Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-01-80 i Lakeville, Minnesota ~ Planning Commission Meeting 1 May 1980 Chairman Johnson called t~e meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Roll call was taken. Pres~nt: Geisness; Antolik; Johnson; Enright; Harvey. Absent: Asmus; Rice. i Also present: Sid Miller,City Building Official; David Licht, City Planner Chairman Johnson called for a review of the Planning Commission minutes of 17 April. 1980. Mr. Geisness stated that wished his statement on page 3 with regard to the proposed restaurant in Lakeway Par PUD clarified. He stated that he questioned the viability of a "Class A" restaurant, not ~ general family type restaurant. 80.68 Motion was made by Antol,~ik, seconded by Enright to approve the Planning Commission meeting minutes of 17 Apr~l 1980 as corrected. Roll call was taken on the', motion. Ayes: Antolik; Johnson; Enright; Geisness. Abstain: Harvey . Mr . Harvey stated he abstpi ned due to having an incomplete set of minutes . Chairman Johnson reopened the continued public hearing on the Lakeway Park PUD application. Mr. Licht advised the Commission that he had met with Mr. Watschke on 29 April and that the applicant, as well as staff were still working on plan revisions. The applicant has as a consequence requested a dontinuing of the hearing until 5 June 1980. I 80.69 Motion was made by Harvey, seconded by Antolik to continue the public hearing on the Lakeway Park PUD application until 5 June 1980. Roll call was taken on theli motion. Ayes: Unanimous I Mr . Chuck Plows of Suburban Engineering, representing Northland Mortgage, appeared before the Commission and informed them of changes in the preliminary plat. In total, five cul- de-sacs have been removed from the plan. The basis of these changes have been slope and grading problems, plus resjtrictions caused by the flood plain. The result of these changes are .that now 4b doubles and 87 singles (179 units) are planned as compared to 43 doubles and 94 singles (180 units) lin the original plat. It was the general consensus that the plat revisions were an improvement.. Mr. Plows advised that the final plat would be ready in approximately one month .l Chairman Johnson opened,~continued discussion of the third draft of the revised zoning ordinance. Comments made on the .text were: i . Page 30, Section 7'4 (8) (h). Mr. Miller lstated some provision should be made for driveways on cul-d -sacs. Lakeville, Minnesota I~ Planning Commission Meeting • 1-May 1980 2. Page 32, Section .4 (8) (m). The Commission questioned why only white striping was being roposed for parking lots. 3. Page 33, Section 7 8 (3). Mr. Geisness requested this section and terminology be clarified. 4. Page 38, Section 1~.1 (2) through (5). Mr. Harvey questioned the necessity of having this materia~ indicating it was "God and Motherhood". Mr. Licht advised that the City Attorney was reviewing the entire airport zoning section based upon decisions in recent Maw suits. The section will as a consequence like)y be totally revised . 5. Page 42, Section 1$.4 (S). Mr. Geisness questioned the advisability of including the term "health" in this provision and asked that the section be reviewed with the Attorney and Engineer. 6. Page 44, Section l~. Mr. Miller advised that some additional provisions should be added governing pi~eons. He stated that while this concern may appear furry, he • has recently encountered three specific problems regarding the keeping of pigeons and anticipated movie. Mr. Licht stated Mr. Knutson would be consulted on the matter . 7. Section 42. Mr. Licht indicated that the City Attorney had requested a separate section for amerxlments and conditional use permits due to the legally recognized difference between the two items. Section 42.1 (13) a Section 43.2 (11). Mr. Licht stated an important policy consideration was i volved in these two provisions. A 4/5's (2/3's) vote by the City Council is onl legally required for amendments. The larger majority vote was, however, reca~mmended . 9. Section 44. Mr. Miller stated there should possibly be reference to the State Building Code. The Commission decided t~ establish special meetings beginning at 7:00 p.m. on 14, 22 and 29 May to review the balance of the Zoning Ordinance revision. A target date of 12 June was established for t~e public hearing on the ordinance text and map. Mr. Licht advised that th~ 15 May agenda items included the Jackson subdivision request, the Layeux application, and a sign variance request by Lakeville State Bank. .Continued discussion on the Zoning ~?rdinance could also take place if tirr~ is available. 2 i • Lakeville, Minnesota • ;Planning Commission Meeting 1 May 19~ Mr. Geisness stated he feMt the City Council liaison should be in attendance at Commission meetings wherh critical public hearings such as Lakeway Park PUD are being considered so that the Council can be advised of public comments and factors considered by the Commission in their recommendation. 80.70 Motion was made by AntoNik, seconded by Harvey to adjourn the meeting. Voice vote was taken on ~he motion. Ayes: Unanimous The meeting was adjournekl at 9:45 p.m. by the Chairman. Respectfully submitted, ~ ruin Geisness, Secretary ATTEST: Charles Johnso ,Chair I 3