Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-23-05 Cify of Lakeville Economic Development Commission Regular Meeting Agenda Wednesday, February 23, 2005, 6:00 p.m. City Hall, 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Approve January 25, 2005 meeting minutes 3. 2004 Economic Development Annual Report 4. Strategic Plan Work Program for 2005 5. Director's Report 6. Adjourn Attachments: • EDAM Legislative Policy Positions 2005 • City of Lakeville January Building Permit Report • MnDOT 35W Corridor `Excellent' For Bus Rapid Transit DRAFT City of Lakeville Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes January 25, 2005 Marion Conference Room, City Hall Members Present: Comms. Brantly, Emond, J. Erickson, Gehrke, Matasosky, Miller, Pogatchnik, Schubert, Tushie Members Absent: Comm. Smith, Ex-Officio member City Administrator Steve Mielke, Ex-Officio member Todd Bornhauser -Executive Director -Lakeville Area Chamber of Commerce Others Present: Staff present: David Olson, Community & Economic Development Director; Amanda Schwabe, Economic Development Coordinator 1. Call Meeting to Order. Chair Matasosky called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Marion Conference Room of City Hall, 20195 Holyoke Avenue, Lakeville, Minnesota. 2. Approve November 30, 2004 Meeting Minutes Motion 05.01 Comms. Emond/Miller moved to approve the minutes of the November 30, 2004 meeting with one recommended change. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Election of Officers Motion 05.02 Comms. Erickson/Emond moved to re-elect Jack Matasosky as Chair, Barry Pogatchnik as Vice-Chair and Bob Brantly as Secretary for 2005. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Review of 2005-2007 Strategic Plan for Economic Development Work Program Mr. Olson informed EDC members that staff has identified a reasonable number of goals that could be completed or have significant progress made on in 2005. He continued to say that City Administrator Mielke has provided input on the proposed work program goals and that his input is based on feedback from the City Council. Staff has identified the following goals for the 2005 departmental work program: 1. Coordinate preparation of a Downtown Plan 2. Implementation of a process to facilitate development of East-West Corridors Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes January 25, 2005 3. Completion of a study to determine the minimum market value of a residential housing unit that generates sufficient City taxes to pay for the City services required by that unit 4. Facilitate a process to establish affordable housing goals for the City Mr. Olson explained that #3 of the proposed department work program was identified as an outcome under the significant issue of Managing Development and the goal: Monitor development and advise the Council to ensure a balanced tax base and manageable rate of growth. He continued to say that completion of the final design and official mapping of Co. Rd. 70/I-35 and remaining improvements to Co. Rd. 50 are ongoing activities even though they were not specifically listed in the proposed 2005 department work program. Mr. Olson stated that the City Administration department has taken the lead on transit issues. A community survey will be completed this spring and will contain a number of questions regarding transit issues. Mr. Olson shared that staff has created a handout that lists all of the significant issues and goals on one page. The goals that have been highlighted in yellow are new initiatives that staff is proposing to attempt in 2005. Mr. Olson explained that staff is looking for feedback from EDC members regarding the proposed 2005 work program. If EDC is in concurrence with the proposed work program staff will put together budgets and timelines for review at an upcoming EDC meeting. Comm. Pogatchnik recommended softening the language related to partnerships to ensure that people understand that activities not proposed to be included in the 2005 work program are ongoing. Chair Matasosky stated that using the word "ongoing" helps to explain that all of the goals are important and that staff time needs to be allocated appropriately. Comm. Brantly questioned if the second goal under Managing Development needs attention in 2005 due to its time sensitive nature. Mr. Olson responded that staff resources will be allocated as necessary to each goal and that wording in the work program needs to state that designating time for new initiatives will be limited. He continued to say that the Strategic Plan serves as a resource to guide development and keep all involved parties on track. Mr. Olson also shared that the goal related to the Downtown Plan was selected as part of the 2005 work program because it is a topic that is currently being addressed and is supported by both the City Council and EDC. Mr. Olson informed EDC members that many transit issues are also being brought to the table and the overall transit plan for the community needs to be addressed. 2 Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes January 25, 2005 Comm. Gehrke asked Mr. Olson when work on the goals that have been identified as part of the 2005 work program would begin. Mr. Olson stated that staff will bring schedules and more defined work plans back to the EDC at a future meeting. Motion 05.03 Comms. Pogatchnik/Emond moved to approve the 2005 work program as presented with recommended amendments. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Olson also shared with EDC members that a press release was sent to the local media as well as the Mpls./St. Paul newspapers regarding the 2005-2007 Strategic Plan for Economic Development. Staff also worked with Sue Palm, Public Information Coordinator, to reserve 2/3 of the next Messages page for an article on the recently adopted Strategic Plan in an easy to read, concise format. In conjunction with that, an Executive Summary was also produced which will be available in both hard copy and on the City of Lakeville website. He continued to say that staff will publish updates throughout the year to keep the public familiarized with the Strategic Plan. Comm. Pogatchnik stated that there has been more publicity for the 2005-2007 Strategic Plan through the presentation at City Council in front of reporters, replays in Cable Channel 16, press releases and now the Messages page than for any other Strategic Plan for Economic Development. He continued to say that staff has done a good job of getting the information out to the public. 5. Summary of 2004 Development Project Feedback Surveys Ms. Schwabe explained to EDC members the Development Project Feedback surveys are sent to developers and owners of commercial and industrial projects after they have received a certificate of occupancy for their project. She continued to say that in 2004, the City sent out 169 survey letters for which 66 responses were received. Ms. Schwabe shared that in comparison to the results from the 2003 survey, a majority of the responses were favorable overall and that many of the respondents gave positive comments about City staff and the development process. Mr. Olson informed EDC members that when negative comments were received staff worked directly with the respondent to remedy the situation. Ms. Schwabe stated that copies of the development survey, a detailed breakdown of the responses dating back to 1999 and a listing of all of the comments received in response to surrey question #5 were included in the packet. 3 Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes January 25, 2005 Comm. Brantly questioned if the negative comments indicate that customer service should be reviewed. Chair Matasosky stated that reviewing customer service training would be appropriate. Mr. Olson shared that in 2004 the City took on implementation of electrical permits and sending surveys to all of the tenants in multi-tenant buildings which explains the increase in the number of surveys sent in 2004 versus previous years. Comm. Pogatchnik stated that the development surveys are a good tool for management. 6. 2004 Building Permit Analysis Ms. Schwabe informed EDC members that City Building Inspections issued over 8,200 building permits through the end of December with a total valuation of $239,918,385. She continued to say that the City issued more commercial/industrial permits in 2004 than in previous years. In 2004, 168 commercial/industrial permits were issued with a total valuation of $44,513,142. Ms. Schwabe explained that among the permits issued for commercial projects in 2004 were: United Properties Argonne Village development including Rainbow Grocery, Walgreens, Wendy's and the attached multi-tenant retail building, Lakeville Crossing Phase II including Kowalski's Market, Edina Realty and two multi-tenant buildings, Lakeville Town Office Phase II, an addition to Super Target, part of which is occupied by Marshalls, LaMettry's Collision, Lakeview Bank, Merchants Bank and Bank of the West. Ms. Schwabe shared that a number of permits for industrial projects were also issued including Drywall Supply, Hebert Office Warehouse Phase II & III, Imperial Plastics and Preferred Property Solutions. Ms. Schwabe stated that residential development comprised over 68% of the building permit valuation in 2004. The City issued 382 single family permits with a valuation of $91,794,000 and 524 townhome permits with a valuation of $69,077,000 in 2004. Comm. Brantly questioned staff as to their feeling on the balance of commercial versus residential development in Lakeville. Mr. Olson stated that in 2004 the City issued a record number of permits for housing units in 2004. He continued to say that commercial development is also increasing, but is still overshadowed by residential development. He stated that issuing 906 residential permits in one year is high and that market conditions determine the number of lots and how quickly they sell. The City is doing well and hopefully the 4 Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes January 25, 2005 industrial sector will increase. He concluded by saying that staff does not see any slowdown in developers acquiring property and proposing developments. Comm. Tushie questioned the number of people per residence. Mr. Olson explained that the Metropolitan Council estimates 2.8 people per dwelling. Chair Matasosky stated that the number of permits issued in 2004 supersedes school district expectations. Comm. Tushie offered that the City will not have growth like that in 2004 every year. He continued to say that supply will eventually go down and other types of lifestyle housing will begin to grow with fewer occupants per dwelling. Comm. Emond stated that townhomes have become the preferred entry level type of housing. Comm. Pogatchnik questioned what percentage of the building permit fees are used to pay for building inspections staff. Mr. Olson explained that recent legislation requires cities to report building permit revenues and expenditures for staff to the State of MN. He continued to say that the City utilizes the State's building permit fee structure and that indirect costs are also figured into the fees. Mr. Olson shared with EDC members that the City of Shakopee is being sued by the Builders Association because the building permit revenues collected are more than expenditures for services. 7. Director's Report Mr. Olson thanked Comms. Matasosky, Pogatchnik and Brantly for attending the December 20th City Council meeting to present the 2005-2007 Strategic Plan for Economic Development. Mr. Olson informed EDC members that Chair Matasosky introduced Frank 5choeben, owner of the Chart House Restaurant and Banquet Facility at the January 18th City Council meeting. Mr. Olson also shared that Comms. Matasosky, Schubert, Gehrke and Erickson were all reappointed in December to the EDC by the City Council. Mr. Olson updated EDC members on the second VFW house demolition project and stated that it has been determined after numerous tests that all of the plaster in the home needs to be removed prior to the demolition. He continued to say that Hoffbeck was the lowest bid for the project and given the necessary notification requirements there should be progress on the demolition by mid February. 5 Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes January 25, 2005 Mr. Olson informed EDC members that the Dakota Electric Association Partners in Progress event will be held on Wednesday, March 9th at Royal Cliff in Eagan. Mr. Olson stated that the 2005 meeting schedule was included in the packet. He continued to say that the February 22nd meeting has been rescheduled to Wednesday, February 23`d due to the City Council meeting falling on the Tuesday of that week. Comm. Tushie stated that he has a conflict on February 23`d and will not be in attendance at that meeting. Chair Matasosky questioned if staff would like to talk about the Twin Cities Community Capital Fund (TCCCF) attachment? Mr. Olson explained that he has received more information on TCCCF and would bring it to the next EDC meeting. He continued to say that the only way the City could consider participating would be to use revolving loan funds towards the required contribution. He stated that the City is still receiving repayments from the New Morning Windows project in the Fairfield Business Campus. Comm. Pogatchnik questioned if the City needs to be a member of TCCCF with the current rate of development? Chair Matasosky explained that TCCCF is considered to be a gap funding source and for a business to actually get money could be a long, drawn out process. Comm. Pogatchnik responded that the best way to get business to Lakeville is good roads, good schools and good existing businesses. 8. Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Attested to: Amanda Schwabe, R. T. Brantly, Secretary Economic Development Coordinator 6 Agenda Item 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Economic Development Commission CC: Steven C. Mielke, City Administrator Amanda Schwabe, Economic Development Coordinator FROM: David L. Olson, Community & Economic Development Director DATE: February 18, 2005 RE: 2004 Economic Development Annual Report Staff will be presenting the 2004 Economic Development Annual Report at the February 22"d City Council meeting and also at the February 23`d, EDC meeting. The report includes commercial /industrial development statistics and highlights for 2004, updated information on major transportation improvements, and other EDC initiatives. The report also includes highlights of the approved 2005-2007 Strategic Plan and the recommended 2005 Work Program goals. Agenda Item MEMORANDUM TO: Economic Development Commission CC: Steven C. Mielke, City Administrator Amanda Schwabe, Economic Development Coordinator FROM: David L. Olson, Community & Economic Development Director DATE: February 18, 2005 RE: Strategic Plan Work Program for 2005 Based on the direction provided by the EDC at the January meeting, staff has developed preliminary 2005 Work Programs for the four Strategic Plan goals that were recommended to be pursued this year. We have attempted to identify the necessary preliminary action steps, which goals will require budget funding to complete, and the approximate time frame for the completion of these action steps. Additional action steps and more specific budget needs will be identified as more detailed work begins on each of these goals. We have identified previous years CDBG allocations that have not been expended to date as a possible funding source for several of the planning efforts and studies contemplated by these goals. As was also discussed at the January meeting, staff will also be continuing ongoing and attempt to pursue new efforts to maintain and create new partnerships with organizations such as the Chamber of Commerce, and the Downtown Lakeville Business Association. We will also continue existing programs and look to develop new opportunities to improve public communications on economic development issues. Staff will be presenting the proposed 2005 Work Program to the City Council at their February 22"d meeting and will inform the EDC of their action at the February 23'd EDC meeting. Action Requested: Provide staff with any additional comments and/or suggestions regarding the proposed 2005 Work Program and, upon making any necessary changes or additions, recommend that staff proceed to implement the proposed 2005 Work Program. 1 STRATEGIC WORK PLAN AREA - 2005 Downtown Plan Facilitate an elT~ort to create along-term plan to promote downtown economic viability while retaining its unique and historical characteristics • To work with existing tools (i.e. Historic Fairtield District of Downtown Lakeville Design Guidelines; Parking Study) to create a common vision for the Historic Downtown Lakeville Central Business District • To improve the economic vitality of Historic Downtown Lakeville by providing additional redevelopment opportunities Action Ste Res onsibilit Bud et Timeline 1. Recommend the creation of a Downtown Planning Staff N!A 2 Qtr Task Force including representatives of the EDC, City Council, Planning Commission, DLBA, Chamber of Commerce, ISD #194, and business and residential property owners. 2. Solicit proposals from planning consultant firms to Staff N/A 2 Qtr provide the necessary technical assistance and facilitation skills. Select a firm and identify the necessary funding. 3. Work with the selected firm to facilitate a process Staff/ NIA 3 Qtr to solicit public input and to obtain consensus on a Task Force/ common vision for the Historic Downtown. Consultant 4. Identify concepts that will facilitate the common Staff/ Unknown 4 Qtr vision in terms of type, magnitude, and location of Task Force/ potential redevelopment areas in the downtown. Consultant STRATEGIC WORK PLAN AREA - 2005 Transportation hnplementation of a process to facilitate development of East West Corridors • Development of identified East-West Corridors is essential for efficient movement of commercial and residential traffic within and through the City. Action Steps Responsibility Bud et Timeline 1. Participate in East-West Corridor Study-Phase II City & County Staff/ $49,000 3` Qtr with Dakota County, City of Farmington, and Consultant Funded by Empire Township. Dakota County 2. Study will result in defining in more detail the City & County Staff/ $49,000 3 Qtr location for the Alignment C transition segment Consultant Funded by between 185th Street in Lakeville to 195th Street in Dakota Farmington. County 3. Study will also result in developing two Alignment City & County Staff/ $49,000 3 Qtr B options between Highview Avenue and TH 3 Consultant Funded by including the current 179th Street and an Dakota alignment via Dodd Road and 170th Street. County 4. Approval of Phase II of the East-West Corridor City Council/ NIA 4 Qtr Study County Board 5. Continue to pursue the designation of CSAH 70 City & County Staff1 N/A Ongoing as a Principal Arterial from Scott County to TH 52. EDC/ City Council STRATEGIC WORK PLAN AREA - 2005 Mana;;ing Development Completion of a study to determine the minimum market value of a residential housing unit that generates sufficient Ciry taxes to pay for the City services required by that unit • Information will be useful as the process of updating the City's Comprehensive Plan begins in 2007 which will involve the review and designation of land uses in un-developed areas of the City. Action Ste s Res nsibilit Bud et Timeline 1. Review analysis from previous Growth Staff/EDC N/A 1 Qtr Management Study to determine the assumptions that were utilized to determine minimum market value of a residential unit required to pay for services required by that unit. 2. Obtain a proposal from the City's fiscal consultant Staff N/A 2" Qtr to complete the necessary work to update the previous analysis and identify a funding source for these services. 3. Work with City's fiscal consultant to complete the Staff/ Unknown 3 Qtr necessary updated analysis. Consultant/ EDC STRATEGIC WORK PLAN AREA - 2005 Affordable Housing Facilitate a process with the City Council to establish affordable housing goals for the City • Approval of affordable housing goals will allow for the implementation of strategies for the attainment of affordable housing for persons of all life cycles. Action Steps Responsibility Budget Timeline 1. Review the housing goals approved by the City Staff/EDC N/A 2" Qtr when it agreed to participate in the Livable Communities program. 2. Meet with the Dakota County CDA representatives Staff/EDC NIA 2 Qtr to review affordable housing issues in Lakeville and Dakota County. 3. Review results from Community Survey regarding Staff/EDC/ N/A 2 Qtr responses to affordable housing questions. City Council 4. Determine process necessary to solicit information Staff/EDC/ Unknown 3 Qtr from appropriate stakeholders to determine City Council/ affordable housing needs not currently being met. Consultant 5. Review all information that has been obtained to Staff/ Unknown 4 Qtr reach consensus as to the desired affordable ConsultanU housing goals for the community. EDCI City Council Agenda Item MEMORANDUM TO: Economic Development Commission CC: Steve Mielke, City Administrator Amanda Schwabe, Economic Development Coordinator FROM: David L. Olson, Community & Economic Development Director DATE: February 18, 2005 RE: February Director's Report The following is the Director's Report for February of 2005. Commercial/Industrial/Institutional Protect Listing An updated C/I/I Project Listing dated January 24, 2005 has been included in the packet. Ten new commercial and industrial projects are currently being reviewed. Update on VFW House #2 Demolition Staff continues to work with Dakota County CDA and the VFW Post 210 to demo the vacant, single-family structure at 20860 Howland Avenue. Asbestos abatement is scheduled for February 24`h and 25`h with demolition to follow on February 28th and March 1St. Hoffbeck Trucking was the lowest bidder and will be completing the project. Dakota Electric Association -Partners in Progress Event The Dakota Electric Association has scheduled their annual Partners in Progress event for March 9, 2005 from 4:30 - 6:30 p.m. at Royal Cliff located at 2280 Cliff Road in Eagan. RSVP's are required by Thursday, February 24th. Please contact Amanda if you are planning to attend this event. Economic Development Association of Minnesota (EDAM) Legislative Policv Positions for 2005 Attached is copy of the adopted legislative policy positions for EDAM which is the primary state-wide economic development organization the state that represents over 500 public and private sector professionals involved in economic development initiatives. The City of Lakeville has been a member of this organization for a number of years. The 2005 Legislative Priorities for EDAM include the following: • Promote Business Retention and Expansion • Targeted Business Attraction and Marketing • Entrepreneurship • Economic Development Finance and Tools • Build and Maintain Infrastructure • Workforce Development and Education If EDC members have any questions or comments regarding these legislative positions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Building Permit Update Through the end of January, the City has issued building permits with a total valuation of $12,578,453. This compares to a valuation of $10,681,086 during the first month of 2004. Included in this amount is $625,000 for commercial and industrial permits year to date, which compares to $827,750 for commercial and industrial permits during the same period in 2004. Also included in this valuation are permits for 20 new single-family dwellings, 25 townhouse units and 16 condo units. Attached is a copy of the full building permit report through January 31, 2005. : PUBLIC Commercial /Industrial /Institutional Projects UPDATE: IANUARY Z4, ZOOS NOTE: Revisions are underlined Narne:ti ~ - L-©catioMAtldregs ; Pr~jeet ~Acti~SnsRegtf~re~i ~ .:.:',=Staius x- Zvi .tLGontsct Alcorn Beverage 21725 Hanover Avenue Installation of metal panels CUP Approved by Ctty Council on 10/4/04, Erin Seeman Argonne Village Lot 4 17756 Kenwood Trail Grocery Store Building Permit Buildin Permit is ued. nder con tru ion. Dave Olson Rainbow Foods & Retail Argonne Village Lot 2 17630 Kenwood Trail Retail Building Building Permit Building Permit. issued nd r construction Dave Olson Walgreens Argonne Village Lot 1 17610 Kenrick Avenue Drive-Ihru Restaurant Building Permit Temoorarv Certificate of Occuoanrv issued 12/29/04 Erin Seeman Wendy's Restaurant CUP Belzer's Chevrolet 21111 Cedar Avenue 40,000 S.F. expansion CUP Amendment Temporary Certificate of Occupancy issued 12/26/03. ay Rubash Easement Agreement Restoration. landscaping pond cleaning to be completed in Sorinp. 2005. Bethlehem Lutheran 20270 Iberia Avenue New 6,800 sq. ft. Church CUP Building permit issued September, 2004. Under Erin Seeman Churoh Constru i n. Celebration Church 16655 Kenyon Avenue New church Building Rezoning from C-3 to PUD Temporary Certificate of Occupancy issued 2/20/03. Frank Dempsey Preliminary and final plat Landsca in to b m leted b rin 2005. As Mike Huber CUP builts re wired. Letter for bt corners needed Central Maintenance Cedar Avenue south of Dodd City of Lakeville Central Building Permit Final site and landscaping inspection needed Allyn Kuennen Facility Boulevard Maintenance Facility & W ater tower r k ide Business Park 21 Street ice/warehouse Preliminary and final plat Scheduled for the February 3 2005 Planning Allvn Kuennen Conditional Use Permit ommission m Hn . Variance Page 1 W 5 ¢Wn~mmmi"dvre,mm"nuddst.daot2sas PUBLIC Commercial /Industrial /Institutional Projects UPDATE: IANUARY 24, 2005 NOTE: Revisions are underlined Name ~ Location/Address Project Actipris Required- - n ~ ~ .Status, Staff ~o~ta~t ~ ~ . Crossroads Church East of Cedar Avenue, south Constructionol a church io CUP Temporary Cemflcate of Occupancy issued 7122/04. Erin Seeman of Dodd Blvd., and east of the PUD Distdct Need mNar of as•built pradinp plan 175' Street Crossroad Lot 1 East of Cedar Ave., south of 4,525 sq. ft. restaurant with CUP Building Permit issued. Temoorarv Cenificate of Erin Seeman Inta'uice and Dodd Blvd. And north of 179 drive-thru window. Site Plan review. Occupancv issued for Intaiuice on 10.75-04 pino's Gvro's Street Crossroads Lot 5 17516 Dodd Boulevard Restaurant CUP -Copper Building Citv Council approved on 17-1-04 Erin Seeman Cheese Louise, LLC Double E rossin Cedar Avenue nd Dodd Retail Preliminary and final plat Waiting for revised plans. Allyn Kuennen Boulevard Drywall Supply Company South of 215 Street and 27,300 sq. ft. oflice Sile plan approval Temoorarv Certificate of Occupancv issued 72 22 04 Frank Dempsey west of Holyoke warehouse, with 70,500 sq. ft. Landscape and erasion control inspection Spring buildout 2005. Elder Jones Office 185 Street and Kenwood Office Buildino Preliminary and linal plat Sketch plan review Frank Demosev Buildin Fleet Farm 77070 Kenrick Avenue Screening Wall CUP Amendment/IUP Permit issued for exterior yard and building Frank Dempsey Interior Remodel/Silo Building Permit modifications. Under construction. Dead trees need to landscaping be replaced. Hebert Office /Warehouse 21034 Heron Way OfficeM/arehouse Building Permit 3 500 secudt bein h Id for miscell nexus items Allyn Kuennen III that need to ba completed Hertz Rental Car Buck Hill Road Ou[door display of rental Conditional Use Permit hedul d for Februa 200 Plannin Commission F ank Dem se vehicles Meetin Page 2 of 5 A~Wb'mmmirqusPrdecstma%tamub5ei9.Aocnr25m5 r 4 `r PUBLIC Commercial /Industrial /Institutional Projects UPDATE: JANUARY Z4, ZOOS NOTE: Revisions are underlined Name, Loco#iprVAddress Project Actions Required , 5#atus staff Contact ; , ri- a Imperial Plastics Heron Way Warehouse addition Building Permit ~ildine oermd issued Under construction Frank Dempsey Parking Deferment Alyson Morris Kenrick Commons South of CSAH 46 and west One commercial lot with retail Preliminary and final plat Temoorarv Certificate of Occupancies can be issued Erin Seeman of Kenrick Avenue center with drive thru window CUP for tenant finish Drive thru stri in must be done. Kenrick Ptaza Kenrick Avenue, north of Retail Strip Center preliminary and IMal plat Permit issued. Under Construction. Frank Dempsey 165'" Street Kenrick Pond Kenrick / 164 Street 15,D00 sq. It. Retail Center Preliminary Plan i until a roved 12- -04. Need m tars and DXF Frank Dempsey Final Plat lil so Develo ant ontr t can be recorde Zach Johnson Easement Right-of-way Vacation Lakeview Financial Bank Itasca Trail and 163' Street Bank Preliminary and linal plat Temporary Certificate of Occuoancv issued 10-2-04 Frank Dempsey Final landscape inspection in Sorina 2005 Lakeville Crossing Cedar Avenue and 160 Strip Retail Buildings PUD Rezoning Building Permits issued. Under Construction. Final Allyn Kuennen Phase II Street landsca in in Lion in S rin 2 Lakeville Crossing Cedar Avenue and 160 Free standing Realty Olfice Building Permit Tem ra rtificate of Occu tic issu 12-30-04. Allyn Kuennen Edina Realty Street Final land a ins action in rin 2005. Lakeville Crossing Cedar Avenue and 160 Anchor Grocery Store and Building Permil Building Permit issued. Under construction. Allyn Kuennen Kowalski s Retail Street strip retail Final site inspection Page 3 of 5 AlgbbommMNSpigechMasN,puhligist.nocpirz6a5 PUBLIC Commercial /Industrial /Institutional Projects UPDATE: IANUARY Z4, ZOOS NOTE: Revisions are underlined Name LQCatiorUgddress - Project ~ ;Actions. Required y ~ . &tat~s Staff contact Lakeville High School 19600 Ipava Avenue Building Addition. CUP Amendment (Antenna) Building Permit issued Untler Constructionx Prank Dempsey North Lakeville High School 21135 Jacquard Avenue New High School building and Preliminary/Final Plat Building Permit issued. Untler Construction. Daryl Morey South accessory outdoor athletic Comp. Plan Amendment Gene Abbott facilities CUP Rezoning Lakeville Tire & Auto 20909 Holyoke Avenue RemodeVRe-roof Conditional Use Permit Certificate of Occupancy issued 10/29/03. Gene Abbott House Demolition Alley Vacation Landscaping to be inspected Spring 2005. Dave Olson Parking Lot Construction Comprehensive Plan Amend. Rezoning Lakeville Town Office Park East of 165 Street Five (5) Building Officeliown PUD Rezoning- Temporary Certificates of Occupancy issued 11/14/03 Allyn Kuennen Offices Plan for 10639 and 1!7/04 for 10670. Need As-builts. Gene Abbott Easement Vacation Lakeville Town Office Park North of 165 Street across 16 lots Preliminary and final plat Building Permit. issued. Under Construction. Final Allyn Kuennen 2'" Addition from Joplin Path Rezoning landscape inspection Spring 2005 Need as-builts LaMeltry's Southwest quadrant of Cedar Major Automobile Repair CUP Temporarv Certificate of Occ ncv issued 12-6-04 Frank Dempsey Avenue and 210'" Street. Building Permit Unauthorized grading into CSAH 23 right-of wav must be removed and as-buiilt radin Ian submitt Merchant's Bank SW corner of 185 lKenwood 7,000 s.t. Bank Preliminary and final plat Buildin0 Permit issued- Under Construction, Frank Dempsey Trail Future Office Building Building Permit Jay Rubash Minnesota Valley Free 16075 Highview Avenue Church Addition CUP amendment Tem ra Certificate f Occu anc i ued 11-17-04. Alyson Morris Lutheran Church Page d o15 9 ~~~~r~~~.~7~ ,r I. PUBLIC Commercial /Industrial /Institutional Projects ITPDATE: 7AM7ARY 24, 2005 NOTE: Revisans are underlined ,Name ~LgcatiorJAddres~ Projecf ~ - Actipns S~gr~ired .:W Status ~ Sceff Gc~cc „ Motoprimo Motor Sports Kenrick Avenue and 167 Retail/ServiceBuilding Preliminary Plat Footrna foundation cermk issued Frank Dempsey Street Final Plat Alyson Morris CUP MSP Commercial Glacier Way & Cedar Avenue 25,000 s.l. Office Building Site Plan review Certificate of Occu rmits i sued for individual Frank Dempsey Building Permit tenants Landscape inspection in Sprang 2005 MW Johnson Office 17645 Juniper Avenue Office Buildin Site Plan Review Site Plan Review Frank Dem se Buildin Conditional Use Permit Stellar Properties 21900 Kenrick Avenue Renovation Phase 1 CUP Bit in P rmit issued. Under construction. Erin Seeman Superamerica Kenrick and Kenwood Trail Fuel sales and convenience Preliminary and final plat 7emoorarv Ced'rficate of Occucencv issued 72-14-04 Frank Dempsey Store CUP Landscaoinp and erosion control issu variance Taco BeIVLong John Silver 17750 Kenwood Trail 3,071 sq. ft. fast food CUP Landscape installation required. Dave Olson restaurant Timbercrest 3 Addition 165 Street and Or and ~ multi-tenant retail. Preliminary and final plat Sketch plan review. ~ Erin Seeman Tr it Office Retail Buildina PUD Amendment Easement Vacation Tollefson Office Buildina K k k Avenue & 205 Multi-Tenant Office Buildin Preliminary and final plat Sketch plan revised pllvn Kuennen Street Woodson Progeny Heron Way New Building Building Permit Need to seed. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Frank Dempsey issued 10/11/04. g:MW~mmmlMusPrel~~1~skryublirl31Aoc01/T8105 Page 5 of 5 Legislative Policy Positions 2005 Economic ' ~ Development Association of Minnesota W fg s r p t I Who is EDAM? The Economic Development Association of Minnesota (EDAM) is a statewide association representing more than 500 public and private sector professionals involved with implementing state, regional, or local economic development initiatives. Our Legislative policies are shaped by members' unique'experience and understanding of the cools and tactics that are mast effective in positioning and marketing Minnesota as a location for corpora[e, small business, hous- ing and community investment. Economic developers generally focus on financing, marketing and implementation strategies for. • Developing public infrastructure • Facilitating business expansion, job creation, and redevelopment • Attracting, training and mobilizing a skilled local workforce • Addressing local housing needs • Marketing Minnesota's benefits as a place [o live and locate a business ~ ~ Building Communities Developing Careers Introduction An Economic Development Strategy for Minnesota Successful economic development projects are generally a result of a number of different factors. EDAM recommends a strategic approach to Minnesota's economic develop- ment policies and legislation based on the following core economic develop- ment components: i 1. Promoting business retention and expansion 2. Mazketing to targeted indus[ries ' 3. Supporting entrepreneurship ~ 4. Providing financial tools for economic development 5. Building and maintaining infrastructure 6. Providing a trained and educated workforce EDAM will work wi[h the Depanment of Employment and Economic Development (DEED), the Pawlenry Administration, legislators, and other a interested organizations to establish a comprehensive economic develop- s ment strategy for Minnesota and to create a forum in which theses entities it ~ may periodically review and revise the strategy. +a <t c one i_~ jl.',, Promote Business Retention and Expansion Issue EDAM Position { j Stains compete vigorously to attract new busi- EDAM supports increased efforts to nesses. It is much more efficient and cost retain and expand Minnesota's businesses, effective, however, to retain and expand a including joint efforts between state, state's existing businesses. Therefore, business regional, and local governments, the retention and expansion must be a key coin- Chamber of Commerce, and private sec- ponent of a state's economic development for entities. efforts. EDAM encourages [he funding and uti- lization of existing retention and expan- sion resources, such as the University of Minnesota's BR&E Strategies Program, as well as academic and state agency research on economic development mat- ters. s two Targeted Business Attraction and Marketing Issue EDAM Position Marketing is a large part of economic devel- EDAM suppons increased funding for opment, and may include advertising, trade the Bioscience Initiative, which encour- missions, and attendance at trade shows. It is ages the growth and expansion of an not financially or pratzically feasible, nor existing Minnesota industry. desirable to contact every industry or entre- EDAM supports existing efforts by the preneur. Therefore, industry dusters which Department of Employment and already exist and flourish in Minnesota Economic Development to promote should be targeted though vazious promo- Minnesota regionally, nationally, and tional avenues. internationally through trade shows and promotional materials. Redevelopment means economic develop- ment for many communities. EDAM EDAM also supports the public/private encourages the establishment of policies and efforts of Positively Minnesotrt, which tools to help make redevelopment sites a seeks to attract new and expanding busi- viable option for business investment. nesses to the State. • EDAM encourages additional efforts and funding in 2005 to market Minnesota and its assets, including the JOBZ pro- gram. • EDAM supports the development of ' tools such as the Enterprise Network Syrtem, Bizpathways, and cost/benefit analysis tools. three Entreprenuership Issue EDAM Position A viable business communiry sustains urban EDAM supports efforts to assist entre- neighborhoods, suburban communities, and preneurs in both rural and urban areas rural towns, by providing services, creating with financial and technical assistance, as jobs, and enabling people to live in the com- well business friendly public policy. munities of their choice. Efforts should be taken to encourage and promote entrepre- EDAM supports initiatives, such as tech- " neurship throughout the State and organize nology transfer programs or angel technical and financial resources for entrepre- investor tax credizs, [hat attract invesr neurs. meat and venture capital to Minnesota. Four Economic Development Finance and Tools i;~ Issue of an Urban Renewal TIF District ro 1 assist mixed-use projects, thereby allow- The state must provide viable financial tools ing different types of districts to be creat- that effectively and efficiently promote its ed and share resources. economic development objects. Minnesota tends to restrict irs use of economic develop- EDAM supports changes to the TIF mem financial tools, while wmpeting states statute which would allow redevelopment appear ro use similar tools more liberally, districts to utilize the base or frozen value Although it's not desirable to unnecessazily of the district. provide corporate subsidies, Minnesota's self- imposed restric[ions put it at a competitive EDAM opposes legislation which would disadvantage to other states. restrict or eliminate the use of eminent domain for economic or development EDAM Position purposes. EDAM is not opposed, howev- er, to changes that would create a more • EDAM supports initiatives that better transparent public process. enable the generation and utilization of on-site development dollars, such as TIF EDAM supports proposals by the TIF and tax abatement, and the use of such Taskforce to better facilitate development tools to fund workforce training efforts. throughout Minnesota, including expanding allowable uses of TIF, funding • EDAM supports the consideration and business development and land recycling research of new financial tools, such as programs, and enhancing tax abatement. leveraging a portion of the State's pension I~ fund, to assist economic development EDAM supports bonding for the i projects. Redevelopment Account, as well as flexi- bility to use it in both the Metro Area • EDAM supports revisions to the Business and Greater Minnesota. EDAM also sup- Subsidy Law which reduce regulatory ports bonding for projects which directly burdens while still providing public dis- support economic development efforts, closure of business assistance. such as local transponation projects, util- ity extensions, and business development • EDAM supports legislation initially pro- and land recycling programs. posed in 2D04 ro allow the establishment five Build and Maintain Infrastructure Issue EDAM Position Economic development is directly dependent EDAM supports efforts to increase fund- on the availability and adequacy of infrastruc- ing for roadway expansions and improve- ture, including but not limited to, roads, rail, meats in both rural and urban areas of sewer, water, and telecommunications. the State. InFrastructure is an important issue in both large cities as well as rural areas throughout EDAM supports funding programs For Minnesota and is an important site selection communities to add, improve, and factor. The construction, maintenance, and expand utility capacity to aid business upgrading of infrastructure is a key compo- growth, especially in rural areas. neat to Minnesota's economic development. • EDAM supports the expansion of light rail and commuter rail, which not only aid in transportation but present oppor- tunnies for economic development and redevelopment. • EDAM supports astate-lead initiative to promote and guide the development and evolution of broadband [ethnology with- in Minnesota, including the development of gigabyte capacity and growing a-com- merce. six Workforce Development and Education Issue EDAM Position An educated workforce is open recognized as EDAM supports integrating the wotk- one of Minnesota's great assets and is critical force training needs of the State's key to the State's continued growth and develop- industries with the curricula of the ment. A trained and educated workforce is University of Minnesota and MNSCU also is an important site selection factor for sys[etns. many companies considering an new loca- tion. EDAM also supports continued funding For customized training services,the one- stop Workforce Center systems, and increased flexibility in the use of Workforce Development Fund dollazs, such as customized [raining. seven The Legislative Committee 2004 LaDonna Boyd Eric Ewald, EDAM Executive Director Henry Fisher Kathryn Hahne, EDAM Government Relations Consultant Jennifer Hawkins Kim Lindquist Carol Lovro Curt Milburn Tom Moore Marc Nevinski, Co-Chair John Rajkowski Margare[ Robare Heidi Steinmetz, Co-Chair Joseph C. Weis Thanks to Our Sponsors The following organizations sponsored the publication of this policy booklet. Connexus Energy ~CONNF~CUS' lour Community Energy f'eNler Dakota Electric G „L RIC ASSOCIATI~~~~O~}}..~~N~~ YwrTavl~stmreF+U+tY' Amer ~.~•J1 Ehlers & Associates ~I II ~I Faegre & Benson F A E G R E rx BENSON LLP springsted ®S p r i n g s t e d ~ . ' ~ ii . s+ s ~Y. I . a ~ Building Communities Developing Careers , Economic Development Association of Mimiesota 1000 Westgate Drive, Suite 252 Saint Paul, MN 5 5 1 14-1067 Te1651-290-6296 Fax 651-290-2266 wtvw.edam.org edamQewald.com ~ Report: Penni4slssued PERMIT ISSUED REPORT. ~ PAGE: Hate Primlea: otr~iizoos City of Lakeville Permit Category: All Permits CURRENT RANGE - PREVIOUS RANGE O1/O1/2005 -01/31/2005 01/01/2004 -01/31/20D4 PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW Building Single Family -All Inclusive 20 40,922.20 4,898,000.00 23,450.23 30 63,722,20 7,712,000.00 36,447.00 Duplex -All Inclusive 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Twnhse Unit - All Inclusive 23 34,534.25 3,505,000.00 13,003.38 I 1 15,112.45 1,452,000.00 8,386.62 Detached Townhouse -All Inc: 2 3,365.50 355,000.00 1,856.08 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Condo 16 20,053.60 1,856,000.00 4,333.44 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Apartments of Units 0 0.00 b.00 0.00 0 A.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile Home Install 1 59:50 0.00 0.00- 0 0.00- 0.00 0.00 Driveway 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Egress Window 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Stucco Siding 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Garages 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 A.00; 0.00. 0.00 Accessory Bldgs 0 0.00 0.00. 0.00 0 0:00 0.00 0.00. Reside 2 49.00 0.00 0.00 5 122.50 0.00 0.00 Reap 1 24.50 0.00 0.00 3 73.50; 0.00 0.00 Res AddnlRepairlRmdl 4 1,935:10 213,000.00 0.00 4 1,806:36 196,000.00 0.00 Deck -Residential 2 180.50 7,000.00 0.00 1 38.75 1,000.00 0:00 Porch -Residential 2 334.50 18,000.00 0.00 1 125.25 6,000.00 0.00 Lower Level -Residential. 31 4,674.25 245,000.00 0.00 52 4,327.0'1 163,000.00 0.00 Addition -Residential 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Commercial -New 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Commercial Addn/Rmdl 5 5,311.45 600,000.00 2,829.26 11 8,044.05 827,750.00 5,156.32 Commercial Re-Roof 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .0.00 0.00 0.00 Industrial -New 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .0.00 0.00 0.00- Industrial Addn/Itmdl 1 321.25 20,000.00 208.81 0 0.00 0.00 -0.00 Tax Exempt Addn/Rmdl 1 .111.25 5,000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tax Exempt -New 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0:00 0.00 0.00 Swimming Pools 1 49.50 O.DO 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0:00 Buildings Moved 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 i .99.50 0.00 0.00 report: PemWSlssued. PERMIT ISSUED REPORT PAGE: Date Priatea: ornvzoos City of Lakeville Pemtit Category: All Permits CURRENT RANGE - - PREVIOUS RANGE 01/01/2005 - 01/31/2005 01/01/2004 - 01/31/2004 PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW Buildings Demolished 3 148.50 0.00 0.00 0 0.00. 0.00 0.00 Foundation Only 1 2,393:75 350,000.00 1,555.94 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grading 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00. .0.00 0.00 Miscellaneous 0 O.DO 0.00 0.00 1 83.25 3,OD0:00 0.00 Sub-total 116 114,468.60 12,072,000.00 47,237.14. 120 93;SS4.76 10,360,750.00 49,989.94 Electrical Single Family 42 3,280.00 5,000.00 0.00 44 2,969.00 0.00 0.00 Duplex 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 80.00. 0.00 0.00 Townhouse 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 880:00 0.00 0.00 Service Lateral 6 120.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00' 0.00. 0.00 Furnace/Air Conditioning 10 240.00 150.00 0.00 0 0,00 0.00 0.00 In Floor Heat 1 20.00 272.00 0.00 0 0,00- 0.00 0.00 Manufactured Home 1 25.00 0.00 0.00 3 150.00. 0.00 0.00 Sub-Panel 1 25.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Temporary Service 1 20.00 0:00 0.00 0 0.00. 0.00 0.00 Saver Switch 60 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fireplace 3 120.00 2,500.00 0.00 0 0100 0.00 0.00 Ras Addition/Remtxlel 15 680.00 19,995:00 0.00 16 470.00 0.00 0.00 Lower Level -Residential 30 1,200.00 13,925.D0 0.00 56 2;280.00 0:00 0.00 Additional Inspections 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0,00 Commercial/Industrial 6 299.00 0.00 0.00 14 940.00 A.00 0.00 CommereiaVlndus[rial AddM 10 610.00 0.00 0.00 6 575.OD 0.00 0.00 Traffic Signal Standard 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Street Lighting 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 D.00 Sprinkler/Alarm 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Institutional/Tax Exempt 3 103.00 0.00 0.00 5 10,615.OD 0.00 0.00 Swimming Pool 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 - 0:00 0.00 0.00 Sign 1 20.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 -0.00 ~I-~ot,~b 0 0.00 0.00 0.00. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~ ~ ~ PAGE: ltepcxt: PemtiLSlssued PERMIT ISSUED REPORT pate r~;ntea: otnlnoos City of Lakeville. Permit Category: All Permits CURRENT RANGE PREVIOUS RANGE 01/01/2005 - 01131/2005. 01/01/2004 - 01/31/2004 PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW 0 0.00. 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00. 0.00 ' Heat Pump Undefined 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 40.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 190 7,962.00 41,842.00 0.00 158 18,999.00 0.00 0.00 Fire Fuel Tank 1 52.50 0.00 0.00 0 0.00' 0.00 0.00 AutomaticFire-Extinguishing 11 3,217.86 271,968.00 0,00 0 0.00. 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 12 3,270.36 271,968.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00' 0.00 Mechanical 17 938.00 27,000.00 0.00 10 395.00 0.00 0.00 Heating Heating/Air Cond 5 197.50 0.00 0.00 3 118.50 0.00 0.00 Air Conditioning 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Commercial Mechanical 12 1,635.22 115,281.00 0.00 12 1,712.92 123,394.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Gas Piping Ventilation 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 39.50 1,895.00 0.00 Refrigeration 0 0.00 0.00. 0.00 1 218.00 16,800:00. 0.00 Fuel Tank 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 90.00 6,000.00 0.00 1 39.50 0.00 0.00 3 118.50 0.00 0.00 Garage Heater Add/Rplc/Repairs 2 79.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 In Floor Water Heat 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Miscellaneous 3 1I8.50 0.00 0.00 1 150.00 .10,000.00 0.00 10 395.00 6,800.00 0.00 11 434.5,0 6,898.00 0.00 Fireplace Sub-total 50 3,402.72 149,081.00 0.00 43 3,276.92 164,987.00 0.00 Plumbing ' .Commercial Pltmbing System 7 578.00 38,600.00 0.00 10 1;500.39 105,833.00 0.00 Plumbing Sys[em 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Water Softener 28 406.00 4,462.00 0.00 23 333.50 1,606.00 0.00 Repot: PetxnitsIssuea PERMIT ISSUED REPORT • - PAGE: Data enatea: otninoos City td Lakeville. Pemut Category: All Pemtits - CURRENT RANGE - PREVIOUS RANGE 01101(2005 -01131/2005 01/Oi/2004 -01/31/2004 PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW Fire Sprinklers 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 746.12. 45,410.00 0.00 Water Meter 0 OAO 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawn Sprinklers 0 0.00 0.00 0:00 10 237.00 2,500.00. 0.00 Inside Plumbing Conversion 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 39.50 0.00 0.00 Addn/Repair/Rmdl 3 .118.50 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Water Heater 14 203.50 0.00 0.00. 3 43.50 0.00 0.00 RPZ 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Miscellaneous 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 39.50 -0.00 0.00 Comm/Muti-Family Lawn Spr 1 39.50. 0.00 0.00 1 39.50 0.00 0.00 Undefined 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 53 1,345.50 43,562.00 0.00 59 2,979.01 155,349.00 0.00 Sign Pertnanent Sign 10 550.00 0.00 0.00 16 850.00 0.00 0.00 Temporary Sign 7 175.00: 0.00 0.00 0 .0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 17 725.00 0.00 0.00 16 850.00 0.00 0.00 Sewer /Water S/W Install 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Private Sewer-ReplaceBepair 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 .0.00 S/W Conversion 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 84.50. 0.00 0.00 Sewer Conversion Only 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0:00 0.00 Water Conversion Only 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Commercial 0 0.00 0.00 O.OD 0 0.00 0.00. 0.00 Draintile Connection 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Miscellaneous 1 39.50 0.00. .0.00 2 / / 79.00' 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 1 39.50 0.00 0.00 3 i 163.:50' 0.00 0.00 User Defined a ReportLPe~talssaea. PERhIITISSUEDREPORT PAGE: Hate PrLaea: ovstnaos City of Lakeville Pemtit Category: All Pe~mi~s CURRENT RANGE PREVIOUS RANGE 01/O1/2005 - 01/31/2005 01/0172004 - 01/31/2004 PERMIT TYPE QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW QTY BASE FEE VALUATION PLAN REVIEW Re-inspection Fee 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 0:00 0.00 0.00 Plan Review 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Security Escrow Landscape Escrow 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Miscellaneous 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 O.DO Sub-total 1 O.OD ' 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Zoning Accessory Buildings 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00. 0.00 0.00 Above Ground Pool 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fences 1 20.D0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-total 1 20.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 441 131,233.68 12,578,453.00 47,237.14 400 119,823.19 10,681,086.00 49,989.94 35W CORRIDOR "EXCELLENT" FOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT January 21, 2005 Page 1 of 2 r~{ ~ 35W CORRIDOR "EXCELLENT" FOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT -January 21, 2005 Mn/DOT report estimates bus ridership will tdple if 8RT is implemented St. Paul --The Interstate 35W corridor is an excellent candidate to deploy a robust Bus Rapid Transit system, according to a report issued today by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The I-35W BRT route would span about 20 miles between downtown Minneapolis and Lakeville. "I35W is one of the busiest, most congested highways in the Twin Cities. BRT is a viable solution to support the enormous growth in employment, population and travel projected for the corridor," said Governor Tim Pawlenty. The study concludes that BRT service could significantly increase transit capacity in the I-35W corridor. Current transit service carries 15,000 express bus riders each weekday in the corridor, the most heavily used transit corridor in the region. According to the study, BRT service would increase ridership to 43,000 riders per day by 2030. The study recommends implementing BRT service by operating buses in shared BRT/High Occupancy Vehicle lanes from Lakeville to Minneapolis. The report notes with optimism that shared BRTIRON lanes are part of the proposed reconstruction of I-35W from 66th Street in Richfield to 42nd Street in Minneapolis, and that future improvements to I-35W also envision shared BRTlHOV lanes. Lt. Gov. and Transportation Commissioner Carol Molnau called the notion of shared BRT/HOV lanes a key recommendation of the report. "The I-35W corridor between Lakeville and Minneapolis serves a vital and growing area within and south of the Metro,' Lt. Gov. Molnau said. "Current and projected travel demand throughout the corridor is staggering. For I-35W, BRT can provide a viable, attractive and affordable transportation choice far thousands of commuters, thus helping to reduce projected congestion growth. The concept of shared BRT/HON lanes is the most realistic approach, providing excellent transit service while saving land and capital expense." Metropolitan Council Chairman Peter Bell said the report is a major step forward in promoting improved transit optians in the region. "The growing rate of congestion is one of the most critical'livability' issues facing the metropolitan area," Chairman Bell said. "The BRT study reflects a growing consensus in the region that a variety of transit options must be considered and implementedrf we are going to increase transit use and reduce congestion in an effective and affordable manner." Rep. Mary Liz Holberg, R-Lakeville, and Rep. Frank Homstein, DFL-Minneapolis, have championed BRT service in the I- 35W corridor, authoring legislation in 2003 that directed Mn/DOT to conduct the BRT feasibility study. "Managing traffic congestion is an issue where suburbs and core cities recognize the need to compromise or everyone loses," said Rep. Holberg. "1 am very pleased with the results of the BRT report. It encourages the development of transit service that will maximize mobility and minimize expenditures." "The report forecasts athree-fold increase in bus ridership in the corridor over the next 25 years," said Rep. Hornstein. "Our growing suburban areas need cost-effective selutions to our current and future traffic challenges. The study confirms that BRT in the I.35W corridor should be part of the mix." The study recommends using the existing Metro area bus fleet, with buses running 55 miles per hour in shared BRT/HON transit lanes, with stops at three "on-line" stations in the corridor. A variety of local bus routes and service would feed and support the'BRT service. The additional capital cost of implementing BRT service in the I-35W corridor is estimated at approximately $35 million, which includes additional buses, BRT stations, park-and-ride lots and some roadway shoulder improvements. (The capital estimate does nol include the construction cost for the shared BRTIRON lanes in the corridor, which are projected in the Metropolitan Council's and Mn/DOT's 20•year investment plans.) The Pawlenty-Molnau Administration recently proposed a comprehensive transportation financing package that contains additional funding to support BRT implementation in the I- 35W corridor, as well as the other Tier t transitways identified in the Metropolitan Council's draft Transportation Policy Plan. The study was conducted for Mn/DOT by URS Corp. with additional input from the city of Minneapolis, Metropolitan Council, hrrn•/hvmm rtnvam nr etote mn ne/tnom PrintO/ 9rlA rtirty acn n7/f17Mr1r15 35W CORRIDOR "EXCELLENT" FOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT 7anuary 21, 2005 Page 2 of 2 Metro Transit, Minnesota Valley Transit Authority, Federal Highway Administration and Hennepin, Dakota and Scott counties. For more information on the BRT study visft the Mn/DOT Web site at www.dot.stafe.mn.us. r..,.,~n........, ~,.~,o.,,.......,.o..,...,..w...,~., v.:...m_~nn.+:,.ie...... mrrnr~nnc QAKt?TA ~U[,TUR~~ 1~PI(2.J#44GRN49 V~ 1 i ,ut3 ~HEtti: ~1~ 2005 Dakota County Economic Summit Creating Our Competitive Advantage March 16, 2005 Registration & Continental Breakfast: 7:15 a.m. Summit Program, including lunch: 8:00 a.m. -1:00 p.m. Dakota County Technical College 1200 East 145u' Street, Rosemount Park and enter through the West Entrance. For more information, contact Bill Coleman, Executive Director at 651-49-2551 or bill@dakotafuture.com or check our web site at www.dakotafuture.com. As a recognized business or community leader, we ask that you accept our invitation to participate as a delegate to the 2005 Dakota County Economic Summit. This event will serve to set the course for the economic future of our community of business, government, education institutions and residents. Event speakers will offer current information on global and regional economic trends with ample participant discussion on how these trends may affect your organization and community. The SummiC features a return of Ed Barlow, President of Creating the Future, Inc. Mr. Barlow has worked extensively with businesses, educational institutions, and economic development organizations worldwide to help them anticipate and influence their future. Summit attendees will learn about the progress made in forming and operating Dakota Future, a private-public economic development organization launched at the November 2003 Summit. Participants will identify opportunities to be engaged in this important effort. Your input will influence the strategic direction that we intend to Take in the next 24 months. Please join us at the Summit as we focus our combined energy and talent on [he important task of continuing to create opportunities and to ensure a prosperous future for our Dakota County community. Private Sector Public Sector Chair Vice-Chair Chair Vice Chair Bill Smith LaDonna Boyd Bill Droste Cheryl Frank Waterous Company Dakota Electric Assoc. City of Rosemount Inver Hills Com. College South St. Paul Farmington Rosemount Inver Grove Heights Dakota County Economic Summit Registration Form Name Organization Address City, State, Zip Telep)mne Email The registration fee for the Summit is $25.00 per person and includes continental breakfast and lunch. You may register online at www.dakotafuture.com or through the mail. To register by mail; please complete mail a separate form for by March 4 to Dakota Future, PO Box 210874, Apple Valley, MN 55124-0874. I have enclosed payment for my registration. For more information: DAKOTA Please invoice me for payment. Bill Coleman 1 651-491-2551FUTURE bill@dakotafutiire.com a_-' -rr• ~ 1 n u . 1 - - 1 r l~~('~! ~ i? ~I~ r rrl,r 'r ~'i ICI' ~ f~_rrrri; ~'r r ~ R„n ~ e .:a-~iv- V ~yqy.{~ . F=• 11 ~ 1 1 111 11 11 11 1 1 1 / 1 ~I '1~ 1 _ i ;nll 11 ~ iii it ii i li ~J(Jil f~1_nrri~N~'IS_~y ~j~h~~~ jJrJlur~i~ ~ri~'~t4r~u, `y l ~ --1 • • 11 : 1 : 1/• 1 111' nl/l: 1 ::1; 1 7/~f~ CJ~ r ~~('~(~r'fJ ~rl'~'~~II J: rJ rrJlf ~`fj ~f l',~I~~;• ~ 1 111 1111 - 1 - _ r _ _~_~r Je/ - - - r 1JrJjf r"F=i Lrl~'1~~.1!_1.'': -''..L' _rJ~'r~J~~'T~ lr!r1ri~{{_; J ' i~"i` :mil ~ Ii,; l- "w''oi 1 / / 1 1 1 1 ' 1It 11- _ _ - -f'rrJ)~~'r~ ~~rL'~~i~~~. ~_,.,_,?x°~ )(~(~~I (r~~lr_;Fri,~f ~J'/.~EJ~rri' \F Sei.. 1 1 : 1 J4~~ f ~ - ~ ~ i / }y 2 '7f~~%! ~ri,~,i~~rig~ .~"_'yr_I J~rr~ rr -1 L1~r~-r~i J(~~.!; r~ti~S'~~_ . `s!~ J=%~~~lr~rr ;jrn ~ r-~^ r. ~ - _ _ ~-~y 1 : 1 1 : 1 ~ It Y 1 1 ~ - • 1 1 ~ ' 1 1 ~ ~ A I 1 1' 11 I - ~ Ir~~ 1 ~ 1 _ ..r__~ _ 1 ¦ - - _ i ~r~J'_~ _(!~i '•_r~F~ I J~%~~U~.LSb:!9 ~!,r~~y~rj~rri~rl~ _tri - ~r ~ IILj : ~1.1 i 1,L 11, / 11-1 11• --~-~----=-s. ~ 1__T'_ri~iri J~ (rri~rJq~rri~xi~ friru~,J;~~~.ir_r~~ (Wrrl~r~~~/~rrr~ri~: - ..-~.~r..111y. . :~ir~- ~4 _ 4~ 3 t J~ ~ r~ r i r~rrl! J .-Y-~ I fa1~ rtI ~I1 [rr'r,:~~~r•~icrr~~c- [rri~~i,•r~/~rr~~ ire . J , r•r~Iflffll~~lf~f1 , ~ 1 t MI 111 _ _ .fi 1 ,r •~v Ji J.f ~r r~~f• I If ( ~f~ ( 1~ ~l ~I_~r__., J~%~_Jrlrl_ t1. LIJr~ ~rll''rEarf~/~~ ~ r z ~ _ ~tSiStll~~1J1S =i 1 1 1 t l 11 1- - t'1 it 1 1 1 N? :11 C / 1 1.: i . 1 e 1~ 1' • . 1 1 . • • . . . . "4/AY ~ - - ~ _ - ":rJI! rJISll:' JF. Y:4>tlII1~11'F 'l ~ ~ rJI ~L S11 JJ>I ~J ~1 11 1 li• it _ 1 / Y1 1 • 1 1 - 11 1 • / 1 11 1 rl ~ 1 . n v i - 1 1 t l: - 1 n l. 1' 1 1 1 1 . . . 1 . • ' 1 1 :1 . 1 1 ~ . .1 ~ . , _ , ~ ~ ~ 1• ~~u• 5