Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 09.cCITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA 2011 Proposed Budget and 2012 Estimated Budget Table of Contents Page Executive Summary Budget Message1 Distinguished Budget Presentation Award18 Elected and Appointed Officials19 Organizational Structure20 Relationships between Departments and Funds21 Financial and Budget Policies22 2011 Budget Development Process and Calendar26 Description of City Funds and Accounting Structure27 Strategic Plan29 Revenue Sources, Trends and Assumptions33 Combined Budgetary Funds Summary - All Appropriated Fund Types40 Property Tax Levy Information45 General Fund Fund Balance Discussion57 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance59 Schedule of Revenues General Property Taxes60 Licenses and Permits61 Intergovernmental62 Charges for Services63 Court Fines, Investment Income, Miscellaneous, and Other Financing65 Department/Program Budget Descriptions and Expenditures General Government Mayor and Council66 Committees and Commissions68 City Administration70 City Clerk73 Legal Counsel75 Planning76 Community and Economic Development80 Inspections83 General Government Facilities87 Finance91 Information Systems95 Human Resources99 Insurance102 i CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA 2011 Proposed Budget and 2012 Estimated Budget Table of Contents (continued) Page General Fund (continued) Public Safety Police104 Fire110 Public Works Engineering114 Streets118 Parks and Recreation Parks 124 Recreation130 Arts Center134 Special Revenue Funds Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and changes in Fund Balances138 Fund Balance Discussion141 Communications Fund142 Compensation Liability Fund147 Environmental Resources Fund149 Economic Development Fund155 Debt Service Funds Description, Credit Rating, 156 Debt Obligations and Issuance157 Legal Debt Limits158 Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and changes in Fund Balances159 Fund Balance Discussion164 Special Assessments Fund165 Property Taxes Fund166 State-Aid Fund167 Tax Increment Fund168 Water Revenue Fund169 Arena Revenue Fund170 HRA Lease Revenue Fund171 Combined Schedule of Governmental Debt Service Requirements172 ii CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA 2011 Proposed Budget and 2012 Estimated Budget Table of Contents (continued) Page Capital Projects Funds Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances174 Fund Balance Discussion179 Municipal State Aid Fund181 Capital Improvement Plan Projects181 Pavement Management Fund182 Capital Improvement Plan Projects183 Improvement Construction Fund184 Capital Improvement Plan Projects185 Building Fund186 Capital Improvement Plan Projects187 Equipment Fund188 Capital Improvement Plan Projects190 Park Dedication Fund191 Capital Improvement Plan Projects192 Trail Improvement Fund193 Capital Improvement Plan Projects193 Storm Sewer Fund194 Capital Improvement Plan Projects195 Water Fund196 Capital Improvement Plan Projects197 Sanitary Sewer Fund198 Capital Improvement Plan Projects199 Tax Increment Fund200 Capital Improvement Plan Projects201 Enterprise Funds Liquor Fund202 Net Assets Discussion206 Utility Fund208 Net Assets Discussion210 Internal Service Fund Municipal Reserves Fund224 Net Assets Discussion225 iii CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA 2011 Proposed Budget and 2012 Estimated Budget Table of Contents (continued) Page Appendices Community Profile226 Map of Lakeville229 Number of City Employees (Full Time Equivalent)230 Listing of Principal Employers234 Commercial and Industrial Building Permits Issued - Years 2008 and 2007235 Equipment Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay (detailed)236 Glossary of Budget Terms241 iv Executive Summary September 7, 2010 To the Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council and the Citizens of Lakeville: The City of Lakeville has, over the past couple years, been confronted with economic and financial challenges similar to those of our residents and businesses. Revenue reductions from loss of state payments for property tax relief, building permits, development fees and investments earnings as well as increased tax delinquencies compelled the City to adjust its budget and modify service delivery. In mid-2008 and again in early 2009, the City responded to the challenges by downsizing its operations by 6% and reducing personnel by 10% with the elimination of more than 18 employee positions. Certain services were eliminated or reduced such as boulevard mowing, park maintenance, snow plowing of trails and sidewalks, gardening program, ice rinks and community and economic development marketing endeavors. User fees were evaluated and adjusted. A significant number of major maintenance projects were deferred in anticipation of improvement in future economic conditions. Employee furloughs and wage reductions were enacted. These moves established a new base of services and service levels in the community. For 2010, additional service reductions and modifications were set in place. Some of the current economic data seems to suggest that the worst of the financial crisis might be behind us. However, there are many who believe that any economic improvements will be moderate for an extended period of time. The City of Lakeville has adjusted to the new realities as a result of these economic challenges. In the process, the organization has established financial and operational platforms which prepare our community for the future. 1 The primary objectives in developing the proposed 2011 – 2012 budget is to achieve the service delivery expectations of residents and businesses, assure efficient and effective delivery of services, implement an attainable long term capital and financial operating plan and establish sustainable restructures to the extent reasonably possible. Budget Objectives Long Term Financial Plan Efficient Proposed and Revenue 2011 and Effective Structure 2012 Services Budget Achieve Service Delivery Expectation A discussion of each of the objectives and how it relates to the proposed 2011 and 2012 budget and tax levy follows. Achieving the service delivery expectations of residents and businesses Achieve is a high priority. To obtain an accurate assessment, Decision Resources Service was retained by the City to gather statistically valid information. The Delivery Expectations results provide meaningful information in the budget process. As such, the survey information is referenced in the appropriate locations within the budget document. 2 The survey indicated, for example, that the overwhelming majority of residents oppose service cuts even if it would reduce their current City property taxes. The business community indicated in a narrow 41% to 38% plurality that it favors service cuts if it would reduce property taxes. The majority of services therefore have no significant changes in program service levels or funding allocation. Reductions are proposed, however, in areas deemed less important by residents and businesses. Both residential and business surveys reveal an opposition to increased property taxes. The proposed budget, therefore, includes a tax levy with no increase for 2011; a modest 2.7% increase for 2012 to finance infrastructure improvements, promote economic development and finance operations. Efficient and effective services. Lakeville has a long and sustained Efficient history of efficient and effective service delivery. According to the and Minnesota State Auditors Office Lakeville ranks a very favorable 194 out Effective of 225 cities in current expenditures per capita for cities with populations Services of 2,500 or more. The efficiencies are achieved by investing in effective technologies such as the geographic information systems, building inspection permitting, liquor inventory systems, and police records management. Partnering with other government agencies, such as the Dakota Communications Center, LOGIS for information systems and the League of Minnesota Cities for risk management and insurance, results in reduced costs. Efficiencies are also achieved with effective personnel management such as those in the Police Department where the number of officers per capita are amongst the lowest in the metro area. The City has also installed energy efficient systems in its facilities such as City Hall, Police Station and Liquor stores to reduce gas and electric costs. The City Council and Staff are committed to the ongoing process of evaluating and implementing systems which result in quality services at the lowest possible price. Long Long term capital and operating plans are integral to sustained fiscal Term stability. The 2011-15 Capital Improvement Plan contemplates projects to Financial accommodate Lakeville’s growth, embraces community safety and Plans promotes economic development. thrd The Kenrick Avenue improvement from 175 to 183 Street will provide a connection between two of Lakeville’s commercial districts with the expectation that it will stimulate business, promote economic development and enhance traffic flow. 3 The Dodd Boulevard improvements as well as the County Road 50 and 60 intersection improvements will provide improved safety and traffic mobility. To the extent reasonably possible, the Capital Improvement projects are financed with non-property tax revenues, such as state and federal grants, special assessments, connection charges and Municipal State Aid funding. Lakeville’s road system infrastructure is aging. The resident and business surveys both indicate concerns over the condition of our road network. The City will embark on a street reconstruction plan to replace the streets when they are no longer cost effective to maintain. Benefitted property owners and the City will be responsible for 40% and 60% of the cost, respectively. The City share of cost will be repaid with property tax levies over a period of time and will be structured to minimize the property tax burden. The street reconstruction program however, comes at a price. Taxes will gradually increase over the coming decade as the transportation system ages and reconstruction programs become inevitable. The economic challenges of the past couple years have resulted in a period of uncertainty and skepticism amongst the populace. To instill confidence that the service levels are affordable and sustainable, a two year budget is provided for City Council consideration. Some of the salient issues addressed in the budget are as follows: New programs and services are considered only if they are self-supporting through user fees. The proposed Police Department citizen academy, for example, will proceed only if it can be financed with user fees and/or donations. Reduction in services for non-essential low priority services. The Forestry function is being reduced in scope. Citizen inquiries and requests for forestry related services will be deferred to private sector and County or State resources. The City oak wilt grant program will be terminated. No new personnel positions for 2011. The Fire Department will recruit 15 volunteer firefighters to replace those who have left the department due to retirements and resignations. The recruitment process will bring the number of volunteer firefighters to 85; the department is authorized to have up to 90 firefighters. Residential growth continues, albeit at a slow but steady pace. Since residents and businesses regard police protection and street maintenance as high priorities, a police patrol position and police records technician are proposed to be added in 2012 to meet the needs of new growth. A street maintenance position will also be added in the fall of 2012. Generally speaking, all other programs and services will remain at the levels established with the 2010 budget. None of the services reduced or eliminated in previous years are proposed to be reinstated. 4 The revenue structures, including fees for services and property taxes, are evaluated each year to ensure that there are adequate financial resources to support the proposed budget. Revenue The only changes proposed in the fee structure are those related to utility Structure services for water, sanitary sewer, surface water management and street lights. The fee changes are proposed as a result of cost increases for Metropolitan Council charges for treatment of sanitary sewer effluent, street lighting electricity, environmental resources operations and water treatment facility debt service requirements. The City Council’s fiscally prudent policies combined with operational efficiencies results in no tax increase for the coming year; an extended period of nominal tax increases are projected for the foreseeable future to account for changes in the increased costs of doing business and the street improvement program. Property Taxes 2011Increase/2012Increase/ PurposeProposed(Decrease)Estimate(Decrease) General Fund operations$ 16,192,544 (21,864)$ 16,642,460 449,916 Equipment acquisition and financing 880,240 (85,823) 603,452 (276,788) Total operations 17,072,784 (107,687)-0.4% 17,245,912 173,1280.7% Market Value Homestead Credit 788,027 157,4660.7% 788,027 - Debt Service Street Improvement Bonds 2,116,223 (415,262) 2,683,980 567,757 Pavement Management 1,546,958 288,270 1,198,487 (348,471) Capital Impr. Bonds - Police 908,488 39,625 961,196 52,708 Capital Impr. Bonds - CMF 857,757 26,582 883,000 25,243 Park Bonds 424,744 7,225 416,531 (8,213) Ice Arena Bonds 275,070 3,781 281,033 5,963 Arts Center Bonds 51,601 - 51,601 - Total capital improvements 6,180,841 (49,779)-0.3% 6,475,828 294,9871.2% Kenrick Ave: 175th - 181st 191,248 191,2480.8% Total tax levy$ 24,041,652 -0.0%$ 24,701,015 659,3632.7% Consistent with the results of the residential and business community survey, one of the primary objectives is a proposed tax levy with no increase for 2011. The $788,027 loss of Market Value Homestead Credit, however, makes the objective very challenging. The objective is achieved by undertaking the following course of action. 5 The General Fund fund balance is proposed to be appropriated to provide $2.8 million in  2010 to finance major maintenance projects, reduce debt and mitigating tax increases for the foreseeable future. The General Fund appropriations are as follows: Fund Total Trail Maintenence Fund$ 1,400,000 Equipment Fund 1,100,000 Building Fund 52,136 G.O. Improvement Bonds 107,490 Pavement Management Fund 140,374 Total$ 2,800,000 No new programs or increase in service levels without a corresponding increase in non-tax  revenues. No increase in personnel positions.  Financing provided from the Liquor Fund ($685,329) for public safety equipment.  Economic conditions have changed. A year ago, tax delinquencies were escalating,  construction activity and permit revenues had declined to new lows, property values were in a downward spiral with no end in sight due to market conditions and interest rates plummeted on quality investments due to the “flight to quality”. In the mean time, the State of Minnesota’s financial condition results in great uncertainty about the State aid payments to cities. At that period of time there was an elevated level of concern about the fragility of the economic system and vulnerability to further deterioration of our financial position. As such, the City of Lakeville like most businesses and individuals, prepared defensive financial positions for what was perceived to be even more difficult conditions in the year(s) ahead. Today, we have a long way to go in order to return to the prosperity of the past two decades; however, there is at least a sense of more stability than a year ago with some indicators reflecting upward movement (albeit gradual) for the years ahead. As such, the proposed budget is premised on the appropriation of the General Fund fund balance ($223,389) in 2011 to minimize tax impacts. The fund balance to expenditure ratio will be 40.1% and 40.0% in 2011 and 2012, respectively. Due to differences in the valuation changes between properties classes the impact of the proposed zero increase in the levy will have disparate impacts. The estimated market value for homesteaded residential properties (taxes payable in 2011) decreased by 7.75%. As such the proposed City tax levy will result in an approximate $32 decrease in City portion of property taxes on the average homesteaded residential property for the coming year. 6 The majority of commercial and industrial properties are also experiencing decreases in their estimated market values. As a result, the City property taxes on most commercial and industrial properties will also decrease for the coming year. A $1 million commercial property will have a $70-140 decrease in the City portion of property taxes depending on the final fiscal disparities rates. The estimated 2012 tax levy will increase by $659,363 which is an overall increase of approximately 2.7%. The primary factors for the increase are as follows: The City share of debt related to street reconstruction projects will result in a levy increase  of $294,987. The levy represents approximately 1.2% of the total levy increase. th The annual debt levy for the Kenrick Ave project from 175 to 181st is approximately  $191,248 and thus represents approximately .8% of the total levy increase. Levy for operations will increase by $173,128 primarily as a result of new personnel  positions including the Police Department patrol officer and records technician as well as Street Maintenance position in the fall of 2012. The increase represents a .7% increase in the total levy. Summary The purpose of local government is to provide public services which meet the needs and expectations of its residents and businesses. The proposed budget achieves that objective. The City Council and Staff are committed to its ongoing endeavors of providing services - efficiently and cost effectively. The financial plan is established on a strong, long-term foundation of providing public services which are affordable and absent significant tax increases for the foreseeable future. 7 Budget Overview Municipalities organize their financial activities into separate “funds” in order to properly manage and account for the services provided. Each fund can be thought of as a separate business organized for a specific purpose. Each of the funds has a different purpose, different constraints on its resources and a different method of accounting for its activities. The City has attempted to allocate resources among its different funds in order to achieve the Council’s goals in the most cost-effective manner possible. General Fund The accounts for all revenues and expenditures necessary to provide a full range of services, including general government administration, community and economic development, public safety, public works, and parks and recreation. GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES - 2011 BY FUNCTION $20,945,949 Public Safety Public Works $9,844,384 $3,190,863 47% 15% Parks and Recreation $3,212,396 General 16% Government Other $4,389,237 $309,069 1% 21% The majority of the City budget, especially in the General Fund, is related to personnel costs and services. Since mid-2008, the City has adjusted its budget as a result of economic conditions and Council initiatives. Since service and costs are primarily derived from personnel services, there has been a corresponding reduction in the City staffing levels. 8 The 2011 proposed budget is based on no new employee positions. From 2009 to 2012, the City will grow by approximately 450 new homes with almost 1,400 new residents. The 2012 budget estimate includes the addition of one Police Patrol Officer and Police Records Technician as well as a Street Maintenance position in the fall of 2012 to serve the steadily growing population. General Fund Number of Employees (Full Time Equivalent) 200720082009201020112012 ActualActualActualAdoptedProposedEstimate General government 42.7 41.1 34.7 32.2 32.2 32.2 Public safety Police 64.1 65.2 62.1 62.3 62.8 64.8 Fire 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Public works Engineering 10.4 9.3 7.3 7.0 7.0 7.0 Streets 19.8 20.0 19.4 19.0 19.0 19.3 Parks and recreation Parks 15.0 15.0 14.5 15.0 15.0 15.0 Recreation 5.3 5.3 4.9 4.7 4.7 4.7 3.2 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 Arts Center 165.1 164.1 151.2 148.5 149.0 151.3 Total General Fund The budget also provides appropriations for anticipated increases in health care costs and a mandated .25% increase in the employer share of the PERA pension costs. A complete discussion of all General Fund departments, services and programs is provided in the subsequent section of this document. Based on the budget challenges for the coming years, there will be no new initiatives in the coming year unless the program is self-sufficient with non-tax revenues and the City staff is directed to do so by the Council. The Forestry program is proposed to be reduced in scope with the elimination of grant programs and private property inquiries. 9 The major functions of the General Fund are finance with a combination of revenues – taxes being the largest source. Other revenues included licenses and permits, charges for services, court fines, intergovernmental revenues and interest income. The following graph illustrates the revenue sources by major service category. GENERAL FUND REVENUE SOURCE BY FUNCTION - 2011 $10,500,000 $1,544,309 $9,500,000 $8,500,000 $8,584,906 $7,500,000 $6,500,000 $5,500,000 $4,500,000 $1,666,832 $3,500,000 $601,653 $846,762 $2,500,000 $2,961,718 $2,700,335 $2,424,543 $1,500,000 $500,000 $(500,000) General GovernmentPublic SafetyPublic WorksParks and Rec. Tax LevyOther Revenue The designated fund balance represents the amount of funds required to operate during the first six months of the year. The City’s most significant revenue sources – general property taxes and intergovernmental revenue – do not provide appreciable revenues until the second half of the year. A healthy financial position also allows the City to avoid volatility in tax rates; helps minimize the impact of state funding changes; allows for the adequate consistent funding of services, repairs and unexpected costs; and can be a factor in determining the City’s bond rating and resulting interest costs. 20112012 ProposedEstimated BudgetBudget Revenues and other financing sources$ 20,722,560$ 21,523,546 Expenditures 20,945,949 21,360,944 Net increase/(decrease) (223,389) 162,602 Fund Balance, January 1 8,615,197 8,391,808 Fund Balance, December 31$ 8,391,808$ 8,554,410 Ratio: Fund balance to expenditures40.1%40.0% The estimated ending fund balance is $8,391,808 and $8,554,410 for 2011 and 2012 respectively. The ratio of fund balance to expenditures is 40.1% and 40.0% for 2011 and 2012 10 respectively. In light of anticipated economic stability in the coming years, the fund balance is adequate and sufficient but not excessive. The fund balance is within City Policy guidelines. Special Revenue Funds Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds from specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific purposes. Establishment of such funds also enables the City to more effectively manage its resources and minimize tax levies. Special revenue funds such as Communications (formerly referred to as Cable TV), Compensation Liability, Environmental Resources, and Economic Development are self supporting from user fees and grants. Communications Fund The budget provides cable TV services on channel 16 and the new channel 12 public access channels. The services also include the weekly Messages publications and the City web-site. Compensation Liability Fund The accounts for the accrued liability of employee benefits attributed to severance compensation. Environmental ResourcesFund The provides a wide range of environmental services which are described in a subsequent section including surface water management and the city wide recycling efforts. The surface water programs will be financed with a $.50 per quarter increase in the surface water management fee. Economic Development Fund The accounts for a state grant received from the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development in 1995. The grant purpose is to provide loans to businesses expanding in or locating to Lakeville. The fund also accounts for administrative fees to be received from the 2008 issuance of conduit debt. Debt Service Funds The City of Lakeville as of December 31, 2010, will have approximately $90 million of debt outstanding (excluding liquor revenue bonds), of which the majority will be repaid from non-tax related revenue sources such as special assessments, state aid street construction allocations, tax increments, ice arena operations and liquor profits. The 2011 tax levy includes $4,959,746 for bond debt repayment, which is a ($978,248) decrease from the 2010 tax levy for debt. The City’s governmental bonds payable are shown in the Debt Service Funds section of this report and liquor revenue bonds are shown separately in the Liquor Fund section. Moody’s Investor Service has assigned Lakeville an Aa1 credit rating. In its opinion letter, Moody’s stated “This very favorable rating reflects the City’s rapid growing tax base and diversifying underlying economy; as well as its healthy financial operations characterized by prudent management and sound fund balances.” Capital Project Funds 11 The Equipment Fund accounts for the acquisition and replacement of vehicles and equipment. All departments evaluated the overall condition of the City’s fleet and equipment. In many cases, the expected useful life of these assets has been extended on the condition that there was no adverse increase in repairs or operating costs. As such, the proposed budget provides $4.3 million for capital equipment acquisitions and replacements for the coming two years. A detailed list of the equipment is included in the budget document. A summary of the proposed equipment acquisitions for the coming years is as follows: Expenditures20112012 $ 87,407 $ 168,074 General Government 716,328 237,577 Police 333,839 35,564 Fire 974,601 802,297 Streets 376,097 128,210 Parks 21,685 18,863 Issuance costs $ 2,509,957 $ 1,390,585 Total The City has several revenues sources available for financing equipment acquisitions including contributions from ALF Ambulance, sales of assets, transfers from other funds, issuance of short term debt and tax levies. ALF Ambulance has contracted with Allina Medical Transportation for emergency medical services effective February 1, 2009. The ALF assets are in the process of being liquidated and distributed to member cities; Lakeville will receive $39,628 in 2011. The Capital Projects Equipment Fund budget appropriates the ALF distribution to the acquisition of public safety equipment. The proposed budget includes a $1.1 million transfer from the General Fund in 2010 and a recommendation that the Liquor Fund provide $685,329 of financing to reduce the reliance on property tax levies. The proposed transfer from the Liquor Fund would finance the following: PurposeTotal Civil defense sirens $ 247,498 Fire: Tender truck 225,000 Police: Software and hardware 212,831 Total$ 685,329 A tax levy is proposed in the amount of $554,377 and $372,974 for 2011 and 2012 to minimize the City reliance on short-term debt and interest cost to finance equipment acquisitions. The City has the statutory authority to issue Certificates of Indebtedness – short term debt – to finance the purchase of police, fire, and streets and park maintenance equipment. Certificates of Indebtedness are repaid with property tax levies which are exempt from levy limits. The proposed budget includes the issuance of $655,000 and $600,000 of debt in 2011 and 2012. The debt will be repaid with tax levies in 2012 – 2014. 12 Building Fund The accounts for construction and major maintenance improvement related to government buildings. A detailed list of the improvements is included in the budget document. A summary of the proposed improvements for the coming years is as follows: Facility20112012 Arts Center$ 2,200$ - Central Maintenance Facility 72,900 City Hall 224,456 Fire Facilities 221,431 9,600 Police Station 9,000 300,000 Senior Center 435,000 Historical Society 23,000 Total capital improvements$ 529,987$ 767,600 The Building Fund projects are financed from the proceeds from the sale of land to Life Time Fitness, transfers from the General Fund and other non-property tax revenue sources. Infrastructure (streets, water, sewers, parks, etc.) is indispensable toward making the City safe, attractive and prosperous. Financing of improvements is often accomplished through issuance of debt because of its long useful life and in order to make the projects affordable. Improvement projects are identified in the City’s five-year Capital Improvement Plan. However, inclusion in the budget does not in itself confer authority to spend City resources. Capital projects are subject to individual review and approval by the Council prior to commencement. The most significant projects contemplated in the Capital Improvement Plan are as follows: thrd Kenrick Avenue from 175 Street to 183 Street ($2.5 million) in 2011 financed with special assessments and property tax levies over a twenty year period. stth Cedar Avenue from 161 Street to 179 Street in 2011 financed with federal grants and Street Improvement Funds. rd Dodd Boulevard (County Road 9) from 183 Street to Hayes Avenue ($6.1 million) in 2012 financed with federal grants, Municipal State Aid Street funds, and Dakota County. Stoneborough Park improvements in 2011 financed with Park Dedication fees. thth Kenrick Avenue trail improvements from 186 Street to 205 Street in 2012 financed with grant funding. Enterprise Funds 13 Liquor Fund The City of Lakeville has, since the repeal of Prohibition in 1933, owned and operated a municipal liquor store with the intent of controlling the sale of alcohol in a responsible manner. Lakeville operates three liquor stores that have a combined sales volume approaching $15 million. The net income derived from operations is committed to projects that are deemed to be of benefit to the community. The Liquor Fund will continue to provide $18,288 of financial support to Independent School District 194 for the “School/Community Prevention Specialist” program. In addition, the Liquor Fund has a long standing history of providing financial support to community projects. Projects proposed to be financed by the Liquor Fund are as follows: Purpose2011 Civil defense sirens $ 247,498 Fire: Tender truck 225,000 Police: Software and hardware 212,831 Fire Station #4 debt 185,320 Police Station debt 100,000 General Fund reimbursement 78,516 66,434 Payment in lieu of property taxes $ 1,115,599 Total Investment in our City’s entrepreneurial endeavors will enhance the City’s ability to continue to provide significant future financial support for projects that benefit our community. The long- term plans include improvements to the Heritage Liquor Store and land acquisition in the vicinity of County Road 70 and Interstate Highway 35. Utility Fund - Water Operation The 2011 water operation budget includes several major maintenance items that include the rehabilitation of well 15, repainting the Fairfield water tower, replacement of a high performance pump at the water treatment facility and continuing the change out of numeric readout water meters with newer digital meters for a total cost of approximately $806,200. The 2012 estimated budget includes rehabilitation of wells 9 and 10 and the repainting of the Airlake Water Tower for a total cost of approximately $882,734. The proposed Utility Fund budget does not provide any new staff positions. Construction of the water system infrastructure such as wells, towers and water treatment plant are financed with water connection charges collected at the time building permits are issued. The current economic conditions have resulted in a significant decrease in housing construction 14 and hence reduction in water connection revenue. As such, the water operations will be required to contribute $1.6 million in the next two years for debt service payments. A summary of the water operations budget is as follows: 20112012 ProposedEstimated Revenues$ 3,458,133$ 3,693,922 Operating expenses (2,249,302) (2,241,732) Major maintenance (806,200) (882,734) Interfund transfers (79,725) (81,458) Debt service (1,200,000) (400,000) Capital outlay (87,027) (22,379) Change in working capital$ (964,121) $ 65,619 Utility Fund – Sanitary Sewer Operation More than 77% of the sanitary sewer operation budget is for Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (M.C.E.S.) sanitary sewer fees for treatment of system effluent. M.C.E.S. has increased sewer charges 3.2% for the coming year; sanitary sewer rates are proposed to increase accordingly. Major maintenance projects include inflow and infiltration mitigation efforts, lift station rehabilitations and lining of the Lake Marion sanitary sewer main in 2012. The sanitary sewer operation change in working capital is summarized as follows: 20112012 ProposedEstimate Revenues$ 4,359,275$ 4,522,613 M.C.E.S. expense (2,941,489) (3,065,964) Operating expenses (977,393) (1,002,532) Major maintenance (92,600) (315,900) Interfund transfers (125,318) (128,544) (59,952) (22,379) Capital outlay $ 162,523$ (12,706) Change in working capital Utility Fund – Street Light Operation The street light operation is financed entirely with service charges billed to customers along with other utility fees such as water, sanitary sewer and surface water management fees. Street lights fees are proposed to increase in 2011 as a result of electric rate increases. Utility Rates Proposed rates for the coming year are as follows: 15 2011 Increase Quarterly ratesBasisProposed Water baseAccount $ 3.60 $ - Water tier 1 (<30 thousand gallons)Gallonage $ 0.85 $ 0.06 Water tier 2 (30 - 49 thousand gallons)Gallonage $ 1.34 $ 0.10 Water tier 3 (>49 thousand gallons)Gallonage $ 2.30 $ 0.30 Water testing fee $ 1.59 $ - Sanitary sewer baseAccount $ 6.25 $ - Sanitary sewer usageGallonage $ 3.09 $ 0.10 Sanitary sewer non metered accountsAccount $ 59.84 $ 1.86 Street lightsAccount $ 7.65 $ 0.90 Surface Water Management FeeAccount $ 7.00 $ 0.50 A residential customer with 20 thousand gallons of usage during the winter quarter currently pays $100.29 for their utility billing which also includes the surface water management fee. The proposed rate structure will result in a $4.93 increase in their quarterly utility bill assuming no change in consumption. A commercial account that uses 100 thousand gallons currently pays approximately $434.19 per quarter. The proposed rate structure will result in a $20.16 increase in their quarterly bill assuming no change in consumption. Overall Lakeville’s water and sanitary sewer fees are less than those charged by other Minnesota metro area municipalities. Commercial Quarterly Totals Residential Quarterly Totals Minneapolis Minneapolis St Paul Savage Inver Grove Hts. St Paul Richfield Inver Grove Hts Savage Burnsville Farmington Richfield Minnetonka Minnetonka Bloomington Eden Prairie Burnsville Shakopee Coon Rapids Bloomington LAKEVILLE Brooklyn Park Apple Valley Woodbury Plymouth Plymouth Blaine Coon Rapids Eagan Apple Valley EaganBrooklyn Park Farmington Shakopee Blaine Eden Prairie LAKEVILLE Woodbury Rosemount Rosemount Maple Grove Maple Grove $-$100$200$300$400 $-$100$200$300$400$500$600$700$800 Water 75,000 GallonsSewer 18,000 GallonsWater 100,000 GallonsSewer 100,000 Gallons Internal Service Municipal Reserves Fund 16 The Internal Service Municipal Reserves Fund was created to account for the City’s general liability, excess liability, and property and casualty insurance costs. The City’s primary insurance carrier is the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). Revenues are derived primarily by transfers from benefited funds, and insurance rebates. The City’s risk management costs are very reasonable due to its favorable claims history and management practices. The favorable claims history is due in large part to the safety conscientiousness of its employees. Distinguished Budget Presentation Award The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to the City of Lakeville, Minnesota for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2010. In order to receive this award, a government must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan, and as a communications device. This award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe the 2011 budget continues to conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. Conclusion Lakeville residents value the quality of life in our community which is derived in large part from the safe and secure neighborhoods; abundant parks, open spaces and trails; an excellent transportation system; environmental amenities; and a diverse commercial/industrial base. These are the reasons our residents and businesses consider Lakeville as their “home”. The role of government is to provide public services deemed to be of value to the people we serve. Commitment to providing quality and efficient services, developing effective partnerships, promoting comprehensive planning and seeking citizen participation remains a high priority. The challenge before us is to maintain the balance of fiscal stewardship during a period of unprecedented economic stress with the continuation of service which meets our community’s expectations. The proposed budget and tax levy maintains that delicate balance of services in a fiscally responsible manner. Respectfully submitted, Steven C. Mielke City Administrator 17 18 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Elected and Appointed Officials Elected Officials Term of Office Mayor Holly Dahl 01/01/09 – 12/31/10 Council Members Mark Bellows 01/01/07 – 12/31/10 Kevin Miller 07/20/09 – 12/31/10 Laurie Rieb 01/01/09 – 12/31/12 Kerrin Swecker 01/01/09 – 12/31/12 Appointed Officials City Administrator Steven C. Mielke Finance Director/Treasurer Dennis Feller City Clerk Charlene Friedges Police Chief Thomas Vonhof Fire Chief Michael Meyer Director of Operations & Maintenance Christopher Petree Parks and Recreation Director Gerald Michaud Planning Director Daryl Morey Community and Economic Development Director David Olson City Engineer Keith Nelson Liquor Director Brenda Visnovec Human Resources Manager Cindi Joosten 19 Au thority CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Organizational Structure December 31, 2009 Citizens of Lakeville Mayor and City Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority City Attorney Economic Parks, Recreation & Planning Telecommunications Lakeville Area Development Natural Resources Commission Committee Arts Center Board Commission Committee City Administrator Communications Community and Human Operations and Parks and Off Sale Police Engineering Finance Fire Planning Economic Resources Maintenance Recreation Liquor Development Streets Accounting Development Communication Plan Review Labor Relations Inspection Planning/Zoning Building Inspection Utilities Accounts Receivable Maintenance Investigation Design Compensation/Benefits Prevention Physical Facilities Recycling Economic Development Accounts Payable Planning Patrol Inspection Recruitment Suppression Utility Billing Fleet Management Recreation Survey Animal Control Information Systems Special Assessments Arts Center G.I.S. 20 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Relationships Between Departments and Funds December 31, 2010 Community General andOperations GovernmentEconomicandParks andOff-Sale FundsAdmin.DevelopmentFinancePoliceFireEngineeringMaintenanceRecreationLiquor General FundXXXXXXXX Special Revenue Funds: CommunicationsX Compensation LiabilityX Environmental ResourcesX Economic DevelopmentX Debt Service Funds:X Capital Projects Funds: Municipal State AidX Pavement Mgmt.XX Improvement Const.X BuildingXXXXXX EquipmentXXXX Trail ImprovementXXX Park DedicationX Storm SewerXX WaterXX Sanitary SewerXX Tax IncrementXX Enterprise Funds: LiquorX UtilityX Internal Service Fund: Municipal ReservesX 21 FINANCIAL AND BUDGET POLICIES These policies provide guidelines for the fiscal administration of the City. The budget for the City of Lakeville serves as a comprehensive, rational guide for financial and programmatic decision-making and operations management throughout each fiscal year. The budget is intended to be not only a financial plan but also a performance plan linked to the strategic goals established by the City Council and outlined in a separate section. Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reporting The financial reporting and budgeting systems of the City are organized on a fund basis. A fund is a fiscal and accounting entity with a self balancing set of accounts. Funds are the control structures that ensure that public monies are spent only for those purposes authorized and within the amounts authorized. Funds are established to account for the different types of activities and legal restrictions that are associated with a particular government function.  An independent audit will be performed annually.  The City will produce comprehensive annual financial reports in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).  The City will endeavor to maintain the GFOA Certificate of Excellence in Financial Reporting. Budgetary Basis of Accounting Governmental fund budgets are on a modified accrual basis of accounting consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. Under the modified accrual basis, revenues are recognized when they are susceptible to accrual (i.e., when they become measurable and available). “Measurable” means the amount of the transaction can be determined and “available” means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current period. Under the modified accrual basis, expenditures are generally recognized when the liability is incurred, except for principal and interest on general long-term debt, which is recognized when due. Governmental fund budgets include the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds, and Capital Projects Funds. Proprietary fund budgets are on an accrual basis of accounting consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. The focus of accrual accounting is primarily upon the determination of net income and the maintenance of capital. Therefore, included within these funds are all assets and liabilities associated with the fund’s operations. Revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded as soon as they result in liabilities for benefits received, notwithstanding that the receipt or payment of cash may take place in another accounting period. Expenses are recognized in the accounting period in which the liability is incurred, which also includes depreciation. For budgetary control purposes, the City also appropriates capital acquisitions for the proprietary funds. Proprietary fund budgets include the Enterprise Liquor Fund and Utility Fund, and the Internal Service Municipal Reserves Fund. A budget is not adopted for the City’s Fiduciary Agency Fund. The City’s audited financial statement uses the modified accrual basis of accounting for all governmental funds (at the fund level), and uses the accrual basis of accounting for all proprietary funds. 22 FINANCIAL AND BUDGET POLICIES (continued) Operating Budgets The City’s operating budget policy sets forth guidance with respect to balanced operating budgets, with an overriding goal of achieving structural balance over a longer-term period, while recognizing that in certain period’s revenues and expenditures may not be equal. A balanced budget for the General Fund is defined as revenues and other sources equal to or exceeding operating expenditures and other uses. Other sources can include that portion of General Fund balance that is allowed to be budgeted for use per the City’s fund balance policy. The budget will provide for adequate maintenance of capital facilities and equipment and for their orderly replacement. Balanced budgets for the proprietary enterprise funds are defined as providing sufficient revenues to support the operations of those funds, without subsidy from the General Fund or property taxes. Charges from the Proprietary Internal Service Fund shall be sufficient to support such activities, with no trend of operating deficits. Budget amounts are as originally or as amended by City Council. The legal level of budgetary control (i.e., the level at which expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations) is at the department level for the General Fund and total expenditures for Special Revenue Funds. The City Administrator has authorization to expend funds in excess of the appropriation for individual line items. Budgeted expenditure appropriations lapse at year-end. Supplementary appropriations can be carried forward to the following year if approved by the City Council. Encumbrances represent purchase commitments outstanding at year-end and are reported as reservations of fund balances since they do not constitute expenditures or liabilities. Any changes to the budget are approved by majority vote of the City Council. Budget Amendment Process Budgets that require amending for reasons of a routine nature or special circumstances are amended by the passage of a resolution approved by the City Council. Amendments of a routine nature are typically amended in December of the current fiscal year while amendments due to special circumstances or unexpected events such as emergencies are amended at the earliest possible City Council meeting date. Revenue Policies Revenue policy elements include:  The City will project its annual revenues by a conservative objective and thorough analytical process.  The City will endeavor to maintain a diversified and stable revenue system to shelter it from annual fluctuations in any one revenue source. All existing and potential revenue sources will be reexamined annually.  New sources of non-property-tax revenue should be actively explored at all times.  Where appropriate and not contrary to accepted public policy or statutes, emphasis will be directed toward full cost recovery through user fees. User fees and cost allocation formulas will be updated periodically (annually if needed). 23 FINANCIAL AND BUDGET POLICIES (continued)  Ongoing, the City will review the full cost of activities supported by user fees to identify the impact of inflation and other cost increases and will review these fees along with the resulting net property tax costs with the City Council at budget time. Sensitivity to market rates will also be considered in setting fees.  Intergovernmental grant requests are subject to fiscal review before the application is submitted. This review is to ensure that the grants do not create an obligation for unfunded expenditures by the City relating to the grant’s purpose and to provide an overall budgetary review of grant proposals.  Investment interest shall be budgeted conservatively. Investments  Investments made by the City will be in conformance with the City of Lakeville’s Investment Policy. All investments will address safety, liquidity, and yield. All temporary cash surpluses during the year are invested in securities permitted by state statute and the Investment Policy.  It is the City’s policy to invest all available monies at competitive interest rates, coordinated with projections of the City’s operating and program cash flow needs. Interest earned from investment of available funds will be distributed to the funds annually based on each funds average monthly cash balance for the year. Capital Improvement Budgets  Capital outlay expenditures result in the acquisition of fixed capital assets that have a value over $1,000 and a useful life of greater than one year. They are tangible in nature in that the physical substance does not materially change its form through use.  The City will adopt a five-year capital improvement plan and update it annually.  The City will coordinate development of the capital improvement budget with the development of the operating budget. Future operating costs associated with new capital improvements will be projected and included in operating budget forecasts.  The City will project its equipment replacement and maintenance needs for the next five years and will update this projection each year. From this projection, a maintenance and replacement schedule will be developed and included in the operating budget. In addition, the City will maintain all its assets at a level adequate to protect the City’s capital investment and to minimize future maintenance and replacement costs.  The City staff will identify the estimated costs and potential funding sources, including the consideration of joint ventures with other cities, for each capital project proposal before it is submitted to the City Council for approval.  The City will identify the estimated cost and potential funding sources for each capital project proposal before it is submitted to the Council for approval and in that process will determine the most effective financing method for the project. 24 FINANCIAL AND BUDGET POLICIES (continued)  Budget balances appropriated in Capital Projects Funds are designated for specific projects and are carried forward as available for expenditure until the project is complete or the balance is transferred to other eligible projects. Debt The City’s debt policy provides guidance to ensure that long-term debt is utilized appropriately and in a fiscally prudent manner. Elements of the policy include:  Limiting long-term borrowing to capital improvements or other long-term projects which cannot, and appropriately should not, be financed from current revenues and/or funds established for equipment replacement.  Final maturity of bonds and notes should not exceed the expected useful life of the underlying project for which it is being issued.  Where possible, the City will endeavor to pledge special assessments, State aid or other non-tax revenues to debt service payments.  Debt will not be used to finance current operations.  State of Minnesota statutes limit the legal debt obligations to 3% of the City’s taxable market value. Fund Balance Fund balance or net assets are terms used to define the difference between a fund’s assets over its liabilities. Fund balance is used in governmental fund types and net assets are used in proprietary fund types. The City’s General Fund unreserved fund balance, designated for working capital as of the end of the year, should equal 40% to 50% of the next year’s budgeted expenditures. Fund balance may be used for various contingencies including the following:  Provide flexibility if state law significantly limits the City’s taxing and spending powers. This could include legislation regarding levy limits, property tax freezes, levy referendum requirements, etc.  Provide flexibility if the State eliminates or reduces State revenue including fire pension aid, police pension aid, state street aid, or PERA aid.  Provide some protection for future funding needs of the capital improvement plan including possible liquor operations legislation.  Support the City’s bond rating.  Cover expenses created by natural disaster, including flood, fire, or tornadoes and protect against other unforeseen expenditures and any other items.  Cover a General Fund deficit when actual revenues are less than expenditures and to allow for a reasonable degree of error in budget forecasting. The fund balance policy protects the City in the event of temporary revenue shortfalls or unpredicted expenditures and provides time to react to permanent changes in the City’s operating environment. 25 2011 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND CALENDAR State statutes, local ordinances, and the City’s budget development policy prescribe the process of budget review and adoption for the City of Lakeville. The laws require public input in the budget process, including the publishing of a budget summary in the local media. Public input is also available at the public meetings at which budget information is discussed. The following is a calendar for the 2011 budget process: April 2010  City Administrator directs staff to prepare their budget based on Council goals and objectives.  Finance Department distributes budget preparation information to all departments.  Proposed budget meetings are held with Department Directors and budget preparers. June/July 2010  Proposed budgets are submitted to the City Administrator and Finance Department.  Finance Department reviews budget requests and prepares a proposed budget.  City Administrator reviews proposed budget and directs revisions based on budget requests and revenue estimates. August 2010  City Council work session on tax legislation, General Fund budget history, budget requests, debt, property tax levy, and potential tax impacts.  Staff reviews proposed budget and makes revisions as directed by the City Council. September 2010  Special City Council meeting to discuss the proposed budget and preliminary property th tax levy as presented to the City Council at their September 7 meeting for approval. th  Preliminary property tax levy certified to Dakota County by September 15. November 2010  City Council work session to review changes to the proposed budget.  Dakota County sends a notice to taxpayers indicating their property tax and the date of each taxing jurisdiction’s budget hearing. December 2010  City Council holds a “Truth in Taxation” public hearing on the final budget and final th property tax levy on December 6.  After listening to public comment, the City Council closes the public hearing. th  City Council adopts the final budget and final property tax levy on December 20. th  Final property tax levy certified to Dakota County by December 25. 26 DESCRIPTION OF CITY FUNDS AND ACCOUNTING STRUCTURE The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. Certain City funds are classified according to generally accepted accounting principles as major funds (generally defined as a fund having any one of their total assets, liabilities, revenues or expenditures/expenses equal to or greater than 10% of either total of governmental fund types or proprietary fund types). The City’s fiscal year is the calendar year. Governmental Fund Types Budgets are appropriated for the following governmental funds through which functions of the City are financed: General Fund The general fund is the operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The general fund is a major fund. Special Revenue Funds The special revenue fund is used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are designated or legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. Special revenue funds utilized by the City include the following: Communications Compensation liability Environmental resources Economic development Debt Service Funds The debt service fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, long-term debt principal, interest and related costs not funded by proprietary fund type operations. The debt service property taxes fund is considered a major fund of the City. Debt service funds utilized by the City include the following: Special assessments Property taxes State-aid Tax increment Water revenue Arena revenue HRA lease revenue Capital Projects Funds The capital projects fund is used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition of equipment, construction of major capital facilities and infrastructure, or other long-term projects. The City prepares a 5-year capital improvement plan budget and adopts the first year of the plan. Once the budget is adopted, the individual capital appropriations do not lapse. In budgeting capital projects funds, the City assumes that all budgeted amounts will be spent on the indicated projects within the fiscal year or shortly thereafter. 27 DESCRIPTION OF CITY FUNDS AND ACCOUNTING STRUCTURE (continued) Governmental Fund Types (continued) Capital Projects Funds (continued) As such, appropriations for uncompleted capital projects are not available for re- appropriation in subsequent years. Capital projects funds utilized by the City include the following: Municipal state aid Pavement management Improvement construction Building Equipment Trail improvement Park dedication Storm sewer Water Sanitary sewer Tax increment Police station and central maintenance facility (CMF) construction Ice arena construction Proprietary Fund Types Budgets are appropriated for the following proprietary funds through which functions of the City’s proprietary activities are funded primarily through retail sales and user charges: Enterprise Funds The enterprise fund is used to account for operations (a) that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business – where the intent of the governing body is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation) of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis to be financed or recovered primarily through user charges, or (b) where the governing body has decided that periodic determination of revenues earned, expenses incurred, and/or net income is appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability or other purposes. The budget for the City’s enterprise liquor fund and enterprise utility fund are major funds. Internal Service Fund The internal service fund is used to account for the financing of goods or services provided by one City department to other City departments. The only internal service fund utilized by the City is the municipal reserves fund. 28 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Strategic Plan Mission Statement “The City of Lakeville provides the foundation for healthy neighborhoods and successful businesses by investing in: comprehensive planning; high quality and efficient services; citizen participation; and effective partnerships.” The City of Lakeville espouses to advance, through implementation of the 2010 Proposed Budget and Capital Improvement Plan the following community and organizational goals: RPC ESPONSIBLE ERFORMANCE OMPLETION G I OALSTEM D C EPARTMENTRITERIASTATUS TAXES (SERVICES) GOALS Maintain and Remain in the lower Achieved in communicate the core third of tax rates in A-1 City Administration 2009 level of services expected Dakota County by Lakeville residents Attract business Community and Reduction in property development to increase Economic tax dependence from A-2 Ongoing commercial/industrial tax Development the current 70% base Continue to develop collaborations/ partnerships with private A-3 City Administration Ongoing interests and other governments on key projects Identify and evaluate A-4 Finance Ongoing alternatives to the property tax for paying for services Work in Acquire land for fourth A-5 Liquor Fund Progress liquor store TRANSPORTATION GOALS Reduce reliance on City Reduction in reliance property taxes for on City property taxes B-1 Finance Ongoing regional/county road for non-city roadway improvements Continue needed Complete County Completed in improvements to local, Road 70/I-35 B-2 Engineering 2009 county and regional interchanges by 2010 transportation network: Complete  improvement of Dodd Scheduled for East-West B-3 Engineering Blvd. from 194th Year 2012 corridors Street to Cedar Ave 29 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Strategic Plan (continued) RPC ESPONSIBLE ERFORMANCE OMPLETION G I OALSTEM D C EPARTMENTRITERIASTATUS Work in  Upgrade County Road Interstate Highway Progress - Yet to B-4 Engineering 70 through Lakeville 35 interchanges be determined  Dodd Blvd. as a More safety, less major artery Work in congestion, economic linking Lakeville Progress - Yet to B-5 Engineering development residents to the be determined opportunities East-West corridor routes TELECOMMUNICATION GOALS Community and Have a plan and Complete feasibility Open - Yet to be Economic ordinance by the C-1 planning for fiber to all determined Development Council homes and businesses DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT GOALS Community and Expand the types of Continue to attract private Economic businesses that are D-1 Ongoing investment to fund Development open downtown downtown redevelopment Community and Implement a publicly Yet to be Economic managed parking D-2 determined Development system Enhance public amenities in downtown Community and Full service restaurant Yet to be Economic D-3 in Central Business determined Development District OPEN SPACES / RECREATION GOALS Park dedication fees E-1 Parks and Recreation Ongoing reflect true land values Provide parks and open Expansion of City space for a fully developed park land as planned City prior to the loss of E-2 Parks and Recreation Ongoing in the Parks and Open available and desired land Space Plan to develop Passage of a park Yet to be E-3 Parks and Recreation referendum determined PUBLIC SAFETY GOALS Improved measurements in proactive police Be a regional leader in activities, as F-1 Police Ongoing disaster preparedness developed by the Police Chief 30 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Strategic Plan (continued) RPC ESPONSIBLE ERFORMANCE OMPLETION G I OALSTEM D C EPARTMENTRITERIASTATUS Prioritize police officer time on core law F-2 Police Ongoing enforcement – patrol and investigative functions PLANNING GOALS G-1 Plan for balance of housing types, including Finish and implement Completed in workforce and life-cycle 2008 Comprehensive Planning 2009 housing that reflect the Land Use Plan changes in Lakeville’s population G-2 Facilitate development of Planning Ongoing new housing types without cost to the City G-3 Continue orderly Planning Ongoing development of Lakeville TRANSIT GOALS Complete a full assessment of what Lakeville residents Prepare Lakeville for H-1 City Administration Ongoing need and the ridership transit services potential of transit alternatives COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOALS Attract interest from Community and private developers for Economic I-1 Ongoing office park Development development Plan and prepare for office park development in Location and Lakeville Community and timetable for office I-2 Economic park agreed upon by Ongoing the Council and the Development developer OTHER GOALS Adopt long-term infrastructure maintenance and Provide for framework for refurbishment long-term maintenance, J-1 Engineering Ongoing program, including the replacement and financing plan needed to finance of aging infrastructure the improvements 31 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Strategic Plan (continued) RPC ESPONSIBLE ERFORMANCE OMPLETION G I OALSTEM D C EPARTMENTRITERIASTATUS Reduce consumption Operations and of water per customer Maintenance (Utility J-2 Ongoing over the next three Fund) years Develop and Operations and implement a Provide a sustainable J-3 Maintenance (Utility comprehensive public Ongoing source of water supply for information campaign Fund) Lakeville’s future on water supply Adopt a stronger Operations and conservation policy to J-4 Maintenance (Utility address diminishing Ongoing water supply for Fund) future development 32 REVENUE SOURCES, TRENDS AND ASSUMPTIONS The City of Lakeville maintains a number of funds for recording fiscal transactions to meet legal accounting requirements. The City’s revenue estimates are budgeted conservatively to avoid possible shortfalls due to unanticipated changes in the economy. A review of all fee structures is completed with the preparation of the budget to ensure that rates are reasonable. Revenue estimation is a key component in preparing the City’s annual budget. The general intent is to make conservative and objective projections. The City’s approach to estimating revenues is to consider each individual revenue source’s history of predictability, stability or volatility. The estimation methods used are a combination of trend analysis and forecasting from department heads. The following is a summary of major revenue sources, trends and assumptions for fiscal year 2011. Governmental Fund Revenues The 2011 proposed budget revenue of $33,053,550 is an $893,936 decrease over 2010 estimate. General Property Taxes. The City General Property Taxes relies on property taxes to support such functions as general government, $24,000,000 public safety, public works and debt $23,800,000 service. The 2011 tax levy is $23,600,000 $24,041,652 of which $16,980,571 is $23,400,000 appropriated to General Fund, $23,200,000 $4,959,746 to Debt Service Funds, and $23,000,000 $2,101,335 to the Capital Projects $22,800,000 Funds. The property tax levy was $22,600,000 increased by $788,027 in both 2011 and 2012 due to the loss of Market $22,400,000 2009201020112012 Value Homestead Credit. A further ActualEstimateProposedEstimate detailed discussion follows in the section entitled “Property Taxes”. Licenses and Permits. Liquor licenses, building, heating, plumbing and other building related permits, Licenses and Permits and cable TV license franchise fees are examples of revenue collected by the City for this category. Building permits are the largest component and account $2,500,000 for $1,062,037 (58.9%) of total licenses and permits revenues. Residential construction is at a 25 year low $2,000,000 due to economic conditions in the housing and financial $1,500,000 sectors. The number of building permits issued for 2011 are expected to increase slightly more than 2010 $1,000,000 estimates. Commercial and industrial construction is also expected to increase from the 2010 estimates. No $500,000 fee increases are proposed for the 2011 budget. $0 2009201020112012 ActualEstimateProposedEstimate 33 REVENUE SOURCES, TRENDS AND ASSUMPTIONS (continued) 20092010201020112012 Residential BuildingActualBudgetEstimateProposedEstimated construction (dwelling units) Single family 126 100 140 165 193 Town-homes 48 20 19 20 29 Total 174 120 159 185 222 Commercial and industrial valuation $ 7,300,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ 10,000,000$ 10,000,000 Intergovernmental Revenue Intergovernmental Revenues. The $4,000,000 intergovernmental revenue classifications consist of grants and aids from Federal, State, County, and local governments. In $3,000,000 2009, the City received $811,000 in Federal grant funding for the Highview Avenue reconstruction project. The 2011 $2,000,000 estimated State aid street maintenance allotment is $374,962 and is consistent $1,000,000 with the 2010 estimated allotment. Other major 2011 intergovernmental revenues include State aid for debt service $0 ($905,303), State aid for police 2009201020112012 ($351,624), and fire relief pension ActualEstimateProposedEstimate ($190,209). Charges for Services. This classification includes user charges or reimbursements received from those who benefited from services provided such as park and recreation programs, general government services, public safety fees and public works related revenues. Revenues which are highly sensitive to construction and development (i.e. planning and engineering fees) are estimated to continue declining in the coming year. 20092010201020112012 Platting ActivitiesActualBudgetEstimateProposedEstimated (dwelling units platted) Single family 30 50 50 100 200 34 REVENUE SOURCES, TRENDS AND ASSUMPTIONS (continued) General government charges for services are anticipated to be $189,989 for 2011 which is an increase of $40,733 over 2010 estimate. The increase is primarily due to a slight increase in Public safety development and increased fiscal management fees. charges for servicesare estimated at $285,843 for 2011, which is a $6,460 increase from 2010 estimate. The largest public safety charge is Independent School District #194 reimbursement for the School Resource Officer ($153,985). Public works charges for services are estimated to Charges for Services be $2,417,870 for 2011, which is an increase of $349,256 over 2010 estimate. The net increase is the result of a proposed surface water management $6,000,000 charge rate increase in 2011 ($69,442). Engineering $5,000,000 development related activities increasing $1,098, and utility connection increasing $50,930 due to the $4,000,000 anticipated moderate increase in platting activities. $3,000,000 $2,000,000 Parks, recreation and arts center chargesfor servicesfor 2011 are estimated to be $897,958, $1,000,000 which is an increase of $56,781 over 2010 estimate. The increase is primarily due to park dedication $0 fees. 2009201020112012 ActualEstimateProposedEstimate The City endeavors to generate non-property tax revenues. As such, new charges for services will continue to be explored as existing charges will be examined periodically for comparability with other communities for appropriate levels of cost recovery. Court Fines Court Fines for 2011 are anticipated to increase $5,766 over the 2010 $300,000 estimate. The City receives a portion of the fines and penalties for traffic $295,000 violations. The distribution of the fines depends upon what violation, $290,000 fines or forfeiture occurred and if the $285,000 arresting officer was a Lakeville Police Officer or a Minnesota State $280,000 Patrol Officer. $275,000 2009201020112012 ActualEstimateProposedEstimate 35 REVENUE SOURCES, TRENDS AND ASSUMPTIONS (continued) Special Assessments Special Assessments are estimated at $483,150, which is a decrease of ($42,315) from 2010 estimate.A portion of the costs for public improvements are recovered by $800,000 assessment charges to the benefiting property owners. These collections are $600,000 primarily appropriated towards the payment of debt service. $400,000 $200,000 $0 2009201020112012 Investment Income ActualEstimateProposedEstimate Investment Income is estimated to be $282,729 $500,000 in 2011, which is consistent with the 2010 $450,000 estimate. Interest rates dropped significantly $400,000 starting in mid-2008 as a result of investor $350,000 “flight to quality.”; based on current market $300,000 conditions there appears to be no substantive $250,000 changes in the foreseeable future. Interest $200,000 earnings are allocated to various funds on the $150,000 basis of average monthly cash balances; there are $100,000 no significant changes in interest rates $50,000 anticipated for the coming year. $0 2009201020112012 Donations ActualEstimateProposedEstimate Donations are estimated to be $138,685 in $400,000 2011, which is a ($25,783) decrease from 2010 estimate. The largest single donation $300,000 represents pull-tab revenue from the Lakeville Hockey Boosters ($113,590) that $200,000 is pledged towards debt service payments of the Lakeville Ames Arena. $100,000 $0 2009201020112012 ActualEstimateProposedEstimate 36 REVENUE SOURCES, TRENDS AND ASSUMPTIONS (continued) Miscellaneous Miscellaneous revenue is estimated to be $346,506 in 2011, which is a decrease of ($658,253) from the 2010 estimate. The $1,000,000 decrease is due to a $540,067 scheduled payment in 2010 from Life Time Fitness for $750,000 land sold in 2006. Antenna site leases by wireless communications companies $500,000 ($244,536) are accounted for in the General Fund and the Capital Projects Water Fund. The remaining miscellaneous revenue items $250,000 include disposal of assets ($83,070) and other ($18,900). $0 20092011 Transfers to General Fund ActualProposed $900,000 $750,000 Transfers to General Fund ($655,652) $600,000 typically represent a reimbursement for $450,000 cost of services such as human relations, $300,000 information technology, and financial activities provided to the benefiting fund. $150,000 $0 2009201020112012 ActualEstimateProposedEstimate Proprietary Fund Revenues The Proprietary Funds 2011 total proposed budget revenue of $13,546,137 is a $1,330,371 increase over 2010 estimate. A discussion of the Enterprise Liquor and Utility Funds are as follows: Liquor Fund Gross Profit Liquor Fund gross profit consists of sales $3,850,000 less the cost of sales (or) suppliers cost of products sold. Gross profit in 2011 is estimated to be approximately $3.7 million $3,800,000 based on sales of $14.9 million less cost of sales of $11.0 million. Sales in 2011 are expected to increase minimally over 2010 $3,750,000 and costs of sales are projected to remain at a fairly constant level of approximately $3,700,000 75% of sales. 2009201020112012 ActualEstimateProposedEstimate 37 REVENUE SOURCES, TRENDS AND ASSUMPTIONS (continued) Utility Fund charges for services are primarily comprised of providing Lakeville residents and businesses with water and sanitary sewer treatment services. Beginning in 2010 the City street lighting program was moved from the General Fund and accounted for in the Utility Fund. The Utility Fund charges separately for water usage and sanitary sewer treatment services based on individual consumption; street lighting is based on a single charge per quarter per residential dwelling unit, and a front foot charge per quarter for commercial/industrial and institutional entities. The following graphs illustrate the revenue trends for water usage, sanitary sewer treatment, and street lights for the years 2009 through 2012. Utility Fund - Water Charges Water Charges in 2011 are expected to $4,000,000 be approximately $3.4 million, which is a ($668,218) or (25%) increase from the 2010 estimate. The increase is due to a $3,000,000 proposed rate increase and a wetter than normal summer in 2010 which reduced $2,000,000 summer watering consumption. $1,000,000 2009201020112012 ActualEstimateProposedEstimate Utility Fund - Sanitary Sewer Charges $5,000,000 Sanitary Sewer Charges in 2011 are expected to be approximately $4.3 $4,000,000 million, which is a $117,659 or 2.8% increase over the 2010 estimate of $3.8 $3,000,000 million. 2011 charges are based primarily on a customer rate increase. $2,000,000 $1,000,000 2009201020112012 ActualEstimateProposedEstimate Utility Fund - Street Light Charges Street Light Charges are expected to be approximately $640,000, which is a $74,000 $750,000 increase over 2010 estimate. As noted above, the street lighting program was accounted for $600,000 in the General Fund prior to 2010. The 2011 $450,000 revenue projection provides for a customer $300,000 rate increase of $.90 per quarter due to increased electricity rates charged by the $150,000 electric utility companies. $0 2009201020112012 38 ActualEstimateProposedEstimate REVENUE SOURCES, TRENDS AND ASSUMPTIONS (continued) Investment Income of the proprietary funds is estimated to be $200,274, which is a slight increase over 2010 estimate. As similar to governmental funds, interest earnings are allocated to various funds on the basis of average monthly cash balances; there are no significant changes in interest rates anticipated in the 2011 budget. Donations of the Utility Fund represent water and sanitary sewer infrastructure that is installed by private developers, ownership of the infrastructure is retained by the City’s Utility Fund. Water and sanitary sewer infrastructure installed by the City Utility Fund - Donations is generally financed through the Capital Projects Water Fund or Sanitary Sewer Fund. These $1,500,000 infrastructure assets are contributed to the Utility Fund as an interfund $1,000,000 transfer in the year of completion. Donations for 2011 are estimated to be approximately $837,000; this $500,000 is an increase of approximately ($600,000) from the 2010 estimate. Donations obtained through private $0 development have decreased 2009201020112012 significantly over the years as ActualEstimateProposedEstimate shown in the chart. 39 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combined Budgetary Funds Summary All Appropriated Fund Types For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues General property taxes$ 22,933,682$ 23,287,471$ 23,363,196$ 23,211,978$ 23,868,365 Tax increment 851,786 887,594 868,163 868,163 859,838 Licenses and permits 1,603,909 1,452,995 1,623,119 1,802,776 2,049,580 Intergovernmental 3,165,154 2,730,304 2,690,869 1,998,311 1,951,593 Charges for services 11,948,336 12,527,214 11,215,867 12,544,942 14,247,841 Court fines 297,413 273,055 288,260 294,026 299,906 Special assessments 769,624 543,805 525,465 483,150 424,843 Investment income 690,147 438,980 427,194 483,003 546,761 Donations 1,641,999 380,744 401,801 975,519 416,975 Miscellaneous 338,369 866,634 1,018,991 346,506 724,995 3,797,780 3,683,987 3,740,327 3,748,583 3,806,738 Gross profit 48,038,199 47,072,783 46,163,252 46,756,957 49,197,435 Total revenues Expenditures and expenses General government 4,816,368 4,923,037 4,885,725 4,806,506 4,937,235 Public safety 8,835,563 9,878,929 9,760,008 9,999,236 10,252,819 Public works 3,906,485 3,628,288 3,567,713 3,871,230 3,876,976 Parks and recreation 2,881,402 3,228,425 3,166,410 3,243,622 3,268,764 Debt service 10,928,316 11,478,505 11,542,031 11,231,143 9,972,849 Capital outlay 7,140,715 4,891,240 7,551,437 11,663,099 11,648,078 11,696,427 13,230,064 13,106,624 13,539,190 14,195,297 Operating expenses 50,205,276 51,258,488 53,579,948 58,354,026 58,152,018 Total expenditures and expenses Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 5,176,969 2,969,435 5,607,734 4,726,370 3,001,564 Transfer to other funds (5,176,969) (2,969,435) (5,607,734) (4,726,370) (3,001,564) Disposal of assets 365,196 95,000 4,500 Issuance of debt 4,945,000 5,905,000 5,965,000 Refunding bonds issued 5,180,000 2,680,000 Payment on refunded bonds called (7,955,000) (7,955,000) 116,016 - 99,322 - - Premium on bonds issued 10,606,212 (7,955,000) (5,080,678) 5,905,000 5,969,500 Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balance and net assets 8,439,135 (12,140,705) (12,497,374) (5,692,069) (2,985,083) 153,223,158 157,202,000 161,662,293 149,164,919 143,472,850 Fund balance and net assets, January 1 $ 161,662,293$ 145,061,295$ 149,164,919$ 143,472,850$ 140,487,767 Fund balance and net assets, December 31 For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances and percentages, see individual fund sections. 40 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combined Budgetary Funds Summary All Appropriated Fund Types For the Year Ending December 31, 2011 (continued on following page) 2011 Proposed Budget Governmental Funds GeneralSpecialDebtCapital FundRevenueServiceProjects Revenues General property taxes$ 16,150,897$ -$ 4,959,746$ 2,101,335 Tax increment 666,079 202,084 Licenses and permits 1,220,561 582,215 Intergovernmental 975,458 42,708 905,303 67,678 Charges for services 1,221,270 682,145 349,088 1,539,157 Court fines 294,026 Special assessments 456,150 27,000 Investment income 125,175 10,239 89,132 58,183 Donations 25,095 113,590 Miscellaneous 54,426 292,080 - - - - Gross profit 20,066,908 1,317,307 7,539,088 4,287,517 Total revenues Expenditures and expenses General government 4,383,290 423,216 Public safety 9,992,639 6,597 Public works 3,214,096 657,134 Parks and recreation 3,241,689 1,933 Debt service 11,050,021 Capital outlay 114,235 25,228 11,523,636 - - - - Operating expenses 20,945,949 1,114,108 11,050,021 11,523,636 Total expenditures and expenses Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 655,652 16,242 2,066,603 1,942,929 Transfer to other funds (254,752) (57,600) (1,781,283) - - - 5,905,000 Issuance of debt 655,652 (238,510) 2,009,003 6,066,646 Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balance and net assets (223,389) (35,311) (1,501,930) (1,169,473) 8,615,197 2,078,198 9,856,159 10,399,692 Fund balance and net assets, January 1 $ 8,391,808$ 2,042,887$ 8,354,229$ 9,230,219 Fund balance and net assets, December 31 For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances and percentages, see fund type summary sections. 41 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combined Budgetary Funds Summary All Appropriated Fund Types For the Year Ending December 31, 2011 (continued from previous page) 2011 Proposed Budget Total Proprietary Funds 2011 Enterprise Internal Service Proposed LiquorUtilityMunicipal Res.Budget Revenues General property taxes$ -$ - $ -$ 23,211,978 Tax increment 868,163 Licenses and permits 1,802,776 Intergovernmental 3,900 3,264 1,998,311 Charges for services 8,325,784 427,498 12,544,942 Court fines 294,026 Special assessments 483,150 Investment income 63,600 130,727 5,947 483,003 Donations 836,834 975,519 Miscellaneous 346,506 3,748,583 - - 3,748,583 Gross profit 3,816,083 9,296,609 433,445 46,756,957 Total revenues Expenditures and expenses General government 4,806,506 Public safety 9,999,236 Public works 3,871,230 Parks and recreation 3,243,622 Debt service 181,122 11,231,143 Capital outlay 11,663,099 2,336,076 10,823,052 380,062 13,539,190 Operating expenses 2,517,198 10,823,052 380,062 58,354,026 Total expenditures and expenses Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 44,944 4,726,370 Transfer to other funds (1,116,575) (1,471,725) (44,435) (4,726,370) Issuance of debt 5,905,000 (1,116,575) (1,426,781) (44,435) 5,905,000 Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balance and net assets 182,310 (2,953,224) 8,948 (5,692,069) 7,128,147 110,492,853 594,673 149,164,919 Fund balance and net assets, January 1 $ 7,310,457$ 107,539,629$ 603,621$ 143,472,850 Fund balance and net assets, December 31 For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances and percentages, see fund type summary sections. 42 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combined Budgetary Funds Summary All Appropriated Fund Types For the Year Ending December 31, 2012 (continued on following page) 2012 Estimated Budget Governmental Funds GeneralSpecialDebtCapital FundRevenueServiceProjects Revenues General property taxes$ 16,597,723$ -$ 5,699,181$ 1,571,461 Tax increment 657,754 202,084 Licenses and permits 1,449,898 599,682 Intergovernmental 975,458 42,708 908,963 17,300 Charges for services 1,275,508 679,209 418,144 2,700,426 Court fines 299,906 Special assessments 397,843 27,000 Investment income 166,900 14,179 85,327 53,508 Donations 25,263 144,790 Miscellaneous 55,541 669,454 - - - - Gross profit 20,846,197 1,335,778 8,312,002 5,241,233 Total revenues Expenditures and expenses General government 4,491,932 445,303 Public safety 10,246,024 6,795 Public works 3,309,426 567,550 Parks and recreation 3,266,773 1,991 Debt service - 9,799,206 - Capital outlay 46,789 34,420 11,566,869 - - - - Operating expenses 21,360,944 1,056,059 9,799,206 11,566,869 Total expenditures and expenses Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 677,349 6,190 1,812,503 459,900 Transfer to other funds (252,807) (59,900) (1,527,183) Disposal of assets - - - 5,965,000 Issuance of debt 677,349 (246,617) 1,752,603 4,897,717 Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balance and net assets 162,602 33,102 265,399 (1,427,919) 8,391,808 2,042,887 8,354,229 9,230,219 Fund balance and net assets, January 1 $ 8,554,410$ 2,075,989$ 8,619,628$ 7,802,300 Fund balance and net assets, December 31 For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances and percentages, see fund type summary sections. 43 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combined Budgetary Funds Summary All Appropriated Fund Types For the Year Ending December 31, 2012 (continued from previous page) 2012 Estimated Budget Total Proprietary Funds 2012 Enterprise Internal Service Estimated LiquorUtilityMunicipal Res.Budget Revenues General property taxes$ -$ - $ -$ 23,868,365 Tax increment 859,838 Licenses and permits 2,049,580 Intergovernmental 3,900 3,264 1,951,593 Charges for services 8,735,499 439,055 14,247,841 Court fines 299,906 Special assessments 424,843 Investment income 56,793 164,018 6,036 546,761 Donations 246,922 416,975 Miscellaneous 724,995 3,806,738 - - 3,806,738 Gross profit 3,867,431 9,149,703 445,091 49,197,435 Total revenues Expenditures and expenses General government 4,937,235 Public safety 10,252,819 Public works 3,876,976 Parks and recreation 3,268,764 Debt service 173,643 9,972,849 Capital outlay 11,648,078 2,410,358 11,394,654 390,285 14,195,297 Operating expenses 2,584,001 11,394,654 390,285 58,152,018 Total expenditures and expenses Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 45,622 3,001,564 Transfer to other funds (438,055) (677,852) (45,767) (3,001,564) Disposal of assets 4,500 4,500 - - - 5,965,000 Issuance of debt (438,055) (627,730) (45,767) 5,969,500 Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balance and net assets 845,375 (2,872,681) 9,039 (2,985,083) 7,310,457 107,539,629 603,621 143,472,850 Fund balance and net assets, January 1 $ 8,155,832$ 104,666,948$ 612,660$ 140,487,767 Fund balance and net assets, December 31 For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances and percentages, see fund type summary sections. 44 PROPERTY TAXES Tax Levy The primary objective for the coming year was to establish a tax levy with no increase for the coming year. The estimated 2012 tax levy increases primarily as result of street reconstruction thst projects and for the Kenrick Avenue improvements from 175 to 181 Street. The 2011 proposed tax levy and estimated tax levy for 2012 is as follows: 2011Increase/2012Increase/ PurposeProposed(Decrease)Estimate(Decrease) General Fund$ 16,192,544$ (21,864)$ 16,642,460$ 449,916 General Fund - Market Value Homestead 788,027 157,466 788,027 - Street Improvement Bonds 2,116,223 (415,262) 2,683,980 567,757 Pavement Management 1,546,958 288,270 1,198,487 (348,471) Capital Improvement Bonds - Police 908,488 39,625 961,196 52,708 Capital Improvement Bonds - CMF 857,757 26,582 883,000 25,243 Equipment acquistion and replacement 554,377 554,377 372,974 (181,403) Park Bonds 424,744 7,225 416,531 (8,213) Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness 325,863 (640,200) 230,592 (95,271) Ice Arena Bonds 275,070 3,781 281,033 5,963 Street Improvement Bonds (Kenrick Ave.) 191,248 191,248 Arts Center Bonds 51,601 - 51,601 - Total tax levy$ 24,041,652$ -$ 24,701,129$ 659,477 % increase0.0%2.7% Property Tax: Levy limits The 2008 State of Minnesota Governor and Legislature re-imposed levy limits for the budget years 2009, 2010 and 2011. Tax increases are limited to 3.9% or the increase in the implicit price deflator – whichever is less. The actual implicit price deflator is 1.68%. The tax levy can also be increased by half the increase in growth. As the residential construction industry recovers, this levy limit constraint could be an ominous factor for financing future operating costs. 45 PROPERTY TAXES (continued) Special levies are also allowed for public safety (police and fire) personnel, pensions, debt service and market value homestead credit. The Levy Limit calculation is as follows: 20112012 IncreaseIncrease Tax Levy(decrease)Tax Levy(decrease) Levy limit base$ 11,388,598 $ 392,186$ 11,623,753 $ 235,155 Special levies$ 13,173,940 $ (557,830)$ 13,971,275 $ 797,335 Total levy limit$ 24,562,538 $ (165,644)$ 25,595,028 $ 1,032,490 Proposed tax levy$ 24,041,652 $ -$ 24,701,129 $ 659,477 Levy limit capacity$ 520,886 $ (165,644)$ 893,899 $ 373,013 State Aid: Property Tax Relief – Market Value Homestead Credit The State Legislature created the Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC) program in 2001 to provide state-paid property tax relief to owner’s homesteaded residential property. The credit is equal to 0.4% of the homestead’s market value up to a maximum credit of $304. The maximum credit of $304 occurs at a market value of $76,000. For homesteads with market values over $76,000, the credit is reduced by .09% of the excess market value. Homesteads with a market value of $413,788 and higher do not receive any credit. Non-residential properties are also not eligible to receive the credit. The original legislation was intended to reimburse cities for the property tax credits provided to homeowners. However, the Legislature has permanently eliminated the reimbursement to certain cities, such as Lakeville, as one method of addressing its budget issues. 46 PROPERTY TAXES (continued) Tax Levy Analysis The following is a comparison of the 2010 and 2011 tax levies as applied to the various General Fund departments, equipment acquisitions, pavement management, and debt service. $Percent 20102011Increase/Increase/ Tax LevyTax Levy(Decrease)(Decrease) Mayor and Council$ 112,602$ 115,833$ 3,2312.9% Committees and Commissions 48,868 53,291 4,4239.1% City administration 268,385 283,761 15,3765.7% City Clerk 170,505 116,057 (54,448)(31.9%) Finance 416,690 409,625 (7,065)(1.7%) Information systems 375,889 387,818 11,9293.2% Human resources 224,084 232,028 7,9443.5% Insurance 283,420 293,555 10,1353.6% Legal counsel 66,236 66,037 (199)(0.3%) Planning 357,386 323,514 (33,872)(9.5%) Community and econ. development 269,304 274,754 5,4502.0% Inspections 147,394 - (147,394)(100.0%) General government facilities 425,973 405,445 (20,528)(4.8%) Total general government 3,166,736 2,961,718 (205,018)(6.5%) Police 7,267,804 7,474,979 207,1752.9% Fire 1,153,385 1,109,927 (43,458)(3.8%) Total public safety 8,421,189 8,584,906 163,7171.9% Engineering 328,523 455,130 126,60738.5% Streets 1,917,493 1,969,413 51,9202.7% Total public works 2,246,016 2,424,543 178,5277.9% Parks 2,153,514 2,169,305 15,7910.7% Recreation 309,472 300,749 (8,723)(2.8%) Arts Center 233,737 230,281 (3,456)(1.5%) Total parks and recreation 2,696,723 2,700,335 3,6120.1% Contingency 314,306 309,069 (5,237)(1.7%) Total general fund operations 16,844,970 16,980,571 135,6010.8% Equipment acquisitions - 554,377 554,377100.0% Pavement management 1,258,688 1,546,958 288,27022.9% Total capital projects 1,258,688 2,101,335 842,64766.9% Street Improvement Bonds 2,531,485 2,116,223 (415,262)(16.4%) Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness 966,063 325,863 (640,200)(66.3%) Capital Improvement Bonds - Police 868,863 908,488 39,6254.6% Capital Improvement Bonds - CMF 831,175 857,757 26,5823.2% Park Bonds 417,519 424,744 7,2251.7% Ice Arena Bonds 271,289 275,070 3,7811.4% Arts Center Bonds 51,601 51,601 -0.0% Total debt service 5,937,995 4,959,746 (978,249)(16.5%) Total City wide levy$ 24,041,653$ 24,041,652$ (1)(0.0%) 47 PROPERTY TAXES (continued) The following is a graphic representation of the changes in the 2011 tax levy from the 2010 tax levy by the various programs and debt service. CHANGES IN TAX LEVY 2010-2011 Equipment Acquisitions$554,377 Pavement management$288,270 Police$207,175 Engineering $126,607 Streets$51,920 Parks$15,791 City administration$15,376 Information systems $11,929 Insurance$10,135 Human resources$7,944 Community and econ. Develop.$5,450 Committees/Commissions $4,423 Mayor and Council$3,231 Legal counsel$(199) Arts Center$(3,456) Finance $(7,065) Contingency$(5,237) Recreation$(8,723) General government facilities$(20,528) Planning $(33,872) Fire$(43,458) City Clerk$(54,448) Inspections$(147,394) Debt service $(978,249) $(1,000,000) $(750,000) $(500,000) $(250,000) $- $250,000 $500,000 $ Changes The following is a comparison of the 2011 and 2012 tax levies as applied to the various General Fund departments, equipment acquisitions, pavement management, and debt service. 48 PROPERTY TAXES (continued) $Percent 20112012Increase/Increase/ Tax LevyTax Levy(Decrease)(Decrease) Mayor and Council$ 115,833$ 112,651$ (3,182)(2.7%) Committees and Commissions 53,291 54,882 1,5913.0% City administration 283,761 287,634 3,8731.4% City Clerk 116,057 180,352 64,29555.4% Finance 409,625 409,082 (543)(0.1%) Information systems 387,818 399,952 12,1343.1% Human resources 232,028 235,359 3,3311.4% Insurance 293,555 304,335 10,7803.7% Legal counsel 66,037 66,450 4130.6% Planning 323,514 309,946 (13,568)(4.2%) Community and econ. development 274,754 276,620 1,8660.7% Inspections - - -0.0% General government facilities 405,445 403,872 (1,573)(0.4%) Total general government 2,961,718 3,041,135 79,4172.7% Police 7,474,979 7,783,870 308,8914.1% Fire 1,109,927 1,072,925 (37,002)(3.3%) Total public safety 8,584,906 8,856,795 271,8893.2% Engineering 455,130 431,413 (23,717)(5.2%) Streets 1,969,413 2,055,545 86,1324.4% Total public works 2,424,543 2,486,958 62,4152.6% Parks 2,169,305 2,200,667 31,3621.4% Recreation 300,749 319,365 18,6166.2% Arts Center 230,281 216,498 (13,783)(6.0%) Total parks and recreation 2,700,335 2,736,530 36,1951.3% Contingency 309,069 309,069 -0.0% Total general fund operations 16,980,571 17,430,487 449,9162.6% Equipment Fund 554,377 372,974 (181,403)(32.7%) Pavement management 1,546,958 1,198,487 (348,471)(22.5%) 2,101,335 1,571,461 (529,874)(25.2%) Street Improvement Bonds 2,116,223 2,875,228 759,00535.9% Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness 325,863 230,592 (95,271)(29.2%) Capital Improvement Bonds - Police 908,488 961,196 52,7085.8% Capital Improvement Bonds - CMF 857,757 883,000 25,2432.9% Park Bonds 424,744 416,531 (8,213)(1.9%) Ice Arena Bonds 275,070 281,033 5,9632.2% Arts Center Bonds 51,601 51,601 -0.0% Total debt service 4,959,746 5,699,181 739,43514.9% Total City wide levy$ 24,041,652$ 24,701,129$ 659,4772.7% The following is a graphic representation of the changes in the 2012 tax levy from the 2011 tax levy by the various programs and debt service. 49 PROPERTY TAXES (continued) CHANGES IN TAX LEVY 2011-2012 Debt service$739,435 $308,891 Police Streets$86,132 City Clerk$64,295 Parks$31,362 Recreation$18,616 Information systems$12,134 Insurance$10,780 $3,873 City administration Human resources$3,331 Community and econ. Develop.$1,866 $1,591 Committees/Commissions Legal counsel$413 Contingency$- Inspections$- Finance$(543) General government facilities$(1,573) Mayor and Council$(3,182) $(13,568) Planning Arts Center$(13,783) Engineering$(23,717) Fire$(37,002) Equipment Acquisitions$(181,403) Pavement management$(348,471) $(400,000)$(200,000)$-$200,000$400,000$600,000$800,000 $ Changes Tax Base 50 PROPERTY TAXES (continued) Property taxes are derived from the property assessment, the local government levies and any voter approved referenda. The estimated market value is determined by the Dakota County Assessor based on an open market sale price. Property market values will vary from parcel to parcel depending on characteristics, condition, location and other factors. A property class is ascribed to each parcel of property based on the use of the property. Generally, properties that are associated with income production have a higher classification than other properties. The property classification system defines the tax capacity of each parcel as the percentage of each parcel’s market value. The largest property classes are residential, commercial and industrial with each comprising 73.8%, 16.8% and 4.7% of the 2011 tax base, respectively. 20102011 EstimatedEstimated Tax Capacity% ofTax Capacity% ofIncrease/ Property ClassValueTotalValueTotal(Decrease) Residential$ 48,443,765 74.3%$ 45,035,403 73.8%$ (3,408,362) Commercial 10,918,055 16.7% 10,277,452 16.8% (640,603) Industrial 3,050,397 4.7% 2,899,246 4.7% (151,151) Apartment 1,127,962 1.7% 1,271,776 2.2% 143,814 Agricultural 704,450 1.1% 518,989 0.9% (185,461) Utility 139,313 0.2% 135,241 0.2% (4,072) Rural vacant0.0% 115,043 0.2% 115,043 Railroads 67,576 0.1% 42,832 0.1% (24,744) Cabins 11,342 0.0% 10,355 0.0% (987) Personal property 772,929 1.2% 745,485 1.1% (27,444) Total$ 65,235,789 100.0%$ 61,051,822 100.0%$ (4,183,967) According to the Dakota County Assessor’s Office, the assessed market value on median value residential properties is $233,700 which is a decrease of 7.51% for taxes payable 2011. General speaking, the majority of commercial and industrial properties will also have a decrease in market value for the coming year. The tax capacity value is adjusted for tax increment and the fiscal disparities contribution shown as follows. 51 PROPERTY TAXES (continued) 20102011 ActualEstimate Tax Capacity Value 65,235,789 61,051,822 -6.4% Tax Increment (1,999,576) (999,915)-50.0% (5,623,626) (5,845,456) Fiscal Disparaties Contribution3.9% 57,612,587 54,206,451 Net Tax Capacity-5.9% Tax Capacity Rate The tax capacity rate is a function of the tax levy and the total tax base. Even though the 2011 property tax levy remains unchanged, the tax capacity rate is projected to increase 4.6% (from .36624 to .38293) due to the decrease in net tax capacity (property values). 20102011% ActualEstimateChange (0.0%) Tax Levy 23,624,134 23,616,908 (2,524,151) (2,859,387) Fiscal Disparities Distribution 13.3% Net Tax Levy 21,099,983 20,757,521 (1.6%) Net Tax Capacity 57,612,587 54,206,451 (5.9%) Tax Capacity Rate 0.36624 0.38293 4.6% Tax levies for bond issues approved by referendum after August 1, 1994, are based on market value rather than tax capacity value. The City of Lakeville levy based on market value for Park Bonds is shown as follows: 2011 Estimate $ 5,653,143,817 Market Value $ 424,744 Tax Levy for Park Bonds 0.0000751 Tax Rate based on Market Value Tax Impact on Residential Properties 52 PROPERTY TAXES (continued) Assuming there are no changes in the tax rates for the other taxing jurisdictions and assuming an average (7.51%) decrease in residential market values, the estimated City taxes on the “average” residential property will decrease by approximately (3.6%) for the coming year. Taxes on the Median-Value Residential Homestead Estimated 200920102011 Market Value on Median Value Home$ 272,100$ 251,000$ 233,700 Multiplied by the property class rate 1.00%1.00%1.00% Tax Capacity Value$ 2,721$ 2,510$ 2,337 Multiplied by the Tax Capacity Rate 0.33973 0.36620 0.38293 Taxes based on Tax Capacity Value$ 924$ 919$ 895 Market Value Homestead Credit (48) (55) (62) Net taxes based on Tax Capacity Value$ 876$ 864$ 833 Taxes based on Market Value 20 18 18 Total taxes payable to City of Lakeville$ 896$ 882$ 851 Increase/(decrease)$ (39) $ (14) $ (32) Percentage increase/(decrease)-4.2%-1.5%-3.6% Tax Impact on Commercial and Industrial Properties The assessors estimated taxable market values for residential market values declined on the average home by approximately (7.51%) for taxes payable 2011. This follows a reduction of (3.3%) and (7.75%) in market value for taxes payable in 2009 and 2010, respectively. ASSESSORS ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE Median Value Homesteaded Residential $300,000 $280,000 Market Value $260,000 $240,000 $220,000 $200,000 20042005200620072008200920102011 Year 53 PROPERTY TAXES (continued) The overwhelming majority of commercial and industrial properties are showing decreases in market values for the coming year. Therefore, based on preliminary calculations, it is estimated that City taxes will decrease by approximately $70 – 140 for a $1 million facility. The tax levy impact on commercial and industrial properties will not be known until the fiscal disparities rates are calculated later this year. The decline in property taxes for the overwhelming majority of Lakeville property owners is attributable to a stable City tax levy combined with the expiration of a Dakota County tax increment district and a increase in the fiscal disparities distribution. In the last couple of years, residential property values have been decreasing while commercial and industrial values were stable or increasing. It appears that the assessed market values for most properties are trending in parallel directions for the coming year. 90% 80% 81% 79%79%79% 79%79% 78% 70% 76% 74% 74% 74% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 21%21% 23% 20% 19% 17% 17% 16%16% 16%16% 10% 0% 20012002200320042005200620072008200920102011 ResidentialCommercial/Industrial The tax structure for commercial and industrial properties is also significantly different than that of homesteaded residential properties. Some of the primary differences are as follows: Commercial and industrial properties are not entitled to the property tax relief which is  granted to residential properties through the Market Value Homestead Credit. Commercial and industrial properties pay a State property tax. This tax now represents the  largest share of commercial and industrial taxes. Commercial and industrial properties are subject to the fiscal disparities pool and tax  distribution. 54 PROPERTY TAXES (continued) Commercial and industrial properties are subject to a higher property class rates than that of  residential property as shown in the following table. Local Local Tax Tax Payable Payable Property Type 2009 2010 Residential Homestead Up to $500,000 1.00% 1.00% Over $500,000 1.25% 1.25% Residential Non-homestead Single Unit Up to $500,000 1.00% 1.00% Over $500,000 1.25% 1.25% 1-3 unit and undeveloped land 1.25% 1.25% Market Rate Apartments Regular 1.25% 1.25% Commercial/Industrial/Public Utility Up to $150,000 1.50% 1.50% Over $150,000 2.00% 2.00% Electric Generation Machinery2.00% 2.00% Seasonal Recreational Residential: Up to $500,000 1.00% 1.00% Over $500,000 1.25% 1.25% Agricultural Land & Buildings Homestead Up to $500,000 1.00% 1.00% Over $500,000 1.00% 1.00% Remainder of Farm Up to $790,000 0.55% 0.55% Over $790,000 1.00% 1.00% Non-homestead 1.00% 1.00% As such, the taxes paid by commercial and industrial properties are more than those paid by residential properties as is shown by the following chart. 55 PROPERTY TAXES (continued) PERCENT OF TOTAL PROPERTY TAXES RESIDENTIAL COMPARED TO COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL 50% 50% 40% 40% 40% 32% 29% 28% 30% 30% 24% 20% 20% 16% 14% 11% 10% 10% 4% 2% 0%0% 0% 0% Fiscal disparities School district CountyState Tax CityOther Fiscal disparities School district CountyState Tax CityOther The State of Minnesota has sole responsibility for the tax structure of the various property classes. Truth in Taxation Minnesota Statutes require cities to certify the proposed property tax levy to the County Treasurer/Auditor and adopt a proposed budget on or before September 15. The County Treasurer/Auditor will mail the parcel specific Truth in Taxation notices in mid-November. These notices inform property owners of the time and place of the budget hearings and the impact of the proposed property tax levy. Lakeville’s Truth in Taxation meeting will be conducted on Monday December 6. The Council has the ability to adopt a final tax levy in December that is equal to or less than the preliminary tax levy approved in September. It may not, however, adopt a final tax levy that is greater than the preliminary tax levy. 56 General Fund The General Fund accounts for all revenues and expenditures necessary to provide a full range of services, including general government administration, community and economic development, public safety, public works, and parks and recreation. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA General Fund Fund Balance Discussion The Fund Balance Policy states “The City’s unreserved fund balance – designated for working capital as of the end of the year – should equal 40% to 50% of the next year’s budgeted expenditures. The fund balance represents the amount of funds required to operate during the first six months of the year. The City’s most significant revenue sources–taxes and intergovernmental revenue– do not provide appreciable revenues until the second half of the year. A healthy financial position also allows the City to avoid volatility in tax rates; helps minimize the impact of state funding changes; allows for the adequate consistent funding of services, repairs and unexpected costs; and can be a factor in determining the City’s bond rating and resulting interest costs. The ratio of fund balance to expenditures is 40.1% and 40.0 for 2011 and 2012, respectively. 20112012 ProposedEstimated BudgetBudget Revenues and other financing sources$ 20,722,560$ 21,523,546 Expenditures 20,945,949 21,360,944 Net increase/(decrease) (223,389) 162,602 Fund Balance, January 1 8,615,197 8,391,808 Fund Balance, December 31$ 8,391,808$ 8,554,410 Ratio: Fund balance to expenditures40.1%40.0% The proposed budget is premised on the assumption the City Council will approve a transfer in 2010 from the General Fund to the following funds. Fund Total Trail Improvement Fund 1,400,000 Equipment Fund 1,100,000 Building Fund 52,136 G.O. Improvement Bonds 107,490 Pavement Management Fund Fire Station #3 parking lot 32,800 Holyoke / 210th Street 29,700 Sealcoating park parking lots 77,874 Total$ 2,800,000 57 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA General Fund Fund Balance Discussion (continued) The purpose of the transfer is to accomplish the following objectives: Minimize 2011 and future tax levies Debt reduction Funding for long-term maintenance of city infrastructure and assets. 58 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA General Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues General property taxes$ 15,564,347$ 16,117,882$ 16,193,607$ 16,150,897$ 16,597,723 Licenses and permits 1,062,367 902,341 1,057,861 1,220,561 1,449,898 Intergovernmental 946,902 1,070,554 1,017,358 975,458 975,458 Charges for services 2,013,095 1,298,419 1,267,582 1,221,270 1,275,508 Court fines 297,413 273,055 288,260 294,026 299,906 Investment income 161,318 104,096 83,450 125,175 166,900 337,351 96,769 113,617 79,521 80,804 Miscellaneous 20,382,793 19,863,116 20,021,735 20,066,908 20,846,197 Total revenues Expenditures Mayor and Council 100,581 110,726 109,377 114,245 110,419 Committees and Commissions 77,660 79,254 76,783 78,156 79,557 City administration 292,084 313,502 313,502 321,899 323,863 City Clerk 109,092 167,664 164,832 114,466 176,776 Legal counsel 80,770 65,132 65,132 65,132 65,132 Planning 514,125 431,982 417,836 352,530 350,800 Community and econ. development 271,722 274,817 271,195 270,988 271,135 Inspections 928,746 891,468 885,370 931,406 904,155 General government facilities 480,840 534,008 491,063 510,537 508,328 Finance 547,696 555,084 553,916 568,579 568,905 Information systems 480,479 454,341 475,084 466,481 477,118 Human resources 272,718 293,923 303,113 305,286 315,453 Insurance 280,031 278,698 278,698 289,532 298,301 Police 7,640,899 8,362,945 8,263,734 8,512,347 8,807,235 Fire 1,176,340 1,371,591 1,339,418 1,332,037 1,290,215 Engineering 703,528 720,216 716,819 747,714 749,441 Streets 2,843,604 2,357,056 2,324,305 2,443,149 2,521,594 Parks 1,887,047 2,152,234 2,106,547 2,174,677 2,192,136 Recreation 564,099 600,075 602,677 598,274 614,680 Arts Center 398,518 430,182 414,635 439,445 426,632 - 309,069 276,884 309,069 309,069 Other 19,650,579 20,753,967 20,450,920 20,945,949 21,360,944 Total expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 492,645 668,238 637,657 655,652 677,349 (1,263,647) - (2,800,000) - - Transfer to other funds (771,002) 668,238 (2,162,343) 655,652 677,349 Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balance (38,788) (222,613) (2,591,528) (223,389) 162,602 11,245,513 9,714,615 11,206,725 8,615,197 8,391,808 Fund balance, January 1 $ 11,206,725$ 9,492,002$ 8,615,197$ 8,391,808$ 8,554,410 Fund balance, December 31 Net change in 2011 and 2012 fund balance percentage(2.6%)1.9% Ratio: Fund balance to expenditures57.0%45.7%42.1%40.1%40.0% 59 General Fund Schedule of Revenues and Other Financing Sources (Uses) 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget General property taxes Ad valorem taxes - current$ 13,451,844$ 14,133,759$ 14,032,905$ 13,865,306$ 14,308,510 Ad valorem taxes - delinquent 302,027 155,909 306,265 178,118 183,577 Market value homestead credit 1,961 Fiscal disparities 1,713,240 1,760,094 1,760,094 2,019,580 2,017,743 Penalties and interest 14,711 7,550 14,000 7,550 7,550 Mobile home tax 45,171 41,500 43,937 43,937 43,937 Mobile home tax credit 18,233 19,070 21,406 21,406 21,406 17,160 - 15,000 15,000 15,000 Gravel tax 15,564,347 16,117,882 16,193,607 16,150,897 16,597,723 Total general property taxes (continued) 60 General Fund Schedule of Revenues and Other Financing Sources (Uses) 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Licenses and permits Licenses Cigarette$ (1,200) $ 16,800$ 19,200$ 600$ 21,600 Trash removal 3,800 3,150 3,750 3,750 3,750 Dog 16,557 20,000 13,652 13,652 13,652 Signs 5,400 3,550 4,882 4,882 4,882 On-sale liquor 110,236 107,000 114,600 120,100 125,600 Sunday liquor 6,528 3,800 4,000 4,200 4,400 Club license 500 500 500 500 500 Non-intoxicating liquor on (600) 1,200 1,500 1,500 1,800 Non-intoxicating liquor off 825 900 825 825 900 Wine 2,500 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Tree removal 900 700 700 675 650 Arcade 2,820 2,490 2,895 2,940 2,985 Fireworks 500 900 500 500 500 Massage 1,875 1,500 1,900 1,900 1,900 600 - 500 500 500 Miscellaneous 151,241 163,490 171,404 158,524 185,619 Total licenses Permits Plan review fees 184,177 160,862 187,173 227,986 280,937 Building 460,907 384,840 498,952 601,688 724,316 Plumbing 64,547 55,671 42,211 47,331 51,842 Water/sewer 14,442 9,174 14,482 18,757 19,822 Mechanical 69,212 43,257 58,068 67,266 76,365 Grading/filling 450 250 250 250 250 Excavating/gravel 775 750 750 750 Driveway 650 600 600 600 600 Zoning 3,270 3,482 3,600 3,800 Right-of-way 21,230 18,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 Fire burning 375 550 595 770 875 Electrical 90,010 65,347 61,594 72,739 82,422 1,081 300 300 300 300 Miscellaneous 911,126 738,851 886,457 1,062,037 1,264,279 Total permits 1,062,367 902,341 1,057,861 1,220,561 1,449,898 Total licenses and permits (continued) 61 General Fund Schedule of Revenues and Other Financing Sources (Uses) 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Intergovernmental State aid police$ 351,623$ 335,887$ 351,624$ 351,624$ 351,624 State aid fire relief 192,073 190,209 190,209 190,209 190,209 State aid streets 234,139 374,962 374,962 374,962 374,962 State aid pensions 21,303 21,303 21,303 21,303 21,303 State POST Board grant 21,010 19,864 21,010 21,010 21,010 State Drug Task Force grant 28,256 12,000 14,050 14,050 14,050 State fire training grant 2,800 State OSHA safety grant 2,863 State snowmobile trail maint. grant 2,718 200 200 200 200 State, Fed. Cnty., police grants 24,372 2,100 2,100 2,100 2,100 Fed. CDBG community development 16,938 5,000 Federal energy grant 1,600 Dakota Communication Center rebate 65,529 County Police domestic prep. grant 1,507 47,300 41,900 41,900 - - County recycling grant 946,902 1,070,554 1,017,358 975,458 975,458 Total intergovernmental (continued) 62 General Fund Schedule of Revenues and Other Financing Sources (Uses) 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Charges for services General government Rezoning fees$ 1,000$ 750$ 750$ 750$ 750 Platting fees 4,531 1,850 3,340 4,500 9,000 Variance fees 600 750 400 600 1,200 PUD application fees 1,000 500 500 500 CUP fees 2,608 2,400 2,000 2,400 2,400 Home occupation fees 830 450 500 500 500 Planner fees 25,340 32,001 14,875 24,000 32,500 Inspection department fees 9,392 7,679 11,796 13,258 15,230 General government service charge 12,468 15,057 5,773 3,448 3,448 Tree escrow fund administration 545 8,000 700 1,200 3,500 Lodging tax fee 6,349 7,474 6,250 6,500 6,750 Fiscal Agent - DCC 37,042 59,400 59,400 60,588 61,800 Fiscal Agent - Arenas 16,000 16,000 16,000 32,000 32,000 Investment management fees 26,597 26,597 26,597 27,395 28,217 Sale of maps/copies 261 400 225 200 150 Sale of printed materials 9 50 (48) 200 150 150 150 Finance charges 144,524 179,058 149,256 177,989 198,095 Total general government Public safety Police department charges 81,971 70,122 51,506 52,273 52,491 SRO - ISD 194 contributions 148,854 150,804 149,500 153,985 157,835 Animal pickup 3,876 3,910 3,876 3,876 3,876 Animal storage 7,239 8,320 7,239 7,239 7,239 Animal rabies 3,957 2,540 3,957 3,957 3,957 Restitution 3,023 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Forfeiture - sale of assets 30,065 5,000 14,400 14,400 14,400 Fire contracts 30,730 32,265 32,270 33,240 34,240 Fire department charges 3,286 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 11,501 11,600 11,885 12,123 12,365 ALF Ambulance - admin. charge 324,502 289,311 279,383 285,843 291,153 Total public safety (continued) 63 General Fund Schedule of Revenues and Other Financing Sources (Uses) 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Charges for services (continued) Public works Engineering platting - preliminary$ 7,725$ 1,500$ 1,500$ 1,500$ 3,000 Engineering platting - final 3,140 1,200 1,200 1,200 2,400 Engineering plan review 6,304 5,000 5,000 5,000 7,500 Engineering developer insp. fees 10,280 500 981 1,000 1,500 Engineering developer cont. admin. 18,979 6,000 9,308 10,000 15,000 Engineering Imp. Proj. design variable 125,064 81,900 81,900 50,560 57,520 Engineering Imp. Proj. const. inspect. 218,422 102,200 102,200 56,800 64,710 Engineering G.I.S. fees 3,525 1,200 3,500 4,200 4,700 Special assessment admin. charge 82,362 79,252 79,252 60,162 59,782 Special assessment searches 300 220 300 300 300 Document/map sales 520 910 307 200 125 Bid plan/spec. deposits 1,257 1,500 1,100 500 500 Street department charges 2,673 4,530 11,097 12,000 12,500 Street lights 558,572 Credit River - Judicial Road maint. 2,746 6,635 1,600 2,746 2,746 Developer street signs installation 1,709 7,000 1,400 2,400 3,000 1,043,578 299,547 300,645 208,568 235,283 Total public works Parks, recreation and arts center Brochure advertising 8,210 5,000 7,050 7,050 7,050 Youth activities 101,776 108,745 113,445 112,582 112,582 Youth sport surcharge 17,938 36,700 36,700 36,700 36,700 Youth special events 13,176 13,391 13,391 13,391 13,391 Youth special events donations 3,200 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 Adult activities 72,690 70,450 70,450 70,450 70,450 Puppet wagon donations 3,000 3,870 3,870 3,870 3,870 Safety Camp 2,694 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Safety Camp donations 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 Sr. Center newsletter cost reimb. Senior Center donations 470 470 470 470 Senior Center excursions 4,562 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Ritter Farm Park ELC 9,976 6,682 6,682 6,682 6,682 Excursions 13,956 7,920 7,920 7,920 7,920 15,480 12,582 12,582 12,582 12,582 Tennis lessons Total recreation programs 267,758 291,310 298,060 297,197 297,197 Park rental/maint./tournament fees 32,469 29,903 29,903 29,903 29,903 Tree sales (net) 4,926 4,500 4,963 5,000 5,000 Senior Center membership surcharge 4,710 4,010 4,010 4,010 4,010 440 440 440 440 440 Senior Center rentals 310,303 330,163 337,376 336,550 336,550 Total parks and recreation (continued) 64 General Fund Schedule of Revenues and Other Financing Sources (Uses) 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Charges for services (continued) Parks, recreation and arts center (continued) Arts center program fees$ 67,783$ 73,500$ 67,176$ 68,250$ 69,250 Arts center brochure ad revenue 585 585 Arts center on-sale 97 2,801 4,470 2,577 121,723 126,840 130,360 139,600 142,600 Arts center rental/event admissions 190,188 200,340 200,922 212,320 214,427 Total arts center 500,491 530,503 538,298 548,870 550,977 Total parks, recreation and arts center 2,013,095 1,298,419 1,267,582 1,221,270 1,275,508 Total charges for services 297,413 273,055 288,260 294,026 299,906 Court fines 161,318 104,096 83,450 125,175 166,900 Investment income Miscellaneous Disposal of assets 221,604 2,939 20,656 9,445 9,445 Park rental farming 400 400 400 400 400 Donations 26,696 48,411 48,738 25,095 25,263 Antenna site leases 88,346 44,990 43,494 44,581 45,696 305 29 329 - - Other 337,351 96,769 113,617 79,521 80,804 Total miscellaneous Other financing sources (uses) - Transfers from (to) Special Revenue: Communications Fund 47,267 48,177 42,069 42,551 43,413 Environmental Resources Fund 108,566 113,597 111,316 151,991 158,558 Debt Service: GO Improvement Bonds (107,490) Capital Projects: Storm Sewer Fund 36,230 40,827 37,153 Pavement Management Fund (140,374) Trail Maintenance Fund (1,400,000) Equipment Fund (1,263,647) (1,100,000) Building Fund (52,136) Internal Service - Muni. Res.Fund 40,663 43,140 43,140 44,435 45,767 Enterprise: Liquor Fund 139,094 142,036 143,640 144,950 151,759 120,825 280,461 260,339 271,725 277,852 Utility Fund (771,002) 668,238 (2,162,343) 655,652 677,349 Total other financing (net) 65 MAYOR AND COUNCIL Program Description: The Mayor and City Council are the legislative and governing body of the City of Lakeville. The Mayor and four City Council Members that are elected at-large; the Mayor is elected to a two year term and each council member is elected to a four year term. Council member elections are staggered so that two council members are elected every two years. The Mayor and Council Members represent the entire community and they are empowered by law to legislate City-wide policy. This includes the authority to pass and enforce ordinances, establish public and administrative policies, create advisory boards and commissions, and manage the City's financial operations including preparing a budget, auditing expenditures, and transacting other City business as required by law. The City Council also serves as the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) for the City. The City Council appoints a City Administrator who directs City staff on implementation of Council decisions and providing day- to-day City operations. Services: Represents the People of Lakeville. not limited to levying taxes, adopting a  budget, disbursement of public monies, Exercise legislative authority through the  and issuance of debt. enactment of ordinances, policies, and resolutions. Formulates policies that will help the  City prepare for the future and adjust to Conducting the City’s intergovernmental  social and economic trends which affairs. The council may make require long-range planning regarding agreements for the joint exercise of City facilities, needs and services. powers through agreements with other units of government, appoint people to Directing the enforcement of City  serve on intergovernmental bodies, ordinances conduct city business with state and Appoints members of the advisory  federal agencies, and participate in boards. intergovernmental programs and the Provide leadership by promoting ideas work of municipal associations such as  and programs which serve the the League of Minnesota Cites. community. The Council has the full authority over  the City’s financial affairs, including but Activity Measures: Lakeville Community Survey Results 2001 2005 2007 2010 Residents who indicated that the quality of life 92% 95% 97% 98% in Lakeville was excellent or good? 66 MAYOR AND COUNCIL (continued) Goals and Objectives: Strategic Plan.  Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 45,263$ 50,224$ 49,290$ 49,327$ 49,334 Commodities 50 50 50 50 Other charges and services 55,318 60,452 60,037 64,868 61,035 $ 100,581$ 110,726$ 109,377$ 114,245$ 110,419 Total Revenues $ 100,581$ 110,726$ 109,377$ 114,245$ 110,419 Taxes and other public funds Budget Factors: Personnel services. There is no proposed changes to the Mayor and Council salary structure for 2011 and 2012. Commodities There are no proposed changes in commodities for 2011 and 2012. Other charges and services The other charges and services budget will increase $4,416 in 2011 and decrease $3,833 in 2012. The City of Lakeville maintains membership in those organizations which provide administrative and legislative guidance including the League of Minnesota Cities ($26,631), the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities ($12,599), Municipal Legislative Commission ($10,000) and the I-35 Alliance ($3,000). Budget also provides appropriations for strategic planning and miscellaneous expenses. 67 COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS Program Description: The City has a number of committees which provide recommendations to the City Council  relating primarily to policy issues. Committees include Planning, Economic Development, Lakeville Area Arts, Parks Recreation and Natural Resources, Yellow Ribbon, and the Pan- O-Prog community celebration. Services: Advise City Council relative to policy issues.  Staff support of the Pan-O-Prog community celebration.  Community Survey: Quality of Service is Residents who service is considered Service/Program support current excellent or essential or very funding level good important Residential Responses: Pan-o-Prog community celebration 96% 72% 82% Business Responses: Pan-o-Prog community celebration 81% 55% 72% 2010 Goals and Objectives: Recognition of contributions of committee members.  The annual Pan-O-Prog Fourth of July fireworks display continues to be financed with  donations from the community businesses. Support functions such as traffic control are financed by the City of Lakeville. 2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives: Recognition of contributions of committee members.  The annual Pan-O-Prog Fourth of July fireworks display continues to be financed with  donations from the community businesses. Support functions such as traffic control are financed by the City of Lakeville. 68 COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS (continued) Budget Summary: 20092010201020112012 FunctionActualBudgetEstimateEstimateEstimate Planning Commission 4,779 5,944 5,404 5,409 5,414 Economic Development 660 1,584 1,584 1,587 1,592 Parks, Recreation and NR. 1,435 3,871 3,333 3,336 3,339 Lakeville Area Arts Center 582 802 816 818 820 Yellow Ribbon Committee 874 250 250 250 250 Pan-O-Prog 69,330 66,803 65,396 66,756 68,142 Total$ 77,660$ 79,254$ 76,783$ 78,156$ 79,557 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 42,279$ 40,441$ 38,912$ 40,021$ 41,168 Commodities 855 908 907 925 925 Other charges and services 34,526 37,905 36,964 37,210 37,464 $ 77,660$ 79,254$ 76,783$ 78,156$ 79,557 Total Revenues and other financing sources Miscellaneous$ 20,850$ 30,000$ 25,182$ 25,095$ 25,263 Other financing sources 1,124 1,200 1,998 500 500 Taxes and other public funds 55,686 48,054 49,603 52,561 53,794 $ 77,660$ 79,254$ 76,783$ 78,156$ 79,557 Total Budget Factors: Personnel services. The personnel services budget will decrease $420 in 2011 and increase $1,147 in 2012. The Pan-O-Prog budget only includes over-time cost; it does not include work performed during regular scheduled work hours. Commodities The commodities budget will increase by $17 in 2011 with no anticipated changes in 2012 Other charges and services Other charges and services will decrease $695 in 2011 and increase $254 in 2012 primarily as a result of Pan-O-Prog activities. Miscellaneous th The pyrotechnics display ($20,000) during the Pan-O-Prog 4 of July celebration is financed exclusively from donations. 69 CITY ADMINISTRATION Program Description: The City Administration Department, under the direction of the City Administrator, is charged with implementing policy and direction established by the City Council. It is the responsibility of the City Administrator to provide the overall direction for the City organization in accordance with policies established by the City Council. Other responsibilities are to ensure that City operations are conducted efficiently and effectively such that City Council and citizen concerns are addressed. The office also develops recommendations to the City Council regarding programs, operations and policies. In addition, the City Administrator presents, reviews and monitors the annual operating budget for the City. This leadership helps to ensure that Lakeville operates within the boundaries of prudence and ethics as set forth in the Lakeville Policy Manual and City Code of Ordinances. Services: Provide complete and objective other official bodies as directed by the  information and recommendations to the Council. City Council. Handles personnel matters for the City in  Oversee and support City departments as accordance with policy established by  they provide the best possible services to the City Council. Negotiates or the community at the lowest possible delegates the negotiation of terms and cost. conditions of employee labor contracts for presentation to the City Council. Provide comprehensive vision and  Conducts annual evaluations and review leadership for the City organization so of work performance for all department that desires and needs of the community heads. and City Council goals are achieved. Recommends from time to time the  Prepare and provide to the City Council  adoption of such measures as deemed a fiscally responsible budget to finance necessary for the health, safety and City operations in support of community welfare of the community or for the desires and city Council goals. improvement of the administration. Attends and participates in discussions at  all meetings of the City Council and Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Request Estimate City Administrator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Assistant to City Administrator 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Executive Administrative Assistant/ Deputy Clerk 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total 2.8 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 70 CITY ADMINISTRATION (continued) 2010 Goals and Objectives: Maintain and communicate the core level of services expected by Lakeville residents.  (Strategic Plan A – 1) Continue to develop collaborations/ partnerships with private interests and other governments  (Strategic Plan A – 3) on key projects. Prepare Lakeville for transit services. Complete a full assessment of what Lakeville residents  (Strategic Plan H – 1) need and the ridership potential of transit alternatives. 2011 – 2012 Goals and Objectives: Maintain and communicate the core level of services expected by Lakeville residents.  (Strategic Plan A – 1) Continue to develop collaborations/ partnerships with private interests and other governments  (Strategic Plan A – 3) on key projects. Prepare Lakeville for transit services. Complete a full assessment of what Lakeville resident  (Strategic Plan H – 1) need and the ridership potential of transit alternatives. Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 283,732$ 297,465$ 303,396$ 306,537$ 309,325 Commodities 543 850 543 900 910 Other charges and services 7,809 15,187 9,563 11,492 11,813 - - - 2,970 1,815 Capital outlay $ 292,084$ 313,502$ 313,502$ 321,899$ 323,863 Total Revenues and other financing sources Other financing sources$ 20,644$ 49,589$ 41,224$ 42,027$ 41,932 271,440 263,913 272,278 279,872 281,931 Taxes and other public funds $ 292,084$ 313,502$ 313,502$ 321,899$ 323,863 Total Budget Factors: Personnel services. The personnel services budget will increase $9,072 and $2,788 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities There is an estimated $50 and $10 increase in 2011 and 2012 budgets for supplies for the coming year. Other charges and services 71 CITY ADMINISTRATION (continued) Other charges and services budget will decrease $3,695 for 2011 and increase $321 in 2012. The 2011 decrease is the result in reductions in cellular phone and use of personal auto. City Administrator did not attend conferences in 2009 and 2010; however, the budget does include appropriations for State conferences in 2011 and 2012 Capital Outlay Capital outlay is attributable to Microsoft Office upgrades in 2011 and computer replacements in 2011 and 2012. 72 CITY CLERK Program Description: The City Clerk is a statutory office that is responsible for City records management, election administration, and legal notification to the public, the issuance of licenses and permits and the preparation and retention of official minutes. The office is also the primary source of information for citizen questions and public records requests. The City Clerk is responsible for election administration including staffing and adherence to all election laws of the State of Minnesota and the Federal government. The duties and responsibilities of the City Clerk are described in Minnesota Statute 412.591. Services: Preparation of Council meeting agendas. Administration of records management  system in accordance with Minnesota Attend all Council meetings and record  Data Retention Act. meeting minutes. Elections administration.  Administration of ordinance  codification. Issuance and renewal of licenses.  Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate City Clerk 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Meeting Agenda Packets 26 27 27 27 27 Meeting Hours 30 30 30 30 30 Ordinances Processed 15 15 15 15 15 Resolutions Processed 190 190 190 190 190 Liquor Licenses 34 34 34 34 34 Massage Therapy Licenses 72 72 72 72 72 Tree Service Licenses 27 27 27 27 27 Registered Voters N/A 32,000 32,000 N/A 33,000 Absentee Ballots Processed N/A 2,000 2,000 N/A 2,000 Election Judges Trained N/A 150 150 N/A 200 N/A = not applicable 73 CITY CLERK (continued) 2011 – 2012 Goals and Objectives Administration of organization wide expansion of records stored electronically on Laser  Fiche. Redistricting of precinct boundaries  Consider new technology innovations in election equipment.  Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 95,770$ 105,056$ 102,694$ 99,661$ 105,458 Commodities 88 1,700 1,550 300 1,700 Other charges and services 13,234 60,458 60,218 13,650 67,803 - 450 370 855 1,815 Capital outlay $ 109,092$ 167,664$ 164,832$ 114,466$ 176,776 Total Revenues $ 109,092$ 167,664$ 164,832$ 114,466$ 176,776 Taxes and other public funds Budget Factors: Personnel services. There are no elections in 2011 and therefore personnel costs overall will decrease $5,395 in 2011 but will increase $5,797 as a result of the Presidential election in 2012. Personnel costs also include anticipated increases in health insurance and a State mandated .25% increase in PERA. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities Commodities will decrease $1,400 in 2011 due to absence of elections and increase $1,400 in 2012 because of Presidential elections. Other charges and services Election judges are considered contract employees. As such there is $46,808 decrease in 2011 and a $54,153 increase in 2012 primarily related to election activities. Capital outlay Capital outlay is attributable to Microsoft Office upgrades in 2011 and computer replacements in 2012 74 LEGAL COUNSEL Program Description: The City Attorney’s office has the statutory responsibility for the administration of all legal services for the City of Lakeville. The work involves serving as the legal advisor and providing legal services to the Council, the committees, commissions and boards of the City, and all City departments. The responsibilities of the office also include substantial involvement in City projects, liability issues, and contractual agreements. The City of Lakeville retains the services of Campbell Knutson, P.A., to handle the City’s legal affairs including questions of law, court actions and prosecutions. Funding for prosecution is provided for in the Police Department budget. Services: Acts as legal counsel at meetings of the Represents the City, its boards and  City Council and Planning Commission. officers, in civil claims and litigation. Drafts and revises local ordinances and Drafts and reviews development  resolutions. agreements. Researches and writes legal opinions and Negotiates and drafts City contracts,  memoranda for elected officials and City leases and indemnification agreements. departments. Administration of all real estate activity.  Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures $ 80,770$ 65,132$ 65,132$ 65,132$ 65,132 Other charges and services Revenues $ 80,770$ 65,132$ 65,132$ 65,132$ 65,132 Taxes and other public funds Budget Factors: Other charges and services The $65,132 budget for 2011 and 2012 is consistent the 2010 budget and historical trends. 75 PLANNING Program Description: The Planning Department offers a variety of services to preserve and enhance the quality of life for those who live and work in the community. The department guides the physical development of Lakeville in a manner that promotes sustained and managed growth and protects the health, safety and general welfare of its residents. The department oversees all the short and long term land use, zoning and development activities as required by State statute. The Planning Department provides technical support to the Planning Commission and City Council. In 2010, the Planning Department was also responsible for developing programs that promote and expand the community’s environmental recycling awareness. Beginning in 2011 this responsibility will be performed by the Environmental Resources Department. Services: Administer comprehensive planning and Coordinate development review with  development regulations and policies as other City departments and outside adopted by the City of Lakeville and the agencies. laws of the State of Minnesota. Initiate dialogue in response to emerging  Administer development review and community issues.  process permits consistent with land use, Respond to public inquires accurately  subdivision and environmental and in a timely manner. regulations. Process applications in a timely,  thorough and accurate manner. Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Planning Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Associate Planners 2.3 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Administrative Assistant 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Total 3.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Activity Measures: In 2009 the Planning Department completed a continuous flow of work including final approval of the 2008 Comprehensive Land Use Plan by the Metropolitan Council, substantial review of the Zoning and Subdivision ordinance update, and review and processing of several residential, commercial, industrial, office, and institutional, development applications. 76 PLANNING (continued) 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Preliminary Plats 7 8 8 10 12 Final Plats 8 10 10 12 15 Administrative Permits 27 30 30 35 40 Sketch Plans 1 8 8 10 12 Conditional Use Permits 8 10 10 10 12 Administrative Subdivision 6 6 6 8 8 Temporary Sign Permits 19 20 20 22 25 Permanent Sign Permits 49 50 50 55 60 Rezoning 3 3 3 3 3 Variances 1 1 1 1 1 Special Home Occ. Permits 0 3 3 0 0 Illegal Signs Removed 578 650 950 580 900 2010 Goals and Objectives: Planning (Strategic Plan G – 2) Facilitate development of new housing types without cost to the City.  (Strategic Plan G – 3) Continue orderly development of Lakeville.  The Planning Department will continue to provide prompt and responsive service to  contractors, developers, property owners, residents, and the general public while working toward the goal of improving the quality of life of residents and implementing the community’s goals and objectives outlined in the City’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan and as directed by the Planning Commission and City Council. Provide quality and efficient response to the needs of the public, City Council and Planning  Commission and continue to work with developers to insure quality development and positive outcomes. Specific projects that the Planning Department will manage include completing the updates to the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, the Argonne Farms East Special Study, the on-going Southwest Industrial Area Enforcement Study, a study to review small lot subdivision designs, and continued coordination with GIS staff to increase the technological capabilities of the department’s databases. Continue to work with the Planning Commission to improve their efficiency and  effectiveness. The Planning Department will continue to provide efficient customer service and completion  of reports and projects while recognizing the current financial status of the City and the national economy. 77 PLANNING (continued) Environmental Recycling Promote annual Drop-Off Day and Road Side Cleanup programs.  Produce more recycling containers in City parks.  Improve City’s recycling web page.  Continue to increase and promote recycling activities throughout the City.  2011 – 2012 Goals and Objectives: (Strategic Plan G – 2) Facilitate development of new housing types without cost to the City.  (Strategic Plan G – 3) Continue orderly development of Lakeville  Implement the community’s goals and objectives outlined in the City’s Comprehensive Land  Use Plan and as directed by the Planning Commission and City Council. Completing a follow-up to the M.U.S.A Expansion Area A study.  Complete the Southwest Industrial Area Enforcement Study.  Monitor the goals and policies of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan as well as the 2010  amendments to the Zoning and Subdivision ordinances for any revisions or corrections that may arise with the implementation of these documents. Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 417,787$ 354,020$ 340,765$ 322,933$ 326,516 Commodities 36,855 27,571 26,709 5,325 5,340 Other charges and services 59,483 50,391 50,362 17,129 17,129 Capital outlay - - - 7,143 1,815 $ 514,125$ 431,982$ 417,836$ 352,530$ 350,800 Total Revenues and other financing sources Intergovernmental$ 47,300$ 41,900$ 41,900$ -$ - Charges for services 36,179 38,651 22,590 33,450 47,000 Taxes and other public funds 430,646 351,431 353,346 319,080 303,800 $ 514,125$ 431,982$ 417,836$ 352,530$ 350,800 Total 78 PLANNING (continued) Budget Factors: Personnel services. The personnel services budget will decrease $31,087 and increase $3,583 in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The decrease in 2011 is due primarily to a reduction in unemployment compensation, administrative reorganization, and the transfer of accounting for environmental recycling activities from the Planning Department to the Environmental Resources Special Revenue Fund. The 2011 and 2012 personnel costs include the State mandated .25% increase in PERA and anticipated increases in health insurance. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities Commodities will decrease $22,246 and increase $15 in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The decrease in 2011 is primarily due to a transfer of accounting for environmental recycling activities from the Planning department to Environmental Resources Special Revenue Fund. Other charges and services The Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance updates were completed in 2009 and 2010 respectively. As such Professional services and printing costs will account for $19,021 of the decrease in other charges and services in 2011. The remaining decrease is due to a transfer of accounting for environmental recycling activities from the Planning Department to the Environmental Resources Special Revenue Fund. Other charges and services budget will increase $350 in 2012. Waste disposal decreased $7,511 in 2010 due to eliminating the acceptance of electronics during the Household Hazardous Waster Drop Off Day event. Manufacturers have been mandated to accept a percentage of electronics for recycling. The City discontinued the practice of accepting electronics during the Drop-off Day event and instead directed citizens to the businesses that provide recycling services. Capital outlay Capital outlay is attributable to Microsoft Office upgrades and two computer replacements in 2011; two additional computers will be replaced in 2012. 79 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Program Description: The Community and Economic Development Department is responsible for services that promote business and development that support the overall economic vitality of the community. Department services include business development, redevelopment, promotion and business retention; real estate sale and acquisitions, economic development strategic planning, and transportation improvement advocacy including transit facilities and service. Services: Coordinate with the Dakota County Serve as a liaison to the business  CDA to administer HUD funded community. Community Development Block Grant Staff and coordinate the activities of the  program and other housing and Economic Development Commission redevelopment programs. (EDC). Coordinate special projects, studies, and  Provide development updates, statistics,  development projects related to and demographics to for the City economic development. Council, Economic Development Coordinate with State and local agencies Commission and City departments.  to provide assistance to new and Coordinate Manufacturers Week  expanding businesses. activities. Provide high-level City development  Coordinate public information activities  strategies. regarding local economic development Respond to inquiries and assist issues.  developers and businesses to navigate through the City’s development process. Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Community and Econ. Dev. Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Economic Development Specialist 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Administrative Assistant 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Total 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 80 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (continued) Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Commercial/Industrial Development Permit Valuation (in millions) $ 7.3 $ 5.0 $ 5.0 $ 10.0 $ 10.0 Number of Permits 68 50 50 75 75 Community Survey: Quality of Service is Residents who service is considered Service/Program support current excellent or essential or very funding level good important Residential Responses: Economic Development & Planning 76% 88% 86% Business Responses : Economic Development & Planning 2010 Goals and Objectives: Monitor trends and opportunities for improved increased broadband services in Lakeville.  Participate in County-wide initiatives to improve broadband services.  Continue to work with property owners in the Downtown to help facilitate redevelopment  opportunities similar to the new Ace Hardware store completed in 2009. Pursue grant opportunities for public improvements Downtown including way-finding and  improvements to Pioneer Plaza. Begin implementation of the 2011-13 Strategic Plan for Economic Development.  Continued participation in “Positively Minnesota” marketing efforts coordinated by the  Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. Increased City marketing and advertising efforts by purchasing ad space on several statewide  web sites and publications. Continuously update Community & Economic Development website.  2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives: (Strategic Plan A Attract business development to increase commercial/industrial tax base.  - 2) (Strategic Plan C – 1) Complete feasibility planning for fiber to all homes and businesses.  (Strategic Plan D Continue to attract private investment to fund downtown redevelopment.  – 1) 81 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (continued) Enhance public amenities in downtown. Implement a publicly managed parking system.  (Strategic Plan D - 2) (Strategic Plan D - 3) Full service restaurant in Central Business District.  Plan and prepare for office park development in Lakeville. Attract interest from private  (Strategic Plan I – 1) developers for office park development. Location and timetable for office park agreed upon by the Council and the developer.  (Strategic Plan I – 2) Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 240,918$ 249,979$ 248,857$ 251,632$ 254,146 Commodities 135 350 350 350 350 Other charges and services 30,669 24,488 21,988 16,463 16,639 - - - 2,543 - Capital outlay $ 271,722$ 274,817$ 271,195$ 270,988$ 271,135 Total Revenues Intergovernmental$ 16,938$ 5,000$ -$ -$ - Miscellaneous 4,213 5,000 5,000 250,571 264,817 266,195 270,988 271,135 Taxes and other public funds $ 271,722$ 274,817$ 271,195$ 270,988$ 271,135 Total Budget Factors: . Personnel services The personnel services budget will increase $1,653 and $2,514 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities Commodities are anticipated to remain unchanged at $350 per year for both 2011 and 2012. Other charges and services The Economic Development Strategic Plan for 2011-2013 will be completed in 2010. Professional services for an Economic Development Commission Strategic Planning Consultant will therefore decrease by $5,000 in 2011. Appropriations have been provided in 2011 and 2012 for printing marketing materials ($2,000), advertising in professional publications ($2,000), internet based marketing ($1,000) and Manufactures Week activities ($2,500 if funded from donations). Capital outlay The capital outlay of $3,541 in 2011 is attributable to Microsoft Office upgrades and a computer replacement; there are no capital outlay acquisitions for 2012. 82 INSPECTIONS Program Description: The primary responsibility of the Inspections Department is for enforcement of the adopted building codes. The department is also responsible for code enforcement to preserve the livability and integrity of residential and commercial districts and prevent deterioration and blighted influences within the community. Services: Process applications, perform plan Conduct seminars for homeowners  review and issue permits for residential regarding new deck construction and and commercial projects. basement remodel projects. Assist design professionals, contractors Respond to customer complaints  and homeowners with interpretations on concerning construction sites, code code related questions. enforcement, refuse storage, and other zoning and housing maintenance. Perform building related inspections.  Respond to complaints of vacant homes  Issue Certificates of Occupancy for  and inspect home’s condition prior to permits which meet or exceed permit occupancy. requirements. Perform code compliance inspections.  Coordinate records, consolidate plans  and archives. Participate in the development and  amendments to State and local code Provide information regarding code  requirements both nationally and locally. requirements. Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Building Official 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Sr. Electrical Inspector 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Sr. Plumbing/Mechanical Inspector 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Sr. Building Inspector 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Building Inspectors 2.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Total 8.7 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 83 INSPECTIONS (continued) Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Construction valuations – all $72,782 $100,000 $54,475 $66,801 $80,786 property types (000) Number of permits issued 3,962 4,000 4,000 4,250 4,500 Aging permits 1,300 1,.300 1,300 1,400 1,500 Number of inspections 14,126 15,000 15,000 15,500 16,000 New residential housing units 174 120 159 185 222 Code enforcement activities Zoning complaints 90 90 90 100 110 Weeds and grass complaints 137 130 130 130 130 Vacant structures monitored 36 78 78 70 70 Plan review (decks, finished 668 800 800 800 800 basements) Community Survey: Quality of Service is Residents who service is considered Service/Program support current excellent or essential or very funding level good important Residential Responses: Building inspections 65% 76% 84% Property maintenance enforcement 78% 79% 86% Business Responses : Building inspections 69% 71% 67% Property maintenance enforcement 78% 82% 73% 2010 Goals and Objectives: Continue to work on aging permits issued in 2008 and older. Aging permits are those permits  that are more than two years old, have not requested any inspections and/or have not received final inspection and approvals. Maintain 1998 service level standards whereby inspections are conducted within 1 day of  request; 2-3 day processing of deck and addition permits applications; 8-10 day processing of new home permits applications; and 8-10 day for processing issuance of commercial/industrial permits application. 84 INSPECTIONS (continued) Implement new changes to commercial energy code in 2010.  Continue implementation of the document imaging system and records retention schedule.  Review the new June 2009 State energy code and implement changes.  Evaluate current policies and procedures. Address uniformity of standardized inspections.  Implement changes which increase efficiency and improve customer service. Establish a tracking process for commercial/industrial projects and issuance of temporary  certificate of occupancy (TCO) and full certificate of occupancy (CO). Update all printed project information and make available on the web site.  Revise City ordinance on Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTS) to reflect changes  adopted by the state and county. 2011 – 2012 Goals and Objectives: Maintain 1998 service level standards whereby inspections are conducted within 1 day of  request; 2-3 day processing of deck and addition permits applications; 8-10 day processing of new home permits applications; and 8-10 day for processing issuance of commercial/industrial permits application. Continue to work on aging permits issued in 2008 and older. Begin working on 2009 and  older permits in 2011. Continue to scan parcel files (approximately 12,000) into our document imaging system and  comply with our records retention schedule and make available at the counter for our customers. Test and evaluate new wireless mobile computer system station for field inspection services  in order to improve efficiency and eventually implement paperless program. Continue to address uniformity of inspections, standardized inspections and electronic policy  manual updates as needed. Update all project handouts and make available on the web site.  Evaluate current policies and procedures and implement changes to increase efficiency and  customer service. 85 INSPECTIONS (continued) Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 846,944$ 791,529$ 791,995$ 799,638$ 810,083 Commodities 13,929 20,464 17,786 18,409 18,746 Other charges and services 67,873 76,703 72,842 67,331 69,881 - 2,772 2,747 46,028 5,445 Capital outlay $ 928,746$ 891,468$ 885,370$ 931,406$ 904,155 Total Revenues Permits$ 911,126$ 738,851$ 886,457$ 1,062,037$ 1,264,279 Charges for services 9,392 7,679 11,796 13,258 15,230 8,228 144,938 (12,883) (143,889) (375,354) Taxes and other public funds $ 928,746$ 891,468$ 885,370$ 931,406$ 904,155 Total Budget Factors: Personnel services. The personnel services budget will increase $8,109 and $10,445 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to unemployment claims, health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities The commodities budget will decrease by $2,055 in 2011 due to primarily to motor fuels consumption and increase $337 in 2012. Other charges and services Other charges and services budget will decrease by $9,372 in 2011 due to reductions in professional services for sprinkler plan review services and data processing services. The budget will increase $2,550 in 2012 for data processing and profession development training. Capital outlay Capital outlay is attributable to Microsoft Office upgrades in 2011 and computer replacements in 2011 and 2012. Two pickups will be replaced by fuel efficient vehicles. 86 GENERAL GOVERNMENT FACILITIES Program Description: The General Government Facilities Department is responsible for the maintenance and operating costs of City Hall, a storage facility, the former police station building (vacated August 2008), the Historical Society Building, and a radio communications building. This department is also responsible for the landscape maintenance and snowplowing of the Heritage Library. This department provides staffing for planning, implementing, coordinating and evaluating a comprehensive program of improvements including project management for the following buildings that are budgeted within their respective departments. Square Location Footage Facility General Government Facilities Budget 20195 Holyoke Avenue 32,600 City Hall th 7773 214 Street 25,000 Storage Facility 20110 Holyoke Avenue 16,406 Former Police Station th 8795 210 Street 2,428 Historical Society 17900 Jacquard Avenue 800 Radio Communications Building Other Budgets rd 9237 183 Street 68,569 Police Station 20190 Holyoke Avenue 8,700 Fire Station #1 16720 Dodd Boulevard 5,724 Fire Station #2 17490 Kenrick Avenue 5,500 Fire Station #3 th 9465 185 Street 13,830 Fire Station #4 18400 Ipava Avenue 47,125 Water Treatment Facility 16179 Kenrick Avenue 9,714 Liquor Store Kenrick 16000 Galaxie Avenue 11,300 Liquor Store Galaxie 20164 Heritage Drive 8,960 Liquor Store Heritage th 7570 179 Street West 110,000 Central Maintenance Facility 20732 Holt Avenue 4,959 Senior Center 20965 Holyoke Avenue 8,200 Arts Center Services: Protect the investment the City and the and cleaning staff necessary to perform  Community have made in its facilities by required job functions. developing and implementing long term Manage facilities maintenance and repair  facility maintenance programs to keep projects. life cycle costs of the facilities as low as Administer contracts and direct possible.  contractors for landscaping, HVAC, Plan for and procure services,  generator maintenance, snow removal, equipment, tools and supplies necessary electrical, plumbing, janitorial, food for effective and efficient operations. services, etc. Plan, organize, coordinate, assign, and  Preventive maintenance programs.  monitor work of facilities maintenance 87 GENERAL GOVERNMENT FACILITIES (continued) Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Estimate Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Facility Maintenance Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 City Hall Receptionists (Part-time) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 City Hall Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Facility Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate City Hall (32,600 sq. ft.) Energy costs per sq. ft. $ 1.77 $ 2.31 $ 1.74 $ 1.83 $ 1.72 Contracted repairs/maintenance $ 1.52 $ 1.47 $ 1.46 $ 1.44 $ 1.40 per sq. ft. Storage Facility (25,000 sq. ft.) Energy costs per sq. ft. $ 0.11 $ 0.12 $ 0.12 $ 0.13 $ 0.14 Contracted repairs/maintenance $ 0.08 $ 0.06 $ 0.08 $ 0.15 $ 0.16 per sq. ft. Vacant Former Police Station (16,406 sq. ft.) Energy costs per sq. ft. $ 0.50 $ 1.02 $ 0.54 $ 0.62 $ 0.64 Contracted repairs/maintenance $ 0.67 $ 0.27 $ 0.21 $ 0.24 $ 0.24 per sq. ft. Historical Society Building (2,428 sq. ft.) Energy costs per sq. ft. $ 1.19 $ 1.51 $ 1.17 $ 1.21 $ 1.27 Contracted repairs/maintenance $ 0.19 $ 0.72 $ 0.71 $ 0.74 $ 0.74 per sq. ft. Radio Communications Building (800 sq. ft.) Energy costs per sq. ft. $ 0.55 $ 1.46 $ 1.46 $ 1.46 $ 1.53 88 GENERAL GOVERNMENT FACILITIES (continued) 2010 Goals and Objectives: To successfully provide customer focused service and maintain the buildings and operating  systems in the best possible condition. Manage renovation and construction projects assuring the most effective use of governmental  funds. Projects will be developed which will improve working and citizens environments.  Strive to respond in a timely, courteous manner to all work requests and minimize callbacks.  Keep the facilities clean, safe, and comfortable. 2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives: Replace the heating ventilation and air conditioning system at City Hall with an energy  efficient system. Replace furnace at fire station #2 with energy efficient system.  Purchase and install various energy efficient projects at the Central Maintenance Facility.  Install energy management controls at Police Station.  Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 198,911$ 200,567$ 200,450$ 206,359$ 209,338 Commodities 28,376 43,406 37,242 39,210 39,080 Other charges and services 253,553 287,263 250,624 259,994 259,910 - 2,772 2,747 4,974 - Capital outlay $ 480,840$ 534,008$ 491,063$ 510,537$ 508,328 Total Revenues and other financing sources Miscellaneous$ 88,346$ 44,990$ 43,494$ 44,581$ 45,696 Other financing sources 66,202 70,143 63,744 66,068 66,768 Taxes and other public funds 326,292 418,875 383,825 399,888 395,864 $ 480,840$ 534,008$ 491,063$ 510,537$ 508,328 Total Budget Factors: Personnel services. The personnel services budget will increase $5,792 and $2,979 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities 89 GENERAL GOVERNMENT FACILITIES (continued) The commodities budget will decrease by $4,196 and $130 in 2011 and 2012 respectively due to reductions in office supplies, toner cartridges and paper supplies. Other charges and services Other charges and services budget will decrease by $27,269 in 2011 and $84 in 2012. Energy improvements in recent years have resulted in a $13,847 decrease in electricity consumption. Favorable weather conditions, energy improvements and reduction in prices have resulted in a $9,585 decrease in the natural gas costs. Capital outlay Capital outlay is $4,974 in 2011 for Microsoft Office upgrades, computer replacement and installation of fiber connections at City Hall. 90 FINANCE Program Description: The Finance Department is responsible for the overall financial management, accounting and reporting activity of the City. This Department also provides financial controls and treasury management of other city departments to help ensure proper stewardship of public funds. The Finance Department coordinates the annual operating and capital budget process for all City operations. Services: Financial reporting. Coordinate and related services, licenses, public safety  prepare the annual audit and activities and quarterly water and Comprehensive Annual Financial Report sanitary sewer services. Manage utility (CAFR). Maintain high quality audit billings to provide high quality customer results and minimize audit costs. service and timely deposit of collections. Preparation of required State, Federal Fiscal agent for ALF Ambulance,  and other government agency reports. Dakota Communications Center, and Maintain general ledger and fixed capital Lakeville Arenas. Services include asset systems and perform various preparation of Comprehensive Annual accounting functions such as Financial Report, interim financial reconciliation of various accounts. reports, accounts payable functions, Treasury management including treasury management, budgeting, and  investment of City funds, accounts debt management. payable function, debt management and Budget administration including the  reporting and manage bank agreements Capital Improvement Plan. and transactions to minimize costs and Supervision of City risk management maximize efficiency.  program. Billing and collection for City services  including but not limited to development Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Finance Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Senior Accountants 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 Accountant II 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Accounts Payable Technician 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 91 FINANCE (continued) Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Bond rating Aa2 Aa2 Aa1 Aa1 Aa1 Outstanding Debt (in millions) $ 105.0 $ 103.0 $ 103.0 $ 102.0 $ 105.0 New Debt Issues (in millions) $ 4.9 $ 0.0 $ 0. 0 $ 5.2 $ 7.4 Total Expenditures/Expenses $ 55.5 $ 51.3 $ 51.3 $ 51.3 $ 51.3 (in millions) Investment Portfolio (in $ 37.1 – $ 37.0 – $ 37.0 – $ 37.0 – $ 37.0 – millions) $ 62.0 $ 57.2 $ 57.2 $ 57.2 $ 57.2 Interest earnings (in millions) $ 0.7 $ 0.4 $ 0.5 $ 0.6 $ 0.7 Yield on investments 1.60% 1.00% 1.10% 1.25% 1.50% Investment benchmark (2 year 0.92% 1.25% 0.60% 0.80% 1.00% Treasury Bill) June 16 May 31 May 31 May 31 May 31 Date City Audit Completed Number of Years earned the GFOA Certificate of 21 22 22 23 24 Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Unqualified Audit Opinion Yes Anticipated Anticipated Anticipated Anticipated GFOA Award: Distinguished ndrdrdthth 2 3 3 4 5 Budget Presentation Award 2010 Goals and Objectives: GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Financial Reporting.  GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award.  Issue debt for Certificates of Indebtedness and Street Improvements.  Work with Information Technology and user departments to complete e-payment and credit  card capabilities to receive payments for various City services, in particular utility bills. (Strategic Goal Identify and evaluate alternatives to the property tax for paying for services.  A – 4). (Strategic Reduce reliance on City property taxes for regional/county road improvements.  Goal B-4) Conversion of fixed capital asset system.  92 FINANCE (continued) 2011 – 12 Goals and Objectives: (Strategic Assist with financial analysis related to acquiring land for fourth Liquor Store  Goal A - 5) Document City’s efforts to reduce reliance on property taxes for regional/county road  (Strategic Goal B-1) improvements Provide financial framework for long term maintenance, replacement and financing of  (Strategic infrastructure through development of a five-year Capital Improvement Plan. Goal J - 1 ) Provide quality periodic and annual financial and budget reports.  Provide quality finance related communications to the community.  Select and implement a financial institution to provide banking services.  Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 487,169$ 489,359$ 489,514$ 495,315$ 500,427 Commodities 3,410 3,750 3,722 4,550 3,650 Other charges and services 57,117 61,422 60,127 67,160 64,828 - 553 553 1,554 - Capital outlay $ 547,696$ 555,084$ 553,916$ 568,579$ 568,905 Total Revenues and other financing sources Charges for services$ 79,591$ 102,197$ 102,147$ 120,133$ 122,167 Other financing sources 40,663 43,140 43,140 44,435 45,767 Taxes and other public funds 427,442 409,747 408,629 404,011 400,971 $ 547,696$ 555,084$ 553,916$ 568,579$ 568,905 Total Budget Factors: Personnel services The personnel services budget will increase $5,956 and $5,112 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities Commodities will increase $800 in 2011 primarily for purchase of check stock and decrease $900 in 2012. 93 FINANCE (continued) Other charges and services The $5,738 increase in other charges and services for 2011 is due primarily to the professional services required for the calculation of the post employment benefit actuarial study in order to comply with the Governmental Accounting Standards Board regulations. Budget also includes annual financial audit service ($29,400), printing of truth-in taxation notices ($5,700) and LOGIS data processing ($35,075). Other charges and services will decrease by $2.332 in 2012. Of the total decrease, $4,515 is attributable to completion of the post employment benefit actuarial study in 2011. Capital outlay Microsoft Office upgrades included in the 2011 budget. 94 INFORMATION SYSTEMS Program Description: The Information Systems Department is responsible for providing and supporting the electronic information systems to other City departments. The services provided by the Department include network infrastructure support; desktop computer support; and planning, analysis and implementation of information systems technology. Services: Provide 24/7 access to the City’s website Provide training and software support to  City personnel. Provide support for users of City  information systems. Maintain and assist in development of  the City’s World Wide Web and Intranet Establish and maintain network systems  sites. to allow efficient flow of information. Coordinate and monitor Internet access  Coordinate future systems development.  for City employees. Maintain and support the City’s local  Coordinate with City staff and LOGIS  area networks. on the deployment and operation of Assist with the maintenance and applications. development of the City’s wide area Provide desktop support to City staff.  network. Provide maintenance and support for  Perform maintenance and repair work on  document imaging solution city-owned computing equipment. Development and implementation of  Perform installation, maintenance, and  City data security plan and disaster upgrades of city-owned computer recovery. software, and VoIP telephones. Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Information Systems (IS) Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 IS Network Specialist 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 IS Technicians 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total 3.3 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 95 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (continued) Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Estimate Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Data Switches 28 28 28 28 28 Desktop VoIP Telephones 270 270 270 270 270 Laptops 42 42 46 48 46 Laser Printers 28 26 26 26 28 Mobile Computers - Fire 6 6 6 12 12 Mobile Computers - Police 27 28 27 28 29 Multifunction – copier/scanner 9 11 11 11 11 Servers - Data/Storage/VoIP 21 10 10 10 10 Servers – virtual 18 19 19 19 19 Software Applications 200 200 200 200 200 Telephone Calls - System Wide 364,172 360,000 365,000 365,000 365,000 Wireless Access Points 24 28 28 28 28 Workstations on LAN 177 177 177 177 177 2010 Goals and Objectives: Begin contract negotiations with Charter Business Link for continued lease and operation of  Wide Area Network fiber, prior to the 2011 expiration of the existing lease agreement. Finalize implementation of 4.9 GHz network between City Hall and Police station for use as  a failover data network in the event of service interruption of the existing fiber connection. Install wireless access point within the Fire stations to allow data downloads from the  network to update applications in mobile computer units. Continue to develop and implement the Information Technology Disaster Recovery Plan.  Implementation of Microsoft Office 2010 Upgrade to all workstations, conduct end user  training of application and support for users after conversion. Upgrade of e-mail server application to Exchange 2007 and implementation of new features  to ensure continued availability of City e-mail communications. Work with LOGIS to complete the annual security audit of network architecture.  Continue to design, implement and train staff on the Laserfiche document storage and  retrieval system. Complete research and begin implementation of Virtual Server farm to replace the existing  hardware with the two server farm locations. Test and document credit card data storage locations and controls and ensure procedures are  compliant with Protection Card Information (PCI) Standards. 96 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (continued) 2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives: Finalize contract negotiations with Charter Business Link for continued lease and operation  of Wide Area Network fiber, prior to the 2011 expiration of the existing lease agreement. Finalize implementation of 4.9 GHz network between City Hall and Police station for use as  a fail over data network in the event of service interruption of the existing fiber connection. Install wireless access point within the Fire stations to allow data downloads from the  network to update applications in mobile computer units. Continue to develop and implement the Information Technology Disaster Recovery Plan.  Implementation of Microsoft Office 2010 Upgrade to all workstations, conduct end user  training of application and support for users after conversion. Upgrade of e-mail server application to Exchange 2010 and implementation of new features  to ensure continued availability of City e-mail communications. Work with LOGIS to complete the annual security audit of network architecture.  Continue to design, implement and train staff on the Laserfiche document storage and  retrieval system. Complete research and begin implementation of Virtual Workstations to replace the existing  hardware. Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 320,480$ 295,766$ 293,855$ 302,079$ 304,925 Commodities 3,321 8,954 8,954 8,954 8,954 Other charges and services 128,676 140,153 152,472 151,818 156,428 28,002 9,468 19,803 3,630 6,811 Capital outlay $ 480,479$ 454,341$ 475,084$ 466,481$ 477,118 Total Revenues and other financing sources Other financing sources$ 86,426$ 84,715$ 82,560$ 83,978$ 85,096 394,053 369,626 392,524 382,503 392,022 Taxes and other public funds $ 480,479$ 454,341$ 475,084$ 466,481$ 477,118 Total Budget Factors: 97 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (continued) Personnel services. The personnel services budget will increase $6,313 and $2,846 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities There are no proposed changes to the commodities budget for 2011 and 2012. Other charges and services Other charges and services budget will increase $11,665 and $4,610 in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The increase in 2011 is primarily the result of new maintenance agreements for CarteGraph, an infrastructure inventory and maintenance software. The 2012 increase is for anticipated increases in existing maintenance agreements. Capital outlay Capital outlay is attributable to desktop computer replacements in 2011 and 2012. Server and network hardware replacements are included in the Equipment Fund budget. 98 HUMAN RESOURCES Program Description: The City Human Resources Department is responsible for development, recommendation and implementation of policies on human resources related issues. The Department provides guidance and assistance to City leadership and employees regarding recruitment, employee satisfaction and development. The Human Resources function strives to retain and support a workforce committed to high quality, efficient services and respectful working relationships. Services: Employee wage and benefit packages Partner in recruitment and performance  administration management with all departments. Payroll administration. Personnel records management.  Workers compensation claims Compensation and classifications system  processing. administration Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Human Resources Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Benefits Specialist 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Payroll Technician 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Total 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 Activity Measures 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Vacancies Filled, excluding 10 18 18 15 15 seasonal Applications processed 901 1,450 1,450 1,150 1,150 Regular Employees 217 220 220 220 220 Seasonal Employees 115 115 115 115 115 Workers Compensation Claims 60 38 38 40 40 Payroll Services (W-2’s generated) 435 437 437 437 437 99 HUMAN RESOURCES (continued) 2010 Goals and Objectives: Competitive compensation through regular market analysis.  Cost-effective insurance options by assisting participants in becoming smarter consumers.  Effective cost-saving partnerships with other entities.  Conversion to electronic time card system.  2011 – 2012 Goals and Objectives: Negotiate affordable collective bargaining agreements with three unions.  Maintain competitive compensation and benefit packages for all employees.  Successfully achieve Pay Equity based on 2010 data.  Support the Insurance Committee in analyzing cost-effective benefit options for 2011 and  beyond. Ensure that the city is prepared for all mandates through the Health Care Reform Act  effective 2010 through 2014. Continue to simplify document management using computer technology; i.e., HRconnection,  electronic time cards, personnel files, and on-line benefit enrollment. Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 233,655$ 245,336$ 245,385$ 250,248$ 252,412 Commodities 677 2,010 1,260 2,590 1,570 Other charges and services 38,386 46,577 56,468 51,165 56,026 - - - 1,283 5,445 Capital outlay $ 272,718$ 293,923$ 303,113$ 305,286$ 315,453 Total Revenues and other financing sources Other financing sources$ 70,095$ 73,573$ 76,008$ 76,438$ 84,761 202,623 220,350 227,105 228,848 230,692 Taxes and other public funds $ 272,718$ 293,923$ 303,113$ 305,286$ 315,453 Total 100 HUMAN RESOURCES (continued) Budget Factors: Personnel services. The personnel services budget will increase $4,912 and $2,164 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities The commodities budget will increase by $580 in 2011 due to purchase of labor law posters and printing of time cards and decrease by $1,020 in 2012. Other charges and services Other charges and services will increase by $4,588 and $4,861in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The majority of the increase in 2011 is for professional consulting fees and management assessments. The 2012 increase is for printing public information. Capital outlay Capital outlay is attributable to Microsoft Office upgrades in 2011 and computer replacements in 2012 101 INSURANCE Program Description: The Insurance Department is responsible for property and liability insurance, workers compensation, the Employee/Management Safety Committee, and related health and safety programs (OSHA, DOT, and EPA). The City uses the Internal Service Municipal Reserves Fund for accounting, reporting and allocation of related insurance costs. Under this model, operating departments in the various City funds receive a charge from the Municipal Reserves Fund, and all costs (premiums, claims, and related) are reflected in a single fund. The Insurance program represents the General Fund’s share of the risk management activities. Services: Manage potential risk and loss from unforeseen events. Tactics include aggressive case  management, promoting safe behaviors, and ensuring safe environments. Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Experience Modification Ratio General Liability .752 .763 .763 .763 .763 2010 Goals and Objectives: Facilitate safety committee meeting and safety incentive program on a monthly basis.  Coordinate workers compensation and property/casualty insurance coverage renewal  processes. Conduct safety audits for all major City facilities.  2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives: Facilitate safety committee meeting and safety incentive program on a monthly basis.  Coordinate workers compensation and property/casualty insurance coverage renewal  processes. Conduct safety audits for all major City facilities.  102 INSURANCE (continued) Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures $ 280,031$ 278,698$ 278,698$ 289,532$ 298,301 Other charges and services Revenues $ 280,031$ 278,698$ 278,698$ 289,532$ 298,301 Taxes and other public funds Budget Factors: Other charges and services The budget will increase by $10,834 and $8,769 in 2011 and 2012 in anticipation of LMCIT premium increases. 103 POLICE Program Description: The primary function of the Police Department is to safeguard and protect the lives, health and property of Lakeville Citizens. The Department includes a wide array of public safety functions including patrol, investigations, proactive drug enforcement, animals control, canine unit, police reservists, Chaplaincy, park ranger and Emergency Management Preparedness. Services: Patrol. Courts and prosecution. Provide 911 uniformed patrol City attorney  response 24 hours a day, 7 days a week prosecutes those who endanger the lives including traffic safety and code and property of others. enforcement , conflict resolution team, School Resource Liaisons. Two police  MAAG team and special operations officers are assigned to the senior high team and middle schools during the school Dispatching. City of Lakeville is a year.  member of the Dakota Communication Emergency Management. Function  Center Joint Powers Organization which includes civil defense siren system, provides dispatching services for all Special Operations Team, participation police, fire and emergency management in County wide domestic preparedness services in the county. committee and preparation for possible Investigations. Adult and juvenile community emergencies.  investigations of criminal activity. Animal Contro l. The Animal Control  Includes crime scene investigation unit unit is responsible for dog licensing and and one officer assigned to the South animal law code enforcement. Metro Drug Task Force. Community Service Officer (CSO).  Records management. The support  Provide assistance to sworn officers and staff is responsible for maintenance of animal control unit. Responsible for police records in accordance with State maintenance of facility and vehicles. and federal data practice laws. During the summer, the police Administration. Provide background department employs seasonal CSO’s  and compliance checks for licensing and who maintain order at the Lake Marion permitting functions including alcohol boat launch and enforce park and tobacco server training. Public regulations. education programs including Child Police Reserves. The Police Reserve  Safety Programs, Citizens Academy and unit is comprised of non-sworn crime prevention, safety camp volunteers who assist the police officers participation, Police cable TV with special events and community programming and Night to Unit emergencies. program. 104 POLICE (continued) Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Sworn Officers Chief 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Captains 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Sergeants 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Investigators 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Narcotics Task Force Officer 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Patrol Officers 31.0 31.5 31.5 32.0 33.0 Total Sworn Officers 51.0 51.5 51.5 52.0 53.0 Crime Prevention Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Community Public Safety Officers 0.3 --- --- --- --- Community Service Officers 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 Animal Control Officer 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Records Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Records Administrative Assistants 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Total 62.1 62.3 62.3 62.8 64.8 Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Calls for service – police 40,964 43,830 41,500 42,000 43,200 Calls for service per officer 803 --- 802 802 800 Officers per thousand population 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 Response times (min.) – critical 1.69 2.00 1.80 1.80 1.80 incidents Assigned cases – Investigators 1,330 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 Calls for service – records 10,009 11,900 10,100 10,190 10,280 Reports and Citations processed 14,362 14,307 14,300 14,300 14,300 Calls for service – animal control 1,813 2,241 1,820 1,825 1,830 105 POLICE (continued) Community Survey: Service is Quality of Residents who considered Service/Program service is support current essential or very excellent or good funding level important Residential Responses: Police protection 97% 100% 81% Traffic enforcement 90% 98% 92% Animal control 82% 72% 85% CSO-seasonal (Park rangers) 43% 33% 57% Business Responses: Police protection 97% 98% 90% Traffic enforcement 92% 92% 87% Animal control 70% 62% 69% CSO-seasonal (Park rangers) 39% 36% 43% 2010 Goals and Objectives: Be a regional leader in disaster preparedness.  Prioritize police officer time on core law enforcement – patrol and investigative functions.  Maintain and enhance the programs and strategies that have given the police department the  ability to prevent and reduce crime in our community, as well as investigate crimes that have already occurred culminating in a very high clearance rate. Develop strategies that help to identify and manage the community and criminal issues that  come with a growing community. Foreseeing the needs of the public and possible enforcement issue in advance will be very important in meeting those needs in the future. Using state of the art technology and tactics to keep up with a changing community and  changing demographics. Using the internet and other communication tools to better communicate and keep our citizens informed of community happenings. Hiring and developing employees to better meet the needs of an ever changing citizenry. The  objective includes keeping employees healthy and balanced is a big part of being better prepared to meet the needs of the citizens we serve. Crime prevention and traffic enforcement – The Department will create a full-time traffic  unit and a full-time crime prevention unit with existing personnel. 106 POLICE (continued) 2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives: Investigations. Maintain the highest clearance rate in Dakota County  Records management. Implement new LOGIS police records management system, as well as  police mobile computer and computer aided dispatch system. Administration. Evaluate computer systems operated by Dakota County and LOGIS. Select  the system that provides the greatest efficiencies. Administration. Evaluate various options for developing a shooting range.  Emergency management. Implement upgrades to outdoor siren warning system in  compliance with federal mandates. Emergency management. Be a regional leader in disaster preparedness. Improved  (Strategic measurements in proactive police activities, as developed by the Police Chief. Plan F – 1) Administration. Prioritize police officer time on core law enforcement – patrol and  (Strategic Plan F – 2) investigative functions. Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ProgramActualBudgetEstimateBudgetEstimate Police patrol$ 3,730,429$ 4,077,490$ 4,131,337$ 4,256,230$ 4,397,799 Dispatching 866,785 933,514 933,514 971,380 1,022,284 Investigations 792,504 908,214 899,424 908,376 918,107 Records management 395,479 417,225 416,898 422,868 489,779 Administration 488,428 476,283 474,984 475,843 477,258 Vehicle and equipment maint. 189,273 287,597 283,593 292,807 301,371 Courts and prosecution 226,065 225,006 225,006 229,835 236,730 K-9 unit 221,430 260,763 241,427 223,864 226,263 Facility maintenance 211,013 286,934 210,543 220,192 232,175 School Resource Officer 150,279 182,675 179,471 181,375 183,858 Community Service Officer 190,476 187,405 154,119 191,668 198,109 Animal control 78,828 83,915 78,031 79,390 80,583 Police reserves 10,143 13,431 12,894 33,304 16,280 Crime prevention 71,860 1,895 1,895 3,570 4,995 Chaplaincy 237 250 250 250 250 Other 17,670 20,348 20,348 21,395 21,394 Total$ 7,640,899$ 8,362,945$ 8,263,734$ 8,512,347$ 8,807,235 107 POLICE (continued) 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 5,805,225$ 6,223,339$ 6,201,162$ 6,364,994$ 6,594,834 Commodities 250,460 347,810 346,534 383,555 374,430 Other charges and services 1,584,828 1,782,485 1,706,727 1,763,798 1,837,971 386 9,311 9,311 - - Capital outlay $ 7,640,899$ 8,362,945$ 8,263,734$ 8,512,347$ 8,807,235 Total Revenues and other financing sources Licenses$ 151,241$ 163,490$ 171,404$ 158,524$ 185,619 Intergovernmental 426,768 435,380 388,784 388,784 388,784 Charges for services 278,985 243,696 233,478 238,730 242,798 Court fines 297,413 273,055 288,260 294,026 299,906 Miscellaneous 530 13,411 13,411 Other financing sources 84,668 87,208 57,136 59,752 60,595 6,401,294 7,146,705 7,111,261 7,372,531 7,629,533 Taxes and other public funds $ 7,640,899$ 8,362,945$ 8,263,734$ 8,512,347$ 8,807,235 Total Budget Factors: Personnel services. The personnel services budget will increase $141,655 due to health insurance, police officer return from military duty and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Personnel budget will increase $229,840 in 2012 primarily due to the addition of one Police Officer and one Records Administrative Assistant. Commodities The commodities budget will increase by $35,745 in 2011. The largest increase is for uniforms ($17,000) for ten new Reservists who will be inducted into the police department as a result of attrition. Motor fuels ($189,000) and uniforms ($89,604) comprise over 73% of the total commodities budget. Commodities budget will decrease $9,125 in 2012. Other charges and services Other charges and services will decrease by $18,687. Dispatching services of the Dakota Communications Center will increase $37,866. Energy conservation improvements in previous years have resulted in a $28,095 decrease in electricity consumption. Favorable weather conditions, energy improvements and reduction in prices have resulted in a $24,040 decrease in the natural gas costs. Dispatching service of the Dakota Communications Center ($971,380), prosecution attorney ($229,835), Police Station facility maintenance and utilities ($206,757) and LOGIS data processing ($98,473) comprise 86% of budgeted other services and charges. 108 POLICE (continued) Other charges and services will increase by $74,173 in 2012 primarily as a result of the dispatching services ($50,904) and facility maintenance and utilities ($12,752) Capital outlay Capital outlay is accounted for in the Equipment Fund. 109 FIRE Program Description: The City of Lakeville Fire Department is organized and designed to provide responsive, efficient and effective for life and property protection. The Department is responsible for fire emergency response, disaster preparedness, fire code compliance/enforcement, fire investigations, fire prevention and education. The City also maintains mutual aid agreements with neighboring communities which provide Lakeville with additional personnel and equipment capabalities to fight major fires and meet the demands of a large scale emergency. Services: Emergency Response Fire prevention inspections.   Fire suppression.  Fire Investigation  Emergency Medical Response (EMS).  Fire cause determination.  Vehicle extrication – rescue.  Education  Ice & water rescue.  Firefighters’ initial and continued  Domestic security and emergency  education and certification. management. Safety Camp.  Hazardous condition and disaster  Night to Unite.  mitigation. Fire prevention visits to schools.  Prevention  “On Call” cable TV program.  Plan review.  Station tours.  Alarm and suppression system  Public and employee fire extinguisher  acceptance testing. training. Occupancy inspections.  Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Fire Chief 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Fire Marshal 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Fire Inspector 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Fire Department Office Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Administrative Assistant 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Total 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 110 FIRE (continued) Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Paid On-Call Fire Fighters 78 85 77 78 90 Calls Fire-Related Calls 125 147 130 136 144 Medical Calls 212 303 220 231 243 Rescue Calls 77 133 80 84 88 Fire Alarms 231 334 240 253 266 Good Intent/Other 319 238 330 346 361 Total Calls 964 1,155 1,000 1,050 1,102 Commercial Fire Inspections 274 435 350 400 425 Plan Reviews 40 70 40 45 50 Fire Education Visits (outside) 185 210 200 210 220 Fire Education Tours (in-house) 55 75 60 65 70 Response Times Less Than Six Minutes 29% 35% 30% 30% 30% 6 – 10 Minutes 53% 55% 55% 57% 58% More Than Ten Minutes 18% 10% 15% 13% 12% Community Survey: Service is Quality of Residents who considered Service/Program service is support current essential or very excellent or good funding level important Residential Responses: Fire protection 97% 99% 91% Business Responses: Fire protection 93% 99% 90% 111 FIRE (continued) 2010 Goals and Objectives: Transition of newly developed fire records management system including integration with  fire pre-plan and commercial property inspection program. Department training improvements for firefighters and officers. Offer additional training to  meet department needs. Commercial property inspections every other year. Complete one half of the commercial  property inspections in 2010. Lakeville Fire Department leadership, communication and training work plan for short and  long term goals. Continued integration of Lakeville Fire Department dispatch operations with Dakota  Communications Center (DCC). Partner with Police Department on development of emergency operations plan for the City,  including training for City employees. Improve response time to emergency calls; respond when needed with appropriate resources.  Maintain adequate number of paid on call firefighters.  Continue long-term needs analysis for full build-out of fire department facilities.  Maintaining four fire stations.  Fire department records management and retention project.  2011 – 2012 Goals and Objectives: Transition to new fire department leadership.  Transition of newly developed fire records management system including integration with  fire pre-plan and commercial property inspection program to enable tracking and documentation of Fire Marshal and Inspector activities. Fire department records management and retention project.  Department training improvements for firefighters and officers; offer formal training to  credential department members. Develop formal training program to credential officers in Incident Command System.  Lakeville Fire Department leadership, communication and training work plan for short and  long term goals. Recruit and train new rookie fire fighters  Partner with Police Department on development of emergency operations plan for the City,  including training for City employees. Improve response time to emergency calls; respond when needed with appropriate resources.  Maintain adequate number of paid on call firefighters.  Continue long-term needs analysis for full build-out of fire department facilities  112 FIRE (continued) Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 894,802$ 940,681$ 894,056$ 916,789$ 906,824 Commodities 62,715 145,424 170,198 138,629 112,683 218,823 285,486 275,164 276,619 270,708 Other charges and services $ 1,176,340$ 1,371,591$ 1,339,418$ 1,332,037$ 1,290,215 Total Revenues Intergovernmental$ 194,873$ 191,809$ 190,209$ 190,209$ 190,209 Charges for services 45,517 45,615 45,905 47,113 48,355 Miscellaneous 400 935,550 1,134,167 1,103,304 1,094,715 1,051,651 Taxes and other public funds $ 1,176,340$ 1,371,591$ 1,339,418$ 1,332,037$ 1,290,215 Total Budget Factors: Personnel services. The personnel services budget will decrease $23,892 in 2011 primarily because of reductions in the number of fire calls. Personnel costs will increase $9,965 in 2012 because of disbursements to the rookie firefighters for training. The personnel costs include health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Wages, firefighter pensions and firefighter compensation adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities The commodities budget will decrease $6,795 due to reductions in motor fuels. The commodities budget will decrease $25,946 in 2012 due to a reduction in protective bunker gear for rookie firefighters. Other charges and services Other charges and services budget will decrease $8,867 in 2011. Energy improvements in recent years have resulted in a $3,041 decrease in electricity consumption. Favorable weather conditions, energy improvements and reduction in prices have resulted in a $7,109 decrease in the natural gas costs. Maintenance and energy efficiency projects for the four fire stations will result in an additional $5,374 expenses for the coming year. A rookie firefighter class was added in 2010 and a slightly larger rookie class is anticipated to be added in 2011 which accounts for a $4,080 increase in 2011 costs for professional medical services and training. The other charges and services budget will decrease $5,911 in 2012 primarily as a result of adding a new rookie firefighter class in 2011. Capital outlay Capital outlay is accounted for in the Equipment Fund. 113 ENGINEERING Program Description: The Engineering Department is responsible for planning, design, surveying, inspection, construction, and rehabilitation of the public infrastructure including streets, wastewater collection system, water supply, storage and distribution system, storm water management system, bike and pedestrian pathways, street signs, street lighting, and traffic signals. The Engineering Department also includes the Geographic Information System (GIS) function which is responsible for the management of data relating to parcels, parcel boundaries, utilities, streets, and other infrastructure. Services: Public infrastructureCustomer service. . Provide design The Department  services, project oversight and assists residents and provides technical management for streets, sanitary sewers, assistance for drainage problems, drainage and water projects, to include grading issues, erosion control and drain wetland mitigation plans Provide tile. Includes review of residential, management of the public assessments commercial, industrial and institutional and other property data. Prepare surveys and construction plans (Site, feasibility studies for public projects that Grading, Erosion Control, Street and are assessed. Inspect tree preservation of Utility). Includes inspection for general all new developments. compliance to the approved survey and subdivision plans. Respond to resident New development . Engineering  inquires regarding drainage alteration Department reviews proposed, and flood zones. Manages the public preliminary and final plats related to new rights of way for all City streets. residential, commercial and industrial Records Management. development construction projects. The department  Process ensures that plans are in maintains the official City base maps, conformance with Comprehensive Plans, as-builts, plans, records and property ordinances and City of Lakeville data relating to special assessments. Standard Specifications. Geographic Information System  Comprehensive Plans.(GIS). Department Develop and maintain the City’s  prepares and provides technical GIS database. Coordinate the oversight and review of the maintenance, development, and Comprehensive Plans for Surface Water application of GIS system. Manage the Management, Sanitary Sewer, Water comprehensive inventory of City Distribution System, and Transportation. utilities. Manage the information conduit between Dakota County GIS and the City. 114 ENGINEERING (continued) Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Engineering City Engineer 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Assistant City Engineer 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Civil Engineer 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Sr. Construction Representative 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Special Assessment/Property Data 0.3 --- --- --- --- Technician Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 GIS GIS Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 GIS Technician 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total 7.3 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate City Improvement Projects Designed $1,947,823 $1,065,000 $1,065,000 $ 751,958 $ 861,487 In-House (Pavement Management) City Improvement Projects Designed --- --- --- $2,024,441 $3,975,334 In-House (Street Reconstruction) City Improvements Designed by $2,386,544 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $1,500,000 $1,750,000 Consultants Preliminary Plats 7 12 8 10 12 Final Plats 8 12 10 12 15 Sketch Plans 1 8 8 10 12 Building Permits 174 120 159 185 222 2010 Goals and Objectives: Continue needed improvements to local, county and regional transportation network  (Strategic Plan B – 3) East - West corridors. o (Strategic Plan B – 4) I-35 interchanges. o Dodd Boulevard as a major artery linking Lakeville residents to the East-West corridor o (Strategic Plan B – 5) routes. 115 ENGINEERING (continued) Provide for framework for long-term maintenance, replacement and financing of aging  (Strategic Plan J - 1) infrastructure. th Perform inspection on the 175 St./Kenrick Ave. Round-About.  Perform the inspection on the utilities and street construction that are installed on the  Elko/New Market interceptor project. Oversee the yearly pavement management project to include estimating, bidding, managing,  and inspecting the project by Department staff. The Department will assist in the preparation of the plans and specifications for the following  City Projects: th Well #7 (20585 Kenrick Ave.) and Well #13 (9471-176 St.) Rehabilitation. o st Lift Station #3 (Italy Ave./201 St.) Repair. o Design, bid, manage and inspect Safe Routes to School project. o Construction of Fieldstone Creek Park facilities. o Development of a trail head facility at the Murphy Hanrehan Park. o 2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives: Continue needed improvements to local, county and regional transportation network  (Strategic Plan B – 3) East - West corridors.: o (Strategic Plan B – 4) I-35 interchanges.: o Dodd Boulevard as a major artery linking Lakeville residents to the East-West corridor o (Strategic Plan B – 5) routes. : Provide for framework for long-term maintenance, replacement and financing of aging  (Strategic Plan J - 1) infrastructure. Dodd Boulevard Reconstruction. Assist in the design (storm sewer) and design review and  provide construction observation of the public utilities and street construction. Provide design, construction observation and contract administration/project management  services for the following Annual street reconstruction project o Annual pavement management/roadway maintenance o th 185 Street / Kenwood Trail round about. o thst Kenrick Avenue: 175 Street to 181 Street. o Cedar Avenue BRT. o Safe Routes to School Grant o Dodd Boulevard Trail Improvement project o Provide construction observation of the public utilities and street construction to be installed  with the Elko/New Market sanitary sewer interceptor project 116 ENGINEERING (continued) Develop as-built certification of grading system for single-family residential building permits  to streamline the building permit process and reduce grading/drainage complaints Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 657,243$ 647,833$ 643,465$ 651,671$ 666,275 Commodities 9,532 15,292 15,090 14,911 14,983 Other charges and services 36,753 57,091 58,264 56,679 58,585 Capital outlay - - - 24,453 9,598 $ 703,528$ 720,216$ 716,819$ 747,714$ 749,441 Total Revenues and other financing sources Charges for services$ 477,878$ 281,382$ 286,548$ 191,422$ 217,037 Other financing sources 106,162 115,785 97,733 107,400 109,545 Taxes and other public funds 119,488 323,049 332,538 448,892 422,859 $ 703,528$ 720,216$ 716,819$ 747,714$ 749,441 Total Budget Factors: Personnel services. The personnel services budget will increase $3,838 and $5,432 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. In addition, personnel services in 2012 are anticipated to increase an additional $4,079 due to step increases. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities The commodities budget will decrease by $381 and increase by $72 in 2011 and 2012 respectively due to motor fuels and equipment parts. Other charges and services Other charges and services will decrease by $412 and increase $1,906 in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The 2012 increases are primarily the result of training and licensure renewals. Capital outlay Capital outlay for 2011 is attributable to computer replacements ($6,513), Microsoft Office upgrades ($3,039), GIS software improvements ($10,571) and three traffic counters ($4,330). Capital outlay in 2012 includes replacement of aging computers ($4,698) and GIS software improvements ($4,900). 117 STREETS Program Description: The Streets Division is responsible for the safe and reliable maintenance of the City’s infrastructure systems including pavement management, snow and ice removal, traffic control and signage, street lights, and storm sewer systems as well as the support systems such as fleet and facilities management. Services: Snow removal and ice controlBoulevard trees & mowing . Plow . Maintain  snow and apply deicing chemicals to 3,700 boulevard trees to include City streets during snow and ice events trimming, removal, and replacement as to maintain a safe driving surface. needed. Mow 87 miles of boulevards and city owned parcels twice annually. Fleet management. Perform routine  Storm sewer maintenance. maintenance and repairs of entire city Inspect 20  fleet of 245 vehicles and mobile percent of the City’s storm sewer equipment. outfalls each year to control water pollution by locating and correcting Street signs and striping . Inventory,  point sources that discharge pollutants. manage, and install regulatory and Gravel road maintenance. informational street signs as well as Regular  traffic control stripping of roadways and grading and shaping of road surfaces and crosswalks. the application of chemicals to reduce dust and stabilize the roadway. Pavement Management. Manage  Streetlights. contractors in the seal coating and crack Inspect streetlights  sealing of 258 centerline miles of streets throughout the City and manage the within Lakeville’s pavement repair or replacement of damaged or management districts. Includes milling, inoperative lights. overlays, patching, and other repairs of streets and sidewalks Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Adopted Estimate Estimate Estimate Streets Superintendent 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Streets Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Streets Lead 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Service Technician Lead (Fleet) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Streets Maintenance II 10.4 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.3 Fleet Service Technicians 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total 19.4 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.3 118 STREETS (continued) Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Labor Hours For: Pothole repairs 2,524 2,400 2,500 2,500 2,500 Ditch mowing 188 300 250 250 250 Street sweeping 1,849 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Shoulder/gravel road 1,046 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 maintenance Storm sewer maintenance 766 700 750 750 750 Boulevard tree trimming 1,899 300 1,500 1,500 1,500 Boulevard weed control 73 150 100 100 100 Number Of: Centerline miles (all roads) 258 267 260 262 262 Gravel roads (miles) 9 9 9 9 9 Snow/ice events 42 50 50 50 50 Deicer applied (tons) 2,319 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Tons/mile (season) 9 19 19 19 19 Cost per mile 600 1,270 1,270 1,333 1,333 Fleet preventive maintenance 1,217 1,225 1,225 1,225 1,225 services Community Survey: Service is Quality of Residents who considered Service/Program service is support current essential or very excellent or good funding level important Residential Responses: Storm drainage and flood control 88% 89% 84% Street lighting 88% 93% 82% Snow plowing 89% 98% 91% Street sweeping 86% 75% 78% Street maintenance and repairs 75% 94% 92% Mowing of boulevards 83% 76% 80% 119 STREETS (continued) Service is Quality of Residents who considered Service/Program service is support current essential or very excellent or good funding level important Business Responses: Storm drainage and flood control 88% 94% 83% Street lighting 89% 92% 85% Snow plowing 95% 96% 90% Street sweeping 88% 67% 75% Street maintenance and repairs 82% 94% 88% Mowing of boulevards 83% 66% 70% 2010 Goals and Objectives: Locate the inlet and outlet of storm sewer outfalls using the Global Positioning System (GPS)  to improve inspections. Establish a data base of sign information for inventory control to include the GPS locations  for all City signs. Complete NPDES inspections of 100 storm sewer outfalls and the cleaning and maintenance  of 20 storm sewer outfalls and 450 storm sewer sedimentation sumps. Provide additional training for staff in snowplow operations through the Dakota County  Technical College. Complete the inspection of signs in the 2010 sign district and replace any damaged or faded  signs in accordance with retroflectivity standards. Inspect 4,070 street lights throughout the City for operation and manage the repair and  replacement of damaged or inoperative lights. 2011 – 2012 Goals and Objectives: Administration  Implement the CarteGraph Systems Work Director application. o Boulevard Trees and Mowing  Inspect approximately 3,700 boulevard and out lot trees and trim, by district, approximately o 400 trees every year to remove dead, damaged, and diseased limbs. Manage right of way along rural roads and remove trees, limbs, and brush which obstructs o movement and sight lines. Mow approximately 87 miles of boulevards and city owned parcels throughout the City o twice during the summer. 120 STREETS (continued) Pavement Management and Sidewalks  Manage the reconstruction of streets as delineated in the Pavement Management Study. o Annually inspect and evaluate approximately 86 miles or one third of City streets for o pavement condition and update the pavement management database. Provide routine pavement maintenance, including crack sealing and seal coating of o approximately 20 miles of streets based on the pavement condition index. Annually inspect 24 miles of sidewalks and make repairs as necessary for pedestrian safety. o Snow and Ice Control  Provide additional staff training on snowplow operation and the application and use of o deicing chemicals. Continue to evaluate all plow routes to ensure effective, efficient, and safe snow and ice o control. Storm Sewer System  Locate the inlet and outlet of storm sewer outfalls using the GPS to improve inspections. o Complete annually the NPDES inspections of 100 storm sewer outfalls and the cleaning o and maintenance of 20 storm sewer outfalls and 450 storm sewer sedimentation sumps. Traffic Signs  Conduct a retro-reflectivity study in accordance with federal mandates and implement a o sign management plan. Establish a data base of sign information for inventory control to include the GPS locations o for all City signs. Continue the inspection of signs in the 2011 sign district and replace any damaged or faded o signs. .Fleet Management  Implement new fleet asset management software. o Transition to and implement a new fuel dispensing and monitoring system. o 121 STREETS (continued) Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ProgramActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Administration 312,101 360,240 349,027 357,261 372,767 Snow removal and ice control 649,489 691,443 641,096 693,137 717,161 Fleet management 411,670 383,178 414,504 442,136 457,488 Signs and stripping 198,455 214,281 191,844 207,527 205,212 Pavement management 154,341 155,903 163,611 168,206 174,749 Central Maintenance Facility 122,211 139,323 120,478 120,586 123,395 Boulevard trees and mowing 104,494 82,920 106,529 108,711 112,751 Gravel roads and dust control 84,632 81,234 83,626 85,926 88,924 Street sweeping 95,487 92,091 103,308 105,677 109,760 Storm sewer systems 103,856 81,669 103,462 106,648 111,041 Traffic signal systems 8,749 10,625 9,425 10,146 10,933 Sidewalks, curbs and gutters 7,752 7,526 7,742 7,936 8,259 Other 590,367 56,623 29,653 29,252 29,154 Total$ 2,843,604$ 2,357,056$ 2,324,305$ 2,443,149$ 2,521,594 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 1,419,760$ 1,429,994$ 1,423,219$ 1,462,719$ 1,506,724 Commodities 616,102 681,945 675,445 734,724 766,464 Other charges and services 807,742 245,117 225,641 245,706 248,406 $ 2,843,604$ 2,357,056$ 2,324,305$ 2,443,149$ 2,521,594 Total Revenues and other financing sources Intergovernmental$ 237,002$ 374,962$ 374,962$ 374,962$ 374,962 Charges for services 565,700 18,165 14,097 17,146 18,246 Other financing sources 104,041 78,386 109,615 108,620 113,598 Taxes and other public funds 1,936,861 1,885,543 1,825,631 1,942,421 2,014,788 $ 2,843,604$ 2,357,056$ 2,324,305$ 2,443,149$ 2,521,594 Total Budget Factors: Personnel services. The personnel services budget will increase $32,725 and $44,005 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. A seasonal employee is also included in both years to assist with the sign program and vehicle maintenance. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities 122 STREETS (continued) The commodities budget will increase by $52,779 in 2011 which is primarily due to cost of ice control chemicals assuming normal weather conditions. Ice control chemicals are approximately $368,136 and thus represent approximately 50% of total commodities expenses. Motor fuels, equipment parts and maintenance materials (gravel) comprise the next largest categories with $ 125,802 (17%), $71,035 (10%), and $57,257 (8%) respectively. Commodities are anticipated to increase $31,740 in 2012 for various expenditures including but not limited to ice control chemicals, motor fuels and equipment parts. Other charges and services Other charges and services will increase by $589 in 2011 and $2,700 in 2012 respectively. The significant expenditures include gas and electric ($94,220) and contract pavement stripping ($67,979). Capital outlay Capital outlay is accounted for in the Equipment Fund. 123 PARKS Program Description: The City of Lakeville provides a comprehensive community-wide array of park facilites and opens spaces. The Parks Department is committed to the effective and responsible management of park, open space, facilities and resources to satisfy the needs of the community. Services: Parks administration is responsible for Manage and maintain the five hockey  planning, management and supervision and pleasure skating areas. of various program functions including Collaborate with and assist various  park maintenance, recreation, the community groups and civic Lakeville Area Arts Center, and the organizations as well as three school Lakeville Senior Center. districts to plan, organize, promote and Planning, administering and managing enhance other activities and  resources for park maintenance, opportunities within the City of improvements and development. Lakeville. Provide routine maintenance of all Oversee the organization and  athletic fields and facilities including implementation of community-centered Central Maintenance Facility, Senior special events such as Household Center, Historical Society Building, Arts Hazardous Waste Drop-off Day, Annual Center and the Ritter Farm Park Tree Sale, Family Fun Fest, Taste of Environmental Learning Center. Lakeville, Fourth of July Celebration, Community clean-up Day, Pan-O-Prog, Provide routine maintenance to all  Lakeville Art Festival, and numerous neighborhood parks and associated youth athletic tournaments. support facilities. Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Administration Parks and Recreation Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Parks Maintenance Operations and Maint. Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Superintendent 0.2 --- --- --- --- Supervisor 0.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Parks Lead 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Maintenance II 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 City Forester .5 .5 .5 .5 .5 Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total 14.5 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 124 PARKS (continued) Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Number of Parks 59 59 59 59 59 Number of Park Facilities (a) 344 348 348 348 348 Number of Park Facility 726 726 726 726 726 Reservations Taken Total Acres of all Parks, 1,636 1,636 1,636 1,636 1,645 Conservation Areas and Greenways Turf/Active Acres 470 470 470 470 475 Miles of Asphalt Trails 91 91 91 92 93 Miles of Grass/Wood Chip Trails 10 10 10 10 10 Boulevard mowing (miles) 37 37 37 37 37 Playgrounds 40 40 40 40 40 Soccer, baseball, softball, football 132 132 132 132 132 and lacrosse fields Active ice rink sites 11 6 6 6 6 Inactive ice rink sites 0 5 5 5 5 Active flower beds 9 9 9 9 9 (maintained by volunteers) Inactive flower beds 51 51 51 51 51 (a) Includes City owned/maintained permanent buildings, temporary portable warming houses, ball diamonds/play fields, soccer fields, play equipment, tennis and basketball courts, picnic shelters, skating rinks, beaches, pedestrian bridges/boardwalk fishing piers, paved and gravel parking lots. Community Survey: Service is Quality of Residents who considered Service/Program service is support current essential or very excellent or good funding level important Residential Responses: Upkeep and maintenance of parks 95% 88% 86% Outdoor ice rinks 54% 37% 55% Upkeep and maintenance of city 72% 64% 79% beaches Forestry program 42% 36% 57% Condition of city trails 82% 66% 83% Snow removal on city trails 64% 46% 69% Trail lighting 60% 68% 83% 125 PARKS (continued) Service is Quality of Residents who considered Service/Program service is support current essential or very excellent or good funding level important Business Responses: Upkeep and maintenance of parks 82% 70% 64% Outdoor ice rinks 56% 40% 51% Upkeep and maintenance of city 58% 57% 58% beaches Forestry program 41% 37% 49% Condition of city trails 67% 52% 65% Snow removal on city trails 56% 53% 62% Trail lighting 56% 72% 70% 2010 Goals and Objectives: Administration Provide parks and open space for a fully developed city prior to the loss of available and  (Strategic Plan Goal E – 1 and E – 2) desired land to develop. Continue efforts to assist the Miracle Field development.  Manage the 2010 Capital Projects Park Dedication Fund.  Assist and act as resource to all civic groups and associated major special events.  Manage general operations of park maintenance and recreation departments as well as the  Lakeville Area Arts Center. Continue fundraising activities for all major special events and programs.  Finalize Chadwick Trail from Chadwick Park to Idaho Avenue as part of South Creek Trail  Corridor. Design and construct Fieldstone Park, a 10-acre neighborhood park in northeast Lakeville.  Design and construct irrigation system at North Park.  Maintenance Continue to maintain and enhance all turf areas, playfields, hard courts, hockey rinks and  recreation facilities in the park system. Continue emphasis on maintenance, renovation, and upgrades of parks and infrastructure.  Continue to update and purchase equipment as part of capital outlay/equipment replacement  schedule. Develop system to rate condition of trails to determine scheduled replacement or overlay.  Work with Lakeville Soccer Club regarding executing a cost share program for installation of  an in-ground irrigation system at North Park. Commence process of designing and constructing Fieldstone Creek Park.  Promote collaborative efforts with Lakeville Baseball Association to complete baseball field  improvements at Foxborough Park. 126 PARKS (continued) 2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives: Administration Provide parks and open space for a fully developed city prior to the loss of available and  (Strategic Plan Goal E – 1 and E – 2) desired land to develop. Continue efforts to assist the Miracle Field development.  Fundraising activities for all major special events and programs.  Complete final punch list and install remaining park amenities at Fieldstone Park.  Finalize irrigation control system at North Park.  Design and construct a trail along the east side of Dodd Rd. from County Road 50 to Itea  Way. Administration of Bury Property acquisition grants.  Lake Marion Loop Trail grant administration.  Administration of Active Livings grant. Establish several trail way finding sign systems  throughout the community. Assist Street Department with development of an Emerald Ash Bore Management Plan.  Participate in the design of a proposed Senior Center/Historical facility.  Design and construct Stoneborough Park, a 6 acre neighborhood park.  Maintenance Develop system to rate condition of trails to determine scheduled replacement or overlay.  Promote collaborative efforts with ISD #194 to complete improvements of softball field at  Lakeview Elementary School. 127 PARKS (continued) Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ProgramActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Park maintenance 1,002,248 1,214,135 1,134,400 1,166,627 1,171,853 Park equipment maintenance 288,263 329,316 352,471 357,276 363,286 Administration 346,060 363,149 369,592 386,434 391,529 Central maintenance facility 91,681 110,261 93,790 98,936 96,404 Hockey and skating rinks 120,636 89,533 114,525 119,760 121,138 Trail lighting 38,159 45,840 41,769 45,644 47,926 Total$ 1,887,047 $ 2,152,234 $ 2,106,547 $ 2,174,677$ 2,192,136 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 1,350,669$ 1,494,618$ 1,493,471$ 1,528,373$ 1,552,225 Commodities 208,062 270,730 249,626 252,987 255,487 Other charges and services 328,316 386,886 363,450 393,317 384,424 $ 1,887,047$ 2,152,234$ 2,106,547$ 2,174,677$ 2,192,136 Total Revenues and other financing sources Intergovernmental$ 2,718$ 200$ 200$ 200$ 200 Charges for services 37,395 34,403 34,866 34,903 34,903 Miscellaneous 5,145 Taxes and other public funds 1,846,934 2,117,631 2,066,336 2,139,574 2,157,033 $ 1,887,047$ 2,152,234$ 2,106,547$ 2,174,677$ 2,192,136 Total Budget Factors: Personnel services. The personnel services budget will increase $33,755 and $23,852 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Commodities The commodities budget will by decrease by $17,743 in 2011 and increase $2,500 in 2012 primarily due to changes in motor fuel consumption. Motor fuels are the largest single commodity ($59,400) representing 46.8% of the Parks department commodity budget. 128 PARKS (continued) Other charges and services Other charges and services will increase by $8,893 in 2011. This increase is the net effect of a $26,743 increase in major maintenance project costs offset by a reduction of $17,221 in Central Maintenance Facility utility costs. The utility costs’ reduction are attributable to energy efficiency upgrades and changes to programming and operating procedures. The most significant line items are contract landscaping ($54,072), electricity ($88,177) and waste disposal ($25,509). The Park Department share of Central Maintenance Facility Other Charges and Services is $87,286. Other charges and service will decrease $8,893 in 2012 primarily due to reduced major maintenance projects. Capital outlay Capital outlay is attributable to Microsoft Office upgrades and computer replacements in 2011 and computer replacements in 2012. Capital outlay for vehicles and equipment is accounted for in the Equipment Fund. 129 RECREATION Program Description: The Recreation Department is responsible for providing year round recreational programs and activities for all age groups. The department also collaborates with and assists numerous Lakeville groups, organizations, clubs and school districts to provide recreation services throughout the community. Services: Senior Citizens.Tennis lessons City maintains a and camps with the  facility to serve the senior population. support of United States Tennis Recreation and social programs are Association (USTA). provided year round through the facility. Excursions . A diverse program of day  Youth activities . A variety of programs trips is offered to various locations  are provided including summer camps, throughout the metropolitan area. firearms safety, golf, Kamp Kermit, Ritter Park ELC. The Environmental  Learn to Skate, Sports Unlimited, and Learning Center is located in one of the Youth Enrichment. metropolitan areas most pristine nature Adult activity. Leagues are organized areas. Nature programs provide  through the Recreation Department that participants with educational include basketball, softball, volleyball, opportunities in a natural environment. broomball, dodge ball, as well as the Puppet Wagon. The Lakeville Lions  Ground Pounders Running Series and sponsor a mobile puppet show that golf lessons. travels to various community parks Youth special events . Programs include during the summer season.  Arbor Day, Egg Hunts, Fishing Contests, Safety Camp. A program that is offered  Haunted Forest, Once Upon a Star, Pan- rdth exclusively to 3 and 4 graders, with O-Prog programs, Santa Calls, Holiday the support of Lakeville Police and Fire, Lights, and Santa Store. Dakota Electric, and the National Guard. Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Recreation Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Recreation Program Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Recreation Program Assistant 0.2 --- --- --- --- Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Senior Center Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Senior Center Admin. Assistant 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Total 4.9 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 130 RECREATION (continued) Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Recreation/Senior Center $275,954 $295,760 $297,810 $297,810 $297,810 Revenues Program Registrations – 7,453 9,629 7,453 7,453 7,453 Participants Youth Activities - Participants 1,313 2,407 1,313 1,313 1,313 Puppet Wagon – Attendance 2,162 2,194 2,162 2,162 2,162 Ritter Farm Park - Participants 103 656 103 103 103 Youth Safety Camp - Participants 85 78 85 85 85 Adult League – Teams 232 243 232 232 232 Adult League - Team Participants 3,480 3,645 3,480 3,480 3,480 Senior Center – Members 1,122 1,135 1,122 1,122 1,122 Community Survey: Service is Quality of Residents who considered Service/Program service is support current essential or very excellent or good funding level important Residential Responses: Park and recreation programming 79% 63% 83% Senior Center programming 51% 58% 68% Business Responses: Park and recreation programming 61% 54% 59% Senior Center programming 39% 61% 63% 2010 Goals and Objectives: Continue to expand level of programming (quantity and quality) with no direct impact on  City subsidy through self-supporting recreation programs. Specific areas of focus include: community events, family activities, healthy initiatives, nature based/environmental education, and cooperative programming with other public or private agencies. Enhance customer service to residents through marketing and office automation  improvements to include web site development and on-line program registration. Provide continuing emphasis on expanding/enhancing alliances and partnerships with  community groups, organizations, and businesses to effectively enhance the provision of recreation programs and activities. 131 RECREATION (continued) 2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives: Enhance communication efforts of Parks and Recreation offerings to the community thru the  use of multi faceted avenues to include social media, the internet and list serve Evaluate program offerings to determine if any updating, fine tuning, major changes,  replacement, or elimination is necessary. Continue to expand level of programming (quantity and quality) with no direct impact on  City subsidy through the use of the self-supporting recreation programs. Specific areas of focus include: community events, family activities, healthy initiatives, nature based/environmental education, and cooperative programming with other public or private agencies. Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ProgramActualBudgetEstimatebudgetBudget Recreation Administration$ 255,802$ 249,625$ 253,612$ 249,630$ 259,111 Senior citizens 154,544 188,211 183,711 183,729 190,654 Youth activities 79,206 83,102 86,402 85,755 85,755 Adult activities 31,808 39,442 39,234 39,442 39,442 Youth special events 11,187 11,721 11,721 11,721 11,721 Tennis lessons 10,092 9,052 9,063 9,063 9,063 Excursions 9,029 6,371 6,371 6,371 6,371 Ritter Park ELC 7,029 5,006 5,018 5,018 5,018 Puppet wagon 3,280 3,870 3,870 3,870 3,870 Safety camp 2,122 3,675 3,675 3,675 3,675 Total$ 564,099$ 600,075$ 602,677$ 598,274$ 614,680 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 327,914$ 325,814$ 325,273$ 320,016$ 323,097 Commodities 17,686 25,700 24,941 25,712 25,712 Other charges and services 214,836 246,479 250,213 249,981 251,826 3,663 2,082 2,250 2,565 14,045 Capital outlay $ 564,099$ 600,075$ 602,677$ 598,274$ 614,680 Total Revenues Charges for services$ 272,908$ 295,760$ 302,510$ 301,647$ 301,647 Miscellaneous 703 290,488 304,315 300,167 296,627 313,033 Taxes and other public funds $ 564,099$ 600,075$ 602,677$ 598,274$ 614,680 Total 132 RECREATION (continued) Budget Factors: Personnel services. The personnel services budget will decrease $5,798 in 2011 as a result of cost allocations and increase $3,081 for 2012. Personnel costs include anticipated increases health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Personnel costs represent 53.5% of the total Recreation budget. Commodities The commodities budget will increase by $12 in 2011 with no anticipated changes in 2012. Commodities represent 4.3% of the total Recreation budget Other charges and services Other charges and services will increase by $3,502 and $1,845 in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The largest expenditure is for contractual recreation program services ($155,253). Capital outlay Capital outlay is attributable to Microsoft Office upgrades and a computer replacement in 2011. The 2012 capital outlay consists of computer replacements and office furniture. 133 ARTS CENTER Program Description: The Lakeville Area Arts Center is a community facility that provides educational, entertainment and recreational programs involving the visual and performing arts. Services: The art center offers a series of The pottery program offers classes for  performing art classes involving a adults, youth, and special programs diverse variety of talent appealing to a during the school day for home schooled wide range of audience members. youth. Professional singers, instrumentalists, Art classes are provided for a diverse  comedians, and actors are scheduled as spectrum of interests including part of the season series. silversmithing, glass lampworking, “Expressions! Community Theater” is batik, seasonal ornaments, dolls, purses,  comprised of area performers that and jewelry. produce three comedies per year. The art center facility is also available to  Art camps provide educational visual host a variety of uses including family  arts sessions for the area youth. gatherings, educational training sessions or business presentations. Painting classes are offered in acrylics,  oils, and watercolors. Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Art Center Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Building Attendant (Part-time) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Pottery Manager 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Art Center Revenues $190,445 $200,340 $200,922 $212,320 $214,427 Class Attendance 2,056 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 LAAC Series Attendance 14,699 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Rental Events Attendance 13,609 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 Other Events Attendance* 7,032 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 134 ARTS CENTER (continued) 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Theatrical performances 57 57 57 57 57 Concerts 9 9 9 9 9 Entertainment performances 14 14 14 14 14 Number of ticket sales 10,746 10,746 10,746 10,746 10,746 Number of arts educations classes 322 322 322 322 322 Community Survey: Service is Quality of Residents who considered Service/Program service is support current essential or very excellent or good funding level important Residential Responses: Art Center programming 71% 46% 68% Business Responses: Art Center programming 50% 41% 50% 2010 Goals and Objectives: Maintain and improve the building’s physical appearance.  Improve and develop storage areas for stage equipment, scenery, and lighting.  Develop a varied offering of art classes in many mediums for all ages of students.  Schedule interesting gallery exhibits.  Research entertaining acts for the performance season and negotiate contracts that result in  the generation of revenue. Support and encourage community groups using the facility for large events such as the Art  Festival, the Taste of Lakeville, and Pan-O-Prog. Market open times for rental opportunities.  Support the outreach efforts of Expressions! Community Theater and Giant Step Theatre.  Seek grants to support entertainment and the expansion of fine arts programs and studio  space. Market our facility as neighboring communities open new art centers.  Expand the audience base through an enlarged playbill circulation.  Continue to work cooperatively with the Friends of the Lakeville Area Arts Center.  135 ARTS CENTER (continued) 2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives: Increase the number of show sponsorships for acts in the 2011-2012 Lakeville Area Arts  Center season to increase revenue. Apply for grants which may be available through the Minnesota Arts and Cultural Heritage  Tax that would allow for additional programs or improve accessibility for the pottery studio. Develop new partnerships with existing community and area arts organizations such as  Children’s Castle Theatre and the Minnesota Valley Photography Club. .Explore Folk Art program.  Develop a long term facility and business plan.  Budget Summary: 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ProgramActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Arts Center Administration 192,853 191,071 188,004 192,161 193,736 Arts Center Building 101,183 129,016 116,556 137,594 124,006 Childrens Theatre 12,178 37,305 39,235 38,650 38,750 Performing Arts Events 44,812 23,950 25,500 25,500 24,500 Art Camp 13,397 18,800 18,800 19,000 19,000 Pottery Camps 20,532 17,240 16,240 16,240 16,240 Expressions! Community Theater 7,301 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,800 Art Classes 3,101 5,100 2,600 2,600 2,600 Painting Classes 3,161 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total$ 398,518$ 430,182$ 414,635$ 439,445$ 426,632 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures Personnel services$ 212,527$ 215,803$ 215,668$ 218,353$ 221,469 Commodities 15,891 23,425 20,875 20,475 20,875 Other charges and services 170,100 190,954 178,092 184,380 184,288 - - - 16,237 - Capital outlay $ 398,518$ 430,182$ 414,635$ 439,445$ 426,632 Total Revenues Charges for services$ 190,188$ 200,340$ 200,922$ 212,320$ 214,427 208,330 229,842 213,713 227,125 212,205 Taxes and other public funds $ 398,518$ 430,182$ 414,635$ 439,445$ 426,632 Total Budget Factors: 136 ARTS CENTER (continued) Personnel services. The personnel services budget will increase $2,550 and $3,116 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Personnel costs represent 49.6% of total Arts Center costs. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities The commodities budget will decrease by $2,950 in 2011and increase by $400 in 2012. Other charges and services Other charges and services budget will decrease by $6,574 and $92 in 2011 and 2012 respectively. Energy improvements in recent years have resulted in a decrease in electricity consumption. Favorable weather conditions, energy improvements and reduction in prices have resulted in a decrease in the natural gas costs. Capital outlay Capital outlay is attributable to Microsoft Office upgrades ($855) and major maintenance projects ($15,382) in 2011. 137 Special Revenue Funds Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds from specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures of specific purposes. Establishment of such funds also enables the City to more effectively manage its resources and minimize tax levies. Communications Fund This fund accounts for franchise fees from cable TV operations. Expenditures and other financing uses are used to finance the City’s Cable TV and Public Communications budgets, including long-term replacement of equipment. Compensation Liability Fund This fund accounts for the accrued liability of employee benefits attributed to severance compensation. Funding is provided by property taxes and interest earnings on investments. Environmental Resources Fund This fund accounts for surface water management fees which finance expenditures directly related to storm water maintenance, education, lake/stream monitoring, and treatment. The fund also accounts for a Waste Abatement Community Funding Grant received from Dakota County. The grant finances expenditures that promote solid waste recycling and community clean up. Economic Development Fund This fund accounts for a $125,000 Economic Recovery Grant received from the State of Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development in 1995. The grant purpose is to provide loans to businesses expanding in or locating to Lakeville. The fund also accounts for administrative fees received from the issuance of conduit debt. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Special Revenue Funds For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues Licenses$ 541,541$ 550,654$ 565,258$ 582,215$ 599,682 Intergovernmental 22,912 808 808 42,708 42,708 Charges for services 568,468 611,003 612,703 682,145 679,209 Investment income 36,659 25,311 15,192 10,239 14,179 Miscellaneous 3,926 - 3,312 - - 1,173,506 1,187,776 1,197,273 1,317,307 1,335,778 Total revenues Expenditures General government 407,826 420,700 445,821 423,216 445,303 Public safety 18,710 6,833 34,247 6,597 6,795 Public works 359,353 504,587 484,772 657,134 567,550 Parks and recreation 35,401 1,877 1,933 1,991 43,213 25,207 149,145 25,228 34,420 Capital outlay 864,503 957,327 1,115,862 1,114,108 1,056,059 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues 309,003 230,449 81,411 203,199 279,719 over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 10,839 8,572 8,572 16,242 6,190 (187,156) (210,049) (205,310) (254,752) (252,807) Transfer to other funds (176,317) (201,477) (196,738) (238,510) (246,617) Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances 132,686 28,972 (115,327) (35,311) 33,102 2,060,839 2,006,326 2,193,525 2,078,198 2,042,887 Fund balance, January 1 $ 2,193,525$ 2,035,298$ 2,078,198$ 2,042,887$ 2,075,989 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(1.7%)1.6% For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances, see the fund balance discussion on the page following the combining schedules. 138 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Special Revenue Funds For the Year Ending December 31, 2011 2011 Proposed Budget CompensationEnvironmentalEconomic CommunicationsLiabiltiyResourcesDevelopmentTotal Revenues Licenses$ 582,215$ -$ -$ -$ 582,215 Intergovernmental 516 42,192 42,708 Charges for services 12,000 667,895 2,250 682,145 3,338 4,270 2,010 621 10,239 Investment income 598,069 4,270 712,097 2,871 1,317,307 Total revenues Expenditures General government 407,568 15,648 423,216 Public safety 6,597 6,597 Public works 3,790 653,344 657,134 Parks and recreation 1,933 1,933 21,281 - 3,947 - 25,228 Capital outlay 428,849 27,968 657,291 - 1,114,108 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues 169,220 (23,698) 54,806 2,871 203,199 over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 15,266 976 16,242 (57,007) - (197,745) - (254,752) Transfer to other funds (57,007) 15,266 (196,769) - (238,510) Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances 112,213 (8,432) (141,963) 2,871 (35,311) 663,555 852,010 500,565 62,068 2,078,198 Fund balance, January 1 $ 775,768$ 843,578 $ 358,602$ 64,939$ 2,042,887 Fund balance, December 31 16.9%-1.0%-28.4%4.6%-1.7% 2011 Net percentage change in fund balance For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances, see the fund balance discussion on the page following the combining schedules. 139 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Special Revenue Funds For the Year Ending December 31, 2012 2012 Estimated Budget CompensationEnvironmentalEconomic CommunicationsLiabiltiyResourcesDevelopmentTotal Revenues Licenses$ 599,682$ -$ -$ -$ 599,682 Intergovernmental 516 42,192 42,708 Charges for services 677,209 2,000 679,209 7,702 4,230 1,598 649 14,179 Investment income 607,900 4,230 720,999 2,649 1,335,778 Total revenues Expenditures General government 429,185 16,118 445,303 Public safety 6,795 6,795 Public works 3,904 563,646 567,550 Parks and recreation 1,991 1,991 34,420 - - - 34,420 Capital outlay 463,605 28,808 563,646 - 1,056,059 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues 144,295 (24,578) 157,353 2,649 279,719 over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 5,214 976 6,190 (47,432) - (205,375) - (252,807) Transfer to other funds (47,432) 5,214 (204,399) - (246,617) Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances 96,863 (19,364) (47,046) 2,649 33,102 775,768 843,578 358,602 64,939 2,042,887 Fund balance, January 1 $ 872,631$ 824,214 $ 311,556$ 67,588$ 2,075,989 Fund balance, December 31 12.5%(2.3%)(13.1%)4.1%1.6% 2012 Net percentage change in fund balance For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances, see the fund balance discussion on the page following this combining schedule. 140 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Special Revenue Funds Fund Balance Discussion Communications Fund The 2011 proposed fund balance is expected to increase by $112,213 or 16.9% and $96,863 or 12.5% in 2012. The 2011 increase is mainly due to completing the transition to digital broadcasting in 2010 resulting in a $150,000 decrease in capital outlay. The 2012 increase is attributable to several items including an anticipated increase in subscribers, reduced capital equipment acquisitions, and reduced compensation liability transfers. Compensation Liability Fund The 2011 proposed fund balance is expected to decrease by $8,432 or 1.0% and $19,364 or 2.3% in 2012. Market conditions have significantly reduced income from investments resulting in retirements exceeding investment income. Environmental Resources Fund The 2011 proposed fund balance is expected to decrease by $141,963 or 28.4% and $47,046 or 13.1% in 2012. The 2011 decrease is mainly due to hydrologic modeling of the Vermillion River Watershed ($97,000) and obtaining a storm water (MPCA) MS4 Permit for $55,000. The 2012 decrease is mainly due to transfers for GIS services. Economic Development Fund The 2011 proposed fund balance is expected to increase by $2,871 or 4.6% and $2,649 or 4.1% in 2012. Beginning in 2008 and continuing through 2017 the City will collect a conduit debt fee from a private activity revenue bond issue. 141 COMMUNICATIONS FUND Program Description: The Communications Department is responsible for the City’s primary sources of information and communication including City newsletter, City website, and Lakeville Government Television (cable channel 16). The Communications Department also manages the Lakeville Access Television (cable channel 12). The Departments mission is to provide information regarding municipal programs and services in a quality and cost-effective manner that engages the community and enhances the City’s image locally, regionally, and nationally. Services: Lakeville Government Television maintains and promotes the employee  (LGTV) Channel 16. The intranet. Communications Department is Publications. The department prepares  responsible for creating government Messages, the City’s weekly newsletter. television programs for cable Channel Special publications are produced such 16. The Department produces and as the new resident guidebook, utility directs broadcasts of live meetings as brochure, welcome packet flyers, project well as prepares for rebroadcast on cable and events collateral materials, and ads. Channel 16. Other services include Marketing plans and focused updating the electronic message board communications are prepared for on cable Channel 16 and working with projects or programs such as other departments to create and produce Comprehensive Land Use Plan, water special video projects such as the comp conservation, dog ordinance, etc. Press plan program, new police station releases are a responsibility of the program, etc. The Department also Department. As well as responding to monitors Cable Franchise issues and public inquiries. Developing and public comments as well as facilitating promoting the style and image standards the Telecommunications Commission for communications pieces are also a and monitoring MACTA legislative primary activity information. Social media. The Department  Lakeville Access Television Channel  establishes and maintains City Listservs 12. The public access television, cable for automatic e-mail delivery of City Channel 12 is managed by the publications. Communications Department. Special event planning. Department is  Website. Website is maintained by the  responsible for planning and Communications Department. The coordination of special events such as Department also coordinates website groundbreakings and grand openings. content with the objectives of other departments. The Department also 142 COMMUNICATIONS FUND (continued) Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Communications Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Communications Specialist 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Video Production Specialists 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Total 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Listserv Subscribers 7,800 8,200 8,200 8,200 8,200 Web Visitors (avg./month) 26,900 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Messages Issues 52 52 52 52 52 Other Publications 15 23 23 23 23 Speech/Press Releases 20 20 20 20 20 Special Events 3 4 7 7 7 Cable TV Franchise Fee $534,616 $550,654 $565,258 $582,215 $599,682 Cable TV Regular Program 56 56 56 56 56 Episodes Cable TV Special Programs 6 6 6 6 6 City Council Meetings 48 48 48 48 48 Cable TV Public Service 10 12 15 15 15 Announcements Social Media --- --- 3 3 3 2010 Goals and Objectives: To improve the public’s ability to obtain and comment on information about the City.  To market the City’s strengths effectively.  To promote and use consistent style and image standards.  To make residents aware of well-managed government services.  To facilitate and encourage citizen participation in local government.  143 COMMUNICATIONS FUND (continued) To enhance Lakeville’s sense of community.  To promote a distinct quality of life unique to Lakeville.  Other  Completed a Strategic Communications Plan to enhance consistent and accurate printed o documents, verbal messages, and visual displays for all City communications and marketing pieces. Research social; media opportunities and policies with the expectation of proceeding in o several forms including Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. 2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives: Update the department’s emergency plan.  Formalize the City Communications strategy.  Create community videos for the website.  Formalize targeted public service announcement programs.  Investigate web improvements such as accessibility and mobile formats.  Renegotiate Franchise Agreement.  Research the development of a quality training program with teleconferences.  144 COMMUNICATIONS FUND (continued) Budget Summary: CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Special Revenue - Communications Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues Licenses franchise fee$ 541,541 $ 550,654 $ 565,258 $ 582,215 $ 599,682 Intergovernmental State aid 516 516 516 516 516 Charges for Services 12,000 Investment income 10,067 9,017 3,196 3,338 7,702 3,926 - 3,312 - - Miscellaneous 556,050 560,187 572,282 598,069 607,900 Total revenues Expenditures - General government Personnel services 295,953 312,848 312,286 316,847 320,652 Commodities 3,394 10,337 9,203 9,216 9,228 Other charges and services 67,419 86,842 109,140 81,505 99,305 43,213 22,205 146,143 21,281 34,420 Capital outlay 409,979 432,232 576,772 428,849 463,605 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues 146,071 127,955 (4,490) 169,220 144,295 over expenditures Other financing (uses) - Transfers To General Fund (47,267) (48,177) (42,069) (42,551) (43,413) (9,483) (7,806) (7,806) (14,456) (4,019) To Sp. Rev. - Comp. Liab.Fund (56,750) (55,983) (49,875) (57,007) (47,432) Total other financing (uses) Net change in fund balance 89,321 71,972 (54,365) 112,213 96,863 628,599 552,039 717,920 663,555 775,768 Fund balance, January 1 $ 717,920$ 624,011$ 663,555$ 775,768$ 872,631 Fund balance, December 31 Net change in 2011 and 2012 fund balance percentage18.3%13.3% 145 COMMUNICATIONS FUND (continued) Budget Factors: Revenues. Revenues are increasing $31,561 (+5.7%) and $17,467 (+3.0%) in 2011 and 2012 respectively due to increased subscriptions. Personnel services. The personnel services budget will increase $3,440 and $3,848 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities The commodities budget will decrease by $1,121 in 2011 and increase by $12 in 2012. Other charges and services Other charges and services budget will decrease by $3,767 in 2011 primarily as a result of not having a community survey. The budget will increase by $17,800 in 2012 because of the Community Survey. The largest 2011 expenditure is for printing and distribution of the weekly newsletter Messages ($43,442). Capital outlay Capital outlay in 2011 is attributable to Microsoft Office upgrades, computer replacements and cable TV monitor replacement in the council chambers. The 2012 capital outlay budget provides for replacement of desktop computers, video server and a fiber head for high definition signal. Other financing (uses) The Communications Fund budget reimburses the General Fund and Special Revenue Fund for its share of overhead and administrative costs. 146 COMPENSATION LIABILITY FUND Program Description: The Compensation Liability Fund accounts for expenditures attributable to severance and paid time off benefits disbursed at the time of termination including annual paid time off cash outs. The primary revenue source is property taxes and transfers from special revenue funds. Benefits paid to Enterprise Fund employees are accounted for in their respective funds. Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Accrued Severance Liability $ 1,118,958 $ 1,233,056 $ 1,207,226 $ 1,328,935 $ 1,448,669 Accrued Time Off Liability $ 450,481 $ 530,359 $ 509,417 $ 578,530 $ 649,247 Total Accrued Liabilities $ 1,569,439 $ 1,763,415 $ 1,716,643 $ 1,907,465 $ 2,097,916 Total Assets $ 892,326 $ 890,094 $ 880,393 $ 872,091 $ 852,857 Net Liabilities $ (677,113) $ (873,321) $ (836,250) $(1,035,374) $(1,245,059) Percentage of Total Assets to 56.9% 50.5% 51.3% 45.7% 40.7% Total Accrued Liabilities 2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives: Maintain a fund balance sufficient to finance current liabilities.  147 COMPENSATION LIABILITY FUND (continued) Budget Summary: CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Special Revenue - Compensation Liability Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues $ 16,318 $ 9,200 $ 8,920 $ 4,270 $ 4,230 Investment income 16,318 9,200 8,920 4,270 4,230 Total revenues Expenditures - Personnel services General government 30,517 10,673 15,192 15,648 16,118 Public safety 18,710 6,833 34,247 6,597 6,795 Public works 3,933 2,498 3,680 3,790 3,904 35,401 - 1,877 1,933 1,991 Parks and recreation 88,561 20,004 54,996 27,968 28,808 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (72,243) (10,804) (46,076) (23,698) (24,578) over expenditures Other financing sources Transfer from Special Revenue: Communications Fund 9,483 7,806 7,806 14,456 4,019 1,356 766 766 810 1,195 Environmental Resources Fund 10,839 8,572 8,572 15,266 5,214 Total other financing sources Net change in fund balance (61,404) (2,232) (37,504) (8,432) (19,364) 950,918 899,434 889,514 852,010 843,578 Fund balance, January 1 $ 889,514$ 897,202$ 852,010$ 843,578$ 824,214 Fund balance, December 31 Net change in 2011 and 2012 fund balance percentage(1.0%)(2.3%) Budget Factors: The Paid Time Off (PTO) plan allows for cash payouts of 40 hours per year, an option not available under the vacation/sick leave policy. Also, the PTO plan created a higher accrual limit for grandfathered employees with existing sick leave balances over 480 hours and 5 or more years of service. The limit for new non-police employees will be slightly lower under the PTO plan. Thus, the liability should continue to increase at an accelerated rate until the grandfathered employees achieve the PTO accrual limit. 148 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES FUND Program Description: The Environmental Resources program purpose is to manage, promote and protect the City’s natural resources including lakes, wetlands, streams, prairies and woodlands. The objective is accomplished through public education endeavors, surface water infrastructure management and monitoring the natural resources. Beginning in 2011, the Environmental Planning Department is also responsible for developing programs that promote and expand the community’s environmental recycling awareness. These programs are designed to encourage landfill abatement and proper waste disposal through education and opportunities. The recycling programs that promote educating, reducing, reusing, and recycling are funded with a grant from Dakota County. Services: Surface water resource monitoring. The workshops with Dakota County Soil and  Environmental Resources Department Water Conservation District to educate and coordinates and manages a variety of water promote water quality stewardship among quality research and improvement projects residents. including aquatic plant control and fish Watershed management. The  management on City water bodies. The Environmental Resources Department staff Department also implements the City of reviews Wetland Delineation and performs a Lakeville’s Comprehensive Water majority of the requirements for being the Resources Management Plan, Wetland Responsible Governmental Unit and the Management Plan, South Creek Local Governmental Unit in relationship to Management Plan and the City of environmental permitting. The staff also Lakeville’s Storm Water Pollution provides the wetland delineation, mitigation Prevention Program (SWPPP). and monitoring plans for public Surface Water infrastructure improvement projects.  management. In the management of the New Development. The Environmental  storm water treatment basins, the Resources department ensures that all environmental resources staff works closely construction plans for new developments with Engineering and Operations and meet NPDES Permit requirements. The Maintenance staff to perform the work or to Environmental Resources staff assist in obtain quotes for the removal of the preparing wetland alteration permits and sediments and restoration of the area mitigation plans, obtains leases from the disturbed. Environmental resources DNR for utility crossing of public waters for determine which storm water basins must be City projects, performs many of the duties inspected and cleaned of sediment. required by local, State and Federal rules Public education and interaction . Public and regulations by being either the  education and outreach required by State Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) or and Federal regulations are carried out with the Local Governmental Unit (LGU). the Wetland Health Evaluation Project, the The Department also provides plan review  Vermillion River Watch program, and and inspections of all erosion control for through presentations to various age groups. industrial, commercial, and institutional Includes coordination and management the building permits. They ensure that the Adopt-a-Pond program, Citizen Assisted wetland delineations are correct and meet Monitoring Program and the Blue Thumb the requirement of the State of Minnesota 149 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES FUND (continued) Wetland Conservation Act, that tree recycling program and organizing the annual preservation plans are accurate and that a Roadside/Watershed Clean-up Day, developer takes feasible measures to save promotion and education on recycling and significant trees and protect valuable waste reduction as well as preparing the natural resources. applications and securing the grant funding to finance the programs. Environmental recycling . Responsibilities  include managing the City of Lakeville’s Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Environmental Resources Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Environmental Resources Specialist 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Activity Measures: Surface Water Management 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Final Plat Reviews 8 26 10 12 15 Lot Tree Preservation Reviews 16 80 30 35 40 Erosion Control Inspections 60 125 75 100 125 Wetland Reviews* 27 41 35 45 55 Watershed Cleanup Day 900 950 1,100 1,200 1,300 (volunteers) Blue Thumb (attendees) 115 --- 77 80 90 * Estimate based on site visits, wetland delineations, monitoring reports and replacement plans submitted. 150 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES FUND (continued) Environmental Recycling 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Drop-Off Day Appliances 164 150 87 85 85 Auto Batteries 242 250 249 250 250 Electronics (tons) 13.91 13.00 --- --- --- Used Oil (gallons) 950 1,000 1,100 1,100 1,100 Oil Filters (55-gallon barrels) 4.50 5.00 2.75 2.75 2.50 Customers Served 833 825 752 750 750 Road Side Cleanup Volunteers 900 950 1,100 1,000 1,000 2010 Goals and Objectives: Ensure that the City of Lakeville meets all the requirements of the Phase III NPDES Permit  requirements. Update the City of Lakeville’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program as required by the  MPCA. Continue to offer a variety of educational and volunteer opportunities for all ages with Blue  Thumb Adopt-a-Pond programs, as well as through various workshops, events, presentations, and restorations. Work with the Vermillion River Watershed and the Black Dog Watershed Management  Organization on the Total Maximum Daily Load assessments for lakes and streams that are listed as impaired in the City of Lakeville. Continue to manage exotic curly leaf pondweed at Orchard Lake.  Assess the potential for the spread of exotic species (Zebra mussel) in Lake Marion and  Orchard Lake. Work with the Fire Department to develop a spill response and obtain training for responsible  staff to meet the requirements of the MPCA and the City of Lakeville’s SWPPP. Assess East Community Park Wetland and work towards improving water quality within the  water body. 151 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES FUND (continued) 2011 -2012 Goals and Objectives: Surface Water Management Coordinate the update of the City of Lakeville MPCA MS4 (Municipal Separate Storm  Sewer System) permit. Coordinate the development of a City wide inventory and assessment program for outfalls  and stormwater basins that meets the required by the MPCA 2011 MS4 permit. Provide educational and volunteer opportunities for all ages that fulfill the requirements of  the MS4 permit. Activities include Blue Thumb program, Adopt-a-Pond programs, Roadside/Watershed Clean-up Day, Eagle Scout Projects, presentations and events with local organizations and schools, and restoration projects. Provide input and direction to the Vermillion River Watershed and the Black Dog Watershed  Management Organization on the development of “Total Maximum Daily Load” assessments for lakes and streams that are listed as impaired in the City of Lakeville. Monitor and manage exotic curly leaf pondweed at Orchard and Lee Lake and Eurasian  water milfoil on Lake Marion and Valley Lake. Submit an annual report outlining all Wetland Conservation Act activities that take place in  the City as required by new Board of Water and Soil Resources rules. Complete the hydrological modeling of the Vermillion River and Blackdog Watersheds.  Environmental Recycling Promote annual Drop-Off Day and Road Side Cleanup programs.  Produce more recycling containers in City parks.  Improve City’s recycling web page.  Continue to increase and promote recycling activities throughout the City.  Research and promote expanded recycling activities.  152 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES FUND (continued) Budget Summary: CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Special Revenue - Environmental Resources Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues Intergovernmental State aid$ 292 $ 292 $ 292 $ 292 $ 292 Intergovernmental grants 22,104 41,900 41,900 Charges for services 565,968 601,003 610,203 667,895 677,209 9,149 6,316 2,486 2,010 1,598 Investment income 597,513 607,611 612,981 712,097 720,999 Total revenues Expenditures - Public works Personnel services 189,068 190,107 191,415 203,740 205,551 Commodities 5,766 9,407 15,276 29,760 29,425 Other charges and services 160,586 302,575 274,401 419,844 328,670 - 3,002 3,002 3,947 - Capital outlay 355,420 505,091 484,094 657,291 563,646 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues 242,093 102,520 128,887 54,806 157,353 over expenditures Other financing (uses) - Transfers To General Fund (108,566) (113,597) (111,316) (151,991) (158,558) To Sp. Rev. - Comp. Liab. Fund (1,356) (766) (766) (810) (1,195) From Enterprise - Liquor Fund 976 976 To Enterprise - Utility Fund: Water operations (18,027) (23,932) (24,622) (26,248) (26,904) (2,457) (15,771) (18,731) (18,696) (18,718) Sanitary sewer operations (130,406) (154,066) (155,435) (196,769) (204,399) Total other financing (uses) Net change in fund balance 111,687 (51,546) (26,548) (141,963) (47,046) 415,426 497,048 527,113 500,565 358,602 Fund balance, January 1 $ 527,113$ 445,502$ 500,565$ 358,602$ 311,556 Fund balance, December 31 Net change in 2011 and 2012 fund balance percentage(28.4%)(13.1%) 153 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES FUND (continued) Budget Factors: Revenues. Revenues are increasing $62,601 and $8,490 in 2011 and 2012 respectively due to a $.50/quarter increase in the surface water management fee and the inclusion of a $41,900 Solid Waste Abatement Grant from Dakota County formally accounted for in the Planning Department. Personnel services. The personnel services budget will increase $2,805 and $1,833 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities The commodities budget will decrease by $1,117 in 2011 due to reduced cost of motor fuels and increase by $15 in 2012. Other charges and services Other charges and services budget will increase by $111,716 in 2011 primarily as a result of hydrologic modeling project for the Vermillion watershed ($97,000) and the professional engineering services for the final phase of a pond inventory ($15,000). The 2012 budget will decrease by $96,402 in 2012 with the completion of the Vermillion River WMO hydrologic modeling project and the pond inventory. Significant projects are as follows: 20112012 Orchard LakeManagement plan implementation $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Orchard LakeAquadic plant assessment 8,500 8,500 Orchard LakeCurly leaf pondweek control 35,000 35,000 Lake MarionManagement plan implementation 15,000 15,000 Lake MarionAquadic plant assessment 4,800 4,800 Valley LakeWater quality improvement 4,500 4,500 Valley LakeAquadic plant control 5,000 5,000 Lee LakeManagement plan and aquadic plant assessment 7,000 7,000 Lee LakeWater quality improvement 5,000 5,000 East WetlandShoreline management 10,000 10,000 East WetlandUpland management 5,000 5,000 East WetlandWater quality improvement 15,000 15,000 East WetlandVegetation and water quality assessment 5,000 5,000 Pond cleaning 60,000 60,000 Total$ 184,800 $ 184,800 Capital outlay Capital outlay in 2011 is attributable to Microsoft Office upgrades and computer replacements. Other financing (uses) The Environmental Resources Fund budget reimburses the General Fund and Special Revenue Fund for its share of overhead and administrative costs. 154 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND Program Description: The Economic Development Fund was created to account for the Economic Recovery Grant received from the State of Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED). The grant purpose is to provide loans to businesses that are either expanding or building within the City of Lakeville. Currently the City has no outstanding or pending loan commitments. The funds are restricted to the certain uses pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Grant. The fund also has unencumbered balances derived from the administrative fees collected from the issuance of private activity revenue bond issues. Services: Promote economic development activities by providing financial incentives to business which are considering locating to or expanding in the City of Lakeville. Budget Summary: CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Special Revenue - Economic Development Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues Charges for services$ 2,500 $ 10,000 $ 2,500 $ 2,250 $ 2,000 1,125 778 590 621 649 Investment income 3,625 10,778 3,090 2,871 2,649 Total revenues Expenditures - General Government 10,543 - - - - Other charges and services Net change in fund balance (6,918) 10,778 3,090 2,871 2,649 65,896 57,805 58,978 62,068 64,939 Fund balance, January 1 $ 58,978$ 68,583$ 62,068$ 64,939$ 67,588 Fund balance, December 31 Net change in 2011 and 2012 fund balance percentage4.6%4.1% Budget Factors: Revenues. The City receives an annual administrative fee (1/8 of 1%) from All Saints School based on the debt issuance until year 2017. Fund balance The fund has a $20,077 unencumbered balance in 2011. 155 Debt Service Funds These funds account for the accumulation of resources for the payment of long-term debt principal and interest, but excluding debt issued for and serviced by an Enterprise Fund. Debt Supported Primarily by Special Assessments Debt issued to finance construction of public improvements. The special assessments levied against benefited property owners are pledged toward the repayment of the principal and interest on these bonds. Debt Supported Primarily by Property Taxes Debt approved by voter referendum, certificates of indebtedness, and capital improvement bonds. Revenues are provided primarily from general property taxes. Debt Supported Primarily by State-aid Street Revenue Debt issued to finance construction of State-aid street projects within the City. The primary revenue source is municipal street state aid allotments from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Debt Supported Primarily by Tax Increment Debt issued to finance construction of public improvements in accordance with approved tax increment plans. Property taxes received from designated tax increment financing districts are pledged to the payment of the bonds. Debt Supported Primarily by Water Revenue Debt issued to finance the construction of wells, pump houses, towers, and a water treatment facility. Water connection fees are pledged toward the repayment of the principal and interest on these bonds. Debt Supported Primarily by Ice Arena Revenue Debt issued for the construction of the Lakeville Ames Ice Arena first and second sheets of ice, spectator seating/locker rooms. Resources include donations from arena revenues and other sources pledged to the payment of the bonds. The Ice Arena Revenue Refunding Bonds of 2008 A and the 2005 Capital Dehumidification Lease- Purchase Agreement are general obligations backed by the full-faith and credit of the City. The Gross Revenue Recreation Facility Bonds of 1999 are not a general obligation bond and accordingly not backed by the full-faith and credit of the City. Debt Supported Primarily by HRA Lease Revenue The Lakeville Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) issued the Public Facility Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 A for the construction of Lakeville’s fourth fire station and the acquisition of a new fire truck. Debt service will be payable solely from lease payments to be made by the City pursuant to the lease agreement between the Authority and the City. The HRA issued the Ice Arena Lease Revenue Bonds of 2006 for the construction of the Hasse single sheet ice arena facility. Debt service will be payable solely from lease payments to be made by the City and I.S.D 194 pursuant to the lease agreement between the Authority, the City and the school district. These bonds are not general obligation bonds and, accordingly, are not backed by the full-faith and credit of the City. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Fund Description Debt Service Funds are established to account for the accumulations of resources for the payment of general long-term principal, interest and related costs. Not included is the debt issued for and serviced by an Enterprise Fund. Depending on the purpose and financing source of repayment, the City will, in consultation with its financial advisor, select the repayment period and type of debt refinance which best meets its’ financial objectives. The five year capital improvement plan is an important planning document utilized for debt management. The City has $89.6 million of debt (excluding Liquor Fund debt). The debt service funds have combined debt service payments of $10.1 million and $11.0 million payable in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The debt is repaid from various revenue sources as shown below: Revenue source20112012 Property taxes$ 4,959,746 $ 5,699,181 Connection charges 1,781,283 1,527,183 State aid 905,303 908,963 Tax increment 666,079 657,754 Special assessments 456,150 397,843 Liquor Fund 285,320 285,320 Independent School District 194 275,070 281,033 Ice arena contributions 187,608 281,901 Other 89,132 85,327 Total$ 9,605,691 $ 10,124,505 Credit rating Moodies Investor Service has assigned the City of Lakeville a very favorable Aa1 credit rating. In its’ most recent analysis of the City of Lakeville, Moodies Investor Service stated “The high quality general obligation rating reflects the city's modestly growing tax base and diversifying underlying economy favorably located in the Twin City metro area; healthy financial operations, characterized by prudent management and ample reserves; and manageable debt position, with above average debt burden that reflects the community’s rapid growth during the past decade.” The credit rating report also referenced the City’s debt position by stating “The city's debt burden has moderated considerably, primarily due to the rapid growth of the tax base, posting a direct debt burden at an average 1.5%. Moody's expects that the overall debt burden, an above average 4.6%, will remain high due to ongoing growth pressures for the city as well as overlapping entities. Principal amortization is average, with 56.0% of principal paid in ten years. The city does not expect to issue additional debt over the near to medium term. Moody's expects the city's debt profile to remain manageable over the medium term due to ongoing full valuation growth and significant non-levy support.” 156 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS (continued) Debt obligations Interest costs have been reduced in recent years with the refinancing of eligible issues. The following is a summary of the principal and interest debt service payments for the coming years. G.O. Debt Supported Pimarily by WaterPublic Revenue andFacility SpecialTaxState-aidLeaseIce YearTaxesAssess.IncrementsRoadsObligationsArena 2011$ 5,501,521$ 1,891,120$ 535,056$ 2,120,068$ 771,324$ 196,926 2012 5,069,303 1,311,642 536,586 1,870,455 778,568 198,607 2013 4,395,733 986,096 518,011 1,878,538 789,723 194,903 2014 4,412,332 641,674 529,004 1,825,353 799,656 195,860 2015 4,431,245 617,488 282,561 1,860,200 808,356 331,493 2016-2020 20,019,410 2,125,766 1,383,953 4,358,558 4,256,469 787,928 2021-2025 20,550,652 - 547,058 81,980 3,938,940 6,536 2026-2030 15,648,693 - - - 3,371,003 - 2031-2032 2,067,384 - - - 1,366,166 - Total$ 82,096,273$ 7,573,786$ 4,332,229$ 13,995,152$ 16,880,205$ 1,912,253 The City is in compliance with all bond covenants. Debt Issuance 2011 and 2012 New debt issues proposed for 2011 and 2012 are related to the issuance of Certificates of Indebtedness for equipment acquisitions, General Obligation Improvement Bonds for the street thth reconstruction program and construction of Kenrick Avenue from 175 to 185. The Certificates are repaid with property tax levies over a 3 year period. The G.O. Improvement bonds will be repaid with special assessments and property taxes. A summary of the proposed debt issues are as follows: Debt IssuePurpose20112012 Certificates of IndebtednessEquipment acquistions$ 665,000$ 600,000 G.O. Improvement BondsStreet reconstruction. 2,675,000 5,365,000 G.O. Improvement BondsKenrick Avenue 2,525,000 - Total$ 5,865,000$ 5,965,000 157 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS (continued) Legal debt limits Minnesota Statutes §475 limit the amount of general obligation debt which is financed solely form property tax levies including Equipment Certificates, Capital Improvements Bonds, Street Reconstruction bonds and debt approved by referendum. The debt can not exceed 3% of the taxable market value of the City. Debt excluded from limitations are those for which some other source of revenue is pledged as security including but not limited to improvement assessment bonds, tax increment bonds, utility revenue bonds and revenue bonds. The debt limit calculations are as follows: 20112012 Included in debt limits G.O. Equipment Certificates$ 1,575,000$ 1,115,000 G.O. Park Bonds 1,920,000 1,565,000 G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds 23,175,000 22,130,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds 28,240,000 27,625,000 HRA Public Facility Lease Revenue Bonds 1,880,000 1,775,000 Total debt subject to debt limits 56,790,000 54,210,000 Excluded from debt limits G.O Improvement Bonds 7,635,000 10,890,000 G.O. State Aid Street Bonds 6,450,000 5,840,000 G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 2,660,000 2,470,000 G.O. Water Revenue Bonds 5,715,000 4,630,000 Ice Arena debt. 10,434,752 10,127,027 Total debt excluded from debt limits 32,894,752 33,957,027 Total Governmental Debt$ 89,684,752$ 88,167,027 Legal Debt Limit (3% of Taxable Market Value)$ 172,098,066$ 160,910,025 Less: G.O. Debt Subject to Limit (56,790,000) (54,210,000) Legal Debt Margin$ 115,308,066$ 106,700,025 158 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Debt Service Funds For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues General property taxes$ 6,193,807$ 5,937,995$ 5,937,995$ 4,959,746$ 5,699,181 Tax increment 629,064 666,079 666,079 666,079 657,754 Intergovernmental 833,879 913,538 905,538 905,303 908,963 Charges for services 261,976 319,897 302,879 349,088 418,144 Special assessments 628,327 490,465 490,465 456,150 397,843 Investment income 83,638 98,682 99,412 89,132 85,327 Donations 196,699 95,000 113,590 113,590 144,790 - 50,000 50,000 - - Miscellaneous 8,827,390 8,571,656 8,565,958 7,539,088 8,312,002 Total revenues Expenditures - debt service Principal maturities 6,436,971 7,337,338 7,337,338 7,382,725 6,153,131 Interest on debt 4,157,176 3,945,282 3,945,282 3,633,290 3,612,030 126,570 6,571 70,097 34,006 34,045 Fiscal charges 10,720,717 11,289,191 11,352,717 11,050,021 9,799,206 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (1,893,327) (2,717,535) (2,786,759) (3,510,933) (1,487,204) over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 3,131,654 2,048,000 2,155,970 2,066,603 1,812,503 Transfer to other funds (57,700) (60,300) (60,300) (57,600) (59,900) Refunding bonds issued 5,180,000 2,680,000 Payment on refunded bonds called (7,955,000) (7,955,000) Premium on bonds issued 116,016 99,322 209,196 - - - - Discount on bonds issued 8,579,166 (5,967,300) (3,080,008) 2,009,003 1,752,603 Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances 6,685,839 (8,684,835) (5,866,767) (1,501,930) 265,399 9,037,087 18,445,119 15,722,926 9,856,159 8,354,229 Fund balance, January 1 $ 15,722,926$ 9,760,284$ 9,856,159$ 8,354,229$ 8,619,628 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(15.2%)3.2% For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances, see the fund balance discussion on the page following the combining schedules. 159 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Debt Service Funds For the Year Ending December 31, 2011 (continued on following page) 2011 Proposed Budget Debt Supported Primarily by SpecialPropertyTax AssessmentsTaxesState-aidIncrement Revenues General property taxes$ 325,775$ 4,307,300$ -$ 51,601 Tax increment 666,079 Intergovernmental 77,135 828,168 Charges for services Special assessments 293,728 162,422 Investment income 6,394 33,260 108 7,874 - - - - Donations 625,897 4,580,117 828,276 725,554 Total revenues Expenditures - debt service Principal maturities 1,725,000 3,140,000 610,000 410,000 Interest on debt 166,120 2,361,521 218,168 125,056 2,600 6,500 1,500 6,526 Fiscal charges 1,893,720 5,508,021 829,668 541,582 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (1,267,823) (927,904) (1,392) 183,972 over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 488,903 100,000 - - - (57,600) Transfer to other funds 488,903 100,000 - (57,600) Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances (778,920) (827,904) (1,392) 126,372 1,859,749 5,393,833 5,086 854,361 Fund balance, January 1 $ 1,080,829$ 4,565,929$ 3,694$ 980,733 Fund balance, December 31 2011 Net change in fund balance percentage(41.9%)(15.3%)(27.4%)14.8% For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances, see the fund balance discussion on the page following the combining schedules. 160 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Debt Service Funds For the Year Ending December 31, 2011 (continued from previous page) 2011 Proposed Budget Total Debt Supported Primarily by 2011 WaterArenaHRA LeaseProposed RevenueRevenueRevenueBudget Revenues General property taxes$ -$ -$ 275,070$ 4,959,746 Tax increment 666,079 Intergovernmental 905,303 Charges for services 74,018 275,070 349,088 Special assessments 456,150 Investment income 1,651 39,845 89,132 - 113,590 - 113,590 Donations - 189,259 589,985 7,539,088 Total revenues Expenditures - debt service Principal maturities 1,085,000 132,725 280,000 7,382,725 Interest on debt 206,900 64,201 491,324 3,633,290 480 500 15,900 34,006 Fiscal charges 1,292,380 197,426 787,224 11,050,021 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (1,292,380) (8,167) (197,239) (3,510,933) over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 1,292,380 185,320 2,066,603 - - - (57,600) Transfer to other funds 1,292,380 - 185,320 2,009,003 Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances - (8,167) (11,919) (1,501,930) 4,217 212,409 1,526,504 9,856,159 Fund balance, January 1 $ 4,217$ 204,242$ 1,514,585$ 8,354,229 Fund balance, December 31 2011 Net change in fund balance percentage0.0%(3.8%)(0.8%)(15.2%) For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances, see the fund balance discussion on the page following the combining schedules. 161 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Debt Service Funds For the Year Ending December 31, 2012 (continued on following page) 2012 Estimated Budget Debt Supported Primarily by SpecialPropertyTax AssessmentsTaxesState-aidIncrement Revenues General property taxes$ 1,076,584$ 4,289,963$ -$ 51,601 Tax increment 657,754 Intergovernmental 76,308 832,655 Charges for services Special assessments 242,877 154,966 Investment income 6,151 28,780 108 8,825 - - - - Donations 1,325,612 4,550,017 832,763 718,180 Total revenues Expenditures - debt service Principal maturities 985,000 2,800,000 635,000 425,000 Interest on debt 326,642 2,269,303 197,655 111,586 3,900 6,110 1,500 5,955 Fiscal charges 1,315,542 5,075,413 834,155 542,541 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues 10,070 (525,396) (1,392) 175,639 over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 488,903 100,000 - - - (59,900) Transfer to other funds 488,903 100,000 - (59,900) Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances 498,973 (425,396) (1,392) 115,739 1,080,829 4,565,929 3,694 980,733 Fund balance, January 1 $ 1,579,802$ 4,140,533$ 2,302$ 1,096,472 Fund balance, December 31 2012 Net change in fund balance percentage46.2%(9.3%)(37.7%)11.8% For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances, see the fund balance discussion on the page following the combining schedules. 162 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Debt Service Funds For the Year Ending December 31, 2012 (continued from previous page) 2012 Estimated Budget Total Debt Supported Primarily by 2012 WaterArenaHRA LeaseEstimated RevenueRevenueRevenueBudget Revenues General property taxes$ -$ -$ 281,033$ 5,699,181 Tax increment 657,754 Intergovernmental 908,963 Charges for services 137,111 281,033 418,144 Special assessments 397,843 Investment income 2,012 39,451 85,327 - 144,790 - 144,790 Donations - 283,913 601,517 8,312,002 Total revenues Expenditures - debt service Principal maturities 870,000 138,131 300,000 6,153,131 Interest on debt 167,800 60,476 478,568 3,612,030 480 400 15,700 34,045 Fiscal charges 1,038,280 199,007 794,268 9,799,206 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (1,038,280) 84,906 (192,751) (1,487,204) over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 1,038,280 185,320 1,812,503 - - - (59,900) Transfer to other funds 1,038,280 - 185,320 1,752,603 Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances - 84,906 (7,431) 265,399 4,217 204,242 1,514,585 8,354,229 Fund balance, January 1 $ 4,217$ 289,148$ 1,507,154$ 8,619,628 Fund balance, December 31 2012 Net change in fund balance percentage0.0%41.6%(0.5%)3.2% For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances, see the fund balance discussion on the page following this combining schedule. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Debt Service Fund Fund Balance Discussion 163 Debt Supported Primarily by Special Assessments will experience a ($778,920) or (41.9%) decrease and a $498,973 or 46.2% increase in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The beginning fund balance of $1,859,749 and $1,080,829 for 2011 and 2012 respectively when combined with the collection of special assessments and connection charges in previous years is adequate and sufficient to meet debt service obligations. Debt Supported Primarily by Property Taxes will decrease by ($827,904) or (15.3%) and ($425,396) or (9.3%) respectively in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The beginning fund balances of $5,393,833 and $4,565,929 in 2011 and 2012 respectively are adequate and sufficient to meet debt service obligations. Debt Supported Primarily by State-aid Street Revenue the fund balance will decrease by $1,392 in each of the next two years as a result of fiscal charges exceeding interest on investments. The fund balance is minor and will be used in the final years of this bond issue. Debt Supported Primarily by Tax Increment the fund balance will increase by $126,372 or 14.8% and $115,739 or 11.8% in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The beginning fund balance of $854,361 and $980,733 for 2011 and 2012 respectively are an important revenue source for meeting future debt service obligations Debt Supported Primarily by Water Revenue will have no change in fund balance in the coming years because transfers from the Capital Projects – Water Fund and Water Enterprise Fund are adequate and sufficient to meet debt service obligations. Debt Supported Primarily by Ice Arena Revenue will decrease by ($8,167) or (3.8%) in 2011 and increase by $84,906 or 41.6% in 2012 due to the debt service structure. Revenue commitments from the Lakeville Arena and Lakeville Hockey Association are adequate and sufficient to meet debt obligations. The ending fund balance of $204,242 and $289,148 for 2011 and 2012 respectively are an important revenue source for meeting future debt service obligations. Debt Supported Primarily by HRA Lease Revenue will decrease by 0.8% and 0.5% due to interest on investments. The fund balance decrease is minor and funded from excess investment income from prior years. The ending fund balance of $1,514,585 and $1,507,154 for 2011 and 2012 respectively include reserves as required by the bond covenants and are an important revenue source for meeting future debt service obligations. 164 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Debt Service - Special Assessments Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues General property taxes$ 761,850$ 857,601$ 857,601$ 325,775$ 1,076,584 Special assessments 338,842 320,588 320,588 293,728 242,877 23,447 11,241 11,241 6,394 6,151 Investment income 1,124,139 1,189,430 1,189,430 625,897 1,325,612 Total revenues Expenditures - debt service Principal maturities 1,890,000 1,795,000 1,795,000 1,725,000 985,000 Interest on debt 414,660 292,290 292,290 166,120 326,642 60,631 - 2,600 2,600 3,900 Fiscal charges 2,365,291 2,087,290 2,089,890 1,893,720 1,315,542 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (1,241,152) (897,860) (900,460) (1,267,823) 10,070 over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from: General Fund 107,490 Capital Projects: Tax Increment Fund 10,905 21,810 21,810 21,810 21,810 Storm Sewer Fund 331,000 331,000 331,000 331,000 331,000 Water Fund 496,093 136,093 136,093 136,093 136,093 Sanitary Sewer Fund 463,647 Improvement Construction Fund 12,469 Refunding bonds issued 4,250,000 Payment on refunded bonds called (4,285,000) (4,285,000) 91,868 - - - - Premium on bonds issued 5,655,982 (3,796,097) (3,688,607) 488,903 488,903 Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances 4,414,830 (4,693,957) (4,589,067) (778,920) 498,973 2,033,986 6,431,139 6,448,816 1,859,749 1,080,829 Fund balance, January 1 $ 6,448,816$ 1,737,182$ 1,859,749$ 1,080,829$ 1,579,802 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(41.9%)46.2% 165 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Debt Service - Property Taxes Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues General property taxes$ 5,095,794$ 4,757,504$ 4,757,504$ 4,307,300$ 4,289,963 Federal Build America Bonds credit$ 45,384 45,384 77,135 76,308 Special assessments 289,485 169,877 169,877 162,422 154,966 Investment income 53,233 39,279 39,278 33,260 28,780 - 50,000 50,000 - - Miscellaneous 5,438,512 5,062,044 5,062,043 4,580,117 4,550,017 Total revenues Expenditures - debt service Principal maturities 2,385,000 3,195,000 3,195,000 3,140,000 2,800,000 Interest on debt 2,349,400 2,383,003 2,383,003 2,361,521 2,269,303 6,710 - 6,500 6,500 6,110 Fiscal charges 4,741,110 5,578,003 5,584,503 5,508,021 5,075,413 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues 697,402 (515,959) (522,460) (927,904) (525,396) over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from: Capital Projects: Police Stn. and CMF Const. Fund 238,000 Improvement Construction Fund 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Enterprise - Liquor Fund Total other financing sources (uses) 338,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Net changes in fund balances 1,035,402 (415,959) (422,460) (827,904) (425,396) 4,780,891 5,727,755 5,816,293 5,393,833 4,565,929 Fund balance, January 1 $ 5,816,293$ 5,311,796$ 5,393,833$ 4,565,929$ 4,140,533 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(15.3%)(9.3%) 166 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Debt Service - State-aid Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues Intergovernmental State aid$ 833,879$ 868,154 $ 860,154 $ 828,168$ 832,655 36 106 106 108 108 Investment income 833,915 868,260 860,260 828,276 832,763 Total revenues Expenditures - debt service Principal maturities 500,000 575,000 575,000 610,000 635,000 Interest on debt 332,949 293,154 293,154 218,168 197,655 10,514 - 37,246 1,500 1,500 Fiscal charges 843,463 868,154 905,400 829,668 834,155 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (9,548) 106 (45,140) (1,392) (1,392) over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Refunding bonds issued 2,680,000 Payment on refunded bonds called (2,730,000)(2,730,000) - - 99,322 - - Premium on bonds issued - (2,730,000) 49,322 - - Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances (9,548) (2,729,894) 4,182 (1,392) (1,392) 10,452 2,740,556 904 5,086 3,694 Fund balance, January 1 $ 904$ 10,662 $ 5,086 $ 3,694$ 2,302 Fund balance, December 31 167 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Debt Service - Tax Increment Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues General property taxes$ 74,575$ 51,601 $ 51,601 $ 51,601$ 51,601 Tax increment 629,064 666,079 666,079 666,079 657,754 4,386 6,329 6,602 7,874 8,825 Investment income 708,025 724,009 724,282 725,554 718,180 Total revenues Expenditures - debt service Principal maturities 360,000 375,000 375,000 410,000 425,000 Interest on debt 188,582 157,413 157,413 125,056 111,586 30,919 6,571 6,571 6,526 5,955 Fiscal charges 579,501 538,984 538,984 541,582 542,541 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues 128,524 185,025 185,298 183,972 175,639 over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer to: Capital Projects: Storm Sewer Fund (57,700) (60,300) (60,300) (57,600) (59,900) Refunding bonds issued 930,000 Payment on refunded bonds called (940,000) (940,000) Premium on bonds issued 24,148 209,196 - - - - Disposal of capital assets 1,105,644 (1,000,300) (1,000,300) (57,600) (59,900) Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances 1,234,168 (815,275) (815,002) 126,372 115,739 435,195 1,714,335 1,669,363 854,361 980,733 Fund balance, January 1 $ 1,669,363$ 899,060 $ 854,361 $ 980,733$ 1,096,472 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage14.8%11.8% 168 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Debt Service - Water Revenue Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Expenditures - debt service Principal maturities 1,000,000 1,020,000 1,020,000 1,085,000 870,000 Interest on debt 289,400 249,000 249,000 206,900 167,800 480 - 480 480 480 Fiscal charges 1,289,880 1,269,000 1,269,480 1,292,380 1,038,280 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (1,289,880) (1,269,000) (1,269,480) (1,292,380) (1,038,280) Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from: 1,289,880 1,269,000 1,269,480 1,292,380 1,038,280 Capital Projects - Water Fund Net changes in fund balances - - - - - 4,217 4,217 4,217 4,217 4,217 Fund balance, January 1 $ 4,217 $ 4,217 $ 4,217 $ 4,217 $ 4,217 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage0.0%0.0% 169 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Debt Service - Arena Revenue Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues Charges for services$ - $ 48,608$ 31,590$ 74,018$ 137,111 Investment income 2,536 1,496 1,953 1,651 2,012 196,699 95,000 113,590 113,590 144,790 Donations 199,235 145,104 147,133 189,259 283,913 Total revenues Expenditures - debt service Principal maturities 71,971 122,338 122,338 132,725 138,131 Interest on debt 68,664 67,414 67,414 64,201 60,476 666 - 600 500 400 Fiscal charges 141,301 189,752 190,352 197,426 199,007 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 57,934 (44,648) (43,219) (8,167) 84,906 197,694 241,789 255,628 212,409 204,242 Fund balance, January 1 $ 255,628$ 197,141$ 212,409$ 204,242$ 289,148 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(3.8%)41.6% 170 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Debt Service - HRA Lease Revenue Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues General property taxes$ 261,588$ 271,289$ 271,289$ 275,070$ 281,033 Charges for services 261,976 271,289 271,289 275,070 281,033 - 40,231 40,232 39,845 39,451 Investment income 523,564 582,809 582,810 589,985 601,517 Total revenues Expenditures - debt service Principal maturities 230,000 255,000 255,000 280,000 300,000 Interest on debt 513,521 503,008 503,008 491,324 478,568 16,650 - 16,100 15,900 15,700 Fiscal charges 760,171 758,008 774,108 787,224 794,268 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (236,607) (175,199) (191,298) (197,239) (192,751) Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from: 189,660 190,097 190,097 185,320 185,320 Enterprise - Liquor Fund Net changes in fund balances (46,947) 14,898 (1,201) (11,919) (7,431) 1,574,652 1,585,328 1,527,705 1,526,504 1,514,585 Fund balance, January 1 $ 1,527,705$ 1,600,226$ 1,526,504$ 1,514,585$ 1,507,154 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(0.8%)(0.5%) 171 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combined Schedule of Governmental Debt Service Requirements As of December 31, 2010 Due in 2011 Maturity Debt DateOutstandingPrincipalInterest G.O. Equipment Certificates of 2006 AFeb-01-11$ 425,000$ 425,000$ 8,500 G.O. Equipment Certificates of 2007 EFeb-01-12 880,000 430,000 28,263 G.O. Equipment Certificates of 2008 AFeb-01-11 270,000 270,000 3,375 G.O. Park Refunding Bonds of 2003 BFeb-01-15 1,920,000 355,000 62,519 G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds of 2003 AFeb-01-26 12,715,000 640,000 510,483 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds of 2004 AFeb-01-30 13,880,000 215,000 616,175 G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds of 2005 AFeb-01-26 2,805,000 130,000 108,600 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds of 2007 DFeb-01-32 14,360,000 400,000 693,863 G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds of 2007 HFeb-01-28 2,710,000 105,000 109,358 4,945,000 170,000 220,385 G.O. Taxable Street Reconstruction Bonds of 2009 AFeb-01-30 54,910,000 3,140,000 2,361,521 Total debt supported primarily by property taxes G.O. Improvement Refunding Bonds of 2007 BFeb-01-16 1,335,000 380,000 44,369 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 2007 FFeb-01-18 685,000 330,000 20,913 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 2008 AFeb-01-19 435,000 190,000 10,625 4,250,000 825,000 90,213 G.O. Improvement Refunding Bonds of 2009 BFeb-01-20 6,705,000 1,725,000 166,120 Total debt supported primarily by special assessments G.O. State Aid Street Bonds of 2001 CApr-01-21 690,000 50,000 32,068 G.O. State Aid Street Bonds of 2007 GApr-01-18 3,080,000 335,000 116,500 2,680,000 225,000 69,600 G.O. State Aid Street Refunding Bonds of 2010 AApr-01-20 6,450,000 610,000 218,168 Total debt supported by state aid street revenue G.O. Tax Increment Refunding Bonds of 2007 AFeb-01-22 2,155,000 70,000 85,961 G.O. Taxable Tax Increment Refund Bonds of 2007 CFeb-01-14 505,000 120,000 22,695 930,000 220,000 16,400 G.O. Improvement Refunding Bonds of 2009 BFeb-01-14 3,590,000 410,000 125,056 Total debt supported primarily by tax increment 5,715,000 1,085,000 206,900 G.O. Water Revenue Refunding Bonds of 2004 BFeb-01-16 G.O. Ice Arena Revenue Refunding Bonds of 2008 AFeb-01-15 660,000 125,000 17,708 Gross Revenue Recreation Facility Bonds of 1999Aug-01-19 770,000 - 41,145 104,752 7,725 5,348 Ice Arena Capital Equipment Lease of 2005Feb-01-21 1,534,752 132,725 64,201 Total debt supported primarily by ice arena revenue HRA Public Facility Lease Revenue Bonds of 2002 AFeb-01-23 1,880,000 105,000 93,393 8,900,000 175,000 397,931 HRA Ice Arena Lease Revenue Bonds of 2006Feb-01-32 10,780,000 280,000 491,324 Total debt supported primarily by lease revenue $ 89,684,752$ 7,382,725$ 3,633,290 Total Governmental Debt 172 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combined Schedule of Governmental Debt Service Requirements As of December 31, 2011 Due in 2012 Maturity Debt DateOutstandingPrincipalInterest G.O. Equipment Certificates of 2007 EFeb-01-12 450,000$ 450,000$ 9,563 G.O. Equipment Certificates of 2011 XFeb-01-14 665,000 215,000 13,263 G.O. Park Refunding Bonds of 2003 BFeb-01-15 1,565,000 375,000 49,744 G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds of 2003 AFeb-01-26 12,075,000 660,000 487,733 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds of 2004 AFeb-01-30 13,665,000 245,000 608,394 G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds of 2005 AFeb-01-26 2,675,000 135,000 103,499 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds of 2007 DFeb-01-32 13,960,000 415,000 673,488 G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds of 2007 HFeb-01-28 2,605,000 110,000 105,595 4,775,000 195,000 218,024 G.O. Taxable Street Reconstruction Bonds of 2009 AFeb-01-30 52,435,000 2,800,000 2,269,303 Total debt supported primarily by property taxes G.O. Improvement Refunding Bonds of 2007 BFeb-01-16 955,000 380,000 29,644 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 2007 FFeb-01-18 355,000 55,000 13,213 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 2008 AFeb-01-19 245,000 35,000 7,778 G.O. Improvement Refunding Bonds of 2009 BFeb-01-20 3,425,000 515,000 76,813 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 2011 XFeb-01-14 2,675,000 - 102,470 2,525,000 - 96,724 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 2011 XFeb-01-32 10,180,000 985,000 326,642 Total debt supported primarily by special assessments G.O. State Aid Street Bonds of 2001 CApr-01-21 640,000 50,000 29,805 G.O. State Aid Street Bonds of 2007 GApr-01-18 2,745,000 345,000 102,900 2,455,000 240,000 64,950 G.O. State Aid Street Refunding Bonds of 2010 AApr-01-20 5,840,000 635,000 197,655 Total debt supported by state aid street revenue G.O. Tax Increment Refunding Bonds of 2007 AFeb-01-22 2,085,000 70,000 83,161 G.O. Taxable Tax Increment Refund Bonds of 2007 CFeb-01-14 385,000 120,000 16,575 710,000 235,000 11,850 G.O. Improvement Refunding Bonds of 2009 BFeb-01-14 3,180,000 425,000 111,586 Total debt supported primarily by tax increment 4,630,000 870,000 167,800 G.O. Water Revenue Refunding Bonds of 2004 BFeb-01-16 G.O. Ice Arena Revenue Refunding Bonds of 2008 AFeb-01-15 535,000 130,000 14,390 Gross Revenue Recreation Facility Bonds of 1999Aug-01-19 770,000 - 41,145 97,027 8,131 4,941 Ice Arena Capital Equipment Lease of 2005Feb-01-21 1,402,027 138,131 60,476 Total debt supported primarily by ice arena revenue HRA Public Facility Lease Revenue Bonds of 2002 AFeb-01-23 1,775,000 110,000 88,393 8,725,000 190,000 390,175 HRA Ice Arena Lease Revenue Bonds of 2006Feb-01-32 10,500,000 300,000 478,568 Total debt supported primarily by lease revenue $ 88,167,027$ 6,153,131$ 3,612,030 Total Governmental Debt 173 Capital Project Funds Capital Project Funds account for financial resources appropriated to the acquisition of capital facilities and equipment, except those financed by Enterprise Funds. Municipal State Aid Street Fund This fund accounts for an annual allotment from the State of Minnesota Municipal State Aid Street Construction account. Pavement Management Fund The Pavement Management Fund’s primary purpose is to account for pavement management activities relating to cracksealing, patching, seal coating and overlays. These major maintenance projects are financed with property taxes. Improvement Construction Fund This fund accounts for the construction of certain public improvements, such as streets, storm sewers, water and sanitary sewer trunk lines. Construction contracts involve multiple financing resources from the City and other government entities. Construction projects usually extend over several years before completion. Building Fund This fund accounts for the accumulation and disbursement of funds for the construction or improvement of public buildings. Equipment Fund This fund accounts for the purchase of public safety, street and park maintenance equipment. The most significant capital acquisitions are related to replacing vehicles, heavy machinery, and technology. Park Dedication Fund This fund accounts for park development fees received from land developers. The expenditures consist of acquiring and developing City parks and trails. Trail Improvement Fund This fund accounts for the long term maintenance, repairs and replacement of the City trails. The primary revenue source is a transfer from the General Fund. (Continued) Capital Project Funds Storm Sewer Fund This fund accounts for fees and area charges to land developers for construction of trunk storm sewer systems. Water Fund This fund accounts for revenues derived primarily from connection charges collected at the time building permits are issued. Funds are appropriated towards the construction costs of water supply lines, wells and water storage facilities, and provide the debt service to bonds issued to finance the construction of the City’s water treatment facility and other trunk infrastructure improvements. Sanitary Sewer Fund This fund accounts for sewer connection and area fees charged to land developers for connecting to the City’s sanitary sewer system. Appropriations are applied to the construction of sanitary sewer trunk systems. Tax Increment Fund This fund accounts for revenue received from tax increment property that does not require debt financing. The expenditures are for current and future development of tax increment property. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Capital Projects Funds For the Year Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues General property taxes 1,195,722$ 1,231,594 1,231,594 2,101,335 1,571,461 Tax increment 222,722 221,515 202,084 202,084 202,084 Intergovernmental 1,334,241 540,314 562,075 67,678 17,300 Charges for services 1,177,405 1,761,363 1,155,266 1,539,157 2,700,426 Special assessments 141,297 53,340 35,000 27,000 27,000 Investment income 178,352 43,359 87,793 58,183 53,508 Donations 80,000 - 2,500 - - 275,938 754,044 886,208 292,080 669,454 Miscellaneous 4,605,677 4,605,529 4,162,520 4,287,517 5,241,233 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay General government 516,616 1,166,219 302,959 531,345 405,734 Public safety Police 499,165 190,838 290,854 946,759 547,177 Fire 3,142 428,933 523,489 333,839 35,564 Public works 5,309,252 2,626,472 5,590,988 8,789,510 10,093,728 737,276 426,163 656,221 922,183 484,666 Parks and recreation 7,065,451 4,838,625 7,364,511 11,523,636 11,566,869 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (2,459,774) (233,096) (3,201,991) (7,236,119) (6,325,636) over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 1,521,347 204,922 2,619,308 1,942,929 459,900 Transfer to other funds (2,878,224) (1,933,980) (1,757,903) (1,781,283) (1,527,183) 4,945,000 - - 5,905,000 5,965,000 Issuance of debt 3,588,123 (1,729,058) 861,405 6,066,646 4,897,717 Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances 1,128,349 (1,962,154) (2,340,586) (1,169,473) (1,427,919) 11,506,688 7,638,750 12,635,037 10,399,692 9,230,219 Fund balance, January 1 $ 12,635,037$ 5,676,596$ 10,294,451$ 9,230,219$ 7,802,300 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(11.2%)(15.5%) For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances, see the fund balance discussion on the page following the combining schedules. 174 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Capital Projects Funds For the Year Ending December 31, 2011 (continued on following page) 2011 Proposed Budget MunicipalPavementImprovementPark State AidManagementConstructionBuildingEquipmentDedication Revenues General property taxes$ - $ 1,546,958$ - $ - $ 554,377$ - Tax increment Intergovernmental 12,000 39,628 Charges for services 474,700 Special assessments Investment income 8,575 3,500 2,350 3,675 5,000 3,000 - - - - 73,625 18,500 Miscellaneous 8,575 1,550,458 2,350 15,675 672,630 496,200 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay General government 226,456 109,092 Public safety 230,431 Police 716,328 Fire 333,839 Public works 275,282 1,646,186 5,385,000 72,900 974,601 - - - 2,200 376,097 384,000 Parks and recreation 275,282 1,646,186 5,385,000 531,987 2,509,957 384,000 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (266,707) (95,728) (5,382,650) (516,312) (1,837,327) 112,200 over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 685,329 Transfer to other funds - - 5,250,000 - 655,000 - Issuance of debt - - 5,250,000 - 1,340,329 - Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances (266,707) (95,728) (132,650) (516,312) (496,998) 112,200 2,003,684 903,875 612,127 1,255,514 1,385,709 695,970 Fund balance, January 1 $ 1,736,977$ 808,147$ 479,477$ 739,202$ 888,711$ 808,170 Fund balance, December 31 2011 Net change in fund balance percentage(13.3%)(10.6%)(21.7%)(41.1%)(35.9%)16.1% For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances, see the fund balance discussion on the page following the combining schedules. 175 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Capital Projects Funds For the Year Ending December 31, 2011 (continued from previous page) 2011 Proposed Budget TrailStormSanitaryTax ImprovementSewerWaterSewerIncrementTotal Revenues General property taxes$ - $ - $ -$ - $ -$ 2,101,335 Tax increment 202,084 202,084 Intergovernmental 16,050 67,678 Charges for services 293,082 643,500 127,875 1,539,157 Special assessments 15,000 5,000 7,000 27,000 Investment income 12,000 300 (2,901) 22,679 5 58,183 - - 199,955 - - 292,080 Miscellaneous 12,000 308,382 845,554 157,554 218,139 4,287,517 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay General government 195,797 531,345 Public safety 230,431 Police 716,328 Fire 333,839 Public works - 146,541 216,500 72,500 8,789,510 159,886 - - - - 922,183 Parks and recreation 159,886 146,541 216,500 72,500 195,797 11,523,636 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (147,886) 161,841 629,054 85,054 22,342 (7,236,119) over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 57,600 1,200,000 1,942,929 Transfer to other funds (331,000) (1,428,473) (21,810) (1,781,283) - - - - - 5,905,000 Issuance of debt - (273,400) (228,473) - (21,810) 6,066,646 Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances (147,886) (111,559) 400,581 85,054 532 (1,169,473) 1,400,000 183,793 (290,562) 2,236,742 12,840 10,399,692 Fund balance, January 1 $ 1,252,114$ 72,234$ 110,019$ 2,321,796$ 13,372 $ 9,230,219 Fund balance, December 31 2011 Net change in fund balance percentage(10.6%)(60.7%)(137.9%)3.8%4.1%(11.2%) For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances, see the fund balance discussion on the page following the combining schedules. 176 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Capital Projects Funds For the Year Ending December 31, 2012 (continued on following page) 2012 Proposed Budget MunicipalPavementImprovementPark State AidManagementConstructionBuildingEquipmentDedication Revenues General property taxes$ -$ 1,198,487$ - $ - $ 372,974$ - Tax increment Intergovernmental 1,250 Charges for services 1,026,330 Special assessments Investment income 7,000 3,500 1,000 3,250 4,350 - - - 300,000 149,000 18,500 Miscellaneous 7,000 1,201,987 1,250 301,000 525,224 1,049,180 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay General government 23,000 186,937 Public safety 309,600 Police 237,577 Fire 35,564 Public works 1,154,600 1,239,633 5,590,000 435,000 802,297 - - - - 128,210 198,075 Parks and recreation 1,154,600 1,239,633 5,590,000 767,600 1,390,585 198,075 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (1,147,600) (37,646) (5,588,750) (466,600) (865,361) 851,105 over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds Transfer to other funds - - 5,365,000 - 600,000 - Issuance of debt - - 5,365,000 - 600,000 - Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances (1,147,600) (37,646) (223,750) (466,600) (265,361) 851,105 1,736,977 808,147 479,477 739,202 888,711 808,170 Fund balance, January 1 $ 589,377$ 770,501$ 255,727$ 272,602$ 623,350$ 1,659,275 Fund balance, December 31 2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(66.1%)(4.7%)(46.7%)(63.1%)(29.9%)105.3% For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances, see the fund balance discussion on the page following the combining schedules. 177 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Capital Projects Funds For the Year Ending December 31, 2012 (continued from previous page) 2012 Proposed Budget TrailStormSanitaryTax ImprovementSewerWaterSewerIncrementTotal Revenues General property taxes$ -$ - $ -$ - $ -$ 1,571,461 Tax increment 202,084 202,084 Intergovernmental 16,050 17,300 Charges for services 684,596 819,000 170,500 2,700,426 Special assessments 15,000 5,000 7,000 27,000 Investment income 10,000 700 1,110 22,593 5 53,508 - - 201,954 - - 669,454 Miscellaneous 10,000 700,296 1,027,064 200,093 218,139 5,241,233 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay General government 195,797 405,734 Public safety 309,600 Police 237,577 Fire 35,564 Public works 342,298 227,400 302,500 10,093,728 158,381 - - - - 484,666 Parks and recreation 158,381 342,298 227,400 302,500 195,797 11,566,869 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (148,381) 357,998 799,664 (102,407) 22,342 (6,325,636) over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from other funds 59,900 400,000 459,900 Transfer to other funds (331,000) (1,174,373) (21,810) (1,527,183) - - - - - 5,965,000 Issuance of debt - (271,100) (774,373) - (21,810) 4,897,717 Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances (148,381) 86,898 25,291 (102,407) 532 (1,427,919) 1,252,114 72,234 110,019 2,321,796 13,372 9,230,219 Fund balance, January 1 $ 1,103,733 $ 159,132$ 135,310$ 2,219,389$ 13,904 $ 7,802,300 Fund balance, December 31 2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(11.9%)120.3%23.0%(4.4%)4.0%(15.5%) For a complete discussion of changes in fund balances, see the fund balance discussion on the page following the combining schedules. Municipal State Aid Street Fund The balance will decrease by $266,707 and $1,147,600 in 2011 and 2012 respectively as a result of the Ipava Avenue overlay from 178 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Project Funds Fund Balance Discussion ndth 162 to 165 street, Dodd Boulevard project and the City share of cost for the Cedar Avenue project. The ending fund balance ($589,377) is appropriated to future projects identified in the 2011 – 2015 Capital Improvement Plan Pavement Management Fund The balance will be $ 667,773 and $ 630,127 for 2011 and 2012. The fund balance provides the working capital until such time as the receipt of its primary revenue source – property taxes. The fund balance is 40% to 50% of the expenditures. The fund balance is consistent with the City’s Fund Balance Policy and the Minnesota State Auditors Statement of Position regarding fund balances. Improvement Construction Fund The balance decreased by $132,650 and $ 223,750 in 2011 and 2012 respectively as a result of City share of cost for the County Road 50 and 60 round-about. The ending fund balance ($255,727) is appropriated to projects identified in the 2011 – 2015 Capital Improvement Plan. Building Fund The balance will decrease by $516,312 and $466,600 in 2011 and 2012. The ending fund balance ($272,602) is appropriated to projects identified in the 2011 – 2015 Capital Improvement Plan. Equipment Fund balance The will decrease by $654,268 and $265,361 in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The ending fund balance ($463,580) will be appropriated to future equipment acquisitions to minimize future debt and tax levies. Park Dedication Fund The balance will increase by $112,200 and $851,105 in 2011 and 2012 in anticipation of increased development activity. The ending fund balance ($1.6 million) will be appropriated to projects indentified in the 2011 – 2012 Capital Improvement Plan. Trail Improvement Fund The balance will decrease by $147,886 and $148,381 as a result of the trail maintenance and replacement program. The ending fund balance ($1.1 million) is appropriated to projects indentified in the 2011 – 2015 Capital Improvement Plan in order to minimize future tax levies. (continued) Storm Sewer Fund The balance will decrease by $111,559 and increase by $86,898 in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The ending fund balance ($196,285) is appropriated to future storm sewer project improvements. 179 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Project Funds Fund Balance Discussion (continued) Water Fund The balance will increase by $401,061 and $136,750 in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The ending fund balance ($136,750) is appropriated to future debt service payments and projects identified in the 2011 – 2012 Capital Improvement Plan. Sanitary Sewer Fund The balance will increase by $85,054 and decrease by $102,407 in 2011 and 2012 respectively. The ending fund balance ($2.2 million) is appropriated to projects identified in the 2011 – 2015 Capital Improvement Plan and the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. Tax Increment Fund The will have no significant balance in 2011 and 2012. The ending fund balance (13,904) is appropriated to meet tax increment obligations. 180 MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET FUND Fund Description Municipal State Aid Street Fund The accounts for an annual allotment from the State of Minnesota Municipal State Aid Street Construction account. ndth Appropriations are proposed in 2011 for an Ipava Avenue overlay from 162 Street to 165 Street ($85,282), Dodd Boulevard project ($120,000) and a portion of the Cedar Avenue project ($70,000). The 2012 estimated budget includes funding for City share of the Dodd Boulevard project. The proposed projects have no direct impact on the operating budget. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Municipal State Aid Street Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimate ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues $ 44,678 $ - $ 12,750 $ 8,575 $ 7,000 Investment income Expenditures - Capital outlay 41,719 1,165,332 596,795 275,282 1,154,600 Public works Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 2,959 (1,165,332) (584,045) (266,707) (1,147,600) Other financing sources (uses) - 760,000 - - - Issuance of debt Net change in fund balance 2,959 (405,332) (584,045) (266,707) (1,147,600) 2,584,770 2,584,770 2,587,729 2,003,684 1,736,977 Fund balance, January 1 $ 2,587,729$ 2,179,438$ 2,003,684$ 1,736,977$ 589,377 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(13.3%)(66.1%) CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Municipal State Aid Street Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012201320142015 Projects Overlay Ipava: 162nd - 165th$ 85,282$ -$ -$ -$ - Cedar Ave.: 3rd Lane - 147th - 179th 70,000 558,000 Dodd Blvd.: Hayes Ave - Cedar Ave. 120,000 393,700 - 1,154,600 - - - Dodd Blvd.: 183rd - Hayes $ 275,282$ 1,154,600$ 393,700$ 558,000$ - Total 181 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT FUND Fund Description Pavement Management Fund’s The primary purpose is to account for pavement management activities relating to cracksealing, patching, seal coating and overlays. These major maintenance projects are financed with property taxes. Accounting for pavement management activities in a designated fund enables the City Council to establish a relatively stable tax levy. The fund activities account for maintenance costs which would otherwise be accounted for in the operating budget. The Pavement Management Fund enables the city to establish a long-term maintenance program and financing plan which when taken into consideration with the street reconstruction program, enables the city to develop a consistent long-term financing plan for one the communities most significant infrastructure assets. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Pavement Management Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimate ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues General property taxes$ 1,195,722$ 1,231,594$ 1,231,594$ 1,546,958$ 1,198,487 Intergovernmental - Federal grant 811,509 Special assessments 3,511 12,823 10,202 27,006 3,500 3,500 Investment income 2,023,565 1,241,796 1,258,600 1,550,458 1,201,987 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay 2,139,854 1,587,832 1,111,725 1,646,186 1,239,633 Public works Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (116,289) (346,036) 146,875 (95,728) (37,646) Other financing sources (uses) - - 140,374 - - Transfer from Genera Fund Net change in fund balance (116,289) (346,036) 287,249 (95,728) (37,646) 732,915 724,313 616,626 903,875 808,147 Fund balance, January 1 $ 616,626$ 378,277$ 903,875$ 808,147$ 770,501 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(10.6%)(4.7%) 182 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Pavement Management Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012201320142015 Projects Crack Seal$ 100,000$ 104,000$ 108,160$ 112,486$ 116,986 Patching 230,000 239,200 248,768 258,719 269,068 Seal Coat 670,000 208,000 216,320 224,973 233,972 Overlays: Minor 201,000 209,800 217,832 226,105 235,629 Overlays: Collector Roads 420,186 453,633 438,397 342,136 618,415 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Other $ 1,646,186$ 1,239,633$ 1,254,477$ 1,189,419$ 1,499,070 Total 183 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION FUND Fund Description Improvement Construction Fund The accounts for the construction of certain public improvements, such as streets, storm sewers, water and sanitary sewer trunk lines. Construction contracts involve multiple financing resources from the City and other government entities and usually extend over several years before completion. Appropriations are provided in the 2011 th proposed budget for street reconstruction projects ($2.675 million), Kenrick Avenue from 175 rd to 183 ($2.575 million) and the City share of cost for the County Road 50/60 roundabout ($135,000). The 2012 estimated budget provides for street reconstruction projects ($5.365 million) and the City share of cost for the County Road 50/60 roundabout ($225,000). The street reconstruction and Kenrick Avenue projects will be financed with the issuance of debt. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Improvement Construction Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimate ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues Intergovernmental$ 209,258 $ - $ - $ - $ - 15,264 - 3,000 2,350 1,250 Investment income 224,522 - 3,000 2,350 1,250 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay General government 97,814 1,413,945 135,250 3,082,909 5,385,000 5,590,000 Public works 1,511,759 135,250 3,082,909 5,385,000 5,590,000 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (1,287,237) (135,250) (3,079,909) (5,382,650) (5,588,750) over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from Capital Projects: Municipal State Aid Street Fund 135,250 Transfer to Debt Service: Property Taxes Fund (12,469) 4,945,000 - - 5,250,000 5,365,000 Issuance of debt 4,932,531 135,250 - 5,250,000 5,365,000 Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balance 3,645,294 - (3,079,909) (132,650) (223,750) 46,742 - 3,692,036 612,127 479,477 Fund balance, January 1 $ 3,692,036$ -$ 612,127 $ 479,477 $ 255,727 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(21.7%)(46.7%) 184 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION FUND (continued) The proposed improvement program for the coming years will increase the street infrastructure system by approximately one lane mile. The General Fund budget provides for one full time maintenance position in the fall of 2012 which will be available for snow plowing and other maintenance task for the new roads and other infrastructure expansions. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Improvement Construction Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012201320142015 Projects Roundabout: County Road 60 / 50 $ 135,000$ 225,000 $ 180,000 $ -$ - Kenrick Avenue: 175th - 183rd 2,575,000 2,675,000 5,365,000 4,915,000 5,475,000 4,205,000 Street reconstruction projects $ 5,385,000$ 5,590,000 $ 5,095,000 $ 5,475,000 $ 4,205,000 Total 185 BUILDING FUND Fund Description Building Fund The accounts for the accumulation and disbursement of funds for the construction or improvement of public buildings. The primary revenue source is sale of assets. The City has invested in energy efficient systems at the Police Station, Central Maintenance Facility and the Arts Center. The result has been lower gas, electric and maintenance costs. The proposed 2011 budget includes financing for cost effective energy system improvements at City Hall, Central Maintenance Facility and fire stations. The budget also includes remodeling of the fire department administrative office to improve operational efficiencies. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Building Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimate ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues Intergovernmental - Federal grant$ - $ 276,174 $ 276,174 $ 12,000 $ - Investment income 4,204 6,116 6,116 3,675 1,000 Donations 80,000 20,794 567,611 553,839 - 300,000 Miscellaneous 104,998 849,901 836,129 15,675 301,000 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay General government 28,009 969,000 105,759 226,456 23,000 Public safety 102,647 42,025 74,310 230,431 309,600 Public works 26,706 71,521 71,409 72,900 45,695 252,800 192,339 2,200 435,000 Parks and recreation 203,057 1,335,346 443,817 531,987 767,600 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (98,059) (485,445) 392,312 (516,312) (466,600) over expenditures Other financing sources Transfer from: General Fund 52,136 Enterprise Liquor Fund 200,000 (238,000) - - - - Transfer to Debt Service Fund (38,000) - 52,136 - - Total other financing sources Net change in fund balance (136,059) (485,445) 444,448 (516,312) (466,600) 947,125 638,434 811,066 1,255,514 739,202 Fund balance, January 1 $ 811,066$ 152,989 $ 1,255,514$ 739,202 $ 272,602 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(41.1%)(63.1%) 186 BUILDING FUND (continued) The proposed infrastructure improvements will have a favorable financial impact on the operating budget by reducing energy and maintenance costs for City Hall, Fire Stations and the Central Maintenance Facility. The improvements for the fire administration offices will not have an impact on the operating budget but will result in improved productivity. Details relating to the proposed expenditures are provided in the 2011 – 2012 Capital Improvement Plan. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Building Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012201320142015 Capital outlay City Hall$ 226,456$ -$ -$ -$ - Historical Society Facility 23,000 8,000 Police Station 9,000 300,000 Fire Facilities 221,431 9,600 3,200 120,000 Central Maintenance Facility 72,900 Senior Center 435,000 2,200 - - - - Arts Center $ 531,987$ 767,600 $ 3,200$ 120,000 $ 8,000 Total expenditures 187 EQUIPMENT FUND Fund Description Equipment Fund The accounts for the purchase of public safety, street and park maintenance equipment. The most significant capital acquisitions are related to replacing vehicles, heavy machinery, and technology. A transfer is proposed in from the General Fund ($1.1 million) to finance, at least in part, equipment acquisition and minimize the use of tax levies for the next several years. The Liquor Fund will finance the modifications and replacement to the civil defense sirens ($247,498), police records software and computer hardware ($212,831) and a fire truck ($225,000). Tax levies are also proposed to finance equipment acquisitions on a pay-as you-go basis in the amount $554,377 and $372,974 in 2011 and 2012 respectively. Short-term debt (Certificates of Indebtedness) will be issued in the amount of $665,000 and $600,000 in 2011 and 2012 respectively to complete the financing for the proposed equipment acquisitions. The estimated 2012 ending fund balance ($463,580) will be appropriated to future equipment acquisitions to reduce short-term debt and tax levies. Replacement of equipment when it has reached the end of its useful life results in lower maintenance cost impacts on the operating budget. All departments evaluated the overall condition of the City’s fleet and equipment. In situations where the equipment is still operating at peak efficiencies with minimal operating costs, the expected useful life of the asset has been extended. 188 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Equipment Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimate ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues General property taxes$ - $ - $ - $ 554,377 $ 372,974 Intergovernmental Market value homestead credit 292,579 ALF Ambulance distribution 117,032 117,032 39,628 Dakota Communication Center rebate 131,058 131,058 Federal Police Byrne Grant 21,761 Investment income 5,679 5,600 5,000 3,250 Donations 2,500 1,000 10,500 10,424 73,625 149,000 Miscellaneous 299,258 258,590 288,375 672,630 525,224 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay General government 184,432 1,422 1,403 109,092 186,937 Public safety Police 396,518 190,838 216,544 716,328 237,577 Fire 3,142 386,908 523,489 333,839 35,564 Public works 788,678 102,457 118,154 974,601 802,297 18,551 29,363 29,528 376,097 128,210 Parks and recreation 1,391,321 710,988 889,118 2,509,957 1,390,585 Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues (1,092,063) (452,398) (600,743) (1,837,327) (865,361) over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from: General Fund 1,263,647 1,100,000 Enterprise - Liquor Fund 9,372 9,372 685,329 - - 655,000 600,000 Issuance of debt 1,263,647 9,372 1,109,372 1,340,329 600,000 Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balance 171,584 (443,026) 508,629 (496,998) (265,361) 705,496 640,931 877,080 1,385,709 888,711 Fund balance, January 1 $ 877,080$ 197,905$ 1,385,709$ 888,711$ 623,350 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(35.9%)(29.9%) 189 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Equipment Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012201320142015 Capital outlay General government$ 109,092$ 186,937$ 320,424$ 524,972$ 477,524 Public safety Police 716,328 237,577 606,205 437,951 679,905 Fire 333,839 35,564 165,000 85,000 10,000 Public works 974,601 802,297 611,534 948,246 948,778 376,097 128,210 394,810 839,413 356,510 Parks and recreation $ 2,509,957$ 1,390,585$ 2,097,973$ 2,835,582$ 2,472,717 Total 190 PARK DEDICATION FUND Fund Description Park Dedication Fund The accounts for park development fees received from land developers. The expenditures consist of acquiring and developing City parks and trails. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Park Dedication Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimate ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues Intergovernmental State grant$ 4,845 $ -$ -$ -$ - Charges for services 108,245 405,970 237,350 474,700 1,026,330 Special assessments 80 Investment income 19,898 4,750 3,000 4,350 115,246 - 123,970 18,500 18,500 Miscellaneous 248,314 405,970 366,070 496,200 1,049,180 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay 673,030 144,000 434,354 384,000 198,075 Parks and recreation Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (424,716) 261,970 (68,284) 112,200 851,105 1,188,970 194,741 764,254 695,970 808,170 Fund balance, January 1 $ 764,254 $ 456,711$ 695,970$ 808,170$ 1,659,275 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage16.1%105.3% The proposed improvements for 2011 and 2012 are anticipated to have nominal impact on the operating budget. 191 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Park Dedication Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012201320142015 Projects Developers credits$ 50,000 $ 80,000$ 90,000$ 150,000$ 150,000 Trail improvements 68,075 113,438 93,980 Park improvements 290,000 481,000 250,000 Other 44,000 50,000 76,000 129,000 94,000 Total Capital Improvements$ 384,000 $ 198,075$ 760,438$ 622,980$ 244,000 Details relating to the proposed park expenditures are provided in the 2011 – 2015 Capital Improvement Plan. 192 TRAIL IMPROVEMENT FUND Fund Description Trail Improvement Fund The accounts for the long term maintenance, repairs and replacement of the City Trails. The primary revenue source is a transfer from the General Fund. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Trail Improvement Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimate ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues $ - $ - $ - $ 12,000 $ 10,000 Investment income Expenditures - Capital outlay - - - 159,886 158,381 Parks and recreation Excess (deficiency) of revenues - - - (147,886) (148,381) over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from: - - 1,400,000 - - General Fund Net change in fund balance - - 1,400,000 (147,886) (148,381) - - - 1,400,000 1,252,114 Fund balance, January 1 $ - $ - $ 1,400,000$ 1,252,114$ 1,103,733 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(10.6%)(11.9%) The proposed improvements for 2011 and 2012 are anticipated to have nominal impact on the operating budget. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Trail Improvement Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012201320142015 Trail sealcoating $ 60,443$ 58,028$ 101,985$ 77,306$ 76,324 99,443 100,353 524,263 391,255 - Trail improvements $ 159,886$ 158,381$ 626,248$ 468,561$ 76,324 Total Details relating to the proposed trail improvement expenditures are provided in the 2011 – 2015 Capital Improvement Plan. 193 STORM SEWER FUND Fund Description Storm Sewer Fund The accounts for fees and area charges to land developers for construction of trunk storm sewer systems. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Storm Sewer Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimate ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues Charges for services$ 143,090$ 150,937$ 146,541$ 293,082$ 684,596 Special assessments 19,054 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 6,851 2,844 900 300 700 Investment income 168,995 168,781 162,441 308,382 700,296 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay 75,311 72,376 73,270 146,541 342,298 Public works Excess (deficiency) of revenues 93,684 96,405 89,171 161,841 357,998 over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from: Debt Service - Tax Increment Fund 57,700 60,300 60,300 57,600 59,900 Transfer to: General Fund (36,230) (40,827) (37,153) (331,000) (331,000) (331,000) (331,000) (331,000) Debt Service - Special Assess. Fund (309,530) (311,527) (307,853) (273,400) (271,100) Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances (215,846) (215,122) (218,682) (111,559) 86,898 618,321 393,325 402,475 183,793 72,234 Fund balance, January 1 $ 402,475$ 178,203$ 183,793$ 72,234$ 159,132 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(60.7%)120.3% The proposed improvements for 2011 and 2012 are anticipated to have nominal impact on the operating budget. 194 STORM SEWER FUND CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Storm Sewer Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012201320142015 Projects $ 146,541$ 342,298$ 415,569$ 440,177$ 476,812 Developer credits $ 146,541$ 342,298$ 415,569$ 440,177$ 476,812 Total 195 WATER FUND Fund Description Water Fund The accounts for revenues derived primarily from connection charges collected at the time building permits are issued and antenna site leases with wireless communications companies. Funds are appropriated towards the construction costs of water supply lines, wells and water storage facilities, and provide the debt service to bonds issued to finance the construction of the City’s water treatment facility and other trunk infrastructure improvements. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Water Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimate ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues Charges for services$ 751,108$ 1,104,675$ 643,500$ 643,500$ 819,000 Special assessments 67,449 14,104 5,000 5,000 5,000 Investment income 24,673 4,591 4,591 (2,901) 1,110 138,898 175,933 197,975 199,955 201,954 Miscellaneous 982,128 1,299,303 851,066 845,554 1,027,064 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay 567,767 206,200 206,200 216,500 227,400 Public works Excess (deficiency) of revenues 414,361 1,093,103 644,866 629,054 799,664 over expenditures Other financing sources (uses) Transfer from Enterprise Fund Water Operating Fund 1,200,000 400,000 Transfer to Debt Service: Special Assessments Fund (496,093) (136,093) (136,093) (136,093) (136,093) (1,289,880) (1,269,000) (1,269,480) (1,292,380) (1,038,280) Water Revenue Fund (1,785,973) (1,405,093) (1,405,573) (228,473) (774,373) Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances (1,371,612) (311,990) (760,707) 400,581 25,291 1,841,757 347,388 470,145 (290,562) 110,019 Fund balance, January 1 $ 470,145$ 35,398$ (290,562)$ 110,019$ 135,310 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage(137.9%)23.0% The proposed improvements for 2011 and 2012 are anticipated to have nominal impact on the operating budget. 196 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Water Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012201320142015 Projects Well #20$ -$ -$ 600,000$ -$ - 216,500 227,400 227,400 227,400 227,400 Trunk water main extensions $ 216,500$ 227,400$ 827,400$ 227,400$ 227,400 Total 197 SANITARY SEWER FUND Fund Description Sanitary Sewer Fund The accounts for sewer connection and area fees charged to land developers for connecting to the City’s sanitary sewer system. Appropriations are applied to the construction of sanitary sewer trunk systems. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Sanitary Sewer Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimate ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues Charges for services$ 174,962$ 99,781$ 127,875$ 127,875$ 170,500 Special assessments 51,203 24,236 15,000 7,000 7,000 44,271 19,397 23,075 22,679 22,593 Investment income 270,436 143,414 165,950 157,554 200,093 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay 255,272 450,836 330,526 72,500 302,500 Public works Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 15,164 (307,422) (164,576) 85,054 (102,407) Other financing sources (uses) Transfer to Debt Service: (463,647) - - - - Special Assessments Fund Net changes in fund balances (448,483) (307,422) (164,576) 85,054 (102,407) 2,849,801 2,103,095 2,401,318 2,236,742 2,321,796 Fund balance, January 1 $ 2,401,318$ 1,795,673$ 2,236,742$ 2,321,796$ 2,219,389 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage3.8%(4.4%) The proposed improvements for 2011 and 2012 are anticipated to have nominal impact on the operating budget. 198 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Sanitary Sewer Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012201320142015 Projects Trunk oversizing upstream of ML07$ 5,000$ -$ -$ -$ - Trunk oversizing SC135 to SC134 67,500 Trunk oversizing NC127a to NC127 102,000 Trunk oversizing NC05 to NC06 66,000 Trunk oversizing NC127a to NC127b 85,000 Trunk oversizing SC22 to SC20 22,500 Trunk oversizing SC12 to SC12a 27,000 Trunk oversizing NC129 to NC127b 67,500 Trunk oversizing SC22 to SC22a 17,000 Trunk oversizing SC43 to SC44 21,000 Trunk oversizing LS24 to NC129 190,000 Trunk oversizing Upstream of NC74 10,000 Trunk oversizing NC132 to NC129 40,500 Trunk oversizing SC44 to SC43 10,000 Trunk oversizing 260,200 - - - - 91,200 Sanitary Sewer Reconstruction $ 72,500$ 302,500$ 295,500$ 60,500$ 351,400 Total Details relating to the proposed Sanitary Sewer Fund expenditures are provided in the 2011 – 2015 Capital Improvement Plan. 199 TAX INCREMENT FUND Fund Description: Tax Increment Fund The accounts for revenue received from tax increment property that does not require debt financing. The expenditures are for current and future development of tax increment property. CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Tax Increment Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimate ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Revenues Tax increment$ 222,722 $ 221,515 $ 202,084 $ 202,084 $ 202,084 Intergovernmental Market value homestead credit 16,050 16,050 16,050 16,050 16,050 11 209 5 5 5 Investment income 238,783 237,774 218,139 218,139 218,139 Total revenues Expenditures - Capital outlay 206,361 195,797 195,797 195,797 195,797 General government Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 32,422 41,977 22,342 22,342 22,342 Other financing sources (uses) Transfer to Debt Service: (10,905) (21,810) (21,810) (21,810) (21,810) Special Assessments Fund Net change in fund balance 21,517 20,167 532 532 532 (9,209) 11,753 12,308 12,840 13,372 Fund balance, January 1 $ 12,308 $ 31,920 $ 12,840 $ 13,372 $ 13,904 Fund balance, December 31 2011/2012 Net change in fund balance percentage4.1%4.0% The proposed improvements for 2011 and 2012 are anticipated to have no impact on the operating budget. 200 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Tax Increment Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012201320142015 Capital outlay DKM tax increment district rebate$ 191,667 $ 191,667 $ 191,667 $ 191,667 $ - State of Minnesota/Dakota County 4,130 4,130 4,130 4,130 - administration fees $ 195,797 $ 195,797 $ 195,797 $ 195,797 $ - Total 201 Enterprise Funds Enterprise Funds account for liquor, water and sanitary sewer operations for the City; they are self-supporting from retail sales and user charges. Operations are managed in much the same way as private enterprises. Liquor Fund This fund accounts for revenues and expenses related to the operation of Lakeville’s municipal off-sale liquor stores. Utility Fund This fund accounts for revenues and expenses related to water, sanitary sewer service, and street lighting provided to the community. LIQUOR FUND Fund Description: The Liquor Fund is responsible for controlling the sale of off-sale alcoholic beverages. while generating revenue for the community. This includes abiding by all State statutes regarding the legal sale of alcohol, offering competitive pricing, while providing superior product selection and customer service. Of the 220 cities operating municipal liquor stores in Minnesota, Lakeville continues to have the largest and most profitable operation. The revenue generated from the operations has financed, at least in part, numerous projects including: Dakota County Heritage Library Land Civil defense sirens.  Acquisition. Central Maintenance Facility  Quarter of a million dollars to Ames architectural services.  Arena. The Liquor Fund also finances 25% of  City Hall expansion projects. the Chemical Awareness Coordinator  position associated with Independent Fire Station remodeling, repairs and debt  School District #194. services. Police Station expansion projects.  Services: Control the sale of alcoholic beverages. proceeds are committed to financing  The City is committed to restricting capital improvements which would youth access to alcohol. Employees are otherwise be financed with property also trained in how to observe and taxes. decline sales to obviously intoxicated Asset management and inventory  individuals. integrity plays an essential role in Lakeville is committed to quality profitability. The retail liquor industry is  customer service. Product selection is highly competitive. Inventory controls continually evolving and is the lifeblood as well as policies that include well that drives our industry. Wine defined checks and balances ensure specifically is a hallmark for Lakeville. assets are controlled, while the Store ambiance, strategic location of management team and point of sale stores and customer satisfaction are operations enable Lakeville to maintain deemed a high priority. a high rate of return on investment through effective marketing strategies. Profits are dedicated to the reduction of  property taxes. Liquor Fund net 202 LIQUOR FUND (continued) Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Estimate Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Operations Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Assistant Operations Director 1.0 1.0 .25 --- --- Assistant to the Operations Director --- --- .50 1.0 1.0 Store Managers 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Inventory Control Technician 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Assistant Store Managers 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead Sales Associates 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Sales Associates 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total 25.7 25.7 25.5 25.7 25.7 Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Sales (in millions) $14.6 $14.7 $14.8 $14.9 $15.1 Operating Income $1,678,214 $1,495,263 $1,579,809 $1,529,718 $1,513,591 Operating Income as a Percent 11.5% 10.2% 10.6% 10.3% 10.0% of Sales Customer Transactions: Heritage Store Location 177,602 188,021 181,414 184,649 189,542 Galaxie Store Location 197,599 196,244 196,644 198,610 201,589 Kenrick Store Location 222,371 212,987 223,629 209,981 212,080 Total Customer 597,572 597,252 599,707 593,240 603,211 Transactions ISD #194 Chemical Awareness $18,324 $18,324 $18,324 $18,324 $18,324 Program Liquor Fund Contributions: Fire Station Debt Service $189,660 $190,097 $190,097 $185,320 $185,320 Police Station Debt Service $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 General Fund For Human $75,350 $76,337 $77,144 $78,016 $82,832 Resources/Information Technology Services General Fund for Payment in $62,620 $64,499 $64,499 $66,434 $68,427 Lieu of Taxes (PILT) Equipment, Major $201,660 $9,372 $9,372 $00.00 $00.00 Maintenance, and Technology Capital Outlay $10,582 $2,002,119 $64,598 $14,000 $3,006,851 203 LIQUOR FUND (continued) 2010 Goals and Objectives Land acquisition for future store at County Road 70 and Interstate Highway 35 Interchange  Strategic Goal A – 5) vicinity. ( Obtain City owned site for the Heritage (leased) location to maintain or increase profitability.  Improve community awareness on the benefits of the municipal liquor operation.  Continue to improve employee knowledge, customer service and profitability of the  operation. Sale of alcoholic beverages in compliance with applicable State statutes and enforcement.  Servicing customers needs quickly and professionally.  Controlling inventory levels, while ensuring proper level of stock that provides good  customer service and selection. Ensuring inventory accuracy by maintaining checks and balances within the system and by  completing inventories on a routine basis. Promote the wine club. Includes conducting four wine club tastings annually and providing  education materials to the members. Responsible for all marketing, advertisement and promotion of the business.  Conduct Silent Auctions in order to build community relationships while providing  additional revenue for other City Departments or programs. Develop relationships and provide service to other businesses within the community.  Maintain proper operational policies and procedures in order to ensure the safety and security  of the business. Educate and mentor employees. Employee meetings conducted five times annually.  Provide funding for Chemical Awareness Coordinator in the schools.  Work closely with fellow associations as well as MADD, SADD and other organizations  regarding alcohol control. Educate the community on the benefits of a municipal liquor operation.  Monitor legislative issues related to liquor stores that could negatively impact the operation.  2011 – 2012 Goals and Objectives: Achieve sales projections according to the Adopted Liquor Fund Budget.  Update Liquor Department Employee Manual.  Generate interest and encourage customer input and participation through social media  activities on Facebook. Increase interest, knowledge and membership of the “Brew Club”. Achieve a minimum of  1,000 Brew Club members by the end of 2011. Improve customer counts by closely monitoring new avenues of marketing and determining  which methods are most impactful and cost effective. Respond to legislative issued related to liquor stores that could negatively impact the liquor  operation. Develop procedures to monitor and evaluate practicality of Club memberships.  Maintain the lowest operating expense as a percent of sales among the top ten highest  volume liquor operations in the state. 204 LIQUOR FUND (continued) Continue to work closely with other municipal liquor operations in the state. Assist cities in  ensuring profitability with their operations in order to maintain municipal liquor state wide. Evaluate all liquor department contracts ensuring that we have necessary coverage in place at  all the lowest fiscally responsible cost. Budget Summary: CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Enterprise - Liquor Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Sales and cost of sales Sales$ 14,604,481 $ 14,693,942 $ 14,887,241 $ 14,913,405 $ 15,141,465 10,806,701 11,009,955 11,146,914 11,164,822 11,334,727 Cost of sales 3,797,780 3,683,987 3,740,327 3,748,583 3,806,738 Gross profit Operating expenses Personnel services 1,235,561 1,279,786 1,253,330 1,313,785 1,375,823 Commodities 47,197 56,880 59,342 57,794 63,062 Other charges and services 831,945 852,058 847,846 847,286 854,262 117,211 141,412 117,211 117,211 117,211 Depreciation 2,231,914 2,330,136 2,277,729 2,336,076 2,410,358 Total operating expenses 1,565,866 1,353,851 1,462,598 1,412,507 1,396,380 Operating income Non-operating revenue (expense) Intergovernmental 3,762 18,696 18,696 3,900 3,900 Investment income 85,650 53,121 46,575 63,600 56,793 Miscellaneous - Utility rebates 2,254 2,254 Interest and bond expense (207,599) (189,314) (189,314) (181,122) (173,643) Transfers in (out) General Fund (139,094) (142,036) (143,640) (144,950) (151,759) Special Rev. Env. Res Fund (976) (976) Debt Service: HRA Lease Rev. Fund (189,660) (190,097) (190,097) (185,320) (185,320) Property Taxes Fund (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) Capital Projects: Equipment Fund (9,372) (9,372) (685,329) (200,000) - - - - Building Fund (746,941) (556,748) (564,898) (1,230,197) (551,005) Total non-operating (net) Change in net assets 818,925 797,103 897,700 182,310 845,375 5,411,522 6,107,591 6,230,447 7,128,147 7,310,457 Net assets, January 1 Net assets, December 31$ 6,230,447$ 6,904,694$ 7,128,147 $ 7,310,457$ 8,155,832 Net change in 2011 and 2012 fund balance percentage2.6%11.6% 205 LIQUOR FUND (continued) Liquor Fund The 2011 net assets are expected to increase by $182,310 or 2.6%. This increase is primarily attributed to gross profit revenue of $3,748,583 exceeding operating expenses other uses of $2,642,704. Liquor Fund Schedule of Working Capital For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Working Capital Current assets Cash and investments$ 5,352,617 $ 4,225,868$ 5,959,368 $ 6,095,672 $ 3,896,987 Receivables 22,993 38,088 22,993 23,338 23,688 Inventory 1,336,502 1,287,692 1,392,635 1,434,414 1,477,447 22,081 22,871 22,412 22,749 23,089 Prepaid expenses 6,734,193 5,574,519 7,397,408 7,576,173 5,421,211 Total current assets Current liabilities Salaries payable 158,144 202,892 162,888 167,775 172,808 Accrued interest payable 83,154 91,753 83,154 85,649 88,218 Accounts payable 933,124 1,199,924 933,124 961,118 989,951 295,000 145,000 145,000 150,000 160,000 Current bonds payable 1,469,422 1,639,569 1,324,166 1,364,542 1,410,977 Total current liabilities $ 5,264,771 $ 3,934,950$ 6,073,242 $ 6,211,631 $ 4,010,234 Working capital, December 31 Changes in Working Capital Working capital provided Change in net assets$ 818,925 $ 797,103$ 897,700 $ 182,310 $ 845,375 Depreciation 117,211 141,412 117,211 117,211 117,211 6,345 3,158 3,158 2,868 2,868 Bond issuance - net 942,481 941,673 1,018,069 302,389 965,454 Total funds provided Working capital applied Additions to capital assets 10,582 2,002,119 64,598 14,000 3,006,851 295,000 145,000 145,000 150,000 160,000 Bonds payable 305,582 2,147,119 209,598 164,000 3,166,851 Total funds applied Net increase (decrease) 636,899 (1,205,446) 808,471 138,389 (2,201,397) 4,627,872 5,140,396 5,264,771 6,073,242 6,211,631 Working capital, January 1 $ 5,264,771 $ 3,934,950$ 6,073,242 $ 6,211,631 $ 4,010,234 Working capital, December 31 206 LIQUOR FUND (continued) The 2011 -2012 budget is based on the premise on the assumption that sales will continue to grow, albeit at a slow pace, in spite of the intense competition from private liquor stores in neighboring communities. As such Sales are projected to be $14.91 million and $15.14 million in 2011 and 2012 respectively. Gross profits are anticipated to be $3.75 and $ 3.81 million in 2011 and 2012. Liquor revenue bonds were issued in 2007 to finance the construction of the Galaxie Avenue store. The debt service requirements (cash basis) of these bonds are shown as follows: MaturityDue in 2011 DateOutstandingPrincipalInterest $ 3,690,000$ 145,000$ 180,875 Liquor Revenue Bonds of 1997Feb-01-27 The above debt is supported by liquor revenue.  The Heritage store operates in a leased facility. A 15 year lease was executed with Heritage Commons LLC in 2000. The remaining balance of the minimum lease payments for base rent as of December 31, 2009 is $739,800. The lease expires on June 30, 2014. The 2011 capital outlay includes approximately $1.9 million to acquire property for a new  store in the vicinity of Interstate Highway 35 and County Road 70 . Budget Factors: Personnel services The personnel services budget will increase $4,882 and $5,193 for 2011 and 2012 respectively due to health insurance and a State mandated .25% adjustment in PERA pension contributions. Wage adjustments, if any, are yet to be determined. Commodities Commodities will increase $914 and $5,268 in 2011 and 2012 respectively. Commodities represent approximately 2.6% of total operating expense budget. Other charges and services Other charges and services will decrease by $4,772 in the 2011 due in part to the reductions in the scope of store maintenance projects for the coming year. Costs are projected to increase by $6,976 in 2012 due primarily to credit card fees, contract building maintenance and other operational issues. The Heritage store operates in a leased facility. A 15 year lease was executed with Heritage Commons LLC in 2000. The lease expires on June 30, 2014. Capital outlay Microsoft Office upgrades and retrofitting the Kenrick Liquor Store coolers with LED lighting are included in the 2011 budget. The Arts Center computer and the Kenrick Avenue outdoor neon sign will be replaced in 2012. 207 UTILITY FUND Overall Fund Description: The Utility Fund is responsible for the operation of a 20 million gallon per day water treatment facility and the associated water collection and distribution system to provide potable water to Lakeville residents and businesses. The City is also responsible for the collection and transmission of sewage to wastewater treatment plants managed by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). Beginning January 1, 2010, City street lighting activity was accounted for in the Utility Fund; this activity was previously accounted for in the General Fund Street Department. The Utility Fund budget is effectively managed by budgeting water, sanitary sewer, and street lighting as separate operations. Individual schedules for revenues, expenses, changes in net assets, and working capital are provided for each of the respective operations. The combining of all these operations comprises the Utility Fund which is presented in the Utility Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets, and Schedule of Working Capital. Services: Water. The system includes operation which transmits effluent to the M.C.E.S.  and maintenance of 17 wells, 5 towers, 2 Empire Treatment Facility. reservoirs, water treatment plant, and Street lighting. The street lighting  310 miles of water distribution system. system is operating and maintained by Sanitary sewer. The system includes Xcel Energy and Dakota Electric  maintenance of a collection and Association (DEA). The City of forwarding system of 255 miles of Lakeville bills customers on a quarterly sanitary sewer main 20 lift stations basis for lighting There are no proposed staffing changes for 2011 and 2012. Staffing: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Position (FTE) Actual Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Operations & Maintenance Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Utilities Superintendent 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Utilities Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Op. and Maint./Safety Specialist 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Utility Maintenance II 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Utility Billing Technicians 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Total 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 208 UTILITY FUND Overall (continued) Capital outlay is allocated to the water and sanitary sewer operations based on benefit to the respective operation. The 2011 and 2012 capital outlay is as follows: 2011 Proposed2012 Estimated SanitarySanitary ItemWaterSewerWaterSewer Floor resurfacing$ 11,518 $ 11,518 Uninterruptible power supply 21,455 Water Treatment Facility improvements 25,000 25,000 Server storage 1,000 GPS data collector 4,884 4,884 Gate card reader 1,400 1,400 Cordless hydrant wrench 6,620 - Utility locators 983 983 Microsoft Office 3,252 3,252 Fuel system 4,054 4,054 1/2-Ton pickup truck with tommy gate$ 13,388 $ 13,388 7,862 7,862 8,991 Computers; desktops and laptops 8,991 $ 87,028 $ 59,953 $ 22,379 $ 22,379 Rate increases are proposed as a result of increases in operating costs. Water rate adjustments will finance debt service requirements. Sanitary sewer rate adjustments are the result of M.C.E.S. costs for treatment of system effluent. Street lights will finance electricity rate increases. The surface water management fee adjustments are to finance environmental resource projects. 20102011 Increase Quarterly ratesBasisActualProposed Water baseAccount$ 3.60 $ 3.60$ - Water tier 1 (<30 thousand gallons)Gallonage$ 0.79 $ 0.85$ 0.06 Water tier 2 (30 - 49 thousand gallons)Gallonage$ 1.24 $ 1.34$ 0.10 Water tier 3 (>49 thousand gallons)Gallonage$ 2.00 $ 2.30$ 0.30 State of MN. water testing feeAccount$ 1.59 $ 1.59$ - Sanitary sewer baseAccount$ 6.25 $ 6.25$ - Sanitary sewer usage (1,000 gallons)Gallonage$ 2.99 $ 3.09$ 0.10 Sanitary sewer non metered accountsAccount$ 57.98 $ 59.84$ 1.86 Street lightingAccount$ 6.75 $ 7.65$ 0.90 209 UTILITY FUND Overall (continued) Budget Summary – Utility Fund: CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Enterprise - Utility Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Operating revenues User charges for services$ 7,291,391 $ 7,950,345 $ 7,264,083 $ 8,121,475 $ 8,529,147 200,283 175,119 202,286 204,309 206,352 Other 7,491,674 8,125,464 7,466,369 8,325,784 8,735,499 Total operating revenue Operating expenses Personnel services 1,379,992 1,508,181 1,493,683 1,548,861 1,611,470 Commodities 372,579 435,136 378,245 389,755 402,609 Other charges and services 1,698,616 2,726,033 2,725,405 2,842,196 3,121,246 Disposal charges 2,645,442 2,825,699 2,825,699 2,941,489 3,065,964 2,995,222 3,039,952 3,039,952 3,100,751 3,193,365 Depreciation 9,091,851 10,535,001 10,462,984 10,823,052 11,394,654 Total operating expenses (1,600,177) (2,409,537) (2,996,615) (2,497,268) (2,659,155) Operating income Non-operating revenue (expense) Intergovernmental 3,264 186,394 186,394 3,264 3,264 Investment income 140,342 108,422 88,904 130,727 164,018 Miscellaneous - Utility rebates - 11,978 11,978 - - Infrastructure contributed 1,235,154 237,333 237,333 836,834 246,922 Disposal of assets - - 95,000 - 4,500 Transfers in (out) General Fund (120,825) (280,461) (260,339) (271,725) (277,852) Special Revenue: Surface Wtr. Mgmt. Fund 20,484 39,703 43,353 44,944 45,622 Capital Projects: - - - (1,200,000) (400,000) Water Fund 1,278,419 303,369 402,623 (455,956) (213,526) Total non-operating (net) Change in net assets (321,758) (2,106,168) (2,593,992) (2,953,224) (2,872,681) 113,408,603 112,689,468 113,086,845 110,492,853 107,539,629 Net assets, January 1 Net assets, December 31$ 113,086,845$ 110,583,300$ 110,492,853$ 107,539,629$ 104,666,948 Net change in 2011 and 2012 fund balance percentage(2.7%)(2.7%) Utility Fund The 2011 net assets are expected to decrease by ($2,953,224) and ($2,872,681) in 2011 and 2012 respectively. This decrease is primarily attributed to the non-working capital expense for depreciation on contributed assets and $1,200,000 and $400,000 transfers for debt service in 2011 and 2012 respectively. 210 UTILITY FUND Overall (continued) Enterprise - Utility Fund Schedule of Working Capital For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Working Capital Current assets Cash and investments$ 8,890,384 $ 9,236,420$ 8,715,106$ 8,200,869$ 9,215,304 Receivables 2,237,520 2,059,713 2,243,479 2,276,844 2,378,311 Inventory 50,031 23,241 50,532 51,036 51,548 1,750 1,803 1,768 1,787 1,804 Prepaid expenses 11,179,685 11,321,177 11,010,885 10,530,536 11,646,967 Total current assets Current liabilities Salaries payable 181,052 265,721 204,145 231,350 264,986 466,616 480,813 673,168 1,001,900 2,055,692 Accounts payable 647,668 746,534 877,313 1,233,250 2,320,678 Total current liabilities $ 10,532,017 $ 10,574,643$ 10,133,572$ 9,297,286$ 9,326,289 Working capital, December 31 Changes in Working Capital Working capital provided Change in net assets$ (321,758)$ (2,106,168)$ (2,593,992)$ (2,953,224)$ (2,872,681) 2,995,222 3,039,952 3,039,952 3,100,751 3,193,364 Depreciation 2,673,464 933,784 445,960 147,527 320,683 Total funds provided Working capital applied Infrastructure contributed$ 1,235,154 $ 237,333$ 237,333$ 836,834$ 246,922 227,142 559,210 607,072 146,979 44,758 Additions to capital assets 1,462,296 796,543 844,405 983,813 291,680 Total funds applied Net increase (decrease) 1,211,168 137,241 (398,445) (836,286) 29,003 9,320,849 10,437,402 10,532,017 10,133,572 9,297,286 Working capital, January 1 $ 10,532,017 $ 10,574,643$ 10,133,572$ 9,297,286$ 9,326,289 Working capital, December 31 Working capital is a valuable measurement of a business’s ability to meet its current obligations (liquidity). The above schedule presents working capital as of December 31 (current assets less current liabilities), and changes in working capital (capital provided less capital applied). The Utility Fund above schedule of working capital combines the working capital of the water, sanitary sewer, and street light operations as shown individually within this section. 211 UTILITY FUND Water Operation Program Description: The water operations is a collection, treatment, storage, and distribution system that delivers potable water to over 17,275 residential, commercial, institutional, and industrial properties. The system also accounts for all costs related to the operation and maintenance of 16 wells, 6 towers, 2 reservoirs, water treatment plant, and 310 miles of water distribution system. Services - Water Operation: Collect, treat, and distribute potable Monitor and ensure water quality and  water to meet the needs of residential, compliance with U.S. Environmental commercial, institutional, and industrial Protection Agency and Minnesota customers. Department of Health requirements. Operate and maintain 17 ground water Operate a 20 million gallon per day  well stations. Treat ground water with water treatment plant. chemicals to remove iron and Locate underground utility structures,  manganese and improve the taste. water main, and residential curb stops. Maintain 310 miles of water main.  Enforce water restrictions pursuant to  Repair water main breaks. Inspect and approved operations policy. approve new water main construction. Exercise fire hydrants annually. Water Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Miles of water main 310 313 313 316 Number of Wells 17 17 17 17 Water towers / reservoirs 8 8 8 8 Hydrants flushed 3374 3389 3409 3429 Gopher State One Call locates 6896 6960 7120 7180 Water utility accounts 17175 17290 17420 17550 Millions of Gallons of treated water Total annual 2,411 2,166 2,415 2,415 DNR permitted water usage 2,812 2,812 2,812 2,812 Maximum daily 16.1 13.5 20.0 20.0 Water main repairs 14 10 11 12 Service order completed 2,500 2,500 2,700 2,750 212 UTILITY FUND Water Operation (continued) Community Survey: Service is Quality of Residents who considered Service/Program service is support current essential or very excellent or good funding level important Residential Responses: Quality of drinking water 80% 97% 96% Business Responses: Quality of drinking water 80% 97% 87% 2010 Goals and Objectives - Water Operation: (Strategic Goal J-2) Reduce consumption of water per customer over the next three years.  Develop and implement a comprehensive public information campaign on water supply  (Strategic Goal J-3) Adopt a stronger conservation policy to address diminishing water supply for future  (Strategic Goal J-4) development. Rehabilitation of well #14.  Installation of an emergency backup generator at well #14.  Contract replacing the interior coatings of the Dakota Heights water tower.  Continue the change out of numeric readout water meters with newer automated digital  meters. 2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives - Water Operation: Rehabilitation of well #14  Repainting of the Fairfield Water Tower  Repainting of Airlake Water Tower  Rehabilitation of 600 horse powered high service pump at the Water Treatment Facility  Implement CarteGraph asset management system.  213 UTILITY FUND Water Operation (continued) Budget Summary - Water Operation: CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Enterprise - Utility Fund Water Operation Schedule of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Operating revenues User charges for services$ 3,431,726 $ 3,174,694 $ 2,499,677 $ 3,165,872 $ 3,387,112 200,283 175,119 202,286 204,309 206,352 Other 3,632,009 3,349,813 2,701,963 3,370,181 3,593,464 Total operating revenue Operating expenses Personnel services 805,100 913,199 822,511 853,644 886,099 Commodities 304,898 354,060 297,907 308,592 320,510 Other charges and services 1,256,326 1,802,158 1,773,498 1,893,266 1,917,857 1,896,712 1,924,012 1,924,012 1,962,492 2,032,341 Depreciation 4,263,036 4,993,429 4,817,928 5,017,994 5,156,807 Total operating expenses (631,027) (1,643,616) (2,115,965) (1,647,813) (1,563,343) Operating income (loss) Non-operating revenue (expense) Intergovernmental 1,632 184,762 184,762 1,632 1,632 Investment income 94,358 77,090 59,268 86,320 96,577 Miscellaneous - Utility rebates 11,978 11,978 Infrastructure contributed 984,099 199,683 199,683 798,431 207,751 Disposal of assets 2,250 Transfers in (out) General Fund (135,414) (128,132) (101,532) (105,973) (108,362) Special Revenue: Enviro. Res. Fund 9,014 23,932 24,622 26,248 26,904 Capital Projects: - - - (1,200,000) (400,000) Water Fund 953,689 369,313 378,781 (393,342) (173,248) Total non-operating (net) Change in net assets 322,662 (1,274,303) (1,737,184) (2,041,155) (1,736,591) 73,696,842 73,911,413 74,019,504 72,282,320 70,241,165 Net assets, January 1 Net assets, December 31$ 74,019,504$ 72,637,110$ 72,282,320$ 70,241,165$ 68,504,574 Net change in 2011 and 2012 fund balance percentage(2.8%)(2.5%) 214 UTILITY FUND Water Operation (continued) Water Operation Schedule of Working Capital For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Working Capital Current assets Cash and investments$ 5,926,817$ 6,612,022 $ 5,754,653 $ 4,828,838 $ 4,886,206 Receivables 2,226,536 2,053,653 2,236,736 2,266,726 2,362,758 Inventory 48,281 21,438 48,764 49,251 49,744 1,750 1,803 1,768 1,787 1,804 Prepaid expenses 8,203,384 8,688,916 8,041,921 7,146,602 7,300,512 Total current assets Current liabilities Salaries payable 106,415 163,223 120,183 137,103 158,317 228,017 311,704 274,385 326,267 393,344 Accounts payable 334,432 474,927 394,568 463,370 551,661 Total current liabilities $ 7,868,952$ 8,213,989 $ 7,647,353 $ 6,683,232 $ 6,748,851 Working capital, December 31 Changes in Working Capital Working capital provided Change in net assets$ 322,662$ (1,274,303)$ (1,737,184)$ (2,041,155)$ (1,736,591) 1,896,712 1,924,012 1,924,012 1,962,492 2,032,340 Depreciation 2,219,374 649,709 186,828 (78,663) 295,749 Total funds provided Working capital applied Infrastructure contributed 984,099 199,683 199,683 798,431 207,751 66,084 208,874 208,744 87,027 22,379 Additions to capital assets 1,050,183 408,557 408,427 885,458 230,130 Total funds applied Net increase (decrease) 1,169,191 241,152 (221,599) (964,121) 65,619 6,699,761 7,972,837 7,868,952 7,647,353 6,683,232 Working capital, January 1 $ 7,868,952$ 8,213,989 $ 7,647,353 $ 6,683,232 $ 6,748,851 Working capital, December 31 215 UTILITY FUND Water Operation (continued) Budget Factors – Water Operation: User Charges Revenue estimates take into consideration proposed rate increases. Contractual services The largest expenditure is for electricity, $459,967 and $483,103 in 2011 and 2012 respectively). Fees are also paid to Minnesota Department of Health and Department of Natural Resources ($142,978 and $144,393 in 2011 and 2013 respectively.) Major maintenance projects Major maintenance in 2011 includes the rehabilitation of well 15 ($60,000), repainting the Fairfield water tower ($631,000), replacement of a high performance pump at the water treatment facility ($60,000) and water meter replacements ($55,200). The 2012 estimated budget includes rehabilitation of wells 9 and 10 ($120,000), repainting the Airlake Water Tower ($439,500) and water meter replacements ($55,200). Transfers to Water Trunk Fund Construction of the water system infrastructure such as wells, towers and water treatment plant are financed with water connection charges collected at the time building permits are issued. The current economic conditions has resulted in a significant decrease in housing construction and hence reduction in water connection revenue. As such, Water Operating Fund will be required to contribute $1.6 million in the next two years for debt service payments. 216 UTILITY FUND Sanitary Sewer Operation Program Description: The sanitary sewer system is a collection and forwarding system that removes wastewater from residential, commercial, institutional, and industrial properties. The system also accounts for all costs associated with the operation and maintenance of lift stations and sanitary sewer main. The treatment facility operations are the responsibility of the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (M.C.E.S.) Services - Sanitary Sewer Operation: Clean, televise, and evaluate Evaluate portions of the sewer system  approximately of sanitary sewer main for surface water inflow and each year and make repairs as necessary. groundwater infiltration (I&I) problems and perform any necessary repairs to Inspect manholes for groundwater  correct the problem. infiltration and seal the structures to eliminate the problem. Operate and maintain lift stations  Sanitary Sewer Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Number of Miles of sanitary sewer lines 225 258 258 261 Miles of sewer cleaned 64 64 65 65 Miles of sewer televised 0 70 70 70 Lift stations 20 19 19 19 Gopher State One Call locates 6,896 6,960 7,120 7,180 Sewer utility accounts 17,104 17,216 17,350 17,480 Sewer backups 2 2 2 2 Service order completed 1,100 1,100 1,120 1,130 2010 Goals and Objectives – Sanitary Sewer Operation: Rehabilitation of lift station #4  Abandon and decommission lift station #1.  2011 - 2012 Goals and Objectives – Sanitary Sewer Operation: Rehabilitation of lift station #4  Rehabilitation of Lift Stations #6. 8, &20.  Sanitary sewer lining – North Lake Marion  Implement CarteGraph asset management system.  217 UTILITY FUND Sanitary Sewer Operation (continued) Budget Summary - Sanitary Sewer Operation: CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Enterprise - Utility Fund Sanitary Sewer Operation Schedule of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Operating revenue $ 3,793,269 $ 4,228,009 $ 4,198,726 $ 4,316,385 $ 4,454,875 User charges for services Operating expenses Personnel services 574,892 576,524 651,161 674,847 704,733 Commodities 67,681 79,613 79,136 79,725 80,643 Other charges and services 442,290 308,623 370,498 315,421 533,056 Disposal charges 2,645,442 2,825,699 2,825,699 2,941,489 3,065,964 1,098,510 1,115,940 1,115,940 1,138,259 1,161,024 Depreciation 4,828,815 4,906,399 5,042,434 5,149,741 5,545,420 Total operating expenses (1,035,546) (678,390) (843,708) (833,356) (1,090,545) Operating income (loss) Non-operating revenue (expense) Intergovernmental State aid 1,632 1,632 1,632 1,632 1,632 Investment income 45,984 31,132 27,472 41,258 63,856 Infrastructure contributed 251,055 37,650 37,650 38,403 39,171 Disposal of assets 95,000 2,250 Transfers in (out) General Fund (135,411) (148,329) (137,980) (144,014) (147,262) Special Revenue: 11,470 15,771 18,731 18,696 18,718 Env Resources Fund 174,730 (62,144) 42,505 (44,025) (21,635) Total non-operating (net) Change in net assets (860,816) (740,534) (801,203) (877,381) (1,112,180) 39,711,761 38,628,055 38,850,945 38,049,742 37,172,361 Net assets, January 1 Net assets, December 31$ 38,850,945$ 37,887,521$ 38,049,742$ 37,172,361$ 36,060,181 Net change in 2011 and 2012 fund balance percentage(2.3%)(3.0%) 218 UTILITY FUND Sanitary Sewer Operation (continued) Sanitary Sewer Operation Schedule of Working Capital For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Working Capital Current assets Cash and investments$ 2,747,171$ 2,504,946$ 2,750,522$ 3,192,795$ 4,169,421 Receivables 10,984 6,043 6,562 9,855 15,253 1,750 1,803 1,768 1,785 1,804 Prepaid expenses 2,759,905 2,512,792 2,758,852 3,204,435 4,186,478 Total current assets Current liabilities Salaries payable 74,637 102,302 83,192 93,448 105,839 238,599 108,505 350,232 623,036 1,605,394 Accounts payable 313,236 210,807 433,424 716,484 1,711,233 Total current liabilities $ 2,446,669$ 2,301,985$ 2,325,428$ 2,487,951$ 2,475,245 Working capital, December 31 Changes in Working Capital Working capital provided Change in net assets$ (860,816)$ (740,534)$ (801,203)$ (877,381)$ (1,112,180) 1,098,510 1,115,940 1,115,940 1,138,259 1,161,024 Depreciation 237,694 375,406 314,737 260,878 48,844 Total funds provided Working capital applied Infrastructure contributed 251,055 37,650 37,650 38,403 39,171 161,058 350,336 398,328 59,952 22,379 Additions to capital assets 412,113 387,986 435,978 98,355 61,550 Total funds applied Net increase (decrease) (174,419) (12,580) (121,241) 162,523 (12,706) 2,621,088 2,314,565 2,446,669 2,325,428 2,487,951 Working capital, January 1 $ 2,446,669$ 2,301,985$ 2,325,428$ 2,487,951$ 2,475,245 Working capital, December 31 Budget Factors – Sanitary Sewer Operation: 219 UTILITY FUND Sanitary Sewer Operation (continued) User Charges. Revenue estimates take into consideration proposed rate increases. Disposal Charges MCES has announced a 3.2% cost increase for the coming year. Major maintenance projects Major maintenance projects in 2011include inflow and infiltration mitigation efforts ($50,000) and lift stations #8 and #20 rehabilitations ($42,600). Major maintenance projects in 2012 include inflow and infiltration mitigation efforts ($50,000), engineering of the Orchard Trail lift station ($25,000) and lining of the Lake Marion sanitary sewer main ($240,900). 220 UTILITY FUND Street Light Operation Program Description: The street light system is designed to protect property, health and safety of the community’s residents and businesses. The system is maintained by Xcel Energy and Dakota Electric Association. Beginning January 1, 2010, the City’s street lighting program will be accounted for in the Enterprise Utility Fund; this activity was previously accounted for in the General Fund Street Department. Services – Street Light Operation: Perform annual inspections of Perform seasonal banner and flag  approximately 4,230 street lights and changes on downtown street light. report any maintenance requirements to responsible electric companies. Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2011 2012 Activity Actual Estimate Proposed Estimated Number of street light units: Dakota Electric 3,362 3,387 3,416 3,450 Xcel Energy 885 891 898 906 Number of street light units: Dakota Electric $ 125.72 $ 127.69 $ 137.71 $ 144.44 Xcel Energy $ 151.03 $ 153.73 $ 166.95 $ 175.04 221 UTILITY FUND Street Light Operation (continued) Budget Summary – Street Light Operation: CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Enterprise - Utility Fund Street Light Operation Schedule of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Operating revenue $ 66,396 $547,642 $565,680 $639,218 $687,160 User charges for services Operating expenses Personnel services 18,458 20,011 20,370 20,638 Commodities 1,463 1,202 1,438 1,456 - 615,252 581,409 633,509 670,333 Other charges and services - 635,173 602,622 655,317 692,427 Total operating expenses 66,396 (87,531) (36,942) (16,099) (5,267) Operating income (loss) Non-operating revenue (expense) Investment income 200 2,164 3,149 3,585 Transfers in (out) 150,000 (4,000) (20,827) (21,738) (22,228) General Fund 150,000 (3,800) (18,663) (18,589) (18,643) Total non-operating (net) Change in net assets 216,396 (91,331) (55,605) (34,688) (23,910) - 150,000 216,396 160,791 126,103 Net assets, January 1 $ 216,396$ 58,669$ 160,791$ 126,103$ 102,193 Net assets, December 31 Net change in 2011 and 2012 fund balance percentage(21.6%)(19.0%) 222 UTILITY FUND Street Light Operation (continued) Street Light Operation Schedule of Working Capital For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Working Capital Current assets Cash and investments$ 216,396$ 119,452$ 209,931$ 179,236$ 159,677 - 17 181 263 300 Receivables 216,396 119,469 210,112 179,499 159,977 Total current assets Current liabilities Salaries payable 196 770 799 830 - 60,604 48,551 52,597 56,954 Accounts payable - 60,800 49,321 53,396 57,784 Total current liabilities $ 216,396$ 58,669$ 160,791$ 126,103$ 102,193 Working capital, December 31 Changes in Working Capital Working capital provided $ 216,396$ (91,331)$ (55,605)$ (34,688)$ (23,910) Change in net assets - 150,000 216,396 160,791 126,103 Working capital, January 1 $ 216,396$ 58,669$ 160,791$ 126,103$ 102,193 Working capital, December 31 Budget Factors – Street Light Operation: User Charges Revenue estimates take into consideration proposed rate increases. Other charges and services Dakota Electric has announced electric rate increases for 2011. Electric rate increases are also anticipated form Xcel Energy. 223 Internal Service Fund The Internal Service Municipal Reserves Fund is used to account for services provided by one City department to other City departments on a cost reimbursement basis. MUNICIPAL RESERVES FUND Program Description: Under GASB Statement No. 10, risk management activities of a government entity can be accounted for in either the General Fund or an Internal Service Fund, if one fund is used. The City uses the Internal Service Municipal Reserves Fund to budget such costs. Under this model, operating departments in the various City funds receive a charge from the Municipal Reserves Fund, and all costs (premiums, claims, and related expenses) are reflected in a single fund. This allows for better accounting and monitoring of the City’s risk management costs. Services: General liability insurance. Employment practices liability  insurance. Excess liability insurance.  Workers compensation insurance.  Property/casualty insurance.  Auto physical damage insurance.  The general liability insurance is provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, a municipal insurance pool, in which the City retains exposure to losses for liability claims up to $50,000 per occurrence, with a $100,000 yearly claims payment maximum; a $1,000 per claim deductible applies if the City exceeds the $100,000 maximum. Risk management charges to operating departments are based on factors such as number of automobiles used, stated value of buildings and contents, and employee salaries. A portion of the City’s liability insurance premium is attributable to vehicles and is allocated along with the physical damage premium. The remainder of the liability insurance premium is combined with an estimate of claims costs (including legal and administration) and allocated accordingly to individual funds. Activity Measures: 2009 2010 2010 2011 2012 Activity Estimate Budget Estimate Estimate Estimate Experience Modification Ratio General Liability .763 .763 .752 .752 .752 Workers Compensation .810 .810 .890 .890 .890 224 MUNICIPAL RESERVES FUND (continued) Budget Summary: CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Internal Service - Municipal Reserves Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets For the Years Ending December 31, 2011 and 2012 201020112012 2009Adopted2010ProposedEstimated ActualBudgetEstimateBudgetBudget Operating revenues Charges for services$ 375,381 $ 359,608 $ 359,608 $ 376,038 $ 387,595 67,638 51,460 51,460 51,460 51,460 Other 443,019 411,068 411,068 427,498 439,055 Total operating revenues Operating expenses 372,662 364,927 365,911 380,062 390,285 Other charges and services 70,357 46,141 45,157 47,436 48,770 Operating income Non-operating revenue (expense) Investment income 4,188 5,989 5,868 5,947 6,036 (40,663) (43,140) (43,140) (44,435) (45,767) Transfer to General Fund (36,475) (37,151) (37,272) (38,488) (39,731) Total non-operating (net) Change in net assets 33,882 8,990 7,885 8,948 9,039 552,906 600,131 586,788 594,673 603,621 Net assets, January 1 Net assets, December 31$ 586,788 $ 609,121 $ 594,673 $ 603,621 $ 612,660 Net change in 2011 and 2012 fund balance percentage1.5%1.5% Municipal Reserves Fund The net assets are projected to increase $8,948 or 1.5% in 2011. The increase is attributed to charges to other funds. Net assets are anticipated to increase $9,039 (1.5%) in 2012. 225 Appendices CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Community Profile Description The City of Lakeville is a suburban community located approximately 20 minutes south of the Minneapolis–Saint Paul metropolitan area within Dakota County. The City has a land area of 38 square miles and serves a community with a Metropolitan Council estimated 2008 population of 54,731. The population of 54,731 is 11,603 or 26.9% over the 2000 Federal Census of 43,128. History The Village of Lakeville was incorporated in 1878. The Village of Lakeville and Lakeville Township merged in 1967. Lakeville became a statutory City on January1, 1974. Organization The City’s governing body consists of a Mayor and four Council members, all elected at large. The Mayor serves a two-year term of office and Council members serve overlapping four-year terms. The present Mayor and Council members are: Expiration of Term Holly Dahl Mayor December 31, 2010 Mark Bellows Council member December 31, 2010 Kevin Miller Council member December 31, 2010 Kerrin Swecker Council member December 31, 2012 Laurie Rieb Council member December 31, 2012 The City Administrator is responsible for the daily management of City business and the administration of policy as directed by the Council. Mr. Steven C. Mielke is the City Administrator and has served in this capacity since June 2004. Mr. Mielke has 23 years of experience in local government. Services Lakeville provides a full range of services. City functions include general government administration, police and fire protection, street maintenance, engineering, planning and zoning, parks and recreation, and community and economic development services. The City also operates two Enterprise Funds for three off-sale liquor stores and a water, sanitary sewer, and street light utility. The three liquor stores strategically located adjacent to major highways collectively represent the largest municipal liquor operation in Minnesota. The City’s Police Department consists of 52 full-time officers and 15 police reservists. The Fire Department has four stations and is served by 90 authorized volunteers. The City has a fire rating of 4 for insurance purposes. This results in a significant reduction of fire insurance premiums for commercial and industrial buildings and apartments. 226 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Community Profile (continued) Additional City facilities include 56 public parks (which include 39 playgrounds), and 18 conservation areas, three municipal swimming beaches, 12 outdoor ice rinks (fully boarded), 3 indoor ice rinks, and approximately 91 miles of trails. The City provides water and sanitary sewer facilities to a majority of its residential areas. The City’s present water system includes 17 wells and seven water storage facilities with a total capacity of 8.0 million gallons. The City’s water treatment plant has a production capacity of 20million gallons of water per day. The Metropolitan Council Environmental Service (MCES) is responsible for treatment and disposal of sanitary sewer effluent. Growth Management: The City has been and is expected to continue to be one of the fastest growing cities in Minnesota. The Lakeville City Council created a Strategic Growth Management Task Force in 1992. Its goal was to develop strategies regarding the rate, location and types of development that would generate fiscal stability while preserving and enhancing the City’s quality of life and services. The City Council reconvened the Strategic Growth Task Force in 1998 for the purpose of making both short and long-term recommendations or suggestions on strategies relating to how the rate, location and type of residential and commercial/industrial growth can generate fiscal stability and preserve or enhance the quality of services, while minimizing any adverse impacts on City systems and taxpayers. In December 2007, the City Council approved the 2008-2010 Strategic Plans for Economic Development. The Plan serves as a guide for the work of the Economic Development Commission (EDC) and Economic Development staff to achieve Lakeville’s economic development objectives. The EDC developed information into seven categories with corresponding goals and outcomes. The seven categories are Transportation, Life-Cycle Housing, Technology, Growth Management, Communication, Partnerships and Fiscal Management. The 2008-2010 Strategic Plan for Economic Development is the sixth plan prepared by the EDC since 1995, when the first strategic plan was completed. The previous strategic plan was from 2005-2007 and featured six strategic areas of focus. Progress was made in all categories, with work being done to improve the City’s roads, create life-cycle housing, improve the Downtown area, create and strengthen partnerships, and communicate with residents and the business community about the benefits of a strong commercial/industrial base. 227 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Community Profile (continued) City of Lakeville 2010 actual land use composition and 2030 projection is as follows : (1) 2010 2030 ActualProjection  Single family residential 20.8% 30.3%  Townhomes, condominiums 2.2% 13.1%  Rural agriculture/residential 36.6% 13.1%  Commercial/industrial 7.0% 13.0%  Parks and open space 15.0% 11.8%  Public right-of-ways 13.4% 10.5%  Public and semi-public 3.9% 4.9%  Multifamily residential 0.1% 2.4%  Manufactured housing 1.0% 0.9% City of Lakeville demographic and economic statistics with select unemployment rate comparisons to Dakota County, State of Minnesota, and the United States for the last ten years are as follows: Labor Force Unemployment Rate (4) City of LakevilleDakota County PersonalState IncomeLaborLaborof Minn. (2) (3) YearPopulation(per capita)ForceRateForceRateRate 200043,128$ 37,000 24,552 1.5% 215,9122.2%3.1% 200144,751$ 37,350 25,665 2.0% 222,2652.8%4.4% 200246,285$ 38,255 26,072 2.8% 226,7503.8%4.4% 200347,523$ 39,612 28,302 2.5% 230,9683.6%4.5% 200449,097$ 41,165 27,950 3.1% 229,7344.2%5.0% 200551,472$ 42,235 28,745 3.2% 231,3224.0%4.8% 200652,323$ 43,720 29,677 3.9% 230,4274.1%4.9% 200753,829$ 45,630 30,492 4.3% 232,6704.6%4.7% 200854,731$ 46,357 30,471 5.6% 229,7166.1%6.8% 200955,772N/A 30,816 6.7% 232,2047.3%8.0% Source: (1) City of Lakeville 2010 Comprehensive Plan. (2) Metropolitan Council as of April 1, (except for year 2000 Federal Census). (3) U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis – Dakota County, Minnesota Data. (4) Minnesota Dept. of Employment and Economic Development as of December 31, 2008. N/A - Not available at the time of this printing. 228 229 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Number of City Employees (Full Time Equivalent) 2009201020112012 Position TitleActualBudgetEstimateEstimate General government City Administrator1.01.01.01.0 Assistant to City Administrator1.00.50.50.5 Executive Administrative Assistant/Deputy Clerk1.01.01.01.0 Communications Manager1.01.01.01.0 Communications Specialist1.01.01.01.0 Video Production Specialists1.92.02.02.0 City Clerk1.01.01.01.0 Planning Director1.01.01.01.0 Associate Planners2.31.51.51.5 Planning Administrative Assistant 0.50.50.50.5 Community and Economic Development Director1.01.01.01.0 Economic Development Specialist1.01.01.01.0 Community and Economic Dev. Admin. Assistant 0.50.50.50.5 Building Official1.01.01.01.0 Senior Inspectors3.03.03.03.0 Building Inspectors2.72.02.02.0 Building Senior Administrative Assistant1.01.01.01.0 Building Administrative Assistants1.01.01.01.0 Facility Maintenance Coordinator1.01.01.01.0 City Hall Receptionist1.01.01.01.0 City Hall Administrative Assistant1.01.01.01.0 Finance Director1.01.01.01.0 Senior Accountants2.62.62.62.6 Accountant II0.90.80.80.8 Accounts Payable Technician1.01.01.01.0 Finance Senior Administrative Assistant1.01.01.01.0 Information Systems Manager1.01.01.01.0 Information Systems Network Specialist1.01.01.01.0 Information Systems Technician1.31.01.01.0 Human Resources Manager1.01.01.01.0 Benefits Specialist1.01.01.01.0 Payroll Technician0.90.80.80.8 Total general government38.636.236.236.2 230 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Number of City Employees (Full Time Equivalent) (continued) 2009201020112012 Position TitleActualBudgetProposedEstimated Public safety Police Sworn officers Chief1.01.01.01.0 Captains2.02.02.02.0 Sergeants10.010.010.010.0 Investigators6.06.06.06.0 Narcotics Task Force Officer1.01.01.01.0 Patrol Officers31.031.532.033.0 Total sworn officers51.051.552.053.0 Crime Prevention Coordinator1.01.01.01.0 Community Public Safety Officers0.3 Community Service Officers3.83.83.83.8 Animal Control Officer1.01.01.01.0 Records Supervisor1.01.01.01.0 Records Administrative Assistants4.04.04.05.0 Total police62.162.362.864.8 Fire Fire Chief1.01.01.01.0 Fire Marshal1.01.01.01.0 Fire Inspector1.01.01.01.0 Fire Department Office Supervisor1.01.01.01.0 Fire Administrative Assistant0.60.60.60.6 Total fire4.64.64.64.6 Total public safety66.766.967.469.4 Public works Engineering City Engineer1.01.01.01.0 Assistant City Engineer1.01.01.01.0 Development/Design Engineer1.01.01.01.0 Senior Construction Representative1.01.01.01.0 Special Assessment/Property Data Technician0.3 Engineering Administrative Assistant1.01.01.01.0 GIS Coordinator1.01.01.01.0 GIS Technician1.01.01.01.0 Environmental Resources Manager1.01.01.01.0 Environmental Resources Specialist1.01.01.01.0 Environmental Resources Technician0.00.00.00.0 Total engineering9.39.09.09.0 231 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Number of City Employees (Full Time Equivalent) (continued) 2009201020112012 Position TitleActualBudgetProposedEstimated Public works (continued) Streets Street Superintendent1.01.01.01.0 Street Supervisor1.01.01.01.0 Street Lead 1.01.01.01.0 Street Maintenance II10.410.010.010.3 Service Technician Lead1.01.01.01.0 Fleet Service Technicians4.04.04.04.0 Streets Administrative Assistant1.01.01.01.0 Total streets19.419.019.019.3 Total public works28.728.028.028.3 Parks and recreation Parks Parks and Recreation Director1.01.01.01.0 Parks Operations and Maintenance Manager1.01.01.01.0 Parks Superintendent0.2 Parks Supervisor0.31.01.01.0 Parks Lead1.01.01.01.0 Park Maintenance II8.58.58.58.5 Park Forester0.50.50.50.5 Parks Senior Administrative Assistant1.01.01.01.0 Park Maintenance Administrative Assistant1.01.01.01.0 Total parks14.515.015.015.0 Recreation Recreation Supervisor1.01.01.01.0 Recreation Program Supervisor1.01.01.01.0 Recreation Program Assistant0.2 Recreation Administrative Assistant1.01.01.01.0 Senior Center Coordinator1.01.01.01.0 Senior Center Administrative Assistant0.70.70.70.7 Total recreation4.94.74.74.7 Arts Center Arts Center Coordinator1.01.01.01.0 Arts Center Administrative Assistant1.01.01.01.0 Arts Center Facility Attendant1.51.51.51.5 Pottery Manager0.20.20.20.2 Total arts center3.73.73.73.7 Total parks and recreation23.123.423.423.4 Total general fund/special revenue fund employees157.1154.5155.0157.3 232 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Number of City Employees (Full Time Equivalent) (continued) 2009201020112012 Position TitleActualBudgetProposedEstimated Liquor fund Operations Director1.01.01.01.0 Assistant to the Director1.01.01.01.0 Store Manager3.03.03.03.0 Inventory Control Technician1.01.01.01.0 Assistant Store Manager5.05.05.05.0 Lead Sales Associate2.72.72.72.7 12.012.012.012.0 Sales Associate 25.725.725.725.7 Total liquor fund employees Utility fund Operations and Maintenance Director1.01.01.01.0 Utilities Superintendent1.01.01.01.0 Utilities Supervisor1.01.01.01.0 Operations and Maintenance/Safety Specialist1.01.01.01.0 Utility Maintenance II11.011.011.011.0 Utility Billing Technician2.02.02.02.0 1.01.01.01.0 Utility Administrative Assistant 18.018.018.018.0 Total utility fund employees Total general fund/special revenue fund employees157.1154.5155.0157.3 Total liquor fund employees 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Total utility fund employees 200.8 198.2 198.7 201.0 Total City employees 233 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Listing of Principal Employers As a part of the Minneapolis-Saint Paul metropolitan area, Lakeville’s labor market is drawn from many of the surrounding communities; and, conversely, many City residents commute to other areas of the Minneapolis-Saint Paul metropolitan area for work. Major employers located in the City of Lakeville are listed below: Approximate Number Employer Product/Service of Employees Independent School District No. 194 (Lakeville) Public education 1,420 Ryt-Way Industries, Inc. Food service contractors 636 ConAgra Store Brands Breakfast cereal manufacturing 489 Imperial Plastics, Inc. Plastics material and resin manufacturing 225 Despatch Industries, Inc. Industrial furnace and oven manufacturing 215 City of Lakeville City government 198 Menasha Corporation Corrugated box manufacturing 191 Jeff Belzers Chevy-Dodge-Kia Auto dealership 110 National Polymers, Inc. Plastics material and resin manufacturing 100 Hearth & Home Technologies, Inc. Fireplaces/metal work 80 Carquest Distribution Center General warehousing and storage 65 Source: Telephone survey of individual employers, November 2009. 234 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Commercial and Industrial Building Permits Issued Years 2009 and 2008 NEW BUILDING PERMITS (in excess of $250,000) BUSINESSPRODUCT/SERVICEVALUATION (1) UponorDistribution facility$ 8,225,000 First IndustrialSpeculative warehouse/distribution 7,998,000 Brunswick Zone XLBowling/family entertainment 4,300,000 Kent 46 Office BldgOffice building 2,760,000 Buffalo Wild WingsRestaurant 1,625,000 Primrose School of North LakevilleDaycare 1,400,000 Green Planet Car WashCar wash/detail center 1,400,000 Heritage Commons 3rdMulti-tenant retail 1,100,000 Ace HardwareRetail hardware store 1,400,000 Kinder CareDaycare 900,000 GCR Tire CenterCommercial tire repair/distribution 400,000 EXPANSION OR REMODEL BUILDING PERMITS (in excess of $250,000) BUSINESSPRODUCT/SERVICEVALUATION (1) Brackett's CrossingPrivate country club/golf course$ 2,800,000 Con Agra FoodsStore brand/private label food prod. 1,400,000 Mendell Mfg.Medical technology manufacturer 690,000 Malt-O-MealAdmin. offices/technology center 600,000 Ryt-Way IndustriesFood packaging 500,000 Hearth & Home Corporate OfficeHearth products producer 425,000 Minnesota School of BusinessPrivate business school 413,000 Holyoke CrossingMulti-tenant retail 385,400 Just Kidding Around DaycareDaycare 350,000 (1) Valuation excludes land and personal property. Source: City of Lakeville Inspections Department. 235 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Equipment Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012 General Government DAS Network Storage 57,292 MS Server 2008 8,358 MS Office Upgrade 7,508 HP LTO-3 Tape Drive Upgrade 5,215 MS Desktop OS-7 2,925 ESX Virtual Server Memory 2,155 Virtual Desktop Storage 61,988 Virtual Desktop Servers 94,920 Computer - Desktop NOC 2,813 Debt issuance 21,685 18,863 3,954 8,353 Other 109,092 186,937 Total General Government 236 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Equipment Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012 Public Safety Police Outdoor Warning Sirens + 247,498 Squad Cars - equipment + 135,170 105,654 Tough book computers 128,079 LOGIS CAD System 84,752 MS Office Suite 15,316 AR-15 Patrol 12,732 Scheduling software - POSS 11,675 Glock Handguns 9,638 1,144 Desktop computers 9,075 25,410 MS Operating System 8,521 AED 6,920 1,384 Taser 4,328 5,193 Traffic Laser 3,735 Cameras 2,692 448 MAAG AR-15 2,070 Oxygen Kits 1,118 PBT 594 1,789 CSO Vehicle + equipment 31,931 Digital Voice Recorders 25,970 ACO vehicle + equipment 24,498 Laptop Computer 2,364 32,415 11,792 Other 716,328 237,577 Total Public Safety Police 237 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Equipment Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012 Public Safety Fire Tender Truck 225,000 Toughbook computers 18,297 SCBA Seat Brackets 18,282 Motorola Type V pagers 15,096 Blitz Nozzels 5,769 Ventilation Fans 5,451 Desktop computers 5,445 12,705 Wire access point 5,249 MS Office Suite 4,505 Traffic Light Bars (R1&3, E-22) 3,830 Apartment Pack Nozzels 3,632 Natural Gas Detection Units 3,386 Laptop Computer 2,364 2,364 MS Desktop OS-7 System upgrades 1,272 Quick Vent Saw 1,159 Motorola Type V pagers 15,096 15,102 5,399 Other equipment 333,839 35,564 Total Public Safety Fire 238 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Equipment Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012 Public Works Streets Sidewalk Maintainer 184,006 Dump Truck with Plow 173,103 348,927 Water Tanker 144,628 Loader Snowblower Attachment 143,338 Vacuum Excavator 82,039 Fuel System 73,000 1/2 Ton Crew Cab 4WD 28,192 Toolbox and Tools 26,037 Tire Changes and Balancer 16,254 Asphalt Milling Machine Attachment 14,738 CarteGraph acquisition 13,700 Trailer 9,712 Desktop/Laptop Computers 7,809 3,630 CCTV Inspection System 7,802 MS Office/OS 7 3,893 Vibratory Rammer 2,880 12-Ton Support Stands 2,110 Magnetic Locator 983 Wheel Loader 243,723 Asphalt Patch Truck 137,355 1/2 ton 4WD Pickup 23,488 3/4 ton 4x4 plow + equipment 5,299 40,377 39,875 Other 974,601 802,297 Total Public Works Streets 239 CITY OF LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA Capital Projects - Equipment Fund Schedule of Capital Outlay 20112012 Parks & Recreation Grounds Master 5910 mower 174,794 87,538 Tractor, Farm Loader, & Rear Boom Flail Mower 91,549 Turbo Toolcat & 72" Snow Blower 49,484 1/2 Ton 4x4 Pickup 23,488 23,488 Desktop computers 7,260 5,445 3/4 Ton Pickup with V-Plow 6,071 MS Office Suite 2,703 Line Trimmers (6) 1,924 Pole Saw 641 642 MS Operating System 636 Chainsaw 534 534 70" 3 PT Hitch Rotary Tiller 17,013 10,563 Other 376,097 128,210 Total Parks & Recreation 240 Glossary of Budget Terms Accrual Accounting Method Transactions are recognized at the time they are incurred, as opposed to when cash is received or spent. Advertising Income Earnings derived from advertising. Ad Valorem Tax Money collected from all the real property within the City based upon the value of the property. Allocated Expenditures Expenses not directly determined by the departments, such as Internal Service Charges and General Fund Charges. Annual Budget The budget authorized by resolution of the City Council for the fiscal year. Appropriation The authorization by City Council to incur obligations and spend City funds. Appropriations are usually made for fixed amounts and are typically granted for one year. Appropriation of Fund Balance Using the existing fund balance for current operations. Assessed Valuation The value of all real and personal property that is used as a basis for ad valorem taxes. Balanced Budget A budget in which expenditures are equal to revenue. Bond Proceeds Funds received from the sale of any bond issue. Budget The financial plan for a specific period of time that identifies expenditures and the sources of revenue to pay for them. Budget Message The opening section of the budget which provides the City Council and the public with a general summary of the most important aspects of the budget, changes from the current and previous fiscal years, as well as the views and recommendations of the City Manager. CDBG Abbreviation for Community Development Block Grant – This fund receives and expends the City’s allocation of the Federal Community Development Block Grant Program money. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) A five-year schedule of capital improvement projects and items in excess of $25,000. This is a flexible budget document that is used as a planning tool for needed improvements. Amounts approved in the CIP are considered guidelines and are not officially as budgeted amounts until they are incorporated in the operating budget of one of the City’s funds. Capital Projects Funds The funds that account for all resources used for the acquisition or construction of capital facilities, except those financed by Proprietary Funds. Capital Outlay Expenditures that result in the acquisition of capital fixed assets that has a value over $2,000 and a useful life of greater than one year. 241 Glossary of Budget Terms (continued) Certified Tax Levy The ad valorem tax levy that is recorded with Dakota County. Circuit Breaker A state-paid property tax refund program for homeowners who have property taxes out of proportion with their income. A similar program is also available to renters. Class Rates The percent of market value set by state law that establishes the property’s tax capacity subject to the property tax. See Table A for a sample list of class rates. Table A: class rates Taxes Local Taxes State Tax Payable Property Class Payable 2010 Payable 2011 2011 Residential Homestead: <$76,0001.00% 1.00% No state tax $76,000-$500,000 1.00% 1.00% >$500,000 1.25% 1.25% Non-homestead Residential: Single unit: <$76,000 1.00% 1.00% No state tax $76,000-$500,000 1.00% 1.00% >$500,000 1.25% 1.25% 1-3 unit buildings 1.25% 1.25% Market-rate Apartments: 1.25% 1.25% No state tax Commercial/Industrial: Subject to state <$100,000 1.50% 1.50% levy (Commercial- $100,000 - $150,000 1.50% 1.50% industrial rate) >$150,000 2.00% 2.00% Seasonal Recreational Residential: Subject to state <$76,000 1.00% 1.00% levy (seasonal- $76,000 - $500,000 1.00% 1.00% recreational rate) >$500,000 1.25% 1.25% Classification of Expenditures A group of object codes that have the same functional characteristics. The City uses four classifications of expenditures: Personnel Services, Commodities, Other Charges and Services, and Capital Outlay. Contingency A budgetary reserve set aside for emergencies or unforeseen expenditures. Contractual Services The cost of items related to a contractual agreement. Examples would be: professional services, insurance, utilities or rentals. Contributions Under certain conditions, people who subdivide land must make a contribution to the City for park purposes of either cash or land. Cash received for this purpose is collected in this account. Court Fines and Forfeits Fines imposed on individuals by the courts for various illegal acts performed within the City. 242 Glossary of Budget Terms (continued) Current Service Level A description of the current services and level of service provided by a program or department. CSAH County State Aid Highway. A road or highway that is maintained either by the State or County. Debt Service Funds The funds that account for the payment of principal and interest on outstanding debt for the city. Department An organizational unit of the City for the purposes of administration and accounting. Depreciation Expenditures incurred when spreading the cost of an asset over its estimated useful life rather than deducting the entire cost in the year the asset is purchased. Enterprise Funds The funds that account for the financing of self-supporting activities of governmental units and render services to the general public based on user charges. Records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting. Fiscal Disparities Program Local units of government in the Twin Cities metropolitan area and on the iron range participate in property tax base sharing programs. Under these two programs, a portion of the growth in commercial and industrial property value of each city and township is contributed to a tax base sharing pool. Each city and township then receives a distribution of property value from the pool based on market value and population in each city. FT Abbreviation for full-time permanent staff position. FTE Abbreviation for full-time equivalent. Full-time equivalent is designated to working 40 hours per week or 2,080 hours per year. Fiscal Year For budgeting purposes, the City’s fiscal year is based on a calendar year. Fixed Capital Asset Purchases of a long-term nature which are to be held and used. Examples would be: land, buildings, machinery, furniture, and equipment. Fund A separate accounting entity, with a set of self-balancing accounts for recording the collection of revenues and the payment of expenditures to carry out a specific function. Fund Balance The excess of a governmental fund’s assets over its liabilities. The term “fund balance” is used in governmental fund types. The term “net assets” is used in proprietary fund types. GAAP Abbreviation for Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. 243 Glossary of Budget Terms (continued) General Fund The general operating fund of the City, the General Fund accounts for most of the City’s financial resources. General Fund revenues include: general property taxes, licenses and permits, intergovernmental revenues, charges for services, and other types of revenue. The General Fund accounts for the revenues and expenditures necessary to deliver basic operating services: police, fire, finance, parks, public works, etc. Governmental Funds The General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds, and Capital Project Funds are governmental funds. HRA Abbreviation for Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Investment Income Interest received from the investment of cash in a fund. Intergovernmental Revenue Money received from Federal, State, County, or local governments in the form of grants or shared revenues for various activities. Internal Service Fund The fund within the proprietary fund types that account for the financing of goods or services provided by one department to other departments of the government. Licenses Revenues received by the issuance of various licenses that are granted to various businesses in the City. Line Item Budget A budget format that summarizes the object codes of expenditures for goods and services that the City intends to purchase during the fiscal year. Market Value An assessor’s estimate of what property would be worth on the open market if sold. The market value is set on January 2 of the year before taxes are payable. Market Value Homestead Credit This credit offsets a portion of each homestead’s property tax burden equal to 0.4 percent of the homestead’s market value up to a maximum credit of $304. MSA Abbreviation for Municipal State Aid for Highway Construction. MCES Abbreviation for Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. The MCES is a division of the Metropolitan Council, a state planning agency that serves the Twin Cities seven- county metropolitan area. The MCES provides the City with wastewater treatment service. Miscellaneous Revenue Money collected from various sources generally on a non-recurring basis or revenue that would not be appropriately classified as a major revenue source. Modified Accrual Accounting Method Transactions are recognized in the accounting period when they become susceptible to accrual, that is, when they become measurable and available. Municipal State Aid (MSA) Maintenance Money received from the State of Minnesota for the maintenance of certain streets within the City that are designated State Aid Streets. 244 Glossary of Budget Terms (continued) Net Assets The excess of a proprietary fund’s assets over its liabilities. The term “net assets” is used in proprietary fund types. The term “fund balance” is used in governmental funds. Objective The accomplishments by a program if operating properly. Other Charges The cost of miscellaneous items such as conferences and schools, dues and subscriptions, depreciation and merchandise for resale. Penalties Charges to utility customers caused by late payment of their water, sewer and recycling charges. Penalties and Interest Fines and interest charges on taxes not paid in a timely manner. PERA Abbreviation for Public Employees Retirement Association. Permits Revenue derived from various permits, as defined by the City or State Code, for the performance of a specific action. For example, building a house. Personnel Services The cost of salaries and wages paid to employees as well as the fringe benefits associated with employment (i.e. Social Security, PERA, health insurance, life insurance, etc.) PILT Abbreviation for payment-in-lieu-of-taxes. The City’s owned liquor store locations do not pay property taxes; therefore, the Liquor Fund pays a determined amount to the General Fund. Property Class The classification assigned to each parcel of property based on the use of the property. For example, owner-occupied residential property is classified as homestead. Property Tax Levy The tax imposed by a local unit of government. The tax is established on or around December 28 of the year preceding the year the levy will be paid by taxpayers. Proprietary Funds Fund’s that account for government operations financed and operated in a manner similar to a private business. Rental Income Fees collected for the rental of equipment and the use of certain facilities. R.E.U. Residential equivalent unit. SCBA Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus. Equipment used by firefighters. Special Assessment Receipts from assessment placed on a property, within the City, for public improvements that have benefited that property. Special Revenue Funds Fund’s that accounts for revenues derived from specific taxes or other earmarked revenue sources. Supplies Items that are not permanent in nature. 245 Glossary of Budget Terms (continued) Tax Capacity The valuation of property based on market value and statutory class rates. The Tax Capacity is measured by applying tax capacity percentages established by the Legislature. The property tax for each parcel is based on its tax capacity. Tax Capacity Rate The replaced the term “Mill Rate” and was by the Legislature in 1988. This rate is expressed as a percentage. TIF Abbreviation for Tax Increment Financing. A method used by the City for financing the acquisition of City infrastructure. Total Tax Capacity The amount computed by first totaling the tax capacities of all parcels of property within a city. Adjustments for fiscal disparities, tax increment and a portion of the powerline value are made to this total since not all tax capacity is available for general tax purposes. Transfers Money or property transferred between City funds. Truth-in-Taxation The “taxation and notification law” which requires local governments to set estimated levies, inform taxpayers about the impacts, and hold a separate hearing to receive taxpayer input. User charges for Services Revenue incurred from the sale of water, sanitary sewer, or street light service to customers of the Utility Fund. User Fee A payment for the direct receipt of a public service by the user of the service. Water Sales Revenue earned from the sale of water to customers of the Utility Fund. 246