HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-24-91 CITY OF LAKEVILLE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 24, 1991
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Zaun.
Roll call was taken. Present: Councilmembers Ruhmann,
Sindt, Mulvihill, Harvey and Mayor Zaun.
Also present: B. Erickson, City Administrator; C. Friedges,
City Clerk.
MINU'PE S
The minutes of the April 8, 1991, Special Council meeting
were approved as presented.
ITEM 5
Mr. Marvin Pulju, Dakota County Assessor, provided a ]ast of
100 property owners who appeared at the April 8th Board of
Review meeting. There were 57 reviews resulting from the
Board of Review meeting, 43 .letters received and 12
additional reviews resulting from phone calls. He explained
that the assessor's office has completed 163. reviews. Mr.
Pulju provided a list of the properties and adjustments that
have been made. There are still 32 reviews pending; a list
of these properties and the reasons. they are .unresolved were
• also provided.
Councilmember Harvey questioned the William Dolan property
review which is pending. He asked .why Mr. Dolan has bypassed
this meeting and plans to appeal to the County Board of
Review. Mr. Pulju stated the property owner was advised he
could attend the local Board of Review,. but chose to appeal
at the County level.
Mr. Ernie Darflinger stated he represents the owners of Lot
33, Argonne Farms, who "are appealing the assessed market
value of their property.. He stated his clients, Mr. Wayne
.Doyle and Mr. Richard Whybrew, were advised by the County
Assessor's Office not to attend the local Board of Review
meeting this evening.
Mr. Darflinger provided a comparison of current and previous
values on Lot 33 of Argonne Farms and the parcels surrounding
it. He also showed increases in valuation of Parcels 30, 31,
32, 34, 36 and 37. He pointed out that the valuations oxa
these parcels have been increased anywhere from 26~ to 43%
from last year. Parcel 33, however, has. been increased by
the Assessor's Office $153,400, which is 930% over last
year. He stated he and his clients. have contacted the
Assessor's staff and have received no reasonable explanation
for this increase.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 24, 1991
PAGE 2
Mr. Steve Nelson, Senior Appraiser, stated the property,
which is zoned commercial, has not been previously valued
consistent with market conditions in that area. He offered
to lower the value to $91,400 for a more even transition with
nearby properties. He stated the appraisers would have to go
back next year and re-evaluate the other. parcels to bring
them all in line with the current market..
Councilmember Harvey was concerned with the differential
between this parcel and the surrounding parcels. He
suggested the assessor apply a similar increase to Parcel 33
as was applied to the neighboring parcels, assuming they were
all properly assessed last year. That increase .would be 40%,
which would establish the land value of Parcel 33 at $23,100
for 1991.
Mr. Erickson agreed that a more in-depth market analysis is
needed in that area of the City, as the land. is probably
valued lower than what it should be. However, all parcels
should be :evaluated and. adjusted consistently.
91.77 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Sindt to acknowledge
receipt of the Dakota County Assessor°s Office reports and
• information from Mr. Darflinger on Parcel 33 of Argonne
Farms.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Zaun, Sindt,
Mulvihill, Harvey, Ruhmann.
91.78 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Ruhmann to direct the
County Assessor's Office to increase the land value on Parcel
33 of Argonne Farms by 40% of last year's valuation
($16,500)® which brings the 1991 assessed value to $23,100.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Ruhmann, Zaun,
Sindt, Mulvihill, Harvey.
91.79 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Sindt to close the
Board of Review Meeting and direct the Assessor's Office to
continue. follow-up on matters that remain pending.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Sindt, Mulvihill,
Harvey, Ruhmann, Zaun.
Time: 7:35 p.m.
•
CITY. OF LAKEVILLE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 24, 1991
PAGE 3
ITEM 3
Mr. Erickson asked the Council to consider approval of a
.resolution concerning the Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for I-35W. He explained that I-35 Solutions Alliance
has been working toward improvement of traffic flow on
I-35W. The EIS for the project has been delayed because of
what is known as the NTN .(Neighborhood Transportation
Network) Alternative being proposed by a Minneapolis
neighborhood group. As stated in the resolution, if the
Minnesota Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Council
and Federal Highway Administration feel the NTN proposal
needs to be reinserted into the EIS process,. the cities
(Lakeville, Burnsville, Apple Valley, Prior Lake,
Bloomington, Richfield and Savage) want. the EIS split .into
two portions, with one being the portion south of the City of
Minneapolis which desperately needs a third lane. This would
enable construction of the third. lane in the south portion
without delay.
91.80 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Mulvihill to approve
Resolution No. 91-47 regarding the Environmental Impact
Statement for I-35W improvements south of I-494.
• Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Sindt, Mulvihill,
Harvey, Ruhmann, Zaun.
ITEM 4
Mr. Erickson explained that School District No. 194 is
proposing the installation of a temporary watermain to the
new high school site for building construction purposes.
This utility extension would not be necessary if the City
proceeds this year with the extension of the existing trunk
sanitary sewer and watermain along Dodd Boulevard as
requested by the school clistrict in their January 15th
petition. These utilities would extend along the west side
of Dodd Boulevard from the north property Line of the
elementary school to the north property line of the high
school site. Staff is recommencling the City Council
authorize preparation of a feasibility report for this
project, as the school district has submitted conditional use
permit and preliminary plat applications to the City.
Mr. Erickson further explained that to expedite the .project,
staff is recommending this work be incorporated with the
175th Street extension, Improvement Project 90-9. .Staff is
also recommending the school district request a waiver of the
• public hearing requirement; then only the school district's
property would be assessed for lateral benefits. No
assessments would be proposed east of Dodd Boulevard since
aLl parcels are presently under Green Acres.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 24, 1991
PAGE 4
91.81 Motion was made by Sindt, seconded by Harvey to approve.
Resolution No. 91-48 authorizing preparation of a .feasibility
report for Dodd Boulevard utility construction, Improvement
Project 91-6.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Mulvihill, .Harvey,
Ruhmann, Zaun, Sindt.
UNFIl~IISHED BUSINESS None.
NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Erickson provided a brief background on the proposed
.redevelopment of the Schmitty .and Sons property on Holyoke
Avenue, along with the proposed extension of sewer from
McGuire Jr. High School to Holyoke Avenue and water along
Holyoke Avenue from McGuire Jr. High School to 210th Street.
Staff is asking the Council to consider purchasing. the
Radford property,. located immediately north of Schmitty &
Sons on Holyoke Avenue, so that the existing house, which has
a malfunctioning septic system, can be demolished to
accommodate future expansion of the Schmitty & Sons
development. The property would also accommodate expansion
• of the parking lot for St. John's Lutheran Church, .and would
allow the City's acquisition of right-of-way easements for
the trunk sewer across the Schmitty and Sons' property on the
south at no cost to the City.
Mr. Erickson explained that the Radford house is located in
the .flood plain and is currently several feet below the .grade
of Holyoke Avenue. Under a 100 year storm, the property
owners would more than. likely experience water in the
basement, as they have previously. The property owners
currently have a purchase agreement on the property. Mr.
Erickson stated that in the City Attorney's opinion, the
buyers are not likely to secure financing for the property
without extension of City sewer. City staff, however,
questions whether it is cost beneficial to extend sanitary
sewer to two non-conforming uses (the Radford house and the
house owned by Schmitty & Sons) . Mr. Erickson explained that
one conclition of the proposed Planned Unit Development for
Schmitty & Sons is to remove their house when they proceed
with their business expansion.
Mr. Erickson proposed the following,. which is acceptable to
Schmitty and Sons:
•
CITY OF LAKEVILLE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 24, 1991
PAGE 5
• 1. The Cit would not extend sewer alon Hol oke Avenue as
Y g Y
originally. planned as a part of Improvement ,Project 90-5,
which .will save the City approximately $11,000.
2. Schmitty and Sons would tear down their existing house
two years from the date the bus garage. is connected to the
sewer system.
3. Reimburse Schmitty & Sons for purchase of the Radford
property for $65,000, to be .paid for out of the City's Trunk
Storm Sewer Fund. The City would maintain a drainage and
utility easement across the entire property to improve
existing drainage problems between this property and Brad
Johnson's apartments. Schmitty & Sons would make
approximately $30,000 of improvements to the property,
including excavation, fill, curb and gutter and blacktop.
They would also be required to combine all parcels.
Mr. Erickson explained that all the necessary legal documents
would be approved by the Council at subsequent meetings and
must. be filed by Schmitty & Sons.
Councilmember Sindt asked if the City should receive
authorization from FEMA before proceeding. Mr. Erickson
• explained that FEMA has issued the .necessary permit. The DNR
has also issued the necessary permit and stated this project
opens up opportunities for enhancement of .the Vermillion
River trout stream by leaving the tree cover in place.
Mayor Zaun asked if this action (not extending sanitary sewer
to Holyoke Avenue) jeopardizes the servicing of property west
of Holyoke Avenue on 215th Street Mr. Erickson stated the
subtrunk extension to Holyoke Avenue would ultimately be
extended westerly along the drainage course to serve the
existing homes west of Dodd Boulevard along 215th Street.
91.82 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Mulvihill to authorize
the City Attorney and City Administrator to .send the April
23, 1991, proposal letter to Schmitty and Sons,. with proposal
No. 3 to read, "The City would participate in 100% of the
purchase price of the Radford property..:'.
Roll call was taken on the motion. .Ayes, Harvey, Ruhmann,
Zaun, Sindt, Mulvihill.
Councilmember Ruhmann asked the Council to consider passing a
resolution in opposition to a provision of Senate File 1169
that would require all cities over 20,000. population to
establish single-member wards for the election of city
• council members. District 36 Representative Bill Macklin was
present and stated he didn't feel this. provision is likely to
pass the Senate Redistricting Committee this session.
CITX OF LAKEVILLE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 24, 1991
PAGE 6
91.83 Motion was made by Ruhmann,seconded by Harvey to approve
Resolution No. 91-58 in opposition ' to a provision in Senate
File 1169 that would require all cities over 2.0,000
population to establish single-member wards for the election
of city. council members.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Ruhmann, Zaun,
Sindt, Mulvihill, Harvey.
There being no further business, Mayor Zaun adjourned the
meeting at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Charlene Friedges, Ci Clerk
D ane Zaun, M r
•
TO; SCHMITTY AND SONS
FROM:. ROBERT ERICKSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: APRIL 23, 1991
RE: REDEVELOPMENT/IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROPOSAL
We have discussed on numerous occasions a proposed redevelopment project for the
Schmitty and Sons property. The intent of the City of Lakeville is to improve
drainage and provide utilities to the Schmitty and Sons site as well as clean up the
appearance and reduce the conflicting land uses at the site. Our initial proposal
is as follows:
1. Limit the assessments for the revised plan to 305 feet of sewer and 305 feet of
water main to the Schmitty and Sons property which would be the same as under
the original proposal.
2. Schmitty and Sons would tear down the existing house, garage and shed on the
north parcel of Schmitty and Sons and cap the well if any.
• 3. The City would participate in 100% of the purchase price of the Radford property
excluding special assessments and hookup to assist Schmitty and Sons to
purchase the Radford property and demolish the house. The City would be
responsible for -the cost of sealing the well and demolishing the house.
4. Acquisition of right-of--way easements from Schmitty and Sons for the trunk sewer
across Schmitty and Sons' property on the south would be of no cost to the City.
5. Schmitty and Sons would install harking on the site with 51 definedparking
spaces now with additional parkmg to be provided at the time of future-
expansion. Parking would need to be installed on the Radford property under a
site plan approved by the City.
6. A reciprocal aggreement between St. John's Lutheran Church and Schmitty and Sons
would be developed by Schrnitty and Sons to allow St. John's Lutheran Church
parking on the Schmitty and Sons property and Schmitty and Sons parking on the
St. John's Lutheran Church property south of the channel. The church would
provide a right of way easement to the City for drainage improvements at no cost
to the City in exchange. for the parking on the Schmitty and Sons property.
7. A future condition be placed when expansion or sale of the Schmitty and Sons
property takes place that the east house is demolished at the time of expansion
or sale.
8. Sidewalks improvements would be made by the City to provide access between
• McGuire Jumor High, the Schmitty and Sons site, and St. Johns Lutheran Church.
City of Lakeville
20195 Holyoke Avenue West • P.O. Box 957 • Lakeville, MN 55044 • (612) 469-4431 • FAX 469-3815
• 9. The Ci would be res onsible for draftin all le al and administrative
documents between the church, the City and Sclunitty and Sons.
10. The PUD would be processed according to City policies.
We consider this to be an attractive proposal to Schmitty and Sons and look forward
to your comments.
MS/mh