The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About98-256 CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA DATE: December. 7, 1998 RESOLUTION NO: 98-256 MOTION BY: Holberg SECONDED BY: Mulvihill RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PLACEMENT OF STOP SIGNS ON GRIFFON TRAIL AT THE INTERSECTION OF HARWELL AVENUE WHEREAS, pursuant to state statute, it is necessary for city council to authorize all stop sign placements on public right-of--way, and WHEREAS, the attached Exhibit A is a petition received from residents requesting a traffic study for all-way stop controls at the intersection of Harwell Avenue and Griffon Trail, and WHEREAS, the petition as required in the city's All-Way Stop Control Policy initiates a traffic study by use of the All-Way Stop Control Justification process, and WHEREAS, attached Exhibit B which is a completed All-Way Stop Control Justification Worksheet, which exceeds minimum point threshold for the establishment of all-way stop controls, and WHEREAS, placement of stop signs on Griffon Trail at the intersection of Harwell Avenue would create an all-way stop control intersection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that stop signs are authorized for placement on Griffon Trail at Harwell Avenue creating an all-way stop intersection. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this nth day of December, 1998, by the City Council of the City of Lakeville. CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: Duane Zaun, a or ATTEST: 1 / ~ ,-r harlene Fried es, City C rk ~T ~ I ! C~ f ~H Y ~ ~ ~G DEPARTMENT OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE RESIDENTS' PETITION. FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL REVIEW INTERSECTION LOCATION: h ~~Q~ ~ YUI Neighborhood Representative: pV y `~~/~r^~ L ~~c{~., Date: (,V ' Z/~^~ OS~ Representative`s Address: U a'`G~ ~lV~ ~1 ~w ~ Phone: I-'~ 7u~ U We; the undersigned residents of the neighborhood within 300 feet of the above referenced intersection and residing on the subject streets, petition the City of Lakeville to undertake a review of conditions at this intersection in consideration of installation of Residential Street All-way Stop Control. This Petition is submitted #o the City in response to concern for safety and well being in the neighborhood. S ' 'concerns identified for each household are listed as follows (choose one or two most important): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Speeding Traffic Through Sight Traffic Other Traffic Volume Traffic Distance Acci eats (state) H HOLD A DRESS HOU D TUBE CO CERN # ~ut~, / .w._.~ r ' t `t ; ~ . 6 2 t1 ~r~ l ~ : l ~~~so w~ /l ~-v~ ~ ; l C 1TY O F LA KEV1 LLE DEPARTMENT OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE RESiDENT1AL STREET ALL-WAY STOP~'ClON/TROL JUST1FiCAT10N WORKSHEET INTERSECTION LOCATION: ~ ~ W ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~~' ~ G ? ~f y h - • LI l r/ EXISTING TAAFFlC CONTROL: a lti I~ a 3^t~l ~ ~ I'" DATE: Q F ~ l 9. / ~I g ~r This Residential Street Alf-Way Stop Control Justification Worksheet is applicable only to intersections of residential sheets with speed limits of 30 miles per hour. This proceedure is 'not' to be applied to the intersection of a local residentfat street with a major collector or arterial street as identified in the Cites Transportation Plan. RESIDENTS' PETITION A petition has been submitted to the~City which has been signed by more than SOgo of the residents within 300 feet of the subject intersection and who live on the streets that would be affected by the requested All-way Stop Control. SUBMITTED BY: DATE: ADDRESS: PHONE: APPROACH SPEEDS 1 2 Uncontrolled approach speed. Check two boxes, one for the 85th percentile 27.5 miles per hour or less 0 points Q approach speed group and one far the highest recorded speed group with two ar more observations. 27.6 to 325 miles per hour 10 points 32.6 to 37.5 miles per hour 20 points -3~~ i =85th percentile approach speed (highest approach). ~ - - 37.6 to 425 miles per hour 30 points SMAh'~ 2 =highest recorded speed group with two or more observations. 426 to 47.5 miles per hour 40 points Q . 47.6 to 525 miles per hour 50 paints Q 526 miles per hour ar more 60 points Q TRAFFIC VOLUMES ~ 2 Intersection approach daily traffic volume. Check two boxes, one for the Less than 250 vehicles per day 0 paints Q total major street approach volume and one for the highest minor street leg. 250 to 450 vehicles per day 10 paints /Sos_~' =total daily traffic volume for both major street approaches. 450 to 700 vehicles per day 20 points Q 7 ~2 =highest minor street approach daily traffic volume (times two). 700 tr t000 vehicles per day 30 points More than 1000 vehicles per day 40 points SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTION The sate stopping sight distance on any uncontrolled approach is restricted to less than 300 feet by horizontal andlor 60 points vertical roadway alignment, or by ather'pennanenC obstructions to sight distance. The safe stopping sight distance an any uncontrolled approach is greater than 300 feet but tens than 450 feet due to 10 points horizontal andlar vertical roadway alignment, or other 'pennanenY obstructions to sight distance. OTHER CONDITIONS The number of reported traffic accidents at the subject intersection within the past 12 months = x (times) 10 points = ' School, parft, bus sto~or other major pedestrian generafor causing (Harty p estrians to cross the subject intersection. 10 paints GC , 4 PREPARED BY: Total Points i ~ It the worksheet point total Is greater than or equal to 100, all-way stop eontmt may be ")usUtled" at the subject intersection. See the reverse side of this worksheet for an explalnatlon of the results at arts review and the status of this request.