HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-23-10City of Lakeville
Economic Development Commission
Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2010
Marion Conference Room, City Hall
Members Present: Comms. Tushie, Vlasak, Schubert, Emond, Brantly, Starfield,
Erickson, Ex- officio member Mayor Holly Dahl, Ex- officio member Chamber of
Commerce Executive Director Todd Bornhauser.
Members Absent: Comms. Matasosky, Smith.
Others Present: David Olson, Community & Economic Development Director; Adam
Kienberger, Economic Development Specialist.
1. Call Meeting to Order
Vice Chair Tushie called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. in the Marion Conference
Room of City Hall, 20195 Holyoke Avenue, Lakeville, Minnesota.
2. Approve February 23, 2010 Meeting Minutes
Motion 10.04 Comms. Erickson / Emond moved to approve the minutes of the
February 23, 2010 meeting as presented. Motion carried
unanimously.
3. Continued Discussion on Business Assistance Policy
Dave Olson referenced the EDC memo and reviewed the EDC's work on this topic
over the past several months. Mr. Olson noted that staff has been in conversation
with several surrounding communities about this issue and discussed several
strategies for addressing business assistance policies.
Ex- officio member Bornhauser asked if the City should hire somebody to do a study
on areas of the City that may be candidates for potential business assistance.
Mr. Olson responded that there may be some grant money out there for this type of
planning study.
Vice Chair Tushie noted that some conceptual work has already been completed in
specific areas of the community by land owners. He added that one option would be
to have the City do road extensions to promote development in strategic areas such
as Eagan did.
Economic Development Commission
Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2010
Mr. Olson continued by discussing an international business prospect that visited
Lakeville but ended up locating in Wisconsin. The business received a substantial
assistance package that Lakeville wouldn't have even been close to competing with.
Comm. Starfield asked if the prospect also considered other cities near Lakeville.
Mr. Olson responded that that is unknown because it was a confidential search.
Vice Chair Tushie asked if there was money available to do a business assistance
policy study. This seems to be an important issue for the EDC.
Mr. Olson responded that Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) dollars
may be an option.
Steve Mielke stated that based on the past discussions the EDC has had on this
issue here is how he sees this issue taking form:
- A local "but for" test is needed
- There must be a demonstrated Return on Investment (ROI)
- Focus would be on:
• To remove blight and encourage redevelopment
• To accomplish City goals e.g.:
■ Transportation infrastructure
■ Utility infrastructure
■ Specific businesses or industries
• To encourage job growth /retention
■ Focus on higher -end jobs
- Establish and identify tools in a "toolbox"
o TIF
o Land cost reduction
o Property tax rebates
o Fee reductions
o Development process advantages
o Assessment options
o State & Federal tools
Mr. Mielke added that identifying tools is easy but the decision on when to use them
is difficult.
Mr. Olson stated that staff would compile a document outlining these ideas and bring
it to the EDC at their next meeting.
Vice Chair Tushie noted that in order for the EDC to package this for the City
Council the EDC would need to first review the Council's long -term goals.
Mr. Mielke agreed that Council goals would have to be established so that there
would be a consensus on when to use these tools if they meet the goals.
2
Economic Development Commission
Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2010
Mr. Mielke added that this should start with the EDC and could warrant a joint
EDC /City Council meeting to discuss long -term goals.
Mr. Olson noted that this is a part of the Strategic Plan for Economic Development
the EDC works on every three years. They are scheduled to begin work on the
2011 -2013 Plan this summer.
Motion 10.05 Comms. Emond /Brantly moved to direct staff to prepare a policy
document outlining these business assistance policy ideas for
discussion at the next EDC meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
Comm. Starfield clarified that he would like to discuss some of the economic
development tools that are available at the next meeting. A description of the tools
and the risk associated with each would be helpful for the discussion.
Mr. Mielke added that while the State tools are already established, the EDC should
discuss what we can do locally.
Vice Chair Tushie mentioned housing revenue bonds are one example of a local
tool.
Mr. Olson concluded the discussion by stating that staff will prepare a list of
business assistance tools along with the pros and cons of each for discussion at the
next EDC meeting.
4. Review and Discussion of 2008 -2010 Strategic Plan for Economic
Development Work Program for 2010.
Mr. Olson reviewed the EDC memo and highlighted each section of the work plan
including:
- Transportation
- Life -cycle housing
- Technology
- Growth management
- Communication
- Partnerships
Comm. Erickson asked how the new transit facilities were doing.
Mr. Olson responded that the 1 -35 station meeting and exceeding expectations and
that an extra route has been added to accommodate demand. The Cedar avenue
station currently has five buses that go to Downtown Minneapolis but isn't as
desirable as the 1 -35 station because it has a stop at the Apple Valley Transit
Station.
3
Economic Development Commission
Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2010
5. Director's Report
Mr. Olson reviewed the Director's Report.
6. Adjourn
Vice Chair Tushie adjourned the meeting at 5:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Adam Kien rger,
Economic Development Specialist
Attested to:
R. T. Brantly, Secretary
2