HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-28-11 WSMinutes
Lakeville City Council Work Session
February 28, 2011
In attendance: Mayor Mark Bellows
Council Member Laurie Rieb
Council Member Kerrin Swecker
Council Member Matt Little
Council Member Colleen LaBeau
Staff: Steve Mielke, City Administrator
Dennis Feller, Finance Director
Dave Olson, Community and Economic Development Director
Daryl Morey, Planning Director
Chris Petree, Operations and Maintenance Director
Steve Michaud, Parks and Recreation Director
Brenda Visnovec, Liquor Operations Manager
Cindi Joosten, Human Resources Manager
Tom Vonhof, Police Chief
Michael Meyer, Fire Chief
Judi Hawkins, Deputy City Clerk
At 5:30 p.m. Council members interviewed one candidate to fill a vacancy on the Lakeville
Area Arts Center Board.
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Bellows.
ITEM #1 — County Road 50 /County Road 60 Intersection Study
Dakota County Engineer Kristi Sebastian presented a study on the intersection of County
Roads 50 & 60 (Kenwood Trail & 185` Street) which had recently been completed by
Bolton & Menk at the request of Dakota County. The study was conducted for the purpose
of evaluating existing traffic conditions, identifying current issues, and planning for future
growth and increased traffic. The 50/60 intersection is currently controlled by a traffic
signal and is functioning at a Level of Service (LOS) D, which is acceptable in an urban
area. However, based on anticipated traffic by 2030, the intersection would be over
capacity with excessive delays. Four -lane divided highways and intersection upgrades will
be required for both County Road 50 and County Road 60 by 2030.
In 2009 Dakota County and the City of Lakeville applied for and were awarded federal
grant monies for a round -about option at the intersection. The study which was recently
completed looked at that option as well as others and recommends a full double -lane
roundabout to best handle the anticipated growth. A LOS C would be expected from the
installation of this round - about. Benefits would include fewer delays, reduction in severity
City Council Work Session Minutes
February 28, 2011
Page 2-
of collisions due to the lower rate of speed, improved pedestrian safety and lower capital
and operating costs.
Council members expressed concerns for removal of the signal and asked if it would be
more difficult for emergency vehicles to safely maneuver through the intersection. Other
concerns were for the amount of space a double -lane roundabout would require and the
impact it would have on surrounding residences and businesses, where right of way will
need to be acquired.
Estimated project cost is $2.1 million. Design and right of way costs would be split 45%
City / 55% County. Construction costs would be funded 80% by Federal grants with the
remaining 20% costs to be divided 45% by the City and 55% by Dakota County. This
project is included in the approved City Capital Improvement Plan as a 2013 project. An
open house is scheduled for March 22 nd at the Lakeville Water Treatment Facility to begin
discussions with residents and development of a preferred alternative and design. The
Kenrick Avenue extension project could impact this intersection by taking some of the
volume from this area but it would not be enough to eliminate the need for improvements.
The project will be brought to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners and the
Lakeville City Council in June for consideration.
Council Member Little asked if an amendment to the agenda could be considered so that
Council could discuss a joint meeting between the Planning Commission and the City
Council. Mayor Bellows will bring up the discussion after Item 5.
ITEM #2 — Tax Increment Financing Summary Report
Community and Economic Development Director David Olson provided a summary of
Lakeville Tax Increment Financing as an informational item for the City Council. In the
City's new Strategic Plan, Tax Increment Financing (TIF) was mentioned as being in the
"toolbox" of incentives for attracting businesses to Lakeville. The compilation of this
information was prompted by a resident's comments at a Council meeting and by a letter to
the editor in the local paper. Mr. Olson explained that the main objective of TIF is to
encourage development or redevelopment which serves a public purpose and would not
otherwise occur without the use of TIF. The most common public purposes are: expanding
the property tax base; providing employment opportunities; redeveloping blighted areas;
remediating polluted soils; and constructing low- and moderate - income housing. When
the duration of the TIF has expired, the property goes back on the tax rolls for the city and
school district.
Finance Director Dennis Feller provided an overview of six existing and seven expired TIF
projects in the City of Lakeville. He stated that return on investments has been favorable
and the properties contribute more in taxes than what was paid out. The seven expired
districts have a market value of approximately $40 million and employ between 900 and
City Council Work Session Minutes
February 28, 2011 Page -3-
1,000 workers. TIF projects have included affordable workforce and senior housing;
redevelopment of blighted downtown lots; cleanup of contaminated soils from the site of a
previous gas station; and creation of economic development opportunities. Modification to
TIF District #8 provided for acquisition and renovations of property for the Lakeville Area
Arts Center. The Dakota County CDA has also utilized TIF in Lakeville to provide
affordable senior housing, rental workforce housing, and funding for a first -time homebuyer
program. The expiration of a CDA TIF district in 2010 resulted in a 1.7% increase in the
tax base. After 2014 there will only be one remaining TIF district in the city.
ITEM #3 — Kenrick Avenue Extension Project Report
City Administrator Steve Mielke stated that the Kenrick Avenue connection is identified in
the CIP as a possible 2011 construction project and Council is being asked to decide if the
project should remain in the budget for planning purposes. He reminded the Council
members that the CIP is a financial planning document; projects in the CIP do not occur
until ordered by Council. Staff has been in contact with the property owner; however no
agreement on construction has been reached. Mielke provided the Council with an
overview of the project's background.
The City's Transportation Plan identifies Kenrick Avenue from County Road 50 ( Kenwood
Trail) to County Road 60 (185 Street) as an A -Minor Reliever, intended to relieve traffic on
other roadways. The Kenrick connection will relieve traffic at the 185 St. and Kenwood
Trail intersection; decrease short trips on 1 -35W; provide alternate transportation to the
vicinity; increase traffic to the retail areas of Southfork, Argonne Village, and TimberCrest;
and encourage commercial development in those business districts. With rental retail
space at Southfork, Argonne and TimberCrest approximately 98% filled, market conditions
seem to be favorable for additional commercial area at this location. This connection
could also provide an alternate route during construction of the CR 50/60 intersection.
Impediments to the project would be the property's wetlands and steep slopes that will
increase the difficulty of constructing the road and limit the amount of buildable land for
the property owner. Due to this, it is likely that some city financial involvement will be
needed. Another possible downside might be competition for tenants between new and
existing retail spaces. Wetland mitigation and soil conditions have not been determined.
The City Engineer's cost estimate is $2.4 million. Financing options could include
A. General Obligation (GO) Special Assessment Bonds (shown in the budget as
$191,000 per year for 20 years);
B. Capital Projects /Street Improvement Funds — non property tax dollars that could
be utilized, however, if these funds are gone, municipal state aid or GO
improvement bonds would then be needed for other projects.
C. Tax Increment (TIF) financing
D. GO Tax Abatement bonds. An additional levy would also be needed.
City Council Work Session Minutes
February 28, 2011 Page -4-
E. Grants: The project would likely be eligible for matching federal funding
through a competitive grant process but there is no guarantee of funding.
Even though the project has been identified in the 2011 CIP, due to the timeline it is no
longer feasible to begin the project this year. The project will need to be moved to the
2012 at the earliest. Staff will stay in contact with the property owners' representative.
Council Member LaBeau asked if sound barrier walls would need to be built. Staff stated
that this project would not require walls, but if additional lanes were built on 35W a sound
study would be conducted by MnDOT.
Council Member Rieb thanked staff for providing information and clarification on this
project.
ITEM #4 — 2011 -12 Budget Review
At the last work session, department directors were asked to identify and prioritize up to
5% of their budgets for possible reductions. Steve Mielke provided Council with a
summary of what has been accomplished toward that exercise.
Exhibit A — Recommended 2011 Budget Adjustments
Starting with 2011 and showing the impact through 2012, staff's recommendations consist
of budget adjustments which could be made with little or no impact on City services.
Reductions beyond those in Exhibit A could result in service impacts such as reductions or
eliminations.
Staff reminded Council that tax levies are set in December and cannot be changed.
However, expenditures which are currently budgeted for 2011 can be removed from the
budget.
Finance Director Dennis Feller provided a department by department summary of the
General Fund proposed budget reductions that staff has brought forward.
Council discussed use of Liquor funds for ISD 194 Chemical Awareness program. Council
members expressed a desire to keep this program in the budget and asked that the program
administrator provide a report at an upcoming work session.
Exhibit B — 2012 Budget Factors to Consider
City Administrator Steve Mielke feels this exercise has been beneficial in preparing for the
2012 budget. Dennis Feller stated that the budget process begins by receiving guidance
from Council in order to best utilize staff's preparation time. A list of potential factors to
consider in establishing the budget included:
City Council Work Session Minutes
February 28, 2011
Page -5-
• Additional employee positions: New employees for 2012 include a police patrol
officer, a police records technician and a street maintenance employee.
• ABLE facility improvements.
• Police Gun Range.
• Senior Center.
• Development Fee survey.
• Liquor Fund Analysis.
• Appropriation of liquor funds.
• Dennis Feller reviewed and summarized several other budget topics including bonds,
debt service and revolving loan funds. Staff will be looking for direction from Council
on several of these issues and options as the 2012 -13 budget is prepared.
• Citizen Budget/Finance Committee.
• Budget documents (re- formatting).
• Building permit revenue projections.
• Inflation factors.
Exhibit C — Potential 5% Budget Reductions
Steve Mielke stated that 5% of the General Fund budget would equate to $1.2 million.
This would certainly result in service cuts and hence reductions in staff.
Council conducted a line by line analysis of Exhibit C.
Council Member Little proposed donating half of his salary (July through December)
towards a Police Records Technician in order to increase the efficiency of patrol officers.
He further proposed using a transfer from the Liquor Fund for the remainder of the cost of
the position until 2012 when the position would be funded from the General Fund.
Resident Marlow Illg, 17460 Highview Avenue, addressed the Council and encouraged
further cuts in the budget. He also expressed concerns about several aspects of the Kenrick
Avenue project.
City Council directed staff to prepare a budget amendment resolution for consideration on
an upcoming Council agenda.
ITEM #5 — Financial Advisory Committee
Mayor Bellows envisions the committee to be a task force and not a commission. The
purpose of the task force would be for Council members to ask questions about the budget
and build confidence among the citizens.
City Council Work Session Minutes
February 28, 2011 Page -6-
Council Member Swecker asked about the process Mayor Bellows used for choosing
prospective members of the task force. She had contacted members of the EDC and they
stated that they were not involved in selecting members of the task force. Council Member
Rieb stated that a couple members of the EDC were asked, but not everyone. Swecker and
Rieb had understood that the task force discussion would be involve all members of the
E DC.
Council Member Swecker provided information she had gathered from cities with similar
groups and the school district. Finance Policy and Audit Committees have been formed for
various purposes including making recommendations to Council, acting as sounding
boards for new ideas and concepts, reviewing specific projects and revenue sources, and
recommending budget and debt policies. It should be made clear to task force members
that they have no actual decision or policy- making power. Steve Mielke added that the
task force should be charged with making recommendations, with the Council retaining the
financial policy decisions. Budget open houses are held in several communities to obtain
input and provide transparent information in a less formal setting. The ISD 194 Finance
committee suggested no more than five members, with a precise application policy and
mission. Swecker said she feels it is the Council's job to prepare the CIP, determine
funding sources, and establish budget policies. She feels Council will benefit from this
group by obtaining additional input from the community.
Council Member Swecker, Steve Mielke, and Dennis Feller will meet to begin the process
of developing written criteria for membership. Council Member LaBeau expressed her
appreciation for the work that was done by Council Member Swecker to collect this
information. LaBeau expects the group to be professional and not result in burdens or
demands on staff. Dennis Feller said it was difficult to determine how much staff time
would be involved.
Council members stated they were in favor of additional transparency and opportunities to
get new ideas.
ITEM #6 — Joint meeting between City Council and Planning Commission.
Mayor Bellows has spoken with Planning Commission Chair Bart Davis in regard to having
a joint meeting. Mayor Bellows suggested the need for an analysis of Lakeville's fees
compared with other cities, a discussion about streamlining the planning process, and how
Lakeville can become more business and developer friendly. Staff is working on a toolbox
of incentives to attract economic development to the community and streamline the
development process. Council Member Little also feels it is important to look at why
developers are frustrated with the system and their perception of the City not being
business or developer friendly. He would like to look for ideas and suggestions for how to
help make things run more smoothly and improve the City's image with developers.
City Council Work Session Minutes
February 28, 2011
Page -7-
Steve Mielke stated that the Planning Commission is just one piece of the process. An
analysis of fees and a toolbox of incentive are not necessarily Planning Commission issues.
The Mayor stated that in his discussions with developers he was told that they experienced
some discrepancies in what they were told in the beginning of the planning processes to
what they were told later on. Swecker asked if the developers would be able to make
recommendations for how the process might be improved. Bellows said consolidation of
departments had been suggested.
Council directed staff to schedule a joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting.
Council members also continue to be interested in a strategic planning workshop. Staff
will explore options for a facilitator and a possible date.
ITEM #7. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 12:10 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
lo J di Hawkins
uty Clerk
Mark Bellows
Mayor