Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-255 CITY OF LAKEVILLE • DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA DATE: December 7, 1998 RESOLUTION NO: 98-255 MOTION BY: Holberg SECONDED BY: Mulvihill RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PLACEMENT OF STOP SIGNS ON HAYES AVENUE AT THE INTERSECTION OF 174TH STREET W. WHEREAS, pursuant to state statute, it is necessary for city council to authorize all stop sign placements on public right-of-way, and WHEREAS, the attached Exhibit A is a petition received from residents requesting a traffic study for all-way stop controls at the intersection of Hayes Avenue and 174th St. W., and WHEREAS, the petition as required in the city's All-Way Stop Control Policy initiates a traffic study by use of the All-Way Stop Control Justification process, and WHEREAS, attached Exhibit B which is a completed All-Way Stop Control Justification • Worksheet, which exceeds minimum point threshold for the establishment of all-way stop controls, and WHEREAS, placement of stop signs on Hayes Avenue at the intersection of 174th Street West would create an all-way stop control intersection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that stop signs are authorized for placement on Hayes Avenue at 174th Street West creating an all-way stop intersection. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this nth day of December, 1998, by the City Council of the City of Lakeville. CITY OF LAKEVILLE BY: Duane Zaun, or ATTEST: 1 / ~ ~ Charlene Friedges, City rk ' ~ ~ 1 1 O f i~G~~ ~ ~ G DEPARTMENT OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE RESIDENTS' PETiTiON FOR RESiD//~~ENTIAL STREET ALL-WA~Y1 STOP CONTROL REVIEW • INTERSECTION LOCATION: rT Q ~f Ve J ~7 s'~': W. Neighborhood Representative: (('-'7 W . ~t~~J~n1 9 h l~•r Date:. g ~ 9 Q Representative's Address: 6 ! ~P ~ Y~Q 1 X1~ ~ q I1f~ Phone: 3 Z ~ 3~'T We; the undersigned residents of the neighborhood within 300 feet of the above referenced intersection and residing on the subject streets, petition the City of Lakeville to undertake a review of conditions at this intersection in consideration of installation of Residential Street All-way Stap Control. This Petition is submitted to the City in response to concern for safety and well being in the neighborhood. Specific concerns identified for each household are listed as follows (choose one or two most important): 7. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Speeding Traffic • Through Sight Traffic Other Traffic Volume Traffic Distance Accidents (state) HOUSEiiOLD ADDRESS HOUSEHOLD SIGNATURE CONC>=AN # / ~ ' i Ham, s _ ~ 1 1 8~~7 ~ ~y~"" S~ W y COY ~~D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 3~f9 eA ~v~ <p5 ~~~z i~~~ 2 s ~ ~~a 7~ l~ S' '~S ~ 8z©3 (Z~Y~ C~N~,,a°~ r y 1 I Or L~.f'1i~EV~LLE DEPARTMENT OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE. RESiDENT1AL STREET ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL JUST1FiCAT10N WORKSHEET INTERSECTION LOCATION: YP<' ~ ~ ~5l ~,S7L W' q~ • DATE: ~ / / r IXISTING TRAFFlC CONTROL: This Residential Street All-Way Stop Control Justification Worksheet is applicable onty to intersections of residential streets with speed limits of 30 miles per hour. This proceedure is 'not' to be applied to the intersection of a local residential street with a major collector or arterial street as identified in the City's Transportation Plan. RESIDENTS' PETITION A petition has bean submitted to the~City which has been signed by more than 50% of the residents within 300 feet of the subject intersection and who live on the streets that would be affected by the requested All-way Stop Control. ~,~J ` ~ 7 SUBMITTED BY: ' sfz~~ ° ~ ` DATE: _ ADDRESS; / ~4f~f? ,ter %+H fj 11 /-j PHONE: 7` v APPROACH SPEEDS ~ 2 Uncontrolled approach speed. Check two boxes, one for the 85th percentile 27.5 miles per hour or less 0 points ~ Q approach speed group and one for the highest recanted speed group with two or more observations. 27.6 to 325 mites per hour t0 points 326 to 37.5 miles per hour 20 points tJ , 1 = 85th peroendli3 approach speed (highest approach).. ~ ~ ? 37.6 to 425 miles per hour 30 points c~' - f 2 =highest recorded speed group with two or more observations. 426 to 47.5 miles per hour 40 points 47.6 to 525 miles per hour 50 points 52.6 miles per hour or more 60 points TRAFFIC VOLUMES ~ 2 IMersecfion approach daffy traffic volume..Checit two boxes, one far the Less than 250 vehicles per day 0 points Q total major street approach volume and one for the highest minor street leg. 250 to 450 vehicles per day 10 points K.% 1 ~ ~ =total daily traffic volume for both major street approaches. 450 to 700 vehicles per day 20 paints ~ Q ' ~ 1 ~ =highest minor street approach daily traffic volume (times two). 700 to t000 vehicles per day 30 points Q Mare than 1000 vehicles per day 40 points SIGHT DISTANCE RESTRICTION The safe stopping sight distance on any uncontrolled approach is restricted to less than 300 feet by horizontal andlor 60 paints vertical roadway alignment, or by other'pennanent' obstructions to sight distance. The safe stopping sfght distance on any uncontrolled approach is greater than 300 feet but less than 450 feet due to 10 points horizontal andlor vertipf roadway alignment, or other 'permanent' obstructions to sight distance. OTHER CONDITIONS ~ / The number of reported traffic acddents at the subject intersection within the past 12 months = N x (times) 10 points = . School, park bus stop or other major pedestrian generator causing many pedestrians to cross the subject intersection. 10 paints PREPARED BY: _ Total Points It the worksheet point total Is greater than or equal to 100, all-way stop control may be 'IusUtled' at the subject intersection. See the reverse side of thfs worksheet for an explalnaUon of the results of this review and the status of thfs request.