HomeMy WebLinkAbout0513
r
10/28/93
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
DAKOTA COUNTY, M1N1vESOTA
ORDINANCE NO: s i s
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE. 10 OF THE LAKEVILLE CITY CODE (THE
SIIBDIVISION ORDINANCE) TO RESPOND TO VARIOIIS GROWTH MANAGEN~NT
DIRECTIVES.
THE .CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEVILLE DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Sectioa 1. Section 10-1-7 of the Lakeville City .Code
(Definitions) is amended to add the following definitions:
Lot Area: The area of a horizontal plane within the .lot
lines.
Lot Area, Minimum: Except as may be otherwise expressly
allowed in this Ordinance or the Zoning Ordinance, the area of
a horizontal plane within the. lot lines excluding major
drainageway, as defined by the Comprehensive Storm Drainage
.Plan, wetlands, waterbodies, road rights-of-way, required
buffer strips, regional utility/pipeline easements, and slopes
steeper than three to one (3:1).
Buffer: The use of land, topography, difference in elevation,
space, fences or landscape plantings to screen or ..partially
screen a use or property from another use or property or to
shield or mitigate noise, lights or other impacts...
Buffer Yard: A strip of land utilized to screen or partially
screen a use or property from another use or property or to
shield or mitigate noise, lights, or other impacts.
Section 2. Section 10-2-1 of the Lakeville City Code (Sketch
Plan Filing and Review Procedures) is amended to read as follows:
10-2-1 SKETCH PLAN: In order to insure that all applicants are
informed of the procedural requirements and minimum
standards of this Ordinance, and .the requirements or
limitations imposed by other City ordinances, plans
and/or policies, prior to the preparation of a
preliminary plat, all applicants shall present a sketch
plan to the Zoning Administrator prior to filing a
preliminary plat. Approval of the sketch plan shall not
be considered binding in regard to subsequent plat
1
review. The Zoning Administrator, notably in the case of
.multi-phased projects, shall have the authority to refer
the sketch plan to the Planning Commission .and/or .City.
Council for review and comment.
The sketch plan submissionshall include, but not be
limited to the following:
A. Formal request for. subdivision..
B. Twenty-five (25) copies of the plat sketch.. plan at
a scale not..less than one (1) inch equals one
..hundred (100) feet.
C. An 8 1/2 x 11 inch reduction of the sketch plan.
D. Payment of plan review fee.
E. Escrow deposit to pay review costs of City Staff
and consultants...
F. In cases of multi-phased subdivisions, applicable:
.preliminary plat submission information. as
regulated by Section 10-3-2 of this Ordinance.
Sectioa 3. Section 10-2-4 of the Lakeville City Code
(Premature Subdivisions) is amended to read as follows:
10-2-4: PRIIKATURE SIIBDIVISIQNS: Any preliminary plat/final plat
and/or development deemed premature pursuant to the
criteria listed: below shall be denied by the City
Council.
Sectioa 4. Section 10-2-4-1.E and F of the Lakeville'City
Code (Conditions Establishing .Premature Subdivisions) are amended
to read as follows:
E. Inconsistency with Comprehensive Plan:. A proposed
subdivision .shall be deemed inconsistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan when the subdivision is inconsistent
with the purposes, objectives, and recommendations of the
adopted Comprehensive Plan of Lakeville, as may be
amended.. Subdivisions which do not follow planned public
improvement corridors or constitute an infilling of
.development shall be deemed. inconsistent with the City's
growth strategies as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan.
F. Public Service Capacity: A proposed subdivision shall be
determined to .lack necessary public service capacity when
services such as recreational facilities,. schools, police
and fire protection and .other public .facilities, which
must be provided at public expense, cannot reasonably be
provided for within the next two (2) years.."
Sectioa 5. Section 10-2-4-1 of the Lakeville City .Code
(Conditions Establishing Premature subdivisions} is amended to add
the following:
H. Inconsistency with Capital Improvement Plans: A proposed
subdivision shall be deemed inconsistent with capital...
improvement plans when .improvements and/or services
necessary to accommodate the .proposed subdivision have
not been programmed in the Lakeville, Dakota County, or
other regional Capital Improvement Plans. The City
Council .may wave this criteria. when it can be
.demonstrated that a revision to capital improvement.
programs can be accommodated.
Sectioa 6. Section 10-2-4 of the Lakeville City Code is
hereby amended by adding sub-paragraph 3 to read as follows:
3. Regional System Service Inadequacies..
A. An approved preliminary .plat or building permit
within an approved final plat may be .deemed as
premature developments if any of the following
conditions set forth are found to exist:
1. .The regionally controlled metropolitan
sanitary. sewer. interceptors or waste water
treatment facilities are classified as having
inadequate capacity to provide service within
the standards of recognized public health and
safety.
2. Responsible metropolitan units of government
prohibit. the City of Lakeville from issuing
building permits.
3. Regional transportation systems are deemed as
inadequate to provide service levels within
standards of recognized public safety.
4. Storm drainage systems under the jurisdiction
of regional watershed districts, the Army
Corps of Engineers, the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources, or other such
.responsible jurisdictions are inadequate to
provide service levels within standards of
recognized public health and safety.
3
B. City Liability Exemption. All preliminary and
final plat approvals and related formal development
agreements shall stipulate and. shall exempt °the
City of Lakeville from. .any. liability associated
with platting or building permit denial-based upon
factors and conditions related to regional
governmental agency .and unit jurisdictions and
related service inadequacies.
Section 7. Section 10-2-4.2 of the City Code. shall be amended
by adding the following:
3. Burden of Establishing: ...The burden shall be upon the
applicant to show that. the proposed subdivision or
development is not premature.
Section 8. Section 10-3-1 of the Lakeville City Code (Sketch
Plan Data Requirements)..is amended to add the following:
I. In cases of major., multi-phased subdivisions, applicable
preliminary plat submission information as regulated by
Section 10-3-2 of this Ordinance.
Section 9. Section. 10-3-2.A.4 of the Lakeville City .Code.
(preliminary plat data requirements) is amended to add.. the
following:
K. Where irregular shaped lots have been proposed, house plans..
shall be submitted which demonstrate .such lots to be buildable
and the resulting structure compatible in size and character
to .the surrounding area.
L. A comprehensive screening. plan which identifies all proposed..
buffering. and screening in both. plan and sectional view..
Section 10. Section 10-4-2.J. of the Lakeville City Code (lot
design standards.) is .hereby amended to read as follows:-
J. Frontage on Two Streets: Double 'frontage, or lots with
frontage on two (2) parallel streets shall not be permitted
except: where. lots back on major collector or arterial
streets., county or state highways, or where topographic or
other conditions render subdividing otherwise unreasonable.
.Such double frontage lots shall adhere to the following
requirements:
4
1. Lot Depth:. Double frontage lots shall have an additional
depth of at least twenty (20) feet in order to allow
space for screen plantings and/or buffering along the
back lot line. To ensure .adequate depth. for such
buffering, except as may be approved by the City Council,
the following minimum depth requirements shall be
required for double frontage lots:
District Minimum Lot Depth
R-1, Low Density 220 feet
Single Family
R-2, Single Family 170 feet
2. Buffering/Screening: All buffer yard requirements as
regulated by Section 9.7.5 of the. Zoning Ordinance are
.satisfactorily meta
Section 11. Section- 10-4-2 of the Lakeville City Code is
amended by adding the following:
L. Buffer Side Yards:
1. In the case of side yards involving single family
residential lots which abut major collector or
arterial streets, except as may be approved by the
City Council, lot widths shall be increased at
.least ten ('10) feet above the minimum lot width .for
the purpose of establishing buffers along the lot
line bordering such streets.
2. Buffering or side yards bordering major collector
or arterial streets shall comply ,with the
requirements as established by Section 9.',7.5 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
Section 12. Section 10-4-2 of the Lakeville City'', Code (Lot
Design Standards) is hereby amended to add the following:
L. Irregular Shaped Lots: On single family. residential lots
determined to be irregular in shape (e.g., triangular),
the developer shall demonstrate to the City an ability to
properly place principal buildings and 'accessory
structures upon the site which are compatible in size and
character to the surrounding area.
M. Required Yard Setback Infringements: All single family
residential lots shall be designed in consideration of
potentials for buildings accommodating three car garages,
porches and decks, etc. Said buildings and structures
5
are to be compatible in size and character with the
surrounding area.
Sectioa 13. Section 10-4-3.B of the Lakeville City Code
(Street design standards) is hereby amended to read as follows:
B. Local Streets.: Local streets should be so planned as to
discourage their-use by non-local traffic.
Section 14. Section 10-4-3.T of the Lakeville City Code
(Street Design Standards) is hereby added to read as follows:
T. Cul-de-Sacs/Dead End Streets:
1. Dead end streets (temporary or permanent) without cul-de-
sac turn grounds shall be. prohibited.
2., Permanent cul-de-sacs shall be allowed only where one or
more of the following criteria have been ..met.:
a. .Area topography or other physical site condtions_
warrant a cul-de-sac.
b. A through street is not physically feasible or
desirable due to environmental .considerations.
3. Permanent cul-de-sacs shall not be longer than five
.hundred (500) feet including a-terminal turn .around which
shall be provided at the closed end,.with a right-of-way
radius not less than sixty (60) feet.
4. Environmentally Sensitive Area Exceptions: In areas
.determined by the City to be environmentallysenstive
due to topography, forestation, and/or wetlands,
deviations to the design standards outlined. in Section
10-4-3.T.3 may be allowed provided that:
a. Such deviations are limited to the following::
1) Right-of-way dedication, excluding turn around
area may be reduced from sixty (60) feet to no
less than fifty (50) 'feet.-
2) Pavement widths may be reduced from thirty-two
(32) feet to no less than twenty:-eight:•.(28)
feet.
6
b. The following standards are met:
1) .All lots shall meet or exceed the. minimum
standard for the applicable zoning district.
2) AlI houses shall .have an .attached accessory
garage of three (3) stalls with corresponding
front driveway parkingapron. The curb cut
opening on the street shall, however, meet
established standards.
3) The required drainage and utility easement in
.the front yard of lots shall be no less than
fifteen (15) feet.
4) All lots .shall have a custom grading plan,
tree preservation plan, and pre-approved site/
building plan prior to the issuance of
building .permits.
5) The cul-de-sac length shall not exceed
ordinance maximums.
6) Any reduction in front yard setbacks shall be
processed according to provisions of the
Zoning Ordinance.
Section 15. Section 10-4-4 of the Lakeville City Code
(Easement standards) is amended by adding sub-paragraph D and E to
read as follows:
D. Exclusion from Minimum Lot Area: Easements
established over wetlands and regional utility
lines shall be excluded from the calculation. of
minimum lot area as defined by this Ordinance.
E. Outlot Alternative: The City may at its discretion
choose to require outlots rather than easements for
wetlands, drainage .areas, and .other natural
features.
Sectioa 16. .Section 10-4-5 of the Lakeville City Code
(Erosion and Sediment Control) is amended by adding sub-paragraph
I to read:.
10-4-5: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL:.
A. The development. shall conform to the natural limitations
presented by topography and soil so as to create the least
.potential for soil erosion..
7
B. Erosion and siltation control measures shall be coordinated
with the different stages of construction. Appropriate
control measures shall be installed prior to development when
necessary to control erosion.
C. Land shall be developed in increments of workable size such
that :adequate erosion and siltation controls can be .provided
as .construction progresses. The smallest-practical area of
land shall be. exposed at any one. period of .time.
D. When soil is exposed, the .exposure shall be for. the shortest
feasible period of time., as specified in the development
agreement.
E. Where the topsoil is removed, sufficient topsoil soil shall be
set aside for respreading over the developed area. Topsoil
shall be restored or provided to a minimum depth of four (4)
inches and shall be of a quality, at least ..equal to the soil
quality prior to. development.
F. Natural vegetation shall be protected wherever practical.
G. Runoff water shall be diverted to a sedimentation basinbefore
being allowed to .enter. the natural drainage system.
H. The developer shall comply with current City specifications
for erosion and sediment control.
I. Development shall comply with. and follow all Best Management
Practices for erosion and sedimentation control as specified
in the MPCA publication "Protecting Water ..Quality in Urban
Areas", as may. be amended.
Section 17. Section. 10-4-6 of the Lakeville City Code (Storm
Drainage. Requirements) is amended to read as .follows:
10-4-6: STORbiDRAINAGF: All subdivision design shall 'incorporate
adequate provisions. for storm water runoff. consistent with the
Lakeville Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) as amended, and with
established City policies, and conform to the following standards.
A. Plan Required. The proposed provisions for storm water runoff
shall be .documented in a runoff water management plan,
prepared by a registered,,professional engineer to the minimum.
.standards described-in paragraph B of this policy.
B. Minimum .Standards For Runoff Water Management Plans. A runoff
water management plan shall include the following items:
1. A map containing a delineation of the sub-watershed.
contribu ing runoff from off-site, and. proposed and
8
existing sub-watersheds on-site. The delineation shall
conform to the nomenclature. of the SWMP and shall
indicate any significant departures from the watershed
delineation of the SWMP.
2. Delineation of existing on-site wetlands, as defined in
the Wetland Conservation Act, lakes,. streams, shoreland,
and/or floodplain areas.
3. For waterbodies and. channels, a listing of normal:{run-
.out) and calculated ten year and 100 year elevations on-
site for both existing and. proposed conditions.
4. Storm water runoff volumes and rates for existing and
proposed conditions.
5. All hydrologic and hydraulic computations completed to
design the proposed storm water management facilities.
Reservoir routing procedures and critical. duration. runoff
events shall be used for design of .water storage areas..
and outlets.
6. A checklist of Best Management Practices to demonstrate
that, to the maximum extent practical, the plan has
incorporated the structural and non-structure Best
Management Practices described in the book Protecting
Water Quality in Urban Areas, published by the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency or the applicable publications.
7. A grading plan's incorporating overflow routes along
.streets or drainage easements designed to protect
structures from damage due to:
a. Storms in excess of the design storm, or
b. Clogging, collapse or other failure of the primary
drainage facilities.
S. An assessment of the potential for construction or
.contribution to regional detention basins, as opposed to
the construction of on-site basins. The SWMP identifies
potential regional pond areas for control. of rate and
nutrient loading. The following criteria shall be used
to .determine .whether on-site storage is required for
within the subdivision:
a. If the runoff water management plan .indicates
construction or enlargement of a storage site or
water quality storage in a wetland or other
waterbody, the facility or its equivalent shall be
constructed to meet the goals of the SWMP.
9
b. If a proposed subdivision will be direc ly
tributary to a waterbody without intervening
detention storage, additional on-site 'pond
.construction for water quality .treatment will be
required if the waterbody is in one of the
following classifications:
Category I: Water bodies supporting direct body-
contact recreation such as swimming, skin. diving or
water skiing.
Category Ia: Waterbodies. capable of supporting a
trout fishery.
Category II: Waterbodies supporting non-contact
recreational. activities. such as sailboating, motor
boating, canoeing and. fishing.
Category III: Waterbodies supporting aesthetic
viewing and wildlife habitat functions, providing
open space, .scenic vis as and. opportunities for
wildlife observation or .warm. water fishing.
Category IV: Nutrient Traps. Waterbodies
functioningmainlyto reduce. downstream loading of
phosphorusand other pollutants.
c. If a proposed subdivision is indirectly tributary
to a Category I, II or III waterbody and
intervening regional detention storage_ is
inadequate, in the opinion of City staff, to meet
.the water quality goals for. downstream waterbodies
as described in the SWMP, additional: on-site pond
construction will be required to meet..these goals..
d. If a proposed subdivision will increase rates.. of
runoff and where downstream storm water s orage or
conveyance facilities are inadequate to protect
downstream: riparian owners from offects of these
.increases, then. on-site storm water storage must be
constructed to restrict. storm water rates to the
pre-development rates.
9. Where on-.site water. quality detention basins are
required, copies of the calculations determining the
design of the basins. The size and design considerations
will be dependent on the receiving waterbody's .water
quality category, the imperviousness of the development
and the .degree to which on-site infiltration of runoff is
encouraged. Design of on-.site detention basins, as
described in the site's Runoff Water Management Plan,
shall incorporate recommendations from .the Nationwide
10
Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and Protecting Water Quality
in Urban Areas, published by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency or the applicable publications. The
following design considerations are required for on-site
water quality detention. basins based. on the receiving
water's water quality category. These designs include
.permanent detention for water quality treatment; extended
,detention designs may be substituted provided that they
provide treatment equivalent to the requirements below:
a. Basins Tributary to Category Land Ia Waterbodies.
1) A permanent. pool ("dead storage") volume below
the normal outlet shall be greater than or
equal to the runoff from a 2.5 inch 24 hour
storm .over the entire contributing drainage
area assuming full development.
2) A permanent pool average depth (basin
volume/basin area.) which shall be greater than
four feet, with a maximum depth of less than
ten feet.
3) An .emergency. spillway (emergency outlet)
adequate to control the 100 year frequency
critical durationrainfall event.
4) Basin side slopes above the normal water level
should be no steeper than 3:1 when possible,
and preferably flatter. A basin shelf with a
minimum width. of ten feet and a maximum slope
of ten to one (10:1) below .the normal water-
level is recommended to enhance wildlife
habitat,. reduce potentially safety hazards,
and improve access for long-term maintenance.
5) To prevent short-circuiting, the distance
between the major .inlets and normal outlet
shall be maximized.
6) A flood pool (temporary storage) volumes above.
the principal outlet spillway shall be
.adequate so that the peak discharge rate from
the ten -and .100 year frequency, critical
duration storm is not greater than the peak
discharge for a similar storm and pre-
developmentwatershed conditions.
7) Extended detention of runofffrom the. more
frequent (one year. to five year) storms shall
be achieved through a principal spillway
design ..which. shall include a perforated
11
vertical riser, a small orifice outlets or a
compoundweir.
8) Effective energy dissipation devices which
reduce outlet velocities to four. feet per
second or less shall consist. of rip rap,
stilling pools or other such measures to
prevent erosion at 'all storm water outfalls
into the .basin and at the detention basin
outlet.
9) Trash and floatable debris skimming devices
shall be placed on the outlet of all on-site
detention .basins to provide treatment up to
the critical duration ten year storm event.
These devices can consist of baffled weirs,
submerged inlets: or other such measures
capable of restricting the outflow of
..floatable materials, including litter, oil and
grease.:.. Computations for the design of such
devices shall.: be included.
10) For purposes of erosion control, vegetation
protection and wildlife habitat .enhancement,,
the tenyear flood level of the basin shall be
no more than two (2) feet above the normal
level of the basin.
b. Basins Tributary to Category II Waterbodies.
1) A permanent pool ("dead storage") volume below
the normal outlet which shall be greater than
or equal. to the runoff from a 2.0 inch 24 hour
storm over the entire contributing drainage
areaassuming full development.
2) All ..other requirements as listed in Items 2`
through 10 for Category I and Ia waterbodes.
c. Basins Tributary to Category III Waterbodies.
1) A permanent pool ("dead storage") volume below
the normal outlet. which shall be greater 'than
` or equal to the runoff from a 1.5 inch 24 hour
storm over the entire contributing drainage
area assuming full..development.
2) All other requirements as listed in Items 2
through 10 for Category I and Ia waterbodies.
d. Basins Tributary to'Category IV Waterbodies..
12
1) Any practical measures needed to maintain the
function and character of the Category IV
waterbody.
e. Basins Tributary to Wetlands.
1) Sedimentation capacity capable of protecting
the wetland from filling due to water borne
silt and sand. Where feasible., ..appropriately
sized sump manholes or other in-line treatment
capable of being cleaned viamanholes shall be
preferred.
2) All other requirements as listed in Items 2
through 10 for Category I and Ia waterbodies.
Sectioa 18. Section 10-4-7 of the Lakeville .City Code.
(Protected Area Requirements) is amended to read as follows:
10-4-7 PROTECTED AREASs Where land proposed for subdivision is
deemed environmentally sensitiveby the City due to the
existence of wetlands., drainageways, watercourses,
floodable areas, significant trees, steep slopes, or
wooded areas, the design of said subdivision shall
clearly reflect all necessary measures of protection to
ensure against adverse environmental impacts.
Based upon the necessity to control and maintain certain
sensitive areas, the City shall determine whether said
protection will be accomplished through lot enlargement
and redesign or dedication of those sensitive areas in
the form of outlots.
In general, measures of protection shall include design
solutions which allow .for construction and grading
involving. a minimum of alteration to sensitive areas.
Such measures, when deemed appropriate by the City, may
include but shall not be limited to the following:
1. The establishment of easements and/or outlots .over
wetlands,.drainageways and watercourses..
2. The implementation of flood .control measures.
3. The enlargement of lots or redesign of the
subdivision.
4. The submission of a tree preservation plan subject
to the review of the Environmental. Affairs
Committee and the approval of the City Council.
13
5. The utilization of appropriate erosion control
measures subject. to approval by the City Engineer.
6. Soil testing to determine .the ability o€ the
proposed subdivision to support development.
7. The limitation of development on lopes steeper
than three. to one (3:1).
8. Structure conformance to the ..natural limitations
presented_by the topography. and soil so as to
create the least potential of soil erosion.
Sectioa 19. Suction 10-4-11.B of the Lakeville City ..Code
(Tree Preservation? is amended by adding the following:.
8. Tree preservation measures shall require written
approval from the City Engineer prior to. removal
and shall not be removed from. the site until the
City Engineer has approved. the grading as built
plans for a mass graded site nor prior to the
release of financial securities held by the City.
Sectioa 20. This amendment shall be effective on 1 January
1994 following its passage and publication.`
:Approved by the Lakeville.City Council this st day of
.November 1993.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
By:
Duane.. R. Zau Mayor
ATTEST:
1
Charlene Friedge City Clerk
14
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
SLtwIlVIARY OF :ORDINANCE NO. 513 , AN ORDINANCE.
AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE LAKEVII.LE CITY CODE,
THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, TO RESPOND TO
.VARIOUS GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVES
This ordinance amends the standards and procedures for subdividing land in the City of
Lakeville including: definitions, sketch plan filing and review procedures, premature
subdivisions, conditions establishing premature subdivision, sketch plat data requirements, lot
design standards, street design standards, easement standards, erosion and sediment control,
storm drainage requirements,. protected area requirements, tree preservation.
A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection by any person during. regular
office hours at the office of the .City Clerk.
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION this 6th day of December , 1993, by the
City Council of the City of Lakeville.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
BY:
Duane R. Zaun, v or
ES
Charlene Friedges, .City Jerk
10505
12/01/93
PUBLIC NOTICE
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
513, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
TITLE 10 OF THE LAKEVILLE CITY
CODE, THE SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE, TO RESPOND TO
VARIOUS GROWTH MANAGEMENT
DIRECTIVES
This ordinance amends the standards
and procedures for subdividing land in
the City of Lakeville including: defini-
tions, sketch plan filing and review pro-
cedures, premature subdivisons, condi-
tions establishing premature subdivision,
sketch plat data requirements, lot design
standards, street design standards,
easement standards, erosion and sedi-
ment control, storm drainage require-
ments, protected area requirements,
tree preservation.
A printed copy of the ordinance is
available for inspection by any person
during regular office hours at the office of
the City Clerk.
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION
this 6th day of December, 1993, by the
City Council of the City of Lakeville.
CITY OF LAKEVILLE
BY: Duane R. Zaun,
Mayor
ATTEST:
(s) Charlene Friedges,
City Clerk
(Published in Lakeville Life & Times on Dec. 20, 1993)
RATE INFORMATION
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial
users for comparable space: $6.65 per column
inch.
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the
above matter: $6.65 per column inch.
(3) Rate actually charged for the above
matter: $5.64 per column inch.
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Richard M. Sherman , being duly sworn,
on oath says that he/she is the publisher
or authorized agent and employee of the
publisher of the newspaper known as
Lakeville Life & Times, and has full know-
ledge of the facts which are stated below:
(A) The newspaper has complied with
all of the requirements constituting quali-
fications as a qualified newspaper, as pro-
vided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02,
331A.07, and other applicable laws, as
amended.
(B) The printed
City of Lakeville Ord. 513 summary
which is attached was cut from the col-
umns of said newspaper, and was printed
and published once on Monday, the
20tHday of December , 1993; and
printed below is a copy of the lower case
alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which
is hereby acknowledged as being the size
and kind of type used in the composition
and publication of the notice:
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
BY: „,./...12,...462- �+
TITLE: Publisher
Subscribed and sworn to before me on
this 21st day of December , 1993.
Notary Public
BARBARA J. GROSBERG
NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
SCOTT COUNTY
Wv ccmmission expires 1 1 97