HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-16-80 +i
• r
CITY OF LAKEVILLE COUNCIL MEETING
June 16, 1980
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Lekson. The pledge of
allegiance. to the flag was given.
Roll call was taken. Present: Councilmembers Spande, Lekson, Zaun, Sindt and
Nelson.
Also present: Patrick Farrell, City Attorney; Darrell Schneider and LeRoy
Nyhus, Consulting City. Engineers; David Licht, City Planning Consultant; and
Patrick McGarvey, City Administrator/Clerk.
80.289 Motion was made by Zaun, seconded by Spande to approve the minutes of the
June 2, 1980 council meeting.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Spande, Lekson, Zaun, Sindt and Nelson.
Approval of the June 5, 1980 special council. meeting minutes was tabled to .the
July 7th council meeting, as they were, not ready.
80.290 Motion was made by .Zaun, seconded by Nelson to approve the claims for payment
as presented.
Roll call was taken on the .motion. Ayes,. Lekson, Zaun, Sindt, Nelson and Spande.
Staff reports, there were none.
80.281 Motion was made by Nelson,. seconded by Sindt to receive the minutes from the
Advisory Committee meetings.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Zaun, Sindt, Nelson, Spande and Lekson.
At this time Mr. Byron Watschke of Fortune Realty presented on the bulletin
board the original plan and revised plan for the Lakeway Park PUD concepts.
Mr. Watschke explained each plan and the changes that had been made from the
original plan which a public hearing was opened in front o£ the Planning
Commission on March 20, 1980.
Mr. Watschke explained that in response to citizen comments and concerns from
the neighborhood adjacent to the property, that the number of dwelling units
in the PUD had been changed in .type. and number. The revised plan called
for more duplex and four-plea units, and included townhouse units with
lesser number of apartment units..
Mr. Watschke further explained that the access of the PUD to 188th street
had been changed so that no direct connection would be available between
the Lakeridge Addition and the Lakeway Park PUD. He further stated that
he did not care whether or not the City opened access between the two or
closed it, or whether or not.. the' City kept 188th Street opened to Trunk
Highway 50. He stated that their major access would be via the extension
of 185th Street west of Highway 50.
At this time Mayor Lekson opened the meeting for questions and comments.
Mr. David Licht, City Planning Consultant, explained that the Planning
Commission had recommended approval of the concept plan but had recommended
further study of the road connection between Lakeridge and Lakeway-and the
status of 188th Street connection to Highway 50.
At this time Mike Murphy, 18801 Jordan Trail, asked about the future of
188th Street.
Mr. Licht explained that the original plan had called for the closing of
188th Street at TH 50 due to the dangerous condition of that intersection,
but that the revised plan showed Joplin Avenue connecting to 188th Street
with access onto TH 50 at least for the time being. He further stated that
Jordan Avenue would have under the revised plan access. to 188th Street for
the traffic wishing to use 188th Street to connect to I-35 and Minnr~g Road.
He stated that Jordan Avenue could be made a one-way street so that.traffic
-1-
. ~ June 16,0
out of the Lakeway Park PUD could not enter Jordan Trail, as one alternative,
or that the Jordan Avenue could be cul-de-sacced with no access to 188th
Street.
Anita Clair, 18788 Jordan Trail, read a letter expressing her concern about
the proposed PUD she said was the consensus of many of her neighbors.
The letter stated opposition to the proposal for multiple housing and the
other proposed development types.
Mr: Watschke stated that he has owned the property involved in the application
for six years.
Mr. Steve Grohoski, 18848 Joplin Avenue, stated that in his opinion the
intersection of 188th Street and TH 50 was a dangerous intersection and
could be closed even if it would cause some minor inconvenience. He further
stated that all of the people that he had sold lots to in the Lakeridge
Addition, as the developer of Lakeridge, were, advised by him that 188th Street
would probably be closed at TH 50 in the future, and that the property north
of 188th. Street may-well be developed far other .than single family housing
as it had been zoned. He stated that in his opinion the property involved
in the application was a very difficult piece of property to develop due
to its terrain, and that it was not economically_ feasible to deveop it into
single family housing lots.
At this time councilman Zaun asked Mr. Licht about his views as to the
concept of land use in this PUD.. Mr. Licht stated that he felt that there
was a good transition from the single family neighborhood of Lakeridge on
the south. He stated that the developer had presented. in his revised plan
a transition involving duplexes, 'to four-plexes, to townhouses, to apartment
units, and then into office uses on the south side of the 185th Street
extension. He stated that just having open space does not represent good
buffering.
At this time Mr. Watschke reminded the council that the revised PUD concept
plan calls for a total of 89 dwelling units compared to the original plan
proposal of 130 dwelling units.
Mr. Farrell advised the council that there would be an agreement between the
City and Mr. Watschke on the development of the PUD, and that even if Mr.
Watschke sold any part or all of it to ,other buyers that.-they would be
bound by the terms of that agreement in the future development of the property.
Mr. Thomas Thompson asked about the sewer capacity of the lines in Lakeridge
and whether or not they could. handle the sewage flow. from the PUD. The
.City Administrator explained .that the sewer system in the Lakeway Park PUD
would not use any of the pipes located in the Lakeridge Addition and the
Conveyance of sewage to the trunk system...'
Councilman Zaun asked Mr. Watschke about his staging plans for the project
Mr. Watschke stated that it would probably take five years to completely
develop the entire project.
Mayor Lekson stated that the reason the City was entertaining to the development
of this property under a Planned Unit Development is that the City retains
-much more control over the future development by the PUD process than
through normal platting:. He stated that it was the desire of the council
to approve a project which would be a credit to the neighborhood and the
entire City.
80.292 Motion was made by Spande, seconded by Sindt to approve the concept plan of
the Lakeway Park PUD with the exception of the street access and future
use of 188th Street, which is to be studied further by the staff and Planning
Commission.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Sindt, Nelson, Spande, Lekson and Zaun.
80.293 Motion was made by Zaun, seconded by Spande to adopt Ordinance No. 166
rezoning the Lakeway Park PUD property from R-1C single family residence
to Planned Unit Development.
Ro11 call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Nelson, Spande, Lekson, Zaun and 5indt.
-2-
•
June 16 80
It was explained to the citizens that a future hearing would be necessary
for the platting of the property, and that they would receive mailed notice
if they lived within 350 feet of the boundaries of the property. Some
residents stated. that they did not receive notice even though they live
within 350 feet for the original hearing, and the Administrator stated
that he would check the City records on this matter.
80.294 Motion was made by Zaun, seconded by Nelson to adopt Resolution No. 80-62
approving the final plat of Foxborough Addition subject to the developer
executing a development agreement and making its necessary financial
security for the improvements.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Spande, Lekson, Zaun, Sindt and Nelson.
The City Administrator explained that it would be necessary to call a new
hearing on the rezoning of certain lots within the Foxborough addition
for the rezoning from single family. residence to two family residence due
to a few changes in the lot and block description. in the final plat as
compared to the-original rezoning hearing held earlier this year. Therefore,
no action can be taken on .the ordinance rezoning the lots at this time.
At this time the City Council took up consideration of the preliminary plat
known as Lakeview Heights located east of Highway 50 and south of 185th
Street. Mr. Jerry Everson was present to present the plat and indicated
that the Planning Commission had recommended denial of the 47 lot preliminary
plat for reasons which he questioned. He also stated that he had prepared
a 45 lot version of the plat which the council had received along with a
letter from him.
Mr. Steve Grohoski spoke to the council and expressed his concern as the
developer of the Woodridge .Addition located to the northeast of this property
due to the small lot size being proposed for this. plat as compared to
-other lots in the vacinity. He stated that in his opinion the lots should
be larger with a lesser number in the plat to maintain the character of the
area. He stated that this proposed plat in .his opinion would be detrimental
to his property located to the north of it, and he may have to take legal
action if the plat were approved if presented.
The mayor stated that the council had received copies of the Planning Consul
tant City Engineer reports on the plat, and that the plat did meet all. of
the minimum requirements set forth in the zoning ordinance' and subdivision
.ordinance for its location.
80.295 .After further discussion, a motion was made by Zaun, seconded by Nelson to
approve the preliminary plat of Lakeview Heights-with 47 lots.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Lekson, Zaun, Sindt, Nelson and Spande.
80.296 Motion was made by Nelson, seconded`by Zaun'to approve a conditional use
permit for the Bethlehem I,~utheran Church at the corner of Iberia Avenue
and 202nd Street with conditions as recommended in the Planner's report
subject to a future review of the parking needs with a change in the City
requirements if necessary.
Ro11 call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Zaun, Sindt, Nelson, Spande and Lekson.
80.297 Motion was made by Zaun,'secanded by Spande to`approve and adopt the.
Lakeville Housing Plan.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Zaun, Sindt, Nelson, Spande and Lekson.
80.298 Motion was made by Zaun, seconded by Sindt to approve and adopt the Community
Capital Improvement Plan.
Roll. call was taken on the. motion. .Ryes, Nelson, Spande, Lekson, .Zaun and Sindt.
80.299 Motion was made by Spande; seconded~by Nelson to adopt Resolution No. 80-63
certifying. the pre-review requirements for the City of Lakeville's comprehensive
plan under the Mandatory Land Planning Act.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Spande, Lekson, Zaun, Sindt and Nelson.
-3-
•
June 16,0
80.300 Motion was made by Nelson, seconded by Sindt to adopt Resolution No.
80-64 calling a public hearing on the Office Electronics, Inc. proposed
industrial development revenue bond project for July 7, 1980,.
Roll call was taken on the motion: Ayes, Lekson, Zaun, Sindt, Nelson and Spande.
80.301 Motion was made by Zaun, seconded by Nelson to receive the report from the
City Council Building Committee on a new City Ha11-Police Station facility
and to authorize the architect to proceed with schematic design work on
the facility.
Ro11 call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Zaun, Sindt, Nelson, Spande and Lekson.
80.302 Motion was made by Zaun, seconded by Spande to receive the 1979 audit of
the City financial records from the George M, Hanson Company.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Sindt, Nelson, Spande, Lekson and Zaun.
80.303 Motion was made by Nelson, seconded by Spande to approve a gambling license
for the Lakeville Lions Club and waive the bond requirements. to conduct
a-bingo game on July 10, 1980.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Nelson, Spande, Lekson, Zaun and Sindt.
80.304 Motion was made by Zaun, seconded by Nelson to adopt Resolution No. 80-65
approving an abatement on special assessments for outlots B and C in the
Lakeridge Addition and approving and authorizing the mayor and clerk to sign
a special assessment agreement with the developer for the remaining part of
the costs of approving Lakeridge. Addition. with sanitary sewer and water,
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Spande, Lekson, Zaun, Sindt and Nelson.
80.305 Motion was made by Nelson, seconded by Sndt o approve a change in Gity office
hours from 8:30 a.m, to 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m „ to 4:30 p.m. with the motor
vehicle office to stay open one night a week until 9:OO p.m., with the
changes effective June 23, 1980.`
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Lekson, Zaun, Sindt, Nelson and Spande.
80.306 Motion was made by Spande, seconded by Lekson to'approve a set-up license
for John's Tavern.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ay es ,.Zaun, Sindt, Nelson, Spande and Lekson.
80.307 Motion was made by Nelson, seconded by Lekson to approve the set-up license
for the Sea Girt Inn.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Sindt, Nelson, Spande, Lekson and Zaun.
80.308 Motion was made by Spande, seconded by Lekson to adopt Resolution No. 80-66
approving transfers from the 1980 contingency fund in the City budget to the
various operating accounts.
Ro11 call_was taken on the motion. Ayes, Nelson, Spande, Lekson, Zaun and Sindt.
80.309 Motion was made by Zaun, seconded by Nelson to adopt Resolution No. 80-67
receiving and approving the preliminary report on extending water and sanitary
sewer to the Forest Hills Addition area and setting a public hearing on the
proposed improvements for July 17, 1980. at 7:30 p.m. CDST at the .Lakeville
High School.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Spande,. Lekson, Zaun, Sindt and Nelson.
80.310 Motion was made by Lekson, seconded by Zaun. to adjourn the council meeting.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Lekson, Zaun, Sindt, Nelson and Spande.
Time: 9:47 p.m,
Respec lly .submitted,
trick E. McGarvey, City Clerk
rdon Leks Mayor -4-