Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
06-15-2026
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 15, 2026 - 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers Members of the public can participate in person at Lakeville City Hall, 20195 Holyoke Avenue. The mayor will allow for public comments and questions at the appropriate time. The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees, and boards. Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy, practices, input from constituents, and a council member’s personal judgment. 1. Call to order, moment of silence and flag pledge 2. Roll Call 3. Citizen Comments 4. Additional agenda information 5. Presentations/Introductions a. Pan-O-Prog Presentation b. Lakeville Arenas Annual Report 6. Consent Agenda a. Check Register Summary b. Minutes of the 06/01/2026 City Council Meeting c. Approval of Supplemental Agreements for 2050 Comprehensive Plan System Plan Updates d. Authorize Grant Agreements with Dakota County for 2026 Aquatic Invasive Species Management Activities e. Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of Information Screens for the Police Department Real Time Information Center (RTIC) f. Proposal from Braun Intertec for Special Inspection and Testing Services for East Community Park Phase II: CIP #25-20 g. Approve Resolution Amending Resolution 11-46 Regarding the Finance Committee h. ISG Conditional Use Permit for Lot 3, Marketplace at Cedar i. Water Efficiency Grant Agreement with Metropolitan Council j. Restoration Covenant Church Conditional Use Permit Page 1 of 485 City Council Meeting Agenda June 15, 2026 Page 2 k. Resolution Approving Charitable Gambling Lakeville Lions l. Resolution Appointing Judges for the August 11, 2026 Primary Election m. Joint Powers Agreement for Maintenance of the North Creek Greenway East Lake Park Segment Between the City of Lakeville and Dakota County n. Approval of Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County for CSAH 46 Pavement Preservation, Drainage Improvements, and City Utility Repairs o. Letter of Intent for Solar Improvements at City Hall p. Approval of Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County for Preliminary and Final Engineering and Traffic Signal Construction for the CSAH 50/5 and I-35 Interchange 7. Action Items a. EB First Addition CUP and ROW Vacation b. Authentix Lakeville Second Addition Preliminary Plat 8. Unfinished Business 9. New Business New Business items are intended for informal City Council discussion and will not begin before 6:30 p.m. The Council may provide direction to staff but will not take formal action on these matters. a. Legislative Session Recap b. Snowmobile Map Update 10. Council/Committee Updates 11. Announcements 12. Adjourn Page 2 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Pan-O-Prog Presentation Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Overview Supporting Information None Financial Impact: $ Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Report Completed by: Page 3 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Lakeville Arenas Annual Report Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Overview Supporting Information 1. Lakeville Arenas_2025 Anual Report & Budget Presentation Packet 2. LakevilleArenas_2025_AnnualReport (1) Financial Impact: $ Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Report Completed by: Page 4 of 485 Lakeville ARENAS Built for the Community 2025 Annual Report Presented to the Lakeville City Council Lakeville Area Schools Board Spring 2026 6,635 Ice Hours $2.14M Revenue 1,096 LTS Enrollments Page 5 of 485 Who We Are Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Lakeville and ISD 194 (Lakeville Area Schools), formed 2006 Operates Ames Arena, Hasse Arena, and the Allina Health Pavilion Rink —the covered outdoor sheet opened Thanksgiving 2024 Operating expenses are fully self-funded through ice rentals and programming revenue —no daily operating tax subsidy Governed by a 5-member Board of Directors representing the City, ISD 194, and the community at large Key partners: City of Lakeville · ISD 194 · Lakeville Hockey Association · Heritage Figure Skating Club Ames Arena 19900 Ipava Ave · 2 indoor sheets Est. 1994 Hasse Arena 8525 215th St W · 1 indoor sheet Est. 2006 Allina Health Pavilion Rink Covered outdoor sheet at Hasse Opened 2024 –2025 Season Joe Bergquist, General Manager · Tonyea Patterson, Admin Supervisor · Nick Ames & Jeff Zimmerman, Operations Managers Page 6 of 485 Built for the Community 2025 —The Year Everything Came Together First Full Year Pavilion Rink Record 6,635 Ice Hours Maggie Flaherty & the Walter Cup Inaugural Mite Day Camps First Sanctioned US Figure Skating Comp Record Learn to Skate 1,096 Enrollments A world-class community asset —built and sustained by Lakeville, for Lakeville. Self-funded · 100% Community-Serving · No Daily Tax Subsidy Page 7 of 485 ICE TIME & USAGE Record Ice Hours in 2025 6,635 total hours —up 13.1% from 2024 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 LHA ISD 194 HS HFSC Clinics/Camps Other Ice Adult Hockey Pickup 2024 2025 +549.5 hrs Other Ice (new programs, tournaments, Pavilion) +213.5 hrs LHA Ice —continued partnership growth +132 hrs Adult Hockey +35% year-over-year +45.25 hrs Pickup Ice Sales +26% year-over-year Page 8 of 485 PROGRAMS & COMMUNITY IMPACT Growing Every Program 1,096 Enrollments —Highest Ever Top 5 program in Minnesota · 4 sessions/year Learn to Skate 53 Enrollments in 2025 Up from 24 in 2024, 8 in 2023 —remarkable trajectory Aspire to Skate 336 Participants (Spring + Fall) Up from 283 in 2024 (+18.7%) —inaugural day camps Mite Leagues +62% Revenue Growth vs. 2024 $67,844 actual · new structured programs & camps Arena Programming 53 Skaters from across Midwest First-ever sanctioned US Figure Skating event, June 2025 Basic Skills Competition NEW Launched 2025 Private lesson add-on —highly successful first year Public Plus Ice Page 9 of 485 2025 Highlights & Events Jan 2025 Hockey Day Lakeville Allina Health Pavilion Rink Grand Opening · community celebration Feb 2025 MN Hockey District 8 Tournament Peewee-A Regional Tournament · Ames Arena Jun 2025 First Sanctioned US Figure Skating Competition 53 skaters from across the Midwest · Hasse Arena Fall 2025 Inaugural Mite Day Camps 34 participants · expanding to 5 days/week in 2026 Jan 1, 2025 US Hockey Hall of Fame Game MN Gophers Women's vs. Bemidji State · Hasse Arena Mar 2025 HFSC Annual Ice Show March 21–22 · Heritage Figure Skating Club Summer 2025 Maggie Flaherty & the Walter Cup Back-to-back PWHL champions · LHA Icecats skate event Dec 2025 Holidays at Hasse Skate with Santa · Open Door Pantry food drive · hot cocoa bar Page 10 of 485 ALLINA HEALTH PAVILION RINK Pavilion Rink —Year Two Upgrades Opened Thanksgiving 2024 · Grand Opening Hockey Day Lakeville, January 2025 Year 2 Improvements Completed: ✓Sunscreens installed —prevents ice glazing 10am–5pm ✓Locker rooms with heaters are completed ✓West/north wind screens for skater comfort ✓Radiant heaters above bleachers, benches & officials' boxes ✓Dragonfly fiber Wi-Fi —installed & ready ✓Broke Ground: concession stand, catering kitchen & 32×40 lobby What's Ahead Spring '26 Patio, playground & security fencing Summer '26 Zamboni/equipment shed 2027+ Dry-floor revenue: roller hockey, basketball, pickleball & more Long-term Footings for potential full enclosure —4th indoor sheet Page 11 of 485 2025 Financial Results Audited —Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025 $2.14M Total Revenue $1.995M Total Expenditures $140,942 Net Surplus $1.088M Fund Balance (12/31/25) 1,410,000 1,610,000 1,891,341 2,136,038 0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000 2022 2023 2024 2025 Revenue Growth 2022–2025 2025 Expenditures by Category Personnel 47.8% Utilities 19.4% Other Charges & Svcs 15.1% Capital Outlay 6.9% Commodities 7.2% Debt Service & Other 3.6% Page 12 of 485 REVENUE DIVERSIFICATION Diversified & Growing Revenue 72% 6% 8% 3% 3% 2%6% Ice Rentals Learn to Skate Concessions Advertising Arena Programming Event Admissions Other Year-over-Year Revenue Growth Ice Rental Revenue $1,527,398 +$205K (+15.4%) Learn to Skate $138,410 +$21K (+17.8%) Arena Programming $67,844 +$26K (+62.1%) Advertising Revenue $71,781 +$21K (+41.7%) Concessions/Pro Shop $164,377 +$1.7K Page 13 of 485 Looking Ahead to 2026 2026 Budget Revenue Budget $2,474,773 Expenditure Budget $2,345,581 Net $6,668 Rate increase: 3.6% rate increase planned for 2026–27 season 2026 Priorities Pavilion Rink 2.0 Completion Patio, playground, Zamboni shed · dry-floor revenue in 2027 Programming Expansion Mite 5-day camps · summer 4-on-4 skates · fall-summer-spring breakfast club · 2027 AAA tournament series New Community Ice Club Memberships Public Ice & Hockey Club Memberships Launching Summer 2026 Staffing & Retention 3% COLA all staff · 6% Driver Supervisors · Office Manager hire Spring '26 Capital Fund No capital expenditures planned · fund continues to rebuild toward targets Lakeville Arenas —Built by the Community · Sustained by the Community · For the Community Questions? Contact Joe Bergquist, General Manager · Lakeville Arenas Page 14 of 485 Executive Governance Summary Lakeville Arenas Lakeville, Minnesota For the year ended December 31, 2025 Page 15 of 485 April 24, 2026 Board of Directors Lakeville Arenas Lakeville, Minnesota We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Lakeville Arenas (the Organization) for the year ended December 31, 2025. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under generally accepted auditing standards, as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of the audit. We have communicated such information in our letter to you dated November 25, 2025. Professional standards require that we provide you with the following information related to our audit. Significant Audit Findings In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the Organization's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization's internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and therefore, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified. We identified no deficiency in internal control that we consider to be a significant deficiency. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of compliance with certain provisions of Minnesota statutes. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit. While our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion, it does not provide a legal determination on the Organization’s compliance with those requirements. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported in accordance with Minnesota statutes. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. 2 Page 16 of 485 Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by the Organization are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies were not changed during the year ended December 31, 2025. We noted no transactions entered into by the Organization during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the proper period. Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management’s knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements include depreciation on capital assets, allowance for doubt full accounts and the liability for the Organizations pensions. • Management’s estimate of depreciation is based on estimated useful lives of the assets. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method. • Management’s estimate of allowance for doubtful accounts is based on an estimate of delinquent account receivable balances that will not be collected. • The Organization’s liability for other post-employment benefits was estimated to be zero primarily based on the assumption that employees, whom participate in the health insurance plan, will not retire with the Organization. • Management’s estimate of its pension liability is based on several factors including, but not limited to, anticipated investment return rate, retirement age for active employees, life expectancy, salary increases and form of annuity payment upon retirement. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop these estimates in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. The disclosures in the financial statements are neutral, consistent, and clear. Certain financial statement disclosures are particularly sensitive because of their significance to financial statement users. Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Management has corrected all such misstatements. In addition, none of the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole. Disagreements with Management For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor’s report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. Management Representations We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated April 24, 2026. 3 Page 17 of 485 Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a “second opinion” on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the governmental unit’s financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor’s opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. Other Matters We applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information (RSI) (Management’s Discussion and Analysis, the budgetary comparison schedule for the General fund, the Schedule of Employer’s Share of the Net Pension Liability and the Schedule of Employer’s Contributions), which is information that supplements the basic financial statements. Our procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We did not audit the RSI and do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI. We were not engaged to report on the introductory section, which accompanies the financial statements but is not RSI. We did not audit or perform other procedures on this other information and we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it. Other Audit Findings or Issues We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the governmental unit’s auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. Future Accounting Standard Changes The following Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statements have been issued and may have an impact on future financial statements: GASB Statement No. 103 - Financial Reporting Model Improvements Effective: 12/31/2026 GASB Statement No. 104 - Disclosure of Certain Capital Assets Effective: 12/31/2026 Further information on upcoming GASB pronouncements. * * * * * Restriction on Use This communication is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors, management and the Minnesota Office of the State Auditor and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. Our audit would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in the system because it was based on selected tests of the accounting records and related data. The comments and recommendations in the report are purely constructive in nature, and should be read in this context. 4 Page 18 of 485 If you have any questions or wish to discuss any of the items contained in this letter, please feel free to contact us at your convenience. We wish to thank you for the opportunity to be of service and for the courtesy and cooperation extended to us by your staff. Abdo Minneapolis, Minnesota April 24, 2026 5 Page 19 of 485 Financial Report For the Year Ended December 31, 2025 Page 20 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS Table of Contents Page I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION List of Appointed Officials ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Letter of Transmittal ................................................................................................................................................... 2 II. FINANCIAL SECTION INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT .................................................................................................................. 5 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS ............................................................................................. 7 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Government-Wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position ....................................................................................................................... 12 Statement of Activities ........................................................................................................................... 13 Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet – Governmental Funds .................................................................................................... 14 Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Position ...................................................................................................................................... 15 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Governmental Funds ............................................................................................................................ 16 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities ................................................ 17 Notes to Financial Statements ............................................................................................................................ 18 III.REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – General Fund - Budget and Actual .................................................................................................................. 34 Schedule of Employer’s Share of Public Employees Retirement Association Net Pension Liability – General Employees Retirement Plan ............................................................................................................... 37 Schedule of Employer’s Public Employees Retirement Association Contributions – General Employees Retirement Plan ............................................................................................................... 38 Notes to Required Supplementary Information ........................................................................................................ 39 IV. OTHER REPORT INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE ....................................... 42 Page 21 of 485 I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION Page 22 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS APPOINTED OFFICIALS DECEMBER 31, 2025 1 Page 23 of 485 2 April 24, 2026 City of Lakeville, Independent School District 194 and Citizens, On behalf of the Lakeville Arena Board, it is my pleasure to present to you the Lakeville Arenas Financial Report for the year ended December 31, 2025. Lakeville Arenas Profile The Lakeville Arenas is a joint powers entity created in December 2004 between the City and ISD 194. Lakeville Arenas is governed by a Board consisting of two representatives appointed by the City, two appointed by ISD 194 and one member appointed to represent the community at large. The Board is charged with the responsibility of undertaking entrepreneurial endeavors in the overall operation and management of the Lakeville Arenas. Its purpose is to lease, maintain, operate, and manage the Arena Complex in the best interests of the overall community. The Lakeville Arenas currently manages the Ames Arena which consists of two contiguous facilities located at 19900 Ipava Avenue and the Hasse Arena located at 8525 215th Street West. A budget is adopted by July 1st of each year. Financial Operations Revenues exceeded expenditures by $140,942 in 2025. 2025 2024 Change Revenues 2,136,038$ 1,891,341$ 244,697$ Expenditures Personnel 953,459 756,750 196,709 Other charges and services 302,038 345,855 (43,817) Utilities 387,855 239,994 147,861 Capital outlay 137,770 362,710 (224,940) Supplies 143,024 180,694 (37,670) Debt service expense 33,793 19,935 13,858 Other expense 37,157 46,733 (9,576) Total expenditures 1,995,096 1,952,671 42,425 Net 140,942$ (61,330)$ 202,272$ Page 24 of 485 3 Revenues were up this past year primarily due to ice rentals, learn to skate, arena programming, and advertising contracts. Personnel services were up in 2025 resulting primarily from the hiring of additional driver and Programs Coordinator positions. Utility costs were higher compared to the prior year due to an increase in electrical and natural gas rates, decrease in amount for solar credits and the addition of the refrigerated outdoor pavilion rink. Capital outlay included Zamboni charger and transmission, pressure washer, slushy machine, freezer, stainless steel countertops, fire door operator, garage doors, dashboard gate panel, and finance purchase agreement for lawn mower. Financial Position A measure of an organization’s ability to meet current and future obligations is its fund balance. Lakeville Arenas had a $1,088,372 fund balance as of December 31, 2025, of which $439,534 is assigned for capital acquisitions as required by the Joint Powers Agreement. An additional $28,504 is non-spendable and $106,077 is assigned to other purposes. The remaining $514,257 provides the working capital to meet cash flow and operational requirements during the summer and fall when revenues are minimal. Arena Debt The Hasse Arena construction was originally financed with a Lease Revenue Bond issued by the Lakeville Housing and Redevelopment Authority in 2006. The debt is repaid with property taxes levied by the City of Lakeville and Independent School District 194. The 2006 bonds were advance refunded by HRA Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A. On February 7, 2022, the City Council authorized the issuance of Taxable General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022B, to refund the HRA Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A (noted above) and provide funding for constructing the outdoor rink at the Hasse Arena. The sale of the bonds was held on March 7, 2022 and closed on April 5, 2022. True interest cost was 2.69 percent. The refunding resulted in savings of approximately $130,000 over the term of the bonds. An amended and restated joint powers agreement to address the payment of the refunding portion of the 2022B bonds was approved by ISD#194 and the City of Lakeville in February 2022. Agreements have been approved with Lakeville Hockey Association (LHA) and Heritage Figure Total Governmental Funds Assets 1,224,182$ Liabilities 135,810$ Fund balances Non-spendable for prepaid 6,285 Non-spendable for inventory 22,219 Assigned for compensated absences 106,077 Assigned for future capital acquisitions 439,534 Unassigned 514,257 Total fund balances 1,088,372 Total liabilities and fund balances 1,224,182$ Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds Page 25 of 485 4 Skating Club (HFSC) for additional contributions to be used for debt repayment of the bonds issued for the new outdoor rink. The Ames arena parking lot expansion project was financed with a Tax Abatement Bond issued by the City of Lakeville. As such, the debt is included in the City of Lakeville Annual Comprehensive Financial Report not the Lakeville Arenas Annual Financial Report. The debt is being repaid with contributions from the Lakeville Hockey Association and the Heritage Figure Skating Club. A portion of the interest on the debt will be paid by Lakeville Arenas. The final debt payment is February 1, 2031. An energy improvement project began in the fall of 2020 at both facilities. The project cost was approximately $7.9 million and was completed in the fall of 2021. The project is financed with a Tax Abatement Bond issued by the City of Lakeville in February 2021. As such, the debt is included in the City of Lakeville Annual Comprehensive Financial Report not the Lakeville Arenas Annual Financial Report. The debt is being repaid with energy savings realized at both facilities and property taxes levied by the City of Lakeville and Independent School District 194. The final debt payment is February 1, 2041. Conclusion The Lakeville community has an arena due to the collaborative efforts of the City of Lakeville, Lakeville Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Independent School District 194, and the Lakeville Hockey Association. In the absence of such a relationship, the community would not have such an amenity. The various organizations within our community who patronize and support the arena are to be commended for their visionary and cooperative partnership approach to make this outstanding amenity a reality. Carly Anderson, Board Chair Page 26 of 485 II.FINANCIAL SECTION Page 27 of 485 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT Board of Directors Lakeville Arenas Lakeville, Minnesota Opinions We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Lakeville Arenas (the Organization), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Organization’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Organization as of December 31, 2025, and the respective changes in financial position for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Basis for Opinions We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the Organization and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Organization’s ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter. Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements. 55 Page 28 of 485 In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, we: •Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. •Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. •Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed. •Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements. •Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Lakeville Arena’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters that we identified during the audit. Report on Summarized Comparative Information We have previously audited the Organization's 2024 financial statements, and we expressed unmodified opinions on the respective financial statements in our report dated June 3, 2025. In our opinion, the summarized comparative information presented herein for the respective financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024, is consistent, in all material respects, with the audited financial statements from which it has been derived. Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the Management’s Discussion and Analysis starting on page 7, the budgetary comparison for the General fund on page 34, and the Schedule of Employer’s Share of the Net Pension Liability and the Schedule of Employer’s Contributions starting on page 37 be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information Management is responsible for the other information in the annual report. The other information comprises the introductory section but does not include the basic financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinions on the basic financial statement do not cover the other information, and we do not express an opinion or any form of assurance thereon. In connection with our audit of the basic financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and consider whether a material inconsistency exists between the other information and the basic financial statements or the other information otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work performed, we conclude that an uncorrected material misstatement of the other information exists, we are required to describe it in our report. Abdo Minneapolis, Minnesota April 24, 2026 6 Page 29 of 485 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Page 30 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 (continued on next page) 7 This discussion and analysis present an overview of the financial activities and financial position of the Lakeville Arenas for the year ended December 31, 2025. Financial Highlights •The Lakeville Arenas’ assets and deferred outflows of resources exceeded its liabilities and deferred inflows of resources at the close of the most recent fiscal year by $1,752,595 (net position). Of this amount, $783,059 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet the Organization’s ongoing operations and obligations. •As of December 31, 2025, the Lakeville Arenas’ governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $1,088,371. Of the total fund balance, $28,504 is non-spendable and $545,611 is assigned for future capital acquisitions and compensated absences; the remaining $514,257 is unassigned. Overview of the Financial Statements This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the Organization’s basic financial statements. The Organization’s basic financial statements are comprised of three components: 1) government-wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves. Government-wide Financial Statements. The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the Organization’s finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector business. The Statement of Net Position presents information on all the Organization’s assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference reported as net position. Over time, increases and decreases in net position serve as a useful indicator of whether the Organization’s financial position is improving or deteriorating. The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the Organization’s net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. Fund Financial Statements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. Lakeville Arenas maintains two individual governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures , and changes in fund balances for the General fund and the Capital Maintenance Reserve fund. Notes to the Financial Statements. The Notes to the Financial Statements provide additional information that is essential to the full understanding of the data provided in the Organization’s other basic financial statements. In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report also presents certain required supplementary information concerning the Organization’s progress in funding its obligation to provide pension benefits to its employees. Required supplementary information can be found starting on page 33 of this report. Page 31 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 (continued on next page) 8 Government Wide Financial Analysis The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the Lakeville Arenas exceeded liabilities and deferred inflows of resources by $1,752,595 at the close of the most recent fiscal year. Of this amount, $783,059 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet the ongoing operations and obligations of the Organization. As of the end of the current fiscal year, the Organization’s unrestricted net position was $783,059, or 37.0 percent of total expenses of $2,114,944. Total assets as of December 31, 2025, were $2,294,183 and comprised primarily of cash and investments (40.3 percent); accounts receivable, interest receivable and inventory (13.0 percent); and capital assets (46.6 percent). Deferred outflows of resources amounted to $154,998. Total liabilities as of December 31, 2025 amounted to $559,940. Non-current liabilities due within one year and in more than one year amount to $45,407 (8.1 percent) and $378,723 (67.6 percent), respectively. Accounts payable, wages payable, sales tax payable and unearned income amounted to $135,810 (24.3 percent). Deferred inflows of resources amounted to $136,646. Organization as a Whole – Government-Wide Financial Statements The following is a condensed version of the statement of net position at December 31, 2025, with comparative information at December 31, 2024: Increase/ 2025 2024 (Decrease) Cash and cash equivalents 925,334$ 666,938$ 258,396$ Other assets 298,848 444,243 (145,395) Capital assets - net 1,070,001 1,117,576 (47,575) Total assets 2,294,183 2,228,757 65,426 Deferred outflows of resources 154,998 49,363 105,635 Current liabilities 181,217 179,303 1,914 Non-Current Liabilities 378,723 271,075 107,648 Total liabilities 559,940 450,378 109,562 Deferred inflows of resources 136,646 97,046 39,600 Net position Net investment in capital assets 969,536 1,049,129 (79,593) Unrestricted 783,059 681,567 101,492 Total net position 1,752,595$ 1,730,696$ 21,899$ Page 32 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 9 A condensed version of the statement of activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 with comparative information from 2024 is shown below. Governmental Activities Governmental activities for 2025 increased the Lakeville Arenas’ net position by $21,899. Revenues • Revenues were up this past year primarily due to ice rentals, learn to skate, arena programming, and advertising contracts. • Ice rentals amounted to $1,527,398 in 2025, which is a $205,109 increase from 2024. Ice rentals are 72.1 percent of general fund revenues. • Learn-To-Skate revenues of $138,410 increased $20,935 (17.8 percent) from 2024. • Public skating revenues of $45,169 decreased $18,310 (28.8 percent) from 2024. • Arena programming revenues of $67,844 increased $25,991 (62.1 percent) from 2024. • Event admissions amounted to $39,158 in 2025, which is a $10,417 (21.0 percent) decrease from 2024. • Concession/pro shop sales (net) amounted to $164,377 in 2025, which is a $1,714 (1.1 percent) increase from 2024. • Advertising revenues were $71,781 in 2025, which is a $21,117 (41.7 percent) increase from 2024. Increase/ 2025 2024 (Decrease) Revenues Program revenues 2,025,560$ 1,782,899$ 242,661$ Investment revenue 36,426 48,971 (12,545) Other revenue 74,857 66,874 7,983 Total revenues 2,136,843 1,898,744 238,099 Expenses Culture and recreation 2,114,944 1,764,204 350,740 Change in net position 21,899 134,540 (112,641) Net position - beginning 1,730,696 1,596,156 134,540 Net position - ending 1,752,595$ 1,730,696$ 21,899$ Page 33 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 (continued on next page) 10 Expenses • Personnel costs were $953,459 which represents 49.4 percent of the total operating expenses. Total personnel costs increased 196,709 (26.0 percent) in 2025. The increase was due to additional driver and Programs Coordinator positions along with benefits for the new full-time positions. • Utility expenses (natural gas and electricity) total $387,855 and represent 20.1 percent of the total operating expenses. Electrical costs increased in 2025 by $129,966 (72.3 percent). Natural gas costs were up $17,895 or 29.7 percent. The increase in electrical and natural gas costs is largely due to an increase in electrical and natural gas rates, decrease in amount for solar credits and the addition of the refrigerated outdoor pavilion rink. • Commodities ($143,024) represent 7.4 percent of the total operating costs. This is a $37,670 decrease compared to 2024 primarily due to less supplies needed for the ice rinks, buildings and concession stands. • Other charges and services ($302,038) represent 15.7 percent of the total operating costs. This is a $43,817 decrease compared to 2024 due to not hiring contractors to complete projects/maintenance and handling in house. • The Hasse Arena construction was originally financed with a Lease Revenue Bond issued by the Lakeville Housing and Redevelopment Authority in 2006. The debt is repaid with property taxes levied by the City of Lakeville and Independent School District 194. The 2006 bonds were advance refunded by HRA Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A. On February 7, 2022, the City Council authorized the issuance of Taxable General Obligation Bonds, Series 2022B, to refund the HRA Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A (noted above) and provide funding for constructing the outdoor rink at the Hasse Arena. The sale of the bonds was held on March 7, 2022 and closed on April 5, 2022. True interest cost was 2.69 percent. The refunding resulted in savings of approximately $130,000 over the term of the bonds. An amended and restated joint powers agreement to address the payment of the refunding portion of the 2022B bonds was approved by ISD#194 and the City of Lakeville in February 2022. Agreements have been approved with Lakeville Hockey Association (LHA) and Heritage Figure Skating Club (HFSC) for additional contributions to be used for debt repayment of the bonds issued for the new outdoor rink. • The Ames arena parking lot expansion project was financed with a Tax Abatement Bond issued by the City of Lakeville. As such, the debt is included in the City of Lakeville Annual Comprehensive Financial Report not the Lakeville Arenas Annual Financial Report. The debt is being repaid with contributions from the Lakeville Hockey Association and the Heritage Figure Skating Club. A portion of the interest on the debt will be repaid by Lakeville Arenas. The final debt payment is February 1, 2031. • An energy improvement project began in the fall of 2020 at both facilities which were completed in the fall of 2021. The project cost approximately $7.9 million. The project was financed with a Tax Abatement Bond issued by the City of Lakeville in February 2021. As such, the debt is included in the City of Lakeville Annual Comprehensive Financial Report not the Lakeville Arenas Annual Financial Report. The debt is being repaid with energy savings realized at both facilities and property taxes levied by the City of Lakeville and Independent School District 194. The final debt payment is February 1, 2041. Page 34 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 (continued on next page) 11 Economic Factors and Next Year's Budget and Rates The Lakeville Arenas is a joint powers organization created by the City of Lakeville and Independent School District 194. The Organization commenced operation of its two facilities in April 2005 – Ames Arena located at 19900 Ipava Avenue and Hasse Arena located at 8525 215th Street. Key economic factors include the following: • Since its establishment in 2005, Lakeville Arenas has funded all of its daily operating costs through ice rentals and other revenue generated by the facilities. Public tax funds are not utilized for daily operations, which remained true in 2025 and is expected to continue in 2026 and 2027. • Ice Rental Revenue in 2025 increased by $205,106 over 2024. Ice rentals year-to-date in 2026, as of April 1, are up $26,649 over the same period in 2025 due to a rate increase of 7.7%. A 3.6% rate increase is expected to be approved for the 2026-2027 prime winter season. • Private camp and training ice rentals are expected to decrease in 2026 due to shifts in local coaching and family spending concerns largely driven by the current economic climate. However, these factors have opened up an opportunity for Lakeville Arenas to expand its programming beyond its original 2026 plans and provide more affordable options for local residents and users. Although revenue from these new programs remains uncertain, early indicators suggest it is likely to surpass the ice rental income from recently canceled for-profit camps and clinics. • Lakeville Arenas continues to diversify its revenue by expanding other skating programs to reduce its dependence on ice rentals alone. In 2025, revenue from in-house programs increased by $46,926 compared to 2024. As of April 1st, 2026, these program revenues have grown by $39,040 compared to the same period in 2025. • Amenity upgrades for the new covered outdoor pavilion rink, aimed at generating revenue during the off-season, will be completed in 2026. New dry-floor revenue streams from the facility are scheduled for 2027. • Electric and natural gas costs increased sharply in 2025 to $387,855 from $239,994 in 2024, a 62% rise. The significant jump is due to lower solar credits, the addition of the refrigerated outdoor pavilion rink, and overall volatility in energy markets in recent years. Lakeville arenas will adjust the 2026 budget to account for these changes and include them in the 2027 budget. • Although the current economic environment is unstable and uncertain, Lakeville Arenas is well- equipped to adapt as necessary to ensure a successful 2026 and 2027. This is partly due to the ongoing focus and success in diversifying and expanding revenue sources, recent energy upgrades at all facilities, and continuous monthly tracking of revenue and expenses. Requests for Information This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the Lakeville Arenas’ results of operations. Questions concerning any information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to Judy Keliher, Board Chair, Lakeville Arenas, 20195 Holyoke Avenue, Lakeville, Minnesota 55044. Page 35 of 485 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Page 36 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS STATEMENT OF NET POSITION DECEMBER 31, 2025 The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement 12 Governmental Activities ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents 925,334$ Interest receivable 5,309 Accounts receivable 265,035 Inventory/prepaid 28,504 Net investment in capital assets Building improvements 457,769 Equipment 612,232 Total assets 2,294,183 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred pension resources 154,998 LIABILITIES Accounts payable 94,887 Wages payable 29,857 Sales tax payable 5,684 Deposits 5,382 Non-current liabilities Due within one year - Financed purchase agreement 27,358 Due in more than one year - Financed purchase agreement 73,108 Due within one year - Compensated absences 18,049 Due in more than one year - Compensated absences 88,028 Due in more than one year - Net pension liability 217,587 Total liabilities 559,940 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred pension resources 136,646 NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets 969,536 Unrestricted 783,059 Total net position 1,752,595$ Page 37 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement 13 Net (Expense) Revenue and Changes in Net Position Operating Charges for Grants and Governmental Functions/Programs Expenses Services Contributions Activities Governmental activities Culture and recreation 2,114,944$ 2,025,560$ -$ (89,384)$ General revenues: Investment earnings 36,426 Other revenue 74,857 Total general revenues 111,283 Change in net position 21,899 Net position - beginning 1,730,696 Net position - ending 1,752,595$ Program Revenues Page 38 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS BALANCE SHEET – GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS DECEMBER 31, 2025 The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement 14 Capital Maintenance Total General Reserve Governmental Fund Fund Funds ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents 464,257$ 461,077$ 925,334$ Interest receivable 2,785 2,524 5,309 Accounts receivable 265,035 - 265,035 Inventory 22,219 - 22,219 Prepaid 6,285 - 6,285 Total assets 760,581$ 463,601$ 1,224,182$ LIABILITIES Accounts payable 70,820$ 24,067$ 94,887$ Wages payable 29,857 - 29,857 Sales tax payable 5,684 - 5,684 Deposits 5,382 - 5,382 Total liabilities 111,743 24,067 135,810 FUND BALANCES Non-spendable for prepaid items 6,285 - 6,285 Non-spendable for inventory 22,219 - 22,219 Assigned for future capital acquisition - 439,534 439,534 Assigned for compensated absences 106,077 - 106,077 Unassigned 514,257 - 514,257 Total fund balances 648,838 439,534 1,088,372 Total liabilities and fund balances 760,581$ 463,601$ 1,224,182$ Page 39 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS RECONCILIATION OF THE BALANCE SHEET OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION DECEMBER 31, 2025 The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement 15 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position are different because: Total fund balances - governmental funds 1,088,372$ 1.Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, not reported in the governmental funds. Capital assets 2,203,138 Less accumulated depreciation (1,133,137) 2.Long term liabilities are not payable with current financial resources and therefore are not reported in the governmental funds. Net pension liability (217,587) Finance purchase agreement (100,466) 3.Accrued compensated absences are not payable with current financial resources and therefore are not reported in the governmental funds.(106,077) 4.Governmental funds do not report long-term amounts related to pensions. Deferred outflows of pension resources 154,998 Deferred inflows of pension resources (136,646) Net position of governmental activities 1,752,595$ Page 40 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES – GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement 16 Capital Maintenance Total General Reserve Governmental Fund Fund Funds REVENUES Charges for services 2,093,270$ -$ 2,093,270$ Investment income 19,765 16,661 36,426 Other income 6,343 - 6,343 Total revenues 2,119,378 16,661 2,136,039 EXPENDITURES Current Culture and recreation Personnel 953,459 - 953,459 Commodities 143,024 - 143,024 Other charges and services 302,038 - 302,038 Utilities 387,855 - 387,855 Debt service expense 33,793 - 33,793 Other expense 37,157 - 37,157 Capital outlay 71,655 66,116 137,771 Total expenditures 1,928,981 66,116 1,995,097 EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 190,397 (49,455) 140,942 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Contribution to City of Lakeville (73,648) - (73,648) Financed purchase agreement issued 60,126 - 60,126 Transfers (to) from other funds (140,000) 140,000 - Total other financing sources (uses)(153,522) 140,000 (13,522) CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES 36,875 90,545 127,420 FUND BALANCES, BEGINNING OF YEAR 611,963 348,989 960,952 FUND BALANCES, END OF YEAR 648,838$ 439,534$ 1,088,372$ Page 41 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES INFUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 The notes to financial statements are an integral part of this statement 17 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position are different because: Total net change in fund balances - governmental funds (modified accrual amount)127,420$ 1.Capital outlays are reported as expenditures in governmental funds. However, in the statement of activities the cost of capital assets is allocated over their useful lives as depreciation expense. In the current period these amounts are: Capital outlay 120,357 Depreciation expense (167,932) 2.Accrued compensated absences are not payable with current financial resources and therefore are not reported in the governmental funds. Accrued compensated absences (37,528) 3.Finance purchase agreement activity is not reported in governmental funds. Finance purchase issued (60,126) Lease repayment 28,107 4.Long-term pension activity is not reported in governmental funds. Pension revenue 12,406 Pension expense (805) Changes in net position - governmental activities 21,899$ Page 42 of 485 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Page 43 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 18 NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The accounting policies of Lakeville Arenas (“the Organization”) conform to generally accepted accounting principles applicable to governmental units as promulgated by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) and the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (“GASB”). The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies. A. REPORTING ENTITY Lakeville Arenas was created under a joint powers agreement between the City of Lakeville (“City”) and Independent School District No. 194 (“ISD 194”), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §471.59 for the purpose of managing and operating Ames and Hasse Arenas. Lakeville Arenas commenced operations on April 1, 2005. Entities established by joint powers agreements are considered governmental units and as such are exempt from federal and state income taxes. The Board consists of five regular members, two each from the City and ISD 194 and one member from the community at large appointed by the other four regular members. Lakeville Arenas has considered all potential units for which it is financially accountable, and other organizations for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the Organization are such that exclusion would cause the Organization’s financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) has set forth criteria to be considered in determining financial accountability. These criteria include appointing a voting majority of an organization’s governing body, and (1) the ability of the primary government to impose its will on that organization or (2) the potential for the organization to provide specific benefits to, or impose specific financial burdens on, the primary government. Lakeville Arenas has no component units. B. GOVERNMENT-WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The goal of government-wide financial statements is to present a broad overview of the Organization’s finances. The basic statements that form the government-wide financial statements are the statement of net position and the statement of activities. The two statements report information on all the non-fiduciary activities of the Organization. For the most part, the effect of interfund activity has been removed from these statements. The statement of activities reports gross direct expenses by function reduced by program revenues. This results in a measurement of net revenue or expense for each of the Organization’s activities. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function. Program revenues are directly associated with the function and include 1) charges for services and 2) operating or capital grants and contributions that are restricted to a particular function. Other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Page 44 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 19 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) Major individual governmental funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. Lakeville Arenas reports two separate funds. Both funds are considered major governmental funds. • General fund - The General fund is the general operating fund of the Lakeville Arenas. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. • Capital Maintenance Reserve fund - The Capital Maintenance Reserve fund is used to account for future capital acquisitions and other capital improvements. C. MEASUREMENT FOCUS, BASIS OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Ice rental income is recognized as revenue when earned. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the Organization considers revenues to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures are recorded when a liability is incurred as under accrual accounting. Debt service expenditures are recorded only when payment is due. Amounts reported as program revenues include the following: amounts received from those who purchase, use or directly benefit from a program; amounts received from parties outside Lakeville Arenas that are restricted to one or more specific programs; and earnings on investments that are legally restricted for a specific program. Revenues that do not meet the previous criteria are reported as general revenues. Revenue resulting from exchange transactions, in which each party gives and receives essentially equal value, is recorded on the accrual basis when the exchange takes place. On a modified accrual basis, revenue is recorded in the year in which the resources are measurable and become available. Non-exchange transactions, in which the Organization receives value without directly giving equal value in return, includes grants, entitlement and donations. Eligibility requirements include timing requirements, which specify the year when the resources are required to be used or the year when use is first permitted, matching requirements, in which the Organization must provide local resources to be used for a specified purpose, and expenditure requirements, in which the resources are provided to the Organization on a reimbursement basis. On a modified accrual basis, revenue from non-exchange transactions must also be available before it can be recognized. Unearned revenue arises when assets are recognized before revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Grants and entitlements received before eligibility requirements are met are also recorded as unearned revenue. Page 45 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 20 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) D. BUDGETS AND BUDGETARY ACCOUNTING The Lakeville Arenas Board has full authority over the financial affairs of the Organization. The Board adopts an annual budget for the Organization. During the budget year, supplemental appropriations and deletions may be authorized by the Organization. The amounts shown in the financial statements as ‘Budget’ represent the original and final budgeted amounts. The Organization prepares its budget on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. All budgeting appropriations lapse at year-end. The legal level of budgetary control is at the fund level for the General fund and the Capital Maintenance Reserve fund. Any changes in the budget must be approved by a majority vote of the Board. The Board approved amendments to the budget during the year to more closely reflect actual revenues and expenses. E. DEPOSITS The Organization's cash and cash equivalents are considered to be cash on hand, demand deposits and short -term investments with original maturities of three months or less from the date of acquisition. Cash balances from all funds are combined and invested to the extent available in certificates of deposit, commercial paper, U.S. Government securities, and other securities authorized by the State of Minnesota. Earnings from such investments are allocated to the respective funds on the basis of applicable cash balance participation by each fund. F. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE Accounts receivable for the Organization’s governmental funds are stated at net realizable value. Revenues are recognized at the time the facility is rented regardless of when payment is made. At December 31, 2025, accounts receivable amounted to $265,035. G. INVENTORY The inventory in the General fund is stated at the lower of cost or market and consists of inventories held for resale. The cost is recognized as an expenditure at the time the individual inventory items are sold. H. PREPAID ITEMS Payments to vendors that reflect costs applicable to future periods are recorded as prepaid items in both the government-wide and fund financial statements. I. CAPITAL ASSETS Capital assets which include building improvements and equipment are recorded at historical cost where historical records are available and at an estimated historical cost where no historical records exist. Donated capital assets are valued at their acquisition value on the date received. A capitalization threshold for financial reporting purposes has been established for assets that exceed $2,500. Page 46 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 21 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) Depreciation has been provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are 4 to 10 years for equipment and 3 to 10 years for building improvements. J. DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES In addition to assets, the statement of net position will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred outflows of resources, represents a consumption of net assets that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until then. The Organization has only one item that qualifies for reporting in this category. Accordingly, the item, deferred pension resources, is reported only in the statements of net position. This item results from actuarial calculations and current year pension contributions made subsequent to the measurement date. K. COMPENSATED ABSENCES Compensated absences consist of unused paid time off (“PTO”). PTO is accrued bi-weekly on an hourly basis and the maximum amount of PTO that can be accrued and carried over to the next year by each employee is limited to twice the annual accrual amount as of December 15th. The General fund is typically used to liquidate governmental fund compensated absences. L. PENSIONS For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows/inflows of resources, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and additions to/deductions from PERA’s fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by PERA except that PERA’s fiscal year end is June 30. For this purpose, plan contributions are recognized as of employer payroll paid dates and benefit payments and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. The General fund is typically used to liquidate the government net pension liability. The Arena participates in various pension plans, total pension expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $35,491. The components of pension expense are noted in the plan summaries in Note 6. M. NET OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) OBLIGATION In accordance with the provisions of GASB Statement No. 75, Accounting and financial Reporting by Employers for Post-employment Benefits Other Than Pensions, an actuarial valuation is not required to be computed when an organization has fewer than 100 participating members. The organization has three members participating in the plan. As such, the “Alternative Measurement Method” is used to estimate the actuarial accrued liability and the annual required contributions. As of December 31, 2025, the liability was determined to be zero. Page 47 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 22 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) N. DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES In addition to liabilities, the statement of net position and fund financial statements will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred inflows of resources, represents an acquisition of net assets that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The Organization has only one item that qualifies reporting in this category. Accordingly, the item, deferred pension resources, is reported only in the statements of net position. This item results from actuarial calculations and current year pension contributions made subsequent to the measurement date. O. FUND BALANCES In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that disclose constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These classifications are as follows: Non-spendable – consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as prepaid items and inventories. Restricted – consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors, grantors or contributors; or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions. Committed – consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints are established by Resolution of the Board. Assigned – consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints reflect the specific purpose for which it is the Organization’s intended use. These constraints are established by the Board. Pursuant to Board Resolution, the Organization’s Fiscal Agent is authorized to establish assignments of fund balance. Unassigned – is the residual classification for the general fund and also reflects negative residual amounts in other funds. When both restricted and unrestricted (committed, assigned or unassigned) resources are available for use, it is the Organization’s policy to first use restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are needed. When committed, assigned or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the Organization’s policy to use resources in the following order: 1) committed 2) assigned and 3) unassigned. A negative residual amount may not be reported for restricted, committed, or assigned fund balances in the General fund. Page 48 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 23 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) P. NET POSITION Net position represents the difference between assets and deferred outflows of resources and liabilities and deferred inflows of resources. Net position is displayed in three components: a. Net investment in capital assets - Consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation reduced by any outstanding debt attributable to acquired capital assets. b. Restricted net position - Consists of net position restricted when there are limitations imposed on their use through external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, laws or regulations of other governments. c. Unrestricted net position - All other net positions that do not meet the definition of “restricted” or “net investment in capital assets.” Q. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. R. INTERFUND ELIMINATIONS Interfund eliminations have been made in the governmental type activities of the government -wide statement columns in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. NOTE 2 - DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS Cash and investments for the Organization as of December 31, 2025 consisted of the following: Custodial credit risk is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the government’s deposits may not be returned to the Organization. State statutes require that federal deposit insurance, surety bonds, or collateral protect the Organization’s deposits. The fair value of the collateral pledge must equal 110 percent of the deposits not covered by insurance or bonds. As of December 31, 2025, the carrying amount and the bank balance of the Organization’s deposits was $8,273. Page 49 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 24 NOTE 2 – DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS (continued) Minnesota statutes require that all City deposits be protected by insurance, surety bond or collateral. The fair value of collateral pledged must equal 110 percent of the deposits not covered by insurance or bonds, with the exception of irrevocable standby letters of credit issued by Federal Home Loan Banks as this type of collateral only requires collateral pledged equal to 100 percent of the deposits not covered by insurance or bonds. The Organization’s investment policy does not place any further limitations beyond the state statute requirements. Minnesota Statutes authorize the Organization to invest in the following: 1) Direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies. 2) Shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 and received the highest credit rating, rated in one of the two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and have a final maturity of thirteen months or less. 3) General obligations of a state or local government with taxing powers rated “A” or better; revenue obligations rated “AA” or better. 4) Obligation of a school district with an original maturity not exceeding 13 months and (i) rated in the highest category by a national bond rating service or (ii) enrolled in the credit enhancement program pursuant to statute section 126C.55. 5) General obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency rated “A” or better. 6) Bankers’ acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System. 7) Commercial paper issued by United States banks corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, of highest quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies and maturing in 270 days or less. 8) Repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements with financial institutions qualified as a “depository” by the government entity, with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000, a primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or certain Minnesota securities broker-dealers. 9) Guaranteed investment contracts (GIC's) issued or guaranteed by a United States commercial bank, a domestic branch of a foreign bank, a United States insurance company, or its Canadian subsidiary, whose similar debt obligations were rated in one of the top two rating categories by a nationally recognized rating agency. Investment and dividend income are recognized as revenue when earned. Concentration risk is the risk associated with investing a significant portion of the Organization’s investments (considered five percent or more) in the securities of a single issuer, excluding U.S. guaranteed investments (such as treasuries), investment pools, and mutual funds. Page 50 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 25 NOTE 2 – DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS (continued) As of December 31, 2025, the Organization’s investment portfolio includes the following securities of single issuers exceeding five percent: Minnesota Municipal Money Market 45.27 percent Henderson State Bank, Henderson NE 5.48 percent JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. 5.47 percent The Organization categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by generally accepted accounting principles. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are significant other observable inputs; Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs. The Organization’s recurring fair value measurements are listed in detail below and are valued using quoted market prices (Level 1 inputs.) The Organization has the following recurring fair value measurements as of December 31, 2025: •Brokered certificates of deposit of $500,799 are valued using quoted market prices (Level 2 inputs). NOTE 3 - INTERFUND TRANSFERS An interfund transfer in the amount of $140,000 was made from the General fund to the Capital Maintenance Reserve fund. This transfer is made annually and finances future capital acquisitions and building improvements. NOTE 4 - CONTRIBUTIONS A contribution to the City for $10,188 (Ames parking lot expansion project) and $63,460 (Ames & Hasse energy improvement project) was made during 2025. Credit Segmented Quality/ Time Ratings Distribution 12/31/2025 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Pooled investments at amortized costs Broker Money Market Funds N/A Under 1 year 414,262$ -$ -$ -$ Non-pooled investments at fair value Brokered Certificates of Deposit N/A Under 1 year 380,763 - 380,763 - Brokered Certificates of Deposit N/A 1 to 5 years 120,036 - 120,036 - Total investments 915,061$ -$ 500,799$ -$ Types of Investments Fair Value Measurement Using Page 51 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 26 NOTE 5 - CAPITAL ASSETS NOTE 6 - DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – STATEWIDE A. Plan Description The Arena participates in the following cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit pension plans administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). These plan provisions are established and administered according to Minnesota Statutes chapters 353, 353D, 353E, 353G, and 356. Minnesota Statues chapter 356 defines each plan’s financial reporting requirements. PERA’s defined benefit pension plans are tax qualified plans under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. General Employees Retirement Plan (GERP) Membership in the General Plan includes employees of counties, cities, townships, schools in non -certified positions, and other governmental entities whose revenues are derived from taxation, fees, or assessments. Plan membership is required for any employee who is expected to earn more than $425 in a month, unless the employee meets exclusion criteria. B. Benefits Provided PERA provides retirement, disability and death benefits. Benefit provisions are established by state statute and can only be modified by the state Legislature. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public service. When a member is “vested” they have earned enough service credit to receive a lifetime monthly benefit after leaving public service and reaching an eligible retirement age. Members who retire at or over their social security full retirement age with at least one year of service qualify for a retirement benefit. Beginning Ending Balance Increases Decreases Balance Governmental activities Capital assets, being depreciated Building improvements 1,099,890$ 26,109$ -$ 1,125,999$ Equipment 982,891 94,248 - 1,077,139 Total assets being depreciated 2,082,781 120,357 - 2,203,138 Less accumulated depreciation Building improvements (567,492) (100,738) - (668,230) Equipment (397,713) (67,194) - (464,907) Total accumulated depreciation (965,205) (167,932) - (1,133,137) Total capital assets, being depreciated, net 1,117,576$ (47,575)$ -$ 1,070,001$ Depreciation was charged to the Organization's functions as follows: Culture and recreation 167,932$ Page 52 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 27 NOTE 6 – DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (continued) General Employees Plan Benefits General Employees Plan requires three years of service to vest. Benefits are based on a member’s highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for General Plan members. Members hired prior to July 1, 1989, receive the higher of Step or Level formulas. Only the Level formula is used for members hired after June 30, 1989. Under the Step formula, General Plan members receive 1.2 percent of the highest average salary for each of the first 10 years of service and 1.7 percent of each additional year. Under the Level formula, General Plan members receive 1.7 percent of highest average salary for all years of service. For members hired prior to July 1, 1989 a full retirement benefit is available when age plus years of service equal 90 and normal retirement age is 65. Members can receive a reduced retirement benefit as early as age 55 if they have three or more years of service. Early retirement benefits are reduced by .25 percent for each month under age 65. Members with 30 or more years of service can retire at an age with a reduction of .25 percent for each month the member is younger than age 62. The Level formula allows General Plan members to receive a full retirement benefit at age 65 if they were first hired before July 1, 1989 or at age 66 if they were hired on or after July 1, 1989. Early retirement begins at age 55 with an actuarial reduction applied to the benefit. Benefit increases are provided to benefit recipients each January. The postretirement increase is equal to 50 percent of the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) announced by the SSA, with a minimum increase of at least 1 percent and a maximum of 1.5 percent. The 2025 annual increase was 1.25 percent. Recipients that have been receiving the annuity or benefit for at least a full year as of the June 30 before the effective date of the increase will receive the full increase. Recipients receiving the annuity or benefit for at least one month but less than a full year as of the June 30 before the effective date of the increase will receive a prorated increase. C. Contributions Minnesota statutes chapter 353, 353E, 353G, and 356 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. Contribution rates can only be modified by the state Legislature. General Employees Fund Contributions General Plan members were required to contribute 6.50 percent of their annual covered salary in fiscal year 2025 and the Arena was required to contribute 7.50 percent for Coordinated Plan members. The Arena’s contributions to the General Employees Fund for the years ending December 31, 2025 were $47,897. The Arena’s contributions were equal to the required contributions for each year as set by state statute. Page 53 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 28 NOTE 6 – DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (continued) D. Pension Costs General Employees Fund Pension Costs At December 31, 2025, the Arena reported a liability of $217,587 for its proportionate share of the General Employees Fund’s net pension liability. The Arena’s net pension liability reflected a reduction due to the State of Minnesota’s contribution of $16 million. The State of Minnesota is considered a non-employer contributing entity and the state’s contribution meets the definition of a special funding situ ation. The State of Minnesota’s proportionate share of the net pension liability associated with the Arena totaled $5,249. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2025, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The Arena’s proportionate share of the net pension liability was based on the Arena’s contributions received by PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025 relative to the total employer contributions received from all of PERA’s participating employers. The Arena’s proportionate share was 0.0066 percent at the end of the measurement period and 0.0044 percent for the beginning of the period. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Arena recognized pension expense of $36,296 for its proportionate share of General Employees Plan’s pension expense. In addition, the Arena recognized an additional negative $805 as pension expense (and grant revenue) for its proportionate share of the State of Minnesota’s contribution of $16 million to the General Employees Fund. Page 54 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 29 NOTE 6 – DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (continued) At December 31, 2025, the Arena reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources, related to pensions from the following sources: The $23,809 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from the Arena’s contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended December 31, 2026. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: E. Long-term Expected Return on Investment The State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of PERA, prepares an analysis of the reasonableness on a regular basis of the long-term expected rate of return using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future rates of return are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce an expected long-term rate of return by weighing the expected future rates of return by the target asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates of geometric real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: Asset Class Target Allocation Long-Term Expected Real Rate of Return Domestic Equity 33.50% 5.10% International Equity 16.50% 5.30% Fixed Income 25.00% 0.75% Private Markets 25.00% 5.90% Total 100.00% Page 55 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 30 NOTE 6 – DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (continued) F. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions The total pension liability of the cost-sharing defined benefit plan was determined by an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2025, using the entry age normal actuarial cost method. The long-term rate of return on pension plan investments used to determine the total liability is 7%. The 7% assumption is based on a review of inflation and investments return assumptions from a number of national investment consulting firms. The review provided a range of investment return rates reasonable by the actuary. An investment return of 7% is within that range. Inflation is assumed to be 2.25% for the General Employees Plan. Benefit increases after retirement are assumed to be 1.50% for the General Employees Plan. Salary growth assumptions in the General Employees Plan range in annual increments from 11.5% after one year of service to 3% after 27 years of service. Mortality rates for the General Employees Plan are based on the Pub-2010 General Employee Mortality Table. The tables are adjusted slightly to fit PERA’s experience. Actuarial assumptions for the General Employees Plan are reviewed every four years. The General Employees Plan was last reviewed in 2022. The assumption changes were adopted by the Board and became effective with the July 1, 2023 actuarial valuation. The following changes in actuarial assumptions and plan provisions occurred in 2025: General Employees Fund Changes in Actuarial Assumptions: The combined service annuity loading factors increased from 15% to 19% for vested, terminated members and from 3% to 44% for non-vested, terminated members. The assumed post-retirement benefit increase changed from 1.25% to 1.5%. Changes in Plan Provisions: The post-retirement benefit increase formula changed to 100% of the Social Security annual increase, between 1% and 1.75%, beginning January 1, 2026. If the funded ratio (on a market value of assets basis) is less than 85% for the last two consecutive annual valuations or is less than 80% in the most recent actuarial valuation, the maximum is reduced to 1.5%. Previously, the benefit increase was 50% of the Social Security annual increase, between 1% and 1.5%. The 1% additional employer contribution is eliminated when the plan reaches 98% funded status (on an actuarial value of assets basis); this contribution was previously scheduled to stop when the plan reached 100% funded status. Page 56 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 31 NOTE 6 – DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (continued) G. Discount Rate The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability in 2025 was 7.0 percent. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that contributions from plan members and employers will be made at rates set in Minnesota Statutes. Based on these assumptions, the fiduciary net position of the General Employees Plans was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current plan members. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability. H. Pension Liability Sensitivity The following presents the Arena’s proportionate share of the net pension liability for all plans it participates in, calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well as what the Arena’s proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate one percentage point lower or one percentage point higher than the current discount rate: I. Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position Detailed information about each pension plan’s fiduciary net position is available in a separately issued PERA financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. That report may be obtained on the Internet at www.mnpera.org. NOTE 7 - RISK MANAGEMENT The Organization is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees and natural disasters. Workers’ compensation coverage is provided through a pooled self-insurance program through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (“LMCIT”). The Organization pays an annual premium to LMCIT. The Organization is subject to supplemental assessments if deemed necessary by the LMCIT. The LMCIT reinsures through Workers’ Compensation Reinsurance Association (“WCRA”) as required by law. For workers’ compensation, the Organization is not subject to a deductible. The Organization’s workers’ compensation coverage is retrospectively rated. With this type of coverage, final premiums are determined after loss experience is known. The amount of premium adjustment, if any, is considered immaterial and not recorded until received or paid. Page 57 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 32 NOTE 7 – RISK MANAGEMENT (continued) Property and casualty insurance coverage is provided through a pooled self-insurance program through the LMCIT. The Organization pays an annual premium to the LMCIT. The Organization is subject to supplemental assessments if deemed necessary by the LMCIT. The LMCIT reinsures through commercial companies for claims in excess various amounts. Liabilities are reported when it is probable that a loss has occurred, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Liabilities, if any, include an amount for claims that have been incurred but not reported. The Organization’s management is not aware of any incurred but not reported claims. The Organization continues to carry commercial insurance for all other risks of loss, including employee health and disability insurance. There were no significant reductions in insurance from the previous year or settlements in excess of insurance coverage for any of the past three fiscal years. NOTE 8 - OUTSTANDING COMMITMENTS The Organization has agreed to help pay a portion of the interest cost on the debt for the parking lot improvements at the Ames facility. This commitment is not a binding agreement and therefore is not considered a long -term liability for the Organization. The City of Lakeville approved a guaranteed energy savings agreement with APEX on April 6, 2020 and approved the notice to proceed provision for the construction portion on August 17, 2020. In August 2020, the City and Independent School District #194 (ISD#194) approved a joint powers agreement (JPA) which provided that the debt and debt-related costs would be paid 50/50 by the City and ISD#194. The City issued $7,770,000 of General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds, Series 2021A on February 16, 2021, to finance the energy saving improvements. The agreement with APEX included a guaranteed utility savings of $63,460 each year for the term of the agreement. The payment for the savings from 2025 will be made in 2026. NOTE 9 - LONG TERM DEBT The accrued liability for compensated absences is recorded as a liability in the Governmental Fund. Unused personal time off is recorded as a liability in these financial statements. The General fund has typically been used to liquidate the compensated absences payable obligation. During the year ended December 31, 2025 the following changes occurred in non-current liabilities: Beginning Ending Due Within Balance Additions Deletions Balance One Year Accrued compensated absences 68,549$ 54,239$ (16,711)$ 106,077$ 18,049$ Page 58 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2025 33 NOTE 9 - LONG TERM DEBT (continued) The Arena’s has entered into financed purchase agreements for the acquisition of a Kubota Skid Steer and John Deere lawn mower with a total purchase price of $87,881 and $60,126, respectively. The agreements are financed through Lease Servicing Center, Inc. dba NCL Government Capital and requires payments of $19,935 and $13,859, respectively, per year with a five-year term. The Arena's obligations under this agreement are reflected below: Maturity Date Balance 12/31/2024 Additions Payments Balance 12/31/2025 Current Portion LT Portion Finance Purchase Agreement 12/31/2028 68,447 - (15,554) 52,893 16,549 36,344 Finance Purchase Agreement 3/31/2029 - 60,126 (12,553) 47,573 10,809 36,764 Page 59 of 485 III. REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Page 60 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES – GENERAL FUND - BUDGET AND ACTUAL FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 (WITH 2024 ACTUAL AMOUNTS FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES) (continued) 34 Budget As Originally Final Variance with 2024 Adopted Budget Actual Final Budget Actual Revenues Charges for services Ice rental 1,425,774$ 1,539,612$ 1,527,398$ (12,214)$ 1,322,289$ Dry-floor rental - 2,405 3,045 640 - Lease/Rental 10,000 10,000 - - Learn to skate 121,913 130,985 138,410 7,425 117,475 Admissions-public skating 64,575 49,370 45,169 (4,201) 63,479 Arena Programming 80,068 65,689 67,844 2,155 41,853 Event admissions (net)48,825 39,591 39,158 (433) 49,575 Concession/Proshop sales (net)168,930 170,600 164,377 (6,223) 162,663 Skate sharpening 6,123 17,369 18,145 776 14,650 Skate rental 3,698 8,473 6,502 (1,971) 7,725 Vending machines 3,396 1,477 1,441 (36) 3,190 Advertising contracts 49,800 80,293 71,781 (8,512) 50,664 Total charges for services 1,973,102 2,115,864 2,093,270 (22,594) 1,833,563 Other income Investment income 19,752 16,818 18,311 1,493 19,959 Increase in fair market value adjustment 11,063 6,396 1,454 (4,942) 7,492 Miscellaneous 3,810 12,082 6,343 (5,739) 8,807 Total revenues 2,007,727 2,151,160 2,119,378 (31,782) 1,869,821 Expenditures Culture and recreation Personnel services Salaries full-time 492,911 533,493 486,414 47,079 317,060 Salaries part-time 204,933 281,673 300,244 (18,571) 320,558 PERA 51,844 57,755 48,031 9,724 37,325 FICA 52,881 61,473 59,901 1,572 48,814 Hospitalization 75,600 30,649 36,022 (5,373) 12,453 Life and disability 1,680 2,131 1,259 872 735 FSA Plan 420 475 129 346 63 Dental insurance 1,260 1,795 2,005 (210) 835 Workers compensation 22,060 23,586 18,472 5,114 18,345 Unemployment compensation - 1,000 982 18 562 Salaries Contingency 10,178 - - - - Total personnel services 913,767 994,030 953,459 40,571 756,750 2025 Page 61 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES – GENERAL FUND - BUDGET AND ACTUAL FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 (WITH 2024 ACTUAL AMOUNTS FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES) (continued) 35 Budget As Originally Final Variance with 2024 Adopted Budget Actual Final Budget Actual Commodities Office supplies - - - - - Office/Operating supplies 58,716 53,535 30,131 23,404 80,972 Motor fuels 1,165 5,987 6,030 (43) 2,830 Cleaning supplies 10,210 12,815 19,836 (7,021) 12,651 Clothing 3,675 5,051 430 4,621 1,470 Chemicals 12,275 18,863 19,192 (329) 11,992 Equipment parts/building supplies 70,089 81,246 63,764 17,482 54,124 Small tools/equipment 11,688 9,674 3,178 6,496 11,195 Computer Supplies 5,640 2,713 463 2,250 5,460 Total commodities 173,458 189,884 143,024 46,860 180,694 Other charges and services Fiscal management fees 42,949 47,364 41,364 6,000 46,380 Bank charges/credit card fees 23,649 26,414 29,991 (3,577) 25,056 Professional services 8,400 7,500 10,000 (2,500) 8,000 Use of personal auto - 1,600 - 1,600 - Advertising 369 1,005 1,839 (834) 416 Insurance 49,615 43,936 43,936 - 47,247 Water and sewer service 32,303 32,054 26,156 5,898 31,572 Waste disposal 8,076 9,272 10,654 (1,382) 7,962 Telephone 3,816 4,940 4,118 822 4,138 Other contractual 19,942 16,917 19,186 (2,269) 53,596 Equipment repair and maintenance 15,105 17,899 27,024 (9,125) 17,048 Building repair and maintenance 64,682 63,444 87,770 (24,326) 96,632 Contract cleaning - - - - 750 Snow removal 27,344 - - - 7,058 Total other charges and services 296,250 272,345 302,038 (29,693) 345,855 Utilities Electric service 215,036 255,267 309,730 (54,463) 179,764 Gas service 101,102 65,465 78,125 (12,660) 60,230 Total utilities 316,138 320,732 387,855 (67,123) 239,994 Debt service expense Finance purchase agreement payment/interest - - 33,793 33,793 19,935 Other expense Contract data processing - - 18,266 18,266 - Schools and conferences 4,708 7,934 4,088 (3,846) 4,829 Business Meetings/Misc. Expenses 7,408 166 553 387 6,897 Licenses & Taxes - 204 - (204) - Dues/subscriptions/licenses 16,710 16,012 14,250 (1,762) 15,072 Total other expense 28,826 24,316 37,157 12,841 26,798 2025 Page 62 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES – GENERAL FUND - BUDGET AND ACTUAL FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 (WITH 2024 ACTUAL AMOUNTS FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES) 36 Budget As Originally Final Variance with 2024 Adopted Budget Actual Final Budget Actual Capital outlay 50,000 184,918 71,655 113,263 107,716 Total expenditures 1,778,439 1,986,225 1,928,981 150,512 1,677,742 Excess of revenues over expenditures 229,288 164,935 190,397 25,462 192,079 Other financing uses Contribution to City of Lakeville (75,710) (75,022) (73,648) 1,374 (75,023) Financing purchase agreement proceeds - 60,126 60,126 - 87,882 Transfers to other funds (140,000) (140,000) (140,000) - (140,000) Total other financing uses (215,710) (154,896) (153,522) 1,374 (127,141) Net change in fund balances 13,578$ 10,039$ 36,875$ 26,836$ 64,938$ Fund balances, beginning of year 611,963 547,025 Fund balances, end of year 648,838$ 611,963$ 2025 Page 63 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS SCHEDULE OF EMPLOYER’S SHARE OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION NET PENSION LIABILITY – GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 37 Page 64 of 485 LAKEVILLE ARENAS SCHEDULE OF EMPLOYER’S PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION CONTRIBUTIONS – GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025 38 Page 65 of 485 NOTES TO THE REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Page 66 of 485 39 BUDGETS AND BUDGETARY ACCOUNTING The Lakeville Arenas Board has full authority over the financial affairs of the Organization. The Board adopts an annual budget for the Organization. During the budget year, supplemental appropriations and deletions may be authorized by the Organization. The amounts shown in the financial statements as ‘Budget’ represent the original and final budgeted amounts. The Organization prepares its budget on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. All budgeting appropriations lapse at year-end. The legal level of budgetary control is at the fund level for the General fund and the Capital Maintenance Reserve fund. Any changes in the budget must be approved by a majority vote of the Board. CHANGES IN ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS 2025 – The combined service annuity loading factors increased from 15% to 19% for vested terminated members and from 3% to 44% for nonvested, terminated members. The assumed post-retirement benefit increase changed from 1.25% to 1.5%. 2024 - The following changes in assumptions are effective with the July 1, 2024 valuation, as recommended in the most recent experience study (dated June 29, 2023): Rates of merit and seniority were adjusted, resulting in slightly higher rates. Assumed rates of retirement were adjusted as follows: increase the rate of assumed unreduced retirements, slight adjustments to Rule of 90 retirement rates, and slight adjustments to early retirement rates for Tier 1 and Tier 2 members. Minor increase in assumed withdrawals for males and females. Lower rates of disability. Continued use of Pub-2010 general mortality table with slight rate adjustments as recommended in the most recent experience study. Minor changes to form of payment assumptions for male and female retirees. Minor changes to assumptions made with respect to missing participant data. 2023 - The investment return assumption and single discount rate were changed from 6.5 percent to 7.0 percent. 2022 - The mortality improvement scale was changed from Scale MP-2020 to Scale MP-2021. 2021 – The investment return and single discount rate were changed from 7.50 percent to 6.50 percent, for financial reporting purposes. The mortality improvement scale was changed from Scale MP-2019 to Scale MP-2020. 2020 - The price inflation assumption was decreased from 2.50 percent to 2.25 percent. The payroll growth assumption was decreased from 3.25 percent to 3.00 percent. Assumed salary increase rates were changed as recommended in the June 30, 2019 experience study. The net effect is assumed rates that average 0.25 percent less than previous rates. Assumed rates of retirement were changed as recommended in the June 30, 2019 experience study. The changes result in more unreduced (normal) retirements and slightly fewer Rule of 90 and early retirements. Assumed rates of termination were changed as recommended in the June 30, 2019 experience study. The new rates are based on service and are generally lower than the previous rates for years 2-5 and slightly higher thereafter. Assumed rates of disability were changed as recommended in the June 30, 2019 experience study. The change results in fewer predicted disability retirements for males and females. The base mortality table for healthy annuitants and employees was changed from the RP-2014 table to the Pub-2010 General Mortality table, with adjustments. The base mortality table for disabled annuitants was changed from the RP-2014 disabled annuitant mortality table to the PUB-2010 General/Teacher disabled annuitant mortality table, with adjustments. The mortality improvement scale was changed from Scale MP-2018 to Scale MP-2019. The assumed spouse age difference was changed from two years older for females to one year older. The assumed number of married male new retirees electing the 100 percent Joint & Survivor option changed from 35 percent to 45 percent. The assumed number of married female new retirees electing the 100 percent Joint & Survivor option changed from 15 percent Page 67 of 485 40 CHANGES IN ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS (continued) to 30 percent. The corresponding number of married new retirees electing the Life annuity option was adjusted accordingly. 2019 - The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2017 to MP-2018. 2018 - The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2015 to MP-2017. The assumed benefit increase was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2044 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.25 percent per year. 2017 - The Combined Service Annuity (CSA) loads were changed from 0.8 percent for active members and 60 percent for vested and non-vested deferred members. The revised CSA loads are now 0.0 percent for active member liability, 15.0 percent for vested deferred member liability and 3.0 percent for non-vested deferred member liability. The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0 percent per year for all years to 1.0 percent per year through 2044 and 2.5 percent per year thereafter. 2016 - The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0 percent per year through 2035 and 2.5 percent per year thereafter to 1.0 percent per year for all future years. The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9 percent to 7.5 percent. The single discount rate was changed from 7.9 percent to 7.5 percent. Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation. CHANGES IN PLAN PROVISIONS 2025 – The post-retirement benefit increase formula changed to 100% of the Social Security annual increase, between 1% and 1.75%, beginning January 1, 2026. If the funded ratio (on a market value assets basis) is less than 85% for the last two consecutive annual valuations or is less than 80% in the most recent actuarial valuation, the maximum is reduced to 1.5%. Previously, the benefit increase was 50% of the Social Security annual increase, between 1% and 1.5%. The 1% additional employer contribution is eliminated when the plan reaches 98% funded status (on an actuarial value of assets basis); this contribution was previously scheduled to stop when the plan reached 100% funded status. 2024 - The workers’ compensation offset for disability benefits was eliminated. The actuarial equivalent factors updated to reflect the changes in assumptions. 2023 - An additional one-time direct state aid contribution of $170.1 million will be contributed to the Plan on October 1, 2023. The vesting period of those hired after June 30, 2010, was changed from five years of allowable service to three years of allowable service. The benefit increase delay for early retirements on or after January 1, 2024 was eliminated. A one-time non-compounding benefit increase of 2.5 percent minus the actual 2024 adjustment will be payable in a lump sum for calendar year 2024 by March 31, 2024. 2022 – There were no changes in plan provisions since the previous valuation. 2021 – There were no changes in plan provisions since the previous valuation. 2020 - Augmentation for current privatized members was reduced to 2.0 percent for the period July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2023 and 0.0 percent after. Augmentation was eliminated for privatizations occurring after June 30, 2020. 2019 - The employer supplemental contribution was changed prospectively, decreasing from $31.0 million to $21.0 Page 68 of 485 40 CHANGES IN PLAN PROVISIONS (continued) million per year. The state’s special funding contribution was changed prospectively, requiring $16.0 million due per year through 2031. 2018 - The augmentation adjustment in early retirement factors is eliminated over a five-year period starting July 1, 2019, resulting in actuarial equivalence after June 30, 2024. Interest credited on member contributions decreased from 4.00 percent to 3.00 percent, beginning July 1, 2018. Deferred augmentation was changed to 0.00 percent, effective January 1, 2019. Augmentation that has already accrued for deferred members will still apply. Contribution stabilizer provisions were repealed. Postretirement benefit increases were changed from 1.00 percent per year with a provision to increase to 2.50 percent upon attainment of 90.00 percent funding ratio to 50.00 percent of the Social Security Cost of Living Adjustment, not less than 1.00 percent and not more than 1.50 percent, beginning January 1, 2019. For retirements on or after January 1, 2024, the first benefit increase is delayed until the retiree reaches normal retirement age; does not apply to Rule of 90 retirees, disability benefit recipients, or survivors. Actuarial equivalent factors were updated to reflect revised mortality and interest assumptions. 2017 - The State’s contribution for the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund equals $16,000,000 in 2017 and 2018, and $6,000,000 thereafter. The Employer Supplemental Contribution for the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund changed from $21,000,000 to $31,000,000 in calendar years 2019 to 2031. The state’s contribution changed from $16,000,000 to $6,000,000 in calendar years 2019 to 2031. 2016 – There were no changes in plan provisions since the previous valuation. Page 69 of 485 IV. OTHER REPORT Page 70 of 485 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE Board of Directors Lakeville Arenas Lakeville, Minnesota We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Lakeville Arenas (the Organization), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements which collectively comprise the Organization’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated April 24, 2026. In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the Organization failed to comply with the provisions of the contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, claims and disbursements, and miscellaneous provisions sections of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Other Political Subdivisions, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 6.65, insofar as they relate to accounting matters. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the Organization’s noncompliance with the above referenced provisions, insofar as they relate to accounting matters. This report is intended solely for the information and use those charged with governance and management of the Organization and the State Auditor and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. Abdo Minneapolis, Minnesota April 24, 2026 42 Page 71 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 1 LAKEVILLE ARENAS PROPOSED 2026 Budget Amendment 2027 Budget 2026–2027 Fee Schedule Serving our Community · Lakeville, Minnesota Page 72 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2026 Budget Amendment — Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 2026 Budget Amendment .................................................................................................................................................. 4 2027 Proposed Budget — Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 9 2027 Proposed Budget .................................................................................................................................................... 10 2026–2027 Board Approved Fee Schedule .................................................................................................................... 15 Page 73 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 3 LAKEVILLE ARENAS 2026 Budget Amendment — Executive Summary Proposed June 2, 2026 · Fund 8970 FINANCIAL SUMMARY Adopted Budget Amended Budget $ Change % Change Revenue $2,474,773 $2,611,496 +$136,723 +5.5% Cost of Goods $122,524 $130,887 +$8,363 +6.8% Operating Expenses $2,345,581 $2,477,447 +$131,865 +5.6% Net Earnings $6,668 $3,163 ($3,505) KEY DRIVERS OF CHANGE Category Driver Impact Revenue Arena Programming — Mite Camp registrations above plan +$167,000 Utilities Electric +$82.7K, Natural Gas +$20.8K (rate/usage pressure) +$101,965 Personnel Salary and benefit true-ups across full-time and part-time staff +$71,459 Other Misc. Insurance, banking and miscellaneous operating costs +$26,299 Contracts Service and maintenance agreements +$23,056 Prof. Services Professional and technical services +$13,715 Supplies Reduced supply spend across operating areas −$31,068 Capital Capital projects deferred or rescoped — cushions operating overage −$73,560 BOTTOM LINE Revenue grew $136.7K (+5.5%), driven almost entirely by Arena Programming. Expenses rose $131.9K (+5.6%), led by Utilities ($102K) and Personnel ($71K), partially offset by deferred Capital (−$74K) and lower Supplies (−$31K). Arena Operations remain profitable. Net Earnings of $3,163 — a $3,505 reduction from the adopted budget cushion of $6,668. Utilities and Personnel are the lines to monitor as we head into the 2027 proposed budget. Page 74 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 4 LAKEVILLE ARENAS 2026 Budget Amendment Statement of Revenue & Expenses · Fund 8970 · June 2, 2026 REVENUE Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Adopted 2026 Change 2026 Amended Convenience Fee (Credit Cards) $4,071 $4,032 ($322) $3,711 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Interest on Investments $18,311 $13,410 +$3,033 $16,444 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Net Change in FV of Investments $1,454 $5,123 ($1,859) $3,264 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Other Revenue $2,272 $5,611 +$11,170 $16,781 Estimated change based on current-year actuals, including the insurance claim received for the stolen sweeper. Ice Rental — LHA $646,633 $720,968 +$8,706 $729,673 Jan–Mar revenue was up $16K year-over-year but $18K below budget due to lower Pavilion ice purchases. Sept–Dec projected up 3.5% from rate increase, plus 14% from four new LHA teams, and added Pavilion purchases. Ice Rental — ISD 194 $232,237 $236,195 +$8,726 $244,921 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Ice Rental — Other $648,528 $724,046 ($52,985) $671,062 Adjusted for actual booked ice. Lost some ice from coaching changes and groups that failed financially; replaced with in -house programming. Does not include miscellaneous rentals or Tuesday nights Heritage relinquished. Lakeville Skating Academy (LTS) $138,410 $137,533 ($2,721) $134,812 Estimated change based on current-year actuals, slightly down from a record prior-year period. Public Admissions $45,169 $49,370 +$10,366 $59,736 Estimate derived from 30% increase on year-to-date actuals, supported by additional public ice and new Open Skate Light Shows and themed skates. HS Game Admissions $39,158 $39,591 ($3,161) $36,430 Estimate based on prior-year HS admissions, which have declined again. Arena Advertising Sales $71,781 $88,323 ($8,413) $79,910 Temporary downturn due to program expansion and coordinator unavailability. New Administrative Manager appointment expected t o refocus sales efforts. Arena Concession Sales $280,237 $296,835 +$12,313 $309,147 YTD actuals incorporated. Initial ~8% reduction attributed to cashless transition. Comprehensive welcome -center overhaul planned under new Administration Manager, with full-time Welcome Center Managers replacing part-time supervisors. Significant growth anticipated post- makeover. Pro Shop Sales $7,609 $7,580 +$3,867 $11,447 Pro Shop is expected to grow with welcome-center attention and the addition of clothing options. Skate Sharpening $18,145 $18,237 +$914 $19,151 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Arena Programming $67,844 $82,111 +$167,367 $249,479 YTD Mite Camp revenue is $130K+ above the prior year. New ice club memberships and programs are expected to generate at least $45K in additional programming revenue this year. Skate Rental $6,502 $9,320 ($111) $9,209 Page 75 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 5 Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Adopted 2026 Change 2026 Amended Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Arena Dry Floor Activities $3,045 $24,047 ($20,466) $3,581 Projected decline attributable to Pavilion Rink summer amenities not being finalized for this season. Lease/Rental Revenue $70,126 $10,000 +$300 $10,300 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. TOTAL REVENUE $2,302,974 $2,474,773 +$136,723 $2,611,496 COST OF GOODS Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Adopted 2026 Change 2026 Amended Pro Shop Cost of Goods ($6,427) ($3,790) ($4,399) ($8,189) Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Concessions Cost of Goods ($117,042) ($118,734) ($3,963) ($122,697) Cost of goods adjusted to actual YTD results, with forecasted sales using prior-year actual margin percentages. TOTAL COST OF GOODS ($123,468) ($122,524) ($8,363) ($130,887) NET REVENUE $2,179,506 $2,352,249 +$128,360 $2,480,610 PERSONNEL EXPENDITURES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Adopted 2026 Change 2026 Amended Salaries — Permanent Regular $475,110 $699,607 +$8,409 $708,016 The goal is to have all 11 FTE positions filled by the end of summer to reduce staff stress and enable focus on new revenue growth. 2 of the 11 will not be filled until later this year, provided new programming growth is realized. Salaries — Permanent Overtime $11,304 $27,021 ($9,899) $17,122 Estimated decrease attributable to additional FTEs and improved hiring stability. Salaries — Part-Time Regular $200,700 $202,637 ($33,263) $169,375 Part-time, regular, and temporary labor should be assessed together. Decrease reflects the addition of full-time staff and the reclassification of some operations staff to programming labor. Salaries — Part-Time Overtime $450 $4,964 ($1,907) $3,057 Adjusted and reduced slightly to account for added staff. Salaries — Temporary $99,094 $45,559 +$87,970 $133,529 Temporary salaries increased to meet programming growth and expansion needs. The high estimate will be adjusted as actual registrations are confirmed. TOTAL SALARY EXPENSE $786,657 $979,788 +$51,311 $1,031,100 PERA — Regular $48,031 $73,484 ($12,424) $61,060 Decrease reflects original over-budgeting of PERA-eligible PT staff, corrected to prior-year actuals. FICA/Medicare $59,901 $73,484 +$1,656 $75,140 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Paid Family Medical Leave Tax $0 $0 +$4,426 $4,426 Added to estimate — was not originally budgeted. Medical Insurance $36,022 $54,000 +$25,582 $79,582 Estimate increased for new FTE positions. Life and Disability Insurance $381 $563 ($24) $539 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Page 76 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 6 Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Adopted 2026 Change 2026 Amended Long-Term Disability $878 $1,610 ($93) $1,517 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Dental Insurance $2,005 $1,831 +$3,106 $4,937 Estimate increased for new FTE positions. Workers Compensation Insurance $18,472 $24,058 ($1,239) $22,819 Estimate based on the current year. Unemployment Compensation $982 $1,020 ($829) $191 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. FSA Plan $129 $485 ($36) $449 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. TOTAL PERSONNEL OTHER EXPENSE $166,802 $230,535 +$20,148 $250,683 TOTAL PERSONNEL EXPENSE $953,460 $1,210,324 +$71,459 $1,281,782 Total increase driven by new FTEs and associated benefits, primarily programming staff supporting revenue growth. Staffing adjusted as actual registration results are observed. SUPPLY EXPENSES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Adopted 2026 Change 2026 Amended Operating Supplies $30,131 $47,406 ($12,612) $34,794 Optional end-of-year supplies are excluded to offset increased utility costs from reduced solar credits, Pavilion energy consumption, and energy market conditions. Motor Fuels $6,030 $6,106 +$485 $6,591 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Building Maintenance Supplies $19,836 $13,072 +$2,156 $15,228 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Clothing $430 $5,152 +$256 $5,408 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Chemicals $19,192 $19,240 +$2,068 $21,308 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Equipment Parts $9,417 $5,175 +$2,514 $7,689 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Building Maintenance (Facility) $50,243 $54,221 ($14,330) $39,891 Optional end-of-year supplies are excluded to offset increased utility expenses. Landscaping Materials $0 $0 +$2,550 $2,550 Added to estimate. Signs and Striping Supplies $4,104 $11,746 ($8,946) $2,800 Estimate adjusted based on prior-year results. Small Tools & Equipment $3,178 $9,867 ($5,282) $4,585 Estimate adjusted based on prior-year results. Computer Supplies $463 $2,767 +$2,623 $5,390 Adjusted for actual YTD additions. TOTAL SUPPLY EXPENSES $143,023 $177,302 ($31,068) $146,234 Page 77 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Adopted 2026 Change 2026 Amended Fiscal Consultant Fees $41,364 $48,311 ($6,072) $42,240 Annual software expenses originally recorded here are now reclassified under Software Subscriptions. Bank Charges $1,316 $1,309 +$249 $1,558 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Audit $10,000 $7,650 +$2,850 $10,500 Audit adjusted to actuals. Use of Personal Auto $0 $0 +$1,632 $1,632 Added to estimate. Advertising $1,839 $1,026 +$164 $1,189 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. General Liability Insurance $43,936 $44,815 +$16,524 $61,339 Estimated increase based on actual year-to-date premiums. TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $98,455 $104,742 +$13,715 $118,458 UTILITIES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Adopted 2026 Change 2026 Amended Electric Service $309,730 $260,372 +$82,695 $343,067 Increased electric expense from reduced solar credits, Pavilion Rink energy consumption, and prevailing energy market conditi ons. Gas Service $78,125 $66,775 +$20,839 $87,614 Increased gas expense based on actual prior use and prevailing energy market conditions. Water $26,156 $32,695 ($2,795) $29,900 Adjusted based on YTD actuals. Waste Disposal $10,654 $9,457 +$312 $9,769 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Telephone $4,118 $7,039 +$913 $7,952 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. TOTAL UTILITIES $428,784 $376,338 +$101,965 $478,303 CONTRACTUAL EXPENSES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Adopted 2026 Change 2026 Amended Other Contractual $18,541 $17,252 ($3,223) $14,029 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Contract Equipment Repair $27,024 $18,257 +$31,122 $49,379 Increased for Rink 1 Zamboni annual maintenance, Rink 3 Zamboni battery replacement, and $10K plow truck. Contract Building Repair $87,770 $64,713 ($4,843) $59,870 Optional end-of-year building improvements were removed to help offset increased utility expenses. TOTAL CONTRACT EXPENSES $133,979 $100,222 +$23,056 $123,278 Page 78 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 8 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Adopted 2026 Change 2026 Amended Software Subscriptions $0 $0 +$18,267 $18,267 Moved City Annual Software charges for BS&A and UKG from Fiscal Consultant fees; increased to reflect last year’s actuals. Major Maintenance $73,648 $76,523 ($3,563) $72,960 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Miscellaneous $553 $170 $0 $170 Change reflects actual year-to-date effects relative to the original budget. Schools and Conferences $4,088 $8,093 ($6,468) $1,625 Reduced to help offset utility increases. Dues and Subscriptions $12,054 $16,333 +$4,074 $20,407 Increased to accommodate certain AI subscriptions. Licenses and Taxes $2,196 $208 +$1,763 $1,971 Adjusted to current YTD figures and prior-year results. Credit Card Fees $28,675 $25,634 +$12,225 $37,859 Increased based on actual YTD trends and expected growth from cashless operations. TOTAL OTHER MISC. EXPENSES $139,480 $126,961 +$26,299 $153,259 CAPITAL EXPENSES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Adopted 2026 Change 2026 Amended Cap Outlay — Buildings $0 $20,000 ($17,560) $2,440 Adjusted to offset utility spikes — relying on capital funds only for Pavilion this year. Cap Outlay — Other Improvements $11,529 $50,000 ($50,000) $0 Adjusted to offset utility spikes — relying on capital funds only for Pavilion this year. Capital Outlay — Computers $0 $6,000 ($6,000) $0 Adjusted to offset utility spikes — relying on capital funds only for Pavilion this year. Capital Lease Payments $28,106 $33,693 ($1,306) $32,387 Interest $5,687 $1,306 $0 $1,306 To Escrow Funds $140,000 $140,000 $0 $140,000 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENSES $245,449 $249,693 ($73,560) $176,133 REVENUE / EXPENSE SUMMARY Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Adopted 2026 Change 2026 Amended TOTAL REVENUES $2,302,974 $2,474,773 +$136,723 $2,611,496 TOTAL COST OF GOODS ($123,468) ($122,524) ($8,363) ($130,887) TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,142,631 $2,345,581 +$131,865 $2,477,447 NET EARNINGS / (LOSSES) $36,875 $6,668 ($3,505) $3,163 Page 79 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 9 LAKEVILLE ARENAS 2027 Proposed Budget — Executive Summary Preliminary, Proposed June 2, 2026 · Fund 8970 FINANCIAL SUMMARY 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed $ Change % Change Revenue $2,611,496 $3,035,648 +$424,152 +16.2% Cost of Goods $130,887 $163,251 +$32,364 +24.7% Operating Expenses $2,477,447 $2,864,505 +$387,058 +15.6% Net Earnings $3,163 $7,892 +$4,729 KEY DRIVERS — 2027 VS. 2026 AMENDED Category 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed $ Change % Change Personnel (salary + benefits) $1,281,782 $1,587,810 +$306,028 +23.9% Utilities $478,303 $523,752 +$45,449 +9.5% Cost of Goods $130,887 $163,251 +$32,364 +24.7% Supplies $146,234 $174,243 +$28,009 +19.2% Other Misc. Expenses $153,259 $161,060 +$7,801 +5.1% Professional Services $118,458 $124,381 +$5,923 +5.0% Contract Expenses $123,278 $119,566 ($3,712) −3.0% Capital Expenses $176,133 $173,693 ($2,440) −1.4% HIGHLIGHTS Revenue grows $424K (+16.2%), continuing the multi-year trend of programmatic and welcome-center expansion, consistent with the annual average growth of the past four years. Net Earnings improve from $3,163 to $7,892 (+$4,729), maintaining the fund’s net -zero-or-positive target. Personnel represents the largest increase in expenditure at $306,000. The salary component alone adds $248,000, primarily attributable to wage adjustments and staffing requirements to sustain growth. Staffing levels will be revised in line with actual programming growth. Utilities increase by $45K (+9.5%) due to ongoing rate pressure and full-year occupancy of the expanded space. Cost of Goods is up $32K (+24.7%), and Supplies are up $28K (+19.2%), both tracking the revenue mix in concessions and programs. Contract expenses and Capital are the only categories down year over year. MANAGEMENT NOTE As in previous years, the budget remains difficult to forecast accurately due to sustained rapid growth and expansion, as well as unforeseen factors in long-term planning. Management will once again retain the flexibility to adjust to fluctuations in projected growth and revise the 2027 budget accordingly, ensuring net-zero or positive earnings by year-end. Page 80 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 10 LAKEVILLE ARENAS 2027 Proposed Budget Statement of Revenue & Expenses · Fund 8970 · June 2, 2026 REVENUE Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed Convenience Fee (Credit Cards) $4,071 $3,711 $3,711 The 2026 amended budget was used as the basis for the 2027 projection. Insurance Refunds/Rebates $0 $0 $2,439 The 2026 amended budget was used as the basis for the 2027 projection. Interest on Investments $18,311 $16,444 $16,444 The 2026 amended budget was used as the basis for the 2027 projection. Net Change in FV of Investments $1,454 $3,264 $3,264 The 2026 amended budget was used as the basis for the 2027 projection. Other Revenue $2,272 $16,781 $16,781 The 2026 amended budget was used as the basis for the 2027 projection. Ice Rental — LHA $646,633 $729,673 $793,178 Adjusted to include 3.5% ice rental rate increase and year-round additional ice for 4 teams added in the 2026–2027 season. Further additions are anticipated in 2027–2028 and will be addressed in the next budget cycle. Ice Rental — ISD 194 $232,237 $244,921 $281,001 Adjusted for ice rate increase with an expanded schedule of heavy games in January and February 2027. Ice Rental — Other $648,528 $671,062 $704,615 Increased 3.5% for the ice rate and 1.5% for the estimated sales growth. Lakeville Skating Academy (LTS) $138,410 $134,812 $138,183 Increased 3.5% for ice rate adjustment. Public Admissions $45,169 $59,736 $77,656 Increased public open activities and newly introduced light-show-themed skates. HS Game Admissions $39,158 $36,430 $36,430 Arena Advertising Sales $71,781 $79,910 $95,892 Target elevated; goal established for 2027. Conservative and attainable with the addition of full-time support staff. Arena Concession Sales $280,237 $309,147 $370,977 Conservative target of 20% growth from concession makeovers, added programming, and public activities. Pro Shop Sales $7,609 $11,447 $14,881 Conservative 30% growth target from clothing additions and T-shirt sales for new tournaments. Skate Sharpening $18,145 $19,151 $22,981 20% growth target from increased traffic. Arena Programming $67,844 $249,479 $374,218 Squirt Day Camps add ~$62K in new revenue; additional $62K from new tournaments. Does not anticipate further ice club members hip growth. Skate Rental $6,502 $9,209 $11,512 Increased public open activities and newly introduced light-show-themed skates. Arena Dry Floor Activities $3,045 $3,581 $60,877 Pavilion Rink completed; off-season rentals launching. Page 81 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 11 Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed Lease/Rental Revenue $70,126 $10,300 $10,609 TOTAL REVENUE $2,302,974 $2,611,496 $3,035,648 Total increase of ~15%, consistent with annual growth rate from 2021 through 2026 (COVID year replaced with preceding -year high to avoid skewing). COST OF GOODS Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed Pro Shop Cost of Goods ($6,427) ($8,189) ($7,440) Concessions Cost of Goods ($117,042) ($122,697) ($155,810) TOTAL COST OF GOODS ($123,468) ($130,887) ($163,251) NET REVENUE $2,179,506 $2,480,610 $2,872,397 PERSONNEL EXPENDITURES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed Salaries — Permanent Regular $475,110 $708,016 $910,050 Full-year allocation for 11 FTE positions, several of which were vacant or filled late in 2026. Includes 3% cost -of-living increase and annual step increases (GM reached step 8 in 2026). Salaries — Permanent Overtime $11,304 $17,122 $15,441 Salaries — Part-Time Regular $200,700 $169,375 $214,431 Additional labor required for tournament expansion will be scaled based on inaugural-year results. Salaries — Part-Time Overtime $450 $3,057 $2,144 Salaries — Temporary $99,094 $133,529 $136,740 Maintaining consistency with the inflated 2026 estimate for optimal programming needs. Adjustments deferred to the next budget cycle based on actual registration outcomes. TOTAL SALARY EXPENSE $786,657 $1,031,100 $1,278,806 PERA — Regular $48,031 $61,060 $78,254 FICA/Medicare $59,901 $75,140 $96,550 Paid Family Medical Leave Tax $0 $4,426 $5,627 Medical Insurance $36,022 $79,582 $94,500 Budgeted based on full FTE staffing throughout the year, including an annual 5% price increase. Life and Disability Insurance $381 $539 $900 Long-Term Disability $878 $1,517 $2,100 Dental Insurance $2,005 $4,937 $6,000 Workers Compensation Insurance $18,472 $22,819 $23,960 Unemployment Compensation $982 $191 $191 FSA Plan $129 $449 $900 TOTAL PERSONNEL OTHER EXPENSE $166,802 $250,683 $309,004 TOTAL PERSONNEL EXPENSE $953,460 $1,281,782 $1,587,810 If salaries and projected revenue are realized as budgeted, total salary expenses will represent 52% of revenue, within the t arget range of 50– 55% as labor-intensive programming expands. Page 82 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 12 SUPPLY EXPENSES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed Operating Supplies $30,131 $34,794 $52,191 Adjusted for tournament trophies and other expanded programming supplies. Motor Fuels $6,030 $6,591 $6,921 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Building Maintenance Supplies $19,836 $15,228 $19,035 Adjusted for increased building traffic. Clothing $430 $5,408 $5,678 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Chemicals $19,192 $21,308 $22,373 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Equipment Parts $9,417 $7,689 $8,073 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Building Maintenance (Facility) $50,243 $39,891 $43,880 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 10% inflationary increase. Landscaping Materials $0 $2,550 $2,678 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Signs and Striping Supplies $4,104 $2,800 $2,940 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Small Tools & Equipment $3,178 $4,585 $4,815 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Computer Supplies $463 $5,390 $5,660 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. TOTAL SUPPLY EXPENSES $143,023 $146,234 $174,243 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed Fiscal Consultant Fees $41,364 $42,240 $44,352 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Bank Charges $1,316 $1,558 $1,636 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Audit $10,000 $10,500 $11,025 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Use of Personal Auto $0 $1,632 $1,714 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Advertising $1,839 $1,189 $1,249 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. General Liability Insurance $43,936 $61,339 $64,406 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. TOTAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $98,455 $118,458 $124,381 Page 83 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 13 UTILITIES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed Electric Service $309,730 $343,067 $377,374 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 10% inflationary increase. Gas Service $78,125 $87,614 $96,375 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 10% inflationary increase. Water $26,156 $29,900 $31,395 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Waste Disposal $10,654 $9,769 $10,258 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Telephone $4,118 $7,952 $8,349 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. TOTAL UTILITIES $428,784 $478,303 $523,752 CONTRACTUAL EXPENSES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed Other Contractual $18,541 $14,029 $14,730 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Contract Equipment Repair $27,024 $49,379 $41,972 Reduced to reflect elevated and unusual Zamboni and equipment repairs in 2026. Contract Building Repair $87,770 $59,870 $62,864 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Contract Landscaping $0 $0 $645 TOTAL CONTRACT EXPENSES $133,979 $123,278 $119,566 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed Software Subscriptions $0 $18,267 $19,180 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Major Maintenance $73,648 $72,960 $72,960 Miscellaneous $553 $170 $178 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Schools and Conferences $4,088 $1,625 $1,706 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Dues and Subscriptions $12,054 $20,407 $21,427 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Licenses and Taxes $2,196 $1,971 $2,070 Based on the 2026 amended budget, with 5% inflationary increase. Page 84 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 14 Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed Credit Card Fees $28,675 $37,859 $43,538 Increased 15% to reflect revenue growth and cashless sales in the welcome center and programs. TOTAL OTHER MISC. EXPENSES $139,480 $153,259 $161,060 CAPITAL EXPENSES Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed Cap Outlay — Buildings $0 $2,440 $0 Capital Lease Payments $28,106 $32,387 $32,387 Interest $5,687 $1,306 $1,306 To Escrow Funds $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENSES $245,449 $176,133 $173,693 REVENUE / EXPENSE SUMMARY Line Item 2025 Actual 2026 Amended 2027 Proposed TOTAL REVENUES $2,302,974 $2,611,496 $3,035,648 TOTAL COST OF GOODS ($123,468) ($130,887) ($163,251) TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,142,631 $2,477,447 $2,864,505 NET EARNINGS / (LOSSES) $36,875 $3,163 $7,892 Budget remains challenging to forecast accurately due to sustained rapid growth. Management retains the flexibility to revise projections to ensure net-zero or positive earnings by year-end. Page 85 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 15 LAKEVILLE ARENAS 2026–2027 Board Approved Fee Schedule SURROUNDING FACILITIES — ICE RATE COMPARISON Facility 25–26 Winter Prime 25–26 Non- Prime 2026 Summer Prime 2026 Summer Non- Prime 26–27 Winter Prime 26–27 Non- Prime 2027 Summer Prime 2027 Summer Non-Prime Apple Valley $275 $195 $195 $195 $285 $205 $205 $205 Bloomington $265 $193 $237.50 $193 $275 $200 $275 $200 Burnsville $270.28 $195 $250 $250 $280 $195 $250 $250 Eagan $250 $185 $185 $165 $255 $190 $190 $170 Farmington $305 $245 $265 $265 $315 $265 — — Lakeville $280 $180 $212.72 $212.72 $290 $190 $221.96 $221.96 AVERAGE $274.21 $198.83 $224.20 $213.45 $283.33 $207.50 $228.39 $209.39 * Rates from the MN Ice Arena Managers Association, published May 6, 2026. * LHA Agreement Rate Clause: Per the LHA agreement, rates must not exceed $10 per hour above the highest rate charged by nearby rinks listed above. PRIME SEASON WINTER ICE RATES (OCT 1 – MAR 31) Description Current With Tax Change Proposed With Tax Indoor Prime Ice Rental Rate (Hourly) $280.00 $302.75 +$10.00 $290.00 $313.56 Indoor Non-Prime Ice (School Days 5 am–2 pm) $180.00 $194.63 +$10.00 $190.00 $205.44 Indoor Fire Ice Sale — Last Minute (up to 30 min notice) $180.00 $194.63 +$10.00 $190.00 $205.44 Outdoor Pavilion Rink Prime Ice Rental Rate (Hourly) $200.00 $216.25 +$10.00 $210.00 $227.06 Outdoor Pavilion Rink Non-Prime Ice (School Days 5 am–2 pm) $100.00 $108.13 +$10.00 $110.00 $118.94 Outdoor Pavilion Rink Fire Ice Sale — Last Minute $100.00 $108.13 +$10.00 $110.00 $118.94 Staff Youth Game Operations Worker (Per Staff/Per Game) $20.00 $21.63 $0.00 $20.00 $21.63 Staff HS Game Operations Worker (Per Staff/Per Game) $30.00 $32.44 $0.00 $30.00 $32.44 SHOULDER SEASON ICE RATES (APR 1 – SEP 30) Description Current With Tax Change Proposed With Tax Indoor Prime Ice Rental Rate (Hourly) $212.72 $230.00 +$9.25 $221.97 $240.00 Indoor Fire Ice Sale — Last Minute (up to 30 min) $92.49 $100.00 +$9.24 $101.73 $110.00 Outdoor Pavilion Rink Dry-Floor Rental Rate (Hourly) $138.73 $150.00 +$9.25 $147.98 $160.00 Outdoor Pavilion Rink Fire Floor Sale — Last Minute $69.36 $75.00 +$9.25 $78.61 $85.00 Page 86 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 16 DRY-FLOOR FACILITY RENTALS (MAR 1 – OCT 31) Description Current With Tax Change Proposed With Tax Outdoor Pavilion Entire Rink Dry-Floor Rental Rate (Hourly) $138.73 $150.00 +$24.97 $163.70 $177.00 Outdoor Pavilion Entire Rink Fire Floor Sale — Last Minute $69.36 $75.00 +$9.25 $78.61 $85.00 Daily Entire Rink Rental (24-hr period — Minimum 2 Days) $1,387.28 $1,500.00 +$550.29 $1,937.57 $2,095.00 Food & Beverage Commission Fee 20% — — 20% — Merchandise Sales Commission Fee 10% — — 10% — Paid Attendance Commission Fee 10% — — 10% — Table Rentals (Each) $9.25 $10.00 $0.00 $9.25 $10.00 Chair Rentals (Each) $1.85 $2.00 $0.00 $1.85 $2.00 Scissor Lift Per Day (Waiver Required) $184.97 $200.00 $0.00 $184.97 $200.00 Manual Pallet Jack Per Day $18.50 $20.00 $0.00 $18.50 $20.00 Dollies & Push Carts Per Day $9.25 $10.00 $0.00 $9.25 $10.00 PUBLIC ACTIVITIES (RATES INCLUDE TAXES) Description Current With Tax Change Proposed With Tax Public Open Indoor Skating (Cost per person) $9.25 $10.00 $0.00 $9.25 $10.00 Public Open Indoor Hockey / Stick & Puck (Cost per person) $9.25 $10.00 $0.00 $9.25 $10.00 Public Open Outdoor Skating / Hockey / Stick & Puck $4.62 $5.00 $0.00 $4.62 $5.00 Freestyle — Figure Skating Practice (Includes skate rental) $18.50 $20.00 $0.00 $18.50 $20.00 Learn to Skate Lessons (Cost per daily session) $13.41 $14.50 +$0.50 $13.91 $15.04 OTHER FEES Description Current With Tax Change Proposed With Tax Skate Rental (tax included) $4.62 $5.00 $0.00 $4.62 $5.00 Skate Sharpening (tax included) $9.25 $10.00 $0.00 $9.25 $10.00 Meeting Room Rentals (Per Hour) $32.37 $35.00 $0.00 $32.37 $35.00 Open Skate Birthday Party Room — 2 hrs $46.24 $50.00 $0.00 $46.24 $50.00 Ames Dryland Training Area $46.24 $50.00 $0.00 $46.24 $50.00 Birthday Party Prime Ice Rental (includes ice, freestyle, skate rental) $280.00 $302.75 +$10.00 $290.00 $313.56 Birthday Party Shoulder Season Ice Rental (incl. ice & skate rental) $212.72 $230.00 +$9.25 $221.97 $240.00 Side Glass Breakage Fee (not applicable to dasher board glass) $500.00 $540.63 $0.00 $500.00 $540.63 Page 87 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 17 Event Cleaning Fees (HS Games, Tournaments, Special Events) $300.00 $324.38 +$200.00 $500.00 $540.63 LR Cleaning / Damage Fee (Minimum charge; additional charges may apply) $25.00 $27.03 +$5.00 $30.00 $32.44 ADVERTISING & SPONSORSHIP RATES (3–5 YEAR AGREEMENTS) Dasher Board Ads — 3-Year Agreements, 32"h × 96"w Description Paid Annually (Current) Paid Upfront (Current) Change Proposed Annually Proposed Upfront Lakeview Bank Rink (Ames) / Hasse Indoor Rink — Prime Location $1,200 $3,060 $0 $1,200 $3,060 Lakeview Bank Rink (Ames) & Hasse Indoor Rink $800 $2,040 $0 $800 $2,040 LHA Rink 2 (Ames) & Hasse Pavilion Rink (Bleacher Side) $800 $2,040 $0 $800 $2,040 LHA Rink 2 (Ames) & Hasse Pavilion Rink (Bleacher Side) — Corner $500 $1,275 $0 $500 $1,275 Dasher Glass Ads — 3-Year Agreements, 72"h × 48"w Description Paid Annually (Current) Paid Upfront (Current) Change Proposed Annually Proposed Upfront Lakeview Bank Rink (Ames) & Hasse Indoor Rink — Prime Location $800 $2,040 $0 $800 $2,040 Lakeview Bank Rink (Ames) & Hasse Indoor Rink $600 $1,530 $0 $600 $1,530 LHA Rink 2 (Ames) & Hasse Pavilion Rink (Bleacher Side) $400 $1,020 $0 $400 $1,020 LHA Rink 2 (Ames) & Hasse Pavilion Rink (Bleacher Side) — Corner $250 $637.50 $0 $250 $637.50 Jumbo Wall Signs — 5-Year Agreements, 72"h × 72"w Description Paid Annually (Current) Paid Upfront (Current) Change Proposed Annually Proposed Upfront Lakeview Bank Rink (Ames) & Hasse Indoor Rink $2,400 $10,200 $0 $2,400 $6,120 Ames LHA Rink 2 (Bleacher Facing Ads) $800 $3,400 $0 $800 $2,040 Pavilion Rink Wind Screens (96' × 96') $2,000 $8,500 $0 $2,000 $5,100 Zamboni Sponsors — 5-Year Agreements (Signage design included) Description Paid Annually (Current) Paid Upfront (Current) Change Proposed Annually Proposed Upfront Page 88 of 485 Lakeville Arenas · Fund 8970 · 18 Lakeview Bank Rink (Ames) & Hasse Indoor Rink $3,000 $12,750 — $3,000 $7,650 LHA Rink 2 & Pavilion Rink $2,400 $10,200 +$100 $2,500 $6,375 Scoreboard Sponsors — 5-Year Agreements (Signage design included) Description Paid Annually (Current) Paid Upfront (Current) Change Proposed Annually Proposed Upfront Lakeview Bank Rink (Ames) & Hasse Indoor Rink $2,500 $10,625 — $2,500 $6,375 LHA Rink 2 & Pavilion Rink $1,500 $6,375 +$500 $2,000 $5,100 In-Ice Advertisements — 3-Year Agreements (Signage design included) Description Paid Annually (Current) Paid Upfront (Current) Change Proposed Annually Proposed Upfront Lakeview Bank Rink (Ames) & Hasse Indoor Rink $2,500 $6,375 — $2,500 $6,375 LHA Rink 2 & Pavilion Rink $1,500 $3,825 +$500 $2,000 $5,100 Player Benches — 3-Year Agreements (Signage design included) Description Paid Annually (Current) Paid Upfront (Current) Change Proposed Annually Proposed Upfront Lakeview Bank Rink (Ames) & Hasse Indoor Rink $2,500 $6,375 — $2,500 $6,375 LHA Rink 2 & Pavilion Rink $1,500 $3,825 +$500 $2,000 $5,100 Bleacher Stairs — 3-Year Agreements (Signage design included) Description Paid Annually (Current) Paid Upfront (Current) Change Proposed Annually Proposed Upfront Lakeview Bank Rink (Ames) & Hasse Indoor Rink $2,500 $6,375 — $2,500 $6,375 Hasse Elevator $2,500 $6,375 — $2,500 $6,375 Restroom Signs — 3-Year Agreement Description Paid Annually (Current) Paid Upfront (Current) Change Proposed Annually Proposed Upfront Restrooms — Per Pair (1 Men's / 1 Women's) $500 $1,275 — $500 $1,275 Page 89 of 485 Lakeville ARENAS Built for the Community 2025 Annual Report Presented to the Lakeville City Council Lakeville Area Schools Board Spring 2026 6,635 Ice Hours $2.14M Revenue 1,096 LTS Enrollments Page 90 of 485 Who We Are Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Lakeville and ISD 194 (Lakeville Area Schools), formed 2006 Operates Ames Arena, Hasse Arena, and the Allina Health Pavilion Rink — the covered outdoor sheet opened Thanksgiving 2024 Operating expenses are fully self-funded through ice rentals and programming revenue — no daily operating tax subsidy Governed by a 5-member Board of Directors representing the City, ISD 194, and the community at large Key partners: City of Lakeville · ISD 194 · Lakeville Hockey Association · Heritage Figure Skating Club Ames Arena 19900 Ipava Ave · 2 indoor sheets Est. 1994 Hasse Arena 8525 215th St W · 1 indoor sheet Est. 2006 Allina Health Pavilion Rink Covered outdoor sheet at Hasse Opened 2024 – 2025 Season Joe Bergquist, General Manager · Tonyea Patterson, Admin Supervisor · Nick Ames & Jeff Zimmerman, Operations Managers Page 91 of 485 2025 Highlights & Events Jan 2025 Hockey Day Lakeville Allina Health Pavilion Rink Grand Opening · community celebration Feb 2025 MN Hockey District 8 Tournament Peewee-A Regional Tournament · Ames Arena Jun 2025 First Sanctioned US Figure Skating Competition 53 skaters from across the Midwest · Hasse Arena Fall 2025 Inaugural Mite Day Camps 34 participants · expanding to 5 days/week in 2026 Jan 1, 2025 US Hockey Hall of Fame Game MN Gophers Women's vs. Bemidji State · Hasse Arena Mar 2025 HFSC Annual Ice Show March 21–22 · Heritage Figure Skating Club Summer 2025 Maggie Flaherty & the Walter Cup Back-to-back PWHL champions · LHA Icecats skate event Dec 2025 Holidays at Hasse Skate with Santa · Open Door Pantry food drive · hot cocoa bar Page 92 of 485 ICE TIME & USAGE Record Ice Hours in 2025 6,635 total hours — up 13.1% from 2024 LHA ISD 194 HS HFSC Clinics/Camps Other Ice Adult Hockey Pickup 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 2024 2025 +549.5 hrs Other Ice (new programs, tournaments, Pavilion) +213.5 hrs LHA Ice — continued partnership growth +132 hrs Adult Hockey +35% year-over-year +45.25 hrs Pickup Ice Sales +26% year-over-year Page 93 of 485 PROGRAMS & COMMUNITY IMPACT Growing Every Program 1,096 Enrollments — Highest Ever Top 5 program in Minnesota · 4 sessions/year Learn to Skate 53 Enrollments in 2025 Up from 24 in 2024, 8 in 2023 — remarkable trajectory Aspire to Skate 336 Participants (Spring + Fall) Up from 283 in 2024 (+18.7%) — inaugural day camps Mite Leagues +62% Revenue Growth vs. 2024 $67,844 actual · new structured programs & camps Arena Programming 53 Skaters from across Midwest First-ever sanctioned US Figure Skating event, June 2025 Basic Skills Competition NEW Launched 2025 Private lesson add-on — highly successful first year Public Plus Ice Page 94 of 485 ALLINA HEALTH PAVILION RINK Pavilion Rink — Year Two Upgrades Opened Thanksgiving 2024 · Grand Opening Hockey Day Lakeville, January 2025 Year 2 Improvements Completed: ✓Sunscreens installed — prevents ice glazing 10am–5pm ✓ Locker rooms with heaters are completed ✓West/north wind screens for skater comfort ✓Radiant heaters above bleachers, benches & officials' boxes ✓Dragonfly fiber Wi-Fi — installed & ready ✓Broke Ground: concession stand, catering kitchen & 32×40 lobby What's Ahead Spring '26 Patio, playground & security fencing Summer '26 Zamboni/equipment shed 2027+ Dry-floor revenue: roller hockey, basketball, pickleball & more Long-term Footings for potential full enclosure — 4th indoor sheet Page 95 of 485 2025 Financial Results Audited — Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2025 $2.14M Total Revenue $1.995M Total Expenditures $140,942 Net Surplus $1.088M Fund Balance (12/31/25) 2022 2023 2024 2025 0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000 1,410,000 1,610,000 1,891,341 2,136,038 Revenue Growth 2022–2025 2025 Expenditures by Category Personnel 47.8% Utilities 19.4% Other Charges & Svcs 15.1% Capital Outlay 6.9% Commodities 7.2% Debt Service & Other 3.6% Page 96 of 485 REVENUE DIVERSIFICATION Diversified & Growing Revenue 72% 6% 8% 3%3% 2% 6% Ice Rentals Learn to Skate Concessions Advertising Arena Programming Event Admissions Other Year-over-Year Revenue Growth Ice Rental Revenue $1,527,398 +$205K (+15.4%) Learn to Skate $138,410 +$21K (+17.8%) Arena Programming $67,844 +$26K (+62.1%) Advertising Revenue $71,781 +$21K (+41.7%) Concessions/Pro Shop $164,377 +$1.7K Page 97 of 485 Looking Ahead to 2026 2026 Budget Revenue Budget $2,474,773 Expenditure Budget $2,345,581 Net $6,668 Rate increase: 3.6% rate increase planned for 2026–27 season 2026 Priorities Pavilion Rink 2.0 Completion Patio, playground, Zamboni shed · dry-floor revenue in 2027 Programming Expansion Mite 5-day camps · summer 4-on-4 skates · fall-summer-spring breakfast club · 2027 AAA tournament series New Community Ice Club Memberships Public Ice & Hockey Club Memberships Launching Summer 2026 Staffing & Retention 3% COLA all staff · 6% Driver Supervisors · Office Manager hire Spring '26 Capital Fund No capital expenditures planned · fund continues to rebuild toward targets Lakeville Arenas — Built by the Community · Sustained by the Community · For the CommunityPage 98 of 485 NEW PUBLIC ICE CLUB MEMBERSHIPS INVESTING IN OUR LOCAL YOUTH Page 99 of 485 NEW HOCKEY ICE CLUB MEMBERSHIPS INVESTING IN OUR LOCAL HOCKEY YOUTH Page 100 of 485 NEW PUBLIC ICE CLUB MEMBERSHIPS INVESTING IN OUR LOCAL YOUTH Page 101 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Check Register Summary Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve the Check Register Summary. Overview Checks 329710 - 329832 $1,133,659.94 ACH/EFT 25489 - 25598 $1,318,824.65 Total $2,452,484.59 The City Council receives a list of expenditures paid (claims detail), which is available to the public upon request. The City serves as the fiscal agent for Lakeville Arenas and Dakota 911 and processes their accounts payable and payments – these amounts are not included in the total above. Supporting Information 1. 06.02.26 CKSUM-Checks 2. 06.02.26 CKSUM-ACH-EFT 3. Check Register 06.02.26 for June 15, 2026 Council Mtg - Checks 4. Check Register 06.02.26 for June 15, 2026 Council Mtg - ACH-EFT Financial Impact: $2,452,484.59 Budgeted: No Source: Various Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Cheri Donovan, Assistant Finance Director Page 102 of 485 CHECK DISBURSEMENT REPORT FOR CITY OF LAKEVILLE Amount 1000 GENERAL FUND 73,093.57 2000 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 744.47 2210 FRANCHISE FEES 848.00 3121 2022B GO TAXABLE BONDS HASSE 187.50 3125 2025A FIRST CENTER 6.01 3126 2026A FIRE STATION #2 CONSTRUCTION BONDS 325.00 3253 2022B TAXABLE GO REF BONDS 16A 187.50 4000 BUILDING FUND 115,491.00 4125 TECHNOLOGY FUND 1,343.61 4500 PARK & TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS 89,096.48 4720 2024A PARK BONDS 1,129.00 5300 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT FUND 998.22 6000 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION FUND 10,830.53 7450 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES FUND 11,485.33 7550 UTILITY FISCAL ADMINISTRATION 56,282.86 7575 STREET LIGHTING FUND 8.69 7600 WATER FUND 11,199.08 7700 SEWER FUND 519,675.91 7800 LIQUOR FUND 230,232.18 7900 MUNICIPAL RESERVES FUND 495.00 8000 ESCROW FUND 10,000.00 Report Total:1,133,659.94 06/10/2026 08:37 AM Page:1/1 Page 103 of 485 CHECK DISBURSEMENT REPORT FOR CITY OF LAKEVILLE Amount 1000 GENERAL FUND 333,101.41 2000 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 476.00 4000 BUILDING FUND 33,586.18 4025 NEW FIRE STATION #2 (2026 CONSTRUCTION)148,353.00 4100 EQUIPMENT FUND 2,725.50 4125 TECHNOLOGY FUND 2,655.10 4500 PARK & TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS 17,870.34 4720 2024A PARK BONDS 2,081.81 5200 STATE AID CONSTRUCTION FUND 3,042.90 5300 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT FUND 10,396.75 5400 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FND 1,602.00 6611 2026 STREET PROJECTS 20,605.96 7550 UTILITY FISCAL ADMINISTRATION 2,098.00 7575 STREET LIGHTING FUND 65.35 7600 WATER FUND 124,042.03 7700 SEWER FUND 47,550.80 7800 LIQUOR FUND 561,118.79 7900 MUNICIPAL RESERVES FUND 3,292.73 8000 ESCROW FUND 4,160.00 Report Total:1,318,824.65 06/10/2026 08:36 AM Page:1/1 Page 104 of 485 MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 1, 2026 - 6:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers 1. Call to order, moment of silence and flag pledge Mayor Hellier called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. 2. Roll Call Members Present: Mayor Hellier, Council Members Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter Staff Present: Justin Miller, City Administrator; Andrea McDowell Poehler, City Attorney; Julie Stahl, Finance Director; Joe Masiarchin, Parks & Recreation Director; Allyn Kuennen, Assistant City Administrator; Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk; Brad Paulson, Police Chief; Paul Oehme, Public Works Director; Tina Goodroad, Community Development Director 3. Citizen Comments None 4. Additional agenda information None 5. Presentations/Introductions a. Recognition of City Administrator Justin Miller for Service on the League of Minnesota Cities Board Luke Fischer, Executive Director of the League of Minnesota Cities, and Wendy Berry, West St. Paul City Council Member and member of the League of Minnesota Cities Board of Directors, recognized City Administrator Justin Miller for his service and leadership on the League of Minnesota Cities Board of Directors. b. Parks & Recreation Quarterly Report Park and Recreation Director Joe Masiarchin presented the Park and Recreation Quarterly Report. 6. Consent Agenda Motion was made by Bermel, seconded by Wolter, to remove Item G, Renewal of 2026 Liquor Licenses, from the Consent Agenda for discussion and to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes - Hellier, Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter a. Check Register Summary b. Minutes of the 05/18/2026 City Council Meeting Page 105 of 485 City Council Meeting Minutes June 1, 2026 Page 2 c. Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County for Engineering and Construction for the Lake Marion Greenway from Ritter Farm Park to Downtown Lakeville d. Approve Contracts for 192nd Street Trail and Retaining Wall Reconstruction e. Approval of Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County for Post-Election Review f. Resolution Authorizing Temporary Closing of City Streets for Pan-O-Prog Events i. Proposals from St. Croix Recreation for the Purchase of Playground Equipment for Dakota Heights and Valley Lake Parks j. Temporary On-Sale Liquor License to Lakeville Lions for Pan-O-Prog Events k. Resolution of Support Authorizing the Submittal of a 2026 Regional Solicitation Funding Application to the Metropolitan Council for the Dodd Boulevard Modernization Project l. Resolution of Support Authorizing the Submittal of a 2026 Active Transportation Program Application to the Metropolitan Council for the Lake Marion Greenway - Downtown Sidewalk Improvements Project m. Resolution of Support Authorizing the Submittal of a 2026 Regional Solicitation Funding Application to the Metropolitan Council for the Lake Marion Greenway - South Creek n. Professional Services Proposal for Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for the Satellite Water Treatment Plant o. Agreement with M&A Bauer Salvage for Dakota Heights Park and Valley Lake Park Playground Removals q. Resolution Accepting Donations to the Lakeville Parks & Recreation Department in the 2nd Quarter of 2026 r. Proposals from Webber Recreational Design, Inc. for the Purchase and Installation of Playground Equipment for Bracketts Crossing Park s. Approve ALF Ambulance 2027 Budget t. Brian Wellert - Valvoline Instant Oil Change - Conditional Use Permit u. Joint Powers Agreement with Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization for Watershed Partner Project Maintenance and Repair Financial Assistance Program v. Proposal from Twin Cities Recreation, Inc. for Dakota Heights Playground Installation w. Proposal from Twin Cities Recreation, Inc. for Valley Lake Park Playground Installation 7. Action Items a. Renewal of Liquor Licenses 2026 Councilmember Wolter abstained from discussion and voting on the renewal of the 2026 liquor licenses, as his employer is included among the license holders. Motion was made by Lee, seconded by Volk, to approve the renewal of the 2026 liquor licenses as presented. Page 106 of 485 City Council Meeting Minutes June 1, 2026 Page 3 Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes - Hellier, Bermel, Lee, Volk, Abstained: Councilmember Wolter b. Recommendation to Rename the Casperson Park Outdoor Performance Stage to the Doug & Deb Anderson Amphitheatre Park and Recreation Director Joe Masiarchin explained that the Parks and Recreation Department has an established Park Naming and Memorials Policy that provides procedures for naming and, in certain cases, renaming park facilities. He noted that the City had received a request to rename the outdoor performance stage at Casperson Park in honor of former Mayor Doug Anderson. In recognition of Deb Anderson's continued volunteerism and contributions to the community, staff recommended that she also be recognized through the renaming. Masiarchin stated that the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Committee reviewed the request at its May 20, 2026, meeting and unanimously recommended approval. Councilmembers discussed the City's park naming policies. It was noted that Mayor Anderson had been a strong supporter of the Park Referendum and was an avid bicyclist. Councilmembers suggested that a future naming opportunity associated with the Dakota County trailhead could also be considered. Motion was made by Bermel, seconded by Wolter, to approve the recommendation to rename the Casperson Park Outdoor Performance Stage to the Doug and Deb Anderson Amphitheater. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes - Hellier, Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter c. Early Voting Administration Options Following State Legislative Changes City Clerk Ann Orlofsky presented the staff report regarding early voting administration options following recent state legislative changes. Phil Wilson, 17320 Halifax Path, encouraged the City to implement a robust public information campaign to ensure residents remain informed and engaged in the voting process. Karin Miller, 17985 Jacquard Path, encouraged the Council to take advantage of the efficiencies and cost savings associated with the 18-day early voting model. Steven Schroer, 9370 176th Street West, a candidate for Minnesota State Senate, spoke on the importance of voter participation and ensuring continued access to voting opportunities for residents. Councilmembers discussed the importance of voter education and emphasized the need for a comprehensive communication campaign to ensure residents are aware of the changes to in-person voting and understand the available voting options. Motion was made by Wolter, seconded by Bermel, to adopt a resolution electing to administer the 18-day in-person early voting model in accordance with Minnesota election law and authorizing staff to notify Dakota County and implement the transition. Page 107 of 485 City Council Meeting Minutes June 1, 2026 Page 4 Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes - Hellier, Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter 8. Unfinished Business None 9. New Business None 10. Council/Committee Updates Lee - Fire Relief Board is planning a waffle breakfast during Pan-O-Prog. Bermel - ALF Annual Board meeting met and is recommending approval its annual budget by the City Council. Wolter - I-35W Solutions received funding for two interchange improvement projects in Lakeville. 11. Announcements a. Next City Council Meeting June 15, 2026 12. Adjourn Motion was made by Volk, seconded by Lee, to adjourn by 6:45 p.m. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes - Hellier, Bermel, Lee, Volk, Wolter Respectfully Submitted, __________________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk ____________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor Page 108 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Approval of Supplemental Agreements for 2050 Comprehensive Plan System Plan Updates Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve supplemental agreements with Barr Engineering, SEH, and SRF Consulting Group to complete the Water and Natural Resources Management Plan Update, Water System Plan Update, Sanitary Sewer System Plan Update, and Transportation Plan Update for the City's 2050 Comprehensive Plan. Overview The Metropolitan Council's Imagine 2050 regional planning framework requires cities to prepare system plans that accurately reflect forecasted growth, planned land uses, and infrastructure needs. In support of the City's 2050 Comprehensive Plan, updates are required to the Water and Natural Resource Management Plan, Water System Plan, Sanitary Sewer System Plan and Transportation Plan. Each plan was last updated in 2018 during the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan update. The updates will be coordinated with the Planning Department and the City's comprehensive plan consultant to ensure consistency across land-use, infrastructure, and environmental planning. Attached are proposals by Barr Engineering to complete the Water and Natural Resource Management Plan update, SEH to complete the Water System Plan and Sanitary Sewer Plan updates, and SRF Consulting Group to complete the Transportation Plan update. The proposals outline the services and estimated costs. All work will be completed under the City's existing Master Services Agreements with the consultants dated September 20, 2021. Funding for these system plan updates will be provided as shown below: City Project Plan Element Consultant Cost Amount Fund Source 26-22 Sanitary Sewer SEH $83,200.00 Sewer Trunk 26-23 Transportation SRF $145,261.00 Pavement Management 26-24 Water SEH $75,400.00 Water Trunk 26-25 Water & Natural Resource Management Barr $286,610.00 Stormwater Infrastructure Page 109 of 485 Supporting Information 1. 2026.06.01 Barr Proposal (WNRMP) 2. 2026.06.05 SEH Proposal (Water) 3. 2026.06.05 SEH Proposal (Sewer) 4. 2026.05.22 SRF Proposal (Transportation) Financial Impact: $590,471.00 Budgeted: Yes Source: Multiple Sources Envision Lakeville Community Values: Design that Connects the Community Report Completed by: Chloe Anderson, Civil Engineer Page 110 of 485 barr.com 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 | 952.832.2600 June 1, 2026 Zach Johnson PE City Engineer, City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: Proposal for Updating the City of Lakeville Water and Natural Resources Management Plan Dear Zach Johnson: Thank you for considering Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) to assist you in updating the City of Lakeville Water and Natural Resources Management Plan (WNRMP or plan). We will do our best to justify your interest and confidence in working with us. This letter presents the scope of professional consulting services we will provide for your project, including our understanding of the project, the proposed work tasks, the estimated cost to perform the work tasks proposed, and the estimated schedule to complete this project. The tasks and products described herein reflect the scope of services you requested of Barr. Scope of work 1.1 Project approach Barr understands that the City of Lakeville’s WNRMP serves as strategic guidance for the city's stormwater, surface water, and natural resources management efforts over the next 10 years. As such, the document must be easily accessible and useful to city staff members, while also meeting the requirements of the Black Dog Watershed Management Organization (BDWMO), Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization (VRWJPO), and Metropolitan Council. The WNRMP must also satisfy the requirements of Minnesota Rules 8410 and Minnesota Statutes 103B. We will work closely with you throughout the project to promote the clarity and usefulness of deliverables, creating a document that you can confidently reference. Our familiarity with Lakeville and your specific stormwater management issues, reinforced during your last WNRMP update and recent modeling projects, will enable efficiency and accuracy throughout the process. Developing a WNRMP that clearly meets your needs will require regular communication, feedback, and decisions from the city. We understand that city staff wish to be involved throughout the process to help shape the plan and help ensure that it’s tailored to reflect the city’s needs. Our scope of work includes engaging city staff members at a number of key points in the process. The involvement of city staff, city council members, and the public is detailed in the scope included below. 1.2 Breakdown of project tasks 1.2.1 Task 1: Project kickoff and management Barr’s project manager and key team members will attend an in-person kickoff meeting to discuss the Lakeville WNRMP. Working with the city’s project manager, we will invite representatives from the city’s relevant departments. We seek to understand what you like and dislike about the current WNRMP, as well as your project goals. We will review available data, identify potential gaps, and develop strategies to address them. Page 111 of 485 Zach Johnson PE June 1, 2026 Proposal for Updating the City of Lakeville Water and Natural Resources Management Plan Page 2 W:\Business Units\WR\Proposals\2026\P117.26 City of Lakeville Lakeville WNRMP Update\City of Lakeville WNRMP_06-01-2026.docx Monthly (or more frequently, as needed), our project manager and other team members (as needed) will attend brief virtual check-in meetings with the city’s project manager. During the check-ins, Barr will summarize completed work, next steps, and items awa iting city action or input. We understand that the completed WNRMP will be provided to the consultant completing the city’s comprehensive plan, who will use it in developing the surface waters and utilities chapter. 1.2.2 Task 2: Data gathering We will review the existing WNRMP (developed by Barr) and other relevant city planning documents (e.g., wellhead protection plan and flood risk prioritization study). We will review available modeling data from recent hydrologic, hydraulic modeling (conducted by Barr); monitoring data, natural resources assessments, or similar efforts (completed by the city or others); water resource management agreements; and GIS data from the city. We will review WMO and regional planning documents including the BDWMO Plan, VRWJPO Plan, and Met Council current water planning documents. We will identify potential data gaps to inform later steps in plan development and/or WNRMP implementation actions. 1.2.3 Task 3: Public and stakeholder engagement Consistent with Minnesota Rules 8410 and Minnesota Statutes 103B, Lakeville is not required to conduct public engagement in developing your WNRMP. However, Barr understands that residents’ and partners’ interest and support are critical to effective WNRMP development and implementation. As part of the kickoff meeting (see task 1), we will work with you to design a partner engagement strategy. Barr understands that you are also preparing to start your comprehensive plan update. To the extent practical, WNRMP engagement activities will leverage and coordinate with the city’s comprehensive plan engagement (which is typically broader in scope). Barr anticipates that engagement will include, at a minimum, 1) a resident survey and 2) meeting(s) with representatives from the Metropolitan Council, BDWMO, and VRWJPO. Engagement activities will seek to identify how residents and partners value and use Lakeville’s water and natural resources, their concerns, and their interests and capacity for action in pursuit of shared goals. Additionally, we recommend that Barr and/or city staff members conduct intercept surveys at community locations or events frequented by audiences whose input is sought. We will work with you to identify these locations. We will also work with Lakeville to leverage the city’s social media presence to request residents’ input using virtual surveys. Combining in-person and online methods allows residents to provide feedback in the most convenient way and setting. During engagement or the review process (see Task 5), Barr’s project manager will attend up to two city- scheduled public or partner engagement meetings (e.g., presentation to the city council, meeting with WMOs, etc.). 1.2.4 Task 4: Draft plan development Barr will update the WNRMP document, incorporating the outcomes of tasks 1, 2, and 3. This task is subdivided into the following steps. We will share drafts of each section during development, allowing the city to review more quickly and keeping the WNRMP on track. Task 4A: Update land and water resources inventory. Section 3 of the 2018 WNRMP includes an inventory of the city’s natural and built environment, presented in text, tables, and figures. Barr will update this section to reflect current conditions and datasets (e.g., land use and climate data). We will use t ables and graphics where appropriate to reduce text and promote comprehension among a range of audiences. We will update GIS figures and maps to contain the most current information, and we will coordinat e with Page 112 of 485 Zach Johnson PE June 1, 2026 Proposal for Updating the City of Lakeville Water and Natural Resources Management Plan Page 3 W:\Business Units\WR\Proposals\2026\P117.26 City of Lakeville Lakeville WNRMP Update\City of Lakeville WNRMP_06-01-2026.docx you to identify information that may be included via referenced (e.g., the Minnesota Stormwater Manual, state agency websites, etc.). Task 4B: Update Section 2 of the WNRMP addressing issues, goals, and policies. Barr will update section 2 of the 2018 WNRMP to reflect the evolution of issues facing the city. Examples of new or expanding issues that have changed may include (but are not limited to) chloride pollution, aging infrastructure, and the impacts of climate change and resilience. We will use data organized in task 4A (e.g., monitoring) as well as modeling results (see Task 7) to identify and characterize local issues related to water quality and other concerns. We will interview city staff members to gather information on local issues related to flood risk, water quality, and other concerns. Barr will work with Lakeville to update the goals and policies detailed in section 2 of the 2018 WNRMP. We will identify changes needed to align with WMOs and state general permits and recommend edits to reflect current city priorities and practices. Your input and feedback are critical to developing goals and policies that balance the needs of all partners and are supported by the city council. For transparency, Barr will track proposed edits relative to the 2018 WNRMP whenever possible. We will limit redundancy by referencing the city’s MS4 permit, the Minnesota Stormwater Manual, and the State construction stormwater general permit, where applicable. Task 4C: Update implementation program. Barr will update section 4 of the 2018 WNRMP and associated implementation tables to reflect Lakeville’s ongoing and planned activities over the next 10 years. We will coordinate with you to determine the criteria for prioritizing implementation activities and identify future planned activities. We will incorporate the results of flood risk prioritization analysis performed as part of Task 7. We will reference WMO programs and projects, as applicable. We will include proposed funding sources and year(s) of implementation consistent with Minnesota Rules 8410. Task 4D: Compile WRMP document for review. Building on content from previous subtasks, Barr will compile the complete WNRMP document. We will leverage our recent experience with city and WMO plans to develop a document that is ADA-compliant and accessible to audiences with a range of technical experience. We will provide the compiled WNRMP in digital draft format for city review and comment and will meet with you as needed to discuss comments and revisions prior to formal review (see Task 5). 1.2.5 Task 5: Plan revision and adoption With approval from Lakeville staff (we assume that city council approval is not required for this step), Barr will distribute the draft WNRMP to WMOs and the Metropolitan Council for 60-day review consistent with Minnesota Rules 8410. We recommend that the city host the draft WNRMP on your website for public review during this time. Barr will compile comments in tabular format and draft pr oposed responses and/or WNRMP edits. We will meet with the city for direction on proposed responses and edits and will resubmit the revised WNRMP to the WMOs and Metropolitan Council, if required. New for the 2050 Comprehensive Plan cycle, Met Council will require WMO resolutions of local water plan approval. Following WMO approval of the WNRMP, Barr will finalize the document. We will provide a complete WNRMP PDF and all relevant digital files. 1.2.6 Task 6: Hydrologic and Hydraulic Model Update The City of Lakeville developed a citywide stormwater model in 2009 and updated it in 2014 and 2017 to reflect ongoing development and incorporate Atlas 14 rainfall data. This stormwater model is the primary tool the City uses to define peak flow rates and water surface elevations and to guide development Page 113 of 485 Zach Johnson PE June 1, 2026 Proposal for Updating the City of Lakeville Water and Natural Resources Management Plan Page 4 W:\Business Units\WR\Proposals\2026\P117.26 City of Lakeville Lakeville WNRMP Update\City of Lakeville WNRMP_06-01-2026.docx decisions. Lakeville now needs to use the stormwater model to not only reflect recent development but also to simulate future rainfall projections and identify areas at risk of flooding. Results from the stormwater model are also used to inform discussions with watershed management organizations within the city (Black Dog Watershed Management Organization and the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization) regarding flood-risk reduction projects. With precipitation shifting toward more frequent and higher -intensity storms, the City expects increased localized flooding, storm sewer capacity issues, and roadway overtopping. This task will update the City’s stormwater model to simulate larger rainfall depths and future rainfall estimates using Atlas 15 Volumes I and II. The stormwater model will also be updated developments that have occurred since 2018. We have assumed up to 145 new developments, however, additional developments may be added on a time and expense basis. This updated model will provide essential technical data to assess climate -driven vulnerabilities and guide resilient infrastructure planning. We assume that city staff will provide either as-built information required to update the models or confirm that preliminary plat submittals previously reviewed by Barr should be used for the model update. The model update will focus on the stormwater ponds/BMPs and downstream trunk storm sewer system for each development. It is assumed that the model updates exclude simulating storm sewer in the development upstream of the ponds/BMPs. The model will be used to simulate existing conditions to identify areas of flood risk. Future conditions or evaluating alternatives to reduce flood risk are excluded from this scope of work because the City indicated a desire to coordinate with individual developers to evaluate potential alternatives at the time development occurs. Flood risk areas that are located in developed areas but may not be affected by future development can be evaluated in the future at the direction of City staff. We will also work with city staff to develop an approach for updating the model as part of the development review process. We assume one coordination meeting with city staff to review results of the updated model and discuss alternative approaches the City would follow to update the model at the time future development occurs. We will summarize model results in an addendum to the Plan that can be incorporated after city staff have had an opportunity to review the model results. The addendum will be provided in electronic format and up to three printed copies. 1.2.7 Task 7: Prioritization of flood-prone areas This task will establish a climate-informed, data-driven framework for prioritizing mitigation of flood-prone areas, allowing the City to direct limited resources toward protecting residents and sustaining critical community services. Prioritization of flood-prone areas will be developed based on feedback from City departments. It is anticipated that prioritization criteria may include some of the following considerations: 1. Number of impacted structures – this criterion considers the number of buildings that are within the 100-year floodplain in a given area. Consideration may be given to the type of structure (i.e., residential, commercial, or auxiliary) 2. Frequency of flooding – this criterion considers how frequently structures are inundated. Structures that are inundated more frequently (i.e., 1-year event) may be given a higher score than structures that are inundated during less frequent events (i.e., 100-year event) Page 114 of 485 Zach Johnson PE June 1, 2026 Proposal for Updating the City of Lakeville Water and Natural Resources Management Plan Page 5 W:\Business Units\WR\Proposals\2026\P117.26 City of Lakeville Lakeville WNRMP Update\City of Lakeville WNRMP_06-01-2026.docx 3. Social Vulnerability Index – this criteria considers census data to provide consideration for if a flood prone area may affect a vulnerable population. 4. Multiple Benefits – this criterion considers the benefits such as recreational, habitat improvement, creek stabilization, etc that could be achieved within a flood -risk mitigation site. 5. Critical Infrastructure – this criterion considers whether a project would reduce flood-risk for infrastructure classified by the City as critical such as emergency evacuation routes, emergency service locations such as medical facilities, police, fire, or city government buildi ngs, emergency support services such as schools, grocery stores, or churches, and critical city services such as sanitary lift stations. Using multiple parameters allows the City to identify mitigation strategies that reduce flood risk, protect residents, enhance wildlife habitat, improve water quality, and support long-term climate impact objectives. This approach ensures that investments are both equitable and cost-effective. For each flood-risk area, we will quantify whether each parameter applies to each flood-risk area. Each flood-risk area will be entered into a spreadsheet and ranked based on the parameters and initial scoring used by the City. City staff will be able to adjust the scoring to see how the prioritized list changes. Barr staff will meet with City staff to review the prioritized list and get feedback. Feedback from City staff will be incorporated into the database to develop the prioritized list of flood-prone areas. The prioritization process will involve coordination with engineering, planning, public works, police, and fire departments to ensure that climate-risk, community services, and public safety are fully incorporated. Barr will prepare a report summarizing the methodology, results, and prioritized list of flood-prone areas. 1.2.8 Task 8: Transfer of GIS Files Following approval of the draft plan by city staff, and the Hydrologic and Hydraulic model we will provide GIS files shown in plan figures for city staff to use in the City’s GIS map. We assume that information will be submitted as layer files. 2 Timeline The table below presents the approximate project timeline by task. Task Schedule Deliverables 1 Project kickoff and management June 2026 • Kickoff meeting • Ongoing project check-in meetings 2 Data gathering June–August 2026 • List of documents review and data gaps 3 Public and stakeholder engagement September 2026– April 2027 • Survey • Summary of engagement results 4 Draft plan development September 2026–November 2027 • Draft WNRMP sections (as developed) • Complete draft WNRMP document 5 Plan revision and adoption • Early 2028 (WNRMP submittal) • Summer 2028 (adoption) • Electronic copies of the final WNRMP document and each chapter as an ADA- compliant PDF and an editable format compatible with programs used by the city • Response-to-comments document • Up to two presentations for staff/council 6 Hydrologic and Hydraulic Model Update • May 2027 • Stormwater model files • Memorandum summarizing model updates Page 115 of 485 Zach Johnson PE June 1, 2026 Proposal for Updating the City of Lakeville Water and Natural Resources Management Plan Page 6 W:\Business Units\WR\Proposals\2026\P117.26 City of Lakeville Lakeville WNRMP Update\City of Lakeville WNRMP_06-01-2026.docx Task Schedule Deliverables 7 Prioritization of flood-prone areas • September 2027 • Memorandum summarizing methodology and prioritized list of flood-prone areas 8 Transfer of GIS Files • March 2028 • Electronic GIS files used for figures in Task 1-7 The proposed schedule assumes that: • One resubmittal of the revised draft WNRMP to watershed management organizations and the Metropolitan Council will occur following the initial 60-day review and comment period. Note that the Metropolitan Council now requires a formal WMO resolution of local water plan approval. • The tentative schedule allows for the final plan to be complete and ready for official adoption by the end of 2028 to align with the intended timeline for comprehensive plan development. 3 Budget The table below presents the project budget by task. The costs included in the table below reflect the assumptions described in the scope and schedule, and include all associated material expenses (e.g., printing). Task Labor subtotal Expenses Total cost 1 Project kickoff and management $6,470 -- $6,470 2 Data gathering $4,840 -- $4,840 3 Public and stakeholder engagement $8,620 $200 $8,820 4 Draft plan development $34,360 -- $34,360 5 Plan revision and adoption $10,080 $500 $10,580 6 Hydrologic and Hydraulic Model Update $179,550 -- $179,550 7 Prioritization of flood-prone areas $38,990 -- $38,990 8 Transfer of GIS Files $3,000 -- $3,000 Total $285,910 $700 $286,610 If this Agreement is satisfactory, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided, and return it to us. (signature page follows) Page 116 of 485 Zach Johnson PE June 1, 2026 Proposal for Updating the City of Lakeville Water and Natural Resources Management Plan Page 7 W:\Business Units\WR\Proposals\2026\P117.26 City of Lakeville Lakeville WNRMP Update\City of Lakeville WNRMP_06-01-2026.docx Sincerely yours, BARR ENGINEERING CO. Brandon Barnes Its Vice President Accepted this ____________ day of ___________________, 2026 CITY OF LAKEVILLE By Its Page 117 of 485 Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-3507 651.490.2000 | 800.325.2055 | 888.908.8166 fax | sehinc.com SEH is 100% employee-owned | Affirmative Action–Equal Opportunity Employer June 5, 2026 RE: City of Lakeville, Minnesota Comprehensive Water Plan and Hydraulic Water Model Calibration Update SEH No. P-LAKEV 190998 10.03 Mr. Zachary Johnson, PE City Engineer City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Dear Zachary: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH®) appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal to the City of Lakeville for preparation of a Comprehensive Water System Master Plan Update, including an update to the City’s hydraulic water system model and the DNR Water Supply Plan. The City is currently completing a Comprehensive Plan update, and this effort presents an opportunity to integrate updated land use and population projections directly into water system planning. The proposed work will build upon previous master planning efforts, recent system improvements, and ongoing modeling efforts to develop a coordinated and forward-looking evaluation of the City’s water system. The following scope of work outlines the recommended tasks to update and calibrate the hydraulic model, evaluate existing system performance, develop future water demand projections, and prepare coordinated planning documents. WORK PLAN Task 1 – Hydraulic Model Update, Data Integration, and Calibration A reliable and well-calibrated hydraulic model is foundational to the success of this effort and will serve as the primary tool for evaluating both existing and future system conditions. While the City has maintained a hydraulic model, it has not undergone a full calibration process to confirm its accuracy relative to real- world system operations. This task will focus on updating the model to reflect current GIS data and recent system improvements, followed by a comprehensive field calibration effort to ensure the model accurately represents pressures, flows, and operational behavior across the system. The resulting model will provide a dependable planning and decision-making tool that can be utilized beyond this study for ongoing system evaluation and design. Summary of Tasks: 1. Collect and review available data including GIS, record plans, SCADA data, pump records, and recent system improvements 2. Update the hydraulic model using the City’s GIS to develop a 1:1 GIS-integrated model 3. Incorporate updated system features including: 4. Water mains, valves, hydrants, and storage facilities 5. Pumping systems and operational controls 6. Recent capital improvements including booster station infrastructure 7. Integrate customer demand data by: a. Linking billing and/or AMI data to spatial demand nodes b. Developing meter-based demand allocation within the model Page 118 of 485 Page 2 c. Develop custom diurnal demand curves based on available AMI or SCADA data d. Update system elevations using current topographic data 8. Field Testing and Calibration: a. Deploy pressure loggers throughout the system to collect data over a two-week period b. Conduct targeted hydrant flow tests to assess system response c. Calibrate the model using field data and system operational records 9. Verify model performance under average day, max day, and extended period simulation conditions 10. Conduct QA/QC review consistent with AWWA Manual M32 guidance 11. This effort will result in a calibrated model that accurately reflects system performance and can be maintained and utilized by the City for future planning and operational evaluations. The outcome of this task will be a fully updated and calibrated hydraulic model that accurately represents system operations and can be confidently used for planning and design. Deliverables: Calibrated hydraulic model files, supporting documentation of calibration results, and technical memorandum summarizing methods and assumptions. Task 2 – Existing System Evaluation and Baseline Condition Assessment Understanding how the current system performs under existing conditions is critical to identifying constraints and planning for future growth. This task will establish a clear, data-driven baseline of system performance by evaluating historical water use, system operations, and hydraulic behavior. Using both collected data and the calibrated model, we will assess pressures, storage utilization, fire flow capability, and overall system reliability. The outcome of this task will be a comprehensive understanding of current system strengths and limitations, which will serve as the benchmark for evaluating future conditions. Summary of Tasks: 1. Review system operations including pumping strategies, tank operation, and pressure zone controls 2. Utilize the calibrated model to evaluate: a. System pressures and level of service b. Fire flow performance in key service areas c. Storage utilization and turnover d. Transmission and distribution system constraints 3. Identify areas of: a. Low or high pressure b. Limited capacity c. Operational inefficiencies 4. This task will provide a clear understanding of how the existing water system performs under current conditions and identify key limitations. This task will establish a defensible baseline of current system performance and clearly identify operational and infrastructure limitations. Deliverables: Technical memorandum summarizing existing conditions, system performance metrics, and identified constraints Task 3 – Water Demand Projections and Future System Needs Analysis With updated land use and population projections being developed through the City’s Comprehensive Plan, this task will translate anticipated growth into future water system demands. By combining historical trends with projected development patterns, we will develop defensible water demand forecasts that reflect realistic system use. These projections will be applied to the calibrated hydraulic model to evaluate how the system performs under future conditions and identify where infrastructure upgrades or Page 119 of 485 Page 3 expansions will be needed. This process ensures that recommended improvements are directly tied to planned growth and future system demands. Summary of Tasks: 1. Develop future water demand projections using: a. Historical demand trends b. Comprehensive Plan population projections c. Future land use and development assumptions 2. Allocate projected demands by service area, pressure zone, or development area 3. Develop planning scenarios including: a. Moderate and high growth conditions b. Development phasing scenarios c. Seasonal peak demand scenarios 4. Apply future demands to the calibrated hydraulic model 5. System Performance Evaluation: Evaluate system performance under future conditions, including: a. Pressure compliance and level of service b. Fire flow capacity c. Storage adequacy and equalization needs d. Pumping capacity and operational limitations e. Transmission system capacity and required upgrades 6. Deficiency Identification: Identify infrastructure limitations including: a. Undersized or constrained water mains b. Storage deficiencies c. Pumping and pressure zone limitations d. System redundancy and resiliency gap. This effort will define future system demands and identify infrastructure improvements required to support planned growth and development. Deliverables: Technical memorandum documenting demand projections, modeling scenarios, and recommended system capacity improvements Task 4 – Master Plan Development, Comprehensive Plan Coordination, and DNR Plan Update The final task will synthesize all technical analyses into coordinated planning documents that provide clear guidance for the City’s future investments and decision-making. This effort will produce a comprehensive Water System Master Plan, a water-focused chapter for the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and an updated DNR Water Supply Plan. These documents will align system recommendations with future development, regulatory requirements, and long-term sustainability goals. The result will be a cohesive, defensible roadmap that supports the City’s continued growth while maintaining a reliable and resilient water system. Summary of Tasks: 1. Capital Improvement Planning: Develop recommended system improvements including: a. Water main upgrades and expansions b. Storage improvements c. Pump station, High Service Pumping and pressure zone modifications d. System resiliency and redundancy improvements 2. Prepare planning-level cost estimates 3. Develop prioritization and implementation phasing 4. Water System Master Plan Update: Prepare a comprehensive Master Plan including: a. Existing system evaluation b. Demand projections Page 120 of 485 Page 4 c. Infrastructure needs and recommendations d. Develop figures, system maps, and supporting technical exhibits 5. Comprehensive Plan Coordination: Prepare a Water System Chapter for inclusion in the City’s Comprehensive Plan a. Coordinate with the City’s planning consultant to ensure: i. Consistency with land use and population projections ii. Alignment with future development planning iii. Summarize system impacts associated with future growth 6. DNR Water Supply Plan Update: Prepare updated documentation consistent with Minnesota DNR requirements, including: a. Demand projections and system capacity b. Water supply sources and sustainability c. Conservation measures and demand management d. Emergency preparedness and resiliency 7. Final Deliverables and Meetings: Provide draft and final reports for City review 8. Meet with City staff to review findings and recommendations 9. Present results to City Council or stakeholders, if requested This task will provide the City with coordinated planning documents that guide long-term investment and be consistent with regulatory compliance. Deliverables: Water System Master Plan report, Comprehensive Plan water chapter, DNR Water Supply Plan Update, and supporting figures, cost estimates, and implementation recommendations. PROJECT SCHEDULE SEH has the staff available to begin the project as soon as the City of Lakeville issues a Notice to Proceed. We anticipate initiating work in July 2026 and completing the Comprehensive Water Plan in coordination with the City’s Comprehensive Plan efforts, with an expected completion by mid to late 2027, well in advance of the formal Comprehensive Plan deadline. COMPENSATION The enclosed task hour budget describes in detail how we will complete our report for an estimated not- to-exceed total fee of $75,400. Our fee includes reimbursable expenses. We will invoice the City of Lakeville monthly on an hourly basis for payment for our services. Monthly charges for services will include expenses. Task Hours Total Task 1 Model Update, Data Integration & Calibration 121 $ 22,000 Task 2 Existing System Evaluation 74 $ 13,200 Task 3 Demand Projections & Future Analysis 106 $ 18,400 Task 4 Master Plan, Comp Plan & DNR WSP 121 $ 21,800 Estimated Project Totals 422 $ 75,400 GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This letter and the existing 2016 Professional Services Agreement between the City of Lakeville, MN, and SEH shall form the full agreement for this proposed project. This agreement may only be modified in writing and if signed by both parties. Page 121 of 485 Page 5 CLOSURE We appreciate the opportunity to provide the City of Lakeville with this proposal and are excited to continue in our efforts to provide you with exceptional water system modeling and master planning support. After you have had an opportunity to review this proposal, we would like to hear any comments, concerns or questions you may have, so please call me at 218.855.1720. If this proposal is acceptable, please sign and return a copy of this proposal letter authorizing us to proceed with the project. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Chad T. Katzenberger, PE Project Manager Enclosure s:\ko\l\lakev\common\140631\2021 modeling letter proposal 102021.docx Accepted this ____ day of ____________, 2026 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA By: Title: Page 122 of 485 Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110 -3507 651.490.2000 | 800.325.2055 | 888.908.8166 fax | sehinc.com SEH is 100% employee-owned | Affirmative Action –Equal Opportunity Employer June 5, 2026 RE: City of Lakeville, Minnesota Comprehensive Water Plan and Hydraulic Water Model Calibration Update SEH No. P-LAKEV 190998 10.03 Mr. Zachary Johnson, PE City Engineer City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Dear Zachary: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH®) appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal to the City of Lakeville for updating the City’s sanitary sewer system model and prepare a Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan Update. This work will support the City’s ongoing Comprehensive Plan update by incorporating updated land use and population projections into system planning. Building on prior planning efforts, recent system improvements, and available modeling data, the scope will provide an updated evaluation of the City’s sanitary sewer system. The scope of work includes updating and calibrating the hydraulic model, evaluating existing system performance, developing future demand projections, and preparing coordinated planning documents. WORK PLAN Task 1 – Sanitary Sewer Model Update and Calibration A reliable model is essential for planning and hydraulic capacity analysis. This task will update the model with current GIS data and system improvements, then calibrate it to accurately reflect flows and operational behavior. The final model will serve as a valuable tool for ongoing evaluation and design beyond this study. Summary of Tasks: 1. Collect and review available background data including sewer mapping, GIS data, as-builts, existing and future land use and anticipated development areas. 2. Update the hydraulic model using the collected data. 3. Incorporate updated system features including: a. Sanitary manhole invert elevations b. Trunk sewer alignments c. Pumping systems and operational controls d. Recent capital improvements 4. Update system elevations using current topographic data 5. Field Testing and Calibration: a. Calibrate the model using field data and system operational records, including MCES flow meters. 6. Verify model performance Page 123 of 485 Page 2 7. Conduct QA/QC review The outcome of this task will be a fully updated and calibrated hydraulic model that accurately represents system operations and can be confidently used for planning and design. Deliverables: Calibrated hydraulic model files, supporting documentation of calibration results, and technical memorandum summarizing methods and assumptions. Task 2 – Existing System Evaluation and Lift Station Condition Assessment This task will establish a clear, data-driven baseline of system performance and identify system constraints. We will also perform condition assessments at the City’s 23 lift stations. The outcome of this task will be a comprehensive understanding of current system strengths and limitations, which will serve as the benchmark for evaluating future conditions. Summary of Tasks: 1. Review existing system operations 2. Utilize the calibrated model to evaluate system constraints 3. Conduct lift station condition assessments a. Evaluate physical condition, operational performance, and regulatory compliance of each facility b. Analyze discharge monitoring reports c. Assumes 23 Lift stations 4. This task will provide a clear understanding of how the existing sewer system performs under current conditions and identify key limitations. This task will establish a defensible baseline of current system performance and clearly identify operational and infrastructure limitations. Deliverables: Technical memorandum summarizing existing conditions, lift station conditions and recommendations, system performance metrics, and identified constraints Task 3 – System Capacity Limitations and Future System Needs Analysis Using land use and population projections from the City’s Comprehensive Plan, this task will convert expected growth into future sanitary sewer needs. We will analyze both historical wastewater flows and projected development to forecast sewer system demands. These forecasts will be tested in the hydraulic model to identify where upgrades or expansions are needed, ensuring recommended improvements match future sanitary sewer requirements. Summary of Tasks: 1. Develop future wastewater flows using: a. Comprehensive Plan population projections b. Existing and proposed land use and development assumptions 2. Allocate projected demands by service area, pressure zone, or development area 3. Develop planning scenarios including: a. Moderate and high growth conditions b. Development phasing scenarios c. Seasonal peak demand scenarios 4. Apply future demands to the calibrated hydraulic model 5. System Performance Evaluation: Evaluate system performance under future conditions a. Sanitary sewer system capacity and required upgrades b. Pumping capacity and operational limitations 6. Identify infrastructure limitations This effort will define future system demands and identify infrastructure improvements required to support Page 124 of 485 Page 3 planned growth and development. Deliverables: Technical memorandum documenting demand projections, modeling scenarios, and recommended system capacity improvements Task 4 – Master Plan Development and Comprehensive Plan Coordination The final task combines technical analyses into planning documents that guide the City’s investments and decisions. This process will deliver a Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan and a sewer-focused chapter for the Comprehensive Plan. The result is a clear roadmap supporting the City’s growth and a resilient sewer system. Summary of Tasks: 1. Capital Improvement Planning: Develop recommended system improvements including: a. Sanitary sewer upgrades and expansions b. Lift station modifications c. System resiliency and redundancy improvements 2. Prepare planning-level cost estimates 3. Develop prioritization and implementation phasing 4. Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan Update: Prepare a comprehensive Master Plan including: a. Existing system evaluation b. Demand projections c. Infrastructure needs and recommendations d. Develop figures, system maps, and supporting technical exhibits 5. Comprehensive Plan Coordination: Prepare a Sanitary Sewer Collection System Chapter for inclusion in the City’s Comprehensive Plan a. Coordinate with the City’s planning consultant to ensure: i. Consistency with land use and population projections ii. Alignment with future development planning iii. Summarize system impacts associated with future growth 6. Final Deliverables and Meetings: Provide draft and final reports for City review 7. Meet with City staff to review findings and recommendations (assumes 2 virtual meetings) 8. Present results to City Council or stakeholders, if requested (assumes 1 virtual meeting) This task will provide the City with coordinated planning documents that guide long -term investment and be consistent with regulatory compliance. Deliverables: Sanitary Sewer Collection System Master Plan report, Comprehensive Plan Sanitary Sewer Collection chapter, and supporting figures, cost estimates, and implementation recommendations. PROJECT SCHEDULE SEH has the staff available to begin the project as soon as the City of Lakeville issues a Notice to Proceed. We anticipate initiating work in July 2026 and completing the Comprehensive Water Plan in coordination with the City’s Comprehensive Plan efforts, with an expected completion by mid to late 2027, well in advance of the formal Comprehensive Plan deadline. COMPENSATION The enclosed task hour budget describes in detail how we will complete our report for an estimated not- to-exceed total fee of $83,200.00. Our fee includes reimbursable expenses. We will invoice the City of Lakeville monthly on an hourly basis for payment for our services. Monthly charges for services will include expenses. Page 125 of 485 Page 4 Task Hours Total Task 1 Model Update, Data Integration & Calibration 112 $ 18,000 Task 2 Existing System Evaluation and Lift Station Condition Assessment 140 $ 25,500 Task 3 System Capacity Limitations and Future System Needs Analysis 86 $ 13,600 Task 4 Master Plan Development and Comprehensive Plan Coordination 142 $ 26,100 Estimated Project Totals 422 $ 83,200 GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This letter and the existing 2016 Professional Services Agreement between the City of Lakeville, MN , and SEH shall form the full agreement for this proposed project. This agreement may only be modified in writing and if signed by both parties. CLOSURE We appreciate the opportunity to provide the City of Lakeville with this proposal and are excited to continue in our efforts to provide you with exceptional sanitary sewer system modeling and master planning support. After you have had an opportunity to review this proposal, we would like to hear any comments, concerns or questions you may have, so please email me at aprok@sehinc.com or call me at 763.760.3346. If this proposal is acceptable, please sign and return a copy of this proposal letter authorizing us to proceed with the project. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Amy Prok, PE Miles B. Jensen, PE Project Manager Client Service Manager Enclosure \\sehinc.com\panzura\pzprojects\ko\l\lakev\common\p-190998 - 2026 comp plan sewer\lakeville comprehensive sanitary sewer plan and hydraulic model calibration update.docx Accepted this ____ day of ____________, 2026 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA By: Title: Page 126 of 485 www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer SRF Project No. 20337.PP May 22, 2026 Jonathan Nelson, Assistant City Engineer City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 jnelson@lakevillemn.gov Subject: Proposal for Professional Services for Transportation Chapter of the 2050 Comprehensive Plan Update Dear Mr. Nelson: Based on your request, SRF Consulting Group, Inc. (“SRF”) is pleased to submit this Proposal to provide professional services for to complete the Transportation Chapter of Lakeville’s 2050 Comprehensive Plan. Scope of Services SRF proposed to carry out the work shown in Attachment A: Scope of Services. Schedule SRF will complete this work within a mutually agreed-upon time schedule. We intend to begin as soon as possible, and we understand that final comprehensive plans are due to the Met Council for review by December 31, 2028. Basis of Payment/Budget SRF proposes to be reimbursed for the Scope of Services on an hourly basis for the actual time expended. Other direct project expenses, such as printing, supplies, reproduction, etc., will be billed at cost and mileage will be billed at the current allowable IRS rate for business miles. Any subconsultants will be paid on an hourly or a lump sum basis. Invoices are submitted on a monthly basis for work performed during the previous month. Payment is due within 35 days. Based on SRF’s understanding of the project and our Scope of Services, the estimated the cost for this Proposal is $145,261. Changes in Scope of Services It is understood that if the scope or extent of work changes, the cost will be adjusted accordingly. Before any out-of-scope work is initiated, however, SRF will submit a budget request for the new work and will not begin work until you provide authorization. Page 127 of 485 Jonathan Nelson May 22, 2026 City of Lakeville Page 2 of 3 Standard Terms and Conditions The Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services executed between the City of Lakeville and SRF Consulting Group, Inc. dated September 20, 2021, together with this proposal for professional services, constitute the entire agreement between the Client and SRF Consulting Group, Inc. and supersede all prior written or oral understandings. This agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified, or canceled by a duly executed written instrument. ADA Compliance • The Contractor acknowledges that the City is required by the American Disabilities Act (ADA) to provide reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities. The Contractor will work with the City in order to provide for reasonable accommodations related to the Services provided by the Contractor under this Agreement. • No Discrimination. Consultant agrees not to discriminate in providing products and services under this Agreement on the basis of race, color, sex, creed, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, status with regard to public assistance, or religion. Violation of any part of this provision may lead to immediate termination of this Agreement. Consultant agrees to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act as amended (“ADA”), section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363A. Consultant agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City from costs, including but not limited to damages, attorneys’ fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought alleging a violation of these laws by Consultant or its guests, invitees, members, officers, officials, agents, employees, volunteers, representatives and subcontractors. Upon request, Consultant shall provide accommodation to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all Services under this Agreement. Consultant agrees to utilize its own auxiliary aid or service in order to comply with ADA requirements for effective communication with individuals with disabilities. Page 128 of 485 Jonathan Nelson May 22, 2026 City of Lakeville Page 3 of 3 Acceptance/Notice to Proceed A signed copy of this Proposal, mailed or emailed to our office will serve as acceptance of this Proposal and SRF’s notice to proceed. The primary contact is Chris Brown at cbrown@srfconsulting.com or 763.452.4832. We appreciate your consideration of this Proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Chris Brown, AICP, PTP Susan G. Miller, PE Project Manager Vice President Approved: City of Lakeville (signature) Name Title Date This cost proposal is valid for a period of 90 days. SRF reserves the right to adjust its cost estimate after 90 days from the date of this proposal. Page 129 of 485 5/22/2026 Scope of Work, Hours, and Fee Page 1 of 6 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Lakeville Project: Transportation Chapter 20337.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 1.0 Project Management & Client Coordination Assumptions: Virtual meetings 1.1 Chris Brown will ensure the project remains on schedule and within scope and budget. General project management tasks include email correspondence, internal coordination, budget tracking, and progress reports. 8-16----1842$8,238.00 1.2 SRF will be available for check-ins with City staff once a month over the duration of the project. Assumes 16-month development process, including 16 virtual check-in meetings 1/2 hr each and prep time. - - 16 - 4 - 4 - 24 $4,672.00 1.3 SRF will facilitate meetings with the City of Lakeville and Dakota County to ensure the plan is appropriate coordinated (3 1-hour virtual meetings) --6-3-3-12$2,202.00 1.4 SRF will coordinate with the City and HKGi to ensure the comprehensive and transportation plans are working in unison (4 1-hour virtual meetings) --8-4-4-16$2,936.00 SRF Deliverables: Monthly progress reports (with invoices), Meeting notes SUBTOTAL - TASK 1 8 0 46 0 11 0 11 18 94 $18,048.00 2.0 Roadways Assumptions: This task will be closely coordinated with Task 11 (Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) and Use of Met Council Model). Time to coordinate and/or meet with agency partners (Dakota County, MnDOT) to obtain data and information has been accounted for in this task. 2.1 SRF will describe and map the roadway functional classification in the community. Identification of all classifications will be provided: Principal Arterials, Minor Arterials, Major Collectors, Minor Collectors, and Local roadways - - 1 2 - 1 1 - 5 $878.00 2.2 SRF will describe and map existing and proposed number of traffic lanes (principal and minor arterial system) - - 1 2 - 1 1 - 5 $878.00 2.3 SRF will describe and map the existing and projected traffic volumes (principal and minor arterial system) - - 1 2 - 1 1 - 5 $878.00 2.4 SRF will describe and map the following funded and planned investments outlined in the Imagine 2050 TPP Highway Investment Plan (planned projects are within the 2050 fiscally constrained plan). The vision and under study managed lane projects and vision targeted regional capacity projects will be included. -Figure 9: Regional Mobility Investments: Interchanges -Figure 10. Regional Mobility Investments: Managed Lanes -Figure 11. Regional Mobility Investments: Targeted Regional Capacity --4-2-4-10$1,736.00 2.5 SRF will incorporate and describe recommendations from local corridor studies and identify any opportunities to complete or update existing corridor studies documented as priority tiered intersection locations in the Intersection Mobility and Safety Study. - - 2 - 8 - 16 - 26 $3,906.00 2.6 SRF will include a safety analysis that includes an analysis of crash trends, data and safety needs by mode and crash severity from the most recent 5 years of available data to prioritize future investments to reduce deaths and serious injuries using a Safe Systems Approach. Our team will identify any high priority transportation corridors and locations in the community to reduce fatalities and serious injuries. - - 4 - 16 - 40 - 60 $8,884.00 2.7 SRF will include an analysis of streets that are candidates for right-sizing for the purposes of Complete Streets and roadway safety, including a map of these candidate corridors. --4-8-8-20$3,268.00 2.8 SRF will incorporate Complete Streets principles into roadway content.--2-2-2-6$1,034.00 SRF Deliverables: Draft roadways element. SUBTOTAL - TASK 2 0 0 19 6 36 3 73 0 137 $21,462.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 20337.PP_ScopeOfWork_v2 MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 130 of 485 5/22/2026 Scope of Work, Hours, and Fee Page 2 of 6 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Lakeville Project: Transportation Chapter 20337.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 3.0 Transit Assumptions: Time to coordinate and/or meet with Metro Transit to obtain data and information has been accounted for in this task. 3.1 SRF will identify, describe and map the community's identified transit market area(s). Our team will include a discussion of the community’s relationship with the transit market area(s). --1-1-2-4$651.00 3.2 SRF will identify, describe and map the transit system located in the community. Our team will include the following features: • Local transit services and demand response (including dial-a-ride, microtransit) services • The existing and planned transit centers and park and rides • The existing and planned transit advantages --1-1-2-4$651.00 3.3 SRF will identify areas of known planned transit service expansion, working with transit provider(s) and identify desired transit expansion corridors or areas based on the City's land use plan. --1-1-2-4$651.00 3.4 SRF will describe and address multimodal access needs to transit services within the community. Our team will include a description of pedestrian access routes to transitway stations, local bus stops and other transit facilities. This may be included in the transit element or in the pedestrian element of the plan (depending on City preference). --1-1-2-4$651.00 3.5 SRF will describe the community’s role and responsibilities with regard to the transitway development process. - - 1 - 1 - 2 - 4 $651.00 3.6 SRF will describe and map the transitway alignment and stations and identify the alignments by transit service type (LRT, Dedicated BRT, Commuter Rail, Highway BRT, Arterial BRT). --1-1-2-4$651.00 3.7 SRF will incorporate Complete Streets principles into transit content.--2-2-2-6$1,034.00 SRF Deliverables: Draft transit element. SUBTOTAL - TASK 3 00808014030$4,940.00 4.0 Biking Assumptions: Time to coordinate and/or meet with agency partners (Met Council, Dakota County) to obtain data and information has been accounted for in this task. 4.1 SRF will describe and map the full local existing and planned bike network. Our team will ensure networks are coordinated across jurisdictions. Include the following information: -Identify local bikeway connections to transit facilities. -Describe plans, strategies or policies to address connectivity gaps in the bike network that improve accessibility and safety. - - 2 2 - 4 - - 8 $1,402.00 4.2 SRF will show all tier 1 and tier 2 RBTN corridors and alignments.--1-1-4-6$919.00 4.3 SRF will show the relationships between the RBTN and local bike network including all existing and planned connections. - - 2 - 2 - 4 - 8 $1,302.00 4.4 SRF will include locations of regional destinations as shown on the RBTN map within your community. Include any locally identified activity centers in your community. --2-2-4-8$1,302.00 4.5 SRF will review RBTN corridors to determine whether there is an existing or planned bicycle facility alignment that may be designated as the RBTN alignment (to replace the corridor). Our team will describe and map the existing and/or planned bike facility alignment(s) proposed for RBTN designation as a dashed line. This task includes coordination with Met Council staff. --2-2-4-8$1,302.00 4.6 SRF will describe and map regional bicycle barriers (i.e., freeways, railroad corridors, rivers and streams) and discuss how to address the need to provide new or improved crossings of regional bicycle barriers. --2-2-4-8$1,302.00 4.7 SRF will work with the City to prioritize short- and medium-term bicycle projects and schedule annual funding for these projects - - 2 - 8 - 12 - 22 $3,370.00 4.8 SRF will incorporate Complete Streets principles into bicycle content.--2-2-2-6$1,034.00 SRF Deliverables: Draft biking element. SUBTOTAL - TASK 4 0 0 15 2 19 4 34 0 74 $11,933.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 20337.PP_ScopeOfWork_v2 MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 131 of 485 5/22/2026 Scope of Work, Hours, and Fee Page 3 of 6 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Lakeville Project: Transportation Chapter 20337.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 5.0 Pedestrian Assumptions: Time to coordinate and/or meet with agency partners (Met Council, Dakota County) to obtain data and information has been accounted for in this task. 5.1 SRF will describe community pedestrian system needs in a manner that responds to the Met Council community designation. - - 2 - 2 - 6 - 10 $1,570.00 5.2 SRF will describe plans, strategies or policies to address connectivity gaps in the pedestrian network that improve accessibility and safety. Our team will identify if Safe Routes to School plans have been done for schools in the community. --2-2-6-10$1,570.00 5.3 SRF will map the existing pedestrian network.--12-2--5$891.00 5.4SRF will identify and map locally developed pedestrian priority networks or areas, as applicable. - -22424 -14$2,308.00 5.5 SRF will work with the City to prioritize short- and medium-term pedestrian projects and schedule annual funding for these projects - - 2 - 10 - 16 - 28 $4,238.00 5.6 SRF will incorporate Complete Streets principles into pedestrian content.--2-2-2-6$1,034.00 SRF Deliverables: Draft pedestrian element. SUBTOTAL - TASK 5 0 0 11 4 20 4 34 0 73 $11,611.00 6.0 Freight Assumptions: Time to coordinate and/or meet with agency partners (Dakota County, MnDOT, Met Council) to obtain data and information has been accounted for in this task. 6.1 SRF will identify and map railways, barge facilities and truck or intermodal freight terminals within your community (we will refer to designated freight nodes on the Metropolitan Freight System map). Our team will include other important nodes that may generate freight movement, such as industrial parks, warehouses or distribution centers and large shopping areas. --1-1-4-6$919.00 6.2 As available from MnDOT or other sources, SRF will include heavy commercial annual average truck volumes on the Principal Arterial and Minor Arterial network within your community. --1-1-4-6$919.00 6.3 SRF will identify, describe and map any local roadway issues or problem areas for goods movement, such as weight-restricted roads or bridges, bridges with insufficient height or width clearances, locations with unprotected road crossings of active rail lines, or intersections with inadequate turning radii. --2-1-4-7$1,136.00 SRF Deliverables: Draft freight element. SUBTOTAL - TASK 6 00403012019$2,974.00 7.0 Travel Demand Management Assumptions: Includes minimum requirements to meet TDM needs documentation 7.1 SRF will describe and document existing local travel demand management policies, ordinances or practices, as applicable. Our team will include any activities or plans to collaborate with regional TDM partners on outreach and promotional activities that support sustainable travel choices. - - 16 - 4 - 4 - 24 $4,672.00 SRF Deliverables: Draft travel demand management element. SUBTOTAL - TASK 7 00160404024$4,672.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 20337.PP_ScopeOfWork_v2 MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 132 of 485 5/22/2026 Scope of Work, Hours, and Fee Page 4 of 6 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Lakeville Project: Transportation Chapter 20337.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 8.0 Aviation Assumptions: Includes minimum requirements to meet aviation needs documentation 8.1 Identify policies that protect regional airspace from obstructions --1---2-3$485.00 8.2 Describe the existing and future functional and operational characteristics for any airport in the compatibility area - - 1 - - - 2 - 3 $485.00 8.3 Identify policies that protect regional airspace from obstructions --1---2-3$485.00 SRF Deliverables: Draft aviation element. SUBTOTAL - TASK 8 003000609$1,455.00 9.0 Equity and Inclusion Assumptions: Includes minimum requirements to meet equity and inclusion needs documentation 9.1 SRF will describe status of the City's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) transition plan or self-evaluation for public rights of way. Our team will identify when it was last updated, any identified target date for compliance, and strategies used to monitor implementation progress and make updates. --2-2-2-6$1,034.00 SRF Deliverables: Draft equity and inclusion element. SUBTOTAL - TASK 9 002020206$1,034.00 10.0 Climate and Natural Systems Assumptions: Includes minimum requirements to meet climate and natural systems needs documentation 10.1 SRF will include an acknowledgement of state designated targets for statewide vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reduction and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions for the seven county metro region. Our team will identify plans, policies or strategies to reduce per capita VMT and total transportation-related GHG emissions in the community to meet state statutes on reduction targets. - - 12 - 4 - - - 16 $3,268.00 SRF Deliverables: Draft climate and natural systems element. SUBTOTAL - TASK 10 00120400016$3,268.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 20337.PP_ScopeOfWork_v2 MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 133 of 485 5/22/2026 Scope of Work, Hours, and Fee Page 5 of 6 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Lakeville Project: Transportation Chapter 20337.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 11.0 Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) and Use of Met Council Model Assumptions: The forecasts published by the Met Council will be used. As a result, the TAZ table will not be replicated in the Transportation Chapter. This task also includes coordination with Met Council to revise TAZ tables. 11.1 The SRF team will leverage the 2050 Metropolitan Council Activity Based Model (ABM) to verify the TAZ information within the 2050 Socio- Economic Data (SED) is consistent with the 2040 SED and the anticipated changes as noted in the RFP. SRF will also coordinate with Met Council if revisions need to be made to the TAZ information. -16-4----20$4,696.00 11.2 As part of the travel demand modeling task, SRF will produce GIS based maps including but not limited to existing and future Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) on key roadways within the city and a GIS based map highlighting anticipated capacity issues. -4-8----12$2,504.00 11.3 As noted in the RFP, SRF will also confirm/eliminate recommendations in the 2040 Transportation plan based on the capacity issues map. -16-4----20$4,696.00 11.4 The culmination of SRF’s work will be summarized and documented as part of the transportation plan. This will be coordinated with the Roadway Element. -4-16----20$4,024.00 SRF Deliverables: Draft TAZ-related elements (may be combined with roadway element). SUBTOTAL - TASK 11 040032000072$15,920.00 12.0 Implementation Plan Assumptions: The City will provide supporting documents and data. 12.1 Develop a list of performance measures to track and monitor the transportation system over the next 20+ years - 4 2 - - - 8 - 14 $2,490.00 12.2 Develop a priority list of needs and investments. Program project priorities into three timeframes (e.g. short-term (0-5 years), mid-term (6-10 years), and long-term (11+20+ years) - 4 8 - - - 24 - 36 $5,936.00 12.3 Develop planning-level cost estimates as appropriate , compared against financial forecasts and funding - 4 - - 32 - - - 36 $6,296.00 12.4 Identify potential funding mechanisms -42-8-2-16$3,014.00 12.5 Develop GIS-based dashboard to display information - 10 8 60 8 16 8 - 110 $20,348.00 SRF Deliverables: GIS-based dashboard and associated documentation. SUBTOTAL - TASK 12 0 26 20 60 48 16 42 0 212 $38,084.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 20337.PP_ScopeOfWork_v2 MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 134 of 485 5/22/2026 Scope of Work, Hours, and Fee Page 6 of 6 SRF Consulting Group, Inc.Work Tasks and Person-Hour Estimates Client: City of Lakeville Project: Transportation Chapter 20337.PP TASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION PROF. VIII-VII PROF. VI PROF. V PROF. IV PROF. III PROF. II PROF. I SUPPORT TOTALS EST. FEE 13.0 Document Compilation and Drafting Assumptions: Goals and strategies to be developed through the preparation of each element as detailed in this proposal. SRF staff will provide the city with an initial understanding of the goals and policies relative to their 2050 TPP alignment, previous goal/policy statements, and our past experiences. 13.1 SRF to coordinate with City staff to incorporate public comment into the draft Chapter. - - 2 2 2 - 8 - 14 $2,218.00 13.2 SRF will compile all elements of the Chapter together in a format consistent with other chapters of the City's comprehensive plan update. 2 - 2 2 2 - 8 - 16 $2,712.00 13.3 SRF will be available to respond to and update elements of the Chapter based on Met Council review. - - 2 2 2 - 8 - 14 $2,218.00 13.4 SRF will create a final draft that is ADA-accessible and compatible with print and/or online use as needed by the City. 2 - 2 2 2 - 8 - 16 $2,712.00 SRF Deliverables: Draft and Final Transportation Chapter provided in an editable format (e.g. word document). Comment-response tables and GIS files/map packages. SUBTOTAL - TASK 13 40888032060$9,860.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PERSON-HOURS 12 66 164 112 163 27 264 18 826 AVERAGE HOURLY BILLING RATE $247.00 $246.00 $217.00 $190.00 $166.00 $147.00 $134.00 $155.00 ESTIMATED LABOR AND OVERHEAD $2,964.00 $16,236.00 $35,588.00 $21,280.00 $27,058.00 $3,969.00 $35,376.00 $2,790.00 $145,261.00 SRF ESTIMATED DIRECT NON-SALARY EXPENSES $0.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $145,261.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 20337.PP_ScopeOfWork_v2 MINNEAPOLIS. MN Page 135 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Authorize Grant Agreements with Dakota County for 2026 Aquatic Invasive Species Management Activities Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve Grant Agreements with Dakota County for 2026 Aquatic Invasive Species Management Activities. Overview Dakota County operates an annual grant program to incentivize local Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) prevention and management efforts across the County. The City submitted applications for 2026 AIS activities focused on lake management and was awarded funding for: • Level 1 Watercraft Inspections at Casperson Park (Lake Marion) and Orchard Lake Park (Orchard Lake). These inspections are a tool for preventing the spread of AIS and will be coordinated by Dakota County. • AIS monitoring and surveying on Lake Marion, Orchard Lake, Kingsley Lake, and East Lake. This work tracks lake health and informs future management strategies. The total estimated cost of the 2026 AIS management activities is $42,277.00. The County's AIS grants will reimburse the City $36,574.00, consistent with the terms outlined in the Agreements. The City's estimated net cost is $5,703.00. Grant Agreements (Dakota County Contract Nos. DCA24176 and DCA24178) are attached. Exhibit A (Dakota County AIS Grant Program Application), Exhibit B (City Applications), Exhibit C (Award Letters), and Exhibit D (Insurance Terms) are available for review in the Engineering Division. Supporting Information 1. Dakota County Contract DCA24176 2. Dakota County Contract DCA24178 Financial Impact: $42,277.00 Budgeted: Yes Source: Utility Fund - Env. Resources Envision Lakeville Community Values: Access to a Multitude of Natural Amenities and Recreational Opportunities Report Completed by: Maria Friedges, Environmental Resources Specialist Page 136 of 485 Page 137 of 485 Page 138 of 485 Page 139 of 485 Page 140 of 485 Page 141 of 485 Page 142 of 485 Page 143 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA24178 P a g e | 1 of 7 Dakota County Contract #DCA24178 AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES AID GRANT AGREEMENT This Grant Agreement (Agreement) is made and entered into by and between the County of Dakota, acting through its Environmental Resources Department (County) and the City of Lakeville (City). RECITALS WHEREAS, under Minn. Stat. §§ 373.01 and 477A.19 the County is empowered to enter into this Agreement; WHEREAS, the County has received an appropriation from the State of Minnesota for Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) Prevention Aid; WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 477A.19, the County has authority to coordinate programs to manage and prevent the growth of aquatic invasive species with local units of government, soil and water conservation districts, watershed districts, or lake associations, in the County; and WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville has proposed 2026 Aquatic Invasive Species Management Activities. WHEREAS, the City agrees to perform AIS Management Activities described in this Agreement to the satisfaction of the County; NOW THEREFORE, in reliance on the above statements and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Agreement, the County and the City agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Parties. The parties to this Agreement are the County and City, collectively referred to as the “parties”. 2. Effective Date and Term. Notwithstanding the dates of signatures of the parties to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be in effect from May 1, 2026 through December 31, 2026, or until completion by the parties of their respective obligations under this Agreement, whichever occurs first, unless earlier terminated by law or according to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to identify cooperative activities of the parties through which the County will disburse Dakota County AIS Prevention Aid to the City for Aquatic Invasive Species prevention activities that are consistent with the County’s 2026-2030 Aquatic Invasive Species Plan. 4. City Obligations. A. City shall provide the AIS Watercraft Inspections on Lake Marion and Orchard Lake activities identified on the City’s proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A and as authorized by the County’s grant application approval attached as Exhibit B, both of which are incorporated herein by reference (the “AIS Management Activities”). Page 144 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA24178 P a g e | 2 of 7 B. The City shall provide a cash match, in-kind contribution or combination thereof, demonstrating direct support to implement and complete the AIS Management Activities as shown on Exhibit A. C. The City shall acknowledge funding or services provided by the County in any promotional materials, signage, reports, publications, notices, or presentations related to activities conducted under this Agreement. This section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 5. County Funding Obligation. The County agrees to reimburse the City in an amount not to exceed $23,111.00 for costs incurred in conducting the AIS Management Activities. In its discretion, the County may provide initial funding for the full AIS Management Activities in the amount of $24,327.00, provided that if it does so, the City shall reimburse the County for its required matching share in the amount of $1,216.00 no later than December 1, 2026. Reimbursement will be made only for those activities completed during the Agreement term and in conformance with this Agreement and Minn. Stat. § 477A.19. Notwithstanding all other provisions of this Agreement, it is understood that any reduction or termination of Aquatic Invasive Species Aid allocated to the County from the State may result in a like reduction to the City. 6. Reimbursement from the County. A. The City may claim reimbursement for expenditures incurred in connection with the performance of the AIS Management Activities that are eligible for reimbursement in accordance with this Agreement. B. The County will reimburse the City for authorized expenditures within 45 calendar days of the City’s submission of invoices to the County. Invoices must be submitted in the form acceptable to the County. All requests for reimbursement must be submitted by December 15, 2026. The City must certify that the requested reimbursements are accurate, appropriate and eligible in accordance with this Agreement, that the amounts are consistent with the funds requested in the City’s proposal attached as Exhibit A, that the City has documentation of the actual expenditures for which reimbursement is sought, and that such expenditures have not been otherwise reimbursed. C. All requests for reimbursement shall be made to: Dakota County Environmental Resources Department Attn: Ben Hoyt 14955 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124 Email: ben.hoyt@co.dakota.mn.us 7. Performance Reporting. Following completion of the AIS Management Activities and prior to December 15, 2026, the City shall submit a report to the County providing the information required by the County under the County’s Aquatic Invasive Species Grant Program Guidelines. Timely submission of a completed report shall be a condition precedent to final payment of the City’s reimbursement requests pursuant to this Agreement. 8. Authorized Representatives. The following named persons are designated as the Authorized Representatives of the parties for purposes of this Agreement. These persons have authority to bind the party they represent and to consent to modifications, except that the Authorized Representatives shall have only the authority specifically granted by their respective governing boards. Notice required to be provided pursuant this Agreement shall be provided to the Page 145 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA24178 P a g e | 3 of 7 following named persons and addresses unless otherwise stated in this Agreement, or in a modification to this Agreement: For the County: For the Grantee: Nikki Stewart, or successor, Director Luke Hellier or successor, Mayor Environmental Resources Department City of Lakeville 14955 Galaxie Avenue 20195 Holyoke Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124 Lakeville, MN 55044 Telephone: 952-891-7554 Telephone: 952-985-4410 Email: nikki.stewart@co.dakota.mn.us Email: lhellier@lakevillemn.gov In addition, notification to the County or the City regarding termination of this Agreement by the other party shall be provided to the Office of the Dakota County Attorney, Civil Division, 1560 Highway 55, Hastings, MN 55033. The parties shall provide written notification to each other of any change to the Authorized Representative. Such written notification shall be effective to change the designated Authorized Representative under this Agreement, without necessitating an amendment of this Agreement. 9. Indemnification and Insurance. Each party to this Agreement shall be liable for the acts or omissions of its officers, directors, employees or agents and the results thereof to the fullest extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party, its officers, directors, employees or agents. It is understood and agreed that the provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 466, and other applicable laws govern liability arising from the parties’ acts or omissions. In the event of any claims or actions asserted or filed against either party, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to allow a claimant to obtain separate judgments or separate liability caps from the individual parties. The City agrees to require all contractors or subcontractors hired to perform any work to complete the Services on the Project to maintain commercial general liability insurance in the amounts consistent with the minimum limits of coverage established by Minn. Stat. § 466.04 during the provisions of services under this Agreement. Each party warrants that they will carry minimum coverage consistent with the liability limits contained in Minn. Stat. Ch. 466 through an insurance company, the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, or self-insurance program. 10. Government Data Practices. All data collected, created, received, maintained, or disseminated for any purpose in the course of the City’s performance of this Agreement are governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as amended, the Minnesota Rules implementing the Act, as well as other applicable State statutes and Federal regulations on data privacy. The City agrees to abide by these statutes, rules and regulations and as the same may be amended from time to time. 11. Use of Contractors. The City may engage contractors to perform activities funded pursuant to this Agreement. However, the City retains primary responsibility to the County for performance of the activities and the use of such contractors does not relieve the City from any of its obligations under this Agreement. If the City engages any contractors to perform any part of the activities, the City agrees that the contract for such services shall include the following provisions: (1) The contractor must maintain all records and provide all reporting as required by this Agreement. Page 146 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA24178 P a g e | 4 of 7 (2) The contractor must defend, indemnify, and save harmless the County from all claims, suits, demands, damages, judgments, costs, interest, and expenses arising out of or by reason of the performance of the contracted work, caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the contractor, including negligent acts or omissions of its employees, subcontractors, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. (3) The contractor must provide and maintain insurance through the term of this Agreement in amounts and types of coverage as set forth in the Insurance Terms, which is attached and Incorporated as Exhibit C, and provide to the County, prior to commencement of the contracted work, a certificate of insurance evidencing such insurance coverage. (4) The contractor must be an independent contractor for the purposes of completing the contracted work. (5) The contractor must acknowledge that the contract between the City and the contractor does not create any contractual relationship between County and the contractor. (6) The contractor shall perform and complete the activities in full compliance with this Agreement and all applicable laws, statutes, rules, ordinances, and regulations issued by any federal, state, or local political subdivisions having jurisdiction over the activities. 12. Assignment, Amendments, Waiver and Complete Agreement. A. Assignment. The City may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior consent of the County and a fully executed assignment agreement, executed by the County and the City. B. Amendments. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by the parties. C. Waiver. If the County fails to enforce any provision of this Agreement, that failure shall not result in a waiver of the right to enforce the same or another provision of this Agreement. D. Agreement Complete. This Agreement and exhibits contain all negotiations and agreements between the parties. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or oral may be used to bind either party. 13. Audit. The City shall maintain books, records, documents and other evidence pertaining to the costs or expenses associated with the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. Upon request the City shall allow the County, Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor to inspect, audit, copy or abstract all books, records, papers or other documents relevant to this Agreement. The City shall use generally accepted accounting principles in the maintenance of such books and records, and shall retain all such books, records, documents and other evidence for a period of six (6) years from the date of the completion of the activities funded by this Agreement. Page 147 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA24178 P a g e | 5 of 7 14. Relationship of the Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement is intended or should be construed as creating or establishing the relationship of co-partners or joint ventures between the County and the City, nor shall the County be considered or deemed to be an agent, representative or employee of the City in the performance of this Agreement. Personnel of the City or other persons while engaging in the performance of this Agreement shall not be considered employees of the County and shall not be entitled to any compensation, rights or benefits of any kind whatsoever. 15. Governing Law, Jurisdiction and Venue. Minnesota law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this Agreement. Venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this Agreement or its breach, must be with the appropriate state court with competent jurisdiction in Dakota County. 16. Nondiscrimination. The City agrees to comply with all applicable laws relating to nondiscrimination and affirmative action. In particular, the City agrees not to discriminate against any employee, applicant for employment, or participant in this Agreement because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, membership or activity in a local civil rights commission, disability, sexual orientation, or age; and further agrees to take action to ensure that applicants and employees are treated equally with respect to all aspects of employment, including selection for training, rates of pay, and other forms of compensation. 17. Compliance with the Law. The City agrees to conduct its work under this Agreement in compliance with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, or regulations. The City is responsible for obtaining and complying with all federal, state, or local permits, licenses, and authorizations necessary for performing the work. 18. Default and Remedies. A. Events of Default. The following shall, unless waived in writing by the County, constitute an event of default under this Agreement: If the City fails to fully comply with any material provision, term, or condition contained in this Agreement. B. Notice of Event of Default and Opportunity to Cure. Upon the County's giving the City written notice of an event of default, the City shall have thirty (30) calendar days in which to cure such event of default, or such longer period of time as may be reasonably necessary so long as the City is using its best efforts to cure and is making reasonable progress in curing such events of default (the “Cure Period”). In no event shall the Cure Period for any event of default exceed two (2) months. Within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of notice of an event of default, the City shall propose in writing the actions that the City proposes to take, and the schedule required to cure the event of default. C. Remedies. Upon the City’s failure to cure an event of default within the Cure Period, the County may enforce any or all of the following remedies, as applicable: 1. The County may refrain from disbursing the grant monies; provided, however, the County may make such a disbursement after the occurrence of an event of default without thereby waiving its rights and remedies hereunder. 2. The County may enforce any additional remedies it may have in law or equity. 3. The County may terminate this Agreement and its obligation to provide funds under this Agreement for cause by providing thirty (30) days’ written notice to Page 148 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA24178 P a g e | 6 of 7 the City. Such notice to terminate for cause shall specify the circumstances warranting termination of the Agreement. Cause shall be a material breach of this Agreement and any supplemental agreement or modification to this Agreement or an event of default. Notice of Termination shall be made by certified mail or personal delivery to the Authorized Representative of the other party. For purposes of termination and default, all days are calendar days. 19. Non-Appropriation. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement may be terminated immediately by the County in the event sufficient funds from the County, State, or Federal sources are not appropriated, obtained and continued at least at the level relied on for the funding of this Agreement, and the non-appropriation of funds did not result from any act or bad faith on the part of the County. If the Agreement is terminated due to lack of funding from the State, the City shall only be entitled to the actual cost of Services rendered up to the date of termination. Alternatively, and in the County’s sole discretion, if payment from the State to the County is decreased, the Parties may negotiate a decrease in the amount of AIS Management Activities to be provided under this Agreement and reduce the amount of funding to be provided by the County accordingly. Any such agreement to reduce AIS Management Activities and County funding obligations shall be incorporated into this Agreement by written amendment. The City agrees that the County’s decision not to terminate shall be sufficient consideration for any modification of the Agreement. 20. Compliance with DNR requirements. A. Prior to conducting authorized watercraft inspections at water accesses, City must execute a Delegation Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). B. City must obtain a permit from the DNR prior to conducting invasive aquatic plant management activities. 21. Severability. Every section, provision or part of this Agreement is declared severable from every other section, provision or part thereof to the extent that if any sections, provision or part of this Agreement shall be held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not invalidate any other section, provision or part thereof. 22. Survival of terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement: 4.C. Publicity; 9. Indemnification; 10. Government Data Practices; 13. Audits; 15. Governing Law, Jurisdiction and Venue. 23. Electronic Signatures. Each party agrees that the electronic signatures of the parties included in this Contract are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as wet ink signatures. Remainder of page intentionally blank. Signature page follows. Page 149 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA24178 P a g e | 7 of 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the dates indicated below. FOR DAKOTA COUNTY (I represent and warrant that I am authorized to execute this contract on behalf of Dakota County.) By: ____________________________________ Nikki Stewart, Director Environmental Resources Department Date of signature: __________________________ FOR THE CITY (We represent and warrant that we are authorized by law to execute this contract and legally bind the City.) By: _________________________________ Luke Hellier, Mayor Date of signature: _____________________ Dakota County Resolution Number: 25-578 Page 150 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of Information Screens for the Police Department Real Time Information Center (RTIC) Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve the Resolution authorizing the purchase of two 110-inch information screens and associated components to create a glass information wall in the Police Department's Real Time Information Center (RTIC). Overview The Police Department has identified a need to purchase two Philips Unite AIO LED displays and the necessary supporting components at a total cost of $51,572.11 to enhance the capabilities of the Department's Real Time Information Center (RTIC). Although this purchase was not included in the approved 2026 budget, the Department proposes funding the acquisition through the reprioritization of existing 2026 capital funds. Delivery of the displays is expected within 8 to 12 weeks. Once received, installation and build- out are anticipated to take approximately two weeks, with project completion expected in October 2026. To accommodate this purchase within the existing 2026 capital budget, the Department proposes delaying the replacement of two vehicles and related equipment. In addition, advancements in portable radio technology and the need to maintain consistency in radio models across the Department have resulted in a revised replacement schedule. Portable radio replacements will now occur at the end of 2027 and early 2028. These adjustments allow the information wall project to proceed without increasing the overall 2026 capital budget. The City's Purchasing Policy requires City Council authorization for purchases exceeding $20,000. While this project was not specifically included in the approved 2026 budget, it can be accommodated within the Police Department's existing capital budget through the postponement of other planned vehicle and equipment replacement. Page 151 of 485 Total Project Cost: $51,572.11 Supporting Information 1. Incident Command Center - Video Wall (220 - 329)_Rev1 Financial Impact: $51,572.11 Budgeted: Yes Source: Reprioritization of existing 2026 capital funds. Envision Lakeville Community Values: Safety Throughout the Community Report Completed by: Brad Paulson, Chief of Police Page 152 of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ate: 6/15/2026 Proposal from Braun Intertec for Special Inspection and Testing Services for East Community Park Phase II: CIP #25-20 Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve proposal from Braun Intertec for Special Inspection and Testing Services for East Community Park Phase II: CIP #25- 20. Overview The construction of East Community Park Phase II is the final project that was approved as part of the 2021 Park Bond Referendum. The project includes items such as the construction of a park shelter with restrooms, playground structure, fishing docks and scenic overlooks, kayak launch and storage and other amenities. With all of these components, special inspection and testing services for items such as soil, concrete, structural masonry and steel, paving and structural wood and wind resistance are necessary. Braun Intertec has provided a proposal to complete these services at an estimated cost of $66,223.00. The services they provide will be under the terms of the Master Service Agreement Between Braun Intertec and the City of Lakeville, dated September 20, 2021. Supporting Information 1. Braun Intertec East Community Park Phase II Proposal Financial Impact: $66,223.00 Budgeted: Yes Source: Park Bond Referendum Envision Lakeville Community Values: Access to a Multitude of Natural Amenities and Recreational Opportunities Report Completed by: Joe Masiarchin, Parks and Recreation Director Page 160 of 485 May 29, 2026 Proposal 10011131_001 Joseph Masiarchin City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: Proposal for Special Inspection and Testing Services East Community Park 16700 Pilot Knob Rd Lakeville, Minnesota Dear Mr. Masiarchin: Braun Intertec Corporation (Braun Intertec) submits this proposal to provide special inspections and testing services for East Community Park project in Lakeville, Minnesota. We have completed the geotechnical evaluation (Project B2508000) for this site, so we have a good understanding of the site and construction challenges. We can aid the construction team by applying this experience and transferring our knowledge developed during the design phase which will provide professional continuity to the construction. Our work on the project to date gives us familiarity with the project team and design development which allows us to understand some of the considerations used when developing the projects design. Our Understanding of the Project We understand this project will include improvements to the existing East Community Park located at 16700 Pilot Knob Road in Lakeville, Minnesota. These improvements will include: ▪ New parking lot and bituminous entrance drive lane ▪ Two stormwater inflltration basins ▪ New park shelter with attached bathrooms ▪ An overlook structure ▪ A new playground structure ▪ A new pedestrian bridge ▪ Concrete pedestrian paths and fiatwork ▪ A new retaining wall ▪ Four flshing docks Page 161 of 485 City of Lakeville East Community Park Proposal 10011131_001 May 29, 2026 Braun Intertec Page 2 ▪ Kayak launch ▪ Site utilities The park structure generally includes cast in place concrete footings and a mass timber framed canopy with a smaller enclosure structure attached. The pedestrian bridge will include cast in-place concrete footings and wing walls with a prefabricated bridge structure. We understand that the flshing piers will generally be supported on a system of helical piles, cast in-place concrete beams, and shallow spread footings to transition on grade. We note the plans required Wind Resistance of the shelter (a New Requirement) and the fishing piers. Available Information This proposal was prepared using the following documents and information. ▪ Project plans and speciflcations prepared by ISG Inc., dated March 13, 2026. ▪ A geotechnical report prepared by Braun Intertec under Project B2508000, dated March 24, 2026. Scope of Services Services are performed under the direction of a licensed professional engineer, either on a continuous or periodic basis, depending on the construction schedule and when they are requested by the general contractor. After reviewing available information, we understand our scope of services for the project will be limited to the tasks deflned below. Soil Related Services ▪ Observe and evaluate the soils exposed in excavations to determine if the soils are similar to those encountered with the geotechnical evaluation and suitable for support of flll, foundations, or pavements. Our engineer can provide consultation for conditions that appear to differ from the geotechnical evaluation. ▪ Perform laboratory mechanical analyses (gradations) of prospective flll materials. ▪ Perform laboratory Proctor tests to determine the maximum Proctor dry densities and optimum moisture contents of prospective flll materials. ▪ Observe the placement and compaction of flll. ▪ Test compacted flll placed below building and pedestrian bridge footprints and oversizing areas, below slabs and/or pavements, behind retaining walls, and in utility trenches to determine if the relative compaction was achieved. ▪ Perform Double Ring Inflltrometer (DRI) testing within the two planned inflltration basins planned for the project site. Page 162 of 485 City of Lakeville East Community Park Proposal 10011131_001 May 29, 2026 Braun Intertec Page 3 Helical Related Services ▪ Observe installation of helical piles for the four flshing pier structures on a continual basis during installation. ▪ Document depth, torque and time of helical piles installation. ▪ Prepare helical foundations summary sheets included within the flnal special inspection report. Concrete Related Services ▪ Observe concrete reinforcement placement. ▪ Sample and test the plastic concrete for slump, air content, temperature and prepare test cylinders for laboratory compressive strength testing with ACI level 1 fleld technicians. We will perform concrete testing on structural items as required by the IBC. Though not required by the IBC we have included testing for the interior slab on grade, exterior fiatwork, curb and gutter, and pavements. ▪ Observe the concrete placement and test sample preparation. ▪ Perform laboratory compressive strength testing of the concrete samples. Structural Masonry Related Services ▪ Observe the structural masonry construction and grouting operation on a periodic basis. ▪ Observe the preparation of grout and masonry block prism samples. ▪ Perform structural masonry grout and structural masonry prism testing. Structural Steel Related Services ▪ Observe and test the structural steel welded and bolted connections in the fleld. ▪ Observe and document the installation of the base plate anchor bolts. Paving Related Services ▪ Observe test rolls of the pavement subgrade soils and/or aggregate base layer to determine if the materials tested are capable of supporting bituminous pavement. ▪ Measure the in-place density of the fresh bituminous with a nuclear density gauge to help the contractor develop a roll pattern for effective compaction. ▪ Perform extracted aggregate gradation, rice speciflc gravity, and asphalt content tests on bituminous samples. Structural Wood and Wind Resistance Related Services ▪ Observed designated fleld-built wood framing for high load diaphragms. Observations include grade and thickness of wood and installation of fasteners. ▪ Observe structural hold-down connections, structural connections, nail plates, and sheathing. ▪ Observe permanent and lateral truss bracing. Page 163 of 485 City of Lakeville East Community Park Proposal 10011131_001 May 29, 2026 Braun Intertec Page 4 Engineering Consulting and Project Communication and Reporting Services ▪ Provide engineering consulting services, review test results and observations reports, and prepare required flnal reports. ▪ Management, including scheduling of our fleld personnel and communication with the contractor, owner, building official, and design team. ▪ Transmit results to the project team on weekly basis to the contractor, owner, building official, fabricators and design team. Basis of Scope of Work The costs associated with the proposed scope of services were estimated using the following assumptions. If the construction schedule is modifled or the contractor completes the various phases of the project at different frequencies or durations than shown in this proposal, we may need to adjust the overall cost accordingly. The scope of work and number of trips required to perform these services are as shown in the attached table. Notable assumptions in developing our estimate include: ▪ Assumptions regarding the number of trips for special inspections and testing are outlined in the attached cost estimate table. As the contractor’s schedule becomes available and designs are flnalized, please review this proposed scope of work to determine if the project’s needs and budget will be met. ▪ Concrete placements for the structure will be observed throughout the duration by our technician as required by the IBC and project documents. ▪ The inspection of the reinforcement associated with structural concrete will be performed immediately prior to testing of the concrete with no additional trips or time incurred. ▪ The masonry construction will require inspections to be completed every time grout is placed. Grout will be placed with high lift grout techniques. ▪ We assume the structural steel fabricator will be AISC certifled and review of quality control manual or inspections of the fabrication shop are not required. If this assumption is not correct, please call us and we will provide a cost estimate for the fabrication shop inspections. ▪ No special site speciflc training or gear is required to complete our scope of services. ▪ Parking will be available on site for our vehicles. ▪ You, or others you may designate, will provide us with current and approved plans and speciflcations for the project. Modiflcation to these plans must also be sent to us so we can review their incorporation into the work. ▪ We will require a minimum of 24 hours’ notice for scheduling inspections for a speciflc time. Shorter than 24 hours’ notice may impact our ability to perform the requested services, and the associated impacts will be the responsibility of others. Page 164 of 485 City of Lakeville East Community Park Proposal 10011131_001 May 29, 2026 Braun Intertec Page 5 Cost We will furnish the services described in this proposal for an estimated fee of $66,223. A tabulation showing hourly and unit rates associated with our proposed scope of services is attached. The actual cost of our services will be based on the actual units or hours expended to meet the requirements of the project documents. This cost estimate was developed with the understanding that the scope of services deflned herein will be required and requested during our normal work hours of 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Services that we are asked to provide to meet the project requirements or the contractor’s construction schedule outside our normal business hours will be invoiced using an overtime rate factor. The factor for services provided outside our normal work hours or on Saturday will be 1.25 times the listed hourly rate for the service provided. The factor for services provided on Sunday or legal holidays will be 1.5 times the listed hourly rate for the service provided. We have not included premiums for overtime in our cost estimate; however, we recommend that allowances and contingencies be made for overtime charges based on conversations with the contractor. You will be billed only for services provided on a time and materials basis. Because our services are directly controlled by the schedule and performance of others, the actual cost may vary from our estimate. It is difficult to project all of the services and the quantity of services that may be required for any project. If services are required that are not discussed above, we will provide them at the rates shown in the attached table or, if not shown, at our current Schedule of Charges. We will invoice you on a monthly basis. Page 165 of 485 City of Lakeville East Community Park Proposal 10011131_001 May 29, 2026 Braun Intertec Page 6 General Remarks We based the proposed fee on the scope of services described and the assumption that you will authorize our services within 30 days and that others will not delay us beyond our proposed schedule. If anything in this proposal is not consistent with your requirements, please let us know immediately. We will provide our services under the terms of the Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services with the City of Lakeville, dated September 20, 2021. To accept this proposal and authorize us to proceed, please sign and return it to us in its entirety. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to you. We will be happy to meet with you to discuss our proposed scope of services further and clarify the various scope components. Braun Intertec will not release any written reports until we have received a signed agreement. Ordering services from Braun Intertec constitutes acceptance of the terms of this proposal. To have questions answered or schedule a time to meet and discuss our approach to this project further, please contact Richard Jett at 815.545.7059 or rjett@braunintertec.com. Sincerely, Braun Intertec Corporation Richard S. Jett, PE Senior Engineer Joseph Westphal, PE Director, Senior Engineer Attachments: Fee Estimate - 10011131_001 The proposal is accepted, and Braun Intertec is authorized to proceed. Accepted by: _________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor and by: ______________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk Date:________________________________ Page 166 of 485 1 Fee Estimate 10011131_001 East Community Park - CMT Client: Work Site Address: City of Lakeville Joseph Masiarchin 20195 Holyoke Ave Lakeville, MN 55044-9047 (952) 985-4641 16700 Pilot Knob Road Rosemount, Minnesota 55068 Qty/Hours Rate Amount Task 1: Special Inspections and Testing Subtask 1.1: Special Inspections and Testing $66,223.00 Subtask 1.1.1: Soil Observations and Testing $18,101.00 Soil Compaction Testing - Nuclear 96.00 82.00 $7,872.00 Park Structure 2 Trips @ 3 Hr 6.00 Pedestrian Bridge 1 Trip @ 3 Hr 3.00 Fishing Pier Foundations 4 Trips @ 3 Hr 12.00 Parking Lot 4 Trips @ 3 Hr 12.00 Retaining Wall Subgrade 2 Trips @ 3 Hr 6.00 Retaining Wall Backfill 4 Trips @ 3 Hr 12.00 Utilities 12 Trips @ 3 Hr 36.00 Site Grading 3 Trips @ 3 Hr 9.00 Soil Observations 48.00 94.00 $4,512.00 Park Structure 2 Trips @ 3 Hr 6.00 Pedestrian Bridge 2 Trips @ 3 Hr 6.00 Fishing Pier Foundations 4 Trips @ 3 Hr 12.00 Parking Lot 1 Trip @ 3 Hr 3.00 Retaining Wall 4 Trips @ 3 Hr 12.00 Overlook / Limestone Blocks 3 Trips @ 3 Hr 9.00 Senior Engineer 4.00 185.00 $740.00 Trip Charge 49.00 25.00 $1,225.00 Nuclear moisture-density meter charge, per hour 96.00 24.00 $2,304.00 Soil Proctor MD Relationship (Standard) ASTM D698 each 4.00 185.00 $740.00 Soil Sieve Analysis with 200 wash, each 4.00 136.00 $544.00 Soil Organic Content ASTM D2947 each 2.00 82.00 $164.00 Subtask 1.1.2: Concrete Observations and Testing $13,889.00 Concrete Testing 65.00 82.00 $5,330.00 Park Structure 4 Trips @ 2 Hr 8.00 Pedestrian Bridge 4 Trips @ 2 Hr 8.00 Fishing Piers 8 Trips @ 2 Hr 16.00 Exterior Flatwork 6 Trips @ 3 Hr 18.00 Curb and Gutter 4 Trips @ 3 Hr 12.00 Kayak Storage Rack 1 Trips @ 3 Hr 3.00 Concrete Observations 11.00 94.00 $1,034.00 Park Structure 3 Trips @ 1 Hr 3.00 Pedestrian Bridge 4 Trips @ 1 Hr 4.00 Fishing Piers 4 Trips @ 1 Hr 4.00 Concrete Cylinder Pick Up 20.00 82.00 $1,640.00 Trip Charge 68.00 25.00 $1,700.00 Concrete Compressive Strength Cylinders ASTM C39 each 135.00 31.00 $4,185.00 Park Structure 4 Sets @ 5 Qty 20.00 Pedestrian Bridge 4 Sets @ 5 Qty 20.00 Fishing Piers 8 Sets @ 5 Qty 40.00 Page 167 of 485 2 Qty/Hours Rate Amount Exterior Flatwork 6 Sets @ 5 Qty 30.00 Curb and Gutter 4 Sets @ 5 Qty 20.00 Kayak Storage Rack 1 Sets @ 5 Qty 5.00 Subtask 1.1.3: Masonry Observations and Testing $1,848.00 Masonry Testing 4.00 106.00 $424.00 Masonry Sample Pick up 1.00 82.00 $82.00 Trip Charge 1.00 25.00 $25.00 Masonry Grout Compressive strength ASTM C 1019 each 3.00 97.00 $291.00 Masonry Hollow Prism Compressive strength ASTM C 1314 each 3.00 269.00 $807.00 Masonry Net area determination ASTM C140 each 3.00 73.00 $219.00 Subtask 1.1.4: Structural Steel and Wood Observations and Testing $1,347.00 Special Inspector Steel 12.00 106.00 $1,272.00 Trip Charge 3.00 25.00 $75.00 Subtask 1.1.5: DRI Testing $5,450.00 Double-ring Infiltrometer Granular ASTM D3385 Labor & Equip 4.00 1,300.00 $5,200.00 DRI Mobilization 1.00 250.00 $250.00 Subtask 1.1.6: Helical Pile Observations $9,420.00 Deep Foundations Observations - Helical Pile Observations 80.00 106.00 $8,480.00 Senior Engineer 4.00 185.00 $740.00 Trip Charge 8.00 25.00 $200.00 Subtask 1.1.7: Asphalt Paving and Testing $1,788.00 Proofroll Observations 8.00 106.00 $848.00 Field Service Technician I - asphalt sample pickup 1.00 82.00 $82.00 Field Service Technician - Roll Pattern 4.00 106.00 $424.00 Trip Charge 4.00 25.00 $100.00 Asphalt Extracted Aggregate Gradation ASTM D5444 each 1.00 104.00 $104.00 Asphalt Rice Specific Gravity ASTM D2041 each 1.00 80.00 $80.00 Asphalt Content ASTM D6307 each 1.00 150.00 $150.00 Subtask 1.1.8: Wind Resistance Observations and Testing $8,350.00 Special Inspector - ICC Commercial Building Inspector 42.00 185.00 $7,770.00 Report Review 2.00 215.00 $430.00 Trip Charge 6.00 25.00 $150.00 Subtask 1.1.9: Project Management $6,030.00 Project Assistant 10.00 82.00 $820.00 Project Accountant 5.00 160.00 $800.00 Project Engineer 16.00 160.00 $2,560.00 Senior Engineer 10.00 185.00 $1,850.00 Task 1 Total: $66,223.00 Project Total $66,223.00 Page 168 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Approve Resolution Amending Resolution 11-46 Regarding the Finance Committee Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve the Resolution Amending Resolution 11-46 Regarding the Finance Committee. Overview The Lakeville Finance Committee was established by Resolution 11-46 on May 16, 2011, with a membership of seven (7) members. Subsequent resolutions added alternate members: Resolution 11-86 (August 2011) added one alternate, and Resolution 22-23 (March 2022) added a second alternate, both serving one-year terms. Resolution 11-46 originally established a two-year limitation on consecutive service in the chairperson role and provided for monthly committee meetings. At its April 22, 2026 meeting, the Finance Committee unanimously agreed to recommend two amendments to Resolution 11-46: 1. Remove the two-year limitation on consecutive service as chairperson or vice chairperson, effective immediately and inclusive of any currently service chairperson. 2. Amend the meeting schedule from monthly to every two months, reflecting actual practice, unless deemed unnecessary by staff or the chairperson. The proposed amendments align the governing resolution with the Finance Committee’s established operating practices and provide greater flexibility in committee leadership. Supporting Information 1. Resolution 11-46 Establishing a Finance Committee 2. Resolution Amending Res 11-46 Regarding the Finance Committee Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Julie Stahl, Finance Director Page 169 of 485 CITY OF LAKEVILLE Resolution No 11 46 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A FINANCE COMMITTEE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Lakeville Minnesota as follows Section 1 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE The Finance Committee of the City shall act as the advisory body to the City Council and City staff regarding short and long term financial planning financial policies and practices local state and national trends in finance and economy legislative issues quarterly financial reports and comprehensive annual financial report public communications and education programs relative to City of Lakeville budget and finances Section 2 COMPOSITION TERMS OF OFFICE A Composition The Finance Committee shall consist of seven 7 members appointed by the City Council B Terms The Committee shall be composed of seven 7 members of which at least six 6 shall be Lakeville residents The Committee Members shall be appointed by the City Council for a term of three 3 years Members shall serve three year staggered terms with two or three appointments made annually C Removal From Office Any member of the Committee may be removed from office with or without cause by a four fifths vote of the entire City Council D Any member of the Committee who misses three 3 consecutive Committee meetings in a calendar year calculated at the end of each calendar year due to unexcused absences shall automatically be removed from office without City Council action and the City Administrator shall notify the member of his or her removal Excused absences include a serious personal or family medical condition death in immediate family or unanticipated work related commitment E The staff liaisons to the Committee shall be the City Administrator and Finance Director 1 Page 170 of 485 Section 3 ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES A Organize Election of Officers 1 At the first meeting of the year the Committee shall elect a chairperson and vice chair No Committee member shall serve more than two 2 consecutive years as chairperson 2 Terms of all elected offices shall be for one year with eligibility for reelection B Members of the Committee shall receive no salaries or fees for their services The Committee may with the consent of the City Council incur expense that is deemed necessary C Meetings of the Committee 1 A meeting to be official must have a quorum present Four 4 regular members shall constitute a quorum 2 All motions must have the majority of votes of those members present to be deemed approved 3 Meetings to be scheduled monthly unless deemed unnecessary by staff or chairperson Section 4 DUTIES The duties of the Committee shall be to provide advice and recommendations to the City Council and staff for the following a Short and long term financial planning to include fees for services structure and policy and alternative finance methodology Not to include spending or taxation levels b Financial policies and practices to include but not limited to fund balance policy debt management policy and investments policy c Local state and national trends in finance and economy to include but not limited to bond markets Federal Reserve and Department of Commerce d Legislative issues to include but not limited to levy limits and property tax relief programs 0 Page 171 of 485 e Review of quarterly financial reports and Comprehensive Annual Financial Report f Public communications and education programs related to budget and City finances to include but not limited to budget format and public presentations of the budget ADOPTED by the City Council of Lakeville Minnesota this 16 day of May 2011 CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY g1L Mark Bellows Mayor U Charlene Friedges Cityglerk 3 Page 172 of 485 CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. ________ Resolution Amending Resolution 11-46 Regarding the Finance Committee WHEREAS, on May 16, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution 11-46 establishing the Finance Committee and setting the number of members at seven (7); and WHEREAS, on August 15, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution 11-86 which added an alternate member (to serve one-year term) to the committee; and WHEREAS, on March 2, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 22-23 to add a second alternate member (to serve one-year term) to the committee; and WHEREAS, on April 22, 2026, the Finance Committee unanimously agreed to remove the two- year limitation, effective immediately, including for any currently serving chairperson; and WHEREAS, Section 3C-3 of the Resolution 11-46 currently provides for monthly meetings, which does not reflect actual practice, and the Council wishes to amend the meeting schedule accordingly; and BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Finance Committee may elect any member to the chairperson and vice chairperson roles without limitation to years of consecutive service. 2. The Finance Committee meetings are to be scheduled every two months unless deemed unnecessary by staff or chairperson. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 15th day of June, 2026. ________________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ________________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Page 173 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 ISG Conditional Use Permit for Lot 3, Marketplace at Cedar Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a conditional use permit to allow a convenience restaurant with a drive-through service window in the M-2, Mixed Use Cedar Corridor District and adopt the findings of fact. Overview Andrea Rand, on behalf of ISG has submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow a convenience restaurant with a drive-through service window in the M-2, Mixed Use Cedar Corridor District. The development is for property located at the south of 179th Street (CSAH 9) and east of Cedar Avenue (CSAH 23), identified as Lot 3, Block 1, Marketplace at Cedar. Section 11-66-7.E of the Zoning Ordinance allows convenience restaurants with a drive-through service window by conditional use permit in the M-2, Mixed Use Cedar Corridor District. The project consists of an approximate 8,500 square foot multi-tenant building, including a convenience restaurant with a drive-through service window. The drive-through ordering window is proposed along the west side of the building. The site plan depicts a single drive- through lane with a bypass lane that circulates around the building from the east side. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the conditional use permit application at its June 4, 2026, meeting and unanimously recommended approval. There was no public comment. The developer has submitted a revised landscape plan, which satisfies stipulation number 6 of the Planning report. Supporting Information 1. CUP-Findings-PCMinutes 2. PlanningReport-LocationMap-ZoningMap 3. SitePlan-Landscaping-Elevations Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Diversified Economic Development Report Completed by: Heather Botten, Senior Planner Page 174 of 485 (Reserved for Dakota County Recording Information) CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 26-_____ 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Lakeville hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for ISG to allow a convenience restaurant with a drive- through service window in the M-2, Mixed Use Cedar Corridor District. 2. Property. The permit is for the following described property in the City of Lakeville, Dakota County, Minnesota: Lot 3, Block 1, Marketplace At Cedar 3. Conditions. This conditional use permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a. The site shall be developed according to the plans approved by the City Council. b. The hours of operation shall be limited to five o’clock (5:00) A.M. to eleven o’clock (11:00) P.M. c. Any rooftop and/or ground-mounted mechanical equipment must be screened per Zoning Ordinance requirements. d. Plantings on the site must adhere to the landscape plan and an as-built planting plan provided prior to inspection of the installed landscaping. The Developer must provide a security with the building permit to guarantee installation of the landscaping. e. Snow storage shall not occur within required parking spaces. Page 175 of 485 2 4. Revocation. The City may revoke the conditional use permit for cause upon determination that the conditional use permit is not in conformance with the conditions of the permit or is in continued violation of the city code or other applicable regulations. 5. Expiration. This conditional use permit shall expire unless the applicant commences the authorized use within one year of the date of this conditional use permit unless an extension is approved by the Zoning Administrator. DATED: June 15, 2026 CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: _____________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor SEAL BY: _____________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the 15th day of June 2026 by Luke M. Hellier, Mayor and by Taylor Snider, Deputy Clerk of the City of Lakeville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. ____________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Page 176 of 485 1 CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ISG – LOT 3 MARKETPLACE AT CEDAR FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION On June 4, 2026, the Lakeville Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the request from ISG for a conditional use permit to allow a convenience restaurant with a drive-through service window in the M-2, Mixed Use Cedar Corridor District. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the conditional use permit application preceded by published and mailed notice. The applicant was present and the Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak. The City Council hereby adopts the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject property is located in Comprehensive Planning District 5, which guides the property for Corridor Mixed Use. 2. The subject site is zoned M-2, Mixed Use Cedar Corridor District. 3. Legal description of the property: Lot 3, Block 1, Marketplace at Cedar 4. Chapter 4 of the City of Lakeville Zoning Ordinance provides that a conditional use permit may not be issued unless certain criteria are satisfied. The criteria and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed convenience restaurant with a drive-through use is consistent with the guided mixed-use designation of the property. Page 177 of 485 2 b. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The proposed convenience restaurant will be compatible with the existing and future commercial and residential land uses in the surrounding area. c. The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance and the City Code. Finding: Provided compliance with the stipulations of the conditional use permit, the proposed use will conform to all other performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance and the City Code. d. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. Finding: The proposed convenience restaurant with a drive-through use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. e. Traffic generated by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The traffic generated by the proposed commercial use will not overburden the streets serving the property. 5. The report dated May 27, 2026, prepared by Heather Botten, Senior Planner, is incorporated herein. DECISION The City Council approves the conditional use permit in the form attached hereto. DATED: June 15, 2026 CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: ________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor SEAL BY: ________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy Clerk Page 178 of 485 CITY OF LAKEVILLE PORTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Item 5.a. Marketplace at Cedar Lot 3 June 4, 2026 5a. Marketplace at Cedar Lot 3 Vice Chair Einck opened the public hearing to consider the application of ISG for a conditional use permit for a convenience restaurant with a drive-through service window in the M-2, Mixed Use Cedar Corridor District. Ryan Durand with Oppidan introduced the project. He stated this building will have a drive- through restaurant, a dental office, and one to three tenant spaces for uses yet to be determined. Senior Planner Heather Botten presented the staff report. The development is for a 1.45 acre parcel located south of 179th Street (CSAH 9) and east of Cedar Avenue (CSAH 23), identified as Lot 3, Block 1, Marketplace at Cedar. The project includes an approximate 8,500 square foot building designed for multi-tenants, one of which would have a convenience restaurant with a drive- through service window. Section 11-66-7.E of the Zoning Ordinance allows convenience restaurants with a drive-through service window by conditional use permit. Community Development Department staff recommend approval of the conditional use permit. Vice Chair Einck opened the hearing to the public for comment. There was no public comment. Motion was made by Kaluza, seconded by Traffas to close the public hearing at 6:06 p.m. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes – unanimous Vice Chair Einck asked for comments from the Planning Commission. • Commissioner Kaluza asked if there are tenants identified yet. Mr. Durand stated they have two tenants identified with signed leases and they are working to find tenants for the rest of the building. • Commissioner Traffas clarified that there are three remaining tenant spaces and asked if the drive-through for the convenience restaurant is the only business that can use the drive- through or if the drive-through could be modified to allow another business to use it. Mr. Durand stated the three spaces could be combined for one tenant or can accommodate three separate tenants. He also stated the drive-through is designed to accommodate other businesses but may require approval from city staff. Page 179 of 485 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, June 4, 2026 Page 2 Motion was made by Kaluza, seconded by Swaney to recommend to City Council approval of the conditional use permit for a convenience restaurant with a drive-through service window in the M-2, Mixed Used Cedar Corridor District and the findings of fact, subject to the following stipulations: 1. The site shall be developed according to the plans approved by the City Council. 2. The hours of operation shall be limited to five o’clock (5:00) A.M. to eleven o’clock (11:00) P.M. 3. Any rooftop and/or ground-mounted mechanical equipment must be screened per Zoning Ordinance requirements. 4. Plantings on the site must adhere to the landscape plan and an as-built planting plan provided prior to inspection of the installed landscaping. The Developer must provide a security with the building permit to guarantee installation of the landscaping. 5. Snow storage shall not occur within required parking spaces. 6. Prior to City Council consideration, the landscape plan must be updated to comply with the Foresters’ comments, including adding shrubs along the north property line and additional landscaping added around the parking lot. Ayes: Kaluza, Einck, Swaney, Traffas Nays: 0 Ayes: Zimmer, Einck, Swaney, Swenson, Traffas, Kaluza Nays: 0 Page 180 of 485 City of Lakeville Community Development Memorandum To: Planning Commission From: Heather Botten Date: May 27, 2026 Subject: Packet Material for the June 4, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Item: ISG – Andrea Rand - Conditional use permit for a convenience restaurant with a drive-through service window in the M-2, Mixed Use Cedar Corridor District Application Action Deadline: June 19, 2026 – 1st 60 days BACKGROUND Andrea Rand, ISG has submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow a convenience restaurant with a drive-through service window in the M-2, Mixed Use Cedar Corridor District. The development is for property located at the south of 179th Street (CSAH 9) and east of Cedar Avenue (CSAH 23), identified as Lot 3, Block 1, Marketplace at Cedar. The project includes an approximate 8,500 square foot building designed for multi-tenants, one of which would have a convenience restaurant with a drive-though service window. The property is 1.45 acres in size and zoned M-2, Mixed Use Cedar Corridor District. Section 11-66-7.E of the Zoning Ordinance allows convenience restaurants with a drive-through service window by conditional use permit. The proposed development plans have been reviewed by Community Development and Engineering staff. EXHIBITS A. Location Map B. Zoning Map C. Site Plan D. Landscape Plan E. Building Elevation Plans Page 181 of 485 2 STAFF ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The property is located in Planning District No. 5, Cedar Corridor, and is guided for Corridor Mixed Use in the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The Corridor Mixed Use Designation allows for development of residential, commercial, public and corridor mixed- uses along the Cedar Avenue The proposed convenience restaurant use is consistent with the land uses envisioned for this district. Zoning. The property is zoned M-2, Mixed Use Cedar Corridor District. The proposed convenience restaurant with a drive-through is consistent with the uses allowed in a commercial district. Surrounding Land Uses, Zoning, and Comprehensive Plan Designation Direction Existing Use Land Use Plan Zoning North 179th Street and Crossroads Shopping Center Commercial PUD South Vacant Corridor Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use East Vacant – Future Taco Bell Corridor Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use West Vacant – Future 7Brew Corridor Mixed Use M-2, Mixed Use Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control, and Utilities. Grading, drainage and erosion control plans have been submitted with the Marketplace at Cedar plat. The Marketplace at Cedar development project will also provide utility stubs (water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer) to each lot including Lot 3. Additionally, the overall Marketplace project includes two (2) private shared stormwater basins that will provide stormwater quality and quantity treatment for the overall development including Lot 3. Engineering and Environmental Resources have reviewed the site, grading, drainage and erosion control, and utility plans. The Engineering Division recommends approval of the CUP with final plans being approved at the time of building permit. CUP SITE PLAN REVIEW Use. Section 11-66-7.E allows convenience restaurants with a drive-through service window subject to approval of a conditional use permit and in accordance with specific performance standards applied to the subject property. Setbacks. The proposed building meets or exceeds the minimum setback requirements of the M- 2 District of: Page 182 of 485 3 Required Proposed Yard abutting a major collector or arterial St. 30 feet 50 feet Side 10 feet 34 Side 10 feet 40 Front 10 feet 140 feet+ Building Height. The proposed building is a single-story structure 22’8” in height, at the top of the parapet. A maximum building height of 48 feet is allowed in the M-2 District. Parking/Drive Aisles. The proposed site was approved for a multi-tenant building with a shared parking with Lot 2 to the west. The setback requirements for parking are 10 feet abutting right-of- way and five feet from interior lot lines. Joint or combined parking facilities on separate lots are not required to observe the parking area setback from such common lot line. As mentioned, the parking lot is shared with the lot to the west The parking requirements are calculated by reviewing the uses on both properties. The combined parking on both parcels require a minimum of 80 parking spaces; this includes the proposed uses of convenience restaurants and medical office and subtracting the 10% gross floor area credit. The maximum number of parking stalls allowed is up to 125% of the minimum parking spaces, without CUP approval. 125% of the minimum parking is 100 spaces. The site plan demonstrates 92 parking spaces, complying with code requirements. Access. Access to the site will primarily be via the private drive to the south. There is also access from the west through the shared parking lot and the Taco Bell lot to the east. Access to the north on 179th Street is not permitted. Pedestrian Access. A trail will be constructed along the south side of 179th Street and a sidewalk will be constructed along the internal private drives within the Marketplace development. Landscaping. The landscape plan provides plantings mainly along the north and south sides of the site, along with additional plantings within the open spaces in the parking lot. The City Forester reviewed the proposed landscape plan and provided comments. Additional trees are required along the east property line to help reduce the amount of headlight glare from vehicles entering the drive-through lane. The landscape plan must be updated to reflect this change prior to City Council consideration of the CUP. Including the landscape modifications, the landscape plan will be considered approved. Plantings on the site must adhere to the plan and provide an as-built planting plan prior to inspection of the installed landscaping. An escrow for the landscape materials and installation amount will be collected with the building permit. Page 183 of 485 4 Building Exterior. The exterior building finish shall be composed of at least sixty-five percent (65%) grade A materials; not more than thirty five percent (35%) grade B or grade C material and not more than ten percent (10%) grade D materials. The proposed building elevations will be constructed of 66-71% Grade A material and 29-34% Grade C. The materials proposed comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements. Drive-Through Window. There is one ordering window on the west side of the building with the drive-through lane wrapping around the building from the east. There is over 180 feet of stacking space. The drive-through lane is separated from off-street parking area. Signs. All proposed signs are subject to the allowances established for the M-2 District by Section 11-23-19.D of the Zoning Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance allows wall signs not to exceed 100 square feet. Sign permits are required to be issued prior to the installation of any signs on the building. Menu Boards. The Zoning Ordinance allows up to two menu signs with a maximum area of 50 square feet and a maximum height of eight feet per lane. The sign must receive a sign permit prior to installation and shall comply with the requirements outlined in Section 11-66-7.E.8.c of the Zoning Ordinance. Signs shown on the plans are illustrative only and no approvals are granted as a part of the CUP request. Hours. Section 11-66-7.E.1 of the Zoning Ordinance limits the hours of operation from 5:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M., unless extended by the City Council as part of the conditional use permit request. Trash Enclosure. The trash and recycling enclosure is proposed to be located behind the building in the northwest corner of the property. The enclosure shall comply with Section 11-18-11of the city code, including the gate being made of maintenance-free material. Exterior Lighting. No light source or combination thereof which casts light on a public street shall exceed one foot-candle meter reading as measured at the right of way or property line. The submitted photometric plan complies with code requirements. All lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source of light visible from the public right-of-way. All building mounted lighting must face downward onto the structure. Mechanical Equipment. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment must be screened if greater than three feet in height. Ground-mounted mechanical equipment must be screened with landscaping and/or fencing. Snow Storage. Snow storage may not take place in required parking spaces. Page 184 of 485 5 RECOMMENDATION Community Development Department staff recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a convenience restaurant with a drive-through service window in the M-2, Mixed Use Cedar Corridor District subject to the following stipulations: 1. The site shall be developed according to the plans approved by the City Council. 2. The hours of operation shall be limited to five o’clock (5:00) A.M. to eleven o’clock (11:00) P.M. 3. Any rooftop and/or ground-mounted mechanical equipment must be screened per Zoning Ordinance requirements. 4. Plantings on the site must adhere to the landscape plan and an as-built planting plan provided prior to inspection of the installed landscaping. The Developer must provide a security with the building permit to guarantee installation of the landscaping. 5. Snow storage shall not occur within required parking spaces. 6. Prior to City Council consideration, the landscape plan must be updated to comply with the Foresters’ comments, including adding shrubs along the north property line and additional landscaping added around the parking lot. Approval of a conditional use permit requires adoption of findings of fact by the Planning Commission and City Council. Draft findings of fact are attached to this report. Page 185 of 485 Page 186 of 485 Page 187 of 485 27 12 5 12 13 12 3 7 FF E = 10 0 0 . 0 0 QS R 2, 9 2 7 S F 18 32 10 FFE = 1004.00 COFFEE 809 SF 40 74 15 FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 102 1,250 SF FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 104 3,700 SF UT I L I T Y FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 106 1,124 SF FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 108 1,188 SF FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 110 1,188 SF 19 NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING 40 74 15 FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 102 1,250 SF FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 104 3,700 SF UT I L I T Y FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 106 1,124 SF FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 108 1,188 SF FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 110 1,188 SF 19 NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING LP-3 LP-2 LP-1 179TH STREET 2 3 179th STREET WEST 5'11'5'11' 6' 20 ' 24 ' 18 ' T Y P . R3.5'R3. 5 ' R4'R 3 ' R 3 . 5 ' R3.5 ' R 5 ' R 1 2 ' R20 ' R20 ' R8' R8' R5' R 4 'R3' R3.7 5 ' R 3 ' 32' B-B 8' 30' 24 ' 25' 11'11' 9' TYP 9' TYP 9' TYP 10 ' 12' 6' 7' 10 ' 5' 16' 22 ' 22' 30 ' 20 ' 9' TYP. 6' 6' 24 ' 24 ' 2 0 ' 22.5' 12 ' 5' R 4 0 ' 1 4 10' PL O T D A T E : 5/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 6 1 : 1 2 P M MARKETPLACE MULTI-TENANT BUILDING LOT 3 LIC. NO.DATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED JERREMY D. FOSS, PE 55871 PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. 34181 C3-SITE DATE REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION BY SHEET TITLE PROJECT PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : S: \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 4 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 4 1 0 0 - 3 4 1 9 9 \ 3 4 1 8 1 M A R K E T P L A C E M U L T I - T E N A N T B U I L D I N G L O T 3 - L A K E V I L L E M N \ 3 4 1 8 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ 3 4 1 8 1 C 3 - S I T E . D W G S A V E D B Y : JA M I E . S T E I N B O R N SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. C3-10 - 04/06/26 26-34181 C3-10 SITE PLAN ---- ---- C3-10 LAKEVILLE MINNESOTA SITE PLAN 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 JRS, DWG JRS, DWG MGC, JDF A B A B A B PAVEMENT LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALK REVERSE PITCH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER TAPER WALK DOWN TO PAVEMENT TAPER WALK DOWN TO PAVEMENT TAPER WALK DOWN TO PAVEMENT CURB TAPER, SEE DETAIL CURB TAPER, SEE DETAIL SITE SUMMARY PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION:7394 179th ST. W. LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 ZONING:M-2 (MIXED USE CEDAR CORRIDOR DISTRICT) SITE/LOT AREA:63,352 SF (1.45 AC) REQUIRED SETBACKS PARKING BUILDING FRONT YARD 10'10' SIDE YARD 5'10' REAR YARD 5'30' REAR YARD 10'30' PARKING DATA LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FAST FOOD AND RETAIL COMMERCIAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED (CODE) (FAST FOOD) 1 STALL PER 70 SQ. FT. (RETAIL COMMERCIAL) 1 STALL PER 200 SQ. FT. GOVERNING INFORMATION 1,250 FAST FOOD / 7,200 RETAIL COMMERCIAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 54 PARKING STALLS PROVIDED STANDARD 71 ACCESSIBLE 3 TOTAL 74 ACCESSIBLE PARKING KEY NOTES ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ("R7-8m") VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN ("R7-8bP") "NO PARKING" PAVEMENT MESSAGE *FURNISH AND INSTALL SIGNS ACCORDING TO STATE AND/OR FEDERAL MUTCD REQUIREMENTS. **SIGNS THAT HAVE MULTIPLE DESIGNATIONS SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE SAME POST. ***SEE PLANS FOR FLUSH/TAPER LENGTH A B C C C SHARED MAIL BOX, SEE ARCH PLANS MODIFIED TYPE B CURB & GUTTER ALONG SOUTH AND EAST SIDES OF BUILING W/ WALK B618 CURB AND GUTTER, TYP (SEE DETAIL) RETAINING WALL AND FENCE BY MARKETPLACE DEVELOPMENT CONNECT INTO EXISTING WALK DRIVE THRU MENU BOARD (SEE ARCH. PLANS) CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SEE DETAIL TRASH ENCLOSURE, SEE ARCH. PLANS LOT 3 PROPERTY LINE, TYP TRANSFORMER Page 188 of 485 40 74 15 FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 102 1,250 SF FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 104 3,700 SF UT I L I T Y FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 106 1,124 SF FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 108 1,188 SF FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 110 1,188 SF 19 NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING LP-3 LP-2 LP-1 >> 179TH STREET 2 3 27 12 5 12 13 12 3 7 FF E = 10 0 0 . 0 0 QS R 2, 9 2 7 S F 18 32 10 FFE = 1004.00 COFFEE 809 SF 40 74 15 FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 102 1,250 SF FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 104 3,700 SF UT I L I T Y FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 106 1,124 SF FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 108 1,188 SF FFE = 1002.00 TENANT 110 1,188 SF 19 NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 0 1 2 3 3 >> > > > > > > I I I I I I I I I I III I (6) AA-M (5) CA-F (5) SL-B (3) CL-H (3) CA-F (5) SL-B (3) CL-H (5) SL-B (3) CA-F (3) CL-H (3) CA-F (5) SL-B (3) CL-H (5) SL-B (3) SL-B (3) CL-H (3) SL-B (9) CA-F (8) CA-F (7) NW-L (8) CA-F (2) MS-C (5) NW-L (7) CA-F (2) NW-L (3) CS-D (7) CA-F (5) CL-H (7) CA-F (3) CS-D (7) CA-F (5) CL-H (5) NW-L (7) CA-F (6) CA-F (10) CA-F (7) CA-F (3) SL-B SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT DECIDUOUS SHADE TREE AA-M 6 ACER X FREEMANII 'ARMSTRONG' ARMSTRONG FREEMAN MAPLE 2.5" CAL B & B ORNAMENTAL TREES MS-C 2 MALUS X 'SPRING SNOW' SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE 2" CAL B & B DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CS-D 6 CORNUS SERICEA 'CARDINAL' CARDINAL RED TWIG DOGWOOD 5 GAL CONT CL-H 25 DIERVILLA LONICERA 'MICHIGAN SUNSET' DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE 5 GAL CONT GRASSES CA-F 98 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS 2 GAL CONT SL-B 34 SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM LITTLE BLUESTEM 2 GAL CONT PERENNIALS NW-L 24 NEPETA X 'WALKER'S LOW' WALKER'S LOW CATMINT 1 GAL CONT PLANT SCHEDULE EDGER STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGING (BLACK COLOR) PL O T D A T E : 4/ 7 / 2 0 2 6 1 2 : 5 9 P M MARKETPLACE MULTI-TENANT BUILDING LOT 3 LIC. NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MITCHELL COOKAS PR E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP, INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. © 2024 I & S GROUP, INC. C5-11 - 04/06/26 26-34181 C5-11 SITE PLANTING PLAN ---- ---- C5-11 LAKEVILLE MINNESOTA SITE PLANTING PLAN 0 SCALE IN FEET 20 40 JV JV MC LANDSCAPE EDGING (TYP) LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS: - ALL EXPOSED GROUND AREAS, INCLUDING STREET BOULEVARDS, AND AREAS NOT DEVOTED TO OFF STREET PARKING, DRIVES, SIDEWALKS, PATIOS OR OTHER SUCH IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH GRASS, SHRUBS, TREES (EXCEPT IN BOULEVARD PORTIONS OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) OR OTHER ORNAMENTAL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS WITHIN ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE DATE OF BUILDING OCCUPANCY, AS DETERMINED BY THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. - DECIDUOUS TREES INTENDED FOR SCREENING SHALL BE PLANTED NOT MORE THAN FORTY FEET (40') APART. EVERGREEN TREES INTENDED FOR SCREENING SHALL BE PLANTED SO THAT THEIR BRANCHES ARE TOUCHING AT THE NARROWEST PROJECTED MATURE CANOPY WIDTH. - OFF STREET PARKING AREAS: ALL OFF STREET PARKING AREAS WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE PARKING SPACES OR ANY PARKING AREA WITHIN TWENTY FEET (20') OF A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT SHALL BE SCREENED 34181 C5-LAND DATE REVISION SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION BY SHEET TITLE PROJECT PROJECT NO. FILE NAME DESIGNED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE DRAWN BY CLIENT PROJECT NO. REVIEWED BY DW G L O C A T I O N : S: \ P R O J E C T S \ 3 4 0 0 0 P R O J \ 3 4 1 0 0 - 3 4 1 9 9 \ 3 4 1 8 1 M A R K E T P L A C E M U L T I - T E N A N T B U I L D I N G L O T 3 - L A K E V I L L E M N \ 3 4 1 8 1 P R O D U C T I O N F I L E S \ C I V I L 3 D \ P R O D U C T I O N D W G S \ 3 4 1 8 1 C 5 - L A N D . D W G S A V E D B Y : JE N N A . V A N B O X T E L SHEET NOT VALID UNLESS THIS TEXT IS COLOR. Page 189 of 485 TENANTTENANT TENANTTENANTTENANT DRIVE-THRU TENANT SPRINKLER RISER & ROOF ACCESS TENANT TENANT STE 102STE 106 TENANT STE 104STE 110 TENANT STE 108 TENANT TENANT A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS MARKETPLACE AT CEDAR LAKEVILLE, MN Mark Revision / Issue Date Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2026 1600 West Lake Street, Suite 127 612-436-4030 Minneapolis, MN 55408 www.archconsort.com PRELIM I N A R Y NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N Page 190 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Water Efficiency Grant Agreement with Metropolitan Council Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a contract with Metropolitan Council for the 2026-2028 Water Efficiency Grant Program. Overview The Metropolitan Council has appropriated funding from the Legacy Amendment’s Clean Water Fund to provide grants to cities for water conservation initiatives that reduce water demand. This is a two-year grant program running from July 2026 through June 2028. The City has successfully participated in this program for several grant cycles and the program has consistently been well received by residents. Grant funds will be used to provide rebates to residents who replace existing fixtures and equipment with WaterSense-labeled, water-efficient devices, including toilets, irrigation controllers and irrigation sprinkler bodies. The Metropolitan Council has awarded Lakeville $48,000 for this grant cycle. As a condition of the grant, participating municipalities must provide a 20 percent local match. Lakeville’s required contribution is estimated at $12,000 resulting in a total rebate program budget of $60,000 available to Lakeville residents over the two-year grant period. Supporting Information 1. Grant Agreement 2. Resolution Financial Impact: $12,000.00 Budgeted: Yes Source: Water Fund Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Shane Quade, Utilities Superintendent Page 191 of 485 City of Lakeville METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CLEAN WATER FUND GRANT AGREEMENT Recipient: City of Lakeville Grant No: SG-26E-03-15 Met Council Action: 2026-95 SW Maximum Grant Amount: $ 48000 Recipient Match (20% of total program excluding low-income option): $ 12000 Recipient’s Authorized Representative: Name: Shane Quade Mailing Address: 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone: 952-985-2741 Email Address: squade@lakevillemn.gov This Clean Water Fund Grant Agreement (“Grant Agreement”) is entered into between the Metropolitan Council, a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (“Met Council”) and the Recipient named above. RECITALS 1. Minnesota Session Laws 2025, Chapter 36, Article 2, Section 8(b), appropriated to the Met Council $1,400,000 in funds from the Legacy Amendment's Clean Water Fund ("Clean Water Fund") for State fiscal years 2026 and 2027, for water demand reduction grants to assist municipalities in the metropolitan area with implementing water demand reduction measures to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. 2. The Met Council is authorized by Minnesota Statutes sections 473.129, subdivision 4 to apply for and use grants from the State for any Metropolitan Council purpose and may dispose of the money in accordance with the terms of the appropriation. 3. The Recipient is authorized to receive grants from the Clean Water Fund for a water demand reduction program to implement measures to reduce water demand to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. 4. On May 13, 2026, the Met Council authorized the granting $1,399,000 of the appropriation to the Recipients participating in the grant program. 5. The Recipient is authorized to receive grants from the Clean Water Fund for a water demand reduction program to implement measures to reduce water demand to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. 6. The Recipient represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this Grant Agreement to the reasonable satisfaction of the Met Council. Page 192 of 485 GRANT AGREEMENT 1. Term of Grant Agreement. 1.1. Effective Date. The Effective Date of this Grant Agreement is the date this agreement is fully executed, provided the Grant Agreement is fully executed on or after July 1, 2026. If the Grant Agreement is fully executed prior to July 1, 2026, the effective date shall be July 1, 2026. 1.2. Grant Activity Period. The Grant Activity Period runs from the Effective Date through the Expiration Date. 1.3. Expiration Date. The Expiration Date is the earlier of Recipient’s satisfactory fulfillment of obligations or June 30, 2028. 1.4. Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration, termination or cancellation of this Grant Agreement: • 9. Liability and Insurance; • 10. Audits; • 11. Government Data Practices; • 13. Data Availability; • 14. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; • 16. Data Disclosure; and • 18.7 Future Eligibility. 2. Duties, Representations and Warranties of Recipient and Use of Grant Funds. 2.1. The Recipient will conduct, administer and complete in a satisfactory manner and in accordance with the terms of this Grant Agreement the program (“Recipient Program”) which is described in Recipient's application to the Met Council for assistance under the Met Council's Clean Water Fund grant program. The Recipient’s application is incorporated into this Grant Agreement as Exhibit A. Recipient will perform the Recipient Program in accordance with the timeline in Exhibit B of this Grant Agreement and to undertake the financial responsibilities described in Exhibit B which is incorporated into this Grant Agreement. The Recipient must complete the Recipient Program as described in Exhibits A and B. The Met Council makes no representation or warranties with respect to the success and effectiveness of the Recipient Program. The Met Council acknowledges that Recipient Program work may be limited to soliciting participation by its residents and businesses in the Recipient Program and requires additional work by the Recipient only to the extent that residents and businesses choose to participate in the Recipient Program, as described in Exhibit B. The Grant Funds must be entirely passed through and can only be used for authorized rebates or grants for qualifying activities. 2.2. Recipient Representations and Warranties. The Recipient represents and warrants to Met Council, as follows: A. It has the legal authority to enter into this Grant Agreement and to conduct and administer the Recipient Program and use the Grant Funds for the purpose or purposes described in this Agreement. B. It has taken all actions necessary for its execution of the Agreement and has provided to Met Council a copy of the resolution by its governing body authorizing Recipient to enter into this Agreement, if required. If a resolution is not required by the Recipient, Recipient shall provide the Met Page 193 of 485 Council documents acceptable to the Council indicating that the appropriate person(s) has authority to enter into this agreement on behalf of the Recipient, such as a city policy or city ordinance. C. It has the legal authority to undertake the Recipient Program, including the Recipient’s financial responsibilities in Exhibit B. D. Only its Authorized Representative may provide certifications required in this Grant Agreement and submit pay claims for reimbursement of Recipient Program costs. E. It will comply with all the terms of this Grant Agreement. F. It will comply with all requirements of Clean Water Funding legislation and appropriations, except for requirements that this Grant Agreement explicitly states will be handled by the Met Council. G. It has made no material false statement or misstatement of fact in connection with the Grant Funds, and all of the information it has submitted or will submit to the Met Council relating to the Grant Funds or the disbursement of any of the Grant Funds is and will be true and correct. It agrees that all representations contained in its application for the Clean Water Fund Grant are material representations of fact upon which the Met Council relied in awarding this Grant and are incorporated into this Agreement by reference. H. It is not in violation of any provisions of its charter or of the laws of the State of Minnesota, and there are no material actions, suits, or proceedings pending, or to its knowledge threatened, before any judicial body or governmental authority against or affecting it and is not in default with respect to any order, writ, injunction, decree, or demand of any court or any governmental authority which would impair its ability to enter into this Grant Agreement, or to perform any of the acts required of it in the Agreement. I. Compliance with the requirements of this Grant Agreement is not prevented by, is a breach of, or will result in a breach of, any term, condition, or provision of any agreement to which it is bound. J. The Recipient Program will not violate any applicable zoning or use statute, ordinance, building code, rule or regulation, or any covenant or agreement of record relating thereto. K. The Recipient Program will be conducted in full compliance with all applicable laws, statutes, rules, ordinances, and regulations issued by any federal, state, or political subdivisions having jurisdiction over the Recipient Program. L. It will comply with the financial responsibility requirements contained in Exhibit B. M. It will furnish satisfactory evidence regarding these representations if requested by the Met Council. 3. Time. Recipient must comply with all time requirements described in this Grant Agreement. In the performance of this Grant Agreement, time is of the essence. 4. Eligible Costs. Eligible costs are those costs incurred by parties within the jurisdiction of the Recipient for 80% of rebate or grant payments as defined in Exhibit B (and not including low-income cost assistance grant Page 194 of 485 activities). The Met Council will not reimburse Recipient for non-eligible costs. Any cost not defined as an eligible cost or not included in the Recipient Program or approved in writing by the Met Council is a non-eligible cost. 5. Consideration and Payment. 5.1 Consideration. The Met Council will reimburse the Recipient for eligible costs performed by the Recipient during the Grant Activity Period up to the Maximum Grant Amount as specified in this agreement. The Met Council bears no responsibility for any cost overruns that may be incurred by the Recipient or any sub-recipients. The Recipient may be eligible to receive additional grant amounts or an adjustment of the Maximum Grant Amount in accordance with the procedure in the Grant Amendment Form attached and incorporated as Exhibit C. A fully executed Exhibit C will amend this Grant by the amount in Exhibit C. 5.2. Advance. The Met Council will make no advance of the Grant Amount to Recipient. 5.3. Payment. To receive payment, the Recipient must submit a Reimbursement Request on forms provided by the Met Council, including electronically scanned receipts to verify the cost of eligible devices reported for each reporting period. Reimbursement Request must be submitted quarterly, even if there are no eligible costs to report. The Recipient must describe its compliance with its the financial requirements, work completed including specific addresses where work was done, and provide sufficient documentation of grant eligible expenditures and any other information the Met Council reasonably requests. The Met Council will promptly pay the Recipient after the Recipient presents to the Met Council a Reimbursement Request and scanned copies of all receipts verifying the cost for all eligible devices reported and the Met Council’s Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. 6. Conditions of Payment. 6.1. For each approved grant activity for which Recipient requests payment, Recipient must certify the following to the Met Council: (1) the device or other grant activity has been purchased or paid for during the Grant Activity Period; (2) Recipient has determined the device, grant activity, or resident (in cases of the low-income cost assistance option), is eligible; (3) Recipient received receipts for the device, installation cost, or other grant activity; and (4) the purchase was not performed in violation of federal, state, or local law, or regulation. 6.2. Conditions Precedent to Any Reimbursement Request. The obligation of the Met Council to make reimbursement payments is subject to the following conditions precedent: A. The Met Council’s receipt of a Reimbursement Request/Progress Report for the funds requested, and electronic copies of receipts verifying the cost for all eligible devices for that reporting period; B. If requested by the Met Council (in form and substance acceptable to the Met Council), evidence that (i) the Recipient has legal authority to and has taken all actions necessary to enter into this Agreement and (ii) this Agreement is binding and enforceable against the Recipient; C. There is no Event of Default under this Grant Agreement or event which would constitute an Event of Default but for the requirement that notice be given or that a period of grace or time elapse; and Page 195 of 485 D. The Recipient has supplied to the Met Council all other items that the Met Council may reasonably require to assure good fiscal oversight of state's funding through the Clean Water Fund. 7. Authorized Representative. The Met Council’s Authorized Representative is: Name: Henry McCarthy or successor Title: Senior Environmental Scientist Mailing Address: 390 North Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone: (651) 602-1946 E-Mail Address: henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us The Met Council’s Authorized Representative has the responsibility to monitor the Recipient’s performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this Grant Agreement. If the services are satisfactory, the Met Council’s Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment. The Recipient’s Authorized Representative is noted on the first page of this Grant Agreement. If the Recipient’s Authorized Representative changes at any time during this Grant Agreement, the Recipient must immediately notify the Met Council and within 30 days provide a new City resolution (if such resolution is necessary) specifying the new Representative. If a resolution is not required by the City, the City’s notification to the Met Council must be in writing. 8. Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, Grant Agreement Complete, and Order of Precedence. 8.1 Assignment. The Recipient may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Grant Agreement without the prior written consent of the Met Council and a fully executed Assignment Agreement. 8.2 Amendments. Except as provided in this Section 8.2, any amendment to this Grant Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the appropriate parties. If requested by the Recipient in writing, the Met Council may, at its sole discretion, authorize in writing a minor change (administrative, compliance, or operational adjustments that do not alter the core scope, objectives, or funding level of the award) to the Recipient Program in Exhibit A, without a formal executed amendment to this Grant Agreement. Met Council further reserves the right to amend grant agreements, in collaboration with grantee municipality, if quarterly reporting indicates rebate or grant programs will not fully utilize grant awards within the grant period or for other documented purposes that will advance the legislative objectives of the pilot program. 8.3 Waiver. If the Met Council fails to enforce any provision of this Grant Agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it. 8.4 Grant Agreement Complete. This Grant Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the Met Council and the Recipient. No other understanding regarding this Grant Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. 8.5 Order of Precedence. This Grant Agreement will be interpreted in the following order of precedence: (1) Grant Agreement excluding exhibits; Page 196 of 485 (2) Exhibit B; and (3) Exhibit A. 9. Liability and Insurance. 9.1 Liability. The Recipient and the Met Council are each responsible for their own acts and the acts of their employees and the results thereof. To the extent authorized by law, a party is not responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The liability of the Parties is governed by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and other applicable laws. Neither Party waives any applicable limits on liability or immunities. 9.2 Relationship of the Parties. Nothing contained in this Grant Agreement is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of co-partners or a joint venture between the Recipient and the Met Council, nor will the Recipient be considered or deemed to be an agent, representative, or employee of the Met Council in the performance of this Grant Agreement, or the Recipient Program. The Recipient represents that it has already or will secure or cause to be secured all personnel required for the performance of this Grant Agreement and the Recipient Program. All personnel of the Recipient or other persons while engaging in the performance of this Grant Agreement or the Recipient Program will not have any contractual relationship with the Met Council related to the work of the Recipient Program and will not be considered employees of the Met Council. In addition, all claims that may arise on behalf of said personnel or other persons out of employment or alleged employment including, but not limited to, claims under the Workers’ Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota, claims of discrimination against the Recipient, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees will in no way be the responsibility of the Met Council. Such personnel or other persons may not require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the Met Council, including but not limited to, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, disability benefits, severance pay and retirement benefits. 10. Audits. Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, the Recipient’s books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Grant Agreement are subject to examination by the Met Council and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the termination date of this Grant Agreement. 11. Government Data Practices. The Recipient and Met Council must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Chapter 13, as it applies to all data provided by the Met Council under this grant contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Recipient under this Grant Agreement. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Recipient or the Met Council. If the Recipient receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause, the Recipient must immediately notify the Met Council. 12. Workers’ Compensation. The Recipient certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. § 176.181, subd. 2, pertaining to workers’ compensation insurance coverage. The Recipient’s employees and agents will not be Page 197 of 485 considered Met Council employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no way the Met Council’s obligation or responsibility. 13. Data Availability. To the extent and as requested by the Met Council, Recipient agrees to comply with Minn. Stat. § 114D.50, subd. 5 requirements for data collected by the Recipient Programs funded with money from the Clean Water Fund that have value for planning and management of natural resources, emergency preparedness and infrastructure investments, including but not limited to the requirement that to the extent practicable, summary data and results of Recipient Programs funded with money from the Clean Water Fund should be readily accessible on the internet and identified as a Clean Water Fund Recipient Program. The Met Council will put overall summary information on the internet and will encourage the Recipient put its municipality information on the web. Recipient understands and agrees that Met Council may list its name and summary information on the internet or in any other Grantor reporting. Data collected by the Recipient Program, if any, funded with money from the Clean Water Fund that have value for planning and management of natural resources, emergency preparedness, and infrastructure investments must conform to the enterprise information architecture developed by the Department of Information Technology Services. Spatial data must conform to geographic information system guidelines and standards outlined in that architecture and adopted by the Minnesota Geographic Data Clearinghouse at the Minnesota Geospatial Information Office. A description of these data that adheres to the Department of Information Technology Services geographic metadata standards must be submitted to the Minnesota Geospatial Information Office to be made available online through the clearinghouse and the data must be accessible and free to the public unless made private under chapter 13. To the extent practicable, summary data and results of projects funded with money from the clean water fund should be readily accessible on the Internet and identified as a clean water fund project. 14. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue. This Grant Agreement will be construed and enforced under the laws of the State of Minnesota without regard to its conflict of law provisions. The venue for any legal proceedings arising out of this Grant Agreement will be the appropriate state or federal court in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 15. Termination. The Met Council may cancel this Grant Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days’ written notice to the Recipient. Upon termination, the Recipient will be entitled to payment for services prequalified and satisfactorily performed before the termination notice. 16. Data Disclosure. Under Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, subd. 3, and other applicable law, the Recipient consents to disclosure of its federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the Met Council, to federal and state tax agencies and Met Council personnel involved in the payment of Met Council obligations. Recipient will require compliance with this Section 16 by Recipient’s subrecipient of Grant funds and shall submit evidence of such compliance to Met Council as requested. 17. Notices. Page 198 of 485 In addition to any notice required under applicable law to be given in another manner, any notices required hereunder must be in writing and must be personally served or sent by email or United States mail, to the Authorized Representative of the party to whom it is directed. 18. Miscellaneous. 18.1 Report to Legislature. As provided in Minn. Stat. § 3.195, the Met Council must submit a report on the expenditure and use of money appropriated under the Clean Water Fund to the legislature by January 15 of each year. The report must detail the outcomes in terms of additional use of Clean Water Fund resources, user satisfaction surveys, and other appropriate outcomes. The Recipient agrees to provide to the Met Council by January 1 of each year a report on any user satisfaction surveys it has related to this Recipient Program, and other appropriate outcomes of the Recipient Program as prescribed in Section 18.3 of this Agreement. 18.2 Supplement. The funds granted under this agreement are to supplement and shall not substitute for traditional sources of funding. Recipient certifies to the Met Council that there was and is no traditional Recipient sources of funding for the grant work, as described in Exhibit A. 18.3 Measurable Outcomes. A Recipient Program or program receiving funding from the Clean Water Fund must meet or exceed the constitutional requirement to protect, enhance, and restore water quality in lakes, rivers and streams and to protect groundwater and drinking water from degradation. A Recipient Program or program receiving funding from the Clean Water Fund must include measurable outcomes, as defined in Minn. Stat. § 3.303, subdivision 10, and a plan for measuring and evaluating the results. A Recipient Program or program must be consistent with current science and incorporate state-of-the-art technology. All information for funded Recipient Program work, including the proposed measurable outcomes, must be made available for publication on the web site required under Minn. Stat. § 3.303, subdivision 10, as soon as practicable and forwarded to the Met Council and the Legislative Coordinating Commission under the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 3.303, subd. 10. The Recipient must compile and submit all information for funded Recipient Programs or programs, including the proposed measurable outcomes and all other items required under Minn. Stat. § 3.303, subdivision 10, to the Met Council and, if requested by the Met Council, the Legislative Coordinating Commission as soon as practicable or by January 15 of the applicable fiscal year, whichever comes first. 18.4 Minn. Stat. § 16B.98. Grants funded by the Clean Water Fund must be implemented according to section 16B.98 and must account for all expenditures. 18.5 Benefit to Minnesota Waters. Money from the Clean Water Fund may only be spent on Recipient Programs that benefit Minnesota waters. 18.6 Website. If the Recipient has information on its website about the water efficiency grant program under Minn. Stat. § 114D.50, the Recipient will when practicable in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 114D.50, subd. 4(f) prominently display on the Recipient’s website home page the Legacy logo accompanied by the phrase "Click here for more information." When a person clicks on the Legacy logo image, the website must direct the person to a web page that includes both the contact information that a person may use to obtain additional information, as well as a link to the Met Council’s and Legislative Coordinating Commission Website required under section 3.303, subdivision 10. 18.7 Future Eligibility. Future eligibility for money from the Clean Water Fund is contingent upon the Recipient satisfying all application requirements related to Met Council’s fulfillment of Minn. Stat. § 114D.50 as well as any additional requirements contained in Minnesota Session Laws 2025, Chapter 36, Article 2, Section 8(b). Page 199 of 485 18.8 Prevailing Wages. The Recipient agrees to comply with all of the applicable provisions contained in chapter 177 of the Minnesota Statutes, and specifically those provisions contained in Minn. Stat. §§ 177.41 through 177.50, as they may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time with respect to the Recipient Program. By agreeing to this provision, the Recipient is not acknowledging or agreeing that the cited provisions apply to the Recipient Program. 18.9 Disability Access. Where appropriate, Recipient of clean water funds, in consultation with the Council on Disability and other appropriate governor-appointed disability councils, boards, committees, and commissions, should make progress toward providing greater access to programs, print publications, and digital media for people with disabilities related to the programs the recipient funds using appropriations made in this agreement. 18.10. General Provisions. (i) Lawsuit. This Grant shall be canceled if a court determines that the appropriation illegally substitutes for a traditional source of funding. (ii) Termination Due to Lack of Funds. Recipient recognizes that Met Council’s obligation to reimburse Recipient for eligible Recipient Program costs is dependent upon Met Council’s receipt of funds from the State of Minnesota appropriated to Met Council under 2025 Session Law, Chapter 40, Article 2, Section 8(b). Should the State of Minnesota terminate such appropriation or should such funds become unavailable to Met Council for any reason, Met Council shall, upon written notice to Recipient of termination or unavailability of such funds, have no further obligations for reimbursement or otherwise under this Grant Agreement. In the event of such written notice, Recipient has no further obligation to complete the Recipient Program as required by this Grant Agreement. 18.11. Counterparts and Electronic Signatures. This Grant Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when executed will be deemed to be an original and the counterparts will together constitute one agreement. A copy of this Grant Agreement, including its signature pages, will be binding and deemed to be an original. Electronic signatures using Adobe Sign or a similar program will be deemed an original signature. 19. Default and Remedies. 19.1 Defaults. The Recipient's failure to fully comply with any of the provisions contained in this Grant Agreement constitute an event of default ("Event of Default"). 19.2. Remedies. Upon an event of default, the Met Council may exercise any one or more of the following remedies: a. Refrain from disbursing the Grant; b. Demand that all or any portion of the Grant already disbursed be repaid to it, and upon such demand the Recipient shall repay such amount to the Met Council; and c. Enforce any additional remedies the Met Council may have at law or in equity. Page 200 of 485 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL By: ________________________________ Regional Administrator, successor, or delegate Date: _______________________________ RECIPIENT: The Recipient certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the this agreement on behalf of the Recipient as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: ________________________________ _____________________________________ Printed Name and Title Date: _______________________________ Page 201 of 485 EXHIBIT A: Application from community Page 202 of 485 Page - 1 2026 – 2028 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WATER EFFICIENCY GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION FORM updated 02 / 25 / 2026 1. Applicant information: MUNICIPALITY: City of Lakeville MUNICIPAL UTILITY: Utilities Department MAILING ADDRESS: 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 2. Primary contact information: Municipality primary authorized representative (all correspondence regarding the Water Efficiency Grant Program should be addressed to individual named below): Name: Shane Quade Title: Utilities Superintendent Phone: 952-985-2741 Email: squade@lakevillemn.gov Mailing Address: 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 3. Secondary contact information: Municipality secondary authorized representative: Name: Melissa Smith Title: Utilities Administrative Assistant Phone: 952-985-2708 Email: msmith@lakevillemn.gov Mailing Address: 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Page 203 of 485 Page - 2 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 4. Water use information: Municipal Total Per Capita Water Use, in gallons per person-day (2025): 88.8 Municipal Residential Per Capita Water Use, in gallons per person-day (2025): 76.5 Municipal Ratio of Peak Month to Winter Month Water Use (2025): 1.9 Program design The following questions help describe the type of program your municipality is proposing, including planned grant activities and optional program elements. For more information about the low-income cost assistance option and grant activities on municipal properties, see the Guidelines document. 5. Will your proposed program be a rebate or grant program? Rebate program 6. Will your proposed program include a low-income cost assistance option? No 7. Will your proposed program include approved grant activities on municipal properties (for example, device replacements or turfgrass conversion)? No 8. If your proposed program includes approved grant activities on municipal properties, does the funding supplement and not supplant? (Additional documentation may be requested.) No 9. Approximately what portion of your requested grant amount will be used for approved grant activities on municipal properties? None Page 204 of 485 Page - 3 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 10. Planned grant activities Which eligible grant activities will your program include? Please provide an estimated number of device replacements/other grant activities for each category you plan to include in your program. Grant activity Property type Residential Commercial Municipal In d o o r w a t e r u s e Toilet replacement 300 Clothes washer replacement 0 Dishwasher replacement 0 Showerhead replacement 0 Faucet replacement or faucet accessory 0 Ou t d o o r wa t e r u s e Irrigation system audit* 0 Irrigation controller replacement* 100 Irrigation spray sprinkler body replacement* 100 Turfgrass conversion/replacement * Please note, the Met Council strongly encourages an irrigation system audit be conducted before the replacement of an irrigation controller or spray sprinkler bodies. An initial audit ensures the user has information for proper set-up and operation of their irrigation system. 11. Estimated water savings per device from WaterSense and Energy Star (if available) will auto- populate in quarterly reporting forms to establish baseline consistency in estimates. Some municipalities may have developed (or plan to develop) specific water savings calculations based on household size, age of device being replaced, and other factors. Municipalities are welcome to submit water savings estimates other than those provided by the WaterSense and Energy Star programs. If your municipality has plans to calculate estimated water savings in-house or using an external resource, please describe below. Lakeville plans to use the estimated water savings from WaterSense. Page 205 of 485 Page - 4 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 12. If your proposed program includes grant activities at municipal properties, please walk through your plans for device replacements and/or turfgrass conversion. In the case of turfgrass conversion, please describe where the work will occur, area removed, species removed, area replaced, species replaced, watering and maintenance needs, and estimated annual gallons of water saved (with explanation of estimate). N/A Page 206 of 485 Page - 5 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Program budget and administration 13. Please outline the amount of funding your municipality is requesting, including – if applicable – an estimate of funds that will be used for low-income cost assistance (no municipality match required). Grants will be made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $75,000. In the event that there are unused or returned funds, municipalities may apply for a grant amendment to increase their award beyond $75,000 (at the discretion of Met Council). Additionally, if a municipality offers low-income cost assistance, it can apply for an additional $10,000 (max grant of $85,000). A Requested grant amount (must be 80% of row C): 56,000 B Required municipality matching amount (must be 20% of row C): 14,000 C Traditional grant program subtotal (row A + row B): 70,000 D (OPTIONAL) Low-income cost assistance requested amount (100% covered by Met Council funds): 0 E Total program budget (row C + row D): 70,000 Example calculation: A Requested grant amount (must be 80% of row C): $16,000 B Required municipality matching amount (must be 20% of row C): $4,000 C Traditional grant program subtotal (row A + row B): $20,000 D (OPTIONAL) Low-income cost assistance requested amount (100% covered by Met Council funds): $5,000 E Total program budget (row C + row D): $25,000 Page 207 of 485 Page - 6 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 14. Please outline what cost coverage your municipality plans to offer for each of the selected grant activities. For example: 70% of the cost of a toilet, up to a maximum of $200. Limited to 2 per household. Toilets-50% of cost up to a maximum of $200 for toilets replaced with a US EPA WaterSense labeled toilet. Maximum four toilets. Irrigation (lawn sprinkler) controllers-50% of cost up to $200 for irrigation controllers replaced with a US EPA WaterSense labeled controller. Maximum one controller per residence. Home-Owner Associations (HOA’s) will be ineligible for irrigation product rebates. Irrigation sprinkler body replacement-75% of the cost of each sprinkler body up to $10 per sprinkler body, limited to $100 for irrigation sprinkler body replacement with a US EPA WaterSense labeled spray sprinkler body. Home-Owner Associations (HOA’s) will be ineligible for irrigation product rebates. 15. Please indicate ways in which you will advertise your program and water conservation. (Examples to be provided in program work plan.) Newsletter X Radio Flyer in water bill Television Email Newspaper Tabling at events X TikTok Municipality website X Instagram X Billboard / physical display Facebook X Nextdoor X Other 16. Work plan In your application submission, please attach a work plan that details the municipality’s schedule, strategy for promoting the program and communications with potential participants – including example communications, program administration, and spending down the requested grant amount by 6/30/28. Example work plan structure: Task description Responsible person Start date Completion date ATTACHED Page 208 of 485 Page - 7 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Evaluating applications Program proposals will be evaluated based on the answers provided in the application form as well as the attached work plan. Strong applications will include clear answers to the questions in the application form and a thoughtful work plan that outlines strategies for structuring, administering, and promoting (if applicable) the program. For municipalities intending to conduct grant activities on municipal property, applications should include intended plans for device/landscape installation and estimated hours/cost of labor (whether being done by the municipality or a contractor). In the event that funds requested exceed funds available, the following criteria will be used to determine the amount granted to a given municipality. • Municipal residential per capita water use • Municipal ratio of peak month to winter month water use • Estimated water savings from proposed program Additionally, municipalities may be asked to provide additional information and/or be awarded less than their requested grant amount if their application is lacking detail, a clear work plan, etc. In future grant cycles, a past participant’s record of spending down their award may be used to inform award amounts. Applications are due by April 13, 2026 Page 209 of 485 Page - 8 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL City of Lakeville Water Efficiency Grant Schedule Task Responsible Person Start Date Completion Date Design rebate program to accept toilets, irrigation controllers, and irrigation spray bodies as qualifying items. Shane Quade/Melissa Smith 4/10/26 4/14/26 Develop PDF rebate reimbursement form for Lakeville residents and businesses. Shane Quade/Melissa Smith 4/14/26 4/14/26 Develop webpage dedicated to the Water Efficiency Grant Rebate Program. Tierney Helmers, Communications Dept. 4/14/26 4/15/26 Choose methods for rebate program advertisement. Shane Quade/Tierney Helmers/Melissa Smith 4/14/26 4/15/26 Submit completed grant application to MCES. Melissa Smith By 4/15/26 Receive notification of grant award from Metropolitan Counsel. Shane Quade PENDING Bring Resolution to Lakeville City Council for the approval of funds provided by MCES for the Water Efficiency Grant. Shane Quade 5/18/26 5/18/26 Advertise rebate program on Instagram, Facebook, City of Lakeville website, Nextdoor app, Bi-weekly ad in SunThisweek newspaper, ad in 8-page quarterly editions Shane Quade/Tierney Helmers, Communication Dept. 7/1/26 Throughout rebate depending on rebate interest. Receive rebate request forms from residents and businesses. Send approved rebates to Utility Billing for rebate distribution. Melissa Smith 7/1/2026 Throughout rebate depending on rebate interest and/or June 30, 2028. Submit quarterly grant reimbursement to MCES. Melissa Smith TBD Quarterly, until funds are depleted. Retain records of property information, type and number of devices purchased within the rebate program, and amount of money from MCES, each resident, and from City of Lakeville. Melissa Smith 7/1/26 6/30/2028, or until funds are depleted. Page 210 of 485 Water Efficiency Grant Social Media Examples City Website Scan the QR code to see the Lakeville Water Efficiency Grant webpage or https://www.lakevillemn.gov/WaterEfficiencyRebate Instagram (6,800 followers) Instagram will consist of a 17-second reel. NextDoor app (28,000 members) Page 211 of 485 Facebook (14,500 followers) Page 212 of 485 EXHIBIT B: Grant program guidelines Page 213 of 485 2026 – 2028 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WATER EFFICIENCY GRANT PROGRAM GUIDELINES updated 02 / 26 / 2026 1. Overview The Metropolitan Council (Met Council) will implement a Water Efficiency Grant Program (WEGP) effective July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2028. Grants will be awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that operate or are served by a municipal public water supply system. In this program, municipalities design and operate their own rebate or grant programs, which are funded by the Met Council with pass-through funds from the Clean Water Land & Legacy Amendment. The Met Council will provide 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20% of the program cost. The WEGP focuses on grant activities that reduce existing water use at residential, commercial, and municipal properties. Met Council-approved grant activities include the replacement of specific water- using devices with more efficient alternatives, irrigation system audits, and the conversion of turfgrass to low-input, drought-tolerant landscapes at municipal properties. Residents and businesses participating in a municipality’s program must be connected to municipal water. Grants will be made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $75,000. In the event that there are unused or returned funds, municipalities may apply for a grant amendment to increase their award beyond $75,000 (at the discretion of Met Council). Grantees will be required to submit quarterly reimbursement requests and provide actual or estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. Grant program goal The goal of the Water Efficiency Grant Program is to support technical and behavioral changes that improve municipal water use efficiency in the seven-county metropolitan area. Changes for 2026-2028 Several changes to the WEGP have been made from past grant cycles. These changes are outlined in the bulleted list below. • Maximum grant amount: $50,000 $75,000 • Clearer guidelines for grant activity/device eligibility and property type o Faucets and faucet accessories added o Flushing urinals and flushometer-valve toilets added o Commercial clothes washers and commercial dishwashers added • Met Council strongly encourages (not a requirement) that an irrigation system audit be conducted before the replacement of an irrigation controller or spray sprinkler bodies. An irrigation system audit from an Irrigation Professional certified by a US EPA WaterSense Page 214 of 485 program ensures the user has information for proper set-up and operation of their irrigation system. • Municipal facility grant activity option added o Replacement of water using devices in municipal properties o Property turfgrass conversion/replacement • Low-income cost assistance option added (additional $10,000 available to expand maximum grant amount to $85,000) o Full cost coverage for eligible residents on indoor water use devices • Updated reporting form • Standardized estimated water savings built into reporting for most grant activities (with option for municipalities to provide more specific water savings estimates) Additional detail about the low-income cost assistance option, newly eligible devices/grant activities, and new eligibility requirements is provided in the following pages. Critical points to remember • The applying municipality must be served by a municipal public water supply system • New construction and new developments are not eligible • A portion of each eligible grant activity’s cost must be paid by the property owner • Funds are for rebates or grants only; consulting and city staff time are ineligible • Grant recipients must display the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment logo and the Metropolitan Council logo on program-related web pages and paper communications • Applications are due April 13, 2026 • Funds must be spent down by June 30, 2028 (municipalities and Met Council will work together to monitor spending and adjust/reallocate funds as needed) • Grant activities on municipal properties must supplement and not supplant dedicated municipal funding sources 2. Grant program structure Administration and funding source The 2026-2028 WEGP will be administered by the Met Council and will be funded with $1,400,000 appropriated by the 2025 Minnesota Legislature. Grant applications will be reviewed and scored by Metropolitan Council Water Resources staff. Legislative Directive: Minnesota 2025 Session Law $650,000 the first year and $750,000 the second year are for grants that implement water demand reduction measures. The grants are to assist municipalities in the metropolitan area with implementing water demand reduction measures to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. Grants will be awarded to municipalities in amounts ranging from $5,000 to $75,000 for providing rebates or grants to property owners and their renters. (An additional $10,000 will be available for Low Income Cost Assistance, as discussed below). Municipalities will be responsible for the design and operation of their rebate or grant program and its details. Grant payments to the municipality will be for 80% of approved program amounts. The municipality must provide the remaining 20% of the granted/rebated amount to the property owner. Municipality rebates or grants are eligible for reimbursement on device replacements and other approved grant activities conducted July 1, 2026 Page 215 of 485 through June 30, 2028 (purchases of eligible devices or grant activities must be made on or after the day the grant agreement is fully executed). Grant program components Each municipality is expected to design their own program to whatever meets their community needs. Three potential components are residential/commercial grant activities, municipal grant activities, and low-income cost assistance for residential properties. Municipalities may include any combination of property type and grant activity offering in their program design. Program design has varied by municipality among past participants, with some focusing on a single type of device replacement such as toilets, and others offering a range of options. In the application form and work plan, municipalities will be asked to lay out the grant activities and property types that would be included in the proposed program. While past grant cycles have occasionally included participants pursuing commercial- and municipal-focused grant activities, the 2026-2028 WEGP guidelines more clearly define, and expand, the options available to municipalities that are interested in designing commercial- or internal-facing programs. Residential and/or commercial grant activities Municipalities may choose to design their programs to include grant activities at residential and commercial properties. This the most common approach among participating communities. The participating community selects which devices or other approved grant activities (irrigation audits) to offer to residents or businesses within the municipality. The participating community also determines how much of an eligible grant activity’s cost is covered by the program. Property owners must pay a portion of the eligible grant activity’s cost. Eligible grant activities for residential and commercial properties are listed in the table in the Eligible Grant Activities section. Municipal grant activities Municipalities may also choose to design their programs to include grant activities occurring on municipal properties. Grant activities eligible for municipal properties are device replacements, irrigation system audits, and the conversion of existing turfgrass to low-input landscaping/drought-tolerant alternative turf. Municipalities that choose to conduct grant activities on municipal properties shall provide measured water savings (ideally) or calculated water savings estimates. These municipalities will also be required to display signage near the grant activity areas that includes the Metropolitan Council and Clean Water Fund logos as well as an explanation of the work done. Participating municipalities must cover the 20% “municipal match” as normal. This funding is intended to promote and supplement funding for device replacement or turf grass conversion efforts. It is not intended to supplant dedicated municipal funding sources for projects. Eligible grant activities for municipal properties are listed in the table in the Eligible Grant Activities section. Low-income cost assistance grant activities Municipalities operating a residential-facing rebate or grant program may elect to include a low-income cost assistance option in their program. Residents or households who meet a certain income threshold are eligible to receive full cost coverage* for the replacement of one indoor water-using device (toilet, clothes washer, dishwasher, showerhead, or faucet/faucet accessory) with a WaterSense or Energy Star alternative. If a municipality decides to offer the low-income cost assistance option, they can apply for an additional $10,000 (max grant amount of $85,000). Page 216 of 485 Municipalities that choose to include this option in their residential rebate or grant programs will be required to verify resident eligibility. No municipal match will be required. Residents are eligible for this cost assistance element if: • The resident is enrolled in a county assistance program o Hennepin County Water Assistance Program o Ramsey and Washington Counties Water Bill Assistance o Scott, Carver, Dakota Counties Energy Assistance Program Scott County Financial Assistance Carver County Emergency Programs Dakota County Emergency Assistance o Anoka County Energy Assistance • The resident is enrolled in SNAP benefits Eligibility for low-income cost assistance can be verified with appropriate paperwork showing participation in one of the above programs. *Cost of device and installation is fully covered by Met Council up to: • $550 for toilets • $1200 for clothes washers • $1200 for dishwashers • $100 for showerheads • $100 for faucets and faucet accessories Application funding request The application form will include a table like the one below, where applying municipalities will lay out their funding request. Row A is the requested grant amount, which covers grant activities at any combination of property types and makes up 80% of the traditional grant program subtotal. Row B is the required municipality match of 20% of the traditional grant program subtotal. Row C is the traditional grant program subtotal. In Row D, applying municipalities may enter the low-income cost assistance amount they expect to spend. The funds in Row D do not require a municipality match. Row E is the sum of Rows C and D. A Requested grant amount for residential, commercial, or municipal grant activities (funding from Met Council) (80% of traditional grant program subtotal): $16,000 B Required municipality matching amount (20% of traditional grant program subtotal): $4,000 C Traditional grant program subtotal (sum of Met Council grant amount and required municipality match): $20,000 D (OPTIONAL) Low-income cost assistance requested amount (funding from Met Council) (100% covered by Met Council funds): $5,000 E Total program budget (sum of traditional grant program subtotal and low-income cost assistance funds): $25,000 Page 217 of 485 *in cases where municipalities have opted in to the low-income cost assistance element, the percent covered by Met Council may exceed 80% Eligibility Requirements for applying municipalities This grant program is limited to municipalities in the seven-county metropolitan area that operate or are served by a municipal public water supply system. Grants are only for water efficiency programs offering rebates or grants to property owners and their renters who are customers of the municipal water supply system and who replace specified water-using devices with approved devices that use substantially less water (or conduct other grant activities such as irrigation audits or, for municipalities, turfgrass conversion). In municipalities where only some neighborhoods or areas are served by a municipal public water supply system, only those served by the municipal public water supply system are eligible. Municipalities eligible per above must apply to participate and, if approved, sign a Met Council Grant Agreement, before any eligible rebates or grants can be submitted for reimbursement. Agreements shall require that municipalities: • Entirely pass through grants received (as is being done by Met Council) • Verify purchase of devices or other grant activities to receive grants • Retain records and cooperate with any audits • Conduct all communications with property owners and ensure all written communications to property owners include both the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment and the Metropolitan Council’s logo • Provide quantitative information for state reporting purposes Page 218 of 485 Eligible grant activities The table below walks through the approved grant activities in the WEGP. Included in the table is information related to the property type (residential, commercial, municipal) where grant activities occur as well as information about estimated water savings. Expenses eligible for reimbursement are the out-of-pocket cost of the device and its installation only, not to include any owner labor costs. In addition, new construction and new developments are ineligible as this program is intended as a current infrastructure replacement program. Eligible grant activity (with hyperlink to product lookup tool) Estimated water savings Indoor water use Toilets Residential toilet replacement with a WaterSense labeled residential toilet 13,000 gallons per year (source) Commercial / Municipal toilet replacement with a WaterSense labeled commercial toilet 790 gallons when replacing a 1.6gpf model and 5,500 when replacing a 3.5gpf model Commercial / Municipal urinal replacement with a WaterSense labeled urinal 4,600 gallons per year (source) Clothes washing machines Residential clothes washing machine replacement with an Energy Star labeled residential clothes washer 2,700 gallons per year (based on WRF average clothes washer use and Energy Star estimated percent savings) Commercial clothes washing machine replacement with an Energy Star labeled commercial clothes washer 45% less water than standard models (source) Dishwashers Residential dishwasher replacement with an Energy Star labeled residential dishwasher 8,400 gallons per year (source) Commercial dishwasher replacement with an Energy Star labeled commercial clothes washer 5,600 gallons per year (source) Showerhead replacement with a WaterSense labeled showerhead 2,700 gallons per year (source) Faucet replacement or faucet accessory with a WaterSense labeled faucet or faucet accessory 700 gallons per year (source) Page 219 of 485 Outdoor water use Irrigation system audit by an Irrigation Professional certified by a US EPA WaterSense program See report from Irrigation Professional who conducted audit Irrigation controllers (Met Council strongly encourages an irrigation system audit before the installation of a new smart controller) Irrigation controller replacement with a WaterSense labeled weather-based controller (this type of controller is most common) 7,600 gallons per year (source) Irrigation controller replacement with a WaterSense labeled soil moisture-based controller 15,000 gallons per year (source) Irrigation spray sprinkler body replacement with a WaterSense labeled spray sprinkler body (Met Council strongly encourages an irrigation system audit before the installation of new spray sprinkler bodies) 5,600 per year (for an average household using 50,500 gallons outdoors, operating at or above 60 pounds per square inch) (source) Turfgrass conversion/replacement to a low-input, drought-tolerant landscape at municipal properties (Municipal properties only) Refer to municipality’s pre- and post- replacement water use to calculate water savings. If unable to measure specific water use, municipality will provide estimated annual water savings with explanation of calculation. Please note, the Met Council strongly encourages an irrigation system audit be conducted before the replacement of an irrigation controller or spray sprinkler bodies. An initial audit ensures the user has information for proper set-up and operation of their irrigation system. Page 220 of 485 Quarterly reporting Reporting requirements and payment process Utilizing a reporting form provided by Met Council, the following information about each grant activity must be reported on a quarterly basis: • Property address and property type (residential, commercial, municipal) • Low-income assistance (Y/N) (if applicable) • Grant activity (device replacement, audit, or municipal turfgrass conversion) • Brand/model info of new device • Purchase date (must be on or after effective date of grant agreement) • Cost per device/approved grant activity • Number of devices/activities • Rebate or grant per device • Estimated annual gallons of water saved per device installation/approved grant activity • Optional notes column for explaining water use calculations if different from those provided • Municipality matching funds disbursed • Number of unmet funding requests from property owners, if any Municipalities are required to submit a signed and dated quarterly reporting form as well as a PDF(s) of receipts corresponding to each entry in the quarterly reporting form. Upon review and confirmation of the above information, Met Council will process a grant payment in the amount of 80% of approved total rebates or grants for the reporting period (in cases where municipalities have opted in to the low-income cost assistance element, the percent covered by Met Council may exceed 80%). Met Council will provide confirmation of grant balances available upon request and reserves the right to amend grant agreements, in collaboration with grantee municipality, if quarterly reporting indicates rebate or grant programs will not fully utilize grant awards within the grant period. Determining estimated water savings Annual water savings estimates may come from a variety of sources. Manufacturers may include water savings estimates in their device descriptions or specifications, irrigation professionals report estimated savings after performing an irrigation system audit, and some past participants of the WEGP have calculated specific water savings estimates based on factors such as household size. Unless a city has specifically calculated estimated water savings or is referring to manufacturer or audit estimates, the recommended sources for estimated water savings are WaterSense and Energy Star. Water savings estimates from WaterSense and Energy Star are included in the table of eligible grant activities. In quarterly reports, municipalities will be asked to note the source of their estimates if they different from the estimates provided above. In the case of irrigation system audits and turfgrass conversion on municipal properties, estimates have not been provided by Met Council as these metrics will be calculated by an Irrigation Professional or the municipality, respectively. In any situation where it is possible to report actual water savings, this is preferred. Page 221 of 485 3. Application process Application requirements The application window for the 2026-2028 Water Efficiency Grant Program will open on Friday, March 13, 2026. Applications are due by Monday, April 13, 2026. The application form will be available on the Met Council website. Required information in the application form includes: o the municipality’s rebate or grant program design and work plan o proposed examples of communications to property owners o requested total grant amount o estimated annual amount of water saved by the applying municipality • Application form is available at: https://metrocouncil.org/Wastewater-Water/Funding- Finance/Available-Funding-Grants.aspx • Submit competed application to: henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us • Metropolitan Council will notify municipalities of grant awards in approximately May 2026 Evaluating applications Program proposals will be evaluated based on the answers provided in the application form as well as the attached work plan. Strong applications will include clear answers to the questions in the application form and a thoughtful work plan that outlines strategies for structuring, administering, and promoting (if applicable) the program. For municipalities intending to conduct grant activities on municipal property, applications should include intended plans for device/landscape installation and estimated hours/cost of labor (whether being done by the municipality or a contractor). In the event that funds requested exceed funds available, the following criteria will be used to determine the amount granted to a given municipality: • Municipal residential per capita water use • Municipal ratio of peak month to winter month water use • Estimated water savings from proposed program Additionally, municipalities may be asked to provide additional information and/or be awarded less than their requested grant amount if their application is lacking detail, a clear work plan, etc. In future grant cycles, a past participant’s record of spending down their award may be used to inform award amounts. Page 222 of 485 EXHIBIT C: Grant amendment form Revision # METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 2026-2028 CLEAN WATER FUND WATER EFFICIENCY GRANT PROGRAM GRANT AMENDMENT FORM NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: Submission of this form is required to modify the Maximum Grant Amount in your Grant Agreement with Metropolitan Council 2026-2028 Clean Water Fund Water Efficiency Grant Program (Grant Program). After determination of your municipality’s Maximum Grant Amount, completion and submission of this form is necessary when 1) you are requesting additional grant funds to meet unexpected rebate or grant demand, or 2) when your municipality has determined that the previously approved program’s rebate or grant demand will not be met, requiring less grant funds than anticipated when the agreement was signed, or 3) when your municipality wishes to substantially change the structure of its program from what was described in the application form and the work plan supplied in the application form. The process for modifying your Grant Agreement is as follows: 1. Your municipality’s authorized representative submits one signed copy of Exhibit C to the Met Council, with any additional information requested by Met Council. 2. Upon receipt and any Met Council approval of signed Exhibit C, the Met Council’s authorized representative will obtain Met Council authorized signatures returns a fully executed copy of Exhibit C indicating the new Maximum Grant Amount to Municipality’s designated authorized representative. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Instructions: Indicate the date of your change request in #1 box. Indicate the number of this particular change request in #2 box (and in box at top of page – must match). Enter the current grant agreement amount (as Met Council approved) in #3 box. If you wish to increase your municipality’s grant amount, enter the amount you are requesting in #4 box. If you wish to decrease your grant amount due to less demand than anticipated, enter the amount in #5 box. Enter in #6 box the amount derived from adding #3 to #4 or derived from subtracting #5 from #3. If you do not wish to modify your municipality’s Maximum Grant Amount, leave boxes #4, #5, and #6 blank or enter “N/A.” If you wish to secure approval for changes to the scope of the approved project in the Water Efficiency Grant Program application form, please document the reasons for the amendment in box #7. Please specify what changes are desired in box #8. Please note that all other requirements as found in the Grant Agreement continue to apply. Page 223 of 485 Grant Agreement # 1. Date of change request: 2. Change request number: 3. Current Grant Agreement Amount (as Met Council approved): 4. Increase due to request for additional funding: 5. Decrease due to less demand: 6. Amended Maximum Grant Agreement Amount requested: 7. Reasons for modifying program structure: 8. Proposed changes to program structure: MUNICIPALITY NAME:_________________________________________________________________ MUNICIPALITY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (signature and date): Page 224 of 485 ______________________________________________________________________________________ METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL (signature and date): ______________________________________________________________________________________ METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AND DATE ______________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Questions may be directed to the Met Council Authorized Representative: Page 225 of 485 Page 226 of 485 CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. 26- Resolution Approving a Grant Agreement with the Metropolitan Council for the 2026-2028 Water Efficiency Grant WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has awarded the City of Lakeville $48,000 in funding for the 2026-2028 Water Efficiency Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville shall match $12,000 (20% of award) in funding; and WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville shall follow grant administrative and reporting criteria outlined in the grant program overview; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, Minnesota: 1. The City of Lakeville shall enter into an agreement with the Metropolitan Council for the 2026-2028 Water Efficiency Grant, a copy of which was before the Council. 2. The proper City officials are authorized to execute such agreement, and any amendments thereto. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 15th day of June 2026. CITY OF LAKEVILLE ______________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Ann Orlofsky, City Clerk Page 227 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Restoration Covenant Church Conditional Use Permit Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve the Restoration Covenant Church conditional use permit and adopt the findings of fact. Overview Rob Jacobson, on behalf of Restoration Covenant Church, has submitted an application and plans for a conditional use permit to a religious institution use to expand with new sanctuary space and for the site to exceed 125% of the minimum parking spaces required by the Zoning Ordinance. The property is zoned RS-3, Single Family Residential District, which allows religious institutions by conditional use permit. A conditional use permit was approved for the original church structure on April 7, 1980, though at that time a CUP form was not created and recorded against the property as is done now. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the conditional use permit at its May 21, 2026 meeting. There was no public comment. The Commission inquired about planned future building additions and whether the stormwater ponding proposed for the site is sized to handle the planned full build out; the applicant confirmed that it is. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Restoration Covenant Church conditional use permit and adopted the findings of fact. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement and Stormwater Maintenance Agreement are required in conjunction with this conditional use permit. Those documents are expected to be brought forward for approval at the next City Council meeting. Supporting Information 1. CUP Form + Findings of Fact 2. May 21, 2026 Planning Commission minutes 3. May 15, 2026 Planning report 4. Exhibits A-F 5. Exhibits G-L 6. May 15, 2026, revised June 10, 2026 Engineering report Page 228 of 485 Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: A Sense of Community and Belonging Report Completed by: Kris Jenson, Planning Manager Page 229 of 485 1 (Reserved for Dakota County Recording Information) CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 26- ___ 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Lakeville hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for Restoration Covenant Church to allow an expansion to an existing religious institution and for the construction of parking stalls in excess of 125% of the minimum required by the Zoning Ordinance in the RS-3, Single Family Residential District at 16880 Cedar Avenue. 2. Property. The permit is for the following described property in the City of Lakeville, Dakota County, Minnesota: The North 340 feet of the South 1220 feet of the West 560 feet as measured along the West and South lines of that part of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 3, Township 114, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota. 3. Conditions. This conditional use permit amendment is issued subject to the following conditions: a. The stipulations and recommendations listed in the Engineering Division memorandum dated May 15, 2026, revised June 10, 2026. b. The building expansion and site shall be developed consistent with the plans approved by the City Council, as may be amended for compliance with stormwater requirements. c. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement (SIPA) and Stormwater Maintenance Agreement (SMA) must be executed, approved by the City Council, and recorded with Dakota County prior to construction beginning on the site. d. A landscape security shall be submitted with the SIPA. e. An as-planted landscape plan must be submitted prior to a landscape inspection of the site. f. All parking spaces within the expanded parking area must be a minimum of nine (9) feet in width as required by Section 11-19-7.I of the Zoning Ordinance. Page 230 of 485 2 4. Revocation. The City may revoke the conditional use permit amendment for cause upon determination that the conditional use permit amendment is not in conformance with the conditions of the permit or is in continued violation of the city code or other applicable regulations. 5. Expiration. This conditional use permit amendment shall expire unless the applicant commences the authorized use within one year of the date of this conditional use permit amendment unless an extension is approved by the Zoning Administrator. DATED: June 15, 2026 CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: ________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor SEAL BY: ________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 15th day of June 2026 by Luke M. Hellier, Mayor and by Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Lakeville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. __________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Page 231 of 485 1 CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION On May 21, 2026, the Lakeville Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meetings to consider the application of Restoration Covenant Church for a conditional use permit to allow: 1) a building expansion of a religious institution in the RS-3, Single Family Residential District, and 2) to exceed 125% of the minimum parking stalls required by the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the application preceded by published and mailed notice. The applicant was present and the Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak. The City Council hereby adopts the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is located in Comprehensive Planning District No. 3, the property for public & quasi-public uses. 2. The property is zoned RS-3, Single Family Residential District. 3. The legal description of the property is: The North 340 feet of the South 1,220 feet of the West 560 feet as measured along the West and South lines of that part of the Southwest quarter of Section 3, Township 114, Range 20, Dakota County, Minnesota. 4. Section 11-4-3E of the City of Lakeville Zoning Ordinance provides that a conditional use permit may not be issued unless certain criteria are satisfied. The criteria and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed religious institution is consistent with uses allowed in residential areas of the City. The building meets the height requirements of the RS-3 District and the exterior materials requirements for institutional uses, which is consistent with the policies and provisions of Planning District 3 of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Page 232 of 485 2 b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with future land uses of the area. Finding: The expansion of the existing religious institution in the RS-3 District will be compatible with existing and future land uses in the area provided compliance with the stipulations outlined in the conditional use permit. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance and the City Code. Finding: The proposed religious institution use in the RS-3 District conforms to the performance standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance required for a conditional use permit for the religious institution and additional parking. d) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. Finding: The proposed religious institution use will be served with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. e) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: Traffic generation from the religious institution use can be accommodated by minor arterial Cedar Avenue. 5. The planning report dated May 15, 2026 prepared by Kris Jenson, Planning Manager, is incorporated herein. DECISION Dated: June 15, 2026 The City Council approves the conditional use permit in the form attached hereto. CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: __________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor BY: __________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Page 233 of 485 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, May 21, 2026 Page 2 Motion was made by Swaney, seconded by Einck to close the public hearing at 6:11 p.m. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes – unanimous Chair Zimmer asked for comments from the Planning Commission. • Commissioner Swenson expressed his support for the project. Motion was made by Swenson, seconded by Tinsley to recommend to City Council approval of the conditional use permit for a minor auto repair use in the M-2, Mixed Use Cedar Corridor District and to allow a commercial building of less than 2,000 square feet of floor area and the findings of fact, subject to the following stipulations: 1. The site shall be developed according to the plans approved by the City Council. 2. Any rooftop and/or ground-mounted mechanical equipment must be screened per Zoning Ordinance requirements. 3. The City Forester has reviewed and approved the landscape plan dated March 4, 2026. Landscaping on site must be installed per the approved plan. Prior to a landscape inspection, an as-built landscape plan must be submitted to the city. 4. The Developer must provide a security with the building permit to guarantee installation of the landscaping. 5. Snow storage shall not occur within required parking spaces. 6. No outside storage of any product (whether new, used or to be discarded or recycled) and no overnight parking shall be allowed. 7. Prior to City Council consideration, the photometric plan shall be updated to comply with code requirements. Ayes: Traffas, Schuenke, Zimmer, Einck, Swaney, Swenson, Tinsley Nays: 0 6b. Restoration Covenant Church Chair Zimmer opened the public hearing to consider the application of Restoration Covenant Church for a conditional use permit for a building expansion with new sanctuary space and to exceed 125% of the minimum parking stalls required by the Zoning Ordinance. Pastor Rob Jacobson introduced the project. Ms. Botten presented the staff report. The existing 5,700 square foot church facility, located at 16880 Cedar Avenue, was built in 1980 and is located on a 4.37 acre parcel adjacent to Cedar Avenue (CSAH 23). The plans propose a 7,555 square foot addition for a new sanctuary and lobby space, allowing a portion of the existing building to be remodeled for classrooms and activity space. Page 234 of 485 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, May 21, 2026 Page 3 This is the first of three planned additions. The parking lot expansion proposes more than 125% of the parking spaces required for the site, based on the new sanctuary space. The stormwater system is still under review by Engineering staff. The civil plans must be approved by the Engineering Division as well as a Site Improvement Performance Agreement and Stormwater Maintenance Agreement executed by the Developer and approved by the City Council prior to any construction beginning on site. Community Development Department staff recommend approval of the conditional use permit. Chair Zimmer opened the hearing to the public for comment. There was no public comment. Motion was made by Swaney, seconded by Tinsley to close the public hearing at 6:20 p.m. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes – unanimous Chair Zimmer asked for comments from the Planning Commission. • Commissioner Traffas inquired what the timeline for the future expansion would be. Pastor Jacobson stated they are out of both kid space and sanctuary space, and they want to have a central entrance. Currently the existing building would be the new family ministries area. In the future plan they would like to build a children’s wing and the current wing would then become a student and adult area. The third addition would potentially become some kind of activities space. • Commissioner Swenson asked with the multiple phases of the building expansion, with the sizing of the parking lots and the expansion proposed is the stormwater facility sized to handle all of the expansions. The architect, Dennis Batty, stated the stormwater facility is sized for all of the future expansions. Motion was made by Tinsley, seconded by Swenson to recommend to City Council approval of the conditional use permit for a building expansion with new sanctuary space and to exceed 125% of the minimum parking stalls required by the Zoning Ordinance, and the Findings of Fact, subject to the following stipulations: 1. The stipulations and recommendations listed in the Engineering Division memorandum dated May 15, 2026. 2. Civil plans must be approved by the Engineering Division. 3. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement (SIPA) and Stormwater Maintenance Agreement (SMA) must be executed, approved by the City Council, and recorded with Dakota County prior to construction beginning on the site. 4. The building and site shall be developed consistent with the plans approved by the City Council. 5. A landscape security shall be submitted with the SIPA. Page 235 of 485 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, May 21, 2026 Page 4 6. An as-planted landscape plan must be submitted prior to a landscape inspection of the site. 7. Prior to City Council consideration of the CUP, the site plan must be revised to show that all parking spaces within the parking lot expansion area meet the nine (9) foot minimum width requirement as required by 11-19-7.I of the Zoning Ordinance. Ayes: Schuenke, Zimmer, Einck, Swaney, Swenson, Tinsley, Traffas, Nays: 0 There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Dawn Erickson, Community Development Recorder Page 236 of 485 City of Lakeville Community Development Memorandum To : Planning Commission From: Kris Jenson, Planning Manager Date: May 15, 2026 Subject: Packet Material for the May 21, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Item: Restoration Covenant Church Conditional Use Permit for: 1. Building expansion of religious institution use with new sanctuary space. 2. Exceed 125% of the minimum parking spaces required by the Zoning Ordinance. Application Action Deadline: June 15, 2026 INTRODUCTION Applications for a conditional use permit have been submitted by representatives of Restoration Covenant Church for the expansion of the existing 5,400 square foot facility as well as to expand the parking lot to include more than 125% of the minimum number of parking spaces required by the Zoning Ordinance. The existing 5,700 square foot church facility was built in 1980 and is located on a 4.37 acre parcel adjacent to Cedar Avenue (CSAH 23). The plans propose a 7,555 square foot addition for a new 301 seat sanctuary and lobby space, allowing a portion of the existing building to be remodeled for classrooms and activity space with table seating for 130 people. This is the first of three planned additions. The Restoration Covenant Church plans have been distributed to Engineering and Environmental Resources staff for review. EXHIBITS A. Aerial Location Map Page 237 of 485 2 B. Zoning Map C. Existing Conditions and Removals D. Site Plan E. Grading & Drainage Plan F. Utility Plan G. Tree Preservation Plan & Inventory (2 pages) H. Landscape Plan I. Floor Plan J. Building Elevations (4 pages) K. Photometric Plan L. RCC Weekly Schedule of Services, Activities, & Operations (2 Pages) PLANNING ANALYSIS Existing Conditions. The site has a 5,400 square foot church and 72 parking spaces and shares an entrance from Cedar Avenue (CSAH 23) with the Spectrum office building to the south. Adjacent Land Uses. North: Single family home (RS-3 District) South: Spectrum office building (C-3 District) East: Bunker Hill park (P/OS District) West: Cedar Avenue (CSAH 23), twinhomes (RST-1 District) and single family homes (RS-3 District) Zoning. The subject property is zoned RS-3, Single Family Residential District which allows religious institution uses by conditional use permit. Setbacks. The existing structure and proposed addition meet the RS-3 District setback requirements, as follows: Front and rear yards – 30 feet Side Yards – 20 feet Religious institutions are required to have double the side yard setback requirements, so the setback from the north and south property lines is 20 feet, rather than the 10 feet required for a residential dwelling. Streets. The subject site abuts Cedar Avenue (CSAH 23), which is classified as a minor principal arterial street in the City’s Transportation plan. Trails and Sidewalks. There is an existing trail along the east side of Cedar Avenue. No additional trails or sidewalks are proposed with this project. Grading, Drainage and Utility Plans. The grading, drainage and utility plans were submitted to the Engineering Division for their review. The civil plans are still under review and must be finalized prior to consideration by Page 238 of 485 3 the City Council. Please refer to the May 15, 2026 Engineering Division report for more detailed review comments. Tree Preservation. Forestry staff have reviewed the submitted tree preservation plan, which identifies 2,470 inches of significant trees within the property boundary. The removal threshold is 40%, or 988 inches. The plans indicate that 1,819 inched will be removed, so 104 diameter inches of replacement planting is required, which is satisfied by the proposed plantings within the landscape plan. Signs. Any changes to the structure of the existing freestanding sign or addition of signs to the site require the issuance of building permit before installation. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Section 11-52-7.D allows religious institutions in the RS-3, Single Family Residential District subject to approval of a conditional use permit. Section 11-19-13.J allows the number of parking spaces to exceed 125% of the minimum number required by conditional use permit subject to the following criteria: A. The use and the site in question shall be served by a street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the type and volume of traffic which would be generated and adequate right of way shall be provided. The site is served by Cedar Avenue (CSAH 23), which is classified as a minor principal arterial street. B. The site design for access and parking shall minimize internal as well as external traffic conflicts and shall be in compliance with chapter 19 of this title. Access to the site will remain unchanged with this building addition. C. If applicable, a pedestrian circulation system shall be clearly defined and appropriate provisions made to protect such areas from encroachment by parked or moving vehicles. The existing sidewalk along the front of the building will be continued along the front of the building expansion, providing a clearly defined pedestrian area. D. Adequate off street parking and off street loading shall be provided in compliance with chapters 19 and 20 of this title. The site currently has 72 parking spaces, with the parking area proposed to be expanded to the east to accommodate up to 153 spaces. Parking for religious institution uses is calculated based on the design capacity of the main assembly, which in this case has a capacity for 301 persons and requiring a minimum of 100 parking spaces. A conditional use Page 239 of 485 4 permit is being processed because the site is proposing in excess of 125% of the Zoning Ordinance requirements, which is supported by staff. The applicant has provided information about the activities to be expected at the site (Exhibit L). The other factors factoring in to staff’s support of the request is the inability of the site to overflow to local streets for larger events; while there is an adjacent office building to the south of the site, there is no shared parking agreement, meaning those spaces cannot be counted on to be available to be used if needed. Finally, while the proposed future additions to the building do not include an increase to the sanctuary space, the addition of classrooms and multi-purpose spaces increase the likelihood that there will be additional parking demand outside of the traditional worship times. Prior to City Council consideration of the CUP, the site plan must be revised to show that all parking spaces within the parking lot expansion area meet the nine (9) foot minimum width requirement as required by 11-19-7.I of the Zoning Ordinance. E. Loading areas and drive-up facilities shall be positioned so as to minimize internal site access problems and maneuvering conflicts, to avoid visual or noise impacts on any "adjacent" residential use or district, and provided in compliance with chapter 20 of this title. Not applicable. F. Whenever a nonresidential use "is adjacent to" a residential use or district, a buffer area with screening and landscaping shall be provided in compliance with chapter 21 of this title. The landscape plan indicates that a number of existing trees along the north property line will remain on site and that two clusters of coniferous trees will be added in those areas to provide additional buffering to the single family home in that area. G. General site screening and landscaping shall be provided in compliance with chapter 21 of this title. The landscape plan includes proposed plantings around the perimeter of the site and the parking lot. Parking lot screening has also been added to west, south, and east sides of the parking lot. No plantings are proposed in the area of the future building additions. The City Forester has reviewed and approved the landscape plan. Prior to any landscape inspections on site, an as-planted landscape plan must be submitted to Forestry staff. H. All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right of way or neighboring residential uses or districts, and shall be in compliance with section 11-16-17 of this title. Page 240 of 485 5 The photometric plan indicates that parking lot lighting will be 20 foot tall poles on a 2.5 foot tall base and located within the center rows of parking. The light levels are in compliance with section 11-16-17 of the Zoning Ordinance. I. Potential exterior noise generated by the use shall be identified and mitigation measures as may be necessary shall be imposed to ensure compliance with section 11-16-25 of this title. There is not anticipated to be any exterior noise generated by the use beyond the general day to day activity. J. The site drainage system shall be subject to the review and approval of the city engineer. The stormwater system is still under review by Engineering staff. The civil plans must be approved by the Engineering Division as well as a Site Improvement Performance Agreement and Stormwater Maintenance Agreement executed by the Developer and approved by the City Council prior to any construction beginning on site. K. The architectural appearance and functional design of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing or potential buildings and area so as to cause a blighting influence. All sides of the principal and accessory structures are to have essentially the same or coordinated, harmonious exterior finish materials and treatment. The proposed building addition is primarily clad in cultured stone, face brick, and glass (79%), in compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements. The Zoning Ordinance permits the east elevation of the structure, which faces away from public right of way, and will be covered and/or removed at the time of building expansion, to utilize grade D materials. The existing structure will have new exterior materials as well, such as to give the entire structure a cohesive appearance. The proposed addition has an overall height to the peak of 33 feet, 4 inches, which is less than the 35 foot maximum height allowed in the RS-3 district. The building also proposed a painted metal cross atop the building, which would have a height of approximately 40 feet. Section 11-17-74 D exempts church spires and crosses or other symbols as an element of the principal building L. Provisions shall be made for daily litter control, an interior location for recycling, and trash handling and storage or an outdoor, enclosed receptacle area shall be provided in compliance with section 11-18-11 of this title. Page 241 of 485 6 A temporary trash enclosure will be created on the east side of the building addition. A permanent trash enclosure is planned to be constructed at the east side of the parking lot once the church is working on the final phase of construction. M. All signs and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance with chapter 23 of this title. A small monument sign exists on site currently for the church. Any structural changes to the sign require a sign permit to be issued prior N. The use and site shall be in compliance with any federal, state or county law or regulation that is applicable and any related permits shall be obtained and documented to the city. Not applicable O. Any applicable business licenses mandated by this code are approved and obtained. Not applicable P. The hours of operation may be restricted when there is judged to be an incompatibility with a residential use or district. The hours of church operation are not expected to be incompatible with the area. Q. The use complies with all applicable performance standards of the zoning district in which it is located and where applicable. The use complies with the performance standards of the RS-3 district. RECOMMENDATION Community Development staff have reviewed the plans for Restoration Covenant Church and determined they meet the requirements of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and recommends approval of a conditional use permit, subject to the following stipulations: 1. The stipulations and recommendations listed in the Engineering Division memorandum dated May 15, 2026. 2. Civil plans must be approved by the Engineering Division. 3. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement (SIPA) and Stormwater Maintenance Agreement (SMA) must be executed, approved by the City Council, and recorded with Dakota County prior to construction beginning on the site. 4. The building and site shall be developed consistent with the plans approved by the City Council. Page 242 of 485 7 5. A landscape security shall be submitted with the SIPA. 6. An as-planted landscape plan must be submitted prior to a landscape inspection of the site. 7. Prior to City Council consideration of the CUP, the site plan must be revised to show that all parking spaces within the parking lot expansion area meet the nine (9) foot minimum width requirement as required by 11-19-7.I of the Zoning Ordinance. Findings of fact are attached for consideration. Page 243 of 485 170TH ST CE D A R A V E ( C S A H 2 3 ) City of Lakeville Location Map Restoration Covenant Church Subject Property EXHIBIT A 1 67TH ST ± UPPER 167TH ST GARCIA WAY G L E N C O E A V E Page 244 of 485 C-1 C-3 C-3 P/OS P/OS P/OS RM-1 RS-3 RS-3 RS-3 RS-3 RS-3 RS-3 RST-1 ϭϳϬdI ^d /9 5 Z s 9 ; / ^ I Ϯ ϯ Ϳ City of Lakeville Location Map Restoration Covenant Church Subject Property EXHIBIT B ϭ ϲϳ dI ^d ± hWW9Z ϭϲϳdI ^d DZ/L tz D > 9 E / K 9 s 9 Page 245 of 485 955.6 955.9 955.4 C cped 952.6 954.8 955.3 964.7 966.9 966.9 959.9959.1 959.7 984.9 984.6 982.3tcc981.14 LightPoletcc975.79 LightPole973.8971.5 LightPoleD Storm Manholerim=971.13 Catch Basinrim=966.58inv(w) =961.71 965.8965.5 964.7 965.1 967.0 967.0 966.4 966.5966.9 LightPole966.5 968.0 967.0 964.2964.8 964.1963.2 963.9 961.6 962.0961.9 961.5961.4 961.7961.6 961.4961.1 961.7 962.2962.2 Drain LightPole 961.9 E Elec.Meter FFE = 962.4 961.86 962.03 963.48 961.75ETransformer G GasMeter 964.8 965.8967.3 968.0 968.5 970.1 970.9 971.0 971.9 972.1 972.6 972.9 974.5 976.3 976.5 975.9 976.2 977.1 976.9 978.8 981.2 981.3 974.2 961.6 SignSignSignSignSign Drain 961.3 Catch Basinrim=960.72inv(n) = 957.0 LightPole M mailbox965.0 C cped Sign H Handhole 962.4 960.5 Sign LightPole tnh960.38 Gate Valve 956.4 956.3 Catch Basinrim=954.36954.9954.9 FlagPole LightPole FloodLight LightPole LightPole 964.7 H HandholeSign Sign Catch Basinrim=966.03inv(e) = 961.91inv(w) = 961.81inv(s) = 962.1815" GasValve Catch Basinrim=967.41 Catch Basinrim=968.33H Handhole LightPole H Handhole C cped ERiser 970.3970.4 FES 15"inv=953.55 967.1965.8966.0 969.2 971.7 972.8 Drain 67.8 80 . 0 67.8 80 . 0 97 2 970 974 97 6 96 6 96 4 96295 8 96 6 96 4 956 954 Tag ID#1518Tag ID#1519 Tag ID#1520 Tag ID#1521 Tag ID#1522Tag ID#1523 Tag ID#1524 Tag ID#1525Tag ID#1526 Tag ID#1527 Tag ID#1528 Tag ID#1529 Tag ID#1530Tag ID#1531 Tag ID#1532 Tag ID#1533 Tag ID#1534 Tag ID#1535 Tag ID#1536 Tag ID#1537 Tag ID#1538 Tag ID#1539 Tag ID#1540 Tag ID#1541 Tag ID#1542Tag ID#1543 Tag ID#1544 Tag ID#1545 Tag ID#1546 Tag ID#1547 Tag ID#1548 Tag ID#1549 Tag ID#1550 Tag ID#1551 Tag ID#1552 Tag ID#1553 Tag ID#1554 Tag ID#1555 Tag ID#1556 Tag ID#1557 Tag ID#1558Tag ID#1559 Tag ID#1560 Tag ID#1561Tag ID#1562 Tag ID#1563 Tag ID#1564 Tag ID#1565 Tag ID#1566 Tag ID#1567 Tag ID#1568Tag ID#1569 Tag ID#1570Tag ID#1571Tag ID#1572 Tag ID#1573 Tag ID#1574 Tag ID#1575 Tag ID#1576 Tag ID#1577 Tag ID#1578Tag ID#1579 Tag ID#1580 Tag ID#1581 Tag ID#1582Tag ID#1583 Tag ID#1584 Tag ID#1585Tag ID#1586 Tag ID#1587 Tag ID#1588 Tag ID#1589 Tag ID#1590 Tag ID#1591 Tag ID#1592 Tag ID#1593 Tag ID#1594 Tag ID#1595 Tag ID#1596 Tag ID#1597 Tag ID#1598 Tag ID#1599 Tag ID#1600 Tag ID#1601 Tag ID#1602Tag ID#1603 Tag ID#1604 Tag ID#1605 Tag ID#1606Tag ID#1607 Tag ID#1608 Tag ID#1609 Tag ID#1610Tag ID#1611 Tag ID#1612 Tag ID#1613Tag ID#1614Tag ID#1615 Tag ID#1616 Tag ID#1617 Tag ID#1618 Tag ID#1619 Tag ID#1620 Tag ID#1621 Tag ID#1622Tag ID#1623Tag ID#1624 Tag ID#1625 Tag ID#1626Tag ID#1627 Tag ID#1628 Tag ID#1629 Tag ID#1630 Tag ID#1631 Tag ID#1632 Tag ID#1633 Tag ID#1634Tag ID#1635 Tag ID#1636 Tag ID#1637Tag ID#1638 Tag ID#1639 Tag ID#1640 Tag ID#1641 Tag ID#1642 Tag ID#1643 Tag ID#1644Tag ID#1645Tag ID#1646 Tag ID#1647 Tag ID#1648Tag ID#1649 Tag ID#1650 Tag ID#1651 Tag ID#1652 Tag ID#1653 Tag ID#1654 Tag ID#1655 Tag ID#1656 Tag ID#1657 Tag ID#1658 Tag ID#1659 Tag ID#1660 Tag ID#1661Tag ID#1662 Tag ID#1663Tag ID#1664 Tag ID#1665 Tag ID#1666 Tag ID#1667Tag ID#1668Tag ID#1669 Tag ID#1670Tag ID#1671 Tag ID#1672 Tag ID#1673 Tag ID#1674 Tag ID#1675 Tag ID#1676 Tag ID#1677 Tag ID#1678 Tag ID#1679 Tag ID#1680 Tag ID#1681Tag ID#1682Tag ID#1683 Tag ID#1684 Tag ID#1685 Tag ID#1686 Tag ID#1687Tag ID#1688Tag ID#1689 Tag ID#1690 Tag ID#1691 Tag ID#1692 Tag ID#1693 Tag ID#1694 Tag ID#1695 Tag ID#1696 Tag ID#1697 Tag ID#1698 Tag ID#1699 Tag ID#1700 Tag ID#1701 Tag ID#1702 Tag ID#1703Tag ID#1704 Tag ID#1705 Tag ID#1706Tag ID#1707 954 956 958 960 962 964 966 968 970 972 974 976 978 980 982 962 964 968 968 970 972 974 96 0 956 9 6 4 9 6 4 962 9 6 8 9 6 2 96 6 BuildingNo. 16880 T r e e l i n e T r e e l i n e B i t u m i n o u sP a r k i n g L o t Shed Storage Container Ce d a r A v e B i t u m i n o u s B i t u m i n o u s 6 S t a l l s 7 S t a l l s 1 8 S t a l l s 7 S t a l l s North Line of the South 1220 feet of the SW14 of Section 3 Th e E a s t L i n e o f t h e W e s t 5 6 0 f e e t o f t h e S W 14 o f S e c t i o n 3 South Line of the North 340 feet of the South 1220 feet of the SW14 of Section 3 Ea s t L i n e o f C e d a r A v e a s m o n u m e n t e d 9 4 4 946 948 950 952 954 956 958 9 6 0 9 6 2 9 6 4 9 6 6 9 6 8 9 7 0 9 7 2 9 7 4 9 7 6 9 7 8 9 8 0 9 8 2 9 8 4 9 8 6 9 8 8 9 9 0 9 9 2 994 946 946 946 948 948 9 4 8 950950 9 5 0 95 6 95 8 96 0 96 2 96 4 96 6 96 8 9 7 0 9 7 2 974 976 986 9 7 4 97 4 97 6 97 8 98 0 982 984 952 954 956 958 960 962 964 966 968 970 972 974 976 9 5 2 972 974 974 946 946 946 948 948 948 950 950 950 950 944 N 0 0 ° 2 8 ' 4 2 " W 3 4 0 . 0 9 N 89°46'33" E 480.04 S 0 0 ° 3 0 ' 4 5 " E 3 3 9 . 7 4 S 89°44'02" W 480.24 962.9 963.5963.5 965.4965.5 964.3964.2 964.9 2 8 S t a l l s 94.7 67 . 2 D S LEGEND 830 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Page 246 of 485 955.6 C cped 966.9 tcc981.14 LightPole tcc975.79 LightPole LightPoleD Storm Manholerim=971.13 Catch Basinrim=966.58inv(w) =961.71 Drain LightPole FFE = 962.4 961.86 962.03 963.48 961.75 E Transformer G GasMeter SignSignSignSign Sign Drain LightPole M mailbox C cped Sign H Handhole Sign LightPole tnh960.38 Gate Valve FlagPole LightPole FloodLight LightPole LightPole H Handhole Sign Sign Catch Basinrim=966.03inv(e) = 961.91inv(w) = 961.81inv(s) = 962.1815" GasValve Catch Basinrim=967.41 H Handhole LightPole H Handhole C cped ERiser Drain 67.8 80 . 0 67.8 80 . 0 Tag ID#1534 Tag ID#1582 Tag ID#1583 Tag ID#1584 Tag ID#1585Tag ID#1586 Tag ID#1587 Tag ID#1588 Tag ID#1589 Tag ID#1590 Tag ID#1591 Tag ID#1592 Tag ID#1593 Tag ID#1594 Tag ID#1601 Tag ID#1602 Tag ID#1641 Tag ID#1642 Tag ID#1666 Tag ID#1667Tag ID#1668 Tag ID#1669 Tag ID#1670 Tag ID#1671 Tag ID#1672 Tag ID#1674 Tag ID#1675 Tag ID#1676 Tag ID#1677 Tag ID#1678 Tag ID#1681Tag ID#1682Tag ID#1694 Tag ID#1697 Tag ID#1698 Tag ID#1699 Tag ID#1700 Tag ID#1701 Tag ID#1702 Tag ID#1703 Tag ID#1704 Tag ID#1705 Tag ID#1706Tag ID#1707 BuildingNo. 16880 T r e e l i n e B i t u m i n o u sP a r k i n g L o t W a l k w a y Overhang Ce d a r A v e B i t u m i n o u s B i t u m i n o u s 6 S t a l l s 7 S t a l l s North Line of the South 1220 feet of the SW14 of Section 3 Th e E a s t L i n e o f t h e W e s t 5 6 0 f e e t o f t h e S W 14 o f S e c t i o n 3 South Line of the North 340 feet of the South 1220 feet of the SW14 of Section 3 Ea s t L i n e o f C e d a r A v e a s m o n u m e n t e d N 0 0 ° 2 8 ' 4 2 " W 3 4 0 . 0 9 N 89°46'33" E 480.04 S 0 0 ° 3 0 ' 4 5 " E 3 3 9 . 7 4 S 89°44'02" W 480.24 █████████████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██████████████████████████████████████████ █ █ █ █ ████████████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ███ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██████████████████████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██████████████████████████ █ ███████████████████████████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██████████████████████████████████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ► ► ►► ►► ►► ►► ►► ►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►► ► ► ► ► ► ► 31 ' 8 " 23'0" 20'2" 8' 9 " 8' 9 " 3' 4 " 61 ' 0 " 65 ' 0 " 4' 0 " 6' 1 0 " 3 5 ' 0 " 6 6 ' 5 " 4' 1 0 " 66'0 " 11'5 " 8' 9 " 69'0" 61'0" 71'0" 10'0" 79'4" 7' 0 " 55'8"33'4" 2' 0 " 27.0 24 . 0 27.0 24 . 0 9. 0 (T Y P . ) 9.0 (TYP.) 9.0 (TYP.) 9.0 (TYP.) 9.0 (TYP.) 20 . 0 (T Y P . ) 20 . 0 (T Y P . ) 18 . 0 (T Y P . ) 18.0 (TYP.) 18 . 0 (T Y P . ) 55 . 7 6.08.022.2 8.1 24 . 0 47 . 4 46 . 9 50.6 50.1 6. 0 8.5 9.0 8.5 (TYP.) 8.58.59.0 9.08.5 166.0 9.0 (TYP.) 22.5 58.994.7 67 . 2 28 . 3 23.3 8.5 (TYP.) Site Plan LEGEND ►► SITE DATA: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Page 247 of 485 830 LEGEND ►► 830 955.6 C cped 966.9 tcc981.14 LightPoletcc975.79 LightPole LightPoleD Storm Manholerim=971.13 Catch Basinrim=966.58inv(w) =961.71 Drain LightPole E Elec.Meter FFE = 962.4 E Transformer G GasMeter SignSignSignSignSign Drain LightPole M mailbox C cped Sign H Handhole Sign LightPole tnh960.38 Gate Valve Catch Basinrim=954.36 FlagPole LightPole FloodLight LightPole LightPole H HandholeSign Sign Catch Basinrim=966.03inv(e) = 961.91inv(w) = 961.81inv(s) = 962.1815" GasValve Catch Basinrim=967.41 Catch Basinrim=968.33H Handhole LightPole H Handhole C cped ERiser Drain 67.8 80 . 0 67.8 80 . 0 97 2 970 974 97 6 96 6 96 4 96295 8 96 6 96 4 956 954 Tag ID#1534 Tag ID#1582Tag ID#1583 Tag ID#1584 Tag ID#1585Tag ID#1586 Tag ID#1587 Tag ID#1588 Tag ID#1589 Tag ID#1590 Tag ID#1591 Tag ID#1592 Tag ID#1593 Tag ID#1594 Tag ID#1601 Tag ID#1602 Tag ID#1641 Tag ID#1642 Tag ID#1666 Tag ID#1667Tag ID#1668Tag ID#1669 Tag ID#1670Tag ID#1671 Tag ID#1672 Tag ID#1674 Tag ID#1675 Tag ID#1676 Tag ID#1677 Tag ID#1678 Tag ID#1681Tag ID#1682Tag ID#1694 Tag ID#1697 Tag ID#1698 Tag ID#1699 Tag ID#1700 Tag ID#1701 Tag ID#1702 Tag ID#1703Tag ID#1704 Tag ID#1705 Tag ID#1706Tag ID#1707 954 956 958 960 962 964 966 968 970 972 974 976 978 980 982 962 964 968 968 970 972 974 96 0 956 9 6 4 9 6 4 962 9 6 8 9 6 2 96 6 BuildingNo. 16880 B i t u m i n o u sP a r k i n g L o t Ce d a r A v e B i t u m i n o u s B i t u m i n o u s 6 S t a l l s 7 S t a l l s North Line of the South 1220 feet of the SW14 of Section 3 Th e E a s t L i n e o f t h e W e s t 5 6 0 f e e t o f t h e S W 14 o f S e c t i o n 3 South Line of the North 340 feet of the South 1220 feet of the SW14 of Section 3 Ea s t L i n e o f C e d a r A v e a s m o n u m e n t e d 9 4 4 946 948 950 952 954 956 958 9 6 0 9 6 2 9 6 4 9 6 6 9 6 8 9 7 0 9 7 2 9 7 4 9 7 6 9 7 8 9 8 0 9 8 2 9 8 4 9 8 6 9 8 8 9 9 0 9 9 2 994 946 946 946 948 948 9 4 8 950950 9 5 0 95 6 95 8 96 0 96 2 96 4 96 6 96 8 9 7 0 9 7 2 974 976 9 7 4 97 4 97 6 97 8 98 0 982 984 952 954 956 958 960 962 964 966 968 970 972 974 976 9 5 2 972 974 974 946 946 946 948 948 948 950 950 950 944 N 0 0 ° 2 8 ' 4 2 " W 3 4 0 . 0 9 N 89°46'33" E 480.04 S 0 0 ° 3 0 ' 4 5 " E 3 3 9 . 7 4 S 89°44'02" W 480.24 ████████ █ █ █ █ █ █████████████████████ █ █ ████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █████████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █████████████ ████████████████ █ █ ████████████████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ 9 5 8 960 962 962 962 964 966 958 964 966 968 970 970 972 972972 97 2 974 974 976 976 978 978 980 980 982982 960 96 2 9 6 4 9 6 6 954 956 956 956 956 956 958 958 958 960 962 ►► ►► ►►►►►►►►►►►► ► ► 9 6 2 TW=958.2 BW=959.2 TW=963.0 BW=963.0 TW=965.0 BW=960.4 TW=965.0 BW=959.2 TW=965.0 BW=959.2 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Page 248 of 485 N 0 0 ° 3 1 ' 2 7 " W 2 6 2 8 . 3 1 955.6 C cped 966.9 LightPole LightPole LightPoleD Storm Manholerim=971.13 Catch Basinrim=966.58inv(w) =961.71 Drain LightPole FFE = 962.4 E Transformer G GasMeter SignSignSignSign Sign Drain LightPole M mailbox C cped Sign H Handhole Sign LightPole tnh960.38 Gate Valve FlagPole LightPole FloodLight LightPole LightPole H Handhole Sign Sign Catch Basinrim=966.03inv(e) = 961.91inv(w) = 961.81inv(s) = 962.1815" GasValve Catch Basinrim=967.41 rim=968.33 H Handhole LightPole H Handhole C cped ERiser Drain 67.8 80 . 0 67.8 80 . 0 Tag ID#1534 Tag ID#1582 Tag ID#1583 Tag ID#1584 Tag ID#1585Tag ID#1586 Tag ID#1587 Tag ID#1588 Tag ID#1589 Tag ID#1590 Tag ID#1591 Tag ID#1592 Tag ID#1593 Tag ID#1594 Tag ID#1601 Tag ID#1602 Tag ID#1641 Tag ID#1642 Tag ID#1666 Tag ID#1667Tag ID#1668 Tag ID#1669 Tag ID#1670 Tag ID#1671 Tag ID#1672 Tag ID#1674 Tag ID#1675 Tag ID#1676 Tag ID#1677 Tag ID#1678 Tag ID#1681Tag ID#1682Tag ID#1694 Tag ID#1697 Tag ID#1698 Tag ID#1699 Tag ID#1700 Tag ID#1701 Tag ID#1702 Tag ID#1703 Tag ID#1704 Tag ID#1705 Tag ID#1706Tag ID#1707 1 5 " H D P E BuildingNo. 16880 T r e e l i n e B i t u m i n o u sP a r k i n g L o t W a l k w a y Overhang Ce d a r A v e B i t u m i n o u s B i t u m i n o u s █████████████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██████████████████████████████████████████ █ █ █ █ ████████████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ███ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██████████████████████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██████████████████████████ █ ███████████████████████████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ██████████████████████████████████████ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ► ► ►► ►► ►► ►► ►► ►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►► ► ► ► ► ► ► 31 ' 8 " 23'0" 20'2" 8' 9 " 8' 9 " 3' 4 " 61 ' 0 " 65 ' 0 " 4' 0 " 6' 1 0 " 3 5 ' 0 " 6 6 ' 5 " 4' 1 0 " 66'0 " 11'5 " 8' 9 " 69'0" 61'0" 71'0" 10'0" 79'4" 7' 0 " 55'8"33'4" 2' 0 " LEGEND ►►►► D S NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Page 249 of 485 9 5 8 960 962 962 962 964 966 968 964 966 968 970 97 0 972 972 9 7 2 97 2 974 974 976 976 978 978 980 980 982 982 95 8 96 0 96 2 9 6 4 9 6 6 954 954 954 956 956 956 958 958 960 962 ►► ►► ►► ►►►►►►►►►►►►►► ► ► ► ► C cped Light Pole Light Pole Light Pole Light Pole Light Pole EElec. Meter E Transformer G Gas Meter SignSignSignSignSignLight Pole M mailbox C cped Sign H Handhole Sign Light Pole tnh 960.38 Gate Valve Flag Pole Light Pole Flood Light Light Pole Light Pole H Handhole Sign Sign Gas Valve H Handhole Light Pole H Handhole C cped ERiser 97 2 970 974 97 6 96 6 96 4 962 95 8 96 6 96 4 956 954 954 956 958 960 962 964 966 968 97 0 972 9 7 4 97 6 978 980 982 955.6 Tag ID #1518Tag ID #1519 Tag ID #1520 Tag ID #1521 Tag ID #1522 Tag ID #1523 Tag ID #1524 Tag ID #1525Tag ID #1526 Tag ID #1527 Tag ID #1528 Tag ID #1529 Tag ID #1530 Tag ID #1531 Tag ID #1532 Tag ID #1533 Tag ID #1534 Tag ID #1535 Tag ID #1536 Tag ID #1537 Tag ID #1538 Tag ID #1539 Tag ID #1540 Tag ID #1541 Tag ID #1542 Tag ID #1543 Tag ID #1544 Tag ID #1545 Tag ID #1546 Tag ID #1547 Tag ID #1548 Tag ID #1549 Tag ID #1550 Tag ID #1551 Tag ID #1552 Tag ID #1553 Tag ID #1554 Tag ID #1555 Tag ID #1556 Tag ID #1557 Tag ID #1558Tag ID #1559 Tag ID #1560 Tag ID #1561Tag ID #1562 Tag ID #1563 Tag ID #1564 Tag ID #1565 Tag ID #1566 Tag ID #1567 Tag ID #1568 Tag ID #1569 Tag ID #1570 Tag ID #1571 Tag ID #1572 Tag ID #1573 Tag ID #1574 Tag ID #1575 Tag ID #1576 Tag ID #1577 Tag ID #1578 Tag ID #1579 Tag ID #1580 Tag ID #1581 Tag ID #1582 Tag ID #1583 Tag ID #1584 Tag ID #1585 Tag ID #1586 Tag ID #1587 Tag ID #1588 Tag ID #1589 Tag ID #1590 Tag ID #1591 Tag ID #1592 Tag ID #1593 Tag ID #1594 Tag ID #1595 Tag ID #1596 Tag ID #1597 Tag ID #1598 Tag ID #1599 Tag ID #1600 Tag ID #1601 Tag ID #1602 Tag ID #1603 Tag ID #1604 Tag ID #1605 Tag ID #1606 Tag ID #1607 Tag ID #1608 Tag ID #1609 Tag ID #1610 Tag ID #1611 Tag ID #1612 Tag ID #1613 Tag ID #1614 Tag ID #1615 Tag ID #1616 Tag ID #1617 Tag ID #1618 Tag ID #1619 Tag ID #1620 Tag ID #1621 Tag ID #1622 Tag ID #1623 Tag ID #1624 Tag ID #1625 Tag ID #1626 Tag ID #1627 Tag ID #1628 Tag ID #1629 Tag ID #1630 Tag ID #1631 Tag ID #1632 Tag ID #1633 Tag ID #1634 Tag ID #1635 Tag ID #1636 Tag ID #1637 Tag ID #1638 Tag ID #1639 Tag ID #1640 Tag ID #1641 Tag ID #1642 Tag ID #1643 Tag ID #1644 Tag ID #1645 Tag ID #1646 Tag ID #1647 Tag ID #1648 Tag ID #1649 Tag ID #1650 Tag ID #1651 Tag ID #1652 Tag ID #1653 Tag ID #1654 Tag ID #1655 Tag ID #1656 Tag ID #1657 Tag ID #1658 Tag ID #1659 Tag ID #1660 Tag ID #1661Tag ID #1662 Tag ID #1663 Tag ID #1664 Tag ID #1665 Tag ID #1666 Tag ID #1667 Tag ID #1668 Tag ID #1669 Tag ID #1670 Tag ID #1671 Tag ID #1672 Tag ID #1673 Tag ID #1674 Tag ID #1675 Tag ID #1676 Tag ID #1677 Tag ID #1678 Tag ID #1679 Tag ID #1680 Tag ID #1681Tag ID #1682 Tag ID #1683 Tag ID #1684 Tag ID #1685 Tag ID #1686 Tag ID #1687 Tag ID #1688 Tag ID #1689 Tag ID #1690 Tag ID #1691 Tag ID #1692 Tag ID #1693 Tag ID #1694 Tag ID #1695 Tag ID #1696 Tag ID #1697 Tag ID #1698 Tag ID #1699 Tag ID #1700 Tag ID #1701 Tag ID #1702 Tag ID #1703 Tag ID #1704 Tag ID #1705 Tag ID #1706 Tag ID #1707 PHASE ONE PROPOSED ADDITION EXISTING BUILDING TREES TO REMOVE, TYP. TREE PROTECTION FENCE PER DETAIL TREES TO REMAIN, TYP. TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. TREES TO REMAIN, TYP. TREES TO REMAIN, TYP. TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. TREE PROTECTION FENCE PER DETAIL TREE PROTECTION FENCE PER DETAIL TREE PROTECTION FENCE PER DETAIL TREES TO REMOVE, TYP. TREES TO REMOVE, TYP. TREES TO REMOVE, TYP. TREES TO REMOVE, TYP.TREES TO REMOVE, TYP. CE D A R A V E N U E PHASE TWO FUTURE ADDITION PHASE THREE FUTURE ADDITION EXISTING WOODLAND TO REMAIN EXISTING WOODLAND TO REMAIN EXISTING WOODLAND TO REMAIN ..\..\CAD Standards\CDG-Registration\signature-ben.jpg DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture & Planning PRELIMINA R Y TREE PRESERVATION AND MITIGATION PLAN: TREE PRESERVATION & MITIGATION PLAN L0 OF L5 LANDSCAPE LEGEND: Existing Tree to Remain Existing Tree to Remove Tree Protection Fence GENERAL NOTES: 1. See Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout and dimensions. 2. Contractor to coordinate all work in the city right-of-way with City of Lakeville Public Works Department. 3. Place a minimum of 6" topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction, including right-of-way boulevards, unless specified otherwise. 4. See Civil Engineer's Plans for proposed grading & utilities. 5. See Sheet L2 for Landscape Details, Notes, and Schedule. 6. Refer to Civil Engineer's Plans for work limits and extent of grading. NOTE: Refer to Civil 'Existing Conditions & Removals' Plan for Tree Removals. Unless otherwise noted on civil plans, grind stumps to a minimum of 30" below grade.* SEE SHEET L4 FOR TREE MITIGATION NOTES, SEE SHEET L5 FOR TREE MITIGATION SCHEDULES * CITY OF LAKEVILLE LANDSCAPE TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS: TOTAL EXISTING SIGNIFICANT INCHES: 2,470 TOTAL SIGNIFICANT INCHES REMOVED: 1,819 40% ALLOWED REMOVAL: 988 SIGNIFICANT INCHES PRESERVED: 651 TOTAL MITIGATION INCHES REQUIRED: 104 OVERSTORY TREES PROPOSED: 17 COLUMNAR TREES PROPOSED: 04 CONIFEROUS TREES PROPOSED: 15 ORNAMENTAL TREES PROPOSED: 07 TOTAL TREES PROPOSED: 43 TOTAL MITIGATION INCHES PROPOSED: 104 MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS CALCULATION: Zoning: Residential District Development in residential districts may remove or disturb up to forty percent (40%) of the total diameter inches of significant trees without replacement; any tree removal or disturbance beyond this threshold shall require replacement tree planting. Tree Replacement Requirements: a.Common Trees: Twelve and one-half percent (12.5%) of the diameter inches removed above the removal limits shall be replaced. b.Conifer Trees: (1) Twenty five percent (25%) of the diameter inches removed above the removal limit must be replaced. (2) Coniferous species shall be replaced with new trees, either coniferous or deciduous, at a rate of twenty five percent (25%) the diameter of inches removed. c.Hardwood Deciduous Trees: Fifty percent (50%) of the diameter inches removed above the removal limit shall be replaced with new deciduous or coniferous tree diameter inches. d.Heritage Trees: One hundred percent (100%) of diameter inches removed must be replaced. * Replacement tree species shall be limited to those identified on the City of Lakeville Building Permit Guidelines, except as otherwise approved by the City Forester, and the following: -- Where ten (10) or more replacement trees are required, not more than twenty percent (20%) shall be of the same genus. -- Ornamental tree species of a lesser size may comprise up to fifteen percent (15%) of the required replacement diameter inches provided that the required total replacement diameter inches is met. All trees scheduled to remain within the work limits shall have a forester limb them up, remove suckers & crossing branches, and ensure clearances for vehicles and trucks. Clear and grub any underbrush. TREES TO REMAIN IN THE WORK LIMITS NOTE: Page 250 of 485 TREE MITIGATION SCHEDULES..\..\CAD Standards\CDG-Registration\signature-ben.jpg DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture & Planning PRELIMINA R Y L4 OF L5 TREE MITIGATION SHEDULES: GENERAL NOTES: 1. See Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout and dimensions. 2. Contractor to coordinate all work in the city right-of-way with City of Lakeville Public Works Department. 3. Place a minimum of 6" topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction, including right-of-way boulevards, unless specified otherwise. 4. See Civil Engineer's Plans for proposed grading & utilities. 5. See Sheet L2 for Landscape Details, Notes, and Schedule. 6. Refer to Civil Engineer's Plans for work limits and extent of grading. Page 251 of 485 9 5 8 960 962 962 962 964 966 968 964 966 968 970 97 0 972 972 9 7 2 97 2 974 974 976 976 978 978 980 980 982 982 95 8 96 0 96 2 9 6 4 9 6 6 954 954 954 956 956 956 958 958 960 962 ►► ►► ►► ►►►►►►►►►►►►►► ► ► ► ► C cped Light Pole Light Pole Light PoleD Storm Manhole rim=971.13 Light Pole Light Pole EElec. Meter E Transformer G Gas Meter SignSignSignSignSignLight Pole M mailbox C cped Sign H Handhole Sign Light Pole tnh 960.38 Gate Valve Flag Pole Light Pole Flood Light Light Pole Light Pole H Handhole Sign Sign Gas Valve H Handhole Light Pole H Handhole C cped ERiser FES 15" inv=953.55 97 2 970 974 97 6 96 6 96 4 962 95 8 96 6 96 4 956 954 954 956 958 960 962 964 966 968 97 0 972 9 7 4 97 6 978 980 982 PHASE ONE PROPOSED ADDITION EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING PAVING TO REMAIN TURF SOD TURF SOD 6' TURF SOD MOW STRIP SEED / SOD LINE 6' TURF SOD MOW STRIP SEED / SOD LINE 6' TURF SOD MOW STRIP SEED / SOD LINE LIVE PLUGS PER SCHEDULE NATIVE SEED 'B' PER SCHEDULE NATIVE SEED 'B' PER SCHEDULE NA T I V E S E E D ' B ' P E R SC H E D U L E NATIVE SEED 'A' PER SCHEDULE 18" ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP 18" ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP ROCK MULCH AND EDGER PER NOTES PAVING PER CIVIL TREES TO REMAIN, TYP. TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. TREES TO REMAIN, TYP. TREES TO REMAIN, TYP. TREE TO REMAIN, TYP. CONIFEROUS TREES, TYP. ORNAMENTAL TREES, TYP. EXISTING WOODLAND TO REMAIN EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA TO REMAIN EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA TO REMAIN EX I S T I N G S I D E W A L K T O R E M A I N CE D A R A V E N U E TURF SOD ROCK MULCH AND EDGER PER NOTES PARKING LOT SCREENING (TYP.) ROCK MULCH AND EDGER PER NOTES PARKING LOT SCREENING (TYP.) CONIFEROUS TREE, TYP. ORNAMENTAL TREE, TYP. OVERSTORY TREE, TYP. OVERSTORY TREE, TYP. OVERSTORY TREE, TYP. COLUMNAR TREES, TYP. 40.00' SOD TO PHASE TWO FUTURE ADDITION PHASE THREE FUTURE ADDITION 6' TURF SOD MOW STRIP TURF SOD TURF SOD NATIVE SEED 'B' PER SCHEDULE SIDEWALK PER CIVIL PLANS OVERSTORY TREES, TYP. TURF SOD ROCK MULCH AND EDGER PER NOTES EXISTING WOODLAND TO REMAIN EXISTING WOODLAND TO REMAIN PARKING LOT SCREENING (TYP.) OVERSTORY TREE, TYP. TU R F S O D SOD TO LANDSCAPE PLAN ..\..\CAD Standards\CDG-Registration\signature-ben.jpg DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture & Planning PRELIMINA R Y LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN: L1 OF L5 Proposed Turf Sod per Landscape Notes Proposed Native Seed ' A' per Landscape NotesProposed Landscape Edger per Landscape Notes Proposed Native Seed 'B' per Landscape Notes Proposed Rock Mulch & Weed Mat per Landscape Notes * NOTE: REFER TO LANDSCAPE SHEET L2 FOR PLANT SCHEDULE * Live Plugs per Schedule LANDSCAPE LEGEND: Existing Tree to Remain CITY OF LAKEVILLE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 11-21-9: REQUIRED SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: A. Screening: Where any commercial, industrial or institutional use, except those within the C-CBD or I-CBD districts, abuts a residential district, that use shall provide screening along the property line abutting any property in the residential district. 1. A greenbelt planting strip shall consist of evergreen trees and/or deciduous trees and shrubs and shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') in width and of a sufficient density to provide a substantially continuous visual screen at maturity of the installed plantings. B. Landscaping: Required landscaping for new residential subdivisions and commercial, industrial or institutional uses shall include plantings at the property perimeter, off street parking perimeter landscaping and interior landscape plantings as well as required residential buffer yard or transitional buffer zone plantings. PARKING LOT SCREENING: Parking lots with more than 5 spaces require screening. Landscape screening shall be set back 2' from the parking stalls. Deciduous trees shall be planted no more than 40 apart. Evergreen trees shall be planted so that branches are touching at narrowest mature canopy width. Large deciduous shrubs shall be planted so that branches are touching at narrowest projected mature width. MINIMUM PLANTING SIZES: 2.5" Shade Tree 2" Ornamental Tree 8' Coniferous Tree IRRIGATION: e: Properties developed after May 17, 2010, with detached townhouse, two-family, townhouse or multiple-family dwelling units within the RST-2, RM or RH district and all commercial, industrial or institutional uses shall provide an exterior inground irrigation system within the property where necessary to ensure that all turf grass, ground cover of cultivated vegetation, garden, hedges, trees and shrubbery maintenance can be accomplished. TREE DIVERSITY MATRIX: SHRUB ROW 1 L1 PARKING LOT SCREENING STRATEGY - CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE PARKING LOT PER CIVIL PLANSLANDSCAPE PER PLAN VIEW FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY PARKED VEHICLE TREE ROW GENERAL NOTES: 1. See Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout and dimensions. 2. Contractor to coordinate all work in the city right-of-way with City of Lakeville Public Works Department. 3. Place a minimum of 6" topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction, including right-of-way boulevards, unless specified otherwise. 4. See Civil Engineer's Plans for proposed grading & utilities. 5. See Sheet L2 for Landscape Details, Notes, and Schedule. 6. Refer to Civil Engineer's Plans for work limits and extent of grading. Page 252 of 485 LANDSCAPE DETAILS, NOTES, & SCHEDULES..\..\CAD Standards\CDG-Registration\signature-ben.jpg DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture & Planning PRELIMINA R Y 1 L2 TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTING - SECTION NOT TO SCALE 1'-6" (MIN.) 4" FACE OF WALL OR BACK OF CURB. MULCH PER LANDSCAPE NOTES EDGER PER LANDSCAPE NOTES 3 OZ. NEEDLE-PUNCH FILTER FABRIC, TURN-UP FINISHED GRADE PITCH SUB-GRADE TO DRAIN AWAY FROM BUILDING WALLS & CURBS. NOTES: SEE PLAN FOR CROSS SLOPE DIRECTION. PLANT BED WIDTH VARIES, SEE PLAN. AT EDGES, OVERLAP SEAMS 4". SEE PLANS WIDTHS MAY VARY SUBMIT MULCH, EDGER, AND FABRIC SAMPLES FOR APPROVAL. . . . . . .. .. ....... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . ... . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN WIDTH OF HOLE EXCAVATION SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. 3'' DEPTH WATERING BASIN PLANTING SOIL PER NOTES. MULCH PER NOTES FINISHED GRADE PLANT ACCORDING TO PLANTING DETAILS FOR ISOLATED PLANTING LOCATIONS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF REDUCED HOLE WIDTH. 2 L2 TYPICAL MULCH AND EDGER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. Tree saucer mulch to be four inches (4") depth single-shred hardwood mulch for trees outside of a plant bed. Install per tree planting detail. 2. Refer to civil plan sheets for grading, drainage, site dimensions, survey, tree removal, proposed utilities & erosion control. 3. All plant material shall comply with the latest edition of the American Standard for Nursery Stock, American Association of Nurserymen. Unless noted otherwise, deciduous shrubs shall have at least 5 canes at the specified shrub height. Plant material shall be delivered as specified. All deciduous trees are measured at 48" from finished grade to determine tree diameter (DBH). All coniferous trees are measured from finished grade to the top of the central leader. If no central leader is present on coniferous trees, that plant is rejected and must be replaced immediately. 4. Plan takes precedence over plant schedule if discrepancies in quantities exist. 5. All proposed plants shall be located and staked as shown. 6. Adjustment in location of proposed plant material may be needed in field. Should an adjustment be required, the client will provide field approval. Significant changes may require city review and approval. 7. The project landscape contractor shall be held responsible for watering and properly handling all plant materials brought on the site both before and after installation. Schedule plant deliveries to coincide with expected installation time within 36 hours. 8. All plant materials shall be fertilized upon installation as specified. 9. The landscape contractor shall provide the owner with a watering schedule appropriate to the project site conditions and to plant material growth requirements. 10. If the landscape contractor is concerned or perceives any deficiencies in the plant selections, soil conditions, drainage or any other site condition that might negatively affect plant establishment, survival or guarantee, they must bring these deficiencies to the attention of the landscape architect & client prior to bid submission. 11. Contractor shall establish to his/ her satisfaction that soil and compaction conditions are adequate to allow for proper drainage at and around the building site. 12. Contractor is responsible for ongoing maintenance of all newly installed material for the duration of the plant warranty, with the exception of turf sod, which shall be maintained for 30 days after installation or until the first mowing, whichever comes first. Contractor must bag clippings from initial mowing and remove from the job site. Any acts of vandalism or damage which may occur prior to warranty start shall be the responsibility of the contractor. Contractor shall provide the owner with O&M information, including (but not limited to), written instructions on proper lawn mowing height, yearly lawn maintenance recommendations, proper plant pruning information, plant & lawn fertilization schedule, and disease/pest control. 13. The contractor shall guarantee newly planted material (including seeding) through ONE calendar year from the date of written owner acceptance. Plants that exhibit more than 15% die-back damage shall be replaced at no additional cost to the owner. The contractor shall also provide adequate tree wrap and deer/rodent protection measures for the plantings during the warranty period. 14. This layout plan constitutes our understanding of the landscape requirements listed in the ordinance. Changes and modifications may be requested by the city based on applicant information, public input, council decisions, etc. 15. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for obtaining any permits and coordinating inspections as required throughout the work process. 16. Plant size & species substitutions must be approved in writing prior to acceptance in the field. 17. Replacement and repairs requested by the Owner during the warranty period must be made within 14 business days of the request. 18. Landscape Contractor is responsible for coordination with the General Contractor, to protect the new improvements on and off-site during landscape work activities. Report any damage to the General Contractor immediately. 19. Turf Sod (if noted per plans) activity shall conform to all rules and regulations as established in the MnDOT Seeding Manual, 2014 edition, for turf bed preparation, installation, maintenance, acceptability, and warranty. Sod installer is to place (2) metal sod staples per roll of sod regardless of slope. On slopes 6:1 or greater, install (4) metal sod staples per roll of sod. 20. The Landscape Contractor shall furnish samples of all landscape materials for approval prior to installation. 21. The Landscape Contractor shall clear and grub underbrush from within the work limits to remove dead branches, leaves, trash, weeds and foreign materials. Remove trees where noted on the civil plan, including the stump to 30" below grade. 22. The landscape contractor shall contact Gopher State One Call no less than 48 hours before digging for field utility locations. 23. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for the removal of erosion control measures once vegetation has been established to the satisfaction of the municipal staff. This includes silt curtain fencing and sediment logs placed in the landscape. 24. The Landscape Contractor shall establish to his/ her satisfaction that the earthwork is complete, topsoil spread to correct depth, and compaction conditions are adequate to allow for proper drainage at and around the building site. Notify the General Contractor immediately if soil conditions left by the earthwork sub-contractor are not satisfactory. No additional compensation will be paid for discrepancies due to earthwork once the landscape contractor begins plant material installation. 25. Topsoil Requirements: All graded areas of the site that are designated on the plan set for turf shall have no less than 6" of imported top soil, areas designated for shrubs, trees, and perennials shall have no less than 12" of imported top soil, meeting MnDOT classifications for planting soil for trees, shrubs, and turf. Slope away from building. 26. Landscape contractor must prove the open sub-grade of all planting areas after their excavation is capable of infiltrating a minimum requirement of 1/4-inch of water per hour prior to installation of plant materials, topsoil, irrigation, weed mat, and mulch. Planting areas not capable of meeting this requirement shall have 4" diameter X 48" depth holes augured every 36" on-center and filled with MnDOT Free-Draining Coarse Filter Aggregate. Re-test sub-grade percolation for compliance to infiltration minimum requirement. 27. Landscape contractor to provide nursery pull list (bill of lading) including plant species and sizes shipped to the site. Additionally, the landscape contractor shall provide nursery stock traceability, proving none of the materials provided contain or are genetic strains of the neonicotinoid family including acetamiprid, clothianidin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, nithiazine, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam. 28. All edger shall be commercial grade black Polyethylene edger. Anchor every 18" on-center (minimum). Submit sample. 29. Unless otherwise noted, rock mulch shall be limestone chip rock over free-draining weed barrier. Wood mulch areas shall be a 4" depth of single-shred Western Red Cedar wood mulch over free-draining weed barrier. Trees outside plant beds to receive wood mulch, as noted. 29.Seed Areas (if noted per plan): Maintain newly seeded areas per MnDOT Seeding Manual, 2024 edition. Warranty includes seeding contractor on-site maintenance visits for mowing, weeding, spot-spraying invasives, and re-seeding bare areas as noted. Ensure cover crop achieves 80% germination and erosion is not evident. An acceptable stand of seeding is full, lush, and free of invasive plants & weeds. L2 OF L5 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER MATURE HEIGHT/SPREAD QTY EVERGREEN TREES AB Abies balsamea Balsam Fir 8` Hgt.B&B 40'H / 25'W 5 JE Juniperus virginiana Eastern Red Cedar 8` Hgt.B&B 25'H / 15'W 5 PD Picea glauca `Densata`Black Hills Spruce 8` Hgt.B&B 40'H / 25'W 5 ORNAMENTAL TREES AO Aesculus glabra Ohio Buckeye 2" Cal. B&B 18'H/12'W 2 MA Maackia amurensis Amur Maackia 2" Cal. B&B 18'H/12'W 1 MS Malus x `Spring Snow`Spring Snow Crab Apple 2" Cal. B&B 18'H/12'W 2 SI Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk`Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 2" Cal. B&B 18'H/12'W 2 OVERSTORY TREES AR2 Acer rubrum Red Maple 2.5" Cal. B&B 50'H / 40'W 1 AS Acer x freemanii `Sienna` Sienna Glen Maple 2.5" Cal. B&B 50'H / 40'W 1 BR Betula nigra River Birch 2.5" Cal. B&B 50'H / 40'W 2 BP Betula platyphylla 'Fargo'Dakota Pinnacle Birch 2.5" Cal.B&B 25'H / 15'W 4 GD Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Draves' TM Street Keeper Honey Locust 2.5" Cal.B&B 40'H / 25'W 5 GI3 Gymnocladus dioica `McKBranched` TM Kentucky Coffeetree 2.5" Cal.B&B 40'H / 25'W 5 TB2 Tilia americana 'Boulevard'Boulevard American Linden 2.5" Cal. B&B 40'H / 25'W 3 SHRUBS Ha Hydrangea arborescens `Annabelle` Annabelle Hydrangea 5 gal.Pot 4'H / 4'W 7 Rg Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low`Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac 5 gal.Pot 2'H / 8'W 10 Ra Ribes alpinum Alpine Currant 5 gal.Pot 4'H / 4'W 58 ANNUALS/PERENNIALS Ds Dicentra spectabilis Bleeding Heart 1 gal.Pot 2'H / 2'W 8 Hr Hemerocallis x `Ruby Stella`Ruby Stella Daylily 1 gal.Pot 2'H / 2'W 18 Lb Leucanthemum x superbum `Becky`Shasta Daisy 1 gal.Pot 2'H / 2'W 32 Nw Nepeta x faassenii `Walkers Low`Walkers Low Catmint 1 gal.Pot 2'H / 2'W 8 GRASSES Ck Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 4'H/3'W 26 EVERGREEN SHRUB Jf Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green` Sea Green Juniper 5 gal.Pot 4'H / 4'W 73 PLANT SCHEDULE PERENNIAL / PLUG PLANT. EDGE CONDITION VARIES - SEE PLAN. MULCH PER NOTES. PLANTING SOIL - PER NOTES. CONTRACTOR PREPARED SUBGRADE. NOTE: HAND-LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED PLANT MATERIALS. 18" MIN. SEE PLAN 6" MIN. 6" M I N . 3 L2 TYP. PERENNIAL PLANTING - SECTION NOT TO SCALE EXISTING SOD BLADE EXISTING THATCH LAYER SOIL NEW SOD BLADE NEW THATCH LAYER SOIL SUB CUT FOR NEW SOD THATCH LAYERS TO HAVE MATCHING ELEVATION 1" 3/ 4 " 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK * THATCH LAYERS TO MATCH * NO THATCH ABOVE ADJACENT GRADE * SUB-CUT AND FINAL GRADE BY SOD INSTALLER OR CURB 4 L2 NEW SOD TO EXISTING SOD NOT TO SCALE GENERAL NOTES: 1. See Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout and dimensions. 2. Contractor to coordinate all work in the city right-of-way with City of Lakeville Public Works Department. 3. Place a minimum of 6" topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction, including right-of-way boulevards, unless specified otherwise. 4. See Civil Engineer's Plans for proposed grading & utilities. 5. Refer to Civil Engineer's Plans for work limits and extent of grading. Page 253 of 485 LANDSCAPE NOTES & SCHEDULES..\..\CAD Standards\CDG-Registration\signature-ben.jpg DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture & Planning PRELIMINA R Y SEEDING SPECIFICATION: MnDOT NATIVE SEEDING INSTALLATION METHOD: Mechanical Drop Seeding Onto Tilled Sites This is the "standard" method for seeding on prepared sites such as those on construction projects. a) Site Preparation: The site should be prepared by loosening topsoil to a minimum depth of 3 inches. b) Fertilizer: Use a fertilizer analysis based on a soil test or a general recommendation is a 10-10-10 (NPK) commercial grade analysis at 200 lbs/acre. c) Seed Installation: Seed should be installed with a drop seeder that will accurately meter the types of seed to be planted, keep all seeds uniformly mixed during the seeding and contain drop seed tubes for seed placement (Brillion-type). The drop seeder should be equipped with a cultipacker assembly to ensure seed-to-soil contact. d) Seeding Rates: Rates are specified in the mixture tabulation for the specified mix. e) Packing: If the drop seeder is not equipped with a cultipacker, the site should be cultipacked following the seeding to ensure seed-to-soil contact. f) Mulch: Cover soil with a hydromulch consisting of natural wood fiber or paper fiber, water, and M-Binder at 100 lbs per acre. MnDOT NATIVE SEED MAINTENANCE - 3 YRS: Native Grass and Forb Mixtures (mixtures beginning with the number 3) Year 1 Establishment (spring seeding): 1) Prepare site - Late April - May 2) Seed - May 1 - June 1 Maintenance: 1) Mow (6-8 inches) - every 30 days after planting until September 30. 2) Weed Control - mowing should help control annual weeds. Spot spray thistles, etc. Establishment (fall seeding): 1) Prepare site - Late August - early September 2) Seed - late September to freeze-up Maintenance (following season): 1) Mow (6-8 inches) - once in May, June, and July 2) Weed Control - mowing should keep annual weeds down. Spot spray thistles, etc. Evaluation: 1) Cover crop growing within 2 weeks of planting (except dormant plantings). 2) Seedlings spaced 1-6 inches apart in drill rows. 3) Native grass seedlings may only be 4-6 inches tall. 4) If there is a flush of growth from foxtail etc., mow as necessary. Year 2 Maintenance: 1) Mow (6-8 inches) one time between June 1 - August 15 before weeds set seed. 2) Weed Control - mowing should keep annual weeds down. Spot spray thistles, etc. 3) Some sites may not require much maintenance the second year. Evaluation: 1) Cover crop will be gone unless winter wheat was used in a fall planting. 2) Grasses forming clumps 1-6 inches apart in drill rows, but still short. 3) Some flowers should be blooming (black-eyed Susans, bergamot, etc.). 4) If there is a flush of growth from foxtail etc., mow site. Year 3 Maintenance: 1) Mow only if necessary. 2) Weed Control - Spot spray thistles, etc. 3) Sites usually do not require much maintenance the third year. Evaluation: 1) Planting should begin looking like a prairie - tall grasses, flowers, etc. Long-term Maintenance: 1) Weed Control - Spot spray thistles, etc. 2) Burning (3-5 year rotation) alternate spring and fall if possible. 3) Haying (3-5 year rotation) late summer or early fall. Alternate with burning (may substitute for burning). 4) Burning two years in a row will really "clean up" rough-looking sites. Native Seed Type 'A' (unless otherwise noted on civil plans), shall be: MnDOT Wet Ditch Mix, Dropped into the topsoil layer at 35 lbs per acre with erosion control blanket. Submit seed mix for approval. Grading and Erosion Control per Civil Plans and Specifications. Note: Seed installer shall provide the Owner with a price for one year of maintenance under base bid plus a separate proposal for two additional years of maintenance. It shall be the Owner's decision to continue the maintenance program with the installer. L3 OF L5 Native Seed Type 'B' (unless otherwise noted on civil plans), shall be: Shooting Star Native Seed Mix 'Dry Short Prairie', Dropped into the topsoil layer at 35 lbs per acre with erosion control blanket. Submit seed mix for approval. Grading and Erosion Control per Civil Plans and Specifications. IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS: City of Lakeville Municipal Code: § 152.1013 LANDSCAPING STANDARDS, NONRESIDENTIAL. (G) Irrigation System Required (1)All landscaped areas, including parking area islands must be equipped with an underground, automatic irrigation system or an alternative if approved by the City Engineer. The irrigation system must include a flow meter, moisture sensing devices and must be calibrated to meet all applicable city codes. Irrigation of adjacent rights-of-way is required; however, irrigation equipment must not be located within the right-of-way without approval from the City Manager. (2) In lieu of an underground automatic irrigation system, an alternative irrigation plan may be approved. An alternative plan can include, but is not limited to, rain gardens, closed rain barrels, or greywater systems. Any alternative system must ensure that landscaping will be provided with adequate irrigation. IRRIGATION NOTES: To adhere to the landscape requirements of the City of Lakeville, a design/build irrigation system is required. Tree Water Bags: Landscape Contractor is required to furnish and install (2) tree watering bags per tree, located outside the irrigation coverage limits. Fill with water upon installation & instruct Owner on re-fill timeline. 1 L3 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MN - TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PLUGFLATRiver BullrushBolboschoenus fluviatius RootSizeCommon NameScientific Name (Provide a random and equal mixture of the plants listed) PLUGFLAT Tussock SedgeCarex stricta PLUGFLATWooley SedgeCarex pellita PLUGFLATBebb's SedgeCarex bebbi PLUGFLAT Blue Joint GrassCalamagrostis canadensis PLUGFLATBottle Brush SedgeCarex comosa PLUGFLATLake SedgeCarex lacustris PLUGFLAT Fox SedgeCarex vulpinoidea PLUGFLATCommon RushJuncus effusus PLUGFLATGreen BulrushScirpus atrovirens PLUGFLAT Cord GrassSpartina pectinata PLUGFLAT WoolgrassScirpus cyperinus 24" On-Center Plug Spacing: * Contractor is to evenly distribute the allocated amount of prairie plugs throughout the basin areas located within the site accordingly. BASIN BOTTOM LIVE PLUG SCHEDULE: TOMAHAWK TREE STABILIZER STAKES. MINIMUM (2) PER TREE. SOD ROOT BALL TO SIT ON MOUNDED MULCH - 4" DEEP - SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES PLANTING SOIL - SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES TOPSOIL SUBGRADE OTHERWISE. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS NOTED PLACE ROOT BALL SO THAT BASAL FLARE IS 1" ABOVE SURROUNDING CONTACT WITH TRUNK. NOTE: DRAIN SYSTEM IS NECESSARY 4" DIAMETER AUGERED HOLE, 42" MIN. DEPTH. FILLED W/ 3/4" DIAMETER DRAIN ROCK. COVER W/ 6" FILTER FABRIC. FOR HEAVY CLAY SOILS. GRADE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THE TREES ARE IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. SUBGRADE. REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE, WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL TR E E H E I G H T M E A S U R E D F R O M T O P O F R O O T B A L L T O B A S E O F C E N T R A L L E A D E R . 3 L3 CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING - SECTION NOT TO SCALE 2 L3 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING - SECTION NOT TO SCALE DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS, CO-DOMINANT LEADERS, AND BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. SOME INTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BE PRUNED; HOWEVER, DO NOT REMOVE THE TERMINAL BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF THE CROWN. FIELD STAKE TREES FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT INSTALL 6" DIA. WHITE DRAIN TILE TRUNK GUARDS ON ALL NEW DECIDUOUS TREES BY NOVEMBER 1. MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THE NURSERY, AND ROTATE TREE TO FACE NORTH AT THE SITE WHEN EVER POSSIBLE. SET TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH TO GRADE OR 1-2 IN. HIGHER IN SLOWLY DRAINING SOILS. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. 4 IN. HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL (FOR ISOLATED TREES ONLY). REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM TOP THIRD OF ROOT BALL. IF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A WIRE BASKET AROUND THE ROOT BALL, CUT THE WIRE BASKET IN FOUR PLACES AND FOLD DOWN 8 IN. INTO PLANTING HOLE. PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL. NOTE: FOR DIMENSIONS OF PLANTING AREAS SEE PLAN, SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE GARDEN BLEND SOIL ( EQUAL MIX OF COMPOST, SAND & SOIL ) PER NOTES. TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT. WOOD MULCH. DO NO PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. MAINTAIN THE MULCH WEED-FREE FOR AFTER PLANTING. MULCH RING 4 FT. DIAMETER MIN. 6FT. DIAMETER PREFERRED NOTES:STAKE TREES ON SLOPES OF 4:1 OR GREATER ENSURE TREE PIT PASSES REQUIRED PERCOLATION TESTING. NOTE: REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE, WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM TOP THIRD OF ROOT BALL GENERAL NOTES: 1. See Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout and dimensions. 2. Contractor to coordinate all work in the city right-of-way with City of Lakeville Public Works Department. 3. Place a minimum of 6" topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction, including right-of-way boulevards, unless specified otherwise. 4. See Civil Engineer's Plans for proposed grading & utilities. 5. See Sheet L2 for Landscape Details, Notes, and Schedule. 6. Refer to Civil Engineer's Plans for work limits and extent of grading. Page 254 of 485 Page 255 of 485 04/10/2025 MASTERPLAN STUDY FOR RESTORATION COVENANT CHURCH FARMINGTON, MN BUILDING ELEVATIONS A4.1 The Dennis Batty & Associates Group architects & engineers incorporated MINNESOTA 22770 IMPERIAL AVENUE N. FOREST LAKE, MN 55025 EMAIL: info@dennisbatty.com PHONE: 651-464-3756 FAX: 651-464-3794 MISSOURI 3242 WEST WINDWARD PASS SPRINGFIELD, MO 65810 EMAIL: info@dennisbatty.com PHONE: 417-889-8540 FAX: 417-889-1644 DRAWN BY: COMMISSION NUMBER: ISSUE DATE: PLOT DATE: 04/10/2025 REVISIONS: MASTERPLAN STUDY FOR RESTORATION COVENANT CHURCH FARMINGTON, MN BUILDING ELEVATIONS A4.0 ST A P L E A R E A ST A P L E A R E A PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA 1/8"=1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION1 A4.0 1/8"=1'-0" WEST ELEVATION2 A4.0 PREFINISHED METAL INSULATED GLASS IN AUMINUM FRAME CULTURED STONE SHINGLED ROOF PAINTED METAL CROSS STUCCO OR EIFS CULTURED STONE CEMENTIOUS SIDING FACE BRICK WOODEN TRELLIS EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED NEW SHINGLED ROOF PAINTED METAL CROSS STUCCO OR EIFS INSULATED GLASS IN AUMINUM FRAME CEMENTIOUS SIDING EXISTING BERM PREFINISHED METAL EXISTING BUILDING Page 256 of 485 The Dennis Batty & Associates Group architects & engineers incorporated MINNESOTA 22770 IMPERIAL AVENUE N. FOREST LAKE, MN 55025 EMAIL: info@dennisbatty.com PHONE: 651-464-3756 FAX: 651-464-3794 MISSOURI 3242 WEST WINDWARD PASS SPRINGFIELD, MO 65810 EMAIL: info@dennisbatty.com PHONE: 417-889-8540 FAX: 417-889-1644 DRAWN BY: COMMISSION NUMBER: ISSUE DATE: PLOT DATE: 04/10/2025 REVISIONS: MASTERPLAN STUDY FOR RESTORATION COVENANT CHURCH FARMINGTON, MN BLDG ELEV & SECTIONS A4.0 ST A P L E A R E A ST A P L E A R E A PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA PREFINISHED METAL INSULATED GLASS IN AUMINUM FRAME CULTURED STONE SHINGLED ROOF PAINTED METAL CROSS STUCCO OR EIFS CULTURED STONE CEMENTIOUS SIDING FACE BRICK 18 ' - 8 " 33 ' - 4 " 40 ' - 4 " 14 ' - 0 " WOODEN TRELLIS EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED NEW PREFINISHED METAL INSULATED GLASS IN AUMINUM FRAME SHINGLED ROOF PAINTED METAL CROSS STUCCO OR EIFS CEMENTIOUS SIDING EXISTING BUILDING 18 ' - 8 " 33 ' - 4 " 40 ' - 4 " EXISTING BERM 04/10/2025 MASTERPLAN STUDY FOR RESTORATION COVENANT CHURCH FARMINGTON, MN BUILDING ELEVATIONS A4.1 1/8"=1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION2 A4.0 1/8"=1'-0" BUILDING SECTION1 A4.0 1/8"=1'-0" WEST ELEVATION4 A4.0 1/8"=1'-0" BUILDING SECTION3 A4.0 Page 257 of 485 MATERIAL BRICK CAST STONE AC M GLASS FUTURE EXPAN. - ACM TOTAL S.F. FACADE: PROPOSED S.F. 0 1,377 365 0 1,082 2,825 GROSS. W/O FUTURE. EXPANSION. 1,743 NORTH TOTAL TOTAL PROPOSED % 0 79 2 1 0 NOT INCLUDED 100 MAT'L. CLASS A C C MATERIAL BRICK CAST STONE AC M GLASS FUTURE EXPAN. - ACM TOTAL S.F. FACADE: PROPOSED S.F. 0 0 0 0 616 616 EAS T TOTAL TOTAL PROPOSED % 0 0 0 0 100 100 MAT'L. CLASS C MATERIAL BRICK CAST STONE AC M GLASS TOTAL S.F. FACADE: PROPOSED S.F. 266 644 76 1,414 2,404 SOUTH TOTAL 2,404 PROPOSED % 1 1 27 3 59 100 MAT'L. CLASS A C MATERIAL BRICK CAST STONE AC M GLASS TOTAL S.F. FACADE: PROPOSED S.F. 0 0 0 0 630 - BUTTS UP AGAINST EXISTING BUILDING WEST TOTAL PROPOSED % 0 0 0 0 MAT'L. CLASS A A MATERIAL CLASS A C FACADE: PERCENTAGE TOTAL 97 3 100 SOUTH TOTAL MATERIAL CLASS FACADE: PERCENTAGE TOTAL WEST BUTTS UP AGAINST EXISTING BUILDING CLASS MATERIAL TOTALSCLADDING PERCENTAGES EAST 566 15 3 A 142 25 A 213 38 C 196 35 A 1,742 ACMACM21 TOTAL 1,742 100 TOTAL 566 100 GRADE A 79% GRADE A 62% GRADE A 97 GRADE A 65% 2,400 723 11 121 17 A 252 35 C 350 48 A 723 100 ACMACM 2,400 PAINTED HOLLOW METAL DOOR CULTURED STONE STUCCO OR EIFS SHINGLED ROOF PAINTED METAL CROSS EXISTING BUILDINGPROPOSED NEW DASHED LINE INDICATES FUTURE ADDITION TO BE FINISHED IN CULTURED STONE 04/10/2025 MASTERPLAN STUDY FOR RESTORATION COVENANT CHURCH FARMINGTON, MN BUILDING ELEVATIONS A4.0 The Dennis Batty & Associates Group architects & engineers incorporated MINNESOTA 22770 IMPERIAL AVENUE N. FOREST LAKE, MN 55025 EMAIL: info@dennisbatty.com PHONE: 651-464-3756 FAX: 651-464-3794 MISSOURI 3242 WEST WINDWARD PASS SPRINGFIELD, MO 65810 EMAIL: info@dennisbatty.com PHONE: 417-889-8540 FAX: 417-889-1644 DRAWN BY: COMMISSION NUMBER: ISSUE DATE: PLOT DATE: 04/10/2025 REVISIONS: MASTERPLAN STUDY FOR RESTORATION COVENANT CHURCH FARMINGTON, MN BUILDING ELEVATIONS A4.1 ST A P L E A R E A ST A P L E A R E A NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA 1/8"=1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION1 A4.1 1/8"=1'-0" EAST ELEVATION2 A4.1 INSULATED GLASS IN AUMINUM FRAME FACE BRICK SHINGLED ROOF PAINTED METAL CROSS STUCCO OR EIFS PAINTED HOLLOW METAL DOOR DASHED LINE INDICATES FUTURE ADDITION TO BE FINISHED IN CULTURED STONE Page 258 of 485 04/10/2025 MASTERPLAN STUDY FOR RESTORATION COVENANT CHURCH FARMINGTON, MN BLDG ELEV & SECTIONS A4.0 The Dennis Batty & Associates Group architects & engineers incorporated MINNESOTA 22770 IMPERIAL AVENUE N. FOREST LAKE, MN 55025 EMAIL: info@dennisbatty.com PHONE: 651-464-3756 FAX: 651-464-3794 MISSOURI 3242 WEST WINDWARD PASS SPRINGFIELD, MO 65810 EMAIL: info@dennisbatty.com PHONE: 417-889-8540 FAX: 417-889-1644 DRAWN BY: COMMISSION NUMBER: ISSUE DATE: PLOT DATE: 04/10/2025 REVISIONS: MASTERPLAN STUDY FOR RESTORATION COVENANT CHURCH FARMINGTON, MN BUILDING ELEVATIONS A4.1 ST A P L E A R E A ST A P L E A R E A NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA NO ENTITIES THIS AREA INSULATED GLASS IN AUMINUM FRAME FACE BRICK SHINGLED ROOF PAINTED METAL CROSS STUCCO OR EIFS CULTURED STONE STUCCO OR EIFS SHINGLED ROOF PAINTED METAL CROSS PAINTED HOLLOW METAL DOOR PAINTED HOLLOW METAL DOOR 18 ' - 8 " 33 ' - 4 " 40 ' - 4 " 14 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 8 " 33 ' - 4 " 40 ' - 4 " 14 ' - 0 " DASHED LINE INDICATES FUTURE ADDITION TO BE FINISHED IN CULTURED STONE CULTURED STONE DASHED LINE INDICATES FUTURE ADDITION TO BE FINISHED IN CULTURED STONE FUTURE ADDITION EXISTING BERM EXISTING BUILDINGPROPOSED NEW 1/8"=1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION1 A4.1 1/8"=1'-0" EAST ELEVATION2 A4.1 04/10/2025 MASTERPLAN STUDY FOR RESTORATION COVENANT CHURCH FARMINGTON, MN BUILDING ELEVATIONS A4.0 MATERIAL BRICK CAST STONE AC M GLASS FUTURE EXPAN. - ACM TOTAL S.F. FACADE: PROPOSED S.F. 0 1,377 365 0 1,082 2,825 GROSS. W/O FUTURE. EXPANSION. 1,743 NORTH TOTAL TOTAL PROPOSED % 0 79 2 1 0 NOT INCLUDED 100 MAT'L. CLASS A C C MATERIAL BRICK CAST STONE AC M GLASS FUTURE EXPAN. - ACM TOTAL S.F. FACADE: PROPOSED S.F. 0 0 0 0 616 616 EAS T TOTAL TOTAL PROPOSED % 0 0 0 0 100 100 MAT'L. CLASS C MATERIAL BRICK CAST STONE AC M GLASS TOTAL S.F. FACADE: PROPOSED S.F. 266 644 76 1,414 2,404 SOUTH TOTAL 2,404 PROPOSED % 1 1 27 3 59 100 MAT'L. CLASS A C MATERIAL BRICK CAST STONE AC M GLASS TOTAL S.F. FACADE: PROPOSED S.F. 0 0 0 0 630 - BUTTS UP AGAINST EXISTING BUILDING WEST TOTAL PROPOSED % 0 0 0 0 MAT'L. CLASS A A MATERIAL CLASS A C FACADE: PERCENTAGE TOTAL 97 3 100 SOUTH TOTAL MATERIAL CLASS FACADE: PERCENTAGE TOTAL WEST BUTTS UP AGAINST EXISTING BUILDING MATERIAL CLASS A C FACADE: PERCENTAGE TOTAL 79 2 1 100 NORTH TOTAL MATERIAL CLASS C FACADE: PERCENTAGE TOTAL 100 100 EAS T TOTAL CLASS MATERIAL TOTALSCLADDING PERCENTAGES Page 259 of 485 Page 260 of 485 Sunday Morning Hours | 9 + 10:30am Services (Memorial Day through Labor Day: 10am Service Only) Projected: With the initial construction phase, we anticipate returning to one Sunday service and adding a second morning service again as attendance grows, potentially within approximately 12–18 months. Primary Sunday activity would continue to remain within the 7:40am–1pm timeframe, with occasional monthly or biweekly evening ministry events occurring between 6–9pm. While many households arrive together, parking demand is increased by volunteer teams, worship and tech teams, Restoration Kids volunteers, and families arriving at different times for ministry programming and service responsibilities. Tuesday Evenings | 5:45–8pm (Occasional Use) Women’s ministry book groups, men’s Bible studies, leadership meetings, and ministry planning gatherings. Wednesday Evenings Midweek Ministry Programming Children’s and adult ministry programming offered during designated seasons throughout the year. (Typically concluding by 8pm) Friday Evenings Serve Team + general ministry events (Typically concluding by 9pm) Additional parking is important to accommodate overlapping gatherings as participation continues to grow. Page 261 of 485 Because the church property does not have the ability to utilize neighborhood streets for overflow parking, Restoration Church is requesting additional parking beyond the minimum required 100 spaces in order to safely and effectively support ministry activities and community outreach events throughout the year. For example, Restoration Church hosts community outreach events such as Trunk or Treat, which draw a large number of families from the surrounding community. These events require the parking lot to function both as event space for participating vehicles providing decorated trunks and activity areas, while still maintaining adequate parking for guests attending the event. Additional on-site parking helps provide safer traffic circulation and allows families and guests to arrive and depart more efficiently. PARKING AGREEMENT: At this time, the church does not have a formal parking agreement with the office property to the south and would not rely on neighborhood street parking for regular operations or larger events. Page 262 of 485 City of Lakeville Public Works – Engineering Division Memorandum To: Kris Jenson, Planning Manager From: Grace Ellis, Graduate Engineer McKenzie L. Cafferty, Environmental Resources Manager Joe Masiarchin, Parks and Recreation Director Copy: Zach Johnson, City Engineer Jon Nelson, Assistant City Engineer Tina Goodroad, Community Development Director Julie Stahl, Finance Director Dave Mathews, Building Official Date: May 15, 2026 – Revised June 10, 2026 Subject: Restoration Church CUP • Site Plan Review • Grading and Erosion Control Plan Review • Utility Plan Review BBAACCKKGGRROOUU NN DD The Dennis Batty & Associates Group has submitted a site plan application named Restoration Covenant Church. The proposed site plan is located east of and adjacent to Cedar Avenue, west of Donnay’s College Park, Outlot 4. This property is a metes and bounds parcel and is zoned RS-3 (Single Family Residential District). The site plan proposes a 7,500 square foot building and parking lot expansion 3.75 acres. The proposed development will be completed by: Developer: The Dennis Batty & Associates Group Engineer/Surveyor: Demarc Land Surveying & Engineering SSIITTEE CCOONNDDIITTIIOONNSS The site consists of an existing building and parking lot and contains shared driveway access on the southwest end. The site drains from the southeast to the northwest towards Upper 167th Court. Page 263 of 485 RREESSTTOORRAATTIIOONN CCHHUURRCCHH CCUUPP MMAAYY 1155,, 22002266 –– RREEVVIISSEEDD JJUUNNEE 1100,, 22002266 PPAAGGEE 22 OOFF 55 SSTTRREEEETT AANNDD SSUUBBDDIIVVIISSIIOONN LLAAYYOOUUTT Cedar Avenue This site is located west of and adjacent to Cedar Avenue, a minor principal, as identified in the City’s Transportation Plan. The site proposes utilizing existing shared access from Cedar Avenue. Private Driveway Development of this site includes the construction of a privately owned and maintained parking lot. CCOONNSSTTRRUUCCTTIIOONN AACC CCEESSSS Construction traffic access and egress for grading, utility, and street construction is anticipated from Cedar Avenue. Dakota County permitting may require an access permit. PPAARRKKSS,, TTRRAAIILLSS AANNDD SSIIDD EEWWAALLKKSS Development does not include the construction of public trails and sidewalks. UUTTIILLIITTIIEESS SSAANNIITTAARRYY SSEEWWEERR The site is located within subdistricts NC-20575 of the North Creek Outlet sanitary sewer district as identified in the City’s Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan. Development includes the modification and relocation of privately owned and maintained sanitary sewer service. The wastewater from the development will be conveyed via trunk sanitary sewer to be monitored by meter M643A and continue to the Empire Wastewater Treatment Facility. The developer shall show on the plans that the existing and reconstructed sanitary sewer service to their property. The Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge shall be paid with the building permit. WWAATTEERRMMAAIINN Development includes the modification and relocation of privately owned and maintained water service. The developer shall show on the plans that the existing and reconstructed water service to their property. DDRRAAIINNAAGGEE AANNDD GGRRAADDIINNGG This site is located within subdistricts NCL-90 and NCL-37 of the North Creek Drainage System stormwater district as identified in the City’s Water and Natural Resources Management Plan. Development includes the construction of one stormwater management basin. Drainage will be directed to the stormwater management basin to collect and treat the stormwater runoff Page 264 of 485 RREESSTTOORRAATTIIOONN CCHHUURRCCHH CCUUPP MMAAYY 1155,, 22002266 –– RREEVVIISSEEDD JJUUNNEE 1100,, 22002266 PPAAGGEE 33 OOFF 55 generated from the site. The basin will outlet to a structure in Cedar Avenue and direct emergency overflow to the public system. The site shall retain emergency overflow on the proposed basin surpassing a 100-year rain event. The Developer shall sign a stormwater maintenance agreement for the stormwater system prior to the recording of the site improvement performance agreement. The stormwater system shall provide water quality treatment, volume reduction, and rate control of the stormwater runoff generated from the proposed site improvements and must comply with City Ordinance requirements prior to city approval of the Site Improvement Performance Agreement (SIPA) and construction commencing. The final grading plan shall identify all fill lots in which the building footings will be placed on fill material. The grading specifications shall also indicate that all embankments meet FHA/HUD 79G specifications. The Developer must certify to the City that all lots with footings placed on fill material are appropriately constructed. Building permits will not be issued until a soils report and an as-built certified grading plan have been submitted and approved by City staff. This site contains more than one acre of site disturbance. A National Pollution Discharge Elimination System General Stormwater Permit for construction activity is required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for areas exceeding one acre being disturbed by grading. SSTTOORRMM SSEEWWEERR Restoration Church CUP includes the construction of privately owned and maintained storm sewer systems. Storm sewers will be installed to collect and convey stormwater runoff generated from the lot to drain off site. Draintile construction is required in areas of non-granular soil for the street sub-cuts and lots. Any additional draintile construction, including perimeter draintile required for building footings, which is deemed necessary during construction shall be the developer’s responsibility to install and finance. The Storm Sewer Charge shall be collected with the building permit. FEMA FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS The site is shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (Map No. 27037C0213E; Eff. Date 12/2/2011) as Zone X by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Based on this designation, there are no areas in the plat located within a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), as determined by FEMA. WWEETTLLAANNDDSS There are no wetlands located on the site. Page 265 of 485 RREESSTTOORRAATTIIOONN CCHHUURRCCHH CCUUPP MMAAYY 1155,, 22002266 –– RREEVVIISSEEDD JJUUNNEE 1100,, 22002266 PPAAGGEE 44 OOFF 55 TTRREEEE PPRREESSEERRVVAATTIIOONN The Tree Preservation Plan submitted with the Restoration Church site plan identifies 2,470 inches of significant trees located within the project boundaries. As a Residential District, the tree removal threshold is 40%, or 988 inches. Plans propose to remove 1,819 diameter inches, or 73.6%, which is above the threshold. Tree removals above the threshold require 104 diameter inches of replacement planting, which is met on the proposed landscape plan. A total of 651 diameter inches of significant trees are identified to be preserved. All trees identified for preservation shall be protected with appropriate tree protection fencing and measures installed prior to, and maintained throughout, construction. Any preserved trees that are damaged or removed during construction will require replacement in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. EERROOSSIIOONN CCOONNTTRROOLL The Developer is responsible for obtaining an MPCA Construction Permit for the site as well as developing a SWPPP for the site prior to construction. The SWPPP must be submitted and approved by the City prior any site work. The permit requires that all erosion and sediment BMPs be clearly outlined in a site’s SWPPP. Changes made throughout construction should be documented in the SWPPP. Additional erosion control measures may be required during construction as deemed necessary by City staff. Any additional measures require shall be installed and maintained by the Developer. The MS4 Administration Fee has not been collected on the parent parcel and is due with the CUP. The developer shall provide construction cost estimates prior to City Council consideration. $250,000 x 2% = $5,000 Grading Cost Restoration Church CUP 2026 Rate MS4 Administration Fee Restoration Church CUP SECURITIES The Developer shall provide a Letter of Credit as security for the Developer-installed improvements relating to Restoration Church CUP. Updated construction costs shall be provided by the developers engineer prior to approval of the SIPA and construction commencing. Securities shall be collected with the SIPA for the site. CONSTRUCTION COSTS Sanitary Sewer Connection $ 5,000.00 Watermain Connection 5,000.00 Storm Sewer Connection 5,000.00 Page 266 of 485 RREESSTTOORRAATTIIOONN CCHHUURRCCHH CCUUPP MMAAYY 1155,, 22002266 –– RREEVVIISSEEDD JJUUNNEE 1100,, 22002266 PPAAGGEE 55 OOFF 55 Grading, Erosion Control and Restoration 250,000.00 SUBTOTAL - CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 265,000.00 OTHER COSTS Developer’s Design (3.0%) $ 7,950.00 Developer’s Construction Survey (2.5%) 6,625.00 City’s Legal Expense (0.5%) 1,325.00 City Construction Observation (5.0%) 13,250.00 Developer’s Record Drawing (0.5%) 1,325.00 Landscaping 25,000.00 SUBTOTAL - OTHER COSTS $ 55,475.00 TOTAL PROJECT SECURITY $ 320,475.00 CASH FEES The Developer shall submit the site plan and construction drawings in an electronic format. The electronic format shall be in .pdf and either .dwg/.dxf or .shx format. The Developer shall also pay a cash fee for City Engineering Administration. The fee for City Engineering Administration will be based on three percent (3.00%) of the estimated construction cost, or $7,950.00. Cash fees shall be collected with the SIPA for the site. CASH REQUIREMENTS MS4 Administration Fee $5,000.00 City Engineering Administration (3.00%) 7,950.00 TOTAL CASH REQUIREMENTS $ 12,950.00 RREECCOOMMMMEENNDDAATTIIOONN Engineering recommends approval of the site plan, grading and erosion control plan, and utility plan for Restoration Church CUP, subject to the requirements and stipulations within this report. Page 267 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Resolution Approving Charitable Gambling Lakeville Lions Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a resolution granting approval to Lakeville Lions to conduct off-site gambling at the Lakeville Area Arts Center. Overview Lakeville Lions has applied to the State of Minnesota Gambling Control Board to conduct gambling activities at the Lakeville Area Arts Center from July 9 to July 11, 2026. The application requires a resolution of approval by the City Council. Supporting Information 1. Gambling Resolution - Lions 2026 Financial Impact: $ Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Page 268 of 485 CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. 26- RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR CHARITABLE GAMBLING WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville received an application from the Lakeville Lions to conduct off-site gambling at the Lakeville Area Arts Center; and WHEREAS, Lakeville Lions is a qualified organization. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lakeville grants approval to the Lakeville Lions to conduct off-site gambling from July 9 to July 11, 2026, at the Lakeville Area Arts Center, 20965 Holyoke Avenue. DATED this 15th day of June 2026 CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: ______________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Page 269 of 485 Financial Impact: $Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Taylor Snider, Assistant to the City Administrator Date: 6/15/2026 Resolution Appointing Judges for the August 11, 2026 Primary Election Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a resolution appointing election judges for the August 11, 2026, Primary Election. Overview Minnesota Statute provides that election judges for precincts in a municipality shall be appointed by the governing body of the municipality. The appointments must be made at least 25 days before the election. The attached resolution includes a list of judges to be appointed for this election. Additional judges may be assigned as needed. Supporting Information 1. Resolution Appointing Election Judges 2. Exhibit A Page 270 of 485 CITY OF LAKEVILLE RESOLUTION NO. 26- RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE AUGUST 11, 2026 PRIMARY ELECTION WHEREAS, the City Clerk is the authorized Election official for the City of Lakeville; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statue§ 204B.21 provides that election judges for precincts in a municipality shall be appointed by the governing body of the municipality; and WHEREAS, the appointments shall be made at least 25 days before the election at which the election judges will serve; and WHEREAS, guidelines have been established for the appointment of election judges; judges must be able to: • read, write, and speak English; • carry out instructions given by election administrators and Head Judges; • learn and follow current election laws as provided by Minnesota Statute; • answer questions and provide clear instructions to voters; • work well with other election judges and the general public NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Lakeville City Council hereby approves the list of election judges, attached hereto as Exhibit A, to serve as election judges for the August 11, 2026, Primary Election. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Lakeville City Council approves guidelines establishing an absentee ballot board and authorizes the City Clerk to oversee the appointment and procedural process for the City of Lakeville. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 15th day of June 2026. CITY OF LAKEVILLE Luke Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Page 271 of 485 Antoinette Adelmann Julie Anderson Mary Ann Arneson Marilyn Ashenbrener Connie Backhaus Karla Barrett Bion Beebe Mardell Bentzen Mary Bochek Jason Bonnett Cindy Brask Roxanne Busch Dianne Carbonneau Amy Carlson Dennis Chick Devon Christianson Carol Clark Larry Clausen Mary Kate Clauson Mardell Collins Cynthia Daniels Sara Drazkowski Emily Dvorak Lisa Ebaugh Elaine Elsen Joyce Elsen Melissa Field Stanley Fleming Wayne Golembeck Donald Gordhamer Marilyn Gordhamer John Gorra Jan Graff Gerald Grenz Lynae Grossman Robert Grossman Stephanie Harnois Gloria Hartman Richard Hawkins Colleen Hayes Jared Herndon Jessica Hillis Ronda Hines Tania Hochhalter Ron Hoffbeck Shelby Hoffman Candice Hojan Terry Hoke Tom Housenga Anne Hoybook Brent Jacobson Susan Jain Jacquelyn Johnston Cate Kautz Barbara King Jon Knudson Thomas Koen Susan Landberg Catherine Langord Wall Diane Lind Alicia Linschied Darren Luepke Stephanie MacDonald Scott Maleska Kevin Marsh Carolyn Metcalf Mike Michels Joseph Miller Faadumo Mohamed Daryl Morey Tracey Mostaert Barbara Mutch Diana Neameyer Bob Nentl Barbara Obershaw Kaye Ochsner Thomas OKeefe Roberta Oveson Doug Parks Russell Paskewitz Susan Pastika Andrea Phillips Dianne Piekarski Sandra Rainey Daniel Raway Diana Regenscheid Zach Reuvers Debra Riggs Janet Ringberg Wayne Rons John Ruppert Ed Rutherford Scott Sammon Heidi Samuels Lawrence Sanders Johanna Sawatske Mary Jo Schmit Jennifer Schneider Steve Schnell Mike Schurch Robin Schuster Vicki Schwartz Louise Seigworth William Shea Susan Sheppard Jacob Simmons David Simonpietri Bob Smits Sheri Soens Kirsten Storlie Sandra Sullivan William Sutlief Kris Swift LaRae Templeton Randy Templeton Mark Tessier Michelle Tetreault Janet Thompson Arnell Thorpe Jeannine Thyren Trace Ulland Karla Vick Utilis Vinson Ray Vogtman Jane Voight Ordean Voight Jeanell Walsh Carol Ward Chelsea Wheat Teresa Will Natalie Wilson Philip Wilson Jennifer Wilts Daniel Wolter Kristina Wyzykowski Sonja Ziemann Brenda Zink Page 272 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Joint Powers Agreement for Maintenance of the North Creek Greenway East Lake Park Segment Between the City of Lakeville and Dakota County Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve Joint Powers Agreement for Maintenance of the North Creek Greenway East Lake Park Segment Between the City of Lakeville and Dakota County. Overview In late 2025, the City and Dakota County partnered to complete a 2-mile trail segment in the City's northeast quadrant. The project was part of the North Creek Greenway, a 14-mile trail that, once completed, will travel through Eagan, Apple Valley, Lakeville, Farmington and Empire Township. The greenway also connects regional destinations including Lebanon Hills Regional Park, the Minnesota Zoo, downtown Farmington, the Vermillion River and Whitetail Woods Regional Park. The trail incorporates elements compatible with natural features along the greenway corridor and expands recreational amenities. The attached Joint Powers Agreement refers to the county’s partnership with the City on the maintenance of the East Community Park (East Lake Park) segment of the greenway. The County will be responsible for the routine maintenance, repair, and replacement of the County’s trail improvements located within the greenway segment(s) highlighted in the attached Exhibit 1 at no cost to the City. The City will be responsible for routine maintenance for the greenway segment(s) as listed in the attached Exhibit 2. The County will reimburse the City for maintenance costs at a rate of $3,750 per mile. Supporting Information 1. JPA Between Dakota County and the City of Lakeville for Maintenance of Greenways, Trails and Associated Improvements 2. Dakota County Authorization to Execute JPA with City of Lakeville for the Greenway and Trail Segment Maintenance Financial Impact: $0.00 Budgeted: Yes Source: Park Improvement Fund Envision Lakeville Community Values: Access to a Multitude of Natural Amenities and Recreational Opportunities Report Completed by: Joe Masiarchin, Parks and Recreation Director Page 273 of 485 Page 274 of 485 Page 275 of 485 Page 276 of 485 Page 277 of 485 Page 278 of 485 Page 279 of 485 Page 280 of 485 Page 281 of 485 Page 282 of 485 Page 283 of 485 Page 284 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Approval of Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County for CSAH 46 Pavement Preservation, Drainage Improvements, and City Utility Repairs Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve the Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County for pavement preservation, drainage improvements, and City utility repair work along County State Aid Highway 46, City Project 26-10. Overview Dakota County will resurface County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 46 (162nd Street) and update pedestrian facilities to meet current ADA standards between CSAH 5 (Kenwood Trail) and the Interstate 35 bridge. This work is scheduled for construction in 2026 as part of the County's pavement preservation program. Several City-owned utilities, including storm sewer, sanitary sewer and waterman, are located within or adjacent to this corridor, and many components are due for maintenance or spot repairs. Coordinating these utility repairs with the County's pavement project allows the City to extend the useful life of existing infrastructure, reduce future pavement cuts and traffic disruptions, lower long-term lifecycle costs, improve the performance of the shared stormwater system, and minimize construction impacts to residents by combining work into a single project. The Joint Powers Agreement outlines project responsibilities and cost participation. The City will lead the design of its utility repair and maintenance work, and the County will lead the pavement preservation design, overall construction and construction administration. The City's estimated cost for drainage improvements and utility maintenance/repairs is $19,000, and will be funded by the Pavement Management Fund and the Sanitary Sewer and Water Operating Funds. Supporting Information 1. 2026.06.15 JPA (Dakota County Contract DCA23523) Financial Impact: $19,000 Budgeted: Yes Source: Multiple Sources Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Zach Johnson, City Engineer Page 285 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA23523 CP 46-068 January 2026 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR MILLING, BITUMINOUS OVERLAY, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CITY UTILITY REPAIRS, AND COST PARTICIPATION BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF DAKOTA AND THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE FOR DAKOTA COUNTY PROJECT NO. 46-068 CITY PROJECT NO. 26-10 SYNOPSIS: Dakota County and the City of Lakeville agree to include the necessary storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain repairs with the 202 6 resurfacing of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 46 (162nd Street) from CSAH 5 (Kenwood Trail) to the bridge over Interstate 35 in Lakeville, Dakota County. All sharing of project costs will be in accordance with the cost sharing policies within the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021). Page 286 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA23523 CP 46-068 January 2026 Page | 2 THIS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), is made and entered into by and between the County of Dakota ("County"), a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, and the City of Lakeville ("City"), a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereafter collectively referred to as “Parties”, and individually as “Party”, and witnesses the following: WHEREAS, under Minnesota Statutes sections 162.17, subd. 1 and 471.59, subd. 1, two governmental units may enter into an agreement to cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties, and one of the participating governmental units may exercise one of its powers on behalf of the other governmental units; and WHEREAS, to provide a safe and efficient transportation system, the County and the City are proceeding with County Project 46-068 and City Project 26-10 (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, County Project 46-068 will include resurfacing the pavement of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 46 (162nd Street) between CSAH 5 (Kenwood Trail) and the bridge over Interstate 35, and includes upgrades to the pedestrian facilities to meet modern ADA standards; and WHEREAS, the City desires to repair storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water infrastructure within the project limits of CSAH 46 (the “City Work”); and WHEREAS, to more efficiently deliver the Project, the County and the City mutually desire to partner with one another in exercising their joint powers to complete final design, construction, administration, and maintenance of the Project, as well as to determine each Parties’ respective share of Project costs; and WHEREAS, the County and City have included the Project in their Capital Improvement Programs and will jointly participate in the costs of said final design engineering, construction administration, and maintenance, per the cost sharing policies within the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021); and Page 287 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA23523 CP 46-068 January 2026 Page | 3 NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed the County and City will share Project responsibilities as detailed in this Agreement and, in accordance with the cost sharing policies within the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021), jointly participate in Project costs as set forth herein. The above recitals are incorporated by reference and are made a part hereof as if fully set forth below. 1. Project Administration. The County shall be the lead agency for design, construction, construction administration, and maintenance of the Project. Subject to the requirements below, the County and the City shall each retain final decision-making authority within their respective jurisdictions. 2. Engineering. Engineering costs shall include the cost of preparing final designs, plans, specifications and proposals, surveying, mapping, consultant engineering, right-of- way mapping, construction management, construction inspection and all related materials testing, including the cost of County and City staff time , as well as the cost of facilitating public and/or third-party agency involvement. 3. Plans, Specifications and Award of Contract. The County is the lead agency and will prepare plans and specifications consistent with County and City design standards, State Aid design standards and MnDOT standards and specifications. The City shall be responsible for inventorying and identifying necessary storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water system repairs, and preparing plans and specifications to be incorporated into the County’s plans and specifications. The Parties’ mutual concurrence with the plans and specifications is required prior to advertising for bids. Within 7 days of opening bids for the construction contract, the lead agency shall submit a cop y of the low bid and an abstract of all bids together with the request for concurrence to the State and the award of the construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. The lead agency may award the construction contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder in accordance with state law. If a bid is not awarded, this Agreement shall terminate for the specific project that is not awarded, and all costs incurred as of the date of termination shall be apportioned in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The construction contract shall be performed in accordance Page 288 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA23523 CP 46-068 January 2026 Page | 4 with approved plans, specifications and special provisions which are made a part hereof by reference with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein. 4. Construction. Construction costs shall include all highway and roadway construction items, including removals; mobilization and traffic control, temporary widening or other measures if required as part of traffic control or project staging; mitigation as required by state and federal permits including accessibility requirements; replacement or restoration of fences, landscaping and driveways when affected by construction; replacement or adjustment of sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer systems, if required due to construction; wetland mitigation and banking; and all other construction aspects outlined in the plan except for elements as called out under this Agreement or County policies included in the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021). The City shall be responsible for inspecting and approving the work associated with utility repairs of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and watermain. During any construction activities on City storm sewer, sanitary sewer, or water, an inspector representing the City must be available at the site. The County and City shall be responsible for the maintenance of all such storm sewer facilities after completion of the Project in accordance with terms and conditions of the current adopted Maintenance Agreement for Storm Sewer Systems (Dakota County Contract No. C0025412). The City shall be responsible for maintaining all sanitary sewer and water facilities. 5. Construction Standards. All construction, including traffic control, shall be accomplished in accordance with applicable State Aid, County and City standards, specifications, and policies to the satisfaction of the County and City. The County and City reserve the right to inspect construction materials and methods as needed. 6. Traffic Control. Prior to the start of any construction activities on City storm sewer, sanitary sewer, or water, a traffic control meeting must be conducted. This meeting can take place at the preconstruction conference. A representative from each the City, County, and contractor must be in attendance. The contractor will provide details of their traffic control plans and must receive concurrence from both the City and County before proceeding with the work. As part of construction inspection, the Parties shall Page 289 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA23523 CP 46-068 January 2026 Page | 5 monitor the traffic conditions and ensure the traffic control measures are in accordance with what was agreed upon during the traffic control meeting. The Parties must coordinate with the contractor in the case that traffic control measures are ineffective or are creating unsafe conditions. 7. Cost Share. After application of all applicable cost sharing provisions of this Agreement and the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021) (cost sharing polices F.1 through F.19), the County will participate in the Project as defined below after deducting federal and state cost participation amounts. Final costs will be based on actuals at the time of construction. Cost Participation – Roadway (County cost policy F.1) • The County will be responsible for 100% of the costs of existing pavement retained and/or rehabilitated through mill and overlay, resurfacing, or other methods, as part of the final project. Cost Participation for Storm Sewer System Maintenance (County cost policy F.7) • The City has inspected and documented a request of specific storm sewer repair items to be included in the construction plans. • Storm sewer repairs: The County and City shall share all costs associated with the repairs to storm sewer systems made as part of the Project. The County shall pay 80% of the storm sewer repair costs, and the City shall pay 20% of the storm sewer repair costs. The City shall be responsible for inspecting and approving this work. Further, the County and City shall be responsible for the maintenance of all such facilities after completion of the Project in accordance with terms and conditions of the current adopted Maintenance Agreement for Storm Sewer Systems (Dakota County Contract No. C0025412). Multi-Use Trails and Sidewalk Maintenance (County cost policy F.8) • Repairs and updates to pedestrian facilities including both trail and sidewalk are included in the construction plans. The County shall pay 100% of the costs for this work. Page 290 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA23523 CP 46-068 January 2026 Page | 6 8. Project Costs: City Utility Repairs. The City has inspected their facilities and documented a request of specific sanitary sewer, and water repair items to be included in the construction plans. The City shall be solely responsible for: • Inspecting and approving said utility work. • Maintaining all such facilities after the completion of the Project. 9. Project Cost Updates. The lead agency must provide updated cost estimates showing the County and City shares of Project costs annually at the time of Capital Improvement Program development. Updated cost estimates will also be provided by the lead agency at the following times: • At construction plan milestones (30%/60%/90%/Final). • Prior to advertising a construction contract. • After bid opening (prior to contract award). • During construction if total contract changes exceed $25,000. Project cost estimate updates include actual and estimated costs for engineering costs, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, construction, and administration. The Parties acknowledge that Project cost estimates are subject to numerous variables causing the estimates to be subject to change and the updates are provided for informational purposes in good faith. Each agency is responsible for informing their respective council or board regarding Project costs estimates. 10. Payment. The County shall administer the contract and act as the paying agent for all payments to the contractor. Payments to the contractor will be made as Project work progresses and when certified by the County Engineer. Upon presentation of an itemized claim by one agency to the other, the receiving agency shall reimburse the invoicing agency for its share of the costs incurred under this Agreement upon receipt or within a maximum of 35 days from the presentation of the claim. If any portion of an itemized claim is questioned by the receiving agency, the remainder of the claim shall Page 291 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA23523 CP 46-068 January 2026 Page | 7 be promptly paid, and accompanied by a written explanation of the amounts in question. Payment of any outstanding amount will be made following good faith negotiation and documentation of actual costs incurred in carrying out the work. 11. Change Orders and Supplemental Agreements. Any change orders or supplemental agreements that affect any of the Project’s cost participation must be approved by the authorized representative of each Party prior to execution of work. The City’s appointed representative is Zach Johnson, City Engineer, and the County’s appointed representative is Todd Howard, Assistant County Engineer, or their successors. Both Parties shall endeavor to provide timely approval of change orders and supplemental agreements so as not to delay construction operations. 12. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement will be effective only after approval by each governing body and execution of a written amendment document by duly authorized officials of each body. 13. Effective Dates for Design and Construction of Project. This Agreement will be effective upon execution by duly authorized officials of each governing body and shall continue in effect until all work to be carried out in accordance with this Agreement has been completed. Absent an amendment, however, in no event will this Agreement continue in effect after December 31, 2027. 14. Final Acceptance. Final completion of the Project must be approved by both the County and the City. The contractor shall provide a maintenance bond for the City Work. The warranty period for materials and workmanship shall be two years from the date of final acceptance by the City, as approved by the City Engineer. The County shall include this requirement in the contract documents. 15. Pavement Maintenance. Upon acceptance of the Project, the City shall be responsible for all pavement maintenance within City-owned right-of-way. The County shall be responsible for all pavement maintenance within County-owned right-of-way. Page 292 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA23523 CP 46-068 January 2026 Page | 8 16. Pavement Marking and Traffic Signing Maintenance . Pavement markings will be installed as applicable for the operation of the highway and intersections along the Project area as outlined in the plans. The City shall be responsible for all pavement marking and sign maintenance within City right-of-way and the County shall be responsible for all pavement marking and sign maintenance within the County right - of-way. 17. Drainage Area and Stormwater or Drainage Facilities Maintenance . Upon final acceptance of the Project, maintenance of any drainage areas and any stormwater or drainage facilities shall be provided in accordance with terms and conditions of the current adopted Maintenance Agreement for Storm Sewer Systems (Dakota County Contract No. C0025412). 18. Sidewalks and Trails. Upon final acceptance of the Project, maintenance of sidewalks and trails shall be provided in accordance with the policies of the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021). The County shall be responsible for the costs of trail resurfacing or reconstruction in accordance with the policies within the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021). 19. Subsequent Excavation. After completion of the Project, and after expiration of the warranty period regarding repair, if excavation within the County right-of-way is necessary to repair or install water, sanitary sewer, or other City utilities, the City shall apply for a permit from the County and shall be responsible to restore the excavated area and road surface to substantially the condition at the time of disturbance. If the City fails to have the highway properly restored, the County Engineer may have the work done and the City shall pay for the work within 35 days following receipt of a written claim by the County. 20. Rules and Regulations. The County and the City shall abide by Minnesota Department of Transportation standard specifications, rules, and contract administration procedures unless amended by the contract specifications. Page 293 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA23523 CP 46-068 January 2026 Page | 9 21. Indemnification. The County agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense arising under the provisions of this Agreement and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of the County and/or those of County employees or agents. The City agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense arising under the provisions of this Agreement for which the City is responsible, including future operation and maintenance of facilities owned by the City and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of the City and/or those of City employees or agents. All Parties to this Agreement recognize that liability for any claims arising under this agreement are subject to the provisions of the Minnesota Municipal Tort Claims Law; Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. In the event of any claims or actions filed against either party, nothi ng in this Agreement shall be construed to allow a claimant to obtain separate judgments or separate liability caps from the individual parties. The County shall include the City as additional insured in the contract documents. 22. Employees of Parties. Any and all persons engaged in the work to be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City, for any purpose, including Worker’s Compensation, and any and all claims that may or might arise out of said employment context on behalf of said employees while so engaged. Any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the County’s employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation or responsibility of the City. Any and all persons engaged in the work to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the County for any purpose, including Worker’s Compensation, and any and all claims that may or might arise out of said employment context on behalf of said employee while so engaged. Any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omissions of the part of the City’s employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation or responsibility of the County. Page 294 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA23523 CP 46-068 January 2026 Page | 10 23. Audits. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sec 16 C. 05, Subd. 5, any books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the County and the City relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the County or the City and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate. The County and the City agree to maintain these records for a period of six years from the date of performance of all services covered under this Agreement. 24. Integration and Continuing Effect. The entire and integrated agreement of the Parties contained in this Agreement shall supersede all prior negotiations, representations or agreements between the City and the County regarding the Project; whether written or oral. All agreements for future maintenance or cost responsibilities shall survive and continue in full force and effect in accordance with the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021) after completion of the construction provided for in this Agreement. 25. Authorized Representatives. The authorized representatives for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement are: COUNTY OF DAKOTA Erin Laberee, Dakota County Engineer (or successor) 14955 Galaxie Ave. Apple Valley, MN 55124 Office: (952) 891-7100 Erin.Laberee@co.dakota.mn.us CITY OF LAKEVILLE Zach Johnson City Engineer 20195 Holyoke Ave. Lakeville, MN 55044 Office: (952) 985-4501 zjohnson@lakevillemn.gov All notices or communications required or permitted by this Agreement shall be either hand delivered or mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the above addresses. Either Party may change its address by written notice to the other Party. Mailed notice shall be deemed complete two business days after the date of mailing. [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW] Page 295 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA23523 CP 46-068 January 2026 Page | 11 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officials. CITY OF LAKEVILLE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By City Engineer Mayor (SEAL) By City Clerk Date: Page 296 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCA23523 CP 46-068 January 2026 Page | 12 COUNTY OF DAKOTA RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: __________________________ By: __ County Engineer Physical Development Director Date: COUNTY BOARD RESOLUTION No. _25-448___ Date: ___9/23/2025__ Page 297 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Letter of Intent for Solar Improvements at City Hall Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve a letter of intent with Apadana Energy for solar improvements at City Hall. Overview The City of Lakeville has the opportunity to pursue funding through the Minnesota Department of Commerce Solar on Public Building (SPB) Grant Program. This program supports the development and installation of photovoltaic (PV) systems on publicly owned buildings and facilities across Minnesota in Xcel Energy territory to reduce energy costs, improve energy resilience and support local sustainability goals. The City is proposing the installation of a solar array no larger than 40 kilowatts on the City Hall building. WSB will support the City through site feasibility analysis, solar system sizing, financial evaluation, solar contractor RFP development and selection and full grant application development. Proposed Project and Potential Outcomes If awarded, grant funding would support the installation of solar PV systems on the City Hall building. Potential project benefits include: • Reduced municipal electricity costs through on-site renewable energy generation • Increased energy resilience for public facilities • Showcasing leadership in sustainability and clean energy adoption By installing solar on the City Hall building, the City can expect an estimated return on investment (ROI) after 5 years, resulting in approximately $191,465 in net savings over 25 years, based on initial planning estimates. The total project cost is estimated at $159,500. Through the State’s Solar on Public Buildings grant program, approximately 70% of the project cost ($111,650) would be covered by grant funding, leaving an estimated City cost of $47,850. In addition, the City may be eligible for federal clean energy tax credits through the Direct Pay program, which can be combined with State grant funding. If awarded, these federal incentives could reduce project costs by an additional 20–30%, potentially lowering the City’s final cost to between $0 and $15,950. Estimated Financial Overview Page 298 of 485 • Total Project Cost $159,500 • SPB Grant Funding (70%) $111,650 • City Contribution before Federal Direct Pay $47,850 • City Contribution after Federal Direct Pay $0 – $15,950 Construction Quote In order for the grant to be complete, a qualified solar contractor needs to submit information for the grant. Also, the grant scoring gives more points if a solar contractor has been selected. The City held a pre-quote meeting at City Hall on June 2, 2026, which was attended by seven contractors. Quotes were received from five contractors on the June 9 deadline and subsequently reviewed by staff. Proposals were submitted by Apadana Energy, Blue Horizon Electric, Olson Solar Energy, TruNorth Solar, and Wolf River Electric. Consistent with the Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements, a scoring matrix was used to evaluate and rank the proposals based on the established selection criteria. Apadana Energy received the highest overall score and is recommended for award of the project contingent upon the City receiving grant funding through the Solar on Public Buildings Grant Program. If the City receives the grant funds and desires to move forward with the solar project a contract with Apadana Energy will be brought back to the City Council for consideration. Estimated Timeline Overview SPB Grant Application Due June 30, 2026 Anticipated Award Notification August 31, 2026 Anticipated Grant Execution & Work Begins October 12, 2026 Project Completion Deadline Within 18 months of grant execution (approx. April 2028) Supporting Information 1. Letter of Intent 2. Letter of Recommendation Financial Impact: $47,850 Budgeted: No Source: Building Fund Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Services Report Completed by: Paul Oehme, Public Works Director Page 299 of 485 • T-E.2.5.4 IRR Ben Ganje 612-280-7469 ben.ganje@apadanatechnology.com *Zero out-of-pocket financing available Cash Payback <1 Years *Assumes all grants/incentives are received 7/12/2026 #DIV/0! *30 years cumulative; system can operate beyond 40 years *Internal Rate of Return on 30 years 68,892 kWh in 1st year; 1,923,682 kWh over 30 years • Environmental Benefits Total Revenue $402,699 2,962,663 lbs. of CO2, which is equivalent to 22,490 trees growing for 10 years Preliminary Design System Size: 55 kW DC / 125 Panels Lakeville City Hall Project Cost 1st Year Net Cost $0 $149,373 Contact: in this proposal. **Includes solar on public buildings grant (Minimum of: $2.03/W & 70% of project cost) *Utility may require relocating meters outdoors. Average meter relocation cost is $3K - $15K, which is not included *Price Valid Until 20195 Holyoke Ave, Lakeville, MN 55044 6/11/2026 Rev 2 © ApadanaSolarTech.com 3401 Nevada Ave N, Minneapolis, MN 55427 (612) 636-1241 Page 300 of 485 • • • 25 Year Optimizer Warranty • SolarEdge Inverters and Power Optimizers • 10 Year Installation Workmanship Warranty • Iron Ridge BX Racking T-E.2.5.4 55 kW, 125 panels -Extendable to 25 Years What are my warranties? • 25 Year Panel Production Warranty -Extendable to 20 years YOUR PRODUCT WARRANTIESYOUR SOLAR SPECS *Consumption data is estimated with the 12 months of supplied usage data What kind of material will be installed What will my system size be? • 25 Year Racking Warranty Monocrystalline 440 Watt Bi-Facial NE Solar Tier 1 Panels or Equivalent • 12 Year Inverter Warranty Solar Utility 24% Energy Offset 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec kWh MONTHLY PRODUCTION Consumption*Production ($50,000) $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Payback: <1 Yrs Loan Payback: <1 Yrs Cash Cumulative Cash Flows © ApadanaSolarTech.com 3401 Nevada Ave N, Minneapolis, MN 55427 (612) 636-1241 Page 301 of 485 HOW MUCH WILL IT SAVE ME (AND THE PLANET)? $44,812 in tax savings $104,561 includes all Utility Incentives and/or Grants $0 $248,838 worth of projected utility savings! Price valid until: I intend to 14,937.00$ Commitment Fee for Engineering & Permitting 82,155.00$ Material Procurement and Mobilization 44,812.00$ Project Installation 7,469.00$ Project Completion Balance System Size:55 kWdc T-E.2.5.4 Your initial payment $149,373 or $2.72/watt, full turnkey design and installation YOUR SOLAR FINANCES You get back ...and For a net cost of Name of authorized representative Signature Date This Letter of Intent (LOI) expresses the mutual interest of the City and Apadana Energy in pursuing the proposed solar project. The parties acknowledge that this LOI is non-binding with respect to construction services and does not obligate the City to proceed with the project. The City shall have no obligation to make any payments, including any engineering, permitting, commitment, design, or other project-related fees, unless and until: (1) the City has been awarded grant funding sufficient to support the project; (2) the City Council has formally accepted the grant award; and (3) the City Council has approved a final contract for the project. Apadana Energy may, at its sole risk and expense, perform preliminary activities necessary to support the grant application process; however, the City shall not be responsible for any costs incurred prior to execution of a City Council-approved contract. No construction, permitting, or other project work shall commence on behalf of the City until a final contract has been approved by the City Council and executed by both parties. Nothing in this LOI shall be construed as creating a binding obligation on the City to award a contract or proceed with the project if grant funding is not secured or if the City Council does not approve the grant or contract. I accept the solar system proposal by Apadana Energy LLC dba Apadana Solar Technologies. Solar on Public Buildings grant plus utility incentives 7/12/2026 Rev 2 Over the 30-years Pay CashPay Cash PPA Finance © ApadanaSolarTech.com 3401 Nevada Ave N, Minneapolis, MN 55427 (612) 636-1241 Page 302 of 485 Total Project Cost $149,373 Utility Xcel Energy Installed Cost ($/Wdc)$2.72 Starting Cost of Electricity $0.0702 Project Payback (Years)<1 System Capacity (kW DC)55.00 Internal Rate of Return (IRR)#DIV/0!Number of Modules 125 Prepared for Lakeville City Hall Proposal ID Rev 2 (CASH)Current Customer Usage (kWh/yr)287,675 20195 Holyoke Ave, Lakeville, MN 55044 Pricing expires 7/12/2026 Total Net Savings (30 yr life)$253,326 Portion to be offset by solar 24% Year Production*Demand**Incentives***Investment Tax Credit (30%) Federal Depreciation State Depreciation Annual Cumulative 0 $104,561 $44,812 ($149,373)($0)($0) 1 68,892 $4,836 $186 $5,022 $5,022 2 68,548 $5,005 $189 $5,193 $10,216 3 68,205 $5,179 $192 $5,370 $15,586 4 67,864 $5,359 $195 $5,554 $21,140 5 67,524 $5,545 $198 $5,743 $26,883 6 67,187 $5,738 $201 ($500)$5,439 $32,322 7 66,851 $5,938 $204 $6,142 $38,463 8 66,517 $6,145 $207 $6,351 $44,815 9 66,184 $6,359 $210 $6,568 $51,383 10 65,853 $6,580 $213 $6,793 $58,175 11 65,524 $6,809 $216 ($500)$6,525 $64,700 12 65,196 $7,046 $219 $7,265 $71,965 13 64,870 $7,291 $223 $7,513 $79,479 14 64,546 $7,545 $226 $7,771 $87,249 15 64,223 $7,807 $229 $8,036 $95,286 16 63,902 $8,079 $233 ($500)$7,812 $103,097 17 63,583 $8,360 $236 $8,596 $111,694 18 63,265 $8,651 $240 $8,891 $120,584 19 62,948 $8,952 $243 $9,195 $129,780 20 62,634 $9,264 $247 $9,511 $139,290 21 62,320 $9,586 $251 ($500)$9,337 $148,627 22 62,009 $9,920 $254 $10,174 $158,801 23 61,699 $10,265 $258 $10,523 $169,324 24 61,390 $10,622 $262 $10,884 $180,208 25 61,083 $10,992 $266 $11,258 $191,466 26 60,778 $11,374 $270 ($500)$11,144 $202,610 27 60,474 $11,770 $274 $12,044 $214,654 28 60,172 $12,179 $278 $12,458 $227,112 29 59,871 $12,603 $282 $12,886 $239,998 30 59,571 $13,042 $287 $13,329 $253,326 Total 1,923,682 ($151,873) NOTE: Actual future performance, values, and returns for each specific solar installation cannot be guaranteed.⁰ Module degredation 0.50% ⁰ Annual degradation based on Apadana and industry data. Annual degradation 0.5%. * Rate escalation 4.00%* Calculated using current utility rates for your customer class, extrapolated forward at an estimated annual rate escalation. ** Demand savings 7.80%** Based on analysis of data from a broad mix of actual, operating installations *** Incentives based on current utility programs, includes Xcel PV Demand Credit Rider calculated to be $0.03/kWh † Fed. & state tax rate N/A † Employs modified accellerated depreciation, customer should consult a tax advisor, bonus depreciation may be available. ‡ Includes cell card replacements (avoidable w/ internet access) and intverter replacement at estimated (extended warranty available) Numbers above are estimates based on industry standards using 44-year average of meteorlogical data. Actual numbers may vary. Consult with your tax advisor or CPA to confirm all tax estimates presented here. ITC percent above is based on information provided by the IRA legislation at the time of proposal or our best judgement given available information. Ongoing Federal ITC updates may alter the ITC. Client should consult their tax advisor to ensure the accuracy of their ITC percentage. $360,387 $44,812 $253,326 ASSUMPTIONS NOTES INVESTMENT SYSTEM Solar Production [kWh]⁰ Revenue Tax Benefits †Cost & Operating Expense ‡ Cash Flow © ApadanaSolarTech.com 3401 Nevada Ave N, Minneapolis, MN 55427 Page 303 of 485 17 8 E 9 T H S T R E E T | SU I T E 2 0 0 | SA I N T P A U L , M N | 55 1 0 1 | 65 1 . 2 8 6 . 8 4 5 0 | WS B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Paul Oehme, Public Works Director From: Mattie Anders, Sustainability Program Manager Date: June 10, 2026 Re: Letter of Recommendation for the Solar on Public Buildings Grant The City of Lakeville is pursuing the Minnesota Department of Commerce’s Solar on Public Buildings Grant for the last round of funding. The City has been utilizing WBS’s sustainability staff to assist in completing this process, which included developing and publishing a request for proposals (RFP) for solar contractors and using scoring criterion to select a contractor (see Lakeville’s attached RFP). Lakeville obtained five (5) different proposals from solar energy contractors on or before June 9, 2026. A scoring matrix was used by Mattie Anders and Lisa Shi (WSB) to individually score these proposals, where one solar contractor had the highest points awarded – Apadana Energy (see the attached proposal). Complete Proposals (10 points) Best Value to the City (30 points) Targeted Group (5 points) Financial Strength and Stability (10 points) Previous Experience (20 points) Project Engineering Analysis (10 points) Customer Service Capabilities (5 points) Apadana Energy included a project schedule, indicating final completion of the solar array and power generation within eighteen (18) months from the date of contract execution. Total project cost listed in the proposal was comparable to other proposals at $159,500, with the grant funding covering 70% of this cost, or approximately $111,650. The project is also eligible to receive a 30% federal tax credit through Direct Pay during the 2027 tax season, which would cover an additional 30% of the total project cost, or $47,850. Assuming the federal elective pay covers 30%, Lakeville will be responsible for $0 for the whole project. The estimated 25-year savings from this program is $191,465. It is recommended that the City Council approve Apadana Energy for this work to enable contract signature, immediate commencement of work, and final grant submittal on or before 6/30/2026, contingent upon state approval of the grant. Attachments: • Apadana Energy Proposal – obtained on 6/9/2026 • Lakeville’s Request for Proposal – released on 5/28/2026 Page 304 of 485 Solar Photovoltaic System Proposal Lakeville City Hall Building 20195 Holyoke Avenue, Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 Prepared for: City of Lakeville Paul Oehem, Public Works Director Prepared by: Apadana Energy 3401 Nevada Avenue N, Suite 2A Minneapolis, MN 55427 www.apadanatechnology.com Primary Contact: Ben Ganje Director 612-280-7469 beng@apadanatech.com Date: June 9, 2026 Page 1 Page 305 of 485 June 9, 2026 Paul Oehem Public Works Director City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: RFP for Solar PV System on Lakeville City Hall Building Dear Mr. Oehem and Selection Committee, Apadana Energy is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Lakeville for the design, engineering, procurement, installation, commissioning, and long-term support of a solar photovoltaic system at the Lakeville City Hall Building. We understand the City is seeking a cost-effective, grant-ready system that supports the Minnesota Department of Commerce Solar on Public Buildings application, protects City Hall, reduces long-term utility costs, and demonstrates Lakeville’s commitment to practical renewable energy investment. Apadana’s proposal is structured as a direct-purchase project so the City can retain the long-term value of ownership, including utility savings, renewable energy credits, and eligibility for applicable federal elective pay benefits. The proposed system will remain at or below the RFP’s 40 kW AC limit and within the City’s stated project-cost target. Apadana will use NE Solar modules and commercial-grade inverter and optimizer equipment, with warranty coverage that exceeds the RFP minimums, including a 10-year workmanship warranty, 25-year module warranty, 25-year optimizer warranty, and included extended inverter warranty coverage. Apadana is also prepared to work with Lakeville on extended payment terms tied to grant timing, project milestones, and City approval processes. We appreciate the opportunity to support the City’s investment in clean energy and believe this proposal provides a strong combination of local experience, grant readiness, long-term reliability, careful facility stewardship, and best value. Sincerely, Lev Buslovich President, Apadana Energy 3401 Nevada Avenue N, Suite 2A Minneapolis, MN 55427 www.apadanatechnology.com (952) 405-6050 Page 2 Page 306 of 485 Key Areas of Differentiation Apadana Energy believes this proposal provides the City of Lakeville with a strong combination of local experience, grant alignment, financial flexibility, facility-sensitive design, and long-term system reliability. Our design proposal will meet or exceed the standards of the city’s request for proposal. The following items will separate us from other installers and, we believe, are unique to our proposal: •CERT-certified Minority Business Enterprise: Apadana Energy is a CERT-certified MBE contractor, providing the City with direct targeted group participation from the prime solar provider, not only from a subcontractor or supplier. •Extended payment options: Apadana understands that this project is tied to the Solar on Public Buildings grant and the City’s reimbursement timeline. We are prepared to work with Lakeville on extended payment terms that coordinate project invoicing with grant reimbursement, City approvals, and project milestones. •More than 15 successful Twin Cities municipal projects: Apadana has completed more than dozens of successful solar projects with Twin Cities municipalities and public-sector entities. This experience gives our team a practical understanding of public-building requirements, occupied-facility construction, utility coordination, prevailing wage documentation, permitting, and public grant compliance. In all projects, Apadana is proud to keep the project within the costs and specifications outlined in the response for proposal. Any change orders came at the request of the municipality. We stand by our bids. •Solar on Public Buildings grant experience: Apadana staff has helped more than a dozen public-sector customers pursue and receive Solar on Public Buildings grant funding by providing the technical, financial, and compliance information required for grant applications and project administration. Most of these have been built within the last 18 months. •No external conduit: Based on the City’s direction, Apadana will design the system with no exposed exterior conduit. Our electrical design will prioritize concealed, interior, attic, mechanical-room, or otherwise non-visible conduit pathways where practical and code- compliant, preserving the exterior appearance of Lakeville City Hall. •NE Solar modules: Apadana is proposing NE Solar bifacial modules for this project, providing the City with high-quality solar equipment selected for long-term performance, warranty strength, and value within the City’s grant-optimized budget. These modules are known to produce more kilowatt hours due to bifacial gain. •Extended inverter warranty included: Apadana will include extended inverter warranty coverage as part of this proposal, giving the City stronger long-term protection than the RFP’s minimum inverter warranty requirement. Page 3 Page 307 of 485 •Public education portal support: Apadana will provide software setup support, monitoring configuration guidance, and staff training for a public-facing SolarEdge monitoring portal if the City would like to use the City Hall solar array as an educational and community-facing sustainability tool. Physical display hardware is not included in the base proposal. •Minnesota-based solar EPC: Apadana is a local solar engineering, procurement, and construction firm with experience delivering rooftop and public-sector solar projects in Minnesota conditions. Our team understands local permitting, Xcel Energy interconnection, snow and wind loading, roof protection, and the documentation standards expected on public projects. We have more than 10 full-time engineers. We don’t employ sub-contractors for local projects. •Turnkey responsibility: Apadana will manage the complete project, including design, engineering, procurement, permitting, interconnection, installation, commissioning, monitoring setup, closeout documentation, O&M manuals, warranty coordination, and grant-support documentation. Apadana is proud to operate a dedicated service department charged with maintaining and operating our projects. Company Overview Apadana Energy is a Minnesota-based engineering, procurement, and construction firm specializing in solar energy systems for public-sector, tribal, commercial, and institutional clients. Founded in 2010, Apadana has grown into one of the most experienced turnkey solar contractors in the region, delivering high-performance photovoltaic systems with a focus on engineering excellence, safety, grant compliance, and long-term reliability. Apadana holds a Minnesota Class A Electrical Contractor License and a Minnesota Building Contractor License. We work with NABCEP- certified professionals, licensed Professional Engineers, and highly skilled electricians who support each stage of the project lifecycle. Apadana is also certified as a Minority Business Enterprise and Small Business Enterprise, bringing additional economic value to publicly funded projects. Through our experience with counties, park districts, municipalities, school districts, tribal governments, and institutional customers, Apadana has demonstrated its ability to manage complex rooftop and ground-mounted solar projects under strict stakeholder, permitting, utility, prevailing wage, grant, and documentation requirements. Page 4 Page 308 of 485 Project Understanding The City of Lakeville is seeking a qualified solar provider to design, build, and maintain a solar photovoltaic system at Lakeville City Hall. The City has stated a preference for rooftop solar and has identified the Lakeville City Hall Building at 20195 Holyoke Avenue as the project site. The City Hall Building has annual electricity usage of approximately 287,676 kWh, average monthly energy usage of approximately 23,973 kWh, and average monthly demand of approximately 77.5 kW. Hourly energy consumption was not available from Xcel Energy at the time of the RFP. Because of that, Apadana has taken a conservative approach to utility savings and demand charge assumptions, described later in this proposal. The project must not exceed the lesser of 40 kW AC or 120 percent of the building’s average annual electricity consumption. Because City Hall has sufficient annual load to absorb the output of the proposed solar system, the 40 kW AC cap is the governing limit. Apadana’s proposed system will be designed to remain at or below this AC capacity threshold while maximizing cost- effective DC capacity within the City’s grant and budget framework. The City’s RFP is directly tied to the Minnesota Department of Commerce Solar on Public Buildings grant program. Apadana understands that the City wishes to maintain total project costs at or below approximately $159,500 in order to maximize the available grant funding. Based on the RFP’s stated assumptions, a project cost of $159,500 may support a Solar on Public Buildings grant of up to approximately $111,650, subject to final Department of Commerce award, eligible project cost, final system sizing, and grant contract execution. Apadana understands that execution of a final contract is contingent upon the City receiving grant funding. If selected, Apadana will support the City’s grant application by providing the technical, financial, and compliance information required by the Department of Commerce, including final system size, production estimates, site plan, one-line diagram, equipment details, project budget, 25-year cash flow analysis, payment milestone schedule, prevailing wage assurance, and MPCA recycling documentation. Proposed Ownership and Financing Structure Apadana is proposing this project as a direct purchase by the City of Lakeville. No Power Purchase Agreement is included in the base proposal. The direct purchase structure allows the City to retain the long-term value of the project, including system ownership, renewable energy credits, utility savings, public education value, and eligibility for applicable federal elective pay benefits. Page 5 Page 309 of 485 This structure also supports a clean and transparent grant application because project cost, grant value, elective pay assumptions, and net cost to the City can be clearly shown in the 25-year cash flow analysis. Apadana is prepared to work with the City on extended payment terms that coordinate with the Solar on Public Buildings reimbursement process, project milestones, City approval cycles, and grant administration. Final payment terms will be confirmed in the project agreement. System Design Rendering Apadana prepared the preliminary Lakeville City Hall solar layout using Aurora Solar to evaluate available roof areas, rooftop constraints, access pathways, shading conditions, and general array placement. The rendering shows a roof-mounted PV system focused on the western and southwestern roof sections, where the roof geometry supports efficient module rows while maintaining appropriate clearances from rooftop equipment, vents, drains, parapets, roof edges, and service areas. This layout reflects Apadana’s intent to balance production, code compliance, constructability, roof protection, aesthetics, and long-term serviceability rather than simply maximizing module count. The design avoids the more architecturally sensitive central roof forms and preserves access for both solar maintenance and existing building systems. Final module placement, setbacks, racking configuration, ballast requirements, and electrical routing will be confirmed during detailed engineering and structural review. Consistent with the City’s direction, the final design will include no exposed exterior conduit and will prioritize concealed or interior routing where practical and code-compliant. . Page 6 Page 310 of 485 Proposed System Snapshot The final system design will be completed after City selection, final engineering review, roof verification, electrical routing confirmation, and grant-support coordination. The following table summarizes the intended design approach and placeholders for final values. See Appendix for product spec sheets, cashflow analysis, and one-line diagram. Apadana will provide final equipment cut sheets, warranties, site layout, one-line diagram, and as-built drawings with the final post-construction package along with grant-support documentation. Item Proposed Value Site Lakeville City Hall Building Address 20195 Holyoke Avenue, Lakeville, MN Proposed DC system size 55kW DC Proposed AC system size 39.99kW AC Module model NE Solar 54THB-M10 Bifacial Module wattage 440w Number of modules 125 Warranty 30 years production Inverter manufacturer SolarEdge Inverter model SE 50kWUS (de-rated to 39.99kW) Inverter Warranty 20 years Optimizer model SEC651U Optimizer Warranty 25 years Racking system Iron Ridge BX Self-ballasted Racking Warranty 25 years Apadana Workmanship Warranty 10 years Tilt 8.5 degrees Estimated Year 1 production 68,892 kWh Annual degradation assumption 0.5% annually Total project cost $159,500 Solar on Public Buildings grant $111,650 Federal elective pay assumption $47,850 Net cost to City $0 Estimated 25-year Savings $191,465 Page 7 Page 311 of 485 Technical and Design Approach During the site review, the City emphasized that preserving the exterior appearance of City Hall is an important project requirement. Apadana incorporated that direction into the design. The proposed electrical approach includes no exposed exterior conduit, with conductors routed through concealed interior pathways where practical and code-compliant. City staff identified an existing three-foot crawl space that should allow conduit to be routed from the west side of the building, where the array is proposed, to the east side of the building, where the electrical meter is located. Final routing will be confirmed during detailed design and reviewed with the City before design approval to ensure the completed installation protects the public- facing character of City Hall while maintaining code compliance and system performance. Apadana designed the City Hall solar PV system as a turnkey rooftop installation, subject to final structural review, roof verification, and electrical routing approval. The system will use NE Solar modules, commercial-grade inverter and optimizer equipment, and a rooftop racking system selected for the building’s roof type, structural capacity, wind loading, snow loading, access requirements, and long-term maintenance needs. Apadana’s preferred approach is a low-slope, ballasted racking system where feasible. This approach eliminates roof penetrations, helps preserve roof integrity, limits disruption to the existing building, and provides flexibility during final layout coordination. The final racking plan will be reviewed by a Minnesota-licensed structural engineer and designed to comply with applicable roof loading requirements, including the RFP’s ten- pounds-per-square-foot limit. The array will be designed to minimize shading from rooftop obstructions while maintaining required fire setbacks, access pathways, service clearances, equipment access zones, and code- required roof pathways. All major electrical components will be UL listed and installed in compliance with applicable electrical, building, fire, and interconnection standards. The system will be designed for reliable operation in Minnesota climate conditions. Page 8 Page 312 of 485 Interconnection, Permitting, and Code Compliance Apadana will be responsible for the electrical design, permit applications, utility interconnection process, equipment procurement, installation, testing, commissioning, and closeout documentation required for the project. The City is served by Xcel Energy, and Apadana will coordinate the required interconnection application, utility review, metering requirements, and permission-to-operate process. Apadana will also support the City with any utility documentation required for the Solar on Public Buildings grant application. The project will be designed and installed in compliance with applicable National Electrical Code requirements, Minnesota State Building Code requirements, local permitting requirements, utility interconnection standards, and applicable fire access requirements. Because the expected project value will exceed $100,000, Apadana understands that building permit requirements may involve the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry. Apadana will coordinate the appropriate permit pathway with the City and the authority having jurisdiction. Demand Charge Savings Assumption Lakeville City Hall is billed on an electric account that includes demand charges, and the RFP identifies average monthly demand of approximately 77.5 kW. The proposed solar PV system may reduce billed demand in months where the building’s peak demand occurs during solar- producing hours. For purposes of this 25-year cash flow analysis, Apadana has taken a conservative approach and has included minimum guaranteed demand charge savings in the base-case financial model. The cash flow analysis therefore reflects energy savings as the primary quantified utility benefit. Any further reduction in demand charges would provide additional financial upside to the City beyond the base-case savings shown in this proposal. Apadana will support the City in reviewing actual utility bills after commissioning to evaluate realized energy savings and any observed demand charge impact. 25-Year Cash Flow Analysis and Cost Assumptions Apadana has provided a 25-year cash flow analysis in an alternative pro forma format. The analysis identifies the cost and savings categories requested in the RFP and uses the snow loss, total loss, and utility escalation assumptions from the Solar on Public Buildings Cash Flow Template. The 25-year pro forma includes the total project cost, Solar on Public Buildings grant assumption, federal elective pay assumption, net City cost, Year 1 production, annual Page 9 Page 313 of 485 degradation, estimated energy savings, O&M assumptions, future costs associated with cell card replacement, extended inverter warranty coverage, recycling assumptions, and cumulative 25- year financial impact. Apadana has incorporated long-term lifecycle costs into the project’s financial analysis, including operations and maintenance, equipment warranty coverage, inverter warranty extension, and recycling assumptions for solar modules, optimizers, and inverters. For purposes of the 25-year cash flow analysis, Apadana has included a conservative allowance for module and inverter recycling or end-of-life handling. Actual recycling cost will depend on the timing of replacement, the number of components requiring replacement, market conditions for PV recycling, manufacturer take-back programs, and recycling options available at the time service is required. Because the proposed system includes long-term manufacturer warranties and extended inverter warranty coverage, Apadana expects component replacement during the cash flow period to be limited. However, the recycling line item is included to reflect the City’s full lifecycle ownership costs and to align with the Solar on Public Buildings cash flow requirements. If a module, optimizer, inverter, or other covered system component ceases to function as intended during the warranty period, Apadana will coordinate the warranty claim and replacement process. Any equipment removed from service will be tracked and handled in accordance with applicable recycling and reporting requirements. See attached Cash Flow pro forma. Solar on Public Buildings Grant Support Apadana understands that the City’s proposal, project selection, and final contract are connected to the Minnesota Department of Commerce Solar on Public Buildings grant process. If selected, Apadana will provide the City with the technical, financial, and compliance materials needed to support the grant application and subsequent project administration. Apadana will provide the City with the required grant-support information by June 24, 2026. Apadana has helped public-sector customers pursue and receive Solar on Public Buildings grant funding by preparing and coordinating these materials. This experience reduces risk for the City because Apadana understands the timing, documentation, and compliance expectations associated with the program. Public Education and Solar Monitoring Portal Apadana will support the City of Lakeville in using the City Hall solar PV system as a public education tool. If the City elects to make system performance information available to the public, Apadana will provide software setup support, portal configuration guidance, monitoring access coordination, and staff training for a public-facing SolarEdge monitoring portal. Page 10 Page 314 of 485 The portal can help residents, staff, elected officials, students, and visitors understand how the City Hall solar array is performing. Depending on the final monitoring configuration, it may display current production, historical production, cumulative energy generation, and environmental benefit equivalents. This option gives Lakeville a simple way to communicate the benefits of the project after installation and showcase the City’s investment in renewable energy. Physical display hardware, wall-mounted monitors, kiosks, cabling, or related building modifications are not included in the base proposal and would be provided by the City or added by separate written authorization. Operations and Maintenance Plan Apadana’s operations and maintenance approach is designed for long-term reliability, simple owner oversight, remote monitoring, timely response to performance issues, and complete closeout documentation. The system will use commercial-grade components, clear safety labeling, remote production monitoring, and manufacturer-supported equipment to reduce maintenance complexity over the life of the project. After commissioning, Apadana will provide the City of Lakeville with three complete O&M manuals. These manuals will include as-built drawings, the single-line diagram, equipment cut sheets, warranty documents, startup and shutdown procedures, monitoring instructions, safety procedures, maintenance recommendations, troubleshooting guidance, and service contact information. The system will include remote monitoring for current and historical production, cumulative generation, inverter performance, system status, and production alerts. Apadana will assist with monitoring setup and provide training to designated City staff on normal operation, monitoring access, basic safety procedures, and shutdown protocol. Apadana recommends annual system review, with additional service visits as needed if monitoring alerts, weather events, roof work, or production anomalies indicate that field inspection is warranted. Preventative maintenance may include review of monitoring data, modules, racking, inverter and optimizer performance, visible wiring, labeling, disconnects, safety signage, roof access clearances, and overall system performance. The system is designed to require limited routine maintenance and to operate in Minnesota climate conditions, including cold temperatures, snow exposure, wind loading, freeze-thaw cycles, and seasonal production variation. Snow removal is not expected as part of normal operations unless requested by the City or required by an unusual safety or performance condition. Apadana will coordinate warranty claims and replacement work for covered components, including support under the 10-year workmanship warranty, 25-year module warranty, 25-year optimizer warranty, and extended inverter warranty coverage. Apadana will also assist with recycling documentation for any module, optimizer, inverter, or related component removed Page 11 Page 315 of 485 from service, including annual MPCA reporting support required under the grant program. Warranties Apadana understands that long-term functionality is critical to predictable energy output and financial value. Comprehensive warranty coverage protects the City against defects, underperformance, or equipment failure and supports the long-term reliability of the system. Apadana’s warranty package includes: •10-YEAR INSTALLATION WORKMANSHIP WARRANTY PROVIDED BY APADANA ENERGY •25-YEAR MODULE WARRANTY •25-YEAR OPTIMIZER WARRANTY •EXTENDED INVERTER WARRANTY (20 YEAR) COVERAGE INCLUDED IN THE PROJECT •25-YEAR MANUFACTURER WARRANTY COVERAGE FOR RACKING •WARRANTY COORDINATION SUPPORT BY APADANA DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD If equipment fails within the applicable manufacturer warranty, Apadana will coordinate the replacement process and assist the City with warranty documentation, replacement planning, and required recycling or disposal documentation. This warranty package exceeds the RFP’s minimum requirements and is intended to provide the City with long-term confidence in the system’s operation. Page 12 Page 316 of 485 References Apadana has completed hundreds of similar-sized projects in the past five years and is happy to provide a list of similar projects completed within the last year. To support the City’s evaluation, references will include commercial grid-connected solar PV systems along with contact information. Reference 1 Project Name: Hopkins Water Treatment Plant Customer: City of Hopkins Location: 1401 Elmo Park Service Road Hopkins, MN 55305 Project Size: 59.4 kWDC (39.99 kWAC) Year Completed: 2025 Project Cost: $140,000 Contact: Don Olson, Public Works Director, dolson@hopkinsmn.com, 952-548-6392 Description: Grid-tied ground mount solar array Solar on Public Buildings Grant Support: Yes Reference 2 Project Name: Brookview Golf Course Clubhouse and Center (see photo) Customer: City of Golden Valley Location: 316 Brookview Parkway Project Size: 125 kWDC (114 kWAC) Year Completed: 2026 Project Cost: $235,000 Contact: Ethan Kehrberg, Sustainability Specialist, 763-593-8083, ekehrberg@goldenvalleymn.gov Description: Self-ballasted roof mount, grid-tied, Solar Edge inversion Solar on Public Buildings Grant Support: No Page 13 Page 317 of 485 Reference 3 Project Name: Fridley Public Works Customer: City of Fridley Location: 400 71st Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 Project Size: 57.7 kWDC (39.99 kWAC) Year Completed: 2025 Project Cost: $115,000 Contact: Rachel Workin, Environmental Planner, 763-572-3594 Description: Roof-mounted Solar, self-ballasted racking, Solar Edge inversion Solar on Public Buildings Grant Support: Yes Reference 4 Project Name: Mahtomedi Public Works Customer: City of Mahtomedi Location: 1250 Lincolntown Ave, Mahtomedi, MN 55115 Project Size: 59.7 kWDC (39.99 kWAC Year Completed: 2025 Project Cost: $115,500 Contact: Bob Goebel, Public Works Director, bob.goebel@ci.mahtomedi.mn.us Description: Roof-mounted Solar, self-ballasted racking, Solar Edge inversion Solar on Public Buildings Grant Support: Yes Reference 5 Project Name: Hutchinson Creekside Bagging Facility Customer: City of Hutchinson Location: 1500 Adams St., Hutchinson, MN 55350 Project Size: 52.8 kWDC (39.99 kWAC) Year Completed: 2026 Project Cost: $134,640 Contact: Mike Stifter, Public Works Director, 320-234-4212, mstifter@hutchinsonmn.gov Description: Roof-mounted Solar, pitched roof racking, Solar Edge inversion Solar on Public Buildings Grant Support: Yes Apadana has more references available upon request. We have completed projects in numerous other cities including Minneapolis, Richfield, Eden Prairie, Edina, Woodbury, as well as many tribal projects and church projects in the Twin Cities. Project Management Plan Apadana will assign a dedicated project manager to serve as the primary point of coordination for the City. The project manager will coordinate design, engineering, procurement, permitting, interconnection, construction scheduling, safety planning, commissioning, documentation, and closeout. Page 14 Page 318 of 485 Apadana uses structured project management systems to track tasks, deadlines, procurement status, design revisions, field issues, and documentation. This approach gives public-sector customers a clear record of progress and helps ensure that grant deadlines and project milestones are not missed. Upon notice of selection, Apadana will immediately begin final site review, document collection, utility coordination, and engineering. Apadana understands that technical and system information for the City’s grant application must be provided by June 24, 2026. We will prioritize the grant- support package first so the City can submit a complete and competitive application to the Department of Commerce. Construction Approach and Site Coordination Lakeville City Hall is an active public facility, and Apadana will plan the work to minimize disruption to staff, visitors, and City operations. Construction sequencing will be coordinated with City representatives before mobilization. Apadana will establish defined staging areas, access routes, safety controls, roof access procedures, material handling plans, and communication protocols before field work begins. Most rooftop installation activity will occur above occupied areas, so Apadana will take care to manage noise, access, safety, and daily cleanup. Any planned electrical shutdowns or service interruptions will be coordinated in advance with City staff and scheduled to minimize operational impact. Apadana’s installation team will follow applicable OSHA requirements, fall protection requirements, electrical safety procedures, and site-specific safety rules. Roof Protection and Structural Review Protecting the City Hall roof is a core part of Apadana’s project approach. Before final design and construction, Apadana will review available roof information, confirm roof conditions in the field, coordinate with the City regarding any active roof warranty requirements, and obtain structural review from a Minnesota-licensed professional engineer. The final design will account for roof load capacity, ballast requirements, wind uplift, snow loading, drainage paths, existing rooftop equipment, roof access, and maintenance clearances. Apadana’s experience on public-building projects has shown that rooftop solar success depends on both energy performance and roof stewardship. We will not proceed with a final rooftop layout until the structural assumptions, access conditions, and mounting approach are confirmed. If rooftop conditions limit the ideal array size or require modifications, Apadana will notify the City promptly and provide practical options, including adjusted layout, reduced system size, alternate racking, or, if needed, evaluation of a ground-mounted alternative on adjacent City property. Page 15 Page 319 of 485 Prevailing Wage and Compliance Apadana understands that the project is subject to Minnesota prevailing wage requirements. Apadana will comply with applicable prevailing wage laws and will ensure that contractors and subcontractors pay required wages and benefits for work performed under the contract. Apadana will assist the City with certified payroll documentation and any required labor reporting associated with the project. Apadana will also comply with applicable contractor affidavit requirements, withholding tax requirements, permit requirements, safety requirements, and grant documentation requirements. Our team has experience working under public-sector documentation standards and understands the importance of complete, organized, and timely compliance records. Project Schedule Apadana Energy understands that the City of Lakeville’s solar project schedule is driven by the Minnesota Department of Commerce Solar on Public Buildings grant process, and we are prepared to meet the deadlines required for a complete and timely grant application. If selected, Apadana will immediately prioritize the technical, financial, and compliance documentation needed by the City, including final system sizing, estimated Year 1 production, production modeling, equipment information, site plan, one-line diagram, project budget, 25-year cash flow analysis, payment milestone schedule, permitting and interconnection narrative, prevailing wage assurance, and MPCA recycling documentation. Apadana will provide the required grant-support materials by June 24, 2026, or earlier if final system assumptions are confirmed before that date. Following grant award and contract execution, Apadana will advance the project through final site verification, engineering, permitting, Xcel Energy interconnection, procurement, construction, commissioning, and closeout. All system components will be ordered or otherwise secured within the Solar on Public Buildings milestone window, interconnection paperwork will be filed within the required timeframe, and the project will be installed, commissioned, and documented within the grant completion period. Apadana will also provide all required closeout materials, including O&M manuals, warranties, monitoring access, as-built documentation, and annual production reporting support after commissioning. Financial Strength and Stability Apadana will provide financial documentation as a confidential appendix to this proposal. This information is intended to demonstrate the company’s financial strength, stability, and capacity to successfully complete the project. This information should be treated as confidential financial information and not disclosed except as required by applicable law. See attached documentation. This proposal shall remain valid for 60 days after the proposal due date. Page 16 Page 320 of 485 Licenses, Certifications, and Qualifications Apadana Energy holds the licenses and qualifications required to perform commercial solar design, construction, electrical installation, and project delivery in Minnesota. Apadana’s project team includes experienced solar professionals, licensed electricians, NABCEP-certified personnel, and professional engineering support for electrical, structural, and related design requirements. For the Lakeville City Hall project, Apadana will provide or coordinate the required professional engineering review, including electrical and structural review, to confirm that the final design complies with applicable codes, utility requirements, roof loading requirements, and the City’s project standards. These licenses and qualifications support Apadana’s ability to deliver a complete turnkey solar PV project, including design, engineering coordination, permitting, procurement, interconnection, installation, commissioning, monitoring setup, warranty support, and long-term service. •CERTIFIED MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (MBE) UNDER CERT •CERTIFIED SMALL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (SBE) UNDER CERT •MINNESOTA RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR LICENSE NO. BC752078 •MINNESOTA CLASS A ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR LICENSE NO. EA727018 •MULTIPLE ENGINEERS ON STAFF HOLDING MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING (PE) REGISTRATIONS FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC/ELECTRICAL, STRUCTURAL, AND CIVIL WORK •NABCEP CERTIFICATION NO. PVA-072722-014495 •OSHA FALL PROTECTION AND SAFETY COURSE CERTIFICATIONS •CERTIFIED MASTER BLACK BELT IN LEAN SIX SIGMA THROUGH CLOE AND PIVOTAL •PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONAL (PMP) CERTIFICATION THROUGH PMI Payment Schedule and Closing Statement Apadana Energy appreciates the opportunity to submit this proposal to the City of Lakeville. We understand the importance of delivering a solar project that is technically sound, financially responsible, grant-ready, and respectful of the City Hall building as a public-facing civic facility. Our proposal is designed to provide the City with a reliable direct-purchase solar system, strong warranty protection, experienced public-sector project execution, Solar on Public Buildings grant support, extended payment flexibility, and long-term service after commissioning. For payment schedule, we generally require 10 percent down payment upon contract signing (this needs to be received prior to July 2 since our office is closed July 3.) After that there is a progress payment (55 percent), final construction payment (30 percent) and final payment when the system is powered on (5 percent). Page 17 Page 321 of 485 For this project, we’d welcome 10 percent down payment upon signing, 20 percent progress payment (purchase materials), and the remaining 70 percent due within 30 days of powering the system on. That way, the city will only need to float the direct pay from the ITC, not the amount of the grant from the state of Minnesota. We believe Apadana is well positioned to deliver this project successfully because our team understands the practical requirements of municipal solar work: careful coordination with staff, protection of existing roofs and facilities, utility interconnection, prevailing wage compliance, clear documentation, responsive service, and timely support through grant administration and closeout. If selected, Apadana will work closely with the City from final design through commissioning and annual reporting to ensure the Lakeville City Hall solar project provides lasting value for the community. Apadana looks forward to the opportunity to partner with the City of Lakeville on a successful renewable energy project that reduces long-term energy costs, supports the City’s sustainability goals, and serves as a visible example of responsible public investment. Sincerely, Lev Buslovich, President, Apadana Energy Page 18 Page 322 of 485 Total Project Cost $159,501 Utility Xcel Energy Installed Cost ($/Wdc)$2.90 Starting Cost of Electricity $0.0702 Project Payback (Years)<1 System Capacity (kW DC)55.00 Internal Rate of Return (IRR)717484.0%Number of Modules 125 Prepared for Lakeville City Hall Proposal ID Rev 1 (CASH)Current Customer Usage (kWh/yr)287,675 20195 Holyoke Ave, Lakeville, MN 55044 Pricing expires 7/10/2026 Total Net Savings (30 yr life)$253,325 Portion to be offset by solar 24% Year Production*Demand**Incentives***Investment Tax Credit (30%) Federal Depreciation State Depreciation Annual Cumulative 0 $111,650 $47,850 ($159,501)($1)($1) 1 68,892 $4,836 $186 $5,022 $5,022 2 68,548 $5,005 $189 $5,193 $10,215 3 68,205 $5,179 $192 $5,370 $15,586 4 67,864 $5,359 $195 $5,554 $21,139 5 67,524 $5,545 $198 $5,743 $26,882 6 67,187 $5,738 $201 ($500)$5,439 $32,321 7 66,851 $5,938 $204 $6,142 $38,463 8 66,517 $6,145 $207 $6,351 $44,814 9 66,184 $6,359 $210 $6,568 $51,382 10 65,853 $6,580 $213 $6,793 $58,175 11 65,524 $6,809 $216 ($500)$6,525 $64,700 12 65,196 $7,046 $219 $7,265 $71,965 13 64,870 $7,291 $223 $7,513 $79,478 14 64,546 $7,545 $226 $7,771 $87,249 15 64,223 $7,807 $229 $8,036 $95,285 16 63,902 $8,079 $233 ($500)$7,812 $103,097 17 63,583 $8,360 $236 $8,596 $111,693 18 63,265 $8,651 $240 $8,891 $120,584 19 62,948 $8,952 $243 $9,195 $129,779 20 62,634 $9,264 $247 $9,511 $139,290 21 62,320 $9,586 $251 ($500)$9,337 $148,626 22 62,009 $9,920 $254 $10,174 $158,800 23 61,699 $10,265 $258 $10,523 $169,323 24 61,390 $10,622 $262 $10,884 $180,207 25 61,083 $10,992 $266 $11,258 $191,465 26 60,778 $11,374 $270 ($500)$11,144 $202,609 27 60,474 $11,770 $274 $12,044 $214,653 28 60,172 $12,179 $278 $12,458 $227,111 29 59,871 $12,603 $282 $12,886 $239,997 30 59,571 $13,042 $287 $13,329 $253,325 Total 1,923,682 ($162,001) NOTE: Actual future performance, values, and returns for each specific solar installation cannot be guaranteed.⁰ Module degredation 0.50% ⁰ Annual degradation based on Apadana and industry data. Annual degradation 0.5%. * Rate escalation 4.00%* Calculated using current utility rates for your customer class, extrapolated forward at an estimated annual rate escalation. ** Demand savings 7.80%** Based on analysis of data from a broad mix of actual, operating installations *** Incentives based on current utility programs, includes Xcel PV Demand Credit Rider calculated to be $0.03/kWh † Fed. & state tax rate N/A † Employs modified accellerated depreciation, customer should consult a tax advisor, bonus depreciation may be available. ‡ Includes cell card replacements (avoidable w/ internet access) and intverter replacement at estimated (extended warranty available) Numbers above are estimates based on industry standards using 44-year average of meteorlogical data. Actual numbers may vary. Consult with your tax advisor or CPA to confirm all tax estimates presented here. ITC percent above is based on information provided by the IRA legislation at the time of proposal or our best judgement given available information. Ongoing Federal ITC updates may alter the ITC. Client should consult their tax advisor to ensure the accuracy of their ITC percentage. $367,476 $47,850 $253,325 ASSUMPTIONS NOTES INVESTMENT SYSTEM Solar Production [kWh]⁰ Revenue Tax Benefits †Cost & Operating Expense ‡ Cash Flow © ApadanaSolarTech.com 3401 Nevada Ave N, Minneapolis, MN 55427 Page 323 of 485 (N) UTILITY AC DISCONNECT 3PH, 4W, 208Y/120V 200A, NEMA 3R (N) PV AC DISCONNECT 3PH, 4W, 208Y/120V 200A, NEMA 3R 150A ~ ~ ~20 20 23 22 DISCONNECT SHALL BE UTILITY VISIBLE OPEN- TYPE, LOCKABLE, AND READILY ACCESSIBLE REFERENCE POINT OF APPLICABILITY 1 ~1' ~100' POINT OF COMMON COUPLING LINELOAD ~1'~1'~1' 2 (N) INVERTER-1 SOLAREDGE 50kW DERATED TO 39.99 KW TO INTERNET VIA CELL CARD TO BUILDING LOADS M (E) MAIN SWITCHBOARD 3PH, 4W, 208Y/120V, 2000A (E) UTILITY BIDIRECTIONAL METER WITH CT CABINET 3PH, 4W, 208Y/120V METER #36455816 FAULT CURRENT = XXXXX A TO UTILITY (E) UTILITY TRANSFORMER 3PH, 4W, 208Y/120V, XXXKVA CT POLARITY DOT (N) PRODUCTION METER UTILITY OWNED SELF-CONTAINED 3PH, 4W, 208Y/120V 200A, NEMA 3R M TO BE WIRED SUCH THAT THE PV IS THE SOURCE.2000A SUPPLY SIDE INTERCONNECTION (LOAD SIDE OF METER) SHALL BE VIA LUGS ON BUS BAR (NON-SPLICING) 2 2 2 20 20 DRAWING TITLE: SCALE: SHEET: SYSTEM INFORMATION: DC SYSTEM SIZE: 55.00 kW AC SYSTEM SIZE: 39.99 kW DC/AC RATIO: 1.38 TILT: 8.4o AZIMUTH: 180o (125) NE SOLAR 440W (DOM) NESE 440-54THB-M10 (1) SOLAREDGE 50KW (DOM) SE50KUS (208V, 3PH) DERATED TO 39.99 KW (125) SOLAREDGE C651U OPTIMIZERS IRONRIDGE BX RACKING LAKEVILLE CITY HALL ADDRESS: 20195 HOLYOKE AVE LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 AHJ: MN-CITY OF LAKEVILLE UTILITY: XCEL ENERGY CASE NUMBER: 0XXXXXX APADANA JOB NUMBER: ENGINEER OF RECORD: SITE INFORMATION: REVISIONS #DESCRIPTION DES CHK DATE 1 PERMIT PLAN CH 6/8/26 2 3 4 5 6 7 APADANA ENGINEERING 3401 NEVADA AVE N NEW HOPE, MN 55427 612-803-9000 SOLAR@APADANATECHNOLOGY.COM NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N E1 NTS ONELINE NOTES: 1. PRODUCTION METER & UTILITY AC DISCONNECT ARE ·LOCATED WITHIN 10' OF UTILITY BIDIRECTIONAL METER & LOCATED WITH THE EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAQUE ON THE UTILITY BIDIRECTIONAL METER AND SERVICE EQUIPMENT ·VISIBLE OPEN-TYPE, LOCKABLE, AND READILY ACCESSIBLE WITH 24/7 ACCESS 2. 24/7 UNESCORTED KEYLESS ACCESS IS TO BE PROVIDED FOR ALL UTILITY EQUIPMENT 3. INVERTERS ARE UL 1741 SB RATED 4. EACH MLPE IS RAPID SHUTDOWN COMPLIANT 5. EACH MLPE IS CONNECTED TO ONE MODULE 6. EQUIPMENT MARKED WITH (E) IS EXISTING AND (N) IS NEW INVERTER SPECIFICATION MODEL SOLAREDGE 50kW SE50KUS(208V,3PH) DERATED TO 39.99 KW POWER RATING 39990 (DERATED FROM 50000)W MAX OUTPUT CURRENT 111.32 (DERATED FROM 139.5)A CEC WEIGHTED EFFICIENCY 97.0 % MAX INPUT CURRENT 3 X 46.5 A MAX DC VOLTAGE 600 V AC OUTPUT VOLTAGE 208 V CERTIFICATION UL 1741, UL 1741 SA, UL 1741 SB MLPE CHARACTERISTICS MODEL SOLAREDGE C651U MAX INPUT VOLTAGE 80 VDC MAX OUTPUT CURRENT 24 ADC MODULE SPECIFICATION MODEL NE SOLAR NESE 440-54THB-M10 POWER @ STC 440 W VOC 38.80 V VMP 32.30 V ISC 14.39 A IMP 13.63 A DIMENSIONS 67.80 X 44.65 X 1.18 IN WEIGHT 54.01 LB CERTIFICATION UL 61730 Page 324 of 485 Page 325 of 485 Page 326 of 485 solaredge.com Three Phase Inverter with Synergy Technology USA Domestic Content Eligible For North America SE50KUS / SE80KUS / SE100KUS / SE110KUS / SE120KUS Eligible for domestic content*: SolarEdge USA-manufactured inverters, when paired with certain SolarEdge USA-manufactured power optimizers, are intended to be eligible for the enhanced federal income tax credit for domestic content Pre-commissioning feature for automated validation of system components and wiring during the site installation process and prior to grid connection Easy two-person installation with lightweight, modular design (each inverter consists of two or three Synergy units and one Synergy Manager) Independent operation of each Synergy unit enables higher uptime and easy serviceability Built-in thermal sensors detect faulty wiring, ensuring enhanced protection and safety Built-in arc fault protection and rapid shutdown Built-in PID mitigation for maximized system performance Monitored** and field-replaceable surge protection devices, to better withstand surges caused by lightning or other events Built-in module-level monitoring with Ethernet or cellular communication for full system visibility IN V E R T E R * For more details, see Eligibility for Domestic Content on the last page. ** Applicable only for DC and AC SPDs. SOLAREDGE’S USA-MANUFACTURED OFFERING FOR C&I ROOFTOPS AND CARPORTS 12-20 YEAR WARRANTY Page 327 of 485 Three Phase Inverter with Synergy Technology USA Domestic Content Eligible for North America SE50KUS / SE80KUS / SE100KUS / SE110KUS / SE120KUS Applicable to inverters with part numbers SE-DBL- USxxIBNxx SE-TRI-USxxIBNxx Model Number SE80KUS SE50KUS SE100KUS SE110KUS SE120KUS UNITS OUTPUT Total Rated AC Output Capacity 80,000 120,000 W Rated AC Active Output Power 80,000 50,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 W Maximum AC Apparent Output Power 80,000 50,000 100,000 120,000 120,000 VA AC Output Line Connections 3W + PE, 4W + PE Supported Grids WYE: TN-C; TN-S; TN-C-S; TT, IT; Delta: IT AC Output Voltage Minimum-Nominal-Maximum(1) (L-N) 244 – 277 – 305 105 – 120 – 132.5 244 – 277 – 305 Vac AC Output Voltage Minimum-Nominal-Maximum(1) (L-L) 422.5 – 480 – 529 183 – 208 – 229 422.5 – 480 – 529 Vac AC Frequency Minimum-Nominal-Maximum(1) 59.5 – 60 – 60.5 Hz Maximum Continuous Output Current (per phase, PF=1) 96.5 139.5 120 144.3 Aac GFDI Threshold 1 A Utility Monitoring, Islanding Protection, Configurable Power Factor, Country Configurable Thresholds Yes Total Harmonic Distortion ≤ 3 % Power Factor Range ±0.85 to 1 INPUT(2) Maximum DC Power (Module STC) Inverter / Synergy Unit 140,000 / 70,000 87,500 / 29,165 175,000 / 58,300 210,000 / 70,000 W Transformer-less, Ungrounded Yes Maximum Input Voltage DC+ to DC- 1000 600 1000 Vdc Operating Voltage Range 850 – 1000 370 – 600 850 – 1000 Vdc Maximum Input Current 2 x 48.25 3 x 46.5 3 x 40 3 x 48.25 Adc Reverse-Polarity Protection Yes Ground-Fault Isolation Detection 167kΩ sensitivity per Synergy Unit(3) CEC Weighted Efficiency 98.5 97 98.5 % Nighttime Power Consumption < 8 < 12 W ADDITIONAL FEATURES Supported Communication Interfaces(4) 2 x RS485; Ethernet; Wi-Fi (optional); Cellular (optional) Smart Energy Management Export Limitation Inverter Commissioning With the SetApp mobile application using built-in Wi-Fi access point for local connection Arc Fault Protection Built-in, user configurable (according to UL 1699B) Photovoltaic Rapid Shutdown System NEC 2014 – 2023, built-in, if paired with C651U PID Rectifier Nighttime, built-in RS485 Surge Protection (ports 1+2) Type II, field replaceable, integrated AC, DC Surge Protection Type II, field replaceable, integrated DC SAFETY SWITCH DC Disconnect Built-in STANDARD COMPLIANCE Safety UL 1699B; UL 1741; UL 1741 SA; UL 1741 SB; UL 1998; CSA C22.2#107.1; Canadian AFCI according to T.I.L. M-07 Grid Connection Standards IEEE 1547-2018, Rule 21, Rule 14 (HI) Emissions FCC Part 15 Class A (1) For other regional settings please contact SolarEdge support. (2) For compatibility of inverters and power optimizers, see this technical note. (3) Where permitted by local regulations. (4) For specifications of the optional communication options, visit the Communication product page or the Knowledge Center to download the relevant product datasheet. Page 328 of 485 Three Phase Inverter with Synergy Technology USA Domestic Content Eligible for North America SE50KUS / SE80KUS / SE100KUS / SE110KUS / SE120KUS Applicable to inverters with part numbers SE-DBL- USxxIBNxx SE-TRI-USxxIBNxx Model Number SE80KUS SE50KUS SE100KUS SE110KUS SE120KUS UNITS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS Number of Synergy Units per Inverter 2 3 AC Maximum Conduit Size 2 ½״ in AC Maximum Conductor Size Line / PE 4/0 AWG / 1/0 AWG DC Maximum Conduit Size 1 x 3"; 2 x 2" in Inverter Unit / Synergy Manager Multi-input (fuse-less)(5) (SE-xxx-USxxIxxSx) 6 / 3 pairs; 6 – 12 AWG 9 / 3 pairs; 6 – 12 AWG Combined input (fuse-less) (SE-xxx-USxxIxxWx) N/A 3 pairs / 1 pair, 2 – 4 AWG; copper or aluminum Dimensions (H x W x D) Synergy Unit: 22 x 12.9 x 10.75 / 558 x 328 x 273 Synergy Manager: 14.17 x 22.4 x 11.6 / 360 x 560 x 295 in / mm Weight Synergy Unit: 70.4 / 32 Synergy Manager: 39.6 / 18 lb / kg Operating Temperature Range -40 to +140 / -40 to +60(6) ̊ F / ˚C Cooling Fan (user replaceable) Noise < 67 dBA Protection Rating NEMA 3R Mounting Brackets provided (5) Fusing is not included with the multi-input version of the Synergy Manager. (6) For power derating information, see the Temperature Derating technical note for North America. *Eligibility for Domestic Content PN Domestically produced MPCs per notice 2024-41* Domestically produced MPCs per notice 2025-08* USESUK-USR0INNN6, when paired with C651U Printed Circuit Board Assemblies, Electrical Parts, Enclosure (35.6%) Printed Circuit Board Assemblies (DC-DC) and (AC-AC), Enclosure, Production (24.8%) USESUK-USR0INNN8, when paired with C651U Printed Circuit Board Assemblies, Enclosure (17.6%) Printed Circuit Board Assemblies (DC-DC) and (AC-AC), Enclosure, Production (24.8%) As it relates to the domestic content rules, the U.S. Department of Treasury and the IRS have not yet issued proposed or final regulations. Rather, the IRS has issued three notices - Notice 2023-38, Notice 2024-41 and Notice 2025-08. These notices provide guidance regarding the domestic content rules. SolarEdge products referenced herein are manufactured with the intent to be eligible for inclusion under the elective safe harbor table in calculating the Domestic Cost Percentage under the “Rooftop (MLPE)” category (under IRS Notices 2024-41 and 2025-08, depending on the PN used – see chart below). Eligibility is subject to the installation of qualified USA-Manufactured inverters and Power Optimizers (C651U) in the same project. SolarEdge does not provide tax and/or legal advice. You should consult with your own legal and/or tax advisor(s) regarding the eligibility of your project for the ITC or PTC, including the 10% Domestic Content bonus, to determine how the applicable rules apply to your project. The forward-looking statements in this document are accurate as of the date herein and are subject to change. For more information, please contact your local SolarEdge sales representative. Page 329 of 485 solaredge.com SolarEdge is a global leader in smart energy technology. By leveraging world-class engineering capabilities and with a relentless focus on innovation, SolarEdge creates smart energy solutions that power our lives and drive future progress. SolarEdge developed an intelligent inverter solution that changed the way power is harvested and managed in photovoltaic (PV) systems. The SolarEdge DC optimized inverter maximizes power generation while lowering the cost of energy produced by the PV system. Continuing to advance smart energy, SolarEdge addresses a broad range of energy market segments through its PV, storage, EV charging, UPS, and grid services solutions. SolarEdge @SolarEdgePV @SolarEdgePV SolarEdgePV SolarEdge www.solaredge.com/corporate/contact solaredge.com © SolarEdge Technologies, Ltd. All rights reserved. SOLAREDGE, the SolarEdge logo, OPTIMIZED BY SOLAREDGE are trademarks or registered trademarks of SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. All other trademarks mentioned herein are trademarks of their respective owners. Date: April 10 2025 DS-000240-NAM Subject to change without notice. Cautionary Note Regarding Market Data and Industry Forecasts: This brochure may contain market data and industry forecasts from certain third-party sources. This information is based on industry surveys and the preparer’s expertise in the industry and there can be no assurance that any such market data is accurate or that any such industry forecasts will be achieved. Although we have not independently verified the accuracy of such market data and industry forecasts, we believe that the market data is reliable and that the industry forecasts are reasonable. Page 330 of 485 solaredge.com Commercial Power Optimizer USA Domestic Content Eligible C651U SolarEdge's USA-manufactured offering for C&I projects, for power optimization at the module level • Eligible for Domestic Content* • SolarEdge USA-manufactured power optimizers, when paired with certain SolarEdge USA-manufactured inverters, are intended to be eligible for the enhanced federal income tax credit for domestic content • Higher Energy Yields • Generates maximum power from each PV module • High efficiency (99.5%) • Supports high power and bifacial PV modules, including G12 modules • Enhanced Monitoring and Visibility • Maximum system visibility up to the individual module level • Pinpointed fault detection and remote troubleshooting • Maximum Protection with Built-in Safety • Designed to automatically reduce high DC voltage to touch-safe levels, upon grid/inverter shutdown, with SafeDC™ • Includes SolarEdge Sense Connect, designed to prevent arcs by monitoring Power Optimizer connectors for overheating • Certified to Photovoltaic Rapid Shutdown, according to NEC 2014 – 2023 PO W E R O P T I M I Z E R 25 YEAR WARRANTY * For more information, refer to the last page of this document Page 331 of 485 © SolarEdge Technologies, Ltd. All rights reserved. SOLAREDGE, the SolarEdge logo, OPTIMIZED BY SOLAREDGE are trademarks or registered trademarks of SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. All other trademarks mentioned herein are trademarks of their respective owners. Date: April 14, 2025 DS-000245-NAM. Subject to change without notice. Power Optimizer USA Domestic Content Eligible for North America C651U Power Optimizer Model C651U INPUT Rated Input DC Power(1) 650 W Absolute Maximum Input Voltage (Voc) 80 Vdc MPPT Operating Range 12.5 – 80 Vdc Maximum Short Circuit Current (Isc) of Connected PV Module(2) 20 Adc Maximum Adjusted Short Circuit Current (with Safety Factor)(3) 25 Adc Maximum Efficiency 99.5 % Weighted Efficiency 98.8 % Overvoltage Category II OUTPUT DURING OPERATION Maximum Output Power 650 Wdc Maximum Output Current 24 Adc Maximum Output Voltage 60 Vdc SAFETY FEATURES SafeDC™ Yes Safety Output Voltage per Power Optimizer 0.5 ± 0.075 Vdc Sense Connect Yes Photovoltaic Rapid Shutdown System Yes, NEC 2014 – 2023 STANDARD COMPLIANCE EMC FCC Part 15; IEC 61000-6-2; IEC 61000-6-3 Safety IEC62109-1 (class II safety); UL 1741; UL 3741; CSA C22.2#107.1 Material UL94 V-0, UV Resistant RoHS Yes Fire Safety VDE-AR-E 2100-712:2013-05 INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS Compatible SolarEdge Inverters(4) Commercial Three Phase Inverters with one of the following part number structures: xSE-SIN-USxxIxxxx SE-DBL-USxxIxxxx SE-TRI-USxxIxxxx Maximum Allowed System Voltage 1000 Vdc Dimensions (W x L x H) 128 x 155 x 52 / 5.03 x 6.10 x 2.05 mm / in Weight 1080 / 2.38 gr / lb Input Connector MC4(5) Input Wire Length (+) 1.4, (-) 1.4 / (+) 4.59, (-) 4.59(6) m / ft Output Connector MC4 Output Wire Length (+) 3.0 (-) 0.10 / (+) 9.84, (-) 0.32 m / ft Operating Temperature Range(7) -40 to +85 / -40 to +185 ˚C / ˚F Protection Rating IP68 / NEMA6P Relative Humidity 0 – 100 % (1) Modules with a front side maximum power of up to 715W at STC are allowed. Up to +5% power tolerance is allowed. (2) When using bifacial modules, consider only the front side Isc at STC (0% back side gain). For details, see here. (3) Adjusted for ambient temperature, irradiance, bifacial gain, safety factor, and so on, in accordance with NEC and CSA. (4) For detailed inverter compatibility information, see here. (5) For other connector types please contact SolarEdge. (6) The Sense Connect feature is only enabled on the output wire connectors. For details, see here. (7) For ambient temperatures above +65°C / +149°F, power derating is applied. For details, see here. Page 332 of 485 © SolarEdge Technologies, Ltd. All rights reserved. SOLAREDGE, the SolarEdge logo, OPTIMIZED BY SOLAREDGE are trademarks or registered trademarks of SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. All other trademarks mentioned herein are trademarks of their respective owners. Date: April 14, 2025 DS-000245-NAM. Subject to change without notice. Power Optimizer USA Domestic Content Eligible for North America C651U PV System Design Using a SolarEdge Inverter(8) 208V Grid 208V Grid 277/480V Grid 277/480V Grid SE10K SE17.3K* SE30K, SE33.3K* SE40K* Compatible Power Optimizers C651U Minimum String Length Power Optimizers 13 13 18 18 PV Modules 13 13 18 18 Maximum String Length Power Optimizers 57 57 57 57 PV Modules 57 57 57 57 Maximum Continuous Power per String 10,000 9600 20,400 20,400 W Maximum Allowed Connected Power per String(9) 1 string or more – 15,000 1 string – 11,400 1 string – 22,650 1 string – 22,650 W 2 strings or more – 15,600 2 strings or more – 30,400 2 strings or more – 30,400 Parallel Strings of Different Lengths or Orientations Yes Maximum Difference in Number of Power Optimizers Allowed Between the Shortest and Longest String Connected to the Same Inverter Unit 5 Power Optimizers *The same rules apply for Synergy units of equivalent power ratings, that are part of the modular Synergy Technology inverter. (8) C651U cannot be mixed with any other Power Optimizer models in the same string. (9) To connect more STC power per string, design your project using SolarEdge Designer. C651U Mechanical Drawing Eligibility for Domestic Content As it relates to the domestic content rules, the U.S. Department of Treasury and the IRS have not yet issued proposed or final regulations. Rather, the IRS has issued three notices - Notice 2023-38, Notice 2024-41 and Notice 2025-08. These notices provide guidance regarding the domestic content rules. SolarEdge products referenced herein are manufactured with the intent to be eligible for inclusion under the elective safe harbor table in calculating the Domestic Cost Percentage under the “Rooftop (MLPE)” category (under IRS Notices 2024-41 and 2025-08, depending on the PN used – see chart below). Eligibility is subject to the installation of qualified USA-Manufactured inverters and Power Optimizers (C651U) in the same project. SolarEdge does not provide tax and/or legal advice. You should consult with your own legal and/or tax advisor(s) regarding the eligibility of your project for the ITC or PTC, including the 10% Domestic Content bonus, to determine how the applicable rules apply to your project. The forward-looking statements in this document are accurate as of the date herein and are subject to change. For more information, please contact your local SolarEdge sales representative. PN Domestically produced MPCs per notice 2024-41* Domestically produced MPCs per notice 2025-08* USE-SIN-USR0IBNS6, when paired with C651U Printed Circuit Board Assemblies, Electrical Parts, Enclosure (35.6%) Printed Circuit Board Assemblies (DC-DC) and (AC-AC), Enclosure, Production (24.8%) USESUK-USR0INNN6, when paired with C651U Printed Circuit Board Assemblies, Electrical Parts, Enclosure (35.6%) Printed Circuit Board Assemblies (DC-DC) and (AC-AC), Enclosure, Production (24.8%) USE-SIN-USR0IBNS8, when paired with C651U Printed Circuit Board Assemblies, Electrical Parts, Enclosure (17.6%) Printed Circuit Board Assemblies (DC-DC) and (AC-AC), Enclosure, Production (24.8%) USESUK-USR0INNN8, when paired with C651U Printed Circuit Board Assemblies, Electrical Parts, Enclosure (17.6%) Printed Circuit Board Assemblies (DC-DC) and (AC-AC), Enclosure, Production (24.8%) Page 333 of 485 Page 334 of 485 Page 335 of 485 Page 336 of 485 1 Solar RFP – City of Lakeville (Rev. 05.28.2026) REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Solar Installation on Lakeville City Hall Building Date of Issue: 05/28/2026 Proposal Due Date: 06/09/2026 Contents I.OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................................................... 2 II.OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................... 2 III.TIMEFRAME ................................................................................................................................................. 3 IV.RFP SCHEDULE............................................................................................................................................ 3 V.SITE INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................... 4 VI.EXAMINATION OF SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING PROPOSAL .......................................................... 4 VII. PROVIDER QUALIFICATIONS .................................................................................................................. 4 VIII.PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS AND ABILITIES ............................................................................. 4 IX.PROJECT SCOPE AND STANDARDS........................................................................................................ 5 X. PREVAILING WAGE.................................................................................................................................... 5 XI. BUILDING PERMITS ................................................................................................................................... 6 XII. CONTRACTOR AFFIDAVIT ....................................................................................................................... 6 XIII.PROJECT MILESTONE AND ANNUAL CHECK-IN FORMS .............................................................. 6 XIV.CONTENT OF PROPOSAL ...................................................................................................................... 6 XV. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................. 8 XVI.OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................... 9 XVII.PROJECT SCHEDULE .............................................................................................................................. 9 XVIII. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS .................................................................................................................. 10 XIX.SELECTION COMMITTEE .................................................................................................................... 10 XX. CITY AND PROVIDER RESPONSIBILITIES .......................................................................................... 10 XXI.PROVIDER SELECTION CRITERIA .................................................................................................... 11 XXII.RIGHT TO REJECT PROPOSALS ......................................................................................................... 12 XXIII. RFP EXHIBITS ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Page 337 of 485 2 Solar RFP – City of Lakeville (Rev. 05.28.2026) CITY OF LAKEVILLE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS I. OBJECTIVE The City of Lakeville, hereinafter referred to as “the City” is soliciting competitive sealed proposals from qualified contractors to design, build, and maintain a solar installation on City property and provide power to City facilities. The City is open to receiving proposals to either directly purchase a solar array or enter into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with a third-party owner. The City is also willing to review other financing and ownership models, including a prepaid PPA. The City wishes not to exceed $159,500 in total project cost in total project cost, to maximize leveraging the funding from the Minnesota Department of Commerce (hereinafter referred to as “the Department”). This not to exceed amount is based on the Department’s maximum allowable grant formula established in the Minnesota Solar on Public Buildings Program Request for Proposal. Responses shall be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 9, 2026. Late responses will not be considered. II. OVERVIEW The City is seeking proposals from interested firms that are capable of designing, engineering, installing, and maintaining a solar photovoltaic (PV) project at the City Hall Building. If the City Hall building is deemed unsuitable for rooftop solar, the City is open to bids that instead include ground mounted solar on adjacent land, if needed. The local government will be responsible for the following: • Providing all available existing relevant plans and records. • Coordinating site access for review before the proposal due date. The site visit is planned for Tuesday, June 2nd from 3:00 PM – 4:00 PM. Information provided in the successful proposal will be used in the local government’s grant application to the Minnesota Department of Commerce Solar on Public Buildings program. If the grant application is not selected for funding, the local government will not proceed with this project and will have no financial obligations to the selected developer. The developer will bear all costs incurred in responding to this RFP. The local government reserves the right to accept or reject any and all proposals. The capacity of each proposed solar array must not exceed the lesser of 40 kilowatts [AC] or 120 percent of the building’s average annual electricity consumption, measured over the most recent three calendar years. For planning purposes, the City assumes a maximum eligible system size of 55 kWdc, consistent with the Department’s grant formula. At the current grant rate of $2.03/W, the estimated maximum grant award is approximately $111,650. Since the grant may not exceed 70% of total project costs, the City aims to maintain total project costs at or below approximately $159,500 to maximize available grant funding. Page 338 of 485 3 Solar RFP – City of Lakeville (Rev. 05.28.2026) In the long-term, the City may be interested in developing solar energy for other sites, and results of this RFP may be used for future projects as deemed appropriate by the City. However, for purposes of this RFP, respondents should limit their responses to this specific site or sites. The City believes on-site solar PV power generation will provide a long-term financial benefit by reducing energy costs through reduction of peak demand loads and daily energy consumption at the sites. The program will provide high quality power with minimal environmental impact and work to advance the City’s sustainability efforts. Through on-site solar PV generation, the City hopes to: • Reap the financial benefits of more affordable electricity at minimal cost. • Reduce environmental impact. • Provide an example of successful renewable energy generation and showcase our organization as a leader in developing renewable energy sources. Through this RFP process, the City intends to select only one proposer for the solar project and is looking for the “best value” proposal based on the selection criteria stated within this RFP. This RFP to seek a provider is part of the City’s process to apply for the Department’s Solar on Public Buildings Grant Program. If selected, there will be additional responsibilities of the provider to contribute to this grant application on behalf of the City. These additional requirements are outlined in Section XIII Project Schedule, and Section XVI City and Provider Responsibilities. All technical and System information requested by the City for the purpose of the grant application must be provided by Wednesday, June 24, 2026. Execution of a contract between the City and the provider is contingent upon receiving grant funding through the Minnesota Solar on Public Buildings Grant Program. III. TIMEFRAME The developer will have a term of eighteen (18) months from the date of contract execution to complete the installation and submit all necessary permits, system commissioning, and other required paperwork. IV. RFP SCHEDULE The following schedule and deadlines apply to this solicitation: Site Visit Tuesday, June 2, from 3:00 PM – 4:00 PM. Marion Conference Room City Hall Building – 20195 Holyoke Ave, Lakeville, MN 55044 Paul Oehem, Public Works Director Poehme@lakevillemn.gov Deadline for Final Submittal of Questions Monday, June 3, 2026, at 4:00 PM Submit questions pertaining to this RFP by email to: Paul Oehem Public Works Director Page 339 of 485 4 Solar RFP – City of Lakeville (Rev. 05.28.2026) City of Lakeville Poehme@lakevillemn.gov Request for Proposal Due Tuesday, June 9, 2026, at 4:00 PM Submit proposal by email to: Paul Oehem, Public Works Director Poehme@lakevillemn.gov Subject: “RFP for Solar PV system on Lakeville City Hall Building” V. SITE INFORMATION The City has determined that solar PV systems can be successfully installed at the following facility, with emphasis on providing solar power on the roofs. City Hall Building – 20195 Holyoke Ave, Lakeville, MN 55044 Total Energy Usage (last 12 months): 287,676 kWh See Exhibit D for more information on the following: Average Monthly Energy Use (2025): 23,973 kWh Average Monthly Demand: 77.5 kW Hourly Energy Consumption is not available, per Xcel Energy VI. EXAMINATION OF SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING PROPOSAL Each provider must fully inform themselves of the conditions relating to the project and the employment of labor thereon. Failure to do so will not relieve a successful proposer of the obligation to carry out the provisions of the contract. The provider will design, install, and maintain a solar PV system to maximize the solar resources at the above listed site, considering the facility’s electrical demand and load patterns, proposed installation sites, available solar resources, applicable zoning ordinances, installation costs and other relevant factors, which shall be discussed in the provider’s proposal. The provider should make every effort to visit each site and determine the best course of action for the facility. The provider will be responsible for determining load characteristics for any roof installation to ensure that warranties remain in place and to avoid damage to existing roofs. VII. PROVIDER QUALIFICATIONS To qualify as the provider for award of this agreement, the prime provider or joint venture must either individually or collectively demonstrate extensive training, relevant expertise and a thorough knowledge of the professional services, functions, activities, and related responsibilities to successfully perform their role in this solar PV installation. VIII. PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS AND ABILITIES Specialized experience is required of the proposed project personnel to undertake the work assignments. Proposals must clearly demonstrate the capability, academic background, training, certifications, and experience of the proposed personnel. The availability of the proposed staff is also of crucial importance and must be demonstrated. The specific responsibility of staff to be Page 340 of 485 5 Solar RFP – City of Lakeville (Rev. 05.28.2026) assigned to the project must be included, as well as professional background and caliber of previous experience of key persons and of each consultant to be assigned to the project. If sub-consultants are employed, similar information must be provided, and the portions to be sub-consulted must be identified. (There is no penalty for the use of sub-consultants; the qualifications of the entire team will be evaluated). Provider(s) shall possess: • Valid and pertinent State of Minnesota contractor construction licenses. • Minnesota Professional Engineering (PE) registration for PV/electrical, structural, civil, and fire protection work. • North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners (NABCEP) certification. • Appropriate other licensing in good standing. IX. PROJECT SCOPE AND STANDARDS The provider will design, provide, install, own (if PPA) and maintain the solar PV systems. This project's scope is inclusive and includes planning, engineering, labor, materials, delivery, installation, and commissioning, as well as all warranties and maintenance. This includes all structural and utility modifications that are required. The provider shall include in its proposal all elements necessary for a turn-key project including rebate applications, grid connection agreement, all permits and approvals from governing agencies and all labor, taxes, services, and equipment. The provider shall apply for and obtain all necessary required approvals and permits. All fees required shall be the responsibility of the applicant. If the project scope includes multiple electrical services, net metering will be located, at each electrical service; however, the provider shall make the decision on the best location for metering and the number of meters required. All proposed roof mounted solar panels, tracks and anchoring equipment shall not exceed ten pounds per square foot. The provider shall verify the structural capacity of the roof. The City will assume the right to the Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) resulting from the PV array’s generation of power for the life of the PV system, even if the City does not own the system. If the City does not own the array, the owner will track the RECs via a tracking system maintained by the owner of the array and assign the RECs to the City. The proposer is responsible for all connections and agreements with the utility. All equipment shall be UL listed. All installations shall comply with local government-approved building and electrical codes. The guaranteed minimum output from the system shall be 85% of the expected performance output from the system. X. PREVAILING WAGE Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 177.41 to 177.44 and corresponding Minnesota Rules 5200.1000 to 5200.1120, the contract with the provider is subject to the prevailing wages as established by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry. Specifically, all contractors and subcontractors must pay all laborers and mechanics for the established prevailing wages for work under the contract. The provider will assist the local government in completing and submitting the required Page 341 of 485 6 Solar RFP – City of Lakeville (Rev. 05.28.2026) certified payroll reports within 4 days after the end of each pay period. The wage determination must be posted in a conspicuous location on the project site. dditional information on prevailing wages can be found here. The provider can find applicable prevailing wage determinations for the project by selecting the county where the project is located on the Department of Labor and Industry’s website. For questions, contact: Stephanie Selb Senior Labor Investigator MN Department of Labor and Industry stephanie.selb@state.mn.us. XI. BUILDING PERMITS When the overall value of the work exceeds $100,000, a building permit is required from the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry. If the total value of the work is less than $100,000, then a building permit must be obtained from the local building department. The exception applies in locations without a local building department, and the total value of the work is less than $100,000. XII. CONTRACTOR AFFIDAVIT Contractors and their subcontractors must comply with the Minnesota Department of Revenue’s withholding tax requirements when working on a construction project contracted by Minnesota state agencies and local government units. This includes counties, cities, and local governments. The Contractor Affidavit (IC134) form can be completed electronically here. For questions, call 651-282-9999 or 1-800-657-3594 (toll-free) or email withholding.tax@state.mn.us XIII. PROJECT MILESTONE AND ANNUAL CHECK-IN FORMS Local governments are required to submit check-in forms to the Department of Commerce. Throughout the grant term, the provider will assist the local government in submitting milestone check-in forms. These are intended to be completed as each task is completed. All forms must be submitted through the Grant Interface Website. The provider will assist the local government with submitting the required annual reports, including the (1) total kWhs consumed at the installation site, (2) total kWhs generated by the solar PV system, and (3) the amount paid by the local government to its utility for electricity. XIV. CONTENT OF PROPOSAL To maintain uniformity with all proposals furnished by provider, proposals shall include the following: • Overview of Principal Elements. A project understanding summary that includes an overview of the principal elements of the proposal, a demonstration of an understanding of Page 342 of 485 7 Solar RFP – City of Lakeville (Rev. 05.28.2026) the project objectives, and a description of your approach to solar PV systems. Include any suggestions or special concerns that the City should be made aware of; the proposed configuration of equipment and any additional scope of work tasks you feel are necessary for the successful completion of the project. Include a discussion of work assignments between the provider and subcontractors used, if any. • Schematic Design Layout. Provider shall provide a system schematic design layout for the systems, including photovoltaic model type and model no., wattage, number of modules, year 1 production, degradation percentage, inverter type and model, mounting system type, azimuth, tilt, system size AC and DC, and the impact on the utility rates and demand charges. a. The capacity of the planned solar array must not exceed the lesser of 40 kilowatts (up to 40 kWac in size) or 120 percent of the average annual electricity consumption of the building, measured over the most recent three calendar years. • Cost. The local government can receive a Solar on Public Buildings grant of 70% of the project’s total cost, which is not to exceed $159,500. Additionally, the local government intends to apply for federal elective pay. The provider must ensure that all equipment complies with federal elective pay rules. The provider shall incorporate the grant and any incentives into the proposal. The provider shall identify costs and anticipated savings over 25 years using the Solar on Public Buildings Cash Flow Template. Alternative cashflow versions are acceptable if similar costs and expenses are identified (e.g., panel recycling, inverter replacement, etc.). The provider should use the assumptions for snow loss, total losses, and utility rate escalator found in the cashflow template. • References. A list of similar projects which your firm completed within the last 5 years. To be considered, respondents are required to have financed, designed, installed, operated, maintained, and completed a minimum of five (5) solar PV projects in the United States that are commercial grid-connected solar PV systems. One (1) of the referenced projects must be with a local government, school, state, or tribal government. Project information should include project description, agency, or client name along with the person to contact, telephone number(s) and e-mail addresses, year completed and project construction and design cost. • Proposal submittal and signature. The proposal shall be signed by a company official with the power to bind the company in its proposal. All proposals must be completely responsive to the RFP. • Power Purchase Agreement. If a PPA is being proposed, the proposed PPA must accompany your proposal. A separate cost proposal is to be submitted that includes the financial terms of a power purchase agreement. A variety of pricing models may be proposed. The provider should propose the lowest cost of electrical energy (price per kWh) they are willing to provide for each year of the PPA. The Price Proposal also shall include guaranteed minimum energy to be produced in each year at each site proposed to be developed. Page 343 of 485 8 Solar RFP – City of Lakeville (Rev. 05.28.2026) The provider shall identify the warranties to be transferred if the City purchases the PV systems. At the end of the PPA or renewal term, and should the City choose not to purchase the system, the proposer shall remove the photovoltaic system(s) and return the sites to preexisting conditions at their expense. • Warranties/Guarantees. The Respondent shall provide the following minimum warranties/guarantees: • 10-year inverter warranty. • 20-year PV panel warranty, with a maximum of 20% degradation. XV. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Proposals are to include detailed technical specifications, and the following technical information should be discussed in this section. • Major equipment manufacturers • Description of technology and configuration • Solar system layout of equipment and characteristics • Electrical interconnection and metering/net-metering • Foundation of PV support system • Level of efficiency • DC and AC capacity rating • Expected annual energy production in kWh • Communications, control, and instrumentation • Facility limitations that may constrain operation • Project Management plan • Start-up and testing • Design life loading (wind, seismic, etc.) • Description of frequency and duration of scheduled maintenance • Provide any information that could impact the cost, construction schedule, or output capability of the project • Proposals shall demonstrate a proven, comprehensive data acquisition system with current and historical data available remotely through a real-time internet site capable of tracking, but not be limited, to the following: o Site-specific actual kWh production (average and cumulative totals) o Site-specific instantaneous maximum kWh production • Proposals shall provide evidence that the proposed technology and equipment would meet or exceed all currently applicable and proposed safety and interconnection standards. All equipment components must be listed or recognized by an appropriate safety laboratory (e.g., Underwriter’s Laboratory [UL]) and meet existing facility structural and fire safety requirements. • Proposals shall provide evidence that the proposed technology and equipment would meet or exceed all currently applicable and proposed environmental standards. • Proposals shall provide evidence that the proposed technology and equipment are designed for normal operation in the Minnesota climate. • Proposals shall provide evidence that the proposed technology does not incorporate proprietary components, and that the system design allows for multiple sources of supply and/or repair. Page 344 of 485 9 Solar RFP – City of Lakeville (Rev. 05.28.2026) • Proposals shall describe reusability or recyclability of proposed technology and equipment. XVI. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Proposals must provide a description of the basic philosophy for performing O&M and include a discussion of contracting for outside services, if applicable. The successful respondent shall provide three (3) copies of the complete O&M manuals for all components of the system upon system commissioning. The O&M plan shall include recycling for any solar module or inverter that needs to be replaced for any reason over the system's life. At the time of any project-level work order execution, the provider shall use solar PV system components that are readily reusable or recyclable. The provider shall track solar system equipment that ceases to function as intended and, by March 31 of the previous calendar year, report annually to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency the recycling of any modules or inverters using the Module or Inverter Recycling Form. Note that the form must be submitted even if no components were recycled. For questions, call 651-751-2211 or email Amanda Cotton, at amanda.cotton@state.mn.us. XVII. PROJECT SCHEDULE All proposals must include a project schedule that includes the following milestones: • Permitting begins • Final design plans complete • Equipment ordered • Construction begins • Electrical generation begins As a condition of the Solar on Public Buildings Grant Program through the Department, grant contracts between the Department and the City will have a term of no more than eighteen (18) months from the date of execution to complete the installation and submit all permit, commissioning, and other System paperwork deemed necessary by the Department. As part of the grant contract between the Department and the City, the City will be required to meet and submit proof of the following milestones with supporting documents or information from the developer as requested. Installation and Project Milestones Milestone Due No Later Than All necessary System components ordered or in the physical possession of the City, Developer, or contractor. End of Month 4 All necessary System interconnection paperwork filed. End of Month 8 System installed, all permits commissioning, and other System paperwork signed and submitted to Department. End of Month 18 Annual Check-ins for System Production Annually, throughout System’s production lifetime, beginning 12 months after System Commissioning Page 345 of 485 10 Solar RFP – City of Lakeville (Rev. 05.28.2026) XVIII. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Please submit a detailed financial report prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) reflecting the current (as of the most recent financial statement date) financial condition of the provider. Such report must include a balance sheet, income statement, and statement of cash flows, along with applicable footnotes, dated concurrently for at least each of the last preceding three years ending on the most recent fiscal quarter such statements were prepared. Public entities or subsidiaries should attach SEC Form 10-K along with, as applicable, detailed unaudited statements for the provider. Non-public entities may attach unaudited financial statements or copies of tax forms and schedules filed with the Internal Revenue Service where applicable. XIX. SELECTION COMMITTEE The City has established a Selection Committee to evaluate provider proposals. The evaluation of each proposal will be based on technical criteria and qualifications, reference checks, and other information gathered independently. XX. CITY AND PROVIDER RESPONSIBILITIES The City will be responsible for the following: • Providing all available existing relevant plans and records. • Hosting one (1) in-person pre-proposal conference and site visit on Tuesday, June 2 2026, from 3:00 PM – 4:00 PM for provider to review site location prior to submittal of proposal. If selected, the provider will be responsible for providing information and supporting preparation of documents to contribute to the City’s grant application with the Minnesota Department of Commerce. Execution of a contract between the City and the provider is contingent upon receiving grant funding through the Minnesota Solar on Public Buildings Grant Program. If selected, the provider will be responsible for providing information for the grant application due June 30, 2026, including but not limited to: • Contributing to review of applicant exceptions to State of MN Sample Grant Contract • Developer contact information • Project Information o Final System size (kWdc) o Final System size (kWac) o Estimated Y1 system energy production (kWh) o Final System energy production estimate report o Updates to System site • System Project Details o System modules o System inverters o Description of permitting and interconnection process for the System o Utility MOU o System site plan Page 346 of 485 11 Solar RFP – City of Lakeville (Rev. 05.28.2026) o One-line diagram, with legend, of the System o Contributing to System proposal and proposed contract agreement between City and developer o System 25Y Cashflow Analysis form o Planned ownership o System’s full project budget o Payment milestone schedule to developer o Developer’s plan to reduce capital expenses o Developer prevailing wage assurance o MPCA Recycling form XXI. PROVIDER SELECTION CRITERIA The City, based on the requirements of this RFP, has designated the following items as selection criteria for the successful provider. Each item will be individually and separately scored by Selection Committee members. The scores of each rater will be tabulated and summarized in a single total score for each of the providers. A. Proposal Completeness (10 points): The measure for which the provider has provided all the requested information in a clear, non-ambiguous way as requested in this RFP. B. Cost/Best Value to the City (30 points): Cost information provided by the provider detailing the cost to the owner and potential savings over a 25-year period. C. Targeted Group (5 points): Utilize certified Women, Minority, or Disabled Owned Businesses to supply materials or services. D. Financial Strength and Stability (10 points): Provide information indicating the provider financial strength in terms of capital and liquid assets sufficient to successfully complete the projects listed in this RFP; and the stability of the provider in terms of length of service, professional capabilities, construction experience and capabilities over time. E. Photovoltaic engineering, project, and construction experience, including a minimum of five successful photovoltaic projects within the scope of this RFP (20 points). F. Project engineering analysis (10 points). Information provided by the provider detailing the estimated kWh generated by the proposed photovoltaic systems in this RFP; including all necessary assumptions for example sunlight availability, dark time, maintenance down time, MTBF (mean time between failures), efficiency of the systems proposed, efficiency losses, net metering, etc. G. Provider customer service and maintenance capabilities (5 points). The ability of the provider to respond quickly, efficiently and cost effectively to service calls, so the photovoltaic systems are operating at optimum output. The City prefers contractors that are flexible with allowing extended payment terms; however, this is not included in the selection criteria. Page 347 of 485 12 Solar RFP – City of Lakeville (Rev. 05.28.2026) XXII. RIGHT TO REJECT PROPOSALS Proposals shall remain valid for 60 days after the opening of the proposals. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted, and no representation made herein that any contract will be awarded pursuant to this RFP or otherwise. All costs incurred in the preparation of the proposal, the submission of additional information and/or any aspect of a proposal prior to award of a written contract will be borne by the provider. The City reserves the right to cancel, modify, or terminate the procurement process or any resulting contract at any time, with or without cause, including after City Council approval, if deemed to be in the best interest of the City or due to funding availability, project changes, or other unforeseen circumstances. The City will provide only the staff assistance and documentation specifically referred to herein and will not be responsible for any other cost or obligation of any kind which may be incurred by the respondent. All proposals submitted become the property of the City. XXIII. RFP EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A: Proposed Solar Location Map EXHIBIT B: PVWatts Report EXHIBIT C: Recent Electrical Bill EXHIBIT D: Historical Energy Data EXHIBIT E: Electrical Service & Electrical site information EXHIBIT F: Roof Information Page 348 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Approval of Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County for Preliminary and Final Engineering and Traffic Signal Construction for the CSAH 50/5 and I-35 Interchange Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve the Joint Powers Agreement with Dakota County for preliminary and final engineering for the CSAH 50/5 and I- 35 Interchange project (City Project 26-05), and for traffic signal construction, administration, and maintenance at the CSAH 5 and Kenyon Avenue Intersection (City Project 27-05). Overview Dakota County and the City are partnering to advance improvements along CSAH 50/5 (Kenwood Trail) between Kenrick Avenue and Klamath Trail, including replacing the existing I- 35 interchange with a diverging diamond interchange (DDI). The corridor experiences significant congestion, safety issues, limited multimodal access, and continued traffic growth. The project includes reconstructed bridges, updated signals, reconfigured ramps, noise walls, and a new multiuse trail. These improvements will significantly enhance safety, mobility, and long-term reliability on one of the City and County's most critical corridors. The Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) also covers construction, administration, and maintenance of a new traffic signal at CSAH 5 and Kenyon Avenue. This signal is scheduled for installation in late summer 2026 and is an important improvement to manage current traffic and to support operations during interchange construction. The JPA outlines roles, responsibilities and cost participation for both the interchange engineering and the traffic signal project. The project has secured significant outside funding, including $1,673,000 in state funds for preliminary engineering, $5,040,000 in federal Congressionally Directed Spending for final engineering, and $47,800,000 in additional state and federal funding for construction. Under Dakota County's cost-share policies, the interchange engineering costs will be split 85% County/15% City, and the traffic signal construction will be shared 55% County/45% City. The City's estimated cost for engineering and the traffic signal work is $480,000. Approving this JPA keeps engineering on schedule, supports timely advancement toward right- of-way and future construction phases, and allows the 2026 installation of the needed traffic signal. Additional agreements will be brought forward for right-of-way acquisition and construction of the full interchange project. Supporting Information 1. 2026.06.15 JPA Page 349 of 485 Financial Impact: $480,000 Budgeted: Yes Source: Multiple Sources Envision Lakeville Community Values: Design that Connects the Community Report Completed by: Zach Johnson, City Engineer Page 350 of 485 Dakota County Contract #DCAXXXXXX JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL ENGINEERING, AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION COST PARTICIPATION BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF DAKOTA AND THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE FOR DAKOTA COUNTY PROJECT NOS. 50-033 AND 05-060 CITY OF LAKEVILLE PROJECT NOS. 26-05 AND 27-05 SYNOPSIS: Dakota County and the City of Lakeville agree to share costs associated with the preliminary and final engineering for County Project (DCP) 50-033 and City Project (CP) 26-05, which provides for intersection and roadway improvements along County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 50/5 between Kenrick Avenue and Klamath Trail and includes a diverging diamond interchange at Interstate 35 (I-35). An additional agreement or amendment will be required to establish cost-participation and other terms for right-of-way acquisition, construction, and maintenance of DCP 50-033. This Agreement also includes cost participation for the construction, administration, and maintenance for DCP 05-060 and CP 27-05, which includes installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of CSAH 5 and Kenyon Avenue, scheduled for late summer 2026. This signal is a critical traffic mitigation measure to alleviate traffic congestion both during current conditions and throughout construction of DCP 50-033. Page 351 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 2 THIS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (Agreement), is made and entered into by and between the County of Dakota (the “County”), a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, and the City of Lakeville (the “City”), a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereafter collectively referred to as the “Parties”, and individually as the “Party”, and witnesses the following: WHEREAS, under Minnesota Statutes sections 162.17, subd. 1 and 471.59, subd. 1, two governmental units may enter into an agreement to cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties, and one of the participating governmental units may exercise one of its powers on behalf of the other governmental units; and WHEREAS, to provide a safe and efficient transportation system, the County and the City are proceeding with County Projects 50-033 and 05-060 and City Projects 26-05 and 27-05; and WHEREAS, DCP 50-033 and CP 26-05 will replace the existing interchange with a diverging diamond design featuring a multiuse trail in the center median and include the installation and modernization of traffic signals, replacement of the I-35 bridges over CSAH 50/5, reconfiguration of ramp terminals and adjacent roads, construction of noise walls, and the addition of a northbound I-35 auxiliary lane from CSAH 50 to CSAH 46; and WHEREAS, DCP 05-060 and CP 27-05 includes construction of a new traffic signal at the intersection of CSAH 5 and Kenyon Avenue that will be constructed prior to DCP 50-033 (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, DCP 50-033 and CP 26-05 and DCP 05-060 and CP 27-05 hereafter will collectively be referred to as the “Project”; and WHEREAS, the purpose and need for the Project is to modernize the interchange and bridges, improve safety for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians, alleviate congestion, and enhance multimodal mobility; and Page 352 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 3 WHEREAS, the Parties wish to complete the current preliminary engineering contract by October 2026 and award a final engineering contract by November 2026 for DCP 50-033 and CP 26-05, with construction to begin in 2029, and for DCP 05-060 to be advertised for construction by July 2026 and construction complete by December 2026 (the “Project Schedule”); and WHEREAS, the City has entered into Right-of-Way Acquisition Loan Fund (the “RALF”) agreements with the Metropolitan Council for the acquisition of real properties for DCP 50- 033 and CP 26-05. The RALF program is a no interest loan program with no repayment due until the Project is constructed. As part of this Agreement, the County will reimburse the City 85% of property acquisition costs; and WHEREAS, to more efficiently deliver the Project, the County and City mutually desire to partner with one another in exercising their joint powers to complete preliminary and final engineering of DCP 50-033 and CP 26-05, and construction, administration, and maintenance of DCP 05-060 and CP 27-05, as well as to determine each Parties’ respective share of Project costs; and WHEREAS, the Project was awarded $1,673,000 in state funds through various sources, which were applied toward preliminary engineering costs; and WHEREAS, the Project was awarded $5,040,000 in federal funds through the 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act as Congressionally Directed Spending, which shall be applied toward design and engineering eligible costs, and requires a 20% state or local funding match, and must be obligated by September 30, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Project has been awarded $47,800,000 in state and federal funds through various sources, which shall be applied toward eligible construction costs, requiring additional separate agreements for phases beyond preliminary and final engineering; and Page 353 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 4 WHEREAS, the County and City have included the Project in their Capital Improvement Programs and will jointly participate in the costs of preliminary and final engineering for DCP 50-033 and CP 26-05, and for the construction, administration, and maintenance of DCP 05- 060 and CP 27-05, per the cost share policies included in the adopted Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021), included herein as Attachment A (the “Cost Share Policy”); and NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed the County and City will share Project responsibilities as detailed in this Agreement and, in accordance with the County’s adopted cost share policies, jointly participate in Project costs as set forth herein. The above recitals are incorporated by reference and are made a part hereof as if fully set forth below. 1. Project Administration. The County shall be the lead agency for engineering design, construction, construction administration, and maintenance of the Project. Subject to the requirements below, the County and the City shall each retain final decision- making authority within their respective jurisdictions. 2. Preliminary Engineering. “Preliminary Engineering” shall be defined as engineering work completed through preliminary layouts, which includes, but is not limited to: a. Surveying and mapping b. Engineering studies and reports c. Public involvement process d. Environmental reports e. Geotechnical information f. Drainage designs g. Traffic evaluation of various alternatives h. Preliminary layouts (30% Plans) Page 354 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 5 Based on the applicable cost sharing provisions of this Agreement and the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021), specifically cost share policy F.1 Cost Participation – Roadway, this Agreement covers preliminary engineering costs incurred after deducting the $1,673,000 awarded in state funding for the existing preliminary engineering contract. 3. Engineering. Engineering costs shall include the cost of preparing preliminary/final designs, plans, specifications and proposals, surveying, mapping, consultant engineering, construction engineering (DCP 05-060/CP 27-05 only), construction management (DCP 05-060/CP 27-05 only), construction inspection (DCP 05-060/CP 27-05 only) and all related materials testing, including the cost of County and City staff time, as well as the cost of facilitating public and/or third-party agency involvement. The City’s share of the Project engineering costs is calculated at 15%, with the County covering the remaining 85% with specific details covered in Attachment A. Attachment B (Opinion of Cost Participation) provides the most recent cost estimate of the funding needed for the existing preliminary engineering contract after deducting the awarded state funds. 4. Plans, Specifications and Award of Contract. The County will prepare plans and specifications consistent with County and City design standards, State-Aid design standards and MnDOT standards and specifications. The Parties’ mutual concurrence with the plans and specifications is required prior to advertising for bids. Within 7 days of opening bids for the construction contract, the lead agency shall submit a copy of the low bid and an abstract of all bids together with the request for concurrence by the State in the award of the construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. The lead agency may award the contract for construction to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder in accordance with state law. If a bid is not awarded, this Agreement shall terminate for the specific project that is not awarded, and all costs incurred as of the date of termination shall be apportioned in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The contract construction shall be performed in accordance with approved plans, specifications and special provisions which are made a part hereof by reference with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein. Page 355 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 6 5. Right-of-Way. Easements will be necessary for completion of the Project during construction. An additional agreement or amendment will be required to establish cost- participation and other terms for right-of-way acquisition for DCP 50-033/CP 26-05. The County, as the lead agency, will undertake all actions necessary to acquire all permanent and temporary highway right-of-way for DCP 05-060/CP 27-05. The costs of acquiring any necessary right-of-way for DCP 05-060/CP 27-05, shall be shared based on applicable cost sharing provisions of this Agreement and the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021). Where necessary, the City shall convey to the County, at no cost, except those agreed to as part of the RALF agreements, all necessary permanent highway and temporary easements, on forms approved by the County Attorney’s office, on all adjacent City- controlled real property for Project purposes. Additionally, if necessary, the City shall convey rights to the County, at no cost, all public easements, and rights-of-way necessary for Project purposes, including the right to grade within drainage and utility easements as necessary. Any right-of-way costs for new sanitary sewer, water mains and appurtenances, and aesthetic elements outside of the right-of-way needed for the highway improvements shall be the responsibility of the City. All construction activities, including traffic control on City-owned streets, must comply with applicable state and City standards and specifications to fulfill the City’s requirements. The City reserves the right to inspect construction materials and methods as necessary. 6. City Permits. Through this Agreement, the City will permit work to occur, including geotechnical testing, within the City’s right-of-way and City-controlled land as defined in the final plans and specifications for the Project. The County, or its contractors, must secure a City building permit for retaining walls and/or other structures, and any other City permits as required by City Code, and the City hereby agrees to waive the City’s permit fees for the permits obtained by the County. Nothing in this Agreement or any permit issued by the City shall prevent the use of the public right-of-way by utilities, communication providers, or any other entity entitled by law to use public right-of-way. Page 356 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 7 The City will process permits for utility work and other activities within the City’s right- of-way. 7. Construction. Construction costs for DCP 05-060/CP 27-05 shall include all highway and roadway construction items, including removals; mobilization and traffic control, temporary widening or other measures if required as part of traffic control or project staging; mitigation as required by state and federal permits including accessibility requirements; replacement or restoration of fences, landscaping and driveways when affected by construction; replacement or adjustment of sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer systems, if required due to construction; wetland mitigation and banking; and all other construction aspects outlined in the plan except for elements as called out under this Agreement or County policies included in the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021). 8. Cost Share. The County and City shall share project costs in accordance with all applicable cost sharing provisions of the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021) and this Agreement as defined below. a. DCP 50-033 and CP 26-05 i. Preliminary and Final Engineering: After deducting state funding ($1,673,000) for preliminary engineering and federal funding ($5,040,000) for final engineering, the County shall be responsible for 85% and the City 15% of engineering costs, per cost share policy F.1 Cost Participation – Roadway. ii. Right-of-Way Acquisition Loan Fund (RALF): The County shall be responsible for 85% and the City 15% of right-of-way costs for land acquired through the Metropolitan Council’s Right-of-Way Acquisition Loan Fund, per cost share policies F.1 Cost Participation – Roadway and F.3 Cost Participation – Right of Way. iii. Right-of-Way and Construction: A separate or amended joint powers agreement will be executed between the County and City for right-of- way acquisition, construction, and maintenance of DCP 50-033/CP 26- Page 357 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 8 05 prior to advertising for construction bids. A MnDOT Cooperative Agreement is also anticipated for construction. iv. Aesthetic Elements: The County will participate in aesthetics up to 3%, per cost share policy F.2 Cost Participation – Aesthetic and details covered in Attachment A/B. Exceptions will include engineering costs (100%) assigned to the City for City utilities, City-specified lighting or other stand-alone City aesthetic elements, including costs for City staff time and engineering contracts as described in Section 10 of this Agreement. The application of the Cost Share Policy F.2 Aesthetic will apply only to the construction costs for the county and city roadways while the trunk highway elements will follow MnDOT’s Aesthetic Cost Participation Policy which varies from 3% to 7% depending on the specific element such as bridges or noise walls, the cost-share approach will be documented in an amendment or separate agreement for construction. b. DCP 05-060 and CP 27-05 i. Preliminary and Final Engineering and Right-of-Way: After deducting state and federal funding, the County shall be responsible for 55% and the City 45% of engineering and right-of-way costs, per cost share policy F.4 Cost Participation – Traffic Signals. ii. Construction: The County shall be responsible for 55% and the City 45% of engineering and right-of-way costs, per cost share policy F.4 Cost Participation – Traffic Signals. No state or federal funding will be applied towards construction. DCP 05-060/CP 27-05 will be advertised for construction bids by July 2026 with construction complete by December 2026. Attachment B provides the most recent cost estimate. 9. Project Cost Updates. The lead agency must provide updated cost estimates showing the County and City shares of Project costs annually at the time of Capital Improvement Program development. Updated cost estimates will also be provided by the lead agency at the following times: Page 358 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 9 • prior to approval of the appraised values for any necessary right-of-way acquisitions; • prior to advertising a construction contract; • after bid opening (prior to contract award); • during construction if total contract changes exceed $25,000; • once per year following the construction season until the Project is complete. Project cost estimate updates include actual and estimated costs for engineering costs, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, construction, and administration. The parties acknowledge that Project cost estimates are subject to numerous variables causing the estimates to be subject to change and the updates are provided for informational purposes in good faith. Each agency is responsible for informing their respective council or board regarding Project costs estimates. 10. Payment. The County shall administer the contract and act as the paying agent for all payments to the Contractor. Payments to the Contractor will be made as Project work progresses and when certified by the City or County Engineer. Upon presentation of an itemized claim by one agency to the other, the receiving agency shall reimburse the invoicing agency for its share of the costs incurred under this Agreement upon receipt or within a maximum of 35 days from the presentation of the claim. If any portion of an itemized claim is questioned by the receiving agency, the remainder of the claim shall be promptly paid, and accompanied by a written explanation of the amounts in question. Payment of any outstanding amount will be made following good faith negotiation and documentation of actual costs incurred in carrying out the work. 11. Change Orders and Supplemental Agreements. Any change orders or supplemental agreements that affect any of the Project’s cost participation must be approved by the authorized representative of each party prior to execution of work. The City’s appointed representative is Zach Johnson, City Engineer, and the County’s appointed representative is Jake Chapek, Assistant County Engineer, or their successors. Both Parties shall endeavor to provide timely approval of change orders and supplemental agreements so as not to delay construction operations. Page 359 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 10 12. Construction Standards. All construction, including traffic control, shall be accomplished in accordance with applicable State-Aid, County and City standards, specifications, and policies to the satisfaction of the County and City. The County and City reserve the right to inspect construction materials and methods as needed. 13. Municipal Construction Items. The City may elect to perform concurrent work outside what is necessary to complete the Project, such as new utility installation, utility servicing, improving adjacent streets and access modifications not required by the project. Other examples include design and administration of work addressing City park amenities, or internal park trails. At this time none has been identified but may be identified in a future separate or amended cost share agreement. The City shall be responsible for 100% of costs, associated with concurrent work outside what is necessary to complete the Project. 14. Street Lighting, Maintenance Costs. Upon completion of DCP 05-060/CP 27-05, the County shall be responsible for 50% and the City 50% of energy costs for the streetlights on the traffic signal, per cost share policy F.17 Street Lighting. The City is responsible for maintenance. 15. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement will be effective only after approval by each governing body and execution of a written amendment document by duly authorized officials of each body. 16. Effective Dates for Design and Construction of Project. This Agreement will be effective upon execution by duly authorized officials of each governing body and shall continue in effect until all work to be carried out in accordance with this Agreement has been completed. Absent an amendment, however, in no event will this Agreement continue in effect after December 31, 2030. 17. Final Acceptance. Final completion of DCP 05-060/CP 27-05must be approved by both the County and the City. The contractor shall provide a maintenance bond for City infrastructure. The warranty period for materials and workmanship shall be two years from the date of final acceptance by the City, as approved by the City Engineer. The County shall include this requirement in the contract documents. Page 360 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 11 18. Pavement Maintenance. Upon acceptance of DCP 05-060/CP 27-05, the City shall be responsible for all pavement maintenance within City-owned right-of-way. The County shall be responsible for all pavement maintenance within County-owned right-of-way unless necessitated by a failure of a City utility system or installation of new City- owned facilities. 19. Pavement Marking and Traffic Signing Maintenance. Pavement markings will be installed as applicable for the operation of the highway and intersections along the DCP 05-060/CP 27-05area as outlined in the plans. The City shall be responsible for all pavement marking and sign maintenance within City right-of-way and the County shall be responsible for all pavement marking and sign maintenance within the County right-of-way. 20. Drainage Area and Stormwater or Drainage Facilities Maintenance. Upon final acceptance of DCP 05-060/CP 27-05, maintenance of any drainage areas and any stormwater or drainage facilities shall be provided in accordance with the adopted Maintenance Agreement for Storm Sewer Systems (Dakota County Contract No. C0025412). 21. Sidewalks and Trails. Upon final acceptance of DCP 05-060/CP 27-05, maintenance of sidewalks and trails shall be provided in accordance with the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021). The County shall be responsible for the costs of trail resurfacing or reconstruction in accordance with County policies included in the Dakota County 2040 Transportation Plan (July 2021). 22. Subsequent Excavation. After completion of DCP 05-060/CP 27-05, and after expiration of the warranty period regarding repair, if excavation within the County right- of-way is necessary to repair or install water, sanitary sewer, or other City utilities, the City shall apply for a permit from the County and shall be responsible to restore the excavated area and road surface to substantially the condition at the time of disturbance. If the City employs its own contractor for the above-described water, sewer or other utility repair or installation, the City shall hold the County harmless from any and all liability incurred due to the repair or installation of said water, sewer or Page 361 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 12 other municipal utility including, but not limited to, the costs of repair as well as liability to third parties injured or damaged as a result of the work. If the City fails to have the highway properly restored, the County Engineer may have the work done and the City shall pay for the work within 35 days following receipt of a written claim by the County. 23. Rules and Regulations. The County and the City shall abide by Minnesota Department of Transportation standard specifications, rules, and contract administration procedures unless amended by the contract specifications. 24. Indemnification. The County agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense arising under the provisions of this Agreement and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of the County and/or those of County employees or agents. The City agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense arising under the provisions of this Agreement for which the City is responsible, including future operation and maintenance of facilities owned by the City and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of the City and/or those of City employees or agents. All parties to this agreement recognize that liability for any claims arising under this agreement are subject to the provisions of the Minnesota Municipal Tort Claims Law; Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. In the event of any claims or actions filed against either party, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to allow a claimant to obtain separate judgments or separate liability caps from the individual parties. The County shall include the City as additional insured in the contract documents. 25. Employees of Parties. Any and all persons engaged in the work to be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City, for any purpose, including Worker’s Compensation, and any and all claims that may or might arise out of said employment context on behalf of said employees while so engaged. Any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the County’s employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation or responsibility of the City. Any and all persons engaged in the work to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the County for Page 362 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 13 any purpose, including Worker’s Compensation, and any and all claims that may or might arise out of said employment context on behalf of said employee while so engaged. Any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omissions of the part of the City’s employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation or responsibility of the County. 26. Audits. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sec 16 C. 05, Subd. 5, any books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the County and the City relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the County or the City and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate. The County and the City agree to maintain these records for a period of six years from the date of performance of all services covered under this Agreement. 27. Integration and Continuing Effect. The entire and integrated agreement of the Parties contained in this Agreement shall supersede all prior negotiations, representations or agreements between the City and the County regarding the Project; whether written or oral. All agreements for future maintenance or cost responsibilities shall survive and continue in full force and effect in accordance with the Dakota County Transportation Plan after completion of the construction provided for in this Agreement. 28. Authorized Representatives. The authorized representatives for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement are: COUNTY OF DAKOTA Erin Laberee, Dakota County Engineer (or successor) 14955 Galaxie Ave. Apple Valley, MN 55124 Office: (952) 891-7100 Erin.Laberee@co.dakota.mn.us CITY OF LAKEVILLE Zach Johnson City Engineer (or successor) 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Office: 952-985-4500 zjohnson@lakevillemn.gov All notices or communications required or permitted by this Agreement shall be either hand delivered or mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the above addresses. Either party may change its address by written notice to the other party. Mailed notice shall be deemed complete two business days after the date of mailing. Page 363 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 14 [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW] Page 364 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 15 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officials. CITY OF LAKEVILLE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By Zach Johnson, City Engineer Mayor (SEAL) By Deputy City Clerk Date: Page 365 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 16 COUNTY OF DAKOTA RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: __________________________ By: __ Erin Laberee, County Engineer George Fischer, Physical Development Director Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Assistant County Attorney Date COUNTY BOARD RESOLUTION KS-_____________ No. ______ Date: ___________ Page 366 of 485 Dakota County Contract #xxxxxxx DCPs 50-033 and 05-060; CP 26-05 and 27-05 June 15, 2026 Page | 17 Page 367 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 EB First Addition CUP and ROW Vacation Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve: 1) an amendment to Conditional Use Permit #24-09 to allow more than one principal residential building on one lot, 2) the vacation of public right of way for 207th Street. and 3) adopt findings of fact. Overview EB Lakeville Development LLC has submitted applications and plans for an amendment to a conditional use permit and for the vacation of public right of way in conjunction with a final plat application for EB First Addition. The project proposes one 142-unit multi-family apartment building and 24 row-style townhomes on 8.28 acres north of 210th Street (CSAH 70) and west of Keokuk Avenue. The preliminary plat and original conditional use permit were approved by the City Council on October 21, 2024. The initial approval was for two multi-family apartment buildings and a conditional use permit for two principal buildings on one lot, building height, and an exception to the exterior material requirements. This development is exempt from the residential development moratorium due to the preliminary plat having already been approved by the City Council. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at its June 4, 2026 meeting. There was one public comment from an adjacent property owner asking about the moratorium and whether a fence that was previously agreed to between the two sites would still be put in place. Staff explained why the project was exempt from the moratorium and that the fence would be included with the development of the site. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the conditional use permit amendment and vacation of the public right of way, subject to three stipulations. The applicant has submitted revised apartment building plans to demonstrate that the alcove units meet the Zoning Ordinance definition of an efficient dwelling unit, so stipulation #3 of the Planning report has been satisfied. Supporting Information 1. CUP Form + Findings of Fact 2. Vacation Resolution 3. Revised apartment unit floor plan 4. June 4, 2026 draft Planning Commission minutes 5. May 28, 2026 Planning report + exhibits 6. May 28, 2026 Engineering report Page 368 of 485 Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: A Home for All Ages and Stages of Life Report Completed by: Kris Jenson, Planning Manager Page 369 of 485 1 (Reserved for Dakota County Recording Information) CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 26-___ AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 24-09 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Lakeville approves an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 24-09 for EB Lakeville Development LLC to allow construction of more than one principal building on one lot of record within the RH-2, Multiple Family Residential District. 2. Property. The permit is for the following described property located at 11813 210th Street West in the City of Lakeville, Dakota County, Minnesota and will be platted as: Lot 1, Block 1, EB First Addition 3. Conditions. This conditional use permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the May 28, 2026 engineering report. b. The 207th Street right of way vacation must be recorded in conjunction with the EB First Addition final plat. 4. Revocation. The City may revoke the conditional use permit for cause upon determination that the conditional use permit is not in conformance with the conditions of the permit or is in continued violation of the city code or other applicable regulations. 5. Expiration. This conditional use permit shall expire unless the applicant commences construction of the authorized use within one year of the date of this conditional use permit unless an extension is approved by the Zoning Administrator. Page 370 of 485 2 Dated: June 15, 2026 BY: ________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor BY:________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk SEAL STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 15th day of June 2026 by Luke M. Hellier, Mayor and by Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Lakeville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. __________________________ Notary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Page 371 of 485 1 CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA EB LAKEVILLE DEVELOPMENT LLC CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION On June 4, 2026 the Lakeville Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of EB Lakeville Development LLC for a conditional use permit amendment to allow construction of more than one principal building within the RH-2, Multiple Family Residential District. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed conditional use permits preceded by published and mailed notice. The applicant was present and the Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak. The City Council hereby adopts the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is located in Planning District No. 6 of the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, which guides the property for high density land use. 2. The property is zoned RH-2, Multiple Family Residential District. 3. The legal description of the property at the time of final plat will be: Lot 1, Block 1, EB First Addition 4. Section 11-4-3E of the City of Lakeville Zoning Ordinance provides that a conditional use permit may not be issued unless certain criteria are satisfied. The criteria and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The multiple family building and townhomes use of the property is consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan and District 6 recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. Page 372 of 485 2 Finding: The multiple family building and townhomes on a single parcel are compatible with existing land uses in the area given compliance with the stipulations listed in the May 28, 2026 planning report. c. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Finding: Provided compliance with stipulations of the conditional use permit, the multiple family building and townhomes on a single parcel will conform to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City’s service capacity. Finding: The subject property is within the existing MUSA and is served with city sanitary sewer and water. The multi-family building and townhomes will not have a negative impact on the City’s service capacity. e. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The multi-family building and townhome uses on a single parcel will not overburden the streets serving the property. 5. The planning report dated May 28, 2026 prepared by Kris Jenson, Planning Manager is incorporated herein. DECISION The City Council approves the conditional use permit amendment conditioned upon compliance with the planning report prepared by Kris Jenson, Planning Manager, dated May 28, 2026. DATED: June 15, 2026 CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: __________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor BY: __________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Page 373 of 485 (Reserved for Dakota County Recording Information) CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 26- _______ RESOLUTION VACATING PUBLIC STREET RIGHT OF WAY WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a public hearing, preceded by two (2) weeks published notice, to consider the following described public street right of way, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the public interest to approve the public street right of way vacation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Lakeville City Council: 1. The public street right of way for 207th Street described in Exhibit A is hereby vacated. 2. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Dakota County Recorder. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 15th day of June 2026. Page 374 of 485 CITY OF LAKEVILLE ________________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( CITY OF LAKEVILLE ) I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 26-_____ is a true and correct copy of the resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lakeville at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 15th day of March 2026, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. ________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk (SEAL) Page 375 of 485 66 1 . 2 6 2 5 25 25 11 0 . 0 0 S0 0 ° 0 2 ' 3 5 " W 5 5 1 . 2 8 N0 0 ° 0 6 ' 5 8 " E 5 5 1 . 2 8 N89°34'51"E 654.17 N89°34'51"E 654.87 S88°56'20"W80.01 20 7 T H S T . W N0 0 ° 0 2 ' 3 5 " E 11 0 . 0 0 M a r 2 7 , 2 0 2 6 - 3 : 5 8 p m - U s e r : g m u l l e n b a c h L : \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 \ C A D \ S u r v e y \ E x h i b i t s \ 5 4 1 4 9 - R O W V A C . d w g Approved: Drawn: Sheet Number Project No. Designed: Rev.: Date: Issued: EB LAKEVILLE, LLCEB FIRST ADDITIONLAKEVILLE, MNROW VACATION EXHIBIT GAM GAM 02/05/2026 1 03/27/2026 1 54149 PARCEL DESCRIPTION: The South 661.26 feet of the East 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 114, Range 21, according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED: That part of Parcel 40, as shown on Dakota County Road Right of Way Map No. 300, according to the recorded map thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota lying north of the following described line: Beginning at the northwest corner of Parcel 41 as shown on said Dakota County Road Right of Way Map No. 300; thence South 88 degrees 56 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 80.01 feet to a corner of said Parcel 40 on the north line of the south 110.00 feet of the East Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 114 North, Range 21 West and said line there terminating. For purposes of this legal, said north line of the south 110.00 feet of the East Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter is assumed to bear North 89 degrees 34 minutes 51 seconds East. Said easement contains approximately 26,184 square feet. NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 80LEGEND RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT A Page 376 of 485 DATE PROJECT NUMBER: SCALE: REVISIONS PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N 7433 AVONDALE PARK BARNHART, MO 63012 636.751.4798 P CREITZEL@STUDIO-785.COM E © 2023 STUDIO 785 LLC NA M E LI C E N S E # DESCRIPTION DATEISSUE DESCRIPTION DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OW N E R : A105 AS NOTED OV E R A L L BU I L D I N G PL A N S EB LA K E V I L L E DE V E L O P M E N T LL C 30 2 0 FR A N C E AV E N U E ST . LO U I S PA R K , MN 55 4 1 6 GR I F F I N LA N D I N G El e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 2 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL C: \ S t u d i o 78 5 \ P r o j e c t s \ 2 0 2 5 \ 2 5 - 0 2 - 0 0 4 TB D - La k e v i l l e MN \ 0 2 De s i g n An d Do c u m e n t a t i o n \ B . Dr a w i n g s \ i . Ar c h i c a d Fi l e s \ b . PL N Fi l e s \ E l e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 2 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n 11 8 1 3 21 0 T H ST R E E T W LA K E V I L L E , MN 55 0 4 4 CONSULTANT: SHEET NO: SH E E T TI T L E : THIS DRAWING AND DETAILS ON IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY BE USED FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT ONLY. IT SHALL NOT BE LOANED, COPIED, OR REPRODUCED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. THE PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT'S SEAL AFFIXED TO THIS SHEET APPLIES ONLY TO THE MATERIAL AND ITEMS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. ALL DRAWINGS, INSTRUMENTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED PREPARED BY THIS ARCHITECT, AND THIS ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH PLANS, DRAWINGS OR DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL. FDW WW/D DW FDW WW/D FDW WW/D FDW WW/D DW W D DW F W D DW F W D D W W D D W D W D W D W WW/ DWW/ D WW/D WW/ D WW/ D WW/ D WW/ D WW/ D WW/D WW/D W/ D W/D W/DW/D WW/D WW/D WW/ D WW/ D WW/D WW/ D DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F WW/D DW F WW/D DW FWW/D N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1 APARTMENT BUILDING FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 0 8'16'32' STAIRSTAIR ELEV.TRASH ELEV. TRASH STAIR A1-1BR A5- ALCOVE A5- ALCOVE B6-2BR B5-2BR JAN. STO. B5-2BR S1- STUDIO S1- STUDIO S1- STUDIO S1- STUDIO A5- ALCOVE B6-2BR A4-1BR A1-1BR B1-2BR B1-2BR A1-1BR B1-2BR B1-2BR B3-2BR A3-1BR ROOF ACCESS A4-1BR A1-1BR A1-1BR B1-2BR B5-2BR B5-2BR STO. A1-1BR A4-1BR B4-2BR B4-2BRA1-1BR A1-1BR A1-1BR A1-1BRA4-1BRB1-2BR B1-2BR DATE PROJECT NUMBER: SCALE: REVISIONS PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N 7433 AVONDALE PARK BARNHART, MO 63012 636.751.4798 P CREITZEL@STUDIO-785.COM E © 2023 STUDIO 785 LLC NA M E LI C E N S E # DESCRIPTION DATEISSUE DESCRIPTION DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OW N E R : A105 AS NOTED OV E R A L L BU I L D I N G PL A N S EB LA K E V I L L E DE V E L O P M E N T LL C 30 2 0 FR A N C E AV E N U E ST . LO U I S PA R K , MN 55 4 1 6 EB LA K E V I L L E IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL 11 8 1 3 21 0 T H ST R E E T W LA K E V I L L E , MN 55 0 4 4 CONSULTANT: SHEET NO: SH E E T TI T L E : THIS DRAWING AND DETAILS ON IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY BE USED FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT ONLY. IT SHALL NOT BE LOANED, COPIED, OR REPRODUCED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. THE PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT'S SEAL AFFIXED TO THIS SHEET APPLIES ONLY TO THE MATERIAL AND ITEMS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. ALL DRAWINGS, INSTRUMENTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED PREPARED BY THIS ARCHITECT, AND THIS ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH PLANS, DRAWINGS OR DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL. Page 377 of 485 DATE PROJECT NUMBER: SCALE: REVISIONS PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N 7433 AVONDALE PARK BARNHART, MO 63012 636.751.4798 P CREITZEL@STUDIO-785.COM E © 2023 STUDIO 785 LLC NA M E LI C E N S E # DESCRIPTION DATEISSUE DESCRIPTION DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OW N E R : A200 AS NOTED UN I T PL A N S EB LA K E V I L L E DE V E L O P M E N T LL C 30 2 0 FR A N C E AV E N U E ST . LO U I S PA R K , MN 55 4 1 6 GR I F F I N LA N D I N G El e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 2 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL C: \ S t u d i o 78 5 \ P r o j e c t s \ 2 0 2 5 \ 2 5 - 0 2 - 0 0 4 TB D - La k e v i l l e MN \ 0 2 De s i g n An d Do c u m e n t a t i o n \ B . Dr a w i n g s \ i . Ar c h i c a d Fi l e s \ b . PL N Fi l e s \ E l e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 2 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n 11 8 1 3 21 0 T H ST R E E T W LA K E V I L L E , MN 55 0 4 4 CONSULTANT: SHEET NO: SH E E T TI T L E : THIS DRAWING AND DETAILS ON IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY BE USED FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT ONLY. IT SHALL NOT BE LOANED, COPIED, OR REPRODUCED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. THE PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT'S SEAL AFFIXED TO THIS SHEET APPLIES ONLY TO THE MATERIAL AND ITEMS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. ALL DRAWINGS, INSTRUMENTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED PREPARED BY THIS ARCHITECT, AND THIS ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH PLANS, DRAWINGS OR DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL. F DW WW/ D 16'-0" 32 ' - 0 " LIVING 15'-2" X 12'-6" QUEEN DESK LA U N D R Y CLOSET BATH 7'-3" X 10'-4" COAT KITCHEN 6'-0" X 14'-0" PA N T R Y WW/ D DW F 29 ' - 0 " 26'-0" LIVING 12'-10" X 17'-2" BEDROOM 12'-0" X 10'-6" PATIO/BALCONY KING DE S K CLOSET BATH 6'-2" X 10'-6" COAT KITCHEN 10'-3" X 10'-9" MECH LA U N D R Y PA N T R Y W/ D PA N T R Y CLOSET LA U N D R Y D W DW F 29 ' - 0 " 27'-4 3/4" BEDROOM 11'-0" X 12'-10" PATIO/BALCONY KINGLIVING 15'-4" X 17'-0" MECH LAUNDRY CLOSET KITCHEN 9'-1" X 10'-11" BATH 9'-6" X 9'-4" COAT DE S K WW/ D DW F 28'-10 1/8" 11 ' - 3 3/ 4 " 5' - 9 " 23'-2 3/4" 13'-8 1/8"4'-5 3/4" 29 ' - 0 " KIN G PATIO/BALCONY LIVING 12'-11" X 16'-9" BEDROOM 13'-0" X 16'-0" DE S K LAUNDRY CLOSET CLOSET BATH 7'-4" X 10'-5" COAT KITCHEN 11'-6" X 11'-2" MECH W/D DW F 23'-6" 30 ' - 0 " BEDROOM 11'-0" X 11'-8" LIVING 11'-4" X 18'-0" PATIO/BALCONY KING MECH CLOSET LAUNDRY COAT BATH 6'-1" X 10'-9" KITCHEN 9'-0" X 10'-10" DW F WW/ D 21'-0" 29 ' - 0 " PATIO/BALCONY LIVING 21'-6" X 11'-2" QUEEN CLOSET KITCHEN 7'-7" X 12'-3" DE S K LA U N D R Y COAT BATH 12'-3" X 6'-0" PA N T R Y SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 S1-STUDIO 0 2'4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 A1 - 1 BEDROOM 1 BATH 0 2'4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 A2 - 1 BEDROOM 1 BATH (ACCESSIBLE) 0 2'4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4 A3 - 1 BEDROOM 1 BATH 0 2'4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"5 A4 - 1 BEDROOM 1 BATH 0 2'4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"5 A5 - ALCOVE (EFFICIENCY) 0 2'4'8' 507 GROSS / 463 NET QUANTITY: 12 749 GROSS / 698 NET QUANTITY: 40 507 SF QUANTITY: 12 749 SF QUANTITY: 40 50% OF A1 UNITS TO HAVE ENLARGED BEDROOM CLOSET IN LIEU OF DESK. 795 SF QUANTITY: 1 867 SF QUANTITY: 3 700 SF QUANTITY: 16 604 SF QUANTITY: 10 DATE PROJECT NUMBER: SCALE: REVISIONS PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T FO R CO N S T R U C T I O N 7433 AVONDALE PARK BARNHART, MO 63012 636.751.4798 P CREITZEL@STUDIO-785.COM E © 2023 STUDIO 785 LLC NA M E LI C E N S E # DESCRIPTION DATEISSUE DESCRIPTION DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OW N E R : A200 AS NOTED UN I T PL A N S EB LA K E V I L L E DE V E L O P M E N T LL C 30 2 0 FR A N C E AV E N U E ST . LO U I S PA R K , MN 55 4 1 6 EB LA K E V I L L E IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL 11 8 1 3 21 0 T H ST R E E T W LA K E V I L L E , MN 55 0 4 4 CONSULTANT: SHEET NO: SH E E T TI T L E : THIS DRAWING AND DETAILS ON IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY BE USED FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT ONLY. IT SHALL NOT BE LOANED, COPIED, OR REPRODUCED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. THE PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT'S SEAL AFFIXED TO THIS SHEET APPLIES ONLY TO THE MATERIAL AND ITEMS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. ALL DRAWINGS, INSTRUMENTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED PREPARED BY THIS ARCHITECT, AND THIS ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH PLANS, DRAWINGS OR DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL. Page 378 of 485 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, June 4, 2026 Page 2 Ayes – unanimous Vice Chair Einck asked for comments from the Planning Commission. • Commissioner Kaluza asked if there are tenants identified yet. Mr. Durand stated they have two tenants identified with signed leases and they are working to find tenants for the rest of the building. • Commissioner Traffas clarified that there are three remaining tenant spaces and asked if the drive-through for the convenience restaurant is the only business that can use the drive- through or if the drive-through could be modified to allow another business to use it. Mr. Durand stated the three spaces could be combined for one tenant or can accommodate three separate tenants. He also stated the drive-through is designed to accommodate other businesses but may require approval from city staff. Motion was made by Kaluza, seconded by Swaney to recommend to City Council approval of the conditional use permit for a convenience restaurant with a drive-through service window in the M-2, Mixed Used Cedar Corridor District and the findings of fact, subject to the following stipulations: 1. The site shall be developed according to the plans approved by the City Council. 2. The hours of operation shall be limited to five o’clock (5:00) A.M. to eleven o’clock (11:00) P.M. 3. Any rooftop and/or ground-mounted mechanical equipment must be screened per Zoning Ordinance requirements. 4. Plantings on the site must adhere to the landscape plan and an as-built planting plan provided prior to inspection of the installed landscaping. The Developer must provide a security with the building permit to guarantee installation of the landscaping. 5. Snow storage shall not occur within required parking spaces. 6. Prior to City Council consideration, the landscape plan must be updated to comply with the Foresters’ comments, including adding shrubs along the north property line and additional landscaping added around the parking lot. Ayes: Kaluza, Einck, Swaney, Traffas Nays: 0 5b. EB Lakeville Development LLC Vice Chair Einck opened the public hearing to consider the application of EB Lakeville Development LLC for an amendment to CUP 24-09 for the construction of more than one principal residential building on one lot of record and vacation of public right of way for 207th Street. Page 379 of 485 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, June 4, 2026 Page 3 Will O’Keefe with Bader Development introduced the project. He stated they are proposing a 142- unit apartment building and 24 townhomes. Ms. Jenson presented the staff report. The property is located north of 210th Street (CSAH 70) and west of Keokuk Avenue, includes a single-family home, and is heavily wooded A preliminary plat and conditional use permits for the Crown Lakeville Apartments project was approved by the City Council on October 21, 2024. EB Lakeville Development has taken over the project and made some changes which require the amendment of the CUP approved for multiple principal buildings on one lot. The 207th Street right of way was previously under the jurisdiction of Dakota County, who conveyed the right of way to the city earlier this year, thus requiring it to be vacated. At the time of preliminary plat approval, conditional use permits were also approved for an exception to the exterior materials requirements and the building height. The apartment building proposed for the site meets the requirements approved with those conditional use permits and therefore those items are not addressed. Because the tree inventory was prepared with the preliminary plat and was approved by City Council at that time, the site is not subject to the current tree preservation requirements. Community Development Department staff recommend approval. Vice Chair Einck opened the hearing to the public for comment. Robert Powell, 11774 205th Street West, asked if the moratorium will affect this development this year, and stated that the previous developer was going to put fencing in and asked if this would still be the case. Motion was made by Kaluza, seconded by Traffas to close the public hearing at 6:18 p.m. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes – unanimous Ms. Jenson stated when the moratorium was approved by City Council it did exempt any residential projects that already had preliminary plat approval, which this project does, so it is allowed to continue forward to final plat. There was a fence that was approved along the north property line, so it would be expected that will still be required as it was part of the preliminary plat approval at that time. Vice Chair Einck asked for comments from the Planning Commission. • Commissioner Traffas asked for the reason they made the change from the one large apartment building to the apartment and townhomes. Mr. O’Keefe stated they saw an opportunity to provide a different type of housing that hadn’t been previously approved and felt it would be addition to the development as a whole and would be well received. Motion was made by Traffas, seconded by Kaluza to recommend to City Council approval of the amendment to conditional use permit #24-09 and the vacation of 207th Street right of way and the findings of fact subject to the following stipulations: 1. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the May 28, 2026 engineering report. Page 380 of 485 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, June 4, 2026 Page 4 2. The 207th Street right-of-way vacation must be recorded in conjunction with the EB First Addition Final plat. 3. Prior to City Council consideration of the CUP amendment, the apartment building plans must be revised such that the “Efficiency Alcove” units remove the bedroom walls so as to meet the definition of an efficient dwelling unit or to increase the size of those same units to be at least 700 square feet as is required for one-bedroom units. Ayes: Einck, Swaney, Traffas, Kaluza, Nays: 0 5c. Authentix Lakeville Second Addition Vice Chair Einck opened the public hearing to consider the application of EB Lakeville Development LLC for a preliminary plat of three outlots to be known at Authentix Lakeville Second Addition. Will O’Keefe with Bader Development introduced the project. Ms. Jenson presented the staff report. EB Lakeville Development LLC has submitted an application and plans for a preliminary and final plat to be known as Authentix Lakeville Second Addition. The plat consists of three outlots totaling 7.25 acres. The property is located north of 210th Street (CSAH 70) and west of Keokuk Avenue. One of the outlots is proposed to be used as a stormwater pond for the adjoining EB First Addition development. Community Development Department staff recommend approval of the preliminary plat. Vice Chair Einck opened the hearing to the public for comment. There was no public comment. Motion was made by Swaney, seconded by Kaluza to close the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes – unanimous Vice Chair Einck asked for comments from the Planning Commission. • There were no comments from the Planning Commission. Motion was made by Swaney, seconded by Kaluza to recommend to City Council approval of the preliminary plat to be known as Authentix Lakeville Second Addition, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the engineering report dated May 28, 2026. 2. The wetland delineation must be completed and approved prior to City Council consideration of the final plat. Page 381 of 485 1 City of Lakeville Community Development Memorandum To: Planning Commission From: Kris Jenson, Planning Manager Date: May 28, 2026 Subject: Packet Material for the June 4, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Item: 1. Amendment of Conditional Use Permit #24-09 for the construction of more than one principal residential building on one lot of record; and 2. Vacation of public right of way for 207th Street Action Deadline: July 15, 2026 BACKGROUND EB Lakeville Development LLC has submitted applications and plans to amend Conditional Use Permit #24-09 for the construction of more than one principal residential building on one lot of record and for the vacation of public right of way for 207th Street. A preliminary plat and conditional use permits for the Crown Lakeville Apartments project was approved by the City Council on October 21, 2024. EB Lakeville Development has taken over the project and made some changes which require the amendment of the CUP approved for multiple principal buildings on one lot. The right of way proposed for vacation was previously under Dakota County’s jurisdiction and has been conveyed to Lakeville, requiring the vacation. The property is located north of 210th Street (CSAH 70) and west of Keokuk Avenue. The property currently includes a single-family home and is heavily wooded. The revised site plans have been submitted to the Engineering Division and Parks and Recreation Department for review. At the time of preliminary plat approval, conditional use permits were also approved for an exception to the exterior materials requirements and the building height. The apartment building proposed for the site meets the Page 382 of 485 2 requirements approved with those conditional use permits and therefore those items are not addressed within this report. EXHIBITS A. Location Map B. Zoning Map C. Land Title Survey D. Site Plan E. Grading Plan F. Landscape Plan G. Apartment Enclosed Garage Plan (2 pages) H. Apartment Floor Plans (2 pages – 1st & 2nd floor) I. Studio & One-Bedroom floor plans J. Right of Way Vacation PLANNING ANALYSIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: CONSTRUCTION OF MORE THAN ONE PRINCIPAL RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ON ONE LOT OF RECORD. Section 11-62-7 of the Zoning Ordinance allows multi-family buildings on a single parcel subject to approval of a conditional use permit, provided that the applicable provisions of Section 11-62-17 are met. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that there is a mechanism in place by which common areas will be maintained. The Developer intends to maintain ownership of the site and buildings and will be responsible for all site maintenance costs. The original site plan approved in conjunction with the preliminary plat and conditional use permits was for two multi-family buildings. The site plan has been revised to be one multi-family building and four row townhome buildings, each with six units. The pertinent changes to the site plan are addressed below. As was the case with the previous site design, the Developer intends to maintain ownership of the site and building and will be responsible for all site maintenance costs. SITE PLAN Floor Area Ratio. Section 11-62-13.B.2 of the Zoning Ordinance limits the floor area ratio for the proposed multiple family buildings to 0.7 as the subject site abuts property zoned RST-2 District to the north. The gross floor area of the proposed multi-family building is 147,862 square feet and the area of Lot 1 is 360,773 square feet, for a FAR of 0.41, which complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. Page 383 of 485 3 Dwelling Units. The proposed buildings have a mix of studios, efficiency alcoves, one- and two-bedroom dwelling units, summarized in the table below: Min Floor Area Required Proposed Floor Area # of Units % of Total Units Studio 500 SF 507 SF 12 8% Efficiency Alcove 700 SF 604 SF 10 7% 1 Bedroom 700 SF 700-867 SF 60 42.5% 2 Bedroom 800 SF 907-1,152 SF 60 42.5% The floor plan of the Efficiency Alcove shows that the units have a separate bedroom (Exhibit H). The Zoning Ordinance includes a definition of efficiency units, which is: “DWELLING, EFFICIENCY APARTMENT: A dwelling unit consisting of one principal room exclusive of bathroom, hallway, closets, or dining alcove.” The inclusion of a bedroom within the unit means that the Efficiency Alcove units do not meet the definition of an Efficiency Apartment Dwelling and therefore must be considered a one-bedroom unit. However, Section 11-17-13.B of the Zoning Ordinance requires one-bedroom units to have a minimum floor area of 700 square feet, which the Efficiency Alcove units do not meet. The Efficiency Alcove units must remove the bedroom walls from those units so that they meet the efficiency apartment definition, or the unit size is revised such that the unit has at least 700 square feet of floor area. Revised plans showing revisions such that the units meet the Zoning Ordinance requirements must be submitted to prior to City Council consideration of the conditional use permit amendment. Development Density. Section 11-62-13 of the Zoning Ordinance requires townhomes within the RH-2 District to provide a minimum of 3,800 square feet of net lot area per unit, while multiple family uses must provide a minimum of 1,675 square feet of net lot area per dwelling unit. The area Lot 1, Block 1 is 8.28 acres or 360,773 square feet. Based on 24 townhome units (91,200 SF required) and 142 apartment units (237,850 SF required), the total minimum lot area required is 329,050 SF. As previously noted, the lot area of the development parcel is 360,773 SF, which complies with the Zoning Ordinance. Parking. The apartment building includes two levels of underground parking so as to provide at least one parking space enclosed below the principal building as required by Section 11-19-13.A of the Zoning Ordinance. A total of 284 parking spaces are provided on site, which meets the requirement of two parking spaces per unit between the surface and enclosed parking spaces. The Page 384 of 485 4 townhome units each provide a two-car garage as well as two parking spaces on the driveway. Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control and Utilities. City sanitary sewer and water is currently available to the site, which is within the current MUSA. All public utilities will be constructed by the developer to serve the proposed preliminary plat following final plat approval. Revised grading and utility plans have been submitted with the EB First Addition final plat plans. Grading, drainage, erosion control, and utility review comments are addressed in the engineering report prepared by Chloe Anderson, Civil Engineer and Mac Cafferty, Environmental Resources Manager, dated May 28, 2026. A copy of the engineering report is attached for reference. Right of Way Vacation. Right of way for a future 207th Street extension was created by Dakota County in 2006, and the right of way was under their jurisdiction. Since that time, development in the area has changed the expected alignment of 207th Street and it will no longer connect with 210th Street, at least in this location and therefore the right of way isn’t needed. Earlier this year, Dakota County transferred the jurisdiction of the right of way to the City, which now allows the right of way to be vacated. RECOMMENDATION Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the amendment to conditional use permit #24-09 and the vacation of 207th Street right of way in conjunction with the EB First Addition plat, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the May 28, 2026 engineering report. 2. The 207th Street right of way vacation must be recorded in conjunction with the EB First Addition final plat. 3. Prior to City Council consideration of the CUP amendment, the apartment building plans must be revised such that the “Efficiency Alcove” units remove the bedroom walls so as to meet the definition of an efficient dwelling unit or to increase the size of those same units to be at least 700 square feet as is required for one-bedroom units. Findings of Fact in consideration of the conditional use permit amendment is attached. Page 385 of 485 ± 207TH ST KE O K U K A V E KESWICK LOOP City of Lakeville Location Map EB First Addition Subject Property EXHIBIT A 210TH ST (CSAH 70) Page 386 of 485 C-3 PUD RST-2 RH-2 RA RM-2RA RH-2 C-3 C-3 P/OS P/OS RM-2 M-1 m 207TH ST KE O K U K A V E KESWICK LOOP City of Lakeville Location Map EB First Addition Subject Property EXHIBIT B 210TH ST (CSAH 70) Page 387 of 485 2 5 25 25 4 1 . 0 27.7 6 9 . 8 48.6 2 7 . 5 21.1 12.4 20 . 8 12.4 20 . 5 11 0 11 0 66 1 . 2 6 DAKOTA COUNTY RD R.O.W. MAP 300 & 300A C.S.A.H. NO. 70 (210TH STREET) 2 5 25 25 11 0 654.87 11 0 . 0 0 11 0 . 0 0 11 0 S0 0 ° 0 2 ' 3 5 " W 6 6 1 . 2 8 S89°34'51"W 655.01 N0 0 ° 0 6 ' 5 8 " E 6 6 1 . 2 9 N89°34'51"E 654.17 CAP 47481 5/8" IRON PIPE 5/8" IRON PIPE 5/8" IRON PIPE DAKOTA CO. R/W 55 1 . 2 8 55 1 . 2 9 12 1 . 6 ' 144.7' 18 1 . 7 ' 344.8' NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO.REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | C H A N D L E R C I R R I C I O N E | 4 / 2 2 / 2 0 2 6 4 : 5 8 : 0 4 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 \ C A D \ S U R V E Y \ S H E E T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 - A L T A . D W G : 1 DATE ISSUED EB LAKEVILLE, LLC LAKEVILLE RYPKEMA PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT 11813 210TH ST W LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA54149 01/14/2026 CDJ GAM SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH To EB Lakeville Development LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company; and All American Title Company LLC, as agent for Old Republic National Title Insurance Company: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6(a), 8, 13 and 17 of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on 01/12/2026. Dated this 14th day of January, 2026. Sambatek, Inc. Glen A. Mullenbach Minnesota License No. 47470 gmullenbach@sambatek.com 1. This survey was prepared utilizing Title Commitment No. 201581 C-1 By All American Title Company, LLC , bearing an effective date of 07/28/2025. 2. The bearing system is based on the Dakota County coordinate system, NAD83 (1986 Adjust), with an assumed bearing of S89°34'51"W for the South line of the East 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26 , Township 114 , Range 21. 3. There is no direct reference to the right-of-ways that burden the property in the recorded Dakota County Road ROW Maps 300 & 300A. Item 8 of Schedule B, Part II of the provided title commitment alludes to the rights of the public by any streets, highway, road or alley. OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL WIRE LIGHT SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC GUY ANCHOR UTILITY POLE GUARD POST UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE BUILDING LINE CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE WET LAND SIGN TRAFFIC MARKERS POND / WATER LINE FEMA FLOOD ZONE LINE SOIL BORING TREE LINE FOUND MONUMENT FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE RESTRICTED ACCESS FOUND RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENT SET MONUMENT MARKED LS 47470 SECTION LINE UNDERLYING / ADJACENT LOT TIE LINE BOUNDARY LINE DEED DISTANCE(100.00) CONIFEROUS TREE TRANSFORMER BUILDING CANOPY REGULAR PARKING STALL COUNTGAS METER COMMUNICATIONS MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL CABLE TV BOX GATE VALVE / HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE CLEAN OUT STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN FLARED END SECTION SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RETAINING WALL BLOCK RETAINING WALL STONE RETAINING WALL RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WIRE FENCE DECIDUOUS TREE ## LEGEND SURVEY NOTES Description from title commitment: The South 661.26 feet of the East 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 114, Range 21, according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. The following notes correspond to the reference numbers listed in Schedule B, Section 2 of the title commitment. Items 1-3, 7, and 9-17 do not require surveyor comment. 4. A highway easement as shown in document filed March 25, 1977, as Document No. 0485958. According to the description in said document, the easement lies within and burdens the surveyed property as shown hereon. 5. A drainage and utility easement as shown in the Final Certificate filed July 7, 2011, as Document No. 2808523. According to the description in said document, the easement lies within and burdens the surveyed property as shown hereon. 6. A reciprocal permanent access easement as shown in the Reciprocal Easement, Covenants and Conditions Agreement, and the terms and conditions of said agreement, filed October 11, 2023, as Document No. 3605463. The description of this easement lies within and burdens the surveyed property as shown hereon. 8. Rights of the public and others entitled to the use of that portion of the land in Schedule A lying within the bounds of, including but not limited to: Any street, highway, road, and/or alley, as laid out, presently used, or dedicated. As shown hereon. SUBJECT PROPERTY CERTIFICATION ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY C2.00 5 304 4. 5. 6. VICINITY MAP SITE 205TH ST W N.T.S. 35 70 210TH ST W K E O K U K A V E 1. The survey shows property corner monuments or witness to the corner that were found during the field work, as well as property corner monuments or witness to the corner set by the surveyor at locations where there did not appear to be any evidence of an existing monument. 2. The address of the surveyed property is shown on the graphical portion of the survey. 3. The surveyed property lies within Flood Plain Zone X – 'Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance flood plain', as depicted by scaled map location and graphic plotting according to FEMA, FIRM Map No. 27037C013E dated 12/02/2011. 4. The gross land area of the surveyed property is 9.937 Acres or 432,853 Square Feet. 6a.The zoning information has not been provided by the client. 8. Visible substantial features observed in the process of conducting the fieldwork are shown hereon. 13. The names of adjoining land owners according to the current county tax records as of 01/13/2026 are shown on the survey. 17. No changes in street right of ways are proposed per Dakota County website accessed 01/13/2026. There is no observable evidence of recent street or sidewalk construction or repair. "TABLE A" NOTES 8. OBSERVED POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENTS No apparent encroachments were observed when conducting the field work for this survey. 4 04/23/2026 GAM GAM GAM CITY RESUBMITTAL EXHIBIT C Page 388 of 485 2 5 25 25 11 0 11 0 EXMH 500RE=1005.38 IE=1083.02 EXCBMH RE=1094.95IE=1088.85 WIE=1088.70 E IE=1089.25 S EX FES IE=1090.19 EXCBRE=1107.05 IE=1104.35 EXCBMH RE=1106.68IE=1103.68 NIE=1103.68 E EXCBMHRE=1105.62 IE=1097.02 N IE=1101.97 WIE=1097.02 SE EXCB RE=1103.34IE=1098.79 EXCBMHRE=1105.69IE=1099.89 W IE=1096.59 E IE=1096.44 S EXMH 501RE=1105.93 IE=1082.88 324.31 PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G FF E : 1 1 1 7 . 0 0 GF E : 1 1 0 5 . 6 7 14 2 U N I T S 4 S T O R I E S O V E R O N E L E V E L P A R K I N G PA R K I N G : 1 6 2 S T A L L S E S T I M A T E D FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FILTRATION BASIN 100-YR HWL 1087.15 10-YR HWL 1085.89 BOTTOM 1083.70 17 7 11 26 30 6 10 F T . S E T B A C K 35 F T . S E T B A C K A A A A A A A AA A A A A A AA A BB B B B BB B B B E E E E E F E F F F F F F G G G G G G G H H J M M 10 FT. SETBACK 10 FT. SETBACK O O N N N N N N N N N N O O A A A 24 . 0 ' R2 0 . 0 ' R20.0 ' R20.0' R20.0' P R5.0' (TYP . ) R 4 4 . 0 ' 16 . 0 ' 20 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' 40 . 0 ' 24 . 0 ' A A R10. 0 ' R 1 0 . 0 ' 26 P 26.0'20.0' 15.5' R2 0 . 0 ' R20. 0 ' R1 0 . 0 ' R10 . 0 ' 24.0' R 5 . 0 ' 24 . 0 ' P P R46.0' R20 . 0 ' 26 . 0 ' R 2 4 . 0 ' R 5 0 . 0 ' R 3 5 . 1 ' R 6 1 . 1 ' R25.0 ' R5.0' (TYP.) K DO G R U N 30 . 5 ' 30 . 5 ' 30 . 5 ' 30 . 5 ' K 29 . 6 ' 41.3' 45.7' 23 . 2 ' Q SCALE IN FEET 0 8040 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2025 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | C H A N D L E R C I R R I C I O N E | 4 / 2 2 / 2 0 2 6 5 : 0 3 : 1 2 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 \ C A D \ C I V I L \ S H E E T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 - C 3 . 0 1 - S I T E . D W G : C 3 . 0 1 S I T E P L A N EB 1ST ADDITION EB LAKEVILLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS LAKEVILLE, MN54149 EC EC MA MARK ANDERSON 03/06/2026 23450 A. BUILDING, STOOPS, STAIRS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) B. B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER C. FLAT CURB SECTION D. CURB TRANSITION E. CONCRETE SIDEWALK F. SEGMENTAL BLOCK RETAINING WALL G. ACCESSIBLE RAMP H. ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING I. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN J. CROSSWALK STRIPING K. BLACK VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK FENCE L. TRANSFORMER M. TRASH ENCLOSURE N. NATURAL AREA SIGN, (SEE DETAIL 6/L1.03) O. TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE DETAIL 5/L1.03) P. TRANSFORMER PAD Q. MONUMENT SIGN KEY NOTES CONCRETE CURB EASEMENT LINE BUILDING LINE RETAINING WALL WET LAND TREE PROTECTION FENCE SAW CUT LINE SIGN PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND BOLLARD ##REGULAR PARKING STALL COUNT 1 KEYNOTE HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE AREALOT1 ROW LOT SUMMARY TOWNHOME UNITS APARTMENT UNITS PARKING SUMMARY INDOOR PARKING OUTDOOR PARKING TOWNHOME GARAGES TOWNHOME DRIVEWAYS TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED PARKING SETBACKS FRONT YARDREAR YARD SIDE YARD (WEST) SIDE YARD (EAST) BETWEEN BUILDINGS MINIMUM LOT SIZE ZONING EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FAR PROPOSED FAR (147,862 SF / 8.28 AC) DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY 8.28 AC 1.65 AC 24 UNITS 142 UNITS 161 SPACES 123 SPACES 48 SPACES48 SPACES 380 SPACES (166 UNITS X 2 SPACES/UNIT) = 332 SPACES 10 FT 10 FT 10 FT 35 FT 25 FT 20,000 SF RH-2 RH-2 0.70 0.41 STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING SITE PLAN C3.02 10 304 NATURAL AREA SIGN 1 02/02/2026 CDC MCA MCA PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 4 04/23/2026 CDC MCA MCA CITY RESUBMITTAL EXHIBIT D Page 389 of 485 2 5 25 25 FND IP FND IP 17255 FND IP FND IP 11 0 11 0 1080 1080 1 0 9 0 1 1 0 0 11 1 0 11 2 0 11 3 0 1 1 4 0 11 5 0 1082 1082 1084 10 8 4 1086 10 8 6 1 0 8 8 10 9 2 10 9 4 10 9 6 1 0 9 8 1 1 0 2 1104 11 0 4 1 1 0 4 1 1 0 6 11 0 6 1106 11 0 8 11 1 2 11 1 4 11 1 6 11 1 8 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 4 11 2 6 112 8 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 4 1 1 3 6 1 1 3 8 1 1 4 2 1 1 4 4 1 1 4 6 11 4 8 1152 1 0 9 0 1100 1110 1 1 2 0 1 1 3 0 1140 114 0 114 0 10 9 2 10 9 4 10 9 6 1098 11 0 2 11 0 4 11 0 6 11 0 8 11 1 2 11 1 4 11 1 6 1 1 1 8 1122 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 6 1 1 2 8 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 4 113 61136 1 1 3 6 1138 1138 1138 1142 1142 114 2 1144 1130 1130 1140 1128 1128 1132 1132 1134 1134 1136 1138 1 1 3 0 1 1 2 6 1 1 2 6 1 1 2 8 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 4 1 1 3 6 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1092 1092 10 9 2 1 0 9 4 1 0 9 6 1 0 9 8 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 4 1 1 0 6 1 1 0 8 11 1 2 1 1 1 4 11 1 6 11 1 8 11 2 0 113 0 1130 11 1 8 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 4 11 2 6 1128 1 1 4 8 1142 1 1 4 0 1144 1142 1 1 4 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 6 11 2 8 11 1 0 11 0 0 1 0 9 8 1 0 9 6 1 0 9 4 1 0 9 2 1 1 1 2 1088 10 8 6 1088 108 4 10 9 0 108 8 108 6 10 8 4 1084 110 0 109 6 1096 1098 1100 1102 1104 1106 1124 1122 1118 111 6 111 4 1112 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 8 1 1 3 6 1 1 4 4 1 1 4 0 11 3 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 3 8 EXMH 500RE=1005.38 IE=1083.02 EXCBMH RE=1094.95IE=1088.85 WIE=1088.70 E IE=1089.25 S EX FES IE=1090.19 EXCBRE=1107.05 IE=1104.35 EXCBMH RE=1106.68IE=1103.68 NIE=1103.68 E EXCBMHRE=1105.62 IE=1097.02 N IE=1101.97 WIE=1097.02 SE EXCB RE=1103.34IE=1098.79 EXCBMHRE=1105.69IE=1099.89 W IE=1096.59 E IE=1096.44 S EXMH 501RE=1105.93 IE=1082.88 324.31 PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G FF E : 1 1 1 7 . 0 0 GF E : 1 1 0 5 . 6 7 14 2 U N I T S 4 S T O R I E S O V E R O N E L E V E L P A R K I N G PA R K I N G : 1 6 2 S T A L L S E S T I M A T E D FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FILTRATION BASIN 100-YR HWL 1087.15 10-YR HWL 1085.89 BOTTOM 1083.70 11 1 6 1 1 1 6 1120 11 1 6 1118 11 2 2 1120 11 1 6 1118 11 2 2 11 1 0 1 1 0 4 1 1 0 6 1 1 0 8 11 1 2 10 9 0 10 8 8 10 9 2 10 9 4 1090 1100 1088 1092 109410961098 11 0 0 10 9 2 10 9 4 10 9 6 10 9 8 11 0 2 11 0 4 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 4 1 1 0 6 1 1 0 8 11 1 2 1114 11 1 4 1116 112 0 1118111 8 1 1 3 0 114 0 11 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 3 4 1 1 3 6 11 3 8 1120 1118 1113.81 1112.24 1103.20 1115.02 1115.70 1115.09 1101.87 T/W: 1110.18 T/W: 1103.78 T/W: 1104.45 T/W: 1137.34 T/W: 1130.29 T/B/W: 1120.62 T/W: 1145.55 T/W: 1132.85 T/B/W: 1123.49 T/W: 1128.59 T/W: 1136.79 T/W: 1134.81 T/W: 1132.85 T/W: 1134.27 T/W: 1130.73 T/W: 1128.78 B/W: 1121.59 B/W: 1122.10 B/W: 1121.80 B/W: 1123.42 B/W: 1122.81 B/W: 1122.74 B/W: 1121.57 B/W: 1123.64 B/W: 1123.38 B/W: 1123.23 B/W: 1089.88 B/W: 1093.00 B/W: 1088.38 B/W: 1099.70 B/W: 1091.35 B/W: 1093.02B/W: 1107.96 B/W: 1121.91 B/W: 1107.87T/W: 1108.53 T/W: 1106.91 T/W: 1103.19 T/W: 1101.96 T/W: 1100.34 1120.001121.50 1121.50 1120.13 1120.00 1120.00 1121.50 1121.50 T/W: 1106.81 B/W: 1099.30 T/B/W: 1124.39 T/B/W: 1121.26 T/B/W: 1110.31 1108.99 11 3 0 B/W: 1105.67 T/W: 1105.67 T/B/W: 1111.33 1115.33 1111.88 1116.00 EO F EO F 1118 1120 1130 1122112411261128 11 4 4 114 8 1 1 3 4 109 0 110 0 109 2 10 9 4 10 9 6 10 9 8 1102 1104 1109.58 1110.08 1105.37 1105.67 1108.64 1105.041115.84 11 0 8 11 1 4 T/W: 1136.12 B/W: 1121.59 T/W: 1133.33 B/W: 1123.41 T/W: 1104.48 B/W: 1091.99 T/W: 1104.45 B/W: 1091.35 T/W: 1104.21 B/W: 1093.28 T/W: 1100.73B/W: 1096.50 T/B/W: 1094.84T/W: 1107.28 B/W: 1095.75 T/W: 1104.01 B/W: 1098.72 T/W: 1104.52 B/W: 1104.37 1120.50 1120.50 1120.50 1120.50 1106.09 1095.20 B/W: 1089.55 B/W: 1088.79 T/W: 1102.93 T/W: 1102.78 B/W: 1088.34T/W: 1102.16 -3.66% -1 1 . 6 3 % -1.79% -1.70% -9 . 9 5 % 1096 1098 1102 -33.33% -3 3 . 1 0 % -31.63% T/W: 1121.50B/W: 1121.04 T/W: 1121.50B/W: 1117.25 T/W: 1121.50B/W: 1117.25T/W: 1121.50B/W: 1120.94 1135.83 1134.18 1087.24 1104.20 1103.90 -5.3 9 % -4.8 6 % -4.2 8 % 1101.13 1101.131096.74 1105.50 1098.58 - 2 0 . 0 5 % 108 3 . 7 0 1100 1092109410961098 108 8 . 7 0 108 8 . 7 0 1083.70 1088.70 1105.67 WETLAND IMPACT AREA = 811 SF WETLAND DELINEATION (AUGUST 27, 2024) WETLAND DELINEATION 25' WETLAND BUFFER EOF WITH RIP RAP 5:1 3:1 ALL GRADING WITHIN THE WETLAND BUFFER ZONE MUST BE 5:1MAX SCALE IN FEET 0 8040 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2025 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | C H A N D L E R C I R R I C I O N E | 4 / 2 2 / 2 0 2 6 5 : 0 3 : 0 2 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 \ C A D \ C I V I L \ S H E E T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 - C 4 . 0 1 - G R A D E . D W G : C 4 . 0 1 G R A D I N G P L A N EB 1ST ADDITION EB LAKEVILLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS LAKEVILLE, MN54149 EC EC MA MARK ANDERSON 03/06/2026 23450 PROPERTY LINE CONCRETE CURB BUILDING LINE RETAINING WALL TREE LINE HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND SOIL BORING999.9 ST # STORM SEWER DRAINTILE WETLAND LIMITSWL 800 SPOT ELEVATIONS RIPRAP EOF 902.5 OVERFLOWELEV. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING GRADING PLAN C4.01 11 304 SEE SHEET C4.02 FOR FILTRATION BASIN GRADING 1 02/02/2026 CDC MCA MCA PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2 02/16/2026 CDC MCA MCA UPDATED WETLAND INFORMATION 4 04/23/2026 CDC MCA MCA CITY RESUBMITTAL EXHIBIT E Page 390 of 485 PR O P O S E D B U I L D I N G FF E : 1 1 1 7 . 0 0 GF E : 1 1 0 5 . 6 7 14 2 U N I T S 4 S T O R I E S O V E R O N E L E V E L P A R K I N G PA R K I N G : 1 6 2 S T A L L S E S T I M A T E D FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 1 . 0 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 FF E : 1 1 2 0 . 5 0 1080 1080 1 0 9 0 1 1 0 0 11 1 0 11 2 0 11 3 0 1 1 4 0 11 5 0 1082 1082 1084 10 8 4 1086 10 8 6 1 0 8 8 1088 10 9 2 10 9 4 10 9 6 1 0 9 8 1 1 0 2 1104 11 0 4 1 1 0 4 1 1 0 6 11 0 6 1106 11 0 8 11 1 2 11 1 4 11 1 6 11 1 8 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 4 11 2 6 112 8 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 4 1 1 3 6 1 1 3 8 1 1 4 2 1 1 4 4 1 1 4 6 11 4 8 1152 1 0 9 0 1100 1110 1 1 2 0 1 1 3 0 1140 114 0 114 0 10 9 2 10 9 4 10 9 6 1098 11 0 2 11 0 4 11 0 6 11 0 8 11 1 2 11 1 4 11 1 6 1 1 1 8 1122 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 6 1 1 2 8 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 4 113 61136 1 1 3 6 1138 1138 1138 1142 1142 114 2 1144 1130 1130 1140 1128 1128 1132 1132 1134 1134 1136 1138 1 1 3 0 1 1 2 6 1 1 2 6 1 1 2 8 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 4 1 1 3 6 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1092 1092 10 9 2 1 0 9 4 1 0 9 6 1 0 9 8 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 4 1 1 0 6 1 1 0 8 11 1 2 1 1 1 4 11 1 6 11 1 8 11 2 0 113 0 1130 1 1 1 6 11 1 8 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 4 11 2 6 1128 1 1 4 8 1142 1 1 4 0 1144 1142 1 1 4 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 6 11 2 8 11 1 0 11 0 0 1 0 9 8 1 0 9 6 1 0 9 4 1 0 9 2 1 1 1 2 1088 10 8 6 1088 108 4 10 9 0 108 8 108 6 10 8 4 1084 110 0 109 6 1096 1098 1100 1102 1104 1106 1124 1122 1118 111 6 111 4 1112 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 8 1 1 3 6 1 1 4 4 1 1 4 0 11 3 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 3 8 BW=1120.3BW=1125.1 TW=1126.0± BW=1119.73 TW=1125.0±TW=1121.0± BW=1122.5 TW=1125.0± FILTRATION BASIN 100-YR HWL 1087.15 10-YR HWL 1085.89 BOTTOM 1083.70 NO P A R K I N G NO PARKING 10 8 6 108 7 10 8 7 10 8 8 10 8 9 10 8 9 10 8 6 108 7 1088 1087 1088 1085 1084 108 6 10 8 1 10 8 2 10 8 3 108 0 107 9 108 1 1 0 8 5 1 0 8 6 1 0 8 7 1 0 8 7 107 8 NATURAL AREA SIGN, TYP. SEE DETAIL 6/L1.02 EXISTING TREE TOBE PRESERVED, TYP. SEE DETAIL 5/L1.02 TOWNHOME FOUNDATIONPLANTING BEDS, TYP. NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2025 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | C H A N D L E R C I R R I C I O N E | 4 / 2 2 / 2 0 2 6 5 : 1 4 : 5 2 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 \ C A D \ C I V I L \ S H E E T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 - L 1 . 0 1 - L S C P . D W G : L 1 . 0 1 L A N D S C A P E P L A N EB 1ST ADDITION EB LAKEVILLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS LAKEVILLE, MN54149 SIG SIG DCR DAN REBOK 56877 SCALE IN FEET 0 8040 NORTH LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.01 27 304 LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED LAKEVILLE LANDSCAPE CODE PLANT SCHEDULE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDGING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PRESERVED EXISTING TREE D S LS RIPRAP Landscaping: Required landscaping for new residential subdivisions and commercial, industrial or institutional uses shall include plantings at the property perimeter, off street parking perimeter landscaping and interior landscape plantings as well as required residential buffer yard or transitional buffer zone plantings. Off Street Parking Areas: All off street parking areas with five (5) or more parking spaces or any parking area within twenty feet (20') of a residential zoning district shall be screened from view as follows: 1. Installation of shade, ornamental and/or evergreen trees at the perimeter of the parking area in accordance with the spacing requirements of subsections A and C of this section. All rooftop and ground mounted mechanical equipment of residential buildings having five (5) units or more and of nonresidential buildings shall comply with the following standards: A. All rooftop and ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened so as to mitigate noise in compliance with section 11-16-25 of this title. B. All rooftop and ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be designed (including exterior color) and located so as to be aesthetically harmonious and compatible with the building. Screening of and landscaping around the equipment may be required where the design, color, and location of the equipment are found to not effectively buffer noise or provide aesthetic harmony and compatibility. Screening shall be constructed of durable materials which are aesthetically compatible with the structure and which may be an integral part of the structure. Applicable requirements for access to the equipment shall be observed in the design and construction of the screening. C. Rooftop mechanical equipment less than three feet (3') in height may be exempt from screening requirements by the zoning administrator. (Ord. 674, sec. 1, 7-17-2000) SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY TREES SG Acer freemanii `Sienna Glen` / Sienna Glen Maple B & B 2.5"Cal 2 RB Betula nigra `Cully` TM / Heritage Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 9 GB Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold` TM / Maidenhair Tree B & B 2.5"Cal 5 HL Gleditsia triacanthos `Skyline` / Skyline Honey Locust B & B 2.5"Cal 10 SO Quercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 5 BO Quercus macrocarpa / Burr Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 4 SAT Salix alba `Tristis` / Golden Weeping Willow B & B 2.5"Cal 2 SUBTOTAL:37 CONIFERS JSB Juniperus scopulorum `Blue Arrow` / Blue Arrow Juniper B & B 8` 57 BS Picea glauca densata / Black Hills Spruce B & B 8 SUBTOTAL:65 ORN. TREES CAL Cornus alternifolia / Pagoda Dogwood B & B 2" CAL. 6 SS Malus x `Spring Snow` / Spring Snow Crab Apple B & B 2"Cal 4 IL Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk` / Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac B & B 2"Cal 2 SUBTOTAL:12 SHRUBS YD Cornus alba `Bud`s Yellow` / Bud`s Yellow Dogwood 5 gal 24" MIN 38 CD Cornus sericea `Alleman`s Compact` / Dwarf Red Twig Dogwood 5 gal 24" MIN 69 MJ Juniperus chinensis `Mint Julep` / Mint Julep Juniper #5 18" 41 SW Physocarpus opulifolius `Summer Wine` / Summer Wine Ninebark #5 24" 50 PT Potentilla fruticosa `Fargo` TM / Fargo Potentilla #5 18" 62 GL Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low` / Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac #5 12"52 SUBTOTAL:312 GRASSES LBS Schizachyrium scoparium `Blue Heaven` / Blue Heaven Little Bluestem #1 47 SUBTOTAL:47 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT GROUND COVERS HM Double Shredded Hardwood Mulch / Natural Color Mulch SB MNDOT Seed Mix Southern Boulevard / Formerly MNDOT seed mix 25-131 Seed SSR MNDOT Seed Mix Southern Shortgrass Roadside / Formerly MNDOT Seed Mix 35-221/36-211 Seed WD MNDOT Seed Mix Wet Ditch / Formerly MNDOT Seed Mix 33-261 Seed RM Rock Mulch / 1.5" BUFF LIMESTONE Rock FP Townhome Foundation Planting Area . TUR HIG Turf Sod Highland Sod / Sod Sod PLANT SCHEDULE REFER TO SHEET C1.04 FOR LANDSCAPE NOTES LANDSCAPE NOTES NATURAL AREA SIGN SEE SHEET L1.02 FOR FILTRATION BASIN SEEDING & OUTLOT B TREE REPLACEMENT PLANTING 1 02/02/2026 CDC MCA MCA PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 4 04/23/2026 SG DR DR CITY RESUBMITTAL EXHIBIT F Page 391 of 485 DATE PROJECT NUMBER: SCALE: REVISIONS PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 7433 AVONDALE PARK BARNHART, MO 63012 636.751.4798 P CREITZEL@STUDIO-785.COM E © 2023 STUDIO 785 LLC NA M E LI C E N S E # DESCRIPTION DATEISSUE DESCRIPTIONDESIGN DEVELOPMENT OW N E R : A100 AS NOTED OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G P L A N S EB L A K E V I L L E D E V E L O P M E N T L L C 30 2 0 F R A N C E A V E N U E ST . L O U I S P A R K , MN 55 4 1 6 EB L A K E V I L L E El e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 1 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL C: \ U s e r s \ c h u c k \ D e s k t o p \ E l e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 1 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n 11 8 1 3 2 1 0 T H S T R E E T W LA K E V I L L E , MN 55 0 4 4 CONSULTANT: SHEET NO: SH E E T T I T L E : THIS DRAWING AND DETAILS ON IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY BE USED FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT ONLY. IT SHALL NOT BE LOANED, COPIED, OR REPRODUCED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. THE PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT'S SEAL AFFIXED TO THIS SHEET APPLIES ONLY TO THE MATERIAL AND ITEMS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. ALL DRAWINGS, INSTRUMENTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED PREPARED BY THIS ARCHITECT, AND THIS ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH PLANS, DRAWINGS OR DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL. 1 1 1.1 1.2 2 2 3 3 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 8.1 8.2 10 10 11 11 10.1 12 12 13 13 0 A A B B C C D D F F E E G G H H G.1 G.1 J J K K L L L.1 L.1 M M N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1 APARTMENT BUILDING LOWER LEVEL 2 GARAGE PLAN 0 8'16'32' 51 SPACES STAIRSTAIR ELEV. STO. STO. MAINT. EXHIBIT G Page 392 of 485 DATE PROJECT NUMBER: SCALE: REVISIONS PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 7433 AVONDALE PARK BARNHART, MO 63012 636.751.4798 P CREITZEL@STUDIO-785.COM E © 2023 STUDIO 785 LLC NA M E LI C E N S E # DESCRIPTION DATEISSUE DESCRIPTIONDESIGN DEVELOPMENT OW N E R : A101 AS NOTED OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G P L A N S EB L A K E V I L L E D E V E L O P M E N T L L C 30 2 0 F R A N C E A V E N U E ST . L O U I S P A R K , MN 55 4 1 6 EB L A K E V I L L E El e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 1 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL C: \ U s e r s \ c h u c k \ D e s k t o p \ E l e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 1 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n 11 8 1 3 2 1 0 T H S T R E E T W LA K E V I L L E , MN 55 0 4 4 CONSULTANT: SHEET NO: SH E E T T I T L E : THIS DRAWING AND DETAILS ON IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY BE USED FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT ONLY. IT SHALL NOT BE LOANED, COPIED, OR REPRODUCED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. THE PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT'S SEAL AFFIXED TO THIS SHEET APPLIES ONLY TO THE MATERIAL AND ITEMS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. ALL DRAWINGS, INSTRUMENTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED PREPARED BY THIS ARCHITECT, AND THIS ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH PLANS, DRAWINGS OR DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL. 1 1 1.1 1.2 2 2 3 3 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 8.1 8.2 10 10 11 11 10.1 12 12 13 13 0 A A B B C C D D F F E E G G H H G.1 G.1 J J K K L L L.1 L.1 M M N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1 APARTMENT BUILDING LOWER LEVEL 1 GARAGE PLAN 0 8'16'32' 110 SPACES STAIRSTAIR ELEV. TRASHWATER SERVICE ELEV. TRASH STAIR DOG WASH Page 393 of 485 DATE PROJECT NUMBER: SCALE: REVISIONS PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 7433 AVONDALE PARK BARNHART, MO 63012 636.751.4798 P CREITZEL@STUDIO-785.COM E © 2023 STUDIO 785 LLC NA M E LI C E N S E # DESCRIPTION DATEISSUE DESCRIPTIONDESIGN DEVELOPMENT OW N E R : A102 AS NOTED OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G P L A N S EB L A K E V I L L E D E V E L O P M E N T L L C 30 2 0 F R A N C E A V E N U E ST . L O U I S P A R K , MN 55 4 1 6 EB L A K E V I L L E El e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 1 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL C: \ U s e r s \ c h u c k \ D e s k t o p \ E l e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 1 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n 11 8 1 3 2 1 0 T H S T R E E T W LA K E V I L L E , MN 55 0 4 4 CONSULTANT: SHEET NO: SH E E T T I T L E : THIS DRAWING AND DETAILS ON IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY BE USED FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT ONLY. IT SHALL NOT BE LOANED, COPIED, OR REPRODUCED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. THE PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT'S SEAL AFFIXED TO THIS SHEET APPLIES ONLY TO THE MATERIAL AND ITEMS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. ALL DRAWINGS, INSTRUMENTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED PREPARED BY THIS ARCHITECT, AND THIS ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH PLANS, DRAWINGS OR DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL. DW D W W D DW F W D DW F W D W D F FF D W WD WW/ DWW/ D WW/D WW/D WW/ D WW/ D WW/ D WW/ D WW/ D WW/D WW/D W/ D W/D W/DW/D WW/D WW/ D WW/ D D W WW/D DW F WW/D WW/ D DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW DW F N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1 APARTMENT BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN 0 8'16'32' STAIRSTAIR ELEV.TRASH ELEV. TRASH STAIR A1-1BR A5- ALCOVE A5- ALCOVE B6-2BR B5-2BR JAN. ELEC. MAIL OFFICE PUB R.R. CYBER CAFE LOBBY B6-2BR A4-1BR A1-1BR B2-2BR ACC. A2-1BR ACC. A1-1BR CLUBROOM FITNESS A3-1BR A4-1BR A1-1BR A1-1BR B2-2BR ACC. B5-2BR B5-2BR A1-1BR A4-1BR B4-2BR B4-2BRA1-1BR A1-1BR A1-1BR A1-1BRA4-1BRB1-2BR B1-2BR MINI- MARKET PACKAGE ROOM OFFICE WORK ROOM MECH. R.R. MECH. A3-1BR ELEC. ELEC. EXHIBIT H Page 394 of 485 DATE PROJECT NUMBER: SCALE: REVISIONS PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 7433 AVONDALE PARK BARNHART, MO 63012 636.751.4798 P CREITZEL@STUDIO-785.COM E © 2023 STUDIO 785 LLC NA M E LI C E N S E # DESCRIPTION DATEISSUE DESCRIPTIONDESIGN DEVELOPMENT OW N E R : A103 AS NOTED OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G P L A N S EB L A K E V I L L E D E V E L O P M E N T L L C 30 2 0 F R A N C E A V E N U E ST . L O U I S P A R K , MN 55 4 1 6 EB L A K E V I L L E El e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 1 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL C: \ U s e r s \ c h u c k \ D e s k t o p \ E l e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 1 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n 11 8 1 3 2 1 0 T H S T R E E T W LA K E V I L L E , MN 55 0 4 4 CONSULTANT: SHEET NO: SH E E T T I T L E : THIS DRAWING AND DETAILS ON IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY BE USED FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT ONLY. IT SHALL NOT BE LOANED, COPIED, OR REPRODUCED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. THE PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT'S SEAL AFFIXED TO THIS SHEET APPLIES ONLY TO THE MATERIAL AND ITEMS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. ALL DRAWINGS, INSTRUMENTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED PREPARED BY THIS ARCHITECT, AND THIS ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH PLANS, DRAWINGS OR DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL. FDW WW/D FDW WW/D FDW WW/D FDW WW/D DW DW D W W D DW F W D DW F W D W D D W D W D W WW/ DWW/ D WW/D WW/ D WW/ D WW/ D WW/ D WW/ D WW/D WW/D WW/D WW/D W/ D W/D W/DW/D WW/D WW/D WW/ D WW/ D F WW/ D WW/D DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F DW F N SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1 APARTMENT BUILDING SECOND FLOOR PLAN 0 8'16'32' STAIRSTAIR ELEV.TRASH ELEV. TRASH STAIR A1-1BR A5- ALCOVE A5- ALCOVE B6-2BR B5-2BR JAN. STO. B5-2BR S1- STUDIO S1- STUDIO S1- STUDIO S1- STUDIO LOUNGE B6-2BR A4-1BR A1-1BR B1-2BR B1-2BR A1-1BR OPEN TO BELOW B1-2BR B3-2BR B3-2BR A4-1BR A1-1BR A1-1BR B1-2BR B5-2BR B5-2BR STO. A1-1BR A4-1BR B4-2BR B4-2BRA1-1BR A1-1BR A1-1BR A1-1BRA4-1BRB1-2BR B1-2BR GUEST SUITE OPEN TO BELOW Page 395 of 485 DATE PROJECT NUMBER: SCALE: REVISIONS PR E L I M I N A R Y NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 7433 AVONDALE PARK BARNHART, MO 63012 636.751.4798 P CREITZEL@STUDIO-785.COM E © 2023 STUDIO 785 LLC NA M E LI C E N S E # DESCRIPTION DATEISSUE DESCRIPTIONDESIGN DEVELOPMENT OW N E R : A200 AS NOTED UN I T P L A N S EB L A K E V I L L E D E V E L O P M E N T L L C 30 2 0 F R A N C E A V E N U E ST . L O U I S P A R K , MN 55 4 1 6 EB L A K E V I L L E El e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 1 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LABELED SCALES. 1" ACTUAL C: \ U s e r s \ c h u c k \ D e s k t o p \ E l e v a g e L a k e v i l l e 0 4 1 7 2 0 2 6 . p l n 11 8 1 3 2 1 0 T H S T R E E T W LA K E V I L L E , MN 55 0 4 4 CONSULTANT: SHEET NO: SH E E T T I T L E : THIS DRAWING AND DETAILS ON IT ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY BE USED FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT ONLY. IT SHALL NOT BE LOANED, COPIED, OR REPRODUCED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE OR PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ARCHITECT. THE PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT'S SEAL AFFIXED TO THIS SHEET APPLIES ONLY TO THE MATERIAL AND ITEMS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. ALL DRAWINGS, INSTRUMENTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED PREPARED BY THIS ARCHITECT, AND THIS ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH PLANS, DRAWINGS OR DOCUMENTS NOT EXHIBITING THIS SEAL. F DW WW/ D 16'-0" 32 ' - 0 " LIVING 15'-2" X 12'-6" QUEEN DESK LA U N D R Y CLOSET BATH 7'-3" X 10'-4" COAT KITCHEN 6'-0" X 14'-0" PA N T R Y WW/ D DW F 29 ' - 0 " 26'-0" LIVING 12'-10" X 17'-2" BEDROOM 12'-0" X 10'-6" PATIO/BALCONY KING DE S K CLOSET BATH 6'-2" X 10'-6" COAT KITCHEN 10'-3" X 10'-9" MECH LA U N D R Y PA N T R Y W/ D PA N T R Y CLOSET LA U N D R Y D W DW F 29 ' - 0 " 27'-4 3/4" BEDROOM 11'-0" X 12'-10" PATIO/BALCONY KINGLIVING 15'-4" X 17'-0" MECH LAUNDRY CLOSET KITCHEN 9'-1" X 10'-11"BATH 9'-6" X 9'-4" COAT DE S K WW/ D DW F 28'-10 1/8" 11 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 5' - 9 " 23'-2 3/4" 13'-8 1/8"4'-5 3/4" 29 ' - 0 " KING PATIO/BALCONY LIVING 12'-11" X 16'-9" BEDROOM 13'-0" X 16'-0" DE S K LAUNDRY CLOSET CLOSET BATH 7'-4" X 10'-5" COAT KITCHEN 11'-6" X 11'-2" MECH W/D DW F 23'-6" 30 ' - 0 " BEDROOM 11'-0" X 11'-8" LIVING 11'-4" X 18'-0" PATIO/BALCONY KING MECH CLOSET LAUNDRY COAT BATH 6'-1" X 10'-9" KITCHEN 9'-0" X 10'-10" WW/ D DW F 21'-0" 29 ' - 0 " PATIO/BALCONY BEDROOM 10'-6" X 10'-0" LIVING 13'-2" X 11'-2" QUEEN CLOSET KITCHEN 7'-7" X 12'-3" DE S K LA U N D R Y COAT BATH 12'-3" X 6'-0" PA N T R Y SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 S1-STUDIO 0 2'4'8'SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 A1 - 1 BEDROOM 1 BATH 0 2'4'8'SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3 A2 - 1 BEDROOM 1 BATH (ACCESSIBLE) 0 2'4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4 A3 - 1 BEDROOM 1 BATH 0 2'4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"5 A4 - 1 BEDROOM 1 BATH 0 2'4'8' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"5 A5 - ALCOVE (EFFICIENCY) 0 2'4'8' 507 SF QUANTITY: 12 749 SF QUANTITY: 40 50% OF A1 UNITS TO HAVE ENLARGED BEDROOM CLOSET IN LIEU OF DESK. 795 SF QUANTITY: 1 867 SF QUANTITY: 3 700 SF QUANTITY: 16 604 SF QUANTITY: 10 EXHIBIT I Page 396 of 485 66 1 . 2 6 2 5 25 25 11 0 . 0 0 S0 0 ° 0 2 ' 3 5 " W 5 5 1 . 2 8 N0 0 ° 0 6 ' 5 8 " E 5 5 1 . 2 8 N89°34'51"E 654.17 N89°34'51"E 654.87 S88°56'20"W80.01 20 7 T H S T . W N0 0 ° 0 2 ' 3 5 " E 11 0 . 0 0 M a r 2 7 , 2 0 2 6 - 3 : 5 8 p m - U s e r : g m u l l e n b a c h L : \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 \ C A D \ S u r v e y \ E x h i b i t s \ 5 4 1 4 9 - R O W V A C . d w g Approved: Drawn: Sheet Number Project No. Designed: Rev.: Date: Issued: EB LAKEVILLE, LLCEB FIRST ADDITIONLAKEVILLE, MNROW VACATION EXHIBIT GAM GAM 02/05/2026 1 03/27/2026 1 54149 PARCEL DESCRIPTION: The South 661.26 feet of the East 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 114, Range 21, according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED: That part of Parcel 40, as shown on Dakota County Road Right of Way Map No. 300, according to the recorded map thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota lying north of the following described line: Beginning at the northwest corner of Parcel 41 as shown on said Dakota County Road Right of Way Map No. 300; thence South 88 degrees 56 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 80.01 feet to a corner of said Parcel 40 on the north line of the south 110.00 feet of the East Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 114 North, Range 21 West and said line there terminating. For purposes of this legal, said north line of the south 110.00 feet of the East Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter is assumed to bear North 89 degrees 34 minutes 51 seconds East. Said easement contains approximately 26,184 square feet. NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 80LEGEND RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT J Page 397 of 485 City of Lakeville Public Works – Engineering Division Memorandum To: Kris Jenson, Planning Manager From: Chloe Anderson, Civil Engineer McKenzie L. Cafferty, Environmental Resources Manager Joe Masiarchin, Parks and Recreation Director Zach Jorgenson, City Forester Copy: Zach Johnson, City Engineer Jonathan Nelson, Assistant City Engineer Julie Stahl, Finance Director Dave Mathews, Building Official Tina Goodroad, Community Development Director Date: May 28, 2026 Subject: EB First Addition CUP and Right-of-Way Vacation • Site Plan Review • Grading and Erosion Control Plan Review • Utility Plan Review BBAACCKKGGRROOUUNNDD EB Lakeville Development, LLC has submitted a conditional use permit amendment for a plat named EB First Addition and plans for the construction of a 142-unit apartment complex and four 6-unit townhome buildings resulting in a total of 166 units on site. The request also includes the vacation of public right of way for 207th Street. The proposed development is located north of and adjacent to 210th Street (CSAH 70) and west of Keokuk Ave. The parent parcel consists of one metes and bounds parcel in Section 26, Township 114, Range 21 (PID No. 220260081010) zoned RH-2, Multiple Family Residential District. The final plat consists of one lot within one block on 9.94 acres. The proposed development will be completed by: Developer: EB Lakeville Development, LLC Engineer/Surveyor: Sambatek Page 398 of 485 EEBB FFIIRRSSTT AADDDDIITTIIOONN MMAAYY 2288,, 22002266 PPAAGGEE 22 OOFF 55 SSIITTEE CCOONNDDIITTIIOONNSS The EB Lakeville Development site contains undeveloped land with one pre-existing homestead and an accessory building that will be demolished prior to site development. A wetland complex is located on the east side of the property. The land generally slopes from the west to the east. An overhead utility line is located adjacent to the south property line of the parent parcel. EEAASSEEMMEENNTTSS Several easements for highway, stormwater, and utility purposes exist across the parent parcel and will remain with the development improvements. A drainage and utility easement shall be established with the final plat encompassing the public watermain through the site. SSTTRREEEETT AANNDD SSUUBBDDIIVVIISSIIOONN LLAAYYOOUUTT 210th Street (CSAH 70) EB Lakeville Development is located north of and adjacent to 210th Street, a Principal Arterial roadway as identified in the City’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The Dakota County Plat Commission reviewed the proposed development at its June 21, 2023 meeting and recommended approval. Dakota County controls the right-of-way requirements and access locations along 210th Street. The current Dakota County Plat Review Needs Map identifies 210th Street as a 4-lane divided roadway with a half right-of-way requirement of 75-feet adjacent to the development. The Developer is dedicating the necessary right-of-way for 210th Street with the EB First Addition final plat. Right of Way Vacation Earlier this year, Dakota County conveyed the right of way for 207th Street, located at the southeast corner of the subject parcel, to the City’s jurisdiction so that it could be vacated in conjunction with the EB First Addition final plat. The future alignment of 207th Street has changed since 2006 when the 207th Street right of way was established by Dakota County in 2006. CCOONNSSTTRRUUCCTTIIOO NN AACCCCEESSSS Construction traffic access and egress for grading, utility and street construction shall be determined with the final construction plans. PPAARRKKSS,, TTRRAAIILLSS AANNDD SSIIDD EEWWAALLKKSS The Park Dedication Fee has not been collected on the parent parcel and shall be satisfied through a cash contribution that shall be paid with the final plat. Page 399 of 485 EEBB FFIIRRSSTT AADDDDIITTIIOONN MMAAYY 2288,, 22002266 PPAAGGEE 33 OOFF 55 UUTTIILLIITTIIEESS SSAANNIITTAARRYY SSEEWWEERR EB Lakeville Development is located within sub-district SC-13440 of the South Creek sanitary sewer district as identified in the City’s Comprehensive Sewer Plan. The wastewater from the proposed site will be conveyed by City-owned sanitary sewer facilities to the Elko/New Market interceptor and then to the Empire Wastewater Treatment Plant. The existing City-owned downstream facilities are adequate to convey the wastewater generated by the proposed development. Private sanitary sewer service hookups were extended from the public sanitary sewer to the south side of the subject parcel for development of the property with the development of EB Lakeville units. The Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge has not been collected on the parent parcel and shall be paid with the final plat. The fee will be based on the current rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. WWAATTEERRMMAAIINN A service stub was provided with the development of EB Lakeville from the 12-inch watermain along 210th Street within the City’s Normal Pressure Zone. Public trunk watermain will be extended through the site in accordance with the City’s Comprehensive Water Plan. The developer will be eligible for a credit to the cash requirements for the cost to oversize as compared to an 8-inch watermain. Final locations and sizes of all sanitary sewer and watermain facilities will be reviewed by City staff with the final plat, building permit application and final construction plans. OOVVEERRHHEEAADD LLIINNEESS An overhead electric transmission line and poles are located along the north side of 210th Street on the parent parcel. The Developer will be required to remove the poles and place the utilities underground when the preliminary plat is developed, consistent with the City’s Public Ways and Property Ordinance or provide a security for their share of the costs to bury the overhead utility adjacent to the plat. DDRRAAIINNAAGGEE AANNDD GG RR AADDIINN GG EB Lakeville Development is located within subdistrict ML-085 of the Lake Marion District of the City’s Comprehensive Water and Natural Resources Management Plan. This development will convey stormwater runoff towards a filtration basin located within adjacent parcel to the east to be constructed in conjunction with EB Lakeville Final Plat. Prior to final plat approval, the final grading plan must be reviewed to be consistent with City Ordinance requirements. Page 400 of 485 EEBB FFIIRRSSTT AADDDDIITTIIOONN MMAAYY 2288,, 22002266 PPAAGGEE 44 OOFF 55 The final grading plan shall identify all fill lots in which the building footings will be placed on fill material. The grading specifications shall also indicate that all embankments meet FHA/HUD 79G specifications. The Developer shall certify to the City that all lots with footings placed on fill material are appropriately constructed. Building Certificates of Occupancy will not be issued until a soils report and an as-built certified grading plan have been submitted and approved by City staff. EB Lakeville Development contains more than one acre of site disturbance. A National Pollution Discharge Elimination System General Stormwater Permit for construction activity is required from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for areas exceeding one acre being disturbed by grading. A copy of the Notice of Stormwater Permit Coverage must be submitted to the City upon receipt from the MPCA. SSTTOORRMM SSEEWWEERR EB 1st Addition includes the construction of private storm sewer systems to be located within Lot 1, Block 1 and will collect and convey stormwater runoff generated from within the development off-site to adjacent parcel located within Authentix 2nd Addition Final Plat. The Storm Sewer Area Charge has not been collected on the parent parcel and must be paid with the final plat. Final locations and sizes of all storm sewer facilities will be reviewed by City staff with the building permit application and final construction plans. FEMA FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS EB Lakeville Development is shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as Zone X by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Based on this designation by FEMA, the plat is not located within a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). WWEETTLLAANNDDSS A wetland delineation report was reviewed in the field and was approved September 4, 2024. One wetland was identified on the site. The project is proposing to impact 1,652 square feet of wetland. The project is eligible for the de minimis exemption based on the information provided and the wetland de minimis application for the areas outlined in the report have been determined to be acceptable for use in implementing the Wetland Conservation Act. The wetland and required buffer will be placed in a conservation easement to be dedicated with the final plat. Natural area signs will be placed along the easement that contains the wetland and wetland buffer. Final locations of signs will be determined with final plat. The plan must be revised to reduce impacts to the wetland buffer prior to final plat. Page 401 of 485 EEBB FFIIRRSSTT AADDDDIITTIIOONN MMAAYY 2288,, 22002266 PPAAGGEE 55 OOFF 55 TTRREEEE PPRREESSEERRVVAATTIIOONN Because the tree inventory was prepared with the preliminary plat, which was approved by the City Council in late 2024, the site is not subject to the current tree preservation requirements. The plan identifies 519 total trees on site and proposes to save 24 trees (4.6%). Measures to protect significant trees as identified in the Tree Preservation ordinance (10-4- 11), including but not limited to tree protection fencing and erosion control measures, are to be installed prior to the start of tree removals or other site work and maintained throughout construction. Minor changes may result in additional removals or saves based on location or condition of the tree. All “save” trees that are damaged or removed will require replacement at a ratio of 2:1 as per the Lakeville Subdivision Ordinance. EERROOSSIIOONN CCOONNTTRROOLL The Developer is responsible for obtaining a MPCA Construction Permit for the site as well as maintaining the SWPPP for the site during construction. The permit requires that any changes made throughout construction must be documented in the SWPPP. The developer is responsible for establishment of all slopes adjacent to the wetland and buffer. The area will be established with native vegetation. Additional erosion control measures may be required during construction as deemed necessary by City staff. Any additional measures required shall be installed and maintained by the developer. The MS4 Administration Fee has not been collected on the parent parcel and must be paid with the final plat or at the time a grading permit is issued, if done prior to final plat. RREECCOOMMMMEENNDDAATTIIOONN Engineering recommends approval of the, site plan, grading and erosion control plan, and utility plan for EB First Addition, subject to the requirements and stipulations within this report. Page 402 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Authentix Lakeville Second Addition Preliminary Plat Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve the preliminary plat of Authentix Lakeville Second Addition. Overview EB Lakeville Development LLC has submitted applications and plans for the preliminary plat of Authentix Lakeville Second Addition, which proposes three outlots on 7.25 acres located north of 210th Street (CSAH 70) and west of Keokuk Avenue. One of the outlots is proposed to contain a stormwater management pond that will serve the EB First Addition development of 142 apartments and 24 townhomes on the parcel to the west. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at its June 4, 2026 meeting. There was no public comment. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the preliminary plat, subject to three stipulations. Supporting Information 1. Preliminary Plat Resolution 2. June 4, 2026 draft Planning Commission minutes 3. May 28, 2026 Planning report 4. May 28, 2026 - revised June 5, 2026 Engineering report Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: A Home for All Ages and Stages of Life Report Completed by: Kris Jenson, Planning Manager Page 403 of 485 CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 26-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, EB Lakeville Development LLC has requested preliminary plat approval of three outlots to be known as Authentix Lakeville Second Addition, legally described as Outlot A, Authentix Lakeville; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at its June 4, 2026 meeting, preceded by notice as required by the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat meets Subdivision Ordinance requirements and is acceptable to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Lakeville City Council: The Authentix Lakeville Second Addition preliminary plat is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the engineering report dated May 28, 2026, revised 5, 2026. 2. The wetland delineation must be completed and approved prior to City Council consideration of the final plat. 3. A stormwater maintenance agreement shall be approved by the City Council with the approval of the final plat. ADOPTED by the Lakeville City Council this 15th day of June 2026. CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: _______________________ Luke M. Hellier, Mayor ATTEST: BY: ________________________ Taylor Snider, Deputy City Clerk Page 404 of 485 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, June 4, 2026 Page 4 2. The 207th Street right-of-way vacation must be recorded in conjunction with the EB First Addition Final plat. 3. Prior to City Council consideration of the CUP amendment, the apartment building plans must be revised such that the “Efficiency Alcove” units remove the bedroom walls so as to meet the definition of an efficient dwelling unit or to increase the size of those same units to be at least 700 square feet as is required for one-bedroom units. Ayes: Einck, Swaney, Traffas, Kaluza, Nays: 0 5c. Authentix Lakeville Second Addition Vice Chair Einck opened the public hearing to consider the application of EB Lakeville Development LLC for a preliminary plat of three outlots to be known at Authentix Lakeville Second Addition. Will O’Keefe with Bader Development introduced the project. Ms. Jenson presented the staff report. EB Lakeville Development LLC has submitted an application and plans for a preliminary and final plat to be known as Authentix Lakeville Second Addition. The plat consists of three outlots totaling 7.25 acres. The property is located north of 210th Street (CSAH 70) and west of Keokuk Avenue. One of the outlots is proposed to be used as a stormwater pond for the adjoining EB First Addition development. Community Development Department staff recommend approval of the preliminary plat. Vice Chair Einck opened the hearing to the public for comment. There was no public comment. Motion was made by Swaney, seconded by Kaluza to close the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. Voice vote was taken on the motion. Ayes – unanimous Vice Chair Einck asked for comments from the Planning Commission. • There were no comments from the Planning Commission. Motion was made by Swaney, seconded by Kaluza to recommend to City Council approval of the preliminary plat to be known as Authentix Lakeville Second Addition, subject to the following stipulations: 1. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the engineering report dated May 28, 2026. 2. The wetland delineation must be completed and approved prior to City Council consideration of the final plat. Page 405 of 485 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes, June 4, 2026 Page 5 3. A stormwater maintenance agreement shall be approved by the City Council with the approval of the final plat. Ayes: Swaney, Traffas, Kaluza, Einck Nays: 0 There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:27 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Dawn Erickson, Community Development Recorder Page 406 of 485 1 City of Lakeville Community Development Memorandum To: Planning Commission From: Kris Jenson, Planning Manager Date: May 28, 2026 Subject: Packet Material for the June 4, 2026 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Item: Authentix Lakeville Second Addition Preliminary Plat Action Deadline: July 15, 2026 BACKGROUND EB Lakeville Development LLC has submitted an application and plans for a preliminary and final plat to be known as Authentix Lakeville Second Addition. The plat consists of three outlots totaling 7.25 acres. The property is located north of 210th Street (CSAH 70) and west of Keokuk Avenue. One of the outlots is proposed to be used as a stormwater pond for the adjoining EB First Addition development. The plans have been reviewed by the Engineering, Environmental Resources, Forestry, and Parks and Recreation staff. EXHIBITS A. Location Map B. Zoning Map C. Preliminary Plat D. Final Plat E. Certificate of Survey F. Grading Plan G. Utility Plan H. Tree Inventory I. Landscape Plan J. April 9, 2026 Dakota County Plat Commission letter Page 407 of 485 2 PLANNING ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The property is located in Planning District No. 6 of the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan and is within the current Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). City municipal services, including sanitary sewer service, are available to serve the property. The subject property is guided C, Commercial in the 2040 Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Zoning and Surrounding Uses. The property is zoned C-3, General Commercial District. The proposed project is surrounded by the following existing or planned land uses: Direction Existing Use Land Use Plan Zoning North Authentix Lakeville townhomes CMU, Corridor Mixed Use M-1, Mixed Use I-35 Corridor South 210th St (CSAH 70), Candlewood Suites, vacant property C, Commercial C-3, General Commercial East Lakeville Inn hotel, Suite Living facility C, Commercial C-3, General Commercial West Proposed EB Lakeville multi- family housing site HDR, High Density Residential RH-2, Multiple Family Residential District Existing Site Conditions. The site is primarily undeveloped; a private frontage road has been constructed along the south side of the property that will provide access for the EB First Addition plat to Keokuk Avenue upon completion of the remaining segment just east of the Authentix Lakeville Second Addition plat boundary. Outlots. The preliminary plat of Authentix Lakeville Second Addition consists of three outlots. Outlot A is 4.35 acres and will be retained by the property owner for future development. At the time of development, a preliminary plat will be required and the wetland and required buffers must be deeded to the City at the time the parcel is platted into lots and blocks. The area of the outlot outside of the wetland meets the minimum lot width and area requirements of the C-3 District. Outlot B is 1.21 acres and will be used to provide stormwater management for the EB First Addition development. A Stormwater Maintenance Agreement (SMA) is required to be approved by the City Council in conjunction with the final plat. Outlot C is 1.7 acres and contains a wetland and required buffers and will be deeded to the City with the final plat. Page 408 of 485 3 Streets. The plat is directly adjacent to 210th Street (CSAH 70), though direct access to 210th Street from the parcels is restricted by Dakota County. A private frontage road was constructed in 2023 to provide access from this parcel to 210th Street and Keokuk Avenue. The Dakota County Plat Commission reviewed the plat at their April 8, 2026 meeting. The April 9, 2026 Plat Commission letter is attached as Exhibit J. Grading, Drainage and Utilities. City sanitary sewer and water are currently available to the site, which is within the current MUSA. Grading, drainage, erosion control, and utility plans were submitted with the preliminary plat plans and are reviewed in the engineering report prepared by Chloe Anderson, Project Engineer and Mac Cafferty, Environmental Resources Manager. See the May 28, 2026 Engineering memo for additional information. Wetlands. A wetland delineation was previously approved for the site but expired in 2025. A new delineation is in progress and must be completed and approved prior to City Council consideration of the final plat. At the time Outlot A is platted into lots and blocks, the wetland and required buffers must be placed within an outlot that is deeded to the City. Tree Inventory/Landscape Plan. Exhibit H includes the inventory of trees of the proposed Outlot B. Because the property has commercial zoning, there is a 70% removal threshold. Per the calculations, at least 32.7 inches must be replaced on the site. Exhibit I indicates that 14 Heritage Birch and Swamp White Oak trees will be planted around the perimeter of the stormwater pond, providing 35 inches (14 trees at 2.5 inches each), to meet the required tree replacement. Park Dedication. The Authentix Lakeville Second Addition plat boundary is at the edge of a neighborhood park service area that is primarily located south of CSHA 70. Cash in lieu park dedication fees can only be collected when a parcel is platted into lots and blocks and therefore will not be collected with the Authentix Lakeville Second Addition final plat. Trails and Sidewalks. No trails or sidewalks are proposed with this plat; there is a 10-foot-wide bituminous path along the north side of 210th Street, which provides a pedestrian connection from the proposed EB First Addition development to the west with the commercial area along Keokuk Avenue. RECOMMENDATION Community Development staff recommends approval of the Authentix Lakeville Second Addition preliminary plat, subject to the following stipulations: Page 409 of 485 4 1. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the engineering report dated May 28, 2026. 2. The wetland delineation must be completed and approved prior to City Council consideration of the final plat. 3. A stormwater maintenance agreement shall be approved by the City Council with the approval of the final plat. Page 410 of 485 207TH ST KE O K U K A V E KESWICK LOOP City of Lakeville Location Map Authentix Lakeville Second Addition Subject Property EXHIBIT A 210TH ST (CSAH 70) K E Y S T O N E A V E Page 411 of 485 C-3 C-3 C-3 PUD RST-2 RH-2 RA RM-2 RH-2 C-3 P/OS P/OS RM-2 M-1 ϮϬϳd,^d < K < h < s < ^t//<>KKW City of Lakeville Zoning Map Authentix Lakeville Second Addition Subject Property EXHIBIT B ϮϭϬd,^d;/^,ϳϬͿ < z ^ d K E s Page 412 of 485 OUTLOT B OUTLOT AOUTLOT C SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH Outlot A, Authentix Lakeville, Dakota County, Minnesota. OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL WIRE LIGHT SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC GUY ANCHOR UTILITY POLE GUARD POST UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE BUILDING LINE CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE WET LAND SIGN TRAFFIC MARKERS POND / WATER LINE FEMA FLOOD ZONE LINE SOIL BORING TREE LINE FOUND MONUMENT FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE RESTRICTED ACCESS FOUND RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENT SET MONUMENT MARKED LS 43933 SECTION LINE UNDERLYING / ADJACENT LOT TIE LINE BOUNDARY LINE DEED DISTANCE(100.00) CONIFEROUS TREE TRANSFORMER BUILDING CANOPY REGULAR PARKING STALL COUNTGAS METER COMMUNICATIONS MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL CABLE TV BOX GATE VALVE / HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE CLEAN OUT STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN FLARED END SECTION SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RETAINING WALL BLOCK RETAINING WALL STONE RETAINING WALL RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WIRE FENCE DECIDUOUS TREE ## TOTAL SITE AREA:315,849 SF (GROSS) LESS OUTLOTS:315,849 SF LESS RIGHT-OF-WAY: 0 SF 0 SF (NET) OUTLOT A:189,442 SF (4.349 ACRES) OUTLOT B: 52,501 SF (1.205 ACRES) OUTLOT C: 73,906 SF (1.697 ACRES) PROPOSED DENSITY: N/A FRONT YARD: N/A REAR YARD: N/A SIDE YARD: N/A 1. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 2. STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 3. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES AND UP TO 1 FOOT ABOVE THE HIGH WATER LEVEL OF ALL PONDS. LEGEND DESCRIPTION PROPERTY SUMMARY LOT SUMMARY SITE DENSITY SITE SETBACKS DEVELOPMENT NOTES VICINITY MAP SITE 205TH ST W N.T.S. 35 70 210TH ST W K E O K U K A V E PRELIMINARY PLAT C3.01 9 30 4 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, survey, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO.REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | C H A N D L E R C I R R I C I O N E | 4 / 2 2 / 2 0 2 6 5 : 0 1 : 1 3 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 \ C A D \ S U R V E Y \ 5 4 1 4 9 - P P L A T ( A U T H E N T I X ) . D W G : C 3 . 0 0 P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A T DATE ISSUED EB LAKEVILLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE 2ND ADDITION LAKEVILLE, MN54149 02/06/2026 GAM GAM Glen A. Mullenbach 02/06/2026 47470 4 04/23/2026 GAM GAM GAM CITY RESUBMITTAL EXHIBIT C Page 413 of 485 OUTLOT B OUTLOT AOUTLOT C SAMBATEK, INC. ENGINEERING, PLANNING AND LAND SURVEYING DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SETAND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 47470 DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENTFOUND AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 43933 0 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 50 100 THE SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT A, AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OFSOUTH 89 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST. SEC. 26, T. 114 N, R. 21 W VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE SITE DENOTES RIGHT OF ACCESS CONVEYED TODAKOTA COUNTY PER DOC. NO. 3565867 CSAH 70 207TH ST W WETLAND PER WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT BY WESTWOOD PS DATED 03/2026 AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE SECOND ADDITION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Atlantic Funding LTD, a Florida limited company, owner of the following described property: Outlot A, AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE, Dakota County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE SECOND ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Atlantic Funding LTD, a Florida limited company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 20 . Signed: Atlantic Funding LTD, a Florida limited company By: Its: STATE OF COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of , 20 , by as of Atlantic Funding LTD, a Florida limited company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public, County, Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires I, Glen A. Mullenbach do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certification are shown and labeled on the plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 . Glen A. Mullenbach, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 47470 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _________ day of _________________, 20______, by Glen A. Mullenbach. Notary Public, County, Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LAKEVILLE, STATE OF MINNESOTA This plat of AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE SECOND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Lakeville, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this ______ day of _______________, 20_____, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. By: Mayor By: Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this ________ day of ________________________, 20_____. By: Todd B. Tollefson, Dakota County Surveyor COUNTY BOARD, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA We do hereby certify that on the 9th day of August, 2022, the Board of Commissioners of Dakota County, Minnesota approved this plat of AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE SECOND ADDITION, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statures, Section 505.03, Subd. 2 and pursuant to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. Chair, County Board County Treasurer-Auditor DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION AND RECORDS, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20_____ on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this _______ day of _________________, 20_____. Amy A. Koethe, Director, Department of Property Taxation and Records COUNTY RECORDER, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plat of AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE SECOND ADDITION was filed in the office of the County Recorder for public record on this _______ day of _______________, 20______, at ______ o'clock ____ .M., and was duly filed in Book________________ of Plats, Page___________ as Document Number . Amy A. Koethe, Dakota County Recorder EXHIBIT D Page 414 of 485 11 0 . 0 0 11 0 SCALE IN FEET 0 10050 NORTH 1. SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESS IS 11655 210TH ST W, LAKEVILLE, MN 55044, ITS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 221197000010. 2. THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 7.25 ACRES OR 315,849 SQUARE FEET. Outlot A, AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE, Dakota County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. 1. THE BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE DAKOTA COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD83 (1986 ADJUST). WITH AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 51 SECONDS EAST FOR THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 114, RANGE 21. THE ORIGINATING MONUMENTS UTILIZED TO ESTABLISH THE HORIZONTAL POSITION OF THIS SURVEY WAS THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION. 2. FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 04/01/2026. 3. THE LOCATION OF THE WETLAND HAS BEEN SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AS DELINEATED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ON 03/2026 DESCRIPTION PROPERTY SUMMARY SURVEY NOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL WIRE LIGHT SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC GUY ANCHOR UTILITY POLE GUARD POST UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE BUILDING LINE CONCRETE CURB BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE WET LAND SIGN TRAFFIC MARKERS POND / WATER LINE FEMA FLOOD ZONE LINE SOIL BORING TREE LINE FOUND MONUMENT FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE RESTRICTED ACCESS FOUND RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENT SET MONUMENT MARKED LS 43933 SECTION LINE UNDERLYING / ADJACENT LOT TIE LINE BOUNDARY LINE DEED DISTANCE(100.00) CONIFEROUS TREE TRANSFORMER BUILDING CANOPY REGULAR PARKINGSTALL COUNTGAS METER COMMUNICATIONS MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL CABLE TV BOX GATE VALVE / HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE CLEAN OUT STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN FLARED END SECTION SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RETAINING WALL BLOCK RETAINING WALL STONE RETAINING WALL RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WIRE FENCE DECIDUOUS TREE 999.9 ## LEGEND ADJACENT LANDOWNERCHART NUMBER## CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY C2.01 6 304 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, survey, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO.REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2021 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | C H A N D L E R C I R R I C I O N E | 4 / 2 2 / 2 0 2 6 4 : 5 8 : 2 7 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 \ C A D \ S U R V E Y \ S H E E T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 - C O S . D W G : C 2 . 0 1 C E R T I F I C A T E O F S U R V E Y DATE ISSUED EB LAKEVILLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE 2ND ADDITION LAKEVILLE, MN54149 03/06/2026 JTW GAM GLEN A. MULLENBACH 03/06/2026 47470 VICINITY MAP SITE 205TH ST W N.T.S. 35 70 210TH ST W K E O K U K A V E 4 04/23/2026 GAM GAM GAM CITY RESUBMITTAL EXHIBIT E Page 415 of 485 FND IP 17255 1080 1080 1090 1082 1084 1086 1088 1092 109 4 1094 108 8 108 6 10 8 4 1084 110 0 EX FES IE=1083.46 OUTLOT A 324.31 FILTRATION BASIN 100-YR HWL 1087.15 10-YR HWL 1085.89 BOTTOM 1083.70 B/W: 1099.70 T/W: 1100.34 1104.20 1096.74 1080 1082 1 0 8 4 1084 10 8 6 1086 10 8 8 1088 108 3 . 7 0 1090 1100 1084 1086 1088 1092 1094 1096 1098 108 8 . 7 0 108 8 . 7 0 1 0 8 3 . 7 0 1 0 8 8 . 7 0 1 0 8 8 . 7 0 1083.70 1088.70 WETLAND DELINEATION 25' WETLAND BUFFER EOF WITH RIP RAP 5:1 3:1 ALL GRADING WITHIN THE WETLAND BUFFER ZONE MUST BE 5:1 MAX SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 PROPERTY LINE CONCRETE CURB BUILDING LINE RETAINING WALL TREE LINE HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND SOIL BORING999.9 ST # STORM SEWER DRAINTILE RIPRAP EOF 902.5 OVERFLOWELEV. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING EAST BASIN GRADING PLAN C4.02 12 304 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2025 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | C H A N D L E R C I R R I C I O N E | 4 / 2 2 / 2 0 2 6 5 : 0 3 : 0 2 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 \ C A D \ C I V I L \ S H E E T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 - C 4 . 0 1 - G R A D E . D W G : C 4 . 0 2 E A S T B A S I N G R A D I N G P L A N EB 1ST ADDITION EB LAKEVILLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS LAKEVILLE, MN54149 EC EC MA MARK ANDERSON 03/06/2026 23450 WETLAND LIMITSWL 800 SPOT ELEVATIONS 6" COARSE FILTER AGGREGATEMNDOT 3149.2.H UP SIZES OF BASIN TO 10-YR HWL (1085.96) 1 02/02/2026 CDC MCA MCA PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 2 02/16/2026 CDC MCA MCA UPDATED WETLAND INFORMATION 4 04/23/2026 CDC MCA MCA CITY RESUBMITTAL EXHIBIT F Page 416 of 485 2 5 25 RI G H T - O F - W A Y P E R D A K O T A C O U N T Y R I G H T - O F - W A Y MA P N O . 3 0 0 A N D N O . 3 0 0 A F I L E D A S DO C N O S . 2 4 8 3 2 1 7 A N D 2 5 4 4 9 4 8 EX FESIE=1083.46 EXCBMH EX FESIE=1090.19 EXCB EXCBMHRE=1105.69IE=1099.89 W IE=1096.59 E IE=1096.44 S 12" GV STMH 102RE=1102.88 IE=1088.20 WIE=1088.20 E FESIE=1085.11 W CBMH 101 RE=1101.75IE=1087.62 WIE=1087.62 E W/ 4040 CDS FES IE=1089.38 S 183 LF - 30" HDPE @ 1.3 7 % 30 LF - 24" HDPE @ 2.66% 43 LF - 30"HDPE @ 1.37% FESIE=1083.70 N 20 LF - 30"HDPE @ 0.00% OCS 403 RE=1088.70IE=1083.70 SIE=1080.77 W IE=1080.77 N 30 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.34% FES IE=1080.67 S 30 LF - 6"PVC SCH 40 @ 0.54% FESIE=1090.00 N FILTRATION BASIN 100-YR HWL 1087.15 10-YR HWL 1085.89 BOTTOM 1083.70 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2025 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | C H A N D L E R C I R R I C I O N E | 4 / 2 2 / 2 0 2 6 5 : 0 9 : 0 4 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 \ C A D \ C I V I L \ S H E E T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 - C 6 . 0 1 - U T I L . D W G : C 6 . 0 2 U T I L I T Y P L A N EB 1ST ADDITION EB LAKEVILLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS LAKEVILLE, MN54149 EC EC MA MARK ANDERSON 03/06/2026 23450 SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH UTILITY PLAN C6.02 20 304 PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND UNDERGROUND GAS LINEUNDERGROUND TELEPHONEUNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DRAINTILE SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN (SAN.) STORM SEWER CONCRETE CURB WATERMAIN EASEMENT LINE 6" COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE MNDOT 3149.2.H UP SIZES OF BASIN TO 10-YR HWL (1085.96) 1 02/02/2026 CDC MCA MCA PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 4 04/23/2026 CDC MCA MCA CITY RESUBMITTAL EXHIBIT G Page 417 of 485 FESIE=1085.11 W 183 LF - 30" HDPE @ 1.3 7 % FESIE=1083.70 N 20 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.00% OCS 403RE=1088.70 IE=1083.70 SIE=1080.77 W IE=1080.77 N 30 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.34% FESIE=1080.67 S 30 LF - 6" PVC SCH 40 @ 0.54% FESIE=1090.00 N FILTRATION BASIN 100-YR HWL 1087.15 10-YR HWL 1085.89 BOTTOM 1083.70 310 1083.13 1083.17 1082.86 1081.92 1080.71 255591089.19TOE B 1088.74 256341102.29TOP B 256381103.25TOP 185641102.15BIT EDGE B 18565 1102.40BIT EDGE B 185691103.32BIT EDGE 185701103.55BIT EDGE 13101100.87FND IP 17255 FND IP 17255 1080 1090 1082 1084 1086 1088 1092 109 4 1094 1084 110 0 N89°56'32"W 649.89 S89°51'49"E 52.34 N39 ° 1 6 ' 4 3 " E 69.4 8 EX FES IE=1083.46 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2362 2363 2365 2366 2368 2369 2370 2371 2372 2373 2374 2375 2376 2377 2378 2379 23802381 2382 2383 2384 2385 2386 2387 2388 2389 2390 2391 2392 2393 2394 2395 2396 2397 2398 2402 2403 2404 2405 2406 2407 2408 2409 2412 2413 2414 10"POP2416 2417 2420 2421 2422 2423 2424 2425 2426 2427 2428 2429 2430 2431 24322433 2434 2435 24362437 2449 2450 2451 324.31 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2362 2363 2365 2366 2368 2369 2370 2371 2372 2373 2374 2375 2376 2377 2378 2379 23802381 2382 2383 2384 2385 2386 2387 2388 2389 2390 2391 2392 2393 2394 2395 2396 2397 2398 2402 2403 2404 2405 2406 2407 2408 2409 2412 2413 2414 10"POP2416 2417 2420 2421 2422 2423 2424 2425 2426 2427 2428 2429 2430 2431 24322433 2434 2435 24362437 2449 2450 2451 3512 171451079.85WTLD A-13 171461080.31WTLD A-14 171471081.64WTLD A-15 171481082.29WTLD A-16 171491082.99WTLD A-17 171501082.88WTLD A-18 171511082.24WTLD A-19 171521082.12WTLD A-20 171531082.39WTLD A-21 171541083.73WTLD A-22 171551083.66WTLD A-23 171561084.65WTLD A-24 171571083.58WTLD A-25 171581083.30WTLD A-26 171591083.38WTLD A-27 171601082.14WTLD A-28 171611079.55WTLD A-29 171621078.37 WTLD A-30 171631077.88WTLD A-31 171641077.64WTLD A-32 171651078.66WTLD A-33 171661079.14WTLD A-34 171671079.26WTLD A-35 171681080.12WTLD A-36 171691081.40WTLD A-37 171701081.64 WTLD A-38 171711082.34WTLD A-39 171721084.36WTLD A-40 171741082.62WTLD A-2 171751081.13WTLD A-3 171761079.74WTLD A-4 SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2025 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | C H A N D L E R C I R R I C I O N E | 4 / 2 2 / 2 0 2 6 5 : 1 2 : 3 6 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 \ C A D \ C I V I L \ S H E E T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 - L 0 . 0 1 - T R E E . D W G : L 0 . 0 3 T R E E P R E S E R V A T I O N P L A N ( O U T L O T B ) EB 1ST ADDITION EB LAKEVILLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS LAKEVILLE, MN54149 SIG SIG DCR DAN REBOK 56877 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARDGUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FORANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICHCONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. OUTLOT B MIXED USE, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND SPECIAL DISTRICT -REMOVAL THRESHOLD = 70% TOTAL SIGNIFICANT TREE DIAMETER INCHES WITHOUT REPLACEMENT TOTAL SIGNIFICANT DIAMETER INCHES (SEE INVENTORY BELOW) = 218 INCHES ALLOWABLE REMOVAL INCHES (70%) 218 INCHES = 152.6 INCHES REMOVAL COMMON DIAMETER INCHES = 60 INCHES ALLOWABLE REMOVAL = 152.6 - 60 = 92.6 INCHESREPLACEMENT REQUIRED = 0 INCHES REMOVAL CONIFER DIAMETER INCHES = 0 INCHES REPLACEMENT REQUIRED = 0 INCHES REMOVAL HARDWOOD DECIDUOUS INCHES = 158 INCHES,REPLACEMENT REQUIRED = 92.6 - 158 = 65.4 INCHES REPLACEMENT RATIO 1/2 DIAMETER INCHES FOR HARDWOOD DECIDUOUS = 32.7 INCHES PROPOSED REPLACEMENT TREES = 14 SHADE TREES X 2.5" CALIPER = 35 INCHES* LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL SIGN PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED LAKEVILLE TREE CODE (NEW) WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TREE TO BE REMOVED D S LS RIPRAP TREE REMOVAL NOTE : CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING PER DETAIL 5/L1.02 PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK ON SITE. SEE GENERAL NOTES SHEET C1.04 FOR ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATIONS. REFER TO SHEET L0.04 FOR OUTLOT B TREE INVENTORY AND REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT STATUS. TREE INVENTORY TABLE SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER TREE PRESERVATION PLAN. OUTLOT B TREE INVENTORY Tag size species class status 2373 20 pop common remove outlot b 2374 14 pop common remove outlot b 2376 18 cwood common remove outlot b 2377 20 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2378 9 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2379 7 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2380 7 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2381 6 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2382 8 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2383 8 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2384 7 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2385 7 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2386 8 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2387 8 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2388 8 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2391 8 pop common remove outlot b 2402 12 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2403 8 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2404 6 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2405 12 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2406 11 oak hardwood remove outlot b 2407 6 oak hardwood remove outlot b *SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN (OUTLOT B) SHEET L1.02 FOR PROPOSED TREE REPLACEMENT PLANTINGSCHEDULE 1 02/02/2026 CDC MCA MCA PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 4 04/23/2026 SG DR DR CITY RESUBMITTAL TREE PRESERVATION PLAN (OUTLOT B)L0.03 26 304 EXHIBIT H Page 418 of 485 1080 1080 1090 1082 1084 1086 1088 1092 109 4 1094 108 8 108 6 10 8 4 1084 110 0 OUTLOT A FILTRATION BASIN 100-YR HWL 1087.15 10-YR HWL 1085.89 BOTTOM 1083.70 1085 1084 10 8 1 10 8 2 10 8 3 NO DATE BY CKD APPR SHEET OF Date License # Print Name: DRAWN BY DESIGNED BY CHECKED BY I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervision andthat I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota. PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT SUBMITTAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REV. COMMENT Engineering | Surveying | Planning | Environmental© 2025 Sambatek24 . 1 S ( L M S T E C H ) | C H A N D L E R C I R R I C I O N E | 4 / 2 2 / 2 0 2 6 5 : 1 4 : 5 2 P M L: \ P R O J E C T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 \ C A D \ C I V I L \ S H E E T S \ 5 4 1 4 9 - L 1 . 0 1 - L S C P . D W G : L 1 . 0 2 L A N D S C A P E P L A N EB 1ST ADDITION EB LAKEVILLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS LAKEVILLE, MN54149 SIG SIG DCR DAN REBOK 56877 SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH LEGEND EASEMENT CURB & GUTTER BUILDING RETAINING WALL PIPE BOLLARD STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING PROPERTY LIMIT EXISTINGPROPOSED PLANT SCHEDULE WETLAND LIMITS TREELINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK S S SANITARY SEWER LANDSCAPE EDGING STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN (SAN.) YARDDRAIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PRESERVED EXISTING TREE D S LS RIPRAP LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.02 28 304 REFER TO SHEET C1.04 FOR LANDSCAPE NOTES LANDSCAPE NOTES NATURAL AREA SIGN SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT GROUND COVERS SSR MNDOT Seed Mix Southern Shortgrass Roadside / Formerly MNDOT Seed Mix 35-221/36-211 Seed WD MNDOT Seed Mix Wet Ditch / Formerly MNDOT Seed Mix 33-261 Seed TUR HIG Turf Sod Highland Sod / Sod Sod PLANT SCHEDULE OUTLOT B TREE REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SIZE QTY TREES RB Betula nigra `Cully` TM / Heritage Birch B & B 2.5"Cal 9 SO Quercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak B & B 2.5"Cal 5 SUBTOTAL:14 PLANT SCHEDULE OUTLOT B 1 02/02/2026 CDC MCA MCA PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 4 04/23/2026 SG DR DR CITY RESUBMITTAL EXHIBIT I Page 419 of 485 Dakota County Surveyor’s Office Western Service Center 14955 Galaxie Avenue Apple Valley, MN 55124 952.891-7087 Fax 952.891-7127 www.co.dakota.mn.us April 9, 2026 City of Lakeville 20195 Holyoke Ave. Lakeville, MN 55044 Re: AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE SECOND ADDITION The Dakota County Plat Commission met on April 8, 2026, to consider the preliminary plat of the above referenced plat. The plat is adjacent to CSAH 70 (210th St. W.) and is therefore subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. This is a replat of Outlot A, AUTHENTIX LAKEVILLE, splitting into three outlots. Restricted access is shown along CSAH 70 per document no. 3565867 and the right-of-way requirements have been met. As noted, the 207th Street/CSAH 70 intersection is planned to be restricted in the future. The Plat Commission has approved the preliminary and final and will recommend approval to the County Board of Commissioners meeting on May 5, 2026. Traffic volumes on CSAH 70 are 8,000 ADT and are anticipated to be 8,200 ADT by the year 2040. These traffic volumes indicate that current Minnesota noise standards for residential units could be exceeded for the proposed plat. Residential developments along County highways commonly result in noise complaints. In order for noise levels from the highway to meet acceptable levels for adjacent residential units, substantial building setbacks, buffer areas, and other noise mitigation elements should be incorporated into this development. No work shall commence in the County right of way until a permit is obtained from the County Transportation Department and no permit will be issued until the plat has been filed with the County Recorder’s Office. The Plat Commission does not review or approve the actual engineering design of proposed accesses or other improvements to be made in the right of way. Nothing herein is intended to restrict or limit Dakota County’s rights with regards to Dakota County rights of way or property. The Plat Commission highly recommends early contact with the Transportation Department to discuss the permitting process which reviews the design and may require construction of highway improvements, including, but not limited to, turn lanes, drainage features, limitations on intersecting street widths, medians, etc. Please contact TJ Bentley regarding permitting questions at (952) 891-7115 or Todd Tollefson regarding Plat Commission or Plat Ordinance questions at (952) 891-7070. Sincerely, Todd B. Tollefson Secretary, Plat Commission c: Mark Anderson, Sambatek EXHIBIT J Page 420 of 485 City of Lakeville Public Works – Engineering Division Memorandum To: Kris Jenson, Planning Manager From: Chloe Anderson, Civil Engineer McKenzie L. Cafferty, Environmental Resources Manager Joe Masiarchin, Parks and Recreation Director Zach Jorgenson, City Forester Copy: Zach Johnson, City Engineer Jonathan Nelson, Assistant City Engineer Julie Stahl, Finance Director Dave Mathews, Building Official Tina Goodroad, Community Development Director Date: May 28, 2026 - Revised June 5, 2026 Subject: Authentix Lakeville Second Addition Preliminary Plat Report • Site Plan Review • Grading and Erosion Control Plan Review • Utility Plan Review BBAACCKKGGRROOUUNNDD EB Lakeville Development, LLC has submitted a preliminary plat named ‘Authentix Lakeville Second Addition’ and plans for the development of three outlots. The proposed development is located north of and adjacent to 210th Street (CSAH 70) and west of Keokuk Avenue. The parent parcel is Outlot A, Authentix Lakeville (PID No. 221197000010) and is zoned C-3, General Commercial District. The preliminary plat consists of three outlots on 7.25 acres. The outlots created with the preliminary plat shall have the following use: Outlot A: Future development; to be retained by the current property owner (4.35 acres) Outlot B: Stormwater management basin; to be retained by the current property owner (1.21 acres) Outlot C: Wetland and buffer; to be deeded to the City (1.70 acres) Page 421 of 485 AAUUTTHHEENNTTIIXX LLAAKKEEVVIILLLLEE SSEECCOONNDD AADDDDIITTIIOONN PPRREELLIIMMIINNAARRYY PPLLAATT MMAAYY 2288,, 22002266,, RREEVVIISSEEDD JJUUNNEE 55,, 22002255 PPAAGGEE 22 OOFF 44 The proposed development will be completed by: Developer: EB Lakeville Development, LLC Engineer/Surveyor: Sambatek SSIITTEE CCOO NN DDIITTIIOO NN SS The Authentix Lakeville Second Addition site contains undeveloped land with a wetland complex throughout a majority of the property. The land generally slopes from the west to the east. An overhead utility line is located adjacent to the south property line of the parent parcel. EEAASSEEMMEENNTTSS Multiple easements for drainage and utility purposes exist across the parent parcel and will remain with the development improvements. SSTTRREEEETT AANNDD SSUUBBDDIIVVIISSIIOONN LLAAYYOOUUTT 210th Street (CSAH 70) Authentix Lakeville Second Addition is located north of and adjacent to 210th Street, a Principal Arterial roadway as identified in the City’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The Dakota County Plat Commission reviewed the proposed development at its April 8, 2026 meeting and recommended approval. Dakota County controls the right-of-way requirements and access locations along 210th Street. The current Dakota County Plat Review Needs Map identifies 210th Street as a 4-lane divided roadway with a half right-of-way requirement of 75-feet adjacent to the development. CCOONNSSTTRRUUCCTTIIOONN AACCCCEESSSS Construction traffic access and egress for grading and utility construction shall be determined with the final construction plans. UUTTIILLIITTIIEESS OOVVEERRHHEEAADD LLIINNEESS An overhead electric transmission line and poles are located along the north side of 210th Street on the parent parcel. The Developer will be required to remove the poles and place the utilities underground with the final plat, consistent with the City’s Public Ways and Property Ordinance or provide a security for their share of the costs to bury the overhead utility adjacent to the plat. Page 422 of 485 AAUUTTHHEENNTTIIXX LLAAKKEEVVIILLLLEE SSEECCOONNDD AADDDDIITTIIOONN PPRREELLIIMMIINNAARRYY PPLLAATT MMAAYY 2288,, 22002266,, RREEVVIISSEEDD JJUUNNEE 55,, 22002255 PPAAGGEE 33 OOFF 44 DDRRAAIINNAAGGEE AANNDD GGRRAADDIINNGG Authentix Lakeville Second Addition is located within subdistrict ML-085 of the Lake Marion District of the City’s Comprehensive Water and Natural Resources Management Plan. This development will convey stormwater runoff generated from EB First Addition final plat towards a filtration basin located within adjacent parcel to the east. Prior to final plat approval, the final grading plan must be reviewed to be consistent with City Ordinance requirements. The final grading plan shall identify all fill lots in which the building footings will be placed on fill material. The grading specifications shall also indicate that all embankments meet FHA/HUD 79G specifications. The Developer shall certify to the City that all lots with footings placed on fill material are appropriately constructed. Building Certificates of Occupancy will not be issued until a soils report and an as-built certified grading plan have been submitted and approved by City staff. The site contains more than one acre of site disturbance. A National Pollution Discharge Elimination System General Stormwater Permit for construction activity is required from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for areas exceeding one acre being disturbed by grading. A copy of the Notice of Stormwater Permit Coverage must be submitted to the City upon receipt from the MPCA. SSTTOORRMM SSEEWWEERR Authentix Lakeville Second Addition includes the construction of a filtration basin to be located within Outlot B and will collect and convey stormwater runoff generated from the off- site development to adjacent parcel to the west. An easement will be required over the stormwater facilities within Outlot B for the benefit of Lot 1, Block 1, EB First Addition. A stormwater maintenance agreement will be required for the stormwater facilities within Outlot B The Storm Sewer Area Charge has not been collected on the parent parcel and must be paid with the final plat. Final locations and sizes of all storm sewer facilities will be reviewed by City staff with the building permit application and final construction plans. FEMA FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS Authentix Lakeville Second Addition is shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as Zone X by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Based on this designation by FEMA, the plat is not located within a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). Page 423 of 485 AAUUTTHHEENNTTIIXX LLAAKKEEVVIILLLLEE SSEECCOONNDD AADDDDIITTIIOONN PPRREELLIIMMIINNAARRYY PPLLAATT MMAAYY 2288,, 22002266,, RREEVVIISSEEDD JJUUNNEE 55,, 22002255 PPAAGGEE 44 OOFF 44 WWEETTLLAANNDDSS A wetland delineation report is currently in progress for the site. Natural area signs will be placed along the area that contains the wetland and wetland buffer. Final locations of signs will be determined with final plat. TTRREEEE PPRREESSEERRVVAATTIIOONN The Tree Preservation Plan submitted with the Authentix Lakeville Second Addition preliminary plat for Outlot B dated April 23, 2026 identifies 218 inches of significant trees located with the project boundaries. As a Mixed Use, Commercial, Industrial, or Special District, the tree removal threshold is 70%, or 152.6 inches. Plans propose to remove all 218 diameter inches, which is above the threshold, and requires the replacement of 32.7 diameter inches of new tree planting. The proposed landscape plan dated April 23, 2026 meets this requirement with 35 inches of new trees. All trees identified for preservation shall be protected with appropriate tree protection fencing and measures installed prior to, and maintained throughout, construction. Any trees to be preserved that are damaged or removed during construction will require replacement in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance (11-21-11). EERROOSSIIOONN CCOONNTTRROOLL The Developer is responsible for obtaining a MPCA Construction Permit for the site as well as maintaining the SWPPP for the site during construction. The permit requires that any changes made throughout construction must be documented in the SWPPP. The developer is responsible for establishment of all slopes adjacent to the wetland and buffer. The area will be established with native vegetation. Additional erosion control measures may be required during construction as deemed necessary by City staff. Any additional measures required shall be installed and maintained by the developer. The MS4 Administration Fee has not been collected on the parent parcel and must be paid with the final plat or at the time a grading permit is issued, if done prior to final plat. RREECCOOMMMMEENNDDAATTIIOONN Engineering recommends approval of the preliminary plat, site plan, grading and erosion control plan, and utility plan for Authentix Lakeville Second Addition subject to the requirements and stipulations within this report. Page 424 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Legislative Session Recap Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: No action requested - information only. Overview The 2026 Minnesota legislative session adjounred on May 17, and several bills were signed into law that will have impacts on the City of Lakeville. Our legislative delegation has agreed to brief the city council on the session. Supporting Information 1. MLC 2026 Session Summary Financial Impact: $0 Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: Good Value for Public Service Report Completed by: Justin Miller, City Administrator Page 425 of 485 2026 Legislative Session Summary Prepared by Tom Poul, Tony Albright, Amy Walstien and Madison Walker 555 Wabasha Street, Suite 220 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Page 426 of 485 Page | 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction II. 2026 MLC Legislative Priorities • MLC Legislative Platform • Legislative Engagement Report III. Legislation of Interest that Passed in 2026 • Housing and Homelessness Prevention Omnibus • Tax Omnibus • Public Safety Omnibus • Impersonating an Officer • Bonding/Capital Investment • Pensions Omnibus • Liquor Omnibus • Cannabis Omnibus • Elections Omnibus • State Government Omnibus • IT Modernization • Office of Inspector General IV. Legislation that Did Not Pass V. Legislative Retirements Appendix • 2026 MLC Legislative Priorities • MLC Letters of Testimony • Housing One-Pager Page 427 of 485 Page | 3 I. Introduction The 2026 legislative session began on February 17 with a solemn first day dedicated to memorializing the life of Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark Hortman. Members also recognized the recovery of Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette Hoffman, who were injured in the same attack that killed the Hortmans. In the House, members honored Speaker Hortman’s 20-year legislative career by placing a bouquet of roses and a photo at her desk, which remained untouched for the duration of the session. While the partisan makeup of the Legislature remained unchanged from the first year of the biennium, both chambers welcomed new members. In the Senate, Michael Holmstrom (R- Wright County) won a special election to replace Senator Bruce Anderson, who passed away, and Amanda Hemmingsen-Jaeger (DFL-Woodbury) won a special election to replace Senator Nicole Mitchell, who resigned following a felony conviction. The House welcomed three new members: XP Lee (DFL-Brooklyn Park), who filled the seat left vacant by Speaker Emerita Hortman’s death; Meg Luger-Nikolai (DFL-Saint Paul), who filled the seat vacated after Representative Kaohly Her was elected Mayor of Saint Paul; and Shelley Buck (DFL- Woodbury), who filled the seat vacated when Hemmingsen-Jaeger was elected to the Senate. Early in session, Minnesota Management and Budget released the February Forecast, which projected a $3.7 billion surplus for the current biennium. However, MMB cautioned that the state continued to face a structural imbalance in future years, with spending growth projected to outpace revenue growth. MMB noted that if the surplus remained largely unspent, the 2029 biennium could end with $377 million on the bottom line. In response, Governor Walz released supplemental budget recommendations that proposed using only $63 million of the FY26-27 surplus and preserving the remainder. Global budget targets remained elusive throughout session, reflecting the competing priorities and operational challenges of a one-seat DFL majority in the Senate and a tied House. An agreement was finally reached on May 13, just five days before constitutional adjournment. Key components of the final budget deal included funding for HCMC, a one-time reduction in car tab fees, and limited property tax relief. The session included two legislative breaks: one on March 19 to observe Eid al-Fitr, and a longer break from March 27 to April 7 for Easter and Passover. The Legislature again combined the first and second policy deadlines, which occurred on March 27. The third deadline, focused on major appropriation and finance bills, occurred on April 7. These deadlines passed with little alignment between House and Senate omnibus policy bills, supplemental spending bills, or plans for a capital investment bill, which was expected to be a major focus of the session. The lack of alignment reflected the Legislature’s divided priorities. DFL members prioritized gun violence prevention measures, a larger bonding bill, and support for key Walz Administration proposals, including assistance for small businesses affected by Operation Metro Surge. Republicans generally favored spending little of the surplus, advancing tax conformity and license tab relief, and opposing tax increases to address the financial challenges facing HCMC. Page 428 of 485 Page | 4 On May 13, with five days remaining in the session, Representative Samantha Sencer-Mura (DFL-Minneapolis) announced on the House Floor that if Speaker Lisa Demuth (R-Cold Spring) did not bring forward the comprehensive gun violence prevention bill that had passed the Senate within 24 hours, House DFL members would begin a sit-in on the House Floor. When the bill was not calendared the next day, House DFL members used a procedural motion known as “declaring an urgency” to attempt to bring the bill forward for a vote. The motion required 90 votes to pass. After six hours of debate, it failed on a tie vote. At the end of the tense floor debate, Representative Liish Kozlowski (DFL-Duluth) announced that House DFL members would proceed with the sit-in. The sit-in dominated the final days of session and lasted 36 hours. The bill was never brought forward for a formal vote. Aside from the sit-in, the final days of session were relatively quiet. Unlike in many years, few conference committees met publicly, and few floor sessions stretched late into the evening. Even with the narrowly divided Legislature, several significant bills passed in the final days, including negotiated omnibus bills on health, human services, public safety, education forecasting and literacy, capital investment, taxes, and state government. Notable accomplishments included passage of a $1.2 billion bonding bill, creation of a $500 million Hospital Stabilization Account, establishment of an Office of the Inspector General, and a temporary reduction in license tab fees. Final agreements were not reached on transportation, agriculture, energy, environment, education policy, or jobs and workforce development. Looking Ahead Minnesota now turns toward a major election year, with control of state government again on the line. The 2026 ballot will include an open U.S. Senate seat, all U.S. House seats, judicial races, and statewide constitutional offices, including Governor and Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, and State Auditor. Legislative control will be especially closely watched. All 134 seats in the Minnesota House of Representatives will be on the ballot. With the chamber currently tied 67-67, even a small number of competitive races could determine which party controls the House. A party needs 68 seats to hold the majority. The Senate will also be in play, with all 67 seats on the ballot. The DFL currently holds a narrow 34-33 majority, making control of the Senate another central question heading into November. Turnover will add another layer of uncertainty. Forty-three legislators have announced they are not seeking re-election, representing just over 20% of the Legislature and a level of turnover comparable to what is often seen in a redistricting year. That means the next Legislature will not only be shaped by partisan control, but also by a significant number of new members, new committee dynamics, and new leadership relationships. The candidate filing period began May 19 and closes June 2 at 5:00 p.m. The primary election will be held Tuesday, August 11, and the general election will be held Tuesday, November 3. The 2027 legislative session begins January 12, 2027, and will be a budget-setting year. Page 429 of 485 Page | 5 II. Status of 2026 MLC Legislative Priorities The Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) actively engaged in advocating for local government priorities, based on the focus areas outlined in our platform. Page 430 of 485 Page | 6 MLC ENGAGEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING AND LOCAL LAND USE Housing remained one of the most significant issues for the Municipal Legislative Commission during the 2026 legislative session. MLC supported a range of housing production and affordability measures, including expanded local financing tools, greater flexibility in state housing programs, regulatory changes to support redevelopment and condominium construction, and increased state investment in affordable housing development and NOAH preservation. For the second consecutive year, broad statewide zoning legislation, often referred to as the “Yes to Homes” proposal, did not advance. MLC communities played a central role in that outcome by raising substantive concerns about local control, infrastructure capacity, neighborhood planning, public engagement, and the need for housing policy to reflect the different realities facing fully developed suburban communities. While the Yes to Homes bill did not move forward, housing remained a major area of legislative activity. Lawmakers ultimately approved a bipartisan omnibus housing and homelessness prevention package that provides approximately $165 million in housing- related investments and is projected to support the creation of more than 2,000 housing units statewide. The bill authorizes $100 million in Housing Infrastructure Bonds and includes major investments in homelessness prevention, workforce housing, supportive housing, manufactured housing infrastructure, and other housing stability initiatives. The final agreement also includes new transparency and reporting requirements for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, limits on certain administrative retentions through FY2028, and targeted policy changes related to housing investment authority and public assistance eligibility. Several high-profile housing policy proposals debated during the session were not included in the final housing agreement, including broad statewide zoning reform, private equity ownership restrictions, certain manufactured housing tenant protections, and additional HOA-related provisions. The final housing bill reflected a more targeted investment and programmatic approach rather than the sweeping land use preemption proposals that MLC communities opposed. Homeowners Association and Common Interest Community Reform MLC also engaged on homeowners association and common interest community reform. The “Homeowners Association Bill of Rights,” was signed into law by Governor Tim Walz on May 12, 2026. The bipartisan legislation includes broad consumer protection reforms, including conflict-of-interest standards, limits on excessive fines and fees, reasonableness requirements for association rules, alternative dispute resolution options, limits on Page 431 of 485 Page | 7 foreclosure as an enforcement tool, and requirements for associations to adopt schedules of fees, fines, and charges. The HOA legislation also includes a provision with direct implications for cities. Beginning January 1, 2027, cities and counties may not require the creation of an HOA or common property necessitating an HOA as a condition of approving certain residential development permits or planned unit developments, unless requested by the developer or required by state or federal law. Local governments raised concerns about this preemption, and an amendment to remove the provision was considered on the House floor but failed on a bipartisan vote. PUBLIC SAFETY MLC engaged on public safety priorities during the 2026 session, including legislation increasing penalties for impersonating a police officer and removing identifying characteristics for the sale/transfer of law enforcement vehicles. The bill to increase penalties for impersonating an officer passed with unanimous bipartisan support, was signed into law by Governor Tim Walz. The new law increases penalties for falsely claiming to be a law enforcement officer, with enhanced penalties when a person uses a vehicle with law enforcement markings, gains access to a building, gives unlawful orders, carries a firearm, commits a repeat offense, or commits another crime while using the disguise. The legislation was advanced in response to the targeted June 2025 attacks on Minnesota lawmakers, in which the alleged perpetrator used a police-style disguise and vehicle markings to exploit trust and gain access to victims. By strengthening penalties for officer impersonation, the law addresses a serious public safety risk for residents, local officials, and law enforcement while reinforcing the importance of public trust in legitimate emergency response. The 2026 omnibus public safety policy bill included a broad set of provisions affecting local governments, including changes related to the sale or transfer of law enforcement vehicles, public employment decisions involving criminal history, survivor benefits for public safety officers, and long-term planning for statewide public safety radio communications infrastructure. The final package also created a task force to evaluate and recommend a statewide, state-funded framework for public safety radio communications, with recommendations due to the Legislature by February 15, 2027. These provisions reflect continued legislative attention to the operational needs of cities, law enforcement agencies, and first responders, particularly as communities manage public safety staffing, emergency communications, and public trust in law enforcement. E-Bikes MLC also engaged on legislation to modernize state law and improve public safety related to electric-assisted bicycles, motorized bicycles, and other micromobility devices. The Page 432 of 485 Page | 8 Minnesota Senate passed S.F. 3236 on a narrow 34-33 vote, but the bill did not advance in the House before adjournment. The legislation responded to the rapid increase in electric- powered bicycles and similar devices on Minnesota roads, sidewalks, and shared-use trails, including concerns about higher-powered electric vehicles being marketed or used as e-bikes despite operating more like motorized bicycles or motorcycles. S.F. 3236 included a series of bipartisan proposals to clarify definitions for micromobility devices, motorcycles, and motorized bicycles; distinguish lower-speed electric-assisted bicycles from higher-powered vehicles; require clear labeling of speed capabilities and motor wattage; establish electrical safety standards; require helmets for e-bike riders under age 18; expand crash reporting requirements; restrict motorized bicycles from sidewalks and shared- use paths; create a motorized bicycle safety coordinator within the Department of Public Safety; and fund public education, crash reporting system updates, and driver’s manual changes. Although the bill did not become law, its Senate passage reflected growing legislative attention to e-bike and micromobility safety issues. TAXES AND LOCAL REVENUE AUTHORITY MLC supported key tax priorities, including preserving local option sales tax authority for regional projects, opposing tax equalization measures and restrictive approval or spacing requirements, allowing metro parks and trails as pre-approved uses, and adding a CPI inflation adjustment so cities can fully fund planned projects. MLC also engaged on the 2026 omnibus tax bill. The final package included federal conformity provisions, property tax relief, Department of Revenue technical changes, public finance provisions, several city-specific tax increment financing provisions, and extensions of county environmental response fund authorities. However, MLC was disappointed that the final agreement did not include any new local option sales tax authorizations or broader local revenue authority for communities seeking voter-approved tools to fund local infrastructure, public safety, parks, and community facilities. Despite continued discussions throughout session, those provisions were ultimately left out of the final agreement. The tax bill included a targeted property tax relief package, anchored by a one-time 14.88% increase in homeowner homestead credit refunds for property taxes payable in 2026. According to the Department of Revenue, the increase is estimated to cost $125 million and provide an average additional refund of about $213 to approximately 588,000 homeowners. The bill also includes more targeted property tax provisions, including seasonal tax base replacement aid to reduce school referendum levies, modified exemptions for certain Fond du Lac Band-owned properties, increased tier thresholds for class 1c homestead resort property, and a one-year LGA adjustment for Northern Township. Overall, MLC’s work during the 2026 session helped shape major housing, public safety, transportation safety, and tax debates. While significant housing investments moved forward, Page 433 of 485 Page | 9 the most sweeping land use preemption proposals did not advance. MLC’s engagement helped preserve space for local decision-making, supported targeted strategies to address housing needs across Minnesota, advanced public safety measures important to communities and local officials, elevated emerging e-bike and micromobility safety concerns, and continued to advocate for flexible local revenue tools that reflect the needs of Minnesota cities. *** Below is a summary of legislation MLC was engaged in that passed, proposals that did not advance, and other bills of interest to MLC members. Housing Production and Affordability: DID NOT PASS: HF 3895 (Igo/Howard) | SF 4123 (Port) – Starter Homes Act The bill creates a new law restricting local government zoning authority over certain housing types. It mandates that municipalities allow mixed housing and accessory dwelling units in specific proportions and locations, limits design and lot size requirements, requires streamlined administrative approvals, and prevents the use of interim ordinances to block these changes. PASSED: SF 1750 (Lucero) | HF1268 (Bahner) – HOA Reform Bill The bill updates and expands Minnesota law to provide additional protections and rights for unit owners in common interest communities, including new limits on fines, fees, and foreclosure actions by associations; mandatory dispute resolution processes; transparency and procedural requirements for meetings and rule changes; conflict of interest rules for board members; and prohibitions on local governments requiring the creation of HOAs as a condition of development. DID NOT PASS: HF 2687 (Agbaje) | SF 3173 (Boldon) - Prohibit private equity company ownership of single-family homes-prohibition of corporate ownership This bill prohibits private equity companies from having a direct or indirect ownership interest in single-family homes in Minnesota, effective August 1, 2026. The prohibition does not apply to private equity companies with ownership interests in fewer than 100 single- family homes, but such entities must disclose ownership and financial information upon request by the Attorney General. DID NOT PASS: HF 3279 (Howard) | SF 2621 (Mohamed) – Constitutional Amendment proposal to increase the sales tax rate by three-eighths of one percent and dedicating the receipts for housing purposes This bill proposes a constitutional amendment to increase Minnesota's sales and use tax and dedicate the resulting revenue to three new funds supporting homeownership, rental, and community stability initiatives. The measure creates and codifies the establishment, purposes, allowable expenditures, and oversight mechanisms for the Homeownership Opportunity Fund, the Community and Household Stability Fund, and the Rental Opportunity Fund. Page 434 of 485 Page | 10 PASSED (IN OMNIBUS) HF 3806 (Howard) | SF 3839 (Port) - Housing Infrastructure Bonds The bill amends state law to permit the issuance of up to $200 million in new housing infrastructure bonds, with the necessary funds for annual debt service to be automatically appropriated from the general fund each year until 2049. The legislation establishes a new subdivision for this additional bond authorization and ensures the commissioner of management and budget will transfer the required funds annually to the housing infrastructure bond account. DID NOT PASS: SF 4867 (Port) – Local Affordable Housing Aid Distribution The bill changes the distribution formula for metropolitan sales tax proceeds by removing the 25% allocation to the metropolitan city aid account and reallocating that portion to the metropolitan county aid account, which will now receive 75% of the proceeds. Additionally, the statutory language referencing metropolitan city aid account funding from the sales tax is removed, limiting its funding to other sources such as donations or transfers. Public Safety: PASSED: HF 3404 (Klevorn) | SF 3735 (Hoffman) – Penalties for Impersonating a Police Officer The bill increases penalties for impersonating a peace officer in Minnesota, making it a felony in most circumstances and establishing harsher punishments for aggravated offenses, repeat violations, or acts involving firearms. Acts that result in the increased penalty are gaining access to certain buildings, directing someone to take a certain action or refrain from acting, violating the provisions related to vehicle lights and sirens, and operating a vehicle marked with “police” or a similar marking indicating the vehicle is a law enforcement vehicle. It also requires law enforcement officers to identify themselves by name, agency, and badge number under most circumstances, with certain exemptions for undercover operations. Local Sales Tax Bypass for Regional Projects: DID NOT PASS: SF4690 (Rest) – Department of Revenue Policy and Technical Bill • Provides phased “transition aid” to cities and towns that lost property tax base due to statutory changes, with support decreasing annually until expiration in 2020 to allow for budget adjustment. • Eliminates the requirement for cities to submit ordinances establishing special service districts or housing improvement areas to the commissioner of revenue, streamlining local administration and reducing state oversight. • Shifts certain local property tax reporting, including tax increment financing (TIF) plans, from the commissioner of revenue to the state auditor. • Repeals and amends outdated special district incentives and local property tax exemptions tied to Job Opportunity Building Zones and similar programs. • Updates the definition of “net income” for composite returns to incorporate additions and subtractions related to accelerated and deferred installment sale gains under section 290.0137. Page 435 of 485 Page | 11 • Removes obsolete property tax provisions, including valuation exclusions for certain business improvements, outdated agricultural property tax provisions, and expired transition or special tax aids. • Revises sales tax administration by updating revenue distribution, clarifying treatment of motor vehicle parts sales tax, and refining Department of Revenue procedures. • Contains no new appropriations or funding, focusing instead on repeals, clean-up, and administrative changes. DID NOT PASS: SF 4262 (Putnam) | HF 3657 (Norris) - Property Tax Task Force This bill establishes a property tax task force charged with investigating methods to reduce property tax on homestead properties and to present legislative options, including at least one with minimal general fund impact. The task force must analyze the effectiveness of existing tax relief mechanisms, classification rates, and trends in property tax burdens across property types and regions. The composition, duties, and reporting requirements of the task force are specified, with a final report due by February 1, 2027, after which the task force expires. Transportation: DID NOT PASS: HF 4111 (Koznick) | SF 4326 (Hoffman) Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Transit Service Consolidation and Implementation The bill centralizes the operation of all public transit services in the Twin Cities metropolitan area under the Metropolitan Council, prohibiting local governments from independently operating transit services after July 1, 2027, except under agreement with the Council. It creates new statutory requirements for service performance reports and fiscal impact analyses, sunsets authority for replacement service programs on June 30, 2027, and establishes a task force to guide and report on the implementation process. The bill also mandates a study and report on options to enhance bus service in affected communities. DID NOT PASS: HF 3513 (Koznick) | SF 4010 (Johnson-Stewart) - Autonomous vehicles This bill creates new statutory definitions for autonomous vehicles and automated driving systems, sets statewide requirements for the operation of autonomous vehicles (including those without a human driver), establishes insurance and financial responsibility standards, regulates on-demand autonomous vehicle networks, modifies requirements for commercial autonomous vehicles, and preempts local regulation specific to autonomous vehicles or networks. Broadband: DID NOT PASS: Allow cities to franchise broadband/Internet providers in the public right- of-way E-Bike Safety: DID NOT PASS: SF 3236 (Johnson-Stewart) | HF 2811 (Myers) – Helmet Requirement for Minors on E-Bicycles Page 436 of 485 Page | 12 The legislation introduces a new requirement for minors (under 18) to wear helmets approved by the commissioner of public safety while operating electric-assisted bicycles. It also establishes a fine for non-compliance. DID NOT PASS: SF 3280 (Johnson-Stewart) | HF 2859 (Acomb) – Local E-Bike Speed Limits The bill allows that a local unit of government may adopt an ordinance to set a posted maximum speed limit for the operation of an electric-assisted bicycle within a business district in a local unit of government's jurisdiction. An ordinance adopted under this section may specify the circumstances under which a posted maximum speed limit is effective for the operation of electric-assisted bicycles. A speed limit adopted under this section is effective upon the erection of appropriate signs designating the speed and indicating the beginning and end of the segment on which the speed limit is established. Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) in Economic Development DID NOT PASS: HF4077 (Greenman)/ SF4379 (Maye Quade) - NDAs This bill would prohibit NDAs for economic development activities across municipalities, school districts, and related entities. Local Government Aid: DID NOT PASS: Support more frequent program reviews to reflect growing financial needs of all cities, including those not currently receiving LGA Sales Tax Expansion DID NOT PASS: The Governor’s supplemental budget proposal revives expansion of the sales tax to professional services – language has not yet been introduced. Digital Advertising Tax DID NOT PASS: HF 4343 (Lee) would impose a tax on digital advertising, modeled after laws in Maryland and Washington (both under litigation). Pensions PASSED: The omnibus pensions bill establishes a Work Group on Duty Disability and the Public Safety Officer’s Benefit Account to recommend reforms to Police and Fire Plan duty disability benefits and help ensure duty-disabled or retired members have access to affordable health insurance, with recommendations due to the Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement by March 1, 2027. Page 437 of 485 Page | 13 III. Legislation of Interest That Passed Housing and Homelessness Prevention Bill H.F. 1141 Representative Howard / Senator Port Chapter 100 Effective Date: Various The 2026 Omnibus Housing and Homelessness Prevention Bill provide $165 million in housing investments and is projected to support the creation of more than 2,000 housing units statewide. The package authorizes $100 million in Housing Infrastructure Bonds (HIBs) for housing development projects across Minnesota and includes significant investments in homelessness prevention, workforce housing, supportive housing, manufactured housing infrastructure, and housing stability initiatives. The agreement also includes new transparency and reporting requirements for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA), limitations on administrative retentions for certain grant programs through FY2028, and policy changes related to public assistance eligibility and local housing investment authority. The bill uses interest earnings and reallocates unspent funds previously reserved for the Tyler Settlement to support housing initiatives, provide debt service for $100 million in Housing Infrastructure Bonds, and fund an additional $40 million for the Family Homeless Prevention and Assistance Program (FHPAP). The final conference committee report was repassed by the House by a 105-28 vote, and the Senate by a 42-25 vote. Several higher-profile policy proposals debated throughout session, including statewide zoning reforms, private equity ownership restrictions, HOA-related provisions, and manufactured housing tenant protections, were ultimately not included in the final agreement. Appropriations The legislation includes targeted one-time and ongoing investments focused on housing production, homelessness prevention, supportive housing, infrastructure improvements, and housing stability. Major appropriations include: • $100 million in Housing Infrastructure Bonds (HIBs) for statewide housing development projects • $40 million for the Family Homeless Prevention and Assistance Program (FHPAP) • $25 million in FY2027 from investment earnings in the state housing development fund to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency to support the following housing programs and initiatives: o $14.275 million for the Greater Minnesota Workforce Housing Development Program o $4 million for supportive housing programs o $4 million for manufactured home park infrastructure grants Page 438 of 485 Page | 14 o $425,000 for statewide tenant education and hotline services o $150,000 for the homeownership education program o $150,000 for the Minnesota Nice HomeShare pilot program in St. Louis County to support collaborative housing opportunities for older adults Return of Unused Tax-Forfeited Settlement Appropriation (“Tyler Settlement”) The bill redirects unused funds from the state’s tax-forfeited lands settlement to housing and homelessness prevention efforts. Any money remaining from the 2024 settlement appropriation that is not needed to resolve claims must be returned to the state and canceled back to the General Fund by June 29, 2026. After reserving $2 million, the remaining balance is appropriated to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency in FY2027 for the Family Homeless Prevention and Assistance Program (FHPAP). The funding is available on a one-time basis and may be distributed flexibly to federally recognized Tribal governments, current grantees, and former grantees based on community need, organizational capacity, and geographic distribution. The law also gives the agency broad flexibility to issue advance payments and redistribute unused funds among grantees to maximize program effectiveness. All funds must be expended by December 31, 2026. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Provisions This article makes several policy changes related to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA), including new transparency requirements, limits on how agency funds may be used, reporting requirements, and expanded authority for certain housing-related investments. It also clarifies that certain payments to people with lived experience do not count against eligibility for means-tested public programs. • Additional Investment Authority: o Expands the types of entities that certain local governments may invest in to include companies focused on local multifamily housing development • Housing and Redevelopment Authorities: o Gives housing and redevelopment authorities the same investment authority as the local governments they are connected to • Approval: o Allows qualifying local governments to use an investment policy, in addition to other existing documents, to meet the approval requirements for these investments. • Meetings by Interactive Technology: o Requires MHFA to livestream its board meetings and keep recordings available online • Service Charges: o Limits MHFA’s ability to retain a portion of state appropriations for administrative costs. The agency may only do so if its investment earnings are not enough to cover those costs, and it must notify legislative housing committee leaders before retaining any funds. This provision sunsets in 2028 Page 439 of 485 Page | 15 • Housing Development Fund Use: o Clarifies that money in MHFA’s housing development fund must be used for housing purposes and cannot be transferred for other uses • Separate Accounts and Transfers: o Requires MHFA to distribute investment earnings from state appropriations according to the new requirements in the bill. It also requires MHFA to notify legislative housing committee leaders before transferring money between accounts holding legislative appropriations • Housing Development Fund Report: o Expands MHFA’s reporting requirements to include more detail on agency operating costs, staffing, investment earnings, use of investment income, unspent balances, and projected biennial costs • Required Use of Investment Earnings: o Requires MHFA to calculate how much investment income remains after accounting for projected administrative costs and then use 25 percent of that amount in each biennium for state-appropriated housing programs. The money must be used for purposes similar to the original appropriation • Appropriations Available Until Expended: o Removes obsolete language and clarifies that income from state appropriations may only be used for administrative costs tied to programs that receive state appropriations • Program Money Transfers: o Requires MHFA to provide written notice to legislative housing committee leaders before transferring money between programs funded by state appropriations. The notice must also be submitted to the Legislative Reference Library • Eligible Recipient: o Expands eligibility for the local public housing program so that counties and cities may receive loans through the program • Lived-Experience Engagement Exemption: o Clarifies that payments made to people who provide lived-experience feedback or help review MHFA proposals do not count as income, assets, or property for certain means-tested state programs • Legislative Fiscal Staff Access: o Requires MHFA to report by February 15, 2027, on how legislative fiscal staff could be given access to the agency’s accounting system • Housing Development Fund Expenditures Beginning in FY2028: o Allows MHFA’s use of investment income for Housing Infrastructure Bond debt service to count toward the amount of investment income the agency is required to spend in the upcoming biennium Page 440 of 485 Page | 16 Tax Omnibus Bill S.F. 5052 Senator Rest / Representative Gomez Chapter 128 Effect Dates: Various The 2026 Tax Omnibus Bill makes numerous provisions to areas such as conforming to federal tax statute, economic development, workforce, property tax relief, homeless aid, and a new tax on fraud. This bill does not include local option sales tax provisions. Federal Tax Conformity • Updates Minnesota’s tax code to conform with several recent changes to the Internal Revenue Code enacted at the federal level • Conforms Minnesota tax law to recent federal changes, including expensing and dependent care provisions • Applies updated Internal Revenue Code references to property tax refunds and estate tax provisions Individual Income and Corporate Franchise Taxes • Narrows eligibility criteria for sustainable aviation fuel to meet federal and environmental standards • Uncaps the $4 million beginning farmer credit allocation for tax year 2026 • Extends the expiration of the pass-through entity tax (PTET) for tax years 2026 and 2027 Sales and Use Taxes • Championship golf tournaments; sales tax exemption: Provides a sales tax exemption for the sale of admission to a world championship golf tournament sponsored by the Professional Golfer’s Association of America. The exemption expires on July 1, 2030 • Allows businesses in a tourism improvement district to collect the service charge from purchasers if it is separately stated on the invoice, bill or sale, or similar document Property Taxes: • Establishes seasonal tax base replacement aid • Modifies a property tax exemption for a property in Duluth owned by the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa • Establishes a property tax exemption for a property in Cloquet owned by the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa • Allows Northern Township to be eligible for local government aid in 2027; • Increases the tier thresholds for class 1c homestead resort property • Provides a one-time increase in the homestead credit refund Page 441 of 485 Page | 17 Tax Increment Financing • Clarifies the conditions under which authorities must either: o Return increment in excess of tax increment financing costs approved in a tax increment financing plan; or o Modify their tax increment financing plans • Provides an extension to 2028 for Eden Prairie to establish a tax increment financing plan under prior special legislation • Allows a Chaska redevelopment district to last ten years longer than the generally applicable limit, collecting up to 36 years of tax increment Public Finance • Shortens the notice period prior to issuing county transportation bonds from 14 days to 10 days, consistent with the notice periods applicable to other local government bonds Miscellaneous • Allows information sharing between the Financial Crimes and Fraud Section (FCFS) of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and the Department of Revenue • Provides for information sharing between the Office of the Inspector General and commissioner of revenue • Modifies the conditions under which taxpayers can file a claim for a refund • Penalty for failure to file, or fraudulent return, evasion o Allows the commissioner to impose a penalty equal to 100 percent of the amount attributable to fraud • Extends Ramsey County’s authority to impose a mortgage registry and deed tax from the end of 2028 to the end of 2036 • Extends Hennepin County’s authority to impose a mortgage registry and deed tax from the end of 2028 to the end of 2036 • Appropriates $500,000 onetime in FY 2027 to the commissioner of Commerce to conduct a nuclear energy study to inform policy makers about potential impacts of new nuclear generation on the public interest in Minnesota • Transfers, Returns and Appropriations: o Transfers $15,000,000 from the Minnesota forward fund account to the general fund in fiscal year 2027 o Transfers $75,000,000 from the driver and vehicle services operating account to the general fund in fiscal year 2027 o Returns up to $40,000,000 in the possession of a claims administrator handling settlement of claims against the state to the general fund Page 442 of 485 Page | 18 o Appropriates $38,000,000 in fiscal year 2026 from the general fund to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for the family homeless assistance and prevention program Department of Revenue – Income and Corporate Franchise Taxes • Modifies the definition of net income to reference: o the addition of accelerated gains in the tax year in which the gain was recognized o the exclusion of accelerated gains in tax years after the accelerated gain was recognized • Clarifies that the exclusion of previously taxed accelerated gains applies both to composite Minnesota tax returns and to individual income tax returns Department of Revenue – Property Taxes • Removes statutory reference to special property tax programs previously applicable to properties that suffered flood damage in 1997 and 2002 • Repeals a requirement that local governments establishing tourism improvement districts provide a copy of the ordinance establishing the district to the Department of Revenue Omnibus Public Safety Policy Bill SF 4760 Senator Latz / Representative Novotny Chapter 97 Effective Dates: Various The omnibus public safety policy bill made a broad range of statutory changes related to crime victims, domestic violence response, law enforcement administration, criminal history and public employment, corrections, fraud enforcement, first responder benefits, and public safety infrastructure. For cities, the bill is relevant both operationally and administratively, with provisions affecting local law enforcement practices, public safety vehicle transfers, domestic abuse reporting, public employment decisions, and long-term planning for emergency radio communications. The package also reflects continued legislative focus on strengthening victim protections, modernizing criminal law, responding to emerging public safety risks, and supporting first responders and public safety agencies across the state. Public Safety Provisions • Includes provisions from the Department of Public Safety Policy bill which includes: o Classifies data relating to research participants maintained by DPS Office of OJP as private data on individuals o Updates terminology and changes terms related to battered women throughout statute to domestic abuse victims Page 443 of 485 Page | 19 o Requires the Office for Missing and Murdered Indigenous Relatives to provide case support to victims and families of MMIR relatives or the reporting person, and classifies data collected by the office related to case support duties as private data on individuals o Requires the Office for Missing and Murdered Black Women and girls to provide case support to victim and families or the reporting person, and classifies data collected by the office related to case support duties as private data on individuals Crime Victim Provisions • Eliminates the requirement for a victim to be specifically identified in a prosecutor’s petition for a sentence adjustment • Expands the protection over victim identify to include the crime of using a minor in a sexual performance • Establishes a procedure during plea and sentencing hearing for the judge to inquire of the prosecutor if the victims have been notified of the hearing, are present, if they have received their statutorily required notifications and if they wish to be heard • Includes protections against employer retaliation provided to victims of violent crime to include stalking victims • Requires prosecutors to notify victims when an offense is eligible for automatic expungement Impaired Drivers License Changes • Classifies data for various indicators and designations on a DL or MN ID card as private data on individuals, which prevents DPS from disseminating that information to the public or to any other parts unless the department has specific authorization • Lengthens the period a temporary driver’s license is effective when a peace officer is revoking the license at a DWI scene from 7 to 14 days Identity Theft/Financial Crimes • Allows BCA to issue administrative subpoenas for financial crimes and fraud and prohibits the recipient of such subpoena from disclosing it was issued or that records were produced in response to the subpoena • Directs the DPS Commissioner to report information received from the Department of Commerce regarding investigation into suspected insurance fraud to the BCA • Amends the definition of identity in statute to criminalize identity theft and include a voice, likeness, including a forged digital likeness • Establishes a statute of limitation to begin when the victim or law enforcement agency is aware of the fraud or ten years after the act occurred for the following offenses; Page 444 of 485 Page | 20 violation of securities fraud, fraudulent certificate of title, failure to pay state funds, theft by swindle, receiving stolen property, and fraudulent statements Corrections Policy • Updated jail medication statute to require facilities to administer the same medications prescribed to inmates prior to incarceration when the facility verifies the medications are current and valid • Requires certain documentation for efforts to verify, reasonable efforts to consult • Allows for emergency situations when medical or mental health circumstances require change in medication • Changes reporting requirements for MINNCOR when partnering with private business, adds calculations of profitability for reporting and wage information by region that must be posted on a public website • Prohibits the commissioner of corrections from placing an offender on supervision abatement until the offender pays all court-ordered restitution provided the offender has the ability to pay but engages in willful nonpayment • Creates a Community Supervision Workgroup to study and make recommendations on statutory changes needed to clarify roles, responsibilities and obligations of supervision delivery systems when a county transitions between state-operated and county-operated community supervision system; report due December 15, 2026 • Includes various updates and rulemaking authority to the DOC for licensing and inspecting juvenile and adult community-based residential corrections facilities, which include: o Inspection obligation updates, at least every two years, publish report o Allows for two-year licenses to local facilities o Requires local facilities to provide data per statute and notify deaths or critical incidents o Requires a death review team for deaths in juvenile facilities o Outlines corrections orders, conditional licenses, review of determinations and revocation notices and procedures o Mandates biennial security audits Criminal Law Changes • Adds the intentional deception of a minor by an adult to facilitate a crime as an aggravating factor applicable to felony sentencing • Adds a reference to the unintentional murder statute referencing an order of protection to include similar designations of that order in other states, tribal lands, DC and Canada Page 445 of 485 Page | 21 • Requires sheriffs and law enforcement officers or their designees to make reasonable effort to notify the petitioner of a harassment, restraining order before or immediately after service the respondent will be or had been served with the order Criminal History • Authorizes disqualifying a person from public employment based on a criminal conviction regardless of whether the applicant shows evidence of rehabilitation and present fitness to perform duties of the position • Amends the standard for showing that a person who committed a crime is eligible for public employment to clarify that the factors relate to both evidence of rehabilitation and present fitness • Removes a distinction between documentary evidence from certain third parties and other evidence presented for consideration • Clarifies that the limits related to reapplication for employment or licensing relate only to application for hiring or licensing authority as defined in statute Domestic Abuse • Allows a court process for domestic abuse victims to remove themselves from a shared wireless plan • Amends the reporting requirement for the independent Use of Force Investigations Unit in the BCA to require information about the number of incidents that began with a law enforcement response to suspected or alleged domestic abuse • Changes the definition of domestic abuse case to require prosecutors to establish plans and procedures for handling domestic abuse cases • Adds harassment and stalking committed against a family or household member, a violation of a harassment or restraining order committed against a family or household member, and a violation of a DANCO to the list of cases that qualify as a domestic abuse case • Requires a peace officer to make a written report and share that report with the alleged victim, the victim’s attorney, and designated agencies that provides services to victims of domestic abuse when the officer investigates an offense against a family or household member that is a qualified domestic violence-related offense • Requires the head of a law enforcement entity to report to DPS on incidents that a responding peace officer believes involved domestic violence and requires specific information in the report • Mandates a report to the legislature summarizing and analyzing the information provided by the heads of law enforcement entities (above) annually and allows this information to be included in the Department’s annual uniform crime report • Clarifies the existing requirement that a person arrested under suspicion of violating an OFP or DANCO must be held until the person’s first court appearance Page 446 of 485 Page | 22 • Requires prosecutors to present certain information to a judge when the judge is considering the terms of the release for a person charged with an offense related to domestic abuse, allows them to submit information through the e-filing system and then requires a judge to make certain findings Prediction Markets • Defines, prohibits, and establishes penalties for creating, operating, and participating in the business prediction markets • Institutes a felony for advertising or marketing financial or technological products Judicial Officials • Adds the Department of Employment and Economic Development Unemployment Insurance and Paid Leave Appeals Division judges to the definition of judicial official for safety and security protections established in law First Responders • Requires vehicles owned or leased by a state or local law enforcement agency to remove any equipment or insignia that could mislead a reasonable person to believe the vehicle is a law enforcement vehicle prior to sale or transfer (ie emergency lights, emblems, etc. o Exceptions exist for sale or transfer between state, local, and federal agencies o Creates civil penalties for failure to follow the statute • Adds death from an exposure-related infectious disease or an exposure-related cancer to the definition of killed in the line of duty for purposes of determining public safety officer survivor benefits eligibility o Provides definitions of the terms nonroutine strenuous or stressful physical activity for purposes of evaluating whether cardiac-related deaths meet the statutory definition of killed in the line of duty o Expands eligibility for line of duty death benefits to certain part-time and paid on-call firefighters and also includes persons separated from service due to a disability o Provides further guidance on what is and is not routine activity for the purposes of determining eligibility for survivor benefits • Creates a Task Force to Establish Statewide Network Funding for Public Safety Radio Communications and Infrastructure to evaluate and make recommendations for transitioning the ARMER network and related interoperable communications to a statewide, state-funded framework o Requires the task force must submit a report to the chairs, cochairs, and ranking minority members of the legislative committees and divisions with jurisdiction over ARMER funding by February 15, 2027 Page 447 of 485 Page | 23 Human Rights Adds a 30-day timeline for decision by the Commissioner of Human Rights following their determination to advance a matter to the Court of Administrative Hearings Impersonating a Police Officer H.F. 3404 Representative Klevorn / Senator Hoffman Chapter 98 Effective Date: August 1, 2026 The Legislature unanimously passed legislation increasing penalties for impersonating a peace officer and creating additional penalties when impersonation is used to gain access, issue unlawful directions, misuse emergency lights or sirens, operate a vehicle that appears to be a law enforcement vehicle, possess a firearm, or commit another crime. The bill makes basic impersonation with intent to mislead a felony punishable by up to two years in prison, a $4,000 fine, or both. Impersonation involving specified buildings, vehicles, lights, sirens, or unlawful directions is punishable by up to five years in prison, a $10,000 fine, or both. Repeat violations within five years, or impersonation while possessing a firearm, are punishable by up to ten years in prison, a $20,000 fine, or both. The bill also creates enhanced penalties when another crime is committed while impersonating a peace officer and requires law enforcement officers to identify their agency, last name, and identification number under most circumstances. The new provisions are effective August 1, 2026, and apply to crimes committed on or after that date. Capital Investment General Obligations Bill: H.F. 719 Representative Franson / S.F. 390 Senator Pappas Chapter: 130 Cash Bill: H.F. 2484 Representative F. Lee/ Senator Pappas Chapter: 129 The 2026 bonding bill emerged as one of the larger negotiated infrastructure packages in recent years, totaling $1.24 billion despite earlier expectations that the bill could be significantly smaller. The final agreement exceeded both Governor Walz’s $907 million recommendation and the House Speaker’s initial position that the package would not surpass $1 billion, reflecting the scale of statewide infrastructure needs and the political pressure created by more than $3.19 billion in project requests. The general obligation bonds bill funds a broad range of capital investments across Minnesota, including $420 million for water infrastructure, $177 million for transportation, and $75 million for the University of Minnesota. The agreement also included motor vehicle registration tax changes negotiated by legislative leaders and Governor Walz which did not impact sales tax but reduced the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund by $119 million in Fiscal Year 2027 and $135 million in Fiscal Year 2028. Page 448 of 485 Page | 24 In addition to the traditional general obligation bonding bill, the legislature passed a cash bill to support projects across Minnesota. This bill represents a $46.47 million cash appropriation from the general fund for various projects including a new study on the unlawful shipment of infectious waste. It also includes five cancellations of previous appropriations that limit the bill to $28.7 million in new spending and provides corrections to language for past projects. Temporary Tab Fee Reduction (January 1, 2027 – December 31, 2027) The bonding bill included a one-year reduction in Minnesota vehicle registration taxes, commonly referred to as tab fees. For taxes paid in 2027, the registration tax rate will temporarily return to the pre-2023 rate of 1.285%, down from the current 1.575% rate enacted as part of the 2023 transportation funding package. The reduction is expected to provide approximately $250 million to $254 million in statewide relief to Minnesota vehicle owners for one year. After the temporary reduction expires, the higher registration tax structure is expected to resume unless the Legislature acts again. Notable Appropriation for Cities For cities, the capital investment package reflects both the importance of state support for local infrastructure and the continued challenge of meeting local needs within a constrained bonding and transportation funding environment. The bill included substantial funding for city and local infrastructure needs across the state, with major investments in water and sewer systems, local roads and bridges, public safety facilities, housing, flood mitigation, and economic development. City-related funding included: • $345 million for specific city water and sewer projects • $137 million for Public Facilities Authority water and sewer programs • Approximately $100 million for specific city economic development projects • $54 million for specific city transportation projects • $47 million for local road improvement projects • $25 million for local bridge replacement • $17.5 million for public housing support • $15 million for metropolitan-area inflow and infiltration projects • $15 million for specific city dam, impoundment, and river crossing projects • $13 million for city public safety projects • $9 million for flood hazard mitigation grants • $5 million for metropolitan-area tree planting • $4.5 million for the local road wetland replacement program • $2 million for Greater Minnesota Business Development Public Infrastructure grants • $1.8 million for drinking water regionalization planning MLC Cities Appropriations • Public Facilities Authority Page 449 of 485 Page | 25 o $6,100,000 - Apple Valley, Water Treatment Plant Improvements • Minnesota Historical Society o $300,000 - Heroes and Heritage Interpretive Trail Loop in Dakota County • Public Safety o $2,000,000 – Eden Prairie; Public Safety Garage and Storage Facility o $2,000,000 – Golden Valley, Fire Station o $2,500,000 – Minnetonka; Fire Station • Department of Transportation o $4,300,000 – Anoka County; TH 65 Interchange o $6,000,000 - Dakota County; Road 50 o $3,000,000 – Savage; Highway 13 Road Improvements o $1,200,000 – Scott County; I-35 Interchange o $10,100,000 - Washington County; CSAH 18 and CSAH 19 Intersection • Employment and Economic Development o $2,500,000 – Chanhassen; Community Center o $5,000,000 – Plymouth; City Center o $4,000,000 – Shakopee; Innovation Hub o $2,000,000 – Woodbury; La Lake Park • Public Facilities Authority o $3,000,000 - Apple Valley Water Treatment Plant Improvements o $4,000,000 - Bloomington North Central Sanitary Sewer Project o $2,750,000 – Burnsville; Water Treatment Plant Other Notable Appropriations – General Obligation Bill • University of Minnesota o $40,000,000 – Asset Preservation o $35,000,000 – Magrath Campus Center Phase 1 • Minnesota State Colleges and Universities o $64,612,000 – Asset Preservation o $4,000,000 – Alexandria Technical and Community College o $1,200,000 – Southwest Minnesota State University • Education o $2,000,000 – Library Construction Grants o $6,500,000 – East Grand Forks; Education Learning Center • $1,700,000 – Minnesota State Academies • $1,300,000 – Perpich Center for the Arts • Natural Resources o $30,000,000 – Natural Resources Asset Preservation o $3,000,000 – Betterment of Building o $1,400,000 – Betterment of Public Lands o $2,000,000 – Aviation Infrastructure Page 450 of 485 Page | 26 o $1,000,000 – Accessibility o $19,840,000 – Flood Hazard Mitigation o $2,000,000 – State Trail Renovation o $3,500,000 – Reforestation • Pollution Control Agency o $1,500,000 – Statewide Drinking Water Contamination Mitigation Program o $10,514,000 – Solid Waste Capital Assistance Grant Program • Board of Water and Soil o $4,500,000 – Local Government Roads Wetland Replacement Program o $2,000,000 – Reinvest in Minnesota Reserve Program • $1,380,000 – Agriculture • $9,000,000 – Minnesota Zoological Garden • Administration o $10,000,000 – Capital Asset Preservation and Replacement Account o $800,000 – Capital Area Trees • Amateur Sports Commission o $4,500,000 – Asset Preservation o $750,000 – Mighty Ducks • Military Affairs o $3,500,000 – Duluth Hangar o $2,300,000 – Asset Preservation • Department of Transportation o $50,000,000 – Local Road Improvement Program o $25,000,000 – Local Bridge Replacement Program o $1,000,000 – Highway Rail Grade Crossings o $1,000,000 – Safe Routes to School • Metropolitan Council o $15,000,000 - Metropolitan Cities Inflow and Infiltration Grants o $10,000,000 - Metropolitan Regional Parks and Trails o $5,000,000 - Community Tree Planting Grants o $500,000 – Champlin; Elm Creek Greenway o $6,000,000 - Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board; North Commons Park o $1,500,000 – Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board; Cedar Riverside Recreation Center o $1,800,000 – Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board; Loring Park o $4,750,000 – Ramsey County; Boulevard Trail o $9,350,000 - Como Zoo o $2,931,000 – Washington County; Brown’s Creek State Trail Connection o $1,000,000 – Washington County; Hardwood Creek Regional Trail Extension • Human Services o $10 million - Emergency Shelter Facility Grants Page 451 of 485 Page | 27 • Direct Care and Treatment o $23,000,000 – Asset Preservation • Children, Youth, and Families o $2,000,000 – Early Childhood Learning Facilities Grants • Veterans Affairs o $15,000,000 – Asset Preservation o $17,200,000 – Minneapolis Veterans Home o $45,172,000 - Minnesota Veterans Home Hastings Campus • Corrections o $39,208,000 – Asset Preservation o $350,000 – Facility Consolidation o $10,712,000 – Minnesota Correctional Facility; Faribault o $1,872,000 – Clay County Jail; Juvenile Detention Facility • Employment and Economic Development o $2,000,000 – Greater Minnesota Business Development Public Infrastructure o $2,000,000 – Innovative Business Development Public Infrastructure o $2,000,000 – Transportation Economic Development Infrastructure o $2,000,000 – Woodbury; La Lake Park • Public Facilities Authority o $19,000,000 – State Match for Federal Grants to State Revolving Loan Program o $30,000,000 – Point Source Implementation Grants Program o $15,000,000 – Lead Service Line Replacement o $17,000,000 – Emerging Contaminants Grant Program • Minnesota Housing Finance Agency o $17,500,000 – Asset Preservation; Public Housing • Minnesota Historical Society o $5,000,000 – Historic Site Asset Preservation o $1,000,000 – County and Local Preservation Grants Other Notable Appropriations – Cash Bill • Minnesota State Colleges and Universities o $3,000,000 - Demolition and removal of obsolete buildings and infrastructure o $1,500,000 - Legislative engagement center • Department of Education o $808,000 - Lower Sioux Indian Community Indian Center and language immersion public charter school • Department of Natural Resources o $400,000 - Pickwick Mill Dam in Winona County • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency o $650,000 - Statewide Drinking Water Contamination Mitigation o $125,000 - Study on the unlawful shipment of infectious or pathological waste Page 452 of 485 Page | 28 • Department of Transportation o $400,000 - 70th Street Interchange in Washington County o $750,000 - Hortman Memorial Highway Signage along TH 610 o $2,900,000 - Ramsey County for North Metro Local Road Planning o $500,000 - Radar Infrastructure Grants • Department of Human Services o $550,000- Emergency Shelter Facilities • $2.3 million to the Minnesota Department of Health o $1,800,000 - Drinking Water Planning Grants o $500,000 - West Central Dental Resources for a critical access dental clinic • Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs o $350,000 - Stillwater Veterans Memorial • Department of Corrections o $2,300,000 - Asset preservation improvements • Department of Employment and Economic Development o $2,250,000 - South St. Paul for environmental remediation at the new Public Works Central Maintenance facility o $10,000,000 - Predesign and design of improvements to the Arena in St. Paul at the RiverCentre complex o $630,000 - St. Paul Port Authority for Capitol Area economic development grants o $1,000,000 - St. Paul Port Authority for improvements to the Heights Redevelopment Site o $1,000,000 - Bridge for Youth multiuse facility in Hennepin County o $1,000,000 - Center for Communication and Development in Minneapolis o $1,300,000- Neighborhood HealthSource for a new clinic in North Minneapolis • State Airports o $1,265,000 – Mankato Regional Airport o $2,000,000 – Duluth International Airport • Other Appropriations o $800,00 - CAAP Board, Melissa Hortman Memorial ▪ Tribute shall be incorporated into the design of a memorial garden on the State Office Building site by the Department of Administration o $3.8 million for an appropriation to the Minnesota Zoological Board to address an operational deficiency Miscellaneous Policy • Designates Trunk Highway 610 as “Hortman Memorial Highway” • Establishes Drinking Water Regionalization Planning and Assistance Grants o Defines eligible recipients and expenses, and criteria for grant administration o Requires a report to the legislature Page 453 of 485 Page | 29 • Requires the Commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency to conduct a study on the unlawful shipment of infectious or pathological waste including: o Assess the frequency of unlawful transfer of infectious or pathological waste o Survey current segregation practices and the costs associated with those practices o Recommendations for legislative or policy changes to reduce the frequency of unlawful transfers of pathological or infectious waste with costs estimates o Consider whether fines on infectious waste generators for noncompliance and unannounced inspections of infectious or pathological waste generators • Establishes Radar Infrastructure Grants o Appropriates funding for grants to political subdivisions for the acquisition, design, construction, and installation of mobile radar infrastructure and equipment to detect and track intruding aircraft and vessels, assist with drone traffic management and emergency response, enhance collision and obstruction avoidance for publicly owned airports and waterways • $17,760,000 - Cancellations for projects previously approved in prior bonding bills • Extends the appropriation for the Corridors of Commerce grant awarded to the improvements along TH 13 in Savage and Burnsville to June 30, 2029 Liquor Omnibus Policy Bill S.F. 2511 Senator Klein / Representative O’Driscoll Chapter 48 Effective Date: Various The Liquor Bill updates statewide alcohol regulations including new liquor license permits for the Science Museum, Union Depot, the University of Minnesota and establishes a food truck liquor pilot program for private events. The bill creates a “Granny Happy Hour,” and allows alcohol at certain care facilities. Allowable personal direct wine shipping limits are increased to four cases annually, and seasonal limits are removed for resort licenses. Items that are nonalcoholic can now be included in manufacturers’ marketing promotions. Policy Changes • Creates an exception allowing manufacture wholesalers who sell nonalcoholic products to continue selling those as long as those products are not used as an inducement to purchase alcoholic beverages • Nursing homes, assisted living facilities and boarding care homes may serve intoxicating liquor on the premises without a license or permit under 340A • The City of Saint Paul may issue an on-sale liquor licenses to the Science Museum and the Union Depot • DPS may issue liquor licenses to those with a concessions contract at the U of M Page 454 of 485 Page | 30 • The limit on seasonal on-sale licenses a county may issue is removed, and counties may issue seasonal on-sale licenses to resorts. Counties may issue on-sale malt licenses • Minneapolis is allowed to issue additional on-sale liquor licenses • Mankato, Rochester, Bloomington, St. Louis Park, and several other cities and counties are permitted to issued additional on-sale liquor licenses within certain requirements Cannabis Policy Bill S.F. 4401 Senator Dibble / Representative Hanson Chapter 123 Effective Date: Various The 2026 Cannabis Policy bill embraces significant reforms to Minnesota’s cannabis framework, addressing low dose hemp and cannabis packaging, allowing hemp businesses to also hold a cannabis license, and makes major changes to canopy size allowances. The bill streamlines and combines medical and adult‐use cannabis regulations creating a macro business license. It changes local governments’ regulation of these businesses and modifies penalties and studies. The bill passed both chambers after a standoff in the tied House related to canopy size and whether to allow increased investor ownership percentages in existing licensed cannabis businesses. While it passed on a 34-33 party line vote in the Senate, the bill passed the House with bi-partisan support 92-42. Hemp-Derived Products & Low-Potency Edibles • Allows a person, cooperative, or business that holds a hemp business license to also hold a cannabis license • Allows a cannabis or hemp business to occupy the same premises as another cannabis or hemp business if the businesses share the same majority owners. Allows transportation of regulated products between businesses sharing the same premises. Determines that businesses occupying the same premises are jointly liable for violations of cannabis statutes and regulations • Modifies cannabis packaging requirements by: (1) removing requirement that packaging or container must be plain, child resistant, tamper-evident, and opaque; (2) requiring cannabis flower to be prepackaged unless licensee has a cannabis flower packaging endorsement; (3) requiring cannabis products and lower-potency hemp edibles be prepackaged; and (4) setting packaging restrictions for containers containing multiple servings of a lower-potency hemp edible product intended to be consumed as a beverage • Removes required information for cannabis product labels, including the name and license number of licensed cultivator and statutorily required warning information. Allows the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) to establish warning requirements. Page 455 of 485 Page | 31 Excludes lower-potency hemp edibles from general cannabinoid product label requirements to make specific lower-potency hemp edible label requirements in another section. Establishes specific ratio hemp-infused cannabis product labeling requirement. Establishes separate labeling requirements for lower-potency hemp edibles • Allows OCM to issue an on-site consumption endorsement to a lower-potency hemp edible retailer that does not have an on-sale liquor license if the retailer submits proof of liability insurance • Introduces a hemp-infused cannabis product in the definition of “cannabis product.” • Allows the combination of cannabidiol, cannabigerol, cannabinol, and cannabichromene if each cannabinoid does not exceed 100 milligrams, and the combination does not exceed 400 milligrams in low dose hemp edibles • Creates a new definition of “ratio hemp-infused cannabis product” for products that contain cannabis and nonintoxicating hemp • Clarifies that lower-potency hemp edible manufacturers can only manufacture hemp- derived consumer products, not cannabis products • Includes unlicensed facilities where lower-potency hemp edibles are manufactured, processed, or sold to the list of facilities over which OCM has inspection authority. Allows OCM to assess civil penalties to unlicensed facilities and to treat the possession of any seized, embargoed, or detained product as the unlicensed business having sold that product • Establishes an edible cannabinoid product handler endorsement and a production of consumer products endorsement. Requires anyone who produces edible cannabis products or lower-potency hemp edibles or otherwise produces hemp-derived consumer products or cannabis products to obtain the appropriate endorsement • Allows OCM to approve THC in hemp-derived topical products. Prohibits hemp- derived topical products containing more than 0.3 percent total THC Local Control • Removes authority for local units of government to issue an interim ordinance on time, place, and manner of cannabis business operation. Requires local units of government to submit evidence of noncompliance if the local unit of government is informing OCM to not issue a license. Allows counties that issue retail registrations to develop a registration process if the process meets the same minimum requirements as local units of government • Clarifies that OCM may deny final license authorization if an applicants’ location would violate local zoning ordinances, the State Fire Code, or the State Building Code • Requires local governments with retail registration authority that perform compliance checks to submit certain data related to the compliance checks to OCM Page 456 of 485 Page | 32 Licensing, Civil, Criminal and Business Operations • Strikes the requirements for OCM to not issue a cannabis business license to a person or business that illegally sold cannabis or violated the cannabis chapter after August 1, 2023 • Requires OCM to not issue a cannabis business license to a person or business that violated the cannabis chapter unless the violation occurred under certain circumstances (good faith mistake, not gross negligence, no illegal sale of cannabis, didn’t cause harm to the public) Requires OCM to not issue a cannabis business license to a person or business who was assessed a fine for certain civil and criminal penalties • Modifies the true party of interest standard to allow: (1) a person who contracts with a city or county to operate no more than ten municipal cannabis stores; and (2) an individual who holds up to 33% ownership of up to four social equity businesses • Establishes an edible cannabinoid product handler endorsement and a production of consumer products endorsement. Requires anyone who produces edible cannabis products or lower-potency hemp edibles or otherwise produces hemp-derived consumer products or cannabis products to obtain the appropriate endorsement • Requires cannabis microbusinesses that operate a retail location or package cannabis flower to obtain the appropriate endorsement • Allows OCM to determine if a civil or regulatory violation disqualifies an individual from a hemp business license • Repeals several cannabis provisions from chapter 151 and a medical cannabis endorsement subdivision Medical Cannabis • Medical cannabis products are now defined as a cannabis product, and form restrictions are removed • Allows cannabis microbusinesses with a manufacturer endorsement to apply for and obtain a medical cannabis manufacturer endorsement if the business meets the medical cannabis manufacturing requirements Studies • Requires OCM to submit certain information in its annual market analysis, including: number of licenses issued; recommendations on number of licenses OCM should make available; supply and demand in the regulated market; impact of unregulated cannabis sales on the regulated market; and integrity of medical cannabis patient registry program. Allows OCM to solicit input to conduct market analysis • Strikes certain inclusions in the annual report to the legislature including information on drivers who admitted to using cannabis or hemp products but retains a narrower version of impaired-by-cannabis driving Page 457 of 485 Page | 33 • Requires OCM to collaborate with state agencies and certain organizations to support education, prevention, and public safety initiatives • Requires OCM to publish and submit a report to the legislature about administering a psilocybin therapeutic use program Elections Policy Bill H.F. 4240 Representative Freiberg / Senator Westlin Chapter 102 Effective Date: Various Absentee Voting Policy • When a full-time clerk of any city or town provides notice to the county auditor about the intent to administer an election, they must include information on whether the municipality’s office will be designated to administer voting starting on the 46th day before the election or the 18th day before the election • Eliminates the limitations on who may receive a sealed transmittal absentee voting envelope from an agent who has been designated to bring them a ballot Election Administration Policy • Allows clerks holding town elections in March to skip recording information in the statewide voter registration system • Requires the early voting official to maintain a printed copy of the voter certificate • Requires that in special elections conducted by a school district with boundaries that include more than one county, at least one polling place must be designated within each county in which more than 5,000 of the school district’s registered voters reside Candidate Policy • Prohibits elected officials and candidates from betting on elections • Establishes a misdemeanor if any candidate places a wager with a prediction market on the outcome of an election in which the candidate is running State Government Omnibus Bill H.F. 4591 Representative Nash / Senator Gustafson Chapter 119 Effective Date: Various The State Government Omnibus bill had a small budget target of less than $1 million. The funding in the bill focused on investing in base appropriations for agencies to coordinate with the Office of the Inspector General. The policy in the bill was limited with over half of the bill’s Page 458 of 485 Page | 34 text focused on restructuring the Board of Barber Examiners and the Board of Cosmetology Examiners. Final Global Budget Target FY2026-2027 - $925,000 FY2028-2029 - $8,000 State Government Appropriations • Increases a FY27 appropriation to the Office of the Inspector General from $1.875M to $2.139M • $561,000 in FY27 to Minnesota IT Services for operations that support data sharing between agencies, and the base appropriation is $1,272,000 • $1000,000 in FY27 for grants to the Association of Minnesota Public Educational Radio Stations • $86,000 in FY27 for the administrative costs of the Melissa and Mark Hortman Memorial State Park Working Group State Government Policy • Authorizes the Secretary of the Senate and the Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives to take limited actions during the legislative interim to maintain the administrative operations of their legislative bodies and the Legislative Coordinating Commission • Requires departments or agencies required by law to submit reports to legislators to submit the reports electronically • Extends the expiration dates for the Legislative Commission on Cybersecurity from December 31, 2028, to December 31, 2035 • Authorizes state agencies to round cash transactions to the nearest five-cent amount • Requires the Commissioner of Administration’s policies to include a grantee fraud risk rating system and to include a template summary page with all requests for proposals for state contracts • Eliminates the requirement that the that State employees be offered a high-deductible health benefit plan in the unrepresented and managerial plan • Establishes the Melissa and Mark Hortman Memorial State Park Working Group that is tasked with creating the Melissa and Mark Hortman Memorial State Park within the Capitol Area Page 459 of 485 Page | 35 Omnibus Pension Bill H.F. 4074 Representative Lillie / Senator Frentz Chapter 106 Effective Date: Various The three main areas of investment for the 2026 Pension Omnibus bill were the Police and Fire Plan, St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association, and supporting the creation of new pension plans for telecommunicators and probation officers. The new pension plans for probation and telecommunicators are based upon the work of the Probation and 911 Telecommunication Work Group established by the 2025 Pensions Omnibus bill. The bill also included administrative changes requested by the plans, increased COLA for the Correctional Plan, and two new work groups. Final Global Budget Target FY202-2027 - $15,411,000 FY2028-2029 - $25,560,000 Work Group on Duty Disability and the Public Safety Officer’s Benefit Account • Requires the Executive Director on Pensions and Retirement to establish a Work Group on Duty Disability and the Public Safety Officer’s Benefit Account for the purpose of recommending legislation that would: Reform duty disability for members of the Police and Fire Plan; and Ensure that members of the Police and Fire Plan who become duty disabled or retire have access to affordable health insurance coverage • Recommendations of the Work Group are due to the Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement by March 1, 2027 Work Group on Vesting and Emergency Medical Providers in Firefighter Relief Associations and the Statewide Volunteer Firefighter Plan • Requires the Executive Director of the Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement to convene a work group for the purpose of recommending legislation that would: Shorten the vesting schedule for firefighter relief association to a maximum of ten years; Require that firefighter relief associations include volunteer or paid on-call emergency medical providers as members on the same basis as volunteer or paid on-call firefighters; and Make the same changes to the PERA Statewide Volunteer Firefighter Plan as recommended • Draft legislation must be submitted to the Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement by January 29, 2027 Page 460 of 485 Page | 36 Probation and 911 Telecommunicator Retirement Subplan for MSRS Employees • Establishes a Probation and Telecommunicator Retirement Subplan of the MSRS General State Employees Retirement Plan effective January 1, 2027, which includes the below features: o Normal retirement at age 60 o Early retirement at age 55 o Increases employee contributions from 6 to 8.71% o Sets the employee contribution rate to 8% for the first 20 months of the plan o Allows for three-year cliff vesting o Includes a 1.9% multiplier o Allows members to purchase credit for past service o Establishes a Standing Review Committee at the Department of Corrections, Department of Public Safety, and the Metropolitan Council to review and determine positions and employees who should be covered in the new plan • Related trunk highway fund appropriation: o Dept. of Public Safety: $7,000 in FY27 - $14,000 in FY28 - $14,000 in FY29 Local Government Probation and Telecommunicator Retirement Plan for PERA Employees • Establishes a Local Government Probation and Telecommunicator Retirement Plan effective January 1, 2027, which includes the below features: o Normal retirement at age 60 o Early retirement at age 55 o Increases employee contributions from 6.5 to 8.82% ▪ Allows for the employee contribution to be 8% for the first 20 months of the plan o Requires employers to contribute 7.5% of employer pay o Allows for three-year cliff vesting o Includes a 1.9% multiplier o Allows members to purchase credit for past service • Related general fund appropriations: $2,610,000 in FY27 to the Local Government Probation and Telecommunicator Retirement Fund. This is a one-time appropriation $390,000 in FY27 to the General State Employees Retirement Fund for the benefit of the Local Government Probation and Telecommunicator Retirement Fund Page 461 of 485 Page | 37 Police and Fire Retirement Plan Changes • Eliminates the one-year waiting period for COLAs in the Police and Fire Plan • Directs $8,000,000 to the Police and Fire Retirement Plan on October 1 of each year until July 1, 2042 Correctional Plan Changes • Reduces employee contributions from 6.83 of pay to 6% of pay • Reduces employer contributions from 10.25 of pay to 9% of pay • Raises the cap on COLAs from 2.5 to 3% St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association • Reduces employee contributions from 9 to 8% of pay • Requires an annual audit of the St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association by the State Auditor • Directs $3,400,000 in state aid to the St. Paul Teachers Retirement Fund Association each year until July 1, 2048 MSRS Changes • Allows two deputy state fire marshals who missed election coverage in the MSRS general plan to elect into the plan PERA Changes • Includes technical changes to the PERA Statewide Volunteer Firefighter Plan • Transfers the Maple Plain Fire Department records, assets, and liabilities from the Statewide Volunteer Firefighter Plan to the Maple Plain Fire Relief Association General Pension Changes • Requires employers of reemployed retirees to pay employer contributions • Revises the definition of “salary” to exclude pay from the State of Minnesota Paid Leave Information Technology Modernization Bill S.F. 334 Senator Wiklund / Representative Clardy Chapter 120 Effective Date: Various The IT Modernization bill creates a formal governance and funding structure to support long- term modernization of Minnesota’s human services technology systems, with a focus on eligibility, enrollment, case management, provider enrollment, claims payment, licensing, child support, data modernization, fraud prevention, and system interoperability. It establishes a Human Services Systems Modernization Advisory Council and a bipartisan Legislative Commission on Human Services Systems to guide planning, oversight, Page 462 of 485 Page | 38 procurement, financing, and implementation, with required consultation before major projects affecting counties or Tribal Nations. The bill also creates a dedicated modernization fund, requires Minnesota IT (MNIT) to develop a multiyear modernization plan, and provides targeted funding for county and Tribal technology improvements, DCYF and DHS system upgrades, MAXIS and METS improvements, fraud prevention tools, and statewide modernization projects. Overall, the new law is intended to move Minnesota away from fragmented legacy systems toward a more coordinated, modern, and accountable human services technology infrastructure. Human Services Systems Modernization Governance • Requires Minnesota Management and Budget to transfer excess general fund revenues into the Human Services Systems Modernization Fund when the fund balance falls below $50 million, and the state ends a biennium with a higher-than-projected closing balance. Transfers must occur by October 15 following the biennium • Establishes a Human Services Systems Modernization Advisory Council to advise DHS, DCYF, and MNIT on the planning, governance, financing, integration, and modernization of human services technology systems used by the state, counties, and Tribal Nations. The council includes representatives from DHS, DCYF, MNIT, counties, county social service administrators, and Tribal Nations • The Council is required to: o Review legacy and replacement systems o Recommend statewide modernization priorities o Evaluate interoperability and enterprise integration opportunities o Identify opportunities to maximize federal financial participation o Assess impacts on counties, Tribal Nations, providers, and beneficiaries o Recommend statutory, governance, procurement, and funding changes needed for modernization efforts o Before initiating major modernization projects that materially affect counties or Tribal Nations, DHS, DCYF, and MNIT must present proposals to the council and consider its recommendations. If agencies reject a recommendation, they must provide a written explanation to legislative leaders within 10 business days o The council must also issue annual reports beginning February 1, 2027, including project status updates, procurement developments, federal funding opportunities, and draft legislative recommendations • Human Services Systems Modernization Fund o Creates a Human Services Systems Modernization Fund to support multiyear modernization of human services IT systems. Agencies may not encumber funds until consultation with the advisory council occurs o Eligible uses include: Page 463 of 485 Page | 39 ▪ Modernization or replacement of eligibility, enrollment, case management, provider enrollment, claims payment, licensing, and child support systems ▪ Shared services and enterprise integration infrastructure ▪ Data modernization, analytics, fraud prevention, and program integrity tools ▪ Interoperability improvements between state, county, Tribal, provider, vendor, and federal systems ▪ Automation, machine learning, predictive analytics, and advanced modeling tools tied to modernization efforts ▪ The bill prohibits using the fund for ordinary agency operations, routine maintenance, or minor technology updates ▪ MNIT must develop a multiyear modernization plan by March 1, 2027, including: • A statewide inventory of major human services systems • Modernization timelines and sequencing • Estimated costs and financing plans • Federal funding assumptions • Cybersecurity, privacy, accessibility, and data governance requirements • Expected outcomes and performance measures • Annual reporting requirements include updates on project status, fund balances, measurable reductions in administrative burden and payment errors, and legacy systems replaced or decommissioned • Legislative Commission on Human Services Systems o Establishes an eight-member bipartisan legislative commission to oversee planning, financing, procurement, implementation, and modernization of human services systems. The commission includes four House members and four Senate members appointed by legislative leadership o The commission is tasked with: ▪ Reviewing system modernization risks, timelines, costs, and outcomes ▪ Monitoring advisory council and MNIT reports ▪ Evaluating Minnesota’s state-supervised, county-administered human services structure ▪ Reviewing how other states modernize and administer human services systems Page 464 of 485 Page | 40 ▪ Recommending legislative, procurement, governance, and funding changes needed for modernization efforts o The commission expires December 31, 2033 • Initial Advisory Council Appointments and Meeting o Requires initial appointments to the advisory council by August 15, 2026, and requires the first meeting by September 15, 2026 • Initial Legislative Commission Appointments and Meeting o Requires appointments and designation of cochairs for the legislative commission by August 15, 2026, with the first meeting held by September 15, 2026 Appropriations and Technology Modernization Investments • Appropriates $10 million in FY2027 to MNIT for county and Tribal human services technology modernization projects, available through June 30, 2031 • Eligible projects include: o Shared data reporting and analytics tools o Workflow automation and electronic forms o Secure portals, messaging, and document upload functionality o Application programming interfaces and interoperability tools o Improvements to MNbenefits o Eligibility, claims processing, provider enrollment, and payment accuracy tools o Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics tools for administrative efficiency and fraud prevention o Training, testing, cybersecurity, and implementation support activities • Appropriates $559,000 in FY2027 from the modernization fund to the Legislative Coordinating Commission to administer the Legislative Commission on Human Services Systems through June 30, 2029 • Appropriates $3.9 million in FY2027 from the modernization fund to MNIT to support the Human Services Systems Modernization Advisory Council through June 30, 2029 Department of Children, Youth, and Families Technology Investments • Appropriates funding for multiple DCYF modernization initiatives, including: o MAXIS integration layer development o Consolidation of economic assistance policy manuals and an AI chatbot o Expanded income verification technology o Development of a secure applicant portal o A modernization study and roadmap o Replacement of MAXIS green screens Page 465 of 485 Page | 41 o Development of a rules engine to improve automation and reduce manual workarounds o Creation of an interagency governance team supporting cross-agency IT implementation and coordination with counties and Tribal Nations Department of Human Services Technology Appropriation • $1.81 million for an interagency governance team supporting modernization implementation and county and Tribal coordination • $9.66 million for MAXIS and METS system improvements MNIT Appropriation • $11.413 million in FY2027 to MNIT for statewide human services modernization projects authorized under the bill, available through June 30, 2031 Fraud Prevention and Detection Technology Funding • $15 million in FY27 to MNIT for fraud prevention and detection modernization, including improved interagency data sharing, analytics, identity authentication, and verification capabilities Transfer to Human Services Systems Modernization Fund • Transfers $50 million from the general fund into the Human Services Systems Modernization Fund in FY27, with additional base transfers in FY28 and FY29 Office of the Inspector General S.F. 856 Senator Gustafson / Representative Norris Chapter 92 Effective Date: Various Following years of headlines about fraudsters taking advantage of Minnesota’s social safety- net programs, the legislature passed a bill establishing the Office of the Inspector General. The new Office will be exclusively focused on tackling fraud. The Office is charged with conducting inspections, evaluations, and investigations of state agencies to identify fraud by using professional accounting standards. The law requires state agencies to enter into interagency agreements to ensure coordination between state agencies and the new Office. Establishing the Office of the Inspector General • Establishes an Inspector General serving as an independent entity in the executive branch responsible for ensuring accountability, transparency, and integrity in the operations of the state executive branch agencies and programs • Requires the Compensation Council to set the salary of the Inspector General Page 466 of 485 Page | 42 • Establishes minimum qualifications to be eligible to be appointed as an inspector general including requiring: o A bachelor’s or higher degree in criminal justice, public administration, law, or a related field; o 10 years of professional experience in auditing, investigations, law enforcement, or a related area; o A professional certificate from the Association of Inspectors General; and o Demonstrate a commitment to safeguarding the mission of public service • The Legislative Inspector General Advisory Commission must recommend candidates for the Inspector General o The Governor appoints an Inspector General from the recommendations of the Advisory Commission • Limits the term of the Inspector General to a five-year term. To be appointed to an additional term, they must be confirmed by a three-fifth vote • Establishes a procedure to remove the Inspector General for cause Powers and Duties of the Inspector General • The Inspector General is authorized and responsible to: o Establish the standards and best practices concerning the operation, investigation, and fraud prevention processes of agency inspectors general o Facilitate information sharing between agencies, including coordinating investigations that involve multiple agencies and designating a lead agency, coordinating and assisting agency identification and review of suspicious documents and data anomalies, and alerting other agencies of a person suspected of committing fraud o Evaluate the performance of agency inspector general offices and recommend improvements o Conduct inspection, evaluation, and investigations of agencies and programs with a focus on recipients of public funds and publicly funded services o Refer matters for civil, criminal, or administrative action to the Office of the Inspector General Anti-Fraud and Waste Bureau under the BCA o Recommend policy and legislative changes to improve program efficiency o Publish reports on completion of an investigation summarizing findings, recommendations, and outcomes o Investigate private entity or local government administering of state programs o Submit an annual report summarizing the work of the office of the Legislative Inspector General Advisory Commission Page 467 of 485 Page | 43 o Alert relevant agency heads when the inspector general has a reasonable suspicion that fraud or misuse is being committed that constitutes a credible allegation, and o Establish and maintain a current exclusion list in a format readily accessible to agencies that identifies each program and individual for which the inspector general has obtained a court order to freeze or cease distribution of funds or made a recommendation to fraud or cease distribution of funds • The Inspector General has authority to investigate fraud and misuse of public funds across all programs administered by agencies • The Inspector General may seek a court order to freeze, or stop, distribution of public funds • Beginning January 1, 2028, the Inspector General may appoint peace officers and establish a law enforcement agency known as the Office of the Inspector General Anti-Fraud and Waste Bureau to conduct statewide investigations and make arrests o The Bureau must develop policies for notifying, coordinating, and referring investigations to other law enforcement agencies concurrently ▪ If the Inspector General establishes a Bureau, the Inspector General must appoint a peace officer to be the chief law enforcement officer responsible for managing the Bureau • The chief law enforcement officer must do an annual report on the cost-effectiveness of the Bureau o The Bureau must develop a policy for notifying the law enforcement agency with primary jurisdiction when it has initiated investigation of any person within the jurisdiction of that agency • The Inspector General has the powers possessed by the court of law to issue and have subpoenas served • The Office of the Inspector General is a government entity and is subject to the Government Data Practices Act • The Inspector General may hire and manage staff as necessary • The Inspector General must maintain a phone line and website for reporting fraud and misuse that allows the person to make anonymous reports • The Inspector General’s activities must adhere to professional standards as prescribed by the Association of Inspectors General or other recognized bodies • Requires the Office of the Inspector General to enter into an interagency agreement with various state agencies including: o Department of Human Services o Department of Children, Youth, and Families o Department of Health Page 468 of 485 Page | 44 o Department of Education o Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Other Notable Policy Provisions • Requires the legislative auditor to refer all credible reports from the public about potential fraud or misuse to the inspector general • Establishes a Legislative Inspector General Advisory Commission • The head of each agency must prominently highlight on the agency’s website the fraud reporting tools administered by the Office of the Inspector General and the Office of the Legislative Auditor • Requires that state employees elected to state legislative office and required to take a leave of absence have the same rights with respect to accrued and future seniority status, efficiency rating, vacation, insurance benefits, sick leave, and other benefits as if the leave was not taken • Adds authority for the Commissioner of Health to withhold payment under any program based on information in the Inspector General’s list supporting a credible allegation of fraud Page 469 of 485 Page | 45 VI. Legislation that Did Not Pass • Jobs and Economic Development Omnibus • Metro Surge financial package / economic development fund • Transportation Omnibus o E-bike / micromobility legislation o Driverless vehicles • Gun violence prevention omnibus bill • Local government sales tax proposals • NDA / confidentiality agreement legislation • Residential Zoning/Land Use Preemption • Broadband franchising Page 470 of 485 Page | 46 VII. Legislative Retirements 2025-2026 Legislative Retirements District Body Party Name Note 10A House R Ron Kresha Co-Chair of Education Finance 13B House R Tim O’Driscoll Co-Chair of Commerce Committee 15A House R Chris Swedzinski Co-Chair Energy Finance and Policy 15B House R Paul Torkelson Co-Chair of Ways and Means 21A House R Joe Schomacker Co-Chair Human Services Finance and Policy 30B House R Paul Novotny Co-Chair of Public Safety Finance and Policy 33A House R Patti Anderson Vice Chair of Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy 39A House DFL Erin Koegel Co-Chair of Commerce Committee 39B House DFL Sandra Feist Co-Vice Chair of Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 40A House DFL Kelly Moller Co-Chair of Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee, Co-Chair of Ethics Committee 13 Senate R Jeff Howe 15 Senate R Gary Dahms Ranking Minority Member on Commerce and Consumer Protection 20 Senate R Steve Drazkowski 21 Senate R Bill Weber Ranking Minority Member on Taxes 22 Senate R Richard Draheim Ranking Member on Jobs and Workforce Committee 24 Senate R Carla Nelson Former Senate Tax Chair 26 Senate R Jeremy Miller Former Senate Majority Leader 37 Senate R Warren Limmer Ranking Minority Member on Judiciary and Public Safety 43 Senate DFL Ann Rest Chair of the Taxes Committee, Vice Chair of the Rules and Administration Committee Page 471 of 485 Page | 47 44 Senate DFL Tou Xiong Chair of the State and Local Government Committee 49 Senate DFL Steve Cwodzinski Chair of the Education Policy Committee 50 Senate DFL Alice Mann Vice Chair of the Health and Human Services Committee 51 Senate DFL Melissa Wiklund Chair of the Health and Human Services Committee 52 Senate DFL Jim Carlson Chair of the Elections Committee 65 Senate DFL Sandy Pappas Chair of Capital Investment Committee Legislators Running for Other Offices 2026 District Body Party Name Note 4A House DFL Heather Keeler 7th Congressional District 5B House R Mike Wiener Senate District 5 13A House R Lisa Demuth Governor 14A House R Bernie Perryman Senate District 14 14B House DFL Dan Wolgamott State Auditor 20B House R Steve Jacob Senate District 20 23A House R Peggy Bennett Governor 36A House R Elliott Engen State Auditor 37A House R Kristin Robbins Governor (Suspended Campaign) 41B House R Tom Dippel Senate District 41 43A House DFL Cedrick Frazier Hennepin County Attorney 43B House DFL Mike Freiberg Senate District 43 52A House DFL Liz Reyer Senate District 52 54B House R Ben Bakeberg Senate District 54 55B House DFL Kaela Berg 2nd Congressional District 65B House DFL Maria Isa Perez- Vega Ramsey County Commissioner District 5 Page 472 of 485 Page | 48 53 Senate DFL Matt Klein 2nd Congressional District 54 Senate R Eric Pratt 2nd Congressional District Legislators Who Did Not Finish Their Term District Body Party Name Note 34B House DFL Melissa Hortman Melissa Hortman was assassinated on June 14, 2025. On August 12, XP Lee was elected to complete her term. 47B House DFL Amanda Hemmingsen-Jaeger Amanda Hemmingsen-Jaeger was elected to the Minnesota Senate during a special election in November 2025. 64A House DFL Kaohly Her Kaohly Her was elected to be the Mayor of Saint Paul in November of 2025. 6 Senate R Justin Eichorn Justin Eichorn resigned following felony charges being brought against him. On April 29, Keri Heintzeman was elected to complete his term. 29 Senate R Bruce Anderson Bruce Anderson passed away on July 21, 2025. A special election to fill his seat will take place on November 4. 47 Senate DFL Nicole Mitchell Nicole Mitchell resigned July 25 following a felony conviction. A special election to fill her seat will take place on November 4. Former Legislators Running for Office District Body Party Name Note 14B House DFL Zachary Dorholt Dorholt served in the Minnesota House. 22 Senate R Jeremy Munson Jeremy Munson served in the Minnesota House of Representatives and was a founding member of the New House Republican Caucus. Page 473 of 485 Page | 49 APPENDIX Page 474 of 485 Page | 50 Page 475 of 485 Page | 51 Page 476 of 485 Page | 52 Page 477 of 485 Page | 53 Page 478 of 485 Page | 54 Page 479 of 485 Page | 55 Page 480 of 485 Page | 56 Page 481 of 485 Page | 57 Page 482 of 485 Page | 58 Page 483 of 485 Date: 6/15/2026 Snowmobile Map Update Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: No action requested - Discussion only. Overview The City of Lakeville's snowmobile ordinance was originally adopted in 1993 and establishes regulations governing the operation of snowmobiles within the City. The current snowmobile trail map and designated route were last approved in 2023. Staff is presenting this item for Council review and any direction regarding potential updates. The ordinance permits snowmobile operation only on designated trails, on private property with owner permission, or along the right-hand side of City streets in single file where allowed. Operation is restricted to the period between December 1 and March 31, and is prohibited between 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in residential and commercial areas except as direct transportation to the operator's residence. Speed is limited to 15 MPH on City streets at all times. Snowmobiling is prohibited in designated "No Snowmobiling" zones, all City parks unless specifically designated, and on public sidewalks, pedestrian trails, and paved bike paths unless posted for snowmobile use. Supporting Information 1. Snowmobile_Trail_Map Financial Impact: $ Budgeted: No Source: Envision Lakeville Community Values: A Sense of Community and BelongingSafety Throughout the Community Report Completed by: Joseph Masiarchin, Parks & Recreation Director Page 484 of 485 AqtntMakX;yUaqJqPXAnnJy BruouNblbr^b~vzu_bNbYVcs`Y9uBsupuOblbr^urY BruouNblY~oKruNYuvYzKYWus/c~zYY~uz09@ WY~c^sKYV{Kcm~OYZuzY1YQYpOY{ u{K[Yz8K{Q_" -~ruouNblYpKOYuvY{KYVusmurWY~b^rKYV~ruouOcmY zKcm~u{vzdKYvzuvYzc__YurY{~vYzpc~~cur BsuouNelYD{Kel~-~ruouNdlYpKOYV|cYr_YzY~supuOcmcs^c~KmmuYVurlKlur^`Y {c^_`KsW~cWYuZK/c~{YYKsWusmcs~cs^mYZdlY rlY~~u`Y{d~YVY~d^rKYW:uBruouNeles^FusY0{cbr^us`YOu mYKzVuzKsu_Y{vuzcusuZK/c~zYYc~v{u`cOcYW 7KiYfllY8rfQfvKl.u sWKzD_Y~vYYVmcpcus/c~{YY~b~ $8=4KKmmcoY~GHIHI6-mm~supuOclY~p ~NYYwbvvYVc_Kp Z\lY{ KVYwKYO{KjY~ KrV`YKVKrVKcmlKpv~7c^`~p ~OYur_YsYYzK~suouNblY c~uvYzKYWusKrzuKVK BruouNdldr^d~vzu_dNdYVOYYYs_Y`u {~u[ )vpKsW&)Kp u[KrVKd`cszY~cWYscKmKrVRuopY{RdKlK{YK~u[`Y/c YRYvK~KpYKs~ T u[{Ks~vuzKcusu`YzY~bVYrQYu[_YuvY{Ku{KrV_YrurlK $8=4 -~ruouNblYpKsuOYuvY{KYVKK~vYYV^zYKY{`Kr 8=4c_br ZYYu[KsmKjY~`uzY vYz~us bQY`u ~Y ~iKbr^u{vOmcQ~lbVbr^KzYK 5CL-~ruouNblYpKsuOYuvY{KYVbrKQK{YmY~~ zYQjlY~~ u{rY^lb^Yr oKssY{uz~uK~uYrVKs^Y{KrvY{~uru{v|uvY{ -~ruouNdlYpKsuOYuvY{KYVdrKpKssYz~uK~uR{YKYKluV rrYSY~~K{ u{r~ Klsuc~Y_dS_Wc~ {O~ Kssu~ u{drYz[Y{Y~d`_Y vYKQYKrVxbYu[u`YzvY{~ur~ -~ruouNblYpKsuOYuvY{KYVurKvNlbQ~bVYKmj vYWY~{cKszKbl uz vNlbQNbiYvK_ rlY~~bb~vu~YVc_~b^r~K _uzbcs^`Y ~YuZ~rupuOcmY~ BruouNblbr^b~vzu_bNbYVcsKll7KiYbllY/bvKzi~ rlY~~ ~vYRd[cRKllVY~d^rKYWK~vY{odYV gu~uv K~rupuOcmYp ~RupYuKSuovlYY~uv g-~ruouNblYpKsuOYuvY{KYVurKsvKYWvNlbQzKbl_Yr_Y -ZY{zYSYcdr^Kd~ Kmu{KVdNlY~d^sKm[{uoKs7K2r[uzSYoYr<[]dSY{ h,~rupuOcmY~zKQjc~Yx bvvYVb`oYKm{KQcurWYbQY~~V~ :uvYz~usrWY{ #YK{~uZK^YpKuvYzKYK~supuOblYusK~{YYuz 3 `b^_K uzoKjYKVbzYQQ{u~~cs^u[K~zYYuz`b^_Kb`br_Y/b 8cssY~uKzY~dVYr~Ou{sKZY{1YR" (&%p~`KYK~ruouNdlY~KZY QY{b[cQKYuuvY{KYK~suouNblYKr_YzYcs8brrY~uK:urzY~cWYr~ + 'KsVulVY{pKW{cY~supuOcmY~urv OmcQmKrV~KrVKYz~uzzKbl~KsWpK Qzu~~Qu su{~KYzuKV~u{_b^_K~b`u K~ruouNbmY~KZYQY}b[cQKY E_c~c~K~ opKzu[`YuZ\dRcKmmKWuvYWBrupuOcmY<zVdrKsRYK~KoYsWYW -RuovlYYRuvpKOYuOKdrYVZ{uo_Y /cu[7KiYdmmY>Kzi~KsV@YS{YKdus1YvK{pYr v`usY($! ('$#% uz_Y7KjYbllY=umcQY0YvK{pYs v`usY($! ('$!' ?zbrYV*" !!" ͺͺͺ ͺͺͺ dž dž dž dž dž dž dždždždždždždž ͺͺͺ ͺ ͺ ͺ ͺ ͺ ͺͺͺͺͺ ŶƚůĞƌƐWĂƌŬΘZŝĚĞ Page 485 of 485