Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-21-80 ~ City of Lakevi`Ile F. I~lanning Commission Meeting I 21 February 1980 i The meeting was called to order by Chairman Johnson at 7:30 p.m. Roll call was taken. Present: Geisness; Antolik$ Johnson; Asmus; Enright; Harvey.. Absent: Rice. Also present: Robert Nelsa~n, Councilman; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Sid Miller, City Building Official; Lef~'oy Nyhus, City Engineer, David Licht, Ci#y Planner. 80:.28 Motion was made by Asmusl~ seconded by .Harvey to approve the Planning Commission .meeting minutes of 7 Februpry 1980. i Rall cal I was taken on the ~otion: Ayes: Unanimous . Chairman Johnson opened discussion of the City Council's request for the City Planning Commission to review alternative zoning designations for Outlot B in Donnay's Vc~f~t Park Fifth Addition located at the southwest corner of Dodd Road and Flagstaff Avenue. Mr. Rollin Crawford, attorhey for Speedy Markets, the owners of the property, stated it was their position that the roperty was B-4 and that they objected to any other desigr~l3en except the B-2 which is sti I under advisement by the City Council . i Mr. Rice arrived at .the meeting at 7:40 p.m. Mr. Harvey questioned the procedures and alternatives open to the Commission on the matter. Mr. Knutson expi~ined that the City Council. was requesting the Commission to advise them on a more broad evaluation of the appropriate use of the property. He further stated that all options are open, but that to formally consider a redesignation of zoning and to hold a publi' hearing a published notice for a specific district is required. Mr. Crawford questioned ~hy the B-1 designation had been selected. Mr. Licht advised the Commission that in prig reviews of development on this property, multiple family and low intense office. use Thad-been suggested as appropriate, but that formal study of such development had not aken place. The,B-1 zoning classification allows both of these activities .and it was there re the staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission to evaluate this alternative a hold a hearing on the matter. Councilman Nelson stated that the Mayor and City C until want a workable solution formulated between all parties concerned . Mr . Bob Schr eder of Speedy Markets and Mr. Crawford were questioned by the Commission if they wished to delay any action on review of the property's develop- ment. Their response was no, but that they objected to down zoning. Mr. Knutson expressed that it was the City's position that the property is presently zoned R-1C. Mr. Geisness stated that a form for discussion through a public hearing was necessary so that the matter could be appropriately evaluated and all persons heard. 8U .29 Motion was made by Asmu~, seconded. by Geisness to hold a public hearing on the rezoning of Outlot B located in Dor~nay's Valley Park 5th Addition from R-1C to B-1 on 20 March 1980. Roll call. was taken on the motion. Ayes: Unanimous. City of Lakeville I~lanning Commission Meeting • 21 February 1980 Mr. Harvey advised the audience as to the uses allowed in the B-1 District. Mr. Patrick McGarvey, Ci~y Administrator, arrived at the meeting at 8:30 p.~rn. The. Chairman opened the cd~ntinued discussion on Dr. O'Brien's application for a conditional use permit and variance to construct a new house on lots 7 to 12, Block 26, Orchard Lake Addition, located on the south side of County Road 44, south of Kingsley Lake. Mr. Licht read the review and recommendation of the Natural Resources Committee. He also explained his report and recommendation dated February 15, 1980. Mr. Asmus questioned access safety and also the c st of public sewer for the site. Mr. Nyhus advised his calculations suggested the ost to be $35,000 to $45,000. Dr. O'Brien indicated his estimates were from $20,00 to $27,000. Upon questioning by the Commission, Dr. O'Brien~stated he had purchased the property from Mr. Sturenberg. Initially the property was under option, abut this had expired and he had exercised the purchase . 80.30 Motion was made by Rice, Seconded by Asmus to recommend to the City Council the denial of Dr. O'Brien's req est for conditional use permit and variance request for Lots 7 through 12, 61ock 26, OrcF~ard Lake Addition based upon: (1) Anticipated public safety • problems, (2) Erosion control problems associated with Orchard Lake, and (3) that the property is useless and undelvelopable and should be removed from the tax rolls. Roll call was taken on the rhotion. Ayes: Unanimous Mr. McGarvey advised thelCommission that there was no sewer assessment on Dr. O'Brien's property and advised the a plicant that the matter would be considered by the City Council at their 3 March 1980 meet ng. Chairman Johnson opened discussion on the proposed relocation of Fire Station One. Mr. Licht stated his report had rot been completed and requested that the matter be addressed at the Commission's 7 Marc 1980 meeting. Mr. McGarvey provided a brief background on the proposed Despatch Irhdustries development. Upon recognition by Chairman Johnson, Paul E . Johnson, representing J . Rapp Company and the Fox Run Plat, outlined ~ platting scheme of the area initially proposed as park land. The change in use was as a result of Park and Recreation staff and committee conclusion and recommendation that the D d Park Subdivision Park, located along Flagstaff to the north and in close proximity to t e Fox Run development should serve as the park facility for this neighborhood of the community, Discussion also took place of the easements through the former park area and its im act on lot development. Mr. Johnson advised that the applicant had been in contact with the Gas Company, but that resolution of any problems would not be pursued until a preliminary',plat had been approved, Mr. Licht informed the Commission that • the staff had initiated cont cf with the Minnesota Department of Transportation in an attempt to resolve the gravel minin easement located in the southeast portion of the plat. 2 i I r City of Lakeville Manning Commission Meeting 21 February 1980 80.31 Motion was made by Rice, econded by Harvey to refer the matter back to the Park and Recreation Committee for r view and recommendation. Mr. McGarvey advised that the Park and Recreation Committee had formally commented on the matter at their meet~ng on 20 February.. Mr. Rice withdrew .his motion. 80.32 Motian was made by Harvey ,seconded by Geisness to recommend to the City Council platting of the 5.7 acre fo erly designated park area in accordance with the Exhibit C development concent as co tained in the City Planner's report dated 20 February 1980 if no park land dedication ~s required in the subdivision. I Roll call was taken on the notion. Ayes: Antolik, Johnson, Enright, Harvey, Geisness. Nay: Rice Enright stated her intent ndt to interfere with the jurisdiction of the Park and Recreation Committee. Mr. Asmus stated development reviews were too fragmented.. 80.33 Motion was made by Geisness, seconded by Enright to recommend to the City Council to reconsider their position ar~d require that some park land dedication be provided within the 89 acre Fox Run Plat. Roll call was taken on the motion: Ayes: Johnson, Enright, Harvey. Nays: Asmus, Rice. Absent: Antolik Mr. Asmus stated his no vo a was based upon; (1) Too many undeveloped parks in the City; (2) Maintenance costs associated with small and numerous parks; and (3) The matter and recommendation was the jurisdiction of the Park and Recreation Committee. Mr. Rice expressed #hat these were t~e same reasons for his vote . 80.34 Motion was made by Asmus, seconded. by Geisness to adjourn the meeting. Voice vote was taken on tNe motion. Ayes: Unanimous Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting at 10:00 p.m. i r r %~.a~~ Marvin Geisness, Secretary ATTEST C ar es Jo nson, ai a ~ 3