HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-06-96 City of Lakeville
• PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
June 6,1996
The meeting was called to order by Vice-Chair Rieb at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall
Council Chambers.
Roll call of members was taken. Present: Rieb, Amborn, Cecchini, Wulff. Absent:
Miller, Kowalke, Luick, Bellows.
Also. present: Robert Erickson, City Administrator; Michael Sobota, Community
.and Economic Development Director; Daryl Morey, City Planner; Frank Dempsey,
Associate Planner; Tim Hanson, Assistant City Engineer; Jim Walston, Assistant
City Attorney; and Donna Quintus, Recording Secretary.
The minutes of the May 16, 1996 Planning Commission meeting were approved as
printed.
Commissioner Kowalke arrived and took his seat on the dais at 6:03 p.m.
ITEM 4. CONSENT AGENDA
• 96-61 MOTION by Amborn, Seconded by Wulffto recommend to City Council approval
of the consent agenda as follows:
A. Consideration of the Final Plat for Fairfield Business Campus 2nd Addition
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous.
ITEM 5. PITBL.I HEARiN r; PAMELA MILLER SPECIAL HOME OCCUPATION
PERMIT APPLICATION
Vice-Chair Rieb opened the public hearing to consider an application for a special
home occupation permit to allow the operation of a hair salon in a single family.
residence. Assistant City Attorney Jim Walston attested that the legal notice had
been duly published and mailed as required by state statute.
Associate Planner Frank Dempsey advised that the City has received an application
from PamelaMiller for a special home occupation permit for the purpose of
operating a hair salon out of her new home located at 17171 Ipava Avenue. The
1.6-acre parcel is unplatted and currently zoned R-2, Single Family Residential
District. The Zoning Ordinance recognizes hair salons as a special home
occupation and is regulated in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 of the
Zoning Ordinance requiring a special home occupation permit. If approved, the
special home occupation permit will be reviewed after one year at which time the
applicant may apply for an extension for up to three years. Staff is recommending
approval of the permit application subject to the stipulations listed in the planning
report.
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 6, 1996
Page 2
Ms. Pamela Miller was present and answered questions from the Commission
regarding the operation of the salon. Ms. Miller stated that she is not considering
the installation of a sign at this time.
There were no comments from the public.
96-62 MOTION by Kowalke, second by Amborn to close the public hearing.
Roll call was taken on the motion: Ayes: Unanimous.
96-63 MOTION by Wulff, second by Cecchini to recommend to City Council approval of
the Special Home Occupation Permit as requested by Ms. Pamela Miller to allow
the operation of a hair salon in a single family residence located at 17171 Ipava
Avenue subject to ten of the stipulations outlined in the Planning Report dated May
28, 1996, (removing No. 10 because it's the same as No. 3) and the findings of fact.
Roll call was .taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous.
ITEM 6. PUBLIC HEARiNC; REZONING & MINOR COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE
PLAN AMENDMENT
Vice-Chair Rieb opened the public hearing to consider the application of Airlake
Development, Inc. for: A) a Minor Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment;
and B) a rezoning of property from I-2, General Industrial District to B 3, Auto
Oriented Business District. Assistant City Attorney Jim Walston attested that the
legal notice had been duly published and mailed in accordance with state statute..
City Planner Daryl Morey presented an overview of the application from Airlake
Development, Inc. for a rezoning of a 15-acre parcel that they own on the south side
of C.S.A.H. 50, directly adjacent to the west of Jeff Belzer's Todd Chevrolet. Mr.
Belzer has signed an agreement to purchase the subject property from Airlake
Development, Inc. for future expansion of his automobile dealership. The purchase
agreement is contingent upon City Council approval of a rezoning from I-2,
General Industrial District to B-3, Auto Oriented Business District. Associated
with this request is a minor comprehensive land use plan amendment redesignating
the proposed land use of the subject property from industrial to commercial.
Mr. Pat Regan, Airlake Development, Inc., and Mr. Jeff Krapu, Belzer Chevrolet,
were present and responded to questions from the Commission. Discussion
included the compatibility of the proposed use with present and future land uses in
the area, ingress/egress to the site, and the proposed signalization at the intersection
• of C.S.A.H. 50 and Cedar Avenue upon completion of the road upgrades. Sobota
stated that all issues related to circulation and access would be addressed when a
site plan and .conditional use permit application were filed by Mr. Belzer.
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 6, 1996.
Page 3
• There were no comments from the public.
96-64 MOTION by Amborn, second by Wulff to close the public hearing.
Roll call was taken on the motion: Ayes: Unanimous.
96-65 MOTION by Amborn, second by Cecchini to recommend approval of the Airlake
Development, Inc. application for a Minor Comprehensive Land Use Plan
AmendmenYand the rezoning application to rezone property from I-2, General
Industrial to B-3, Auto Oriented Commercial District subject to Mr. Belzer closing
on the purchase of the subject property and the findings of fact as presented in the
May 31, 1996 planning report.
Roll call was taken on the motion: Ayes: Unanimous.
ITEM 7. PUBLIC HEARING; GATEWAY CENTER EASEMENT VACATIONS &
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT
Vice-Chair Reb opened the public hearing to consider the application of Gateway
Development, LLC for: A} street and easement vacations; and B) the Gateway
Center preliminary and final plat. Assistant City Attorney Jim Walston attested that
the legal notice for the easement vacations and the preliminary and final plats had
been duly .published and mailed in accordance, with state statute.
Gateway Development, Inc. has submitted a preliminary plat for Gateway Center
and a final plat for phase I of the development identified as Gateway First Addition.
This commercial subdivision is proposed to be located on a 15.4 acre parcel of land
situated in the southwest quadrant of the C.S.A.H. 5 (Kenwood Trail) and 172nd
Street intersection, south of the an-ramp to I-35. The. proposed preliminary plat
consists of seven commercial lots on two blocks. The Gateway First Addition final
plat will accommodate the first phase of development consisting of two of these lots
with the remaining developable lots being final plated as two outlots (D and E) for
future development. The final plat also includes three outlots. (A, B, and C) which
are being final platted and deeded over to the City for storm water retention and
sedimentation ponds.
City Planner Daryl Morey presented an overview of the details associated with the
plats and the vacations including the following:
. Zoning and Proposed Land Use:
The property is zoned B-4, General Business District and the proposed
commercial development of this property is consistent with the Comprehensive
• Land. Llse Plan. The property is located within the 2010 Urban Service Area.
. Lot Layout and Street Design:
All proposed lot areas and lot widths meet or exceed minimum ordinance
requirements. Two local streets are proposed to be constructed to serve the
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes.
June 6, 1996
Page 4
Gatewa Center develo ment. One o these streets will rovide access onto
y p p
172nd Street, which is designated as a major collector in the City's
Transportation Plan. Appropriate street rights-of--way are proposed with this
plat. In addition, a temporary turnaround easement is proposed to be located on
Outlot D for the first phase of
development.
. Outlots:
Outlots A, B and C include sediment retention and storm water retention ponds
which will be deeded to the City with the final plat of Gateway First Addition.
The sedimentation basins located within these outlots must be maintained by a
commercial development association for the Gateway Center. Outlots D and E
will be final platted in a future phase of the development.
. Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control .and Utilities:
The developer is proposing to grade the entire site with the first phase because of
the severe topography. Assistant City Engineer Tim Hanson responded to
several questions regarding grading and erosion control and utilities.
. Tree Preservation and Wetlands:
The Environmental Affairs Committee has reviewed this development proposal
.and has recommended approval
• Park and Trail Dedication:
Cash contribution in lieu of land is recommended along with the construction of
a sidewalk/trail along 172nd Street, as part of
Phase I construction.
Mr. Carl Tollefson, developer, and Mr. Steve Grohoski, Gateway Center partner,
were present and responded to several questions from the Commission.
Commissioner Wulff expressed concern that additional traffic will be generated
.with the commercial development of this site. Ms. Wulff stated her belief that the
existing traffic conditions at this intersection are dangerous and that current
roadways cannot handle more traffic.
Several persons were present for the public comment portion of this public hearing.
Each of the following stated they were concerned that commercial development of
this site would increase traffic in the C.S.A.H. 5 (Kenwood Trail)/172nd Street
West/I-35 area and agreed that traffic is already at a dangerous level in this segment
of these roadways. They further stated their belief that commercial development
was not needed on the west side of I-35. Those residents in attendance were:
Mary Gillespie, 17542 Kodiak Court;
Karen Carron, 17555 Kodiak Avenue;
Connie Tzenis, 11285 172nd Street West;
i Roselyn Wilson, 11538 172nd Street West;
Denise McKenna, 17545 Kodiak Avenue; and
Donna Thompson, 17547 Kodiak Court.
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 6, 1996
Page 5
City Planner Daryl Morey and Assistant City Engineer Tim Hanson responded to
several questions from the Commission and the public. Mr. Hanson stated that
existing traffic conditions are temporary because of the I-35 reconstruction and will
be improved upon completion of the interstate improvements and the opening of the
new I-35/County Road 46 interchange. Because of this site's location along a state
and county corridor, both MnDOT and the Dakota County Transportation
Department have reviewed this development. Their reviews did not identify traffic
volume .concerns. The City, as well as the state and county, acknowledge that some
increase in traffic maybe experienced initially. However, with the opening of the
new I-35/C.S.A.H. 46 interchange this fall, as well as other ultimate roadway
improvements, it is anticipated that existing traffic conditions will be immediately
alleviated.
Ms. Irene Schultz, 11195 172nd Street West,-addressed the Commission stating her
confidence and opinion that the new interchange will ease traffic conditions. She
also indicated the current. traffic conditions began this summer, after the
reconstruction project at I-35 was initiated.
Commissioners Wulff, Amborn and Cecchini expressed a desire that a traffic study
be completed prior to final action on the Gateway Center Development.
•
Staff believes that the new interchange will provide an alternative route for
vehicular traffic that is more direct for many of those currently utilizing the
C.S.A.H. 51172nd StreedI-35 intersection.
x-66 MOTION by Cecchini, second by Wulffto table action on the Gateway Center
preliminary. end final plat until a traffic analysis can be completed for the subject
site.
Discussion continued.
Mr. Steve Grohoski stated he preferred formal: recommendation by the Planning
Commission at this meeting so that this proposal can be brought before the City
Council. at their next meeting.
Mr. Fred Richter, Steiner Development and representative for Holiday Station
Stores, Inc., stated that the concerns of the Commission for traffic congestion that
exists in this area today are valid. However, he further stated his confidence in
staff's ability to meet and address all issues. He agreed that the opening of the new
interchange will relieve traffic congestion in the C.S.A.H./172nd StreetiI-35
intersection. He stated that the. opening of the proposed Holiday convenience store
and gas station could be planned to coincide with the opening of the new
interchange.
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 6, 1996
Page 6
• mm's '
Co i stoner Cecchini withdrew his motion.
96-66 MOTION by Cecchini, second by Amborn to close the public hearing.
Roll call was taken on the motion: Ayes: Unanimous.
96-67 MOTION by Amborn, second by Kowalke to recommend approval of the street and
easement vacations as requested by Gateway Development, LLC.
Roll call was taken on the motion: Ayes: Unanimous.
96-68 MOTION by Amborn, second by Cecchini to recommend approval of the Gateway
Center preliminary and final plats subject to the stipulations as outlined in the May
31, 1996 planning report with an additional stipulation that a formal traffic study be
conducted by the City's traffic consultant related to traffic issues as they pertain to
Subdivision Ordinance Section 10-2-4-1.C.1. and 2. regarding premature
developments.
Roll call was taken on the mation:
Ayes: Rieb, Amborn, Cecchini.
Nays:. Wulff. Due to current traffic conditions on C.S.A.H. 5 being dangerous and
• the fact that approval ofthe development will intensify an already dangerous traffic
situation; that Section 10-2-4-1 be considered as valid reason for denial of
premature development; and that improvements to the I-35/C.S.A.H. 5
bridge/underpass should be scheduled and completed prior to additional
development along this corridor.
Nays: Kowalke. Commissioner Kowalke stated that the county and state
transportation agencies have recommended that this development would not create
additional traffic congestion and he had confidence in their appraisal of the future
.alleviation of traffic upon opening of the C.S.A.H. 46 interchange, and as such, a
traffic study is not needed. He further stated that it is the obligation of the Planning
Commission to make a solid recommendation for either denial or approval to the
City Council based upon their review of the facts submitted.
Motion passes.
Vice-Chair called for a recess. at 8:55 p.m: and reconvened the June 6,.1996 regular
meeting at 9:05 p.m.
ITEM 8. PLTBL.IC HF.ARiNC; .HOLIDAY STATION STORE CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT
• Vice-Chair Rieb opened the public hearing to consider the application of Steiner
Development, Inc. for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a
convenience store, gas station and car wash in the B-4, General Business District.
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 6, 1996
Page 7
• Assistant City Attorney Jim Walston attested that the legal notice had been duly
published and mailed in accordance with state statute.
Steiner Development, Inc., representative for The Holiday Companies, has applied
for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a Holiday gasoline station,
convenience store and car wash in the B-4, General Business District. The property
is located west of I-3 5 and County Road 5 and south of 172nd Street on Lot 1,
Block 1 of the proposed Gateway First Addition final plat.
Associate Planner Dempsey presented an overview of the following:
aesthetic treatment
parking
site design and layout
site lighting
landscaping plan
screening
signage
This lot will also accommodate the Gateway Center ident~cation sign for the
. entire commercial development.
outside storage
oil/water separator maintenance.
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit subject to the stipulations
as stated in the plannering report.
There were no comments from the audience.
96-69 MOTION by Kowalke, second by Amborn to close the public hearing.
Roll call was. taken on the motion: Ayes: Unanimous.
96-70 MOTION by Kowalke, second by Cecchini to recommend approval of the
conditional use permit as requested from Steiner Development to allow the
construction of a convenience store, gas station and car wash in the B-4, General
Business District subject to the seven stipulations as printed in the May 23, 1996
planning report with an additional stipulation that the oil and water separator be
maintained and inspected on an annual basis, and the findings of fact.
Roll call was taken on the motion:
• Ayes: Ambarn, Cecchini,. Kowalke, Rieb.
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 6, 1996
Page 8
• Nays: Wulff. Commissioner Wulff stated she could not support the findings of fact
as listed under 4f. related to traffic generation because that she felt there wasn't
sufficient information to make a positive finding.
ITEM 9. P 1BL.I H .ARiNC; ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: ATTACHED
GARAGES
Vice-Chair Rieb opened the public hearing for consideration of the application of
the City of Lakeville for an amendment to Ordinance No. 167 concerning accessory
buildings and maximum allowable square footage. Assistant City Attorney Jim
Walston attested that the legal notice had been duly published in accordance with
state statute.
Associate Planner Dempsey reviewed the background on the proposed ordinance
amendment. In response to an increase in requests for oversized attached garages,
particularly in "executive" subdivisions with very large single family homes, City
staff is requesting that the current zoning ordinance regulating attached garages. to
not more than 1,000 square feet be reviewed for possible revision. On May 16,
1996 the Planning Commission agreed with staff that compatibility with standard
and customary home sizes was the intention of current regulations for attached
• garages and that, as new homes in some subdivisions have increased in size along
with the 1994 ordinance requirement for larger lot sizes, justification for larger.
attached garages may be warranted.
Associate Planner Dempsey advised that staff is recommending a maximum
attached garage size of 1,250 square feet in the R-A, R-1 and R-2 Districts for lots
platted after January 1, 1994 and for pre-1994 R-2 District Tats larger than one acre.
Staff also recommends allowing an attached garage to exceed 1,250 square feet in
these areas by means of a conditional use permit providing for flexibility in the
ordinance. The Planning Commission directed staff to address the use of storage
areas below "at-grade" garages. Language has been incorporated into the draft
ordinance specifying that storage spaces located directly below attached garages
shall not be considered in determining allowable attached garage floor area.
.There were no comments from the audience.
96-71 MOTION by Amborn, second by Wulff to close the public hearing.
Roll call was: taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous.
96-72 MOTION by Wulff, second by Cecchini to recommend to City Council approval of
. the proposed ordinance amendment concerning accessory buildings.
Roll call was. taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous.
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 6, 1996
Page 9
T M
I E 10. P L.I(' H .ARiN ;TOM RYAN REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT
Vice-Chair Rieb opened the public hearing for consideration of an application from
Tom Ryan to allow a detached accessory building in excess of 1,100 square feet in
area and 15 feet in height. Assistant City Attorney Jim Walston attested that the
legal notice had been duly published and mailed as required by state statute.
Mr. Tom Ryan has submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow an
expansion of his existing house and attached garage located at 16615 Ipava
Avenue. Mr. Ryan is proposing to construct a two stall addition and a sleeping
room onto his existing home. The attached garage addition complies with the size
requirements proposed with the zoning ordinance amendment for attached garages
{Agenda Item 9). Mr. Ryan owns two contiguous parcels, one 7 acres and one 1 l
acres. Staff is recommending the combination of these two parcels prior to City
Council consideration of the conditional use permit.
Associate Planner Dempsey advised that an existing detached accessory building on
the property was built for agricultural purposes by the former property owner in
1984 without benefit of a building permit. Mr. Ryan has agreed to bring this
• accessory building into compliance with the zoning ordinance by applying for the
conditional use permit. Mr. Ryan noted that the detached accessory building is used
as a barn and houses animals and related hobby farm. equipment. The applicant has
also agreed to remove the detached accessory building prior to future development
or subdivision of the property into single family lots.
Discussion also included:
• requirement for septic system inspection;
• restriction that the living quarters proposed above the garage will not provide for
separate living facilities such as cooking or refrigeration appliances; and
• proposed aesthetic treatment of the addition.
There was no public comment.
95-73 MOTION by Amborn, second by Wulff to close the public hearing.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous.
95-74 MOTION by Wulff, second by Amborn to recommend to City Council approval of
the conditional use permit as requested by Tom Ryan to allow a detached accessory
. building in excess of 1,100 square feet in area and 15 feet in height in the R-2,
Single Family Residential District located at 16615 Ipava Avenue subject to the
stipulations as stated in the planning report dated May 23, 1996 and the findings of
fact.
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 6, .1996
Page 10
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous.
ITEM 11. PITBi.iC NEr~R1N(: (Continued
from March 21,1996):
SORENSON/SOBERG REQUEST FOR REZONING; CURTIS SOBERG
REQUEST FOR REZONING; AND 3j BEAUCHEMIN CONDITIONAL. USE
PERMIT APPLICATION
Vice-Chair Rieb reconvened the public hearing continued from March 21, 1996 for
consideration of the following applications:
1. Lloyd and Gail Sorenson and Robin L. Soberg to rezone property from R-1,
Low Density Single Family Residential District to R-A, Single Family
Agricultural Residential District;
2. Curtis Soberg requestto rezone property from R-A, Single Family Agricultural
Residential District to R-1, Low Density Single Family Residential District; and
3. Sa11y Beauchemn request for a conditional use permit to allow an existing
house to be moved onto property in the City of Lakeville.
On March 21,.1996 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to
consider the rezoning of property and a conditional use permit to move a house onto
. property in the southwest corner of Lakeville. The public hearing was tabled until
additional information was submitted pertaining to percolation tests and the
proposed exterior remodeling of the house to be moved onto the subject property.
Staff noted that the percolation test and elevation drawings had now been submitted
and staff recommended approval of the rezonings and conditional use permit.
There was no comment from the public.
96-75 MOTION by Wulff, second by Cecchini to close the public hearing.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous.
96-76 MOTION by Wulff, second by Amborn to recommend approval of the rezonings
from R-1, Low Density Single Family Residential District to R-A, Single Family
Agricultural Residential District and from R-A, .Single Family Agricultural District
to R-1, Low Density Single Family Residential District as requested and to
recommend approval of a conditional use permit to allow an existing house to be
moved onto a lot in the City of Lakeville as requested subject to the planning report
dated March 13, 1996, with the adition of the following: 1) the open basement.. left
by the moved house shall be surrounded with safety fence and immediately
. backfilled upon moving the house from the site; and 2) outside storage shall be
limited to items identified and located on the site plan, and the findings of fact.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous.
Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
June 6, 1996
Page 11
The Planning Commission was informed that the regular Planning Commission
meeting scheduled for July 4, 1996 has been canceled.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Respe ully submitte
onna Quintus, Recor mg Secretary
ATTES
.V~
Laurie Rieb, Vice-Chair
•
•