Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-09-84 rp ~ CITY OF LAKEVILLE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 9, 1984 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Zaun at 7:00 p.m. Roll call was taken. Present: Councilmembers Nelson, Sindt, Enright, Harvey and Mayor Zaun. Also present: Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Keith Nelson, Consulting City Engineer; James Robinette, Community Development Director; Dennis Feller, Finance .Director; Patrick McGarvey, City Administrator/Clerk. Mayor Zaun opened the public hearing on the assessment of improvement project 83-7, 175th Street and Ipava Avenue street improvements. The city clerk attested to the legal notice. Mr. Nelson presented slides showing the project area and project costs. The city clerk presented the information concerning the prepayment of the assessments. without interest and future payments to minimize interest costs to the property owner. There was no one present wishing to speak or ask questions on the project. 84.511 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Sindt to close the public hearing. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Nelson, Zaun, Sindt, Enright, Harvey. 84.512 Motion was made by Enright, seconded by Nelson to adopt Resolution No. 84-134 approving the assessment roll on project_83-7, 175th Street and Ipava Avenue. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Zaun, Sindt, Enright, Harvey, Nelson. Mayor Zaun then took up other matters on the agenda waiting for the 7:30 time for the beginning of the next public improvement assessment hearing. 84.513 Motion was made by Sindt, seconded by Harvey to adopt Resolution No. 84-135 giving final approval to the Star Tex industrial development revenue bond issue. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Sindt, Enright, Harvey, Nelson, Zaun. 84.514 Motion was made by Sindt, seconded by Harvey to adopt Resolution No. 84-136 approving a party wall. agreement between Star Tex Corporation and RJTP Corporation on their project. 4, CITY OF LAKEVILLE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING October 9, 1984 Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Enright, Harvey, Nelson, Zaun, Sindt. 84.515 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Enright to adopt Resolution No. 84-137 giving final approval on the RJTP industrial development revenue bond project. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Harvey, Nelson, Zaun, Sindt, Enright. The city council reviewed a redraft of the joint powers agreement previously approved between the cities of Delano and Lakeville trans- ferring a portion of Lakeville's industrial development revenue bond entitlement to Delano. The redraft was requested by the City of Delano and their city attorney to clarify provisions concerning the payment to Lakeville by Delano for the additional city fee and the possible return of any portion of the fee in the event Delano did not use all of the $1.2 million entitlement. Councilman Harvey suggested that the wording, "the difference", be included on the last line of Paragraph 9 on ..Page 4 for further clarifi- cation. 84.516 Motion was .made by Enright, seconded-by Nelson to approve, and author- ize the mayor and clerk to execute, the redraft of the joint powers agreement with the City of Delano with the amendment as stated above. Roll call was taken on .the motion. Ayes, Nelson,. Zaun, Sindt, Enright, Harvey. The city administrator requested the city council to adopt a resolution calling a public hearing on the issuance of $2.190 million of indus- trial development revenue bonds for National Electric, Inc. at a special council meeting on October 29, 1984, so that the decision can be made prior to the October 31st deadline for use of industrial revenue bonding under state law. 84.517 Motion was made by Sindt, seconded by Nelson to adopt Resolution No. 84-138 calling a public hearing for October 29, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers for the issuance of $2.190 million of industrial development revenue bonds for National Electric, Inc. for one of two sites, provided that the one outside the city of Lakeville is annexed into Lakeville if it is to be the location for the new plant. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Zaun, Sindt, Enright, Harvey, Nelson. At this time Mayor Zaun opened the public improvement assessment hearing for projects 83-9, 83-14 and 84-6, which are the utility system extensions and improvements along Dodd Boulevard,, County Road 64 and Kenrick Avenue, and within the McDonald's McStop Addition. 2 4~ CITY OF LAKEVILLE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING October 9, 1984 The city clerk attested. to the legal notice. The .city engineer presented a slide showing the project locations and project costs. At this time the city administrator explained that the deferment policy previously .explained by the council at the improvement hearing on these particular water and sanitary sewer extension projects, with the exception of the improvements within the McStop Addition, would be as follows. Any of the parcels of property that are undeveloped, unplatted or which do not .have any buildings on them at the present time that are hooking up to the utility systems will have their assessments deferred without interest until such time as they final plat the property or build and connect a building on their property, at which time the principal of the assessment as adopted for that parcel of property would be then levied, .and the interest would begin at the rated adopted on this assessment roll. It was explained that if person owned a large parcel of property and wished to build a single house on it in the interim, that the wise thing to do would be to divide the property into a small .parcel for the house, and then the assessment for the parcel with the house on it would be made. only for the parcel where the utility service is being provided. The remaining portion of the parcel would .continue to be deferred until it is final platted or built on. Mr. & Mrs. Paul Hammer asked about the deferment on their property on Dodd Road, which only received the water system improvement at this time. The city engineer advised them that the intent was to defer the assessment on their property until they connect to the water system, since they, at .present., still do not have sanitary sewer available to their property. 84.518 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Sindt to close the public hearing. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Sindt, Enright, Harvey, Nelson, Zaun. 84.519 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Nelson to adopt Resolution N0. 84-139 approving the assessment roll on the above projects. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Enright, Harvey, Nelson, Zaun, Sindt. 84.520 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Nelson to approve Resolution No. 84-140 setting forth and adopting the deferment .policy on projects 83-9, 83-14, and 84-6. 3 CITY OF LAKEVILLE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING October 9, 1984 Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Enright, Harvey, Nelson, Zaun, Sindt. At this time Mayor Zaun opened the public hearing on project 83-3 for the assessment of Holyoke Avenue and 202nd Street intersection street improvements. The city clerk attested to the legal notice. The city engineer presented a slide showing the location of the project improvements and the cost associated with the improvements and the assessment rates. Mr. Nelson explained the cost participation in the improvements and stated. that the total amount of the improvement cost being assessed to benefited property came to $152,.344 out of a total project cost of $902,872. The rest. of the cost is covered by funds from the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Dakota County and the City. of Lakeville through the MSA gas tax funds. Mr. Nelson also stated that the city would be assessing the city owned property on the corner with the commercial rate for the street and curb & gutter improvements. Mr. & Mrs. Perry asked about the deferment policy on their vacant lot to the west of their lot with their home on it. It was pointed out that that the policy adopted by the council on this project at the improvement hearing would provide for the deferment of the curb and gutter assessment on this lot until such time as a building permit is issued, at which time the principal .amount of the assessment would be due or could be assessed at the interest rate being approved on this assessment roll at this time. Mrs. Steberg questioned the engineer about the driveway work yet to be done and how it would be blended into the new road and. existing drives. Mr. Nelson stated that either he or the M/DOT officials would be meeting with the property owners along the street to make the driveway transitions compatible, and that they would be replaced with like material as existed before the project. Mr. Clark asked when the project was expected to be completed, and it was pointed out that the project is nearing completion and should be opened to traffic within three weeks, weather permitting. 84.521 Motion was made by Sindt, seconded by Harvey to close the public hearing. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Harvey, Nelson, Zaun, Sindt, Enright. 84.522 Motion was made by Sindt, seconded by Nelson to adopt Resolution No. 84-141 approving the assessment roll on project 83-3. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Nelson, Zaun, Sindt, Enright, Harvey. 4 • CITY OF LAKEVILLE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING October 9, 1984 84.523 Motion was made by Sindt, seconded by Nelson to adopt Resolution No. 84-142 adopting the assessment deferment policy on project 83-3. Roll call was taken on the motion.. Ayes, Nelson, Zaun, Sindt, Enright, Harvey. At this time .Mayor Zaun reopened the public hearing on the assessments for the 0akridge Heights addition improvements, which was tabled at the October ist council meeting. Mr. Kurt Laughinghouse., representing Derrick Land Companies, was present and addressed the city council over concerns that he had regarding the engineering, inspection, base map updating and contingency costs included in the assessment roll. Mr. Laughinghouse stated that he felt the engineering fees on this. project should be looked at in comparison to the engineering and inspection costs to a similar. size project in another community that his company was involved with. Mayor Zaun and the council members ..explained to Mr. Laughinghouse the history of public improvements in_the city of Lakeville and problems that have existed_.in the past .and why .the city has given the engineering and inspection requirements today to prevent similar problems from occurring. At this time the staff presented a memorandum prepared by Keith Nelson recommending some change of policy regarding the charge. to developers for certain .parts of the administrative and engineering/inspection fees. 84.524 After discussion, motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Nelson to adopt the policy as recommended and set forth in the October 3, 1984, memorandum from Keith Nelson for this and future assessment roll preparation on developer improvement projects made by the city. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Enright, Harvey, Nelson, Zaun. Nays, Sindt. Councilmember Sindt stated that she. did not have enough time to study the new policy, which was the reason she.. voted "no". 84.525 Motion was made by Enright, seconded by Nelson to adopt Resolution No. 84-143 approving .the revised assessment roll on project 82-10 in the amount of $527,166..23.... Roll call was taken on the motion.. .Ayes, Enright., Harvey, Nelson, Zaun. Nays, Sindt. 84.526 Motion was made by Nelson, seconded by Harvey to adjourn the special council meeting. 5 CITY OF LAKEVILLE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING October 9, 1984 Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes, Harvey, Nelson, Zaun, Sindt, Enright. Time: 9:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Patrick E. McG rvey,'City erk Dua a Zaun, Mayor 6 CITY OF LAKEVILLE AGENDA SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER. 9, 1984 7.:00 P.M. Call to order.. 1. Roll call. 2. Public hearing on the assessment of Improvement Project No. 83-7, 175th Street and Ipava_street improvements. a. Attest to the legal notice. b. .Presentation of .the. project costs and assessments. c. questions and comments. d. Motion to close the public hearing. e. Resolution .adopting the assessment _roll. 3. Public hearing on the assessment of Improvement.. Projects 83-9, 83-14 and 84-6 County Road 64, Kenrick Avenue and Dodd Boulevard utility improvements. a. Attest _to .the legal notice. b. Presentation of the_project_costs_and assessments. c. Ques ions and comments.. d. :Motion to close the public. hearing. e. Resolution adopting the assessment roll.`''. 4. Public ..hearing on_the assessmen of_Improvement Project _83-3, Holyoke Avenue and 202nd Street intersection. improvement. a. Attest ,to the .legal notice. b. Presentation of the project costs and assessments. c. Questions .and .comments. d. Motion 'to close the public hearing. e. Resolution .:adopting theass_essment roll. 5. Continued .public hearing on the assessment. of Improvement Project No. 82-10, 0akridge Heights. a. Presentation of the project costs and. assessments. b. Questions and comments. c. Motion to close the public .hearing.. d. Resolution adopting the assessment roll. 6. Approval of final resolution for Star Tex industrial development revenue bonds. 7. Approval of final resolution for R.1TP industrial development revenue. bonds. i • • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 9, 1984 8. Approval of an amendment to thejont powers agreement with the City of Delanoconcernng:the industrial development revenue bond transfer from Lakeville to Delano.. of entitlement authority. 9. Adopt a. resolution calling a public hearng_for. October 29, 1984, on the issuance. of .$2,..1:90,000 industrial development revenue bonds for National Electric, Inc. 10. Any other business. 11. Adjourn. 2