HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-03-86 Lakeville, Minnesota
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
April 3, 1986
7:00 p.m.
Chairman Miller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the
Lakeville City Council Chambers.
Roll call of members was taken. Present: MacGibbon, Miller,
Sizer, Walters, Whittingham. Absent: Langhorst
Also present: Roger Knutson, City Attorney; David Licht, City
Planner; Jim Robinette, Community Development Director; Shirley
Sorensen, Recording Secretary.
Chairman Miller called for additions or corrections to the
minutes of the March 20, 1986 planning commission meeting.
86.29 Motion was made by Sizer, seconded by Walters, to approve. the
minutes of the March 20, 1986 planning commission meeting.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Walters, Whittingham,
Miller, Sizer. Abstain: MacGibbon
The presentation to be given by Park and Recreation Director.,
Steve Michaud, of park acquisition and development bond referen-
dum, was postponed until the April 17th meeting.
Item #5 was skipped over for the time being.
Chairman Miller opened the public hearing to consider the
application of Daniel F. and Debbie K. Grossman for a conditional
use permit for outside storage. on land zoned B-4, General
Business, located on the north side of 205th Street (County Road
64) near the intersection of Lucerne Trail. Mr. Knutson stated
that the proper mailed and published notices have been given for
this hearing.
Mr. Daniel Grossman explained there is a building on the property
now, which they. will be using, and they plan to put fence up all
around. He said there is some existing landscaping around the
proposed outside storage area, but they will be adding more.
Mr. Licht said the only major concerns involve landscaping,
(around .the fence and the parking and driveway areas), accepta-
bility of fencing material. and surfacing of parking and driveway
areas. Mr. Licht does feel there is a need for plantings along
the fences because of the length of them. He also feels we
should specify blacktop or concrete for the parking/driveway
areas rather than class five gravel. He went on to say there is
an ordinance coming forth shortly changing the ordinance so that
in the future it will be mandatory that parking lots and drive-
ways be .blacktop or concrete.. The city does, however, have the
right to impose this requirement on the applicant. Drainage will
be reviewed by the engineer.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 3, 1986
Commission member Sizer asked about this one small section that
is zoned B-4, feels that some where along the line it should have
been reverted back to the R-1 zoning that surrounds it. Mr.
Licht explained that it has been zoned that way since before
1969.
Discussion followed on: requiring of security deposit, blacktop
of parking/driveway area, signage, use of existing building, type
of fence and type of plantings.
It was brought up that any future signing must meet the require-
ments of the current sign ordinance.
86.30 Motion was made by Walters, seconded by Whittingham, to close the
public hearing.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous
Commission member Sizer again questioned why we should have this
island of B-4 zoning in a R-1 area. Mr. Licht explained that the
use would still be there, even if we rezoned the area.
Mr. Grossman said there would be some retail business but most of
the work is contracted out.
• 86.31 Motion was made by MacGibbon, seconded by Walters, to recommend.
to city council approval of the application of Daniel F. and
Debbie K. Grossman for a conditional use permit for outside
storage on land zoned B-4, General Business, located on the north
side of 205th Street (County Road 64) near the intersection of
Lucerne Trail, subject to the following conditions:
1. The parking area and driveways are to be surfaced with
asphalt or concrete. This improvement is to occur with the
construction of the fence and use of the outdoor storage
area.
2. The storage area is to be surfaced with Class 5 gravel.
3. The improvement schedule submitted by the applicant is to
be strictly adhered to.
4. The parking area landscaping improvements are to be
installed according to Zoning Ordinance requirements.
5. Additional landscaping, subject to staff approval, is to be
provided along the east, south and west sides of the
storage area wood fence.
6. The design of the privacy fence is found to be acceptable.
It is not to be stained or painted. but left in a natural
condition.
2
•
Planning Commission Minutes
April 3, 1986
• 7. Site drainage is to be reviewed and subject to the approval
of the City Engineer.
8. Signs on the property are to conform to the City's sign
regulations and no variance is to be pursued.
9. .Any other staff recommendations.
.Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous
Chairman .Miller opened the public hearing to consider the
application of Brackett's Associates, Inc. for a minor comprehen-
sive plan change for inclusion in the 1990 Urban Service Area,
subdivision located on the Brackett's Golf Course property, north
of the intersection of Judicial Road and 185th Street. Mr.
Knutson stated that the proper mailed and published notices have
been given for this hearing.
Mr. Licht explained that, when the developer came before the
planning commission previously, we just did not get the process
going for getting this property included in the 1990 Urban
Service Area, which is what we are taking care of tonight.
Mr. Robinette explained what is done, the subtracting of the
• acreage from an amount that is in a 'bank'., with the Metropolitan
Council.
86.32 Motion was made by Sizer, seconded by Walters, to close the
public hearing.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes.: Unanimous
86.33 Motion was made by Sizer, seconded by Whittingham, to recommend
to city council approval of the minor comprehensive plan change
for Brackett's Associates, Inc. for inclusion in the 1990 Urban
Service Area, subdivision located on the Brackett's Golf Course
property, north of the intersection of Judicial Road and 185th
Street.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous
Chairman Miller called for. the review of Environmental Assessment
Worksheets for the proposed development of SouthFork Village,
located approximately 1/2 mile southeast of the intersection of
I-35 and State Trunk Highway 50 on the south side of Highway 50.
Mr. Robinette explained the purpose of this hearing is so that
persons can come and comment on this project. This is a require-
went if a development has more than 150 units. Originally
SouthFork Village plan had more than 200 units, but as proposed
• now has only 137 units. Developers decided to proceed with this
requirement in case they go back to the original 200 units.
3
Planning Commission Minutes
April 3, 1986
Chairman Miller asked if there was anyone in the audience that
wished to speak on this subject. There was no one.
86.34 Motion was made by Sizer, seconded by MacGibbon, concurring with
the findings of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for
SouthFork Village and making a negative declaration as to an
environmental impact statement being required.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous
Chairman Miller called for final plat approval of Swan Addition
and Jack Fahrenholz, Developer, explained that the ninth lot was
changed to Outlot B, the only change that was made from the
preliminary plat. Question was asked what the procedure would be
at such time as they want to build on the outlot and the answer
was that it would have to be platted, coming back before the
planning commission and council again. It is considered a
buildable lot. Walters asked if Outlot A should be dedicated to
the City, as it is part of the park now, and was told 'yes'.
86.35 Motion was made by Sizer, seconded by Whittngham, to recommend
to city council approval of the final plat of Swan Addition,
subject. to the planner's report dated March 31, 1986 and any
other staff recommendations.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous
.86.36 Motion was made by Sizer, seconded by Walters, to adjourn the
meeting.
Voice vote was taken on the motion.
Chairman. Miller adjourned the meeting at 7:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Steven C. Sizer, S etary
ATTEST:
c ~
Dennis Miller, Chairman
4