Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-03-92 s CITY OF LAKEVILLE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3,1992 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Zaun. The pledge of allegiance to the flag was given. Roll call was taken. Present: Councilmembers Ruhmann, Sindt, Mulvihill, Harvey and Mayor Zaun. Also present: R. Erickson, City Administrator; R. Knutson, City Attorney;. K. Nelson, City Engineer; M. Sobota, Community & Economic Development Director; D. Feller, Finance Director; D. Gudmundson, Chief. of Police; D. Krings, Chief Building Official; C. Friedges, City Clerk. MINUTES The minutes of the July. 13th .special Council meeting were approved as presented. The minutes of .the. July 20th Council meeting were approved with corrections on Pages 1 and 5 as requested by Councilmember Sindt. STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS Attorney: None.. Engineer: Mr. Nelson announced that traffic signals along Cedar Avenue: are currently being installed. Administrator: Mr. Erickson provided additional information to the Council for .agenda items No. 9, a revised document which eliminates the word "amendment" from the conditional use permit; 10, a signed development contract, letter of credit and security; 12, additional background material regarding the Dakota Electric substation site; and 14, additional information to provide a historical perspective on the Acorn Heights rezoning matter. PRESENTATIONS/INTRODUCTIONS Mr. Feller introduced the new City Hall Receptionist, Suzie Gerken. Mr. Krings introduced the new Building. Inspector, Scott Wheeler. CITIZENS' COMII~NTS None. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmembers removed Item No. 7e, agreement with Dakota County for right-of :way acquisition on the County .Road 46 interchange, from the consent agenda. Councilmembers added Item No. 16, agreement with Resource Strategies Corp. for a waste management facilities impact. analysis. 92.1'72 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Sindt to approve the modified consent agenda items as follows: y + CITY OF LAKEVILLE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3,1992 PAGE 2 a. .Approve claims for payment. b. Receive minutes of the following advisory committee meetings: Planning Commission, July 16th Parks & Recreation Committee, July 15th Cable TV $oard, July 14th Environmental Affairs Committee, July 14th c. Resolution No. 92-124 approving plans and specifications and setting a bid date for the installation of an emergency generator. d. Resolution No. 92-125 approving plans and specifications and setting a bid date for replacement of fuel tanks at the public works building. e. (Removed from consent agenda). f. Approve Fire Permit Agreement with Eureka Township. g. Resolution No. 92-126 changing the name of Hemlock Path in the Woodbury First Addition to 173rd Street West. h. Approve storm sewer credit and final storm sewer area assessment for • Dodd Ridge 3rd Addition. i. Resolution No. 92-127 withdrawing from the Minnesota Police Recruitment System and authorize staff to engage the services of Personnel Decisions, Inc. j. Resolution No. 92-128 requesting advance encumbrance of state .aid funds for Ipava Avenue, Improvement Project 91-2. k. Final acceptance of streets and utilities for Orchard Oaks. 1. Receive Fire Relief Association Certificate of Special Fund Requirements. 16. Approve agreement with Resource Strategies Corp. for a waste management facilities impact analysis. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Ruhmann, Zaun, Sindt, Mulvihill, Harvey. ITEM 7E Councilmember Harvey questioned the use of ad valorem .taxes to help finance the right-of--way portion of the County Road 46 project. He wanted to know the amount of ad valorem taxes that would be levied with, or without, state highway funding. r, CITY OF LAKEVILLE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3,1992 PAGE 3 Mr. Erickson explained that the City Council previously approved an amendment to .the Mills Fleet Farm TIF District which would allow the use of excess increment approximately $850,000, to be applied to the County Road 46 project for right-of--way acquisition. He explained that MnDOT is still considering their share of the financial .participation toward this project, and staff will not have an exact amount until later this week. Mr. Erickson pointed out that in the absence of State funding, the City would not be in a financial position to proceed. with the .right-of--way acquisition and/or work on the interchange. 92.173. Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Mulvihill to approve the Agreement for Right-of--Way Acquisition .between Dakota County and the Cities of Lakeville and Burnsville for the reconstruction of County .Road 46, Improvement Project 91-3, subject to the Minnesota Department of Transportation identifying significant financial participation in the project. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Zaun, Sindt, Mulvihill, Harvey,. Ruhrnann. ITEM 8 Mayor Zaun opened the public hearing on the praposed extension of sanitary • sewer to 195th Street West, east of Holyoke Avenue, Improvement Project 92-10. The City Clerk attested to notices being duly published and mailed Mr. Nelson presented the proposed project, which was. initiated by a recent petition from area residents requesting sanitary sewer along 195th Street. T'he proJJ'ect would extend northerly along Holyoke Avenue to 195th Street, then east. He .explained that .the project is being proposed due to the drain fields leaching into the .drainage ditch along 195th Street, which poses a health problem to the area residents. Mr. Nelson explained that there have been .several petitions for this project in the past. A petition was resented in 1984, at which time a feasibility report was prepared and a public hearing was held. There was some opposition at that time, and the project did not proceed. A neighborhood .meeting was held on June 11, 1992, and the majority of the residents expressed a desire to proceed with the. project at this time. Mr. Nelson. explained that staff updated the construction costs used in the 1984. feasibility report based on the Engineering News Record Cost Index. Staff is recommending the project be assessed on an equal unit basis, rather than a front footage basis, .and only the existing lots in .the Schweich Addition and the three existing homes along Holyoke Avenue would be assessed. These parcels would be assessed $3,410 each, which totals $57,970 being assessed. The balance of the project would be financed from the Trunk Utility Fund. There would be no assessments at this time against the undeveloped land. In . the future, as development occurs, the City would collect connection charges to this sanitary sewer to recoup part of the -costs being financed by the City CITY OF LAKEVILLE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3,1992 • PAGE 4 at this time. Since a significant portion of the property is located outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area, the property is not likely to develop for 10 to 20 years. Mr. Nelson explained that the two parcels at the east .end of 19Sth Street, which are located along the future alignment of Highview ..Avenue, .are not included in the project. at this time. The City would require utility easements from the property owners if they wish to have sewer extended to their property. Ms. Susan Mortensen, 8487 19Sth Street, stated she would like sewer extended to her property and would be willing to grant a utility easement at no cost to the City. She asked that a survey be .completed for the roadway: alignment, and Mr. Nelson stated a survey would be .provided. Mr. Mark Zweber, 21310 Dodd Boulevard, stated he owns the 37-acre parcel an Holyoke Avenue and asked if the sewer would run along his property line. Mr. Nelson explained that a 100 foot roadway easement exists which can be utilized for the sewer line. Mr. Zweber asked for reassurance that his property will not be assessed for sanitary sewer until it is developped. Mr. Knutson explained that the present Council .cannot bind a future Council's decision on assessments. However, based on 20 years of experience with the City, he felt confident that the Council's decision at the assessment hearing wail be consistent with what is stated at the public improvement hearing. Mr. Erickson pointed out that the Zweber property is not within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area at this time. He stated Mrs. Donnelly had contacted him requesting a letter stating that there would be no levied assessments accruing interest on her property. Counclmember Harvey asked if the three parcels along Holyoke Avenue would be subdividable once sewer is extended to them. Mr. Erickson explained that per subdivision ordinance requirements, some major infrastructure improvements would have to be made by the City and/or County before that pproperty could develop (i.e. watermain extension and street improvements). He also stated driveway access onto Holyoke Avenue would be restricted due to its status as a collector street. 92.174 Motion was made by Sindt, seconded by Mulvihill to close the public hearing. Roll call was .taken on the motion. Ayes, Zaun, Sindt, Mulvihill, Harvey, Ruhmann. At .the request of a resident in the audience who was not given a chance to speak, Mayor Zaun re-opened thepublic hearing. Ms. Susan Mullen, 8489 19Sth Street, stated she would like sanitary sewer extended to her property and is willing to grant a utility. easement. She questioned the City's policy regarding compensation for the easement and 5' CITY OF LAKEVILLE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3,1992 PAGE S whether or not she would need to have her abstract title updated to show that easement. Mr. Erickson stated the City only pays for easements under unique .circumstances. Mr. Nelson stated the City Attorney will prepare the easement and have it recorded against her property. 92.175 Motion was made by Sindt, seconded by Harvey to close the public hearing. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Mulvihill, Harvey, Ruhmann, Zaun, Sindt. 92.176 Motion was made by Mulvihill, seconded by Harvey to approve Resolution No, 92-129 ordering. public improvement and preparation of plans and specifications for the proposed sanitary sewer extension along 19Sth Street West, east of Holyoke Avenue, Improvement Project 92-10. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Harvey, Ruhmann, Zaun, Sindt, Mulvihill. ITEM 9 Mr. Sobota explained. that the conditional use permit for John Petran to allow a veterinary clinic at 16570 Cedar Avenue was tabled at the July 20th Council meeting pending receipt of additional information from the owner of the building, L.A. Donnay Properties, Inc. The following information has been provided to address the Council's previous concerns regarding soundproofing and ventilation: The wall between Ole Piper Inn and the proposed veterinary clinic will be sealed between the floor and roof decking. A sound proofing chamber will be provided, along with fiberglass insulation. According to the Chief Building Official, this will meet or exceed the required STC rating of 4S. The wall plan between Osman Cleaners and the proposed veterinary clinic shows complete caulking and sealing of the wall from the .floor. to the existing metal deck. Improvements to the HVAC system would include capacity to exchange air at 1.2 times per hour. In addition to the exhaust -fan, a .timer mechanism will be installed to provide automatic exhaust .fan operation at regular intervals throughout the day. Staff is recommending a $3,500 security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit from .the owner of the building to ensure. the improvements are made prior. to occupancy. Councilmember Sindt questioned the sound proofing. capabilities of the. proposed wall.. Mr. Krings explained that the wall will be filled with 3.S inches of fiberglass, which is the type of wall used in apartment buildings. It is apse-tested assembly which absorbs .sound. In answer to Councilmember l~ r CITY OF LAKEVILLE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3,1992 • PAGE 6 Sindt's concern about air borne bacteria, he explained. that a sealed. smoke gasket material, which is used for fire walls, is beingrecommended. Councilmember Harveyy suggested possibly specifying that water resistent sheet rock be used. Mr. Krings agreed that water resistent sheet rock could be used in the surgery and kennel areas. He also stated grubber-base seal would be applied around the floor in those areas. Gouncilmember Ruhmann asked about the non-porous capability of sheet rock. Mr. Krings explained that an epoxy coating-can be applied to the sheet rock, which makes rtnon-porous. 92.177 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Mulvihill to receive the Planning Commission's findings of fact and grant a conditional use ..permit. to John Petran to allow a veterinary clinic in a B-2, Retail Business District, at 1b570 Cedar Avenue. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Ruhmann, Zaun, Sindt, Mulvihill, Harvey. ITEM 10 Mr. Rick Sathre, consulting engineer for Builders Development, Inc., requested Council approval of the final plat of Lake Marion. Estates 2nd Addition. Mr. Morey presented the proposed plat, .which consists of 25 single family residential lots on the south side of .205th Street (County .Road 64) and .east of Juno Trail. The property is zoned R-2, .Single Family Residential District and falls within the Shoreland Overlay District for Lake Marion. The preliminary plat for Lake Marion Estates was approved in 1985. Mr. Morey stated the plat has been reviewed by the staff and various advisory committees, as well as the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District, and all recommend approval. A tree preservation plan .has been submitted, which shows that the majority of the existing trees will be saved. Jasmine Avenue is proposed to be constructed from 205th Street to the southwest boundary of Lake Marion Estates 2nd Addition and will line up with 204th Street on the north side of 205th Street. Upper 205th Street and Jaguar Avenue will be extended to connect with the proposed Jasmine Avenue. Juno Trail will also connect with Jasmine Avenue. Mr. Knutson explained that the design of a plat is accomplished during preliminary plat review. The final plat is reviewed to assure that the provisions of the approved preliminary plat have been satisfied. If all provisions have been. satisfied, the final plat has to be approved, Councilmember Harvey voiced a concern that the large lot adjacent to County Road 64 has been divided since preliminary plat approval, and is now shown as Lots 1 and 2. He was concerned that the house pad on Lot 1 will be situated CITY OF i .axF VILLE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3,1992 PAGE 7 too close to County Road 64, given the fact that County Road 64 may, at some time, become afour-lane county roadway. Mr. Sathre explained that since preliminary plat. approval in 1985, an easement on the southern portion of his plat was given to Mr. Wensmann for his flat so that he could accommodate a street connection and meet the City's drainage requirements. As a result, one lot had to be eliminated from the .Lake Marion Estates 2nd Addition .::plat. The developer then adjusted .the entire block o gain back that lot. He further explained that a 100 foot right-of-way has been provided for the future widening of County.. Road 64. Lot 1 meets the minimum setback requirements from that 100-foot nght-of-way. Councilmember Harvey asked about the proposed drainage into a sedimentation pond and was concerned about phosphorus removal before storm water enters Lake Marion. Mr. Nelson explained that a dry pond currently exists which meets a standard that pre-existed. When future development occurs and the rate of .discharge increases, .amore modern design pond will be built. Mr. Doug Loock, 10291 204th Street, had a concern about the construction of the pond. Mr. Erickson stated a more modern design, Walker, pond would normally be constructed by the City as development increases. If the Council so chooses, the .Walker pond could be created at this time by the developer of Lake Marion Estates 2nd Addition, to the .City Engineer's standards, and the City would credit the developer for the work done. Mike & .Sharon Borgert, 10281 204th Street, presented a petition from residents in Southbluff expressing opposition to the connection of Jasmine Avenue to 205th Street at 204th Street. The Barggert's requested that a cul-de-sac be constructed on Jasmine Avenue south of 205th Street. 92.178 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Sindt to receive the petition from the residents of Southbluff. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Ruhmann, Zaun, Sindt, Mulvihill, Harvey. Ms. Marilyn Nichols, 10301 204th Street, raised a concern that the connection of Jasmine Avenue. to 204th Street will cause increased drainage to the 204th Street area. Mr. Erickson explained that at a recent meeting with some of the 204th Street ..residents, staff was informed of an existing drainage problem, which is unrelated to this plat. He stated City staff has agreed to work with the residents to solve the drainage problem on 204th Street. Mr. Nelson explained that drainage from this plat will not cross 205th Street onto 204th Street. t- CITY OF LAKEVILLE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3,1992 . PAGE 8 Ms. Nichols was concerned with the removal of existing trees which currently buffer the 204th Street homes from County Road 64. She also raised a concern regarding the likelihood of increased traffic on 205th Street from Jasmine Avenue. Kurt and Tracy Jeffries, 10310 204th Street, were opposed to the intersection of Jasmine Avenue at 205th. Street. They were also opposed to tree removal along County Road b4 and the potential for increased runoff. Staff explained that .Jasmine Avenue at 205th Street has a ten percent grade, which is the maximum allowed in a residential area. This grade is being accepted in order to provide a vehicle stacking area at two percent grade and to saveexisting trees by avoiding additional earth work Mr. Erickson explained that the Wensmann development to the south of Lake Marion Estates was designed to disburse traffic. Jacquard Avenue, a major north-south collector street, and a future parkway to the west will take the bulk of the north/south traffic en route to the Interstate. Jasmine Avenue is expected to have a very low volume of traffic. Mr. Erickson stated the bottom line is that the City does not have the n'ght to tell the developer to construct a cul-de-sac on Jasmine Avenue. T e developer has already gone above and beyond his legal requirements by changing the grade of the road for tree preservation, installing drain tile, etc., since these requirements did not exist at the time the prehnunary plat was approved. 92.179 Motion was made by Sindt, seconded by Mulvihill to approve Resolution No. 92-130 approving the final plat and development agreement for Lake .Marion Estates 2nd Addition,. including the requirement that the .developer create a pond, as a part of this. plat, consistent with. standard specifications. set by the City Engineer. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Zaun, Sindt, Mulvihill, Harvey, Ruhmann. 92.180 Motion was made by Sindt, seconded by Ruhmann to direct staff to meet with the 204th Street (Southbluff) residents concerningtheir drainage problem. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Sindt, .Mulvihill, Harvey, Ruhmann, .Zaun. Mayor Zaun recessed the meeting. at 9:45 p.m. and reconvened at 9:50 p.m. ITEM 11 Mr. Warren Isrealson of Progress Land Company requested Council consideration of the final plat of Meadow Brook 4th Addition. , CITY OF T .AKRVILLE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3,1992 PAGE 9 Mr. Sobota presented the proposed plat, which consists of 71 single family residential lots east of Flagstaff Avenue and south of 170th Street. The plat is zoned R-2, Single Family Residential District and is the final phase of development of the Meadow Brook preliminary platJPUD-CUP approved in August of 1989.. The plat has been reviewed by City staff and advisory committees, as well as the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District, and all recommend approval. 1VIr. Sobota a lained that the building footprint plan meets the stipulation of the FUD-C~P to ensure house plans could fit on the "undersized" lots. Copies of 30 typical house plans were provided for the Council's review. Mayor Zaun referenced Page 5 of the July 9th planning consultant's report, which states that all required. improvements and issues which remain outstanding fiom the three previous additions must be resolved prior to the issuance of building permits. Mr. Sobota stated the engineering staff has indicated that there are no outstanding issues related to this plat which are out of the ordinary. 92.181 Motion was made by Ruhmann, seconded by Sindt to approve Resolution No. 92-131 approving the final plat and development agreement for Meadow Brook 4th Addition, Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes,. Mulvihill, Harvey, Ruhmann, Zaun, Sindt. ITEM 12 Mr. Bill McGoldrick and Mr. Dennis Olson of Cooperative Power Association requested Council consideration of a conditional use .permit amendment to allow the installation of antennae in excess of 15 feet in height at 16609 Ipava Avenue. Mr. Morey explained that the conditional use permit amendment would. allow Cooperative Power Assn. to install two antennae on top of .the existing. 100 foot tall steel transmission pole located at the .Dakota Electric substation on the west side of Ipava Avenue. south of 165th .Street. One antenna is a 16-foot tall .omnidirectional "whip" antenna, and the other is a 13.5 inch by 42 inch parabolic antenna. The color of both antennae will be .compatible with the light blue. color of the 100 foot tall transmission pole to which whey :will be attached, He explained .that this request involves an amendment to the conditional use permit that was approved in 1987 to allow the Dakota Electric substation. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this request at its July 16th meeting. Discussion centered on existing on-site landscaping: compared with the landscaping plan that was approved with the .original conditional use hermit in 1987. The Planning Commission directed staff to perform a site . inspection of the existing landscaping .and recommended approval of .the conditional use permit amendment. Since the Planning Commission meeting, CITY OF LAKEVILLE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3, 1992 PAGE 10 Northwest Associated Consultants' staff inspected the existing landscaping on the substation site and found that it is significantly different from the landscaping shown on the plan approved with the original conditional use permit. The site inspection revealed that additional landscaping is necessary along the north property .line, and the installation of seven evergreen trees was recommended. The site inspection also revealed a number of landscape maintenance issues that must also be addressed. Councilmember Sindt asked. about the maintenance of trees :and if he City monitors the conditional use permits hat are .:granted to ensure that requirements have been met. Mr. Morey stated that while most trees come with a typical one-yyear warranty, the staff does make afollow-up inspection of these sites. It was pointed out, however, that these site inspections were not completed in every situation back in 1987. Councilmember Mulvihill stated she was concerned. with. granting an amendment to a conditional use. permit that .was not adhered to initially. Mr. Ed Bronkhorst of Dakota Electric Assn. explained that the reason the plantings. were not consistent with the 19871andscape plan was because they understood at that time that they were given a .conceptual drawing and were directed to work closely with the abutting property owners in the placement of the trees. He stated they had worked with the property owners to achieve a layout that was acceptable to them. He pointed out that the total number of plantings exceeds the number required in the 1987 conditional use permit. He further explained that the reason the landscaping was not completed along the north property line was because the adjacent property owner was unsure about the future development of his property. Councilmember Harvey stated he felt any modification to the landscaping plan should have come back to the City Council for approval. Mr. Erickson explained that the planning consultant was merely .stating that the screening needs to be completed. at this time, given the development that is occurring m the area. 92.182 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Sindt to approve a .conditional use permit amendment for Cooperative Power Association to allow the installation of .antennae in excess of 15 feet in height at 16609 Ipava Avenue, subject to receipt of a $5,000 security. Roll call :was taken on -the motion. .Ayes, Harvey, Ruhmann, Zaun, Sindt, Mulvihill. 92.183 Motion was made by Ruhmann, seconded by Mulvihill to extend .the Council meeting beyond the 10:30 adjournment time. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Ruhmann, .Zaun, Sindt, Mulvihill, Harvey. i CITY OF LAKEVILLE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3,1992 PAGE 11 ITEM 13 Richard and Laverne Fenner requested Council consideration of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a detached accessory building at 7880 202nd Street. Mr. Morey stated conditional use permit approval would allow the Fenners to construct a 26 foot by 3b foot detached .accessory building on their 10-acre .parcel on the south side of 202nd Street east of Hamburg Avenue. The total area of the existing and proposed detached accessory buildings (1,896 square feet) requires conditional use permit approval, because it exceeds the 1,100 square foot maximum allowed. in R-2 districts. The property is located outside the 2010 MUSA, and City sewer and water is not available. Landscaping will be installed around the Fenner's proposed detached accessory building to provide screening. The Planning Commission held a public hearing: on the conditional use permit request and unanimously recommended .approval. Staff also recommends approval. 92.184 Motion was made by Sindt, seconded by Harvey to receive the Planning Commission's findings of fact and approve a conditional use permit for Richard and Laverne Fenner to allow the construction of a detached accessory building at 7880 202nd Street. • Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Zaun, Sindt, Mulvihill, Harvey, Ruhmann. ITEM 14 Mr. Morey presented a request by City staff, at the request of the property owners, to rezone Lots 1-3, Block 3, of the Acorn Heights subdivision. The current R-7 zoning of these lots does not permit single family homes, even though the lots in the replat of Acorn Heights were designed far single family homes. He explained that three other lots in Acorn Heights are also zoned R-7. These lots are not included in the rezoning request, because the property owner, Mr. George Thompson, indicated that he would like to build a duplex on his property, which the R-2 district would not allow. Staff is recommending, and Mr. Thompson. has verbally agreed, that these three lots be rezoned to R-4, which is the least intensive zoning classification that allows duplexes, and that the three lots be combined to insure that only one duplex will be constructed on his property. The City will initiate this rezoning when Mr. Thompson makes a written request. Mr. Morey explained that the multiple family residential zoning designation of these lots has been in place since 1970. In 1988, City staff recommended the lots be rezoned to R-2; however, the property owners objected to the rezoning at .that tune. He pointed out that apartments and multiple .'family (three or more units) dwellings are not allowed uses on lots where public sewer is not available, which is the case with the lots in Acorn Heights. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the rezoning request and unanimously recommended approval. CITY OF LAKEVILLE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3,1992 . PAGE 12 Councilmember Ruhmann asked about wetland protection for this area. Mr. Knutson stated all lots fall within the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991. Councilmember Harvey stated he was opposed to building single family homes next to the Interstate. He felt there should be a buffer, such as multiple family homes, between the Interstate and a single family residential area. Councilmembers referenced the single family home on Lot 1, which is currently under construction. They asked why a building permit. was issued for the house prior to this rezoning request being considered, Mr. Erickson explained that due to a change in the text of the zoning ordinance, i.e. R-3C to R-7, single family homes were precluded as a permitted use. The property owners have now requested that the property be rezoned for single family homes, which is consistent with the re-platting of Acorn Heights. He further stated he did not feel existing homeowners to the east would be in favor of multiple family residential in this area. 92.185 Motion was made by Mulvihill, seconded by Ruhmann to adopt Ordinance No. 467 rezoning land located east of Kenrick Avenue at 181st Street from. R-7, High Density .Residential District, to R-2, Single Family Residential District. Roli call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Sindt, Mulvihill, Ruhmann, Zaun. Nays, Harvey. Councilmember Harvey stated he was opposed to building single family homes next to the Interstate. ITEM 15 Mr. Nelson presented Supplemental Agreement No. 6 with McNamara Contracting in the amount of $39,553.t)D for the paving of Highview Avenue from County Road 46 to 3600 feet south. He explained that Highview Avenue was originally constructed to state-aid standards and was graded as a rural roadway in 1974. Lang term plans are to realign Highview Avenue with Gardenview Drive in Apple Valley on the north side of 160th Street. Staff felt that based on the current traffic volume, this portion of Highview Avenue should be paved prior to the reopening of County Road 46 this fall. However, staff did not want to put. a lot of money into the roadway if it is going to eventually be torn up and reconstructed. As an interim solution, staff is recommending a 2-1/2 to 3 inch bituminous overlay on top of the existing Class S surface This would be adequate .fora 10 year design life, with some anticipated maintenance. Mr. Nelson explained .that by paving this roadway, the City would save approximately $10,000 per year in maintenance costs. It would also help reduce traffic throw the nearby residential neighborhoods by those motorists who want to avoi traveling on gravel. Councilmember Harvey questioned the amount of maintenance in a 10-year period that would be required on three inches of blacktop. He also asked if the road would have ..posted weight limits in spring. Mr. Nelson stated he anticipates some maintenance, especially in the low areas.. He does not anticipate, at this time, that weight limits will be necessary. CITY OF LAKEVII.LE COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 3,1992 PAGE 13 92.186 Motion was made by Sindt, seconded by Ruhmann to approve Supplemental Agreement No. 6 with McNamara Contractingg in the amount of $39,553 far the paving of Highview Avenue from County Road 46 to 3600. feet south, Improvement Project 91-1. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Mulvihill, Harvey, .Ruhmann, Zaun, Sindt. UNFINISHED BUSII~TESS Councihnember Sindt suggested a work session be held to discuss future street extensions such as the Jasmine Avenue issue in the Lake Marion Estates Znd Addition plat. Mr. Erickson stated he felt this .type of situation is unlikely. to occur since the Council's recent adoption of a policy that limits the duration of a preliminary plat to only two years, unless the final plat is filed. NEW BUSINESS None. ANNOUNCEMENTS Next Regular Council meeting, August 17th Council. Work Session, August 4th Mayor Zaun adjourned the meeting at 11:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, harlene Friedges, City erk D ne Zaun, y r