The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutItem 08March 7, 2011 Item No. Proposed Action Staff recommends approval of the following motion: Move to approve Wetland Replacement plan for Keokuk Ave and 205` Street, Outlots A & B. Overview The delineation for the site was conducted on September 30, 2010 by Kimley -Horn and Associates and was field reviewed by staff from the City of Lakeville and Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) on October 15, 2010. Four areas were delineated on the project site for a total of 1.36 acres. The delineation was approved for this site on February 4, 2011. A Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) was held on January 18, 2011. Representatives were present from the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Dakota County SWCD, MN Board of Soil and Water Resources (BWSR) and City Staff. The TEP discussed the delineation and other aspects of the potential development project. Based on the TEP findings, Kimley -Horn and Associates submitted a replacement plan on February 9, 2011 and included information suggested at the TEP meeting. The replacement plan indicates 0.97 acres of impact. The plan provides detailed information of the site alternatives and options looked at to avoid wetland impacts. The plan proposes to purchase 2:1 replacement (1.94 acres) via the Bachman wetland bank located in the same watershed. In addition to mitigating wetland impacts, the plan is to relocate and stabilize the existing channel /wetland. The applicant is required to continue to work with TEP members to finalize the design of the channel stabilization. The applicant is also responsible for completing the proper ACOE permitting. No wetland impacts will occur until the City has received confirmation from BWSR that the required credits have been officially withdrawn from the wetland bank. Primary Issues to Consider None Supporting Information • Wetland Replacement Plan • TEP Findings of Fact Mac Cafferty, E mental Resources Manager WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN: KEOKUK AVE AND 205 STREET, OUTLOTS A & B MARCH 7, 2011 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Financial Impact: $ None Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: Budgeted: Y/N Source: Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application Local Government Unit (LGU) City of Lakeville Address 20195 Holyoke Ave Lakeville, MN 55044 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Wal -Mart Real Estate Business Trust Project Name Keokuk Ave and 205 St. Outlot A & B Date of Application 02/09/11 Application Number 116199069 Type of Application (check all that apply): ❑ Wetland Boundary or Type ❑ No -Loss ® Replacement Plan ❑ Exemption ❑ Banking Plan ❑ Sequencing Summary and description of proposed project (attach additional sheets as necessary): The location of this project is located in Section 25, T114N, R21W, which is located west of Interstate 35, south of 205 Street and east of Keokuk Ave, in Lakeville, MN. The delineation was approved for this site on 2/4/2011. The replacement plan indicates 0.97 acres of impact. The plan provides detailed information of the site alternatives and options looked at to avoid wetland impacts. The plan proposes to purchase 2:1 replacement (1.94 acres) via the Bachman wetland bank located in the same watershed. If you have questions regarding this application please contact LGU listed below. 2. APPLICATION REVIEW AND DECISION Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420 .0255, Subp. 3 provides notice that an application was made to the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments can be submitted to: Name and Title of LGU Contact Person Ann Messerschmidt Environmental Resources Specialist Address (if different than LGU) N/A Phone Number and E -mail Address 952 - 985 -4528 amesserschmidt@lakevillemn.gov Comments must be received by (minimum 15 business -day comment period): 03/04/2011 Date, time, and location of decision: 03/07/2011, 7 p.m., City Hall, Lakeville, MN Decision -maker for this application: ❑ Staff ® Governing Board or Council Signature: BWSR Forms 11 -25 -09 Date: Page 1 of 2 3. LIST OF ADDRESSEES SWCD TEP member: Mr. Brian Watson, 4100 — 220 Street West — Suite 102, Farmington, MN 55024 BWSR TEP member: Mr. Ken Powell, 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, MN 55155 • DNR TEP member: Ms. Melissa Doperalski, Ecological Services Division, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 ❑ DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member): • WD or WMO (if applicable): Mr. Mark Zabel, Vermillion River 'WMO, 14955 Galaxie Ave, Apple Valley, MN 55124 ® Members of the public who requested notice: Mr. Eric Vevea, Vevea & Company, Inc., 1496 Sherwood Way, Eagan, MN 55122 ® Applicant and Landowner (if different) (notice only): OWNER Wal -Mart Real Estate Business Trust, 2001 Southeast 10 Street, Bentonville, AR, 72716 -0050 AGENT: Beth Kunkel, Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc., 2550 University Ave West, Suite 345N, St. Paul, MN 55114 ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager ( notice only): Ms. Sarah Wingert, US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District Regulatory Branch, 180 Fifth Street E, St. Paul, MN 55101 ® BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan applications only) /1/ 4. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the application, list any other attachments: ® Copy of replacement plan (not if listed as notice only) El BWSR Forms 11 -25-09 Page 2 of 2 NA- 026620 -03B (V.2.02 for MS WORD) 9/11/2007 Minnesota Local /State /Federal Application Form for Water/Wetland Projects For Internal Use Only Application No. Field Office Code Date Initial Application Received Date initial Application Deemed Complete PART I: BASIC APPLICATION "Sec HELP" directs you to important additional information and assistance in Instructions, Page 1. 1. LANDOWNER/APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION (See Help 1) Name: WaI -Mart Real Estate Business Trust Phone: 479 - 204-0550 Complete mailing address: 2001 Southeast 10 Street, Bentonville, AR 72716 1 A. AUTHORIZED AGENT (See Help IA) (Only if applicable; an agent Is not required) Name: Beth Kunkel Phone: 651 -643 -0455 Complete mailing address: 2550 University Avenue West Suite 238N 2. NAME, TYPE AND SIZE OF PUBLIC WATERS or WETLANDS IMPACTED (Attach Additional Project Area sheets if needed) Name or I.D. # of Waters Impacted (if applicable; if known): (Check all that apply): ❑ Lake ❑ River T.4 Circular 39 Wetland type: ❑ 1, ❑ IL E) 2, ❑ 3, ❑ 4, ❑ 5, ® 6, ❑ 7, ❑ 8 Wetland plant community type ❑ shallow open water, ❑ deep marsh, ❑ shallow marsh, ❑ sedge meadow, ® fresh meadow, ❑ wet to wet -mesic prairie, ❑ calcareous fen, ❑ open bog or coniferous bog, ® shrub -carr /alder thicket, ❑ hardwood swamp or coniferous swamp, ❑ floodplain forest, ❑ seasonally flooded basin Indicate size of entire lake or wetland (check one): ►KA Less than 10 acres (indicate size: 1.36) ❑ 10 to 40 acres ❑ Greater than 40 acres Signature of applicant Om 3. PROJECT LOCATION (Information can be found on property tax statement, property title or title insurance): Project street address: Keokuk Avenue and 205 Street, Fire #: City (if applicable): Lakeville '/ Section: Section: 25 Township 114N Range #: 21W County: Dakota Lot #: B Block: Subdivision: Watershed (name or #) Vermilion River UTM location: N E Attach a simple site locator map. If needed, include on the map written directions to the site from a known location or landmark, and provide distances from known locations. Label the sheet SITE LOCATOR MAP. 4. TYPE OF PROJECT: Describe the type of proposed work. Attach TYPE OF PROJECT sheet if needed. see attached 5. PROJECT PURPOSE, DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS: Describe what you plan to do and why it is needed, how you plan to construct the project with dimensions (length, width, depth), area of impact, and when you propose to construct the project. This is the most important part of your application. See HELP 5 before completing this section; see What To Include on Plans (Instructions, page 1). Attach PROJECT DESCRIPTION sheet. see attached Footprint of project: 0,97 acres or 42,253 square feet drained, filled or excavated. 6. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES: What alternatives to this proposed project have you considered that would avoid or minimize impacts to wetlands or waters? List at least TWO additional alternatives to your project in Section 5 that avoid wetlands (one of which may be "no build" or "do nothing "), and explain why you chose to pursue the option described in this application over these alternatives. Attach PROJECT ALTERNATIVES sheet if needed. See attached 7. ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: For projects that impact more than 10,000 square feet of water or wetlands, list the complete mailing addresses of adjacent property owners on an attached separate sheet. (See HELP 7) 8. PORTION OF WORK COMPLETED: Is any portion of the work in wetland or water areas already completed? ❑ Yes ®No. If yes, describe the completed work on a separate sheet of paper labeled WORK ALREADY COMPLETED. (See HELP 8) 9. STATUS OF OTHER APPROVALS: List any other permits, reviews or approvals related to this proposed project that are either pending or have already been approved or denied on a separate attached sheet. See HELP 9. 10. I am applying for state and local authorization to conduct the work described in this application. I am familiar with the information contained in this application. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information in Part I is true, complete, and accurate. 1 possess the authority to undertake the work described, or 1 am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant 7 E -mail: beth.kunkel @kimley- horn.com Date . r ature ofugent (if applicable) Date E -mail: david.cox @waI- mart.com a-- 7 // This block must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity and has the necessary property rights to do so. If only the Agent has signed, please attach a separate sheet signed by the landowner, giving necessary authorization to the Agent. 'See Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin (Eggers and Reed, 1997) as modified by the Board of Water and Soil Resources, United States Army Corps of Engineers. Minnesota Local /State /Federal Application Forms for Water /Wetland Projects Page 1 _ titust . _ 1T- R ..; G Jr AD D . t :P Q ' J. 1✓9'i%W I Calf 'f " `• ica •I . P RE DRES fa - 13s]V Wirt:�� .;Jl ..... 1?,_rl� .. a, :,. : 1 ._ x �' <•• "1 • Rv: • `SP O `` �D:A NT `G ,li, I:. ... w • i ..1 rL .I �N ? • R , S .t) � � /, attg ON �Ci t�ttiii<t • T Ella ' •E � 1+6: (JC N )3107' ) .c). J3 A IQ P.. ..r ... IU �r , 7•t c7' Ali °. 7f D' ° r^ � . .4 •R fT .IV ' I'U E C!` ... ..,.. m 0 ' ISC11:, S R�;I) • f. ' 2�;;' I' Xi?��, Ol ;;�vf�?a'.�R'TAI;1}>E.[I>Y��A. � FD ��; :.. � • F�EACH•T U ]C, ��ItD �TS HAl2G •- A3t1 A � THE'i41v14 : • : YP �',... - � � - ki .2 S s; .b, • � L:� pp�.� '�E ;A ` � !rl CRES, )�',�' Fs � . . ,.. •�' ER ,A'- �0�?:W � 1)S. �� , R T _�.= r.,::• _ ti r. Cf; %'v ..?`i ~ .Y :ypSt: O' I~ C Q I 2 3 :, 1 e� �r' P x? RIIQTT; IQaTI ':W . ,.... .., , ,.,,_ . OR = 'F •4 r ;2 •AD' ' JO INO� RSA: ` , OP . �#l? �R, a l f,` lc .R • A �ETi �REC6lYEI)- FR9�`Q7 R� �� . � •. R . "s:cI:lSl �) t ;C�T�"J . 19.V �A ,,,�a. :� j C IN T • :c: 1V RiBI's .. _ J4.. 0 � . • �P 1T- R ..; G Jr AD D . t :P Q X10: �' <•• "1 • Rv: • `SP O `` �D:A NT `G ,li, I:. ... .• APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT (33 CFR 325) OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003 Expires Dec 31, 2004 The public burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require 5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington 1 leadquartcrs Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202 -4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penahy for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT RETURN your fonn to tither of these addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT: Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marne Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal purpose: Information provided on this fonn will be used in evaluating the application for a pennit Routine uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other Federal, state, and local government agencies, Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. ITEMS 1 THROUGH 4 TO BE PILLED IN BY THE CORPS I. APPLICATION NO. 1 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED YOU DO Nor NEED TO COMPLETE ITEMS 6 -10 and 12 -25 in the SHADED AREAS. 411 applicants must complete non - shaded items 5 and 26. If an agent is used, also complete items 8 and 11. This optional Federal form is valid for use only when included as part of this entire state applicationpacket. 5. APPLICANT'S NAME Wal -Mart Real Estate Business Trust PPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required) Beth Kunkel, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. 11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION (If applicable; co nplete only if authorizing an agent) 1 hereby authorize Beth Kunkel to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application. DATE: 26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is complete and accurate. 1 further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. N._ aid Signature of applicant Date Sig i tSt of agent (if any) Date The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant), or. it.may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in Block 11 has been filled out and signed. 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in•any'mattner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfttlly falsifies, conceals, or covers up with any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both. ENG FORM 4345, Jul 97 EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW -OR) Minnesota Local /State/Federal Application Forms for Water /Wetland Projects Page 2 FOR LGU USE ONLY: Determination for Part 1: ❑ No WCA Jurisdiction ❑ Exempt: No. (per MN Rule 8420.0122) ❑ No loss: _ (A,B,.. per MN Rule 8420.0220) ❑ Wetland Boundary or type ❑ Replacement required — applicant must complete Part 11 COMPLETE T IE SECTION BELOW ONLY IF REPLACE a ENT IS NOT REOUIRED: Application is (check one): ❑ Approved ❑Approved with conditions (conditions attached) Comments/Findings: County where recorded LOU official signature Dale Name and Title For Agricultural and Drainage exemptions (MN Rule 8420.0122 Subps. 1 and 213), LGI) has received proof of recording of restrictions (per MN Rule 8420.0115): Date Document II assigned by recorder ❑ Denied LOU official signature Date Minnesota Local /State/Federal Application Forms for Water /Wetland Projects Page 3 Wetland impact (as noted on overhead view) Watershed name or number (if known) Watershed and Bank Aga Ce Wetland plant community type' Predominant vegetation in impacted wetland area Size of area impacted (in acres or square feet) Existing land use in project area (check all that apply) Vermillion River 8 2 reed canary grass 0.34 ❑ Housing ® Commercial First • Industrial • Parks /recreation areas impact 8 6 sandbar willow 0.63 • Highways and associated rights -of -way • Forested • Farmsteads /agricultural • Vacant lands ❑ Public and semi - public (schools /gov't facilities) • Airports Second impact • Extractive (gravel pits/quarries) ❑ Other: PART 11: REPLACEMENT PLAN SUPPLEMENT For assistance in completing Parr 1!, contact your Local Government Unit or a professional consultant 11. DESCRIPTION OF WETLAND IMPACTS: Complete the chart below: 1) Use one row of boxes for each wetland impact; 2) If your project has more than one wetland impact, reference your overhead view (part of Section 5) to this chart by identifying and labeling "first impact" and "second impact" on your overhead view; 3) If you are identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the first dotted line and leave the others blank; 4) If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted area for each separate wetland type within that impact area; 5) If you do not have access to some of this information, call your I -GU or SWCD office for assistance. (Photocopy char! for more impacts, if needed.) CTS t lf you are identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the first dotted lint and leave the others blank. If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each separate wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted area for each separate wetland type with that impact area. TOTALS OF AREA(S) IMPACTED FOR EACH WETLAND TYPE ON CIIART (indicate acres ® or square feet 0) Wetland plant community type': Shallow open water: Deep marsh: Shallow Marsh: Sedge meadow: Fresh wet meadow: 0.34 Wet to wct mesic prairie: Calcareous fen: Open bog or coniferous bog: Shrub carr or alder thicket: 0.63 Hardwood swamp or coniferous swamp: Floodplain forest Seasonally flooded basin 12. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Are you aware of any special considerations that apply to either the impact site(s) or the replacement site(s)? 0 Yes ® No (Examples: site presence of endangered species, special fish and wildlife resources, sensitive surface waters, or waste disposal site.) If YES, list and describe briefly. 13. SHORELAND IMPACT ZONE: Please identify each wetland impact site noted in Section 15 that is within 1000 feet of a lake or 300 feet of a river. N/A ' See Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin (Eggers and Reed, 1997) as modified by the Board of Water and Soil Resources, United States Army Corps of Engineers. Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Fonns for Water /Wetland Projects Page 4 Identify Wetland replacement site (as noted on overhead view) Watershed name or number (if known) Dank Service Area County Section, Township, Range Wetland Plant Community Type' Type(s) of replacement credits (in acres or square feet) Restored or created? Indicate R or C New Wetland Credits (NWC) Public Value Credits (PVC) Name of First replacement site • Name of Second replacement site ' 14. HOW PROPOSED REPLACEMENT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED: Indicate how proposed replacement will be accomplished (check only one box below and continue as indicated): ® A. Wetland banking credits only Complete Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits Form and include with your application. Copies of this fonn are available from your LGU, or download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us Skip to Section 19, page 6 (You do not need to complete Sections 15 -18). ❑ B. Project - specific replacement only Continue with Section 15 below. ❑ C. A Combination of wetland banking and project - specific replacement. Busing project specific replacement that will result in surplus wetland credits that you propose to deposit in the state wetland bank for future use, then you must submit a wetland banking application directly to your LOU before or concurrently with submittal of this form. Also, Complete Application for Withdrawal of Weiland Credits Form and include with your application. Copies of this form and the wetland banking application is available from your LGU, or download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us Continue with Section 15 below. 15. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND(S) CONSTRUCTION (Complete this section only if you marked Box B or Box C in Section 14 above): Describe in detail how replacement wetland(s) will be constructed. if several methods will be used, describe each method. Details should include the following: 1) type of construction (such as excavated in upland, restored by tile break, restored by ditch block or revegetated); 2) type, size and specifications of outlet structures; 3) elevations relative to Mean Sea Level or established benchmarks or key features (such as sill, emergency overflow or structure height); 4) what best management practices will be implemented to prevent erosions or site degradation; 5) proposed timetable for starting and ending the project; and 6) a vegetation management plan. Write this description on a separate sheet of paper labeled DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND CONSTRUCTION. 16. SURPLUS WETLAND CREDITS: If using project- specific replacement (Box B or Box C in Section 14 above), will the replacement result in any surplus wetland credits that you wish to have deposited in the State Wetland Bank for future use? ❑ Yes ❑ No. if yes, submit a Wetland Banking Application directly to your LOU before or concurrently with submittal of this form. Copies are available from your LOU, or download a copy from www.bwsr.statc.mn.us 17. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLANDS: Complete the chart below: 1) Use one row of boxes for each wetland replacement site; 2) If your project has more that one wetland replacement site, reference your overhead view (part of Section 5) to this chart by identifying and labeling "first replacement site" and "second replacement site" on your overhead view; 3) If you are identifying only one wetland type within a given replacement site, use the first dotted line(s) and leave the others blank; 4) If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type in a given replacement site, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each separate wetland type, and identify type(s) of replacement credits and "restored or created" for each separate wetland type with that replacement site; 5) If you do not have acccss to some of the information, or if you do not know your replacement ratio, call your LOU or SWCD office for assistance. Photocopy chart for more wetland replacements, if needed.) DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLANDS If you are identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impac area, use the first dotted line and leave the others blank. If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each separate wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted area for REQUIRED REPLACEMENT RATIO each separate wetland type within that impact area. (If known) TOTAL NWC Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water /Wetland Projects Page 5 TOTAL PVC Wetland plant community type: Shallow open water: Deep marsh:: • Shallow Marsh: Sedge meadow: Fresh wet meadow: Wet to wet mesic prairie: Calcareous fen: Open bog or coniferous bog: Shrub carr on alder thicket: Hardwood swamp or coniferous swamp: Floodplain forest Seasonally flooded basin * Sec Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin (Eggers and Reed, 1997) as modified by the Board of Water and Soil Resources, United States Army Corps of Engineers. • 18. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PROJECT- SPECIFIC REPLACEMENT (Required only if you marked Box B or Box C in Section 14): For projects involving at least some project- specific replacement, include the following additional information: ❑ Two drawings to scale of the replacement wetland. include both overhead view and profile (side view or cross - sectional view). See What to Include on Plans (Instructions, Page 3) for a detailed description of what should be included in these drawings. Without drawings, your application will be considered incomplete. ❑ For created replacement wetlands, include additional soils information (if available) that indicates the capability of the site to produce and maintain wetland characteristics. Note 1: For replacement wetlands located on pipeline casements, you need to receive endorsement of your project from both the easement holder and the Minnesota Department of4ttblic Safety's Office of Pipeline Safety. Before start of construction, the owner of any utilities must be notified. The landowner or contractor is responsible for giving this notice by calling "Gopher State One -Call" at 652- 454 -0002 (Twin Cities Metro Arca) or 1- 800 -252 -1166 (all other locations). Note 2: For extensive or complex projects supplementary information may be requested at a later dated from one or more of the responding agencies. Such information may include (but not be limited to) the following: topographic map, water table map, soil borings, depth soundings, aerial photographs, environmental assessment and/or engineering reports. 19. SIGNED AFFIRMATION: FOR PROJECTS INVOLVING REPLACEMENT BY WETLAND BANKING ONLY. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information in Part II is true, complete and accurate; and 1 affirm that the wetland losses will be replaced via withdrawal from an account in the State Wetland Bank. FOR PROJECTS INVOLVING EITHER PROJECT - SPECIFIC REPLACEMENT ONLY OR A COMBINATION OF WETLAND BANKING AND PROJECT- SPECIFIC REPLACEMENT: Part A: The replacement wetland. I affirm that the replacement wetland was not: Previously restored or created under a prior approved replacement plan or permit; AND Drained or filled under an exemption during the previous 10 years; AND Restored with financial assistance from public conservation programs; AND Restored using private funds, other than landowner funds, unless the funds are paid back with interest to the individual or organization that funded the restoration; and the individual or organization notifies the local govemtnent unit in writing that the restored wetland may be considered for replacement. Part B: Additional assurances (check all that apply): ® The wetland will be replaced before or concurrent with the actual draining or filling of a wetland. ❑ An irrevocable bank letter of credit, perfonnance bond, or other acceptable security has been provided to guarantee successful completion of the wetland replacement. ® The wetland losses will be replaced via withdrawal from an account in the State Wetland Bank. Part C. For projects involving any project- specific replacement: Within 30 days of either receiving approval of this application or beginning work on the project, I will record the Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants on the deed for the property on which the replacement wetland(s) will be located; and 1 will at the same time submit proof of such recording to the I.GU. To die best of my knowledge and belief, all information in Part 11 is true, complete and accurate; and 1 affirm all statements in Part A and C, as well as checked assurance(s) in Part B. Signalufn or applicant or agent FOR LGU USE ONLY County where recorded Replacement plan is (check one): ❑ Approved Date ❑Approved with conditions (conditions attached) ❑ Denied LGU official signature Date LGU has receive evidence of title and proof of recording of Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland: Date Document ff assigned by recorder LGU official signature Dale Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects Page 6 Real Estate & Design David Cox , 8r. Design Manager February 4, 2011 Mr. Mac Cafferty City of Lakeville WCA LGU 20195 Holyoke Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 -9177 RE: Walmart Store #5992 -00, Lakeville MN Authorization to Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. to serve as Walmart's Permitting Agent Dear Mr. Cafferty, On behalf of Wal -Mart Stores, Inc. (Walmart), I authorize Will Matzek and /or Beth Kunkel of Kimley -Horn and Associates to act as Walmart's duly authorized agent for preparing applications and subsequent correspondence required to obtain permits and/or approvals for the local/state/federal permitting agencies. Sincerely, David Co Sr. Design Manager Wal -Mart Stores, Inc. cc: TR Rose U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — St. Paul District Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources -- Area Hydrologist Walmart ) Save money. Live better. 2001 S.E. 10 Street Bentonville, AR 72719 Phone 479,204.0660 Fax 470273.4107 www.walmart.com Keokuk Avenue and 205 Street, Outlot B Combined Wetland Permit Application Attachments to Parts I and II February 7 2011 ATTACHMENTS TO JOINT APPLICATION FORM FOR WETLAND REPLACEMENT 4. Tyne of Project: The project consists of construction of a 152,000 s.f. retail building with 681 parking stalls, landscaping, stormwater treatment, and other appurtenances on a 15.95 acre lot (Outlot B) at Keokuk Avenue and 205 Street in Lakeville, MN (Figure 1). The store will offer general retail, grocery, pharmacy, and other retail sales and services. 5. Project Purpose, Description, and Dimensions: Purpose: The 15.95 acre Outlot B is zoned C -3, General Commercial and according to the City of Lakeville Zoning Ordinances, the purpose of the C -3 district is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. With the recent reconstruction of the adjacent CSAH 70 interchange, and the City's zoning classification of the Site, the development of Outlot B as a Walmart satisfies the goals and intent of the City of Lakeville Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. The current and future residents and businesses in the general area surrounding the CSAH 70 interchange are currently required to travel approximately two miles to the next closest large retail area. Development of Outlot B will also utilize the existing infrastructure of the Interstate 35 corridor and the CSAH 70 interchange area as guided by the City of Lakeville that currently serves the community. Walmart's market research of the community and region determined that a 152,000 s.f. retail building with a general retail, grocery, pharmacy, and other retail sales and services is desirable to meet the community's current and future needs. In association with the building development, sufficient street access, parking, stormwater treatment and landscaping are proposed as part of the project. Outlot B was ultimately selected for the development as the proper street and utility infrastructure are in place, and the Site is guided for commercial retail development by the City of Lakeville. Existing Conditions: Wetlands within the area of the proposed project were delineated, reviewed, and approved in the Fall of 2008 by Westwood and 2010 by Kimley -Horn. Please refer to the Keokuk Avenue and 205 Street Outlot A and Outlot B Wetland Delineation Report prepared by Kimley -Horn dated January 2011 submitted under separate cover to the City and TEP for delineation details. One wetland area was identified at the site and was identified as "Wetland D" by Westwood in 2008. Wetland D is a wetland complex associated with a drainage channel that runs along the south and east parcel boundaries of Outlot B (Figure 2). The channel length through the site is 1,540 feet and drops 5 feet in elevation from south to north. The total wetland area within the site is 1.36 acres. The wetland is comprised primarily of two wetland types; wet meadow and shrub -scrub with the dominant vegetation being reed canary grass (non- native) and sandbar willow (native). Much of the site west of the wetland has been previously graded for land development as part of the Lakeville Commerce Center in 1988/89. The upland area is dominated by alfalfa, smooth brome, and red clover. To the east of the wetland is MnDOT right of way, an overhead powerline easement and an upland knob covered with smooth brome grass and patches of sumac. Outlot A to the north of the site is primarily wetland (an extension of Wetland D), which was also included in the delineation for this project. The outlet to the wetland is a culvert that was installed when I -35 was constructed in the late 60's /early 70's. The culver is a 72 -inch RCP with an invert elevation of 1027.70 feet. r 1 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Year Precip.* General observations Storm pond location observations 1951 Wet Site cultivated both sides of channel, erosion; channel clearly defined Grading or excavation activity; no sign of hydrology 1964 Normal Site cultivated both sides of channel; channel clearly defined Saturation possible; similar to area to east 1970 Wet Channel more vegetated; site cultivated west of channel; I -35 in place No sign of hydrology 1974 Dry Cultivated west of channel Saturation east of pond site 1979 Wet Cultivated west of channel Inconclusive 1984 Wet Cultivated west of channel Saturation east of pond site 1988 Dry Cultivated west of channel Inconclusive 1989 Dry Grading of road and site completed, no cultivation, south end of channel realigned Pond constructed; appears to have been mined for gravel 1991 Wet No change No change 2005 Wet Tollefson Office Center constructed west of pond Pond expanded to the west 2009 Normal No change No change Generally, the quality of Wetland D has been categorized by the city's inventory as "restore ", which means the wetland received low scores for vegetation and habitat but due to its location, past disturbance, and /or hydrology, it potentially could be a good candidate for wetland restoration. An approximately 0.70 acre regional stormwater pond is also located within Outlot A. It was originally excavated and mined around 1988 as part of the business park grading and infrastructure improvements. It was intended to provide flood control from Lakeville Commerce Center development. This pond was expanded in 2005 when the Tollefson Office Center building was constructed just west of the pond. Historic Wetland Boundaries: In an effort to determine the historic wetland boundaries within these two outlots, a number of data sources were reviewed including NWI maps, soil survey data, city and Corps records, and historic aerial photography. There has been significant disturbance within this site and adjacent Outlot A over the years, with the most recent grading activities occurring in 1988/89 and 2005. Aerial photos were available from the County website and SWCD office included years 1951, 1964, 1974, 1988, 1989, 1991, 2005, and 2008. Aerial photos from years 1970, 1979, and 1984, were obtained from HIG (Figure 6a -i). After reviewing the historic aerials for wetland and hydrology indicators, it does not appear that there was any obvious wetland in the area where the regional pond was constructed, although the area immediately east of the pond does show signs of high water. * Annual precipitation data used to determine whether precipitation was wetter or drier than the 30 -year average (http: // climate .umn.edu /wetland /wetland.asp - Accessed February 2011). The NRCS Websoil Survey identifies the storm pond area as having Estherville sandy loam and Kennebec silt loam soils, which are not considered hydric soils. The National Wetland Inventory does not indicate any wetland within the area of the storm water pond. Based on information provided by the City and confirmed from aerial photos, the storm pond was originally excavated in 1988, and expanded in 2005. The pond was originally (1988) designed to hold 15 acre -feet of permanent storage with 55 acre -feet of storm storage. (Proposed plans are shown in Figure 3). The original pond average depth was approximately 3 feet. The intent of the pond was for regional flood control from the Lakeville Commerce Center Development. When the pond was expanded in 2005, rit k 2 the north end of the pond excavated to a new depth of 8 feet and was expanded to the west. This expansion was to provide additional storage to the regional stormwater pond. There is no record of a US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) permit for the excavation of the pond in 1988. The pond was excavated prior to the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Based on the evidence described above, it is our determination that the storm water pond that was constructed on Outlot A in 1988 was not constructed within wetland and is therefore not covered by either Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or the Wetland Conservation Act. Proposed Impact: Wetland Fill In this location, given the topography and site requirements, wetland impacts are unavoidable. The total permanent impact to the wetland is estimated to be 0.97 acres (Figure 4). The majority of the impact is not avoidable due to the existing topography and narrow area between building pad and the Mn /DOT I- 35 right -of -way fence. Temporary Wetland Disturbance: During site construction, there will be 0.16 acres of temporary wetland impact. This area of temporary impact is shown in Figure 4. Temporary impacts are needed for grading of the channel realignment and retaining wall construction along the eastern edge of the site. The wetland area included in the temporary impacts will be restored back to preconstruction conditions (grades) and will be reseeded with native seed mix 34 -181. Channel Realignment The drainage channel or the narrow portion of Wetland D will be relocated and reconstructed to the east to maintain the drainage through the site. The design of this channel is an open (not piped) channel with a vegetated bottom that has a width of approximately 5 feet and a 3:1 slope on either side of the channel. The channel will be constructed with numerous rock check dams to help reduce the velocity of the water and protect the channel from erosion. The channel bottom will be seeded with wetland seed mix 34 -181 for a native flora. Placement of erosion control blanket, diversion berms and swales, and silt fence along with vegetation establishment will be completed prior to water diversion into the new channel. A sediment forebay will be constructed at the end of the new channel alignment to collect any sediment prior to flowing into the wetland in Outlot A. A level spreader will be constructed on the northern edge of the sediment forebay to disperse the flow from the channel into the adjacent wetland. None of the site generated runoff from impervious surfaces will be directed to this channel. Storm Pond Expansion To meet regional stormwater quality requirements, Walmart is proposing to expand the existing regional stormwater pond located in Outlot A. This pond is currently 0.70 acres and is used for the storage and treatment of run -off from the adjacent properties within the Lakeville Commerce Center Development. This regional stormwater pond will be expanded by an additional 0.16 surface acres (7,000 surface s.f.) to accommodate the additional run -off from the development of Outlot B. This expansion will impact 0.07 acres of delineated wetland area which is located along the east edge of the existing stormwater pond (Figure 5). Even though this sliver of wetland was likely created in association with the storm pond, the 0.07 acres has been included in the total (0.97 acres) wetland impacts for the site. The storm pond will also be excavated to increase the storage volume. The additional storage will increase the pond depth to 8 feet instead of the existing depth of 3 feet. The expansion of the regional storm pond in 2005 increased depth of the northern section of the pond to 8 feet; thus the proposed expansion will be equivalent to the expansion in 2005. The surface expansion will just increase the surface area of the pond to the east with an average depth of 1 foot. This increased area will be seeded with seed mix 33- 361. 3 6. Project Alternatives: Two avoidance options are required to be evaluated for projects with wetland impacts. Walmart has evaluated the no -build alternative as well as a reduced store size to avoid the proposed wetland impacts. In addition, other sites were evaluated in the project vicinity to determine if there was a better opportunity to minimize wetland impacts. To further evaluate minimizing wetland impacts, alternate building layouts were evaluated on the proposed site to reduce wetland impacts. Each of these scenarios is described below: No -Build Alternative: The no -build alternative would avoid wetland impacts. Walmart looked for other sites on the Interstate 35 corridor in the City of Lakeville to develop if this particular site was not chosen. The other sites were evaluated based on the same criteria as Outlot B, and it was determined that the other sites were either already developed or would have more wetland impact than the development of Outlot B. More discussion on site alternatives is included in the Site Location Alternatives Section. Reduced Building Size: A building approximately half the size of the proposed development would avoid all wetland impacts. However, the Walmart business model does not provide for a facility of this size in order to achieve no wetland impact on the Outlot B site. The much smaller retail building footprint would be missing key features such as the additional grocery, retail, and pharmacy capabilities which are crucial for Walmart's business model to serve the community and region. Site Location Alternatives: Walmart identified the area surrounding the interchange of I -35 and CSAH 70 as a desirable location for a number of factors, some of which include: the existing transportation and utility infrastructure to support the Store is already in place, the City of Lakeville has the area zoned appropriately for a Walmart, and the area has good access and visibility to I -35. After identifying the general area of I -35 and CSAH 70, Walmart then focused on specific sites surrounding the interchange. Walmart reviewed a number of factors prior to deciding on the preferred Site (Site A) and the existing wetlands and natural resources were a major factor in the Site selection. The attached Alternative Site exhibit (Figure 7) illustrates the areas that were reviewed by Walmart during their Site selection process including a comparison of potential wetland impacts for each site. Four sites are shown in Figure 7. Each site has the same or greater wetland impact than Site A. Additionally, the other sites were eliminated as they either did not allow for adequate parking (as required by City), did not provide the desired circulation or building layout, or had other site constraints like topography, access, or size that made them Tess desirable for Walmart's needs. The other sites would also impact higher quality wetlands than what is found on Outlot B. Wetland quality ratings are found in the City of Lakeville's 2003 Wetland Management Plan. Site Layout Alternatives: Preferred Alternative: The proposed site design (Figure 4) avoids wetland impacts to the maximum extent possible. Of the approximately 1.36 acres of onsite wetland, 0.39 acres are either considered temporary impacts or are avoided. The 0.97 acres of impacts that cannot be avoided are a result of meeting the City's parking requirements for a retail building of this size and the location of the existing wetland /channel. The proposed design re- routes the wetland around the perimeter of the site to maintain the hydraulics of the waterway. The new channel will be stabilized with native vegetation prior to being placed into operation. /r N TOeF -N.; n fir.. 3 "::�._Sf a' ..lit::. 4 Replacement page 02/09/2011 avoided. The 0.97 acres of impacts that cannot be avoided are a result of meeting the City's parking requirements for a retail building of this size and the location of the existing wetland /channel. The proposed design re- routes the wetland around the perimeter of the site to maintain the hydraulics of the waterway. The new channel will be stabilized with native vegetation prior to being placed into operation. The City of Lakeville requires 5.0 parking stalls per 1,000 SF of retail building. The City allows a 10% reduction in gross leasable area to accommodate for storage and mechanical areas. Based on code, 681 parking stalls are required for this site, and 681 stalls are provided in the current design. A one -way drive aisle configuration has also been utilized to decrease the width of the parking field and reduce wetland impacts. A one -way aisle is only 18.5' per Lakeville code, while a two -way aisle must be 24'. This more efficient layout allows for the site to have sufficient parking per code with less wetland impacts. The stormwater detention, infiltration, and treatment areas have been proposed outside of the wetland area to avoid wetland impact. In addition, the project proposes expanding the adjacent regional stormwater pond to provide the remaining detention capacity required for the site. Modular block retaining walls are proposed in all fill areas adjacent to the wetland, which results in a reduction in wetland impacts of approximately 1,800 square feet. All stormwater runoff from the impervious surface onsite will be collected in pipes and transported to either the onsite infiltration basin or regional stormwater pond. Other on -site configurations were initially considered but rejected due to additional wetland impact: Alternative Al: Walmart's preferred business model would include a Garden Center and Drive -thru pharmacy. Site dimensions restrict the possibility of providing a drive -thru, but a Garden Center could be provided if wetlands were not considered. This reconfiguration of the site resulted in approximately 1.33 acres of wetlands would be impacted onsite (Figure 8a). Alternative A2: Alternative A2 is provided to illustrate an alternate site configuration. The building is rotated 90 degrees and moved to the center of the site. This layout is not as efficient, and while it does not result in additional wetland impacts, the city parking requirements cannot be satisfied, nor does it meet Walmart's new site specifications (Figure 8b). Based on these factors, the on -site alternatives were dropped from further consideration. 9. Other permits and approvals: The application is being submitted for City of Lakeville and US Army Corps of Engineers approval. Other: An NPDES permit and SWPPP will also be required for this project. Erosion control measures will include diversion berms and swales, erosion control blanket, check dams and silt fence /barrier protection at appropriate locations (wetland perimeter, inlet and outlet culverts, to minimize erosion within the channel. Any areas disturbed by heavy equipment during construction will be restored to preconstruction conditions as needed. The NPDES permit and SWPPP will address any secondary impacts resulting from the proposed construction. City Approvals: Site Plan, Preliminary and Final Plat approvals are needed from the City of Lakeville. /"' _ rt N- MR 3'3 5 Activity Acres of Wetland Permanent Impact 0.97 Channel Realignment 0.90 Stormwater Pond Expansion 0.07 Temporary Impact 0.16 Temporary Grading 0.16 11. Description of Wetland Impacts: Wetland Impacts are listed below by activity. The channel realignment will permanently impact 0.34 acres of Type 2 — fresh (wet) meadow and 0.63 acres of Type 6 — shrub -carr wetland. The stormwater pond expansion will impact 0.07 acres of Type 2 — fresh (wet) meadow. The temporary grading will temporarily impact 0.16 acres of Type 6 — shrub -carr wetland. 14. Wetland Replacement: Due to the County and City's restore rating (poor vegetation and habitat) for the impacted wetland, onsite replacement was not encouraged due to the small size of the replacement needed (less than five acres), adjacent invasive species (reed canary grass), maintenance requirements, and low probability of long -term success. Banked replacement credits, approved by BWSR and the Corps are available within BSA 8, which is the BSA this project is located. Account # 1144 Bachmann, is the only site within the BSA and Dakota County and the same watershed as the project. As such, the Bachmann site is the preferred bank site for this project as indicated by the Corps, BWSR, City and SWCD. Because the bank site is within the same BSA, the replacement ratio required for the project is 2:1. A 2:1 ratio was agreed upon during the TEP meeting on January 18 Wetland credits are available from account number #1144 which is located within the Army Corps Wetland Bank Service Area (8), the major watershed (38), and the Vermillion River watershed district. A draft wetland banking credit withdrawal form is attached. In addition to the required replacement, Walmart will also relocate the open channel connection through the site. This will be done by realigning the channel to the east of the proposed parking area and building and by constructing 1,950 feet of retaining wall. Erosion control blanket, check dams, silt fence, and diversion swales will be used to protect the channel from erosion and sedimentation during construction of the site (Figure 9). Sequencing of the construction of the site is as follows. The new channel alignment will be constructed and vegetation will be established prior to the diversion of water from the existing channel to the new alignment. Retaining walls will be constructed along the western edge of the new channel alignment prior to construction of the rest of the site. Attachments: Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 4. Figure 5. pr Nuirl k n".01.1-4, I!, 3'3 A.SJ:.'al:z,. Ii IC . Project Location Wetland Boundary 1988 Storm Water Pond Design Wetland Impacts /Grading Plan Wetland Type Impacts Figure 6a -i. Historic Aerial Photos Figure 7. Site Alternatives Figure 8a -b. Site Plan Alternatives Figure 9. Erosion Control Plan Attachment A: Draft Wetland Banking Credit Withdrawal Form 6 z CREATED REGIONAL STORMWATER POND 205TH STREE 210TH:STREET 215TH STREET pr- Kimley-Horn M. Mir 1 and Associates, Inc. 64 PROJECT SITE NORTH 0 500 1,000 mi■==i Feet < 1 uJ D z uJ 64 205TH;STREE . :ILEtiati6+411iTY:Y:Y: 215TH STREET 210TH-STREET Keokuk Avenue and 205th Street Wetland Permit Application Figure 1. Project Location DELINEATECtBY KIMLEY -HORIC (2010) LEGEND DELINEATED BY WESTWOOD (2008) DELINEATED BY KIMLEY -HORN (2010) - CREATED REGIONAL STORMWATER POND Kimley -Horn NORTH C Mr and Associates, Inc. 0 75 150 Feet Keokuk Avenue and 205th Street Wetland Permit Application Figure 2. Delineated Wetland Boundaries t >t il N N O , A r' P9 aia as »» .J2 Li.,. "s« u, 77/4 au EEFF:. ; F.'EFE'iFil; i ' Di .a ON. 4 N+ r r OI(..JW v66i.,i.ri.2 aaxi aaaaaa G . 4 - . lg ,sa • WNWWW b�ioaW 3 a s mac.• s., r Swift tint of see. 25, rug &V _ y w Drawing AKEVILLE \CADD \PLAN SHEETS \6050 GRADING PLAN.DWG 6050 Feb 08, 2011 9:27oni by colleen.loris We document. waelber with the concepts ond designs presented Nn, pa on instrument or serN b Intended aNY Ix the weelRC pvpow and diem for .m¢n it was prworeE. Reuse of and Improver reliance on this document rIt noul .rlltan wtnwizpUOn one! oEpptptbn by Klmley -Horn and Associates. Inc. shod be rRNWI liability to Kimley -HOm ond Aaexlarea, mc. I I I I 1 I I -- --- - - - - -- --- - - -__- =_ - _ -- -fir -- ��vuE cn o O 5 1 1 1 1. 1, I ey I0 Z 0 Og% i b 0 0 �rn -4 co O M7DPSTA7F MIp4iMAY NO. .15 la m y 0 m z 4- Walmart* LAKEVILLE, MN KEOKUK AVE AND CSAH 70 STORE # 5992 -00 DAKOTA COUNTY MINNESOTA A STA7F Tn 1 0 Ara/MAY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN No SCALE AS SHOWN DESIGNED BY C DRAWN BY CHECKED BY CPL WDM r1 mow - AND/LE /N CD I HEREBY CERTIFY TUT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY UCENSED P80E0590041 ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. WILUAM D. MATZEK, P.E. DATE: 02/07/11 MN UC. N0. 45790 MOH** Y 5 4 p n No r- 6) z v 1/111M KinirtHom ob..= and Panden. hit No -TS 9 0 °z C � 2 I le REVISIONS f 'A 'g''.' 4 11 y;o I I ; zN / I 1 ' 1. . 1 • II II 11 i _ I1 II HO-d f. V I I I I � HO -d I POH '�N � — yP -OH - 'O _O.,d M -� H01 P -OH = P- 1 ick AAA � A ^ i yin \f'I D D DATE BY f 3:1 NAXJ (TYP.) EXISTING GRIXIND� IL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 1 r P OSED UND can I EXSTNG 5' CHAIN LINK FENCE PROPERTY LINE Drawing AKEVILLE \CADD \PLAN SHEETS \6050 GRADING PLAN.DWG 6050 Feb 08, 2011 9:27oni by colleen.loris We document. waelber with the concepts ond designs presented Nn, pa on instrument or serN b Intended aNY Ix the weelRC pvpow and diem for .m¢n it was prworeE. Reuse of and Improver reliance on this document rIt noul .rlltan wtnwizpUOn one! oEpptptbn by Klmley -Horn and Associates. Inc. shod be rRNWI liability to Kimley -HOm ond Aaexlarea, mc. I I I I 1 I I -- --- - - - - -- --- - - -__- =_ - _ -- -fir -- ��vuE cn o O 5 1 1 1 1. 1, I ey I0 Z 0 Og% i b 0 0 �rn -4 co O M7DPSTA7F MIp4iMAY NO. .15 la m y 0 m z 4- Walmart* LAKEVILLE, MN KEOKUK AVE AND CSAH 70 STORE # 5992 -00 DAKOTA COUNTY MINNESOTA A STA7F Tn 1 0 Ara/MAY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN No SCALE AS SHOWN DESIGNED BY C DRAWN BY CHECKED BY CPL WDM r1 mow - AND/LE /N CD I HEREBY CERTIFY TUT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY UCENSED P80E0590041 ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. WILUAM D. MATZEK, P.E. DATE: 02/07/11 MN UC. N0. 45790 MOH** Y 5 4 p n No r- 6) z v 1/111M KinirtHom ob..= and Panden. hit No -TS 9 0 °z C � 2 I le REVISIONS f 'A 'g''.' 4 11 y;o I I ; zN / I 1 ' 1. . 1 • II II 11 i _ I1 II HO-d f. V I I I I � HO -d I POH '�N � — yP -OH - 'O _O.,d M -� H01 P -OH = P- 1 ick AAA � A ^ i yin \f'I D D DATE BY Print Preview 2009 Aerial Page 1 of 1 Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Map Scale 1 inch = 308 feet http: / /gis.co. dakota. mn. us / website /dakotanetgis /printPreview.aspx ?PrintOptData =2009 Aeri... 2/4/2011 Print Preview 2005 Aerial Legend ❑ Tax Parcels Streets Interstate U.S. Highway State Highway CSAHIThrough Route County State Aid Highway County Road Other Municipality Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Page 1 of 1 Map Scale 1 inch = 393 feet http: / /gis.co. dakota. mn. us / website / dakotanetgis /printPreview.aspx ?PrintOptData =2005 Ae... 1/27/2011 Print Preview 1991 Aerial Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Page 1 of 1 Legend Tax Parcels Streets Interstate U.S. Highway State Highway CSAHIThrough Route County State Aid Highway County Road Other Municipality Map Scale 1 inch = 393 feet http: / /gis.co. dakota. mn. us / website/ dakotanetgis /printPreview.aspx ?PrintOptData =1991 Ae... 1/27/2011 19, Dakota Co. SWCD 1988 Dakota Co. SWCL - II 1 51 1 CAL 1 Nt 1)H MA 11t GATIIIII.ERS Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Lakeville, MN 1984 HIG Project Number. MBB -1057 Client Project Number. SP -10 -08339 Approximate Scale 1:6000 (1"=500') ��f Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Lakeville, MN 1979 HIG Project Number. MB8 -1057 Client Project Number. SP -10 -08339 Approximate Scale 1:6000 (1"=500') U 11 1ST 0 11 I c A I I N F 1) N M A 1 ION GATIICR.CRS INC Print Preview 1974 Aerial Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Page 1 of 1 Legend Tax Parcels Streets Interstate U.S. Highway er r State Highway CSAHRhrough Route County State Ald Highway County Road Other Municipality Map Scale 1 inch = 393 feet http: / /gis.co. dakota. mn. us / website / dakotanetgis /printPreview.aspx ?PrintOptData =1974 Ae... 1/27/2011 Phase Environmerital Site Assessment Lakeville, MN 1970 HIG Project Number MBB-1057 Client Project Number: SP'1O-0833B Approximate Scale 1:6003 (1"--500) Print Preview 1964 Aerial Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Page 1 of 1 Legend Tax Parcels Streets Interstate U.S. Highway State Highway CSAH/Through Route County State Ald Highway County Road Other Municipality Map Scale 1 inch = 393 feet http: / /gis.co. dakota. mn. us / website / dakotanetgis /printPreview.aspx ?PrintOptData =1964 Ae... 1/27/2011 Print Preview Figure 6. Historic Aerials 1951 Aerial Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Page 1 of 1 Map Scale 1 inch = 308 feet http: / /gis.co. dakota. mn. us / website / dakotanetgis /printPreview.aspx ?PrintOptData =1951 Aeri... 2/4/2011 LEGEND 7 WETLAND IMPACTS (TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT) PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS l in TYPE 1 - FLOODPLAIN FOREST II TYPE 2 - FRESH (WET) MEADOW CREATED REGIONAL STORMWATER POND TYPE 6 - SHRUB -CARR NE „ Kimley -Hom lob and Associates, Inc. NORTH 0 100 200 woo Feet Keokuk Avenue and 205th Street Wetland Permit Application Figure 5. Wetland Type Impacts � g 8 oP �ff • 11 Pq d B FD 3 T m ! T O I� C D rn� m C D F ZN Z > 0 v 0 0) rn D Z m O m � ▪ D n • rn --Im m 0 Z 0 m m zz Z Z O O D n 0 0 0 N) O Co DD C 0 00 0 53 00 X 0 V Of N co N �(A D D 411 m rt Z Z 0 0 0 ` ,) O 0 O N 80 14 V# nn N co 0 vX 00 C 0 51 mm 00 D D X mm C/3 CA - 0 - 0 0 0 �� O n t0 n m 0 U m 00 Tzi 00 X 0 0 0) 0) V co W — (n N D D 0 0 �� A 5 z 0 0 D < 0 0 O 0-& f# I# nn W N I# N cn 11 � R o •: c u) 0> Aram �F o N m 0 0Z > 0 = -I = z z>c 73 — = m z > Ca m z � m� m z E 00 • 11 N as 0 cn F 3 R 0 •• c cn Drn� F Z � Nr*rn E > 0 v 0 m f r m G7 z 0 N68'45'49 E 108.84 Ae x X m 00 C 053 m m 00 D D � 77 F x Z U Cr) N CO N - 0 - 0 D D 0 0 O m m Cn 10 mm zz z0 00 D � .Zl m D 0 O O m 0 m 0 D O O N 0 0 Technical Evaluation Panel Findings of Fact Date/Time: January 18, 2011 at 9 a.m. LGU: City of Lakeville County: Dakota Contact: Mac Cafferty or Ann Messerschmidt Project: Keokuk Ave and 205 St. Outlot A&B Phone: (952) 985 -4528 Location: Sect. 25, T114N, R21W City: Lakeville TEP Members in Attendance Mac Cafferty City of Lakeville Zach Johnson City of Lakeville Brian Watson DCSWCD Others in Attendance Luke Payne Kimley -Horn Beth Kunkel Kimley -Horn Ann Messerschmidt Sarah Wingert Ken Powell Ashley Payne Sue Steinwall City of Lakeville ACOE BWSR Kimley -Horn Fredrikson & Byron A TEP meeting was called for this site January 18, 2011 at 9 a.m. The City of Lakeville has recently received a wetland delineation report from Kimley -Horn for the above mentioned site and has sent out a Notice of Application on January 12, 2011 (decision to be sent out February 3 pending no comments). The purpose for the meeting was to discuss potential layouts for the site and provide draft information about sequencing. The meeting started with a general overview of the site, explanation of the different wetland types and information on how the delineation was conducted. Mr. Powell inquired about the history of the site and if there were any wetland impacts during the original grading of the site in the 1980's. It was requested that the future wetland mitigation plan should include information on the history of the site and to verify that WCA permitting was followed if it existed at the time of construction for the stormwater pond. The options for site layout and site locations were explained and maps were provided to help demonstrate sequencing. The different layouts and locations were discussed. The owner's original desired layout included a drive -thru pharmacy as well as a garden center resulting in additional wetland impacts and involved piping the current open water channel. After review of the various site location options and site layouts, the preferred layout relocated the open water channel to the east and established and reduced impacts by eliminations of the drive -thru pharmacy as well as a outside garden center. The site layout involves retaining walls along the perimeter of the site to reduce impacts to the wetland and a newly created channel. With this layout, the surface flow would be maintained in a stabilized channel. Mr. Powell indicated that he would also like to see information in the report that pertained to avoiding as many secondary impacts to the wetland as possible. TEP members agreed that keeping the water in an open channel is preferable to piping the water to the wetland. Additional information and design is needed to show how the new channel would be stabilized and reduce erosion and sediment loads to the downstream wetland. There was discussion that possibly adding a forebay at the end of the channel to reduce velocity and decrease the amount of sediments to the receiving wetland. Mr. Watson commented that after reviewing all the site location options, that the site location chosen was the preferred site due to the quality of the wetlands on the alternative sites. The TEP felt that additional temporary wetland impacts, during the construction of the channel would be acceptable if it would allow for the channel to be restored in away that would improve both water and vegetation quality and reduce erosion to the downstream wetland. KimJcy -Horn staff indicated that the plan for the mitiption of the impacted wetland is to purchase credits from a wetland Bank that is in the same watershed at the requited 2:1 ratio. T ) I P members agreed t h a t this is t h e bat o p t i o n d u e t o the site cadmium and z tog wetland cl Y• !EP members suggested that the mitigation report include very detailed information on bow the final site location and layout was determined, how the channel will be restored and improved, what the stomata plan for the site is, that eno- build" alternative is battled in the plan, and detailed plans on how the channel will be constructed to reduce the amount of potential erosion dam For further q"it1 ms regarding this meeting, please contact Ann Masaachmidt, Bnvirootdal at )98S-4.528 (12Y �► ® � (Dam) WSRRepresentative ) d ... A1/44/2*/11 ' /161 Representafive (Date) AIR Repro I (Date)