HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-15-02 CITY OF LAKEVILLE
Planning .Commission Meeting Minutes
AUGUST 15, 2002
The August 15, .2002 Planning Commission .meeting was called to order by Chair
Wulff in the City Hall Council Chambers at 5:55 p.m.
Flagpledge and roll call of members:
Present: Stolte, Swecker, Wulff, Larson, Grenz, Drotning, ex-officio Puncochar.
Absent: Detjen
Staff Present: Robert Erickson, City Administrator; Daryl Morey, Planning
Director; David Olson, Community & Economic Development Director; .Frank
Dempsey, Associate Planner, Ron Mullenbach, Associate Planner; Leif Hanson,
Zoning Enforcement Coordinator; Jay Rubash, Assistant City Engineer; Andrea
Poehler, Assistant City Attorney; and Penny Brevig, Recording Secretary.
ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES:
The Augusfi 1, 2002 Planning Commission meeting minutes were approved as
presented.
ITEM 4: ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Mr. Morey indicated that our new Planning Commission member, Paul Reuvers,
would be attending the September 5, 2002 Planning Commission meeting.
Mr. Morey stated the following items were distributed to the Planning Commission .
members and staff before tonight's meeting.
1. August 14, 2002 Parks, Recreation & Natural Resources Committee meeting
motions regarding Airlake Development Sixth Addition preliminary and
final plat, Morgan Square final plat, Heritage Walk final plat, and Shady Oak
Grove preliminary and final plat.
2. .Letter from Dakota County Plat Commission regarding .Morgan Square.
3. Letter from the Dakota County Soil & Water conservation District regarding
Shady Oak Grove.
4. Newspaper article in the Pioneer Press (August 15, 2002) written by
Lakeville City Administrator Robert Erickson regarding the proposed
Elko/New Market sewer interceptor.
City Administrator Robert Erickson attended tonight's Planning Commission
. meeting to inform the Planning Commission members about the proposed
Elko/New Market sewer extension.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 2
ITEM 5: ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION VICE CHAIRPERSON
02.93 Motion by Swecker, Second by Drotning to nominate Commissioner Stolte to the
office of Vice Chair for the remainder of the year 2002.
Ayes: Stolte, Swecker, Wulff, Larson, Grenz, Drotning.
Nays: 0
ITEM 6: CONSENT AGENDA
02.94 Motion by Drotning, Second by Stolte to recommend to City Council approval of
the August 15, 2002 Planning Commission Consent Agenda as follows:
Approve the application of Cynthia Konich fora 3-year extension of a
Special Home Occupation Permit to operate a massage therapy business out
of her home, located at 17217 Idlewood Way, subject to the 2 stipulations
listed in the August 9, 2002 planning report.
Ayes: Swecker, Wulff, Larson, Grenz, Drotning, Stolte.
• Nays: 0
ITEM 7: COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN (Tabled at the August 2, 2002 Planning
Commission meeting)
Chair Wulff opened discussion regarding the proposed Comprehensive Sign. Plan
for amulti-tenant. commercial building, located at 20908. Holyoke Avenue.
Rod Borg was in attendance at tonight's meeting to answer any questions the
Planning Commission or public may have. He presented an overview of his sign
plan and agreed with staff recommendations regarding the sign plan. He
questioned the need for an enclosure for his trash dumpster.
Zoning Enforcement Coordinator Leif Hanson presented the planning report. Mr.
Hanson stated that Perma Companies has submitted a comprehensive. sign plan for
their multi-tenant building located at 20908 Holyoke Avenue. in downtown
Lakeville. The building is located in .the C-CBD District at the corner of 209 Street
and Holyoke Avenue.
Mr. Hanson indicated that a total of 4 commercial tenants are located .within the
building and are requesting wall signage on the exterior of the building. A fifth
• tenant space is located at the rear of the building and is not allowed an exterior wall
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 3
sign because it does not face a public street. The fifth tenant space, which has been
used for storage purposes, must comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements.
He stated that the Sign Ordinance, which was revised on March 4, 2002, requires
new and existing multiple occupancy commercial and industrial buildings devoted
to three or more businesses or industrial uses to submit a comprehensive sign plan
subject to review by the Planning Commission and the approval of the City Council
before any signs are installed on the premises. Mr. Hanson indicated that the
building located at 20908 Holyoke Avenue currently does not have any exterior
wall. or freestanding signs. Perma Companies are proposing to install a total of 5
exterior wall signs on the building. No freestanding signs are proposed.
Mr. Hanson explained that the sign ordinance states that individual tenants located
m a multiple occupancy building may display. an exterior wall sign on the building.
only if the tenant's business has. an exclusive entrance and faces a public street.. The
proposed sign plan shows that each of the 4 tenants has an exclusive exterior
entrance. Mr. Hanson indicated that the Heratus Floors tenant has an exterior
entrance facing Holyoke Avenue and one facing 209 Street. Each tenant is
allowed to display one exterior wall sign while the Heratus Floors tenant may
• display two exterior wall signs because it is located on the corner of 209 Street and
Holyoke Avenue and has an exclusive entrance off of each street.
Mr. Hanson reviewed the measurements of the exterior wall signs allowed in the C-
CBD Zoning District, which are outlined in his July 24, 2002 planning report. He
also indicated the type of signs .that are proposed to be installed on this building,
which are also .outlined in his July 24, 2002 planning report. All exterior wall signs
facing Holyoke Avenue must be projecting signs. Mr. Hanson indicated that each
of the signs shall require a sign permit issued by the City of Lakeville and must also
receive the landlords written approval prior to a sign being installed on the
building. 'He also stated that all new signs, or replacement signs must be reviewed
by staff to determine if the sign is consistent with the approved comprehensive sign
plan and the Sign Ordinance.
Mr. Hanson stated that the Zoning Ordinance requires all dumpsters located
outside on properties in the C-CBD District to be stored indoors or screened from
neighboring properties and public rights of way.
Mr. Hanson indicated that staff inspected Mr. Borg's site and noted that there was
not enough space for the dumpster to be located in back of the building without
encroaching onto other properties or into public right-of-way. Mr. Hanson stated
that consistent with past practice of eliminating non-conformities as part of a
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 4
• .
planning action, staff recommends that the property owner move the dumpster
indoors in compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Mr. Hanson stated that should the Planning Commission recommend to City
Council approval of the Comprehensive Sign Plan, Planning Department staff
recommends approval subject to the 2. stipulations listed in the July 24, 2002
planning report.
Chair Wulff opened discussion to the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Grenz wanted staff to check with the Fire Marshall to see if it was
safe to store: the dumpster inside the building.
Commissioner Swecker asked- how the garbage company would access the
dumpster. Mr. Hanson indicated that it would have to be taken outside for pick-
up. Mr. Borg indicated that he has a 13" above ground level step at the entrance to
his back door. That space is occupied by himself and he does not. want the
dumpster inside the building.
• The Planning Commission was very reluctant to have the dumpster stored inside.
Mr. Borg's building due to fire safety. They want staff to research if there would be
sufficient right-of-way left if they vacate a portion of the alley. The City. Attorney-
. suggested an encroachment agreement as a possible solution.
The Planning Commission agreed with Mr. Borg's Comprehensive Sign Plan. They
concurred that staff work with Mr. Borg to come up with a viable solution for
screening the dumpster prior to' consideration of the Comprehensive Sign Plan by
the City Council
02.95 Motion by Drotning, Second by Swecker to recommend to City Council approval
of the proposed Comprehensive Sign Plan for amulti-tenant commercial building,
located at 20908 Holyoke Avenue, subject to the 2 stipulations listed in the July 24,
2002 planning report.
Ayes: Wulff, Larson, Grenz, Drotning, Stolte, Swecker.
Nays: 0
ITEM 8. ROBERT POSTHUMUS
Chair Wulff opened the public hearing to consider the application of Robert
Posthumus for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow the .construction of
more than one detached accessory building in the RA, Rural/Agricultural District,
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 5
located at 12295197 Street. Assistant City Attorney Poehler attested that the legal
notice had been duly published in accordance with state statutes and City Code.
Robert Posthumus was in attendance at tonight's meeting to answer any questions
the Planning Commission or public may have. Regarding Stipulation 8, he asked
staff if there had been any code changes for private sanitary sewer systems since his
house was built. Mr. Morey suggested he talk with the City's Plumbing Inspector
regarding this issue.
Associate Planner Frank Dempsey presented the planning report. Mr. Dempsey
indicated that Mr. Posthumus is proposing to construct one 1,728 square foot
storage building and two 384 square foot horse shelters on his 10.55 acre lot, in the
RA, Rural/Agriculture District. The existing house was constructed in 1994. The
house includes an existing two-stall attached garage. Mr. Dempsey stated that the
proposed storage building will be 18.5 feet in height and will be constructed to the
north and west of the existing house and 95 feet from the .existing horse barn. He
indicated that the storage building would be accessed from an extension of the
existing driveway.
. Mr. Dempsey stated that the storage building is to be used for storage of personal
vehicles, .personal equipment and other personal property. This building will
match the color of the horse barn.
Mr. Dempsey stated that the two horse shelters will be located 110 feet east of the
existing horse barn. These two. buildings will be 11 feet in height and will match
the dark brown color of the existing horse barn.
Mr. Dempsey indicated that the Posthumus property is well screened from 197
Street. The proposed buildings will be screened and setback a significant distance
from public right-of-way and adjacent properties. He stated that 197 Street is an
unimproved road with a future minor collector classification and planned overland
pedestrian trail.. A Fifty-five foot roadway easement was dedicated by the
Posthumus property when the property was administratively subdivided in 199E
No additional roadway easement. is needed at this time.
Mr. Dempsey stated that the property is not served. with City sanitary sewer. The
existing private sanitary sewer system was installed in 1994 when the house was
constructed. He indicated that consistent with the stipulation of other similar
CUP's, the private sanitary sewer. system will be required to be inspected for
compliance with current code, and it must be brought into compliance if it doesri t
comply.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 6
Mr. Dempsey described the screening of the proposed storage building and the
smaller horse shelters, as indicated in his August 9, 2002 planning report. No
additional landscape screening will be required.
Mr. Dempsey outlined the criteria that must be considered for a CUP for an
oversized accessory building, which is listed in his August 9, 2002 planning report.
The provisions have been considered and are determined to have been. satisfactorily
met.
Consistent with other previous CUP's approved on large parcels of property, Mr.
Dempsey stated that a stipulation of the CUP will .require that the accessory
buildings be removed if the property is subdivided in the future.
Mr. Dempsey stated that should the Planning Commission recommend to City
Council approval of Robert Posthumus's Conditional Use Permit Amendment,
Planning Department staff recommends the 9 stipulations listed in the August 9,
2002 planning report,. and approval of the Findings of fact, dated August 15, 2002.
Chair Wulff opened the hearing to the public for comment.
• There were no comments om the audience.
02.96 Motion by Swecker, Second by Grenz to close the public hearing at 6:30 p.m.
Ayes: Larson, Grenz, Drotning, Stolte, Swecker, Wulff.
Nays: 0
Commissioner Larson asked about Stipulations 4 and 8. Mr. Morey indicated that
staff wants to be sure that the accessory building does not become a living quarters.
Also, whenever there is a planning action, the City takes that opportunity to be sure
that the property is in compliance with today's regulations. If the private sanitary
sewer. system is not in compliance, it will have to be brought into compliance with
current codes and ordinances.
Commissioner Drotning questioned whether Stipulation 6 was needed regarding
"No home occupations are permitted...." Mr. Dempsey stated that staff includes
this stipulation in the conditional use permit because it is recorded against the
property, so if there is a change in ownership, the new owner would be notified of
this. requirement through the recorded conditional use permit document.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 7
Commissioner Drotning indicated that the City's intent should be clear and
suggested that the words "home occupations" be changed to "business .activities,"
or something similar.
Assistant City Attorney Poehler indicated. that this wording .would not be a
problem.
Commissioner Grenz asked for clarification of the number of horses Mr. Posthumus
has on his property. Mr. Posthumus indicated that he has 4 horses that he boards
and 3 that he owns.
Mr. Morey indicated that if the Planning Commission agrees, Stipulation 6 could be
reworded as follows: "Use of the accessory buildings shall not violate Zoning.
ordinance requirements (i.e. business activities, home occupations).
02.97. Motion by Stolte, Second by Drotning to recommend to City Council approval of
the Robert Posthumus Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow the
construction of more than one detached accessory building in the RA,
Rural/Agricultural District, located at 12295 197 Street, subject to the 9
• stipulations listed in the August 9, 2002 planning report, as amended, and approval
of the Findings of Fact dated August 15, 2002.
Ayes: Grenz, Drotning, Stolte, Swecker, Wulff, Larson.
Nays: 0
ITEM 9. PRESTON DROGEMULLER
Chair Wulff opened the public hearing to consider the application of Preston
Drogemuller for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a detached
accessory building, which would result in a total accessory building area greater
than 656 square feet and a height greater than 15 feet in the RM-1, Medium Density
Residential District, located. at 7825 202nd Street. Assistant City Attorney Poehler
attested that the -legal notice had been duly published in accordance with state
statutes and City Code.
Preston Drogemuller was in attendance at tonight's meeting to answer any
questions the Planning Commission or public may have. He gave an overview of
his project. Mr. Drogemuller stated that he wanted it clarified that just because he
will be installing three horse stalls in his new accessory building, he may have more
than 3 horses, consistent with Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 8
Associate Planner Frank Dempsey presented the planning report. Mr. Dempsey
stated that Preston Drogemuller has submitted an application for a conditional use
permit (CUP) to allow the construction of a detached accessory building on his
property located at 7825 202nd Street. He indicated that the Drogemuller house was
constructed in 1990 on a 10 acre metes and bound"s described parcel in the RM-1,
Medium Density Residential District.
Mr. Dempsey stated that the property is served with a private sanitary sewer
system. Also, there are no detached accessory buildings currently located on the
property. The existing attached garage is 576 square feet in area. Mr. Dempsey
indicated that the proposed new horse barn accessory building would be 2,184
square feet in area and 19 feet in height and would be constructed to the north and
west of the existing house. The total accessory building area on the property would
be 2,760 square feet, which exceeds the 656 square feet of area and 15 feet of height
permitted in the RM-1 District.
Mr. Dempsey. stated that the horse barn would. be located approximately 362 feet
from the 202nd Street right-of-way. The accessory building would be accessed from
an unpaved extension of the. existing driveway and will be located 182.3 feet from
the north (rear) property line and 201.3 feet from the west (side) property line. Mr.
Drogemuller proposes to use the accessory building space to keep horses and for
storage of .yard maintenance equipment and other personal property.
Mr. Dempsey indicated that the Zoning Ordinance allows horses to be kept within
any zoning district. Up to one horse per acre on a minimum 2~/~ acre parcel is
permitted. He stated that the accessory building will have three horse stalls in the
building.
Mr. Dempsey stated that the Drogemuller property is within the 2010 MUSA,
which means that City sanitary sewer is not anticipated to be available to the
property until after 2010. Mr. Drogemuller recently had the private septic system
inspected to determine if it was in compliance with current code requirements. Mr.
Dempsey stated that the private inspector determined that the septic system did
not .comply, so Mr. Drogemuller has begun the work to replace the. old septic
system with a compliant system.
Consistent with similar, approved CUP's, staff recommends that the detached
accessory building be removed from the property as a stipulation of any future
subdivision of the property.
• Mr. Drogemuller has agreed to dedicate additional roadway easement for 202na
Street (CR 64), which, Mr. Dempsey indicated, is designated as ahigh-density
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 9
minor arterial roadway in the City's Transportation Plan. Mr. Drogemuller's
survey identifies a 75-foot roadway easement dedication west of the existing hedge-
. .row to the west property line and a 55 foot roadway easement dedication in front of
the hedge-row to the east property line.
Mr. Dempsey outlined.. the criteria that must be considered for a .CUP for an
oversized accessory building, which is listed in his August 9, 2002 planning report.
The provisions have been considered and are determined to have been satisfactorily
met.
Mr. Dempsey stated that should the Planning Commission recommend to City
Council .approval of Preston Drogemuller's Conditional Use Permit, Planning
..Department staff recommends the 8 stipulations listed in the August 9, 2002
planning. report, and approval of the Findings of Fact, dated August 15, 2002.
Chair Wulff opened the hearing to the public for comment.
There were no comments from the audience.
02.98 Motion by Swecker, Second by Drotning to close the public hearing at 6:50 p.m.
Ayes: Drotning, Stolte, Swecker, Wulff, Larson, Grenz.
Nays: 0
The Planning Commission requested Stipulation 7 be amended, as in the previous
agenda item, to read "Use of the accessory building shall not violate Zoning
Ordinance requirements (i.e. business activities, home occupations)."
Commissioner Grenz asked if there would be any water service to the proposed
building, and if so, recommended a stipulation specifying what the water is to be
used for. Mr. Drogemuller indicated that yes he would have running water inside
the building to water the horses.
Mr. Morey indicated that staff is more concerned about not having sanitary sewer
hooked up to the building so the building could not be converted in the future to
living space. Mr. Rubash stated that in order for Mr. Drogemuller to get. his
building permit, the proposed water service would be reviewed and would have to
comply with the Plumbing Code, so it wouldn't be necessary to add this as a
stipulation.
02.99 Motion by Swecker, Second by Drotning to recommend to City Council approval
of Preston Drogemuller's Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a
Planning Commission Meeting
.August 15, 2002
Page 10
•
detached accessory building which would .result in a total accessory building area
greater than 656 square .feet and a height greater than 15 feet in the RM-1, Medium
Density Residential District, located at 7825 202nd Street, subject to the 8 stipulations
listed in the August 9, 2002 planning report, as amended, and approval of the
Findings of Fact dated August 15, 2002.
Ayes: Stolte, Swecker, Wulff, Larson, Drotning.
Nays: Grenz -His reason being he felt a stipulation should be added as to what the water
service will be used for in the proposed accessory building.
ITEM 10. AIRLAKE DEVELOPMENT SIXTH ADDITION
Chair Wulff opened the public hearing to consider the application of Airlake
Development, Inc. for a Preliminary and Final Plat of two (2) lots on one (1) block
on approximately 22 acres of land to be known. as Airlake Development Sixth
Addition. Assistant City Attorney Poehler attested that the legal notice had been
duly published in accordance with state statutes and City Code.
Jack Matasosky, President of APPRO Development and Bill Black, local manager of
Boise Cascade, were in attendance at tonight's meeting to answer any questions the
Planning Commission or public may have. Mr. Black distributed some
informational brochures about Boise Cascade. He indicated that they are a
wholesale, not retail operation and they need to be on a rail line.
Associate Planner Ron Mullenbach presented the planning report. Mr. Mullenbach
stated that APPRO Development, representing Airlake Development, has
submitted applications for. the preliminary and final plat of two lots on one block to
be known as Airlake Development Sixth Addition. He indicated that the subject..,
property consists of 21.55 acres of land, which was final platted earlier this year as
Outlot A, Airlake Development Fifth Addition, and is zoned I-1, Limited Industrial
District. Mr. Mullenbach stated that the Airlake Development Fifth Addition
development contract includes securities to guarantee the removal or abandonment
of all existing improvements on the parent parcel, such as field drives, septic
systems, and wells.
Mr. Mullenbach indicated that the Airlake Development Sixth Addition
preliminary and final plat plans also include a site plan for a proposed Boise
Cascade office, warehouse and building materials distribution facility on Lot 2,
Block 1.
. The Airlake Development Sixth Addition preliminary and final plat plans have
been distributed to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Committee and
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 11
their comments. have been distributed to the Planning Commission at tonight's
meeting. Airlake Development, Inc. has previously satisfied the park dedication
requirements for the parent parcel with a cash contribution. The preliminary and
final plat plans have also been distributed to the Dakota County Plat Commission
and their comments and approval were included in the August 9, 2002 planning
report.
Mr. Mullenbach stated that. both Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1 of the preliminary and
final :plat greatly exceed the minimum lot requirements of the I-1, .Limited
Industrial District.
Mr. Mullenbach stated that the Airlake Development Sixth Addition preliminary
and final plat abuts CSAH 70 onus north side. CSAH 70 is designated as a high-
density minor arterial in the City's Transportation Plan and is proposed to
ultimately be constructed as a four-lane divided roadway. He indicated that full
turn lane improvements on CSAH 70 at Holyoke Avenue will be made as part of
this development.
Mr. Mullenbach indicated that full access to CSAH 70 is proposed at a .shared
. private drive aligned with Holyoke Avenue on the north side of CSAH 70. The
proposed driveway location meets Dakota County Access Spacing Guidelines for a
four-lane divided roadway. He stated that the proposed shared private drive is
preferable to a public cul-de-sac for maintenance reasons.
Mr. Mullenbach stated that the preliminary and final plat. plans identify the
extension of rail over Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1. The proposed rail layout provides
an opportunity in the future for extension of rail through the Dick's Sanitation site
to serve the Ruddle property to the west.
Mr. Mullenbach stated that Boise Cascade is proposing to construct a 72,000 square
foot office/warehouse building with accessory outdoor storage of building
materials on Lot 2 of the final. plat. The office/warehouse building is a permitted
use and the accessory .outdoor storage is a permitted accessory use in .the I-1,
Limited Industrial District.
Mr. Mullenbach reviewed the Boise Cascade site plan in detail in his August 9, 2002
planning report. He indicated .that the setbacks are in compliance with the I-1
District requirements.
Mr. Mullenbach stated that, based on the uses identified by the applicant, the
. office/warehouse building requires a total of 82 parking spaces. -The site plan
identifies a total of 48 parking spaces of the 82 required. He indicated that a
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 12
maximum of 50 percent of the required parking may be deferred with the approval
of a parking deferment agreement. The developer has submitted a parking
deferment plan that identifies the potential build-out of the 82 required parking
spaces. A signed parking deferment agreement must be submitted prior to
issuance of a building permit for the Boise Cascade building.
Mr. Mullenbach indicated that Boise Cascade is proposing outdoor storage of
building materials within an enclosed and screened outdoor storage area on the
south side of the property. Truck traffic will enter and exit the outdoor storage area
off the southerly extension of the hared private drive. Mr. Mullenbach indicated
that outdoor storage is allowed as an accessory use in the I-1 District. The outdoor
storage area is screened from CSAH 70 by the building and a landscaped berm.
Mr. Mullenbach stated that should the Planning Commission recommend to City
Council approval of Airlake Development Sixth Addition Preliminary and Final
Plat, Planning Department staff recommends the 11 stipulations listed in the
August 9, 2002 planning report. .
Chair Wulff opened the hearing to the public for comment.
• There were no comments from the audience.
02.100 Motion by Drotning, Second by Stolte to close the public hearing at 7:10 p.m.
Ayes: Swecker, Wulff, Larson, Grenz, Drotning, Stolte.
Nays: 0
Commissioner Grenz asked if there is any manufacturing that will be done at the
.Boise Cascade site. Mr. Black indicated there only would be what he calls
"remanufacturing" at the Lakeville .site, i.e. cutting larger stock in half prior to
distribution.
Commissioner Drotning indicated that he thought. APPRO Development had come
up with a very nice landscape plan, but he thought there should be trees adjacent to
the future T-shed. Mr. Matasosky stated that there had been extensive discussion
with the Boise Cascade corporate office and indicated that it was a practical issue
not to put trees at this location due to maneuvering of 60 foot long materials'stored
in this .area. Mr. Matasosky indicted that they could put up a slatted chain .link
fence, if required. It was agreed that since Airlake Development owns the adjacent
parcel (Lot 1, Block 1), they will include the trees when that parcel develops.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 20Q2
Page 13
02.101 Motion by Stolte, Second by Drotning to recommend to City Council approval of
the Airlake Development Sixth Addition Preliminary and Final Plat of two (2) lots
on one (1) block on approximately 22 acres of land, subject to the 11 stipulations
listed in the August 9, 2002 planning report.
Ayes: Wulff, Larson, Grenz, Drotning, Stolte, Swecker.
Nays: 0
Break at 7:20 p.m.
Reconvened at 7:35 p.m.
ITEM 11. SOLrrHFORK ANIMAL HOSPITAL
Chair Wulff opened the public hearing to consider the application of Craig and
Paula Albright for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a
veterinary clinic in the- C-3, General Commercial District, located west of Junelle
Path and north of 175 Street.. Assistant City Attorney Poehler attested that the
legal notice had been duly published in accordance with state statutes and City
Code.
Crai Albri ht, alon with Jack Matasosk and Jim Connelly from APPRO
g g g Y
Development, and Grant Jacobson from Jacobson Engineers and Surveyors were in
attendance at tonight's meeting to answer any questions the Planning Commission
or public may have. Mr. Matasosky gave an overview of the project.
Associate Planner Ron Mullenbach presented the planning report. Mr. Mullenbach
stated that Craig and Paula Albright of Southfork Animal Hospital are requesting a
conditional use permit (CUP) to allow the construction of an approximately 4,100
square foot veterinary clinic on property located west of Junelle Path and north of
175 Street. He indicated that the project area includes an existing metes and
bounds description parcel currently owned by Paul Krause that is proposed to be
administratively subdivided into two parcels, with the Southfork Animal Hospital
locating on the southerly parcel. Veterinary clinics are allowed by CUP in the C-3
District.
Mr. Mullenbach stated that Mr. and Mrs. Albright are proposing to move their
existing business, which is located within Kenwood Center at 17761 Juniper Path, to
this new location. The .project is exempt from the I-35/C.R. 50 interchange
commercial development moratorium because the. CUP application was submitted
prior to the City Council enacting the moratorium.
•
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 14
•
Mr. Mullenbach stated that Parcel A and Parcel B of the proposed administrative
subdivision exceed the minimum lot requirements of the C-3 District.
Mr. Mullenbach stated that the proposed site and building plans are in compliance
with the Zoning Ordinance related to setbacks, parking, and exterior building
materials. The applicants have submitted information indicating compliance with
the Zoning Ordinance performance standards for veterinary clinics.
Mr. Mullenbach stated that should the Planning Commission recommend to City
Council approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a
veterinary clinic in -the C-3, General Commercial District, Planning Department
staff recommend the 9 stipulations listed in the August 9, 2002 planning report, and
approval of the Findings of Fact, dated August 15, 2002.
Chair Wulff opened the hearing to the public for comment.
There were no comments from the audience.
02.102 Motion by Swecker, Second by Grenz to close the public hearing at 7:40 p.m.
• Ayes: Larson, Grenz, Drotning, Stolte, Swecker, Wulff.
Nays: 0
The Planning Commission indicated that they were very concerned about a new
building being constructed in the I35/C. R. 50 interchange moratorium area, when
there has not been any decisions made yet as to proposed infrastructure
improvements in that area. Chair Wulff commented that she agrees they have the
right to construct the building in this location, but is concerned about the impact it
may have on the interchange design.
Commissioners Drotning and Stolte asked about the number of future driveways
on Junelle Path, which will become the new frontage road when the interchange
improvements are made. Mr. Mullenbach stated that staff has required a shared
drive between the two proposed parcels to reduce the overall number of driveways
on Junelle Path.
Community & Economic Development Director David Olson explained that there
would be no more buildings constructed in the I35/C.R. 50 interchange
moratorium area while the moratorium is in place. SRF, the consulting firm
working on the I-35/C.R. 50 interchange study, are looking at roadway
• improvement options for this area. The next step will be to meet with property
owners in the moratorium area to present the options.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15,.2002
Page 15
Commissioner Puncochar wanted the' applicant to be aware that access to the site
could be limited. to right-in/right-out only, depending on the final design of the
interchange area and Junelle Path.
Commissioner Drotning asked if soil tests had been done in this area. Mr. Connelly
indicated that their soil tests indicate. the soil is suitable for the proposed
improvements.
02.103 Motion by Drotning, Second by Stolte to recommend to City Council approval of
the Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a veterinary clinic in the C-
3, General Commercial District, located west of Junelle Path and north of 175
Street, subject to the 9 stipulations listed in the August 9, 2002 planning report, and
approval of the Findings of Fact, dated August 15, 2002.
Ayes: Grenz, Drotning, Stolte, Swecker, Wulff, Larson.
Nays: 0
ITEM 12. MORGAN SQUARE
• Chair Wulff opened the public hearing to consider the application of James Allen to
rezone property from RM-1, Medium Density Residential District to PUD, Planned
Unit Development, and. consider the final plat of 36 townhouse unit lots, 4 common
lots and 6 Outlots. Assistant City Attorney Poehler attested that the legal notice
had been duly published in accordance with state statutes and City Code.
The applicants, James .Allen and Sharon Allen, were in attendance at tonight's
meeting, along with project engineer Steve Albrecht from Bolton and Menk, to
answer any questions the Planning Commission or public may have. Mr. Albrecht
presented an overview of the final plat and outlined the changes that have occurred
since the preliminary plat was reviewed by the Planning Commission on June 20,
2002.
Associate Planner Frank Dempsey presented the planning report. Mr. Dempsey
stated that Mr. James Allen, representing Morgan Square, LLC, has submitted an
application for the final plat of Morgan Square, which consists of 36 attached
townhouse unit lots, 4 common area lots, and 6 outlots on land located south of
205 Street, north of 210 Street (CSAH 70), and west of Keokuk Avenue and
Lakeville Theatre. He indicated that the Morgan Square final plat represents the
first phase of the two phase, 76 attached townhouse unit. preliminary plat approved
by the City Council on July 15, 2002.
•
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 16
•
Mr. Dempsey stated that in conjunction with the. final plat and consistent with the
Planning Commission's recommendation of approval for the Morgan Square
preliminary. plat, the developer has submitted an application to rezone the property
included in the preliminary plat (i.e. Lots 1-20, Block 1; Lots 1-20, Block 2; and
Outlots A-E) to PUD, Planned Unit Development.
Mr. Dempsey explained that the preliminary plat was revised from the initial plans
submitted by the developer based ;upon recommendations from the Planning
Commission and staff related to the design of proposed .Morgan Avenue as a
collector street within an 80 foot right-of-way instead of as a local street within a 66
foot right-of-way as originally proposed.
Mr. Dempsey stated that the developer was willing to increase the Morgan Avenue
right-of-way as .recommended by staff and the Planning Commission provided he
did not lose any townhouse units. In recommending approval of the preliminary
plat, the Planning Commission expressed their support for a PUD rezoning instead
of a variance in conjunction with the Phase 1 final plat to allow a guest parking
setback reduction from 30 feet to 20 feet to accommodate the increased right-of-way
with no loss of units.
Mr. Dem se stated that Mor an Avenue will be constructed to a minor collector
p y g
design with a 36 foot street width and 5 foot concrete sidewalks on both sides
within an 80 foot right-of-way. In addition, Mr. Dempsey stated that "No Parking"
signs will be installed on both sides of Morgan Avenue, which will include a
temporary turnaround on the south end until it is extended to the south to intersect
with realigned Keokuk Avenue when Outlot F develops. Mr. Dempsey stated that
the City has expressed a willingness to favorably consider rezoning the property
between the future realignment of Keokuk Avenue and County Road 70 from RM-
2, Medium Density Residential District to C-3, General Commercial District
consistent with the adjacent parcels in Lakeville Commerce Center to the east when
Outlot F is final platted into, lots and blocks. Mr. Dempsey indicated< that the
owner of the property, Lakeville Land, Ltd., has agreed to sell to James Allen, the
20 feet of additional right-of-way of County Road 70 to be dedicated with .the
Morgan Square final plat. The 20-foot right-of-way dedication along County Road
70 addresses the recommendation of the Dakota County Plat Commission.
Mr. Dempsey indicated that 205 Street, which is currently a 24-foot wide rural
section roadway, is designated as a major collector in the city's Transportation Plan.
The developer will construct aleft-turn lane and by-pass lane for west bound 205
Street traffic and aright-turn lane for east bound 205 Street traffic in existing 205
Street right-of-way. He stated that a temporary grading easement will be required
from the property owner to the north to construct the 205 Street improvements.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 17
Mr. Dempsey stated that the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Committee
recommended a cash contribution to satisfy the park dedication requirement at
their August 14, 2002 meeting.
Mr. Dempsey reviewed the RM-1 District Standards, which are listed in the August
9, 2002 planning report.
Mr. Dempsey stated that the developer has submitted a landscape plan with the
final plat. He indicated that the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinances
require the installation of a landscaped buffer screen adjacent to major collector
205 Street. The landscape plan proposes the installation of 35 six-foot tall Black
Hills Spruce trees adjacent to the ponds proposed on the south. side of 205 Street.
Landscaping is also proposed along Morgan Avenue and adjacent to the
townhouse buildings. Mr. Dempsey indicated that the documentation provided by
the developer with the Morgan Square final plat indicates that the estimated project
value for both phases of the Morgan Square. development are in compliance with
Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Mr. Dempsey. stated that should. the Planning Commission recommend to City
• Council approval to .rezone property from RM-1, Medium Density Residential
District to PUD, Planned Unit Development, and approval of the final plat of 36
townhouse unit lots, 4 common lots and 6 Outlots, Planning Department staff
recommends the 17 stipulations listed in the August 9, 2002 planning report, and
approval of the Findings of Fact, dated August 15, 2002.
Chair Wulff opened the hearing to the public for comment.
There were no comments from the audience.
02.104 Motion by Swecker, Second by Grenz to close the public hearing at 8:05 p.m.
Ayes: Drotning, Stolte, Swecker, Wulff, Larson, Grenz.
Nays: 0
Commissioner Swecker confirmed the area proposed to be rezoned to PUD,
Planned Unit Development.
02.105 Motion by Swecker, Second by Drotning to recommend #o City Council approval
to rezone property from RM-1, Medium Density Residential District to PUD,
Planned Unit Development, and approval of the final plat of 36 townhouse unit
• lots, 4 common lots .and 6 Outlots to be known as Morgan Square, subject to the 17
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 18
stipulations listed in the August 9, 2002 planning report, and approval of the
Findings of Fact, dated August 15, 2002.
Ayes: Stolte, Swecker, Wulff,. Larson, Grenz, Drotning.
Nays: 0
ITEM 13. HERITAGE WALK
Chair Wulff opened the public hearing to consider a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to bring 0.20 acres of land currently within the Metropolitan Urban
Service Area (MUSA) Expansion Area B into the current MUSA Boundary to allow
the connection of an existing single family home to the municipal sanitary sewer
system, located at 20182 Highview Avenue, and consideration of the final plat of
148 townhouse unit lots, 4 common lots, and 4 outlots, to be known as Heritage
Walk. Assistant City Attorney Poehler attested that the legal notice had been duly
published in accordance with state statutes and City Code.
Kelly Murray from Wensmann Realty, Inc. was in attendance at tonight's meeting
to answer any questions the Planning Commission or public may have.
Associate Planner Ron Mullenbach resented the plannin re ort. Mr. Mullenbach
P g P
stated that Planning Department staff is requesting consideration of an amendment
to the Comprehensive Plan that would bring approximately 0.20 acres of land
currently within. MUSA Expansion Area B into the current MUSA. He indicated
that the proposed amendment .would allow the existing Kristina Berres home,
located at 20182 Highview Avenue, to be connected to City sanitary sewer service
as part of the Heritage Walk final plat improvements.
Mr. Mullenbach stated that Kristina Berres owns an approximately 5.0 acre parcel
at the northeast corner of .Highview Avenue and 202nd Street. Wensmann Realty
has negotiated with Ms. Berres for the acquisition of right-of-way necessary to
facilitate the upgrade of Highview Avenue in conjunction with the Heritage Walk
development. In return for the deeded right-of-way, Mr. Mullenbach indicated that
Wensmann Realty agreed to, among other items, connect the existing home to
public sanitary sewer and water.
Mr. Mullenbach stated that City staff has agreed to process a comprehensive plan
amendment that would bring the home into the current MUSA and allow it to be
connected to public sanitary sewer and water, pursuant to the agreement between
Wensmann Realty and Kristina Berres. He stated that with final acceptance of the
• proposed Heritage Walk public improvements, the Berres property will be served
by the public sanitary sewer and water systems. The MUSA amendment is
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 19
•
necessary to allow for the connection of the existing home to the public sanitary
sewer and water systems when they become available.
Mr. Mullenbach stated that the MUSA amendment request proposes to bring the
minimum amount of land necessary to include the existing home in the current
MUSA. The remaining portion of the parent parcel would remain within MUSA
Expansion Area B.
Mr. Mullenbach indicated that the Heritage Walk final .plat plans are being
processed simultaneous to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request.
Mr. Mullenbach stated that should the Planning Commission recommend to City
Council approval of the Berres MUSA Amendment, Planning Department staff
recommend the 3 stipulations listed in the August 9, 2002 planning report, and
should the Planning Commission recommend to City Council approval of the
Heritage Walk final plat, Planning Department staff recommend the 19 stipulations
listed in the August 9, 2002 planning report.
Chair Wulff opened the hearing to the public for comment.
.
fi"
• There were no comments om the audience.
02.106 Motion by Drotning, Second by Swecker to close the public hearing at 8:15 p.m.
Ayes: Swecker, Wulff, Larson, Grenz, Drotning, Stolte.
Nays: 0
Chair Wulff asked staff if the existing Kristina Berres house would be removed with
the widening of 202nd Street. Mr. Mullenbach explained that the house could
remain with the widening of 202nd Street, but the age of the home may determine
its removal.
Commissioner Grenz asked if any of the driveway accesses on Highview Avenue
had been removed since the Heritage Walk preliminary plat was approved. Mr.
Mullenbach stated that the number of driveways on Highview Avenue remains the
same as proposed on the approved preliminary plat.
Commissioner Swecker stated that she now considers the future extension of
Highview Avenue to not be a negative factor with respect to the proposed
driveways onto Highview Avenue.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 20
02.107 Motion by Drotning, Second by Larson. to recommend to City Council approval of
a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to bring 0.20 acres of land currently within the
Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) Expansion Area B into the current
MUSA`Boundary to allow the connection of an existing single family home to the
municipal sanitary sewer system, located at 20182 Highview Avenue, subject to the'
3 stipulations listed in the August 9, 2002 planning report, and approval of the final
plat of 148 townhouse unit lots, 4 common lots, and 4 outlots, to be known as
Heritage Walk, subject to the 19 stipulations listed in the August 9, 2002 planning
report.
Ayes: Wulff, Larson, Drotning, Stolte, Swecker.
Nays: Grenz -His reason being he didn't like the driveway accesses on Highview Avenue.
ITEM 14. SHADY OAK GROVE
Chair Wulff opened the public hearing to consider the application of Jerome -Craig
Homes for a Preliminary and Final Plat 21 single family lots to be known as Shady
Oak Grove. Assistant City Attorney Poehler attested that the legal notice had been
duly published in accordance with state statutes and City Code.
• a Hult ren from erome - Crai Homes and Wa ne Lamoreaux from Pioneer
JY g J g Y
Engineering were in attendance at .tonight's meeting to answer any questions the
Planning Commission or public may have. Mr. Lamoreaux presented an overview
of the preliminary and final plat of Shady Oak Grove.
Planning Director Daryl Morey presented the planning report. Mr. 'Morey stated
that Jeff Hultgren, representing Jerome-Craig Homes, has submitted applications
for the preliminary and final plat of Shady Oak Grove, which consists of 21 single
family lots and 5 outlots on 14.9 acres of land located south of 185 Street and west
of Ipava Avenue. He indicated that the subject property consists of two metes and
bounds description parcels as well as Outlot A, Spring Hill Second. The
development of single family lots on Outlot A, Spring Hill Second in conjunction
with the Shady Oak Grove development was shown conceptually on the approved
Spring Hill preliminary plat.
Mr. Morey stated that the subject property is currently zoned PUD, Planned Unit
Development. The preliminary and final plat has been designed to RS-3, Single
Family Residential District lot standards for this development.
Mr. Morey indicated that there is asingle-family home with a long driveway access
to 185 Street located within the subject property boundaries. This single-family
home will remain and will. be located within one of the platted lots in Shady Oak
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 21
i
Grove. The existing driveway and access to 185 Street will be removed and a new
driveway will be .constructed to access Irvine Lane. He indicated that the existing
house must be connected to City sanitary sewer and water as part of the Shady Oak
Grove development and the existing septic system and well must be
removed/abandoned in compliance with federal, state and county requirements.
Mr. Morey indicated that the figures provided for lot area, width and depth, which
are shown on the preliminary plat of Shady Oak Grove meet or exceed the
requirements for the RS-3 District. He also indicated .that the building setbacks for "
the RS-3 District are being met for all 21 lots.
Mr. Morey stated that the Shady Oak Grove preliminary and final plat proposes
five outlots. Outs A, C, and E will be deeded by the developer to the City with the
Shady Oak Grove final plat. The developer will retain ownership of Outlots B :and
D.
Mr. Morey stated that the Shady Oak Grove preliminary and final plat abuts 185
Street (C.S.A.H. 60), which is designated as ahigh-density minor arterial roadway
in the City's Transportation Plan. The Dakota County Plat Commission is
• recommending approval of Shady Oak Grove preliminary and final plat.
Mr. Morey stated that the development of Shady Oak Grove includes the
construction of two local streets. Irvine Trail will be extended west from the Spring
Hill development and will be stubbed at the west boundary of the preliminary and
final plat. Irvine Lane extends south of Irvine Trail -and curves back to the north.
An eyebrow cul-de-sac with a 60-foot radius is located on the south side of Irvine
Lane.
Mr. Morey indicated that the developer must install a temporary turnaround on the
north end of Irvine Lane until the street is extended with the future development of
the adjacent property. No building permit will be issued for Block 2, Lot 8 until the
temporary turnaround is removed.
Mr. Morey stated that the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances require the
installation of a berm/landscape screen in the buffer yard area of the two lots that
abut 185 Street. He indicated that the developer is proposing to utilize existing
trees as the buffer yard screen to the greatest extent possible.
Mr. Morey stated that the preliminary and final plat plans have been forwarded to
the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District for review. A letter from
them with their recommendations for erosion .control was distributed to the
Planning Commission at tonight's meeting.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 22
Mr. Morey stated that there are two wetlands located within the preliminary and
final plat boundaries. The developer is proposing to fill wetland B located within
Lots 3 and 4, Block 4. The developer is proposing to provide wetland mitigation
adjacent to wetland basin A located within Outlot A. He indicated .that the
proposed house pads for Lots 7 and 8, .Block 2 meet the 33-foot building setback
requirement from the delineated edge of all saved wetland and mitigation areas.
Mr. Morey stated that the 1999 Park, Trail & Open Space System Plan identifies a
trail on the south side of 185 Street as a greenway trail corridor connection within
the subject property.
Mr. Morey indicated that the Parks,. Recreation and Natural Resources Committee
recommendation related to the park dedication requirement for Shady Oak Grove
from .their August 14, 2002 meeting was distributed at tonight's Planning
Commission meeting.
Mr. Morey stated that should the Planning Commission recommend to City
Council approval of the Shady Oak Grove preliminary and final plat, Planning.
Department staff recommend the 14 stipulations listed in the August 9, 2002
• planning report with a modification to stipulation number 11 to require a $2,000
landscaping security for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1.
Chair Wulff opened the hearing to the public for comment.
Kathleen Michalek, 9710 -185th Street West
Her concerns were:
? Whether the City was going to make her develop her land.
? Was not interested in the streets coming through her land.
? Whether she had to connect to City sanitary sewer and water.
Dick Sullivan, 9798 -185th Street West
His concerns were:
? How many accesses will be allowed onto 185 Street.
? Too many trees are being removed.
02.108 Motion by Stolte, Second by Drotning to close the public hearing at 8:45 p.m.
Ayes: ,Larson, Grenz, Drotning, Stolte, Swecker, Wulff.
Nays: 0
In answer to Ms. Michalek's questions, Chair Wulff indicated thaf no roads will go
through her property until they develop their land and the City does not force
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 23
anyone to develop their land. She also stated that they would be required to hook
up to City sanitary sewer .within 2 years of its availability to their property. They
may also choose to connect to City sanitary sewer in the future if their septic system
fails.
In answer to Mr. Sullivan s questions, regarding accesses onto 185th Street, Mr.
Morey indicated thaf this is up to the County because 185th Street is a county road
(60) and the County's access spacing guidelines must be met. He stated that 185th
Street is designated as ahigh-density minor. arterial roadway .that will .likely
include a median when it is upgraded by the County in the future.
Commissioner Puncochar commented that trees have always been a concern of the
Planning Commission. Development is landowner/developer driven, not City
driven.. Commissioner. Puncochar asked if City staff considered Irvine Lane as a
loop street. Mr. Morey indicated Irvine Lane will loop back to connect with Irvine
Trail when the adjacent property develops. The shape of the parcel and the natural
features dictate the street and lot configuration of the Shady Oak Grove plat.
Commissioner Grenz asked' if this plat would be mass graded or custom graded.
. He felt that custom grading would save additional trees. Mr. Lamoreaux indicated
that the developer was encouraged by staff to mass grade the house pads and front
yard areas. Mr. Rubash explained that this site is relatively flat and with the water
table and drainage issues, it would be better to mass grade to ensure property
storm water drainage is achieved. He also stated that if more than 2 feet of cut or
fill is proposed, City policy requires mass grading.
Mr. Morey stated that staff has to consider tree preservation and site drainage
when reviewing residential plat requests. Mass grading was recommended by staff
to prevent future drainage problems.
Chair Wulff questioned whether the turnaround could be shortened at the end of
Irvine Lane to save additional trees. Mr. Rubash stated that staff will work with the
developer to determine if the turnaround could be pulled back slightly to save
additional trees.
Commissioner Drotning asked about public access to the greenway corridor trail in
the Spring Hill developments. Mr. Morey indicated that public access to the trail is
available in the Spring Hill development. Mr. Morey stated that a public access to
the greenway corridor trail will be considered when the adjacent property to the
west develops. Commissioner Drotning agreed that there needs to be connections
i to the greenway. corridor within the neighborhoods as the properties develop.
Planning Commission Meeting
August 15, 2002
Page 24
Add the following wording to Stipulation 11: "A $2,000 landscaping security shall
be submitted by the developer for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1."
02.109 Motion by Larson, Second by Stolte to recommend to City Council approval of the
Preliminary and Final Plat of 21 single family lots to be known as Shady Oak
Grove, subject to the 14 stipulations listed in the August 9, 2002 planning report, as
amended.
Ayes: Grenz, Drotning, Stolte, Swecker, Wulff, Larson.
Nays: 0
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Penny B evi ,Recording Secret ry
ATTEST:
Wendy Wulff, hair