200 Sieve on embankment (select granular & common) Trip Charge Sample Pick Up on aggregate base CL 5 on select granular on subgrade on watermain trench backfill on aggregate surfacing CL 2 on reclamation material on trench backfill Page 50 of 251 CMT02 24.00 hours 110.00$ 2,640.00$ Footings 3 pours at 2.00 hours each 4" Colored 1 pours at 2.00 hours each 5" Walk 1 pours at 2.00 hours each 6" Walk 3 pours at 2.00 hours each B618 1 pours at 2.00 hours each S424 1 pours at 2.00 hours each D412 1 pours at 2.00 hours each Misc.1 pours at 2.00 hours each CMT01 12.00 hours 95.00$ 1,140.00$ 8 trips at 1.50 hours each 2130 20 trips 60.00$ 1,200.00$ 2040 48 cylinders 40.00$ 1,920.00$ 12 sets at 4 cylinders each Subtotal 6,900.00$ CMT80 3.00 hours 215.00$ 645.00$ CMT85 1.00 hours 275.00$ 275.00$ CMT70 11.00 hours 175.00$ 1,925.00$ CMT90 1.00 hours 95.00$ 95.00$ Subtotal 2,940.00$ 6,180.00$ 990.00$ 6,900.00$ 2,940.00$ 23,450.00$ Sample Pickup Concrete Curing and Compressive Strength Testing Trip Charge Principal Engineer Laboratory Testing Project Assistant Project Administrator Project Engineer/Manager Project Supervision, Review and Management Inspection and Testing Project Summary Testing of Concrete Field Testing Concrete Assumptions Testing assumptions are based on 90% plans. Actual cost will depend on project management time, time spent onsite and testing tasks performed for the project. Estimated Total Concrete Reinforcement Concrete Aggregate and Soils Project Supervision, Review and Management Page 51 of 251 p 612.746.3660 f 612.746.3679 www.merjent.com 1 M a i n S t r e e t S E S u i t e 3 0 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , M i n n e s o t a 5 54 1 4 33 p 612.746.3660 f 612.746.3679 www.merjent.com p 612.746.3660 f 612.746.3679 www.merjent.com Via Email: aharwood@wsbeng.com January 6, 2025 Alison Harwood Director, Natural Resources WSB Engineering 540 Gateway Blvd Burnsville, MN 55337 Office: 612.360.1320 Alison Harwood <aharwood@wsbeng.com> Subject: Proposal for Phase I Survey of the Lake Marion Greenway Trail – Ritter Farm Park to Casperson Park, T114 R21 S23 and S24, Lakeville, Dakota County, Minnesota. SHPO No. 2026-0042 Dear Ms. Harwood, Merjent, Inc. (Merjent) is happy to present this proposal to provide a Phase I survey and report to satisfy the requirements of the Minnesota State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO) and the Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) for WSB Engineering (WSB) on behalf of the City of Lakeville. This proposal is based on information received via email December 29, 2025. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Merjent understands the City of Lakeville Lake Marion Greenway Trail – Ritter Farm Park to Casperson Park, T114 R21 S23 and S24 (Project) entails approximately 0.89 linear miles of greenway trail, in two segments, to be constructed by the City of Lakeville (City). Merjent assumes that the work is completely locally funded; therefore, unless the project requires federal permitting, federal laws and regulations, such as Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), will not apply. The Phase Ia literature review will focus on the area depicted in the provided maps, and the surrounding 0.5-mile radius from the centerline of the proposed trail, using SHPO and OSA professional files. Since SHPO recommended a Phase I survey in their letter to the City, dated November 16, 2025, the results of the literature review will be included in the final Phase I report and will not be provided as a standalone document. This Proposal addresses the scope of work by describing our technical approach for providing the Phase I investigations for SHPO compliance. Page 52 of 251 Page 2 PROJECT APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK The proposed Project Approach addresses the scope of work by describing our technical approach to providing the Phase I survey and report for SHPO compliance. The estimated cost to conduct the survey and prepare the deliverable is included in the Cost Estimate section of this proposal. Phase Ia Literature Review Merjent will conduct a desktop literature review survey to compile existing information and identify archaeological resources within and around the Project area to aid in assessing the overall facility to provide sufficient background information for NHPA compliance per SHPO guidelines. Merjent will conduct a review of a 0.5-mile radius study area around the property for archaeological and architectural resources. At a minimum, Merjent will: • Review the OSA Portal and the Minnesota Statewide Historic Inventory Portal (MnSHIP) to identify previously recorded archaeological and architectural resources within a 0.5-mile buffer from the Project, and review their NRHP eligibility status (NRHP listed, NRHP eligible, NRHP ineligible, and inventoried/recorded, but unevaluated, properties). • Review and provide historical topographic maps and historical aerial photographs to identify historic-aged resources older than 45-years old within the Project for additional inventory. Geographic information system (GIS) staff will prepare GIS files for previous archaeological resources within the Project area. Results of the desktop archaeological resources survey will be summarized in the final Phase I report. In developing this scope of work and cost estimate, Merjent has made the following assumptions: • Accurate shape files of the project location will be provided upon award, either by WSB or the City, • Will only present data on archaeological and architectural sites within a 0.5-mile study area. Phase I Archaeology Survey If awarded, Merjent will concurrently apply for an OSA permit and begin the literature review. Currently, the turnaround time for the OSA permit is 30 to 45 days. Following receipt of the permit, Merjent will conduct a Phase I Archaeological Survey of the proposed location in the spring of 2026 as soon as ground conditions allow. This work will incorporate both prehistoric and historical archaeology. It is assumed that archaeological survey will be required for the entirety the project areas. Throughout all stages of this investigation, Merjent will apply industry (cultural resou rce management) best practices and adhere to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation (48 CFR 44716). Methods will be in accordance with reconnaissance survey described by the SHPO Manual for Archaeological Projects in Minnesota (Anfinson, 2005) and the State Archaeologist’s Manual for Archaeological Projects in Minnesota (Anfinson, 2011). The goals for Phase I Archaeological survey include: • The Identification of archaeological resources within the defined Project Area of Potential Effect (APE) and documentation of their specific archaeological contexts, if any are present. • Provide management recommendations for each archaeological resource identified or reidentified during the course of these investigations. Page 53 of 251 Page 3 • Discuss eligibility/non-eligibility of minor and/or repetitiously occurring sites. • Identify those archaeological resources that are recommended for additional testing in Phase II survey to evaluate their NRHP eligibility. Merjent has made several assumptions with regard to completing the archaeological survey. Our assumptions include: • Archaeological fieldwork will be completed during a single mobilization • No archaeological sites will be identified during the course of the Phase I investigations • No deep testing will be required in association with the currently proposed undertaking • No more than 40 shovel tests will require excavation. • No subsurface testing will occur on steep slopes, wetlands, or paved surfaces. • Survey investigations for any revisions to the Project footprint or modifications to the assumed APE during or after the completion of the initial work will require a change order. Survey Methods for the archaeological survey will include: • Use of an iPad and using the Collector application and an GPS receiver during Phase I survey to provide geospatial data for all field datums and site boundaries. • The field methods and reporting format will adhere to the Minnesota SHPO and OSA Standards and Guidelines for Archaeological Resource Management Studies • Surface investigations will be conducted along linear transects spaced at 15-meter intervals Phase I reporting Merjent will prepare a Phase I archaeological report for the Project. All reporting will be done in accordance with the Minnesota SHPO guidelines. Merjent will submit the following deliverables: • One electronic copy of the Phase I Archaeological Survey report for the proposed Project, including all associated maps and photographs for submittal to the SHPO through the OSA Portal SCHEDULE Merjent will submit the application for the OSA license and begin the literature review within 3 days of award. Surface/near surface pedestrian survey will commence as early in the Spring 2026 as ground conditions allow. The draft report will be provided to WSB no more than 2 weeks following completion of fieldwork. WSB will provide one round of consolidated edits for deliverables prior to submission of the final letter report. PROJECT TEAM Merjent’s proposed Project team has experience providing Phase I surveys and reports for similar projects with similar resources. The Merjent Team for this Project will consist of an overall Project Page 54 of 251 Page 4 Manager, an archaeologist, and a GIS specialist. Merjent’s small but experienced team was specifically selected to be as flexible and responsive as possible during all phases of the Project . A brief profile of the key staff members proposed to manage and complete the Project is provided below, including their proposed Project role and relevant experience. Linda Naunapper – Project Manager Dr. Linda Naunapper, PhD, RPA, an archaeologist at Merjent, has 20 years of experience in environmental and cultural resources compliance. Her professional expertise includes National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 analyses, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analyses, interagency and tribal consultation, and regulatory compliance documentation. Dr. Naunapper has worked on federal, state and privately funded cultural resources projects in the Midwest/Great Lakes, California, Hawaii, Louisiana, Puerto Rico, Texas and South Carolina. Prior to working in regulatory compliance, Dr. Naunapper conducted archaeological and historical field investigations for numerous consulting firms, universities and state agencies in the Midwest, Great Lakes and eastern Plains. Although her research specialization is in material culture of late preh istory and early history, she has worked at archaeological sites spanning the Paleoindian through late historic periods. Aaron Armstrong-Duarte – Principal Investigator Dr. Aaron Armstrong-Duarte is proposed as the Principal Investigator for this undertaking. He has a PhD. from the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, and has over 20 years of experience working on archaeological projects in the United States and abroad. Dr. Armstrong-Duarte is an Archaeologist and has been Principal Investigator at Merjent for over two years. His experience as a project Principal Investigator includes data recovery and test excavations, human osteology and zooarchaeology, geoarchaeology, artifact analysis and curation, construction monitoring, site and project background research, permitting, archaeological survey, consulting with Tribal Historic Preservation Offices, conducting surveys with Tribal Cultural Assistants, and report and grant writing. With projects under his purview, Aaron has ensured compliance with federal and state historic preservation laws and procedures. He has experience implementing guidelines of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Minnesota’s Field Archaeology Act, Private Cemeteries Act, and Historic Sites Act. Dr. Armstrong-Duarte meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology as published in 36 CFR Section 61. Lacy Lepisto – Archaeologist Ms. Lacy Lepisto is proposed as the research archaeologist for this undertaking. Ms. Lepisto has 10 years of experience that includes archival research as well as fieldwork on both small - and large-scale projects in Minnesota and the surrounding states. She is proficient in all aspects of pre-survey archival research and post-survey reporting for both archaeological and historical surveys. COST ESTIMATE Merjent’s estimated costs for the required task in the scope of work described above is $12,000. Merjent proposes to perform the scope of work described herein on a time and materials basis in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract, not to exceed the total proposed cost without prior approval from WSB. Merjent will provide all invoices electronically and will include the WSB project name and number on each invoice. Page 55 of 251 Page 5 Merjent appreciates the opportunity to provide this proposal and assist WSB on this Project. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding the proposed approach or wish to discuss any scope of work tasks or budget. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, William M. Harding, MA, RPA Merjent, Inc. CC: Linda Naunapper, Merjent Lacy Lepisto, Merjent Aaron Armstrong-Duarte, Merjent Jeff Thommes, Merjent Page 56 of 251 Scope of Work Lake Marion Greenway Trail – LCCMR Grant Administration Page 1 Scope of Work Lake Marion Greenway Trail LCCMR Grant Administration Services The City of Lakeville’s Lake Marion Greenway Trail project has been recommended for Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) funding by the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR). City staff have requested a scope of work and proposed fee for assistance with grant administration. WSB will complete the tasks listed below. This document represents WSB’s best understanding of the scope and level of effort required to assist the City of Lakeville through the administration process. However, the actual level of effort will depend on the project schedule and the specific requests made to the City by LCCMR. 1. Project Management and Coordination Task 1 will involve overall project management, including coordination with the City of Lakeville, progress reports, billing and quality control/quality assurance to ensure the final deliverables meet required standards. Deliverables: ▪ Invoicing and progress reports ▪ Calls, emails and other correspondence ▪ Kickoff and check in meetings 2. Work Plan Revisions Task 2 will involve completing any additional work plan revisions required by LCCMR. Deliverables: ▪ Revised work plan text, graphics, maps, or other materials as requested 3. Work Plan Status Summaries LCCMR will require work plan status summaries every 3-6 months that contain budget and schedule updates, work plan modifications (if needed), etc. Based on the anticipated project schedule, this scope assumes three updates per year from 2026 through 2029 for a total of 12 updates. Deliverables: ▪ Draft and final work plan status summaries 4. Reimbursement Requests This task will involve assisting the City with assembling and submitting the required materials to request reimbursement for work completed based on project milestones. Required materials will include invoices and proof of payment to contractors completing the work. Page 57 of 251 Scope of Work Lake Marion Greenway Trail – LCCMR Grant Administration Page 2 Deliverables: ▪ Draft and final reimbursement requests 5. Final Submittal Task 5 involves preparation of the final project budget information, as builts, payment requests, and proof of payment. This information will need to be submitted prior to the project’s proposed end date. Proposed Staff Austin Hauf will lead the proposed scope. He will be supported by DJ Sosa and Luke Lunde. DJ is currently serving as PM for WSB’s existing contract with the City for this project. Luke has assisted other communities with similar grant administration work. Proposed Fee WSB's proposed fee to assist the City with LCCMR grant administration activities is not to exceed $35,398. Task Description Hours Cost 1.0 Project Management and Coordination 20 $4,160 2.0 Work Plan Revisions 14 $3,304 3.0 Work Plan Status Summaries 52 $11,124 4.0 Reimbursement Requests 40 $8,320 5.0 Final Submittal 40 $8,760 TOTAL 166 $35,398 Proposed Timeline WSB will complete the tasks listed above on an as-needed basis according to funder requirements. Once this scope amendment is approved, a draft schedule will be submitted to the City of Lakeville for review and approval prior to commencing these services. Page 58 of 251 Sr.Sr.Sr. Soil Total Task Description PM Planner Scientist Hours Cost 1.0 Project Management and Coordination 2 16 2 20 4,160.00$ 2.0 Work Plan Revisions 2 8 4 14 3,034.00$ 3.0 Work Plan Status Summaries 8 36 8 52 11,124.00$ 4.0 Reimbursement Requests 4 32 4 40 8,320.00$ 5.0 Final Submittal 8 24 8 40 8,760.00$ Total Hours 24 116 26 166 2026 Hourly Costs $279 $197 $225 Fee $6,696 $22,852 $5,850 $35,398 City of Lakeville LCCMR Grant Administration Services Lake Marion Greenway Trail Detailed Cost Breakdown of Tasks Page 59 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 CNH Architects Contract Amendment Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a contract amendment with CNH Architects for the design of the new Fire Station 2 Overview The original AIA B132 contract with CNH dated April 9, 2025, indicates that if the size of the project increases from the original proposed design, the fee paid to CNH will be adjusted based on the final established project scope at the completion of the Schematic Design Phase. The original $1,518,900 fee for service was based on an estimated construction of a 42,200 square foot fire station. After completion of the Schematic Design Phase as reviewed by the City Council at their October 2025 work session, the final size of the fire station is 47,865 square feet. CNH also included civil design of the new north/south access road through the site and the storm water basin, which was not originally included in their scope of work. The increase in the overall size of the fire station and the additional civil design work correlates to an increase of $242,040 to CNH’s fees for a total of $1,760,940. Supporting Information 1. CNH Contract Amendment 1 Financial Impact: $242,040 Budgeted: Yes Source: New FS2 Project Fund. Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Allyn Kuennen, Assistant CIty Administrator Page 60 of 251 Page 61 of 251 Page 62 of 251 Page 63 of 251 Page 64 of 251 FEE We propose the above additional services for a fixed stipulated sum as shown below. ITEM A -Increased Building Scope $229,215.00 ITEM B - A djacent Site Work $ 12,825.00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL SERVICES $242,040.00 Reimbursable fees will be billed as indicated in the original contract. AGREEMENT Upon acceptance, this additional fee proposal becomes a part of the original AIA B132 Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect dated January 21, 2025. All items are to remain as originally indicated except as modified herein. SCHEDULE The Construction Document design phase completion noted in Paragraph 1.1.4.2 will remain unchanged showing a completion date of around April, 2026. We appreciate working with you on this project and are pleased to meet these additional needs. Sincerely, Principal/ President CNH Architects, Ltd. 4 Accepted by City of Lakeville: _________________________________________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor Date __________________________________________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Date Page 65 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Professional Services Agreements for Mechanical Systems Design and Construction Services Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion:Move to approve professional services supplemental agreement with SEH, Inc. to provide design and consultation services for city facilities mechanical systems renovations. Overview The Water Treatment Facility, Police Station, and Central Maintenance Facility each have mechanical system renovation projects programmed in the 2026 Capital Improvement Plan as part of the City’s ongoing effort to maintain reliable, efficient, and sustainable building infrastructure. To support these projects, staff proposes engaging Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH), a consultant included under the City’s master agreement for professional services, to provide consulting, design, and construction administration services. SEH will assist staff in evaluating existing system conditions, developing detailed project scopes, and supporting project implementation to ensure the renovations meet current operational and performance needs. The proposed improvements include the following: • Water Treatment Facility: Replacement of the boiler plant, which is original to the building’s 1998 construction and is highly inefficient. • Police Station: Replacement of the boiler plant installed during the original 2008 construction. The boilers are nearing the end of their expected service life and currently require significant repairs to burners and heat exchangers. • Central Maintenance Facility: Replacement of the air handling unit, condenser, and boiler plant, all original to the building’s 2000 construction. This equipment is inefficient and no longer meets current EPA refrigeration requirements. Staff will evaluate the benefits and risks of packaging these projects into a single bid solicitation, as well as the option of bidding by mechanical system type, to encourage broader contractor participation, improve pricing competitiveness, and support efficient project delivery. All services will be provided in accordance with the terms and conditions of the September 20, 2021 General Services Agreement between the City of Lakeville and Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). Page 66 of 251 Supporting Information 1. Lakeville Maintenance Building Proposal 2. Lakeville Police Station Proposal 3. Lakeville WTP Proposal Financial Impact: Not to exceed $170,000 Budgeted: Yes Source: Building Fund CIP Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Tom Breeggemann Facilities Supervisor Page 67 of 251 February 4, 2026 RE: Lakeville Maintenance Building HVAC Replacements Lakeville Maintenance Building Lakeville, MN SEH No. LAKEV P-189662 Tom Breeggemann City of Lakeville 18400 Ipava Avenue Lakeville MN, 55044 Dear Tom, The City of Lakeville is proposing to make upgrades to the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems serving the Lakeville Maintenance Building in Lakeville, MN. The upgrades include replacement of a central air handling unit and associated rooftop condensing unit with a new air handler and condenser utilizing code compliant A2L refrigerant. The project will also include a design option for boiler and boiler pump replacement. Herewith is our proposal for professional engineering services for the work of assembling a cost estimate, bid documents, bidding assistance, and construction administration services for the project. Background The Lakeville Maintenance Building is currently equipped with a McQuay central station air handling unit with hot water heating coil and DX cooling coil. The air handler is factory matched with a rooftop condensing unit. The air handler and condenser are past their expected service life and utilize non-compliant refrigerant. The boilers are Burnham standard efficiency boilers, each providing 1063 MBH gross heating output. All HVAC equipment including the air handler, condenser, and boiler plant is controlled via the facility’s existing Schneider Electric building automation system (BAS). The City has experienced the following issues with the existing HVAC systems: • Air Handing Unit and Condenser: The air handler and condenser are both past their expected service life and utilize non-compliant refrigerant. • Boilers: The existing boilers and associated inline boiler pumps are past their expected service life and no longer function as originally intended. • HVAC Controls: The facility is currently equipped with a Schneider Electric BAS. New equipment including pumps and boilers will need to be incorporated into the existing Schneider BAS system. The City would like SEH to provide design services including construction documents, bidding assistance, and construction administration services for upgrades to these systems. Page 68 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville Maintenance Building HVAC Replacments February 4, 2026 Page 2 Scope of Services The following is a scope of services for each phase of the project. Task 1: Design Services – Task 1A to include Air Handler and Condenser replacement, Task 1B to include Boiler and pump replacement. 1. Prepare 90% level plans, and specifications and submit to the City for review. 2. Prepare opinion of probable construction cost and submit to the City for review. 3. Meet with the City of Lakeville to discuss 90% submittal documents. 4. Incorporate City review comments. 5. Provide internal QA (Quality Assurance) review. 6. Finalize plans and specifications for bidding. Task 2: Bidding Services 1. Post bid docs to Quest CDN. Respond to RFIs and inquiries from Contractors. 2. Prepare addenda as required. 3. Attend pre-construction walk-through with bidders. 4. Attend bid opening. Document bid-results. 5. Prepare bid tabulation and letter of recommendation and submit to the City. Task 3: Construction Administration 1. Lead the construction kickoff meeting. Assemble / distribute meeting minutes. 2. Review shop drawings. 3. Prepare change orders and proposal requests if needed for construction modifications to meet design intent. 4. Attend one construction site visit to review progress and conformance with plans. 5. Visit the site at completion of project for final review and punch list. 6. Review contractor payment invoices. 7. Review project close out documents and coordinate final close-out. Assumptions and Clarifications 1. HVAC Controls integration and installation will be by the City of Lakeville under a separate contract. 2. SEH will provide all documentation electronically and has not included any printing costs. 3. SEH will post the bidding documents electronically via Quest CDN. Project Schedule Based on the City’s budgeting schedule, the following is proposed for the project: Prepare the bidding documents ....... ...................... May 2026 Provide Opinion of Probable Cost ........................... May 2026 Bid Project .............................................................. June 2026 Award Contract ....................................................... June 2026 Contracts Signed .................................................... July 2026 Shop Drawings........................................................ August 2026 Start Construction ................................................... August 2026 End Construction (HVAC on-line) ............................ November 2026 Page 69 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville Maintenance Building HVAC Replacments February 4, 2026 Page 3 Consultant Staff Nick Brula P.E (MN) ......................... Project Manager/Mechanical Engineer Tyler Duffin ..................................... Mechanical Graduate Engineer Keith Lahde ...................................... Mechanical CADD Technician John Carlson P.E (MN) .................... Electrical Engineer Nate Smith ....................................... Electrical CADD Technician Joel Rector P.E (MN) ....................... Structural Engineer Tom Schuette .................................. Architectural Designer Compensation Task 1A – Design Services: Air Handler and Condenser Replacement We propose to complete the scope of services identified above on an hourly basis that is in accordance with our standard billing rate schedule. We proposed a Not-to-Exceed amount of $38,353 for this phase. Task 1B – Design Services: Boilers and Inline Boiler Pump Replacement We propose to complete the scope of services identified above on an hourly basis that is in accordance with our standard billing rate schedule. We proposed a Not-to-Exceed amount of $16,850 for this phase, contingent on acceptance of Task 1A. Task 2 – Bidding Services We propose to complete the scope of services identified above on an hourly basis that is in accordance with our standard billing rate schedule. We proposed a Not-to-Exceed amount of $5,288 for this phase. Task 3 - Construction Administration We propose to complete the scope of services identified above on an hourly basis that is in accordance with our standard billing rate schedule. We proposed a Not- to-Exceed amount of $11,502 for this phase. Reimbursable Expenses We propose a Not-to-Exceed amount of $350, for reimbursable expenses including travel expenses. Fee Summary: $38,353 Task 1A - Air Handler and Condensing Unit Replacement $16,850 Task 1B – Boiler and Pump Replacement (Contingent on 1A) $5,288 Bidding Services $11,903 Construction Administration $350 Expenses $71,893 Total Fee Page 70 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville Maintenance Building HVAC Replacments February 4, 2026 Page 4 General Services Agreement The terms and conditions of this proposal wholly include the contents of the September 20, 2021 General Services Agreement between the City of Lakeville and Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc. Upon approval of this proposal, we will assemble a project amendment to our standard agreement. Closure We want to thank you for the opportunity to provide the City of Lakeville with this proposal. As always, it is very important to us our services continue to meet and surpass your needs and expectations. After you have had an opportunity to review this proposal, we would like to hear any comments, concerns or questions you may have. If this proposal is acceptable, please sign and return a copy of this proposal letter, authorizing us to proceed with the project. Page 71 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville Maintenance Building HVAC Replacments February 4, 2026 Page 5 Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Nicholas J. Brula, PE Project Manager Accepted this ____ day of , 2026 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA By: Title: Date: And, By: Title: Date: Page 72 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville Maintenance Building HVAC Replacments February 4, 2026 Page 6 Page 73 of 251 February 4, 2026 RE: Lakeville Police Station Boiler Replacement Lakeville Police Station Lakeville, MN SEH No. LAKEV P-189662 Tom Breeggemann City of Lakeville 18400 Ipava Avenue Lakeville MN, 55044 Dear Tom, The City of Lakeville is proposing to make upgrades to the heating systems serving the Lakeville Police Station in Lakeville, MN. The upgrades include improvements to the hot water heating system including boiler plant and associated hot water pumping system at the facility. Transmitted herewith is our proposal for professional engineering services for the work of assembling a Boiler Options technical memorandum and cost estimate, bid documents, bidding assistance, and construction administration services for the project. Background The Lakeville Police Station is currently equipped with two (2) Benchmark 2.0 hydronic boilers each with a 2000 MBH input rating. The boilers are original to the building and provide 100% redundant heating capacity to the facility. Three base mounted, Bell and Gossett centrifugal pumps are utilized to distribute heated water to coils throughout the building. The pumps are Bell and Gossett 1510 series base mounted centrifugal pumps each sized at 310 gpm at 90 feet of total dynamic head (TDH). All HVAC equipment including the boiler plant is controlled via the facility’s existing Schneider Electric building automation system (BAS). The City has experienced the following issues with the existing HVAC systems: • Boilers: The existing boilers are past their expected service life and no longer function as originally intended. The City has replaced boilers at other facilities with Riello high- efficiency condensing boilers. • HVAC Pumps: Existing hydronic pumps are past their expected service life. Pumps show visible wear, and tear. • HVAC Controls: The facility is currently equipped with a Schneider Electric BAS. New equipment including pumps and boilers will need to be incorporated into the existing Schneider BAS system. The City would like SEH to provide design services including construction documents, bidding assistance, and construction administration services for upgrades to these systems. Page 74 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville Police Station Boiler Replacement February 4, 2026 Page 2 Scope of Services The following is a scope of services for each phase of the project. Task 1: Boiler Improvements Technical Memorandum 1. Visit the site to gather data and take field measurements. 2. Assemble technical memorandum summarizing boiler improvement options, feasibility, and cost. Two options will be reviewed. a. Option 1: Demo both existing Aerco boilers and provide two new high efficiency Reillo boilers each sized for 60% capacity. b. Option 2: Demo existing Aerco boiler. Provide one new high-efficiency Reillo boiler sized for full (100%) capacity. Leave one Aerco boiler to remain as lag (backup) boiler. 3. Meet with the City of Lakeville to discuss boiler improvement options. Once the City selects which option is preferred, SEH will proceed with design phase. Task 2: Design Services 1. Prepare 90% level plans, and specifications and submit to the City for review. Design will include the boiler replacement option selected by the City of Lakeville and will include Add-Alternate 1 for pump and motor replacement and Add-Alternate 2 for variable frequency drive (VFD) replacement. 2. Prepare opinion of probable construction cost and submit to the City for review. 3. Meet with the City of Lakeville to discuss 90% submittal documents. 4. Incorporate City review comments. 5. Provide internal QA (Quality Assurance) review. 6. Finalize plans and specifications for bidding. Task 3: Bidding Services 1. Post bid docs to Quest CDN. Respond to RFIs and inquiries from Contractors. 2. Prepare addenda as required. 3. Attend pre-construction walk-through with bidders. 4. Attend bid opening. Document bid-results. 5. Prepare bid tabulation and letter of recommendation and submit to the City. Task 4: Construction Administration 1. Lead the construction kickoff meeting. Assemble / distribute meeting minutes. 2. Review shop drawings. 3. Prepare change orders and proposal requests if needed for construction modifications to meet design intent. 4. Attend one construction site visit to review progress and conformance with plans. 5. Visit the site at completion of project for final review and punch list. 6. Review contractor payment invoices. 7. Review project close out documents and coordinate final close-out. Assumptions and Clarifications 1. HVAC Controls integration and installation will be by the City of Lakeville under a separate contract. 2. SEH will provide all documentation electronically and has not included any printing costs. 3. SEH will post the bidding documents electronically via Quest CDN. Page 75 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville Police Station Boiler Replacement February 4, 2026 Page 3 Project Schedule Based on the City’s budgeting schedule, the following is proposed for the project: Prepare the bidding documents ....... ...................... May 2026 Provide Opinion of Probable Cost ........................... May 2026 Bid Project .............................................................. June 2026 Award Contract ....................................................... June 2026 Contracts Signed .................................................... July 2026 Shop Drawings........................................................ August 2026 Start Construction ................................................... August 2026 End Construction (HVAC on-line) ............................ November 2026 Consultant Staff Nick Brula P.E (MN) ......................... Project Manager/Mechanical Engineer Tyler Duffin ..................................... Mechanical Graduate Engineer Keith Lahde ...................................... Mechanical CADD Technician John Carlson P.E (MN) .................... Electrical Engineer Nate Smith ....................................... Electrical CADD Technician Joel Rector P.E (MN) ....................... Structural Engineer Compensation Task 1 – Boiler Technical Memorandum We propose to complete the scope of services identified above on an hourly basis that is in accordance with our standard billing rate schedule. We proposed a Not-to-Exceed amount of $6,122 for this phase. Task 2 – Design Services We propose to complete the scope of services identified above on an hourly basis that is in accordance with our standard billing rate schedule. We proposed a Not-to-Exceed amount of $29,009 for this phase. Task 3 – Bidding Services We propose to complete the scope of services identified above on an hourly basis that is in accordance with our standard billing rate schedule. We proposed a Not-to-Exceed amount of $5,288 for this phase. Task 4 - Construction Administration We propose to complete the scope of services identified above on an hourly basis that is in accordance with our standard billing rate schedule. We proposed a Not- to-Exceed amount of $10,903 for this phase. Reimbursable Expenses We propose a Not-to-Exceed amount of $250, for reimbursable expenses including travel expenses. Page 76 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville Police Station Boiler Replacement February 4, 2026 Page 4 Fee Summary: $6,122 Boiler Technical Memorandum $29,009 Design Services $5,288 Bidding Services $10,903 Construction Administration $250 Expenses $51,572 Total Fee Page 77 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville Police Station Boiler Replacement February 4, 2026 Page 5 General Services Agreement The terms and conditions of this proposal wholly include the contents of the September 20, 2021 General Services Agreement between the City of Lakeville and Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc. Upon approval of this proposal, we will assemble a project amendment to our standard agreement. Closure We want to thank you for the opportunity to provide the City of Lakeville with this proposal. As always, it is very important to us our services continue to meet and surpass your needs and expectations. After you have had an opportunity to review this proposal, we would like to hear any comments, concerns or questions you may have. If this proposal is acceptable, please sign and return a copy of this proposal letter, authorizing us to proceed with the project. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Nicholas J. Brula, PE Project Manager Accepted this ____ day of , 2026 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA By: Title: Date: And, By: Title: Date: Page 78 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville Police Station Boiler Replacement February 4, 2026 Page 6 Page 79 of 251 February 4, 2026 RE: Lakeville WTP Boiler Replacement Lakeville Water Treatment Plant Lakeville, MN SEH No. LAKEV P-165911 Tom Breeggemann City of Lakeville 18400 Ipava Avenue Lakeville MN, 55044 Dear Tom, The City of Lakeville is proposing to make upgrades to the heating systems serving the Lakeville Water Treatment Plant (WTP) in Lakeville, MN. The upgrades include improvements to the hot water heating system including boiler plant and associated primary and secondary hot water pumping system at the facility. Transmitted herewith is our proposal for professional engineering services for the work of assembling bid documents, bidding assistance, and construction administration services for the project. Background The Lakeville WTP is currently equipped with two (2) Weil-McLain model 988 hydronic boilers. The boilers were installed in 1997 and are standard efficiency (non-condensing) with natural gas fired burners. The boilers provide 100% redundant heating capacity to the facility. Primary and secondary pumps are utilized to distribute heated water to coils throughout the building. The pumps are Taco FE series base mounted centrifugal pumps. All HVAC equipment including the boiler plant is controlled via the facility’s existing Schneider Electric building automation system (BAS). The City has experienced the following issues with the existing HVAC systems: • Boilers: The existing boilers are past their expected service life and are showing wear and tear. The boilers are non-condensing which limits control options and overall performance. The City has replaced boilers at other facilities with Riello high-efficiency condensing boilers. • HVAC Pumps: Existing hydronic pumps are past their expected service life. Pumps show visible corrosion, wear, and tear. • Combustion Air: Existing boilers are not equipped with separated combustion flue system. Combustion air is drawn from a large combustion air duct system located in the boiler room. • HVAC Controls: The plant is currently equipped with Schneider Electric BAS. New equipment including pumps and boilers will need to be incorporated into the existing Schneider BAS system. Page 80 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville WTP Boiler Replacement February 4, 2026 Page 2 The City would like SEH to provide design services including construction documents, bidding assistance, and construction administration services for upgrades to these systems. Scope of Services The following is a scope of services for each phase of the project. Task 1: Design Services 1. Prepare 90% level plans, and specifications and submit to the City for review. Design to include replacement of existing boilers with two new Riello boilers sized for 100% redundancy along with new HVAC pumps and associated controls. 2. Prepare opinion of probable construction cost and submit to the City for review. 3. Meet with the City of Lakeville to discuss 90% submittal documents. 4. Incorporate City review comments. 5. Provide internal QA (Quality Assurance) review. 6. Finalize plans and specifications for bidding. Task 2: Bidding Services 1. Post bid docs to Quest CDN. Respond to RFIs and inquiries from Contractors. 2. Prepare addenda as required. 3. Attend pre-construction walk-through with bidders. 4. Attend bid opening. Document bid-results. 5. Prepare bid tabulation and letter of recommendation and submit to the City. Task 3: Construction Administration 1. Lead the construction kickoff meeting. Assemble / distribute meeting minutes. 2. Review shop drawings. 3. Prepare change orders and proposal requests if needed for construction modifications to meet design intent. 4. Attend one construction site visit to review progress and conformance with plans. 5. Visit the site at completion of project for final review and punch list. 6. Review contractor payment invoices. 7. Review project close out documents and coordinate final close-out. Assumptions and Clarifications 1. HVAC Controls integration and installation will be by the City of Lakeville under a separate contract. 2. SEH will provide all documentation electronically and has not included any printing costs. 3. SEH will post the bidding documents electronically via Quest CDN. . Page 81 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville WTP Boiler Replacement February 4, 2026 Page 3 Project Schedule Based on the City’s budgeting schedule, the following is proposed for the project: Prepare the bidding documents ....... ...................... May 2026 Provide Opinion of Probable Cost ........................... May 2026 Bid Project .............................................................. June 2026 Award Contract ....................................................... June 2026 Contracts Signed .................................................... July 2026 Shop Drawings........................................................ August 2026 Start Construction ................................................... August 2026 End Construction (HVAC on-line) ............................ November 2026 Consultant Staff Nick Brula P.E (MN) ......................... Project Manager Tyler Duffin ..................................... Mechanical Graduate Engineer Keith Lahde ...................................... Mechanical CADD Technician John Carlson P.E (MN) .................... Electrical Engineer Nate Smith ....................................... Electrical CADD Technician Compensation Task 1 – Design Services We propose to complete the scope of services identified above on an hourly basis that is in accordance with our standard billing rate schedule. We proposed a Not-to-Exceed amount of $31,083 for this phase. Task 3 – Bidding Services We propose to complete the scope of services identified above on an hourly basis that is in accordance with our standard billing rate schedule. We proposed a Not-to-Exceed amount of $5,288 for this phase. Task 4 - Construction Administration We propose to complete the scope of services identified above on an hourly basis that is in accordance with our standard billing rate schedule. We proposed a Not- to-Exceed amount of $10,903 for this phase. Reimbursable Expenses We propose a Not-to-Exceed amount of $250, for reimbursable expenses including travel expenses. Fee Summary: $31,083 Design Services $5,288 Bidding Services $10,903 Construction Administration $250 Expenses $47,524 Total Fee Page 82 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville WTP Boiler Replacement February 4, 2026 Page 4 Page 83 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville WTP Boiler Replacement February 4, 2026 Page 5 General Services Agreement The terms and conditions of this proposal wholly include the contents of the September 20, 2021 General Services Agreement between the City of Lakeville and Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc. Upon approval of this proposal, we will assemble a project amendment to our standard agreement. Closure We want to thank you for the opportunity to provide the City of Lakeville with this proposal. As always, it is very important to us our services continue to meet and surpass your needs and expectations. After you have had an opportunity to review this proposal, we would like to hear any comments, concerns or questions you may have. If this proposal is acceptable, please sign and return a copy of this proposal letter, authorizing us to proceed with the project. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Nicholas J. Brula, PE Project Manager Accepted this ____ day of , 2026 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA By: Title: Date: And, By: Title: Date: Page 84 of 251 Mr. Tom Breeggemann, City of Lakeville Lakeville WTP Boiler Replacement February 4, 2026 Page 6 Page 85 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Keokuk Property Real Estate Brokerage Services Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a contract with North Star Commercial Real Estate Advisors for real estate brokerage services to sell 1.83 acres of city- owned property located directly north of the Keokuk Liquor Store. Overview Earlier this year, the city requested proposals for brokerage services for the sale of 1.83 acres of city-owned commercial property. The city received and reviewed three proposals in response to the RFP. The city council directed staff to move forward with a one-year contract with North Star Commercial Real Estate Advisors. The attached contract has been reviewed by the city attorney and staff recommends approval as presented. Supporting Information 1. North Star Commercial Real Estate Services Contract Financial Impact: $n/a Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Allyn Kuennen, Assistant City Administrator Page 86 of 251 Created by Scott Naasz with SkySlope®Forms 20830 Keokuk Ave Lakeville, Dakota, MN 55044 22-44340-01-033 2/28/2027 1,120,000 X X 1 3 X 02/04/2026 Page 87 of 251 X Buyer Broker compensation may be addressed as part of the LOI and/or Purchase Agreement 180 X X X X X Page 88 of 251 X Page 89 of 251 Page 90 of 251 Scott Naasz scott@northstarexperts.com eXp Commercial 612-819-8285 40922534 02/04/2026 02/17/2026Luke Hellier Mayor, City of Lakeville lhellier@lakevillemn.gov Taylor Snider Deputy City Clerk tsnider@lakevillemn.gov Page 91 of 251 Version_C_USA_EN_02.26.2024.a WIRING FRAUD ADVISORY NOTICE Cybercrime is a potential threat in real estate and business brokerage transactions. Instances have occurred where criminals hack into the email accounts of real estate and business brokerage transaction service providers (such as, for example, law firms, escrow companies, and financial institutions), and from these email accounts, criminals proceed to send emails containing fraudulent wiring instructions to innocent parties. These fraudulent wiring instructions direct innocent parties to deliver funds to the criminals’ bank accounts (often to off-shore accounts), rather than to the legitimate bank accounts belonging to the respective service provider. Once innocent parties release their funds to the criminals’ bank accounts, there is little chance that such funds will ever be recovered. Some criminals have even established fraudulent telephone numbers, intended to be called by innocent parties if they attempt to seek verbal confirmation that the fraudulent wiring instructions are accurate. In such cases, innocent parties call the telephone number (mistakenly believing that they are calling the respective service provider), the call is then answered by the criminals, and then the criminals provide confirmation that the fraudulent wiring instructions are in fact accurate. The innocent parties, wrongly believing that they just spoke to, and received confirmation from, the respective service provider, then authorize a transfer of their funds into the criminals’ bank accounts under the false impression that they are transferring their funds to the respective service provider. Don’t let this be you! EXP WILL NEVER SEND WIRING INSTRUCTIONS TO YOU REGARDING YOUR TRANSACTION Be advised of the following: 1.You should obtain the telephone numbers of your service providers at the time that you first engage them. 2.You should never wire funds to your service providers without first calling them (at the telephone number that you originally obtained from them), and having them confirm that the wiring instructions you received from them are accurate (including the account number, routing number, and any other codes). 3.You should avoid sending personally identifiable information (such as social security numbers, social insurance numbers, dates of birth, etc…) in emails or text messages. It is best to provide such information in person or over the telephone directly to your intended service provider. 4.You should take steps to secure any electronic systems you are using. For example, ensure that your email account and WiFi service each contain strong passwords, and that you are opting-in to use two-step verification processes, where available. 5.If an email, telephone call, or other communication seems suspicious, follow your instincts and do not authorize the release of any funds without first independently confirming that the communication is legitimate. Additional information concerning how to protect yourself from and against wiring fraud may be obtained from the following sources, among others: •U.S. Department of Justice (Criminal Division): https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-fraud/report-fraud •Federal Bureau of Investigation: https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/white-collar-crime & https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/cyber •The National White-Collar Crime Center: https://www.nw3c.org/UI/Index.html •On Guard Online: www.onguardonline.gov Received, reviewed, and understood by each of the undersigned: Date Date (For Colorado Residents Only): This form has not been approved by the Colorado Real Estate Commission. Created by Scott Naasz with SkySlope® Forms __________________________________ __________________________________Luke Hellier, Mayor Taylor Snider, Dep. City Clerk 02/17/2026 02/17/2026 Page 92 of 251 AGENCY RELATIONSHIPS IN REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS 1. Page 1 2. MINNESOTA LAW REQUIRES that early in any relationship, real estate brokers or salespersons discuss with 3. consumers what type of agency representation or relationship they desire.(1) The available options are listed below. This 4. is not a contract. This is an agency disclosure form only. If you desire representation you must enter into a 5. written contract, according to state law (a listing contract or a buyer/tenant representation contract). Until such time 6. as you choose to enter into a written contract for representation, you will be treated as a customer and will not receive 7. any representation from the broker or salesperson. The broker or salesperson will be acting as a Facilitator (see 8. paragraph IV on page two (2)), unless the broker or salesperson is representing another party, as described below. 9. ACKNOWLEDGMENT: I/We acknowledge that I/we have been presented with the below-described options. 10. I/We understand that until I/we have signed a representation contract, I/we am/are not represented by the 11. broker/salesperson. I/We understand that written consent is required for a dual agency relationship. 12. THIS IS A DISCLOSURE ONLY, NOT A CONTRACT FOR REPRESENTATION. 13. (Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date) 14. I. Seller’s/Landlord’s Broker: A broker who lists a property, or a salesperson who is licensed to the listing broker, 15. represents the Seller/Landlord and acts on behalf of the Seller/Landlord. A Seller’s/Landlord’s broker owes to WKH6HOOHU/DQGORUGWKHƂGXFLDU\GXWLHVGHVFULEHGRQSDJHWZR (2) The broker must also disclose to the Buyer PDWHULDOIDFWVDVGHƂQHGLQ016WDWXWH6XEGRIZKLFKWKHEURNHULVDZDUHWKDWFRXOGDGYHUVHO\DQG VLJQLƂFDQWO\DIIHFWWKH%X\HUpVXVHRUHQMR\PHQWRIWKHSURSHUW\ 016WDWXWH6XEGGRHVQRWDSSO\WR 19. rental/lease transactions.) If a broker or salesperson working with a Buyer/Tenant as a customer is representing the 20. Seller/Landlord, they must act in the Seller’s/Landlord’s best interest and must tell the Seller/Landlord any information GLVFORVHGWRWKHPH[FHSWFRQƂGHQWLDOLQIRUPDWLRQDFTXLUHGLQDIDFLOLWDWRUUHODWLRQVKLS VHHSDUDJUDSK,9RQSDJH 22. two (2)). In that case, the Buyer/Tenant will not be represented and will not receive advice and counsel from the 23. broker or salesperson. 24. II. Buyer’s/Tenant’s Broker: A Buyer/Tenant may enter into an agreement for the broker or salesperson to represent 25. and act on behalf of the Buyer/Tenant. The broker may represent the Buyer/Tenant only, and not the Seller/Landlord, 26. even if they are being paid in whole or in part by the Seller/Landlord. A Buyer’s/Tenant’s broker owes to the %X\HU7HQDQWWKHƂGXFLDU\GXWLHVGHVFULEHGRQSDJHWZR (2) The broker must disclose to the Buyer material facts DVGHƂQHGLQ016WDWXWH6XEGRIZKLFKWKHEURNHULVDZDUHWKDWFRXOGDGYHUVHO\DQGVLJQLƂFDQWO\DIIHFW WKH%X\HUpVXVHRUHQMR\PHQWRIWKHSURSHUW\ 016WDWXWH6XEGGRHVQRWDSSO\WRUHQWDOOHDVHWUDQVDFWLRQV 30. If a broker or salesperson working with a Seller/Landlord as a customer is representing the Buyer/Tenant, they 31. must act in the Buyer’s/Tenant’s best interest and must tell the Buyer/Tenant any information disclosed to them, H[FHSWFRQƂGHQWLDOLQIRUPDWLRQDFTXLUHGLQDIDFLOLWDWRUUHODWLRQVKLS VHHSDUDJUDSK,9RQSDJHWZR ,Q 33. that case, the Seller/Landlord will not be represented and will not receive advice and counsel from the broker or 34. salesperson. 35. III. Dual Agency - Broker Representing both Seller/Landlord and Buyer/Tenant: Dual agency occurs when one 36. broker or salesperson represents both parties to a transaction, or when two salespersons licensed to the same EURNHUHDFKUHSUHVHQWDSDUW\WRWKHWUDQVDFWLRQ'XDODJHQF\UHTXLUHVWKHLQIRUPHGFRQVHQWRIDOOSDUWLHVDQG 38. means that the broker and salesperson owe the same duties to the Seller/Landlord and the Buyer/Tenant. This 39. role limits the level of representation the broker and salesperson can provide, and prohibits them from acting H[FOXVLYHO\IRUHLWKHUSDUW\,QDGXDODJHQF\FRQƂGHQWLDOLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWSULFHWHUPVDQGPRWLYDWLRQIRUSXUVXLQJ DWUDQVDFWLRQZLOOEHNHSWFRQƂGHQWLDOXQOHVVRQHSDUW\LQVWUXFWVWKHEURNHURUVDOHVSHUVRQLQZULWLQJWRGLVFORVH VSHFLƂFLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWWKHP2WKHULQIRUPDWLRQZLOOEHVKDUHG'XDODJHQWVPD\QRWDGYRFDWHIRURQHSDUW\ 43. to the detriment of the other.(3) :LWKLQWKHOLPLWDWLRQVGHVFULEHGDERYHGXDODJHQWVRZHWRERWK6HOOHU/DQGORUGDQG%X\HU7HQDQWWKHƂGXFLDU\ 45. duties described below.(2)'XDODJHQWVPXVWGLVFORVHWR%X\HUVPDWHULDOIDFWVDVGHƂQHGLQ016WDWXWH6XEG RIZKLFKWKHEURNHULVDZDUHWKDWFRXOGDGYHUVHO\DQGVLJQLƂFDQWO\DIIHFWWKH%X\HUpVXVHRUHQMR\PHQWRIWKH SURSHUW\ 016WDWXWH6XEGGRHVQRWDSSO\WRUHQWDOOHDVHWUDQVDFWLRQV 01 $*&<',&6 Taylor Snider, Dep. City ClerkLuke Hellier, Mayor 02/17/2026 02/17/2026 Page 93 of 251 AGENCY RELATIONSHIPS IN REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS 48. Page 2 49. IV. Facilitator: A broker or salesperson who performs services for a Buyer/Tenant, a Seller/Landlord or both but GRHVQRWUHSUHVHQWHLWKHULQDƂGXFLDU\FDSDFLW\DVD%X\HUpV7HQDQWpV%URNHU6HOOHUpV/DQGORUGpV%URNHURU'XDO 51. Agent. THE FACILITATOR BROKER OR SALESPERSON DOES NOT OWE ANY PARTY ANY OF THE FIDUCIARY 52. DUTIES LISTED BELOW, EXCEPT CONFIDENTIALITY, UNLESS THOSE DUTIES ARE INCLUDED IN A 53. WRITTEN FACILITATOR SERVICES AGREEMENT. The facilitator broker or salesperson owes the duty of FRQƂGHQWLDOLW\WRWKHSDUW\EXWRZHVQRRWKHUGXW\WRWKHSDUW\H[FHSWWKRVHGXWLHVUHTXLUHGE\ODZRUFRQWDLQHGLQ 55. a written facilitator services agreement, if any. In the event a facilitator broker or salesperson working with a Buyer/ 56. Tenant shows a property listed by the facilitator broker or salesperson, then the facilitator broker or salesperson 57. must act as a Seller’s/Landlord’s Broker (see paragraph I on page one (1)). In the event a facilitator broker or 58. salesperson, working with a Seller/Landlord, accepts a showing of the property by a Buyer/Tenant being represented 59. by the facilitator broker or salesperson, then the facilitator broker or salesperson must act as a Buyer’s/Tenant’s 60. Broker (see paragraph II on page one (1)). 61. (1) 7KLVGLVFORVXUHLVUHTXLUHGE\ODZLQDQ\WUDQVDFWLRQLQYROYLQJSURSHUW\RFFXSLHGRULQWHQGHGWREHRFFXSLHGE\ 62. one to four families as their residence. 63. (2) 7KHƂGXFLDU\GXWLHVPHQWLRQHGDERYHDUHOLVWHGEHORZDQGKDYHWKHIROORZLQJPHDQLQJV 64. LoyaltyEURNHUVDOHVSHUVRQZLOODFWRQO\LQFOLHQW V pEHVWLQWHUHVW 65. 2EHGLHQFHEURNHUVDOHVSHUVRQZLOOFDUU\RXWDOOFOLHQW V pODZIXOLQVWUXFWLRQV 66. DisclosureEURNHUVDOHVSHUVRQZLOOGLVFORVHWRFOLHQW V DOOPDWHULDOIDFWVRIZKLFKEURNHUVDOHVSHUVRQKDVNQRZOHGJH ZKLFKPLJKWUHDVRQDEO\DIIHFWWKHFOLHQW V pXVHDQGHQMR\PHQWRIWKHSURSHUW\ 68. &RQƂGHQWLDOLW\EURNHUVDOHVSHUVRQZLOONHHSFOLHQW V pFRQƂGHQFHVXQOHVVUHTXLUHGE\ODZWRGLVFORVHVSHFLƂF 69. information (such as disclosure of material facts to Buyers). 70. 5HDVRQDEOH&DUHEURNHUVDOHVSHUVRQZLOOXVHUHDVRQDEOHFDUHLQSHUIRUPLQJGXWLHVDVDQDJHQW 71. AccountingEURNHUVDOHVSHUVRQZLOODFFRXQWWRFOLHQW V IRUDOOFOLHQW V pPRQH\DQGSURSHUW\UHFHLYHGDVDJHQW 72. (3) If Seller(s)/Landlord(s) elect(s) not to agree to a dual agency relationship, Seller(s)/Landlord(s) may give up the 73. opportunity to sell/lease the property to Buyer(s)/Tenant(s) represented by the broker/salesperson. If Buyer(s)/ 74. Tenant(s) elect(s) not to agree to a dual agency relationship, Buyer(s)/Tenant(s) may give up the opportunity to 75. purchase/lease properties listed by the broker. 76. NOTICE REGARDING PREDATORY OFFENDER INFORMATION: Information regarding the predatory offender 77. registry and persons registered with the predatory offender registry under MN Statute 243.166 may be 78. obtained by contacting the local law enforcement offices in the community where the property is located, 79. or the Minnesota Department of Corrections at (651) 361-7200, or from the Department of Corrections Web site at 80. https://coms.doc.state.mn.us/publicregistrantsearch 01 $*&<',6& Page 94 of 251 FACILITATOR SERVICES AGREEMENT: SELLER This form is approved by the Minnesota Association of REALTORS®, which disclaims any liability arising out of use or misuse of this form. © 2017-2025 Minnesota Association of REALTORS® 1.Date 2. Page 1 of pages 3.DEFINITIONS: This Agreement involves the property located at , 4. City of , 5. County of , State of Minnesota, Zip Code , 6. legally described as (“Property”). 7. Seller is (“Seller”). (e.g., individual(s), estate, trust, corporation, etc.) 8.Broker is (“Broker”). (Real Estate Company Name) 9. T his Agreement starts on , and ends at 11:59 P.M. on 10. . This Agreement terminates upon successful closing of the 11. Property(ies) specified in this Agreement or expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, whichever occurs first. 12. This Agreement may only be canceled by written mutual agreement of the parties. 13.PRICE: Seller offers the Property for sale for the price of $ , upon the following 14. terms: . 15.LISTING: Seller gives Broker the EXCLUSIVE NONEXCLUSIVE right to provide the services specified below. -------------------------(Check one.)--------------------- 16.BROKER’S OBLIGATION: Seller understands that Broker is not representing Seller as Seller’s agent and owes Seller 17. no fiduciary duties other than as specified in this Agreement. Seller understands that confidential information about 18. price, terms, and motivation for pursuing the transaction given to Broker shall be kept confidential unless Seller instructs 19. Broker in writing to disclose specific information. Broker shall deal honestly with all parties. Broker shall use reasonable 20. efforts and professional knowledge and skills to assist Seller in selling the Property. Broker shall comply with Minnesota law 21. regarding escrow of funds related to the sale or purchase of property. Broker must disclose to potential purchasers all material 22. facts as defined in MN Statute 82.68, Subd. 3, pertaining to the property, of which Broker is aware, which could 23. adversely and significantly affect an ordinary purchaser’s use or enjoyment of the Property, or any intended use of 24.the Property. 25.Broker shall, unless prohibited by governing authority,: (Check all that apply.) 26. list the Property in the Multiple Listing Service (“MLS”). 27. assist in showing the Property to prospective buyers. 28. place a lock box with keys on the Property. 29. display a “For Sale” sign on the Property. 30. assist in the preparation of the Purchase Agreement. 31. provide Seller with information about other service providers related to the real estate transaction (e.g., real 32. estate closers). 33. assist the parties in completing the transaction. 34. provide the following additional services: 35. 36.Seller shall grant Broker access to the Property and Seller authorizes Broker to market the Property, including submission 37. of data to an MLS. Seller understands this Agreement DOES NOT give Broker the authority to rent or manage the Property. 38. Broker may place information on the Internet concerning the Property, including sold information (except as limited to in 39. the following MLS Data Feed Options section). Upon final acceptance of a purchase agreement, Seller allows Broker to 40. withdraw the Property from the market. If Broker sells the Property, Broker may notify the MLS and member REALTORS ® 41. of the price and terms of the sale. Seller acknowledges that neither Broker, the MLS, the Minnesota Association of 42. REALTORS®, nor any other broker is insuring Seller or occupant against theft, loss, or vandalism. MN:FSA:S-1 (8/25) 20830 Keokuk Ave Lakeville Dakota 55044 22-44340-01-033 2/28/2027 1,120,000 Justin Miller 6 eXp Realty X X 02/04/2026 02/04/2026 Page 95 of 251 FACILITATOR SERVICES AGREEMENT: SELLER 43. Page 2 44. Property located at . 45.MLS DATA FEED OPTIONS: 46. EXPLANATIONS AND DEFINITIONS: 47.“IDX site” means a website operated by a broker participating in the MLS on which the broker can advertise the 48. listings of other brokers in MLS, subject to certain MLS rules. The consumer visiting an IDX site is not required to 49. register on the site or to have a brokerage relationship with the broker displaying listings on the site. 50.“Virtual office website” (“VOW”) means a website operated by a broker participating in the MLS that delivers 51. brokerage services to consumers over the worldwide web. Visitors to a VOW are required to register on the site (with 52. their name and a real e-mail address) and enter a brokerage relationship with the broker operating the VOW. The 53. broker operating the VOW can then show the visiting customer/client nearly all of the information available to the 54. broker in MLS. The seller(s) of a listing has the right to opt out of certain kinds of data display under the MLS’s VOW 55. policy. The MLS imposes various other rules and restrictions on VOWs. 56. For each of the following options, the MLS system automatically defaults to “Yes.” Seller’s instructions pertaining to 57. the Internet display of the MLS input data for the Property are as follows: 58.Option 1. Listing display on the Internet. If Seller selects “No,” this listing will not be included in MLS data feeds 59. to Internet websites that display property listing data, whether intended for advertising the Property or 60. providing online brokerage services (e.g., VOWs). Brokers participating in MLS can still disclose the listing 61. to customers/clients via other means, including e-mail, fax, mail, hand delivery, and orally. 62. Shall the Property listing be displayed on the Internet, including sold information? Yes No 63. Seller understands and acknowledges that if Seller has selected “No” for Option 1, consumers who 64. conduct searches for listings on the Internet will not see information about the Property in response to 65. their searches. 66.If “No” was selected at Option 1, skip Options 2-4. If “Yes” was selected for Option 1, continue to Option 2. 67.Option 2. Listing address (house and unit numbers and street name) display on the Internet. If Seller selects 68. “No,” the address of the Property will be hidden on web sites receiving data feeds from MLS that result 69. in Internet listing display, whether intended for advertising the Property or providing online brokerage 70. services (e.g., VOWs). Brokers participating in MLS can still disclose the address to customers/clients 71. via other means, including e-mail, fax, mail, hand delivery, and orally. 72. Shall the listing address (house and unit numbers and street name) be displayed 73. on the Internet? Yes No 74.Option 3. An automated valuation of the Property listing or a link to an automated valuation of it may be 75. displayed adjacent to the listing. Some VOWs or IDX sites may provide an automated valuation model 76. (“AVM”) function/service. An AVM uses statistical calculations to estimate the value of a property based 77. upon data from public records, MLS, and other sources, and incorporating certain assumptions. The 78. accuracy of AVMs has sometimes been criticized because they do not take into consideration all relevant 79. factors in valuing a property. Seller, by selecting “No,” may prohibit display of an automated valuation of 80. their listing adjacent to the listing. 81. Shall an automatic valuation of the Property listing or a link to an automated 82. valuation be displayed adjacent to the listing? Yes No 83.Option 4. Comments or reviews of the Property by persons other than the displaying broker may be displayed 84. with or attached as a link to the listing data of the Property. Some VOWs or IDX sites may provide 85. functionality that permits the customers/clients using the VOW or IDX site to enter comments or reviews 86. with the listing or by hyperlink to such comments or reviews. Note that the broker displaying the listing 87. on their VOW or IDX site may add commentary representing their professional judgment regarding the 88. listing’s value, etc. 89. Shall comments or reviews of the Property by persons other than the displaying 90. broker be displayed with or attached as a link to the listing data of the Property? Yes No MN:FSA:S-2 (8/25) 20830 Keokuk Ave Lakeville, Dakota, MN 55044 X X X X Page 96 of 251 FACILITATOR SERVICES AGREEMENT: SELLER 91. Page 3 92. Property located at . 93.LISTED FOR LEASE: The Property IS IS NOT currently listed for lease. If IS, the listing broker is ----------(Check one.)-------- 94. . If IS NOT, Seller MAY MAY NOT list the Property for lease during -----------(Check one.)---------- 95. the term of this Agreement with another broker. 96. Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit Broker and Seller from entering into a listing agreement for the lease of this 97. Property upon terms acceptable to both parties. 98.SELLER’S OBLIGATION: Seller shall notify Broker of relevant information important to the sale of the Property. Seller 99. agrees to provide Broker with necessary disclosures and documents to facilitate this transaction. Seller shall surrender 100. any abstract of title and a copy of any owner’s title insurance policy for this Property, if in Seller’s possession or control, 101. to buyer or buyer’s designated title service provider. Seller shall take all actions necessary to convey marketable title 102. by the date of closing as agreed to in a purchase agreement. Seller shall sign all documents necessary to transfer to 103. buyer marketable title to the Property. Seller has the full legal right to sell the Property. 104. Access to the Property: To facilitate the showing and sale of the Property, Seller authorizes Broker to: 105. 1. access the Property; 106. 2. authorize other brokers and their salespersons, inspectors, appraisers, contractors, and other industry 107. professionals to access the Property at reasonable times and upon reasonable notice; and 108. 3. duplicate keys to facilitate convenient and efficient showings of the Property. 109. Authorizing access means giving Broker permission to allow the above-referenced persons to enter the Property, with or 110. without a licensed salesperson present, disclosing to the other person any security codes necessary to enter the Property, 111. and lending a key to the other person to enter the Property, directly or through a lockbox. Seller agrees to commit no 112. act which might tend to obstruct Broker’s performance here. If the Property is occupied by someone other than Seller, 113. Seller shall comply with Minnesota law and any applicable lease provisions of an existing lease and provide tenant with 114. proper notice in advance of any Property showing. Seller understands that prospective buyers and others authorized to 115. access the Property may record the Property by photograph, video, or other medium while accessing the Property. 116.RECORDING ON THE PROPERTY: Seller understands that MN Statute 626A.02 specifically prohibits the interception 117. of oral communications without the consent of at least one of the two parties to the communication. Seller should seek 118. appropriate legal advice regarding compliance with this statute if Seller intends to utilize technology that may intercept 119. oral communications between persons other than Seller. 120.SELLER CONTENT LICENSE: In the event Seller provides content, including, but not limited to, any photos or videos 121. of the Property (“Seller Content”) to Broker, Seller grants to Broker a nonexclusive, perpetual, worldwide, transferable, 122. royalty free license to sub-license (including through multiple tiers), reproduce, distribute, display, perform, and create 123. derivative works of the Seller Content. Seller represents and warrants that Seller has authority to provide Seller Content 124. and Seller Content does not violate any restrictions regarding use including any third-party intellectual property rights 125. or laws. Seller agrees to execute any further documents that are necessary to effect this license. 126.NOTICE: THE COMPENSATION FOR THE SALE, LEASE, RENTAL, OR MANAGEMENT OF REAL PROPERTY 127. SHALL BE DETERMINED BETWEEN EACH INDIVIDUAL BROKER AND THE BROKER’S CLIENT. 128. BROKER COMMISSIONS ARE NOT SET BY LAW AND ARE FULLY NEGOTIABLE. 129.TOTAL BROKER’S COMPENSATION: 130. Seller agrees to pay Broker a retainer fee of $ at the commencement of this Agreement, 131. which fee shall be kept by Broker whether or not Seller sells the Property. The retainer fee will apply toward satisfaction 132. of any obligation to compensate Broker. 133. Seller shall pay Broker, as Broker’s total compensation, percent (%) of the selling price or 134. $ , whichever is greater, if Seller sells or agrees to sell the Property during the term of this 135. Agreement. 136.If Seller agrees to pay buyer broker’s compensation directly to buyer broker, then Seller’s obligation to pay Broker’s 137. compensation as specified on lines 133–135 shall be reduced by the amount paid up to % or 138. $ of the selling price. 139. Other MN:FSA:S-3 (8/25) 20830 Keokuk Ave Lakeville, Dakota, MN 55044 0.00 0 0 X eXp Commercial Page 97 of 251 FACILITATOR SERVICES AGREEMENT: SELLER 140.Page 4 141. Property located at . 142.COOPERATING BROKER COMPENSATION: Of the total Broker’s compensation, Broker SHALL SHALL NOT offer --------------(Check one.)------------- 143. compensation to cooperating brokers. If SHALL, the compensation to cooperating brokers shall be as follows: 144. % of the selling price or $ , whichever is greater, to cooperating brokers 145. representing buyer. 146. % of the selling price or $ , whichever is greater, to cooperating brokers 147. assisting buyer. 148. Other: 149. 150.If, within days (not to exceed six (6) months) after the expiration of this Agreement, Seller sells or agrees to 151. sell the Property to anyone who: 152. 1. during the term of this Agreement made inquiry of Seller about the Property and Seller did not tell Broker 153.about the inquiry; or 154. 2. during this Agreement made an affirmative showing of interest in the Property by responding to an advertisement, or 155. by contacting Broker or the licensee involved, or was physically shown the Property by Broker and whose name 156. and address is on a written list Broker gives to Seller within 72 hours after the expiration of this Agreement; 157. then Seller shall still pay Broker the compensation noted here, even if Seller sells the Property without Broker’s 158. assistance. Seller understands that Seller does not have to pay Broker’s compensation if Seller signs a valid listing 159. contract or facilitator services agreement for this Property after the expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, under 160.which Seller is obligated to compensate another licensed real estate broker. 161.To secure the payment of Broker’s compensation, Seller hereby assigns to Broker the gross proceeds of the sale of 162.the Property in an amount equal to the compensation due to Broker under this Agreement. 163.ADDITIONAL COSTS: Seller acknowledges that Seller may be required to pay certain closing costs, which may 164.effectively reduce the proceeds from the sale. 165.CLOSING SERVICES: 166.NOTICE: THE REAL ESTATE BROKER, LICENSEE ASSISTING SELLER, OR REAL ESTATE CLOSING AGENT 167. HAS NOT EXPRESSED AND, UNDER APPLICABLE STATE LAW, MAY NOT EXPRESS OPINIONS 168. REGARDING THE LEGAL EFFECT OF THE CLOSING DOCUMENTS OR OF THE CLOSING ITSELF. 169.After a purchase agreement for the Property is signed, arrangements must be made to close the transaction. Seller 170.understands that no one can require Seller to use a particular person in connection with a real estate closing and 171.that Seller may arrange for a qualified closing agent or Seller’s attorney to conduct the closing. 172.Seller’s choice for closing services: (Check one.) 173. Seller directs Broker to arrange for a qualified closing agent to conduct the closing. 174. Seller shall arrange for a qualified closing agent or Seller’s attorney to conduct the closing. 175. (Seller’s Initials) (Seller’s Initials) 176.FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN REAL PROPERTY TAX ACT (“FIRPTA”): Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code 177.provides that a transferee (“Buyer”) of a United States real property interest must be notified in writing and must 178.withhold tax from the transferor (“Seller”) if the transferor (“Seller”) is a foreign person, provided there are no applicable 179.exceptions from FIRPTA withholding. 180.Seller represents and warrants that Seller IS IS NOT a foreign person (i.e., a non-resident alien individual, ------(Check one.)------ 181.foreign corporation, foreign partnership, foreign trust, or foreign estate) for purposes of income taxation. 182.Due to the complexity and potential risks of failing to comply with FIRPTA, Seller should seek appropriate legal and 183.tax advice regarding FIRPTA compliance, as Broker will be unable to confirm whether Seller is a foreign person 184.or whether the withholding requirements of FIRPTA apply. MN:FSA:S-4 (8/25) 20830 Keokuk Ave Lakeville, Dakota, MN 55044 180 X X Buyer/Tenant Broker compensation may be addressed as part of the LOI and/or Purchase AgreementX X Page 98 of 251 FACILITATOR SERVICES AGREEMENT: SELLER 185.Page 5 186. Property located at . 187.WARRANTY: There are warranty programs available for some properties which warrant the performance of certain 188.components of a property, which warranty programs Seller may wish to investigate prior to the sale of the Property. 189.NOTICE: IN THE EVENT A FACILITATOR BROKER OR LICENSEE, WORKING WITH A SELLER, ACCEPTS A 190. SHOWING OF THE PROPERTY BY A BUYER BEING REPRESENTED BY THE SAME FACILITATOR 191. BROKER OR ANY OF ITS LICENSEES, PURSUANT TO A WRITTEN BUYER REPRESENTATION 192. CONTRACT, THEN THE FACILITATOR BROKER OR LICENSEE MUST ACT AS A BUYER’S BROKER. 193. A BUYER’S BROKER MUST ACT IN THE BUYER’S BEST INTEREST. IN THAT CASE, THE SELLER 194. WILL NOT RECEIVE ADVICE AND COUNSEL FROM THE BROKER OR LICENSEE. 195.OTHER POTENTIAL SELLERS: Seller understands that Broker may list other properties during the term of this 196.Agreement. Seller consents to Broker representing such other potential sellers before, during, and after the expiration 197.of this Agreement. 198.PREVIOUS AGENCY RELATIONSHIPS: Broker, or licensee assisting Seller, may have had a previous agency 199.relationship with a potential buyer of Seller’s Property. Seller acknowledges that Seller’s Broker, or licensee assisting 200.Seller, is legally required to keep information regarding the ultimate price and terms the buyer would accept and the 201.motivation for buying confidential, if known. 202.INDEMNIFICATION: Broker will rely on the accuracy of the information Seller provides to Broker. Seller agrees 203.to indemnify and hold harmless Broker from and against any and all claims, liability, damage, or loss arising from any 204.misrepresentation, misstatement, omission of fact, or breach of a promise by Seller. Seller agrees to indemnify and hold 205.harmless Broker from any and all claims or liability related to damage or loss to the Property or its contents, or any 206.injury to persons in connection with the marketing of the Property. Indemnification by Seller shall not apply if the 207.damage, loss, or injury is the result of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the Broker. 208.FAIR HOUSING NOTICE: Seller understands that Seller may not refuse to sell, or discriminate in the terms, conditions, 209.or privileges of sale, to any person due to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status 210.with regard to public assistance, handicap (whether physical or mental), sexual orientation, or family status. Seller 211.understands further that local ordinances may include other protected classes. 212.ADDITIONAL NOTICES AND TERMS: As of this date Seller has not received notices from any municipality, government 213.agency, or unit owners’ association about the Property that Seller has not informed Broker about in writing. Seller 214.agrees to promptly inform Broker, in writing, of any notices of that type that Seller receives during the term of this 215.Agreement. 216.This shall serve as Seller’s written notice granting Broker permission to obtain mortgage information (e.g., mortgage 217.balance, interest rate, payoff, and/or assumption figures, etc.) regarding any existing financing on this Property. A 218.copy of this document shall be as valid as the original. 219.ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement and all addenda and amendments signed by the parties shall constitute the 220.entire agreement between Seller and Broker. Any other written or oral communication between Seller and Broker, 221.including, but not limited to, e-mails, text messages, or other electronic communications are not part of this Agreement. 222.This Agreement can be modified or canceled only in writing signed by Seller and Broker or by operation of law. All 223.monetary sums are deemed to be United States currency for purposes of this Agreement. 224.ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES: The parties agree the electronic signature of any party on any document related to 225.this transaction constitute valid, binding signatures. 226.CONSENT FOR COMMUNICATION: Seller authorizes Broker and its representatives to contact Seller by mail, phone, 227.fax, e-mail, text message or other means of communication during the term of this Agreement and anytime thereafter. MN:FSA:S-5 (8/25) 20830 Keokuk Ave Lakeville, Dakota, MN 55044 Page 99 of 251 FACILITATOR SERVICES AGREEMENT: SELLER 228. Page 6 229. Property located at . 230.OTHER: 231. 232. 233.BROKER SELLER 234.ACCEPTED BY:ACCEPTED BY: (Real Estate Company Name) (Seller’s Signature) 235.By: (Licensee’s Signature) (Seller’s Printed Name) 236. (Licensee’s Printed Name) (Date) 237. (Date) (Marital Status) 238. (Address) (Address) 239. (City/State/Zip) (City/State/Zip) 240. (Phone) (Phone) 241. (E-Mail Address) 242. 243. (E-Mail Address) SELLER ATTESTED BY: (Signature) 244. (Printed Name) 245. (Date) 246. (Marital Status) 247. (Address) 248. (City/State/Zip) 249. (Phone) 250. (E-Mail Address) 251. THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT BETWEEN SELLER AND BROKER. 252.IF YOU DESIRE LEGAL OR TAX ADVICE, CONSULT AN APPROPRIATE PROFESSIONAL. MN:FSA:S-6 (8/25) P:“X: neokuk lve 1akevilleV fiakotaV .g BB:UU Luke M. Hellier, Mayor lhellier@lakevillemn.gov Bonnie Nguyen bonnie@northstarexperts.com eXp Realty 5851 Cedar Lake Road #500 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 612-532-7445 02/04/2026 02/17/2026 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 952-985-4403 n/a 02/17/2026 n/a 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 952-985-4403 Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk tsnider@lakevillemn.gov Page 100 of 251 NorthstarMLS Certification to Withhold Revised June 2023 Certification to Withhold Property Listing from NorthstarMLSÔ If the listing is being withheld from the Multiple Listing Service, this signed form must be uploaded in Add/Edit by the listing office within two business days of the contract start date. Contact the NorthstarMLS Help Desk with any questions at 651-251-5456, 877-251-5455, or help@northstarmls.com Informed Consent: The undersigned as owners of the property at: ___________________________________________________________________________________ Address City Zip have listed it for sale with_______________________________________________________________ Name of MLS Participant (Agent/Broker) (Please Print) Contract Date______________________________ Contract Expiration Date___________________________ County____________________________________ PID#___________________________________________ Property Type: ! Single Family ! Multi-Family ! Farm ! Lots & Land ! Commercial/Mixed Use In 2022, over 87,000 properties sold through the NorthstarMLS database. Withholding your property from the Multiple Listing Service (MLS): · Prevents your property from being exposed to the broadest market of over 22,000 agents and their buyers. · Eliminates the ongoing advertising benefit of having your property available 24/7 to all potential buyers regardless of when they may start looking. · Limits marketing to agents affiliated with your listing broker and limits public advertising of the property. · Keeps your property off public web sites where buyers search for properties. This form acknowledges that the listing agent has fully explained the benefits of placing your property for sale on the MLS. The undersigned are aware that they are entitled to have their property entered on the MLS, and that their property can be withheld from the MLS only at their written request. The undersigned affirm that they have not been induced in any manner by the above-named MLS Participant to withhold their property from the MLS. By signing this form, the undersigned acknowledge having read and understood the foregoing. The undersigned request that the property identified above be withheld from the Multiple Listing Service. Upon sale of this property, the undersigned authorizes the listing broker to disseminate sales information to members of the MLS. Dated Owner signature: Dated Owner signature: The undersigned Participant of the MLS hereby acknowledges that the above owners of property have listed with the undersigned; that they have been advised by the undersigned of the benefits of the MLS; and that the undersigned has not acted in any manner to induce them to withhold their property from the MLS. Dated: By Agent or Broker Signature Office ID # Office Name: Agent ID # Address: Phone: 20830 Keokuk Ave Lakeville, Dakota, MN 55044 Dakota 22-44340-01-033 2/28/2027 Bonnie Nguyen | eXp Realty X 25792 506006217 eXp Realty 5851 Cedar Lake Rd #500, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 612-532-7445 02/04/2026 Page 101 of 251 Copyright 2024 Regional Multiple Listing Service of Minnesota, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 8//24 NorthstarMLS COMMERCIAL / MIXED-USE LISTING INPUT FORM Disclosures By signing the authorization section below, the Seller acknowledges the following disclosures: 1.The Sellers real estate broker (the Broker) is a participant in the Regional Multiple Listing Service of Minnesota, Inc. (RMLS). 2.The Seller has authorized the Broker to give the information on this form about the Sellers property to RMLS. 3.All data submitted to RMLS becomes the sole property of RMLS. 4.RMLS assumes no responsibility or liability to the Seller for errors or omissions on this form or in the RMLS computer system. 5.The Broker is required to promptly provide information to RMLS about any change in status or price of the Sellers listing. 6.If the Sellers property is sold, the Broker must report to RMLS the price and terms of the sale. 7.Neither the Seller nor any prospective buyer of the property can alter the Brokers responsibility to report all such data to RMLS by agreement among them. 8.RMLS shall retain and make available all such data and photographs to all its participants (real estate brokers, appraisers, and affiliated professionals) for an indefinite period. 9.Under no circumstances will RMLS permit data about the Sellers listing to be deleted from RMLSs systems in order to conceal any information, including information that the property was listed for a period of time by another broker or brokers. 10.The Brokers use of RMLSs systems is subject to the duties imposed on the Broker by the rules and regulations of RMLS and by the Code of Ethics of the National Association of REALTORS. 11.At the request of the Broker, unless the field called Advertising Selection is marked NO, RMLS will electronically transmit information about the Sellers property to Internet web sites to aid in marketing the property for sale. 12.At the request of the Broker, unless the field called Display Address is marked NO, RMLS will include the address of the Sellers property in transmissions of data to web sites. Authorization: I have read and understood the disclosures above. I certify that the information contained on this form is accurate to the best of my knowledge. 100 The Listing Contract Starts* 101 and ends at 11:59 P.M. on* 102 Owner (Signature)* 103 Owner (type or print)* 104 Owner (Signature)* 105 Owner (type or print)* 106 Real Estate Company* 107 By (Agent Signature)* 2/28/2027 &LW\RI/DNHYLOOH eXp Realty 02/17/2026 Luke Hellier, Mayor Taylor Snider, Dep. City Clerk Page 102 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Conditional Use Permit - CA Commercial Development Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a conditional use permit to allow a convenience restaurant with a drive-through Overview Representatives of CA Commercial Development have submitted an application for a conditional use permit for a convenience restaurant with a drive-through located in the Heritage Commons PUD. The property is currently platted as Outlot A, Heritage Commons 9th Addition, located north of 202nd Street (CSAH 50), south of Heritage Drive, and east of Idealic Avenue. The project includes a 4,750 square foot building designed for two convenience restaurant tenants, one of which would have a drive-though service window. The property is 1.29 acres in size and is currently an outlot. Final plat approval is required before construction of the building can take place. The subject property is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development, with the underlying zoning of C-3, General Commercial District. Section 11-66-7.E of the Zoning Ordinance allows convenience restaurants with a drive-through service window by conditional use permit. The plans have been reviewed by Community Development Department and Engineering Division staff. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at its regular meeting on December 18, 2025. The applicant was present and there was no public comment. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the request subject to 11 stipulations. Supporting Information 1. Conditional Use Permit Form and FOF 2. Planning Commission Minutes 3. Staff Memos 4. Exhibits Financial Impact: $ Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Diversified Economic Development Report Completed by: Heather Botten, Senior Planner Page 103 of 251 1 (Reserved for Dakota County Recording Information) CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 26-_____ 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Lakeville hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for CA Commercial Development to allow a convenience restaurant with a drive-through for property zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development located north of 202nd Street (CSAH 50), south of Heritage Drive, and east of Idealic Avenue. 2. Property. The permit is for the following described property in the City of Lakeville, Dakota County, Minnesota: Outlot A, Heritage Commons 9th Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. 3. Conditions. This conditional use permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a) Outlot A, Heritage Commons 9th Addition must be platted into a lot and block prior to development of the parcel. b) Implementation of the recommendations listed in the December 4, 2025 planning and engineering reports. c) The site shall be developed according to the plans approved by the City Council. d) Execution of a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement shall be required between the Developer and the City of Lakeville for the maintenance of the stormwater system located on the subject parcel. e) An agreement for shared driveway access shall be established between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Heritage Commons 9th Addition and Lot 1, Block 1, Heritage Commons 8th Addition (Tires Plus) prior to the release of the final plat. f) The hours of operation shall be limited to five o’clock (5:00) A.M. to eleven o’clock (11:00) P.M. Page 104 of 251 2 g) Any rooftop and/or ground-mounted mechanical equipment must be screened per Zoning Ordinance requirements. h) The City Forester has reviewed and approved the landscape plan dated December 11, 2025. Landscaping on site must be installed per the approved plan. Prior to a landscape inspection, an as-built landscape plan must be submitted to the city. i) The Developer must provide a security with the final plat to guarantee installation of the landscaping. j) Exterior lighting shall be down-cast only and shall not glare onto road right-of-way. k) Snow storage shall not occur within required parking spaces. 4. Revocation. The City may revoke the conditional use permit for cause upon determination that the conditional use permit is not in conformance with the conditions of the permit or is in continued violation of the city code or other applicable regulations. 5. Expiration. This conditional use permit shall expire unless the applicant commences the authorized use within one year of the date of this conditional use permit unless an extension is approved by the Zoning Administrator. DATED: February 17, 2026 CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: _____________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor SEAL BY: _____________________________ Taylor Snider, Deput City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 17th day of February, 2026 by Luke M. Hellier, Mayor and by Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Lakeville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Page 105 of 251 3 ____________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CA COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS OF FACT DECISION On December 18, 2025, the Lakeville Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application by CA Commercial Development for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a convenience restaurant with a drive-through service window on property zoned Planned Unit Development. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the conditional use permit application preceded by published and mailed notice. The applicant was present and the Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak. The City Council hereby adopts the following: FINDINGS OF FACT Page 106 of 251 4 1. The subject property is located in Comprehensive Planning District 4, which guides the property for Commercial. 2. The subject site is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development. 3. Legal description of the property is: Outlot A, Heritage Commons 9th Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota 4. Chapter 4 of the City of Lakeville Zoning Ordinance provides that a conditional use permit may not be issued unless certain criteria are satisfied. The criteria and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed convenience restaurant use is consistent with the guided commercial use of the property. b. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The proposed convenience restaurants will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the area. c. The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance and the City Code. Finding: Provided compliance with the stipulations of the conditional use permit and PUD ordinance, the proposed use will conform to all other performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance and the City Code. d. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. Finding: The proposed uses can be accommodated with existing public services and will not over burden the City’s service capacity. e. Traffic generated by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Page 107 of 251 5 Finding: The streets serving this site are adequate to accommodate traffic from the proposed use. 5. The report dated December 4, 2025, prepared by Heather Botten, Senior Planner is incorporated herein. DECISION The City Council approves the conditional use permit in the form attached hereto. DATED: February 17, 2026 CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: ________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor SEAL BY: ________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Page 108 of 251 CITY OF LAKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES RELATING TO ITEM 5.e CA COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT December 18, 2025 Members Present: Chair Christine Zimmer, Vice Chair Scott Einck, Pat Kaluza, John Swaney, Jason Swenson, Mark Traffas, Amanda Tinsley Members Absent: None Staff Present: Kris Jenson, Planning Manager; Tina Goodroad, Community Development Director (via Teams), Heather Botten, Senior Planner; Jon Nelson, Assistant City Engineer; Dawn Erickson, Community Development Recorder 5e. CA Commercial Development – Conditional Use Permit Chair Zimmer opened the public hearing to consider the application of CA Commercial Development for a conditional use permit for a convenience restaurant with a drive-through located in the Heritage Commons. Mark Wilhoite introduced the project. Ms. Botten presented the staff report. Representatives of CA Commercial Development have submitted an application for a conditional use permit for a convenience restaurant with a drive- through located in the Heritage Commons PUD. The property is currently platted as Outlot A, Heritage Commons 9th Addition, located north of 202nd Street (CSAH 50), south of Heritage Drive, and east of Idealic Avenue. The project includes a 4,750 square foot building designed for two convenience restaurant tenants, one of which would have a drive though service window. The property is 1.29 acres in size and is currently an outlot. Final plat approval is required before construction of the building can take place. The subject property is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development, with the underlying zoning of C-3, General Commercial District. Section 11-66-7.E of the Zoning Ordinance allows convenience restaurants with a drive-through service window by conditional use permit. Chair Zimmer opened the hearing to the public for comment. There was no public comment. Motion was made by Traffas, seconded by Swaney to close the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes – unanimous Chair Zimmer asked for comments from the Planning Commission. • Commissioner Swenson expressed his appreciation for the angled parking spaces. Motion was made by Tinsley, seconded by Kaluza to recommend to City Council approval of the conditional use permit for a convenience restaurant with a drive-through located in the Heritage Commons Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Findings of Fact, subject to the following stipulations: Page 109 of 251 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, December 18, 2025 Page 2 1. Outlot A, Heritage Commons 9th Addition must be platted into a lot and block prior to development of the parcel. 2. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the December 4, 2025 engineering report. 3. The site shall be developed according to the plans approved by the City Council. 4. Execution of a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement shall be required between the Developer and the City of Lakeville for the maintenance of the stormwater system located on the subject parcel. 5. An agreement for shared driveway access shall be established between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Heritage Commons 9th Addition and Lot 1, Block 1, Heritage Commons 8th Addition (Tires Plus) prior to the release of the final plat. 6. The hours of operation shall be limited to five o’clock (5:00) A.M. to eleven o’clock (11:00) P.M. 7. Any rooftop and/or ground-mounted mechanical equipment must be screened per Zoning Ordinance requirements. 8. The City Forester has reviewed and approved the landscape plan dated December 11, 2025. Landscaping on site must be installed per the approved plan. Prior to a landscape inspection, an as-built landscape plan must be submitted to the city. 9. The Developer must provide a security with the final plat to guarantee installation of the landscaping. 10. Exterior lighting shall be down-cast only and shall not glare onto road right-of-way. 11. Snow storage shall not occur within required parking spaces. Ayes: Swaney, Swenson, Tinsley, Traffas, Kaluza, Zimmer, Einck Nays: 0 Page 110 of 251 Page 111 of 251 Page 112 of 251 Page 113 of 251 Page 114 of 251 Page 115 of 251 Page 116 of 251 Page 117 of 251 Page 118 of 251 Page 119 of 251 Page 120 of 251 ST ST S S DS G DS DS CS 500 UWMHT ELEV=981.58 WA T WA T WA T WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV DT DT DT ∆∆∆∆ RESTRICTED ACCESS PE R T H E P L A T OF HERITAGE COMMON S ( E X 1 7 ) DRAINAGE & UTILIT Y E A S E M E N T PER THE PLAT OF H E R I T A G E C O M M O N S 8TH ADDITION (EX 1 7 ) ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PER THE PLAT OF HERITAGE COMMONS 8TH ADDITION (EX 17) EXISTING BUILDING 8 0 INV(E)=9 7 3 . 9 8 1 2 " C O N INV(S)=9 7 2 . 2 8 1 8 " P V C INV(W)= 9 7 2 . 4 1 1 8 " P V C INV(W)=9 7 4 . 7 3 1 2 " C O N INV(S)=9 7 3 . 7 6 1 2 " C O N INV(N)=9 7 3 . 6 6 1 8 " C O N RIM=976.86 INV(N)=972.44 18" CON INV(NW)=970.77 48" PVC INV(W)=971.01 18" CON INV(S)=N/A INV(E)=970.71 36" CON STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO S T O STO STO STO STO RIM=976.88 INV(S)=972.63 18" CON RIM=978.18 INV(W)=969.56 48" CON INV(E)=969.60 48 CON INV(S)=N/A STO STO STO STO RIM=979.46 INV(N)=972.71 18" C O N INV(E)=973.14 12" C O N OCS-RIM=977.27 INV(SE)=975.57 12" C O N INV(W)=974.27 12" C O N FES-15" CON IE=974.82 FES-18" CON IE=974.40 RIM=980.01 INV(NE)=975.49 18 " P V C INV(S)=975.46 12" P V C RIM=977.49 INV(E)=971.15 8" CON RIM=979.89 INV(E)=969.89 8" CON INV(W)=969.79 8" CON SANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN BITUMINOUS ROADWAY 980 980 98 0 978 978 97 9 9 7 9 97 9 97 9 97 9 978 980 981 97 9 DO N O T E N T E R DO NOT ENTER UTILITY ROOM APPROX. 6'x13' 9' 21' 18' 12' 18' 9' 21' 21' 9' 5' 18' 21' 9' 21' 9' 5' 5'5' 7' 9' 20' 24'24' 12' 26' R10' R10' R15' R5'R5' R15' R5' R4' R15' R3' R5' R5'R12' 6' 8' 9' R4' 32' R5' R8' R35' R20' R5' R15' R3.00' R3.00' PROPOSED RESTAURANT 4750 SF PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN FFE = 981.2510'x12' DETECTOR PAD 10'x12' DETECTOR PAD 2' 5' 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 9 9 11 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 15 A A A A A A B B B C C G G G G G E F 15 14 3 13 9 13 19 19 19 19 1919 19 H S.1 S.1 S.2 S.4 S.3 S.2 S.2 3636 36 14 14 14 14 14 8 13 13 13 15' REAR PARKING SETBACK 5' SIDE PARKING SETBACK (TYP.) 10' SIDE SETBACK (TYP.) 15' FRONT PARKING SETBACK 30' FRONT BUILDING SETBACK I I I I I OUTDOOR PATIO OUTDOOR PATIO N: \ 0 0 6 9 2 0 7 . 0 0 \ D W G \ C I V I L \ 0 0 6 9 2 0 7 . 0 0 S P 0 1 . D W G 2/10/2026 CA P A N E R A L A K E V I L L E C200 LA K E V I L L E , M N CA P A N E R A LA K E V I L L E SI T E P L A N 56 0 7 8 2/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 6 JO S E P H S C H R A M M 28 0 5 E D W A R D S R D , S U I T E 3 9 0 CI N C I N N A T I , O H 4 5 2 0 9 CA C O M M E R C I A L DE V E L O P M E N T ... 10 / 1 6 / 2 0 2 5 FOR CONSTRUCTION © 2 0 2 5 W e s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 0'20'40'60' 1" = 20' 11 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 5 12 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 5 01 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 6 2/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 6 . CI T Y C O M M E N T S FO R E S T R Y C O M M E N T S CI T Y C O M M E N T S CI T Y C O M M E N T S . 20 ' 4' o r 2' PROJECT NUMBER: 0069207.00 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: DA T E : LI C E N S E N O . I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E OR U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A DU L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S OF T H E S T A T E O F MI N N E S O T A PR E P A R E D F O R : VE R T I C A L S C A L E : HO R I Z O N T A L S C A L E : DR A W N : CH E C K E D : DE S I G N E D : IN I T I A L I S S U E : RE V I S I O N S : we s t w o o d p s . c o m Ph o n e (3 2 0 ) 2 5 3 - 9 4 9 5 19 0 0 M e d i c a l A r t s A v e S , S u i t e 1 0 0 Fa x (3 2 0 ) 3 5 8 - 2 0 0 1 Sa r t e l l , M N 5 6 3 7 7 To l l F r e e (8 0 0 ) 2 7 0 - 9 4 9 5 We s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . 1 B618 CURB AND GUTTER 8 PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 9 PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 10 PRIVATE PARALLEL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 11 CROSS WALK STRIPING 13 TRAFFIC ARROW 14 SIGN INSTALLATION 15 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING 19 PAVEMENT SECTIONS 36 SIGN POST WITH BOLLARD 1 ·EXISTING ZONING:PUD, PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT ·PROPOSED ZONING:PUD W/ CUP (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) ·EXISTING PARCEL DESCRIPTION:OUTLOT A - HERITAGE COMMONS 8TH ADDITION ·PROPOSED PARCEL DESCRIPTION HERITAGE COMMONS 12TH ADDITION ·PROPERTY AREA:56,407 SF (1.29 AC) ·EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:1,873 SF (3.3%) ·PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:42,306 SF (75.00%) ·BUILDING GROSS SIZE:4,750 SF EAST RESTAURANT:2,063 SF WEST RESTAURANT: 2,606 SF UTILITY ROOM:82 SF ·FLOOR-AREA-RATIO(FAR):0.08 ·BUILDING SETBACK PER CODE:30'=FRONT 10'=SIDE 30'=REAR ·PARKING SETBACK:15'=FRONT AND ROW 5'=SIDE 15'=REAR ·90 DEGREE PARKING SPACE/DRIVE AISLE:9' WIDE X 20' LONG, 24' AISLE ·PARKING RATIO REQUIREMENT CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESTAURANT W/ DRIVE-THRU:1 SPACE / 70 SF OF GFA RESTAURANT W/ DRIVE-THRU (4,668 GFA/70)67 SPACES TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED:67 SPACES ·PARKING PROVIDED:67 SITE DETAILS (SI-0XX) SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY 1.BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, MINNESOTA, JUNE 6, 2025. 2.LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 3.REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS. 4.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS. 6.ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 3.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B618 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 9.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 11.SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. GENERAL SITE NOTES PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER LOT LINE CONCRETE PAVEMENT NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS SITE LIGHTING BY OTHERS EXISTING PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TRAFFIC SIGN BOLLARD / POST CONCRETE SIDEWALK TIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTER SITE LEGEND 5 A TRANSITION CURB B FLAT CURB C PAINT 4" WHITE STRIPING D PAINT TRANSITION CURBS YELLOW E MENU BOARD AND ORDER STATION (SEE ARCH PLANS) F OVERHEAD CLEARANCE BAR AND CONCRETE BASE (SEE ARCH PLANS) G MATCH EXISTING CURB H TRASH ENCLOSURE (SEE ARCH PLANS) I SITE LIGHTING (BY OTHERS) SITE KEYNOTESA S.10 S.1 REFERENCE SIZE MnDOT DESIGNATION S.2 S.3 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE DO NOT ENTER BEGIN ONE WAY 12" X 18" 30" X 30" 24" X 30" R7-8M R5-1 R6-6 SIGN LEGEND S.4 ONE WAY (RIGHT)24" X 30"R6-2R Page 121 of 251 T ST ST S S DS G DS DS CS 500 UWMHT ELEV=981.58 WA T WA T WA T WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV DT DT DT ∆∆∆∆ RESTRICTED ACCESS PE R T H E P L A T OF HERITAGE COMMON S ( E X 1 7 ) DRAINAGE & UTILIT Y E A S E M E N T PER THE PLAT OF H E R I T A G E C O M M O N S 8TH ADDITION (EX 1 7 ) ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PER THE PLAT OF HERITAGE COMMONS 8TH ADDITION (EX 17) EXISTING BUILDING 8 0 INV(W)=9 7 4 . 7 3 1 2 " C O N INV(S)=9 7 3 . 7 6 1 2 " C O N INV(N)=9 7 3 . 6 6 1 8 " C O N INV(N)=972.44 18" CON INV(NW)=970.77 48" PVC INV(W)=971.01 18" CON INV(E)=970.71 36" CON STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO S T O STO STO STO STO INV(S)=972.63 18" CON RIM=978.18 INV(W)=969.56 48" CON INV(E)=969.60 48 CON INV(S)=N/A STO STO STO STO RIM=979.46 INV(N)=972.71 18" C O N INV(E)=973.14 12" C O N OCS-RIM=977.27 INV(SE)=975.57 12" C O N INV(W)=974.27 12" C O N FES-15" CON IE=974.82 FES-18" CON IE=974.40 RIM=980.01 INV(NE)=975.49 18 " P V C INV(S)=975.46 12" P V C RIM=977.49 INV(E)=971.15 8" CON RIM=979.89 INV(E)=969.89 8" CON INV(W)=969.79 8" CON SANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN BITUMINOUS ROADWAY 980 980 98 0 978 978 97 9 9 7 9 97 9 97 9 97 9 978 980 981 97 9 DO N O T E N T E R DO NOT ENTER PROPOSED RESTAURANT 4750 SF FFE = 981.25 979.95 979.36 980.17 979.56 979.90 980.17 979.55 979.08 979.80 980.88 981.19 E.O.F. 980.00 978.79 979.70 980.29 LP 979.07 979.85 979.35 980.00 980.15 979.95 980.12 979.54 979.09 980.24 980.75 980.51 B 981.10 F 981.10 980.70 980.60 980.70 B 981.09 F 981.09 980.66 980.24 979.94 979.78 979.91 979.48 B 980.95 F 980.45 980.75 979.93 980.69 979.89 979.31 979.52 980.19 2.98% 1.6 6 % 1.77 % 2. 3 4 % 1.0 5 % 2 . 4 0 % 2.60% 2.4 6 % 2.0 5 % 1.60% 2.48%2 . 0 6 % 1. 7 0 % 2.64% 980.70 980.70 980.70 980.70 B 981.10 F 981.10 980.95 980 981 9 8 0 979.72 979.74 979.29 979.40979.67 980.22 B 980.39 F 980.39 B 980.42 F 980.42 B 979.83 F 979.83 B 979.81 F 979.81 980.33 979.95 980.05 980.04979.63 980.32 981.22 981.16 981.16 980.84 981.07 980.26 980.18 981.22 980.32 980.25 979.85 980.62 979.80 979.94 979.75 979.78 979.74 980.69 979.86 979.74 979.68 979.91 980.63 979.56 979.65 979.72 979.78 979.89 979.86 979.57 979.66 979.72 979.83 980.08 979.79 980.41 B 980.79 F 980.29 980.34 980.66 980.33 980.08 B 981.10 F 981.10 B 981.10 F 981.10 980.86 980.81 980.75 980.75 B 981.22 F 980.72 B 981.19 F 980.69 980.63 981 98 0 B 80.86 F 80.36 B 980.35 F 979.85 B 980.29 F 979.79 979 980 978 980 9 8 0 980 980 980.87 980.94 980.99 981.07 981.16 981.16 981.15 1. 9 0 % 1. 9 1 % 1. 9 1 % 1.71% 981.16 981.05 981.25 1.51% 977.94 978.55 978.98 980.90 979.85980.90 N: \ 0 0 6 9 2 0 7 . 0 0 \ D W G \ C I V I L \ 0 0 6 9 2 0 7 . 0 0 G D 0 1 . D W G 2/10/2026 CA P A N E R A L A K E V I L L E C300 LA K E V I L L E , M N CA P A N E R A LA K E V I L L E GR A D I N G P L A N 56 0 7 8 2/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 6 JO S E P H S C H R A M M 28 0 5 E D W A R D S R D , S U I T E 3 9 0 CI N C I N N A T I , O H 4 5 2 0 9 CA C O M M E R C I A L DE V E L O P M E N T ... 10 / 1 6 / 2 0 2 5 FOR CONSTRUCTION © 2 0 2 5 W e s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 0'20'40'60' 1" = 20' 11 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 5 12 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 5 01 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 6 2/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 6 . CI T Y C O M M E N T S FO R E S T R Y C O M M E N T S CI T Y C O M M E N T S CI T Y C O M M E N T S . 20 ' 4' o r 2' PROJECT NUMBER: 0069207.00 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: DA T E : LI C E N S E N O . I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E OR U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A DU L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S OF T H E S T A T E O F MI N N E S O T A PR E P A R E D F O R : VE R T I C A L S C A L E : HO R I Z O N T A L S C A L E : DR A W N : CH E C K E D : DE S I G N E D : IN I T I A L I S S U E : RE V I S I O N S : we s t w o o d p s . c o m Ph o n e (3 2 0 ) 2 5 3 - 9 4 9 5 19 0 0 M e d i c a l A r t s A v e S , S u i t e 1 0 0 Fa x (3 2 0 ) 3 5 8 - 2 0 0 1 Sa r t e l l , M N 5 6 3 7 7 To l l F r e e (8 0 0 ) 2 7 0 - 9 4 9 5 We s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . PROPERTY LINE 982 980 SB-19 SOIL BORING LOCATION STO STORM SEWER DRAIN TILE EXISTING PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR INTERVAL CONTOUR982 980 SPOT ELEVATION FLOW DIRECTION SB-19 CURB AND GUTTER GRADING LEGEND 1.LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. 2.CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVEMENT, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS. 3.ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 4.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD OR SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 6.ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THIS SHEET. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING AND PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. 8.SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. 9.SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE SITE GRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES. 11.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 12.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, AT MINIMUM, WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING MINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITH FULLY-LOADED TANDEM-AXLE DUMP TRUCK, OR APPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF 2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISION AND DIRECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND RE-COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. 13.EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKING AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 14.EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS OR PARKING AREA, SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F2. 15.ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. GRADING NOTES 0.00% 900.00 900.00 Page 122 of 251 2.98% 1.6 6 % 1.77 % 2. 3 4 % 1.0 5 % 2 . 4 0 % 2.60% 2.4 6 % 2.0 5 % 1.60% 2.48%2 . 0 6 % 1. 7 0 % 2.64% 1. 9 0 % 1. 9 1 % 1. 9 1 % 1.71% 1.51% T ST ST S S DS G DS DS CSWA T WA T WA T WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WAT PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG PUG CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV DT DT DT ∆∆∆ ∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆∆ EXISTING BUILDING STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO S T O STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO SANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN DO N O T E N T E R DO NOT ENTER PROPOSED RESTAURANT 4750 SF FFE = 981.25 2 - SKH 9 - ANJ 10 - BLB 7 - KFG 6 - PCB 3 - BUJ 9 - ANJ 11 - KFG 11 - SDO 3 - KFG 11 - ANJ 12 - KFG 6 - DBH 3 - PDS 2 - BUJ 6 - AFD 4 - PDS 12 - BLB 5 - PDS 11 - BLB 6 - DBH 1 - NPO2 - SKH 1 - NPO 6 - DBH 9 - ANJ 12 - KFG 6 - DBH 4 - AGG 11 - KFG A B A B A B A B A BA C C C C C C C C C A B C A A A B A B A PERENNIALS SDO 11 STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS X 'STELLA DE ORO'#1 CONT.24" O.C.H 18-20" W 18-24" PCB 6 NORTHERN EXPOSURE™ PURPLE CORAL BELL / HEUCHERA X 'TNHEUNEP'#1 CONT.18" O.C.H 15-18" W 18-24" CODE QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING MATURE SIZE DECIDUOUS TREES AGG 4 AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO / GINKGO BILOBA 'AUTUMN GOLD'2.5" CAL. B&B AS SHOWN H 40'-50' W 25'-35' SKH 4 SKYLINE® HONEY LOCUST / GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS 'SKYCOLE'2.5" CAL. B&B AS SHOWN H 40'-50' W 30'-40' NPO 2 NORTHERN PIN OAK / QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS 2.5" CAL. B&B AS SHOWN H 50'-60' W 40'-50' CONIFEROUS SHRUBS ANJ 38 ANDORRA JUNIPER / JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 'ANDORRA'#5 CONT.4`-0" O.C.H 3-4` W 3-4` BUJ 5 BUFFALO JUNIPER / JUNIPERUS SABINA 'BUFFALO'#5 CONT.5`-0" O.C.H 8-10" W 3-5` DECIDUOUS SHRUB AFD 6 ARCTIC FIRE® RED TWIG DOGWOOD / CORNUS SERICEA 'FARROW'#5 CONT.4`-0" O.C.H 3-5` W 3-5` DBH 24 DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE / DIERVILLA LONICERA #5 CONT.3`-0" O.C.H 3-4` W 3-4` GRASSES KFG 57 KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS / CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER'#1 CONT.30" O.C.H 3-4` W 2-3` BLB 33 BLAZE LITTLE BLUESTEM / SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM 'BLAZE'#1 CONT.24" O.C.H 2-3` W 18-24" PDS 12 PRAIRIE DROPSEED / SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS #1 CONT.24" O.C.H 2-3` W 2-3` N: \ 0 0 6 9 2 0 7 . 0 0 \ D W G \ C I V I L \ 0 0 6 9 2 0 7 . 0 0 P L 0 1 . D W G 2/10/2026 CA P A N E R A L A K E V I L L E L100 LA K E V I L L E , M N CA P A N E R A LA K E V I L L E LA N D S C A P E PL A N 2/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 6 28 0 5 E D W A R D S R D , S U I T E 3 9 0 CI N C I N N A T I , O H 4 5 2 0 9 CA C O M M E R C I A L DE V E L O P M E N T ... 10 / 1 6 / 2 0 2 5 44 0 1 8 JE F F W E S T E N D O R F FOR CONSTRUCTION © 2 0 2 5 W e s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 0'20'40'60' 1" = 20' 11 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 5 12 / 1 1 / 2 0 2 5 01 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 6 2/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 6 . CI T Y C O M M E N T S FO R E S T R Y C O M M E N T S CI T Y C O M M E N T S CI T Y C O M M E N T S . 20 ' 4' o r 2' PROJECT NUMBER: 0069207.00 SHEET NUMBER: DATE: DA T E : LI C E N S E N O . I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E OR U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A DU L Y L I C E N S E D L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U N D E R T H E L A W S OF T H E S T A T E O F MI N N E S O T A PR E P A R E D F O R : VE R T I C A L S C A L E : HO R I Z O N T A L S C A L E : DR A W N : CH E C K E D : DE S I G N E D : IN I T I A L I S S U E : RE V I S I O N S : we s t w o o d p s . c o m Ph o n e (3 2 0 ) 2 5 3 - 9 4 9 5 19 0 0 M e d i c a l A r t s A v e S , S u i t e 1 0 0 Fa x (3 2 0 ) 3 5 8 - 2 0 0 1 Sa r t e l l , M N 5 6 3 7 7 To l l F r e e (8 0 0 ) 2 7 0 - 9 4 9 5 We s t w o o d P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , I n c . A BUFF LIMESTONE ROCK MULCH (TYP.) B EDGER (TYP.) C SOD (TYP.) ALANDSCAPE KEYNOTES LANDSCAPE LEGEND SHRUBS OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE PERENNIALS EDGER 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. REMOVE ALL TWINE, BURLAP, AND WIRE BASKET FROM THE TOP HALF OF THE ROOT BALL AND DISPOSE OF OFFSITE. 12.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16.BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 6" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17.TREE PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL TREES WITHIN TURF AREAS. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND NATURAL COLORED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE BUFF LIMESTONE, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18.EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER M/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AND SODDED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22.REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. PLANTING NOTES ABBREVIATIONS: B&B = BALLED AND BURLAPPED CAL. = CALIPER HT. = HEIGHT MIN. =MINIMUM O.C. = ON CENTER QTY .= QUANTITY CONT. = CONTAINER NOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. PLANT SCHEDULE LAST REVISED: 10/23/18SHRUB & PERENNIAL CONTAINER PLANTING LA27-C N.T.S. 2X CONT. DIAMETER SET CONTAINER ROOT SOIL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR MILD COMPACTED SOIL FOR DEPTH TO MATCH FINISH GRADE SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. DEPTH PER CONTAINER SOIL DEPTH BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED PLANTING SOIL OR AS APPROVED EDGING AT PLANTING BEDS, AS SPECIFIED, ADJACENT TO LAWN AREAS MULCH AS SPECIFIED (AND FILTER FABRIC, AS INDICATED) REMOVE CONTAINER, SCARIFY SIDES, AND SET SOIL MASS ON COMPACTED SOIL BASE MOUND, MATCHING SHRUBS NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GRADE LAST REVISED: 10/19/18DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING LA28 N.T.S. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. TREE WRAP MATERIAL FROM GROUNDLINE UPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, AS REQUIRED. PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. 2X BALL DIAMETER GROUND COVER NOTES SOD SOD:10,612 SF (0.24 AC) MULCH ROCK MULCH:2,692 SF (0.06 AC) Page 123 of 251 FIRST FLOOR 0" T.O. PARAPET 1 19' -4" 24 A304 3.15 3.14 T.O. PARAPET 2 17' -8" BR2 3.07 G1 G1 3.11 SF4 3.11 3.02 BR2 3.08 BR3 3.12 PX1 3.02 3.12 A B C.5C D E 8 A301 16 A301 24 A301 10' - 0" T.O. MET. SCREEN 20' -4" 3.36 1 A220 T.O. STOREFRONT 10' -0" T.O. STOREFRONT B 8' -2" 4' - 0" 3.13 B.O.DECK 16' -0" 3.38 3.10BR23.10 BR2 3.01 SF3 BM SF2 EQ EQ EQ BR1 BR1 3.31 3.01 3.11 BR3 BR3 SF2 3.02 9 A231 9 A231 SF3 3 A231 6 A230 11 A601 15 A231 24 A231 18 A230 6 A230 A304 8 3.08 FIRST FLOOR 0" T.O. PARAPET 1 19' -4" T.O. PARAPET 2 17' -8" 1 2 4 8 A300 16 A300 24 A300 3.02 3.08 BR2 G1 3.04 3.11 3.11 3.01 G1 3.31 SF4 3.15 3 T.O. MET. SCREEN 20' -4" 3.36 3.21 3.16 2 A220 T.O. STOREFRONT 10' -0" T.O. STOREFRONT B 8' -2" TYP CORNER DETAILS SF3 BM 5 BR2 3.08 PX1 PX1 3.01 3.02 3.02 3.11 3.11 3.11 SF3 SF3 SF3 3.11 SF3 SF3 G1 3.083.08G1G13.08G13.08 3.04 3.03 3.21 3.37 3.37 24 A230 22 A231 13 A231 SIM 9 A231 9 A231 3 A231 6 A230 11 A601 4 A230 4 A230 2 A231 2 A231 10 A230 10 A230 7 A231 BR3 BR2 BR13.03 3.03 3.19 3.19 BR2 BR3 GENERAL NOTES: A. ALL GLAZING TO BE G1 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. FOR STOREFRONT / WINDOW ELEVATIONS SEE SHEET A611. B. GENERAL COTRACTOR TO PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR EXTERIOR BUILDING SIGNS C. REFER TO SHEET A230 FOR TYPICAL CORNER DETAILS AT THIN BRICK AND NICHIHA SYSTEM - SF4. - ONE SIDED BANNER - MATERIAL: WHITE BANNER WITH GROMMETS - GRAPHICS: DIGITALLY PRINTED - HEIGHT: 3'-11 1/2" - WIDTH: 7'-9 1/2" SPECIFICATIONS:INSTALLATION: BANNERS PROVIDED BY PANERA AND TO BE INSTALLED ON EXTERIOR OF BUILDING BY G.C. PER PANERA PROVIDED HANGING INSTRUCTIONS AND PLACEMENT LOCATION(S). G.C. TO INSTALL AFTER CONSTRUCTION BARRIER SIGN REMOVED -WITHOUT DRIVE THRU GPD GROUP, INC.® 520 So h ain S ree , S i e 2531 Fax 330.572.2101330.572.2100 Akron, OH 44311 54321 C B A D JOB NO. DESIGNER RECORD BID PERMIT DATE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER 11/10/25 --/--/-- --/--/---- --/--/-- 2025383.08 Ba k e r y C a f e # : 6 4 9 2 20 1 7 0 I b e r i a A v e , La k e v i l l e , M N 5 5 0 4 4 EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S - S H E L L A200 JOApprover 1/4" = 1'-0" 24 DT ELEVATION - WEST 1/4" = 1'-0" 22 FRONT ELEVATION - SOUTH KEYED NOTES 3.01 LOCATION OF INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED FLUSH MOUNTED CHANNEL LETTERS AND/OR TRADEMARK SYMBOL; PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY TENANT SIGN VENDOR UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT; SHELL GC TO PROVIDE BLOCKING AND POWER IN WALL FOR SIGN AND PROVIDE ACCESS PANEL ON BACKSIDE OF PARAPET FOR ACCESS AS REQUIRED. (UNDER SEPARATE SIGNAGE PERMIT) 3.02 PRE-FINISHED METAL 2- PIECE SNAP-ON COMPRESSION COPING BY DUROLAST OR SIMILAR | COLOR: CHARCOAL TO MATCH RAL 7043 3.03 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. FIXTURES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY LANDLORD. LANDLORD TO PROVIDE POWER AND J-BOX AT LOCATION PER TENANT DRAWINGS. REFER TO REFLECTED CEILING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3.04 MAIN ENTRANCE/EXIT | REFER TO DOOR ELEVATIONS, SCHEDULES, & DETAILS SHEET FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3.07 DRIVE-THRU WINDOW | MFR: QUIKSERV | MODEL: FM42E | TO BE INSTALLED IN STOREFRONT SURROUND. COLOR TO MATCH STOREFRONT. 3.08 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLAZING. REFER TO SHEET A603 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3.10 CONTROL JOINT WHERE INDICATED, PROVIDE SEALANT TO MATCH ADJACENT MATERIAL. REFER TO DETAILS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3.11 INSTALL PRE-MANUFACTURED ALUMINUM CANOPY W/ TIE RODS WITH FINISHED UNDERSIDE, PROVIDED WITH SHELL CONSTRUCTION. | MANF: API, INC. | COLOR: DARK BRONZE, CANOPY TO INCLUDE LIGHTING, DRAINAGE, CANOPY UNDERSIDE TO HAVE FINISH SF3. 3.12 HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL 'V' SCORE JOINT, REFER TO SECTIONS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3.13 SECURITY CAMERA INSTALLED BY PANERA IT, GC TO PROVIDE ROUGH-IN LOCATION | COORDINATE ROUGH-IN LOCATION(S) AND HEIGHTS WITH PANERA CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3.14 4" DIA. CONCRETE BOLLARD BY LANDLORD | FINISH: PAINT SAFETY YELLOW AT DRIVE THRU | REFER TO SHEET A003 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 3.15 6" DIA. CONCRETE BOLLARD BY LANDLORD | FINISH: PAINT SAFETY YELLOW AT DRIVE THRU, EXCEPT AT DRIVE THRU | REFER TO SHEET A003 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 3.16 FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS BOX | INSTALLED ADJACENT ENTRY DOOR. COORDINATE LOCATION WITH LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT. 3.19 HOSE BIBB | STAINLESS STEEL BOX. REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION AND 18/A231 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3.21 BUILDING ADDRESS SIGN | VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION, AND STYLE WITH LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT 3.31 'DRIVE THRU' SIGN AS PART OF TENANT SIGNAGE BY SIGN VENDOR. SHELL GC TO PROVIDE BLOCKING IN WALL FOR SIGN AND PROVIDE ACCESS PANEL ON BACKSIDE OF PARAPET FOR ACCESS AS REQUIRED 3.36 PREMANUFACTURED RIBBED PANEL ROOF EQUIPMENT SCREENING, MFR: ROOFSCREEN, TYPE: 7.2 RIBBED PANEL COLOR: TO MATCH CHARCOAL OR EQUAL. 3.37 CONTROL JOINT, PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS, MFR: NICHIHA. 3.38 COMPOSITE PLANK SCREEN WALL | MFR: TREX COMPOSITE PLANK | COLOR: SF2 REFER TO SHEET A021 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. BM ALUMINUM BREAK METAL | COLOR TO MATCH STOREFRONT BR1 BRICK MASONRY WALL SYSTEM | MFR: TABS WALL SYSTEM + THIN BRICK, UTILITY STACKED, VERTICAL PATTERN | COLOR: MCNEAR (THIN BRK.) + SANTIAGO CREATIVE MATERIALS CUSTOM BLEND (TABS WALL SYSTEM) BR2 BRICK MASONRY WALL SYSTEM | MFR: TABS WALL SYSTEM + THIN BRICK, UTILITY STACKED, HORIZONTAL PATTERN | COLOR: MCNEAR (THIN BRK.) + SANTIAGO CREATIVE MATERIALS CUSTOM BLEND (TABS WALL SYSTEM) BR3 BRICK MASONRY WALL SYSTEM | MFR: TABS WALL SYSTEM + THIN BRICK, UTILITY STACKED, VERTICAL PATTERN | COLOR: ENDICOTT (THIN BRK.) GOLDEN BUFF G1 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT | MFR: KAWNEER TRIFAB VERRSAGLAZE 451T | COLOR: DARK BRONZE | 2" x 4 1/2" PROFILE | THERMAL BREAK| 1" CLEAR INSULATED GLAZING: PPG SOLARBAN 70 (OR APPROVED EQUAL) | REFER TO SHEET A602 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PX1 EIFS SYSTEM | PRODUCT: DRYVIT OUTSULATION PLUS MD w/ MOISTURE DRAINAGE SYSTEM |TEXTURE: DRYVIT LYMESTONE | PAINTED COLOR: #105 SUEDE SF2 TREX SELECT, EARTH TONES; COLOR: PEBBLE GREY. SF3 TONGUE & GROOVE PLANKS; 6" EXTRUDED ALUMINUM SMOOTH PLANK WITH BEECHWOOD (#15BEE) FINISH, MFR: LONGBOARD SF4 SPECIALTY FINISH: RIBBED FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH 3" CORNER PIECE BY MFR. ALL CORNERS | MFR: NICHIHA | COLOR: PANERA GREEN 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 NEW CONSTRUCTION BANNER X ELEVATION PERCENTAGES WINDOWS: 39% EIFS:8% BRICK:33% GREEN: 16% CANOPY: 5% ELEVATION PERCENTAGES WINDOWS: 9% EIFS:20% BRICK:67% WOOD: 0% GREEN: 2% CANOPY: 2% RE V . D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N TOTAL BUILDING REQUIRED: 3,404 SF (65%) PROVIDED: 3,581 SF (68%) 5,237 SF TOTAL 65% MIN GRADE A MATERIALS REQUIRED (BRICK + GLASS) 12/11/25 Page 124 of 251 GENERAL NOTES: A. ALL GLAZING TO BE G1 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. FOR STOREFRONT / WINDOW ELEVATIONS SEE SHEET A603. B. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR EXTERIOR BUILDING SIGNS C. REFER TO SHEET A230 FOR TYPICAL CORNER DETAILS AT THIN BRICK AND NICHIHA SYSTEM - SF4. FIRST FLOOR 0" FIRST FLOOR 0" T.O. PARAPET 2 17' -8" 124 24 A302 16 A302 BR3 PX1 3.12 3.02 3.06 BR2 3.11 3.01 3.02 3.15 3.12 3.29 3.36 T.O. MET. SCREEN 20' -4" 2 A220 T.O. STOREFRONT 10' -0" 3.13 SF3 5 3.12 3.06 BR3 BR2 BR1 3.31 3.01 3.03 3.03 3.34 PX1 3.11SF2 5 A231 5 A231 EQEQEQEQEQ 3.29 24 A231 24 A230 TYP. CORNER DETAILS BR2 BR1BR1 BR3 3.183.18 3.19 FIRST FLOOR 0" FIRST FLOOR 0" T.O. PARAPET 1 19' -4" T.O. PARAPET 2 17' -8" T.O. PARAPET 2 17' -8" ABCED.5 16 A303 24 A303 3.02 3.11 3.01 T.O. MET. SCREEN 20' -4" 3.36 1 A220 T.O. STOREFRONT 10' -0" T.O. STOREFRONT B 8' -2" B.O.DECK 16' -0" 3.38 24 A230 TYP CORNER DETAILS SF2 SF3 3.01 3.35 BR3 BR3 PX1 BR1 BR2 3.06 BR2 SF2 G1 3.11 PX1 3.03 3.12 3.12 3.12 3.12 EQ EQ EQ EQ 3.08 5 A231 2 A231 24 A231 18 A231 4 A230BR2 BR3 BR1 3.103.10 3.10 GPD GROUP, INC.® 520 So h ain S ree , S i e 2531 Fax 330.572.2101330.572.2100 Akron, OH 44311 54321 C B A D JOB NO. DESIGNER RECORD BID PERMIT DATE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER 11/10/25 --/--/-- --/--/---- --/--/-- 2025383.08 Ba k e r y C a f e # : 6 4 9 2 20 1 7 0 I b e r i a A v e , La k e v i l l e , M N 5 5 0 4 4 EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S - S H E L L A201 JOHB 1/4" = 1'-0" 24 REAR ELEVATION - NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0" 22 SIDE ELEVATION - EAST KEYED NOTES 3.01 LOCATION OF INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED FLUSH MOUNTED CHANNEL LETTERS AND/OR TRADEMARK SYMBOL; PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY TENANT SIGN VENDOR UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT; SHELL GC TO PROVIDE BLOCKING AND POWER IN WALL FOR SIGN AND PROVIDE ACCESS PANEL ON BACKSIDE OF PARAPET FOR ACCESS AS REQUIRED. (UNDER SEPARATE SIGNAGE PERMIT) 3.02 PRE-FINISHED METAL 2- PIECE SNAP-ON COMPRESSION COPING BY DUROLAST OR SIMILAR | COLOR: CHARCOAL TO MATCH RAL 7043 3.03 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. FIXTURES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY LANDLORD. LANDLORD TO PROVIDE POW ER AND J-BOX AT LOCATION PER TENANT DRAWINGS. REFER TO REFLECTED CEILING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3.06 HOLLOW METAL SERVICE DOOR. EXTERIOR PAINT FINISH TO MATCH ADJACENT MATERIAL PX1. REFER TO A603 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3.08 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLAZING. REFER TO SHEET A603 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3.10 CONTROL JOINT WHERE INDICATED, PROVIDE SEALANT TO MATCH ADJACENT MATERIAL. REFER TO DETAILS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3.11 INSTALL PRE-MANUFACTURED ALUMINUM CANOPY W/ TIE RODS WITH FINISHED UNDERSIDE, PROVIDED WITH SHELL CONSTRUCTION. | MANF: API, INC. | COLOR: DARK BRONZE, CANOPY TO INCLUDE LIGHTING, DRAINAGE, CANOPY UNDERSIDE TO HAVE FINISH SF3. 3.12 HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL 'V' SCORE JOINT, REFER TO SECTIONS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3.13 SECURITY CAMERA INSTALLED BY PANERA IT, GC TO PROVIDE ROUGH-IN LOCATION | COORDINATE ROUGH-IN LOCATION(S) AND HEIGHTS WITH PANERA CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3.15 6" DIA. CONCRETE BOLLARD BY LANDLORD | FINISH: PAINT SAFETY YELLOW AT DRIVE THRU, EXCEPT AT DRIVE THRU | REFER TO SHEET A003 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 3.18 NICKEL BRONZE NOZZLE RWL/OVERFLOW DRAIN THRU ROOF, MIN. 12" ABOVE GRADE. SEE DETAIL 23/A231. 3.19 HOSE BIBB | STAINLESS STEEL BOX. REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION AND 18/A231 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3.29 GAS METER AND PIPING, PAINT PIPING TO MATCH BUILDING FACADE. REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3.31 'DRIVE THRU' SIGN AS PART OF TENANT SIGNAGE BY SIGN VENDOR. SHELL GC TO PROVIDE BLOCKING IN WALL FOR SIGN AND PROVIDE ACCESS PANEL ON BACKSIDE OF PARAPET FOR ACCESS AS REQUIRED 3.34 EXTERIOR ROOF ACCESS LADDER TO INCLUDE CAGE, PROVIDED BY LANDLORD. 3.35 GC TO PROVIDE NEW CONSTRUCTION BANNER, REFER TO 4/A200. VERIFY PLACEMENT ON ELEVATION WITH CPM. 3.36 PREMANUFACTURED RIBBED PANEL ROOF EQUIPMENT SCREENING, MFR: ROOFSCREEN, TYPE: 7.2 RIBBED PANEL COLOR: TO MATCH CHARCOAL OR EQUAL. 3.38 COMPOSITE PLANK SCREEN WALL | MFR: TREX COMPOSITE PLANK | COLOR: SF2 REFER TO SHEET A021 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. BR1 BRICK MASONRY WALL SYSTEM | MFR: TABS WALL SYSTEM + THIN BRICK, UTILITY STACKED, VERTICAL PATTERN | COLOR: MCNEAR (THIN BRK.) + SANTIAGO CREATIVE MATERIALS CUSTOM BLEND (TABS WALL SYSTEM) BR2 BRICK MASONRY WALL SYSTEM | MFR: TABS WALL SYSTEM + THIN BRICK, UTILITY STACKED, HORIZONTAL PATTERN | COLOR: MCNEAR (THIN BRK.) + SANTIAGO CREATIVE MATERIALS CUSTOM BLEND (TABS WALL SYSTEM) BR3 BRICK MASONRY WALL SYSTEM | MFR: TABS WALL SYSTEM + THIN BRICK, UTILITY STACKED, VERTICAL PATTERN | COLOR: ENDICOTT (THIN BRK.) GOLDEN BUFF G1 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT | MFR: KAWNEER TRIFAB VERRSAGLAZE 451T | COLOR: DARK BRONZE | 2" x 4 1/2" PROFILE | THERMAL BREAK| 1" CLEAR INSULATED GLAZING: PPG SOLARBAN 70 (OR APPROVED EQUAL) | REFER TO SHEET A602 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PX1 EIFS SYSTEM | PRODUCT: DRYVIT OUTSULATION PLUS MD w/ MOISTURE DRAINAGE SYSTEM |TEXTURE: DRYVIT LYMESTONE | PAINTED COLOR: #105 SUEDE SF2 TREX SELECT, EARTH TONES; COLOR: PEBBLE GREY. SF3 TONGUE & GROOVE PLANKS; 6" EXTRUDED ALUMINUM SMOOTH PLANK WITH BEECHWOOD (#15BEE) FINISH, MFR: LONGBOARD X ELEVATION PERCENTAGES DOORS: 5% EIFS: 37% BRICK: 58% WOOD: 0% GREEN: 0% CANOPY: 0% ELEVATION PERCENTAGES WINDOWS: 7% EIFS:39% BRICK: 52% GREEN: 0% CANOPY: 1% DOORS: 1% RE V . D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N TOTAL BUILDING REQUIRED: 3,404 SF (65%) PROVIDED: 3,581 SF (68%) 5,237 SF TOTAL 65% MIN GRADE A MATERIALS REQUIRED (BRICK + GLASS) 12/11/25 Page 125 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Resolution Approving an Application to the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources for a 2027 Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund Grant Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve Resolution Authorizing an Application to the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR) for a 2027 Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) Grant. Overview The LLCMR makes funding recommendations to the legislature for special environment and nature resources projects, primarily from the Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF). Projects that are awarded funding from the ENRTF help maintain and enhance Minnesota’s environment and natural resources. The 2027 ENRTF Request for Proposal welcomes proposals for projects that aim to protect, conserve, preserve and enhance Minnesota’s air, water, land, fish, wildlife and other natural resources. The requested funding includes three years of salary for a dedicated naturalist at the Ed Mako Environmental Learning Center, as well as an outdoor classroom and a nature play area. Supporting Information 1. Resolution Approving an Application to the LCCMR for a 2027 Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund Grant Financial Impact: $NA Budgeted: No Source: NA Envision Lakeville Community Values: Access to a Multitude of Natural Amenities and Recreational Opportunities Report Completed by: Susan Johnson, Recreation Manager Page 126 of 251 CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO._________ RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION TO THE LEGISLATIVE-CITIZEN COMMISSION ON MINNESOTA RESOURCES FOR A 2027 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND GRANT WHEREAS, The City of Lakeville seeks $723,000 for dedicated naturalist staff at the Ed Mako Environmental Learning Center along with an outdoor classroom and nature play area at Ritter Farm Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the City of Lakeville supports the above referenced project and authorizes the submittal of a proposal for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Lakeville to the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR) in response to the 2027 Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) Request for Proposal; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That, if funding is awarded, the City of Lakeville agrees to accept the award and may enter into an agreement with the state of Minnesota for the above referenced project. The City of Lakeville will comply with all applicable laws, environmental requirements, and regulations and any additional conditions stated in the grant agreement and the approved LCCMR work plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That City of Lakeville understands that grants from the ENRTF are generally paid out on a reimbursement basis. The City of Lakeville has the financial capability to pay for project expenses prior to seeking reimbursement; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That City of Lakeville certifies none of the current principals of the City of Lakeville have been convicted of a felony financial crime in the last ten years. For this purpose, a principal is defined as a public official, a board member, or staff that would have the authority to access or determine the use of ENRTF funds, if awarded; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City of Lakeville Parks & Recreation Director is hereby authorized to execute such agreements and work plans as necessary, and Joe Masiarchin is authorized to implement the project on behalf of the City of Lakeville. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City of Lakeville has the financial capability to meet the match requirements and ensure adequate construction, operation, and maintenance of the project once completed; and PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 17th day of February, 2026. CITY OF LAKEVILLE: _________________________ Luke M Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk Page 127 of 251 Page 128 of 251 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION TO THE LEGISLATIVE-CITIZEN COMMISSION ON MINNESOTA RESOURCES (LCCMR) FOR A 2027 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND (ENRTF) GRANT WHEREAS, The City of Lakeville seeks $723,000 for dedicated naturalist staff at the Ed Mako Environmental Learning Center along with an outdoor classroom and nature play area at Ritter Farm Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the City of Lakeville supports the above referenced project and authorizes the submittal of a proposal for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Lakeville to the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR) in response to the 2027 Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) Request for Proposal; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That, if funding is awarded, the City of Lakeville agrees to accept the award and may enter into an agreement with the state of Minnesota for the above referenced project. The City of Lakeville will comply with all applicable laws, environmental requirements, and regulations and any additional conditions stated in the grant agreement and the approved LCCMR work plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That City of Lakeville understands that grants from the ENRTF are generally paid out on a reimbursement basis. The City of Lakeville has the financial capability to pay for project expenses prior to seeking reimbursement; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That City of Lakeville certifies none of the current principals of the City of Lakeville have been convicted of a felony financial crime in the last ten years. For this purpose, a principal is defined as a public official, a board member, or staff that would have the authority to access or determine the use of ENRTF funds, if awarded; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City of Lakeville Parks & Recreation Director is hereby authorized to execute such agreements and work plans as necessary, and Joe Masiarchin is authorized to implement the project on behalf of the City of Lakeville. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City of Lakeville has the financial capability to meet the match requirements and ensure adequate construction, operation, and maintenance of the project once completed; and PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 17th day of February, 2026. ___________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Page 129 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Short-Term Rental Ordinance Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: move to approve ordinances amending Titles 9 and 11 of the City Code and summary ordinances for publication Overview At the July and December 2025 work sessions, the City Council discussed short-term rentals. The current Zoning ordinance language allows for the renting of rooms by administrative permit within most residential districts. It limits how often a unit may be rented and requires off-street parking but includes no other standards. The City Council directed staff to create a clear and robust short-term ordinance section, similar to the long-term rental program. The Council emphasized occupancy and parking restrictions. The proposed amendment will be added to Title 9: Building Regulations of the City Code, which also includes the rental registration language. Because the new ordinance language will be added to Title 9, the renting of rooms language in the Zoning Ordinance (Title 11) must be deleted. A public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on February 5, 2026, regarding an ordinance amendment to those residential sections to remove renting of rooms. The proposed short-term rental language requires an annual permit from the city and addresses occupancy standards, parking requirements, management requirements, and enforcement language. It also limits a maximum of two short-term rental permits per person/entity. The new short-term ordinance would go into effect immediately and communication would begin in March to inform the public about the changes in order to gain compliance. Supporting Information 1. Lakeville Short-Term Rental Ordinance redline 2. Lakeville Short-Term Rental Ordinance Final 3. Zoning Ord Update to Residential District related to STR redline 4. Summary For Publication Title 9 5. Summary For Publication Title 11 Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Safety Throughout the Community Report Completed by: Tina Goodroad, Community Development Director Page 130 of 251 Page 131 of 251 1 CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKEVILLE CITY CODE REGULATING SHORT-TERM RENTALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE ORDAINS: Section 1. Section Title 9 of the City Code (Building Regulations) is hereby amended to include the following chapter: CHAPTER 10 SHORT-TERM RENTALS 9-10-1: Purpose 9-10-2: Definitions 9-10-3: Application 9-10-4: Permit Required 9-10-5: Procedure 9-10-6: General Provisions 9-10-7: Performance Standards 9-10-8: Suspension and Revocation 9-10-9: Enforcement 9-10-1: PURPOSE: The City of Lakeville is committed to maintaining the quality of life of its residents and has a compelling interest in protecting the character of its residential neighborhoods. The rental of homes for temporary residential occupancy is a commercial activity, and when not properly managed, short-term rentals have the capacity to generate noise, traffic, and trash beyond what is typically present in a residential neighborhood creating a public nuisance. The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that the short-term rental of a permitted dwelling unit is conducted, operated, and maintained so as not to become a nuisance to the surrounding neighborhood, an influence that fosters blight and deterioration, or creates a disincentive to reinvest in the community. 9-10-2: DEFINITIONS: For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and terms are defined as follows: BEDROOM: A habitable room within a dwelling unit which is used, or intended to be used, primarily for the purpose of sleeping, but shall not include any kitchen, dining room, or living room. DWELLING UNIT: A residential building or portion thereof intended for occupancy by one or more persons with facilities for living, sleeping, cooking and eating, but not including hotels, motels, nursing homes, tents, seasonal cabins, boarding or rooming houses, motor homes, or travel trailers. OFF-STREET PARKING SPACE: An area within the permitted short-term rental property or within a building on the short-term rental property intended for the parking of a passenger vehicle. Page 132 of 251 2 OWNER: The fee owner of the building containing a short-term rental unit, as listed on the records of the Dakota County Property and Taxation Services. PRIMARY RESIDENCE: A dwelling unit occupied by the same person or persons for more than six (6) months per calendar year. REMUNERATION: Compensation, money, or other considerations given in return for occupancy, possession, or use of real property. RENT OR RESERVATION FEE: The remuneration charged for the temporary occupancy of a home rental unit. RENTAL MANAGEMENT: A person, enterprise, or agency representing the owner of the short-term rental dwelling or unit to serve as the primary contact for the city. RESIDENTIAL RENTAL: Any building, or one (1) or more portions thereof, occupied or intended to be occupied for residential purposes. SHORT-TERM RENTAL (ACCESSORY USE): A dwelling unit which is the primary residence of a household, in which temporary lodging in all or part of the dwelling unit is offered for remuneration. SHORT-TERM RENTAL (PRINCIPAL USE): A dwelling unit which is not the primary residence of a household, in which temporary lodging in all or part of the dwelling unit is offered for remuneration. TRANSIENT: Any person who, at their own expense or at the expense of another, exercises, or is entitled to, temporary occupancy or temporary possession, by reason of any rental agreement, concession, permit, right of access, or any other type of agreement. ZONING ADMINSTRATOR: The person designated by the City Administrator to be the Zoning Administrator for the City of Lakeville. 9-10-3: APPLICATION: A. This chapter applies to any dwelling unit or portion of a dwelling unit proposed to be used as a residential rental for a period of thirty-one (31) consecutive calendar days or less herein defined as a short-term rental. B. All other residential rental dwelling units other than those defined by section 9-10-3.A of this title shall be subject to the provisions of title 9, chapter 9 of this code. 9-10-4: PERMIT REQUIRED: A. The short-term rental of any dwelling unit, or advertisement of a dwelling unit for short-term rental, shall be prohibited unless a permit authorizing short-term rental has been approved in accordance with this Chapter. Page 133 of 251 3 B. Rental of all or a portion of a dwelling unit as a short-term rental by a homeowner to any transient is allowed as provided by this section following issuance of a short-term rental permit. 9-10-5: PROCEDURE: A. Form. Application for a short-term rental permit shall be filed by the property owner or local management with the Zoning Administrator on forms to be provided by the city and shall include the following information: 1. The name, address, telephone number, and email of the short-term rental property owner and rental management; 2. The name, address, telephone number, and email of the person completing the registration form; 3. The address of the short-term rental property. 4. For short-term rental as an accessory use, the name, address, telephone number, and email of the person using the property as a primary residence, along with proof of occupancy (such as but not limited to proof of homestead tax status or a lease agreement). B. Fee. The application shall be accompanied by a fee as established by city council resolution. The annual fee is non-refundable. C. Zoning Administrator. The Zoning Administrator or their designee shall review the application and related materials and shall determine whether the proposal is in compliance with all applicable evaluation criteria, codes, ordinances, and applicable performance standards set forth in this title and the city code. D. Incomplete Application. In cases where the application is judged to be incomplete, the Zoning Administrator or their designee shall notify the applicant, in writing, of what information must be provided for the application to be deemed complete within fifteen (15) business days of the date of submission. E. Term. Issuance of a short-term rental permit shall authorize use of the property as a short-term rental in accordance with the following schedules: 1. A short-term rental permit issued between January 1 and October 31 of any given calendar year shall expire at midnight on December 31 of that same calendar year. 2. A short-term rental permit issued between November 1 and December 31 of any given calendar year shall authorize use of the property as a short-term rental through December 31 of the following calendar year. Page 134 of 251 4 F. Renewal. The renewal of a short-term rental permit shall be processed in the same manner as the initial application, unless said permit has been suspended or revoked in accordance with section 9-10-8 of this title. G. Number of Permits Limited. No property owner shall be issued more than two (2) short-term rental permits within the city, no more than one (1) of which may be for short-term rental (principal use). H. Permit Transfer. A short-term rental permit is non-transferable and may not be assigned to another person or premises, including, but not limited to, any successor in title to ownership of the short-term rental or upon lease of the short-term rental to a person or persons for a period longer than thirty-one (31) consecutive days. 9-10-6: GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Property Owner Consent: 1. All property owners as identified on Dakota county property records shall agree to operate the property as a short-term rental and must sign the short-term rental permit application. 2. The Zoning Administrator shall be notified of any changes in ownership during the term of a short-term rental permit. B. Certification of Taxes: 1. Prior to approving an application for a short-term rental permit, the property owner shall provide certification to the city that there are no delinquent property taxes, special assessments, interest, or city utility fees due upon the parcel of land to which the interim use permit application relates. 2. The property owner shall pay all federal, state and local taxes, including local lodging tax as required by title 3, chapter 17 of this code during the short-term rental permit term. C. Compliance. The short-term rental property shall be in compliance with all city, county, and state codes, laws, and regulations in order to be eligible for a short-term rental permit including, but not limited to, exterior maintenance of the structure, yard, access, and off-street parking areas. D. Rental Management: 1. Each short-term rental property owner shall appoint rental management upon whom the city may lawfully serve notices pertaining to the administration of this or any other chapter of the city code or state or federal law, service of which shall be as effective as if made upon such residential rental property owner. 2. The short-term property owner may serve as the rental management, provided they reside or maintain a business office within Minnesota. Page 135 of 251 5 3. The designated rental management shall be able to respond to matters regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of the short-term rental or needs or behavior of transient guests of a short-term rental at the property. E. Inspection. Property owner and rental management shall agree that the Zoning Administrator or their designee have permission to access exterior areas of the property when responding to a reported violation of the standards in this section, in order to ascertain if a violation has occurred. 9-10-7: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: The following performance standards shall apply to all short-term rentals: A. Advertising. Listings advertising a property’s availability for rent or reservation fee shall state the assigned city permit number, maximum occupancy permitted, and the maximum number of vehicles that may be legally parked within off-street parking spaces on the property. B. Occupancy: 1. A minimum of one (1) transient of a short-term rental must be an adult eighteen (18) years of age or older. 2. The maximum number of overnight occupants, including permanent occupants of the property if they are present, is limited to two (2) adults per bedroom, plus their dependent children. C. Dwelling Requirements: 1. There shall be a minimum of one (1) bedroom within the short-term rental dwelling unit and all bedrooms must be located within the principal building. 2. There shall be no change in the exterior appearance of principal or accessory buildings, or premises, or any other visible evidence of the conduct of a short-term rental, except that additional off-street parking as required by this chapter may be provided and appropriate signage designating such. D. Off-Street Parking: 1. Use of off-street parking spaces by transient vehicles within the short-term rental property shall be limited to passenger vehicles in accordance with Section 11-19-7.F.3 of this code. 2. All transient vehicles shall be parked within the garage or upon a driveway surface(s) that complies with the design requirements of section 11-19-7.I of this code within the short- term rental property. Page 136 of 251 6 3. Transient vehicle parking accessory to the short-term rental use shall not be parked upon public streets between the hours of 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m and shall not obstruct traffic within the public street, visibility at intersections, or access to fire hydrants, mailboxes, or neighboring properties at any time. E. Waste: 1. The property owner shall maintain a contract for waste collection services as required by section 4-2-2 of this code. 2. An appropriate number of waste containers shall be provided to accommodate the amount of trash and recycling generated by the short-term rental, but not less than one (1) container for mixed municipal solid waste and one (1) container for recyclable waste; 3. Waste shall not be stored outside of approved containers and all waste containers shall be stored within the garage, except on the day of collection. F. Outdoor Use. No special events, loud parties, camping, fireworks, or discharge of firearms is allowed. G. Noise. Noise shall not carry beyond property lines and shall be subject to section 4-1-4 of this code, including reduced noise levels between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. I. Disclosures. The following information shall be posted in a conspicuous location near the home’s front entrance: 1. Phone number(s) contact info for the short-term rental property owner or rental management at which they will be accessible twenty-four (24) hours each day. 2. The Good Neighbor Brochure provided by the city. 9-10-8: SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION: Any short-term rental found to be out of compliance with the general provisions and performance standards of this chapter or any other provision of this code violations shall be subject to permit suspension or revocation. A First Offense. Upon determining a short-term rental property is out of compliance with any provision of this chapter or any city code violations, the permittee shall be ordered by Zoning Administrator to correct the violation and take any/all appropriate actions necessary to prevent further violations. B. Second Offense. Upon determining that a second offense has occurred within three hundred sixty-five (365) days of an initial offense, the permittee shall be ordered by the Zoning Administrator to correct the violation and take any/all appropriate actions necessary to prevent further violations. Page 137 of 251 7 C. Third Offense. Upon determining that a third offense has occurred within one hundred eighty (180) days of the second offense, the permit shall be immediately suspended and directed to the Zoning Administrator or their designee for reinstatement, amendment, or revocation. D. Revocation. The Zoning Administrator may, after a third offense, upon making a finding that the short-term rental property is and continues to be in violation of this title or other provisions of this code, revoke a short-term rental license. E. Reapplication. Revocation of a short-term home rental permit by the city will prohibit the property owner’s ability to reapply for a permit until after three hundred sixty-five (365) calendar days have passed from the date of revocation. F. Appeals: 1. An appeal from an administrative order or suspension by the Zoning Administrator related to a first, second, or third violation offense or a revocation of a rental permit shall be filed by the property owner or local management agreement with the Zoning Administrator within ten (10) days after the making of the order or suspension. 2. The Zoning Administrator shall prepare technical reports when appropriate and shall provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation on the appeal to the city council. 3. City Council Action: a. An appeal of an administrative order or suspension related to a first, second, or third violation or suspension shall be heard by the City Council at its next regular meeting. b. Revocation Appeals: (1) Upon receipt of an appeal application for a revocation, the Zoning Administrator shall notify the short-term rental permit holder, in writing, of the violations triggering the revocation, and the date upon which a public hearing will be held by the city council to consider the appeal. (2) Notice of said hearing shall consist of description of request and property location published in the official newspaper and written notification of said hearing mailed to the short-term rental property owner and all owners of land within five hundred feet (500’) of the boundary of the property in question at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. (3) Failure of a property owner to receive said notice shall not invalidate any such proceedings as set forth within this section. Page 138 of 251 8 (4) The short-term rental property owner or local management shall appear before the city council in order to answer questions concerning the appeal request. (5) Upon receiving the report of the Zoning Administrator and conducting the public hearing, the city council shall make recorded findings of fact and may reinstate the permit, impose any condition it considers necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare or revoke the permit. 4. An appeal stays all proceedings and the furtherance of the action being appealed unless it is certified to the city council, after the notice of appeal is filed, that by reason of facts stated in the certificate a stay would cause imminent peril to life and property. 5. The Zoning Administrator shall serve a copy of the final order of the city council upon the short-term rental property owner by mail. 6. All decisions made by the city regarding an appeal shall be final, except that any aggrieved person shall have the right to appeal within thirty (30) days after delivery of the decision to the appellant, to the District Court in Dakota County. Any person seeking judicial review under this chapter must serve the city and all necessary parties, including any landowners, within the thirty (30) day period defined above. 9-10-9: ENFORCEMENT: A. An owner, operator, tenant, or occupant of any building or property in violation of the provisions of this chapter or any city code violations may be charged and found guilty of a misdemeanor and may be held responsible for the cost of enforcement in addition to penalties. B. The City may exercise any and all remedies at law or in equity to ensure compliance. All unpaid costs, charges, and penalties may be certified to the property for collection with the property taxes. (remainder of page intentionally blank) Page 139 of 251 9 Section 2. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 17th day of February, 2026. CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: ________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST BY: ________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk Page 140 of 251 1 CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKEVILLE CITY CODE REGULATING SHORT-TERM RENTALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE ORDAINS: Section 1. Section Title 9 of the City Code (Building Regulations) is hereby amended to include the following chapter: CHAPTER 10 SHORT-TERM RENTALS 9-10-1: Purpose 9-10-2: Definitions 9-10-3: Application 9-10-4: Permit Required 9-10-5: Procedure 9-10-6: General Provisions 9-10-7: Performance Standards 9-10-8: Suspension and Revocation 9-10-9: Enforcement 9-10-1: PURPOSE: The City of Lakeville is committed to maintaining the quality of life of its residents and has a compelling interest in protecting the character of its residential neighborhoods. The rental of homes for temporary residential occupancy is a commercial activity, and when not properly managed, short-term rentals have the capacity to generate noise, traffic, and trash beyond what is typically present in a residential neighborhood creating a public nuisance. The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that the short-term rental of a permitted dwelling unit is conducted, operated, and maintained so as not to become a nuisance to the surrounding neighborhood, an influence that fosters blight and deterioration, or creates a disincentive to reinvest in the community. 9-10-2: DEFINITIONS: For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and terms are defined as follows: BEDROOM: A habitable room within a dwelling unit which is used, or intended to be used, primarily for the purpose of sleeping, but shall not include any kitchen, dining room, or living room. DWELLING UNIT: A residential building or portion thereof intended for occupancy by one or more persons with facilities for living, sleeping, cooking and eating, but not including hotels, motels, nursing homes, tents, seasonal cabins, boarding or rooming houses, motor homes, or travel trailers. OFF-STREET PARKING SPACE: An area within the permitted short-term rental property or within a building on the short-term rental property intended for the parking of a passenger vehicle. Page 141 of 251 2 OWNER: The fee owner of the building containing a short-term rental unit, as listed on the records of the Dakota County Property and Taxation Services. PRIMARY RESIDENCE: A dwelling unit occupied by the same person or persons for more than six (6) months per calendar year. REMUNERATION: Compensation, money, or other considerations given in return for occupancy, possession, or use of real property. RENT OR RESERVATION FEE: The remuneration charged for the temporary occupancy of a home rental unit. RENTAL MANAGEMENT: A person, enterprise, or agency representing the owner of the short-term rental dwelling or unit to serve as the primary contact for the city. RESIDENTIAL RENTAL: Any building, or one (1) or more portions thereof, occupied or intended to be occupied for residential purposes. SHORT-TERM RENTAL (ACCESSORY USE): A dwelling unit which is the primary residence of a household, in which temporary lodging in all or part of the dwelling unit is offered for remuneration. SHORT-TERM RENTAL (PRINCIPAL USE): A dwelling unit which is not the primary residence of a household, in which temporary lodging in all or part of the dwelling unit is offered for remuneration. TRANSIENT: Any person who, at their own expense or at the expense of another, exercises, or is entitled to, temporary occupancy or temporary possession, by reason of any rental agreement, concession, permit, right of access, or any other type of agreement. ZONING ADMINSTRATOR: The person designated by the City Administrator to be the Zoning Administrator for the City of Lakeville. 9-10-3: APPLICATION: A. This chapter applies to any dwelling unit or portion of a dwelling unit proposed to be used as a residential rental for a period of thirty-one (31) consecutive calendar days or less herein defined as a short-term rental. B. All other residential rental dwelling units other than those defined by section 9-10-3.A of this title shall be subject to the provisions of title 9, chapter 9 of this code. 9-10-4: PERMIT REQUIRED: A. The short-term rental of any dwelling unit, or advertisement of a dwelling unit for short-term rental, shall be prohibited unless a permit authorizing short-term rental has been approved in accordance with this Chapter. Page 142 of 251 3 B. Rental of all or a portion of a dwelling unit as a short-term rental by a homeowner to any transient is allowed as provided by this section following issuance of a short-term rental permit. 9-10-5: PROCEDURE: A. Form. Application for a short-term rental permit shall be filed by the property owner or local management with the Zoning Administrator on forms to be provided by the city and shall include the following information: 1. The name, address, telephone number, and email of the short-term rental property owner and rental management; 2. The name, address, telephone number, and email of the person completing the registration form; 3. The address of the short-term rental property. 4. For short-term rental as an accessory use, the name, address, telephone number, and email of the person using the property as a primary residence, along with proof of occupancy (such as but not limited to proof of homestead tax status or a lease agreement). B. Fee. The application shall be accompanied by a fee as established by city council resolution. The annual fee is non-refundable. C. Zoning Administrator. The Zoning Administrator or their designee shall review the application and related materials and shall determine whether the proposal is in compliance with all applicable evaluation criteria, codes, ordinances, and applicable performance standards set forth in this title and the city code. D. Incomplete Application. In cases where the application is judged to be incomplete, the Zoning Administrator or their designee shall notify the applicant, in writing, of what information must be provided for the application to be deemed complete within fifteen (15) business days of the date of submission. E. Term. Issuance of a short-term rental permit shall authorize use of the property as a short-term rental in accordance with the following schedules: 1. A short-term rental permit issued between January 1 and October 31 of any given calendar year shall expire at midnight on December 31 of that same calendar year. 2. A short-term rental permit issued between November 1 and December 31 of any given calendar year shall authorize use of the property as a short-term rental through December 31 of the following calendar year. Page 143 of 251 4 F. Renewal. The renewal of a short-term rental permit shall be processed in the same manner as the initial application, unless said permit has been suspended or revoked in accordance with section 9-10-8 of this title. G. Number of Permits Limited. No property owner shall be issued more than two (2) short-term rental permits within the city, no more than one (1) of which may be for short-term rental (principal use). H. Permit Transfer. A short-term rental permit is non-transferable and may not be assigned to another person or premises, including, but not limited to, any successor in title to ownership of the short-term rental or upon lease of the short-term rental to a person or persons for a period longer than thirty-one (31) consecutive days. 9-10-6: GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Property Owner Consent: 1. All property owners as identified on Dakota county property records shall agree to operate the property as a short-term rental and must sign the short-term rental permit application. 2. The Zoning Administrator shall be notified of any changes in ownership during the term of a short-term rental permit. B. Certification of Taxes: 1. Prior to approving an application for a short-term rental permit, the property owner shall provide certification to the city that there are no delinquent property taxes, special assessments, interest, or city utility fees due upon the parcel of land to which the interim use permit application relates. 2. The property owner shall pay all federal, state and local taxes, including local lodging tax as required by title 3, chapter 17 of this code during the short-term rental permit term. C. Compliance. The short-term rental property shall be in compliance with all city, county, and state codes, laws, and regulations in order to be eligible for a short-term rental permit including, but not limited to, exterior maintenance of the structure, yard, access, and off-street parking areas. D. Rental Management: 1. Each short-term rental property owner shall appoint rental management upon whom the city may lawfully serve notices pertaining to the administration of this or any other chapter of the city code or state or federal law, service of which shall be as effective as if made upon such residential rental property owner. 2. The short-term property owner may serve as the rental management, provided they reside or maintain a business office within Minnesota. Page 144 of 251 5 3. The designated rental management shall be able to respond to matters regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of the short-term rental or needs or behavior of transient guests of a short-term rental at the property. E. Inspection. Property owner and rental management shall agree that the Zoning Administrator or their designee have permission to access exterior areas of the property when responding to a reported violation of the standards in this section, in order to ascertain if a violation has occurred. 9-10-7: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: The following performance standards shall apply to all short-term rentals: A. Advertising. Listings advertising a property’s availability for rent or reservation fee shall state the assigned city permit number, maximum occupancy permitted, and the maximum number of vehicles that may be legally parked within off-street parking spaces on the property. B. Occupancy: 1. A minimum of one (1) transient of a short-term rental must be an adult eighteen (18) years of age or older. 2. The maximum number of overnight occupants, including permanent occupants of the property if they are present, is limited to two (2) adults per bedroom, plus their dependent children. C. Dwelling Requirements: 1. There shall be a minimum of one (1) bedroom within the short-term rental dwelling unit and all bedrooms must be located within the principal building. 2. There shall be no change in the exterior appearance of principal or accessory buildings, or premises, or any other visible evidence of the conduct of a short-term rental, except that additional off-street parking as required by this chapter may be provided and appropriate signage designating such. D. Off-Street Parking: 1. Use of off-street parking spaces by transient vehicles within the short-term rental property shall be limited to passenger vehicles in accordance with Section 11-19-7.F.3 of this code. 2. All transient vehicles shall be parked within the garage or upon a driveway surface(s) that complies with the design requirements of section 11-19-7.I of this code within the short- term rental property. Page 145 of 251 6 3. Transient vehicle parking accessory to the short-term rental use shall not be parked upon public streets between the hours of 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m and shall not obstruct traffic within the public street, visibility at intersections, or access to fire hydrants, mailboxes, or neighboring properties at any time. E. Waste: 1. The property owner shall maintain a contract for waste collection services as required by section 4-2-2 of this code. 2. An appropriate number of waste containers shall be provided to accommodate the amount of trash and recycling generated by the short-term rental, but not less than one (1) container for mixed municipal solid waste and one (1) container for recyclable waste; 3. Waste shall not be stored outside of approved containers and all waste containers shall be stored within the garage, except on the day of collection. F. Outdoor Use. No special events, loud parties, camping, fireworks, or discharge of firearms is allowed. G. Noise. Noise shall not carry beyond property lines and shall be subject to section 4-1-4 of this code, including reduced noise levels between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. I. Disclosures. The following information shall be posted in a conspicuous location near the home’s front entrance: 1. Phone number(s) contact info for the short-term rental property owner or rental management at which they will be accessible twenty-four (24) hours each day. 2. The Good Neighbor Brochure provided by the city. 9-10-8: SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION: Any short-term rental found to be out of compliance with the general provisions and performance standards of this chapter or any other provision of this code violations shall be subject to permit suspension or revocation. A First Offense. Upon determining a short-term rental property is out of compliance with any provision of this chapter or any city code violations, the permittee shall be ordered by Zoning Administrator to correct the violation and take any/all appropriate actions necessary to prevent further violations. B. Second Offense. Upon determining that a second offense has occurred within three hundred sixty-five (365) days of an initial offense, the permittee shall be ordered by the Zoning Administrator to correct the violation and take any/all appropriate actions necessary to prevent further violations. Page 146 of 251 7 C. Third Offense. Upon determining that a third offense has occurred within one hundred eighty (180) days of the second offense, the permit shall be immediately suspended and directed to the Zoning Administrator or their designee for reinstatement, amendment, or revocation. D. Revocation. The Zoning Administrator may, after a third offense, upon making a finding that the short-term rental property is and continues to be in violation of this title or other provisions of this code, revoke a short-term rental license. E. Reapplication. Revocation of a short-term home rental permit by the city will prohibit the property owner’s ability to reapply for a permit until after three hundred sixty-five (365) calendar days have passed from the date of revocation. F. Appeals: 1. An appeal from an administrative order or suspension by the Zoning Administrator related to a first, second, or third violation offense or a revocation of a rental permit shall be filed by the property owner or local management agreement with the Zoning Administrator within ten (10) days after the making of the order or suspension. 2. The Zoning Administrator shall prepare technical reports when appropriate and shall provide general assistance in preparing a recommendation on the appeal to the city council. 3. City Council Action: a. An appeal of an administrative order or suspension related to a first, second, or third violation or suspension shall be heard by the City Council at its next regular meeting. b. Revocation Appeals: (1) Upon receipt of an appeal application for a revocation, the Zoning Administrator shall notify the short-term rental permit holder, in writing, of the violations triggering the revocation, and the date upon which a public hearing will be held by the city council to consider the appeal. (2) Notice of said hearing shall consist of description of request and property location published in the official newspaper and written notification of said hearing mailed to the short-term rental property owner and all owners of land within five hundred feet (500’) of the boundary of the property in question at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. (3) Failure of a property owner to receive said notice shall not invalidate any such proceedings as set forth within this section. Page 147 of 251 8 (4) The short-term rental property owner or local management shall appear before the city council in order to answer questions concerning the appeal request. (5) Upon receiving the report of the Zoning Administrator and conducting the public hearing, the city council shall make recorded findings of fact and may reinstate the permit, impose any condition it considers necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare or revoke the permit. 4. An appeal stays all proceedings and the furtherance of the action being appealed unless it is certified to the city council, after the notice of appeal is filed, that by reason of facts stated in the certificate a stay would cause imminent peril to life and property. 5. The Zoning Administrator shall serve a copy of the final order of the city council upon the short-term rental property owner by mail. 6. All decisions made by the city regarding an appeal shall be final, except that any aggrieved person shall have the right to appeal within thirty (30) days after delivery of the decision to the appellant, to the District Court in Dakota County. Any person seeking judicial review under this chapter must serve the city and all necessary parties, including any landowners, within the thirty (30) day period defined above. 9-10-9: ENFORCEMENT: A. An owner, operator, tenant, or occupant of any building or property in violation of the provisions of this chapter or any city code violations may be charged and found guilty of a misdemeanor and may be held responsible for the cost of enforcement in addition to penalties. B. The City may exercise any and all remedies at law or in equity to ensure compliance. All unpaid costs, charges, and penalties may be certified to the property for collection with the property taxes. (remainder of page intentionally blank) Page 148 of 251 9 Section 2. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 17th day of February, 2026. CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: ________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST BY: ________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Page 149 of 251 CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE LAKEVILLE CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 11-46-13.E the City Code (Zoning Ordinance – AP District; Uses by Administrative Permit) is hereby repealed it its entirety with subsequent sections renumbered accordingly: E. Renting of rooms within an owner occupied dwelling unit to not more than two (2) individuals who are each unrelated to the principal family as an accessory use provided that: 1. The property owner shall not enter into a rental agreement with more than two (2) individuals within a thirty (30) day period. 2. There shall be one off street parking stall provided for each rental occupant on the property in addition to the parking stalls required by chapter 19 of this title. Section 2. Section 11-47-11.E the City Code (Zoning Ordinance – RA District; Uses by Administrative Permit) is hereby repealed it its entirety with subsequent sections renumbered accordingly: E. Renting of rooms within an owner occupied dwelling unit to not more than two (2) individuals who are each unrelated to the principal family as an accessory use provided that: 1. The property owner shall not enter into a rental agreement with more than two (2) individuals within a thirty (30) day period. 2. There shall be one off street parking stall provided for each rental occupant on the property in addition to the parking stalls required by chapter 19 of this title. Section 3. Section 11-50-11.G the City Code (Zoning Ordinance – RS-1 District; Uses by Administrative Permit) is hereby repealed it its entirety with subsequent sections renumbered accordingly: G. Renting of rooms within an owner occupied dwelling unit to not more than two (2) individuals who are each unrelated to the principal family as an accessory use provided that: Page 150 of 251 1. The property owner shall not enter into a rental agreement with more than two (2) individuals within a thirty (30) day period. 2. There shall be one off street parking stall provided for each rental occupant on the property in addition to the parking stalls required by chapter 19 of this title. Section 4. Section 11-51-11.G the City Code (Zoning Ordinance – RS-2 District; Uses by Administrative Permit) is hereby repealed it its entirety with subsequent sections renumbered accordingly: G. Renting of rooms within an owner occupied dwelling unit to not more than two (2) individuals who are each unrelated to the principal family as an accessory use provided that: 1. The property owner shall not enter into a rental agreement with more than two (2) individuals within a thirty (30) day period. 2. There shall be one off street parking stall provided for each rental occupant on the property in addition to the parking stalls required by chapter 19 of this title. Section 5. Section 11-52-11.G the City Code (Zoning Ordinance – RS-3 District; Uses by Administrative Permit) is hereby repealed it its entirety with subsequent sections renumbered accordingly: G. Renting of rooms within an owner occupied dwelling unit to not more than two (2) individuals who are each unrelated to the principal family as an accessory use provided that: 1. The property owner shall not enter into a rental agreement with more than two (2) individuals within a thirty (30) day period. 2. There shall be one off street parking stall provided for each rental occupant on the property in addition to the parking stalls required by chapter 19 of this title. Section 6. Section 11-53-11.G the City Code (Zoning Ordinance – RS-4 District; Uses by Administrative Permit) is hereby repealed it its entirety with subsequent sections renumbered accordingly: G. Renting of rooms within an owner occupied dwelling unit to not more than two (2) individuals who are each unrelated to the principal family as an accessory use provided that: 1. The property owner shall not enter into a rental agreement with more than two (2) individuals within a thirty (30) day period. Page 151 of 251 2. There shall be one off street parking stall provided for each rental occupant on the property in addition to the parking stalls required by chapter 19 of this title. Section 7. Section 11-54-11.F the City Code (Zoning Ordinance – RS-CBD District; Uses by Administrative Permit) is hereby repealed it its entirety with subsequent sections renumbered accordingly: F. Renting of rooms within an owner occupied dwelling unit to not more than two (2) individuals who are each unrelated to the principal family as an accessory use provided that: 1. The property owner shall not enter into a rental agreement with more than two (2) individuals within a thirty (30) day period. 2. There shall be one off street parking stall provided for each rental occupant on the property in addition to the parking stalls required by chapter 19 of this title. Section 8. Section 11-55-11.F the City Code (Zoning Ordinance – RSMH District; Uses by Administrative Permit) is hereby repealed it its entirety with subsequent sections renumbered accordingly: F. Renting of rooms within an owner occupied single-family dwelling to not more than two (2) individuals who are each unrelated to the principal family as an accessory use provided that: 1. The property owner shall not enter into a rental agreement with more than two (2) individuals within a thirty (30) day period. 2. There shall be one off street parking stall provided for each rental occupant on the property in addition to the parking stalls required by chapter 19 of this title. Section 9. Section 11-56-11.G the City Code (Zoning Ordinance – RST-1 District; Uses by Administrative Permit) is hereby repealed it its entirety with subsequent sections renumbered accordingly: G. Renting of rooms within an owner occupied dwelling unit to not more than two (2) individuals who are each unrelated to the principal family as an accessory use provided that: 1. The property owner shall not enter into a rental agreement with more than two (2) individuals within a thirty (30) day period. 2. There shall be one off street parking stall provided for each rental occupant on the property in addition to the parking stalls required by chapter 19 of this title. Page 152 of 251 Section 10. Section 11-57-11.G the City Code (Zoning Ordinance – RST-2 District; Uses by Administrative Permit) is hereby repealed it its entirety with subsequent sections renumbered accordingly: G. Renting of rooms within an owner occupied dwelling unit to not more than two (2) individuals who are each unrelated to the principal family as an accessory use provided that: 1. The property owner shall not enter into a rental agreement with more than two (2) individuals within a thirty (30) day period. 2. There shall be one off street parking stall provided for each rental occupant on the property in addition to the parking stalls required by chapter 19 of this title. Section 11. Section 11-58-13.G the City Code (Zoning Ordinance – RM-1 District; Uses by Administrative Permit) is hereby repealed it its entirety with subsequent sections renumbered accordingly: G. Renting of rooms within an owner occupied single-family dwelling to not more than two (2) individuals who are each unrelated to the principal family as an accessory use provided that: 1. The property owner shall not enter into a rental agreement with more than two (2) individuals within a thirty (30) day period. 2. There shall be one off street parking stall provided for each rental occupant on the property in addition to the parking stalls required by chapter 19 of this title. Section 12. Section 11-59-13.G the City Code (Zoning Ordinance – RM-2 District; Uses by Administrative Permit) is hereby repealed it its entirety with subsequent sections renumbered accordingly: G. Renting of rooms within an owner occupied single-family dwelling to not more than two (2) individuals who are each unrelated to the principal family as an accessory use provided that: 1. The property owner shall not enter into a rental agreement with more than two (2) individuals within a thirty (30) day period. 2. There shall be one off street parking stall provided for each rental occupant on the property in addition to the parking stalls required by chapter 19 of this title. Section 13. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. Page 153 of 251 ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 17th day of February, 2026. CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: ________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST BY: ________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk Page 154 of 251 SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE LAKEVILLE CITY CODE This ordinance amends Title 9 of the Lakeville City Code. An amendment has been made to add chapter 10. Title 9, Chapter 10 (Short-Term Rentals) A printed copy of the entire ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. Approved for publication by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, Minnesota this 17th day of February, 2026. CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: ________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Page 155 of 251 SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 11 OF THE LAKEVILLE CITY CODE This ordinance amends Title 11 of the Lakeville City Code. An amendment has been made to the following chapters of the Lakeville City Code: Title 11 (Zoning) 11-46-13: AP, Agriculture Preserve District 11-47-11: RA, Rural/Agriculture District 11-50-11: RS-1, Single- Family Residential District 11-51-11: RS-2, Single-Family Residential District 11-52-11: RS-3, Single-Family Residential District 11-53-11: RS-4, Single-Family Residential District 11-54-11: RS-CBD, Single-Family Residential Central Business District 11-55-11: RSMH, Single-Family Residential Manufactured Home Park District 11-56-11: RST-1, Single and Two-Family Residential District 11-57-11: RST-2, Single and Two-Family Residential District 11-58-11: RM-1, Medium Density Residential District 11-59-11: RM-2, Medium Density Residential District A printed copy of the entire ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. Approved for publication by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, Minnesota this 17th day of February, 2026. CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: ________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Page 156 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 2026 Fee Schedule Amendment Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a resolution amending the 2026 fee schedule to include short-term rental application fees. Overview Upon adoption of the short-term rental ordinance, updates to the 2026 fee schedule are necessary to include the annual and renewal fees. A resolution has been prepared to amend the fee schedule to add short-term rental fees, including the initial application fee of $100 and annual renewal of $50. Supporting Information 1. Resolution Amending the 2026 Fee Schedule - Short Term Rental Fees Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Safety Throughout the Community Report Completed by: Tina Goodroad, Community Development Director Page 157 of 251 CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO._________ RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 2026 FEE SCHEDULE TO INCLUDE SHORT-TERM RENTAL APPLICATION FEES WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville has adopted Ordinance No._ regulating short-term rentals; and WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville desires to incorporate short-term rental application fees into the 2026 Fee Schedule to recover administrative costs and ensure safe and lawful operations; and WHEREAS, all short-term applications shall be administratively reviewed and approved by City staff; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, Minnesota, that the 2026 Fee Schedule is hereby amended to include the following short-term application fees, effective immediately: Short-Term Rental Registration Fees: Initial Application $100 Applies to first-time short-term rental application with the City Annual Renewal $50 Annual renewal for continued operation BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff is authorized to administer the collection and processing of these fees in accordance with applicable state and local regulations. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 17th day of February 2026. CITY OF LAKEVILLE: _________________________ Luke M Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy Clerk Page 158 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Public Hearing for Vacation of Right-of -Way from the Deer Park Plat and Dedication of Easements Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a resolution vacating right-of-way from the Deer Park Plat and dedication easements. Overview The property owner at 16535 Laigle Avenue has requested the City vacate the perimeter right- of-way surrounding the property. This action requires a public hearing to consider the vacation of the right-of-way. The Deer Park Plat was recorded in 1887 and the City does not have any public infrastructure within the plat. The City has no current or future need for this right-of-way and finds the request acceptable. In conjunction with the proposed vacation, staff has worked with the property owner to dedicate road easements along Laigle Avenue. Currently, Laigle Avenue does not have a formal road easement over much of the area where the roadway was constructed. Supporting Information 1. Resolution Vacating Rights-of-Way Financial Impact: $ NA Budgeted: No Source: NA Envision Lakeville Community Values: Design that connects the Community Report Completed by: Paul Oehme, Public Works Director Page 159 of 251 1 237781v2 (Reserved for recording) CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. 26- RESOLUTION VACATING DEDICATED RIGHTS-OF-WAY WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.851, after two (2) weeks published notice of the hearing and after mailing written notice of the hearing at least ten (10) days before the hearing to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation, the Lakeville City Council has conducted a hearing to consider the vacation of the dedicated rights-of-way of legally described on the attached Exhibit “A” and depicted in Exhibit “B” (the “Easements”); and WHEREAS, following the hearing and consideration of the proposed vacation of the Easements the City Council has determined the Easements are not needed for public purposes, provided that the easements attached hereto as Exhibits “C”, “D” and “E” are granted to the City and recorded simultaneously with this Resolution (“Additional Easements”). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville: 1. The Easements legally described on the attached Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B are hereby vacated subject to the Additional Easements being granted to the City and recorded simultaneously with this Resolution. 2. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas lines, sanitary and storm sewer lines, water pipes, mains, hydrants, and natural drainage areas thereon or thereunder, to continue to maintain the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereof. 3. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Dakota County Recorder subject to the condition identified in Section 1 of this Resolution. Page 160 of 251 2 237781v2 ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 17th day of February, 2026. CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: _______________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) ( COUNTY OF DAKOTA) I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 26-___ is a true and correct copy of the resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lakeville at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 17th day of February, 2026 as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. ________________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk (seal) DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 Page 161 of 251 3 237781v2 EXHIBIT A EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED That part of Pearl Street, as delineated and dedicated, in Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying northerly of the centerline of Walnut Street, as delineated and dedicated, in said Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, and its easterly extension; and lying southerly of the westerly extension of the southerly right-of-way line of Laigle Avenue, as delineated and dedicated, in SWAN ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, all in Dakota County, Minnesota. AND The North Half of Walnut Street, as delineated and dedicated, in Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying easterly of the centerline of Central Street, as delineated and dedicated, in said Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, and its southerly extension; and lying westerly of the easterly right-of-way line of Pearl Street, as delineated and dedicated, in said Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, and its extension across said Walnut Street, all in Dakota County, Minnesota. AND The East Half of Central Street, as delineated and dedicated, in Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying northerly of the centerline of Walnut Street, as delineated and dedicated, in said Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, and its westerly extension; and lying southerly of the northerly right-of-way line of Vine Street, as delineated and dedicated, in said Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, and its extensions across said Central Street, all in Dakota County, Minnesota. AND That part of Vine Street, as delineated and dedicated, in Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying easterly of the centerline of Central Street, as delineated and dedicated, in said Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, and its northerly extension; and lying westerly of the following described line and its extensions: Commencing at the northeast corner of Government Lot 3 in Section 2, Township 114 North, Range 21 West of the 5th Principal Meridian; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 59 minutes 01 second West along the north line of said Government Lot 3, a distance of 47.24 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described, thence South 07 degrees 32 minutes 31 seconds East, a distance of 30.26 feet to a point on the north line of Lot 1, Block 1, said Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, distant 13.00 feet westerly of, as measured at a right angle, the east line of said Lot 1, and said line there terminating. All in Dakota County, Minnesota. Page 162 of 251 4 237781v2 EXHIBIT B Page 163 of 251 5 237781v2 EXHIBIT C GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES DARREN B. SCHMITT AND ELIZABETH M. SCHMITT, married to each other, as joint tenants, hereinafter referred to as "Grantors", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant unto the CITY OF LAKEVILLE, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns, forever, a permanent easement for public roadway and drainage and utility purposes over, on, across, under and through the land situated in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, legally described on the attached Exhibit “A” and depicted on the attached Exhibit “B” (the "Easement Premises"). INCLUDING the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the Easement Premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public roadway and drainage and utility systems over, across, on, under, and through the Easement Premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain, pave, and excavate the Easement Premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public roadway and drainage and utility systems. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantors hereto have signed this easement this _____ day of _______________________, 2025. Page 164 of 251 6 237781v2 GRANTORS: Darren B. Schmitt Elizabeth M. Schmitt STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ______________, 2025, by Darren B. Schmitt, spouse to Elizabeth M. Schmitt. _________________________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ______________, 2025, by Elizabeth M. Schmitt, spouse to Darren B. Schmitt. _________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 AMP/smt Page 165 of 251 7 237781v2 EXHIBIT A TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT Easement Description A perpetual easement for roadway and drainage and utility purposes over, under and across that part of the herein described Parcel A, lying easterly of the following described line and its extensions: Commencing at the northeast corner of Government Lot 3 in Section 2, Township 114 North, Range 21 West of the 5th Principal Meridian; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 59 minutes 01 second West along the north line of said Government Lot 3, a distance of 47.24 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described, thence North 14 degrees 57 minutes 41 seconds West, a distance of 337.03 feet to the north line of said Parcel A, and said line there terminating. Parcel A (Warranty Deed Doc. No. 3229913) That part of Lot 52, Fourth Addition to Benham Investment Company’s Minnesota Orchard Gardens, lying Southwesterly of Scenic Highway, Dakota County, Minnesota. Page 166 of 251 8 237781v2 EXHIBIT B TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT Easement Depiction Page 167 of 251 9 237781v2 EXHIBIT D GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES DARREN B. SCHMITT AND ELIZABETH M. SCHMITT, married to each other, as joint tenants, hereinafter referred to as "Grantors", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant unto the CITY OF LAKEVILLE, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns, forever, a permanent easement for public roadway and drainage and utility purposes over, on, across, under and through the land situated in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, legally described on the attached Exhibit “A” and depicted on the attached Exhibit “B” (the "Easement Premises"). INCLUDING the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the Easement Premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public roadway and drainage and utility systems over, across, on, under, and through the Easement Premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain, pave, and excavate the Easement Premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public roadway and drainage and utility systems. The above-named Grantors, for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, do covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that they are well seized in fee title of the Easement Premises; that they have the sole right to grant and convey the easement to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Easement Premises; and they will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantors hereto have signed this easement this _____ day of _______________________, 2025. Page 168 of 251 10 237781v2 GRANTORS: Darren B. Schmitt Elizabeth M. Schmitt STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ______________, 2025, by Darren B. Schmitt, spouse to Elizabeth M. Schmitt. _________________________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ______________, 2025, by Elizabeth M. Schmitt, spouse to Darren B. Schmitt. _________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 AMP/smt Page 169 of 251 11 237781v2 EXHIBIT A TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT Easement Description A perpetual easement for roadway purposes over, under and across that part of the herein described Parcel A, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Parcel A; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 30 minutes 34 seconds West along the east line of said Parcel A, a distance of 30.90 feet; thence North 22 degrees 23 minutes 11 seconds West, a distance of 33.41 feet to a point on the north line of said Parcel A, distant 13.00 westerly of, as measured at a right angle, said east line; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 11 seconds East along the north line of said Parcel A, a distance of 13.00 feet to said point of beginning. AND A perpetual easement for roadway purposes over, under and across that part of the herein described Parcel A, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Parcel A; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 30 minutes 34 seconds West along the east line of said Parcel A, a distance of 58.33 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence southerly a distance of 112.61 feet along a non-tangential curve, concave to the east, having a radius of 56.00 feet, a central angle of 115 degrees 12 minutes 54 seconds, a chord distance of 94.57 feet, and a chord bearing of South 00 degrees 30 minutes 34 seconds West, to the east line of said Parcel A; thence North 00 degrees 30 minutes 34 seconds East along said east line, a distance of 94.57 feet to said point of beginning. Parcel A (Certificate of Title No. 115013) Land situated in the County of Dakota and State of Minnesota Lots Seven (7) to Twenty four (24) inclusive, Block One (1) all in Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds within and for said County and State. AND Lots Three (3), Four (4), Five (5), Six (6), Twenty five (25), Twenty six (26), Twenty seven (27), Twenty eight (28), Block One (1), Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds within and for said County and State. Page 170 of 251 12 237781v2 EXHIBIT B TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT Easement Depiction Page 171 of 251 13 237781v2 EXHIBIT E GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES DARREN B. SCHMITT AND ELIZABETH M. SCHMITT, married to each other, as joint tenants, hereinafter referred to as "Grantors", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant unto the CITY OF LAKEVILLE, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns, forever, a permanent easement for public roadway and drainage and utility purposes over, on, across, under and through the land situated in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, legally described on the attached Exhibit “A” and depicted on the attached Exhibit “B” (the "Easement Premises"). INCLUDING the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the Easement Premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public roadway and drainage and utility systems over, across, on, under, and through the Easement Premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain, pave, and excavate the Easement Premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public roadway and drainage and utility systems. The above-named Grantors, for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, do covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that they are well seized in fee title of the Easement Premises; that they have the sole right to grant and convey the easement to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Easement Premises; and they will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantors hereto have signed this easement this _____ day of _______________________, 2025. Page 172 of 251 14 237781v2 GRANTORS: Darren B. Schmitt Elizabeth M. Schmitt STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ______________, 2025, by Darren B. Schmitt, spouse to Elizabeth M. Schmitt. _________________________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ______________, 2025, by Elizabeth M. Schmitt, spouse to Darren B. Schmitt. _________________________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 AMP/smt Page 173 of 251 15 237781v2 EXHIBIT A TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT Easement Description A perpetual easement for roadway and drainage and utility purposes over, under and across the east 13.00 feet, as measured at a right angle, of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Deer Park Addition to South Saint Paul, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. Page 174 of 251 16 237781v2 EXHIBIT B TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT Easement Depiction Page 175 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 Cedar Avenue Corridor Land Use and Market Analysis Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: No action required Overview Community Development staff have been working with a consulting group (TKDA) to evaluate land use along the Cedar Avenue corridor between 185th and 200th Streets. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan identified this area (one half mile on either side of Cedar Avenue) as a special planning district, intended to align land use strategies with the Red Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) plan. The Land Use Plan proposed five transit station areas along Cedar Avenue to support the potential extension of the Red Line through Lakeville and increased residential densities of at least eight dwelling units per acre within the broader Cedar Corridor and 20-40 units per acre within a ½-mile radius of the proposed station areas. With the Red Line BRT no longer included in the Metropolitan Council’s Imagine 2050 Transportation Policy Plan, it is necessary to reassess market conditions and determine appropriate land uses along the corridor to guide development in Lakeville’s upcoming 2050 Comprehensive Plan. The market study for this area has been completed, and City staff have conducted a design charrette to develop an updated land use plan. City staff and a TKDA representative met with study area property owners on December 9th and 11th to share the findings and gather feedback. Planning Commission received this report at their meeting on February 5, 2026. These findings and the concept will be used as we continue the process to update the 2050 Comprehensive Plan. Supporting Information 1. Lakeville-Cedar Ave-SAP Final Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Diversified Economic Development Report Completed by: Tina Goodroad, Community Development Director Page 176 of 251 Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Study January 2026 Prepared by Page 177 of 251 Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................1 Site Boundary 1 Background 1 Planning Process 2 Existing Conditions Review ..........................................................3 Transportation and Infrastructure Context 3 Environmental Context 4 Development Context 4 Market Analysis and Context Review ...........................................5 Guidance for developing the Small Area Plan includes: 7 Land Use .......................................................................................7 Commercial and Office Development 7 Concept Review and Development Framework ...........................8 Small Area Plan .............................................................................9 Transportation Network 9 Land Use 10 Phasing 11 Conclusion ....................................................................................11 Page 178 of 251 City of Lakeville | Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan 1 Introduction The City of Lakeville developed a Land Use and Market Analysis Plan for the Cedar Avenue corridor between 185th Street and 200th Street. While the City of Lakeville has consistently ranked as the fastest growing city in the Twin Cities metro area, this segment of the community has remained undeveloped. The purpose of this Plan is to understand the market and land use opportunities in this project area to support the City’s broader 2050 planning efforts. Ultimately, the study aims to provide a baseline analysis of how the Cedar Avenue site is likely to develop based on current market conditions and develop a stronger understanding of stakeholder goals. The analysis serves as general guidance for land use decisions and sets the stage for comprehensive planning. Site Boundary The limits of the study, shown in Figure 1, include 185th Street to the north, 200th Street to the south, Hamburg Avenue to the west, and the City boundary to the east. 0 0.1 0.2Miles ¯Site Boundary Municipal Boundary Stream Wetland Park Future County Highway contour_2f_3m Cedar Avenue Market Study Land Use Concept N Legend Existing Road Planned Road Multimodal Connection Existing Green Space Corridor Transportation Nodes Single Family/Detached Townhomes (2.5 to 6 du/ac) Attached Townhomes/Twinhomes (6-9 du/ac) Apartments (18-32 du/ac) Commercial/Office Shoreline Boundaries C e d a r A v e C e d a r A v e 190th St W190th St W H a m b u r g A v e H a m b u r g A v e 200th St W200th St W Ci t y O f L a k e v i l l e Ci t y O f L a k e v i l l e Ci t y O f F a r m i n g t o n Ci t y O f F a r m i n g t o n 185th St W185th St W Figure 1. Site Boundary Background The 2040 Comprehensive Plan designated the Cedar Avenue Corridor as a special planning area, aligning land use approaches with plans for the Red Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) extension. It called for the creation of five transit station areas to support the Red Line’s expansion through Lakeville. Additionally, the plan recommended increasing residential density to at least 8 units per acre within the Cedar Avenue Corridor, and between 20 and 40 units per acre within a half-mile of the five planned transit stations. However, since the Red Line BRT is no longer included in the Imagine 2050 Transportation Policy Plan, the City is now re-evaluating market trends and land use opportunities along the corridor to help shape the forthcoming 2050 Comprehensive Plan. Page 179 of 251 City of Lakeville | Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan 2 Planning Process The planning process began with a comprehensive assessment of the site’s existing conditions, including land use, transportation connections, utilities, topography, and socioeconomic trends. The project team completed a market analysis specific to the project area, followed by an analysis of the current land use conditions. A design charrette was facilitated with city staff where a design framework and multiple alternatives were developed. After iterative review, a final alternative was selected and presented to property owners for review. Study Process Page 180 of 251 City of Lakeville | Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan 3 Existing Conditions Review Transportation and Infrastructure Context Dakota County has jurisdiction over Cedar Avenue (Highway 23) and 185th Street (Highway 60), as well as 200th Street (Highway 64) east of Cedar Avenue. All other roadways within the study area fall under the ownership and maintenance responsibilities of the City of Lakeville. Figure 2 provides a visual representation of the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes in the area, which indicates the approximate number of vehicles traveling along each roadway on an average day throughout the year. This information is important for understanding current traffic patterns and identifying potential areas of congestion or safety concerns. Cedar Avenue, classified as a principal arterial, serves as the primary transportation corridor in the study area and currently experiences the highest volume of vehicular traffic. Crash data collected between 2015 and 2025 is mapped by both severity and location, providing insights into safety issues along these key corridors. Understanding crash patterns also informs future roadway design and traffic control measures. Dakota County has identified a future extension of 185th Street, which is depicted as a dashed line on the project maps. This planned extension will continue eastward, ultimately connecting with the City of Farmington and linking to 195th Street. As the area continues to evolve, these planned transportation improvements will play a significant role in shaping travel patterns and supporting the long-term vision for the Cedar Avenue Corridor. AADT: 1,161 AA D T : 1 5 , 2 4 7 AA D T : 1 , 3 5 8 AA D T : 4 3 4 AADT: 191 AADT: 446 AADT: 1,311 AADT: 475 AADT: 2,421 AA D T : 2 3 , 3 7 1 LA K E V I L L E FA R M I N G T O N 190th St W 185th St W 200th St W Ce d a r A v e Ce dar Ave Gl o b e D r Henning A v e Ge y s e r W a y Glandon Pass HamletAve Grasshopper D r 198thSt W Gl a s s w o r t D r Gleed Rd H an c o c k A v e Gambrel Pa t h H a r r i s burg W a y Gamma Ln H a r n ess Ave 1 8 6 t h St W G abard i n e L n H arborDr Glacier Way Hamby Way 201st St W 1 87th St W Glenbridge Ave Ham b u r g Ave Ginseng Way GreenstoneWay G allifr e y Way Ha m e l D r 184th St W Harvest Dr 1 8 3 rd St W 0 0.15 0.3 Miles ¯Site Boundary Municipal Boundary Parcels Future County Highway $QQXDL $YHUDJH 'DLL\ 7UDIğF (Latest Data) Less than 2,000 2,001 to 4,000 4,001 to 8,000 8,001 to 12,000 More than 12,000 Crashes by Severity (2015-2025) Serious Injury Minor Injury Possible Injury Property Damage Only Cedar Avenue Small Area Plan Transportation Context Figure 2. Transportation Context Future 185th Street Extension Page 181 of 251 City of Lakeville | Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan 4 Environmental Context Figure 3 represents the existing topography across the project. Areas in blue highlight low-lying drainage corridors. These corridors are crucial to the site’s natural water management, as they direct stormwater runoff and help prevent flooding in developed and undeveloped areas. Understanding the location and extent of these low-lying areas is important for planning future development, as they may present constraints for building placement, infrastructure, and road alignments. Additionally, preservation of these drainage corridors can help maintain ecological function and support green infrastructure strategies, such as stormwater retention basins or natural open space buffers. Development Context Figure 4 illustrates recent developments in and near the project study area. See Table A for a summary of the overall densities. All developments are residential, with a mix of single-family and attached and detached townhomes. These new neighborhoods reflect current housing trends and demand for a variety of residential options within the area. The single-family homes provide traditional detached living, while the attached and detached townhomes offer higher-density alternatives that cater to diverse household preferences and affordability levels. These new residential areas contribute to shaping the character of the area and establish a foundation for future infrastructure investments, community amenities, and transportation improvements as outlined in the planning process. 64 60 23 Aronson Park Middle Creek Park Grand Prairie Park LA K E V I L L E FA R M I N G T O N 200th St W 190th St W 18 5 t h S t W Ce d a r A v e Ced ar Ave Gl o b e D r Henning A v e Ge y s e r W a y GlandonPass HamletAve Grasshopper D r 198thSt W Gl a s s w o r t D r Gleed Rd Han c o c k A v e Gambrel Pa t h H a r r i s burg W a y Gamma Ln H a r n ess Ave 1 8 6 t h S t W G abard i n e L n H arborDr Glacier Way Hamby Way 201stSt W 187th St W Glenbridge Ave Ginseng Way Greenstone Way G allifr e y Way H a m el Dr H a m burg Ave 184th S t W Harvest Dr 183rd S t W 0 0.15 0.3 Miles ¯Site Boundary Municipal Boundary Stream Wetland Park Elevation Lower (900 ft)Higher (1,100 ft) Cedar Avenue Small Area Plan Environmental Context Figure 3. Environmental Context Figure 4. Development Context Page 182 of 251 City of Lakeville | Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan 5 Table A. Recent Development Context Development Housing Types Total Units Net Density Gross Density Voyager Farms Addition Detached townhomes 154 units 4.0 u/a 2.47 u/a Glacier Creek 5th Addition Single-family homes 39 units 3.18 u/a 3.10 u/a Amelia Meadows Single-family and attached townhomes 232 units 3.88 u/a 3.15 u/a Berres Ridge 9th Addition Single-family homes 34 units 2.6 u/a 1.95 u/a Reserve at Cedar Creek Single-family homes 48 units 3.27 u/a 2.40 u/a Cedar Creek Villas Addition Single-family homes 66 units 3.13 u/a 2.20 u/a Cedar Hills Addition Single-family homes 205 units 3.11 u/a 2.16 u/a Market Analysis and Context Review The project team conducted a comprehensive market analysis to guide planning and land-use decisions for the undeveloped Cedar Avenue corridor in Lakeville (See Appendix A for the full report). The methodology included site analysis, demographic and economic assessment, review of competitive market conditions, and demand forecasts based on population, household, and employment projections, all adjusted with recent market trends. The intent of the market analysis was to provide a foundation of understanding for the current development opportunities in the project area. This data was used to influence the development of alternative concepts. The market study identified expected development typologies for the corridor, providing density estimates and anticipated uses for each type: • Single-Family Homes & Detached Townhomes: 3 units per acre • Attached Townhomes & Twinhomes: 6 units per acre • Apartments: 25 units per acre • Restaurant & Retail: General retail, service, and office uses (no specified density) • Office & Medical Office: Professional office uses, retail, sales, and services (no specified density) Table B represents the market demand findings. The data illustrates approximately how many units of each development typology are likely to develop between 2025-2030 and 2030-2040 if development were left solely to the market. Note that a total build-out of all the land by 2040 is not anticipated. Page 183 of 251 City of Lakeville | Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan 6 Table B. Demand Estimates for the Project Area Development Densities from Market Analysis* 2025-2030 2030-2040 Single-Family Homes and Detached Townhomes 3.0 units per acre 350 – 400 units 115.0 – 135.0 acres 700 – 800 units 230.0 – 270.0 acres Attached Townhomes and Twinhomes 6.0 units per acre 100 – 130 units 16.0 – 22.0 acres 200 – 300 units 33.0 – 50.0 acres Apartments 25.0 units per acre 250 – 300 units 10.0 – 12.0 acres 500 – 600 units 20.0 – 24.0 acres Restaurant and Retail 10,000 sqft per acre 8,000 – 12,000 sqft 1.0 – 1.5 acres 0 – 50,000 sqft 0.0 – 5.0 acres Office and Medical Office 10,000 sqft per acre 0 - 15,000 units 0.0 – 1.5 acres 0 – 30,000 units 0.0 – 3.0 acres *These are typical densities of new developments in the City of Lakeville and are used to estimate absorption of land in the project area. The following is a summary of key findings from this market analysis: Residential • Overall, the site would work well for residential development • Absorption of single-family homes/townhomes in Lakeville has been steady despite market swings, interest rate spikes, etc. • Several new rental projects have been built in the Lakeville market in recent years, increasing overall supply, but absorption has been strong Restaurant and Retail • Based on traffic counts and site characteristics, retail would work well at parcels immediately adjacent to Cedar Avenue • However, the site currently lacks the east-west connections that would drive significant retail development in the study area Office, Medical Office, and Industrial • General office development will continue to be slow, but there may be opportunities for medical office development in the study area Page 184 of 251 City of Lakeville | Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan 7 Guidance for developing the Small Area Plan includes: • Focus initial development on single-family residential projects closer to but not immediately adjacent to Cedar Avenue • Cluster higher-density apartments and townhome developments closer to major intersections • As housing affordability continues to drive household decisions, provide flexibility to pivot to more dense housing option—both for-sale and rental • Set aside some parcels immediately adjacent to major intersections for retail development—especially the 185th Street intersection • Carefully consider the specifics of the planned 185th Street extension into Farmington. This roadway will become critical in determining how traffic flows through the area and the overall commercial opportunity of these sites • Plan for total build-out of area to be greater than 15 years • Take the opportunity to develop a trail and park system throughout the area—leverage connectivity to the new Grand Prairie Park Land Use The project team approached the determination of overall densities by utilizing them as a planning tool rather than as final recommendations. Densities helped estimate land consumption and identify appropriate locations for different housing typologies within the study area. The team compared market analysis findings with existing city policies and recent development trends within the City of Lakeville. This process allowed for a flexible and responsive land use plan that could adapt to evolving market conditions and community needs while maintaining consistency with broader city goals. Table C. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Categories Land Use Density (du/ac)Anticipated Uses Acres % of Area Low/Medium Density 4.0-5.0 Single-family, two family, detached townhouses 557 64% Medium/High Density 5.0-9.0 Detached townhouse, quad, row/ back-to-back attached townhouses 119 14% Corridor Mixed Use 26.0-45.0 High density residential, senior housing, commercial, office 119 14% Parks N/A Open space and recreation 69 8% The study compared market analysis findings against the Comprehensive Plan guidance and assumed the following residential density ranges for proposed development scenarios: • Single-family Homes: 2.5-4.5 units/acre • Detached Townhomes: 3.0-6.0 units/acre • Twinhomes: 4.0-7.0 units/acre • Attached Townhomes: 6.0-9.0 units/acre • Apartments: 18.0-32.0 units/acre Commercial and Office Development Commercial and office uses were estimated at 10,000 square feet per acre, with considerations for supporting retail, service, and office uses. These uses are planned to complement residential areas and support community needs. Page 185 of 251 City of Lakeville | Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan 8 Concept Review and Development Framework Following an analysis of the existing conditions and input gathered from City staff, a range of alternatives was considered. Each concept was carefully analyzed to understand its unique strengths, limitations, and potential impacts. The following design framework was developed to guide and evaluate each concept: • Balancing community amenities • Enhancing multimodal transportation connectivity • Developing robust east-west connections • Providing flexibility in land uses • Protecting green space corridors • Developing “complete neighborhoods” • Supporting Envision Lakeville and the Economic Development Strategic Plan These priorities aim to create vibrant, accessible, and sustainable neighborhoods along the Cedar Avenue Corridor. Concepts Developed During Design Charrette Page 186 of 251 City of Lakeville | Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan 9 Small Area Plan Figure 5 represents the final alternative developed for the Small Area Plan. This concept represents the general location of the land use typologies and circulation through the project area if the site were to be built out. Based on the findings of the market study, complete consumption is not anticipated by 2040. Transportation Network The solid black lines represent the existing roadways, while the dashed lines represent anticipated future connections. Dakota County’s 2040 Transportation Plan allows for access to Cedar Avenue every ½ mile along principal arterials. An additional crossing is identified between 190th Street and 200th Street. The County-led 185th Street extension is illustrated, which would provide enhanced east-west connections at the north end of the project area. A north/south roadway is shown on the east connecting Glacier Creek down to Amelia Meadows. An additional north/south connection is anticipated outside of the project area connecting Hamburg Avenue to Berres Ridge. Internal circulation is anticipated within the proposed developments. Multimodal connections are illustrated in purple dashed lines. Overall multimodal connectivity is desired along major thoroughfares, with the goal of connecting neighborhoods to community destinations, including Grand Prairie Park. A future greenway is desired along the low-lying green corridor in the northeast area of the project area, with a potential grade separated pedestrian crossing into Grand Prairie Park. An additional grade separated pedestrian crossing is identified at the center of the project area across Cedar Avenue. (Note that at the time of this study, the City of Lakeville is undergoing a Parks System Master Plan Update which may effect some of the planned connections.) 0 0.1 0.2 Miles ¯Site Boundary Municipal Boundary Stream Wetland Park Future County Highway contour_2f_3m Robin Hutcheson Cedar Avenue Market Study Land Use Concept Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 13 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 10 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 20 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 5 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 12 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 24 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 22 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 60 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 15 AC Amelia Meadows 232 Units Cedar Hills Addition 344 Units Cedar Creek Villas 66 Units Berres Ridge 34 Units Voyager Farms 154 Units Glacier Creek 39 Units Reserve at Cedar Creek 48 Units Single-family/ Detached Townhomes 32 AC Single-family/ Detached Townhomes 18 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 43 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 28 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 45 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 16 AC Single-family/ Detached Townhomes 76 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 55 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 100 AC Apartments 8 AC Apartments 5 AC Apartments 10 AC Apartments 6 AC Apartments 9 AC Apartments 9 AC Apartments 5 AC Commercial/ Office 14 AC Commercial/ Office 13 AC Future Extension Possible Grade Separated Ped Crossing Possible Grade Separated Ped Crossing Neighborhood Park Gas Pipeline Easement (location approximate) Transitional Zone Transitional Zone Commercial/ Office 3 AC NLegend Existing Road Planned Road Multimodal Connection Existing Green Space Corridor Transportation Nodes Single-family/Detached Townhomes (2.5 to 6 du/ac) Attached Townhomes/Twinhomes (6-9 du/ac) Apartments (18-32 du/ac) Commercial/Office Shoreland Boundaries C e d a r A v e C e d a r A v e 190th St W190th St W Future 195th St WFuture 195th St W 200th St W200th St W 185th St W185th St W Grand Prairie ParkGrand Prairie Park H a m b u r g A v e H a m b u r g A v e Figure 5. Small Area Plan Page 187 of 251 City of Lakeville | Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan 10 0 0.1 0.2 Miles ¯Site Boundary Municipal Boundary Stream Wetland Park Future County Highway contour_2f_3m Robin Hutcheson Cedar Avenue Market Study Land Use Concept Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 13 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 10 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 20 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 5 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 12 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 24 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 22 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 60 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 15 AC Amelia Meadows 232 Units Cedar Hills Addition 344 Units Cedar Creek Villas 66 Units Berres Ridge 34 Units Voyager Farms 154 Units Glacier Creek 39 Units Reserve at Cedar Creek 48 Units Single-family/ Detached Townhomes 32 AC Single-family/ Detached Townhomes 18 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 43 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 28 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 45 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 16 AC Single-family/ Detached Townhomes 76 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 55 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 100 AC Apartments 8 AC Apartments 5 AC Apartments 10 AC Apartments 6 AC Apartments 9 AC Apartments 9 AC Apartments 5 AC Commercial/ Office 14 AC Commercial/ Office 13 AC Future Extension Possible Grade Separated Ped Crossing Possible Grade Separated Ped Crossing Neighborhood Park Gas Pipeline Easement (location approximate) Transitional Zone Transitional Zone Commercial/ Office 3 AC NLegend Existing Road Planned Road Multimodal Connection Existing Green Space Corridor Transportation Nodes Single-family/Detached Townhomes (2.5 to 6 du/ac) Attached Townhomes/Twinhomes (6-9 du/ac) Apartments (18-32 du/ac) Commercial/Office Shoreland Boundaries C e d a r A v e C e d a r A v e 190th St W190th St W Future 195th St WFuture 195th St W 200th St W200th St W 185th St W185th St W Grand Prairie ParkGrand Prairie Park H a m b u r g A v e H a m b u r g A v e Land Use The proposed land use scenarios build upon the previously established development framework, prioritizing adaptability to accommodate a range of future growth patterns. Rather than concentrating density in isolated pockets, the plan envisions a thoughtful distribution of residential and commercial uses throughout the project area. This approach encourages a vibrant mix of housing types and commercial amenities, fostering a more integrated and dynamic community environment. Preservation of existing green space corridors is a key principle, ensuring that new developments not only respect but actively enhance these ecological assets. By positioning buildings and infrastructure in harmony with natural features, the plan seeks to maintain critical habitats, support stormwater management, and offer residents direct access to recreational open spaces. Developments adjacent to these corridors are encouraged to incorporate pedestrian and bicycle pathways, further strengthening multimodal connections and encouraging active lifestyles. Higher density residential housing is strategically situated near major intersections and commercial nodes to support walkability, increase accessibility to services, and promote efficient use of transportation networks. This placement allows residents to easily access shops, offices, and public transit options, reducing reliance on personal vehicles and supporting sustainable mobility. The inclusion of a neighborhood park on the east side of the project area provides a central gathering place for community activities, recreation, and social interaction. The park’s location is designed to maximize accessibility for nearby residents while complementing the broader network of green spaces and multimodal connections envisioned for the corridor. Collectively, these strategies aim to create a well-balanced, resilient, and inclusive neighborhood that aligns with the broader goals of the Cedar Avenue Corridor and the City of Lakeville’s long-term vision. Figure 5. Small Area Plan Page 188 of 251 City of Lakeville | Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan 11 0 0.1 0.2 Miles ¯Site Boundary Municipal Boundary Stream Wetland Park Future County Highway contour_2f_3m Robin Hutcheson Cedar Avenue Market Study Land Use Concept Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 13 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 10 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 20 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 5 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 12 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 24 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 22 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 60 AC Attached Townhomes/ Twinhomes 15 AC Amelia Meadows 232 Units Cedar Hills Addition 344 Units Cedar Creek Villas 66 Units Berres Ridge 34 Units Voyager Farms 154 Units Glacier Creek 39 Units Reserve at Cedar Creek 48 Units Single-family/ Detached Townhomes 32 AC Single-family/ Detached Townhomes 18 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 43 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 28 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 45 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 16 AC Single-family/ Detached Townhomes 76 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 55 AC Single-Family/ Detached Townhomes 100 AC Apartments 8 AC Apartments 5 AC Apartments 10 AC Apartments 6 AC Apartments 9 AC Apartments 9 AC Apartments 5 AC Commercial/ Office 14 AC Commercial/ Office 13 AC Future Extension Possible Grade Separated Ped Crossing Possible Grade Separated Ped Crossing Neighborhood Park Gas Pipeline Easement (location approximate) Transitional Zone Transitional Zone Commercial/ Office 3 AC NLegend Existing Road Planned Road Multimodal Connection Existing Green Space Corridor Transportation Nodes Single-family/Detached Townhomes (2.5 to 6 du/ac) Attached Townhomes/Twinhomes (6-9 du/ac) Apartments (18-32 du/ac) Commercial/Office Shoreland Boundaries C e d a r A v e C e d a r A v e 190th St W190th St W Future 195th St WFuture 195th St W 200th St W200th St W 185th St W185th St W Grand Prairie ParkGrand Prairie Park H a m b u r g A v e H a m b u r g A v e Figure 6. Development Phasing Plan Phasing Due to the presence of existing utilities, it is anticipated that initial development will take place in the southeast portion of the project area. Subsequent phases of growth are expected to progress northward, then expand west, and finally extend down to the south as illustrated in Figure 6. This sequencing leverages available infrastructure to facilitate efficient development and supports the phased implementation of the Small Area Plan. Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 1 Conclusion The Small Area Plan for the Cedar Avenue Corridor presents a comprehensive and forward- thinking framework that balances growth, mobility, and environmental stewardship. By integrating flexible land use strategies, robust transportation networks, and enhanced multimodal connections, the plan aims to accommodate future development while preserving the area’s natural assets and fostering a vibrant community. Key principles such as the distribution of diverse housing and commercial options, the creation of accessible public spaces, and the reinforcement of greenway corridors ensure that the evolving neighborhood remains resilient, inclusive, and sustainable. As the City of Lakeville continues to refine its vision through ongoing initiatives and future planning work, this plan provides a strong foundation for achieving a well-connected and thriving corridor for current and future residents. Page 189 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 Page 190 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 2 Market Analysis for Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Purpose Provide market analytics component to guide a larger planning and land-use analysis for an undeveloped area on the Cedar Avenue corridor Overall Methodology Site analysis Demographic and economic analysis Review of competitive market Forecasts of demand o Based on demographic and economic projections o Calibrated with recent market trends Summary of findings and recommendations Considered Uses Single-family homes Townhomes and twinhomes Multifamily apartment buildings Restaurant and retail space Other commercial land uses Page 191 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 3 Market Analysis Methodology Summary Summary of Demand Estimate Methodology Sources of Data Residential Demand 1.Use household forecasts from ESRI and Metropolitan Council to forecast demand from new households. 2.Use existing rental rates to estimate split between for-sale and rental. 3.Use turnover rates to estimate demand from existing households. 4.Use building permits and recent sales to estimate the demand for single-family versus attached units. 5.Calibrate with absorption from market analysis and with other estimates. 6.Project forward next 10 years using population, household, and employment assumptions from the Metropolitan Council. •US Census •HUD and City of Lakeville (building permits) •ESRI •Metropolitan Council •Costar •Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors •Fieldwork, interviews, and other primary research Commercial Demand 1.Understand strengths and challenges for commercial uses at the site 2.Use consumer expenditure and employment projections to estimate increase in demand for retail and office space. 3.Use site analysis, sales tax data, and existing commercial space to estimate amount capturable by the site. 4.Calibrate with findings from the commercial market analyses. 5.Project forward next 10 year using population, household, and employment assumptions from the Metropolitan Council. •City of Lakeville •US Census •ESRI •Metropolitan Council •Costar •Fieldwork and other primary research Page 192 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 4 Demand Estimates for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Process Development Densities from Market Analysis*2025-2030 2030-2040 Single-Family Homes and Detached Townhomes 3.0 units per acre 350 – 400 units 115.0 – 135.0 acres 700 – 800 units 230.0 – 270.0 acres Attached Townhomes and Twinhomes 6.0 units per acre 100 – 130 units 16.0 – 22.0 acres 200 – 300 units 33.0 – 50.0 acres Apartments 25.0 units per acre 250 – 300 units 10.0 – 12.0 acres 500 – 600 units 20.0 – 24.0 acres Restaurant and Retail 10,000 sq. ft. per acre 8,000 – 12,000 sq. ft. 1.0 – 1.5 acres 0 – 50,000 sq. ft. 0.0 – 5.0 acres Office and Medical Office 10,000 sq. ft. per acre 0 – 15,000 sq. ft. 0.0 – 1.5 acres 0 – 30,000 sq. ft. 0.0 – 3.0 acres * These are typical densities of new developments in the City of Lakeville and are used to estimate absorption of land at the small area.Page 193 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 5 Preliminary Findings Focus initial development on single family residential projects closer to but not immediately adjacent to Cedar Avenue Cluster higher-density apartments and townhome developments nearer to major intersections As housing affordability continues to drive household decisions, provide flexibility to pivot to more dense housing option—both for-sale and rental Set aside some parcels immediately adjacent to major intersections for retail development—especially the 185th Street intersection Carefully consider the specifics of the planned 185th Street extension into Farmington. This roadway will become critical in determining how traffic flows through the area and the overall commercial opportunity of these sites Plan for total buildout of area to be greater than 15 years Take opportunity to develop trail and park system throughout the area—leverage connectivity to the new Grand Prairie Park Guidance for Small Area Planning Process Residential Overall, the site would work well for residential development Absorption of single-family homes/townhomes in Lakeville has been steady despite market swings, interest rate spikes, etc. Several new rental projects have been built in the Lakeville market in recent years, increasing overall supply, but absorption has been strong Restaurant and Retail Based on traffic counts and site characteristics, retail would work well at parcels immediately adjacent Cedar Avenue However, the site currently lacks the east-west connections that would drive significant retail development in the study area Office, Medical Office, and Industrial General office development will continue to be slow; but there may be opportunities for medical office development in the study area Key Findings from Market Analysis Page 194 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 6 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Page 195 of 251 Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Area Site Analysis: Cedar Avenue Study Area Defined The red boundary marks the study area in the City of Lakeville The area includes about 950 acres Source: ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC Page 196 of 251 Site Analysis: Traffic Counts in and near Lakeville Cedar Avenue has about 22,000 vehicles per day through the study area There are intersections carrying existing vehicle traffic on Cedar Avenue at: 150th Street (CSAH 42) 160th Street (CSAH 60) Dodd Boulevard 179th Street (CSAH 9) 202nd Street/Lakeville Boulevard (CSAH 50) 215th Street (CSAH 70) Source: ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC Page 197 of 251 Site Analysis: Traffic Counts in and near the Study Area Traffic counts east-west through the study area are limited 185th Street: 1,300 vehicles per day 190th Street: 300-600 vehicles per day 200th Street: 500-2,400 vehicles per day Traffic counts through this area will evolve as road connections are made further east of the study area and as development occurs Source: ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC Page 198 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 10 Site Analysis Strengths Large, vacant parcels create open opportunity for development, with potential create road network to optimize future development Cedar Avenue provides excellent connectivity north to Apple Valley and the central Twin Cities area New housing growth and commercial development already on the edge of the development Close to strong retail districts at Cedar Avenue and Dodd Boulevard and farther north along Cedar Avenue in Apple Valley Employment districts south of the site provides daytime employment that is attractive to commercial uses Weaknesses In the short term, there is no key east- west thoroughfare to attract commercial development Connections to key interchanges on Interstate 35 (202nd Street (CSAH 50), 185th Street, and 215th Street (CSAH 70)) east of the study area are not simple and can be challenging to navigate. There is no one east-west road funneling traffic to the interstate Mass of retail to the north near Cedar Avenue and CSAH 42 in Apple Valley and northeast at Pilot Knob Road and 160th Street and may limit demand in the study area Over the long term, the large industrial district and airport to the south may create a psychological barrier to developing residential markets south of the industrial district Page 199 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 11 Demographics: Drive-Time Rings around the Cedar Avenue Study Area Primary market area for residential development is generally defined as the City of Lakeville It is assumed that almost all demand for housing will come from forecasted growth and turnover in the City of Lakeville For retail and other commercial demand, the trade area is assumed to be the 10-minute drivetime area around the study area For the retail and commercial analysis, it is assumed development at the study area will capture a portion of the growth occurring in this 10-minute drivetime area HWY 55 + Jacob Ave Source: ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC Page 200 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 12 Demographics: Population and Population Growth Lakeville is seeing strong population growth The population of the Lakeville is approximately 78,000, according to ESRI**, a national demographics firm used by real estate developer and users The rate of growth for the City of Lakeville and the drivetime areas exceed growth rates in Dakota County, the Twin Cities MSA*, and the nation as a whole The annual growth rate over the next five years is projected to slow considerably, compared to the previous 15 years 1 Population and Population Growth Annual Proj. Annual Census Census Estimate Forecast Growth Rate Growth Rate 2010 2020 2025 2030 2010-2025 2025-2030 City of Lakeville 55,975 69,496 77,927 83,439 2.2%1.4% Cedar Avenue Study Area 5-Minute Drive-Time Area 16,803 24,238 29,551 32,023 3.8%1.6% 10-Minute Drive-Time Area 91,639 111,712 121,354 127,342 1.9%1.0% 15-Minute Drive-Time Area 182,366 208,553 220,045 226,662 1.3%0.6% Dakota County 398,552 439,882 456,240 468,184 0.9%0.5% Minneapolis-St. Paul MSA 3,333,633 3,690,261 3,809,346 3,903,629 0.9%0.5% United States 308,745,538 331,449,281 339,887,819 347,149,422 0.6%0.4% Source: US Census Bureau; ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC *The Census-defined Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) consists of Hennepin, Ramsey, Dakota, Anoka, Washington, Scott, Wright, Carver, Sherburne, Chisago, Isanti, Le Sueur, Mille Lacs counties in Minnesota and St. Croix and Pierce counties in Wisconsin. **This analysis uses ESRI data because it is forecasted for smaller areas and geographies (e.g., drivetime areas). It also provides 5- year forecasts by demographic characteristics (e.g., age and income). Further, this data source is used by developers and private sector decision makers for site selection. Page 201 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 13 Demographics: Households and Household Growth Household growth is strong in Lakeville The City of Lakeville has approximately 27,000 households, based on ESRI estimates As with population, household growth in the city and the drivetime areas is projected to exceed the comparison areas The annual household growth rate is projected to slow in the next five years, compared to the previous 15-year period 2 Households and Household Growth Annual Proj. Annual Census Census Estimate Forecast Growth Rate Growth Rate 2010 2020 2025 2030 2010-2025 2025-2030 City of Lakeville 18,690 23,267 26,691 28,873 2.4%1.6% Cedar Avenue Study Area 5-Minute Drive-Time Area 5,689 7,955 9,998 10,897 3.8%1.7% 10-Minute Drive-Time Area 31,734 38,525 42,500 45,047 2.0%1.2% 15-Minute Drive-Time Area 66,598 75,813 81,101 84,359 1.3%0.8% Dakota County 152,060 168,008 176,680 182,870 1.0%0.7% Minneapolis-St. Paul MSA 1,293,601 1,434,315 1,498,244 1,546,472 1.0%0.6% United States 116,716,292 126,817,580 132,422,916 136,716,884 0.8%0.6% Source: US Census Bureau; ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC Page 202 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 14 Demographics: Long-Term Population, Household, and Employment Projections The long-term projections show continued growth in Lakeville but rates of growth slowing Metropolitan Council has preliminary estimates available for projected population, households, and employment, 2020 to 2050 (Note that these forecasts are more conservative than the ESRI forecasts for the current decade) Growth rates for both population and households are projected to slow somewhat between 2030 and 2050, according to the Metropolitan Council Demand forecasts for residential and commercial uses in this analysis account for this projected slow down 3 Long-Term Population, Household, and Employment Projections Census Forecast Forecast Forecast 2020 2030 2040 2050 2020-2030 2030-2040 2040-2050 2020-2030 2030-2040 2040-2050 Population Lakeville 69,490 79,900 84,700 89,500 10,410 4,800 4,800 1.4%0.6%0.6% Dakota County 439,882 468,828 489,346 524,186 28,946 20,518 34,840 0.6%0.4%0.7% Seven-County Metro Area 3,163,100 3,374,100 3,559,300 3,814,000 211,000 185,200 254,700 0.6%0.5%0.7% Households Lakeville 23,265 28,100 31,000 33,100 4,835 2,900 2,100 1.9%1.0%0.7% Dakota County 168,008 184,913 198,226 213,600 16,905 13,313 15,374 1.0%0.7%0.7% Seven-County Metro Area 1,239,525 1,357,300 1,454,300 1,563,300 117,775 97,000 109,000 0.9%0.7%0.7% Employment Lakeville 15,888 23,100 25,200 29,900 7,212 2,100 4,700 3.8%0.9%1.7% Dakota County 166,945 202,433 217,393 244,283 35,488 14,960 26,890 1.9%0.7%1.2% Seven-County Metro Area 1,543,400 1,814,100 1,901,400 2,061,700 270,700 87,300 160,300 1.6%0.5%0.8% * Imagine 2050 local forecasts approved February 2025 Source: Metropolitan Council; LOCi Consulting LLC Projected Annual % Growth RateProjected Change Page 203 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 15 Demographics: Daytime Employment The employment base in Lakeville contributes to residential and commercial demand Because many workers who reside in Lakeville commute outside of the city, the daytime population shrinks to about 61,000 people Based on US Census Data from 2022 (not shown on chart): 14,185 workers commute into the city 32,338 residents commute out of the city 4,470 residents both work and live in Lakeville Workers who commute into Lakeville provide additional retail spending These workers are also potential residents who may consider homes in Lakeville to be closer to their jobs 4 Daytime Population, 2025 Total Daytime Daytime Total Daytime Population:Population: Population Population Workers Residents City of Lakeville 77,927 61,065 25,315 35,750 Cedar Avenue Study Area 5-Minute Drive-Time Area 29,551 23,064 9,261 13,803 10-Minute Drive-Time Area 121,354 99,039 44,205 54,834 15-Minute Drive-Time Area 220,045 182,745 81,824 100,921 Dakota County 456,240 422,035 208,817 213,218 Source: US Census Bureau; ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC Page 204 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 16 Demographics: Median Household Income Incomes are high in the City of Lakeville and increasing relative to inflation Median household income in the City of Lakeville is about $133,000—33% higher than the median for the Metro MSA ESRI is forecasting 2.4% inflation over the 2025- 2030 period and provide forecasts without adjustments for inflation—so growth below 2.4% means that incomes are actually declining relative to inflation The projected annual growth rates for the City of Lakeville and the 5- and 10-minute drivetime areas meet or exceed this projected inflation— 2.4% to 2.8% This forecasts suggests that income growth in the market is real growth Dakota County and the Metro MSA, however, are projected to see declines in income relative to inflation Higher base incomes and income growth are attractive to housing and commercial developers 5. Median Household Income, 2025 Source: ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLCSee Figure A.1 for detail for these figures 6. Projected Annual Growth in Median Household Income, 2025-2030 Page 205 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 17 Demographics: Projected Household Growth by Age of Householder in the City of Lakeville, 2025 to 2030 Baby Boomers (Age 65 plus) will continue to drive household growth Source: ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC 7. Projected Household Growth by Age of Householder, City of Lakeville, 2025 to 2030 8. Projected Household Growth by Income of Householder, City of Lakeville, 2025 to 2030 Overall shift in growth to higher income groups—Millennials hitting higher income earning years and Baby Boomers with higher investment incomes Page 206 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 18 Demographics: Household Rental Rates and Housing Turnover for Homeowners and Renters in the City of Lakeville The household rental rate in Lakeville is half the rate for the Minneapolis-St. Paul market as a whole 26% of homeowners and 68% of renters moved into their homes within the last five years This data is used to determine housing demand from turnover within existing households 9 Household Rental Rates in Lakeville, 2023 Source: American Community Survey, U.S. Census; ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC 12.2% 24.6%29.1% Lakeville Dakota County Minneapolis-St. Paul MSA 10 Move-In Year for Households in Lakeville, 2023 Source: American Community Survey, US Census Bureau; ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 1989 or Earlier 1990-1999 2000-2009 2010-2017 2018-2020 2021 or Later Owner-Occupied Households Renter-Occupied Households Page 207 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 19 Demographics: Growth in Consumer Expenditure in Retail Categories Retail expenditure is projected to grow by about $37 million in the 10- Minute Drivetime Area—about 0.6% per year when adjusted for inflation This growth is driven by new households in the market and real income growth Grocery stores and restaurant categories are projected to see the highest increases in consumer spending These categories make up the largest percentage of overall spending Additionally, groceries and restaurants tend to be less impacted by online competition, so these categories have seen more growth in commercial real estate demand 11 Forecasted Growth in Consumer Spending in the 10-Min Drivetime Area, 2025-2030 * Data is shown in 2024 Dollars, adjusted from ESRI projection. ESRI assumes 2.4% inflation. Source: US Census Bureau; ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC $0 $3,000,000 $6,000,000 $9,000,000 $12,000,000 $15,000,000 Apparel and Accessories Electronics Pets Toys Sporting Goods Books Groceries Restaurants Liquor Pharmacy Furniture and Home Improvement Household and Personal Care Page 208 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 20 Demographics: Employment by Industry Compared to the Seven- County Metro Area, the City of Lakeville has a higher percentage of Construction, Manufacturing, Retail Trade, Educational Service, and Accommodation and Food Service jobs These types of jobs are more likely to be located at retail and industrial real estate and less likely to be located in office space 12 Distribution of Employment for the City of Lakeville and the Metro Area, 2024 Notes: Source: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development; Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages; Employment Outlook; LOCi Consulting LLC Utilities employment is not disclosed for the City of Lakeville. Page 209 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 21 Building Permits: Lakeville is averaging 835 housing unit permits per year since 2018, although production has slowed significantly in the last year 13 Building Permit Units in the City of Lakeville, 2018-2024 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Housing Units 602 945 1,223 1,126 714 713 523 Single-Family Homes 446 521 639 527 325 309 285 Detached Townhomes 32 35 103 136 62 58 100 Townhomes 49 64 73 73 160 94 49 Apartment Units 75 325 408 390 167 252 89 Source: City of Lakeville; LOCi Consulting LLC 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Housing Units Page 210 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 22 For-Sale Residential Market: With rising interest rates, existing home sales have cooled Lakeville, driven by interest rate increases and following national trends 14 Residential Real Estate Transactions in Lakeville 1,102 Source: Multiple Listing Service; LOCi Consulting LLC 1,792 2,034 1,807 1,793 1,079 1,102 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 15 Median Sales Price of Home Sales in Lakeville Source: Multiple Listing Service; LOCi Consulting LLC $370,999 $397,048 $440,000 $485,000 $485,000 $494,117 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 16 Average Days on the Market for Home Sales in Lakeville Source: Multiple Listing Service; LOCi Consulting LLC 54 42 24 31 46 54 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Page 211 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 23 For-Sale Residential Market: Select Actively Marketing Single-Family Developments in Lakeville Source: MLS, websites, interviews, LOCi Consulting LLC Development Units Square Footage Price Points Estimated Units per Acre Cedar Hills – Discovery Collection Single-Family Homes 2020 139 (85 sold)2,185 – 2,706 $559,810 - 612,550 1.3 (78-acre development) Glacier Creek, 2nd 4th and 5th Additions Single-Family Homes 2021 99 (77 Sold)2,984 - 3,921 $635,529 - 799,900 3.0 (32-acre development) Berres Ridge, 7th 8th and 9th Additions Single-Family Homes 2020 88 (44 Sold)2,377 – 4,801 $548,900 – 774,900 2.1 (42-acre development) Page 212 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 24 For-Sale Residential Market: Select Actively Marketing Townhome Developments in Lakeville Source: MLS, websites, interviews, LOCi Consulting LLC Development Units Square Footage Price Points Estimated Units per Acre Cedar Hills – Villa Collection Detached Townhomes 2020 205 (85 sold) 1,783 – 1,968 $498,685 - 579,780 2.6 (76-acre development— estimated as the gross acreage for the development) Voyageur Farms Detached Townhomes 2022 90 (24 sold)1,828 – 2,502 $439,900 – 570,000 2.4 (38-acre development) Brookshire Side-by-Side Townhomes 2022 71 (45 Sold)1,665 – 1,894 $349,000 – 422,000 7.1 (10-acre development) Cordelia, 2nd Addition Side-by-Side Townhomes 2023 91 (61 Sold)1,883 – 2,011 $363,000 – 450,000 7.5 (12-acre development) Page 213 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 25 Rental Market: New rental product developed in the market has pushed the vacancy rate above 5%, but market-rate rents are still seeing growth 17 Vacancy Rates for Market-Rate Rental Housing in Lakeville * Data is Q1 2018 to Q2 2025 Source: CoStar; LOCi Consulting LLC 18 Average Rent for Market-Rate Rental in Lakeville * Data is Q1 2018 to Q2 2025 Source: CoStar; LOCi Consulting LLC * Includes estimates for all market-rate units in Lakeville, regardless of size of unit type. Page 214 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 26 Rental Market: Absorption of rental units has remained strong in Lakeville 19 Quarterly Absorption of Units for Market-Rate Rental in Lakeville * Data is Q1 2018 to Q2 2025 Source: CoStar; LOCi Consulting LLC The Lakeville rental market has seen an average rental unit absorption of about 200 units per year since 2018 (about 50 units per quarter) Page 215 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 27 Rental Market: Recently Constructed Rental in Lakeville—Since 2018 Source: Websites, interviews, Costar, LOCi Consulting LLC Development Year Built Units Vacancies Square Footages Rents Estimated Units per Acre Notes Authentix Lakeville 11656 207th St W 2023 252 10 544 – 1,348 $1,303 – 2,933 20.9 (12.0-acre development) Townhome-style, rental development Livery Modern Apts. 5076 161st St W 2022 204 4 868 – 1,505 $1,775 – 2,851 19.2 (10.7-acre development) Townhome-style, rental development Arris Apartments 10805 173rd St W 2021 197 7 515 – 1,333 $1,353 – 2,637 25.3 (7.8-acre development) Four-story apartment building Northlake Lofts 18400 Orchard Trail 2022 208 6 515 – 1,580 $1,414 – 2,762 20.6 (10.0-acre development) Four-story apartment building The Springs at Lakeville 17400 Glacier Way 2020 260 11 662 – 1,436 $1,609 - 2,629 16.8 (15.5-acre development) Townhome-style, rental development The Edison at Spirit 5181 161st St 2019 160 0 752 – 1,337 $1,534 – 1,960 30.8 (5.2-acre development) Four-story apartment building Lakeside Flats 16255 Kenyon Ave 2018 120 6 588 – 1,679 $1,415 – 2,335 29.5 (4.2-acre development) Three-story apartment building Page 216 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 28 Residential Market: Themes from Interviews and Discussions Source: Interviews, LOCi Consulting LLC For Sale Market 2024 and 2025 have been much slower than 2022 and 2023—because of higher interest rates—but sales seem to be trending up in the last few months A significant portion of townhome demand is driven by investors—depending on the homeowner association agreements, the number of investor buyers is often capped Buyers with contingent sales have become much more common in the last two years Homebuyers frequently say they want larger lot sizes, but lot size is not a critical issue–brokers said they believe most buyers will be willing to go smaller on lot size to keep the overall cost lower There is strong demand from 1st and 2nd generation immigrant families in Lakeville The strong school district(s) are a strong selling point for Lakeville Rental Market Lease up of new projects is going well—managers are still seeing strong demand Renters like the variety of rental types offered in Lakeville, with both apartment buildings and townhome style rentals Renters are coming from all over the Twin Cities and a wide variety of new household formations, middle-aged and young senior renters, and change-of life- renters * Informal interviews were completed as a part of the data gathering process. Realtor in sales offices and leasing agents in rental offices were interviewed. All projects are currently marketing in Lakeville near the study area.Page 217 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 29 Retail Real Estate Market: Vacancy rates for retail are much lower than the Metro Area and absorption over the last 10 years has been strong Lakeville’s retail vacancy rate was 0.5% in 2nd quarter of 2025 (versus 2.7% for the Minneapolis Market) The retail market in Lakeville has seen average annual absorption* of over 50,000 square feet of space per year (2018-2025 Q2) 20 Average Lease and Vacancy Rates for Retail Space in Lakeville * Data is Q1 2018 to Q2 2025.. Rents are average for all lease types. Source: CoStar; LOCi Consulting LLC 21 Net Quarterly Absorption for Retail Space in Lakeville * Data is Q1 2018 to Q2 2025 Source: CoStar; LOCi Consulting LLC * Absorption is the amount of new or vacant space moved into and occupied by users over a period of time. Positive absorption means new users are moving to the market and occupying new and vacant spaces. Negative absorption most likely results in vacant spaces.Page 218 of 251 General Merchandisers, Grocers, and Pharmacies in the Lakeville Area Cedar Avenue Study Area Walgreens Lunds & Byerly’s Page 219 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 31 Retail Real Estate Market: New Construction in Lakeville since 2018 Development Year Built Square Footage Acreage Floor Area Ratio 20681 Keokuk Ave – Taco Bell 2024 2,867 1.76 0.04 17401 Dodd Blvd – New Creations Child Care and Learning Center 2023 23.842 1.31 0.14 7200 Lakeville Blvd – Apple Collision and Glass 2022 61,674 10.28 0.13 20170 Iberia Avenue – Tires Plus 2021 6,500 1.08 0.14 18477 Kenrick Ave – Raising Cane’s 2021 3,365 1.49 0.08 Source: City of Lakeville, Costar, Dakota County GIS, websites, interviews, LOCi Consulting LLC Page 220 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 32 Retail Real Estate Market: New Construction in Lakeville since 2018 (Continued) Development Year Built Square Footage Acreage Floor Area Ratio 20880 Keokuk Ave – Strip Mall (Emporium Room)2021 19,611 2.74 0.16 17380 Cedar Ave – Hy-Vee Fast & Fresh 2019 7,830 3.90 0.05 11542 207th St – ALDI 2018 22,261 2.52 0.20 9139 202nd St – O’Reilly Auto Parts 2018 7,569 1.01 0.17 19925 Idealic Ave – Advanced Oral Surgery 2018 4,164 0.75 .013 Source: City of Lakeville, Costar, Dakota County GIS, websites, interviews, LOCi Consulting LLC Page 221 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 33 Office Real Estate Market: Vacancy rates are lower than the metro and positive office space absorption since 2020 (driven mostly by medical office) 22 Average Lease and Vacancy Rates for Office Space in Lakeville * Data is Q1 2018 to Q2 2025.. Rents are average for gross lease types. Source: CoStar; LOCi Consulting LLC 23 Net Quarterly Absorption for Office Space in Lakeville * Data is Q1 2018 to Q2 2025 Source: CoStar; LOCi Consulting LLC Lakeville’s office vacancy rate was 5.2% in 2nd quarter of 2025 (versus 11.6% for the Minneapolis Market) The Lakeville office market has seen absorption* of about 20,000- square feet per year since 2018, although the last year (2024 Q2 to 2025 Q2) saw negative absorption * Absorption is the amount of new or vacant space moved into and occupied by users over a period of time. Positive absorption means new users are moving to the market and occupying new and vacant spaces. Negative absorption most likely results in vacant spaces.Page 222 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 34 Office Real Estate Market: New Office Constructed in Lakeville since 2018 – all but one development is medical office Development Year Built Square Footage Acreage Floor Area Ratio 18465 Orchard Trail – Lakeville Specialty Center 2022 107,036 4.24 0.58 17489 Dodd Blvd – Allina Health Lakeville North Clinic 2022 68,356 4.47 0.35 17210 Kenyon Ave – Summit Orthopedics 2021 25,600 1.72 0.34 18484 Kachina Ct – Park Nicollet Clinic 2019 28,128 4.63 0.14 21088 Keswick Loop – Compeer Financial 2018 30,295 3.40 0.20 Source: City of Lakeville, Costar, Dakota County GIS, websites, interviews, LOCi Consulting LLC Page 223 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 35 Planned and Pending Developments in Lakeville Heritage Commons 10th Addition has received pre-plat approval for the construction of two convenience restaurants - Chipotle and a drive-thru coffee shop, located at 202nd Street and Dodd Boulevard Oppidan is proposing the 13-acre Marketplace at Cedar with nine commercial lots located at the SE corner of Cedar Avenue (CSAH 23) and 179th Street (CSAH 9). Marketed tenants include ALDI, Taco Bell, Valvoline, and a credit union. The project received preliminary plat approval by the City Council MSP Pilot Knob, LLC has proposed the development of a 9,205 square-foot commercial space to be located within the Spirit of Brandtjen Farm commercial development for Grow Pediatrics. The project has not received final council approval Heritage Commons 9th Addition has received final plat approval for the development of a Chase Bank Commercial Single-Family 539 total available single-family lots as of June 30, 2025 259 total single-family lots preliminary platted, pending final plat Townhomes 616 total available townhome lots as of June 30, 2025 250 townhome lots preliminary platted, pending final plat Apartments Crown LMN, LLC been approved to develop two market- rate, four story multi-family apartment buildings with 182 units on just under 10 acres located north of 210th Street (CSAH 70) and west of Keokuk Avenue (This project may not move forward) Ron Clark Construction has received final plat approval by the City Council for a development to be known as Kenyon Green—with 15 attached townhomes and a 49-unit multi- family apartment building on a 6.5-acre parcel Residential Page 224 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 36 Appendix Page 225 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 37 A.1 Median Household Income Proj. Annual Estimate Forecast Growth Rate 2025 2030 2025-2030 City of Lakeville $132,898 $152,332 2.8% Cedar Avenue Study Area 5-Minute Drive-Time Area $126,924 $145,765 2.8% 10-Minute Drive-Time Area $119,242 $134,470 2.4% 15-Minute Drive-Time Area $109,551 $121,263 2.1% Dakota County $103,582 $113,378 1.8% Minneapolis-St. Paul CBSA $99,859 $109,679 1.9% United States $81,624 $92,476 2.5% Source: US Census Bureau; ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC Page 226 of 251 Market Analysis for Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 A.2 Households by Age and Income in Lakeville 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ Less than $15,000 147 289 255 282 444 501 686 $15,000-$24,999 114 209 248 249 469 501 739 $25,000-$34,999 99 262 268 235 388 503 846 $35,000-$49,999 300 858 958 643 938 1,089 1,362 $50,000-$74,999 322 1,543 1,753 1,516 1,697 2,196 1,713 $75,000-$99,999 350 1,919 2,288 2,007 1,959 1,997 1,155 $100,000-$149,999 235 2,590 3,871 3,644 3,423 2,349 744 $150,000-$199,999 75 1,855 3,309 3,010 2,577 1,202 514 $200,000+28 1,742 4,028 4,219 3,559 1,426 393 Median HH Inc.$61,128 $107,258 $130,460 $137,297 $121,482 $86,722 $54,588 Minneapolis-St. Paul $53,317 $97,534 $119,053 $126,783 $112,459 $80,580 $52,412 CBSA 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+ Less than $15,000 143 250 211 251 300 438 790 $15,000-$24,999 99 174 172 193 312 423 742 $25,000-$34,999 84 201 197 159 245 420 831 $35,000-$49,999 282 730 757 541 676 931 1,477 $50,000-$74,999 327 1,396 1,476 1,376 1,332 2,178 2,075 $75,000-$99,999 375 1,815 2,032 2,013 1,680 2,114 1,525 $100,000-$149,999 270 2,700 3,505 3,633 3,016 2,702 1,044 $150,000-$199,999 89 2,224 3,345 3,447 2,623 1,568 864 $200,000+38 2,530 4,613 5,335 4,022 2,236 799 Median HH Inc.$66,838 $121,424 $145,999 $153,123 $139,550 $100,012 $62,376 Minneapolis-St. Paul $56,933 $107,563 $130,078 $140,611 $127,872 $93,170 $60,030 CBSA Source: ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC 2025 Age of Householder 2030 Age of Householder Page 227 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 39 A3 Consumer Spending in Retail Categories In the PMA Estimate Forecast Growth 2025 2030 2025-2030 Apparel and Accessories $131,952,021 $136,147,978 $4,195,957 Electronics $98,644,558 $101,637,838 $2,993,280 Pets $53,786,322 $55,381,732 $1,595,410 Toys $9,538,135 $9,832,874 $294,739 Sporting Goods $14,340,669 $14,807,825 $467,156 Books $6,332,023 $6,514,428 $182,405 Groceries $378,421,636 $389,942,505 $11,520,869 Restaurants $220,651,845 $227,693,334 $7,041,489 Liquor $36,035,529 $37,126,013 $1,090,484 Pharmacy $37,276,088 $38,321,474 $1,045,386 Furniture and Home Improvement $129,996,336 $133,973,377 $3,977,041 Household and Personal Care $75,548,333 $77,875,734 $2,327,401 Total $1,192,523,495 $1,229,255,113 $36,731,618 * Data is shown in 2025 Dollars, adjusted from ESRI projection. ESRI assumes 2.4% inflation. Source: US Census Bureau; ESRI; LOCi Consulting LLC Page 228 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 40 A4 Est. Employment by Industry for the Metro Area and Lakeville, 2024 Number Pct.Number Pct. Utilities 7,035 0%------ Construction 80,031 5%1,237 6% Manufacturing 172,794 10%2,871 13% Wholesale Trade 77,820 4%853 4% Retail Trade 155,474 9%2,787 13% Transportation and Warehousing 79,091 4%948 4% Information 28,735 2%267 1% Finance and Insurance 99,668 6%502 2% Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 27,103 2%317 1% Professional and Technical Services 124,295 7%615 3% Management of Companies 74,226 4%237 1% Administrative and Waste Services 84,323 5%1,525 7% Educational Services 137,938 8%2,369 11% Health Care and Social Assistance 304,451 17%2,668 12% Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 35,946 2%659 3% Accommodation and Food Services 135,106 8%2,319 11% Other Services 56,525 3%856 4% Public Administration 79,689 5%542 3% Total 1,764,363 100%21,599 100% Notes: City of Lakeville Utilities employment is not disclosed for the City of Lakeville. Seven County Metro Area Source: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development; Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages; Employment Outlook; LOCi Consulting LLC Page 229 of 251 Market Analysis for Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 A.5 For-Sale Housing Demand in the Study Area, 2025 to 2030. Households in 2025 Households in 2030 Projected growth of the market Estimated percentage that will choose new for-sale housing Units needed to meet demand from household growth in Lakeville Estimated number of households that own in Lakeville in 2025 Pct. that will seek new for-sale housing between 2025 and 2030 Pct. that will choose new for-sale housing Units needed to meet demand from turnover in PMA Estimated demand from outside PMA Total Demand for For-Sale Housing in Lakeville Planned or pending lots in Lakeville Units needed in Lakeville Units needed in Lakeville Source: LOCi Consulting LLC 23,442 26% 3% 150 1. Based on distribution of MLS listed new construction sold between 2020 and 2024. Demand from For-Sale Housing Turnover in Lakeville 88% 1,916 28,873 2,182 Demand from Household Growth in Lakeville 26,691 Demand from Outside the PMA 5% 2,175 383 128 Demand in Lakeville by Housing Type 1 Single-Family Townhomes 75%25% 511 Planned and Pending Single-Family and Townhome Lots 1,664 Page 230 of 251 Market Analysis for Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 A.6 Rental Housing Demand in the Growth Area, 2025 to 2030 Households in 2025 Households in 2030 Projected growth of the market Estimated percentage that will choose new rental housing Units needed to meet demand from household growth in Lakeville Estimated number of households that rent in Lakeville in 2024 Pct. that will seek new rental housing between 2025 and 2030 Pct. that will choose new rental housing Units needed to meet demand from turnover in PMA Planned or pending rental units Total Demand for For-Sale Housing in Lakeville Estimated demand from outside PMA Total Demand for For-Sale Housing in Lakeville Source: LOCi Consulting LLC 26,691 Demand from Household Growth in Lakeville 69% 28,873 2,182 12% 266 Demand from For-Sale Housing Turnover in Lakeville 3,249 10% 223 Demand from Outside the PMA Planned and Pending Rental Units 230 258 5% 272 Page 231 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 43 A7 Retail Space Demand in the Growth Area, 2025-2030 Increase in Consumer Demand in 2025 Dollars, 2025 to 2030 Percent of Consumer Demand Spent at Brick and Mortar Retail Demand from Brick-and-Mortar Retail in the Market Times Percentage Capturable by the Retail Node Equals Consumer Demand for Retail Sales in the Market Divided by Average Sales per Square Foot $400 -$600 Equals Demand for New Retail Space in the Retail Node 7,800 -11,700 Source: ESRI; Minnesota Department of Revenue; Costar; LOCi Consulting LLC $36,731,618 15.0% $4,683,300 85% $31,222,000 Page 232 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 44 A.8 Medical Office Space Demand in the Study Area, 2025-2030 Estimated Base of Medial Office Employment, Seven County Metro Area, 2023 Ambulatory Health Care Services Total Estimated Total Square Footage Medical Office in Seven County Metro, 2025 1 Medical Office Square Footage per Employee Estimated Five-Year Growth of Medical Office Employment, Seven County Metro Area, 2022 - 2032 Ambulatory Health Care Services Total Additional Medical Office Space Demanded in Seven County Metro, 2025-2030 Medical Office SF in Lakeville, 2025 1 Medical Office SF in Lakeville as Percent of Total Metro Estimated Demand for Medical Office SF in Lakeville Estimated capture rate for Study Area Estimated Demand for Medical Office SF in Lakeville 1. Costar data. LOCi Consulting LLC 91,729 91,729 Source: ESRI; Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development; CoStar; 24,000,000 262 4,450 4,450 1,200,000 339,000 1.4% 16,950 10.0% 1,695 Page 233 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 45 Data Resources and Study Limitations The data in this market analysis are compiled from a variety of sources, including interviews with city officials, property managers, and real estate salespeople, along with secondary demographic, economic, and competitive resources. Sources are identified in the tables and figures. LOCi Consulting believes that these sources are reliable. However, there is no way to authenticate this data and information. LOCi Consulting does not guarantee the data and assumes no liability for any errors in fact, analysis, or judgement. The data in this analysis includes the most recent information available at the time of this analysis. The findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this demand analysis are based on the best judgements and analysis at the time of the study. LOCi Consulting makes no guarantees or assurances that the projections or conclusions will be realized as stated. Page 234 of 251 Market Analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Planning Study Prepared for TKDA and the City of Lakeville September 9, 2025 46 Contact Information: Grant Martin Principal LOCi Consulting LLC 651-888-8464 grant@lociconsult.com https://www.lociconsult.com/ Services: •Market studies •Demographic analysis •Customer segmentation •Market identification •Market sizing •Competitive analysis •Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and site selection •Data analytics Thank you! Page 235 of 251 City of Lakeville | DRAFT Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan | Appendix B B-1 Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Study Appendix B: Land Use Analysis DRAFT January 2026 Prepared by Introduction An analysis of past and current land use policy, recent de- velopments, and future needs was completed to inform land use recommendations within Cedar Avenue Small Area Plan. Outcomes of each of these analyses are high- lighted within this appendix to provide additional context and background. Additionally, considerations for how this analysis can be used within future policy updates and the 2050 Comprehensive Plan are provided. Existing Framework A review of existing land use policy and recent devel- opment activity established an existing framework and understanding for the small area plan to be built upon. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Lakeville Thrive!, the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, has guided Lakeville’s development decisions since its adoption in October of 2019. The plan established growth management and land use goals and policies that support fiscally responsible growth that aligns with community needs and character. The future land use plan utilizes 16 land use categories to guide development decision throughout the community. The Cedar Avenue small area plan study area is included within the Cedar Corridor special planning area. At the time of the plan’s development the Red Line Bus Rapid Transit Corridor (BRT) was planned for extension along Page 236 of 251 City of Lakeville | DRAFT Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan | Appendix B B-2 Cedar Avenue. The Cedar Corridor was analyzed for transit-oriented development at a minimum average density of 8.0 dwelling units per acre to support the transit operations. Four land use categories were used within the small area plan study area: Table 1. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Categories Land Use Density (du/ac)Anticipated Uss Acres % of Area Low to Medium Density 4.0-5.0 Single family, two family, detached townhouses 557 64% Medium to High Density 5.0-9.0 Detached townhouse, quad, row/ back-to-back attached townhous- es 119 14% Corridor Mixed Use 26.0-45.0 High density residential, senior housing, commercial, office 119 14% A station was planned at Cedar Avenue and 195th Street, located within the study area. Land within a ½ mile of the transit station was guided to support the development of 2,283 to 3,656 new dwelling units at a den- sity range of 0.1 to 45.0 units per acre. The Corridor Mixed Use land use category was guided to support the creation of 1 job per every 920 sf, resulting in a total job creation within the study area of 1,557 employees. Table 2. 195th Street Transit Station Plan Land Use Net Acres Density Dwelling Units Min Max Min Max Low Density Residential 1.0 0.1 3.0 1 3 Low to Medium Density 159.3 4.0 5.0 637 796 Medium to High Density 106.1 4.0 7.0 424 743 Corridor Mixed Use 47 26.0 45 1,221 2,114 Total 313.2 2,283 3,656 The extension of the Red Line BRT is no longer planned following Metropolitan Coun- cil and Dakota County decisions, initiating the desire to explore land use opportuni- ties and market realities through this small area plan. Page 237 of 251 City of Lakeville | DRAFT Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan | Appendix B B-3 Recent Development Context While transportation context has changed, development surrounding the project area has continued. Ad- jacent development has included a combination of single-family homes alongside detached and attached townhomes, reflecting broader housing market trends and responding to Lakeville’s evolving demographic and economic conditions. In recent years, the surrounding area has experienced steady housing develop- ment and demand, supported by both traditional detached homes and higher-density, lower-maintenance and more affordable housing options. These developments support the addition of 778 units near the study area. Table 3. Recent Development Context Development Housing Types Total Units Net Density Gross Density Voyager Farms Addition Detached townhomes 154 units 4.0 u/a 2.47 u/a Glacier Creek 5th Addition Single-family homes 39 units 3.18 u/a 3.10 u/a Ameila Meadows Single-family and at- tached townhomes 232 units 3.88 u/a 3.15 u/a Berres Ridge 9th Addition Single-family homes 34 units 2.6 u/a 1.95 u/a Reserve at Cedar Creek Single-family homes 48 units 3.27 u/a 2.4 u/a Cedar Creek Villas Addition Detached townhomes 66 units 3.13 u/a 2.20 u/a Cedar Hills Addition Detached townhomes 205 units 3.11 u/a 2.16 u/a Spatially, these new neighborhoods are concentrated near existing transportation corridors and utility infrastructure extensions, enabling incremental and efficient expansion of the built environment. Their lo- cation also places new residents in close proximity to emerging commercial areas, parks, and city services, enhancing the overall accessibility and reinforcing development opportunities. Development to the south- east of the study area supports the extension of city services into the study area, opening opportunities for growth within the study area, moving from south to north on the east side of Cedar Avenue before crossing over Cedar Avenue to support development on the west side. As these developments take shape, they are beginning to define the character of the study area, transi- tioning it from largely rural and low-density development patterns towards neighborhoods that support neighborhood commercial uses while preserving existing natural corridors. The concentration of new developments and growth opportunities underscores the need for coordinated planning across land use and transportation networks to support safe, convenient, and equitable infrastructure and development. Page 238 of 251 City of Lakeville | DRAFT Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan | Appendix B B-4 Land Use Analysis The land use analysis for the Cedar Avenue Small Area Plan was developed to establish a clear and data-in- formed foundation for how this key growth area should evolve over time. The analysis combined insights from the market study, recent development patterns, and the city’s adopted policy guidance to create a land use framework that reflects current conditions while anticipating future opportunities. This approach ensures that land use recommendations are grounded in local context, aligned with market realities, and positioned to support strategic public investment. This work comes at a pivotal time, as the city will soon begin its 2050 Comprehensive Plan update. The land use analysis completed for the small area plan is intentionally designed to inform and complement this up- coming effort. The framework, land use categories, and development are intended to serve as foundational inputs and data points for the broader Comprehensive Plan. In particular, the analysis helps define land use typologies that support investment within the study area and respond to the community’s long-term hous- ing, employment, and commercial needs. The Cedar Avenue study area is a significant growth area within the community, as one of the largest areas positioned to accommodate new housing, commercial development, infrastructure extension, and public and open spaces. With ongoing shifts in residential densities and evolving expectations for neighbor- hood-serving commercial development, it is critical to understand the development capacity of the area and how it contributes to Lakeville’s overall land use balance. Establishing this understanding ensures that future development not only fits the study area context but also supports broader community goals related to housing diversity, fiscal health, and sustainable infrastructure expansion. The market analysis prepared as part of the study served as the basis for defining a set of land use typolo- gies tailored to the study area. These typologies reflect both recent development patterns in Lakeville and the projected market environment for the next 10 to 15 years. By grounding land use guidance in market conditions, the analysis supports development that is realistic, financially feasible, and responsive to long- term community needs. A total of six land use typologies were used to build land use recommendations within the study area. These categories provide a structured approach for evaluating development scenarios, calculating housing capaci- ty, and identifying the infrastructure needed to support full build-out of the area. Single-family homes Density: 2.5 to 4.5 units/acre Description: This typology reflects traditional detached housing on individual lots, offering private yards, driveway access, and lower-density neighborhood character. Detached townhomes Density: 3.0 to 6.0 units/acre Description: Detached townhomes provide a transition between single-family neigh- borhoods and higher-density residential forms. These homes offer standalone units, but at a slightly higher density and may incorporate shared maintenance or managed common areas. Page 239 of 251 City of Lakeville | DRAFT Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan | Appendix B B-5 Twinhomes Density: 4.0 to 7.0 units/acre Description: Twinhomes include two attached units within a single structure, blending moderate density living with a residential character similar to single-fami- ly homes. Attached townhomes Density: 6.0 to 9.0 units/acre Description: Attached townhomes offer a medium-density building typology, where units share walls and have smaller individual yards. Apartments Density: 18.0 to 32.0 units/acre Description: Apartments provide the highest-density residential option within the study area, typically consisting of multi-story buildings with a mix of unit sizes and shared amenities. Commercial and office development Description: Commercial and office developments accommodate retail service, medical, and employment-oriented businesses that support both the study area and the broader community. Several key physical and environmental considerations also shaped the small area plan recommendations within the study area. The construction of Grand Prairie Park introduces a major amenity that will serve as a regional attraction and influence land values, development desirability and connections to outdoor recreation. Additionally, the study area includes multiple green space corridors and natural drainageways that lay a critical role in storm- water management. These natural features, combined with areas of challenging typography, represent important constraints but also significant opportunities to integrate environmental systems into neighborhood design. Pre- serving and enhancing these features will support both ecological function and community character as develop- ment progresses. Page 240 of 251 City of Lakeville | DRAFT Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan | Appendix B B-6 Consumption estimates The market analysis findings identified land use consumption estimates for the next 15 years. These estimates were identified to align with the city’s 2050 household projections identified by the Metropolitan County and over- all market trends and conditions. This analysis found that nearly 75 percent of the study area could be built out by 2040, with the remaining area assumed to be developed in following years. The timeline for this development was not identified, because it is challenging to forecast accurate and defendable market conditions beyond 15 years. Table 4. 2050 Forecasts Forecast 2020 2030 2040 2050 Population 69,690 79,990 84,700 89,550 Households 23,265 28,100 31,000 33,100 Employment 15,888 23,100 25,200 29,900 To support further understanding of development potential and the relationship to various land use categories and infrastructure planning, a development phasing plan was developed (Figure 6 of the study report). This phasing aligns with the planned utility extension from the southeast in Amelia Meadows to the north. It also aligns with the 2050 forecasts, assuming that the market and development potential supports 59% of the city’s household growth for the 2020 to 2030 and 2030 to 2040 growth periods. The phasing plan was developed to identify the land use consumption need to support the development of a mix of residential typologies to support housing forecasts. The following table outlines the total acres identified for the land use typologies as grouped together in the small area plan by forecast period. The number of units identified was calculated using an average density for each typology group. Additionally, the unit total and density calcula- tions did not remove acreage for future infrastructure of service uses. It is recommended that further analysis is completed during the Comprehensive Plan update. Table 5. Land Use Consumption by Phase. 2025-2030 Total Single-family and De- tached townhomes Attached townhomes and Twinhomes Apartments 3 u/a 6 u/a 18 u/a Acres 169 acres 135 acres 22 acres 12 acres Household units 753 units 405 units 132 units 216 units 4.5 Average Net Density Page 241 of 251 City of Lakeville | DRAFT Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan | Appendix B B-7 2030 - 2040 Total Single-family and De- tached townhomes Attached townhomes and Twinhomes Apartments 3 u/a 6 u/a 18 u/a Acres 344 acres 270 acres 50 acres 24 acres Household units 1,542 units 810 units 300 units 432 units 4.5 Average Net Density Beyond 2040 (Full build-out) Total Single-family and De- tached townhomes Attached townhomes and Twinhomes Apartments 3 u/a 6 u/a 18 u/a Acres 164 acres 114 acres 35 acres 15 acres Household units 822 units 342 units 210 units 270 units 5.0 Average Net Density 2050 Considerations The small area plan provides data points and interim recommendations that can be used by the city within the 2050 Comprehensive Plan update process and to inform conversations with developers and property owners about development and infrastructure activities within and near the study area. The following considerations may help to inform future planning efforts regarding the Cedar Avenue study area. Evolving density expectations for lower density residential typologies Single-family and detached townhome typologies traditionally align with Lakeville’s lower density land use cate- gories. However, recent development activity in and around the study area has produced higher net densities for these housing types. This trend may warrant revisiting and potentially increasing density ranges for these cate- gories in future land use planning to better reflect market conditions, development feasibility, and efficient use of infrastructure. Medium-Density typologies align with established land use categories Attached townhomes and twinhomes are well aligned with Lakeville’s existing medium density land use categories. These typologies fit comfortably within density ranges historically applied in the City’s planning framework and continue to meet demand for flexible, attainable, and moderately dense housing options. Their placement in the land use plan should reinforce transitions between lower-density neighborhoods and higher-density districts. Page 242 of 251 City of Lakeville | DRAFT Cedar Avenue Land Use & Market Analysis Plan | Appendix B B-8 High-Density Residential should consider form and function Apartment development aligns with the City’s high density residential categories and has historically been deliv- ered across a wide density spectrum. Future planning should explore this full range, including building scale, inter- nal circulation, access, parking design, and resident amenities, to ensure the City provides rental options suitable for a diverse array of households. The land use plan should support strategic placement of high density housing to reinforce multimodal access, transit potential, and proximity to services. Commercial and office uses should consider both neighborhood and regional needs Commercial and office areas in the study area should be planned to accommodate a variety of small scale neigh- borhood services and may support broader regional commercial activity. The study area’s location along Cedar Avenue and the future 185th Street extension, support both localized daily needs and regional visitation. Green Corridors are foundational to future land use and infrastructure planning The green corridors that traverse the study area, including drainageways, natural resource areas, and challenging topography, are key structural elements for future neighborhood design. These features must be intentionally integrated into master planning efforts to ensure ecological function, stormwater performance, and community character are preserved. The corridors also offer opportunities for trails, open space connections, and neighbor- hood identity. Single-Family and Detached Townhomes will remain leading market drivers According to the market study, single-family and detached townhomes show the highest demand and absorption potential. These are also the development types most recently delivered in surrounding areas. Their placement within the land use framework should reflect the small area plan’s development structure, align with lower volume transportation networks, and take advantage of adjacency to green corridors to enhance neighborhood quality. Twinhomes and Attached Townhomes as transitional, market-driven housing options Twinhome and attached townhome products also exhibit strong market support and may occupy significant development areas within the study area. These typologies serve as effective transitions between lower-density housing and higher intensity uses. They are well suited near apartment sites, commercial areas, and community amenities where increased activity levels and infrastructure capacity support a more compact residential form. Strategic distribution of apartment development to support housing diversity and com- merce Apartment land uses were intentionally placed in smaller concentrations throughout the study area to diversify housing choices and strengthen the viability of commercial development. By locating higher-density housing near amenities and activity centers, the plan supports walkability, enhances access to services, and helps generate customer bases for emerging commercial nodes. Commercial typology supports local and regional activity nodes The commercial typology was applied to areas positioned to serve both neighborhood residents and regional travelers. Its placement leverages visibility and access along Cedar Avenue while also benefiting from proximity to higher-density residential development. The future extension of 185th Street is expected to further enhance mobility and access, potentially catalyzing additional commercial investment in the study area. Page 243 of 251 Date: 2/17/2026 2026-2036 Parks System Master Plan and State of the Parks Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: No formal action, for discussion only. Overview Planning and implementation of the 2026-2036 Parks System Master Plan began in late 2025. As part of the Existing Conditions portion of the process, several initiatives have been completed: • Ongoing meetings with the steering committee, composed of staff and advisory committee members. • Over the last few months, staff have met with advisory group members, representatives from youth athletic associations, and other community stakeholders to gather feedback on the current state of the parks system and the future state it could take. • Community members and park visitors were invited to complete an online survey that was advertised at most park locations, posted on social media channels, and posted on the city’s website. o A total of 1,309 responses were received, representing an estimated 1,900 youth and 4,600 individuals. As we move into the Needs Assessment portion of the process, a public open house is scheduled for March 4. Staff will present a summary of the community-wide survey for review by the Mayor and City Council. Supporting Information 1. Community Survey Results Summary Financial Impact: $NA Budgeted: No Source: NA Envision Lakeville Community Values: Access to a Multitude of Natural Amenities and Recreational Opportunities Report Completed by: Joe Masiarchin, Parks and Recreation Director Page 244 of 251 ANTLERS PARK ARONSON PARK BASSETT PARK BRACKETTS CROSSING BUNKER HILL PARK CASPERSON PARK CEDAR CROSSING PARK CEDAR HIGHLANDS PARK CHADWICK PARK CHERRYVIEW PARK DAKOTA HEIGHTS PARK DODD POINTE PARK DODD TRAIL PARK EAST COMMUNITY PARK FAIRFIELD PARK FIELDSTONE PARK GRAND PRAIRIE PARK GREENTRIDGE PARK GREENWAY PARK HIGHVIEW HEIGHTS PARK HYPOINTE CROSSING PARK INDEPENDENCE PARK JAYCEE PARK KENMORE PARK KENREEL PARK KENSIGNTON PARK KING PARKKNOB HILL PARK LAKERIDGE PARK LEGACY PARK LONE OAK PARK LYNWOOD HEIGHTS PARK MARION FIELDS PARK MEADOWS PARK MIDDLE CREEK PARK NORTH CREEK PARK OAK SHORES PARK ORCHARD LAKE BEACH ORCHARD LAKE PARK PARKVIEW PARK PINNACLE RESERVE PARK PRAIRIE LAKE PARK QUIGLEY-SIME PARK RITTER FARM PARK ROLLING OAKS PARK SLEEPY HALLOW PARK SPY GLASS PARK STEVE MICHAUD PARK STONEBOROUGH PARK SUMMERLYN PARK TERRACE PARK VALLEY LAKE PARK VILLAGE CREEK PARK WAYSIDE PARK WILD MEADOWS PARK FOX BOROUGH & CONSERVATION AREA ANTLERS PARK ARONSON PARK BASSETT PARK BRACKETTS CROSSING PARK BUNKER HILL PARK CASPERSON PARK CEDAR CROSSING PARK CEDAR HIGHLANDS PARK CHADWICK PARK CHERRYVIEW PARK DAKOTA HEIGHTS PARK DODD POINTE PARK DODD TRAIL PARK EAST COMMUNITY PARK FAIRFIELD PARK FIELDSTONE PARK GRAND PRAIRIE PARK GREENTRIDGE PARK GREENWAY PARK HIGHVIEW HEIGHTS PARK HYPOINTE CROSSING PARK INDEPENDENCE PARK JAYCEE PARKKENMORE PARK KENREEL PARK KENSIGNTON PARK KING PARK KNOB HILL PARK LAKERIDGE PARK LEGACY PARK LONE OAK PARK LYNWOOD HEIGHST PARK MARION FIELDS PARK MEADOWS PARK MIDDLE CREEK PARK NORTH CREEK PARK OAK SHORES PARK ORCHARD LAKE BEACHORCHARD LAKE PARK PARKVIEW PARK PINNACLE RESERVE PARK PRAIRIE LAKE PARK QUIGLEY-SIME PARK RITTER FARM PARK ROLLING OAKS PARK SLEEPY HALLOW PARK SPY GLASS PARKSTEVE MICHAUD PARK STONEBOROUGH PARK SUMMERLYN PARK TERRACE PARK VALLEY LAKE PARK VILLAGE CREEK PARK WAYSIDE PARK WILD MEADOWS PARK FOX BOROUGH & CONSERVATION AREA • Have students in the district • I grew up in Lakeville and have many ties to the city OtherI live in Lakeville I live outside of Lakeville, but I still use the parks I work and/or go to school in Lakeville 92.8%6.5%8.5%1.2% 1 What best describes your connection to Lakeville? (Choose all that apply) 3 Which park do you visit the most? (choose one) Which park is the closest to where you live?2 1,309 Responses Page 245 of 251 Hiking Sledding Playing Hockey Pleasure Skating Fat Tire/ Mountain BikingCross-Country SkiingSnowshoeingSnowmobiling Ice Fishing Other Daily A few times per week A few times per month A few times per year Never *Common responses: -Walking -Running -Bike Trails PlaygroundsPaved Trails Natural Surface Trails Baseball/ Softball Fields Soccer/Football/ Lacrosse Fields Basketball Courts Volleyball Picnic Shelter/ Gazebo Indoor Park Buildings Natural Areas Tennis Courts Pickleball Courts Beaches Disc Golf Dog Park Horseback Riding TrailsArchery Other Daily A few times per week A few times per month A few times per year Never ? ? *Common responses: -Bocce Ball -Mountain biking -Hockey Rinks -Archery Access KENSIGNTON PARK LYNWOOD HEIGHTS PARK MARION FIELDS PARK STONEBOROUGH PARK 4 How often do you or members of your household use the following facilities in Lakeville parks during the summer/ when it’s warm out? 5 How often do you or members of your household do the following activities in Lakeville parks during the winter/ when it’s cold out? Page 246 of 251 WATER-BASED AMENTITIES TRAILS, CONNCETIVITY AND NATURAL AREAS Strong desire for splashpads, a community pool/public indoor pool, and a waterpark. Strong want for a Community Center! (Indoor pool, playground, walking track, courts, gym, pickleball, meeting/party space) Other locations for beach and water access (kayak and canoe launches) Better connections, maintenance, and safer crossings More natural surface trails and pollinator/native areas (nature play) INDOOR RECREATION PLAYGROUNDS Year round restroom opportunity Strongly value dog friendly amentities (more dog waste bins) Larger dog parks (ability to seperate large and small dogs, space for o leash dog park) Want for large destination parks Designed for all ages More courts (especially west areas but Want to keep tennis courts and pickleball courts) More accesible parks (rubber surfacing instead of woodchips and parks within walking distance) Better management of use of space Better parking solutions Want more of or better: baseball/softball elds, soccer, lacrosse, hockey, volleyball, basketball, batting cages, football elds Court lighting More winter rec facilities: cross-country skiing, sledding/snow tubing, outdoor skating rinks, snowshoe trails, cold plunge and sauna Real/permanent restrooms, more drinking fountains, more shade (structures/shelters or natural), benches, picnic tables, better lighting and safety imporvements SPECIALIZED RECREATION More specialized rec facilities: Disc Golf, Mountian biking trails, Archery, Zipline, Obstacle courses, Climbing wall, Skate/Scooter park, Outdoor workout equipment PICKLEBALLDOG PARKS WINTER RECREATION PARK AMENTITIES SPORTS FACILITIES 6 What activities or amentities do you wish were available or wish there were more of? Page 247 of 251 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 % Ar t s a n d C u l t r u r e In f a n t / T o d d l e r Yo u t h S p o r t s Ad u l t S p o r t s Se n o i r C i t i z e n St u d e n t i n t h e sc h o o l s y s t e m Cy c l i s t Na t u r a l i s t , B i r d w a t c h e r , Fo r a g e r , e t c . Do g O w n e r Ot h e r ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y ) *Common other responses: -Archery -Runner In general, the parks in Lakeville meet my needs 25% 58% 12% 4% 1%In general, the trails in Lakeville meet my needs 23% 55% 16% 5% 1%In general, the recreation programs in Lakeville meet my needs 16% 52% 26% 5% 1% Lakeville parks need updating 8% 29% 43% 17% 3% Lakeville’s Park System needs additional/dierent amenities 11% 29% 42% 15% 3% Lakeville needs to focus on taking care of what is already there, rather than doing something new 13% 29%37% 18% 3% Lakeville’s parks are well-maintained 20% 62% 15% 2% 1%I feel safe when using the parks and trails in Lakeville 33% 58% 8% 1% 0%I feel that Lakeville’s parks oer something for everybody 23% 56% 16% 4% 1% Strongly Agree Agree DisagreeNeutral Strongly Disagree 8 Do you or members of your family fall into any of the following user groups or special interests?(Check all that apply) 7 Please indicate how you feel about the following statements Page 248 of 251 Lack of time Lack of interestin oerings Not enough youngkid options Not enough teenoptions Not enough adultoptions Not enough senioroptions Don't knowabout them Too dicultto get to Condition offacilities Too crowded Don't feel safethere No restrooms No drinking water Prefer other cities'park oerings Prefer Dakota County/Regional Park oerings Prefer other privaterecreation options (golf, resorts, camps, etc.) Not physically able/Accessibility issues 10 20 30 40 % 9 If you don't use Lakeville parks, or your use is limited, what are some of the reasons? (Check all that apply) Page 249 of 251 EAGAN •Has a nice Community Center example: better winter indoor options •Waterparks/Splashpads •Lebanon Hills: natural wooded trails, large anture preserve, dirt paths, shade, safer feeling •Woodhaven Park: inclusive, accessible, great for all ages •Strong recreation programming •Skate Park MAPLE GROVE •Central Park/Ice Loop: winter skating loop with lights, re pits •Destination playgrounds •Indoor community spaces •Massive connected trail system •Family-centered amenities (all ages) •Fernbrook Fields: high quality sports complexes APPLE VALLEY •Outdoor waterpark and splashpads •Community Center •Strong indoor winter options (toddler play gym) •Cobblestone Lake area (walkable, high quaility public space) •Great Park renovation (Hayes Park, Kelly Park) THREE RIVER PARK DISTRICT •Major connected trail network •Large natural areas •Destination playgrounds •Great maps and waynding •Outdoor recreation rentals (kayaks, skis, etc.) BLOOMINGTON •Hyland Park/Chutes and Ladders-style mega plaground •Skate parks •Great trail system •Well-maintained sports elds •Programming for kids SHAKOPEE •Community Center (indoor pool, kids waterpark) •Strong sports complexes •Great winter and indoor options •Farmstead Bike Park •Good public engagement practices EDINA •Centennial Lakes (beautiful, multi-use, near restraunts)•Great trails•Programming and indoor winter activities•Walkable parks integrated into neighborhoods WOODBURY •Large rec center •Impressive sports complexes•Great trails •Big destination playgrounds BURNSVILLE •Restored natural areas•Cross-country ski trails •Nicollet Commons•Variety of nature focused spaces ROSEMONT AND PRIOR LAKE •Great sports eld maintenance•Splash pads•Natural playgrounds•Greenways and trails COMMON THEMES: -A Community Center -More year round spaces for activities (indoors) -Water Amenities -Natural Areas (wooded) -Destinations -High quaility sports facilities 10 Are there any communities you think Lakeville should look to as examples of a great park system? What makes them stand out to you? Page 250 of 251 SUMMARY: -Residents expressed strong appreciation for Lakeville’s parks, trails, and natural amenities, but also voiced concerns about accessibility, natural area preservation, balanced development, and maintenance. Many comments focused on improving trail connectivity, adding year-round facilities (restrooms), protecting natural resources, designing new parks for all ages and upgrading or adding more athletic facilities. Several residents feel the need for a community center. SIMILIAR COMMENTS: -Connectivity, safety, and trail condition concerns.-Residents want more natural preservation, not more development.-Maintenance of existing assets is more important to many than building new ones.-Archery at Ritter Farm is a top-value asset that should be protected.-Crowding at Antler’s Park and limited parking are major issues.-Strong demand for year-round restrooms and indoor recreation.-Many feel Lakeville should balance sports with natural areas and family recreation.-Desire for more shade, benches, seating, and bathrooms across parks.-Concern about loss of green space due to housing growth.-Overall, residents appreciate Lakeville’s parks but want thoughtful, sustainable growth. 11 Do you have any other thoughts, questions, or concerns that we should know about regarding the parks and trails facilities in Lakeville? Page 251 of 251