Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-16-88 ~ ii CITY OF LAKEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 16, 1988 The meeting was called. to order by Terrence Langhorst, Vice Chairman at 7:00 p.m. in the Airlake Council Chambers. Roll call of members was taken. Present: Whitehouse, Miller, Sizer, Langhorst, Whittingham, Walters. Absent: MacGibbon. Also present .was Alan Brixius., City Planner, Elliott Knesch, Gity Attorney and Mira Holliday, Recording Secretary. 88.124 Motion was made by Walters seconded by Miller to approve the minutes of the May 19, 1988 Planning Commission meeting. Roll call was taken on the motion. .Ayes: Unanimous. Alan Brixius gave a review of the final plat of Highview Heights. He explained that there are three different phases which are being developed by different developers. He reviewed each addition and recommended approval of the first addition subject to the following stipulations: 1. Dedication of Outlot A to the City. • 2. Approval of a comprehensive plan amendment to include the plat into the 199.0 MUSA. 3. Completion of the EAW. 4. Satisfaction of the parkland dedication requirement. He recommended approval of the second addition subject to the following stipulations: 1. The applicant receives approval of a comprehensive Plan Amendment to bring the 2nd Addition into the City's 1990 Urban Service Area. 2. The applicant receives the. City Engineer's approval of the plat's final grading, drainage, and utility plans and easements as proposed. 3. The applicant fulfills the Park Land Dedication requirement, as determined by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commit- tee. 4. The City Engineer shall address the requirement of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet. • Planning .Commission Minutes June 16, 1988 He recommended approval of the third addition subject to the following stipulations: 1. The applicant receives approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment to bring the 3rd Addition into the City's 1990 Urban Service Area. 2. The applicant receives the City Engineer's approval of the plat's final grading, drainage, and utility plans and easements as proposed. 3. The applicant fulfills the Park Land Dedication requirement, as determined by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee. 4. The City Engineer shall address the requirement of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Mr. Bill Huser of Heritage Development was present to answer questions of the Commission. A discussion was held concerning Outlot A, the EAW for the project and the collector street. 88.125 Motion was made by Miller, seconded by Whittingham to recommend approval of the final plat of Highview Heights 1st Addition subject to the recommendations listed in the Planner's report of • 6/2/88. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous. 88.126 Motion was made by Miller, seconded by Sizer to recommend approval of the final plat of Highview Heights 2nd and 3rd Additions subject to the recommendations in the Planner's report of 6/2/88. Roll call was taken. on the motion. Ayes:. Unanimous. The public hearing to consider the application of Bridelwilde Joint Venture for a rezoning from R-2 to B-3 and B-4 in the proposed Shady Oak Shore plat was continued from the. May 19, 1988 meeting. Alan Brixius presented a review of the request and stated that the market study conducted by Maxfield Research Group, Inc. indicated there would be a need for additional commercial zoning in that area. He also stated that this was not consistent with the comprehensive plan and would have to be a policy decision. He recommended only a limited commercial zoning district, if any. Mr. Al Herrmann and Mr. Roger Derrick of Bridlewilde Joint Venture, and Mr. Lee Maxfield of Maxfield Research Group and Mr. Ralph Wagner of Probe Engineering were present. Mr. Herrmann presented pictures to the Commission of the type of buildings he proposes for the commercial site. He explained various aspects • of the types of businesses that would be interested in the area. 2 Planning Commission Minutes June 16, 1988 A lengthy discussion was held among the Commission, the develop- ers and staff which included: - The specific location of the proposed commercial area and .other options. - The market study. - The comprehensive plan. - Dodd and Cedar intersection. - The planned alignment of Dodd Blvd. by Dakota County. - Public street system within the project. - Access to the commercial area. - 1990 MUSA There was no public comment. 88.127 Motion was made by Miller, seconded by Walters to close the public. hearing. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous. 88.128 Motion was made by Miller, seconded by Sizer to recommend approval of the application of Bridelwilde Joint Venture for a rezoning from R-2 and R-A to B-3 and B-4 provided the City Planner and the developer show what access will be between Dodd Blvd. and Cedar Ave. within the plat and with public streets • toward the south. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Whitehouse, Miller, Sizer, Whittingham, Walters. Nay: Langhorst. The reason .for Langhorst's nay was he felt the commercial area should be more toward the corner of the property. The public hearing to consider the application of Duane Marek for a conditional use permit for an auto body shop was opened. The City Attorney attested that. all legal notices had been duly published and mailed. Alan Brixius gave a review of the. proposal discussing parking, berming, landscaping, future expansion, trash recepticals, business hours and outdoor storage. Ae recommended approval subject to: 1. Perimeter curbing is provided around all areas of the proposed parking lot and driveways. 2. Landscaping within three feet of the property line is setback to the minimum setback of three feet. 3. A specific trash facility is illustrated on the plan either inside one of the two proposed structures or in a separate enclosed facility in accordance with Section 37.4.8.1) of the Zoning Ordinance. 3 .Planning Commission Minutes June 16, 1988 4. The proposal be resubmitted for formal City review at the time the "future additions" are. to be developed.. At such time, all applicable zoning and subdivision standards must be maintained such as building setbacks, parking require- ments, and percent of green space. No building permits are to be issued for the "future addition" until such expansion plans have been found to be acceptable. 5. The applicant develop the "future additions" at the time when the use can no longer provide all its storage needs within the two initial structures. This is to ensure no .outside storage will occur on the property as it is specif - ically prohibited by the Ordinance.. 6. One of the two proposed wall signs is eliminated to conform to the City's Sign .Ordinance. 7. Subject to the comments of the City Administrator, City Attorney, City Building Official, City Engineer, Community Development director and other City Staff. Mr. Duane Marek, applicant and Mr. Gary Turpening were present. Mr. Turpening displayed architectural drawings for interested citizens that were present. Mr. Felix Tilleges and Mr. Thomas Hoffman were present and asked questions of Mr. Turpening and • staff concerning outdoor storage of damaged cars and the disposal of unused paint. The Commission discussed trash recepticals and screening, placement of trees and future expansion. 88.12 Motion was made by Sizer, seconded by Walters to close the public hearing. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes:- Unanimous. 88.130 Motion was made by Walters, seconded by Miller to recommend approval of the application of Duane Marek for a conditional use permit for an auto body shop subject to the recommendations listed in the Planner's report of June 9, 1988 plus the provisions of trash recepticals with screening, a 30 foot driveway and any other staff recommendations. Roll call was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous. 88.131 Motion was made by Miller, seconded by Whitehouse to adjourn the meeting. 4 Planning. Commission Minutes June 16, 1988 Voice vote was taken on the motion. Time: 9:15 P.M. Respectfully submitted: M'ra Holliday,- cording Sec tary ATTEST:. Terr~`ence Langhorst, Vice hairm n • 5