HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-20-87
{
Lakeville, Minnesota
.PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
August 20, 1987
The meeting was called to order by Dennis Miller, Chairman at
7:00 p.m. in .the Airlake Council Chambers.
Roll call of members was taken. .Present: Whitehouse,
Langhorst,' Sizer, Miller, Whittingham, Walter Absent:
MacGibbon.
Also present was David Licht, City Planner, Elliott Knetsch,
.City Attorney, Jim Robinette, Community Development. Director.
and Mira Holliday, Recording Secretary.
87.53 Motion was made by Sizer, seconded by Whittingham to approve
the minutes of the August 6, 19$7 Planning Commission meeting.
Roll call was takeh on the motion. Ayes: Whitehouse, Sizer,
Whittingham, Walters. Abstain: Langhorst, riiller.
The public. hearing to consider the preliminary plat of Lynwood...
East was opened. The City Attorney attested that all. legal,
.notices had been duly published and mailed.
David Licht gave a review of the plat and recoqunended approval
subject. to the Planner's. report of August 13, 1987.`Scott
.Johnson of Arcon Construction was present.
Mr. Tom Ryan who. owns the property adjoining the oufilot of
Lynwood East was. present and asked questions concerning the
proposed streets. rir. Johnson responded..
The. drainage and erosion control plan was discussed by Mr.
Licht and Mr. Johnson.
87.54 i~iotion was made by Sizer, seconded by Walters, to close thu
public hearing.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous.
87.55 Motion was :made by Whittingham, seconded by Sizer to recommend
approval of the preliminary plat of Lynwood East subject to
recommendations (with the exception of recommendation ~~'2) in
the Planner's report 'of August 13,.1987•
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous.
David Licht gave a review of the. final plat of Lynwood North
2nd Addition and stated that everything was in compliance.
$7..56 Motion was made by Sizer, seconded by Walters, to recommend
approval of the. final plat of Lynwood North, 2nd Addition
subject to the recommendations in the Planner's report of
8/17/87 provided access is notmade off of Jackpine Trail.
Roll call. was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous.
The public hearing Eo consider a planned unit development
conditional use permit for Amoco Oil Company was .opened. The
City Attorney attested that all legal notices :had been duly
published and mailed.
Jim Fellipi representing Amoco Ui1 Company gave a review of
the site plan and answered questions of the Commission. There
was concern over the traffic flow and the driveways. This was
addressed by David Licht. The signage plan, which is not in
conformance was discussed by Mr. Licht also. Recommendations
are made in the Planner's report of $/12/87.
Sizer stated that he does not feel. the City needs another gas
station in that area and that it would be doing .other busi-
nesses in the area a disservice to approve it. He feels the
City should hold out for amore desirable business.
Mick Tinglehoff, wtio currently owns the property stated that he
has contacted 15 different restaurants in regard to this site
and .got no response.. He stated that he felt if Amoco were owner
and.. contacted the same restaurants, more response would be
given.
Mr. Kelly, owner of Lakeville Super America was present and
questioned the driveway plans.. This was .explained to him by
Mr. Licht.
Steve Grohosk was .present and questioned the number of parking
spaces. He felt the parking on the current plan would be
inadequate. Mr. Licht addressed this issue .and stated that the
parking plane was in conformance.
87.57 Motion was made by Langhorst, seconded by Whittingham to close
the public hearing.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous.
87.58 .Motion was. made by Langhorst, seconded by Whittingham to
recommend approval of a planned unit development conditional
use permit for Amoco Oil Company subject to the recommendations
of the Planner's report of 8./12/$7.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Langhorst,
Whittingham, Walters. Nays: Whitehouse, Sizer, riiller.
The reason for Whitehouse's nay was that he does not approve of
a freestanding sign along Hir~tiway 50.
2
i
s.
Ttie reason for Sizer's nay was he felt the :.City should wait for
a more desirable business-for that area.
Thee reason. for Tiiller's nay was. he does rrot approve of the
site layout and and does not approve of the project because of
recommendations ~2, 3, 4, 5, and 11 of the Planner's report.
of 8/12/87.
The ffinal plat of Cedar Glen was reviewed by -David Licht and he
recommended approval subject to the Planner's report of
8/12/87. Paul Thomas of Pioneer Engineering, representing
Ground Development was present and stated..thatrecommendatons-
had been met.
87.59 Motio~r was made by Whittingham, seconded by Whitehouse, to
approve the final plat of Cedar Glen subject to recommendations
in the Planner's report of 8/12/87.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous.
A brief discussion was held concerning the Homestead Creek lot-
exception access which will be before the Commission .within the'
next few weeks.
A zoning ordinance revision concerning parking and ,exterior
storage was discussed.. Mr. Robinette stated that. the
Commission should give the matter some thought within the next.
few weeks, as changes may need to be made.
87..60 Motion was made by Langhorst, seconded by Whittingham to
adjourn the meeting.
Voice vote was taken on the motion.
Time: 9:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
ira Holliday,.R cording Sec tary
ATTEST:
r
r
Dennis Miller, Chairman
3