Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout87-116 r y CITY OF LAKEVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION Date September 8, 1987 Resolution No. 87-116 Motion By Harvey Seconded By Enright RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION REGARDING THE HOMESTEAD CREEK ADDITION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET WHEREAS, the City of Lakeville, as the responsible govern- mental unit, has directed the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet ("EAW") before granting final approval for the Homestead Creek plat; and WHEREAS, the City has received and reviewed the EAW and has forwarded it for comment to various groups, organizations, and individuals as required by law; and WHEREAS, the Notice of Availability for Review was published • in the EQB Monitor on July 27, 1987; and WHEREAS, the thirty (30) day comment period has closed; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received and considered letters and other comments on the EAW. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeville: The Findings of Fact and Conclusion attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are adopted by the Lakeville City Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lakeville this 8th .day of September, 1987. CITY O LAKEVILL j- ~ , BY f Duane R. Zaun ayor A E f' Patrick McGarvey, Cit Clerk • • FINDINGS OF FACT HOMESTEAD CREEK ADDITION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of a 292 lot single-family plat with sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermain, and street construction. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET PREPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION The City of Lakeville prepared an Environmental Assessment Work- sheet (EAW) for Homestead Creek Addition, pursuant to the rules of the Minnesota Environmental Review Program. The EAW was distributed to all persons on the Minnesota Environ- mental Review Program distribution list, the notice of availability for review was published in the EQB Monitor on July 27, 1987, and the RGU provided a press release to a local newspaper. The Natural Resources Committee conducted a public informational review of the EAW on July 7, 1987. The thirty (30) day comment period ended on August 26, 1987. • CRITERIA 1. Type, extent and reversibility of environmental impacts: The EAW describes the project and analyzes the possible environmental impacts associated with the project. The results of this analysis are that no irreversible adverse impacts will occur as a result of this project. 2. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects:. No related projects are planned as part of this project. 3. Extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitiga- tion by ongoing public regulatory authority: The Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency will maintain ongoing authority over the project as a result of permit applications. 4. Extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken • . by public agencies or the project proposer, or of EIS's previously prepared on similar projects: No similar environmental studies have been undertaken in Lakeville. COMMENTS Five (5) letters were received in comment to the EAW or the project . 1. Minnesota Historical Society, July 27, 1987. This letter contained no comments or questions requiring a response. 2. Metropolitan Council, July 14, 1987 and August 4, 1987. The letters contained no comments or questions requiring a response. 3. Minnesota Environmental Quality Board, July 21, 1987. The letter contained no comments or questions requiring a response. • 4. Minnesota Department of Transportation, July 16, 1987. The letter contained no comments or questions requiring a response. CONCLIISION The City of Lakeville, acting as the responsible governmental unit, makes a negative declaration. The proposed project does not require the preparation of an environmental impact statement. •